Cover des Buchs: Humanitarian Admission to Europe
Sammelband Open Access Vollzugriff

Humanitarian Admission to Europe

The Law between Promises and Constraints
Herausgeber:innen:
Verlag:
 2020

Publikation durchsuchen


Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5730-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9860-3
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriften zum Migrationsrecht
Band
30
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
371
Produkttyp
Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 10 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. IntroductionSeiten 11 - 13 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1.1 From ‘Legal Avenues’ and ‘Safe Pathways’, to ‘Humanitarian Visas’ and other ‘Protected Entry Procedures’
      2. 1.2 Policy Developments at EU Level. A Focus on Resettlement
    3. 2 Litigation for Humanitarian Admission to EuropeSeiten 27 - 31 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 3.1 The CJEU Invoking the Limits to its Competence of Judicial Review
      2. 3.2. Some Limits to the Intervention of Courts in Policy Debates on Humanitarian admission to Europe
    5. 4 The Revolving Doors of the Rule of LawSeiten 39 - 42 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    6. 5 The Law Between Promises and ConstraintsSeiten 43 - 46 Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Dirk Hanschel Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionDirk Hanschel
      2. 1 A Major Discrepancy Between Moral Claim and Legal RealityDirk Hanschel
      3. Dirk Hanschel
        1. 2.1 The Scope of Human Rights - Territory, Jurisdiction and Beyond?Dirk Hanschel
        2. Dirk Hanschel
          1. 2.2.1 The Standard of the ICCPRDirk Hanschel
          2. 2.2.2 The Standard of the ICESCRDirk Hanschel
        3. 2.3 The Exercise of Jurisdiction and Resulting Human Rights Obligations in EmbassiesDirk Hanschel
        4. 2.4 Inside Jurisdiction and/or Territory, but Outside Full Human Rights ProtectionDirk Hanschel
      4. Conclusion and OutlookDirk Hanschel
    2. Stephanie Law Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. Stephanie Law
        1. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Plight of the Syrian Family and the Externalisation of Border Control by the EUStephanie Law
        2. The Common European Asylum System (CEAS)Stephanie Law
        3. Schengen and the EU Legal Framework on VisasStephanie Law
      2. Protected Entry Procedures and Humanitarian VisasStephanie Law
      3. The Problem of the ‘Foot in the Door’ to the EUStephanie Law
      4. The Situation of the Syrian FamilyStephanie Law
      5. The ECJ’s Interpretation of EU LawStephanie Law
      6. The Application of the EU Fundamental Rights Framework to Humanitarian VisasStephanie Law
      7. The Political Questions: Policy and Legislative Discussions at the EU LevelStephanie Law
      8. ConclusionStephanie Law
    3. Sylvie Sarolea Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionSylvie Sarolea
      2. 1. The Setting of the Play: The Right of Asylum, a Right ‘of the Foot in the Door’Sylvie Sarolea
      3. 2. The Need for Legal AvenuesSylvie Sarolea
      4. 3. X & X: Does EU LAW require EU States to Open Legal Avenues for Asylum Seekers?Sylvie Sarolea
      5. Sylvie Sarolea
        1. 4.1 The textSylvie Sarolea
        2. 4.2 The Inconstancy of the Criteria of IntentionSylvie Sarolea
        3. 4.3 The Forgotten Possibility for a ProlongationSylvie Sarolea
      6. 5. Scope of Application of EU Asylum LawSylvie Sarolea
      7. 6. Consequences on the Application of the EU CharterSylvie Sarolea
      8. 7. The scope of territorial jurisdiction of the European Convention of Human RightsSylvie Sarolea
      9. 8. Access to Justice and the Criteria of the Availability of an AlternativeSylvie Sarolea
      10. 9. Bridging the Gaps in Access to Justice: the Global Compact for RefugeesSylvie Sarolea
    1. Katia Bianchini Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1 IntroductionKatia Bianchini
      2. Katia Bianchini
        1. 2.1 Legal basis of the humanitarian corridorsKatia Bianchini
        2. 2.2 The MoUs for the humanitarian corridors: signatories, selection of countries and number of humanitarian visasKatia Bianchini
        3. 2.3 The process of identification and selection of beneficiaries for the humanitarian corridorsKatia Bianchini
        4. Katia Bianchini
          1. 2.4.1 ‘Vulnerability’Katia Bianchini
          2. 2.4.2 Integration in Italy and avoidance of secondary movementsKatia Bianchini
        5. 2.5 Reception of beneficiaries: legal status and support provided after arrivalKatia Bianchini
        6. 2.6 Perspectives for enhancement and replication of the humanitarian corridors in other countriesKatia Bianchini
        7. 2.7 ShortcomingsKatia Bianchini
      3. 3 Other uses of humanitarian visas and instances of ad-hoc entry measuresKatia Bianchini
      4. Katia Bianchini
        1. 4.1. The debate on the need of EU legislation on protected entriesKatia Bianchini
        2. Katia Bianchini
          1. 4.2.1 Subjective rightKatia Bianchini
          2. 4.2.2 Procedural guaranteesKatia Bianchini
      5. 5 ConclusionKatia Bianchini
      6. AppendixKatia Bianchini
    2. Pauline Endres de Oliveira Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 6.1 IntroductionPauline Endres de Oliveira
      2. 6.2 Admission in exceptional individual casesPauline Endres de Oliveira
      3. Pauline Endres de Oliveira
        1. 6.3.1 HAP Syria 1 – 3: Procedure and beneficiariesPauline Endres de Oliveira
        2. 6.3.2 Admissions on the basis of the EU-Turkey-Statement: HAP TurkeyPauline Endres de Oliveira
      4. Pauline Endres de Oliveira
        1. 6.4.1 Private sponsorship programmes for relatives of Syrian nationals in GermanyPauline Endres de Oliveira
        2. 6.4.2 Controversies raised by private sponsorship: Duration of financial commitmentsPauline Endres de Oliveira
      5. Pauline Endres de Oliveira
        1. 6.5.1 Beneficiaries of resettlementPauline Endres de Oliveira
        2. 6.5.2 Resettlement proceduresPauline Endres de Oliveira
        3. 6.5.3 Germany’s commitment to the EU resettlement programme: A game of numbersPauline Endres de Oliveira
      6. Pauline Endres de Oliveira
        1. 6.6.1 The mentorship scheme as novelty to resettlementPauline Endres de Oliveira
        2. 6.6.2 NesT – Weak resettlement or improved private-sponsorship?Pauline Endres de Oliveira
      7. Pauline Endres de Oliveira
        1. Pauline Endres de Oliveira
          1. 6.7.1.1 Reception and place of residencePauline Endres de Oliveira
          2. 6.7.1.2 Duration of stay and options of permanent settlementPauline Endres de Oliveira
          3. 6.7.1.3 Access to work, social benefits and language coursesPauline Endres de Oliveira
          4. 6.7.1.4 The travel document as ‘Achilles heel’ of resettlement refugee statusPauline Endres de Oliveira
        2. Pauline Endres de Oliveira
          1. 6.7.2.1 Family reunification depends on the method of arrivalPauline Endres de Oliveira
          2. 6.7.2.2 Family reunification depends on the time of arrival: The changing laws and policies regarding beneficiaries of subsidiary protectionPauline Endres de Oliveira
      8. 6.8 ConclusionPauline Endres de Oliveira
    3. Serge Bodart Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionSerge Bodart
      2. 1 The LegislationSerge Bodart
      3. 2 The Administrative Practices and Case LawSerge Bodart
      4. Conclusion: The Pending QuestionsSerge Bodart
    1. Sophie Nakueira Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionSophie Nakueira
      2. 1 A Word on MethodSophie Nakueira
      3. Sophie Nakueira
        1. 2.1 Conforming to Vulnerability CategoriesSophie Nakueira
        2. 2.2 Multiplying Soft Law RegimesSophie Nakueira
      4. Sophie Nakueira
        1. 3.1 Dependency on aid systemSophie Nakueira
        2. 3.2 Climate ChangeSophie Nakueira
        3. 3.3 Economic DimensionSophie Nakueira
        4. 3.4 Poor InfrastructureSophie Nakueira
        5. 3.5 Contested Concept of ‘Family’Sophie Nakueira
        6. 3.6 Conflict of Interest in the Provision of Aid ServicesSophie Nakueira
        7. 3.7 The Exercise of Discretion by Aid AgenciesSophie Nakueira
      5. 4 Escaping Vulnerability: Survival StrategiesSophie Nakueira
      6. ConclusionSophie Nakueira
    2. Chapter 8: Making the Case X&X for the Humanitarian VisaSeiten 271 - 282 Tristan Wibault Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. Catharina Ziebritzki Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. IntroductionCatharina Ziebritzki
      2. Catharina Ziebritzki
        1. 1.1. Emphasis on resettlement in the context of crisisCatharina Ziebritzki
        2. 1.2. Elements of the emerging EU resettlement lawCatharina Ziebritzki
      3. Catharina Ziebritzki
        1. 2.1. Towards replacing territorial asylum procedures?Catharina Ziebritzki
        2. 2.2. Towards externalising responsibility?Catharina Ziebritzki
      4. Catharina Ziebritzki
        1. 3.1. Resettlement as a component of the Common European Asylum SystemCatharina Ziebritzki
        2. 3.2. Objective I: Providing international protectionCatharina Ziebritzki
        3. 3.3. Objective II: Complementing territorial asylum proceduresCatharina Ziebritzki
        4. 3.4. Objective III: Sharing international responsibilityCatharina Ziebritzki
      5. ConclusionCatharina Ziebritzki
    2. Eugenia Relaño Pastor Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1. IntroductionEugenia Relaño Pastor
      2. Eugenia Relaño Pastor
        1. 2.1 What do we mean by humanitarian visa?Eugenia Relaño Pastor
        2. 2.2. Humanitarian visas and EU fundamental rightsEugenia Relaño Pastor
      3. 3. Current Regulatory FrameworkEugenia Relaño Pastor
      4. Eugenia Relaño Pastor
        1. 4.1 From the Treaty of Amsterdam to the Stockholm ProgrammeEugenia Relaño Pastor
        2. 4.2. From the Stockholm Programme to the migration crisisEugenia Relaño Pastor
        3. 4.3 The LIBE Committee´s legislative own-initiative reportEugenia Relaño Pastor
      5. 5. Some concluding observationsEugenia Relaño Pastor
    3. Jean-Yves Carlier Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. The Long-term Path: Visa Facilitation and SuppressionJean-Yves Carlier
      2. The Short-term Path: Judicial ControlJean-Yves Carlier

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Schriften zum Migrationsrecht"