
Humanitarian Admission to Europe
The Law between Promises and Constraints- Editors:
- |
- Series:
- Schriften zum Migrationsrecht, Volume 30
- Publisher:
- 2020
Summary
Bringing together contributions from legal scholars and practitioners, this book contributes to a broader reflection on the extent to which policy controversies on humanitarian admission to Europe are channeled and managed through law.
The book is divided into four parts. The first part identifies the international and European legal obligations that are binding on both the EU and the Member States, and the constraints they impose – potentially and actually – when dealing with migrants who are outside EU territory. The second part studies the legal framework of humanitarian admission in three Member States (Germany, Italy and Belgium), as well as the related procedures and practices. The third part focuses on the experiences of those seeking humanitarian admission, including how they mobilize the law to obtain legal access to Europe. It presents the results of ethnographic fieldwork conducted among refugees in a refugee camp in Uganda who are seeking resettlement, as well as the testimony of the lawyer who defended a Syrian family applying for a humanitarian visa in Belgium in a landmark case that was litigated before the CJEU (X. and X. v. Belgium). The fourth part discusses the prospects for future developments in the EU legal and policy framework, including attempts at reforming the EU Visa Code and establishing a Union resettlement framework.
The book is edited by Marie-Claire Foblets and Luc Leboeuf, both from the Department of Law and Anthropology of the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Edition
- 1/2020
- Copyright Year
- 2020
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-5730-5
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-9860-3
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Schriften zum Migrationsrecht
- Volume
- 30
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 371
- Product Type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 1 - 10 Download chapter (PDF)
- IntroductionPages 11 - 13 Download chapter (PDF)
- 1.1 From ‘Legal Avenues’ and ‘Safe Pathways’, to ‘Humanitarian Visas’ and other ‘Protected Entry Procedures’
- 1.2 Policy Developments at EU Level. A Focus on Resettlement
- 2 Litigation for Humanitarian Admission to EuropePages 27 - 31 Download chapter (PDF)
- 3.1 The CJEU Invoking the Limits to its Competence of Judicial Review
- 3.2. Some Limits to the Intervention of Courts in Policy Debates on Humanitarian admission to Europe
- 4 The Revolving Doors of the Rule of LawPages 39 - 42 Download chapter (PDF)
- 5 The Law Between Promises and ConstraintsPages 43 - 46 Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- IntroductionAuthors:
- 1 A Major Discrepancy Between Moral Claim and Legal RealityAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 The Scope of Human Rights - Territory, Jurisdiction and Beyond?Authors:
- Authors:
- 2.2.1 The Standard of the ICCPRAuthors:
- 2.2.2 The Standard of the ICESCRAuthors:
- 2.3 The Exercise of Jurisdiction and Resulting Human Rights Obligations in EmbassiesAuthors:
- 2.4 Inside Jurisdiction and/or Territory, but Outside Full Human Rights ProtectionAuthors:
- Conclusion and OutlookAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:
- Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Plight of the Syrian Family and the Externalisation of Border Control by the EUAuthors:
- The Common European Asylum System (CEAS)Authors:
- Schengen and the EU Legal Framework on VisasAuthors:
- Protected Entry Procedures and Humanitarian VisasAuthors:
- The Problem of the ‘Foot in the Door’ to the EUAuthors:
- The Situation of the Syrian FamilyAuthors:
- The ECJ’s Interpretation of EU LawAuthors:
- The Application of the EU Fundamental Rights Framework to Humanitarian VisasAuthors:
- The Political Questions: Policy and Legislative Discussions at the EU LevelAuthors:
- ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- IntroductionAuthors:
- 1. The Setting of the Play: The Right of Asylum, a Right ‘of the Foot in the Door’Authors:
- 2. The Need for Legal AvenuesAuthors:
- 3. X & X: Does EU LAW require EU States to Open Legal Avenues for Asylum Seekers?Authors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 The textAuthors:
- 4.2 The Inconstancy of the Criteria of IntentionAuthors:
- 4.3 The Forgotten Possibility for a ProlongationAuthors:
- 5. Scope of Application of EU Asylum LawAuthors:
- 6. Consequences on the Application of the EU CharterAuthors:
- 7. The scope of territorial jurisdiction of the European Convention of Human RightsAuthors:
- 8. Access to Justice and the Criteria of the Availability of an AlternativeAuthors:
- 9. Bridging the Gaps in Access to Justice: the Global Compact for RefugeesAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- 1 IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Legal basis of the humanitarian corridorsAuthors:
- 2.2 The MoUs for the humanitarian corridors: signatories, selection of countries and number of humanitarian visasAuthors:
- 2.3 The process of identification and selection of beneficiaries for the humanitarian corridorsAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.4.1 ‘Vulnerability’Authors:
- 2.4.2 Integration in Italy and avoidance of secondary movementsAuthors:
- 2.5 Reception of beneficiaries: legal status and support provided after arrivalAuthors:
- 2.6 Perspectives for enhancement and replication of the humanitarian corridors in other countriesAuthors:
- 2.7 ShortcomingsAuthors:
- 3 Other uses of humanitarian visas and instances of ad-hoc entry measuresAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1. The debate on the need of EU legislation on protected entriesAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.2.1 Subjective rightAuthors:
- 4.2.2 Procedural guaranteesAuthors:
- 5 ConclusionAuthors:
- AppendixAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- 6.1 IntroductionAuthors:
- 6.2 Admission in exceptional individual casesAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.3.1 HAP Syria 1 – 3: Procedure and beneficiariesAuthors:
- 6.3.2 Admissions on the basis of the EU-Turkey-Statement: HAP TurkeyAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.4.1 Private sponsorship programmes for relatives of Syrian nationals in GermanyAuthors:
- 6.4.2 Controversies raised by private sponsorship: Duration of financial commitmentsAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.5.1 Beneficiaries of resettlementAuthors:
- 6.5.2 Resettlement proceduresAuthors:
- 6.5.3 Germany’s commitment to the EU resettlement programme: A game of numbersAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.6.1 The mentorship scheme as novelty to resettlementAuthors:
- 6.6.2 NesT – Weak resettlement or improved private-sponsorship?Authors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 6.7.1.1 Reception and place of residenceAuthors:
- 6.7.1.2 Duration of stay and options of permanent settlementAuthors:
- 6.7.1.3 Access to work, social benefits and language coursesAuthors:
- 6.7.1.4 The travel document as ‘Achilles heel’ of resettlement refugee statusAuthors:
- Authors:
- 6.7.2.1 Family reunification depends on the method of arrivalAuthors:
- 6.7.2.2 Family reunification depends on the time of arrival: The changing laws and policies regarding beneficiaries of subsidiary protectionAuthors:
- 6.8 ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- IntroductionAuthors:
- 1 The LegislationAuthors:
- 2 The Administrative Practices and Case LawAuthors:
- Conclusion: The Pending QuestionsAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- IntroductionAuthors:
- 1 A Word on MethodAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 Conforming to Vulnerability CategoriesAuthors:
- 2.2 Multiplying Soft Law RegimesAuthors:
- Authors:
- 3.1 Dependency on aid systemAuthors:
- 3.2 Climate ChangeAuthors:
- 3.3 Economic DimensionAuthors:
- 3.4 Poor InfrastructureAuthors:
- 3.5 Contested Concept of ‘Family’Authors:
- 3.6 Conflict of Interest in the Provision of Aid ServicesAuthors:
- 3.7 The Exercise of Discretion by Aid AgenciesAuthors:
- 4 Escaping Vulnerability: Survival StrategiesAuthors:
- ConclusionAuthors:
- Chapter 8: Making the Case X&X for the Humanitarian VisaPages 271 - 282Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1.1. Emphasis on resettlement in the context of crisisAuthors:
- 1.2. Elements of the emerging EU resettlement lawAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1. Towards replacing territorial asylum procedures?Authors:
- 2.2. Towards externalising responsibility?Authors:
- Authors:
- 3.1. Resettlement as a component of the Common European Asylum SystemAuthors:
- 3.2. Objective I: Providing international protectionAuthors:
- 3.3. Objective II: Complementing territorial asylum proceduresAuthors:
- 3.4. Objective III: Sharing international responsibilityAuthors:
- ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- 1. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- 2.1 What do we mean by humanitarian visa?Authors:
- 2.2. Humanitarian visas and EU fundamental rightsAuthors:
- 3. Current Regulatory FrameworkAuthors:
- Authors:
- 4.1 From the Treaty of Amsterdam to the Stockholm ProgrammeAuthors:
- 4.2. From the Stockholm Programme to the migration crisisAuthors:
- 4.3 The LIBE Committee´s legislative own-initiative reportAuthors:
- 5. Some concluding observationsAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- The Long-term Path: Visa Facilitation and SuppressionAuthors:
- The Short-term Path: Judicial ControlAuthors:




