Cover of book: Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law

Influence on the Interpretation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment and Full Protection and Security Standards
Authors:
Publisher:
 28.10.2022

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2022
Publication date
28.10.2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7488-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3279-6
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht
Volume
46
Language
English
Pages
249
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
    1. Permanent Court of International Justice No access
    2. International Court of Justice No access
    3. Iran – US Claims Tribunal No access
    4. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea No access
    5. Claims Commissions No access
    6. International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes No access
    7. Other Arbitrations No access
    1. Friendship, Commerce and Navigation Treaties No access
    2. Claims Conventions No access
    3. International Investment Agreements No access
    4. Other International Instruments No access
    5. Domestic Legal Instruments No access
  4. Part 1. Introduction No access 39 - 42
    1. A. Consideration of Host State Circumstances and the Purposes of International Investment Law No access
      1. 1. Economic Circumstances No access
      2. 2. Political Circumstances No access
      3. 3. Social Circumstances and Level of Development No access
    1. A. Jurisdiction No access
      1. 1. Force Majeure No access
      2. 2. Necessity No access
    3. C. Damages No access
  7. III. Conclusion and Scope No access 64 - 65
  8. Part 2. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard No access 66 - 66
        1. a) Fairness in International Law No access
        2. b) Application of Franck’s Fairness to the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard No access
        3. c) Criticism of Franck’s Concept of Fairness No access
        4. d) Interim Result No access
        1. a) Possible Approaches to Equity No access
        2. b) Commonalities of the Approaches No access
        1. a) Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses No access
        2. b) Modern Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses No access
        3. c) Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses with an Explicit Reference to Host State Circumstances No access
      2. 2. Broader Context No access
      3. 3. Extra-Contractual Documents No access
      4. 4. Conclusion No access
    3. C. Object and Purpose No access
        1. a) Denial of Justice and Administrative Due Process No access
        2. b) Arbitrariness No access
      2. 2. Relevance of Host State Circumstances No access
        1. a) Clauses Limited to the International Minimum Standard No access
        2. b) Clauses Referencing International Law No access
          1. i. Admissibility of the International Minimum Standard as Interpretative Material No access
          2. ii. Weight of the International Minimum Standard in the Interpretation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard No access
    5. E. Results No access
        1. a) Specific Host State Conduct No access
        2. b) Regulatory Framework No access
        1. a) Circumstances in the Host State No access
        2. b) Host State’s Right to Regulate No access
        3. c) Investor’s Behaviour No access
      3. 3. Conclusion No access
        1. a) Denial of Access to Courts No access
        2. b) Undue Delay No access
        3. c) Inadequate Administration of Justice No access
        4. d) Excursus: Due Process in Administrative Decision-Making No access
        5. e) Misapplication of the Law No access
      2. 2. Consideration of Host State Circumstances No access
      3. 3. Conclusion No access
        1. a) Arbitrariness as a Shocking or Surprising Act No access
          1. i. Legitimate Purpose No access
          2. ii. Suitability No access
          3. iii. Necessity No access
          4. iv. Proportionality stricto sensu No access
        3. c) Interim Result No access
        1. a) Similar Cases No access
        2. b) Different Treatment No access
        3. c) No Reasonable Justification No access
        4. d) Interim Result No access
      3. 3. Coercion and Harassment No access
      4. 4. Bad Faith No access
      5. 5. Conclusion No access
        1. a) Relevance of Circumstances in the Discussion of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard No access
        2. b) Importance of the Nature of the Circumstances for Tribunals’ Consideration No access
        1. a) Abstract Affirmation to Consider Host States’ Circumstances and Balance Diverging Interests No access
        2. b) Relevance of the Investors’ Behaviour No access
  11. Part 3. Full Protection and Security Standard No access 164 - 164
        1. a) Contractual Protection and Security Clause No access
        2. b) Customary Standard of Minimum Treatment of Aliens No access
      2. 2. Interim Result No access
    2. B. Ordinary Meaning No access
        1. a) Conventional Full Protection and Security Clauses No access
        2. b) Modern Full Protection and Security Clauses No access
        3. c) Full Protection and Security Clauses with an Explicit Reference to Host State Circumstances No access
      2. 2. Broader Context No access
      3. 3. Extra-contractual Documents No access
      4. 4. Interim Result No access
    4. D. Object and Purpose No access
      1. 1. Substantive Content of the International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Aliens No access
      2. 2. Relevance of Host State Circumstances No access
        1. a) Clauses Equating Full Protection and Security and the International Minimum Standard No access
        2. b) Other Clauses Referencing International Law No access
        3. c) Unqualified Clauses No access
    6. F. Results No access
        1. a) Scope of Protection No access
          1. i. Modified Objective Standard No access
          2. ii. Reasonableness No access
          3. iii. Reasonableness Under the Circumstances No access
        1. a) Scope of Protection No access
        2. b) Consideration of Host State Circumstances No access
      3. 3. Interim Result No access
      1. 1. Judicial Protection No access
      2. 2. Legal Stability No access
        1. a) Importance of the Nature of the Circumstances for Tribunals’ Consideration No access
        2. b) Time of the Decisions No access
        1. a) Standard of Liability No access
        2. b) Relevance of Host State Circumstances No access
  14. Part 4. Analysis of the Results No access 220 - 220
    1. A. Results on the Normative Foundations No access
      1. 1. Relevance of the Host States’ Circumstances No access
      2. 2. Relevance of the Investor’s Behaviour No access
      3. 3. Nature of the Host States’ Circumstances Considered No access
      4. 4. Time of the Decisions No access
      1. 1. Relationship Between the Fair and Equitable Treatment and Full Protection and Security Standards No access
        1. a) Legal Treatment versus Physical Protection No access
        2. b) Negative versus Positive Obligation No access
        3. c) State Measures versus Third Parties’ Actions No access
        4. d) Applicability of the Due Diligence Standard No access
    2. B. Consequences for the Consideration of the Circumstances Prevailing in the Host State No access
  17. III. Theses in Summary No access 233 - 234
  18. Bibliography No access 235 - 249

Bibliography (262)

  1. Ago R, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ [1970] UN Doc A/CN.4/233 Open Google Scholar
  2. Allen RE, Fowler HW and Fowler FG (eds), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English (8th edn, Clarendon Press 1990) Open Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez GA and Park WW, ‘The New Face of Investment Arbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11’ (2003) 28 YJIL 365 Open Google Scholar
  4. Amerasinghe CF, Diplomatic Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar
  5. American Society of Appraisers and others, ‘International Valuation Glossary - Business Valuation’ <https://www.appraisers.org/docs/default-source/5---standards/revised-bv-standards-february-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=d5b561b2_12> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (William David Ross tr, Enhanced Media 2017) Open Google Scholar
  7. Barrera EB, ‘The Case for Removing the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard from NAFTA’ [2017] CIGI Papers No. 128 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3012347> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  8. Baumann J, ‘International Investment Law in the Context of State Fragility: Full Protection and Security and Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in Tobias Ackermann and Sebastian Wuschka (eds), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Koninklijke Brill NV 2020) Open Google Scholar
  9. Bedjaoui M, Towards A New International Economic Order (Holmes & Meier 1979) Open Google Scholar
  10. Berg NM, Ward DV and Saunders Gregor K, ‘COVID-19 Measures: Leveraging Investment Agreements to Protect Foreign Investments’ (Ropes & Gray, 28 April 2020) <https://www.ropesgray.com/en/newsroom/alerts/2020/04/COVID-19-Measures-Leveraging-Investment-Agreements-to-Protect-Foreign-Investments> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  11. Bernasconi-Osterwalder N, Brewin S and Maina N, ‘Protecting Against Investor–State Claims Amidst COVID-19: A Call to Action for Governments’ (International Institute for Sustainable Development, April 2020) <https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/investor-state-claims-covid-19.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  12. Besson S and D’Aspremont J (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  13. Bishop DR, Crawford J and Reisman WM, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International 2014) Open Google Scholar
  14. Bjorklund AK, ‘Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’ (2005) 45 Va J Int’l L 809 Open Google Scholar
  15. Bodansky D and Crook JR, ‘Symposium: The ILC’s State Responsibility Articles: Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 AJIL 773 Open Google Scholar
  16. Bohmer L, ‘Changes to Mexico’s Electricity Regulation in Light of Pandemic Prompt Threats of Investment Arbitration Claims’ (IAReporter, 18 May 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/changes-to-mexicos-electricity-regulation-in-light-of-pandemic-prompt-threats-of-investment-arbitration-claims/> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  17. ——, ‘Peru Round-up: A Pandemic-Related Notice of Dispute, Imminent Public Hearings, and an Update on 12 Other Arbitrations against the State’ (IAReporter, 9 June 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/peru-round-up-a-pandemic-related-notice-of-dispute-imminent-public-hearings-and-an-update-on-12-other-arbitrations-against-the-state/> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  18. ——, ‘Chile Round-up: Three Threats, and One Arbitration Drawing to an End’ (IAReporter, 20 November 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/chile-round-up-three-threats-and-one-arbitration-drawing-to-an-end/> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  19. Bonnitcha J, ‘Investment Treaties and Transition from Authoritarian Rule’ (2014) 15 J World Investment & Trade 965 Open Google Scholar
  20. ——, Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  21. Borchard EM, The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad: Or, The Law of International Claims (The Banks law Law publishing Publishing Company 1915) Open Google Scholar
  22. Borchardt E, ‘The “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1940) 38 Mich L Rev 445 Open Google Scholar
  23. Brown C, ‘The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a “General Principle of Law”: Some Preliminary Thoughts’ (2009) 6 TDM Open Google Scholar
  24. ——, Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  25. Brownlie I, State Responsibility (Clarendon Press 1983) Open Google Scholar
  26. Buchan R, ‘Cyberspace, Non-State Actors and the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm’ (2016) 21 J Conflict & Sec L 429 Open Google Scholar
  27. Burger L, ‘The Trouble with Salini (Criticism of and Alternatives to the Famous Test)’ (2013) 31 ASA Bulletin 521 Open Google Scholar
  28. Burgstaller M and Risso G, ‘Due Diligence in International Investment Law’ (2021) 38 J Int'l Arb 697 Open Google Scholar
  29. Burke-White WW and von Staden A, ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2008) 48 Va J Int’l L 307 Open Google Scholar
  30. Calvo C, Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique (5th edn, Rousseau 1896) Open Google Scholar
  31. Campbell C, ‘House of Cards: The Relevance of Legitimate Expectations under Fair and Equitable Treatment Provisions in Investment Treaty Law’ (2013) 30 J Int’l Arb 361 Open Google Scholar
  32. Cheng B, ‘Justice and Equity in International Law’ (1955) 8 CLP 185 Open Google Scholar
  33. Cheng T-H, ‘Power, Authority and International Investment Law’ (2005) 20 Am U Int’l L Rev 465 Open Google Scholar
  34. Chetail V, ‘Vattel and the American Dream: An Inquiry into the Reception of the Law of Nations in the United States’ in Peter Haggenmacher, Pierre-Marie Dupuy and Vincent Chetail (eds), The Roots of International Law: Liber Amicorum Peter Haggenmacher (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2014) Open Google Scholar
  35. Chung O, ‘The Lopsided International Investment Law Regime and Its Effect on the Future of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2007) 47 Va J Int’l L 953 Open Google Scholar
  36. Clayton R and Tomlinson H (eds), The Law of Human Rights, vol 1 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  37. Clover Alcolea L, ‘'The COVID-19 Crisis: Core Investment Law Issues Revisited' Revisited' (2021) 18 TDM 1 Open Google Scholar
  38. Collins D, ‘Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets’ (2011) 12 J World Investment & Trade 225 Open Google Scholar
  39. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, ‘Call for ISDS Moratorium During COVID-19 Crisis and Response’ <https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/call-isds-moratorium-during-covid-19-crisis-and-response> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  40. Cottier T, Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation (Cambridge University Press 2015) Open Google Scholar
  41. ——, ‘Equity in International Law’ in Thomas Cottier, Shaheeza Lalani and Clarence Siziba (eds), Intergenerational Equity: Environmental and Cultural Concerns (Brill Nijhoff 2019) Open Google Scholar
  42. Crawford J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text, and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press 2002) Open Google Scholar
  43. ——, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th edn, Oxford University Press 2019) Open Google Scholar
  44. Cullen H, ‘The Role of History in Thomas Franck’s Fairness in International Law and Institutions’ (2002) 13 EJIL 927 Open Google Scholar
  45. Davies A, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation, Fair and Equitable Treatment and Legitimate Expectations’ (2018) 15 Manchester J Int’l Economic Law 314 Open Google Scholar
  46. de Brabandere E, ‘Host States’ Due Diligence Obligations in International Investment Law’ (2015) 42 Syracuse J Int’l L & Com 319 Open Google Scholar
  47. de Vattel E, The Law of Nations; or, Principles of the Law of Nature: Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (Luke White 1787) Open Google Scholar
  48. de Visscher C, ‘La Responsabilité Des Etats: Cours Professé à l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, Juillet 1923’ (1924) 2 Bibliotheca Visseriana Dissertationum Ius Internationale illustrantium 87 Open Google Scholar
  49. ——, ‘Le Déni de Jusitice En Droit International’ (1936) 54 Recueil des cours de droit international de la Haye 370 Open Google Scholar
  50. Demirkol B, Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2018) Open Google Scholar
  51. Demuth A, ‘Income Approach and the Discounted Cash Flow Methodology’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/income-approach-and-the-discounted-cash-flow-methodology> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  52. ‘Denunciation of ICSID Convention’ (ICSID News Releases, 16 May 2007) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/news-and-events/news-releases/denunciation-icsid-convention?CID=103> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  53. Diehl A, The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2012) Open Google Scholar
  54. Dietz T, Dotzauer M and Cohen ES, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis of Investor-State Arbitration and the New EU Investment Court System’ (2019) 26 Review of International Political Economy 749 Open Google Scholar
  55. Dörr O, ‘Article 31’ in Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: a commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018) Open Google Scholar
  56. Douglas Z, ‘Nothing If Not Critical for Investment Treaty Arbitration: Occidental, Eureko and Methanex’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International 27 Open Google Scholar
  57. ——, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  58. ——, ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’ (2014) 63 ICLQ 867 Open Google Scholar
  59. Draguiev D, ‘Bad Faith Conduct of States in Violation of the “Fair and Equitable Treatment” Standard in International Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2014) 5 JIDS 273 Open Google Scholar
  60. Duarte-Silva T, ‘Country Risk’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/country-risk> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  61. Dumberry P, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide to NAFTA Case Law on Article 1105 (Kluwer Law International 2013) Open Google Scholar
  62. ——, ‘The Protection of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’ (2014) 31 J Int’l Arb 47 Open Google Scholar
  63. ——, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2016) Open Google Scholar
  64. Dunn FS, Diplomatic Protection of Americans in Mexico (Columbia University Press 1933) Open Google Scholar
  65. Dupuy F and Dupuy P-M, ‘What to Expect from Legitimate Expectations? A Critical Appraisal and Look into the Future of the “Legitimate Expectations” Doctrine in International Investment Law’ in Mohamed Abdel-Raouf and Philippe Leboulanger (eds), Festschrift Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri: From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2015) Open Google Scholar
  66. Eberhardt P and Olivet C, Profiting from Injustice - How Law Firms, Arbitrators and Financiers Are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom (Corporate Europe Observatory and the Transnational Institute 2012) Open Google Scholar
  67. Eckes Jr. AE, Opening America’s Market: U.S. Foreign Trade Policy since 1776 (University of North Carolina Press 1995) Open Google Scholar
  68. Economides CP, ‘Content of the Obligation: Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result’ in James Crawford and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar
  69. Efthymiou D, ‘Climate Change, Human Rights and Distributive Justice’ (2009) 20 Finnish YB Int’l L 111 Open Google Scholar
  70. Ehsassi A, ‘Cain and Abel: Congruence and Conflict in the Application of the Denial of Justice Principle’ in Stephan Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar
  71. Falsafi A, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Foreign Investors’ Property: A Contingent Standard’ (2007) 30 Suffolk Transnat’l L Rev 317 Open Google Scholar
  72. Fitzmaurice GG, ‘The Meaning of the Term “Denial of Justice”’ (1932) 13 BYIL 93 Open Google Scholar
  73. Focarelli C, ‘Denial of Justice’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2009) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  74. Foster GK, ‘Recovering Protection and Security: The Treaty Standard’s Obscure Origins, Forgotten Meaning, and Key Current Significance’ (2012) 45 Vand J Transnat’l L 1095 Open Google Scholar
  75. Franck SD, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions’ (2005) 73 Fordham L.Rev. 1521 Open Google Scholar
  76. ——, ‘Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict and Dispute Systems Design’ (2007) 92 Minn L Rev 161 Open Google Scholar
  77. Franck TM, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Clarendon Press 1995) Open Google Scholar
  78. Freeman AV, The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice (Longmans 1938) Open Google Scholar
  79. ——, ‘Human Rights and the Rights of Aliens’ (1951) 45 ASIL Proceedings 120 Open Google Scholar
  80. ——, ‘Responsibility of States for Unlawful Acts of Their Armed Forces’ (1955) 88 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye 263 Open Google Scholar
  81. French D, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 281 Open Google Scholar
  82. Gaillard E, ‘Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice’ in Christina Binder and Christoph Schreuer (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  83. Gallus N, ‘The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection’ (2005) 6 J World Investment & Trade 711 Open Google Scholar
  84. Garcia CG, ‘All the Other Dirty Little Secrets: Investment Treaties, Latin America, and the Necessary Evil of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2004) 16 Fla J Int’l L 301 Open Google Scholar
  85. Garcia Dominguez MD, ‘Calculating Damages in Investment Arbitration: Should Tribunals Take Country Risk into Account?’ (2017) 34 Ariz J Int’l & Comp. L 95 Open Google Scholar
  86. Garcia FJ and others, ‘Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law’ (2015) 18 JIEL 861 Open Google Scholar
  87. García-Bolívar OE, ‘Economic Development at the Core of the International Investment Regime’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar
  88. Garcia-Mora MR, ‘The Calvo Clause in Latin American Constitutions and International Law’ (1950) 33 Marquette Law Review 205 Open Google Scholar
  89. Gardiner RK, Treaty Interpretation (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015) Open Google Scholar
  90. Garner JW, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries Suffered by Foreigners Within Their Territories on Account of Mob Violence, Riots and Insurrection’ (1927) 21 Am Soc’y Int’l L Proc 49 Open Google Scholar
  91. Gazzini T, Interpretation of International Investment Treaties (Hart Publishing 2016) Open Google Scholar
  92. Goebel Jr. J, ‘International Responsibility of States for Injuries Sustained by Aliens on Account of Mob Violence Insurrections and Civil Wars’ (1914) 8 AJIL 802 Open Google Scholar
  93. Gourgourinis A, ‘Delineating the Normativity of Equity in International Law’ (2009) 11 Int’l Comm L Rev 327 Open Google Scholar
  94. Hall WE, International Law (Clarendon Press 1880) Open Google Scholar
  95. Hamrock KJ, ‘The ELSI Case: Toward an International Definition of “Arbitrary” Conduct’ (1992) 27 Tex Int’l L J 837 Open Google Scholar
  96. Haq I, ‘From Charity to Obligation: A Third World Perspective on Concessional Resource Transfers’ (1979) 14 Tex Int’l LJ 389 Open Google Scholar
  97. Heiskanen V, ‘Arbitrary and Unreasonable Measures’ in August Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar
  98. Henckels C, Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 2015) Open Google Scholar
  99. Hern R and others, ‘Market or Comparables Approach’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/market-or-comparables-approach> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  100. Hernández GI, ‘The Interaction between Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Interpretation of Full Protection and Security Clauses’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  101. Hölken C, Systemische Integration von Investitionsschutzabkommen (Nomos 2017) Open Google Scholar
  102. Huaqun Z, ‘Balance, Sustainable Development, and Integration: Innovative Path for BIT Practice’ (2014) 17 JIEL 299 Open Google Scholar
  103. Hueckel J, ‘Rebalancing Legitimacy and Sovereignty In International Investment Agreements’ (2012) 61 Emory LJ 601 Open Google Scholar
  104. Hulme MH, ‘Preambles in Treaty Interpretation’ (2016) 164 UPaLRev 1281 Open Google Scholar
  105. International Law Association, ‘ILA New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development’ (2002) 2 International Environmental Agreements 209 Open Google Scholar
  106. International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties, with Commentaries, Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly’ (1966) II Yearbook of the International Law Commission 187 Open Google Scholar
  107. ——, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (2001) II.2 Yearbook of the International Law Commission 26 Open Google Scholar
  108. ——, ‘Second Report on Identification of Customary International Law’ (22 May 2014) UN Doc A/CN.4/672 Open Google Scholar
  109. International Monetary Fund, The IMF and Argentina, 1991-2001 (International Monetary Fund, Independent Evaluation Office 2004) Open Google Scholar
  110. Janis MW, ‘The Ambiguity of Equity in International Law’ (1983) 9 Brook J Int’l L 7 Open Google Scholar
  111. Johnson Jr. OT and Gimblett J, ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’ in Karl P Sauvant (ed), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010-2011 (Oxford University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar
  112. Juillard P, ‘Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2007) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  113. Junngam N, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in International Investment Law: What and Who Is Investment Fully [?] Protected and Secured From’ (2018) 7 Am U Bus L Rev 1 Open Google Scholar
  114. Kantor M, Valuation for Arbitration: Compensation Standards, Valuation Methods and Expert Evidence (Kluwer Law International 2008) Open Google Scholar
  115. Katsikis D, ‘“Necessity” due to COVID-19 as a Defence to International Investment Claims’ (2021) 36 ICSID Review 46 Open Google Scholar
  116. Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘In Search of Transparency and Consistency: ICSID Reform Proposal’ (2005) 2 TDM 1 Open Google Scholar
  117. ——, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?: The 2006 Freshfields Lecture’ (2007) 23 Arbitration International 357 Open Google Scholar
  118. Kaufmann-Kohler G and Banifatemi Y, ‘Is Consistency a Myth?’, Precedent in International Arbitration (Huntington 2007) Open Google Scholar
  119. Kaufmann-Kohler G and Potestà M, ‘Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism?’ <https://www.cids.ch/images/Documents/CIDS_First_Report_ISDS_2015.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  120. ——, Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts (Springer Open 2020) Open Google Scholar
  121. Kennedy D, ‘The Disciplines of International Law and Policy’ (1999) 12 LJIL 9 Open Google Scholar
  122. Kill T, ‘Don’t Cross the Streams: Past and Present Overstatement of Customary International Law in Connections with Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations’ (2008) 106 Mich L Rev 853 Open Google Scholar
  123. Kingsbury B and Schill SW, ‘Public Law Concepts to Balance Investors’ Rights with State Regulatory Actions in the Public Interest – the Concept of Proportionality’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar
  124. Kinnear M, ‘The Continuing Development of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Andrea K Bjorklund, Ian A Laird and Sergey Ripinsky (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues III: Remedies in International Investment Law Emerging Jurisprudence of International Investment Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009) Open Google Scholar
  125. Kläger R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’ (2010) 11 J World Investment & Trade 435 Open Google Scholar
  126. ——, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar
  127. Klatt M and Meister M, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar
  128. Koh HH, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’ (1997) 106 YJIL 2599 Open Google Scholar
  129. Kolb R, The International Law of State Responsibility: An Introduction (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017) Open Google Scholar
  130. Kopar R, Stability and Legitimate Expectations in International Energy Investments (Hart 2021) Open Google Scholar
  131. Kriebaum U, ‘The Relevance of Economic and Political Conditions for Protection under Investment Treaties’ (2011) 10 Law & Prac. Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 383 Open Google Scholar
  132. ——, ‘Are Investment Treaty Standards Flexible Enough to Meet the Needs of Developing Countries?’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  133. ——, ‘Arbitrary/Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures’ in Marc Bungenberg and others (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015) Open Google Scholar
  134. Kymlicka W, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2002) Open Google Scholar
  135. Landmann N, Legitimate Expectations and Fair-and-Equitable-Treatment under the Energy Charter Treaty (Nomos 2021) Open Google Scholar
  136. Lapidoth R, ‘Equity in International Law’ (1987) 22 Isr L Rev 161 Open Google Scholar
  137. Lee J, ‘The Coronavirus Pandemic and International Investment Arbitration - Application of “Security Exceptions” Clauses in Investment Agreements’ (2020) 13 Contemp Asia Arb J 185 Open Google Scholar
  138. Legum B, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment and Human Rights: A Pedigree in the Rule of Law’ (2016) 1 EILA Rev 274 Open Google Scholar
  139. Lehane G, ‘Full Protection and Security for Investors in the African Extractives Industry’ (2019) 16 TDM 1 Open Google Scholar
  140. Lesaffer R, ‘International Law and Its History: The Story of an Unrequited Love’ in Matthew CR Craven, Malgosia Fitzmaurice and Maria Vogiatzi (eds), Time, History and International Law (Nijhoff 2007) Open Google Scholar
  141. Lillich RB, The Human Rights of Aliens in Contemporary International Law (Manchester University Press 1984) Open Google Scholar
  142. Lim KS, ‘Armed Conflicts and Customary International Law on Investment: Codification and Fragmentation of “Protection and Security”’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Open Google Scholar
  143. Linden ÅJ and others, Electricity Tariff Deficit Temporary or Permanent Problem in the EU? (European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs 2014) Open Google Scholar
  144. Lorz RA, ‘Protection and Security (Including the NAFTA Approach)’ in Marc Bungenberg and others (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015) Open Google Scholar
  145. MacGregor G, Blower S and Mitchell D, ‘Overview of Damages and Accounting Basics’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/overview-of-damages-and-accounting-basics> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  146. Malik M, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard Comes of Age: Yet Another Challenge for States in Investment Treaty Arbitration?’ [2011] IISD Best Practice Series Open Google Scholar
  147. Manciaux S, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in Investment Law: A Specific Obligation?’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Open Google Scholar
  148. Mann FA, ‘State Contracts and International Arbitration’ (1967) 42 BYIL 1 Open Google Scholar
  149. Mann FA, ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1981) 52 BYIL 241 Open Google Scholar
  150. Mantilla Blanco S, Justizielles Unrecht im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht: zur Verletzung völkerrechtlicher Standards des Investitionsschutzes durch nationale Gerichte (Nomos 2016) Open Google Scholar
  151. ——, Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law (Springer 2019) Open Google Scholar
  152. Marboe I, Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  153. Matsui Y, ‘The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility’ in René Provost (ed), State Responsibility in International Law (Dartmouth Publishing Company 2002) Open Google Scholar
  154. Mayer B, ‘Obligations of Conduct in the International Law on Climate Change: A Defence’ (2018) 27 Rev Eur Comp & Int’l Envtl L 130 Open Google Scholar
  155. McLachlan C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 ICLQ 279 Open Google Scholar
  156. ——, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57 ICLQ 361 Open Google Scholar
  157. McLachlan C, Shore L and Weiniger M, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  158. Miles K, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment, and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  159. Miljenić O, ‘Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law’ (2019) 35 Pravni Vjesnik 35 Open Google Scholar
  160. Monebhurrun N, ‘The (Mis)Use of Development in International Investment Law: Understanding the Jurist’s Limits to Work with Development Issues’ (2017) 10 LDR 451 Open Google Scholar
  161. ——, ‘Diligentia Quam in Suis as a Technique for a Contextual Application of the Full Protection and Security Standard: Considering the Level of Development of Host States in International Investment Law’ (2020) 28 Afr J Intl & Comp L 596 Open Google Scholar
  162. Moss GC, ‘Full Protection and Security’ in August Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar
  163. Mourre A, ‘Are Amici Curiae the Proper Response to the Public’s Concerns on Transparency in Investment Arbitration?’ (2006) 5 Law & Prac. Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 257 Open Google Scholar
  164. Mouyal LW, International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate: A Human Rights Perspective (Routledge 2016) Open Google Scholar
  165. Moyano García JP, ‘Customary Law Defenses Against COVID-19 Investment Claims’ (2021) 18 TDM 1 Open Google Scholar
  166. Muchlinski P, ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 527 Open Google Scholar
  167. ——Muchlinski PT, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Where Now?’ (2000) 34 Int’l L 1033 Open Google Scholar
  168. Mujeeb Rahman E, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law: The Customary Status’ (2021) 105 JL Po’y & Globalization 111 Open Google Scholar
  169. NAFTA Free Trade Commission, ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’ (31 July 2001) <https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  170. Newcombe AP and Paradell L, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2009) Open Google Scholar
  171. OECD, ‘Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property ('OECD Draft Convention’)’ (1968) 7 ILM 117 Open Google Scholar
  172. Orellana Zabalza G, The Principle of Systemic Integration: Towards a Coherent International Legal Order (Lit Verlag 2012) Open Google Scholar
  173. Ostřanský J, ‘An Exercise in Equivocation: A Critique of Legitimate Expectations as a General Principle of Law under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Andrea Gattini, Attila Tanzi and Filippo Fontanelli (eds), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018) Open Google Scholar
  174. Paddeu F and Parlett K, ‘COVID-10 19 and Investment Treaty Claims’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 30 March 2020) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/03/30/covid-19-and-investment-treaty-claims/> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  175. Paparinskis M, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary International Law: Preliminary Remarks’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar
  176. ——, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford University Press 2014) Open Google Scholar
  177. Paradell L, ‘The BIT Experience of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Federico Ortino, Audley Sheppard and Hugo Warner (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues Volume II : Nationality and Investment Treaty Claims, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Treaty Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2007) Open Google Scholar
  178. Paulsson J, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005) Open Google Scholar
  179. Pauwelyn J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003) Open Google Scholar
  180. Perera SM, ‘Equity-Based Decision-Making and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Lessons From the Argentine Investment Disputes – Part I’ (2012) 13 J World Investment & Trade 210 Open Google Scholar
  181. Pisillo-Mazzeschi R, ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 35 German YB Int’l L 9 Open Google Scholar
  182. Porterfield MC, ‘An International Common Law of Investor Rights?’ (2006) 27 U Pa J Int’l L 97 Open Google Scholar
  183. Potestà M, ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept’ (2013) 28 ICSID Review 88 Open Google Scholar
  184. Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, ‘Setting the Record Straight: Debunking Ten Common Defenses of Controversial Investor-State Corporate Privileges’ (Public Citizen, 11 May 2015) <https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/ustr-isds-response.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  185. Radicati di Brozolo LG and Ponzano F, ‘Representative Aspects of “Mass Claims” Proceedings in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Bernard Hanotiau and Eric A Schwartz (eds), Class and Group Actions in Arbitration (International Chamber of Commerce 2016) Open Google Scholar
  186. Rainey B, Wicks E and Ovey C, Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  187. Rawls J, A Theory of Justice (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1971) Open Google Scholar
  188. Reinisch A and Schreuer C, International Protection of Investments: The Substantive Standards (Cambridge University Press 2020) Open Google Scholar
  189. Ribco Borman Y, ‘COVID-19 & International Investment Protection’ (Shearman & Sterling, 14 April 2020) <https://www.shearman.com/perspectives/2020/04/covid-19-international-investment-protection> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  190. Roberts A, ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104 AJIL 179 Open Google Scholar
  191. Root E, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’ (1910) 4 ASIL Proceedings 16 Open Google Scholar
  192. Rosentreter D, Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Principle of Systemic Integration in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Nomos 2015) Open Google Scholar
  193. Rubins N and Lauterburg B, ‘Independence, Impartiality and Duty of Disclosure in Investment Arbitration’ in Christina Knahr and others (eds), Investment and Commercial Arbitration - Similarities and Divergences (Eleven International Publishing 2010) Open Google Scholar
  194. Ryk-Lakhmann I, ‘Protection of Foreign Investments Against the Effects of Hostilities: A Framework for Assessing Compliance with Full Protection and Security’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Open Google Scholar
  195. Salacuse JW, The Law of Investment Treaties (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015) Open Google Scholar
  196. Salacuse JW and Sullivan NP, ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’ (2005) 46 Harv Int’l LJ 67 Open Google Scholar
  197. Sattorova M, The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? (Hart Publishing 2018) Open Google Scholar
  198. Schernbeck A, Der Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in internationalen Investitionsschutzabkommen (Nomos 2013) Open Google Scholar
  199. Schill SW, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law, and Comparative Public Law’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar
  200. ——, ‘Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach’ (2011) 52 Va J Int’l L 57 Open Google Scholar
  201. Schill SW and Djanic V, ‘Wherefore Art Thou? Towards a Public Interest-Based Justification of International Investment Law’ (2018) 33 ICSID Review 29 Open Google Scholar
  202. Schreuer C, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6 J World Investment & Trade 357 Open Google Scholar
  203. ——, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): Interactions with Other Standards’ in Graham Coop and Clarisse C Ribeiro (eds), Investment Protection and the Energy Charter Treaty (JurisNet 2008) Open Google Scholar
  204. ——, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  205. ——, ‘The Protection of Investments in Armed Conflicts’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment Law within International Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) Open Google Scholar
  206. Schreuer CH, ‘Protection against Arbitrary or Discriminatory Measures’ in Catherine A Rogers and Roger P Alford (eds), The Future of Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  207. Schwarzenberger G, The Inductive Approach to International Law (Stevens & Sons 1965) Open Google Scholar
  208. ——, Foreign Investments and International Law (Stevens & Sons 1969) Open Google Scholar
  209. Shaw MN, International Law (8th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  210. Shea DR, The Calvo Clause: A Problem of Inter-American and International Law and Diplomacy (University of Minnesota Press 1955) Open Google Scholar
  211. Simma B and Kill T, ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Step Towards a Methodology’ in Christina Binder and Christoph Schreuer (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  212. Simpson GJ, ‘Is International Law Fair?’ (1996) 17 Mich J Int’l L 615 Open Google Scholar
  213. Sinclair IM, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, Manchester University Press 1984) Open Google Scholar
  214. Sipiorski E, ‘Full Protection and Security from Physical Security to Environmental Security: Its Limitations and Future Possibilities’ in Tobias Ackermann and Sebastian Wuschka (eds), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff 2020) Open Google Scholar
  215. Snider TR, ‘The Relationship Between Fair and Equitable Treatment and the International Minimum Standard of Treatment: An Overview and a Link to Africa’ (2019) 16 TDM Open Google Scholar
  216. Snodgrass E, ‘Protecting Investors’ Legitimate Expectations - Recognizing and Delimiting a General Principle’ (2006) 21 ICSID Review 1 Open Google Scholar
  217. Sohn LB, ‘Arbitration of International Disputes Ex Aequo et Bono’ in Pieter Sanders (ed), International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff 1967) Open Google Scholar
  218. ——Sohn LB, ‘The Role of Equity in the Jurisprudence in the International Court of Justice’ in Bernard Dutoit and Etienne Grisel (eds), Mélanges Georges Perrin: recueil de travaux offerts à M. Georges Perrin (Payot 1984) Open Google Scholar
  219. Sornarajah M, The International Law on Foreign Investment (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  220. Spears SA, ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’ (2010) 13 Journal of International Economic Law 1037 Open Google Scholar
  221. Spears SA, ‘Making Way for the Public Interest in International Investment Agreements’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar
  222. Stanivukovic M, ‘Legitimate Expectations: A Commentary of Micula v. Romania’ (2017) 14 TDM 1 Open Google Scholar
  223. Stern B, ‘The Future of International Investment Law: A Balance Between the Protection of Investors and the States’ Capacity to Regulate’ in José E Alvarez and others (eds), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options (Oxford University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar
  224. Stevenson A and Waite M (eds), Concise Oxford English Dictionary (12th edn, Oxford University Press 2011) Open Google Scholar
  225. Stone J, ‘Arbitrariness, the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard, and the International Law of Investment’ (2012) 25 LJIL 77 Open Google Scholar
  226. Stone Sweet A and Mathews J, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 Colum J Transnat’l L 72 Open Google Scholar
  227. Study Group of the International Law Commission, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’ (13 April 2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682 Open Google Scholar
  228. Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, ‘First Report’ (2014) 76 Int’l L Ass’n Rep Conf 947 Open Google Scholar
  229. Tasioulas J, ‘International Law and the Limits of Fairness’ (2002) 13 EJIL 993 Open Google Scholar
  230. Teitelbaum R, ‘A Look At The Public Interest In Investment Arbitration: Is It Unique? What Should We Do About It?’ (2010) 5 Publicist 54 Open Google Scholar
  231. Titi AC, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Nomos 2014) Open Google Scholar
  232. ——Titi C, ‘Full Protection and Security, Arbitrary or Discriminatory Treatment and the Invisible EU Model BIT’ (2014) 15 J World Investment & Trade 534 Open Google Scholar
  233. Trimble PR, ‘Globalization, International Institutions, and the Erosion of National Sovereignty and Democracy - Fairness in International Law and Institutions by Thomas M. Franck’ (1997) 95 Mich L Rev 1944 Open Google Scholar
  234. Tudor I, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar
  235. UNCTAD (ed), Fair and Equitable Treatment (United Nations 1999) Open Google Scholar
  236. —— (ed), FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives (United Nations 2003) Open Google Scholar
  237. ——, The Role of International Investment Agreements in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries (United Nations 2009) Open Google Scholar
  238. —— (ed), Fair and Equitable Treatment (United Nations 2012) Open Google Scholar
  239. —— (ed), Investment and the Digital Economy (United Nations 2017) Open Google Scholar
  240. ——, World Investment Report 2021 - Investing in Sustainable Recovery (United Nations 2021) <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2021_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  241. ——, ‘International Investment Agreements: Reform Accelerator’ (2020) UNCTAD/DIAE/PCB/INF/2020/8 <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaepcbinf2020d8_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  242. ——, ‘Interpretations of IIAs: What States Can Do’ UNCTAD IIA Issues Note No. 3, December 2011 <https://unctad.org/en/Docs/webdiaeia2011d10_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  243. ——, ‘Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Roadmap’ UNCTAD IIA Issues Note No. 2, June 2013 <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/webdiaepcb2013d4_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  244. Van Harten G, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford University Press 2008) Open Google Scholar
  245. Vandevelde KJ, ‘A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment’ (2010) 43 NYU J Intl L & Pol 43 Open Google Scholar
  246. ——, The First Bilateral Investment Treaties: U.S. Postwar Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation Treaties (Oxford University Press 2017) Open Google Scholar
  247. Vasciannie S, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (1999) 70 BYIL 99 Open Google Scholar
  248. ——, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (2000) 70 BYIL 99 Open Google Scholar
  249. ‘Venezuela Submits a Notice under Article 71 of the ICSID Convention’ (ICSID News Releases, 26 January 2012) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/news-and-events/news-releases/venezuela-submits-notice-under-article-71-icsid-convention> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  250. Viñuales J and Spoorenberg F, ‘Conflicting Decisions in International Arbitration’ (2009) 8 Law Pract Int Courts Trib 91 Open Google Scholar
  251. Wälde TW, ‘Energy Charter Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration: Controversial Issues’ (2004) 5 J World Investment & Trade 373 Open Google Scholar
  252. ——, ‘Interpreting Investment Treaties: Experiences and Examples’ in Christina Binder and others (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Open Google Scholar
  253. Web Yackee J, ‘Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Evidence’ (2011) 51 Va J Int’l L 397 Open Google Scholar
  254. Weeramantry JR, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2012) Open Google Scholar
  255. Weiler T, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination, and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Nijhoff 2013) Open Google Scholar
  256. ——, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination, and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013) Open Google Scholar
  257. Wells LT, ‘Backlash to Investment Arbitration: Three Causes’ in Michael Waibel (ed), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (Kluwer Law International 2010) Open Google Scholar
  258. White C and Fan M, Risk and Foreign Direct Investment (Palgrave Macmillan 2006) Open Google Scholar
  259. Zeitler HE, ‘Full Protection and Security’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Open Google Scholar
  260. Ziegler KS, ‘Jay Treaty (1794)’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2013) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Open Google Scholar
  261. Zielonka C, Der Ausgleich zwischen Investorenschutz- und Regulierungsinteressen in internationalen Investitionsschutzabkommen (Duncker & Humblot 2017) Open Google Scholar
  262. Zrilič J, The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press 2019) Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Book Titles No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex