Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law: Influence on the Interpretation of the Fair and Equitable T…

Dr. Johanna Braun

doi:10.5771/9783748932796

, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.

Monographie Kein Zugriff

Host State Circumstances and Absolute Standards of Protection in International Investment Law

Influence on the Interpretation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment and Full Protection and Security Standards

Autor:innen:
Reihe:: Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht, Band 46
Verlag:: 2022

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Werk beschäftigt sich mit den sogenannten „absoluten“ Schutzstandards im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht: dem Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) und dem Full Protection and Security (FPS) Standard. Es bearbeitet die Frage, ob außergewöhnliche Umstände im Gaststaat einen Einfluss auf die Auslegung dieser Standards haben. Zu diesem Zweck untersucht die Autorin die normativen Grundlagen beider Standards, einschließlich des jeweiligen Wortlauts, Systematik und Zweck, bevor die bestehende Schiedsgerichtspraxis analysiert wird.

.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2022
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-7488-3
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-3279-6
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht
Band: 46
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 249
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 16
1. Permanent Court of International Justice Kein Zugriff
2. International Court of Justice Kein Zugriff
3. Iran – US Claims Tribunal Kein Zugriff
4. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Kein Zugriff
5. Claims Commissions Kein Zugriff
6. International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes Kein Zugriff
7. Other Arbitrations Kein Zugriff
1. Friendship, Commerce and Navigation Treaties Kein Zugriff
2. Claims Conventions Kein Zugriff
3. International Investment Agreements Kein Zugriff
4. Other International Instruments Kein Zugriff
5. Domestic Legal Instruments Kein Zugriff
Part 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff Seiten 39 - 42
1. A. Consideration of Host State Circumstances and the Purposes of International Investment Law Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. Economic Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Political Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Social Circumstances and Level of Development Kein Zugriff
1. A. Jurisdiction Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. Force Majeure Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Necessity Kein Zugriff
3. C. Damages Kein Zugriff
III. Conclusion and Scope Kein Zugriff Seiten 64 - 65
Part 2. Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff Seiten 66 - 66
1. 1. 1. a) Fairness in International Law Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Application of Franck’s Fairness to the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Criticism of Franck’s Concept of Fairness Kein Zugriff
    4. d) Interim Result Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Possible Approaches to Equity Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Commonalities of the Approaches Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. a) Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Modern Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Fair and Equitable Treatment Clauses with an Explicit Reference to Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Broader Context Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Extra-Contractual Documents Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
3. C. Object and Purpose Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 1. a) Denial of Justice and Administrative Due Process Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Arbitrariness Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Relevance of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  3. 1. a) Clauses Limited to the International Minimum Standard Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Clauses Referencing International Law Kein Zugriff
    3. 1. i. Admissibility of the International Minimum Standard as Interpretative Material Kein Zugriff
      2. ii. Weight of the International Minimum Standard in the Interpretation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
5. E. Results Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 1. a) Specific Host State Conduct Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Regulatory Framework Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Circumstances in the Host State Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Host State’s Right to Regulate Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Investor’s Behaviour Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. a) Denial of Access to Courts Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Undue Delay Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Inadequate Administration of Justice Kein Zugriff
    4. d) Excursus: Due Process in Administrative Decision-Making Kein Zugriff
    5. e) Misapplication of the Law Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Consideration of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 1. a) Arbitrariness as a Shocking or Surprising Act Kein Zugriff
    2. 1. i. Legitimate Purpose Kein Zugriff
      2. ii. Suitability Kein Zugriff
      3. iii. Necessity Kein Zugriff
      4. iv. Proportionality stricto sensu Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Interim Result Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Similar Cases Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Different Treatment Kein Zugriff
    3. c) No Reasonable Justification Kein Zugriff
    4. d) Interim Result Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Coercion and Harassment Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Bad Faith Kein Zugriff
  5. 5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 1. a) Relevance of Circumstances in the Discussion of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Importance of the Nature of the Circumstances for Tribunals’ Consideration Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Abstract Affirmation to Consider Host States’ Circumstances and Balance Diverging Interests Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Relevance of the Investors’ Behaviour Kein Zugriff
Part 3. Full Protection and Security Standard Kein Zugriff Seiten 164 - 164
1. 1. 1. a) Contractual Protection and Security Clause Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Customary Standard of Minimum Treatment of Aliens Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Interim Result Kein Zugriff
2. B. Ordinary Meaning Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 1. a) Conventional Full Protection and Security Clauses Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Modern Full Protection and Security Clauses Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Full Protection and Security Clauses with an Explicit Reference to Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Broader Context Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Extra-contractual Documents Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Interim Result Kein Zugriff
4. D. Object and Purpose Kein Zugriff
5. 1. 1. Substantive Content of the International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Aliens Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Relevance of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  3. 1. a) Clauses Equating Full Protection and Security and the International Minimum Standard Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Other Clauses Referencing International Law Kein Zugriff
    3. c) Unqualified Clauses Kein Zugriff
6. F. Results Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 1. a) Scope of Protection Kein Zugriff
    2. 1. i. Modified Objective Standard Kein Zugriff
      2. ii. Reasonableness Kein Zugriff
      3. iii. Reasonableness Under the Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Scope of Protection Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Consideration of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Interim Result Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. Judicial Protection Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Legal Stability Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 1. a) Importance of the Nature of the Circumstances for Tribunals’ Consideration Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Time of the Decisions Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Standard of Liability Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Relevance of Host State Circumstances Kein Zugriff
Part 4. Analysis of the Results Kein Zugriff Seiten 220 - 220
1. A. Results on the Normative Foundations Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1. Relevance of the Host States’ Circumstances Kein Zugriff
  2. 2. Relevance of the Investor’s Behaviour Kein Zugriff
  3. 3. Nature of the Host States’ Circumstances Considered Kein Zugriff
  4. 4. Time of the Decisions Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 1. Relationship Between the Fair and Equitable Treatment and Full Protection and Security Standards Kein Zugriff
  2. 1. a) Legal Treatment versus Physical Protection Kein Zugriff
    2. b) Negative versus Positive Obligation Kein Zugriff
    3. c) State Measures versus Third Parties’ Actions Kein Zugriff
    4. d) Applicability of the Due Diligence Standard Kein Zugriff
2. B. Consequences for the Consideration of the Circumstances Prevailing in the Host State Kein Zugriff
III. Theses in Summary Kein Zugriff Seiten 233 - 234
Bibliography Kein Zugriff Seiten 235 - 249

Literaturverzeichnis (262 Einträge)

Ago R, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ [1970] UN Doc A/CN.4/233 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Allen RE, Fowler HW and Fowler FG (eds), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English (8th edn, Clarendon Press 1990) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Alvarez GA and Park WW, ‘The New Face of Investment Arbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11’ (2003) 28 YJIL 365 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Amerasinghe CF, Diplomatic Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
American Society of Appraisers and others, ‘International Valuation Glossary - Business Valuation’ <https://www.appraisers.org/docs/default-source/5---standards/revised-bv-standards-february-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=d5b561b2_12> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (William David Ross tr, Enhanced Media 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Barrera EB, ‘The Case for Removing the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard from NAFTA’ [2017] CIGI Papers No. 128 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3012347> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Baumann J, ‘International Investment Law in the Context of State Fragility: Full Protection and Security and Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in Tobias Ackermann and Sebastian Wuschka (eds), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Koninklijke Brill NV 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Bedjaoui M, Towards A New International Economic Order (Holmes & Meier 1979) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Berg NM, Ward DV and Saunders Gregor K, ‘COVID-19 Measures: Leveraging Investment Agreements to Protect Foreign Investments’ (Ropes & Gray, 28 April 2020) <https://www.ropesgray.com/en/newsroom/alerts/2020/04/COVID-19-Measures-Leveraging-Investment-Agreements-to-Protect-Foreign-Investments> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Bernasconi-Osterwalder N, Brewin S and Maina N, ‘Protecting Against Investor–State Claims Amidst COVID-19: A Call to Action for Governments’ (International Institute for Sustainable Development, April 2020) <https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/investor-state-claims-covid-19.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Besson S and D’Aspremont J (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Bishop DR, Crawford J and Reisman WM, Foreign Investment Disputes: Cases, Materials and Commentary (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Bjorklund AK, ‘Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’ (2005) 45 Va J Int’l L 809 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Bodansky D and Crook JR, ‘Symposium: The ILC’s State Responsibility Articles: Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 AJIL 773 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Bohmer L, ‘Changes to Mexico’s Electricity Regulation in Light of Pandemic Prompt Threats of Investment Arbitration Claims’ (IAReporter, 18 May 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/changes-to-mexicos-electricity-regulation-in-light-of-pandemic-prompt-threats-of-investment-arbitration-claims/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Peru Round-up: A Pandemic-Related Notice of Dispute, Imminent Public Hearings, and an Update on 12 Other Arbitrations against the State’ (IAReporter, 9 June 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/peru-round-up-a-pandemic-related-notice-of-dispute-imminent-public-hearings-and-an-update-on-12-other-arbitrations-against-the-state/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Chile Round-up: Three Threats, and One Arbitration Drawing to an End’ (IAReporter, 20 November 2020) <https://www.iareporter.com/articles/chile-round-up-three-threats-and-one-arbitration-drawing-to-an-end/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Bonnitcha J, ‘Investment Treaties and Transition from Authoritarian Rule’ (2014) 15 J World Investment & Trade 965 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Borchard EM, The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad: Or, The Law of International Claims (The Banks law Law publishing Publishing Company 1915) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Borchardt E, ‘The “Minimum Standard” of the Treatment of Aliens’ (1940) 38 Mich L Rev 445 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Brown C, ‘The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a “General Principle of Law”: Some Preliminary Thoughts’ (2009) 6 TDM Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Brownlie I, State Responsibility (Clarendon Press 1983) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Buchan R, ‘Cyberspace, Non-State Actors and the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm’ (2016) 21 J Conflict & Sec L 429 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Burger L, ‘The Trouble with Salini (Criticism of and Alternatives to the Famous Test)’ (2013) 31 ASA Bulletin 521 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Burgstaller M and Risso G, ‘Due Diligence in International Investment Law’ (2021) 38 J Int'l Arb 697 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Burke-White WW and von Staden A, ‘Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2008) 48 Va J Int’l L 307 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Calvo C, Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique (5th edn, Rousseau 1896) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Campbell C, ‘House of Cards: The Relevance of Legitimate Expectations under Fair and Equitable Treatment Provisions in Investment Treaty Law’ (2013) 30 J Int’l Arb 361 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Cheng B, ‘Justice and Equity in International Law’ (1955) 8 CLP 185 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Cheng T-H, ‘Power, Authority and International Investment Law’ (2005) 20 Am U Int’l L Rev 465 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Chetail V, ‘Vattel and the American Dream: An Inquiry into the Reception of the Law of Nations in the United States’ in Peter Haggenmacher, Pierre-Marie Dupuy and Vincent Chetail (eds), The Roots of International Law: Liber Amicorum Peter Haggenmacher (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Chung O, ‘The Lopsided International Investment Law Regime and Its Effect on the Future of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2007) 47 Va J Int’l L 953 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Clayton R and Tomlinson H (eds), The Law of Human Rights, vol 1 (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Clover Alcolea L, ‘'The COVID-19 Crisis: Core Investment Law Issues Revisited' Revisited' (2021) 18 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Collins D, ‘Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets’ (2011) 12 J World Investment & Trade 225 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, ‘Call for ISDS Moratorium During COVID-19 Crisis and Response’ <https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/call-isds-moratorium-during-covid-19-crisis-and-response> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Cottier T, Equitable Principles of Maritime Boundary Delimitation (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Equity in International Law’ in Thomas Cottier, Shaheeza Lalani and Clarence Siziba (eds), Intergenerational Equity: Environmental and Cultural Concerns (Brill Nijhoff 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Crawford J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text, and Commentaries (Cambridge University Press 2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th edn, Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Cullen H, ‘The Role of History in Thomas Franck’s Fairness in International Law and Institutions’ (2002) 13 EJIL 927 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Davies A, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation, Fair and Equitable Treatment and Legitimate Expectations’ (2018) 15 Manchester J Int’l Economic Law 314 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
de Brabandere E, ‘Host States’ Due Diligence Obligations in International Investment Law’ (2015) 42 Syracuse J Int’l L & Com 319 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
de Vattel E, The Law of Nations; or, Principles of the Law of Nature: Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (Luke White 1787) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
de Visscher C, ‘La Responsabilité Des Etats: Cours Professé à l’Académie de Droit International de La Haye, Juillet 1923’ (1924) 2 Bibliotheca Visseriana Dissertationum Ius Internationale illustrantium 87 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Le Déni de Jusitice En Droit International’ (1936) 54 Recueil des cours de droit international de la Haye 370 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Demirkol B, Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Demuth A, ‘Income Approach and the Discounted Cash Flow Methodology’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/income-approach-and-the-discounted-cash-flow-methodology> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
‘Denunciation of ICSID Convention’ (ICSID News Releases, 16 May 2007) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/news-and-events/news-releases/denunciation-icsid-convention?CID=103> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Diehl A, The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Dietz T, Dotzauer M and Cohen ES, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis of Investor-State Arbitration and the New EU Investment Court System’ (2019) 26 Review of International Political Economy 749 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Dörr O, ‘Article 31’ in Oliver Dörr and Kirsten Schmalenbach (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: a commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Douglas Z, ‘Nothing If Not Critical for Investment Treaty Arbitration: Occidental, Eureko and Methanex’ (2006) 22 Arbitration International 27 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘International Responsibility for Domestic Adjudication: Denial of Justice Deconstructed’ (2014) 63 ICLQ 867 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Draguiev D, ‘Bad Faith Conduct of States in Violation of the “Fair and Equitable Treatment” Standard in International Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2014) 5 JIDS 273 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Duarte-Silva T, ‘Country Risk’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/country-risk> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Dumberry P, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide to NAFTA Case Law on Article 1105 (Kluwer Law International 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘The Protection of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’ (2014) 31 J Int’l Arb 47 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Dunn FS, Diplomatic Protection of Americans in Mexico (Columbia University Press 1933) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Dupuy F and Dupuy P-M, ‘What to Expect from Legitimate Expectations? A Critical Appraisal and Look into the Future of the “Legitimate Expectations” Doctrine in International Investment Law’ in Mohamed Abdel-Raouf and Philippe Leboulanger (eds), Festschrift Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri: From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Eberhardt P and Olivet C, Profiting from Injustice - How Law Firms, Arbitrators and Financiers Are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom (Corporate Europe Observatory and the Transnational Institute 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Eckes Jr. AE, Opening America’s Market: U.S. Foreign Trade Policy since 1776 (University of North Carolina Press 1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Economides CP, ‘Content of the Obligation: Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result’ in James Crawford and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Efthymiou D, ‘Climate Change, Human Rights and Distributive Justice’ (2009) 20 Finnish YB Int’l L 111 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Ehsassi A, ‘Cain and Abel: Congruence and Conflict in the Application of the Denial of Justice Principle’ in Stephan Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Falsafi A, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment of Foreign Investors’ Property: A Contingent Standard’ (2007) 30 Suffolk Transnat’l L Rev 317 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Fitzmaurice GG, ‘The Meaning of the Term “Denial of Justice”’ (1932) 13 BYIL 93 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Focarelli C, ‘Denial of Justice’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2009) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Foster GK, ‘Recovering Protection and Security: The Treaty Standard’s Obscure Origins, Forgotten Meaning, and Key Current Significance’ (2012) 45 Vand J Transnat’l L 1095 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Franck SD, ‘The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions’ (2005) 73 Fordham L.Rev. 1521 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict and Dispute Systems Design’ (2007) 92 Minn L Rev 161 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Franck TM, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Clarendon Press 1995) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Freeman AV, The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice (Longmans 1938) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Human Rights and the Rights of Aliens’ (1951) 45 ASIL Proceedings 120 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Responsibility of States for Unlawful Acts of Their Armed Forces’ (1955) 88 Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de la Haye 263 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
French D, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 281 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Gaillard E, ‘Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice’ in Christina Binder and Christoph Schreuer (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Gallus N, ‘The Influence of the Host State’s Level of Development on International Investment Treaty Standards of Protection’ (2005) 6 J World Investment & Trade 711 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Garcia CG, ‘All the Other Dirty Little Secrets: Investment Treaties, Latin America, and the Necessary Evil of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2004) 16 Fla J Int’l L 301 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Garcia Dominguez MD, ‘Calculating Damages in Investment Arbitration: Should Tribunals Take Country Risk into Account?’ (2017) 34 Ariz J Int’l & Comp. L 95 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Garcia FJ and others, ‘Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law’ (2015) 18 JIEL 861 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
García-Bolívar OE, ‘Economic Development at the Core of the International Investment Regime’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Garcia-Mora MR, ‘The Calvo Clause in Latin American Constitutions and International Law’ (1950) 33 Marquette Law Review 205 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Gardiner RK, Treaty Interpretation (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Garner JW, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries Suffered by Foreigners Within Their Territories on Account of Mob Violence, Riots and Insurrection’ (1927) 21 Am Soc’y Int’l L Proc 49 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Gazzini T, Interpretation of International Investment Treaties (Hart Publishing 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Goebel Jr. J, ‘International Responsibility of States for Injuries Sustained by Aliens on Account of Mob Violence Insurrections and Civil Wars’ (1914) 8 AJIL 802 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Gourgourinis A, ‘Delineating the Normativity of Equity in International Law’ (2009) 11 Int’l Comm L Rev 327 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Hall WE, International Law (Clarendon Press 1880) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Hamrock KJ, ‘The ELSI Case: Toward an International Definition of “Arbitrary” Conduct’ (1992) 27 Tex Int’l L J 837 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Haq I, ‘From Charity to Obligation: A Third World Perspective on Concessional Resource Transfers’ (1979) 14 Tex Int’l LJ 389 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Heiskanen V, ‘Arbitrary and Unreasonable Measures’ in August Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Henckels C, Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Hern R and others, ‘Market or Comparables Approach’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/market-or-comparables-approach> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Hernández GI, ‘The Interaction between Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict in the Interpretation of Full Protection and Security Clauses’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Hölken C, Systemische Integration von Investitionsschutzabkommen (Nomos 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Huaqun Z, ‘Balance, Sustainable Development, and Integration: Innovative Path for BIT Practice’ (2014) 17 JIEL 299 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Hueckel J, ‘Rebalancing Legitimacy and Sovereignty In International Investment Agreements’ (2012) 61 Emory LJ 601 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Hulme MH, ‘Preambles in Treaty Interpretation’ (2016) 164 UPaLRev 1281 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
International Law Association, ‘ILA New Delhi Declaration of Principles of International Law Relating to Sustainable Development’ (2002) 2 International Environmental Agreements 209 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
International Law Commission, ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties, with Commentaries, Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly’ (1966) II Yearbook of the International Law Commission 187 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’ (2001) II.2 Yearbook of the International Law Commission 26 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Second Report on Identification of Customary International Law’ (22 May 2014) UN Doc A/CN.4/672 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
International Monetary Fund, The IMF and Argentina, 1991-2001 (International Monetary Fund, Independent Evaluation Office 2004) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Janis MW, ‘The Ambiguity of Equity in International Law’ (1983) 9 Brook J Int’l L 7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Johnson Jr. OT and Gimblett J, ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’ in Karl P Sauvant (ed), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010-2011 (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Juillard P, ‘Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2007) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Junngam N, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in International Investment Law: What and Who Is Investment Fully [?] Protected and Secured From’ (2018) 7 Am U Bus L Rev 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kantor M, Valuation for Arbitration: Compensation Standards, Valuation Methods and Expert Evidence (Kluwer Law International 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Katsikis D, ‘“Necessity” due to COVID-19 as a Defence to International Investment Claims’ (2021) 36 ICSID Review 46 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kaufmann-Kohler G, ‘In Search of Transparency and Consistency: ICSID Reform Proposal’ (2005) 2 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse?: The 2006 Freshfields Lecture’ (2007) 23 Arbitration International 357 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kaufmann-Kohler G and Banifatemi Y, ‘Is Consistency a Myth?’, Precedent in International Arbitration (Huntington 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kaufmann-Kohler G and Potestà M, ‘Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism?’ <https://www.cids.ch/images/Documents/CIDS_First_Report_ISDS_2015.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts (Springer Open 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kennedy D, ‘The Disciplines of International Law and Policy’ (1999) 12 LJIL 9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kill T, ‘Don’t Cross the Streams: Past and Present Overstatement of Customary International Law in Connections with Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations’ (2008) 106 Mich L Rev 853 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kingsbury B and Schill SW, ‘Public Law Concepts to Balance Investors’ Rights with State Regulatory Actions in the Public Interest – the Concept of Proportionality’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kinnear M, ‘The Continuing Development of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Andrea K Bjorklund, Ian A Laird and Sergey Ripinsky (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues III: Remedies in International Investment Law Emerging Jurisprudence of International Investment Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kläger R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’ (2010) 11 J World Investment & Trade 435 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Klatt M and Meister M, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Koh HH, ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’ (1997) 106 YJIL 2599 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kolb R, The International Law of State Responsibility: An Introduction (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kopar R, Stability and Legitimate Expectations in International Energy Investments (Hart 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kriebaum U, ‘The Relevance of Economic and Political Conditions for Protection under Investment Treaties’ (2011) 10 Law & Prac. Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 383 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Are Investment Treaty Standards Flexible Enough to Meet the Needs of Developing Countries?’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Arbitrary/Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures’ in Marc Bungenberg and others (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Kymlicka W, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Landmann N, Legitimate Expectations and Fair-and-Equitable-Treatment under the Energy Charter Treaty (Nomos 2021) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Lapidoth R, ‘Equity in International Law’ (1987) 22 Isr L Rev 161 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Lee J, ‘The Coronavirus Pandemic and International Investment Arbitration - Application of “Security Exceptions” Clauses in Investment Agreements’ (2020) 13 Contemp Asia Arb J 185 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Legum B, ‘The International Minimum Standard of Treatment and Human Rights: A Pedigree in the Rule of Law’ (2016) 1 EILA Rev 274 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Lehane G, ‘Full Protection and Security for Investors in the African Extractives Industry’ (2019) 16 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Lesaffer R, ‘International Law and Its History: The Story of an Unrequited Love’ in Matthew CR Craven, Malgosia Fitzmaurice and Maria Vogiatzi (eds), Time, History and International Law (Nijhoff 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Lillich RB, The Human Rights of Aliens in Contemporary International Law (Manchester University Press 1984) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Lim KS, ‘Armed Conflicts and Customary International Law on Investment: Codification and Fragmentation of “Protection and Security”’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Linden ÅJ and others, Electricity Tariff Deficit Temporary or Permanent Problem in the EU? (European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Lorz RA, ‘Protection and Security (Including the NAFTA Approach)’ in Marc Bungenberg and others (eds), International Investment Law (Nomos 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
MacGregor G, Blower S and Mitchell D, ‘Overview of Damages and Accounting Basics’ in John A Trenor (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (4th edn, Law Business Research Ltd 2021) <https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-damages-in-international-arbitration/4th-edition/article/overview-of-damages-and-accounting-basics> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Malik M, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard Comes of Age: Yet Another Challenge for States in Investment Treaty Arbitration?’ [2011] IISD Best Practice Series Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Manciaux S, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in Investment Law: A Specific Obligation?’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Mann FA, ‘State Contracts and International Arbitration’ (1967) 42 BYIL 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Mann FA, ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1981) 52 BYIL 241 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Mantilla Blanco S, Justizielles Unrecht im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht: zur Verletzung völkerrechtlicher Standards des Investitionsschutzes durch nationale Gerichte (Nomos 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Marboe I, Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Matsui Y, ‘The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility’ in René Provost (ed), State Responsibility in International Law (Dartmouth Publishing Company 2002) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Mayer B, ‘Obligations of Conduct in the International Law on Climate Change: A Defence’ (2018) 27 Rev Eur Comp & Int’l Envtl L 130 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
McLachlan C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 ICLQ 279 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57 ICLQ 361 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
McLachlan C, Shore L and Weiniger M, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Miles K, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment, and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Miljenić O, ‘Full Protection and Security in International Investment Law’ (2019) 35 Pravni Vjesnik 35 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Monebhurrun N, ‘The (Mis)Use of Development in International Investment Law: Understanding the Jurist’s Limits to Work with Development Issues’ (2017) 10 LDR 451 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Diligentia Quam in Suis as a Technique for a Contextual Application of the Full Protection and Security Standard: Considering the Level of Development of Host States in International Investment Law’ (2020) 28 Afr J Intl & Comp L 596 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Moss GC, ‘Full Protection and Security’ in August Reinisch (ed), Standards of Investment Protection (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Mourre A, ‘Are Amici Curiae the Proper Response to the Public’s Concerns on Transparency in Investment Arbitration?’ (2006) 5 Law & Prac. Int’l Cts. & Tribunals 257 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Mouyal LW, International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate: A Human Rights Perspective (Routledge 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Moyano García JP, ‘Customary Law Defenses Against COVID-19 Investment Claims’ (2021) 18 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Muchlinski P, ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 527 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——Muchlinski PT, ‘The Rise and Fall of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Where Now?’ (2000) 34 Int’l L 1033 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Mujeeb Rahman E, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law: The Customary Status’ (2021) 105 JL Po’y & Globalization 111 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
NAFTA Free Trade Commission, ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’ (31 July 2001) <https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Newcombe AP and Paradell L, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
OECD, ‘Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property ('OECD Draft Convention’)’ (1968) 7 ILM 117 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Orellana Zabalza G, The Principle of Systemic Integration: Towards a Coherent International Legal Order (Lit Verlag 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Ostřanský J, ‘An Exercise in Equivocation: A Critique of Legitimate Expectations as a General Principle of Law under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Andrea Gattini, Attila Tanzi and Filippo Fontanelli (eds), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Paddeu F and Parlett K, ‘COVID-10 19 and Investment Treaty Claims’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 30 March 2020) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/03/30/covid-19-and-investment-treaty-claims/> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Paparinskis M, ‘Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary International Law: Preliminary Remarks’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Paradell L, ‘The BIT Experience of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ in Federico Ortino, Audley Sheppard and Hugo Warner (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues Volume II : Nationality and Investment Treaty Claims, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Treaty Law (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2007) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Paulsson J, Denial of Justice in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Pauwelyn J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Perera SM, ‘Equity-Based Decision-Making and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Lessons From the Argentine Investment Disputes – Part I’ (2012) 13 J World Investment & Trade 210 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Pisillo-Mazzeschi R, ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 35 German YB Int’l L 9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Porterfield MC, ‘An International Common Law of Investor Rights?’ (2006) 27 U Pa J Int’l L 97 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Potestà M, ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept’ (2013) 28 ICSID Review 88 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, ‘Setting the Record Straight: Debunking Ten Common Defenses of Controversial Investor-State Corporate Privileges’ (Public Citizen, 11 May 2015) <https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/ustr-isds-response.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Radicati di Brozolo LG and Ponzano F, ‘Representative Aspects of “Mass Claims” Proceedings in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Bernard Hanotiau and Eric A Schwartz (eds), Class and Group Actions in Arbitration (International Chamber of Commerce 2016) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Rainey B, Wicks E and Ovey C, Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Rawls J, A Theory of Justice (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1971) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Reinisch A and Schreuer C, International Protection of Investments: The Substantive Standards (Cambridge University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Ribco Borman Y, ‘COVID-19 & International Investment Protection’ (Shearman & Sterling, 14 April 2020) <https://www.shearman.com/perspectives/2020/04/covid-19-international-investment-protection> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Roberts A, ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104 AJIL 179 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Root E, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’ (1910) 4 ASIL Proceedings 16 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Rosentreter D, Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Principle of Systemic Integration in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Nomos 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Rubins N and Lauterburg B, ‘Independence, Impartiality and Duty of Disclosure in Investment Arbitration’ in Christina Knahr and others (eds), Investment and Commercial Arbitration - Similarities and Divergences (Eleven International Publishing 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Ryk-Lakhmann I, ‘Protection of Foreign Investments Against the Effects of Hostilities: A Framework for Assessing Compliance with Full Protection and Security’ in Katia Fach Gómez, Anastasios Gourgourinis and Catharine Titi (eds), International Investment Law and the Law of Armed Conflict (Springer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Salacuse JW, The Law of Investment Treaties (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Salacuse JW and Sullivan NP, ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’ (2005) 46 Harv Int’l LJ 67 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Sattorova M, The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? (Hart Publishing 2018) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Schernbeck A, Der Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in internationalen Investitionsschutzabkommen (Nomos 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Schill SW, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law, and Comparative Public Law’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach’ (2011) 52 Va J Int’l L 57 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Schill SW and Djanic V, ‘Wherefore Art Thou? Towards a Public Interest-Based Justification of International Investment Law’ (2018) 33 ICSID Review 29 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Schreuer C, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6 J World Investment & Trade 357 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): Interactions with Other Standards’ in Graham Coop and Clarisse C Ribeiro (eds), Investment Protection and the Energy Charter Treaty (JurisNet 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘The Protection of Investments in Armed Conflicts’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment Law within International Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Schreuer CH, ‘Protection against Arbitrary or Discriminatory Measures’ in Catherine A Rogers and Roger P Alford (eds), The Future of Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Schwarzenberger G, The Inductive Approach to International Law (Stevens & Sons 1965) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, Foreign Investments and International Law (Stevens & Sons 1969) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Shaw MN, International Law (8th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Shea DR, The Calvo Clause: A Problem of Inter-American and International Law and Diplomacy (University of Minnesota Press 1955) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Simma B and Kill T, ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Step Towards a Methodology’ in Christina Binder and Christoph Schreuer (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Simpson GJ, ‘Is International Law Fair?’ (1996) 17 Mich J Int’l L 615 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Sinclair IM, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, Manchester University Press 1984) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Sipiorski E, ‘Full Protection and Security from Physical Security to Environmental Security: Its Limitations and Future Possibilities’ in Tobias Ackermann and Sebastian Wuschka (eds), Investments in Conflict Zones: The Role of International Investment Law in Armed Conflicts, Disputed Territories, and ‘Frozen’ Conflicts (Brill Nijhoff 2020) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Snider TR, ‘The Relationship Between Fair and Equitable Treatment and the International Minimum Standard of Treatment: An Overview and a Link to Africa’ (2019) 16 TDM Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Snodgrass E, ‘Protecting Investors’ Legitimate Expectations - Recognizing and Delimiting a General Principle’ (2006) 21 ICSID Review 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Sohn LB, ‘Arbitration of International Disputes Ex Aequo et Bono’ in Pieter Sanders (ed), International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff 1967) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——Sohn LB, ‘The Role of Equity in the Jurisprudence in the International Court of Justice’ in Bernard Dutoit and Etienne Grisel (eds), Mélanges Georges Perrin: recueil de travaux offerts à M. Georges Perrin (Payot 1984) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Sornarajah M, The International Law on Foreign Investment (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Spears SA, ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’ (2010) 13 Journal of International Economic Law 1037 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Spears SA, ‘Making Way for the Public Interest in International Investment Agreements’ in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Stanivukovic M, ‘Legitimate Expectations: A Commentary of Micula v. Romania’ (2017) 14 TDM 1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Stern B, ‘The Future of International Investment Law: A Balance Between the Protection of Investors and the States’ Capacity to Regulate’ in José E Alvarez and others (eds), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Stevenson A and Waite M (eds), Concise Oxford English Dictionary (12th edn, Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Stone J, ‘Arbitrariness, the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard, and the International Law of Investment’ (2012) 25 LJIL 77 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Stone Sweet A and Mathews J, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 Colum J Transnat’l L 72 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Study Group of the International Law Commission, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’ (13 April 2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, ‘First Report’ (2014) 76 Int’l L Ass’n Rep Conf 947 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Tasioulas J, ‘International Law and the Limits of Fairness’ (2002) 13 EJIL 993 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Teitelbaum R, ‘A Look At The Public Interest In Investment Arbitration: Is It Unique? What Should We Do About It?’ (2010) 5 Publicist 54 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Titi AC, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Nomos 2014) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——Titi C, ‘Full Protection and Security, Arbitrary or Discriminatory Treatment and the Invisible EU Model BIT’ (2014) 15 J World Investment & Trade 534 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Trimble PR, ‘Globalization, International Institutions, and the Erosion of National Sovereignty and Democracy - Fairness in International Law and Institutions by Thomas M. Franck’ (1997) 95 Mich L Rev 1944 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Tudor I, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
UNCTAD (ed), Fair and Equitable Treatment (United Nations 1999) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
—— (ed), FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives (United Nations 2003) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, The Role of International Investment Agreements in Attracting Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries (United Nations 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
—— (ed), Fair and Equitable Treatment (United Nations 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
—— (ed), Investment and the Digital Economy (United Nations 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, World Investment Report 2021 - Investing in Sustainable Recovery (United Nations 2021) <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2021_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘International Investment Agreements: Reform Accelerator’ (2020) UNCTAD/DIAE/PCB/INF/2020/8 <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaepcbinf2020d8_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Interpretations of IIAs: What States Can Do’ UNCTAD IIA Issues Note No. 3, December 2011 <https://unctad.org/en/Docs/webdiaeia2011d10_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Roadmap’ UNCTAD IIA Issues Note No. 2, June 2013 <https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/webdiaepcb2013d4_en.pdf> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Van Harten G, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Vandevelde KJ, ‘A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment’ (2010) 43 NYU J Intl L & Pol 43 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, The First Bilateral Investment Treaties: U.S. Postwar Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation Treaties (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Vasciannie S, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (1999) 70 BYIL 99 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (2000) 70 BYIL 99 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
‘Venezuela Submits a Notice under Article 71 of the ICSID Convention’ (ICSID News Releases, 26 January 2012) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/news-and-events/news-releases/venezuela-submits-notice-under-article-71-icsid-convention> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Viñuales J and Spoorenberg F, ‘Conflicting Decisions in International Arbitration’ (2009) 8 Law Pract Int Courts Trib 91 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Wälde TW, ‘Energy Charter Treaty-Based Investment Arbitration: Controversial Issues’ (2004) 5 J World Investment & Trade 373 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, ‘Interpreting Investment Treaties: Experiences and Examples’ in Christina Binder and others (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Web Yackee J, ‘Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Evidence’ (2011) 51 Va J Int’l L 397 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Weeramantry JR, Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Weiler T, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination, and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Nijhoff 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
——, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination, and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Wells LT, ‘Backlash to Investment Arbitration: Three Causes’ in Michael Waibel (ed), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (Kluwer Law International 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
White C and Fan M, Risk and Foreign Direct Investment (Palgrave Macmillan 2006) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Zeitler HE, ‘Full Protection and Security’ in Stephan W Schill (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Ziegler KS, ‘Jay Treaty (1794)’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2013) <opil.ouplaw.com/home/EPIL> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Zielonka C, Der Ausgleich zwischen Investorenschutz- und Regulierungsinteressen in internationalen Investitionsschutzabkommen (Duncker & Humblot 2017) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796
Zrilič J, The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748932796