Cover des Buchs: Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law

Influence on the Interpretation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment and Full Protection and Security Standards
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 28.10.2022

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Werk beschäftigt sich mit den sogenannten „absoluten“ Schutzstandards im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht: dem Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) und dem Full Protection and Security (FPS) Standard. Es bearbeitet die Frage, ob außergewöhnliche Umstände im Gaststaat einen Einfluss auf die Auslegung dieser Standards haben. Zu diesem Zweck untersucht die Autorin die normativen Grundlagen beider Standards, einschließlich des jeweiligen Wortlauts, Systematik und Zweck, bevor die bestehende Schiedsgerichtspraxis analysiert wird.

.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
Erscheinungsdatum
28.10.2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7488-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3279-6
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht
Band
46
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
249
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 16
    1. Permanent Court of International Justice Kein Zugriff
    2. International Court of Justice Kein Zugriff
    3. Iran – US Claims Tribunal Kein Zugriff
    4. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Kein Zugriff
    5. Claims Commissions Kein Zugriff
    6. International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes Kein Zugriff
    7. Other Arbitrations Kein Zugriff
    1. Friendship, Commerce and Navigation Treaties Kein Zugriff
    2. Claims Conventions Kein Zugriff
    3. International Investment Agreements Kein Zugriff
    4. Other International Instruments Kein Zugriff
    5. Domestic Legal Instruments Kein Zugriff
  4. Part 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff 39 - 42
    1. A. Consideration of Host State Circumstances and the Purposes of International Investment Law Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Economic Circumstances Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Political Circumstances Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Social Circumstances and Level of Development Kein Zugriff
    1. A. Jurisdiction Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Force Majeure Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Necessity Kein Zugriff
    3. C. Damages Kein Zugriff
  7. III. Conclusion and Scope Kein Zugriff 64 - 65
  8. Part 2. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff 66 - 66
        1. a) Fairness in International Law Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Application of Franck’s Fairness to the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Criticism of Franck’s Concept of Fairness Kein Zugriff
        4. d) Interim Result Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Possible Approaches to Equity Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Commonalities of the Approaches Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Modern Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses with an Explicit Reference to Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Broader Context Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Extra-Contractual Documents Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    3. C. Object and Purpose Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Denial of Justice and Administrative Due Process Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Arbitrariness Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Relevance of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Clauses Limited to the International Minimum Standard Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Clauses Referencing International Law Kein Zugriff
          1. i. Admissibility of the International Minimum Standard as Interpretative Material Kein Zugriff
          2. ii. Weight of the International Minimum Standard in the Interpretation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
    5. E. Results Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Specific Host State Conduct Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Regulatory Framework Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Circumstances in the Host State Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Host State’s Right to Regulate Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Investor’s Behaviour Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Denial of Access to Courts Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Undue Delay Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Inadequate Administration of Justice Kein Zugriff
        4. d) Excursus: Due Process in Administrative Decision-Making Kein Zugriff
        5. e) Misapplication of the Law Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Consideration of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Arbitrariness as a Shocking or Surprising Act Kein Zugriff
          1. i. Legitimate Purpose Kein Zugriff
          2. ii. Suitability Kein Zugriff
          3. iii. Necessity Kein Zugriff
          4. iv. Proportionality stricto sensu Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Interim Result Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Similar Cases Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Different Treatment Kein Zugriff
        3. c) No Reasonable Justification Kein Zugriff
        4. d) Interim Result Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Coercion and Harassment Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Bad Faith Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Relevance of Circumstances in the Discussion of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Importance of the Nature of the Circumstances for Tribunals’ Consideration Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Abstract Affirmation to Consider Host States’ Circumstances and Balance Diverging Interests Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Relevance of the Investors’ Behaviour Kein Zugriff
  11. Part 3. Full Protection and Security Standard Kein Zugriff 164 - 164
        1. a) Contractual Protection and Security Clause Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Customary Standard of Minimum Treatment of Aliens Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Interim Result Kein Zugriff
    2. B. Ordinary Meaning Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Conventional Full Protection and Security Clauses Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Modern Full Protection and Security Clauses Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Full Protection and Security Clauses with an Explicit Reference to Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Broader Context Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Extra-contractual Documents Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Interim Result Kein Zugriff
    4. D. Object and Purpose Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Substantive Content of the International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Aliens Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Relevance of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Clauses Equating Full Protection and Security and the International Minimum Standard Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Other Clauses Referencing International Law Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Unqualified Clauses Kein Zugriff
    6. F. Results Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Scope of Protection Kein Zugriff
          1. i. Modified Objective Standard Kein Zugriff
          2. ii. Reasonableness Kein Zugriff
          3. iii. Reasonableness Under the Circumstances Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Scope of Protection Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Consideration of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Interim Result Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Judicial Protection Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Legal Stability Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Importance of the Nature of the Circumstances for Tribunals’ Consideration Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Time of the Decisions Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Standard of Liability Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Relevance of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  14. Part 4. Analysis of the Results Kein Zugriff 220 - 220
    1. A. Results on the Normative Foundations Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Relevance of the Host States’ Circumstances Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Relevance of the Investor’s Behaviour Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Nature of the Host States’ Circumstances Considered Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Time of the Decisions Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Relationship Between the Fair and Equitable Treatment and Full Protection and Security Standards Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Legal Treatment versus Physical Protection Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Negative versus Positive Obligation Kein Zugriff
        3. c) State Measures versus Third Parties’ Actions Kein Zugriff
        4. d) Applicability of the Due Diligence Standard Kein Zugriff
    2. B. Consequences for the Consideration of the Circumstances Prevailing in the Host State Kein Zugriff
  17. III. Theses in Summary Kein Zugriff 233 - 234
  18. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 235 - 249

Literaturverzeichnis (262)

  1. Ago R, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ [1970] UN Doc A/CN.4/233 Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Allen RE, Fowler HW and Fowler FG (eds), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English (8th edn, Clarendon Press 1990) Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Alvarez GA and Park WW, ‘The New Face of Investment Arbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11’ (2003) 28 YJIL 365 Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Amerasinghe CF, Diplomatic Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  5. American Society of Appraisers and others, ‘International Valuation Glossary - Business Valuation’ <https://www.appraisers.org/docs/default-source/5---standards/revised-bv-standards-february-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=d5b561b2_12> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (William David Ross tr, Enhanced Media 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Barrera EB, ‘The Case for Removing the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard from NAFTA’ [2017] CIGI Papers No. 128 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3012347> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Baumann J, ‘International Investment Law in the Context of State Fragility: Full Protection and Security and Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in Tobias Ackermann and Sebastian Wuschka (eds), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Koninklijke Brill NV 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Bedjaoui M, Towards A New International Economic Order (Holmes & Meier 1979) Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Berg NM, Ward DV and Saunders Gregor K, ‘COVID-19 Measures: Leveraging Investment Agreements to Protect Foreign Investments’ (Ropes & Gray, 28 April 2020) <https://www.ropesgray.com/en/newsroom/alerts/2020/04/COVID-19-Measures-Leveraging-Investment-Agreements-to-Protect-Foreign-Investments> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Bernasconi-Osterwalder N, Brewin S and Maina N, ‘Protecting Against Investor–State Claims Amidst COVID-19: A Call to Action for Governments’ (International Institute for Sustainable Development, April 2020) <https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/investor-state-claims-covid-19.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Besson S and D’Aspremont J (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Bishop DR, Crawford J and Reisman WM, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Bjorklund AK, ‘Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’ (2005) 45 Va J Int’l L 809 Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Bodansky D and Crook JR, ‘Symposium: The ILC’s State Responsibility Articles: Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 AJIL 773 Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bohmer L, ‘Changes to Mexico’s Electricity Regulation in Light of Pandemic Prompt Threats of Investment Arbitration Claims’ (IAReporter, 18 May 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/changes-to-mexicos-electricity-regulation-in-light-of-pandemic-prompt-threats-of-investment-arbitration-claims/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  17. ——, ‘Peru Round-up: A Pandemic-Related Notice of Dispute, Imminent Public Hearings, and an Update on 12 Other Arbitrations against the State’ (IAReporter, 9 June 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/peru-round-up-a-pandemic-related-notice-of-dispute-imminent-public-hearings-and-an-update-on-12-other-arbitrations-against-the-state/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  18. ——, ‘Chile Round-up: Three Threats, and One Arbitration Drawing to an End’ (IAReporter, 20 November 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/chile-round-up-three-threats-and-one-arbitration-drawing-to-an-end/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Bonnitcha J, ‘Investment Treaties and Transition from Authoritarian Rule’ (2014) 15 J World Investment & Trade 965 Google Scholar öffnen
  20. ——, Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Borchard EM, The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad: Or, The Law of International Claims (The Banks law Law publishing Publishing Company 1915) Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Borchardt E, ‘The “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1940) 38 Mich L Rev 445 Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Brown C, ‘The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a “General Principle of Law”: Some Preliminary Thoughts’ (2009) 6 TDM Google Scholar öffnen
  24. ——, Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Brownlie I, State Responsibility (Clarendon Press 1983) Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Buchan R, ‘Cyberspace, Non-State Actors and the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm’ (2016) 21 J Conflict & Sec L 429 Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Burger L, ‘The Trouble with Salini (Criticism of and Alternatives to the Famous Test)’ (2013) 31 ASA Bulletin 521 Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Burgstaller M and Risso G, ‘Due Diligence in International Investment Law’ (2021) 38 J Int'l Arb 697 Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Burke-White WW and von Staden A, ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2008) 48 Va J Int’l L 307 Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Calvo C, Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique (5th edn, Rousseau 1896) Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Campbell C, ‘House of Cards: The Relevance of Legitimate Expectations under Fair and Equitable Treatment Provisions in Investment Treaty Law’ (2013) 30 J Int’l Arb 361 Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Cheng B, ‘Justice and Equity in International Law’ (1955) 8 CLP 185 Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Cheng T-H, ‘Power, Authority and International Investment Law’ (2005) 20 Am U Int’l L Rev 465 Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Chetail V, ‘Vattel and the American Dream: An Inquiry into the Reception of the Law of Nations in the United States’ in Peter Haggenmacher, Pierre-Marie Dupuy and Vincent Chetail (eds), The Roots of International Law: Liber Amicorum Peter Haggenmacher (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Chung O, ‘The Lopsided International Investment Law Regime and Its Effect on the Future of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2007) 47 Va J Int’l L 953 Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Clayton R and Tomlinson H (eds), The Law of Human Rights, vol 1 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Clover Alcolea L, ‘'The COVID-19 Crisis: Core Investment Law Issues Revisited' Revisited' (2021) 18 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Collins D, ‘Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets’ (2011) 12 J World Investment & Trade 225 Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, ‘Call for ISDS Moratorium During COVID-19 Crisis and Response’ <https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/call-isds-moratorium-during-covid-19-crisis-and-response> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Cottier T, Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  41. ——, ‘Equity in International Law’ in Thomas Cottier, Shaheeza Lalani and Clarence Siziba (eds), Intergenerational Equity: Environmental and Cultural Concerns (Brill Nijhoff 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Crawford J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text, and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  43. ——, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th edn, Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Cullen H, ‘The Role of History in Thomas Franck’s Fairness in International Law and Institutions’ (2002) 13 EJIL 927 Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Davies A, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation, Fair and Equitable Treatment and Legitimate Expectations’ (2018) 15 Manchester J Int’l Economic Law 314 Google Scholar öffnen
  46. de Brabandere E, ‘Host States’ Due Diligence Obligations in International Investment Law’ (2015) 42 Syracuse J Int’l L & Com 319 Google Scholar öffnen
  47. de Vattel E, The Law of Nations; or, Principles of the Law of Nature: Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (Luke White 1787) Google Scholar öffnen
  48. de Visscher C, ‘La Responsabilité Des Etats: Cours Professé à l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, Juillet 1923’ (1924) 2 Bibliotheca Visseriana Dissertationum Ius Internationale illustrantium 87 Google Scholar öffnen
  49. ——, ‘Le Déni de Jusitice En Droit International’ (1936) 54 Recueil des cours de droit international de la Haye 370 Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Demirkol B, Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Demuth A, ‘Income Approach and the Discounted Cash Flow Methodology’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/income-approach-and-the-discounted-cash-flow-methodology> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  52. ‘Denunciation of ICSID Convention’ (ICSID News Releases, 16 May 2007) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/news-and-events/news-releases/denunciation-icsid-convention?CID=103> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Diehl A, The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Dietz T, Dotzauer M and Cohen ES, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis of Investor-State Arbitration and the New EU Investment Court System’ (2019) 26 Review of International Political Economy 749 Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Dörr O, ‘Article 31’ in Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: a commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Douglas Z, ‘Nothing If Not Critical for Investment Treaty Arbitration: Occidental, Eureko and Methanex’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International 27 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. ——, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  58. ——, ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’ (2014) 63 ICLQ 867 Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Draguiev D, ‘Bad Faith Conduct of States in Violation of the “Fair and Equitable Treatment” Standard in International Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2014) 5 JIDS 273 Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Duarte-Silva T, ‘Country Risk’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/country-risk> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Dumberry P, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide to NAFTA Case Law on Article 1105 (Kluwer Law International 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  62. ——, ‘The Protection of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’ (2014) 31 J Int’l Arb 47 Google Scholar öffnen
  63. ——, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Dunn FS, Diplomatic Protection of Americans in Mexico (Columbia University Press 1933) Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Dupuy F and Dupuy P-M, ‘What to Expect from Legitimate Expectations? A Critical Appraisal and Look into the Future of the “Legitimate Expectations” Doctrine in International Investment Law’ in Mohamed Abdel-Raouf and Philippe Leboulanger (eds), Festschrift Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri: From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Eberhardt P and Olivet C, Profiting from Injustice - How Law Firms, Arbitrators and Financiers Are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom (Corporate Europe Observatory and the Transnational Institute 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Eckes Jr. AE, Opening America’s Market: U.S. Foreign Trade Policy since 1776 (University of North Carolina Press 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Economides CP, ‘Content of the Obligation: Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result’ in James Crawford and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Efthymiou D, ‘Climate Change, Human Rights and Distributive Justice’ (2009) 20 Finnish YB Int’l L 111 Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Ehsassi A, ‘Cain and Abel: Congruence and Conflict in the Application of the Denial of Justice Principle’ in Stephan Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Falsafi A, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Foreign Investors’ Property: A Contingent Standard’ (2007) 30 Suffolk Transnat’l L Rev 317 Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Fitzmaurice GG, ‘The Meaning of the Term “Denial of Justice”’ (1932) 13 BYIL 93 Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Focarelli C, ‘Denial of Justice’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2009) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Foster GK, ‘Recovering Protection and Security: The Treaty Standard’s Obscure Origins, Forgotten Meaning, and Key Current Significance’ (2012) 45 Vand J Transnat’l L 1095 Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Franck SD, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions’ (2005) 73 Fordham L.Rev. 1521 Google Scholar öffnen
  76. ——, ‘Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict and Dispute Systems Design’ (2007) 92 Minn L Rev 161 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Franck TM, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Clarendon Press 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Freeman AV, The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice (Longmans 1938) Google Scholar öffnen
  79. ——, ‘Human Rights and the Rights of Aliens’ (1951) 45 ASIL Proceedings 120 Google Scholar öffnen
  80. ——, ‘Responsibility of States for Unlawful Acts of Their Armed Forces’ (1955) 88 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye 263 Google Scholar öffnen
  81. French D, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 281 Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Gaillard E, ‘Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice’ in Christina Binder and Christoph Schreuer (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Gallus N, ‘The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection’ (2005) 6 J World Investment & Trade 711 Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Garcia CG, ‘All the Other Dirty Little Secrets: Investment Treaties, Latin America, and the Necessary Evil of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2004) 16 Fla J Int’l L 301 Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Garcia Dominguez MD, ‘Calculating Damages in Investment Arbitration: Should Tribunals Take Country Risk into Account?’ (2017) 34 Ariz J Int’l & Comp. L 95 Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Garcia FJ and others, ‘Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law’ (2015) 18 JIEL 861 Google Scholar öffnen
  87. García-Bolívar OE, ‘Economic Development at the Core of the International Investment Regime’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Garcia-Mora MR, ‘The Calvo Clause in Latin American Constitutions and International Law’ (1950) 33 Marquette Law Review 205 Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Gardiner RK, Treaty Interpretation (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Garner JW, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries Suffered by Foreigners Within Their Territories on Account of Mob Violence, Riots and Insurrection’ (1927) 21 Am Soc’y Int’l L Proc 49 Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Gazzini T, Interpretation of International Investment Treaties (Hart Publishing 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Goebel Jr. J, ‘International Responsibility of States for Injuries Sustained by Aliens on Account of Mob Violence Insurrections and Civil Wars’ (1914) 8 AJIL 802 Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Gourgourinis A, ‘Delineating the Normativity of Equity in International Law’ (2009) 11 Int’l Comm L Rev 327 Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Hall WE, International Law (Clarendon Press 1880) Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Hamrock KJ, ‘The ELSI Case: Toward an International Definition of “Arbitrary” Conduct’ (1992) 27 Tex Int’l L J 837 Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Haq I, ‘From Charity to Obligation: A Third World Perspective on Concessional Resource Transfers’ (1979) 14 Tex Int’l LJ 389 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Heiskanen V, ‘Arbitrary and Unreasonable Measures’ in August Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Henckels C, Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Hern R and others, ‘Market or Comparables Approach’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/market-or-comparables-approach> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Hernández GI, ‘The Interaction between Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Interpretation of Full Protection and Security Clauses’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Hölken C, Systemische Integration von Investitionsschutzabkommen (Nomos 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Huaqun Z, ‘Balance, Sustainable Development, and Integration: Innovative Path for BIT Practice’ (2014) 17 JIEL 299 Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Hueckel J, ‘Rebalancing Legitimacy and Sovereignty In International Investment Agreements’ (2012) 61 Emory LJ 601 Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Hulme MH, ‘Preambles in Treaty Interpretation’ (2016) 164 UPaLRev 1281 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. International Law Association, ‘ILA New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development’ (2002) 2 International Environmental Agreements 209 Google Scholar öffnen
  106. International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties, with Commentaries, Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly’ (1966) II Yearbook of the International Law Commission 187 Google Scholar öffnen
  107. ——, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (2001) II.2 Yearbook of the International Law Commission 26 Google Scholar öffnen
  108. ——, ‘Second Report on Identification of Customary International Law’ (22 May 2014) UN Doc A/CN.4/672 Google Scholar öffnen
  109. International Monetary Fund, The IMF and Argentina, 1991-2001 (International Monetary Fund, Independent Evaluation Office 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Janis MW, ‘The Ambiguity of Equity in International Law’ (1983) 9 Brook J Int’l L 7 Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Johnson Jr. OT and Gimblett J, ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’ in Karl P Sauvant (ed), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010-2011 (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Juillard P, ‘Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2007) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Junngam N, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in International Investment Law: What and Who Is Investment Fully [?] Protected and Secured From’ (2018) 7 Am U Bus L Rev 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Kantor M, Valuation for Arbitration: Compensation Standards, Valuation Methods and Expert Evidence (Kluwer Law International 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Katsikis D, ‘“Necessity” due to COVID-19 as a Defence to International Investment Claims’ (2021) 36 ICSID Review 46 Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘In Search of Transparency and Consistency: ICSID Reform Proposal’ (2005) 2 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  117. ——, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?: The 2006 Freshfields Lecture’ (2007) 23 Arbitration International 357 Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Kaufmann-Kohler G and Banifatemi Y, ‘Is Consistency a Myth?’, Precedent in International Arbitration (Huntington 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Kaufmann-Kohler G and Potestà M, ‘Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism?’ <https://www.cids.ch/images/Documents/CIDS_First_Report_ISDS_2015.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  120. ——, Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts (Springer Open 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Kennedy D, ‘The Disciplines of International Law and Policy’ (1999) 12 LJIL 9 Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Kill T, ‘Don’t Cross the Streams: Past and Present Overstatement of Customary International Law in Connections with Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations’ (2008) 106 Mich L Rev 853 Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Kingsbury B and Schill SW, ‘Public Law Concepts to Balance Investors’ Rights with State Regulatory Actions in the Public Interest – the Concept of Proportionality’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Kinnear M, ‘The Continuing Development of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Andrea K Bjorklund, Ian A Laird and Sergey Ripinsky (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues III: Remedies in International Investment Law Emerging Jurisprudence of International Investment Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Kläger R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’ (2010) 11 J World Investment & Trade 435 Google Scholar öffnen
  126. ——, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Klatt M and Meister M, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Koh HH, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’ (1997) 106 YJIL 2599 Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Kolb R, The International Law of State Responsibility: An Introduction (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Kopar R, Stability and Legitimate Expectations in International Energy Investments (Hart 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Kriebaum U, ‘The Relevance of Economic and Political Conditions for Protection under Investment Treaties’ (2011) 10 Law & Prac. Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 383 Google Scholar öffnen
  132. ——, ‘Are Investment Treaty Standards Flexible Enough to Meet the Needs of Developing Countries?’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  133. ——, ‘Arbitrary/Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures’ in Marc Bungenberg and others (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Kymlicka W, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Landmann N, Legitimate Expectations and Fair-and-Equitable-Treatment under the Energy Charter Treaty (Nomos 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Lapidoth R, ‘Equity in International Law’ (1987) 22 Isr L Rev 161 Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Lee J, ‘The Coronavirus Pandemic and International Investment Arbitration - Application of “Security Exceptions” Clauses in Investment Agreements’ (2020) 13 Contemp Asia Arb J 185 Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Legum B, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment and Human Rights: A Pedigree in the Rule of Law’ (2016) 1 EILA Rev 274 Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Lehane G, ‘Full Protection and Security for Investors in the African Extractives Industry’ (2019) 16 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Lesaffer R, ‘International Law and Its History: The Story of an Unrequited Love’ in Matthew CR Craven, Malgosia Fitzmaurice and Maria Vogiatzi (eds), Time, History and International Law (Nijhoff 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Lillich RB, The Human Rights of Aliens in Contemporary International Law (Manchester University Press 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Lim KS, ‘Armed Conflicts and Customary International Law on Investment: Codification and Fragmentation of “Protection and Security”’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Linden ÅJ and others, Electricity Tariff Deficit Temporary or Permanent Problem in the EU? (European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Lorz RA, ‘Protection and Security (Including the NAFTA Approach)’ in Marc Bungenberg and others (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  145. MacGregor G, Blower S and Mitchell D, ‘Overview of Damages and Accounting Basics’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/overview-of-damages-and-accounting-basics> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Malik M, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard Comes of Age: Yet Another Challenge for States in Investment Treaty Arbitration?’ [2011] IISD Best Practice Series Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Manciaux S, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in Investment Law: A Specific Obligation?’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Mann FA, ‘State Contracts and International Arbitration’ (1967) 42 BYIL 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Mann FA, ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1981) 52 BYIL 241 Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Mantilla Blanco S, Justizielles Unrecht im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht: zur Verletzung völkerrechtlicher Standards des Investitionsschutzes durch nationale Gerichte (Nomos 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  151. ——, Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Marboe I, Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Matsui Y, ‘The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility’ in René Provost (ed), State Responsibility in International Law (Dartmouth Publishing Company 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Mayer B, ‘Obligations of Conduct in the International Law on Climate Change: A Defence’ (2018) 27 Rev Eur Comp & Int’l Envtl L 130 Google Scholar öffnen
  155. McLachlan C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 ICLQ 279 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. ——, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57 ICLQ 361 Google Scholar öffnen
  157. McLachlan C, Shore L and Weiniger M, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Miles K, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment, and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Miljenić O, ‘Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law’ (2019) 35 Pravni Vjesnik 35 Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Monebhurrun N, ‘The (Mis)Use of Development in International Investment Law: Understanding the Jurist’s Limits to Work with Development Issues’ (2017) 10 LDR 451 Google Scholar öffnen
  161. ——, ‘Diligentia Quam in Suis as a Technique for a Contextual Application of the Full Protection and Security Standard: Considering the Level of Development of Host States in International Investment Law’ (2020) 28 Afr J Intl & Comp L 596 Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Moss GC, ‘Full Protection and Security’ in August Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Mourre A, ‘Are Amici Curiae the Proper Response to the Public’s Concerns on Transparency in Investment Arbitration?’ (2006) 5 Law & Prac. Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 257 Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Mouyal LW, International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate: A Human Rights Perspective (Routledge 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Moyano García JP, ‘Customary Law Defenses Against COVID-19 Investment Claims’ (2021) 18 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Muchlinski P, ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 527 Google Scholar öffnen
  167. ——Muchlinski PT, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Where Now?’ (2000) 34 Int’l L 1033 Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Mujeeb Rahman E, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law: The Customary Status’ (2021) 105 JL Po’y & Globalization 111 Google Scholar öffnen
  169. NAFTA Free Trade Commission, ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’ (31 July 2001) <https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Newcombe AP and Paradell L, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  171. OECD, ‘Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property ('OECD Draft Convention’)’ (1968) 7 ILM 117 Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Orellana Zabalza G, The Principle of Systemic Integration: Towards a Coherent International Legal Order (Lit Verlag 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Ostřanský J, ‘An Exercise in Equivocation: A Critique of Legitimate Expectations as a General Principle of Law under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Andrea Gattini, Attila Tanzi and Filippo Fontanelli (eds), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Paddeu F and Parlett K, ‘COVID-10 19 and Investment Treaty Claims’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 30 March 2020) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/03/30/covid-19-and-investment-treaty-claims/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Paparinskis M, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary International Law: Preliminary Remarks’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  176. ——, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Paradell L, ‘The BIT Experience of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Federico Ortino, Audley Sheppard and Hugo Warner (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues Volume II : Nationality and Investment Treaty Claims, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Treaty Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Paulsson J, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Pauwelyn J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Perera SM, ‘Equity-Based Decision-Making and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Lessons From the Argentine Investment Disputes – Part I’ (2012) 13 J World Investment & Trade 210 Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Pisillo-Mazzeschi R, ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 35 German YB Int’l L 9 Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Porterfield MC, ‘An International Common Law of Investor Rights?’ (2006) 27 U Pa J Int’l L 97 Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Potestà M, ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept’ (2013) 28 ICSID Review 88 Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, ‘Setting the Record Straight: Debunking Ten Common Defenses of Controversial Investor-State Corporate Privileges’ (Public Citizen, 11 May 2015) <https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/ustr-isds-response.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Radicati di Brozolo LG and Ponzano F, ‘Representative Aspects of “Mass Claims” Proceedings in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Bernard Hanotiau and Eric A Schwartz (eds), Class and Group Actions in Arbitration (International Chamber of Commerce 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Rainey B, Wicks E and Ovey C, Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Rawls J, A Theory of Justice (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1971) Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Reinisch A and Schreuer C, International Protection of Investments: The Substantive Standards (Cambridge University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Ribco Borman Y, ‘COVID-19 & International Investment Protection’ (Shearman & Sterling, 14 April 2020) <https://www.shearman.com/perspectives/2020/04/covid-19-international-investment-protection> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Roberts A, ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104 AJIL 179 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Root E, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’ (1910) 4 ASIL Proceedings 16 Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Rosentreter D, Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Principle of Systemic Integration in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Nomos 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Rubins N and Lauterburg B, ‘Independence, Impartiality and Duty of Disclosure in Investment Arbitration’ in Christina Knahr and others (eds), Investment and Commercial Arbitration - Similarities and Divergences (Eleven International Publishing 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Ryk-Lakhmann I, ‘Protection of Foreign Investments Against the Effects of Hostilities: A Framework for Assessing Compliance with Full Protection and Security’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Salacuse JW, The Law of Investment Treaties (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Salacuse JW and Sullivan NP, ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’ (2005) 46 Harv Int’l LJ 67 Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Sattorova M, The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? (Hart Publishing 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Schernbeck A, Der Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in internationalen Investitionsschutzabkommen (Nomos 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Schill SW, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law, and Comparative Public Law’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  200. ——, ‘Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach’ (2011) 52 Va J Int’l L 57 Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Schill SW and Djanic V, ‘Wherefore Art Thou? Towards a Public Interest-Based Justification of International Investment Law’ (2018) 33 ICSID Review 29 Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Schreuer C, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6 J World Investment & Trade 357 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. ——, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): Interactions with Other Standards’ in Graham Coop and Clarisse C Ribeiro (eds), Investment Protection and the Energy Charter Treaty (JurisNet 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  204. ——, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  205. ——, ‘The Protection of Investments in Armed Conflicts’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment Law within International Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Schreuer CH, ‘Protection against Arbitrary or Discriminatory Measures’ in Catherine A Rogers and Roger P Alford (eds), The Future of Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Schwarzenberger G, The Inductive Approach to International Law (Stevens & Sons 1965) Google Scholar öffnen
  208. ——, Foreign Investments and International Law (Stevens & Sons 1969) Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Shaw MN, International Law (8th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Shea DR, The Calvo Clause: A Problem of Inter-American and International Law and Diplomacy (University of Minnesota Press 1955) Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Simma B and Kill T, ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Step Towards a Methodology’ in Christina Binder and Christoph Schreuer (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Simpson GJ, ‘Is International Law Fair?’ (1996) 17 Mich J Int’l L 615 Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Sinclair IM, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, Manchester University Press 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Sipiorski E, ‘Full Protection and Security from Physical Security to Environmental Security: Its Limitations and Future Possibilities’ in Tobias Ackermann and Sebastian Wuschka (eds), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Snider TR, ‘The Relationship Between Fair and Equitable Treatment and the International Minimum Standard of Treatment: An Overview and a Link to Africa’ (2019) 16 TDM Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Snodgrass E, ‘Protecting Investors’ Legitimate Expectations - Recognizing and Delimiting a General Principle’ (2006) 21 ICSID Review 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Sohn LB, ‘Arbitration of International Disputes Ex Aequo et Bono’ in Pieter Sanders (ed), International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff 1967) Google Scholar öffnen
  218. ——Sohn LB, ‘The Role of Equity in the Jurisprudence in the International Court of Justice’ in Bernard Dutoit and Etienne Grisel (eds), Mélanges Georges Perrin: recueil de travaux offerts à M. Georges Perrin (Payot 1984) Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Sornarajah M, The International Law on Foreign Investment (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Spears SA, ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’ (2010) 13 Journal of International Economic Law 1037 Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Spears SA, ‘Making Way for the Public Interest in International Investment Agreements’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Stanivukovic M, ‘Legitimate Expectations: A Commentary of Micula v. Romania’ (2017) 14 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Stern B, ‘The Future of International Investment Law: A Balance Between the Protection of Investors and the States’ Capacity to Regulate’ in José E Alvarez and others (eds), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Stevenson A and Waite M (eds), Concise Oxford English Dictionary (12th edn, Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Stone J, ‘Arbitrariness, the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard, and the International Law of Investment’ (2012) 25 LJIL 77 Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Stone Sweet A and Mathews J, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 Colum J Transnat’l L 72 Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Study Group of the International Law Commission, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’ (13 April 2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682 Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, ‘First Report’ (2014) 76 Int’l L Ass’n Rep Conf 947 Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Tasioulas J, ‘International Law and the Limits of Fairness’ (2002) 13 EJIL 993 Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Teitelbaum R, ‘A Look At The Public Interest In Investment Arbitration: Is It Unique? What Should We Do About It?’ (2010) 5 Publicist 54 Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Titi AC, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Nomos 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  232. ——Titi C, ‘Full Protection and Security, Arbitrary or Discriminatory Treatment and the Invisible EU Model BIT’ (2014) 15 J World Investment & Trade 534 Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Trimble PR, ‘Globalization, International Institutions, and the Erosion of National Sovereignty and Democracy - Fairness in International Law and Institutions by Thomas M. Franck’ (1997) 95 Mich L Rev 1944 Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Tudor I, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  235. UNCTAD (ed), Fair and Equitable Treatment (United Nations 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  236. —— (ed), FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives (United Nations 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  237. ——, The Role of International Investment Agreements in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries (United Nations 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  238. —— (ed), Fair and Equitable Treatment (United Nations 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  239. —— (ed), Investment and the Digital Economy (United Nations 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  240. ——, World Investment Report 2021 - Investing in Sustainable Recovery (United Nations 2021) <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2021_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  241. ——, ‘International Investment Agreements: Reform Accelerator’ (2020) UNCTAD/DIAE/PCB/INF/2020/8 <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaepcbinf2020d8_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  242. ——, ‘Interpretations of IIAs: What States Can Do’ UNCTAD IIA Issues Note No. 3, December 2011 <https://unctad.org/en/Docs/webdiaeia2011d10_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  243. ——, ‘Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Roadmap’ UNCTAD IIA Issues Note No. 2, June 2013 <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/webdiaepcb2013d4_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Van Harten G, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Vandevelde KJ, ‘A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment’ (2010) 43 NYU J Intl L & Pol 43 Google Scholar öffnen
  246. ——, The First Bilateral Investment Treaties: U.S. Postwar Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation Treaties (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Vasciannie S, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (1999) 70 BYIL 99 Google Scholar öffnen
  248. ——, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (2000) 70 BYIL 99 Google Scholar öffnen
  249. ‘Venezuela Submits a Notice under Article 71 of the ICSID Convention’ (ICSID News Releases, 26 January 2012) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/news-and-events/news-releases/venezuela-submits-notice-under-article-71-icsid-convention> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Viñuales J and Spoorenberg F, ‘Conflicting Decisions in International Arbitration’ (2009) 8 Law Pract Int Courts Trib 91 Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Wälde TW, ‘Energy Charter Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration: Controversial Issues’ (2004) 5 J World Investment & Trade 373 Google Scholar öffnen
  252. ——, ‘Interpreting Investment Treaties: Experiences and Examples’ in Christina Binder and others (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Web Yackee J, ‘Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Evidence’ (2011) 51 Va J Int’l L 397 Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Weeramantry JR, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Weiler T, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination, and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Nijhoff 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  256. ——, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination, and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Wells LT, ‘Backlash to Investment Arbitration: Three Causes’ in Michael Waibel (ed), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (Kluwer Law International 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  258. White C and Fan M, Risk and Foreign Direct Investment (Palgrave Macmillan 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Zeitler HE, ‘Full Protection and Security’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Ziegler KS, ‘Jay Treaty (1794)’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2013) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Zielonka C, Der Ausgleich zwischen Investorenschutz- und Regulierungsinteressen in internationalen Investitionsschutzabkommen (Duncker & Humblot 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Zrilič J, The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover des Buchs: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex