Cover of book: Waste prevention through product ecodesign regulation in Brazilian and EU environmental law
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Waste prevention through product ecodesign regulation in Brazilian and EU environmental law

Authors:
Publisher:
 2023

Summary

Waste prevention and product ecodesign are increasingly becoming central issues as the debate on circular economy gains considerable momentum on the political agenda. Based on a legal-economic analysis of environmental law, this book provides a comparative examination of Brazilian and EU waste and product-related environmental law to answer the question of what lessons Brazil can learn from the European Union to prevent waste through product ecodesign regulation, if any. Examples of both indirect regulation such as extended producer responsibility, and direct regulation such as the Ecodesign Directive are scrutinised, showing that there is room for improvement in both jurisdictions.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7837-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2247-6
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Umweltrechtliche Studien - Studies on Environmental Law
Volume
54
Language
English
Pages
316
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 26
    1. A. The economic-legal approach No access
    2. B. Environmental economics No access
    3. C. The legal parallel: managerial, single-point, pollution-oriented, production-related environmental law No access
    4. D. The insufficiency of the traditional approach No access
    5. E. Summary No access
    1. A. Sustainable development in context No access
    2. B. Sustainable development in environmental-economic theory No access
    3. C. Sustainable development in ecological-economic theory and the contribution of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen: ‘matter matters’ No access
    4. D. The ‘ecologisation’ of environmental law and its methodological corollaries No access
    5. E. Summary No access
    1. A. Integrated waste management No access
    2. B. The functions of waste law: a dichotomy No access
    3. C. Waste: a legal creation No access
    4. D. Waste prevention through product ecodesign No access
    5. E. Summary No access
    1. A. EPR as incentive-based environmental policy: origins and rationale No access
    2. B. Products covered by EPR No access
      1. I. Extended producer responsibility No access
        1. 1. Who is the producer? No access
        2. 2. Producer, product or shared responsibility? No access
          1. a) Physical responsibility in the EU No access
          2. b) Physical responsibility in Brazil No access
          3. c) Targets No access
          1. a) Financial responsibility in the EU No access
          2. b) Financial responsibility in Brazil No access
        3. 3. Informational responsibility No access
    4. D. Conjugating physical and financial responsibility No access
    5. E. Implementing EPR: individual versus collective responsibility No access
    6. F. Summary No access
      1. I. EU EPR legislation No access
      2. II. Brazilian EPR legislation No access
      3. III. Appraisal No access
      1. I. Descriptive overview of the Ecodesign Directive No access
        1. 1. Standard setting and regulatory unambitiousness: does the Ecodesign Directive provide impetus to eco-innovation? No access
            1. aa) Implementing measures No access
            2. bb) Self-regulatory measures No access
            1. aa) Implementing measures No access
            2. bb) Self-regulatory measures No access
          3. c) Appraisal No access
        3. 3. Methodological challenges No access
        4. 4. Regulatory context and legislative coordination: fine-tuning environmental legislation or simply shifting the burden? No access
        5. 5. Scope expansion No access
        6. 6. Room for national ecodesign requirements? No access
        7. 7. Concluding remarks on the Ecodesign Directive No access
      1. I. The EU No access
        1. 1. Environmental federalism and powers to legislate in Brazil No access
        2. 2. Plastic carrier bags No access
    4. D. Excursus: the case of mobile phone chargers in the EU No access
    5. E. Summary No access
  7. CONCLUSION (THESES) No access 285 - 292
  8. LIST OF REFERENCES No access 293 - 316

Bibliography (327)

  1. AFONSO DA SILVA, José Afonso da Silva, Curso de direito constitucional positivo, 38.ed., São Paulo, Malheiros, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  2. AFONSO DA SILVA, Luís Virgílio, “Federalismo e articulação de competências no Brasil”, in PETERS, B. GUY; Pierre, Jon (org.), Administração pública: coletânea, vol. 1, Brasília/São Paulo, ENAP/UNESP, 2010, 549-570. Open Google Scholar
  3. AMAZONAS, Maurício de Carvalho, Valor e meio ambiente: elementos para uma abordagem evolucionista, Tese de doutorado, Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  4. ANDERSON, David, Environmental economics and natural resource management, 3.ed., London, Routledge, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  5. ANKER, Helle Tegner, “Integrated resource management – lessons for Europe?”, European Environmental Law Review 11 (2002), 199-209. Open Google Scholar
  6. ANTUNES, Paulo de Bessa, Federalismo e competências ambientais no Brasil, 2.ed., São Paulo, Atlas, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  7. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, “Principe d’intégration: évolution vers une nouvelle étape législative”, in BORN, Charles-Hubert; JONGEN, François (coord.), D’urbanisme et d’environnement: liber amicorum de Francis Haumont, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2015, 401-412. Open Google Scholar
  8. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, “Desmaterialização: uma mudança de paradigma?”, Revista CEDOUA 29 (2012), 161-172. Open Google Scholar
  9. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, “Direito administrativo dos resíduos”, in OTERO, Paulo; GONÇALVES, Pedro, Tratado de direito administrativo especial, vol. I, Coimbra, Almedina, 2009, 1-147. Open Google Scholar
  10. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, O princípio do nível elevado de protecção e a renovação ecológica do direito do ambiente e dos resíduos, Coimbra, Almedina, 2006. Open Google Scholar
  11. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, O princípio do poluidor-pagador: pedra angular da política comunitária do ambiente, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 1997. Open Google Scholar
  12. ARDENTE, Fulvio; WOLF, Marc-Andree; MATHIEUX, Fabrice; PENNINGTON, David, Integration of resource efficiency and waste management criteria in the implementing measures under the Ecodesign Directive: review of resource efficiency and end-of-life requirements, European Union, Institute for Environment and Sustainability of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  13. ASAFU-ADJAYE, John, Environmental economics for non-economists: techniques and policies for sustainable development, 2. ed., New Jersey, World Scientific, 2005. Open Google Scholar
  14. AYRES, Robert U., “The second law, the fourth law, recycling and limits to growth”, Ecological economics 29 (1999), 473-483. Open Google Scholar
  15. AYRES, Robert U., “Comments on Georgescu-Roegen”, Ecological economics 22 (1997), 285-287. Open Google Scholar
  16. AYRES, Robert U., “Industrial metabolism: theory and policy”, in AYRES, Robert U.; SIMONIS, Udo E. (eds.), Industrial metabolism: restructuring for sustainable development, Tokyo, United Nations University Press, 1994, 3-20. Open Google Scholar
  17. AYRES, Robert U., KNEESE, Allen V., “Externalities: economics and thermodynamics”, in ARCHIBUGI, Franco; NIJKAMP, Peter (eds.), Economy and ecology: towards sustainable development, Dordrecht, Springer, 1989, 89-118. Open Google Scholar
  18. BALLU, Matthieu; TOULOUSE, Edouard, Energy savings in practice: potential and delivery of EU ecodesign measures, Cool products for a cool planet, 2010, available at <http://www.eeb.org/index.cfm/library/energy-savings-in-practice-potential-and-delivery-of-eu-ecodesign-measures/?LinkServID=9752FE1D-B396-3C0E-9B3380E32EC94147>, last accessed on 5 September 2016. Open Google Scholar
  19. BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Celso Antonio, Curso de direito administrativo, 30.ed., São Paulo, Malheiros, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  20. BAUMAN, Henrikke; TILLMAN, Anne-Marie, The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application, Lund, Studentlitteratur, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  21. BAUMGÄRTNER, Stefan, “Thermodynamics of waste generation”, in BISSON, Katy; PROOPS, John (eds.), Waste in ecological economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2002, 13-37. Open Google Scholar
  22. BEGON, Michael; TOWNSEND, Colin R.; HARPER, John L., Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems, 4.ed., Oxford, Blackwell, 2006. Open Google Scholar
  23. BEINHOCKER, Eric D., The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  24. BELL, Stuart; MCGILLIVRAY, Donald; PEDERSEN, Ole W., Environmental law, 8. ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  25. BERCOVICI, Gilberto, Dilemas do Estado federal brasileiro, Porto Alegre, Livraria do Advogado, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  26. BIRN, Helmut, “Rechtliche Instrumente zur Steuerung der Abfall- und Reststoffströme”, NVwZ 11 (1992), 419-425. Open Google Scholar
  27. BMU, Umweltgesetzbuch (UGB-KomE). Entwurf der unabhängigen Sachverständigenkommission zum Umweltgesetzbuch beim Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  28. BORTOLETO, Ana Paula, Waste prevention and policy behaviour – new approaches to reducing waste generation and its environmental impacts, Oxford, Routledge, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  29. BRANDT, Edmund; RÖCKEISEN, Susana, Konzeption für ein Stoffstromrecht, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2000. Open Google Scholar
  30. BRANDT, Edmund; KOTULLA, Michael; LEITZKE, Claus; RÖCKEISEN, Susana; SCHOENECK, Stefan; SCHULZ, Claudia Undine, Stoffstromrecht. Ausgangslage und Entwicklungslinien, Cottbus, Fakultät Umweltwissenschaften und Verfahrenstechnik der Brandenburgischer Technischen Universität Cottbus, 1996. Open Google Scholar
  31. BREEN, Barry, “Environmental law from resource to recovery”, in CAMPBELL-MOHN, Celia; BREEN, Barry; FUTRELL, J. William (eds.), Environmental Law: From resources to recovery, Saint Paul (Minnesota), West Publishing, 1993, 51-70. Open Google Scholar
  32. BRENNCKE, Martin, “Die Zulässigkeit des europarechtlichen Verbots der Glühlampe nach Art. 95 EG”, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 20 (2009), 247-250. Open Google Scholar
  33. BREUER, Rüdiger, “Umweltschutzrecht”, in SCHMIDT-AßMANN, Eberhard; SCHOCH, Friedrich (Hrsg.), Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, 14. ed., Berlin, de Gruyter, 2008, 591-774. Open Google Scholar
  34. BRINKTRINE, Ralf, “Altfahrzeug-Verordnung (AltfahrzeugV)”, in SCHMEHL, Arndt (Hrsg.), Gemeinschaftskommentar zum Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz (KrWG) sowie zur Verpackungsordnung (VerpackV), zur Altfahrzeugverordnung (AltfahrzeugV), zum Elektro- und Elektronikgesetz (ElektroG), zum Batteriegesetz (BattG), zur Bioabfallverordnung (BioAbfV), zur Abfallverzeichnisverordnung (AVV) und zur EU-Abfallverbringungsverordnung (VVA), Köln, Carl Heymanns, 2013, 932-940. Open Google Scholar
  35. BULLINGER, Martin, “Rechtsfragen des Verursacherprinzips beim Umweltschutz”, in BULLINGER, Martin; RINCKE, Günther; OBERHAUSER, Alois; SCHMIDT, Ralf-Bodo, Das Verursacherprinzip und seine Instrumente: Eine interdisziplinäre Untersuchung, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1974, 69-108. Open Google Scholar
  36. BUNDGAARD, Anja Marie; MOSGAARD, Mette Alberg; REMMEN, Arne, “From energy efficiency towards resource efficiency within the Ecodesign Directive”, Journal of Cleaner Production 144 (2017), 358-374. Open Google Scholar
  37. BUNDGAARD, Anja Marie; REMMEN, Arne; ZACHO, Kistrina Overgaard, Ecodesign Directive 2.0: from energy efficiency to resource efficiency, Copenhagen, Miljøstyrelsen, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  38. BURY, Duncan R. W., “Should Extended Producer Responsibility Programs Use Eco-Fee-Included Pricing?”, Canadian Tax Journal 58 (2010), 927-950. Open Google Scholar
  39. CAHILL, Rachel; GRIMES, Sue M.; WILSON, David C., “Extended producer responsibility for packaging wastes and WEEE – a comparison of implementation and the role of local authorities across Europe”, Waste management & Research 29 (2010), 455-479. Open Google Scholar
  40. CAVALCANTI, Clóvis, “Concepções da economia ecológica: suas relações com a economia dominante e a economia ambiental”, Estudos avançados 24 (2010), 53-67. Open Google Scholar
  41. CENTRE FOR STRATEGY & EVALUATION SERVICES, Evaluation of the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC) Final Report, 2012, available at <http://cses.co.uk/ecodesign_evaluation>, last accessed on 10 August 2016. Open Google Scholar
  42. CHALMERS, Damian, “Community policy on waste management – managing environmental decline gently”, in ETTY, Thijs; SOMSEN, Han (eds.), Yearbook of European Law 14 (1994), 257-312. Open Google Scholar
  43. CHANCEREL, Perrine; SCHILL, Wolf-Peter; ROTTER, Susanne, “Praktische Aspekte der individuellen Herstellerverantwortung für Elektro- und Elektronikaltgeräte”, in THOMÉ-KOZMIENSKY, Karl J.; VERSTEYL, Andrea; BECKMANN, Michael (Hrsg.), Produktverantwortung – Verpackungsabfälle, Elektro- und Elektronikaltgeräte, Altfahrzeuge, Neuruppin, TK, 2007, 267-283. Open Google Scholar
  44. CHEHEBE, José Ribamar Brasil, Análise de ciclo de vida de produtos: ferramenta gerencial da ISO 14000, Rio de Janeiro, Qualitymark, 1997. Open Google Scholar
  45. CHERTOW, Marian R., “Waste, industrial ecology, and sustainability”, Social Research 65 (1998), 31-53. Open Google Scholar
  46. CHEYNE, Ilona; “The definition of waste in EC law”, JEL 14 (2002), 61-73. Open Google Scholar
  47. CHEYNE, Ilona; PURDUE, Michael, “Fitting definition to purpose: the search for a satisfactory definition of waste”, JEL 7 (1995), 149-168. Open Google Scholar
  48. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “O conceito de consumidor no direito brasileiro dos resíduos”, in press. Open Google Scholar
  49. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “O conceito de fabricante na Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos”, Revista de Direito Ambiental 86 (2017), 239-258. Open Google Scholar
  50. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “Juridificação dos resíduos no Brasil”, in PHILIPPI JR., Arlindo; PASSOS DE FREITAS, Vladimir; SPÍNOLA, Ana Luiza Silva (eds.), Direito ambiental e sustentabilidade, Barueri, Manole, 2016, 155-205. Open Google Scholar
  51. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “Logística reversa: produção e consumo sustentáveis?”, BENJAMIN, Antônio Herman; LEITE, José Rubens Morato (org.), 20º Congresso Brasileiro de Direito Ambiental: ambiente, sociedade e consumo sustentável, São Paulo, Instituto O Direito por um Planeta Verde, 2015, 278-291, available at <http://www.planetaverde.org/arquivos/biblioteca/arquivo_20150602200928_5210.pdf>, last accessed on 10 May 2016. Open Google Scholar
  52. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “O conceito econômico-jurídico de desenvolvimento sustentável”, Cadernos O Direito 6 (2011), 337-360. Open Google Scholar
  53. CLIFT, Roland; FRANCE, Chris, “Extended producer responsibility in the EU: a visible march of folly”, JIE 10 (2006), 5-7. Open Google Scholar
  54. COASE, Ronald Harry, “The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1960), 1-44. Open Google Scholar
  55. COGLIANESE, Cary; NASH, Jennifer; OLMSTEAD, Todd, “Performance-based regulation: prospects and limitations in health, safety, and environmental protection”, Administrative Law Review 55 (2003), 705-730. Open Google Scholar
  56. COMPARATO, Fábio Konder, “A proteção do consumidor: importante capítulo do direito econômico”, Revista de Direito Mercantil, Industrial, Econômico e Financeiro 15/16 (1974), 89-105. Open Google Scholar
  57. CONRAD, Jon M., Resource economics, 2. ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  58. CRAIG, Paul; DE BÚRCA, Gráinne, EU Law: text, cases, and materials, 6. ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  59. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Industry attitudes towards ecodesign standards for improved resource efficiency”, Journal of Cleaner Production 123 (2016), 155-166. Open Google Scholar
  60. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “The application of ‘life cycle thinking’ in European environmental law: theory and practice”, JEEPL 12 (2015a), 97-127. Open Google Scholar
  61. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “The setting of progressive energy efficiency performances standards for products through the Ecodesign Directive”, Nordic Environmental Law Journal (2015b), 21-41. Open Google Scholar
  62. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Promoting energy and resource efficiency through the Ecodesign Directive”, Scandinavian Studies in Law 59 (2014), 147-179. Open Google Scholar
  63. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Product and life cycle issues in European environmental law: a review of recent developments”’, in ETTY, Thijs; SOMSEN, Han (eds.), Yearbook of European environmental law, vol. 7, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007b, 76-124. Open Google Scholar
  64. DALHAMMAR, Carl, An emerging product approach in environmental law: incorporating the life cycle perspective, Doctoral dissertation, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund, Lunds Universitet, 2007a. Open Google Scholar
  65. DALHAMMAR, Carl, MACHACEK, Erika; BUNDGAARD, Anja; OVERGAARD, Kristina; REMMEN, Arne, Addressing resource efficiency through the Ecodesign Directive: a review of opportunities and barriers, Copenhagen, Norden, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  66. DALY, Herman Edward, “Toward some operational principles of sustainable development”, Ecological Economics 2 (1990), 1-6. Open Google Scholar
  67. DE SADELEER, Nicolas, EU environmental law and the internal market, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  68. DE SADELEER, Nicolas, “EC waste law or how to juggle with legal concepts. Drawing the line between waste, residues, secondary materials, by-products, disposal and recovery operations”, in JEEPL 6 (2005), 458-477. Open Google Scholar
  69. DHONDT, Nele, Integration of environmental protection into other EC policies: legal theory and practice, Groningen, Europa Law, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  70. DIECKMANN, Martin; REESE, Moritz, “Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallrecht”, in KOCH, Hans-Joachim (Hrsg.), Umweltrecht, 4.ed., München, Franz Vahlen, 2014, 359-416. Open Google Scholar
  71. DIETRICH, Sascha; AKKERMAN, Floris, “EU-Ökodesign-Richtlinie. Implementierung – Umsetzung - Überwachung”, ZUR 24 (2013), 274-278. Open Google Scholar
  72. DI FABIO, Udo, “Integratives Umweltrecht – Bestand, Ziele, Möglichkeiten”, NVwZ 17 (1998), 329-337. Open Google Scholar
  73. D’OLIVEIRA, Rafael Lima Daudt, O princípio da integração ambiental e a simplificação do Estado, Coimbra, Instituto Jurídico da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, 2015, available at <http://www.ij.fd.uc.pt/publicacoes/estudos_serieM/pub_3/M_numero3.pdf>, last accessed on 10 April 2017. Open Google Scholar
  74. DREWS, Bill; WACKE, Gerhard; VOGEL, Klaus; MARTENS,Wolfgang,Gefahrenabwehr. Allgemeines Polizeirecht (Ordnungsrecht) des Bundes und der Länder, 9.ed., Köln, Carl Heymanns, 1986. Open Google Scholar
  75. DRIESEN, David M.; ADLER, Robert W.; ENGEL, Kirsten H., Environmental law: a conceptual and pragmatic approach, 3.ed., New York, Wolters Kluwer, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  76. DUBOIS, Maarten, “Extended producer responsibility with a tax on non-collected waste”, JIE 20 (2016), 6-7. Open Google Scholar
  77. EARP, Henrique N. Sá; ROMEIRO, Ademar R., “The entropy law and the impossibility of perpetual economic growth”, Open Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (2015), 641-650. Open Google Scholar
  78. EDBRING, Emma Gullstrand; LEHNER, Matthias; MONT, Oksana, “Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption”, Journal of Cleaner Production 123 (2016), 5-15. Open Google Scholar
  79. EHRENFELD, John R., “Industrial ecology: a framework for product and process design”, Journal of Cleaner Production 5 (1997), 87-95. Open Google Scholar
  80. ENGEL, Christoph, Abfallrecht und Abfallpolitik, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2002. Open Google Scholar
  81. EPINEY, Astrid, Umweltrecht der Europäischen Union, 3.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  82. EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE COORDINATION OF CONSUMER REPRESENTATION IN STANDARDISATION; EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL CITIZENS ORGANISATION FOR STANDARDISATION, ANEC-ECOS position paper on the revised packaging standards prepared under the second standardisation mandate M317, ANEC2005/ENV/001, Brussels, 2005, available at <http://www.anec.org/attachments/env001-05.pdf>, last accessed on 20 September 2016. Open Google Scholar
  83. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of product rules 2016, C (2016) 1958 final, 5 April 2016. Open Google Scholar
  84. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, A common mobile phone charger – questions and answers, MEMO/11/75, dated 8 February 2011, available at <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-75_en.htm>, last accessed 15 September 2016. Open Google Scholar
  85. FABER, Malte; MANSTETTEN, Reiner; PROOPS, John, Ecological economics: concepts and methods, Cheltenham/Northampton (Massachusetts), Edward Elgar, 1996. Open Google Scholar
  86. FABER, Malte; NIEMES, H.; STEPHAN, G., Entropy, environment and resources: an essay in physic-economics, 2. ed., Springer, Dordrecht, 1995. Open Google Scholar
  87. FALKE, Josef, “Konkretisierung von Anforderungen des integrierten Umweltschutzes an Anlagen und Produkte durch untergesetzliche Regelungen, insbesondere durch technische Normen”, BRAUNSCHWEIGISCHE WISSENSCHAFTLICHE GESELLSCHAFT, Jahrbuch 2000 der Braunschweigischen Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft, Braunschweig, Cramer, 2001, 199-242. Open Google Scholar
  88. FALKE, Josef, “Achievements and unresolved problems of European standardisation: the ingenuity of practice and the queries of lawyers”, in JOERGES, Christian; LADEUR, Karl-Heinz; VOS, Ellen (eds.), Integrating scientific expertise into regulatory decision-making: national traditions and European innovations, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1997, 187-224. Open Google Scholar
  89. FAURE, Michael, “The harmonization, codification and integration of environmental law: a search for definitions”, European Environmental Law Review 9 (2000), 174-182. Open Google Scholar
  90. FAURE, Michael, DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Principles for the design of a policy framework to address product life cycle impacts” in MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; DALHAMMAR, Carl; BUGGE, Hans Christian (ed.), Preventing environmental damage from products: an analysis of the policy and regulatory framework in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018, 57-86. Open Google Scholar
  91. FERRAZ JUNIOR, Tercio Sampaio, Introdução ao estudo do direito: técnica, decisão, dominação, 4.ed., São Paulo, Atlas, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  92. FERRAZ JUNIOR, “Normas gerais e competência concorrente: uma exegese do art. 24 da Constituição Federal”, Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo 90 (1995), 245-251. Open Google Scholar
  93. FLANDERKA, Fritz; KERI, Christian; QUODEN, Joachim; STROETMANN, Clemens, Verpackungsverordnung: Kommentar unter vollständiger Berücksichtigung der 6. und 7. Änderungsverordnung mit Darstellungen zur Entwicklung in Deutschland, Österreich und Europa, 4.ed., Heidelberg, Rehm, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  94. FLANDERKA, Fritz; STROETMANN, Clemens, “Von der Verpackungsverordnung zum Wertstofssgesetz”, AbfallR 11 (2012), 1-11. Open Google Scholar
  95. FRENZ, Walter, Europarecht, 2.ed., Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  96. FRENZ, Walter, “Grundlagen und Grenzen abfallrechtlicher Produktverantwortung”, in HENDLER, Reinhard; MARBURGER, Peter; REIFF, Peter; SCHRÖDER, Meinhard (Hrsg.), Abfallrecht in Bewegung: Zur Neuordnung des Rechts der Verpackungsentsorgung, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2008, 25-61. Open Google Scholar
  97. FRIEGE, Henning, “Auf dem Weg zum Stoffrecht. Überlegungen zur Reform des Umweltrechts auf der Grundlage des Konzepts zum Management von Stoffströmen”, ZUR 5 (1995), 241-248. Open Google Scholar
  98. FRIEGE, Henning, Engelhardt, Claudia; Henseling, Karl Otto (Hrsg.), Das Management von Stoffströmen: geteilte Verantwortung – Nutzen für alle, Berlin, Springer, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  99. FROSCH, Robert A., “Toward the end of waste: reflections on a new ecology of industry”, Daedalus 125 (1996), 199-212. Open Google Scholar
  100. FÜHR, Martin, “Stoffbezogenes Umweltrecht: Vom Gefahrstoffrecht zum produktorientierten Stoffstrommanagement”, in DOLDE, Klaus-Peter (Hrsg.), Umweltrecht im Wandel, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2001, 685-699. Open Google Scholar
  101. FÜHR, Martin, Stoffstromsteuerung durch Produktregulierung, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2000. Open Google Scholar
  102. GATTERMANN, Jana, Produktverantwortung nach dem Elektrogesetz und der Altfahrzeugverordnung: Wirkungen auf eine innovative Produktgestaltung, Kassel, Kassel University Press, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  103. GEBERS, Betty; FÜHR, Martin; WOLLNY, Volrad, Ökologische Stoffwirtschaft: Grundanforderungen an eine Stoffflußregulierung, Darmstadt, Öko-Institut, 1993. Open Google Scholar
  104. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Looking back”, in DRAGAN, J. C.; SEIFERT, E. K.; DEMETRESCU, M. C. (eds.), Entropy and bioeconomics: proceedings of the First International Conference of the EABS, Milano, Nargard, 1991a, 11-21. Open Google Scholar
  105. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Thermodynamics and we, the humans”, in DRAGAN, J. C.; SEIFERT, E. K.; DEMETRESCU, M. C. (eds.), Entropy and bioeconomics: proceedings of the First International Conference of the EABS, Milano, Nargard, 1991b, 184-201. Open Google Scholar
  106. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “The entropy law and the economic process in retrospect”, Eastern Economic Journal 12 (1986), 3-25. Open Google Scholar
  107. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Matter: a resource ignored by thermodynamics – renewable resource economics”, in ST.-PIERRE, L. E.; BROWN, G. R. (eds.), Future sources of organic raw materials – CHEMRAWN I, Oxford, Pergamon, 1980, 79-87. Open Google Scholar
  108. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “The steady state and ecologic salvation: a thermodynamic analysis”, BioScience 27 (1977), 266-270. Open Google Scholar
  109. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Energy and economic myths”, Southern Economic Journal 41 (1975), 347-381. Open Google Scholar
  110. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, The entropy law and the economic process, London/Cambridge (Massachusetts), Harvard University Press, 1971. Open Google Scholar
  111. GILLESPIE, Alexander, The illusion of progress: unsustainable development in international law and policy, Sterling, Earthscan, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  112. GODDARD, Haynes C., “The benefits and costs of alternative solid waste management policies”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 13 (1995), 183-213. Open Google Scholar
  113. GOPALAKRISHNAN, Chennat, “Classic papers in natural resource economics: an overview”, in GOPALAKRISHNAN, Chennat (ed.), Classic papers in natural resource economics, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000, 1-10. Open Google Scholar
  114. GÖTZ, Volkmar, Allgemeines Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 15.ed., München, C. H. Beck, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  115. GROSZ, Mirina, Sustainable waste trade under WTO law: chances and risks of the legal frameworks’ regulation of transboundary movements of wastes, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  116. HANSCHEL, Dirk, “Progress and the precautionary principle in administrative law - country report on Germany”, in RIEDEL, Eibe; WOLFRUM, Rüdiger (eds.), Recent trends in German and European constitutional law, Berlin, Springer, 2006, 179-209. Open Google Scholar
  117. HARDIN, Garrett, “The tragedy of the commons”, Science 162 (1968), 1243-1248. Open Google Scholar
  118. HARSCH, Bradley A., “Consumerism and environmental policy: moving past consumer culture”, Ecology Law Quarterly 26 (1999), 534-610. Open Google Scholar
  119. HARTWICK, John M.; OLEWILER, Nancy D., The economics of natural resource use, New York, Harper & Row, 1986. Open Google Scholar
  120. HERRMANN, Friederike; SANDEN, Joachim; SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SCHULZE, Falk, “Ressourcenschutzrecht – Ziele, Herausforderungen, Regelungsvorschläge”, ZUR 23 (2012), 523-531. Open Google Scholar
  121. HINCHLIFFE, Daniel; AKKERMAN, Floris, “Assessing the review process of EU Ecodesign regulations”, Journal of Cleaner Production 168 (2017), 1603-1613. Open Google Scholar
  122. HOTELLING, Harold, “The economics of exhaustible resources”, The Journal of Political Economy 39 (1931), 137-175. Open Google Scholar
  123. HUBER, Peter M., “Risk decisions in German constitutional and administrative law”, in WOODMAN, Gordon R.; KLIPPEL, Diethelm (eds.), Risk and the law, Abingdon, Routledge, 2009, 23-35. Open Google Scholar
  124. HUULGAARD, Rikke Dorothea; REMMEN, Arne, Eco-design requirements for televisions: how ambitious is the implementation of the Energy-using Product Directive?, Copenhagen, Miljøstyrelsen, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  125. JAFFE, Adam B.; NEWELL, Richard G.; STAVINS, Robert N., “Technological change and the environment”, in MÄLER, Karl-Göran; VINCENT, Jeffrey R. (eds.), Handbook of environmental economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2003, 461-516. Open Google Scholar
  126. JANS, Jan H.; VEDDER, Hans H. B., European environmental law: after Lisbon, 4.ed., Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  127. JEPSEN, Dirk; REINTJES, Norbert; FRIEDER, Rubik; STECKER, Rebecca; ENGEL, Florian; EISENHAUER, Patrik; SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SPENGLER, Laura, Grundkonzeption eines Top-Runner-Modells auf der EU-Ebene, UBA Texte 36/2011, Dessau-Roßlau, UBA, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  128. JOERGES, Christian; SCHEPEL, Harm; VOS, Ellen, The law’s problem with the involvement of non-governmental actors in Europe’s legislative processes: the case of standardisation under the ‘new approach’, EUI Working Paper LAW No. 99/9, available at <http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/154/law99_9.pdf>, last accessed on 17 August 2016. Open Google Scholar
  129. KALIMO, Harri; LIFSET, Reid; VAN ROSSEM, Chris; VAN WASSENHOVE, Luk; ATASU, Atalay, “What roles for which stakeholders under producer responsibility?”, RECIEL 24 (2015), 40-57. Open Google Scholar
  130. KALIMO, Harri; MAYERS, Kieren, “Greening the economy through design incentives: allocating extended producer responsibility”, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 21 (2012), 274-305. Open Google Scholar
  131. KEMNA, René; VAN ELBURG, Martjin; LI, William; VAN HOLSTEIJN, Rob; BRISAER, André, Methodology study eco-design of energy-using products (MEEUP). Methodology report, Delft/Brussels, 2005, available at <http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/methodology-for-ecodesign-of-energy-related-products-meerp-2011--pbNB0313617/downloads/NB-03-13-617-EN-C/NB0313617ENC_002.pdf?FileName=NB0313617ENC_002.pdf&SKU=NB0313617ENC_PDF&CatalogueNumber=NB-03-13-617-EN-C>, last accessed on 30 April 2017. Open Google Scholar
  132. KEMNA, René; AZAÏS, Nelly; VAN ELBURG, Martjin; VAN DER VOORT, Maaike; LI, William, Methodology for ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP 2011). Methodology report. Part 1: methods, Brussels/Delft, 2011, available at <http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/methodology-for-ecodesign-of-energy-related-products-meerp-2011--pbNB0313617/downloads/NB-03-13-617-EN-C/NB0313617ENC_002.pdf?FileName=NB0313617ENC_002.pdf&SKU=NB0313617ENC_PDF&CatalogueNumber=NB-03-13-617-EN-C>, last accessed on 30 April 2017. Open Google Scholar
  133. KLAYMAN, Elliot, “Standard setting under the Consumer Product Safety Amendments of 1981 – a shift in regulatory philosophy”, The George Washington Law Review 51 (1982), 96-112. Open Google Scholar
  134. KLOEPFER, Michael, “Zur Entwicklung des Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallrechts in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland”, AbfallR 11 (2012), 261-268. Open Google Scholar
  135. KLOEPFER, Michael, Produktverantwortung für Elektrogeräte: Rechtsprobleme der Entsorgung von Altprodukten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Entwurfs einer Elektroaltgeräte-Verordnung, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  136. KLOEPFER, Michael, “Abfallrecht im Bundestaat: Eine Einführung”, in KLOEPFER, Michael (Hrsg.), Abfallrecht und Föderalismus, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1999, 13-35. Open Google Scholar
  137. KLÖCK, Oliver, “Abfall ohne Ende? – Bericht über die 9. Kölner Abfalltage”, UPR 3 (2001), 100-102. Open Google Scholar
  138. KLÖPFFER, Walter; GRAHL, Birgit, Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  139. KOCH, Hans-Joachim; REESE, Moritz, Novellierung der EU-Abfallrahmenrichtlinie: Änderungsbedarf und Änderungsvorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung des europäischen Abfallrechts, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2006. Open Google Scholar
  140. KOCH, Hans-Joachim; “Revising the Waste Framework Directive. Basic deficiencies of European waste law and proposals for reform”, JEEPL 6 (2005), 441-457. Open Google Scholar
  141. KOCH, Hans-Joachim; “Abfallrechtliche Regulierung der Verwertung – Chancen und Grenzen”, DVBl. 115 (2000), 300-312. Open Google Scholar
  142. KÖNIG, Doris, “Gesetzgebung”, in SCHULZE, Reiner; ZULEEG, Manfred; KADELBACH, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht: Handbuch für die deutsche Rechtspraxis, 3.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2015, 83-144. Open Google Scholar
  143. KRÄMER, Ludwig, EU Environmental Law, 8.ed., London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  144. KRÄMER, Ludwig, Überlegungen zu Ressourceneffizienz und Recycling, Research Papers in Law 6/2003, Brugge, Collège d’Europe, 2003, available at <https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/researchpaper_6_2003_kramer.pdf>, last accessed on 29 April 2017. Open Google Scholar
  145. KRÄMER, Ludwig, “The distinction between product and waste in Community law”, in KLETT, Wolfgang; SCHMITT-GLESER, Gerhard; SCHNURER, Helmut (Hrsg.), Abfall ohne Ende? Oder: Ende der Abfalleigenschaft durch Umwandlung zu Rohstoff, Köln, Gutke, 2001, 253-276. Open Google Scholar
  146. KRÄMER, Ludwig, WINTER, Gerd, “Umweltrecht”, in SCHULZE, Reiner; ZULEEG, Manfred; KADELBACH, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht: Handbuch für die deutsche Rechtspraxis, 3.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2015, 1548-1639. Open Google Scholar
  147. KRELL, Andreas Joachim, “A necessária mudança de foco na implantação do federalismo cooperativo no Brasil: da definição de competências legislativas para o desenho de formas conjuntas de execução administrativa”, in DE SOUZA NETO, Cláudio Pereira; SARMENTO, Daniel; BINEBOIM, Gustavo (org.), Vinte anos da Constituição Federal de 1988, Rio de Janeiro, Lumen Juris, 2009, 635-660. Open Google Scholar
  148. KRIEGER, Stephan, “Wozu wird das Abfallrecht gebraucht?”, UPR 15 (1995), 408-412. Open Google Scholar
  149. KUNIG, Philip, “Do direito do lixo para o direito da correcta gestão dos ciclos dos materiais? Comentários acerca da legislação alemã sobre os resíduos e a sua evolução”, Revista Jurídica do Urbanismo e do Ambiente 1 (1994a), 95-108. Open Google Scholar
  150. KUNIG, Philip, “Von der Wegwerfgesellschaft zur Kreislaufwirtschaft: Überlegungen zum Stoffstromrecht, in BREUER, Rüdiger; KLOEPFER, Michael; MARBURGER, Peter; SCHRÖDER, Meinhard (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch des Umwelt- und Technikrechts, Heidelberg, R. v. Decker, 1994b, p. 277-295. Open Google Scholar
  151. LADEUR, Karl-Heinz, “Das Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallgesetz als Schritt auf dem Weg zu einem ‘ökologischen Stoffflußrecht’? Zu den Anforderungen an die Koordination öffentlichen und privaten Entscheidens unter Komplexitätsbedingungen”, ZfU 21 (1998), 279-315. Open Google Scholar
  152. LANGNER, Dirk; KLINDT, Thomas, “Technische Sicherheitsvorschriften und Normen”, in DAUSES, Manfred A. (Hrsg.), Handbuch des EU-Wirtschaftsrechts, Band 1, 40.ed., München, C.H. Beck, 2016, Rn. 1-160. Open Google Scholar
  153. LEA, Anne, “The scrapping of end of life vehicles: is new European legislation necessary?”, Environmental Law Review 65 (2000), 65-73. Open Google Scholar
  154. LEE, Maria, EU environmental law: challenges, changes and decision-making, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2005. Open Google Scholar
  155. LEE, Robert G.; STOKES, Elen, “Rehabilitating the definition of waste: is it fully recovered?”, in ETTY, Thijs F. M.; SOMSEN, Han (eds.), Yearbook of European Environmental Law, vol. 8, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 162-181. Open Google Scholar
  156. LEMOS, Patricia Faga Iglecias, Resíduos sólidos e responsabilidade civil pós-consumo, 2.ed., São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  157. LEVY, Daniel de Andrade, Responsabilidade civil: de um direito dos danos a um direito das condutas lesivas, São Paulo, Atlas, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  158. Lewandowski, Enrique Ricardo, “Considerações sobre o federalismo brasileiro”, Justiça & Cidaadania 157 (2013), 13-17. Open Google Scholar
  159. LIDGREN, Karl; SKOGH, Gorän, “Extended producer responsibility: recycling, liability, and guarantee funds”, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 21 (1996), 170-181. Open Google Scholar
  160. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Industrial ecology in the age of input-output analysis”, in Suh, Sangwon (ed.), Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology, Dordrecht et al., Springer, 2009, 3-21. Open Google Scholar
  161. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Take it back: extended producer responsibility as a form of incentive-based environmental policy”, Journal of Resource Management and Technology 21 (1993), 163-175. Open Google Scholar
  162. LIFSET, Reid J.; GRAEDEL, T. E., “Industrial ecology: goals and definitions”, in AYRES, Robert U.; AYRES, Leslie W. (eds.), A handbook of industrial ecology, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2002, 3-15. Open Google Scholar
  163. LIFSET, Reid J.; LINDHQVIST, Thomas, “Producer responsibility at a turning point?”, JIE 12 (2008), 144-147. Open Google Scholar
  164. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Can we take the concept of individual producer responsibility from theory to practice?”, JIE 7 (2003), 3-6. Open Google Scholar
  165. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Trust, but verify”, JIE 5 (2002), 9-11. Open Google Scholar
  166. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Getting the goal right: EPR and DfE”, JIE 2 (1998), 6-8. Open Google Scholar
  167. LIFSET, Reid J.; “What’s in a name: producer or product responsibility?”, JIE 1 (1997), 6-7. Open Google Scholar
  168. LIFSET, Reid J.; ATASU, Ataly; TOJO, Naoko, “Extended producer responsibility: national, international, and practical perspectives”, JIE 17 (2013), 162-166. Open Google Scholar
  169. LINDHQVIST, Thomas, Extended producer responsibility in cleaner production: policy principle to promote environmental improvements of product systems, Doctoral dissertation, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund, Lunds Universitet, 2000. Open Google Scholar
  170. LINDHQVIST, Thomas, LIDGREN, Karl, “Modeller för förlängt producentansvar”, in MILJÖDEPARTEMENTET, Från vaggan till graven – sex studier av varors miljöpåverkan, Stockholm, Allmäanna, 1991, 7-44. Open Google Scholar
  171. LOPES, José Reinaldo de Lima, Responsabilidade civil do fabricante e a defesa do consumidor, São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 1992. Open Google Scholar
  172. LUECK, Dean, “The rule of first possession and the design of the law”, Journal of Law and Economics 38 (1995), 393-436. Open Google Scholar
  173. MACROY, Richard; HAVERCROFT, Ian, “Environmental principles in the United Kingdom”, in MACROY, Richard; HAVERCROFT, Ian; PURDY, Ray (eds.), Principles of European environmental law, Groningen, 2004, 195-214. Open Google Scholar
  174. MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Regulating planned obsolescence: a review of legal approaches to increase product durability and reparability in Europe”, RECIEL 25:3 (2016), 378-394. Open Google Scholar
  175. MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; BUGGE, Hans Christian (ed.), Preventing environmental damage from products: an analysis of the policy and regulatory framework in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018a. Open Google Scholar
  176. MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; “Developing legislation to prevent environmental damage from products: a Herculean but necessary task”, in MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; DALHAMMAR, Carl; BUGGE, Hans Christian (ed.), Preventing environmental damage from products: an analysis of the policy and regulatory framework in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018b, 1-20. Open Google Scholar
  177. MALCOM, Rosalind, “Ecodesign laws and the environmental impact of our consumption of products”, JEL 23 (2011), 487-503. Open Google Scholar
  178. MALCOM, Rosalind, “Integrated product policy – a new regulatory paradigm for a consumer society?”, European Environmental Law Review 14 (2005), 134-144. Open Google Scholar
  179. MASING, Johannes, “Kritik des integrierten Umweltschutzes”, DVBl. 113 (1998), 549-559. Open Google Scholar
  180. MAXWELL, Dorothy; MCANDREW, Laure; SCHISCHKE, Karsten; STOBBE, Lutz; NISSEN, Nils F.; WHITE, Owen, “Non-energy related policy options to foster eco-design of electronics products”, Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, New York, IEEE, 2011, 281-285, available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6031846>, last accessed on 12 September 2016. Open Google Scholar
  181. MAYERS, Kieren; LIFSET, Reid; BODENHOEFER, Karl; VAN WASSENHOVE, Luk N., “Implementing individual producer responsibility for waste electrical and electronic equipment through improved financing”, JIE 17 (2012), 186-198. Open Google Scholar
  182. MAYERS, Kieren; PEAGAM, Richard; FRANCE, Chris; BASSON, Lauren; CLIFT, Roland, “Redesigning the camel: the European WEEE Directive”, JIE 15 (2011), 4-8. Open Google Scholar
  183. MAYUMI, Kozo, The origins of ecological economics: the bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen, London/New York, Routledge, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  184. MCDONOUGH, William; BRAUNGART, Michael, Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things, New York, North Point, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  185. MCDOUGALL, Forbes R.; WHITE, Peter R.; FRANKE, Marina; HINDLE, Peter, Integrated solid waste management: a life cycle inventory, 2.ed., Oxford, Blackwell Sciences, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  186. MCKERLIE, Kate; KNIGHT, Nancy; THORPE, Beverly, “Advancing extended producer responsibility in Canada”, Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (2006), 616-628. Open Google Scholar
  187. MEADOWS, Donella H.; MEADOWS, Dennis L.; RANDERS, Jørgen; BEHRENS III, William W., The limits to growth: a report for The Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind, Washington, D.C., Potomac, 1972. Open Google Scholar
  188. MERTENS, Kathleen, “The energy efficiency framework for energy-related products – is it really the story of a life cycle?”, in DELVAUX, Bram; HUNT, Michaël; TALUS, Kim (eds.), EU Energy law and policy issues, vol. 3, Brussels, Intersentia, 2011, 327-349. Open Google Scholar
  189. MEßERSCHMIDT, Klaus, Europäisches Umweltrecht, München, C. H. Beck, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  190. MISONNE, Delphine, “The Directive on ecodesign, the way forward regarding IPP?”, elni Review 1 (2005), 16-28. Open Google Scholar
  191. MITCHELL, Brian S., An introduction to materials engineering and science for chemical and materials engineers, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  192. MOLENBROEK, Edith; SMITH, Metthew; GROENENBER, Heleen; WAIDE, Paul; ATTALI, Sophie; FISCHER, Corinna; KRIVOŠIK, Juraj; FONSECA, Paula; SANTOS, Bruno; FONG, João, Evaluation of the Energy Labelling Directive and specific aspects of the Ecodesign Directive – final technical report, Utrecht, Ecofys, 2014, available at <http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/final_technical_report-evaluation_eld_ed_june_2014.pdf>, last accessed 25 April 2017. Open Google Scholar
  193. MONIER, Véronique; HESTIN, Mathieu; CAVÉ, Jérémie; LAUREYSENS, Ilse; WATKINS, Emma; REISINGER, Hubert; PORSCH, Lucas, Development of guidance on extended producer responsibility (EPR), Final report for the European Commission – DG Environment, 2014, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/target_review/Guidance%20on%20EPR%20-%20Final%20Report.pdf>, last accessed on 15 May 2016. Open Google Scholar
  194. MONIER, Véronique; HESTIN, Mathieu; SCHUSTER, Rita; VAN ACOLEYEN, Mike; LAUYRENSENS, Ilse, Awareness and exchange of best practices on the implementation and enforcement of the essential requirements for packaging and packaging waste, Final report for the European Commission – DG Environment, 2011, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/packaging/pdf/packaging_final_report.pdf>, last accessed on 15 August 2016. Open Google Scholar
  195. MONT, Oksana, “Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use”, Ecological Economics 50 (2004), 135-153. Open Google Scholar
  196. MOREIRA, Danielle de Andrade, Responsabilidade ambiental pós-consumo: da prevenção à reparação de danos, Tese de doutorado, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, 2008. Open Google Scholar
  197. MUDGAL, Shailendra; TINETTI, Benoît; TRIGO, Alvaro de Prado; FANINGER, Thibault; SCHISCHKE, Karsten; PROSKE, Marina; VON GEIBLER, Justus; TEUBLER, Jens, Material-efficiency ecodesign report and module to the methodology for the ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP). Part 1: material efficiency for ecodesign, n.p., BIO Intelligence, 2013a, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/105/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf>, last accessed on 2 May 2017. Open Google Scholar
  198. MUDGAL, Shailendra; Material-efficiency ecodesign report and module to the methodology for the ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP). Part 2: enhancing MEErP for ecodesign, n.p., BIO Intelligence, 2013b, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/106/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native>, last accessed on 2 May 2017. Open Google Scholar
  199. MUDGAL, Shailendra; Material-efficiency ecodesign report and module to the methodology for the ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP). Part 2: test reports TV and washing machine, n.p., BIO Intelligence, 2013c, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/107/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native>, last accessed on 2 May 2017. Open Google Scholar
  200. MUELLER, Charles C., Os economistas e as relações entre o sistema econômico e o meio ambiente, Brasília, Editora UnB/Finatec, 2007. Open Google Scholar
  201. NASH, Hazel Ann, “The revised Directive on waste: solving legislative tensions in waste management?”, JEL 21 (2009), 139-149. Open Google Scholar
  202. Neumayer, Eric, Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms, 4.ed., Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  203. NUSDEO, Ana Maria de Oliveira, “Desenvolvimento e ecologia revisitado. Evolução do debate e perspectivas atuais”, in NUSDEO, Fábio (ed.), O direito econômico na atualidade, São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 2014, 227-250. Open Google Scholar
  204. NUSDEO, Ana Maria de Oliveira, “O uso de instrumentos econômicos nas normas de proteção ambiental”, Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo 101 (2006), 357-378. Open Google Scholar
  205. NUSDEO, Fábio, Curso de economia: introdução ao direito econômico, 6.ed., São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  206. NUSDEO, Fábio, “Desenvolvimento econômico – um retrospecto e algumas perspectivas”, in SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto (coord.), Regulação e desenvolvimento, São Paulo, Malheiros, 2002. Open Google Scholar
  207. NUSDEO, Fábio, Desenvolvimento e ecologia, São Paulo, Saraiva, 1975. Open Google Scholar
  208. OBERHAUSER, Alois, “Abgrenzung des Verursacherprinzips und seine Einordnung in die Umweltpolitik”, in BULLINGER, Martin; RINCKE, Günther; OBERHAUSER, Alois; SCHMIDT, Ralf-Bodo, Das Verursacherprinzip und seine Instrumente: Eine interdisziplinäre Untersuchung, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1974, 27-49. Open Google Scholar
  209. OECD, Extended producer responsibility – updated guidance, ENV/EPOC/WPRPW(2015)16/FINAL, 12 April 2016, available at <http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/EPOC/WPRPW(2015)16/FINAL&docLanguage=En>, last accessed 15 May 2016. Open Google Scholar
  210. OECD, Strategic waste prevention: OECD reference manual, ENV/EPOC/PPC(2000)5/FINAL, 1 August 2000, available at <http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=env/epoc/ppc(2000)5/final>, last accessed on 10 April 2017. Open Google Scholar
  211. OEHLMANN, Claas, Vom Abfall als Problem zum Abfall als Ressource. Das europäische Abfallrecht als Baustein einer europäischen Kreislaufwirtschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2017. Open Google Scholar
  212. ON, Alexandru-Daniel, Prevention and the pillars of a dynamic theory of civil liability: a comparative study on preventive remedies, LL.M. Paper, Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Law Center, 2013, available at <http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=studpapers>, last accessed on 25 March 2016. Open Google Scholar
  213. ONIDA, Marco, “Products and the environment”, in MACROY, Richard (ed.), Reflections on 30 years of EU environmental law: a high level of protection?, Groningen, Europa Law, 2006, 233-269. Open Google Scholar
  214. ONIDA, Marco, “Environmental protection by product policy: focus on dangerous substances”, in ONIDA, Marco (ed.), Europe and the environment: legal essays in honour of Ludwig Krämer, Groningen, Europa Law, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  215. OOSTERHUIS, Frans; RUBIK, Frieder; SCHOLL, Gerd, Product policy in Europe: new environmental perspective, Dordrecht et al., Kluwer, 1996 Open Google Scholar
  216. ORMOND, Thomas, “Der Kreislauf des Abfallrechts”, historiae iuris (1998), available at <http://www.forhistiur.de/1998-10-ormond/>, last accessed 18 March 2017. Open Google Scholar
  217. OSTROM, Elinor, “Private and Common Property Rights”, in BOUCKAERT, Boudewijn; DE GEEST, Gerrit (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume II: Civil Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2000, 332-379. Open Google Scholar
  218. OSTROM, Elinor, OSTROM, Vincent, “Public goods and public choices”, in McGinnis, Michael D., Polycentricity and local public economies: readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 1999, 75-103. Open Google Scholar
  219. OSTROM, Elinor, SCHLAGER, Edella, “The formation of property rights”, in HANNA, Susan S.; FOLKE, Carl; MÄLER, Karl-Göran (eds.), Rights to nature: ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment, Washington, D.C., Island Press, 1996, 127-156. Open Google Scholar
  220. PACKARD, Vance, The waste makers, London, Longmans, 1960. Open Google Scholar
  221. PALMER, Karen; WALLS, Margaret, The product stewardship movement: understanding costs, effectiveness, and the role for policy, RFF Report, Washington, Resources for the Future, November 2002, available at <https://media.rff.org/archive/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-RPT-prodsteward.pdf>, last accessed on 28 December 2019. Open Google Scholar
  222. PEARCE, David W., “An intellectual history of environmental economics”, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27 (2002), 57-81. Open Google Scholar
  223. PEARCE, David W., TURNER, R. Kerry, “Packaging waste and the polluter pays principle: a taxation solution”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 35 (1992), 5-15. Open Google Scholar
  224. PEIRÓ, Laura Talens; POLVERINI, Davide; ARDENTE, Fulvio; MATHIEUX, Fabrice, “Advances towards circular economy policies in the EU: the new Ecodesign regulation of enterprise servers”, Resources, Conservation & Recycling, in press, available online on 28 September 2019 at <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104426>, last accessed on 29 December 2019. Open Google Scholar
  225. PELKMANS, Jacques, “The new approach to technical harmonization and standardization”, Journal of Common Market Studies 25 (1987), 249-269. Open Google Scholar
  226. PERMAN, Roger; MA, Yue; COMMON, Michael; MADDISON, David; McGilvray, James, Natural resource and environmental economics, 4. ed., Harlow (England), Pearson, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  227. PIGOU, Arthur Cecil, The economics of welfare, London, McMillan, 1920. Open Google Scholar
  228. PLEPYS, Andrius; HEISKANEN, Eva; MONT, Oksana, “European policy approaches to promote servicizing”, Journal of Cleaner Production 97 (2015), 117-123. Open Google Scholar
  229. PORTER, Richard, The economics of waste, Washington D. C., Resources for the Future (RFF), 2002. Open Google Scholar
  230. POWERS, Charles W.; CHERTOW, Marian R., “Industrial ecology: overcoming policy fragmentation”, in ESTY, Daniel C.; CHERTOW, Marian R. (eds.), Thinking ecologically: the next generation of environmental policy, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997, 19-36. Open Google Scholar
  231. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Verpackungsverordnung (VerpackV)“, in SCHMEHL, Arndt (Hrsg.), Gemeinschaftskommentar zum Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz (KrWG) sowie zur Verpackungsordnung (VerpackV), zur Altfahrzeugverordnung (AltfahrzeugV), zum Elektro- und Elektronikgesetz (ElektroG), zum Batteriegesetz (BattG), zur Bioabfallverordnung (BioAbfV), zur Abfallverzeichnisverordnung (AVV) und zur EU-Abfallverbringungsverordnung (VVA), Köln, Carl Heymanns, 2013, p. 869-931. Open Google Scholar
  232. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Bilanz und Perspektiven der Produktverantwortung”, in FAßBENDER, Kurt; KÖCK, Wolfgang (Hrsg.), Auf dem Weg in die Recyclinggesellschaft? – Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Kreislaufwirtschaftsrecht, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2011, 43-55. Open Google Scholar
  233. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Abfallrechtliche Produktverantwortung: Rechtliche Zielsetzungen und Auswirkungen in der Praxis am Beispiel der AltfahrzeugV und des ElektroG”, ZUR 21 (2010), 512-520. Open Google Scholar
  234. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Begriff und Bedeutung der (Vorbereitung zur) Wiederverwendung im Abfallrecht”, AbfallR 5 (2008), 220-225. Open Google Scholar
  235. REDCLIFT, Michael R., Wasted: counting the costs of global consumption, London, Earthscan, 1996. Open Google Scholar
  236. REESE, Moritz, “Grundprobleme des europäischen Abfallrechts und Lösungsbeiträge der neuen Abfallrahmenrichtlinie”, NVwZ 28 (2009a), 1073-1079. Open Google Scholar
  237. REESE, Moritz, “Konzeptionelle Herausforderungen und Lösungsbeiträge der novellierten EG-Abfallrahmenrichtlinie”, in Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht, Dokumentation zur 32. Wissenschaftlichen Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht e.V. Leipzig 2008, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2009b, 131-162. Open Google Scholar
  238. REESE, Moritz, Kreislaufwirtschaft im integrierten Umweltrecht: Eine Studie zu den begrifflichen, instrumentellen und funktionalen Grenzen des Abfallverwertungsrechts, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2000. Open Google Scholar
  239. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Sustainable resource management – new legal approaches needed?”, JEEPL 9 (2012a), 34-62. Open Google Scholar
  240. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Ziele, Grundsätze, Strategien und Instrumente”, in HANSMANN, Klaus; SELLNER, Dieter (Hrsg.), Grundzüge des Umweltrechts, 4.ed., Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2012b, 135-310. Open Google Scholar
  241. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Konzeption eines in sich geschlossenen Stoffrechts”, in KLETT, Wolfgang; SCHMITT-GLESER, Gerhard; SCHNURER, Helmut (Hrsg.), Vom Investitionserleichterungs- und Wohnbaulandgesetz zum Umweltgesetzbuch, Köln, Gutke, 1995a, 391-413. Open Google Scholar
  242. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Konzeption eines in sich geschlossenen Stoffrechts”, in ENQUETE-KOMMISSION “SCHUTZ DES MENSCHEN UND DER UMWELT DES DEUTSCHEN BUNDESTAGES” (Hrsg.), Studienprogramm Umweltverträgliches Stoffstrommanagement, Band 2 (Instrumente), Bonn, Economica Verlag, 1995b. Open Google Scholar
  243. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Abfall in der Ordnung von Mensch und Umwelt”, in HOSEMANN, Gerhard (Hrsg.), Abfall: Schicksal oder Herausforderung, Erlangen, Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg, 1994, 15-26. Open Google Scholar
  244. REHBINDER, Eckard, Politische und rechtliche Probleme des Verursacherprinzips, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1973. Open Google Scholar
  245. REHBINDER, Eckard, SCHMIHING, Christoph, Ökobilanzen als Instrument des Umweltrechts, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  246. REIMER, Franz (Hrsg.), Ressourceneffizienz – Leitbild für das Umweltrecht?, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  247. REIMER, Franz (Hrsg.), TÖLLE, Susanne, “Ressourcenbegriff als Problembegriff”, ZUR 24 (2013), 589-598. Open Google Scholar
  248. RISK & POLICY ANALYSTS, Study on the impact of the MoU on harmonisation of chargers for mobile telephones and to assess possible future options, dated 22 August 2014, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/7432/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf>, last accessed on 15 September 2016. Open Google Scholar
  249. REVESZ, Richard L., “Federalism and environmental regulation: an overview”, in REVESZ, Richard L.; SANDS, Philippe; STEWART, Richard B. (ed.), Environmental law, the economy, and sustainable development: the United States, the European Union and the international community, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, 37-79. Open Google Scholar
  250. ROBBERS, Gerhard, Einführung in das deutsche Recht, 6.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2017. Open Google Scholar
  251. RÖCKINGHAUSEN, Marc, Integrierter Umweltschutz im EG-Recht: Der Begriff des integrierten Umweltschutzes in der Rechtsordnung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  252. ROLLER, Gerhard; FÜHR, Martin, “Individual producer responsibility: a remaining challenge under the WEEE Directive”, RECIEL 17 (2008), 277-283. Open Google Scholar
  253. ROSE, Ian; KNIGHTON, George, “Integrated product policy: the new approach to environmental regulation”, European Environmental Law Review 8 (1999), 266-270. Open Google Scholar
  254. ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan, “Public law versus private law in environmental regulation: European Union proposals in the light of United States and German experience”, in EIDE, Erling; VAN DEN BERGH, Roger (eds.), Law and economics of the environment, Oslo, Juridisk Forlag, 1996, p. 13-39. Open Google Scholar
  255. ROSS, Alf, Directives and norms, New York, Humanities Press, 1968. Open Google Scholar
  256. ROTTER, Vera Susanne, “Waste management and producer responsibility: a score behind – a new ahead”, Waste Management & Research 29 (2011), 889-890. Open Google Scholar
  257. SCHALL, John, Does the solid waste management hierarchy make sense? A technical, economics and environmental justification for the priority of source reduction and recycling, Working paper #1, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 1992. Open Google Scholar
  258. SACHS, Noah, “Can we regulate our way to energy efficiency? Product standards and climate policy”, Vanderbilt Law Review 65 (2012), 1631-1678. Open Google Scholar
  259. SACHS, Noah, “Greening demand: energy consumption and U.S. climate policy”, Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 19 (2009), 295-319. Open Google Scholar
  260. SACHS, Noah, “Planning the funeral at the birth: extended producer responsibility in the European Union and the United States”, Harvard Environmental Law Review 30 (2006), 51-98. Open Google Scholar
  261. SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto, “Regulação, desenvolvimento e meio ambiente”, in SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto (org.), Regulação e desenvolvimento: novos temas, São Paulo, Malheiros, 2012, 15-59. Open Google Scholar
  262. SANDEN, Joachim; SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SCHULZE, Falk, Entwicklung eines Regelungskonzepts für ein Ressourcenschutzrecht des Bundes, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  263. SANDER, Knut; SCHILLING, Stephanie; TOJO, Naoko; VAN ROSSEM, Chris; VERNON, Jan; GEORGE, Carolyn, The producer responsibility principle of the WEEE Directive: final report, n.p., 2007. Open Google Scholar
  264. SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang; FENSTERSEIFER, Tiago, “A competência constitucional legislativa em matéria ambiental à luz do ‘federalismo cooperativo ecológico’ consagrado pelo ordenamento jurídico brasileiro”, Revista de Direito Ambiental 71 (2013), 55-116. Open Google Scholar
  265. SCHENKE, Wolf-Rüdiger, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 9.ed., Heidelberg, C. F. Müller, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  266. SCHENKEL, Werner, “Visionen einer integrierten Stoffflusspolitik”, in KLETT, Wolfgang; SCHMITT-GLESER, Gerhard; SCHNURER, Helmut (Hrsg.), Abfall ohne Ende? Oder: Ende der Abfalleigenschaft durch Umwandlung zu Rohstoff, Köln, Gutke, 2000, 391-413. Open Google Scholar
  267. SCHENKEL, Werner, Recht auf Abfall? Versuch über das Märchen vom süßen Brei, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1993. Open Google Scholar
  268. SCHENKEL, Werner, REICHE, Jochen, “Stoffpolitik und Umweltrecht – zur Diskussion über die 5. Novelle des Abfallgesetzes”, ZAU 6 (1993), 184-196. Open Google Scholar
  269. SCHEPEL, Harm, “The new approach to the new approach: the juridification of harmonized standards in EU law”, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 12 (2013), 521-533. Open Google Scholar
  270. SCHEPEL, Harm, The constitution of private governance – product standards in the regulation of integrating markets, Oxford, Hart, 2005. Open Google Scholar
  271. SCHLAGER, Edella; OSTROM, Elinor, “Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis”, Land Economics 68 (1992), 249-262. Open Google Scholar
  272. SCHLIESSNER, Ursula, “Integrated product policy: where is the EU heading?”, European Environmental Law Review 10 (2001), 86-88. Open Google Scholar
  273. SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SPENGLER, Laura, “Die Erweiterung der Ökodesign-Richtlinie – auf dem Weg zur ‘Super-Umweltrichtlinie’?”, EurUP 2 (2010), 54-61. Open Google Scholar
  274. SCHRÖDER, Meinhard, “Europarecht und integriertes Umweltrecht”, NuR 22 (2000), 481-486. Open Google Scholar
  275. SCHULZE, Falk, Kurzanalyse 22: Ressourceneffizienzvorgaben in der Ökodesign-RL, PolRess (Ressourcenpolitik) AP 2 – Wirkungsanalysen Politikansätze, 2015, available at <http://edocs.fu-berlin.de/docs/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDOCS_derivate_000000005875/KAx22xRessourceneffizienzvorgabenxxkodesign.pdf>, last accessed on 22 August 2016. Open Google Scholar
  276. SCOTFORD, Eloise, “Trash or treasure: policy tensions in EC waste regulation”, JEL 19 (2007), 367-388. Open Google Scholar
  277. SENDIM, José de Sousa Cunhal, Responsabilidade civil por danos ecológicos: da reparação do dano através da restauração natural, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  278. SIDERIUS, Hans-Paul, “The role of experience curves for setting MEPS for appliances”, Energy Policy 59 (2013), 762-772. Open Google Scholar
  279. SIDERIUS, Hans-Paul, The ecodesign and energy labelling process – challenges and solutions, 2012, available at <http://www.eup-network.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Produktgruppen/Lots/Working_Documents/2012_19-04_horizontal_assessment_120227pdf__EN_1.pdf>, last accessed on 5 August 2016. Open Google Scholar
  280. SIDERIUS, Hans-Paul, NAKAGAMI, Hidetoshi, “A MEPS is a MEPS is a MEPS: comparing Ecodesign and Top Runner schemes for setting product efficiency standards”, Energy Efficiency 6 (2013), 1-19. Open Google Scholar
  281. SMEDDINCK, Ulrich, “Von Trümmern zu Ressourcen – das Abfallrecht in Deutschland von der Nachkriegszeit bis heute”, in SMEDDINCK, Ulrich; KLUG, Ann Christin (Hrsg.), Vom Abfallrecht zur Kreislaufwirtschaft. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung des Abfallrechts und zu Abfallvermeidungsprogrammen nach § 33 KrWG, Halle an der Saale, Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg, 2016, 9-32. Open Google Scholar
  282. SMEDDINCK, Ulrich, “Die Entwicklung des Ressourcenschutzrechts – Schlaglichter: Von den Ursprüngen zur globalen Governance”, Verwaltungsarchiv 103 (2012), 183-2016. Open Google Scholar
  283. SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY (SETAC), Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a “code of practice”, Pensacola (Florida), SETAC, 1993. Open Google Scholar
  284. SOLER, Fabricio Dorado; SILVA FILHO, Carlos Roberto, Gestão de resíduos sólidos: o que diz a lei, 2.ed., São Paulo, Trevisan, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  285. SPARWASSER, Reinhard; ENGEL, Rüdiger; VOßKUHLE, Andreas, Umweltrecht: Grundzüge des öffentlichen Umweltschutzrechts, 5. ed., Heidelberg, C.F. Müller, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  286. STREINZ, Rudolf, Europarecht, 10. ed., Heidelberg, C. F. Müller, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  287. SUNDFELD, Carlos Ari, Direito administrativo ordenador, São Paulo, Malheiros, 1993. Open Google Scholar
  288. SVENSSON, Sahra; RICHTER, Jessika Luth; MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; PIHLAJARINNE, Taina; MAIGRET, Aline; DALHAMMAR, Carl, “The emerging ‘right to repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S”, Pre-print of the paper presented at Going Green CARE INNOVATION 2018, Vienna, 2018, available at https://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf>, last accessed on 27 December 2019. Open Google Scholar
  289. TAJANI, Antonio, “Common charger for small electronic devices”, Enterprise & Industry Magazine 16 (2013), 3. Open Google Scholar
  290. TAVARES, André Ramos, “Aporias acerca do ‘condomínio legislativo’ no Brasil: uma análise a partir do STF”, in TAVARES, André Ramos; LEITE, George Salomão; SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang (org.), Estado constitucional e organização do poder, São Paulo, Saraiva, 2010, p. 161-191. Open Google Scholar
  291. TCHOBANOGLOUS, George; KREITH, Frank, Handbook of solid waste management, 2.ed., New York et al, McGraw-Hill, 2002. Open Google Scholar
  292. THOLEN, Lena, “Die Ressourcenfrage innerhalb der Ökodesign-Richtlinie. Aspekte einer neuen Schwerpunktsetztung im Zuge der Weiterentwicklung der Richtlinie auf nicht-energiebetriebene Produkte”, ZfU 4 (2011), 469-495. Open Google Scholar
  293. THOMPSON, Michael, “Waste and fairness”, Social Research 65 (1998), 55-73. Open Google Scholar
  294. THOMPSON, Michael, Rubbish theory: the creation and destruction of value, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979. Open Google Scholar
  295. THOMSEN, Silke, Produktverantwortung: Rechtliche Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Kreislaufwirtschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  296. TIETENBERG, Tom; LEWIS, Lynne, Environmental and resource economics, 10.ed., Harlow (England), Pearson, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  297. TOJO, Naoko, EPR programmes: individual versus collective responsibility. Exploring various forms of implementation and their implication to design change, IIIE Reports 2003:8, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  298. TOJO, Naoko, LINDHQVIST, Thomas, Product-oriented environmental interventions. Building policy instruments, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  299. TOJO, Naoko, Thomas; DAVIS, Gary A., “EPR programme implementation: institutional and structural factors”, in ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Seminar on extended producer responsibility, EPR: programme implementation and assessment, 13-14 December 2001. Open Google Scholar
  300. TÖLLE, Susanne, Der Rechtsrahmen für den Erlass von Ökodesign-Anforderungen, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  301. TOPOREK, Marta, Legal briefing: The potential for EU Member States to adopt national measures stricter than those established in the EU legislation based on Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex. Article 95 of the EC Treat) – study of the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Directives, n.p., ClientEarth, 2010, available at <http://www.clientearth.org/reports/climate-energy-art-114-1-tfeu-ecodesign-and-energy-labelling-directives-briefing.pdf>, last accessed on 25 October 2016. Open Google Scholar
  302. TROMANS, Stephen, “EC waste law – a complete mess?”, JEL 13 (2001), 133-156. Open Google Scholar
  303. TUFET-OPI, Enrique, “Life after end of life: the replacement of end of life product legislation by a European integrated product policy in the EC”, JEL 14 (2002), 33-60. Open Google Scholar
  304. TUKKER, Arnold; HUPPES, Gjalt; GUINÉE, Reinout Heijungs; DE KONING, Arjan; VAN OERS, Lauran; SUH, Sangwon; GEERKEN, Theo; VAN HOLDERBEKE, Mirja; JANSEN, Bart; NIELSEN, Per, Environmental impacts of products (EIPRO): analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25, European Communities, European Commission/JRC, 2006, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf >, last accessed 25 April 2017. Open Google Scholar
  305. TURNER, R. Kerry; POWELL, Jane C., “Towards an integrated waste management strategy”, Environmental Management and Health 2 (1991), 6-12. Open Google Scholar
  306. UBA, Kolloquium zur Konzeption des Stoffflußrechts. Bedeutung – Sachstand – Perspektiven für eine rechtliche Steuerung von Stoffströmen, UBA Texte 18/95, Berlin, UBA, 1995. Open Google Scholar
  307. VALSECCHI, Carolina, Energy efficiency in the EU: an introduction, n.p., IEEP, n.d., available at <http://www.ieep.eu/minisite_assets/briefings-on-climate/pdfs/Energy%20Efficiency%20in%20the%20EU%20An%20Introduction.pdf>, last accessed on 25 October 2016. Open Google Scholar
  308. VAN CALSTER, Geert, EU waste law, 2.ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  309. VAN ROSSEM, Chris; DALHAMMAR, Carl; TOULOUSE, Edouard, Designing greener electronic products: building synergies between EU product policy instruments or simply passing the buck?, Report for the EEB, 2010, available at <http://www.eeb.org/?LinkServID=66030392-BF80-2CAC-B5335569F1526F90&showMeta=0>, last accessed on 12 August 2016. Open Google Scholar
  310. VAN ROSSEM, Chris; KOGG, Beatrice; MONT, Oksana, “Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?”, Ökologisches Wirtschaften 19 (2004), 11-13. Open Google Scholar
  311. VON LERSNER, Heinrich Freiherr, “Vor- und Nachteile föderalistischer Strukturen im Abfallrecht”, in KLOEPFER, Michael (Hrsg.), Abfallrecht und Föderalismus, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1999, 37-44. Open Google Scholar
  312. VON LERSNER, “Abfall als Wirtschaftsgut – Zur rechtlichen Problematik des Abfallbegriffs”, Natur und Recht 3 (1981), 1-5. Open Google Scholar
  313. VERSMANN, Andreas, “Artikel 4 – Abfallhierarchie”, in VON LERSNER, Heinrich; WENDENBURG, Helge (Hrsg.), Recht der Abfallbeseitigung des Bundes, der Länder und der Europäischen Union, Band 5, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2015, 1-15. Open Google Scholar
  314. VON BERTALANFFY, Ludwig, General system theory: foundations, development, applications, New York, George Braziller, 1968. Open Google Scholar
  315. WAGNER, Erika, “Integratives Umweltrecht auf nationaler und europäischer Ebene”, Recht der Umwelt (1999), 3-21. Open Google Scholar
  316. WALLS, Margaret, Deposit-refund systems in practice and theory, Discussion paper 11-47, Washington, Resources for the Future, 2011, available at <http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-DP-11-47.pdf>, last accessed on 10 May 2016. Open Google Scholar
  317. WALLS, Margaret, Extended producer responsibility and product design: economic theory and selected case studies, Discussion paper 06-08, Washington, Resources for the Future, 2006, available at <https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-06-08-REV.pdf>, last accessed on 29 July 2019. Open Google Scholar
  318. WALLS, Margaret, The role of economics in extended producer responsibility: making policy choices and setting policy goals, Discussion paper 03-11, Washington, Resources for the Future, 2003, available at <http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-DP-03-11.pdf>, last accessed on 10 March 2016. Open Google Scholar
  319. WEBERSINN, Michael, “Produktverantwortung – Eine ordnungspolitische Standbestimmung anlässlich der Umsetzung der EU-Abfallrahmenrichtlinie in deutsches Recht”, AbfallR 6 (2010), 266-275. Open Google Scholar
  320. WEGENER, Bernhard W., “Die Freiheit stirbt mit der Glühbirne (wieder ein Stück)”, ZUR 20 (2009), 169-170. Open Google Scholar
  321. WICKE, Lutz, Umweltökonomie, 4.ed., München, Vahlen, 1993. Open Google Scholar
  322. WILTS, Henning, Ausweitung der Produzentenverantwortung mit Fokus auf Rücknahmeverpflichtungen, 2013, available at <http://www.ressourcenpolitik.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/PolRess_ZB_AP2-Kurzanalyse-5_Produzentenverantwortung_final.pdf>, last accessed on 29 July 2019. Open Google Scholar
  323. WINTER, Gerd, “Ecological proportionality: an emerging principle of law for nature?”, in Voigt, Christina (ed.), Rule of law for nature: new dimensions and ideas in environmental law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, 111-129. Open Google Scholar
  324. WINTER, Gerd, JANS, Jan H.; MACROY, Richard; KRÄMER, Ludwig, “Weighing up the EC environmental liability directive”, JEL 20 (2008), p. 163-191. Open Google Scholar
  325. WINTER, Gerd, BLAZEK, John R., “Perspectives for environmental law – entering the fourth phase”, JEL 1 (1989), 38-47. Open Google Scholar
  326. ZAGO, Mariana Augusta dos Santos, Federalismo no Brasil e na Alemanha: estudo comparativo de competências legislativas e de execução, Tese de doutorado, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  327. ZUNDEL, Stefan; BUNKE, Dirk; SCHRAMM, Engelbert; STEINFELD, Michael, “Stoffstrommanagement: Zwischenbilanz einer Diskussion”, ZfU 21 (1998), 317-339. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Environmental Law & Energy Law & Nuclear Law", "Law General, Comprehensive Works and Collections"
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Die Bedeutung der Physiologie und Ethologie der Tiere als Grundlage für Tierschutz und Tierschutzrechtsverfahren
Book Titles Full access
Sibylle Wenzel
Die Bedeutung der Physiologie und Ethologie der Tiere als Grundlage für Tierschutz und Tierschutzrechtsverfahren
Cover of book: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Edited Book Full access
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover of book: Kostenübersichtstabellen
Book Titles No access
Manfred Schmeckenbecher, Karin Scheungrab
Kostenübersichtstabellen
Cover of book: Taschen-Definitionen
Educational Book No access
Nomos Verlag
Taschen-Definitionen

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex