Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Die local remedies rule im Investitionsschutzrecht

Authors:
Publisher:
 15.07.2014

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2014
Publication date
15.07.2014
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1106-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5206-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht
Volume
13
Language
German
Pages
402
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 6
  2. Vorwort No access 7 - 18
  3. Abkürzungsverzeichnis No access 19 - 22
  4. Einleitung No access 23 - 26
  5. Gang der Darstellung No access 27 - 28
  6. Die Local Remedies Rule als allgemeine Regel des Völkerrechts No access 29 - 102
  7. Die Anwendbarkeit der Local Remedies Rule in Investitionsschiedsverfahren No access 103 - 156
  8. Die Erschöpfungsregel als Verfahrensregel im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht No access 157 - 290
  9. Die Nutzung nationaler Rechtsbehelfe als Voraussetzung der Verletzung materiell-rechtlicher Schutzstandards? No access 291 - 374
  10. Verzeichnis der zitierten Entscheidungen und Literatur No access 375 - 402

Bibliography (531)

  1. Administration of the Prinz von Pless (Germany v. Poland), PCIJ Rep, Ser. A/B, No. 54 (1933), S. 150 Open Google Scholar
  2. Ambatielos Case (Greece v. United Kingdom), ICJ Rep. 1953, S. 10 Open Google Scholar
  3. Avena and other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), ICJ Rep. 2004, S. 12 Open Google Scholar
  4. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co Ltd (Belgium v. Spain) (Second Phase), ICJ Rep. 1970, S. 3 Open Google Scholar
  5. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co Ltd (Belgium v. Spain): Preliminary Objections, ICJ Rep. 1964, S. 6 Open Google Scholar
  6. Case Concerning Ahmdou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) (Preliminary Objections), ICJ Rep. 2007, S. 582 Open Google Scholar
  7. Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, ICJ Rep. 2006, S. 6 Open Google Scholar
  8. Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Iran v. United States of America), ICJ Rep. 2003, S. 161 Open Google Scholar
  9. Case concerning the Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (Israel v Bulgaria), ICJ Pleadings 1959, S. 531 Open Google Scholar
  10. Case Concerning the Factory at Chórzow (Germany v. Poland), PCIJ Rep, Ser. A, No. 9 (1927) Open Google Scholar
  11. Case of Certain Norwegian Loans (France v Norway), ICJ Pleadings 1957, vol. I, S. 408 Open Google Scholar
  12. Case of Certain Norwegian Loans (France v. Norway), ICJ Rep. 1957, S. 9 Open Google Scholar
  13. Certain German Interests in Upper Silesia (Germany v. Poland) (Preliminary Objections), PCIJ Ser. A, No. 6 (1925) Open Google Scholar
  14. Certain German Interests in Upper Silesia (Germany v. Poland), PCIJ Ser. A, No. 7 (1926) Open Google Scholar
  15. Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria (Belgium v. Bulgaria), PCIJ Rep, Ser. A/B, No. 77 (1939) Open Google Scholar
  16. Elettronica Sicula (ELSI) (United States of America v. Italy), ICJ Rep. 1989, S. 15 Open Google Scholar
  17. Interhandel (Switzerland v. United States of America), ICJ Rep. 1959, S. 6 Open Google Scholar
  18. Jurisdiction of the Courts of Danzig, PCIJ Rep, Ser. B, No. 15 (1928), S. 1 Open Google Scholar
  19. LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America), ICJ Rep. 2001, S. 466 Open Google Scholar
  20. Losinger & Co. Case (Switzerland v. Yugoslavia), PCIJ Rep, Ser. A/B, No. 67 (1936), S. 15 Open Google Scholar
  21. Martini Case (Italy v. Venezuela), Award, 3. Mai 1930, 25 AJIL (1931), S. 554 Open Google Scholar
  22. Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. Great Britain), PCIJ Rep, Series A, No. 2 (1924), S. 6 Open Google Scholar
  23. Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. Guatemala) (Second Phase), ICJ Rep. 1955, S. 4 Open Google Scholar
  24. Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) (Second Phase), ICJ Rep. 1955, S. 4 Open Google Scholar
  25. Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case (Estonia v. Lithuania), PCIJ Rep, Series A/B, No. 76 (1939), S. 4 Open Google Scholar
  26. Phosphates in Morocco (Kingdom of Italy v. French Republic), PCIJ Ser. A/B, No. 74 (1938) Open Google Scholar
  27. Pleadings, Interhandel Case (Switzerland v. United States of America), ICJ Rep. 1959 Open Google Scholar
  28. The Case of the S.S. Lotus (France v. Turkey), PCIJ Rep, Ser. A, No. 10 (1927) Open Google Scholar
  29. Amoco International Finance Corporation v. Iran, 15 IUSCT Rep. (1987), S. 189 Open Google Scholar
  30. Islamic Republic of Iran and United States of America (State Responsibility for Awards Rendered against its Nationals) (Case No. A/21), 14 IUSCT Rep. (1987), S. 324 Open Google Scholar
  31. Islamic Republic of Iran and United States of America (The Question of Jurisdiction over Claims of Persons with Dual Nationality) (Case No. A/18), 23 ILM (1984), S. 483 Open Google Scholar
  32. Nasser Esphahanian v. Bank Tejarat, 2 IUSCT Rep. (1983), S. 157 Open Google Scholar
  33. Oil Field of Texas, Inc. v. Iran, 12 IUSCT Rep. (1986), S. 308 Open Google Scholar
  34. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Iran, 21 IUSCT Rep. (1989), S. 79 Open Google Scholar
  35. Cardot / Frankreich, Ser. A Nr. 200 = EuGRZ 1991, S. 437 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(91)90002-N
  36. Ilhan / Türkei (22277/93), ECHR 2000-VII Open Google Scholar
  37. K-F / Deutschland, Reports 1997-VII = NJW 1999, S. 775 Open Google Scholar
  38. Kudla/Poland (30210/96), NJW 2001, S. 2694 Open Google Scholar
  39. IV. Schiedsgerichtliche Entscheidungen Open Google Scholar
  40. Soweit nicht anders angegeben sind die Entscheidungen im Internet unter http://italaw.com abrufbar. Open Google Scholar
  41. Abaclat and others v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 4. August 2011 Open Google Scholar
  42. Abaclat and others v. Argentine Republic, Dissenting Opinion of Professor Georges Abi-Saab, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 4. August 2011 Open Google Scholar
  43. AES Corporation v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 26. April 2005, 12 ICSID Rep, S. 312 Open Google Scholar
  44. Ambatielos Case (Greece v. United Kingdom), Award, 6. März 1956, 12 UNRIAA, S. 83 Open Google Scholar
  45. Amco Asia Corporation et al v. Republic of Indonesia, Award, 20. November 1984, 1 ICSID Rep., S. 413 Open Google Scholar
  46. Amco Asia Corporation et al v. Republic of Indonesia, Decision on Annulment, 16. Mai 1986, 1 ICSID Rep, S. 509 Open Google Scholar
  47. Arbitration under Article 181 of the Treaty of Neuilly (Greece v. Bulgaria), Award, 28 AJIL (1934), S. 773 Open Google Scholar
  48. Archer Daniels Midland Company and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. v The United Mexican States, Award, 21. November 2007 Open Google Scholar
  49. Archer Daniels Midland Company and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. v. The United Mexican States, Concurring Opinion of Arthur W. Rovine, abrufbar unter http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/Index.jsp Open Google Scholar
  50. ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Award, 18. Mai 2010 Open Google Scholar
  51. The Attorney General of Canada v. S.D. Meyers, Inc (T-225-01), [2004] F.C.R., S. 38 Open Google Scholar
  52. Austrian Airlines v. The Slovak Republic, Final Award, 9. Oktober 2009 Open Google Scholar
  53. Azinian, Davitian, & Baca v. Mexico, Award, 1. November 1999 Open Google Scholar
  54. Azurix Corporation v The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8. Dezember 2003 Open Google Scholar
  55. Azurix Corporation v The Argentine Republic, Award, 14. Juli 2006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/02773940600675233
  56. Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Award, 27. August 2009 Open Google Scholar
  57. BG Group Plc. v. The Republic of Argentina, Final Award, 24. Dezember 2007 Open Google Scholar
  58. Burlington Resources Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador, Decision on Jurisdiction, 2. Juni 2010 Open Google Scholar
  59. Camuzzi International S.A. v The Argentine Republic, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 10. Juni 2005 Open Google Scholar
  60. Cargill, Incorporated v. The United Mexican States, Award, 18. September 2009 Open Google Scholar
  61. Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v. The Republic of Ecuador, Partial Award on the Merits, 30. März 2010 Open Google Scholar
  62. CME Czech Republic B.V. v. The Czech Republik, Partial Award, 13. September 2001 Open Google Scholar
  63. CME Czech Republic B.V. v. The Czech Republik, Final Award, 14. März 2003 Open Google Scholar
  64. CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Republic of Argentina, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 17. Juli 2003, 7 ICSID Rep., S. 494 Open Google Scholar
  65. CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Republic of Argentina, Award, 12. May 2005, 44 ILM (2005), S. 1205 Open Google Scholar
  66. Compañiá de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Annulment, 3. Juli 2002, 6 ICSID Rep., S. 340 Open Google Scholar
  67. Consortium R.F.C.C. v. Kingdom of Morocco, Award, 22. Dezember 2003, 20 ICSID Rev.-FILJ (2005), S. 391 Open Google Scholar
  68. Continental Casualty Company v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22. Februar 2006 Open Google Scholar
  69. Corn Products International, Inc. v. The United Mexican States, Decision on Responsibility, 15. Januar 2008 Open Google Scholar
  70. Corn Products International, Inc. v. The United Mexican States, Separate Opinion of Andreas F. Lowenfeld Open Google Scholar
  71. Duke Energy Electroquil Partners & Electroquil S.A. v. Repulic of Ecuador, Award, 18. August 2008 Open Google Scholar
  72. El Oro Mining and Railway Company (Ltd.) (Great Britain v United Mexican States), Decision No. 55, 18. Juni 1931, 5 UNRIAA, S. 191 Open Google Scholar
  73. Emilio Augustin Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, Decision on Jurisdiction, 25. Januar 2000, 5 ICSID Rep, S. 396 Open Google Scholar
  74. EnCana Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Award, 3. Februar 2006, 12 ICSID Reports, S. 427 Open Google Scholar
  75. EnCana Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Horacio Naón, 30. Dezember 2005, 12 ICSID Reports, S. 489 Open Google Scholar
  76. Enron Corporation v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14. Januar 2004, 11 ICSID Reports, S. 273 Open Google Scholar
  77. Ethyl Corporation v. The Government of Canada, Award on Jurisdiction, 24. Juni 1998, 7 ICSID Reports, S. 12 Open Google Scholar
  78. Eureko B.V. v. Republic of Poland, Partial Award, 19. August 2005 Open Google Scholar
  79. Finnish Ships Arbitration (Finland v. Great Britain), Award, 9. Mai 1934, 3 UNRIAA, S. 1479 Open Google Scholar
  80. GAMI Investments, Inc. v. The United Mexican States, Final Award, 15. November 2004 Open Google Scholar
  81. Gas Natural SDG S.A. v The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 17. Juni 2005 Open Google Scholar
  82. GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v. Ukraine, Award, 31. März 2011 Open Google Scholar
  83. Generation Ukraine, Inc v. Ukraine, Award, 16. September 2003, 10 ICSID Reports, S. 240 Open Google Scholar
  84. Glamis Gold, Ltd. v. United States of America, Award, 8. Juni 2009 Open Google Scholar
  85. Helnan International Hotels A/S v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 3. Juli 2008 Open Google Scholar
  86. Helnan International Hotels A/S v. The Arab Republic of Egypt (Annulment Proceeding), Decision of the ad hoc Committee, 14. Juni 2010 Open Google Scholar
  87. Hochtief AG v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 24. Oktober 2011 Open Google Scholar
  88. Hochtief AG v. The Argentine Republic – Separate and Dissenting Opinion of J. Christopher Thomas, Decision on Jurisdiction, 24. Oktober 2011 Open Google Scholar
  89. IBM World Trade Corporation v. Republic of Ecuador, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22. Dezember 2003 Open Google Scholar
  90. ICS Inspection and Control Services Limited (United Kingdom) v. Republic of Argentina, Award on Jurisdiction, 10. Februar 2012 Open Google Scholar
  91. Impregilo S.p.A v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22. April 2005, 8 ICSID Rep., S. 568 Open Google Scholar
  92. Impregilo S.p.A v. Argentine Republic, Award, 21. Juni 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.1989.tb00455.x
  93. Impregilo S.p.A v. Argentine Republic – Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Brigitte Stern, Award, 21. Juni 2011 Open Google Scholar
  94. International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. The United Mexican States, Award, 26. Januar 2006 Open Google Scholar
  95. International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. The United Mexican States – Separate Opinion of Thomas Wälde, Award, Dezember 2005 Open Google Scholar
  96. Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A., S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L v. Romania, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 24. September 2008 Open Google Scholar
  97. Jalapa Railroad & Power Co., American Mexican Claims Commission, Award, 1948, 8 Whiteman Digest of International Law (1976), S. 908 Open Google Scholar
  98. Jan de Nul N.V. & Dredging International N.V. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16. Juni 2006 Open Google Scholar
  99. Jan de Nul N.V. & Dredging International N.V. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 6. November 2008 Open Google Scholar
  100. Lanco International Inc. v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8. Dezember 1998, 40 ILM 2001, S. 457 Open Google Scholar
  101. LG&E Energy Corporation v Argentine Republic, Decision on Liability, 3. Oktober 2006, 46 ILM (2007), S. 36 Open Google Scholar
  102. LG&E Energy Corporation v Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 30. April 2004, 11 ICSID Reports, S. 411 Open Google Scholar
  103. Limited Liability Company Amto v. Ukraine, Final Award, 26. März 2008 Open Google Scholar
  104. Link Trading v. Republic of Moldova, Award on Jurisdiction, 16. Februar 2001 Open Google Scholar
  105. The Loewen Group, Inc, and Raymond Loewen v. United States of America, Award, 26. Juni 2003, 42 ILM (2003), S. 811 Open Google Scholar
  106. The Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond Loewen v. United States of America, Decision on Jurisdiction, 5. Januar 2001, 7 ICSID Reports, S. 425 Open Google Scholar
  107. Joint Reply of Claimants: The Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen to the Counter-Memorial of the United States (8. Juni 2001), abrufbar unter http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/6328.doc Open Google Scholar
  108. The Loewen Case – Rejoinder of the United States of America (27. August 2001), abrufbar unter http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/7388.pdf Open Google Scholar
  109. Reply of the United States of America to the Counter-Memorial of the Loewen Group, Inc. on Matters of Jurisdiction and Competence (26. April 2002), abrufbar unter http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/9947.pdf Open Google Scholar
  110. Marvin Feldman v. Mexico, Award, 16. Dezember 2002, 7 ICSID Reports, S. 341 Open Google Scholar
  111. Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling Co. S.A. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12. April 2002 Open Google Scholar
  112. Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States, Award, 30. August 2000, 5 ICSID Rep, S. 209 Open Google Scholar
  113. Metalclad Corporation and the United Mexican States – Judicial Review, Transcript of Proceedings (19. Februar 2001), abrufbar unter http://naftaclaims.com/Disputes/Mexico/Metalclad/MetalcladTranscriptsDay1.pdf Open Google Scholar
  114. Methanex v. United States, Partial Award, 7. August 2002 Open Google Scholar
  115. Mexican Union Railway Case (Great Britain v United Mexican States), Decision No. 21, 15. Februar 1930, 5 UNRIAA, S. 115 Open Google Scholar
  116. Mondev International Ltd. v. United States of America, Award, 11. Oktober 2002, 6 ICSID Rep, S. 192 Open Google Scholar
  117. Murphy Exploration and Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, Award on Jurisdiction, 15. Dezember 2010 Open Google Scholar
  118. Mytilineos Holdings SA v The State Union of Serbia & Montenegro and The Republic of Serbia, Partial Award on Jurisdiction, 8. September 2006 Open Google Scholar
  119. National Grid PLC v. The Argentine Republic Decision on Jurisdiction, 20. Juni 2006 Open Google Scholar
  120. Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, Award, 12. Oktober 2005 Open Google Scholar
  121. North American Dredging Co Case (United States v. Mexico), Award, 31. März 1926, 4 UNRIAA, S. 26 Open Google Scholar
  122. Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB v. The Republic of Latvia, Award, 16. Dezember 2003 Open Google Scholar
  123. Occidental Exploration & Production Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, [2005] EWCA Civ 1116 Open Google Scholar
  124. Olguín v. Paraguay, Decision on Jurisdiction, 26. Juli 2001, 6 ICSID Rep., S. 156 Open Google Scholar
  125. Pantechniki S.A. Contractors & Engineers v. The Republic of Albania, Award, 30. Juli 2009 Open Google Scholar
  126. Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Lithuania, Award, 11. September 2007 Open Google Scholar
  127. Phillips Petroleum Co. Iran v The Islamic Republic of Iran, Award, 30. Dezember 1982, 1 Iran-US CTR, S. 487 Open Google Scholar
  128. Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8. Februar 2005, 44 ILM (2005), S. 721 Open Google Scholar
  129. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada, Award on the Merits (Phase 2), 10. April 2001, 7 ICSID Rep., S. 102 Open Google Scholar
  130. Railroad Development Corporation v The Republic of Guatemala, Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction Open Google Scholar
  131. Raymond L. Loewen v. USA, Motion to Vacate and Remand Arbitration Award, 25. Februar 2004, United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Case 1:04-CV-02151-RWR) Open Google Scholar
  132. Renta 4 S.V.S.A. v. The Russian Federation, Award on Preliminary Objections, 20. März 2009 Open Google Scholar
  133. Robert E. Brown Case (United States v Great Britain), Award, 23. November 1923, 6 UNRIAA, S. 120 Open Google Scholar
  134. Ronald S. Lauder v. The Czech Republic, Final Award, 3. September 2001 Open Google Scholar
  135. RosInvestCo UK Ltd. v The Russian Federation, Award on Jurisdiction, Oktober 2007 Open Google Scholar
  136. Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri A.S. v. Kazakhstan, Award, 29. Juli 2008 Open Google Scholar
  137. S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada, Partial Award, 13. November 2000, 40 ILM (2001), S. 1408 Open Google Scholar
  138. The Attorney General of Canada v. S.D. Meyers, Inc. – Amended Memorandum of Fact and Law of the Applicant, the Attorney General of Canada (Court File No. T-225-01), abrufbar unter http://www.naftaclaims.com/Disputes/Canada/SDMyers/SDMyers-Canada-JRT-CanadaMemo.pdf Open Google Scholar
  139. Saipem S.p.A. v. The People's Republic of Bangladesh, Decision on Jurisdiction and Recommondation on Provisional Mesaures, 21. März 2007 Open Google Scholar
  140. Saipem S.p.A. v. The People's Republic of Bangladesh, Award, 30. Juni 2009 Open Google Scholar
  141. Salem Case (United States v. Egypt), Award, 8. Juni 1932, 2 UNRIAA, S. 1165 Open Google Scholar
  142. Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29. November 2004, 44 ILM (2005), S. 573 Open Google Scholar
  143. Saluka Investments BV v. Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17. März 2006 Open Google Scholar
  144. Selwyn Case (Great Britain v Venezuela), Interlocutory Award, 1903, 9 UNRIAA, S. 380 Open Google Scholar
  145. SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Republic of the Philippines Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29. Januar 2004, 8 ICSID Rep, S. 518 Open Google Scholar
  146. Siemens A. G. v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 3. August 2004, 44 ILM 2005, S. 138 Open Google Scholar
  147. Siemens A. G. v. Argentine Republic, Award, 6. Februar 2007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2006.10.005
  148. Société Générale v. Dominican Republic, Preliminary Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 19. September 2008 Open Google Scholar
  149. Steiner and Gross v Polish State, Award, 30. März 1928, 4 AD (1927-1928), S. 472 Open Google Scholar
  150. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16. Mai 2006 Open Google Scholar
  151. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal, S.A. v. The Argentine Republic and AWG Group Ltd. v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Jurisdiction, 3. August 2006 Open Google Scholar
  152. Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v. United Mexican States, Award, 29. Mai 2003, 43 ILM 2004, S. 133 Open Google Scholar
  153. Telefónica S.A. v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25. Mai 2006 Open Google Scholar
  154. Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. v. The Republic of Hungary, Award, 13. September 2006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/02773940600675233
  155. Toto Costruzioni Generali S.p.A. v. Republic of Lebanon, Decision on Jurisdiction, 11. September 2009 Open Google Scholar
  156. Trail Smelter Case (United States v Canada), Award, 16. April 1938 und 11. März 1941, 3 UNRIAA, S. 1905 Open Google Scholar
  157. TSA Spectrum de Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Award, 19. Dezember 2008 Open Google Scholar
  158. Tza Yap Shum v. Republic of Peru, Decision on Jurisdiction, 19. Juni 2009 Open Google Scholar
  159. Vattenfall AB, Vattenfall Europe AG, Vattenfall Europe Generation AG v. Federal Republic of Germany, Award (on agreed terms), 11. März 2011 Open Google Scholar
  160. Vattenfall AB and others v. Federal Republic of Germany, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/12 Open Google Scholar
  161. Vladimir Berschader and Moise Berschader v. The Russian Federation, Award, 21. April 2006 Open Google Scholar
  162. Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States – Dissenting Opinion of Mr. Keith Highet, Award, 2. Juni 2000, 15 ICSID Rev.-FILJ, S. 241 Open Google Scholar
  163. Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (Nr. 2), Mexico’s Preliminary Objection Concerning the Previous Proceedings, 26. Juni 2002, 6 ICSID Rep, S. 538 Open Google Scholar
  164. Waste Management, Inc. v. United Mexican States (Nr. 2), Award, 30. April 2004, 43 ILM (2004), S. 967 Open Google Scholar
  165. White Industries Australia Limited v. The Republic of India, Final Award, 30. November 2011 Open Google Scholar
  166. Wintershall Aktiengesellschaft v Argentine Republic, Award, 8. Dezember 2008 Open Google Scholar
  167. Yaung Chi Oo Trading PTE Ltd v. Myanmar, Award, 31. März 2003 Open Google Scholar
  168. van Aaken, Anne, Defragmentation of Public International Law Through Interpretation: A Methodological Proposal, 16 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. (2009), S. 483-512 Open Google Scholar
  169. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Protection, 17 FYBIL (2006), S. 91-130 Open Google Scholar
  170. Adler, Matthew A., The Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule After the International Court of Justice's Decision in ELSI, 39 ICLQ (1990), S. 641-653 Open Google Scholar
  171. Ago, Roberto, Le Délit International, 68 RdC (1939), S. 415-554 Open Google Scholar
  172. Ago, Roberto, Sixth Report on State Responsibility (UN Doc A/CN.4/302), YILC 1977 (vol. II/1) Open Google Scholar
  173. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, The Formal Character of the Rule of Local Remedies, 25 ZaöRV (1965), S. 446-477 Open Google Scholar
  174. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Local Remedies in International Law, 2. Auflage, Cambridge u.a. 2004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493928.018
  175. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, The Local Remedies Rule in an Appropriate Perspective, 36 ZaöRV (1976), S. 727-759 Open Google Scholar
  176. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Whither the Local Remedies Rule?, 5 ICSID Rev.-FILJ (1990), S. 292-310 Open Google Scholar
  177. Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Thilo Hoppe, Kerstin Andreae, Dr. Gerhard Schick, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, BT-Drs. 17/6956 (27. Oktober 2011) Open Google Scholar
  178. Anzilotti, Dionisio, La Résponsabilité Internationale des Etats à Raison des Dommages Soufferts par des Etrangers, 13 RGDIP (1906), S. 5-29 Open Google Scholar
  179. Aréchaga, Eduardo Jiménez de, International Law in the Past Third of a Century, 159 RdC (1978), S. 1-344 Open Google Scholar
  180. Aréchaga, Eduardo Jiménez de, International Responsibility, in: Max Sorensen (Hrsg.), Manual of Public International Law, London u.a. 1968, S. 531-603 Open Google Scholar
  181. Arif, Kader, Bericht über die künftige Auslandsinvestitionspolitik vom 22. März 2011, (2010/2203(INI)), abrufbar unter http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2011-0070+0+DOC+PDF+V0//DE Open Google Scholar
  182. Bank, Roland/Foltz, Friederike, Lump Sum Agreements, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2010, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  183. Beattie, Alan, Concern Grows Over Global Trade Regulation, Financial Times, 12. März 2008, S. 9 Open Google Scholar
  184. Bennouna, Mohamed, Preliminary Report on Diplomatic Protection, UN Doc A/CN.4/484 (1998) Open Google Scholar
  185. Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie/Johnson, Lise, Belgium’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Review, IISD Draft for Discussion (März 2010) Open Google Scholar
  186. Besson, Samantha, The Sovereign, the Investor and the Arbitrator, in: Peter Gauch, Franz Werro, Pascal Pichonnaz (Hrsg.), Mélanges en l'honneur de Pierre Tercier, Genf u.a. 2008, S. 745-777 Open Google Scholar
  187. Bjorklund, Andrea K., Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition Among International Economic Law Tribunals Is Not Working, 59 Hastings L. J. (2007), S. 241-307 Open Google Scholar
  188. Bjorklund, Andrea K., Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims, 45 VJIL (2005), S. 812-895 Open Google Scholar
  189. Bjorklund, Andrea K., Waiver and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies in NAFTA Jurisprudence, in: Todd Weiler (Hrsg.), NAFTA Investment Law and Arbitration: Past Issues, Current Practice, Future Prospects, Ardsley, N.Y. 2004, S. 253-286 Open Google Scholar
  190. Böckstiegel, Karl-Heinz, Internationaler Investitionsschutz aus der Perspektive eines Schiedsrichters, SchiedsVZ 2008, S. 265-270 Open Google Scholar
  191. Borchard, Edwin M., The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad, New York 1915 Open Google Scholar
  192. Borchard, Edwin M., The Local Remedy Rule, 28 AJIL (1934), S. 729-733 Open Google Scholar
  193. Borchard, Edwin M., Theoretical Aspects of the International Responsibility of States, 1 ZaöRV (1929), S. 223-250 Open Google Scholar
  194. Bourquin, Maurice, Observations sur la Règle de l'Epuisement des Recours Internes, 45 AIDI (1954-I), S. 45-62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1026881200143806
  195. Braun, Tillmann Rudolf, Investitionsschutz durch internationale Schiedsgerichte, TranState Working Papers No. 89 (2009), abrufbar unter http://www.sfb597.uni-bremen.de/pages/pubAp.php Open Google Scholar
  196. Briggs, Herbert W., The Local Remedies Rule: A Drafting Suggestion, 50 AJIL (1956), S. 921-927 Open Google Scholar
  197. Brower, Charles N., The Functions and Limits of Arbitration and Judicial Settlement Under Private and Public International Law, 18 Duke J. of Comp. & Int'l L. (2008), S. 259-309 Open Google Scholar
  198. Brower, Charles N., Investor-State Disputes Under NAFTA: The Empire Strikes Back, 40 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. (2002), S. 43-88 Open Google Scholar
  199. Brower, Charles N., Response: Beware the Jabberwock: A Reply to Mr. Thomas, 40 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. (2002), S. 465-487 Open Google Scholar
  200. Brown Weiss, Edith Invoking State Responsibility in the Twenty-First Century, 96 AJIL (2002), S. 798-816 Open Google Scholar
  201. Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 7th edition, Oxford 2008 Open Google Scholar
  202. Burger, Laurence, Swiss Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Survey, 27 J. Int. Arb. (2010), S. 473-503 Open Google Scholar
  203. Burkhardt, Hans-Martin, Das deutsch-chinesische Investitionsschutzabkommen, RIW 1983, S. 28-33 Open Google Scholar
  204. Bynkershoek, Cornelius van, Quaestionum Juris Publici Libri Duo,1737, englische Übersetzung abgedruckt in: James Brown Scott (Hrsg.), The Classics of International Law, Bd. 14, Oxford 1930 Open Google Scholar
  205. Byron, Dennis/Malcolm, Christopher, Caribbean Community (CARICOM), in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2009, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  206. Caflisch, Lucius, La pratique suisse en matière de droit international public – 1972, Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für internationales Recht 1973, S. 359- Open Google Scholar
  207. Calvo, Carlos, Derecho Internacional Teórico y Práctico de Europa y América, Paris 1868 Open Google Scholar
  208. Calvo, Carlos, Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique, 5. Auflage, Paris 1896 Open Google Scholar
  209. Carozza, Paolo G., Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law, 97 AJIL (2003), S. 38-79 Open Google Scholar
  210. Cassese, Antonio, Remarks on Scelle's Theory of "Role Splitting" (dedoublement fonctionnel) in International Law, 1 EJIL (1990), S. 210-231 Open Google Scholar
  211. Chen, Hongyi, An Introduction to the Legal System of the People's Republic of China, 3. Auflage, Hong Kong 2004 Open Google Scholar
  212. Choi, Won Mog, The Present and Future of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Paradigm, 10 JIEL (2007), S. 725-747 Open Google Scholar
  213. Chung, Kyo-Hwa/Waibel, Michael/Kaushal, Asha/Balchin, Claire, The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, in: Kyo-Hwa Chung, Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Claire Balchin (Hrsg.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, S. xxxvii-li Open Google Scholar
  214. Clark, Grover, The English Practice with Regard to Reprisals by Private Persons, 27 AJIL (1933), S. 694-723 Open Google Scholar
  215. Conclusions of the work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, UN Doc A/CN.4/L.702 Open Google Scholar
  216. Coronel-Jones, César, The Future of International Arbitration in Ecuador: The Boomerang Effect, International Law Office (22. Juli 2010), abrufbar unter http://www.internationallawoffice.com/newsletters/detail.aspx?g=e46353d6-6931-47da-9acd-a187dcf9cf84 Open Google Scholar
  217. Cottier, Thomas/Müller, Jörg-Paul, Estoppel, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2007, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  218. Crawford, James R., The ILC's Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Worngful Acts: A Retrospect, 69 AJIL (2002), S. 854-890 Open Google Scholar
  219. Crawford, James R., Second Report on State Responsibility (UN Doc A/CN.4/498) Open Google Scholar
  220. Crawford, James R./Grant, Thomas D., Exhaustion of Local Remedies, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2008, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  221. Cremades, Bernado M., Resurgence of the Calvo Doctrine in Latin America, 7 Bus. L. Int'l (2006), S. 53-72 Open Google Scholar
  222. D'Ascoli, Silvia/Scherr, Kathrin Maria, The Rule of Prior Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the International Law Doctrine and its Application in the Specific Context of Human Rights Protection, EUI Working Paper No. 2007/2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.964195
  223. Dahm, Georg, Die Subsidiarität des internationalen Rechtsschutzes bei völkerrechtswidriger Verletzung von Privatpersonen, in: Ernst von Caemmerer, Arthur Nikisch, Konrad Zweigert (Hrsg.), Vom deutschen zum europäischen Recht – Festschrift für Hans Dölle (Bd. 2), Tübingen 1963, S. 3-33 Open Google Scholar
  224. Dahm, Georg/Delbrück, Jost/Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht, Bd. I/1, 2. Auflage, Berlin 1989 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110900774
  225. Dahm, Georg/Delbrück, Völkerrecht, Bd. I/3, 2. Auflage, Berlin 2002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110906950
  226. Daillier, Patrick/Nguyen-Quoc, Dinh/Pellet, Alain, Droit International Public, 7. Auflage, Paris 2002 Open Google Scholar
  227. Dickerson, Hollin, Minimum Standards, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2010, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  228. Dodge, William S., Investor-State Dispute Settlement Between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement, 39 VJTL (2006), S. 1-37 Open Google Scholar
  229. Dodge, William S., National Courts and International Arbitration: Exhaustion of Remedies and Res Judicata Under Chapter Eleven of NAFTA, Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 2000, S. 357-383 Open Google Scholar
  230. Doehring, Karl, Handelt es sich bei einem Recht, das durch diplomatischen Schutz eingefordert wird, um ein solches, das dem die Protektion ausübenden Staat zusteht, oder geht es um die Erzwingung von Rechten des betroffenen Individuums?, in: Georg Ress, Torsten Stein (Hrsg.), Der diplomatische Schtuz im Völker- und Europarecht, Baden-Baden 1996, S. 13-20 Open Google Scholar
  231. Doehring, Karl, Local Remedies, Exhaustion of, in: Rudolf Bernhardt (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Bd. 3, Amsterdam ua. 1997, S. 238-241 Open Google Scholar
  232. Doehring, Karl, Völkerrecht, 2. Auflage, Heidelberg 2004 Open Google Scholar
  233. Dolzer, Rudolf, Das deutsch-chinesische Investitionsschutzabkommen, in: Nobert Horn, Rolf Schütze (Hrsg.), Wirtschaftsrecht und Außenwirtschaftsverkehr der Volksrepublik China, Berlin u.a. 1987 Open Google Scholar
  234. Dolzer, Rudolf, Eigentum, Enteignung und Entschädigung im geltenden Völkerrecht, Berlin 1985 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70605-9
  235. Dolzer, Rudolf, Meistbegünstigungsklauseln in Investitionsschutzverträgen, in: Jürgen Bröhmer, Ronald Bieber, Christian Callies, et al (Hrsg.), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte – Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag, Köln 2005, S. 47-54 Open Google Scholar
  236. Dolzer, Rudolf, Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources and Economic Decolonization, 7 HRLJ (1986), S. 217-230 Open Google Scholar
  237. Dolzer, Rudolf, Wirtschaft und Kultur im Völkerrecht, in: Wolfgang Graf Vitzthum (Hrsg.), Völkerrecht, 4. Auflage, Berlin 2007, S. 498-576 Open Google Scholar
  238. Dolzer, Rudolf/Myres, Terry, After Tecmed: Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Investment Protection Agreements, 19 ICSID Rev.-FILJ (2004), S. 49-60 Open Google Scholar
  239. Dolzer, Rudolf/Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford u.a. 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780199211753.001.1
  240. Dolzer, Rudolf/Stevens, Margrete, Bilateral Investment Treaties, Den Haag u.a. 1995 Open Google Scholar
  241. Dolzer, Rudolf/von Walter, André, Fair and Equitable Treatment – Lines of Jurisprudence on Customary Law, in: Federico Ortino, Lahra Liberti, Audley Sheppard, Hugo Harner (Hrsg.), Investement Treaty Law: Current Issues II, London 2007 Open Google Scholar
  242. Douglas, Zachary, The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration, 74 BYIL (2003), S. 151-289 Open Google Scholar
  243. Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims, Cambridge 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581137.007
  244. Douglas, Zachary, The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails, 1 J. Int'l. Disp. Settlement (2011), S. 97-113 Open Google Scholar
  245. Duchesne, Matthew S., The Continuous-Nationality-Of-Claims Principle: Its Historical Development and Current Relevance to Investor-State Investment Disputes, 36 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. (2004), S. 783-815 Open Google Scholar
  246. Dugan, Christopher/Wallace, Don/Rubins, Noah/Sabahi, Borzu, Investor-State Arbitration, Oxford 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780379215441.book.1
  247. Dugard, John, Diplomatic Protection, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2010, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  248. Dugard, John, First Report on Diplomatic Protection, UN Doc A/CN.4/506 (2000) Open Google Scholar
  249. Dugard, John, Second Report on Diplomatic Protection, UN Doc A/CN.4/514 (2001) Open Google Scholar
  250. Dugard, John, Third Report on Diplomatic Protection, UN Doc A/CN.4/523 (2002) Open Google Scholar
  251. Dumberry, Patrick, The Quest to Define "Fair and Equitable Treatment" for Investors under International Law – The Case of the NAFTA Chapter 11 Pope and Talbot Awards, 3 JWI (2002), S. 657-691 Open Google Scholar
  252. Dunn, Frederick Sherwood, The Protection of Nationals, Baltimore 1932 Open Google Scholar
  253. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Dionisio Anzilotti and the Law of International Responsibility of States, 3 EJIL (1992), S. 139-148 Open Google Scholar
  254. Eagleton, Clyde, The Responsibility of States in International Law, New York 1928 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2188742
  255. Eustathiades, Constantin Th., La Responsabilité Internationale de l’Etat Pour les Actes des Organes Judiciaires et le Problème du Déni de Justice en Droit International, Paris 1936 Open Google Scholar
  256. Fach Gomez, Katia, Latin America and ICSID: David versus Goliath?, 17 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. (2011), S. 195-230 Open Google Scholar
  257. Fawcett, J. E. S., The Exhaustion of Local Remedies, Substance or Procedure?, 31 BYIL (1954), S. 452-458 Open Google Scholar
  258. Fenwick, Charles G., International Law, 4. Auflage, New York 1965 Open Google Scholar
  259. Fietta, Stephen, Most Favoured Nation Treatment and Dispute Resolution Under Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Turning Point?, Int. A.L.R. 2005, S. 131-138 Open Google Scholar
  260. Fiezzoni, Silvia Karina, The Challenge of UNASUR Member Countries to Replace ICSID Arbitration, 2 BLR (2011), S. 134-144 Open Google Scholar
  261. Fitzmaurice, Gerald, Hersch Lauterpacht – The Scholar as Judge (Part I), 37 BYIL (1961), S. 1-71 Open Google Scholar
  262. Fitzmaurice, Gerald, The Meaning of the Term "Denial of Justice", 13 BYIL (1932), S. 93-114 Open Google Scholar
  263. Flamm, Patrick/Köllner, Patrick, KORUS, KOREU und darüber hinaus: Südkoreas Freihandelspolitik in voller Fahrt, GIGA Focus Nr. 12 (2011), abrufbar unter http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/gf_asien_1112.pdf Open Google Scholar
  264. Flemes, Daniel, Konkurrierender Regionalismus: Fünf Jahre UNASUR und ALBA, GIGA Focus Nr. 12 (2009), abrufbar unter http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/gf_lateinamerika_0912.pdf Open Google Scholar
  265. Focarelli, Carlo, Denial of Justice, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2008, Online-Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  266. Foster, George K., Striking a Balance Between Investor Protections and National Sovereignty: The Relevance of Local Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration, 49 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. (2011), S. 201-267 Open Google Scholar
  267. Francioni, Francesco, Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law, 20 EJIL (2009), S. 729-747 Open Google Scholar
  268. Francioni, Francesco, Equity in International Law, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2007, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  269. Franck, Susan D., The ICSID Effect? Considering Potential Variations in Arbitration Awards, 51 VJIL (2011), S. 825-914 Open Google Scholar
  270. Freeman, Alwyn V., The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice, New York 1970 Open Google Scholar
  271. Gaillard, Emmanuel, Establishing Jurisdiction Through a Most-Favored-Nation Clause, 233 NYLJ (2. Juni 2005), S. 2 Open Google Scholar
  272. Gantz, David A., The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions: From NAFTA to the United States – Chile Free Trade Agreement, 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. (2004), S. 679-767 Open Google Scholar
  273. Gantz, David A., Symposium: Two Regional Issues: The Mexican Trucking Case and NAFTA: Introduction, Commentary, and Afterword & The Future of International Economic Dispute Resolution in the Western Hemisphere (Dispute Settlement in the FTAA), 42 S. Tex. L. Rev. (2001), S. 1285-1301 Open Google Scholar
  274. Ganz, Sarah, Weighing the Interest of Host-State and Investor – a Further Blow to Domestic Litigation Provisions in BITs?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (21.10.2011), abrufbar unter http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2011/10/21/weighing-the-interests-of-host-state-and-investor-a-further-blow-to-domestic-litigation-provisions-in-bits/ Open Google Scholar
  275. Garbe, Craig, Investment Arbitration and the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement: Time for a Change?, Investment Treaty News (1. Juli 2011), S. 8, abrufbar unter http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2011/iisd_itn_july_2011_en.pdf Open Google Scholar
  276. Garcia-Amador, Francisco V., State Responsibility. Some New Problems, 94 RdC (1958), S. 365-492 Open Google Scholar
  277. Garcia-Amador, Francisco V., Fifth Report on State Responsibility (UN Doc A/CN.4/125), YILC 1960 (vol. II) Open Google Scholar
  278. Garcia-Amador, Francisco V., Sixth Report on International Responsibility, (UN Doc A/CN.4/134), YILC 1961 (vol. II) Open Google Scholar
  279. Garcia-Amador, Francisco V., Third Report on State Responsibility (UN Doc A/CN.4/111), YILC 1958 (vol. II) Open Google Scholar
  280. Garcia-Bolivar, Omar E., Sovereignty v. Investment Protection: Back to Calvo?, 24 ICSID Rev.-FILJ (2009), S. 464-488 Open Google Scholar
  281. Gardiner, Richard K., Treaty Interpretation, Oxford 2008 Open Google Scholar
  282. Garnett, Richard, National Court Internvention in Arbitration As an Investment Treaty Claim, 60 ICLQ (2011), S. 485-498 Open Google Scholar
  283. Gathright, Bradford K., Comment: A Step in the Wrong Direction: The Loewen Finality Requirement and the Local Remedies Rule in NAFTA Chapter Eleven, 54 Emory Law Journal (2005), S. 1093-1137 Open Google Scholar
  284. Gazzini, Tarcisio, The Role of Customary International Law in the Field of Foreign Investment, 8 JWIT (2007), S. 691-715 Open Google Scholar
  285. Geck, Wilhelm Karl, Diplomatic Protection, in: Rudolf Bernhardt (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Bd. 1, Amsterdam ua. 1992, S. 1045 Open Google Scholar
  286. Gentili, Alberico, De Iure Belli Libri Tres, 1612, englische Übersetzung abgedruckt in: James Brown Scott (Hrsg.), The Classics of International Law, Bd. 16, Oxford 1933 Open Google Scholar
  287. Gess, Karol N., Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources – An Analytical Review of the United Nations Declaration and its Genesis, 13 ICLQ (1964), S. 398-449 Open Google Scholar
  288. Gillard Government Trade Policy Statement, Trading Our Way to More Jobs and Prosperity (April 2011), abrufbar unter http://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/trade/trading-our-way-to-more-jobs-and-prosperity.pdf Open Google Scholar
  289. Gillman, Eric, The End of Investor-State Arbitration in Ecuador? An Analysis of Article 422 of the Constitution of 2008, 19 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. (2008), S. 269-299 Open Google Scholar
  290. Gottlieb, A.E./Beesley, J.A., Canadian Practice in International Law During 1968 As Reflected in Correspondence and Statements of the Department of External Affairs, 7 CYIL (1969), S. 298-339 Open Google Scholar
  291. Gottwald, Eric, Leveling the Playing Field: Is it Time for a Legal Assistance Center for Developing Nations in Investment Treaty Arbitration?, 22 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. (2007), S. 237-275 Open Google Scholar
  292. Gourgourinis, Anastasios, The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication, J. Int'l Disp. Settlement 2011, S. 31-57 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq022
  293. Graf Vitzthum, Wolfgang, Begriff, Geschichte und Rechtsquellen des Völkerrechts, in: Wolfgang Graf Vitzthum (Hrsg.), Völkerrecht, 4. Auflage, Berlin 2007, S. 1-79 Open Google Scholar
  294. Greenwood, Christopher, State Responsibility for the Decisions of National Courts, in: Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Dan Sarooshi (Hrsg.), Issues of State Responsibility Before International Judicial Institutions, Oxford 2004, S. 55-73 Open Google Scholar
  295. Griebel, Jörn, Die Einbeziehung von "contract claims" in internationale Investitionsstreitigkeiten über Streitbeilegungsklauseln in Investitionsschutzabkommen, SchiedsVZ 2006, S. 306-311 Open Google Scholar
  296. Griebel, Jörn, Internationales Investitionsrecht, München 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1080841
  297. Griebel, Jörn/Kim, Yun-I, Zwischen Aufbruch, Stillstand und Rückschritt – Überlegungen zur Zukunft des internationalen Investitionsrechts, SchiedsVZ 2007, S. 186-195 Open Google Scholar
  298. Grotius, Hugo, Des Hugo Grotius drei Bücher über das Recht des Krieges und Friedens, 2. Band, abgedruckt in: J. H. Kirchmann (Hrsg.), Philosophische Bibliothek oder Sammlung der Hauptwerke der Philosophie alter und neuer Zeit, 16. Band, Berlin 1869 Open Google Scholar
  299. Grzeszick, Bernd, Rechte des Einzelnen im Völkerrecht, 43 AVR (2005), S. 312-344 Open Google Scholar
  300. Gugath, Birgit, Venezuela will Ölfirmen nur teilweise entschädigen, Financial Times Deutschland, 19. April 2007, S. 15 Open Google Scholar
  301. Guggenheim, Paul, Lehrbuch des Völkerrechts, Bd. 2, Basel 1951 Open Google Scholar
  302. Guggenheim, Paul, Observations sur la Règle de l'Epuisement des Recours Internes, 46 AIDI (1956), S. 190-192 Open Google Scholar
  303. Hackworth, Green H., Observations sur la Règle de l'Epuisement des Recours Internes, 45 AIDI (1954-I), S. 69-73 Open Google Scholar
  304. Häde, Ulrich, Der völkerrechtliche Schutz von Direktinvestitionen im Ausland, 35 AVR (1997), S. 181-212 Open Google Scholar
  305. van Haersolte-van Hof, Jacomijn J./Hoffmann, Anne K., The Relationship Between International Tribunals and Domestic Courts, in: Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, Christoph Schreuer (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford; New York 2008, S. 962-1007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.013.0024
  306. Haesler, Thomas, The Exhaustion of Local Remedies in the Case Law of International Courts and Tribunals, Leyden 1968 Open Google Scholar
  307. Hagelberg, Juliane, Die völkerrechtliche Verfügungsbefugnis des Staates über Rechtsansprüche von Privatpersonen, Baden-Baden 2006 Open Google Scholar
  308. Hailbronner, Kay, Der Staat und der Einzelne als Völkerrechtssubjekte, in: Wolfgang Graf Vitzthum (Hrsg.), Völkerrecht, 4. Auflage, Berlin 2007, S. 157-264 Open Google Scholar
  309. van Harten, Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford 2006 Open Google Scholar
  310. Hailbronner, Kay, Perceived Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Kyo-Hwa Chung, Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Claire Balchin (Hrsg.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, S. 433-453 Open Google Scholar
  311. Hailbronner, Kay, Toward an Independent Rules-Based System of Trade and Investment, The MacDonald Laurier Institute Commentary (28. September 2011), abrufbar unter http://www.macdonaldlaurier.ca/files/pdf/State-Investor-Arbitration-Commentary-Sept-28-2011.pdf Open Google Scholar
  312. Harvard Research on the Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners, 23 AJIL (Supplement) (1929), S. 131-239 Open Google Scholar
  313. Head, Ivan L., A Fresh Look at the Local Remedies Rule, 5 CYIL (1967), S. 142-158 Open Google Scholar
  314. Herdegen, Matthias, Die Bedeutung von Auslandsinvestitionen für die wirtschaftliche, soziale und kulturelle Entwicklung, in: Rudolf Dolzer, Matthias Herdegen, Bernhard Vogel (Hrsg.), Auslandsinvestionen – Ihre Bedeutung für Armutsbekämpfung, Wirtschaftswachstum und Rechtskultur, Freiburg i. Brsg. 2006, S. 352-362 Open Google Scholar
  315. Herdegen, Matthias, Diplomatischer Schutz und die Erschöpfung von Rechtsbehelfen, in: Georg Ress, Torsten Stein (Hrsg.), Der diplomatische Schtuz im Völker- und Europarecht, Baden-Baden 1996, S. 63-96 Open Google Scholar
  316. Herdegen, Matthias, Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 9. Auflage, München 2011 Open Google Scholar
  317. Herdegen, Matthias, Völkerrecht, München 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783899498172
  318. Herdegen, Matthias, Wirkungen von Schiedssprüchen in Streitigkeiten zwischen Privatpersonen und fremden Staaten, RIW 1989, S. 329-337 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75026-7_11
  319. Historische Commission bei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Hrsg.), Die Recesse und andere Akten der Hansetage 1256 – 1430, Band 1, Nachdr., Hildesheim 1976 Open Google Scholar
  320. Hobér, Kaj, MFN Clauses and Dispute Resolution in Investment Treaties: Have We Reached the End of the Road?, in: Christina Binder, Ursula Kriebaum, August Reinisch, Stephan Wittich (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 31-41 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0004
  321. Hoffmann, Anne K., The Investor's Right to Waive Access to Protection under a Bilateral Investment Treaty, 22 ICSID Rev.-FILJ (2007), S. 69-94 Open Google Scholar
  322. Hohl, Friedrich Rudolf, Bartolus a Saxoferrato: Tractatus Represaliarum, Bonn 1954 Open Google Scholar
  323. Hyde, Charles Cheney, International Law Chiefly As Interpreted and Applied by the United States, Bd. 1, Boston 1922 Open Google Scholar
  324. ICSID (Hrsg.), History of the ICSID Convention: Documents Concerning the Origin and Formulation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of other States, Washington, D.C. 1970 Open Google Scholar
  325. ICSID News Release, Venezuela Submits a Notice under Article 71 of the ICSID Convention (26. Januar 2012), abrufbar unter http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=OpenPage&PageType=AnnouncementsFrame&FromPage=Announcements&pageName=Announcement100 Open Google Scholar
  326. ILA German Branch / Working Group (Hrsg.), General Public International Law and International Investment Law – A Research Sketch on Selected Issues –, Beitra?ge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, Heft 105, Halle 2011 Open Google Scholar
  327. Inter-American Juridical Committee, Contribution of the American Continent to the Principles of International Law that Govern the Responsibility of the State, OAS Doc. OEA/Ser.I/VI.2-CIJ-61 (1962) Open Google Scholar
  328. International Law Association, Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property (Final Report), Toronto Conference (2006), abrufbar unter: http://www.ila-hq.org/ Open Google Scholar
  329. International Law Association, Resolution No. 5/2006: Diplomatic Protection of Persons and Property, abrufbar unter: http://www.ila-hq.org/ Open Google Scholar
  330. International Law Commission, Diplomatic Protection – Comments and Observations Received from Governments (Addendum) (3. April 2006), A/CN.4/561/Add.1 Open Google Scholar
  331. International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses with Commentaries, UN Doc. A/33/10, YILC 1978 (vol. II) Open Google Scholar
  332. Jessup, Philip C., A Modern Law of Nations: An Introduction, New York 1949 Open Google Scholar
  333. Johnson, Toni, The Return of Resource Nationalism, Analysis in Brief – Council on Foreign Relations, 13. August 2007, abrufbar unter http://www.cfr.org/venezuela/return-resource-nationalism/p13989 Open Google Scholar
  334. Jones, Carie, When does the Waiver Provision in NAFTA Article 1121 Have Consequences? An Analysis of the Situation Considered, Yet Unresolved in Loewen Group, Inc. v. United States, 15 Currents Int'l Trade L.J. (2006), S. 3-19 Open Google Scholar
  335. Juillard, Patrick, Calvo Doctrine/Calvo Clause, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2009, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  336. Kelsey, Jane, Investment Developments in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, Investment Treaty News (Januar 2012), S. 8-9, abrufbar unter http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/iisd_itn_january_2012_en.pdf Open Google Scholar
  337. Kerley, Ernest L., Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law, 56 AJIL (1962), S. 165-170 Open Google Scholar
  338. Kerling, Michael, Effektivität von Investitionsschutzverfahren aus Sicht der Industrie, in: Christian Tietje (Hrsg.), International Investment Protection and Arbitration, Berlin 2008 Open Google Scholar
  339. Kinnear, Meg N./Bjorklund, Andrea K./Hannaford, John F. G., Investment Disputes Under NAFTA: An Annotated Guide to NAFTA Chapter 11, Alphen aan den Rijn 2006 Open Google Scholar
  340. Kiss, Alexandre, Abuse of Rights, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2006, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  341. Kiss, Alexandre-Charles, Re?pertoire de la Pratique Franc?aise en Matie?re de Droit International Public, Bd. 3, Paris 1965 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3406/afdi.1965.1841
  342. Klein, Eckhart, Anspruch auf diplomatischen Schutz?, in: Georg Ress, Torsten Stein (Hrsg.), Der diplomatische Schtuz im Völker- und Europarecht, Baden-Baden 1996, S. 125-136 Open Google Scholar
  343. Knottnerus, Roeline/van Os, Roos, The Netherlands: A Gateway to ‘Treaty Shopping’ for Investment Protection, Investment Treaty News (Januar 2012), S. 10-12, abrufbar unter http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/iisd_itn_january_2012_en.pdf Open Google Scholar
  344. Kohnert, Nicole/Brambusch, Jens, Wir müssen draussen bleiben, Financial Times Deutschland, 14. Juli 2010, S. 23 Open Google Scholar
  345. Kokott, Juliane, Interim Report on "The Role of Diplomatic Protection in the Field of the Protection of Foreign Investment", in: The International Law Assocication – Report on the Seventieth Conference, New Delhi 2002, S. 259-277 Open Google Scholar
  346. Kokott, Juliane, Interim Report on „The Exhaustion of Local Remedies“, in: A. Soons, C. Ward (Hrsg.), The International Law Association (ILA) – Report on the Sixty-ninth Conference, London 2000 Open Google Scholar
  347. Kotzur, Markus, Ex Aequo et Bono, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2011, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  348. Kriebaum, Ursula, Eigentumsschutz im Völkerrecht – eine vergleichende Untersuchung zum internationalen Investitionsrecht sowie zum Menschenrechtsschutz, Berlin 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-12702-3
  349. Kriebaum, Ursula, Local Remedies and the Standards for the Protection of Foreign Investment, in: Christina Binder, Ursula Kriebaum, August Reinisch, Stephan Wittich (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 417-462 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0023
  350. Kulick, Andreas, Vier Geschichten des internationalen Investitionsrechts, SchiedsVZ 2010, S. 257-264 Open Google Scholar
  351. Kurtz, Jürgen, Access to Justice, Denial of Justice and International Investment Law: A Reply to Francesco Francioni, 20 EJIL (2010), S. 1077-1085 Open Google Scholar
  352. Kurtz, Jürgen, The Australian Trade Policy Statement on Investor-State Dispute Settlement, ASIL Insights (vol. 15, issue 22, 2. August 2011), abrufbar unter http://www.asil.org/insights110802.cfm Open Google Scholar
  353. Laird, Ian, A Community of Destiny: The Barcelona Traction Case and the Development of Shareholder Rights to Bring Investment Claims, in: Todd Weiler (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law, London 2005, S. 669-700 Open Google Scholar
  354. Law, Castor H. P., The Local Remedies Rule in International Law, Genf 1961 Open Google Scholar
  355. Leathley, Christian, What will the Recent Entry Into Force of the UNASUR Treaty Mean for Investment Arbitration in South America?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (13. April 2011), abrufbar unter http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2011/04/13/unasur-treaty-and-investment-arbitration-in-south-america/ Open Google Scholar
  356. Legnano, Giovanni da, Tractatus de Bello, de Repraessaliis et de Duello, 1360, abgedruckt in: James Brown Scott (Hrsg.), The Classics of Internationa Law, Bd. 8, New York 1964, S. 207-374 Open Google Scholar
  357. Lévesque, Céline, Investor-State Arbitration Under NAFTA Chapter 11: What Lies Beneath Jurisdictional Challenges, 17 ICSID-Rev (2002), S. 320-379 Open Google Scholar
  358. Lowenfeld, Andreas F., International Economic Law, 2. Auflage, Oxford 2008 Open Google Scholar
  359. Malanczuk, Peter, Zur Repressalie im Entwurf der International Law Commission zur Staatenverantwortlichkeit, 45 ZaöRV (1985), S. 293-323 Open Google Scholar
  360. Mann, F. A., State Contracts and International Arbitration, 42 BYIL (1967), S. 1-37 Open Google Scholar
  361. Marboe, Irmgard/Reinisch, August, Contracts between States and Foreign Private Law Persons, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2010, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  362. Markert, Lars, Streitschlichtungsklauseln in Investitionsschutzabkommen, Baden-Baden 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845226613
  363. Marsden, R. G. (Hrsg.), Documents Relating to Law and Custom of the Sea, London 1916 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1835024
  364. Maunz, Theodor/Dürig, Günter (Hrsg.), Grundgesetz, Band 3, 53. Auflage, München 2009 Open Google Scholar
  365. Maupin, Julie A., MFN-based Jurisdiction in Investor–State Arbitration: Is There Any Hope for a Consistent Approach?, 14 JIEL (2011), S. 157-190 Open Google Scholar
  366. McLachlan, Campbell, The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention, 54 ICQL (2005), S. 279-319 Open Google Scholar
  367. Maupin, Julie A./Shore, Laurence/Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration : Substantive Principles, Oxford international arbitration series, Oxford; New York 2007 Open Google Scholar
  368. Meron, Theodor, The Incidence of the Rule of Local Remedies, 35 BYIL (1959), S. 83-101 Open Google Scholar
  369. Moore, John Bassett, A Digest of International Law, Bd. 6, Washington 1906 Open Google Scholar
  370. Morelli, Gaëtano, La Théorie Générale du Procès International, 61 RdC (1937), S. 253-373 Open Google Scholar
  371. Mosler, Hermann, Das Österreichisch-Deutsche Schiedsverfahren nach dem Finanz- und Ausgleichsvertrag vom 27. November 1961, 32 ZaöRV (1972), S. 36-70 Open Google Scholar
  372. Mourre, Alexis, Perspectives of International Arbitration in Latin America, 17 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. (2006), S. 597-613 Open Google Scholar
  373. Mummery, David R., The Content of the Duty to Exhaust Local Judicial Remedies, 58 AJIL (1964), S. 389-414 Open Google Scholar
  374. Nacimiento, Patricia/Burianski, Markus, Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht – Die Bestimmung des geschützten „Investors” in Konzernstrukturen, NZG 2010, S. 52-54 Open Google Scholar
  375. Nair, Promod, State Responsibility for Non-Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Revisiting Saipem Two Years On, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (25. August 2011), abrufbar unter http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2011/08/25/state-responsibility-for-non-enforcement-of-arbitral-awards-revisiting-saipem-two-years-on/ Open Google Scholar
  376. Newcombe, Andrew, When is Court Interference in Arbitration Proceedings Expropriatory?, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (07. Juli 2009), abrufbar unter http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2009/07/07/when-is-court-interference-in-arbitration-proceedings-expropriatory/ Open Google Scholar
  377. Newcombe, Andrew/Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment, Austin u.a. 2009 Open Google Scholar
  378. Newcombe, Andrew Paul, Investor Misconduct: Jurisdiction, Admissibility or Merits?, in: Chester Brown, Kate Miles (Hrsg.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge 2011, S. 187-200 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043809.015
  379. Norway State Secretary Committee, Comments on the Model for Future Investment Agreements (19. Dezember 2007), abrufbar unter http://italaw.com/investmenttreaties.htm Open Google Scholar
  380. Nowrot, Karsten, International Investment Law and the Republic of Ecuador: From Arbitral Bilateralism to Judicial Regionalism, in: Christian Tietje, Gerhard Kraft, Matthias Lehmann (Hrsg.), Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, Heft 96, Halle 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1620424
  381. o. V., A victory by default? – Argentina's debt restructuring, The Economist, 5. März 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2005.07.087
  382. o. V., Bolivien verstaatlicht drei Stromproduzenten, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 4.5.2010, S. 10 Open Google Scholar
  383. o. V., Korean Protests Erupt Over Investor-State Arbitration Provisions in US-South Korea FTA, Investment Treaty News (Januar 2012), S. 14, abrufbar unter http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/iisd_itn_january_2012_en.pdf Open Google Scholar
  384. o. V., Venezuela to Quit Arbitration Body, New York Times, 16. Januar 2012, S. B2 Open Google Scholar
  385. O'Connell, Daniel Patrick, International Law, Band 2, 2. Auflage, London 1970 Open Google Scholar
  386. Paulsson, Jan, Arbitration Without Privity, 10 ICSID Rev.-FILJ (1995), S. 232-257 Open Google Scholar
  387. Paulsson, Jan, Avoiding Unintended Consequences, in: Karl P. Sauvant (Hrsg.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, New York 2008, S. 241-265 Open Google Scholar
  388. Paulsson, Jan, Denial of Justice in International Law, Cambridge 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494420.001
  389. Paulsson, Jan, Jurisdiction and Admissibility, in: Gerald Aksen, Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, Michael J. Mustill, Paolo Michele Patocchi, Anne Marie Whitesell (Hrsg.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner, Paris 2005, S. 601-617 Open Google Scholar
  390. Pérez Loose, Hernán, International Arbitration With Ecuador: A New Legal Minefield, International Law Office (21. Oktober 2010), abrufbar unter http://www.internationallawoffice.com/newsletters/detail.aspx?g=b7740f30-d2ab-4603-a3c6-c3f3cc3ffeaa Open Google Scholar
  391. Peters, Paul, Dispute Settlement Arrangements in Investment Treaties, 22 NYIL (1991), S. 91-161 Open Google Scholar
  392. Peterson, Luke Eric, ANALYSIS: As Brussels Continues to Clarify Thinking on Investment Dispute Settlement in Discussion Paper, Spotlight Settles on Legitimacy Concerns Plaguing Current Brand of Investor-State Arbitration, Investment Arbitration Reporter (Vol. 9, No. 8, 9. Juni 2011), abrufbar unter http://www.iareporter.com/articles/20110609_7 Open Google Scholar
  393. Peterson, Luke Eric, Norway Draft BIT Has Many Innovations With Respect To Protection, Investment Treaty News (27. März 2008), abrufbar unter http://www.iisd.org/itn/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/itn_mar27_2008.pdf Open Google Scholar
  394. Peterson, Luke Eric, Out of Order, in: Kyo-Hwa Chung, Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Claire Balchin (Hrsg.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, S. 483-488 Open Google Scholar
  395. Peterson, Luke Eric, Unpublished Discussion Paper Gives Overview of European Commission Trade Department's Recent Thinking on Foreign Dispute Settlement, Investment Arbitration Reporter (Vol. 9, No. 8, 9. Juni 2011), abrufbar unter http://www.iareporter.com/articles/20110609_5 Open Google Scholar
  396. Phillipson, Coleman, The International Law and Custom of Ancient Greece and Rome, 2. Band, London 1911 Open Google Scholar
  397. Productivity Commission, Research Report: Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements, Melbourne 2010 Open Google Scholar
  398. Public Statement on the International Investment Regime (31. August 2011), abrufbar unter http://www.osgoode.yorku.ca/public-statement/documents/Public%20Statement%20%28June%202011%29.pdf Open Google Scholar
  399. Radi, Yannick, The Application of the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause to the Dispute Settlement Provisions of Bilateral Investment Treaties: Domesticating the ‘Trojan Horse’, 18 EJIL (2007), S. 757-774 Open Google Scholar
  400. Ranjan, Shikar, Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO), in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2009, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  401. Reinisch, August, Die Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten, in: Christian Tietje (Hrsg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, Berlin 2009 Open Google Scholar
  402. Reinisch, August, Die internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit und andere Formen der Streitbeilegung, in: Christian Tietje (Hrsg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, Berlin 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783899496642.745
  403. Reinisch, August, Expropriation, in: Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, Christoph Schreuer (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford; New York 2008, S. 407-458 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.001.0001
  404. Reinisch, August, Interntationales Investititonsschutzrecht, in: Christian Tietje (Hrsg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, Berlin 2009 Open Google Scholar
  405. Reinisch, August (Hrsg.), Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001
  406. Reisman, W. Michael/Iravani, Heidi, The Changing Relation of National Courts and International Commercial Arbitration, 21 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. (2010), S. 5-45 Open Google Scholar
  407. Report of the International Conference on Financing for Development, UN Doc A/CONF.198/11 (2002) Open Google Scholar
  408. Report of the International Law Commission (29th Session), UN Doc A/32/10, YILC 1977, vol. II(2) Open Google Scholar
  409. Report of the International Law Commission (53rd Session), UN Doc A/56/10, YILC 2001, vol. II(2) Open Google Scholar
  410. Report of the International Law Commission (54th Session), UN Doc A/57/10 (2002) Open Google Scholar
  411. Report of the International Law Commission (58th Session), UN Doc A/61/10 (2006) Open Google Scholar
  412. Report of the International Law Commission (63rd Session), UN Doc A/66/10 (2011) Open Google Scholar
  413. Report of the Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy Regarding the Draft Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Presented to the US Department of State (30. September 2009), abrufbar unter http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/2009/131098.htm Open Google Scholar
  414. Republic of South Africa, Bilateral Investment Treaty Policy Framework Review – Government Position Paper (Juni 2009), abrufbar unter http://www.pmg.org.za/files/docs/090626trade-bi-lateralpolicy.pdf Open Google Scholar
  415. Re?solution sur "la re?gle de l'e?puisement des recours internes", adopte?e par l'Institut de droit international en 1956, 45 AIDI (1956), S. 364 Open Google Scholar
  416. Resolutions of the Institute of International Law Adopted at Lausanne, 1927, 22 AJIL (Suppl.) (1928), S. 330-344 Open Google Scholar
  417. Die Revolutionäre bitten zur Kasse, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 30.10.2007, S. 12 Open Google Scholar
  418. Roberts, Anthea, Power and Persuasion in Invetment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 AJIL (2010), S. 179-225 Open Google Scholar
  419. Rolin, Henri A., Les Principes de Droit International Public, 77 RdC (1950), S. 305-479 Open Google Scholar
  420. Rubins, Noah, Loewen v. United States: The Burial of an Investor-State Arbitration Claim, 21 Arbitration International (2005), S. 1-36 Open Google Scholar
  421. Ruffert, Matthias, Reprisals, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2010, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  422. Salacuse, Jeswald W., The Law of International Investment Treaties, Oxford u.a. 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199206056.001.0001
  423. Salacuse, Jeswald W./Sullivan, Nicholas P., Do BIT's Really Work?: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain, 46 Harv. Int'l L. J. (2005), S. 67-129 Open Google Scholar
  424. Sarhan, Abdelaziz, L'Epuisement des Recours Internes en Matière des Responsabilité Internationale, Paris 1962 Open Google Scholar
  425. Sattorova, Mavluda, Judicial Expropriation or Denial of Justice? A Note on Saipem v Bangladesh, Int. A.L.R. 2010, S. 35-41 Open Google Scholar
  426. Scelle, Georges, Le Phénomène Juridique du Dédoublement Fonctionnel, in: Walter Schätzel, Hans-Jürgen Schlochauer (Hrsg.), Rechtsfragen der internationalen Organisation – Festchrift für Hans Wehberg zu seinem 70. Geburtstag, Frankfurt/Main 1956, S. 324-343 Open Google Scholar
  427. Scelle, Georges, Observations sur la Règle de l'Epuisement des Recours Internes, 45 AIDI (1954-I), S. 78-81 Open Google Scholar
  428. Scelle, Georges, Précis de Droit des Gens. Principes et Systématique, Bd. 1, Paris 1932 Open Google Scholar
  429. Schill, Stephan W., Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction – A Reply to Zachary Douglas, 2 J. Int'l. Disp. Settlement (2011), S. 353-371 Open Google Scholar
  430. Schill, Stephan W., Private Enforcement of International Investment Law – Why We Need Investor Standing in BIT Dispute Settlement, in: Kyo-Hwa Chung, Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Claire Balchin (Hrsg.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, S. 29-50 Open Google Scholar
  431. Schill, Stephan W., Tearing Down the Great Wall: The New Generation Investment Treaties of the People's Republic of China, 15 CJICL (2007), S. 73-118 Open Google Scholar
  432. Schöbener, Burkhard/Markert, Lars, Das International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), ZVglRWiss 105 (2006), S. 65-116 Open Google Scholar
  433. Schreuer, Christoph, Calvo's Grandchildren: The Return of Local Remedies in Investment Arbitration, 1 LPICT (2005), S. 1-17 Open Google Scholar
  434. Schreuer, Christoph, Denunciation of the ICSID Convention and Consent to Arbitration, in: Kyo-Hwa Chung, Michael Waibel, Asha Kaushal, Claire Balchin (Hrsg.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, S. 353-368 Open Google Scholar
  435. Schreuer, Christoph, The Dynamic Evolution of the ICSID System, in: Rainer Hofmann, Christian J. Tams (Hrsg.), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID): Taking Stock After 40 Years, Baden-Baden 2007, S. 15-30 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845203317
  436. Schreuer, Christoph, Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET): Interactions With Other Standards, in: Clarisse Ribeiro, Graham Coop (Hrsg.), Investment Protection and the Energy Charter Treaty, New York 2008, S. 63-100 Open Google Scholar
  437. Schreuer, Christoph, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2. Auflage, Cambridge 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596896.007
  438. Schreuer, Christoph, Interaction of International Tribunals and Domestic Courts in Investment Law, in: Arthur W. Rovine (Hrsg.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers 2010, Leiden, S. 71-94 Open Google Scholar
  439. Schreuer, Christoph, Shareholder Protection in International Investment Law, in: Pierre-Marie Dupuy, Bardo Fassbender, Malcom Shaw, Karl-Peter Sommermann (Hrsg.), Völkerrecht als Wertordnung – Common Values in International Law, Festschrift für Christian Tomuschat, Kehl u.a. 2006, S. 601-619 Open Google Scholar
  440. Schreuer, Christoph, Travelling the BIT Route – of Waiting Periods, Umbrella Clauses and Forks in the Road, 5 JWIT (2004), S. 231-256 Open Google Scholar
  441. Schwarze, Jürgen, Rechtsschutz Privater bei völkerrechtswidrigem Handeln fremder Staaten, 24 AVR (1986), S. 408-433 Open Google Scholar
  442. Schwarzenberger, Georg, International Law, Band 1, 3. Auflage, London 1957 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2195709
  443. Schwebel, Stephen, On Whether the Breach by a State of a Contract with an Alien Is a Breach of International Law, in: Justice in International Law – Selected Writings of Stephen M. Schwebel, Cambrigde 1987, S. 425-435 Open Google Scholar
  444. Schwebel, Stephen M., The United States 2004 Model Bilateral Investment Treaty: An Exercise in Regressive Development of International Law, in: Gerald Aksen, Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, Michael J. Mustill, Paolo Michele Patocchi, Anne Marie Whitesell (Hrsg.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner, 2005, S. 815-23 Open Google Scholar
  445. Scott, James Brown (Hrsg.), The International Conferences of American States (1889-1928), Publications of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Division of International Law, New York 1931 Open Google Scholar
  446. Seidl, Gerd, Die Völkerrechtsordnung an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert, 38 AVR (2000), S. 23-47 Open Google Scholar
  447. Shany, Yuval, Regulating Jurisdictional Relations between National and International Courts, Oxford 2007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211791.003.0001
  448. Shaw, Malcom, International Law, 8. Auflage, Cambridge u.a. 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841637.005
  449. Shea, Donald R., The Calvo Clause, London u.a. 1955 Open Google Scholar
  450. Shen, Wei, Is This a Great Leap Forward? A Comparative Review of the Investor-State Arbitration Clause in the Asean-China Investment Treaty: From BIT Jurisprudential and Practical Perspectives, 27 J. Int. Arb. (2010), S. 379-419 Open Google Scholar
  451. Shihata, Ibrahim F. I., Toward a Greater Depoliticization of Investment Disputes: The Roles of ICSID and MIGA, 1 ICSID Rev-FILJ (1986), S. 1-25 Open Google Scholar
  452. Siess-Scherz, Ingrid, Die Bedeutung des Subsidiaritätsprinzips für den Reformprozess des EGMR, in: Wolfram Karl (Hrsg.), Internationale Gerichtshöfe und nationale Rechtsordnung, Internationales Symposium am Österreichiischen Institut für Menschenrechte am 28. und 29. November 2003 in Salzburg zu Ehren von em.o.Univ.-Prof. DDr. Dr. h.c. Franz Matscher, Kehl u.a. 2005, S. 83-109 Open Google Scholar
  453. Simpson, John Liddle/Fox, Hazel, International Arbitration: Law and Practice, New York 1959 Open Google Scholar
  454. Sinclair, Anthony, ICSID Arbitration: How Long Does It Take?, 4 Global Arb. Rev. (26. Oktober 2009), S. 18-23 Open Google Scholar
  455. Sinclair, Anthony, The Origin of the Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection, 20 Arbitration International (2004), S. 411-434 Open Google Scholar
  456. Sipress, Alan, Flawed Legal System Impeding Indonesia; Lacking Confidence, Foreign Investors Flee, Washington Post, 29. Oktober 2002, S. A17 Open Google Scholar
  457. Società Italiana per l'Organizzazione Internazionale/Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, La Prassi Italiana di Diritto Internazionale: Prima Serie (1861-1887), Bd. 2, New York 1970 Open Google Scholar
  458. Söderlund, Christer, Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties, in: M.Á. Fernández-Ballesteros, David Arias (Hrsg.), Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades, Las Rozas 2010, S. 1121-1130 Open Google Scholar
  459. Sohn, Louis B./Baxter, R. R., Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens: II. Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens, 55 AJIL (1961), S. 548-584 Open Google Scholar
  460. Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment, 3. Auflage, Cambridge u.a. 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841439.006
  461. Sornarajah, M., State Responsibility and Bilateral Investment Treaties, 20 JWTL (1986), S. 79-98 Open Google Scholar
  462. Spiegel, Hans W., Origin and Development of Denial of Justice, 32 AJIL (1938), S. 63-81 Open Google Scholar
  463. Spiermann, Ole, Individual Rights, State Interests and the Power to Waive ICSID Jurisdiction Under Bilateral Investment Treaties, 20 Arbitration International (2004), S. 179-211 Open Google Scholar
  464. Spiermann, Ole, Twentieth Century Internationalism in Law, 18 EJIL (2007), S. 785-814 Open Google Scholar
  465. Starke, Joseph Gabriel, Imputability in International Delinquencies, 19 BYIL (1938), S. 104-117 Open Google Scholar
  466. Stein, Torsten/von Buttlar, Christian, Völkerrecht, 12. Auflage, Köln 2009 Open Google Scholar
  467. Stratmann, Klaus, Vattenfall verklagt Deutschland, Handelsblatt, 2. November 2011, S. 6 Open Google Scholar
  468. Summary Records of the Meetings of the Fifty-Fourth Session, UN Doc A/CN.4/SER.A/2002, YILC 2002 (vol. I) Open Google Scholar
  469. Ténékides, Cyriaque Georges, L'Epuisement des Voies de Recours Internes Comme Condition Préalable de l'Instance Internationale, 14 RDILC (1933), S. 514-535 Open Google Scholar
  470. von Thiesenhausen, Friederike, Peinliche Premiere, Financial Times Deutschland, 8. April 2009, S. 1 Open Google Scholar
  471. Thirlway, Hugh, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1960-1989 (Part Seven), 66 BYIL (1995), S. 1-96 Open Google Scholar
  472. Thomas, J.C., A Reply to Professor Brower, 40 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. (2002), S. 433-463 Open Google Scholar
  473. Tietje, Christian, Begriff, Geschichte und Grundlagen des Internationalen Wirtschaftssystems und Wirtschaftsrechts, in: Christian Tietje (Hrsg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, Berlin 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783899496642.1
  474. Tietje, Christian, Internationaler Investitionsschutz, in: Dirk Ehlers, Friedrich Schoch (Hrsg.), Rechtsschutz im Öffentlichen Recht, Berlin 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783899496055.63
  475. Tomuschat, Christian, Die Charta der wirtschaftlichen Rechte und Pflichten der Staaten. Zur Geltungskraft von Deklarationen der UN-Generalversammlung, 36 ZaöRV (1976), S. 444-491 Open Google Scholar
  476. Tomz, Michael, Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries, Princeton 2007 Open Google Scholar
  477. Trakman, Leon E., Foreign Direct Investment – Hazard or Opportunity?, 41 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. (2009), S. 1-66 Open Google Scholar
  478. Trindade, A. A. Cançado, The Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law, Cambridge studies in international and comparative law, Cambridge 1983 Open Google Scholar
  479. Trindade, A. A. Cançado, The Birth of State Responsibility and the Nature of the Local Remedies Rule, 56 RDI (1978), S. 157-188 Open Google Scholar
  480. Trindade, A. A. Cançado, Origin and Historical Development of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law, 12 RBDI (1976), S. 499-527 Open Google Scholar
  481. Tudor, Ioana, The "Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard" in the International Law of Foreign Investment, Oxford 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235063.001.0001
  482. Udombana, Nsongurua J., So Far, So Fair: The Local Remedies Rule in the Jurisprudence of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, 97 AJIL (2003), S. 1-37 Open Google Scholar
  483. UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, New York/Genf 2007 Open Google Scholar
  484. UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Mid-1990s, New York/Genf 1998 Open Google Scholar
  485. UNCTAD, Course on Dispute Settlement (UNCTAD/EDM/Misc.232), Genf 2003 Open Google Scholar
  486. UNCTAD, Course on Dispute Settlement: 5.4 The Arbitral Proceeding (UNCTAD/EDM/Misc.232/Add. 36), Genf 2003 Open Google Scholar
  487. UNCTAD, Dispute Settlement: Investor-State, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, New York/Genf 2003 Open Google Scholar
  488. UNCTAD, International Investment Agreements: Key Issues, Volume I, New York/Genf 2004 Open Google Scholar
  489. UNCTAD, International Investment Instruments: A Compendium, Vol. III, New York/Genf 1996 Open Google Scholar
  490. UNCTAD, Investor-State Dispues Arising from Investment Treaties: A Review, New York/Genf 2005 Open Google Scholar
  491. UNCTAD, Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Impact on Investment Rulemaking, New York/Genf 2007 Open Google Scholar
  492. UNCTAD, Latest Developments in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, IIA Issues Note No. 1 (2010), abrufbar unter http://www.unctad.org Open Google Scholar
  493. UNCTAD, Latest Developments in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, IIA Issues Note No. 1 (2011), abrufbar unter http://www.unctad.org Open Google Scholar
  494. UNCTAD, Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, New York/Genf 2010 Open Google Scholar
  495. UNCTAD, Recent Developments in International Investment Agreements (2008–June 2009), IIA Monitor No. 3 (2009), abrufbar unter http://www.unctad.org Open Google Scholar
  496. UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2009 – Transnational Corporations, Agriculture Production and Development, New York/Genf 2009 Open Google Scholar
  497. Urbanek, Helmut, Das völkerrechtsverletzende Urteil, 9 ÖZÖR (1958/1959), S. 213-275 Open Google Scholar
  498. Valenti, Mara, The Most-Favoured Nation Clause in BITs as a Basis for Jurisdiction in Foreign Investor-Host State Arbitration, 24 Arbitration International (2008), S. 447-466 Open Google Scholar
  499. Vattel, Emer de, Le Droit des Gens ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle, 1758, deutsche Übersetzung abgedruckt in: Walter Schätzel (Hrsg.), Die Klassiker des Völkerrechts, Bd. III, Tübingen 1959 Open Google Scholar
  500. Verdross, Alfred/Simma, Bruno, Universelles Völkerrecht, Berlin 1984 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-05708-5
  501. Verzijl, Jan Hendrik Willem, Expose? Pre?liminaire Pre?sente? a? l'Institut de Droit International, 45 AIDI (1954-I), S. 5- Open Google Scholar
  502. Verzijl, Jan Hendrik Willem, International Law in Historical Perspective, Bd. 6, Leiden 1973 Open Google Scholar
  503. Verzijl, Jan Hendrik Willem, La Règle de l'Epuisement des Recours Internes, 45 AIDI (1954-I), S. 5-112 Open Google Scholar
  504. Vilijoen, Frans/Saurombe, Amos, Southern African Development Community, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2010, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  505. Villiger, Mark. E., Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Leiden 2009 Open Google Scholar
  506. Villiger, Mark. E., The Principle of Subsidiarity in the European Convention on Human Rights, in: Marcelo G. Kohen (Hrsg.), Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law, Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflish, Leiden 2007, S. 623-637 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004153837.i-0.184
  507. Vis-Dunbar, Damon, Norway Shelves Its Proposed Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, Investment Treaty News (Juni 2009), abrufbar unter http://www.iisd.org/itn/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ITN-June-2009.pdf Open Google Scholar
  508. Visscher, Charles de, Le Déni de Justice en Droit International, 52 RdC (1935), S. 369-442 Open Google Scholar
  509. Vitoria, Francisco de, De Indis et de Iure Belli Relectiones, englische Übersetzung der Ausgabe von 1696 abgedruckt in: James Brown Scott (Hrsg.), The Classics of International Law, Bd. 7, Washington 1917 Open Google Scholar
  510. Wagner, Thomas, Die Bank des Präsidenten, Financial Times Deutschland, 18. August 2008, S. 15 Open Google Scholar
  511. Waibel, Michael, Two Worlds of Necessity in ICSID Arbitration: CMS and LG&E, 20 LJIL (2007), S. 637-648 Open Google Scholar
  512. Waibel, Michael/Kaushal, Asha/Chung, Kyo-Hwa/Balchin, Claire (Hrsg.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010 Open Google Scholar
  513. Wälde, Thomas W./Ndi, George, Stabilizing International Investment Commitments: International Law Versus Contract Interpretation, 31 Tex. Int'l L. J. (1996), S. 216-267 Open Google Scholar
  514. Wälde, Thomas W./Sabahi, Borzu, Compensation, Damages, and Valuation in: Peter Muchlinski, Federico Ortino, Christoph Schreuer (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford; New York 2008, S. 1049-1124 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.001.0001
  515. Wallace, Don, Fair and Equitable Treatment and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico, in: Todd Weiler (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law, London 2005, S. 669-700 Open Google Scholar
  516. von Walter, André, Oil Concession Disputes, Arbitration on, in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2010, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  517. Wallace, Don, Die Reichweite von Schirmklauseln in Investitionsschutzabkommen, RIW 2006, S. 815-824 Open Google Scholar
  518. Warbrick, Colin, Protection of Nationals Abroad, 37 ICLQ (1988), S. 1002-1012 Open Google Scholar
  519. Wengler, Wilhelm, Völkerrecht, Band 1, Berlin 1964 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88662-1_11
  520. Werner, Kathrin, Vattenfall verklagt Deutschland, Financial Times Deutschland, 3. November 2011, S. 4 Open Google Scholar
  521. Westcott, Thomas, Foreign Investment Issues in the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement, Economic Round-up (Sommer 2005), S. 69-84, abrufbar unter http://www.treasury.gov.au/documents/958/PDF/06_Foreign_investment_policy_AUSFTA.pdf Open Google Scholar
  522. Weston, Burns H., The Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States and the Deprivation of Foreign-Owned Wealth, 75 AJIL (1981), S. 437-475 Open Google Scholar
  523. Wolff, Christian, Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum, 1749, englische Übersetzung abgedruckt in: James Brown Scott (Hrsg.), The Classics of Interntional Law, Bd. 13, Oxford 1934 Open Google Scholar
  524. Wong, Jarrod, The Application of Most-Favored Nation Clauses to Dispute Resolution Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 3 AJWH (2008), S. 171-198 Open Google Scholar
  525. Yackee, Jason Webb, Toward a Minimalist System of International Investment Law, Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 2009, S. 303-339 Open Google Scholar
  526. Yepes, Jesús María, Les Problèmes Fondamentaux du Droit des Gens en Amérique, 34 RdC (1934), S. 1-145 Open Google Scholar
  527. Zeiler, Gerold, Jurisdiction, Competence and Admissibility of Claims in ICSID Arbitration Proceedings, in: Christina Binder, Ursula Kriebaum, August Reinisch, Stephan Wittich (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 76-91 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0007
  528. Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth, Full Protection and Security, in: Stephan W. Schill (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0006
  529. Ziegler, Katja S., Jay Treaty (1794), in: Rüdiger Wolfrum (Hrsg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford 2009, Online Edition, www.mpepil.com Open Google Scholar
  530. Zissis, Carin, Bolivia's Nationalization of Oil and Gas, Backgrounder des Council on Foreign Relations, 12. Mai 2006, abrufbar unter http://www.cfr.org/economics/bolivias-nationalization-oil-gas/p10682 Open Google Scholar
  531. Zouche, Richard, luris et Iudicii Fecialis, sive, luris Inter Gentes, et Quaestionum de Eodem Explicatio, 1650, in: James Brown Scott (Hrsg.), The Classics of International Law, Bd. 1, Washington 1911 Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Book Titles No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex