Cover des Buchs: Waste prevention through product ecodesign regulation in Brazilian and EU environmental law
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Waste prevention through product ecodesign regulation in Brazilian and EU environmental law

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2023

Zusammenfassung

Im Zuge der wachsenden Bedeutung der Circular Economy im Rahmen der politischen Agenda bestimmen die Themen Abfallvermeidung und Produkt-Ökodesign zunehmend die umwelt- und abfallrechtlichen Debatten. Basierend auf einer rechtsökonomischen Analyse des Umweltrechts bietet dieses Buch eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung des Abfallrechts und des produktbezogenen Umweltrechts Brasiliens und der EU, um der Frage nachzugehen, ob und was Brasilien im Zusammenhang mit der Vermeidung von Abfällen durch Produkt-Ökodesign-Regulierung von der EU lernen kann. Beispiele sowohl für indirekte Steuerung wie die erweiterte Herstellerverantwortung als auch für direkte Steuerung wie die Ökodesign-Richtlinie werden eingehend untersucht, um in beiden Rechtssystemen Verbesserungspotenzial aufzuzeigen.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7837-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2247-6
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Umweltrechtliche Studien - Studies on Environmental Law
Band
54
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
316
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 26
    1. A. The economic-legal approach Kein Zugriff
    2. B. Environmental economics Kein Zugriff
    3. C. The legal parallel: managerial, single-point, pollution-oriented, production-related environmental law Kein Zugriff
    4. D. The insufficiency of the traditional approach Kein Zugriff
    5. E. Summary Kein Zugriff
    1. A. Sustainable development in context Kein Zugriff
    2. B. Sustainable development in environmental-economic theory Kein Zugriff
    3. C. Sustainable development in ecological-economic theory and the contribution of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen: ‘matter matters’ Kein Zugriff
    4. D. The ‘ecologisation’ of environmental law and its methodological corollaries Kein Zugriff
    5. E. Summary Kein Zugriff
    1. A. Integrated waste management Kein Zugriff
    2. B. The functions of waste law: a dichotomy Kein Zugriff
    3. C. Waste: a legal creation Kein Zugriff
    4. D. Waste prevention through product ecodesign Kein Zugriff
    5. E. Summary Kein Zugriff
    1. A. EPR as incentive-based environmental policy: origins and rationale Kein Zugriff
    2. B. Products covered by EPR Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Extended producer responsibility Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Who is the producer? Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Producer, product or shared responsibility? Kein Zugriff
          1. a) Physical responsibility in the EU Kein Zugriff
          2. b) Physical responsibility in Brazil Kein Zugriff
          3. c) Targets Kein Zugriff
          1. a) Financial responsibility in the EU Kein Zugriff
          2. b) Financial responsibility in Brazil Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Informational responsibility Kein Zugriff
    4. D. Conjugating physical and financial responsibility Kein Zugriff
    5. E. Implementing EPR: individual versus collective responsibility Kein Zugriff
    6. F. Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. I. EU EPR legislation Kein Zugriff
      2. II. Brazilian EPR legislation Kein Zugriff
      3. III. Appraisal Kein Zugriff
      1. I. Descriptive overview of the Ecodesign Directive Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Standard setting and regulatory unambitiousness: does the Ecodesign Directive provide impetus to eco-innovation? Kein Zugriff
            1. aa) Implementing measures Kein Zugriff
            2. bb) Self-regulatory measures Kein Zugriff
            1. aa) Implementing measures Kein Zugriff
            2. bb) Self-regulatory measures Kein Zugriff
          3. c) Appraisal Kein Zugriff
        3. 3. Methodological challenges Kein Zugriff
        4. 4. Regulatory context and legislative coordination: fine-tuning environmental legislation or simply shifting the burden? Kein Zugriff
        5. 5. Scope expansion Kein Zugriff
        6. 6. Room for national ecodesign requirements? Kein Zugriff
        7. 7. Concluding remarks on the Ecodesign Directive Kein Zugriff
      1. I. The EU Kein Zugriff
        1. 1. Environmental federalism and powers to legislate in Brazil Kein Zugriff
        2. 2. Plastic carrier bags Kein Zugriff
    4. D. Excursus: the case of mobile phone chargers in the EU Kein Zugriff
    5. E. Summary Kein Zugriff
  7. CONCLUSION (THESES) Kein Zugriff 285 - 292
  8. LIST OF REFERENCES Kein Zugriff 293 - 316

Literaturverzeichnis (327)

  1. AFONSO DA SILVA, José Afonso da Silva, Curso de direito constitucional positivo, 38.ed., São Paulo, Malheiros, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. AFONSO DA SILVA, Luís Virgílio, “Federalismo e articulação de competências no Brasil”, in PETERS, B. GUY; Pierre, Jon (org.), Administração pública: coletânea, vol. 1, Brasília/São Paulo, ENAP/UNESP, 2010, 549-570. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. AMAZONAS, Maurício de Carvalho, Valor e meio ambiente: elementos para uma abordagem evolucionista, Tese de doutorado, Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. ANDERSON, David, Environmental economics and natural resource management, 3.ed., London, Routledge, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. ANKER, Helle Tegner, “Integrated resource management – lessons for Europe?”, European Environmental Law Review 11 (2002), 199-209. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. ANTUNES, Paulo de Bessa, Federalismo e competências ambientais no Brasil, 2.ed., São Paulo, Atlas, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, “Principe d’intégration: évolution vers une nouvelle étape législative”, in BORN, Charles-Hubert; JONGEN, François (coord.), D’urbanisme et d’environnement: liber amicorum de Francis Haumont, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2015, 401-412. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, “Desmaterialização: uma mudança de paradigma?”, Revista CEDOUA 29 (2012), 161-172. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, “Direito administrativo dos resíduos”, in OTERO, Paulo; GONÇALVES, Pedro, Tratado de direito administrativo especial, vol. I, Coimbra, Almedina, 2009, 1-147. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, O princípio do nível elevado de protecção e a renovação ecológica do direito do ambiente e dos resíduos, Coimbra, Almedina, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. ARAGÃO, Maria Alexandra de Sousa, O princípio do poluidor-pagador: pedra angular da política comunitária do ambiente, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. ARDENTE, Fulvio; WOLF, Marc-Andree; MATHIEUX, Fabrice; PENNINGTON, David, Integration of resource efficiency and waste management criteria in the implementing measures under the Ecodesign Directive: review of resource efficiency and end-of-life requirements, European Union, Institute for Environment and Sustainability of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. ASAFU-ADJAYE, John, Environmental economics for non-economists: techniques and policies for sustainable development, 2. ed., New Jersey, World Scientific, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. AYRES, Robert U., “The second law, the fourth law, recycling and limits to growth”, Ecological economics 29 (1999), 473-483. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. AYRES, Robert U., “Comments on Georgescu-Roegen”, Ecological economics 22 (1997), 285-287. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. AYRES, Robert U., “Industrial metabolism: theory and policy”, in AYRES, Robert U.; SIMONIS, Udo E. (eds.), Industrial metabolism: restructuring for sustainable development, Tokyo, United Nations University Press, 1994, 3-20. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. AYRES, Robert U., KNEESE, Allen V., “Externalities: economics and thermodynamics”, in ARCHIBUGI, Franco; NIJKAMP, Peter (eds.), Economy and ecology: towards sustainable development, Dordrecht, Springer, 1989, 89-118. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. BALLU, Matthieu; TOULOUSE, Edouard, Energy savings in practice: potential and delivery of EU ecodesign measures, Cool products for a cool planet, 2010, available at <http://www.eeb.org/index.cfm/library/energy-savings-in-practice-potential-and-delivery-of-eu-ecodesign-measures/?LinkServID=9752FE1D-B396-3C0E-9B3380E32EC94147>, last accessed on 5 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Celso Antonio, Curso de direito administrativo, 30.ed., São Paulo, Malheiros, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. BAUMAN, Henrikke; TILLMAN, Anne-Marie, The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application, Lund, Studentlitteratur, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. BAUMGÄRTNER, Stefan, “Thermodynamics of waste generation”, in BISSON, Katy; PROOPS, John (eds.), Waste in ecological economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2002, 13-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. BEGON, Michael; TOWNSEND, Colin R.; HARPER, John L., Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems, 4.ed., Oxford, Blackwell, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. BEINHOCKER, Eric D., The origin of wealth: evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. BELL, Stuart; MCGILLIVRAY, Donald; PEDERSEN, Ole W., Environmental law, 8. ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. BERCOVICI, Gilberto, Dilemas do Estado federal brasileiro, Porto Alegre, Livraria do Advogado, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. BIRN, Helmut, “Rechtliche Instrumente zur Steuerung der Abfall- und Reststoffströme”, NVwZ 11 (1992), 419-425. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. BMU, Umweltgesetzbuch (UGB-KomE). Entwurf der unabhängigen Sachverständigenkommission zum Umweltgesetzbuch beim Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. BORTOLETO, Ana Paula, Waste prevention and policy behaviour – new approaches to reducing waste generation and its environmental impacts, Oxford, Routledge, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. BRANDT, Edmund; RÖCKEISEN, Susana, Konzeption für ein Stoffstromrecht, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. BRANDT, Edmund; KOTULLA, Michael; LEITZKE, Claus; RÖCKEISEN, Susana; SCHOENECK, Stefan; SCHULZ, Claudia Undine, Stoffstromrecht. Ausgangslage und Entwicklungslinien, Cottbus, Fakultät Umweltwissenschaften und Verfahrenstechnik der Brandenburgischer Technischen Universität Cottbus, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. BREEN, Barry, “Environmental law from resource to recovery”, in CAMPBELL-MOHN, Celia; BREEN, Barry; FUTRELL, J. William (eds.), Environmental Law: From resources to recovery, Saint Paul (Minnesota), West Publishing, 1993, 51-70. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. BRENNCKE, Martin, “Die Zulässigkeit des europarechtlichen Verbots der Glühlampe nach Art. 95 EG”, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 20 (2009), 247-250. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. BREUER, Rüdiger, “Umweltschutzrecht”, in SCHMIDT-AßMANN, Eberhard; SCHOCH, Friedrich (Hrsg.), Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, 14. ed., Berlin, de Gruyter, 2008, 591-774. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. BRINKTRINE, Ralf, “Altfahrzeug-Verordnung (AltfahrzeugV)”, in SCHMEHL, Arndt (Hrsg.), Gemeinschaftskommentar zum Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz (KrWG) sowie zur Verpackungsordnung (VerpackV), zur Altfahrzeugverordnung (AltfahrzeugV), zum Elektro- und Elektronikgesetz (ElektroG), zum Batteriegesetz (BattG), zur Bioabfallverordnung (BioAbfV), zur Abfallverzeichnisverordnung (AVV) und zur EU-Abfallverbringungsverordnung (VVA), Köln, Carl Heymanns, 2013, 932-940. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. BULLINGER, Martin, “Rechtsfragen des Verursacherprinzips beim Umweltschutz”, in BULLINGER, Martin; RINCKE, Günther; OBERHAUSER, Alois; SCHMIDT, Ralf-Bodo, Das Verursacherprinzip und seine Instrumente: Eine interdisziplinäre Untersuchung, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1974, 69-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. BUNDGAARD, Anja Marie; MOSGAARD, Mette Alberg; REMMEN, Arne, “From energy efficiency towards resource efficiency within the Ecodesign Directive”, Journal of Cleaner Production 144 (2017), 358-374. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. BUNDGAARD, Anja Marie; REMMEN, Arne; ZACHO, Kistrina Overgaard, Ecodesign Directive 2.0: from energy efficiency to resource efficiency, Copenhagen, Miljøstyrelsen, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. BURY, Duncan R. W., “Should Extended Producer Responsibility Programs Use Eco-Fee-Included Pricing?”, Canadian Tax Journal 58 (2010), 927-950. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. CAHILL, Rachel; GRIMES, Sue M.; WILSON, David C., “Extended producer responsibility for packaging wastes and WEEE – a comparison of implementation and the role of local authorities across Europe”, Waste management & Research 29 (2010), 455-479. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. CAVALCANTI, Clóvis, “Concepções da economia ecológica: suas relações com a economia dominante e a economia ambiental”, Estudos avançados 24 (2010), 53-67. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. CENTRE FOR STRATEGY & EVALUATION SERVICES, Evaluation of the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC) Final Report, 2012, available at <http://cses.co.uk/ecodesign_evaluation>, last accessed on 10 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. CHALMERS, Damian, “Community policy on waste management – managing environmental decline gently”, in ETTY, Thijs; SOMSEN, Han (eds.), Yearbook of European Law 14 (1994), 257-312. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. CHANCEREL, Perrine; SCHILL, Wolf-Peter; ROTTER, Susanne, “Praktische Aspekte der individuellen Herstellerverantwortung für Elektro- und Elektronikaltgeräte”, in THOMÉ-KOZMIENSKY, Karl J.; VERSTEYL, Andrea; BECKMANN, Michael (Hrsg.), Produktverantwortung – Verpackungsabfälle, Elektro- und Elektronikaltgeräte, Altfahrzeuge, Neuruppin, TK, 2007, 267-283. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. CHEHEBE, José Ribamar Brasil, Análise de ciclo de vida de produtos: ferramenta gerencial da ISO 14000, Rio de Janeiro, Qualitymark, 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. CHERTOW, Marian R., “Waste, industrial ecology, and sustainability”, Social Research 65 (1998), 31-53. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. CHEYNE, Ilona; “The definition of waste in EC law”, JEL 14 (2002), 61-73. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. CHEYNE, Ilona; PURDUE, Michael, “Fitting definition to purpose: the search for a satisfactory definition of waste”, JEL 7 (1995), 149-168. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “O conceito de consumidor no direito brasileiro dos resíduos”, in press. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “O conceito de fabricante na Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos”, Revista de Direito Ambiental 86 (2017), 239-258. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “Juridificação dos resíduos no Brasil”, in PHILIPPI JR., Arlindo; PASSOS DE FREITAS, Vladimir; SPÍNOLA, Ana Luiza Silva (eds.), Direito ambiental e sustentabilidade, Barueri, Manole, 2016, 155-205. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “Logística reversa: produção e consumo sustentáveis?”, BENJAMIN, Antônio Herman; LEITE, José Rubens Morato (org.), 20º Congresso Brasileiro de Direito Ambiental: ambiente, sociedade e consumo sustentável, São Paulo, Instituto O Direito por um Planeta Verde, 2015, 278-291, available at <http://www.planetaverde.org/arquivos/biblioteca/arquivo_20150602200928_5210.pdf>, last accessed on 10 May 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. CIPRIANO, Tasso Alexandre Richetti Pires, “O conceito econômico-jurídico de desenvolvimento sustentável”, Cadernos O Direito 6 (2011), 337-360. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. CLIFT, Roland; FRANCE, Chris, “Extended producer responsibility in the EU: a visible march of folly”, JIE 10 (2006), 5-7. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. COASE, Ronald Harry, “The problem of social cost”, Journal of Law and Economics 3 (1960), 1-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. COGLIANESE, Cary; NASH, Jennifer; OLMSTEAD, Todd, “Performance-based regulation: prospects and limitations in health, safety, and environmental protection”, Administrative Law Review 55 (2003), 705-730. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. COMPARATO, Fábio Konder, “A proteção do consumidor: importante capítulo do direito econômico”, Revista de Direito Mercantil, Industrial, Econômico e Financeiro 15/16 (1974), 89-105. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. CONRAD, Jon M., Resource economics, 2. ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. CRAIG, Paul; DE BÚRCA, Gráinne, EU Law: text, cases, and materials, 6. ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Industry attitudes towards ecodesign standards for improved resource efficiency”, Journal of Cleaner Production 123 (2016), 155-166. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “The application of ‘life cycle thinking’ in European environmental law: theory and practice”, JEEPL 12 (2015a), 97-127. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “The setting of progressive energy efficiency performances standards for products through the Ecodesign Directive”, Nordic Environmental Law Journal (2015b), 21-41. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Promoting energy and resource efficiency through the Ecodesign Directive”, Scandinavian Studies in Law 59 (2014), 147-179. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Product and life cycle issues in European environmental law: a review of recent developments”’, in ETTY, Thijs; SOMSEN, Han (eds.), Yearbook of European environmental law, vol. 7, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007b, 76-124. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. DALHAMMAR, Carl, An emerging product approach in environmental law: incorporating the life cycle perspective, Doctoral dissertation, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund, Lunds Universitet, 2007a. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. DALHAMMAR, Carl, MACHACEK, Erika; BUNDGAARD, Anja; OVERGAARD, Kristina; REMMEN, Arne, Addressing resource efficiency through the Ecodesign Directive: a review of opportunities and barriers, Copenhagen, Norden, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. DALY, Herman Edward, “Toward some operational principles of sustainable development”, Ecological Economics 2 (1990), 1-6. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. DE SADELEER, Nicolas, EU environmental law and the internal market, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. DE SADELEER, Nicolas, “EC waste law or how to juggle with legal concepts. Drawing the line between waste, residues, secondary materials, by-products, disposal and recovery operations”, in JEEPL 6 (2005), 458-477. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. DHONDT, Nele, Integration of environmental protection into other EC policies: legal theory and practice, Groningen, Europa Law, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. DIECKMANN, Martin; REESE, Moritz, “Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallrecht”, in KOCH, Hans-Joachim (Hrsg.), Umweltrecht, 4.ed., München, Franz Vahlen, 2014, 359-416. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. DIETRICH, Sascha; AKKERMAN, Floris, “EU-Ökodesign-Richtlinie. Implementierung – Umsetzung - Überwachung”, ZUR 24 (2013), 274-278. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. DI FABIO, Udo, “Integratives Umweltrecht – Bestand, Ziele, Möglichkeiten”, NVwZ 17 (1998), 329-337. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. D’OLIVEIRA, Rafael Lima Daudt, O princípio da integração ambiental e a simplificação do Estado, Coimbra, Instituto Jurídico da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, 2015, available at <http://www.ij.fd.uc.pt/publicacoes/estudos_serieM/pub_3/M_numero3.pdf>, last accessed on 10 April 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. DREWS, Bill; WACKE, Gerhard; VOGEL, Klaus; MARTENS,Wolfgang,Gefahrenabwehr. Allgemeines Polizeirecht (Ordnungsrecht) des Bundes und der Länder, 9.ed., Köln, Carl Heymanns, 1986. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. DRIESEN, David M.; ADLER, Robert W.; ENGEL, Kirsten H., Environmental law: a conceptual and pragmatic approach, 3.ed., New York, Wolters Kluwer, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. DUBOIS, Maarten, “Extended producer responsibility with a tax on non-collected waste”, JIE 20 (2016), 6-7. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. EARP, Henrique N. Sá; ROMEIRO, Ademar R., “The entropy law and the impossibility of perpetual economic growth”, Open Journal of Applied Sciences 5 (2015), 641-650. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. EDBRING, Emma Gullstrand; LEHNER, Matthias; MONT, Oksana, “Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption”, Journal of Cleaner Production 123 (2016), 5-15. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. EHRENFELD, John R., “Industrial ecology: a framework for product and process design”, Journal of Cleaner Production 5 (1997), 87-95. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. ENGEL, Christoph, Abfallrecht und Abfallpolitik, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. EPINEY, Astrid, Umweltrecht der Europäischen Union, 3.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE COORDINATION OF CONSUMER REPRESENTATION IN STANDARDISATION; EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL CITIZENS ORGANISATION FOR STANDARDISATION, ANEC-ECOS position paper on the revised packaging standards prepared under the second standardisation mandate M317, ANEC2005/ENV/001, Brussels, 2005, available at <http://www.anec.org/attachments/env001-05.pdf>, last accessed on 20 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of product rules 2016, C (2016) 1958 final, 5 April 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, A common mobile phone charger – questions and answers, MEMO/11/75, dated 8 February 2011, available at <http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-75_en.htm>, last accessed 15 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. FABER, Malte; MANSTETTEN, Reiner; PROOPS, John, Ecological economics: concepts and methods, Cheltenham/Northampton (Massachusetts), Edward Elgar, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. FABER, Malte; NIEMES, H.; STEPHAN, G., Entropy, environment and resources: an essay in physic-economics, 2. ed., Springer, Dordrecht, 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. FALKE, Josef, “Konkretisierung von Anforderungen des integrierten Umweltschutzes an Anlagen und Produkte durch untergesetzliche Regelungen, insbesondere durch technische Normen”, BRAUNSCHWEIGISCHE WISSENSCHAFTLICHE GESELLSCHAFT, Jahrbuch 2000 der Braunschweigischen Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft, Braunschweig, Cramer, 2001, 199-242. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. FALKE, Josef, “Achievements and unresolved problems of European standardisation: the ingenuity of practice and the queries of lawyers”, in JOERGES, Christian; LADEUR, Karl-Heinz; VOS, Ellen (eds.), Integrating scientific expertise into regulatory decision-making: national traditions and European innovations, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1997, 187-224. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. FAURE, Michael, “The harmonization, codification and integration of environmental law: a search for definitions”, European Environmental Law Review 9 (2000), 174-182. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. FAURE, Michael, DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Principles for the design of a policy framework to address product life cycle impacts” in MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; DALHAMMAR, Carl; BUGGE, Hans Christian (ed.), Preventing environmental damage from products: an analysis of the policy and regulatory framework in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018, 57-86. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. FERRAZ JUNIOR, Tercio Sampaio, Introdução ao estudo do direito: técnica, decisão, dominação, 4.ed., São Paulo, Atlas, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. FERRAZ JUNIOR, “Normas gerais e competência concorrente: uma exegese do art. 24 da Constituição Federal”, Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo 90 (1995), 245-251. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. FLANDERKA, Fritz; KERI, Christian; QUODEN, Joachim; STROETMANN, Clemens, Verpackungsverordnung: Kommentar unter vollständiger Berücksichtigung der 6. und 7. Änderungsverordnung mit Darstellungen zur Entwicklung in Deutschland, Österreich und Europa, 4.ed., Heidelberg, Rehm, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. FLANDERKA, Fritz; STROETMANN, Clemens, “Von der Verpackungsverordnung zum Wertstofssgesetz”, AbfallR 11 (2012), 1-11. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. FRENZ, Walter, Europarecht, 2.ed., Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. FRENZ, Walter, “Grundlagen und Grenzen abfallrechtlicher Produktverantwortung”, in HENDLER, Reinhard; MARBURGER, Peter; REIFF, Peter; SCHRÖDER, Meinhard (Hrsg.), Abfallrecht in Bewegung: Zur Neuordnung des Rechts der Verpackungsentsorgung, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2008, 25-61. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. FRIEGE, Henning, “Auf dem Weg zum Stoffrecht. Überlegungen zur Reform des Umweltrechts auf der Grundlage des Konzepts zum Management von Stoffströmen”, ZUR 5 (1995), 241-248. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. FRIEGE, Henning, Engelhardt, Claudia; Henseling, Karl Otto (Hrsg.), Das Management von Stoffströmen: geteilte Verantwortung – Nutzen für alle, Berlin, Springer, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. FROSCH, Robert A., “Toward the end of waste: reflections on a new ecology of industry”, Daedalus 125 (1996), 199-212. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. FÜHR, Martin, “Stoffbezogenes Umweltrecht: Vom Gefahrstoffrecht zum produktorientierten Stoffstrommanagement”, in DOLDE, Klaus-Peter (Hrsg.), Umweltrecht im Wandel, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2001, 685-699. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. FÜHR, Martin, Stoffstromsteuerung durch Produktregulierung, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. GATTERMANN, Jana, Produktverantwortung nach dem Elektrogesetz und der Altfahrzeugverordnung: Wirkungen auf eine innovative Produktgestaltung, Kassel, Kassel University Press, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. GEBERS, Betty; FÜHR, Martin; WOLLNY, Volrad, Ökologische Stoffwirtschaft: Grundanforderungen an eine Stoffflußregulierung, Darmstadt, Öko-Institut, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Looking back”, in DRAGAN, J. C.; SEIFERT, E. K.; DEMETRESCU, M. C. (eds.), Entropy and bioeconomics: proceedings of the First International Conference of the EABS, Milano, Nargard, 1991a, 11-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Thermodynamics and we, the humans”, in DRAGAN, J. C.; SEIFERT, E. K.; DEMETRESCU, M. C. (eds.), Entropy and bioeconomics: proceedings of the First International Conference of the EABS, Milano, Nargard, 1991b, 184-201. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “The entropy law and the economic process in retrospect”, Eastern Economic Journal 12 (1986), 3-25. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Matter: a resource ignored by thermodynamics – renewable resource economics”, in ST.-PIERRE, L. E.; BROWN, G. R. (eds.), Future sources of organic raw materials – CHEMRAWN I, Oxford, Pergamon, 1980, 79-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “The steady state and ecologic salvation: a thermodynamic analysis”, BioScience 27 (1977), 266-270. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, “Energy and economic myths”, Southern Economic Journal 41 (1975), 347-381. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, Nicholas, The entropy law and the economic process, London/Cambridge (Massachusetts), Harvard University Press, 1971. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. GILLESPIE, Alexander, The illusion of progress: unsustainable development in international law and policy, Sterling, Earthscan, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. GODDARD, Haynes C., “The benefits and costs of alternative solid waste management policies”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 13 (1995), 183-213. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. GOPALAKRISHNAN, Chennat, “Classic papers in natural resource economics: an overview”, in GOPALAKRISHNAN, Chennat (ed.), Classic papers in natural resource economics, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000, 1-10. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. GÖTZ, Volkmar, Allgemeines Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 15.ed., München, C. H. Beck, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. GROSZ, Mirina, Sustainable waste trade under WTO law: chances and risks of the legal frameworks’ regulation of transboundary movements of wastes, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. HANSCHEL, Dirk, “Progress and the precautionary principle in administrative law - country report on Germany”, in RIEDEL, Eibe; WOLFRUM, Rüdiger (eds.), Recent trends in German and European constitutional law, Berlin, Springer, 2006, 179-209. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. HARDIN, Garrett, “The tragedy of the commons”, Science 162 (1968), 1243-1248. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. HARSCH, Bradley A., “Consumerism and environmental policy: moving past consumer culture”, Ecology Law Quarterly 26 (1999), 534-610. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. HARTWICK, John M.; OLEWILER, Nancy D., The economics of natural resource use, New York, Harper & Row, 1986. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. HERRMANN, Friederike; SANDEN, Joachim; SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SCHULZE, Falk, “Ressourcenschutzrecht – Ziele, Herausforderungen, Regelungsvorschläge”, ZUR 23 (2012), 523-531. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. HINCHLIFFE, Daniel; AKKERMAN, Floris, “Assessing the review process of EU Ecodesign regulations”, Journal of Cleaner Production 168 (2017), 1603-1613. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. HOTELLING, Harold, “The economics of exhaustible resources”, The Journal of Political Economy 39 (1931), 137-175. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. HUBER, Peter M., “Risk decisions in German constitutional and administrative law”, in WOODMAN, Gordon R.; KLIPPEL, Diethelm (eds.), Risk and the law, Abingdon, Routledge, 2009, 23-35. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. HUULGAARD, Rikke Dorothea; REMMEN, Arne, Eco-design requirements for televisions: how ambitious is the implementation of the Energy-using Product Directive?, Copenhagen, Miljøstyrelsen, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. JAFFE, Adam B.; NEWELL, Richard G.; STAVINS, Robert N., “Technological change and the environment”, in MÄLER, Karl-Göran; VINCENT, Jeffrey R. (eds.), Handbook of environmental economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2003, 461-516. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. JANS, Jan H.; VEDDER, Hans H. B., European environmental law: after Lisbon, 4.ed., Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. JEPSEN, Dirk; REINTJES, Norbert; FRIEDER, Rubik; STECKER, Rebecca; ENGEL, Florian; EISENHAUER, Patrik; SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SPENGLER, Laura, Grundkonzeption eines Top-Runner-Modells auf der EU-Ebene, UBA Texte 36/2011, Dessau-Roßlau, UBA, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. JOERGES, Christian; SCHEPEL, Harm; VOS, Ellen, The law’s problem with the involvement of non-governmental actors in Europe’s legislative processes: the case of standardisation under the ‘new approach’, EUI Working Paper LAW No. 99/9, available at <http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/154/law99_9.pdf>, last accessed on 17 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. KALIMO, Harri; LIFSET, Reid; VAN ROSSEM, Chris; VAN WASSENHOVE, Luk; ATASU, Atalay, “What roles for which stakeholders under producer responsibility?”, RECIEL 24 (2015), 40-57. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. KALIMO, Harri; MAYERS, Kieren, “Greening the economy through design incentives: allocating extended producer responsibility”, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 21 (2012), 274-305. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. KEMNA, René; VAN ELBURG, Martjin; LI, William; VAN HOLSTEIJN, Rob; BRISAER, André, Methodology study eco-design of energy-using products (MEEUP). Methodology report, Delft/Brussels, 2005, available at <http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/methodology-for-ecodesign-of-energy-related-products-meerp-2011--pbNB0313617/downloads/NB-03-13-617-EN-C/NB0313617ENC_002.pdf?FileName=NB0313617ENC_002.pdf&SKU=NB0313617ENC_PDF&CatalogueNumber=NB-03-13-617-EN-C>, last accessed on 30 April 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. KEMNA, René; AZAÏS, Nelly; VAN ELBURG, Martjin; VAN DER VOORT, Maaike; LI, William, Methodology for ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP 2011). Methodology report. Part 1: methods, Brussels/Delft, 2011, available at <http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/methodology-for-ecodesign-of-energy-related-products-meerp-2011--pbNB0313617/downloads/NB-03-13-617-EN-C/NB0313617ENC_002.pdf?FileName=NB0313617ENC_002.pdf&SKU=NB0313617ENC_PDF&CatalogueNumber=NB-03-13-617-EN-C>, last accessed on 30 April 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. KLAYMAN, Elliot, “Standard setting under the Consumer Product Safety Amendments of 1981 – a shift in regulatory philosophy”, The George Washington Law Review 51 (1982), 96-112. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. KLOEPFER, Michael, “Zur Entwicklung des Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallrechts in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland”, AbfallR 11 (2012), 261-268. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. KLOEPFER, Michael, Produktverantwortung für Elektrogeräte: Rechtsprobleme der Entsorgung von Altprodukten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Entwurfs einer Elektroaltgeräte-Verordnung, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. KLOEPFER, Michael, “Abfallrecht im Bundestaat: Eine Einführung”, in KLOEPFER, Michael (Hrsg.), Abfallrecht und Föderalismus, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1999, 13-35. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. KLÖCK, Oliver, “Abfall ohne Ende? – Bericht über die 9. Kölner Abfalltage”, UPR 3 (2001), 100-102. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. KLÖPFFER, Walter; GRAHL, Birgit, Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. KOCH, Hans-Joachim; REESE, Moritz, Novellierung der EU-Abfallrahmenrichtlinie: Änderungsbedarf und Änderungsvorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung des europäischen Abfallrechts, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. KOCH, Hans-Joachim; “Revising the Waste Framework Directive. Basic deficiencies of European waste law and proposals for reform”, JEEPL 6 (2005), 441-457. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. KOCH, Hans-Joachim; “Abfallrechtliche Regulierung der Verwertung – Chancen und Grenzen”, DVBl. 115 (2000), 300-312. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. KÖNIG, Doris, “Gesetzgebung”, in SCHULZE, Reiner; ZULEEG, Manfred; KADELBACH, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht: Handbuch für die deutsche Rechtspraxis, 3.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2015, 83-144. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. KRÄMER, Ludwig, EU Environmental Law, 8.ed., London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. KRÄMER, Ludwig, Überlegungen zu Ressourceneffizienz und Recycling, Research Papers in Law 6/2003, Brugge, Collège d’Europe, 2003, available at <https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/researchpaper_6_2003_kramer.pdf>, last accessed on 29 April 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. KRÄMER, Ludwig, “The distinction between product and waste in Community law”, in KLETT, Wolfgang; SCHMITT-GLESER, Gerhard; SCHNURER, Helmut (Hrsg.), Abfall ohne Ende? Oder: Ende der Abfalleigenschaft durch Umwandlung zu Rohstoff, Köln, Gutke, 2001, 253-276. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. KRÄMER, Ludwig, WINTER, Gerd, “Umweltrecht”, in SCHULZE, Reiner; ZULEEG, Manfred; KADELBACH, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht: Handbuch für die deutsche Rechtspraxis, 3.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2015, 1548-1639. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. KRELL, Andreas Joachim, “A necessária mudança de foco na implantação do federalismo cooperativo no Brasil: da definição de competências legislativas para o desenho de formas conjuntas de execução administrativa”, in DE SOUZA NETO, Cláudio Pereira; SARMENTO, Daniel; BINEBOIM, Gustavo (org.), Vinte anos da Constituição Federal de 1988, Rio de Janeiro, Lumen Juris, 2009, 635-660. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. KRIEGER, Stephan, “Wozu wird das Abfallrecht gebraucht?”, UPR 15 (1995), 408-412. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. KUNIG, Philip, “Do direito do lixo para o direito da correcta gestão dos ciclos dos materiais? Comentários acerca da legislação alemã sobre os resíduos e a sua evolução”, Revista Jurídica do Urbanismo e do Ambiente 1 (1994a), 95-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. KUNIG, Philip, “Von der Wegwerfgesellschaft zur Kreislaufwirtschaft: Überlegungen zum Stoffstromrecht, in BREUER, Rüdiger; KLOEPFER, Michael; MARBURGER, Peter; SCHRÖDER, Meinhard (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch des Umwelt- und Technikrechts, Heidelberg, R. v. Decker, 1994b, p. 277-295. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. LADEUR, Karl-Heinz, “Das Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallgesetz als Schritt auf dem Weg zu einem ‘ökologischen Stoffflußrecht’? Zu den Anforderungen an die Koordination öffentlichen und privaten Entscheidens unter Komplexitätsbedingungen”, ZfU 21 (1998), 279-315. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. LANGNER, Dirk; KLINDT, Thomas, “Technische Sicherheitsvorschriften und Normen”, in DAUSES, Manfred A. (Hrsg.), Handbuch des EU-Wirtschaftsrechts, Band 1, 40.ed., München, C.H. Beck, 2016, Rn. 1-160. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. LEA, Anne, “The scrapping of end of life vehicles: is new European legislation necessary?”, Environmental Law Review 65 (2000), 65-73. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. LEE, Maria, EU environmental law: challenges, changes and decision-making, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. LEE, Robert G.; STOKES, Elen, “Rehabilitating the definition of waste: is it fully recovered?”, in ETTY, Thijs F. M.; SOMSEN, Han (eds.), Yearbook of European Environmental Law, vol. 8, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, 162-181. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. LEMOS, Patricia Faga Iglecias, Resíduos sólidos e responsabilidade civil pós-consumo, 2.ed., São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. LEVY, Daniel de Andrade, Responsabilidade civil: de um direito dos danos a um direito das condutas lesivas, São Paulo, Atlas, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Lewandowski, Enrique Ricardo, “Considerações sobre o federalismo brasileiro”, Justiça & Cidaadania 157 (2013), 13-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. LIDGREN, Karl; SKOGH, Gorän, “Extended producer responsibility: recycling, liability, and guarantee funds”, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 21 (1996), 170-181. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Industrial ecology in the age of input-output analysis”, in Suh, Sangwon (ed.), Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology, Dordrecht et al., Springer, 2009, 3-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Take it back: extended producer responsibility as a form of incentive-based environmental policy”, Journal of Resource Management and Technology 21 (1993), 163-175. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. LIFSET, Reid J.; GRAEDEL, T. E., “Industrial ecology: goals and definitions”, in AYRES, Robert U.; AYRES, Leslie W. (eds.), A handbook of industrial ecology, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2002, 3-15. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. LIFSET, Reid J.; LINDHQVIST, Thomas, “Producer responsibility at a turning point?”, JIE 12 (2008), 144-147. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Can we take the concept of individual producer responsibility from theory to practice?”, JIE 7 (2003), 3-6. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Trust, but verify”, JIE 5 (2002), 9-11. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. LIFSET, Reid J.; “Getting the goal right: EPR and DfE”, JIE 2 (1998), 6-8. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. LIFSET, Reid J.; “What’s in a name: producer or product responsibility?”, JIE 1 (1997), 6-7. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. LIFSET, Reid J.; ATASU, Ataly; TOJO, Naoko, “Extended producer responsibility: national, international, and practical perspectives”, JIE 17 (2013), 162-166. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. LINDHQVIST, Thomas, Extended producer responsibility in cleaner production: policy principle to promote environmental improvements of product systems, Doctoral dissertation, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics (IIIEE), Lund, Lunds Universitet, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. LINDHQVIST, Thomas, LIDGREN, Karl, “Modeller för förlängt producentansvar”, in MILJÖDEPARTEMENTET, Från vaggan till graven – sex studier av varors miljöpåverkan, Stockholm, Allmäanna, 1991, 7-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. LOPES, José Reinaldo de Lima, Responsabilidade civil do fabricante e a defesa do consumidor, São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. LUECK, Dean, “The rule of first possession and the design of the law”, Journal of Law and Economics 38 (1995), 393-436. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. MACROY, Richard; HAVERCROFT, Ian, “Environmental principles in the United Kingdom”, in MACROY, Richard; HAVERCROFT, Ian; PURDY, Ray (eds.), Principles of European environmental law, Groningen, 2004, 195-214. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; DALHAMMAR, Carl, “Regulating planned obsolescence: a review of legal approaches to increase product durability and reparability in Europe”, RECIEL 25:3 (2016), 378-394. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; BUGGE, Hans Christian (ed.), Preventing environmental damage from products: an analysis of the policy and regulatory framework in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018a. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; “Developing legislation to prevent environmental damage from products: a Herculean but necessary task”, in MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; DALHAMMAR, Carl; BUGGE, Hans Christian (ed.), Preventing environmental damage from products: an analysis of the policy and regulatory framework in Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018b, 1-20. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. MALCOM, Rosalind, “Ecodesign laws and the environmental impact of our consumption of products”, JEL 23 (2011), 487-503. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. MALCOM, Rosalind, “Integrated product policy – a new regulatory paradigm for a consumer society?”, European Environmental Law Review 14 (2005), 134-144. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. MASING, Johannes, “Kritik des integrierten Umweltschutzes”, DVBl. 113 (1998), 549-559. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. MAXWELL, Dorothy; MCANDREW, Laure; SCHISCHKE, Karsten; STOBBE, Lutz; NISSEN, Nils F.; WHITE, Owen, “Non-energy related policy options to foster eco-design of electronics products”, Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, New York, IEEE, 2011, 281-285, available at <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=6031846>, last accessed on 12 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. MAYERS, Kieren; LIFSET, Reid; BODENHOEFER, Karl; VAN WASSENHOVE, Luk N., “Implementing individual producer responsibility for waste electrical and electronic equipment through improved financing”, JIE 17 (2012), 186-198. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. MAYERS, Kieren; PEAGAM, Richard; FRANCE, Chris; BASSON, Lauren; CLIFT, Roland, “Redesigning the camel: the European WEEE Directive”, JIE 15 (2011), 4-8. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. MAYUMI, Kozo, The origins of ecological economics: the bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen, London/New York, Routledge, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. MCDONOUGH, William; BRAUNGART, Michael, Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things, New York, North Point, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. MCDOUGALL, Forbes R.; WHITE, Peter R.; FRANKE, Marina; HINDLE, Peter, Integrated solid waste management: a life cycle inventory, 2.ed., Oxford, Blackwell Sciences, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. MCKERLIE, Kate; KNIGHT, Nancy; THORPE, Beverly, “Advancing extended producer responsibility in Canada”, Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (2006), 616-628. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. MEADOWS, Donella H.; MEADOWS, Dennis L.; RANDERS, Jørgen; BEHRENS III, William W., The limits to growth: a report for The Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind, Washington, D.C., Potomac, 1972. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. MERTENS, Kathleen, “The energy efficiency framework for energy-related products – is it really the story of a life cycle?”, in DELVAUX, Bram; HUNT, Michaël; TALUS, Kim (eds.), EU Energy law and policy issues, vol. 3, Brussels, Intersentia, 2011, 327-349. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. MEßERSCHMIDT, Klaus, Europäisches Umweltrecht, München, C. H. Beck, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. MISONNE, Delphine, “The Directive on ecodesign, the way forward regarding IPP?”, elni Review 1 (2005), 16-28. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. MITCHELL, Brian S., An introduction to materials engineering and science for chemical and materials engineers, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. MOLENBROEK, Edith; SMITH, Metthew; GROENENBER, Heleen; WAIDE, Paul; ATTALI, Sophie; FISCHER, Corinna; KRIVOŠIK, Juraj; FONSECA, Paula; SANTOS, Bruno; FONG, João, Evaluation of the Energy Labelling Directive and specific aspects of the Ecodesign Directive – final technical report, Utrecht, Ecofys, 2014, available at <http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/final_technical_report-evaluation_eld_ed_june_2014.pdf>, last accessed 25 April 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. MONIER, Véronique; HESTIN, Mathieu; CAVÉ, Jérémie; LAUREYSENS, Ilse; WATKINS, Emma; REISINGER, Hubert; PORSCH, Lucas, Development of guidance on extended producer responsibility (EPR), Final report for the European Commission – DG Environment, 2014, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/target_review/Guidance%20on%20EPR%20-%20Final%20Report.pdf>, last accessed on 15 May 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. MONIER, Véronique; HESTIN, Mathieu; SCHUSTER, Rita; VAN ACOLEYEN, Mike; LAUYRENSENS, Ilse, Awareness and exchange of best practices on the implementation and enforcement of the essential requirements for packaging and packaging waste, Final report for the European Commission – DG Environment, 2011, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/packaging/pdf/packaging_final_report.pdf>, last accessed on 15 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. MONT, Oksana, “Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use”, Ecological Economics 50 (2004), 135-153. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. MOREIRA, Danielle de Andrade, Responsabilidade ambiental pós-consumo: da prevenção à reparação de danos, Tese de doutorado, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, UERJ, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. MUDGAL, Shailendra; TINETTI, Benoît; TRIGO, Alvaro de Prado; FANINGER, Thibault; SCHISCHKE, Karsten; PROSKE, Marina; VON GEIBLER, Justus; TEUBLER, Jens, Material-efficiency ecodesign report and module to the methodology for the ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP). Part 1: material efficiency for ecodesign, n.p., BIO Intelligence, 2013a, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/105/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf>, last accessed on 2 May 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. MUDGAL, Shailendra; Material-efficiency ecodesign report and module to the methodology for the ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP). Part 2: enhancing MEErP for ecodesign, n.p., BIO Intelligence, 2013b, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/106/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native>, last accessed on 2 May 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. MUDGAL, Shailendra; Material-efficiency ecodesign report and module to the methodology for the ecodesign of energy-related products (MEErP). Part 2: test reports TV and washing machine, n.p., BIO Intelligence, 2013c, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/107/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native>, last accessed on 2 May 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. MUELLER, Charles C., Os economistas e as relações entre o sistema econômico e o meio ambiente, Brasília, Editora UnB/Finatec, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. NASH, Hazel Ann, “The revised Directive on waste: solving legislative tensions in waste management?”, JEL 21 (2009), 139-149. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Neumayer, Eric, Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms, 4.ed., Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. NUSDEO, Ana Maria de Oliveira, “Desenvolvimento e ecologia revisitado. Evolução do debate e perspectivas atuais”, in NUSDEO, Fábio (ed.), O direito econômico na atualidade, São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 2014, 227-250. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. NUSDEO, Ana Maria de Oliveira, “O uso de instrumentos econômicos nas normas de proteção ambiental”, Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo 101 (2006), 357-378. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. NUSDEO, Fábio, Curso de economia: introdução ao direito econômico, 6.ed., São Paulo, Revista dos Tribunais, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. NUSDEO, Fábio, “Desenvolvimento econômico – um retrospecto e algumas perspectivas”, in SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto (coord.), Regulação e desenvolvimento, São Paulo, Malheiros, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. NUSDEO, Fábio, Desenvolvimento e ecologia, São Paulo, Saraiva, 1975. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. OBERHAUSER, Alois, “Abgrenzung des Verursacherprinzips und seine Einordnung in die Umweltpolitik”, in BULLINGER, Martin; RINCKE, Günther; OBERHAUSER, Alois; SCHMIDT, Ralf-Bodo, Das Verursacherprinzip und seine Instrumente: Eine interdisziplinäre Untersuchung, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1974, 27-49. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. OECD, Extended producer responsibility – updated guidance, ENV/EPOC/WPRPW(2015)16/FINAL, 12 April 2016, available at <http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/EPOC/WPRPW(2015)16/FINAL&docLanguage=En>, last accessed 15 May 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. OECD, Strategic waste prevention: OECD reference manual, ENV/EPOC/PPC(2000)5/FINAL, 1 August 2000, available at <http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=env/epoc/ppc(2000)5/final>, last accessed on 10 April 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. OEHLMANN, Claas, Vom Abfall als Problem zum Abfall als Ressource. Das europäische Abfallrecht als Baustein einer europäischen Kreislaufwirtschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. ON, Alexandru-Daniel, Prevention and the pillars of a dynamic theory of civil liability: a comparative study on preventive remedies, LL.M. Paper, Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Law Center, 2013, available at <http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=studpapers>, last accessed on 25 March 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. ONIDA, Marco, “Products and the environment”, in MACROY, Richard (ed.), Reflections on 30 years of EU environmental law: a high level of protection?, Groningen, Europa Law, 2006, 233-269. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. ONIDA, Marco, “Environmental protection by product policy: focus on dangerous substances”, in ONIDA, Marco (ed.), Europe and the environment: legal essays in honour of Ludwig Krämer, Groningen, Europa Law, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. OOSTERHUIS, Frans; RUBIK, Frieder; SCHOLL, Gerd, Product policy in Europe: new environmental perspective, Dordrecht et al., Kluwer, 1996 Google Scholar öffnen
  216. ORMOND, Thomas, “Der Kreislauf des Abfallrechts”, historiae iuris (1998), available at <http://www.forhistiur.de/1998-10-ormond/>, last accessed 18 March 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. OSTROM, Elinor, “Private and Common Property Rights”, in BOUCKAERT, Boudewijn; DE GEEST, Gerrit (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume II: Civil Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2000, 332-379. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. OSTROM, Elinor, OSTROM, Vincent, “Public goods and public choices”, in McGinnis, Michael D., Polycentricity and local public economies: readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press, 1999, 75-103. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. OSTROM, Elinor, SCHLAGER, Edella, “The formation of property rights”, in HANNA, Susan S.; FOLKE, Carl; MÄLER, Karl-Göran (eds.), Rights to nature: ecological, economic, cultural, and political principles of institutions for the environment, Washington, D.C., Island Press, 1996, 127-156. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. PACKARD, Vance, The waste makers, London, Longmans, 1960. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. PALMER, Karen; WALLS, Margaret, The product stewardship movement: understanding costs, effectiveness, and the role for policy, RFF Report, Washington, Resources for the Future, November 2002, available at <https://media.rff.org/archive/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-RPT-prodsteward.pdf>, last accessed on 28 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. PEARCE, David W., “An intellectual history of environmental economics”, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27 (2002), 57-81. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. PEARCE, David W., TURNER, R. Kerry, “Packaging waste and the polluter pays principle: a taxation solution”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 35 (1992), 5-15. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. PEIRÓ, Laura Talens; POLVERINI, Davide; ARDENTE, Fulvio; MATHIEUX, Fabrice, “Advances towards circular economy policies in the EU: the new Ecodesign regulation of enterprise servers”, Resources, Conservation & Recycling, in press, available online on 28 September 2019 at <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104426>, last accessed on 29 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. PELKMANS, Jacques, “The new approach to technical harmonization and standardization”, Journal of Common Market Studies 25 (1987), 249-269. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. PERMAN, Roger; MA, Yue; COMMON, Michael; MADDISON, David; McGilvray, James, Natural resource and environmental economics, 4. ed., Harlow (England), Pearson, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. PIGOU, Arthur Cecil, The economics of welfare, London, McMillan, 1920. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. PLEPYS, Andrius; HEISKANEN, Eva; MONT, Oksana, “European policy approaches to promote servicizing”, Journal of Cleaner Production 97 (2015), 117-123. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. PORTER, Richard, The economics of waste, Washington D. C., Resources for the Future (RFF), 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. POWERS, Charles W.; CHERTOW, Marian R., “Industrial ecology: overcoming policy fragmentation”, in ESTY, Daniel C.; CHERTOW, Marian R. (eds.), Thinking ecologically: the next generation of environmental policy, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997, 19-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Verpackungsverordnung (VerpackV)“, in SCHMEHL, Arndt (Hrsg.), Gemeinschaftskommentar zum Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz (KrWG) sowie zur Verpackungsordnung (VerpackV), zur Altfahrzeugverordnung (AltfahrzeugV), zum Elektro- und Elektronikgesetz (ElektroG), zum Batteriegesetz (BattG), zur Bioabfallverordnung (BioAbfV), zur Abfallverzeichnisverordnung (AVV) und zur EU-Abfallverbringungsverordnung (VVA), Köln, Carl Heymanns, 2013, p. 869-931. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Bilanz und Perspektiven der Produktverantwortung”, in FAßBENDER, Kurt; KÖCK, Wolfgang (Hrsg.), Auf dem Weg in die Recyclinggesellschaft? – Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Kreislaufwirtschaftsrecht, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2011, 43-55. Google Scholar öffnen
  233. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Abfallrechtliche Produktverantwortung: Rechtliche Zielsetzungen und Auswirkungen in der Praxis am Beispiel der AltfahrzeugV und des ElektroG”, ZUR 21 (2010), 512-520. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. PRELLE, Rebecca, “Begriff und Bedeutung der (Vorbereitung zur) Wiederverwendung im Abfallrecht”, AbfallR 5 (2008), 220-225. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. REDCLIFT, Michael R., Wasted: counting the costs of global consumption, London, Earthscan, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. REESE, Moritz, “Grundprobleme des europäischen Abfallrechts und Lösungsbeiträge der neuen Abfallrahmenrichtlinie”, NVwZ 28 (2009a), 1073-1079. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. REESE, Moritz, “Konzeptionelle Herausforderungen und Lösungsbeiträge der novellierten EG-Abfallrahmenrichtlinie”, in Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht, Dokumentation zur 32. Wissenschaftlichen Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Umweltrecht e.V. Leipzig 2008, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2009b, 131-162. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. REESE, Moritz, Kreislaufwirtschaft im integrierten Umweltrecht: Eine Studie zu den begrifflichen, instrumentellen und funktionalen Grenzen des Abfallverwertungsrechts, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Sustainable resource management – new legal approaches needed?”, JEEPL 9 (2012a), 34-62. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Ziele, Grundsätze, Strategien und Instrumente”, in HANSMANN, Klaus; SELLNER, Dieter (Hrsg.), Grundzüge des Umweltrechts, 4.ed., Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2012b, 135-310. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Konzeption eines in sich geschlossenen Stoffrechts”, in KLETT, Wolfgang; SCHMITT-GLESER, Gerhard; SCHNURER, Helmut (Hrsg.), Vom Investitionserleichterungs- und Wohnbaulandgesetz zum Umweltgesetzbuch, Köln, Gutke, 1995a, 391-413. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Konzeption eines in sich geschlossenen Stoffrechts”, in ENQUETE-KOMMISSION “SCHUTZ DES MENSCHEN UND DER UMWELT DES DEUTSCHEN BUNDESTAGES” (Hrsg.), Studienprogramm Umweltverträgliches Stoffstrommanagement, Band 2 (Instrumente), Bonn, Economica Verlag, 1995b. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. REHBINDER, Eckard, “Abfall in der Ordnung von Mensch und Umwelt”, in HOSEMANN, Gerhard (Hrsg.), Abfall: Schicksal oder Herausforderung, Erlangen, Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg, 1994, 15-26. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. REHBINDER, Eckard, Politische und rechtliche Probleme des Verursacherprinzips, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1973. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. REHBINDER, Eckard, SCHMIHING, Christoph, Ökobilanzen als Instrument des Umweltrechts, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. REIMER, Franz (Hrsg.), Ressourceneffizienz – Leitbild für das Umweltrecht?, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. REIMER, Franz (Hrsg.), TÖLLE, Susanne, “Ressourcenbegriff als Problembegriff”, ZUR 24 (2013), 589-598. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. RISK & POLICY ANALYSTS, Study on the impact of the MoU on harmonisation of chargers for mobile telephones and to assess possible future options, dated 22 August 2014, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/7432/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/pdf>, last accessed on 15 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. REVESZ, Richard L., “Federalism and environmental regulation: an overview”, in REVESZ, Richard L.; SANDS, Philippe; STEWART, Richard B. (ed.), Environmental law, the economy, and sustainable development: the United States, the European Union and the international community, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, 37-79. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. ROBBERS, Gerhard, Einführung in das deutsche Recht, 6.ed., Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. RÖCKINGHAUSEN, Marc, Integrierter Umweltschutz im EG-Recht: Der Begriff des integrierten Umweltschutzes in der Rechtsordnung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. ROLLER, Gerhard; FÜHR, Martin, “Individual producer responsibility: a remaining challenge under the WEEE Directive”, RECIEL 17 (2008), 277-283. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. ROSE, Ian; KNIGHTON, George, “Integrated product policy: the new approach to environmental regulation”, European Environmental Law Review 8 (1999), 266-270. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. ROSE-ACKERMAN, Susan, “Public law versus private law in environmental regulation: European Union proposals in the light of United States and German experience”, in EIDE, Erling; VAN DEN BERGH, Roger (eds.), Law and economics of the environment, Oslo, Juridisk Forlag, 1996, p. 13-39. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. ROSS, Alf, Directives and norms, New York, Humanities Press, 1968. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. ROTTER, Vera Susanne, “Waste management and producer responsibility: a score behind – a new ahead”, Waste Management & Research 29 (2011), 889-890. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. SCHALL, John, Does the solid waste management hierarchy make sense? A technical, economics and environmental justification for the priority of source reduction and recycling, Working paper #1, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. SACHS, Noah, “Can we regulate our way to energy efficiency? Product standards and climate policy”, Vanderbilt Law Review 65 (2012), 1631-1678. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. SACHS, Noah, “Greening demand: energy consumption and U.S. climate policy”, Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 19 (2009), 295-319. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. SACHS, Noah, “Planning the funeral at the birth: extended producer responsibility in the European Union and the United States”, Harvard Environmental Law Review 30 (2006), 51-98. Google Scholar öffnen
  261. SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto, “Regulação, desenvolvimento e meio ambiente”, in SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto (org.), Regulação e desenvolvimento: novos temas, São Paulo, Malheiros, 2012, 15-59. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. SANDEN, Joachim; SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SCHULZE, Falk, Entwicklung eines Regelungskonzepts für ein Ressourcenschutzrecht des Bundes, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. SANDER, Knut; SCHILLING, Stephanie; TOJO, Naoko; VAN ROSSEM, Chris; VERNON, Jan; GEORGE, Carolyn, The producer responsibility principle of the WEEE Directive: final report, n.p., 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang; FENSTERSEIFER, Tiago, “A competência constitucional legislativa em matéria ambiental à luz do ‘federalismo cooperativo ecológico’ consagrado pelo ordenamento jurídico brasileiro”, Revista de Direito Ambiental 71 (2013), 55-116. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. SCHENKE, Wolf-Rüdiger, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 9.ed., Heidelberg, C. F. Müller, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. SCHENKEL, Werner, “Visionen einer integrierten Stoffflusspolitik”, in KLETT, Wolfgang; SCHMITT-GLESER, Gerhard; SCHNURER, Helmut (Hrsg.), Abfall ohne Ende? Oder: Ende der Abfalleigenschaft durch Umwandlung zu Rohstoff, Köln, Gutke, 2000, 391-413. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. SCHENKEL, Werner, Recht auf Abfall? Versuch über das Märchen vom süßen Brei, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. SCHENKEL, Werner, REICHE, Jochen, “Stoffpolitik und Umweltrecht – zur Diskussion über die 5. Novelle des Abfallgesetzes”, ZAU 6 (1993), 184-196. Google Scholar öffnen
  269. SCHEPEL, Harm, “The new approach to the new approach: the juridification of harmonized standards in EU law”, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 12 (2013), 521-533. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. SCHEPEL, Harm, The constitution of private governance – product standards in the regulation of integrating markets, Oxford, Hart, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. SCHLAGER, Edella; OSTROM, Elinor, “Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis”, Land Economics 68 (1992), 249-262. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. SCHLIESSNER, Ursula, “Integrated product policy: where is the EU heading?”, European Environmental Law Review 10 (2001), 86-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. SCHOMERUS, Thomas; SPENGLER, Laura, “Die Erweiterung der Ökodesign-Richtlinie – auf dem Weg zur ‘Super-Umweltrichtlinie’?”, EurUP 2 (2010), 54-61. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. SCHRÖDER, Meinhard, “Europarecht und integriertes Umweltrecht”, NuR 22 (2000), 481-486. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. SCHULZE, Falk, Kurzanalyse 22: Ressourceneffizienzvorgaben in der Ökodesign-RL, PolRess (Ressourcenpolitik) AP 2 – Wirkungsanalysen Politikansätze, 2015, available at <http://edocs.fu-berlin.de/docs/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/FUDOCS_derivate_000000005875/KAx22xRessourceneffizienzvorgabenxxkodesign.pdf>, last accessed on 22 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. SCOTFORD, Eloise, “Trash or treasure: policy tensions in EC waste regulation”, JEL 19 (2007), 367-388. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. SENDIM, José de Sousa Cunhal, Responsabilidade civil por danos ecológicos: da reparação do dano através da restauração natural, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. SIDERIUS, Hans-Paul, “The role of experience curves for setting MEPS for appliances”, Energy Policy 59 (2013), 762-772. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. SIDERIUS, Hans-Paul, The ecodesign and energy labelling process – challenges and solutions, 2012, available at <http://www.eup-network.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Produktgruppen/Lots/Working_Documents/2012_19-04_horizontal_assessment_120227pdf__EN_1.pdf>, last accessed on 5 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. SIDERIUS, Hans-Paul, NAKAGAMI, Hidetoshi, “A MEPS is a MEPS is a MEPS: comparing Ecodesign and Top Runner schemes for setting product efficiency standards”, Energy Efficiency 6 (2013), 1-19. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. SMEDDINCK, Ulrich, “Von Trümmern zu Ressourcen – das Abfallrecht in Deutschland von der Nachkriegszeit bis heute”, in SMEDDINCK, Ulrich; KLUG, Ann Christin (Hrsg.), Vom Abfallrecht zur Kreislaufwirtschaft. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung des Abfallrechts und zu Abfallvermeidungsprogrammen nach § 33 KrWG, Halle an der Saale, Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg, 2016, 9-32. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. SMEDDINCK, Ulrich, “Die Entwicklung des Ressourcenschutzrechts – Schlaglichter: Von den Ursprüngen zur globalen Governance”, Verwaltungsarchiv 103 (2012), 183-2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY (SETAC), Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a “code of practice”, Pensacola (Florida), SETAC, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. SOLER, Fabricio Dorado; SILVA FILHO, Carlos Roberto, Gestão de resíduos sólidos: o que diz a lei, 2.ed., São Paulo, Trevisan, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. SPARWASSER, Reinhard; ENGEL, Rüdiger; VOßKUHLE, Andreas, Umweltrecht: Grundzüge des öffentlichen Umweltschutzrechts, 5. ed., Heidelberg, C.F. Müller, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  286. STREINZ, Rudolf, Europarecht, 10. ed., Heidelberg, C. F. Müller, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. SUNDFELD, Carlos Ari, Direito administrativo ordenador, São Paulo, Malheiros, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. SVENSSON, Sahra; RICHTER, Jessika Luth; MAITRE-EKERN, Eléonore; PIHLAJARINNE, Taina; MAIGRET, Aline; DALHAMMAR, Carl, “The emerging ‘right to repair’ legislation in the EU and the U.S”, Pre-print of the paper presented at Going Green CARE INNOVATION 2018, Vienna, 2018, available at https://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/63585584/Svensson_et_al._Going_Green_CARE_INNOVATION_2018_PREPRINT.pdf>, last accessed on 27 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. TAJANI, Antonio, “Common charger for small electronic devices”, Enterprise & Industry Magazine 16 (2013), 3. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. TAVARES, André Ramos, “Aporias acerca do ‘condomínio legislativo’ no Brasil: uma análise a partir do STF”, in TAVARES, André Ramos; LEITE, George Salomão; SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang (org.), Estado constitucional e organização do poder, São Paulo, Saraiva, 2010, p. 161-191. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. TCHOBANOGLOUS, George; KREITH, Frank, Handbook of solid waste management, 2.ed., New York et al, McGraw-Hill, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. THOLEN, Lena, “Die Ressourcenfrage innerhalb der Ökodesign-Richtlinie. Aspekte einer neuen Schwerpunktsetztung im Zuge der Weiterentwicklung der Richtlinie auf nicht-energiebetriebene Produkte”, ZfU 4 (2011), 469-495. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. THOMPSON, Michael, “Waste and fairness”, Social Research 65 (1998), 55-73. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. THOMPSON, Michael, Rubbish theory: the creation and destruction of value, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. THOMSEN, Silke, Produktverantwortung: Rechtliche Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Kreislaufwirtschaft, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  296. TIETENBERG, Tom; LEWIS, Lynne, Environmental and resource economics, 10.ed., Harlow (England), Pearson, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  297. TOJO, Naoko, EPR programmes: individual versus collective responsibility. Exploring various forms of implementation and their implication to design change, IIIE Reports 2003:8, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  298. TOJO, Naoko, LINDHQVIST, Thomas, Product-oriented environmental interventions. Building policy instruments, The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. TOJO, Naoko, Thomas; DAVIS, Gary A., “EPR programme implementation: institutional and structural factors”, in ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Seminar on extended producer responsibility, EPR: programme implementation and assessment, 13-14 December 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  300. TÖLLE, Susanne, Der Rechtsrahmen für den Erlass von Ökodesign-Anforderungen, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. TOPOREK, Marta, Legal briefing: The potential for EU Member States to adopt national measures stricter than those established in the EU legislation based on Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex. Article 95 of the EC Treat) – study of the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Directives, n.p., ClientEarth, 2010, available at <http://www.clientearth.org/reports/climate-energy-art-114-1-tfeu-ecodesign-and-energy-labelling-directives-briefing.pdf>, last accessed on 25 October 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  302. TROMANS, Stephen, “EC waste law – a complete mess?”, JEL 13 (2001), 133-156. Google Scholar öffnen
  303. TUFET-OPI, Enrique, “Life after end of life: the replacement of end of life product legislation by a European integrated product policy in the EC”, JEL 14 (2002), 33-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. TUKKER, Arnold; HUPPES, Gjalt; GUINÉE, Reinout Heijungs; DE KONING, Arjan; VAN OERS, Lauran; SUH, Sangwon; GEERKEN, Theo; VAN HOLDERBEKE, Mirja; JANSEN, Bart; NIELSEN, Per, Environmental impacts of products (EIPRO): analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25, European Communities, European Commission/JRC, 2006, available at <http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf >, last accessed 25 April 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. TURNER, R. Kerry; POWELL, Jane C., “Towards an integrated waste management strategy”, Environmental Management and Health 2 (1991), 6-12. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. UBA, Kolloquium zur Konzeption des Stoffflußrechts. Bedeutung – Sachstand – Perspektiven für eine rechtliche Steuerung von Stoffströmen, UBA Texte 18/95, Berlin, UBA, 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. VALSECCHI, Carolina, Energy efficiency in the EU: an introduction, n.p., IEEP, n.d., available at <http://www.ieep.eu/minisite_assets/briefings-on-climate/pdfs/Energy%20Efficiency%20in%20the%20EU%20An%20Introduction.pdf>, last accessed on 25 October 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  308. VAN CALSTER, Geert, EU waste law, 2.ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  309. VAN ROSSEM, Chris; DALHAMMAR, Carl; TOULOUSE, Edouard, Designing greener electronic products: building synergies between EU product policy instruments or simply passing the buck?, Report for the EEB, 2010, available at <http://www.eeb.org/?LinkServID=66030392-BF80-2CAC-B5335569F1526F90&showMeta=0>, last accessed on 12 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  310. VAN ROSSEM, Chris; KOGG, Beatrice; MONT, Oksana, “Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?”, Ökologisches Wirtschaften 19 (2004), 11-13. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. VON LERSNER, Heinrich Freiherr, “Vor- und Nachteile föderalistischer Strukturen im Abfallrecht”, in KLOEPFER, Michael (Hrsg.), Abfallrecht und Föderalismus, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1999, 37-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  312. VON LERSNER, “Abfall als Wirtschaftsgut – Zur rechtlichen Problematik des Abfallbegriffs”, Natur und Recht 3 (1981), 1-5. Google Scholar öffnen
  313. VERSMANN, Andreas, “Artikel 4 – Abfallhierarchie”, in VON LERSNER, Heinrich; WENDENBURG, Helge (Hrsg.), Recht der Abfallbeseitigung des Bundes, der Länder und der Europäischen Union, Band 5, Berlin, Erich Schmidt, 2015, 1-15. Google Scholar öffnen
  314. VON BERTALANFFY, Ludwig, General system theory: foundations, development, applications, New York, George Braziller, 1968. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. WAGNER, Erika, “Integratives Umweltrecht auf nationaler und europäischer Ebene”, Recht der Umwelt (1999), 3-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  316. WALLS, Margaret, Deposit-refund systems in practice and theory, Discussion paper 11-47, Washington, Resources for the Future, 2011, available at <http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-DP-11-47.pdf>, last accessed on 10 May 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  317. WALLS, Margaret, Extended producer responsibility and product design: economic theory and selected case studies, Discussion paper 06-08, Washington, Resources for the Future, 2006, available at <https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-06-08-REV.pdf>, last accessed on 29 July 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  318. WALLS, Margaret, The role of economics in extended producer responsibility: making policy choices and setting policy goals, Discussion paper 03-11, Washington, Resources for the Future, 2003, available at <http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF-DP-03-11.pdf>, last accessed on 10 March 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  319. WEBERSINN, Michael, “Produktverantwortung – Eine ordnungspolitische Standbestimmung anlässlich der Umsetzung der EU-Abfallrahmenrichtlinie in deutsches Recht”, AbfallR 6 (2010), 266-275. Google Scholar öffnen
  320. WEGENER, Bernhard W., “Die Freiheit stirbt mit der Glühbirne (wieder ein Stück)”, ZUR 20 (2009), 169-170. Google Scholar öffnen
  321. WICKE, Lutz, Umweltökonomie, 4.ed., München, Vahlen, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  322. WILTS, Henning, Ausweitung der Produzentenverantwortung mit Fokus auf Rücknahmeverpflichtungen, 2013, available at <http://www.ressourcenpolitik.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/PolRess_ZB_AP2-Kurzanalyse-5_Produzentenverantwortung_final.pdf>, last accessed on 29 July 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  323. WINTER, Gerd, “Ecological proportionality: an emerging principle of law for nature?”, in Voigt, Christina (ed.), Rule of law for nature: new dimensions and ideas in environmental law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, 111-129. Google Scholar öffnen
  324. WINTER, Gerd, JANS, Jan H.; MACROY, Richard; KRÄMER, Ludwig, “Weighing up the EC environmental liability directive”, JEL 20 (2008), p. 163-191. Google Scholar öffnen
  325. WINTER, Gerd, BLAZEK, John R., “Perspectives for environmental law – entering the fourth phase”, JEL 1 (1989), 38-47. Google Scholar öffnen
  326. ZAGO, Mariana Augusta dos Santos, Federalismo no Brasil e na Alemanha: estudo comparativo de competências legislativas e de execução, Tese de doutorado, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  327. ZUNDEL, Stefan; BUNKE, Dirk; SCHRAMM, Engelbert; STEINFELD, Michael, “Stoffstrommanagement: Zwischenbilanz einer Diskussion”, ZfU 21 (1998), 317-339. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Umweltrecht & Energierecht & Atomrecht", "Recht allgemein, Übergreifende Werke und Sammlungen"
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Die Bedeutung der Physiologie und Ethologie der Tiere als Grundlage für Tierschutz und Tierschutzrechtsverfahren
Monographie Vollzugriff
Sibylle Wenzel
Die Bedeutung der Physiologie und Ethologie der Tiere als Grundlage für Tierschutz und Tierschutzrechtsverfahren
Cover des Buchs: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover des Buchs: Kostenübersichtstabellen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Manfred Schmeckenbecher, Karin Scheungrab
Kostenübersichtstabellen
Cover des Buchs: Taschen-Definitionen
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Nomos Verlag
Taschen-Definitionen

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex