Cover des Buchs: National Constitutional Identity
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

National Constitutional Identity

Judicial Resistance in the EU As Civil Disobedience and Conscientious Objection
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 05.02.2025

Zusammenfassung

Die nationale Verfassungsidentität artikuliert Verfassungskonflikte zwischen nationalen und supranationalen Rechtsordnungen in Form des gerichtlichen Widerstands gegen den Vorrang des Gemeinschaftsrechts. Das Buch untersucht kritisch die nationale Verfassungsidentität kritisch auf der Ebene der Verfassungstheorie und durch eine detaillierte Analyse ihrer praktischen Anwendung, wie sie vom EuGH und den obersten Gerichten der Mitgliedstaaten interpretiert wird. Darüber hinaus führt das Buch ein neuartiges Rahmenwerk von „Identitätsclustern" ein, das Identitätsansprüche anhand ihrer rechtfertigenden Gründe oder Rationalitäten bewertet. Schließlich zieht diese Untersuchung einen strukturellen Vergleich zwischen nationalen Identitätsansprüchen und den Konzepten des zivilen Ungehorsams und der Gewissensverweigerung. Identitätsansprüche weisen, ähnlich wie ziviler Ungehorsam, auf Mängel im Rechtssystem hin und stehen bis zu deren Beseitigung im Widerspruch zum EU-Recht. Im Zusammenhang mit der Gewissensverweigerung weisen Identitätsansprüche auf individuelle Umstände hin, die mit dem allgemeinen Rechtsrahmen nicht in Einklang gebracht werden können.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2025
Erscheinungsdatum
05.02.2025
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-2321-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4970-1
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriftenreihe Europäisches Recht, Politik und Wirtschaft
Band
406
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
518
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 22 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
      1. 1.1 Research Questions and Objectives
      2. 1.2 Methodology and Terminology
      3. 1.3 Existing Identity Research and Scholarly Interlocuters
        1. 2.1.1 Functional Characteristics of the EU’s Competences and its Consequences
        2. 2.1.2 Retained Exclusive Member States’ Competences
        3. 2.1.3 Actions Explicitly Prohibited by the EU: Reserved Member States’ Competences
        4. 2.1.4 Interim Conclusion
        1. 2.2.1 Competing Claims to Authority
        2. 2.2.2 Complementing Visions of Constitutional Pluralism: A Point of Departure
    3. 3 Outline
  3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1 Introduction
      1. 2.1 Pouvoir Constituant and Pouvoir Constitué as Ideal Paradox
      2. 2.2 Constitutional Populism and Constitutional Form – the Power of the FCC
      3. 2.3 Carl Schmitt and Identity of the Constitution – A Voluntaristic Account
      1. 3.1 The Eternity Clause – Identity Terminology Omitted
      2. 3.2 Identity: The Part of the Basic Law Dealing with Fundamental Rights
      3. 3.3 Identity: The Legal Principles Underlying Fundamental Rights
      1. 4.1 The Maastricht Treaty and the European Article
        1. 4.2.1 The Principle of National Democracy and the Right to Vote
        2. 4.2.2 Maastricht’s Empirical and Normative Assumption
        3. 4.2.3 Inner Contradiction of the Maastricht Argumentation
        4. 4.2.4 Neologism of Staatenverbund
      1. 5.1 The Lisbon Decision
      2. 5.2 Constitutional Identity and Ultra Vires Review Introduced
        1. 5.3.1 Five Essential Areas ‘Since Always’ (seit jeher)
        2. 5.3.2 Exclusive Control or Substantial Freedom of Action
      4. 5.4 The Lack of Democratic Legitimacy of the EU
      5. 5.5 Staatenverbund Intensified and Impossibility of the EU as a Federation
      6. 5.6 Concluding Remarks
      1. 6.1 Introduction – Continuity and Revisions
      2. 6.2 Mangold and the Right to Err
      3. 6.3 Ultra Vires Only as Manifest and Structurally Significant Violations
      4. 6.4 Concluding Remarks
      1. 7.1 The Context of the Outright Monetary Mechanism
      2. 7.2 OMT I – FCC’s First Reference ‘Dictate’ to the CJEU
      3. 7.3 Relationship Between Constitutional Identity and Ultra Vires Review
      4. 7.4 Article 4(2) and National Constitutional Identity by the FCC
      5. 7.5 The Right to Vote and Constitutional Review – OMT I, ESM and OMT II
      6. 7.6 Concluding Remarks
      1. 8.1 EAW – Human Dignity and the Principle of Individual Guilt
      2. 8.2 Reviewing EU Law Against German Fundamental Rights Standards
    9. 9 Conclusion
  4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1 Introduction
      1. 2.1 National Constitutional Identity – Muddying the Waters
      2. 2.2 Legal Intuition and Beyond
      3. 2.3 The Unbearable Lightness of Identity
      1. 3.1 Identity and Fundamental Rights
      2. 3.2 Shared Liberal Constitutional Commitments – Sameness
      3. 3.3 Sovereignty – Control and Independence Over Essential Areas
      4. 3.4 Political and Constitutional Fundamental Structures – Institutional Diversity
        1. 3.5.1 Human Dignity and Identity
        2. 3.5.2 Equality and Nobility Titles
        3. 3.5.3 Principles of Criminal Law
        4. 3.5.4 Interim Concluding Remarks
        1. 3.6.1 Unifying Effect of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms
        2. 3.6.2 Self-Determination of Churches and Non-Discrimination
        3. 3.6.3 Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages and Fundamental Freedoms
        1. 3.7.1 Protection of Languages and Equality of the Member States
        2. 3.7.2 Language as Identity in the CJEU’s Case Law
        1. 3.8.1 Uneasy Historical Narratives
        2. 3.8.2 Common State and Questions of Dissolution
        3. 3.8.3 Colonial Past
      9. 3.9 Cultural Diversities
      10. 3.10 Citizenship and Nationality
      11. 3.11 Interim Conclusions
        1. 4.1.1 Constitutional Transformation and Illiberal Democracy
        2. 4.1.2 Relocation of Refugees and Identitarian Constitutional Defence
        3. 4.1.3 Identity Decision – Historical Constitution
        4. 4.1.4 National Constitutional Identity and Migration
        5. 4.1.5 Interim Conclusions
        1. 4.2.1 Contextualizing the Struggles of Former One-Party Systems
        2. 4.2.2 The Trajectory of Changes – Undermining the Judiciary
        3. 4.2.3 The CJEU’s Milestone Protecting Judicial Independence – ASJP
        4. 4.2.4 Introduction of Identity to Safeguard Judicial Reform
        5. 4.2.5 The CJEU Further Strengthens National Judicial Independence
        6. 4.2.6 Legal Polexit as Climax of the Constitutional Conflict
        7. 4.2.7 Interim Conclusions
    5. 5 Conclusion
  5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1 Introduction
      1. 2.1 Multilevel Constitutional Design of Fundamental Rights Protection
      2. 2.2 The Scope of Fundamental Rights Application – A Disputed Matter
      3. 2.3 Three Levels of Fundamental Rights Protection – Turning Minimum Protection into a Final Norm
      1. 3.1 European Identity Clause and Fundamental Rights – Going Beyond
      2. 3.2 Identity as Commitments, Interpretations and Unique Fundamental Rights
      3. 3.3 Treating Fundamental Rights Identity Claims Differently
      1. 4.1 To be Forgotten I – Reviewing the Basic Law’s Standards
      2. 4.2 The Basic Law as the Standard of Review in EU Matters
      3. 4.3 Embracing or Facilitating Diversity of Fundamental Rights in the EU
      4. 4.4 Marginalizing the EU Charter but Forgetting Constitutional Identity
      1. 5.1 Direct Application of the EU Charter in Constitutional Complaints
      2. 5.2 Constructive Pluralism in the Field of European Fundamental Rights
      3. 5.3 The Tensions of the Right to be Forgotten II – Applying and Interpreting
      4. 5.4 Co-Shaping the Process of Constitutionalization of the EU
    6. 6 Forgetting Fundamental Rights Identity Claims
    7. 7 Conclusion
  6. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1 Introduction
      1. 2.1 Evolution of European Identity Clause under the EU Treaties
      2. 2.2 Identity as a Core National Responsibility
    3. 3 National Constitutional Identity: National or Constitutional
      1. 4.1 Protecting National Identity to Sacrifice Common European Values
      2. 4.2 National Constitutional Identity and the Other EU Principles in Accord
      1. 5.1 Deterrence and Engagement
      2. 5.2 Identity as Dissent and Resistance
      1. 6.1 Identity as a Pre-Constitutional Conception to Define the Community
      2. 6.2 Identity as a Constitutional Argument – Identitarian Adjudication
      3. 6.3 Identitarian Adjudication Beyond the EU
      4. 6.4 Protecting the Core of the Constitution
      1. 7.1 The Courts
      2. 7.2 The Legislator
      3. 7.3 The Executives
      4. 7.4 Legal Scholarship
      1. 8.1 From Public Policy to National Identity – Connections and Shortcomings
      2. 8.2 Possibilities for Misuse and Considerations of Abandoning the Concept
      3. 8.3 Identity in the Light of Tradition, History and Culture
    9. 9 Conclusion
  7. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1 Introduction
      1. 2.1 Know Thyself
      2. 2.2 European (Constitutional) Identity – Two Contrasting Methodological Narratives
      3. 2.3 (Constitutional) Identity as an Evasive Concept
      4. 2.4 An Endeavour of Numerous Projections – Following Intuition and Creating Meaning
      5. 2.5 Shared Constitutional Traditions – Comparison and Differentiation
      1. 3.1 Conceptual History
      2. 3.2 Sovereignty and Identity Together
      3. 3.3 European Sovereignty and Neo-Colonial Delusions
      1. 4.1 Identity as Relational, not Descriptive
      2. 4.2 Identified Subject Matter as Idea or Narrative
      3. 4.3 Singleness and Multitude of Identities
      1. 5.1 Identity as Perpetuum Mobile
      2. 5.2 (Dis)Ability to Change and the Hierarchy of Norms
      3. 5.3 Law and Democratic Reversibility
    6. 6 Call the Essential Constitutional Commitments by their Name
    7. 7 Concluding Remarks
  8. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1 Introduction
      1. 2.1 On Structural Similarities: The Birth of the Idea
      2. 2.2 Existing Scholarly Connections of Civil Disobedience and Conscientious Objection with the Acts of State and its Institutions − State Civil Disobedience
      3. 2.3 Institutions as Agents of Civil Disobedience – Parliaments and Courts
        1. 2.4.1 Civil Disobedience and Solange I – Resistance to Change
        2. 2.4.2 Conscientious Objection and Sayn-Wittgenstein – Asking for Exemption
      5. 2.5 Methods of Research – Interdisciplinary Aspect
        1. 2.6.1 The Scope of the Survey – Explored and Overlooked Theories
        2. 2.6.2 Apples, Oranges, and Anthropomorphism – Comparing Individuals and Constitutions, Civil Society and Judicial Institutions
        3. 2.6.3 (Un)Productive Journey – What Can We Learn?
    3. 3 Conscience and Conscientious Objection
      1. 4.1 Conscientious Refusal and Political Principles in the Theory of Justice
      2. 4.2 Conscientious Objection in the Theoretical Approach of Joseph Raz
      3. 4.3 When the Law is Doubtful – Dworkin’s Judicial Theory of Civil Disobedience
        1. 5.1.1 Legal Paternalism and Self-Regarding Actions
        2. 5.1.2 Consent
        1. 5.2.1 Objections Against the State and Beyond
        2. 5.2.2 Objection on Behalf of the State
        3. 5.2.3 Conscientious Objection Among Private Individuals
      3. 5.3 Compensation or Substitute Services
      4. 5.4 Away with a Comprehensive Legal Doctrine of Conscientious Objection
      1. 6.1 Defining Civil Disobedience – The Last Resort, Non-violence, and Openness to Consequences
      2. 6.2 Moral Justificatory Reasons from Raz
      3. 6.3 Determining What is Morally Right and Wrong – Conflicting Examples
    7. 7 Transplants of Civil Disobedience – Modest Guidelines for Justification
      1. 8.1 Disobedience as Incentive to Change – Ultra Vires Review
      2. 8.2 Identity Claims as Constitutional Conscientious Objection – Asking for Exemption
      1. 9.1 The Motivation for Action – Individual v Collective Interests
      2. 9.2 Constructive and Undermining Consequences of Resistance – Time will Judge
      3. 9.3 Discursive or Absolute Resistance
      4. 9.4 Normative Justificatory Reasons for Action – The Rationale
    10. 10 Conclusion
  9. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1 Closing Insights
    2. 2 Key Takeaways
    3. 3 Looking Ahead
  10. Bibliography 477 - 510 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  11. Table of Cases 511 - 518 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (615)

  1. Aertgeerts P, ‘Between Unity and Diversity: EU Data Protection Legislation as a Catalyst for a Constitutional Trilogue’ in Maja Sahadžić et al. (eds), Legal Mechanisms of Divergence and Convergence: Accommodating Diversity in Multilevel Constitutional Orders (Routledge 2023) (forthcoming) Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Akkermans B, ‘Public Policy (Orde Public): A Comparative Analysis of National, Private International Law, and EU Public Policy’ (2019) 8 European Property Law Journal 260 Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Alcoberro Llivina C and Saiz Arnaiz A (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (1st edn, Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Alexy R and Rivers J, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Allezard L, ‘Identité(s) et Droit Constitutionnel’ (These de doctorat, Université Clermont Auvergne 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Altavilla C, Giannone D and Lenza M, ‘The Financial and Macroeconomic Effects of OMT Announcements’ (2014) 1707 ECB Working Paper Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Anderson B, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised edition, Verso 1991 and 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Anter A, ‘The State as Machine’ in Andreas Anter (ed), Max Weber’s Theory of the Modern State: Origins, Structure and Significance (Palgrave Macmillan UK 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Antonov M, ‘Philosophy behind Human Rights: Valery Zorkin vs. the West?’ in Lauri Mälksoo and Wolfgang Benedek (eds), Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect (Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Arcari M and Ninatti S, ‘Narratives of Constitutionalization in the European Union Court of Justice and in the European Court of Human Rights’ Case Law’ (2017) 11 Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 11 Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Arendt H, The Human Condition (University of Chicago Press 1958) Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Arendt H, Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics. Civil Disobedience. On Violence. Thoughts on Politics and Revolution (1st edn, Mariner Books 1972) Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Aristotle, The Politics of Aristotle (Ernest Barker tr, Oxford University Press 1962) Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Arnull A and Chalmers D (eds), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Arzoz X, ‘The Protection and Promotion of Language Equality in the EU: Gaps, Paradoxes, and Double Standards’ in Thomas Giegerich (ed), The European Union as Protector and Promoter of Equality (Springer International Publishing 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Avbelj M, ‘Pluralism and Systemic Defiance in the EU’ in András Jakab and Dimitry Kochenov (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Avbelj M, ‘The Right Question about the FCC Ultra Vires Decision’ (Verfassungsblog, 6 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Avbelj M, ‘The Federal Constitutional Court Rules for a Bright Future of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 27 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Avbelj M and Komárek J, ‘Four Visions of Constitutional Pluralism’, EUI Working Paper LAW No. 2008/21 (European University Institute 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Avbelj M and Komárek J (eds), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, vol 14 (Hart Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Azoulai L, ‘The European Court of Justice and the Duty to Respect Sensitive National Interests’ in Bruno de Witte, Elise Muir and Mark Dawson (eds), Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice (Edward Elgar Pub 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Azoulai L (ed), The Question of Competence in the European Union (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Bakó B, Challenges to EU Values in Hungary: How the European Union Misunderstood the Government of Viktor Orbán (Routledge 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Balibar E and Wallerstein I, Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities (Verso 1991) Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Balkin JM, ‘Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory’, Derrida and Law (Routledge 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Barak A (ed), ‘Human Dignity as a Value and as a Right in Constitutions’, Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Barak A (ed), ‘Human Dignity in German Constitutional Law’, Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Barbour S and Carmichael C (eds), Language and Nationalism in Europe (Oxford University Press 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Bast J and von Bogdandy A (eds), Europäisches Verfassungsrecht: Theoretische und dogmatische Grundzüge (2nd edn, Springer 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Bauer MW et al. (eds), Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration: How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bay C, ‘Civil Disobedience: Prerequisite for Democracy in Mass Society’ in Jeffrie G Murphy (ed), Civil disobedience and violence (Wadsworth Pub Co 1971) Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bedau HA, ‘On Civil Disobedience’ (1961) 58 The Journal of Philosophy 653 Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Bellamy R, ‘Sovereignty, Republicanism and the Democratic Legitimacy of the EU’ in Richard Bellamy (ed), A Republican Europe of States: Cosmopolitanism, Intergovernmentalism and Democracy in the EU (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Bellamy R and Kröger S, ‘Countering Democratic Backsliding by EU Member States: Constitutional Pluralism and “Value” Differentiated Integration’ (2021) 27 Swiss Political Science Review 619 Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Belov M, ‘The Functions of Constitutional Identity Performed in the Context of Constitutionalization of the EU Order and Europeanization of the Legal Orders of EU Member States’ (2017) 9 Perspectives on Federalism 72 Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bergbauer S, Explaining European Identity Formation (Springer 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Berlin I, ‘A Matter of Life’ in Clara Urquhart (ed), A Matter of Life (Jonathan Cape Thirty Bedford Square 1963) Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Bernardi A, I controlimiti: primato delle norme europee e difesa dei principi costituzionali (Jovene 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bertolini E and Dawson M, ‘Fundamental Rights as Constraints to and Triggers for Differentiated Integration’ (2021) 27 Swiss Political Science Review 637 Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Besselink L, ‘The Bite, the Bark, and the Howl: Article 7 TEU and the Rule of Law Initiatives’ in András Jakab and Dimitry Kochenov (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Besselink LFM, ‘National and Constitutional Identity before and after Lisbon’ (2010) 6 Utrecht Law Review 36 Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Besselink LFM, ‘Case C-208/09, Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v. Landeshauptmann von Wien, Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2010.’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review 671 Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Besselink LFM, ‘The Persistence of a Contested Concept: Reflections on Ten Years Constitutional Identity in EU Law’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 597. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Beyer-Katzenberger M, ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint at the Bundesverfassungsgericht: Was the Mangold Judgement of the European Court of Justice an Ultra Vires Act?’ (2011) 11 ERA Forum 517 Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Bhabha HK, The Location of Culture (2nd edn, Routledge 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Bhat PI, Idea and Methods of Legal Research (Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Bieber R and Kopp E, ‘The EC’s Democratic Deficit: Maastricht Is Only a Step in the Right Direction’ (2019) 40 Harvard International Review 44 Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Bielefeldt H, Ghanea N and Wiener M, ‘Conscientious Objection’, Freedom of religion or belief: An International Law Commentary (Oxford University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Biernat S, ‘How Far Is It from Warsaw to Luxembourg and Karlsruhe: The Impact of the PSPP Judgment on Poland’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 1104 Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Biernat S, ‘Statement of Retired Judges of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal’ (Verfassungsblog, 11 October 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Biernat S, ‘26 sędziów TK w stanie spoczynku: wyrok z 10.03.2022 r. jest gorszącym ekscesem orzeczniczym zbliżającym nas do Rosji’ (Konstytucyjny.pl, 13 March 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Bilchitz D, ‘Do Corporations Have Positive Fundamental Rights Obligations?’ (2010) 57 Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Bilfinger K, Der Reichssparkommissar (De Gruyter 1928) Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Bilz C, Margin of Appreciation Der EU-Mitgliedstaaten, vol 164 (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Bix BH, ‘Joseph Raz’s Approach to Legal Positivism’ in Patricia Mindus and Torben Spaak (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Blanke H-J and Mangiameli S (eds), The Treaty on European Union (TEU): A Commentary (Springer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Blanke H-J and Mangiameli S (eds), Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - A Commentary, Volume 1: Preamble, Articles 1-89 (Springer 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Bleckmann A, ‘Die Wahrung der „nationalen Identität“ im Unions-Vertrag’ (1997) 52 JuristenZeitung 265 Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Blömacher S, Die Menschenwürde als Prinzip des deutschen und europäischen Rechts: Kohärenz der Konzepte? (1st edn, Duncker & Humblot 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Bobek M, ‘Landtová, Holubec, and the Problem of an Uncooperative Court: Implications for the Preliminary Rulings Procedure’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review 54 Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Bobić A, ‘Developments in The EU-German Judicial Love Story: The Right To Be Forgotten II’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 31 Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Bobić A, The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union (Oxford University Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Boekestein TL, ‘Making Do With What We Have: On the Interpretation and Enforcement of the EU’s Founding Values’ (2022) 23 German Law Journal 431 Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Bogdanowicz P and Taborowski M, ‘How to Save a Supreme Court in a Rule of Law Crisis: The Polish Experience: ECJ (Grand Chamber) 24 June 2019, Case C-619/18, European Commission v Republic of Poland’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review 306 Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Bonelli M, ‘From a Community of Law to a Union of Values’ (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 793 Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Bonelli M, ‘National Identity and European Integration Beyond “Limited Fields”’ (2021) 27 European Public Law Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Bonelli M and Claes M, ‘Judicial Serendipity: How Portuguese Judges Came to the Rescue of the Polish Judiciary: ECJ 27 February 2018, Case C-64/16, Associação Sindical Dos Juízes Portugueses’ (2018) 14 European Constitutional Law Review 622 Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Boom SJ, ‘The European Union after the Maastricht Decision: Will Germany Be the “Virginia of Europe?”’ (1995) 43 The American Journal of Comparative Law 177 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Borowski M, ‘Drittwirkung’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Bossuyt M and Verrijdt W, ‘The Full Effect of EU Law and of Constitutional Review in Belgium and France after the Melki Judgment’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review 355 Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Botha H, ‘Human Dignity in Comparative Perspective’ (2009) 20 Stellenbosch Law Review 171 Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Breuer M, ‘Wider das Recht auf Vergessen … des Bundesverfassungsgerichts!’ (Verfassungsblog, 2 December 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Bribosia E and Rorive I, ‘Seeking to Square the Circle: A Sustainable Conscientious Objection in Reproductive Health Care’ in Michel Rosenfeld and Susanna Mancini (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Brodocz A and Vorländer H, ‘Das Vertrauen in das Bundesverfassungsgericht’ in Hans Vorländer (ed), Die Deutungsmacht der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Brownlee K, Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Bruggeman R and Larik J, ‘The Elusive Contours of Constitutional Identity: Taricco as a Missed Opportunity’ (2020) 35 Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 20 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Brunk I (Wuerth) and Hakimi M, ‘Russia, Ukraine, and the Future World Order’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law 687 Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Brzozowski W, ‘The Midwife’s Tale: Conscientious Objection to Abortion after Grimmark and Steen’ (2021) 10 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 298 Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Buchanan A, ‘From Nuremburg to Kosovo: The Morality of Illegal International Legal Reform’ (2001) 111 Ethics 673 Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Buchanan A, ‘Reforming the International Law of Humanitarian Intervention’ in JL Holzgrefe and Robert O Keohane (eds), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Buchanan A, ‘The Morality of International Legal Reform’ in Allen Buchanan (ed), Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Bucholc M, ‘Abortion Law and Human Rights in Poland: The Closing of the Jurisprudential Horizon’ (2022) 14 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 73 Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Bugarič B, ‘The Rise of Nationalist-Authoritarian Populism and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe’ in Uladzislau Belavusau and Aleksandra Gliszczynska-Grabias (eds), Constitutionalism under Stress (Oxford University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Burchardt D, ‘Backlash against the Court of Justice of the EU? The Recent Jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court on EU Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Review’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Burgorgue-Larsen L, ‘A Huron at the Kirchberg Plateau or a Few Naive Thoughts on Constitutional Identity in the Case-Law of the Judge of the European Union’ in Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz and Carina Alcoberro Llivina (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (1st edn, Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Caldwell PC, Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism (Illustrated edition, Duke University Press 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Calhoun C (ed), Habermas and the Public Sphere (1st edn, The MIT Press 1993) Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Calliess C, ‘Europa als Wertegemeinschaft – Integration und Identität durch Europäisches Verfassungsrecht?’ (2004) 59 JuristenZeitung 1033 Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Calliess C, ‘The Transnationalization of Values by European Law’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1367 Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Calliess C, ‘Constitutional Identity in Germany: One for Three or Three in One?’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Calliess C and Ruffert M, ‘EUV Art. 2 Die Werte Der Union’, EUV/AEUV (4th edn, 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Calliess C and Schyff G van der, ‘Constitutional Identity Introduced’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Calliess C and van der Schyff G (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Calliess C and van der Schyff G, ‘Constitutional Identity Introduced’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Campbell M, ‘Conscientious Objection, Health Care and Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) 11 Medical Law International 284 Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Campbell M, ‘Conscientious Objection and the Council of Europe: The Right to Conscientious Objection in Lawful Medical Care Resolution 1763 (2010) Resolution Adopted by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly’ (2011) 19 Medical Law Review 467 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Camus A, Carnets 1942-1951 (Hamish Hamilton 1966) Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Castán DT, ‘Marriage Equality and the German Federal Constitutional Court: the Time for Comparative Law’ (Verfassungsblog, 11 July 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Cavanaugh WT, The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Chalmers D, Davies G and Monti G, European Union Law: Text and Materials (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Chavkin W, Swerdlow L and Fifield J, ‘Regulation of Conscientious Objection to Abortion’ (2017) 19 Health and Human Rights 55 Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Checkel JT and Katzenstein PJ, ‘Conclusion - European Identity in Context’ in Jeffrey T Checkel and Peter J Katzenstein (eds), European Identity (Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Choi SYP and David R, ‘Lustration Systems and Trust: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland’ (2012) 117 American Journal of Sociology 1172 Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Chronowski N and Vincze A, ‘The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Central European University Case: Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: Decision of the Hungarian Constitutional Court of 6 July 2021 and the Judgment of the ECJ of 6 October 2020, Case C-66/18’ (2021) 17 European Constitutional Law Review 688 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Claes M, ‘National Identity and the Protection of Fundamental Rights’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 517 Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Claes M and Reestman J-H, ‘The Protection of National Constitutional Identity and the Limits of European Integration at the Occasion of the Gauweiler Case’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 917 Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Cloots E, National Identity in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Cloots E, ‘Constitutional Rights and Primary EU Law’ in Elke Cloots (ed), National Identity in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Cloots E, ‘National Identity, Constitutional Identity, and Sovereignty in the EU’ (2016) 45 Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 82 Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Confucius, The Analects (DC Lau tr, 1st edn, Penguin Classics 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Connor W, Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding (Princeton University Press 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Corthaut T, EU Ordre Public (New edition, Wolters Kluwer 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Cowen T, ‘How Far Back Should We Go? Why Restitution Should Be Small’ in Jon Elster (ed), Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy (Cambridge University Press 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Craig P, ‘The ECJ and Ultra Vires Action: A Conceptual Analysis’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 395 Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Craig P and de Búrca G, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (6th edn, Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Czarnota A, ‘The Constitutional Tribunal’ (Verfassungsblog, 3 June 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Czarnota A, ‘Rule of Lawyers or Rule of Law?: On Constitutional Crisis and Rule of Law in Poland’, Governance and Constitutionalism (Routledge 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Dahbour O, ‘National Identity: An Argument for the Strict Definition’ (2002) 16 Public Affairs Quarterly 17 Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Daly E, ‘Constitutional Identity in Ireland: National and Popular Sovereignty as Checks on European Integration’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Danto EA, ‘Three Roads from Vienna: Psychoanalysis, Modernism and Social Welfare’ in Joy Damousi and Mariano Ben Plotkin (eds), The Transnational Unconscious: Essays in the History of Psychoanalysis and Transnationalism (Palgrave Macmillan UK 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Dawson M and Bobić A, ‘Making Sense of the “Incomprehensible”: The PSPP Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 1953 Google Scholar öffnen
  122. de Boer N, ‘Karlsruhe’s Europe and the Politics of National Constitutional Identity Review’, Judging European Democracy The Role and Legitimacy of National Constitutional Courts in the EU (Oxford University Press 2023) (forthcoming) Google Scholar öffnen
  123. de Búrca G, ‘Fundamental Human Rights and the Reach of EC Law’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 283 Google Scholar öffnen
  124. de Búrca G, ‘Poland and Hungary’s EU Membership: On Not Confronting Authoritarian Governments’ (2022) 20 International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 Google Scholar öffnen
  125. de Cecco F, ‘Room to Move? Minimum Harmonization and Fundamental Rights’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 9 Google Scholar öffnen
  126. de Haan J and Eijffinger SCW, ‘The Democratic Accountability of the European Central Bank: A Comment on Two Fairy-Tales’ (2000) 38 Journal of Common Market Studies 393 Google Scholar öffnen
  127. de Nanclares JMYP, ‘Constitutional Identity in Spain: Commitment to European Integration without Giving Up the Essence of the Constitution’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  128. de Poorter J et al. (eds), A Constitutional Identity for the EU?, vol 4 (TMC Asser Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  129. de Witte B, ‘Sovereignty and European Integration: The Weight of Legal Tradition’ in Neil Walker (ed), Relocating Sovereignty (1st edn, Routledge 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  130. de Witte B, ‘Exclusive Member State Competences: Is There Such a Thing?’ in Sacha Garben and Inge Govaere (eds), The Division of Competences between the EU and its Member States (Hart Publishing 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  131. de Witte B, ‘Article 4(2) TEU as a Protection of the Institutional Diversity of the Member States’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 559 Google Scholar öffnen
  132. de Witte B and Fromage D, ‘National Constitutional Identity Ten Years on: State of Play and Future Perspectives’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 411 Google Scholar öffnen
  133. de Witte F, ‘Sex, Drugs & EU Law: The Recognition of Moral and Ethical Diversity in EU Law’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 1545 Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Delanoy W, ‘What Is Culture?’ in Guido Rings and Sebastian Rasinger (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication (Cambridge University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Della Croce Y and Nicole-Berva O, ‘Civil Disobedience in Times of Pandemic: Clarifying Rights and Duties’ [2021] Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Delledonne G and Fabbrini F, ‘The Founding Myth of European Human Rights Law: Revisiting the Role of National Courts in the Rise of EU Human Rights Jurisprudence’ (2019) 44 European Law Review 178 Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Delmas C, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Delmas C and Brownlee K, ‘Civil Disobedience’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 edition, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Dermine P, ‘The Italian Budget Drama – Brussels and Rome on Collision Course’ (Verfassungsblog, 27 October 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Devi B, ‘Negotiating Identity in Albert Camus’s The Outsider’ (2020) 12 Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research 351 Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Dobbs M, ‘Sovereignty, Article 4(2) TEU and the Respect of National Identities: Swinging the Balance of Power in Favour of the Member States?’ (2014) 33 Yearbook of European Law 298 Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Donato J, ‘Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation’ (1988) 40 Stanford Law Review 1517 Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Donovan P, ‘The Holy War’ (1985) 17 Family Planning Perspectives 5 Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Doroga S, ‘Understanding Constitutional Identity Through the Language of Courts’ in Alexandra Mercescu (ed), Constitutional Identities in Central and Eastern Europe (Peter Lang 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Dougan M, ‘Judicial Review of Member State Action under the General Principles and the Charter: Defining the “Scope of Union Law”’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 1201 Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Doyle O, ‘Trojan Horses and Constitutional Identity’ (Verfassungsblog, 23 November 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Drace-Francis A, European Identity: A Historical Reader (Macmillan International Higher Education 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Dreier H (ed), Grundgesetz Kommentar, vol 2 (2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Drinóczi T, ‘Constitutional Identity in Europe: The Identity of the Constitution. A Regional Approach’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 105 Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Drinóczi T and Bień-Kacała A, Rule of Law, Common Values, and Illiberal Constitutionalism: Poland and Hungary within the European Union (Routledge 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Drinóczi T and Bień-Kacała A, Illiberal Constitutionalism in Poland and Hungary: The Deterioration of Democracy, Misuse of Human Rights and Abuse of the Rule of Law (Routledge 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Drinóczi T and Faraguna P, ‘The Constitutional Identity of the EU as a Counterbalance for Unconstitutional Constitutional Identities of the Member States’ in Jurgen de Poorter et al. (eds), A Constitutional Identity for the EU?, vol 4 (TMC Asser Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Dubinsky S and Davies WD, ‘Language and National Identity’ in Stanley Dubinsky and William D Davies (eds), Language Conflict and Language Rights: Ethnolinguistic Perspectives on Human Conflict (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Dworkin R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1978) Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Dworkin R, ‘“Natural” Law Revisited’ (1982) 34 Florida Law Review 165 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Dworkin R, Law’s Empire (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1986) Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Dzehtsiarou K, ‘Lustration in Ukraine: Political Cleansing or a Tool of Revenge?’ (Verfassungsblog, 26 June 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Dzehtsiarou K (ed), ‘Defining European Public Order: An Impossible Task’, Can the European Court of Human Rights Shape European Public Order? (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Eckes C, ‘The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order’ (2020) 4 Europe and the World: A Law Review, 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Eder K, ‘A Theory of Collective Identity Making Sense of the Debate on a “European Identity”’ (2009) 12 European Journal of Social Theory 427 Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Eijsbouts WT and Reestmann J-H, ‘Editorial: European Sovereignty’ (2018) 14 European Constitutional Law Review 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  162. El Khoury T, ‘Pouvoir Constituant’ in Rainer Grote et al. (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford Constitutional Law 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Eleftheriadis P, ‘Germany’s Failing Court’ (Verfassungsblog, 18 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Elena E, Saka O and Fuertes A-M, ‘How Did the ECB Save the Eurozone without Spending a Single Euro?’ Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) (26 March 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Erasmus D, The Complaint of Peace. Translated from the Querela Pacis (A.D. 1521) (The Open Court Publishing Co 1917) Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Ercolessi G and Hägg I, ‘Recent Developments in France Concerning the Laïcité’ in Fleur de Beaufort and Patrick van Schie (eds), Separation of church and state in Europe (European Liberal Forum 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Erhardt J, Wamsler S and Freitag M, ‘National Identity between Democracy and Autocracy: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Countries’ (2021) 13 European Political Science Review 59 Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Erskine T, ‘Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents: The Case of States and Quasi-States’ (2001) 15 Ethics & International Affairs 67 Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Etcheverry JB, ‘An Approach to Legal Principles Based on Their Justifying Function’ (2019) 32 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 321 Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Everling U, ‘Das Maastricht-Urteil Des Bundesverfassungsgerichts Und Seine Bedeutung Für Die Entwicklung Der Europäischen Union’ (1994) 17 Integration 165 Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Everling U, ‘The Maastricht Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court and Its Significance for the Development of the European Union’ (1994) 14 Yearbook of European Law 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Fabbrini F, Fundamental Rights in Europe (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Fabbrini F, ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity’ in Robert Schütze and Takis Tridimas (eds), Oxford Principles Of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order: Volume I (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Fabbrini F and Pollicino O, ‘Constitutional Identity in Italy: Institutional Disagreements at a Time of Political Change’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Fabbrini F and Sajó A, ‘The Dangers of Constitutional Identity’ (2019) 25 European Law Journal 457 Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Fabbrini S, ‘Between Power and Influence: The European Parliament in a Dual Constitutional Regime’ (2019) 41 Journal of European Integration 417 Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Faix M, ‘Genesis Eines Mehrpoligen Justizkonflikts: Das Verfassungsgericht Der Tschechischen Republik Wertet Ein EUGH-Urteil Als Ultra-Vires-Akt’ (2012) 20–21 Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 597 Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Faraguna P, ‘Taking Constitutional Identities Away from the Courts’ (2016) 41 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 492 Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Faraguna P, ‘Constitutional Identity in the EU–A Shield or a Sword?’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 1617 Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Faraguna P, ‘On the Identity Clause and Its Abuses: “Back to the Treaty”’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 427 Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Faraguna P and Drinóczi TD, ‘Constitutional Identity in and on EU Terms’ (Verfassungsblog, 21 February 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Federico GD, ‘The Potential of Article 4(2) TEU in the Solution of Constitutional Clashes Based on Alleged Violations of National Identity and the Quest for Adequate (Judicial) Standards’ (2019) 25 European Public Law 347 Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Feichtner I, ‘The German Constitutional Court’s PSPP Judgment: Impediment and Impetus for the Democratization of Europe’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 1090 Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Fenton-Glynn C, ‘Freedom from Violence and Exploitation’ in Claire Fenton-Glynn (ed), Children and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Fiala C et al., ‘Yes We Can! Successful Examples of Disallowing “Conscientious Objection” in Reproductive Health Care’ (2016) 21 The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 201 Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Fichera M and Pollicino O, ‘The Dialectics Between Constitutional Identity and Common Constitutional Traditions: Which Language for Cooperative Constitutionalism in Europe?’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 1097 Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Field MA, Surrogate Motherhood : The Legal and Human Issues (2nd edn, Harvard University Press 1990) Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Fitzmaurice G, ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ in Académie de Droit International de la Ha (ed), Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law, vol 92 (Brill Nijhoff 1968) Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Fleming V, Ramsayer B and Zakšek TŠ, ‘Freedom of Conscience in Europe? An Analysis of Three Cases of Midwives with Conscientious Objection to Abortion’ (2018) 44 Journal of Medical Ethics 104 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Føllesdal A, ‘Law Making by Law Breaking? A Theory of Parliamentary Civil Disobedience against International Human Rights Courts’ in Andreas Føllesdal, Geir Ulfstein and Matthew Saul (eds), The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond (Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Foucault M, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, vol 1 (New Press 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Franceschet A, ‘Theorizing State Civil Disobedience in International Politics’ (2015) 11 Journal of International Political Theory 239 Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Freedland MR and Adams-Prassl J (eds), Viking, Laval and Beyond (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Fromage D, ‘National Constitutional Identity and Its Regional Dimension Post-Lisbon as Part of AGeneral Trend Towards Multilevel Governance Within the EU’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 497 Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Fukuyama F, ‘Why National Identity Matters’ (2018) 29 Journal of Democracy 5 Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Garben S, ‘Confronting the Competence Conundrum: Democratising the European Union through an Expansion of Its Legislative Powers’ (2015) 35 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 55 Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Garben S and Govaere I (eds), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States. Reflections on the Past, the Present and the Future (Hart Publishing 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Garrett R and Barrett N, ‘Dublin III in Practice: Synthesizing a Framework for European Non-Refoulement Cases at the Human Rights Committee’ (2021) 13 Journal of Human Rights Practice 250 Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Gehring MW (ed), ‘Ius Obstacles to European Constitutionalization’, Europe’s Second Constitution: Crisis, Courts and Community (Cambridge University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Genette G, Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation (Jane E Lewin tr, Cambridge University Press 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Goldmann M, ‘Adjudicating Economics? Central Bank Independence and the Appropriate Standard of Judicial Review’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 265 Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Goldmann M, ‘As Darkness Deepens: The Right to Be Forgotten in the Context of Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 45 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Goodin RE, ‘Toward an International Rule of Law: Distinguishing International Law-Breakers from Would-Be Law-Makers’ (2005) 9 The Journal of Ethics 225 Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Grabenwarter C et al., ‘The Role of the Constitutional Courts in the European Judicial Network’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 43 Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Granmar CG, ‘Global Applicability of the GDPR in Context’ (2021) 11 International Data Privacy Law 225 Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Green JA, The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (Oxford University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Greenawalt K, ‘A Contextual Approach to Disobedience’ (1970) 70 Columbia Law Review 48 Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Grimm D, ‘The Various Faces of Fundamental Rights’ in David Dyzenhaus, Jacco Bomhoff and Thomas Poole (eds), The Double-Facing Constitution (Cambridge University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Grimm D, ‘A Long Time Coming’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 944 Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Groussot X, Pech L and Petursson GT, ‘The Scope of Application of Fundamental Rights on Member States’ Action: In Search of Certainty in EU Adjudication’ (2011) 1 The Eric Stein Working Papers Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Grzeszick B, ‘GG Art. 20’ in Theodor Maunz et al. (eds), Grundgesetz-Kommentar (C.H. Beck 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Gstrein OJ, ‘The Right to be Forgotten in 2022: Luxembourg judges keep surfing the legislative void’ (Verfassungsblog, 20 December 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Guastaferro B, ‘Sincere Cooperation and Respect for National Identities’ in Robert Schütze and Takis Tridimas (eds), Oxford Principles Of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order: Volume I (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Guastaferro B, ‘Sincere Cooperation and Respect for National Identities’ in Robert Schütze and Takis Tridimas (eds), Oxford Principles Of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order, vol 1 (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Habermas J, ‘Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State’ (1985) 30 Berkeley Journal of Sociology 95 Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Habermas J, ‘Address: Multiculturalism and the Liberal State’ (1995) 47 Stanford Law Review 849 Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Habermas J, ‘The European Nation State. Its Achievements and Its Limitations. On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship’ (1996) 9 Ratio Juris 125 Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Habermas J, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (New edition, Blackwell Publishers 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Hailbronner M, ‘Rethinking the Rise of the German Constitutional Court: From Anti-Nazism to Value Formalism’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 626 Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Hailbronner M, ‘Value Formalism’ in Michaela Hailbronner (ed), Traditions and Transformations: The Rise of German Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Halberstam D and Möllers C, ‘The German Constitutional Court Says “Ja Zu Deutschland!”’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1241 Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Hallstein W, ‘Speech at the University of Padua’ (March 1962) Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Halmai G, ‘The Invalid Anti-Migrant Referendum in Hungary’ (Verfassungsblog, 4 October 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Halmai G, ‘The Hungarian Constitutional Court and Constitutional Identity’ (Verfassungsblog, 10 January 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Halmai G, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23 Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Halmai G, ‘Populism or Authoritarianism? A Plaidoyer Against Illiberal or Authoritarian Constitutionalism’ in Adam Czarnota, Martin Krygier and Wojciech Sadurski (eds), Anti-Constitutional Populism (Cambridge University Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Hamilton MA, ‘The Missing Children in Elite Legal Scholarship’ in Michel Rosenfeld and Susanna Mancini (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Harari YN, Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow (1st edn, Harvill Secker 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Haraszti M, ‘A Discussion of Péter Krasztev and Jon Van Til’s The Hungarian Patient: Social Opposition to an Illiberal Democracy’ (2017) 15 Perspectives on Politics 545 Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Haratsch A, Europarecht (12th edn, Mohr Siebeck 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Hard R, The Routledge Handbook of Greek Mythology (8th edn, Routledge 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Hart HLA, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593 Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Heino A and others, ‘Conscientious Objection and Induced Abortion in Europe’ (2013) 18 The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception 231 Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Heinig HM, ‘Why Egenberger Could Be Next’ (Verfassungsblog, 19 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Heller H, Sovereignty: A Contribution to the Theory of Public and International Law (David Dyzenhaus ed, Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Hendry I and Dickson S, British Overseas Territories Law (Hart Publishing 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Herdegen M, ‘Maastricht and the German Constitutional Court: Constitutional Restraints for an “Ever Closer Union" and Document “Extracts from: Brunner v. The European Union"’ (1994) 31 Common Market Law Review 235 Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Herdegen M, ‘GG Art. 79’ in Theodor Maunz and Günter Dürig (eds), Grundgesetz-Kommentar (69th edn, C. H. Beck 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Hillion C, ‘The Copenhagen Criteria and Their Progeny’ in Christophe Hillion (ed), EU Enlargement: A Legal Approach (Hart Publishing 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Hilpold P, ‘So Long Solange? The PSPP Judgment of the German Constitutional Court and the Conflict between the German and the European “Popular Spirit”’ in Markus Gehring (ed), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, vol 23 (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Hirschl R, Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Hjorth R, ‘State Civil Disobedience and International Society’ (2017) 43 Review of International Studies 330 Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Hjortnæs L, ‘A view from the Danish Supreme Court in light of the Ajos Judgment’ in Wolfgang Heusel and Jean-Philippe Rageade (eds), The Authority of EU Law (Springer Professional 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Hoag RW, ‘Violent Civil Disobedience: Defending Human Rights, Rethinking Just War’ in Michael W Brough, John W Lango and Harry Van Der Linden (eds), Rethinking the Just War Tradition (State University of New York Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Hobbes T, Leviathan (Christopher Brooke ed, 1st edn, Penguin Classics 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Hobsbawm EJ, Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 1992) Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Hobsbawn E, ‘Language, Culture, and National Identity’ (1996) 63 Social Research 1065 Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Hohnerlein J, Recht Und Demokratische Reversibilität, vol 36 (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Holtman RB, The Napoleonic Revolution (Louisiana State Unitversity Press 1981) Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Hong M, ‘Human Dignity, Identity Review of the European Arrest Warrant and the Court of Justice as a Listener in the Dialogue of Courts: Solange-III and Aranyosi’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 549 Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Hoose P, Claudette Colvin: Twice Toward Justice (Reprint edition, Square Fish 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Horne CM, ‘The Impact of Lustration on Democratization in Postcommunist Countries’ (2014) 8 International Journal of Transitional Justice 496 Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Horne CM and Levi M, ‘Does Lustration Promote Trustworthy Governance? An Exploration of the Experience of Central and Eastern Europe’ in János Kornai and Susan Rose-Ackerman (eds), Building a Trustworthy State in Post-Socialist Transition (Palgrave Macmillan US 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Howard JA, ‘Social Psychology of Identities’ (2000) 26 Annual Review of Sociology 367 Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Huber PM, ‘The Federal Constitutional Court and European Integration’ (2015) 21 European Public Law 83 Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Hyde L and Thoreau HD, The Essays of Henry D. Thoreau: Selected and Edited by Lewis Hyde (North Point Press 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Isensee J, ‘Vorrang Des Europarechts Und Deutsche Verfassungsvorbehalte: Offener Dissens’ in Joachim Burmeister (ed), Verfassungsstaatlichkeit: Festschrift für Klaus Stern zum 65. Geburtstag (C. H. Beck 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Isiksel NT, ‘Fundamental Rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 551 Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Itzcovich G, ‘On the Legal Enforcement of Values. The Importance of the Institutional Context’ in András Jakab and Dimitry Kochenov (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Jacobs D and Maier R, ‘European Identity: Construct, Fact and Fiction’ in Marja Gastelaars and Arie de Ruijter (eds), A United Europe: The Quest for a Multifaceted Identity (Shaker Publishing 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Jacobsohn GJ, Constitutional Identity (Harvard University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Jacobsohn GJ, ‘Static and Dynamic: Comments on the Misuse of Constitutional Identity’ [2021] Round Table: Constitutional Identity: Universality of Constitutionalism vs. National Constitutional Traditions? Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Jakab A and Sonnevend P, ‘Continuity with Deficiencies: The New Basic Law of Hungary’ (2013) 9 European Constitutional Law Review 102 Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Jaklic K, Constitutional Pluralism in the EU (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Jaraczewski J, ‘Gazing into the Abyss: The K 3/21 decision of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal’ Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Joerges C, ‘Law, Economics and Politics in the Constitutionalisation of Europe’ (2003) 5 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 123 Google Scholar öffnen
  267. John Paul II, Eccledia in Europe (Catholic Truth Society 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Jones J, ‘Human Dignity in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Its Interpretation Before the European Court of Justice’ (2012) 33 Liverpool Law Review 281 Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Kahl B, ‘Europäische Union: Bundesstaat–Staatenbund–Staatenverbund? Zum Urteil des BVerfG vom 12. Oktober 1993’ (1994) 33 Der Staat 241 Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Kaina V, Karolewski IP and Kuhn S (eds), European Identity Revisited: New Approaches and Recent Empirical Evidence (Routledge 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Kampfer GK, Die Europäische Union auf dem Weg zu einem Bundesstaat? Von der föderalen Struktur der Europäischen Union und der Europäisierung der Außenpolitik (Nomos 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Kaufman A, ‘Liberalism: John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin’ in William E Scheuerman (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Kelemen RD, ‘Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union’ (2017) 52 Government and Opposition 211 Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Kelemen RD et al., ‘National Courts Cannot Override CJEU Judgments: A Joint Statement in Defense of the EU Legal Order’ (Verfassungsblog, 26 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Kelemen RD and Pech L, ‘Working Paper: Why Autocrats Love Constitutional Identity and Constitutional Pluralism’ (Reconnect 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Kelemen RD and Pech L, ‘The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland’ (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 59 Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Keller H and Heri C, ‘The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Adjudicating Religious Exception Claims’ in Michel Rosenfeld and Susanna Mancini (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Kelsen H, Pure Theory of Law (The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Kempen OE, ‘Historische und aktuelle Bedeutung der „Ewigkeitsklausel“ des Art. 79 Abs. 3 GG. Überlegungen zur Begrenzten Verfassungsautonomie der Bundesrepublik’ (1990) 21 Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 354 Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Kennedy E, ‘Foreword’ in Carl Schmitt (ed), Jeffrey Seitzer (tr), Constitutional Theory (Duke University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Kenny D, ‘Abortion, the Irish Constitution, and Constitutional Change’ (2018) 5 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais 257 Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Kessedjian C, ‘Public order in European law’ (2007) 1 Erasmus Law Review 25 Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Kiiver P, ‘German Participation in EU Decision-Making after the Lisbon Case: A Comparative View on Domestic Parliamentary Clearance Procedures’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1287 Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Kirchhof P, ‘Die Identität der Verfassung’ in Josef Isensee and Paul Kirchhof (eds), Handbuch des Staatsrechts Band II: Verfassungsstaat (3rd edn, CF Müller 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Kischel U, ‘The Comparative Method’ in Uwe Kischel and Andrew Hammel (eds), Comparative Law (Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Klabbers J, Peters A and Ulfstein G, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Klamert M, The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Klamert M, ‘Loyalty and the Constitutionalization of EU Law’, The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Kleinlein T, ‘Neue starke Stimme in der europäischen Grundrechts-Polyphonie’ (Verfassungsblog, 1 December 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Kleinlein T, Grundrechtsföderalismus, vol 287 (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Kocemba K, ‘Pregnancy Registry in Poland’ (Verfassungsblog, 22 June 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Koch C, ‘“Bis Hierher Sollst Du Kommen Und Nicht Weiter”: The German Constitutional Court and the Boundaries of the European Integration Process’ in Gabrielle Appleby, Nicholas Aroney and Thomas John (eds), The Future of Australian Federalism: Comparative and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Kochenov D, ‘On Policing Article 2 TEU Compliance – Reverse Solange and Systemic Infringements Analyzed’ (2013) 33 Polish Yearbook of International Law 145 Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Kochenov DV and Bárd P, ‘The Four Elements of the Autocrats’ Playbook’ (Verfassungsblog, 18 September 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Kokaz N, ‘Theorizing International Fairness’ (2005) 36 Metaphilosophy 68 Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Kokott J, ‘Deutschland im Rahmen der Europäischen Union – zum Vertrag von Maastricht’ (1994) 119 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 207 Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Komárek J, ‘Czech Constitutional Court Playing with Matches: The Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU Ultra Vires; Judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 323 Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Kommers DP, ‘The Basic Law: A Fifty Year Assessment’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 571 Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Kommers DP and Miller RA, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany: Third Edition, Revised and Expanded (Duke University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Koncewicz TT, ‘“Court-packing” in Warsaw: The Plot Thickens’ (Verfassungsblog, 18 December 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Konstadinides T, ‘Constitutional Identity as a Shield and as a Sword: The European Legal Order within the Framework of National Constitutional Settlement’ (2011) 13 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 195 Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Körtvélyesi Z, ‘The Illiberal Challenge in the EU: Exploring the Parallel with Illiberal Minorities and the Example of Hungary’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review 567 Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Körtvélyesi Z and Majtényi B, ‘Game of Values: The Threat of Exclusive Constitutional Identity, the EU and Hungary’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 1721 Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Kos M, ‘The Relevance of National Identity in European Union Law and Its Potential for Instrumentalisation’ (2019) LXXIX Zbornik nanstvenih razprav Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Kos M, ‘The PSPP Judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Slovenian Constitutional System’ (2021) 2 Central European Journal of Comparative Law 93 Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Kos M, ‘Constitutional Diversity and Differentiation in the EU: What Role for National Constitutional Demands under EU Law?’ in Maja Sahadžić et al. (eds), Legal Mechanisms of Divergence and Convergence: Accommodating Diversity in Multilevel Constitutional Orders (Routledge 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Kosař D and Vyhnánek L, ‘The Constitutional Court of Czechia’ in Armin von Bogdandy, Peter Huber and Christoph Grabenwarter (eds), The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: Volume III: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions (2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Kosta V, Fundamental Rights in EU Internal Market Legislation (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Kovács K, ‘The Rise of an Ethnocultural Constitutional Identity in the Jurisprudence of the East Central European Courts’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 1703 Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Kovács K, ‘Introduction: Identity, the Jurisprudence of Particularism and Possible Constitutional Challenges’ in Kriszta Kovács (ed), The Jurisprudence of Particularism (Bloomsbury 2023) Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Kovács K and Tóth GA, ‘Hungary’s Constitutional Transformation’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review 183 Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Kovler AI, ‘Russia: European Convention on Human Rights in Russia: Fifteen Years After’ in Ineta Ziemele and Iulia Motoc (eds), The Impact of the ECHR on Democratic Change in Central and Eastern Europe: Judicial Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Krisch N, ‘Pouvoir Constituant and Pouvoir Irritant in the Postnational Order’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 657 Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Kröll T, ‘Der EuGH als “Hüter” des republikanischen Grundprinzips der österreichischen Bundesverfassung?’ (2011) Jahrbuch Öffentliches Recht 313 Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Krunke H, ‘Constitutional Identity in Denmark: Extracting Constitutional Identity in the Context of a Restrained Supreme Court and a Strong Legislature’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Krunke H, ‘Constitutional Identity in Denmark’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Krunke H and Klinge S, ‘The Danish Ajos Case: The Missing Case from Maastricht and Lisbon’ (2018) 3 European Papers 157 Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Krunke H and Schulyok F, ‘National Citizenship and EU Citizenship: What Actual Competence Is Left for the Member States in the Field of Citizenship?’ in Thomas Giegerich, Oskar J Gstrein and Sebastian Zeitzmann (eds), The EU Between ‘an Ever Closer Union’ and Inalienable Policy Domains of Member States (Nomos 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Krygier M, ‘Law as Tradition’ (1986) 5 Law and Philosophy 237 Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Krygier M, Czarnota A and Sadurski W (eds), Anti-Constitutional Populism (Cambridge University Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Kumm M, ‘Who Is the Final Arbiter of Constitutionality in Europe? Three Conceptions of the Relationship Between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review 351 Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Kumm M, ‘The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 907 Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Kumm M, ‘How Does European Union Law Fit into the World of Public Law? Costa, Kadi, and Three Conceptions of Public Law’ in Jürgen Neyer and Antje Wiener (eds), Political Theory of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Kumm M, ‘The Moral Point of Constitutional Pluralism: Defining the Domain of Legitimate Institutional Civil Disobedience and Conscientious Objection’ in Julie Dickson and Pavlos Eleftheriadis (eds), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Kumm M, ‘Rethinking Constitutional Authority: On the Structure and Limits of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek (eds), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, vol 14 (Hart Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Kumm M, ‘The Idea of Thick Constitutional Patriotism and Its Implications for the Role and Structure of European Legal History’ in Helle Porsdam and Thomas Elholm (eds), Dialogues on Justice: European Perspectives on Law and Humanities, vol 3 (De Gruyter 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Kumm M, ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law’ (2013) 20 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 605 Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Kumm M, ‘Rebel Without a Good Cause: Karlsruhe’s Misguided Attempt to Draw the CJEU into a Game of “Chicken” and What the CJEU Might Do About It’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 203 Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Kumm M, ‘The Rule of Law, Legitimate Authority and Constitutionalism’ in Christoph Bezemek, Michael Potacs and Alexander Somek (eds), Legal Positivism, Institutionalism and Globalisation, vol 1 (Hart Publishing 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Kumm M, ‘The Turn to Justification: On the Structure and Domain of Human Rights Practice’ in Adam Etinson (ed), Human Rights: Moral or Political? (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Kymlicka W, ‘Modernity and National Identity’ in Shlomo Ben-Ami, Yoav Peled and Alberto Spektorowski (eds), Ethnic Challenges to the Modern Nation State (Palgrave Macmillan 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Laclau E, On Populist Reason (Reprint edition, Verso Books 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  333. Lanza E, ‘Core of State Sovereignty and Boundaries of European Union’s Identity in the Lissabon – Urteil’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal 399 Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Lasek-Markey M, ‘Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal on the Status of EU Law: The Polish Government Got All the Answers It Needed from a Court It Controls’ (European Law Blog, 21 October 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  335. Lehner R, ‘Die “Integrationsverfassungsbeschwerde“ nach Art. 38 Abs. 1 S. 1 GG’ (2013) 52 Der Staat 535 Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Leloup M, ‘An Uncertain First Step in the Field of Judicial Self-Government: ECJ 19 November 2019, Joined Cases C-585/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18, A.K., CP and DO’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review 145 Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Lenaerts K, ‘Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism’ (1990) 38 American Journal of Comparative Law 205 Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Lenaerts K, ‘Exploring the Limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 375 Google Scholar öffnen
  339. Lenaerts K, ‘Die Werte der Europäischen Union in der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union: eine Annäherung’ (2017) 21 Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 639 Google Scholar öffnen
  340. Lenaerts K, ‘No Member State Is More Equal than Others’ (Verfassungsblog, 8 October 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  341. Lenaerts K and Gutiérrez-Fons JA, ‘A Constitutional Perspective’ in Robert Schütze and Takis Tridimas (eds), Oxford Principles Of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order: Volume I (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Lenaerts K, Gutiérrez-Fons JA and Adam S, ‘Exploring the Autonomy of the European Union Legal Order’ [2021] Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 47 Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Letki N, ‘Lustration and Democratisation in East-Central Europe’ (2002) 54 Europe-Asia Studies 529 Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Levey D, ‘Gibraltar English’ in Daniel Schreier et al. (eds), Further Studies in the Lesser-Known Varieties of English (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Levits E, ‘Die Europäische Union als Wertegemeinschaft’ in Thomas Jaeger (ed), Europa 4.0? (Jan Sramek Verlag 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Liebersohn H, ‘Weber’s Historical Concept of National Identity’ in Guenther Roth and Hartmut Lehmann (eds), Weber’s Protestant Ethic: Origins, Evidence, Contexts (Cambridge University Press 1993) Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Lienbacher G and Lukan M, ‘Constitutional Identity in Austria: Basic Principles and Identity beyond the Abolition of the Nobility’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Lindahl H, ‘Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood’ in Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Locke J, Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (Ian Shapiro ed, 1st edn, Yale University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  350. Lomas P, ‘Anthropomorphism, Personification and Ethics: A Reply to Alexander Wendt’ (2005) 31 Review of International Studies 349 Google Scholar öffnen
  351. Loughlin M, ‘Introduction’ in Neil Walker, Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  352. Luther King Jr. M, Letter from Birmingham Jail: Martin Luther King (1st edn, Penguin Classics 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  353. MacCormick N, ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’ (1993) 56 Modern Law Review 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  354. Madsen MR, Olsen HP and Šadl U, ‘Competing Supremacies and Clashing Institutional Rationalities: The Danish Supreme Court’s Decision in the Ajos Case and the National Limits of Judicial Cooperation’ (2017) 23 European Law Journal 140 Google Scholar öffnen
  355. Madsen MR, Olsen HP and Šadl U, ‘Legal Disintegration? The Ruling of the Danish Supreme Court in AJOS’ (Verfassungsblog, 30 January 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  356. Maduro MP, ‘Three CLaims of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek (eds), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Hart Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  357. Mahlmann M, ‘The Politics of Constitutional Identity and Its Legal Frame – the Ultra Vires Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court’ (2010) 11 German Law Journal 1407 Google Scholar öffnen
  358. Majone G, Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  359. Mälksoo L, ‘Russia’s Constitutional Court Defies the European Court of Human Rights: Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Judgment of 14 July 2015, No 21-П/2015’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 377 Google Scholar öffnen
  360. Mälksoo L, ‘International Law and the 2020 Amendments to the Russian Constitution’ (2021) 115 American Journal of International Law 78 Google Scholar öffnen
  361. Mancini GF, ‘The Making of a Constitution for Europe’ (1989) 26 Common Market Law Review 595 Google Scholar öffnen
  362. Mancini S and Rosenfeld M, ‘Introduction: The New Generation of Conscience Objections in Legal, Political, and Cultural Context’ in Michel Rosenfeld and Susanna Mancini (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  363. Mancini S and Rosenfeld M (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  364. Mangold AK, ‘Das Böckenförde-Diktum’ (Verfassungsblog, 9 May 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Marcisz P, ‘A Chamber of Certain Liability’ (Verfassungsblog, 31 October 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  366. Marochkin S, ‘ECtHR and the Russian Constitutional Court: Duet or Duel?’ in Lauri Mälksoo and Wolfgang Benedek (eds), Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect (Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  367. Martí JL, ‘Two Different Ideas of Constitutional Identityidentity of the Constitution v. Identity of the People’ in Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz and Carina Alcoberro Llivina (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (1st edn, Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  368. Martinico G, ‘What Lies Behind Article 4(2) TEU?’ in Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz and Carina Alcoberro Llivina (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (1st edn, Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Martinico G, ‘Taming National Identity: A Systematic Understanding of Article 4.2 TEU’ (2021) 27 European Public Law Google Scholar öffnen
  370. Martinico G and Repetto G, ‘Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Duels in Europe: An Italian Perspective on Case 269/2017 of the Italian Constitutional Court and Its Aftermath’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 731 Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Marzal T, ‘Is the BVerfG PSPP decision “simply not comprehensible”?’ (Verfassungsblog, 9 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  372. Masing J, ‘RiBVerfG Masing: Vorläufige Einschätzung der „Google-Entscheidung“ des EuGH’ (Verfassungsblog, 14 August 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  373. Masing J, ‘Das Bundesverfassungsgericht’ in Matthias Herdegen et al. (eds), Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts (1st edn, C. H. Beck 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Mathews J, ‘Some Kind of Right’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 40 Google Scholar öffnen
  375. Mayer F, ‘The European Constitution and the Courts - Adjudicating European Constitutional Law in a Multilevel System’ in Joseph HH Weiler and Armin von Bogdandy (eds), European Integration: The New German Scholarship (9/03 edn, The Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law and Jean Monnet Center at NYU School of Law) Google Scholar öffnen
  376. Mayer FC, ‘Die Drei Dimensionen Der Europäischen Kompetenzdebatte’ (2001) 61 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 577 Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Mayer FC, ‘Rebels Without a Cause? A Critical Analysis of the German Constitutional Court’s OMT Reference’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 111 Google Scholar öffnen
  378. Mayer FC, ‘Auf dem Weg zum Richterfaustrecht?’ (Verfassungsblog, 7 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  379. Mayer FC, ‘To Boldly Go Where No Court Has Gone Before. The German Federal Constitutional Court’s Ultra Vires Decision of May 5, 2020’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 1116 Google Scholar öffnen
  380. McCrone D and Bechhofer F, Understanding National Identity (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Meessen KM, ‘Hedging European Integration: The Maastricht Judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany’ (1993) 17 Fordham International Law Journal 511 Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Michnik A and Havel V, ‘Confronting the Past: Justice or Revenge?’ (1993) 4 Journal of Democracy 20 Google Scholar öffnen
  383. Mickonytė A, ‘The Right to a Name Versus National Identity in the Context of Eu Law: The Case of Lithuania’ (2017) 42 Review of Central and East European Law 325 Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Mill JS, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, vol 10 (Liberty Fund 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  385. Millet F-X, L’Union européenne et l’identité constitutionnelle des États membres (Lextenso editions et Karine Roudier 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  386. Millet F-X, ‘Constitutional Identity in France: Vices and – Above All – Virtues’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  387. Millet F-X, ‘Successfully Articulating National Constitutional Identity Claims: Strait Is the Gate and Narrow Is the Way’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 571 Google Scholar öffnen
  388. Milligan T, ‘Animal Rescue as Civil Disobedience’ (2017) 23 Res Publica 281 Google Scholar öffnen
  389. Misztal BA, ‘How Not to Deal with the Past: Lustration in Poland’ (1999) 40 European Journal of Sociology 31 Google Scholar öffnen
  390. Mlynarski M, Zur Integration Staatlicher Und Europäischer Verfassungsidentität, vol 37 (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  391. Möllers C, ‘“We Are (Afraid of) the People”: Constituent Power in German Constitutionalism’ in Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  392. Möllers C, ‘Multi-Level Democracy’ (2011) 24 Ratio Juris 247 Google Scholar öffnen
  393. Möllers C and Schneider L, Demokratiesicherung in der Europäischen Union (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  394. Mouffe C, The Return of the Political (Revised edition, Verso Books 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  395. Muir M, Civil Disobedience: A Reasonable Polemic (University of Oxford 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  396. Murswiek D, ‘Art. 38 GG als Grundlage eines Rechts auf Achtung des unabänderlichen Verfassungskerns’ (2010) 65 JuristenZeitung 702 Google Scholar öffnen
  397. Nettesheim M, ‘Das PSPP-Urteil des BVerfG – Ein Angriff auf die EU?’ [2020] Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1631 Google Scholar öffnen
  398. Neubauer G, ‘State Civil Disobedience: Morally Justified Violations of International Law Considered as Civil Disobedience’ (TranState Working Papers 2009) Working Paper 86 Google Scholar öffnen
  399. Newman E, A Civil Tongue (1st edn, Bobbs-Merrill Co 1976) Google Scholar öffnen
  400. Niedobitek M, ‘The Lisbon Case of 30 June 2009 – A Comment from the European Law Perspective’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1267 Google Scholar öffnen
  401. Nordberg EMK, Skirbekk H and Magelssen M, ‘Conscientious Objection to Referrals for Abortion: Pragmatic Solution or Threat to Women’s Rights?’ (2014) 15 BMC Medical Ethics 15 Google Scholar öffnen
  402. Norman R, ‘Civil Disobedience and Nuclear Protest: A Reply to Dworkin’ (1986) 44 Radical Philosophy 24 Google Scholar öffnen
  403. Oeter S, ‘Bundesstaat, Föderation, Staatenverbund - Trennlinien und Gemeinsamkeiten föderaler Systeme’ (2015) 75 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Heidelberg Journal of International Law 733 Google Scholar öffnen
  404. Oeter S and Merli F, ‘Vierter Beratungsgegenstand: Rechtsprechungskonkurrenz zwischen nationalen Verfassungsgerichten, Europäischem Gerichtshof und Europäischem Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte’ in Stefan Kadelbach et al. (eds), Bundesstaat und Europäische Union zwischen Konflikt und Kooperation, vol 66 (De Gruyter 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  405. Ohler C, ‘Herrschaft, Legitimation Und Recht in Der Europäischen Union – Anmerkungen Zum Lissabon-Urteil Des BVerfG’ (2010) 135 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 153 Google Scholar öffnen
  406. Oomen B, ‘Strengthening Constitutional Identity Where There Is None: The Case of the Netherlands’ (2016) 77 Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 235 Google Scholar öffnen
  407. Oppenheimer A, The Relationship between European Community Law and National Law: The Cases (Cambridge University Press 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  408. Oprisko R and Kaliher K, ‘The State as a Person?: Anthropomorphic Personification vs. Concrete Durational Being’ (2014) 6 Journal of International and Global Studies 30 Google Scholar öffnen
  409. Osterloh L and Nußberger A, ‘GG Art. 3 Gleichheit vor dem Gesetz’ in Michael Sachs (ed), Grundgesetz Kommentar (8th edn, C. H. Beck 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  410. Pap AL, Democratic Decline in Hungary: Law and Society in an Illiberal Democracy (Routledge 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  411. Partlett W, ‘Russia’s 2020 Constitutional Amendments: A Comparative Analysis’ (2021) 23 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 311 Google Scholar öffnen
  412. Passchier R and Stremler M, ‘Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments in European Union Law: Considering the Existence of Substantive Constraints on Treaty Revision’ (2016) 5 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 337 Google Scholar öffnen
  413. Payandeh M, ‘The OMT Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court: Repositioning the Court within the European Constitutional Architecture’ (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 400 Google Scholar öffnen
  414. Pech L, ‘Protecting Polish Judges from the Ruling Party’s “Star Chamber”: The Court of Justice’s interim relief order in Commission v Poland (Case C-791/19 R)’ (Verfassungsblog, 9 April 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  415. Pech L and Kochenov D, ‘Respect for the Rule of Law in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: A Casebook Overview of Key Judgments since the Portuguese Judges Case’ [2021] Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies Google Scholar öffnen
  416. Pech L and Scheppele KL, ‘Illiberalism Within: Rule of Law Backsliding in the EU’ (2017) 19 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 3 Google Scholar öffnen
  417. Pech L, Wachowiec P and Mazur D, ‘Poland’s Rule of Law Breakdown: A Five-Year Assessment of EU’s (In)Action’ (2021) 13 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  418. Pernice I, ‘Machtspruch aus Karlsruhe: „Nicht Verhältnismäßig? – Nicht Verbindlich? – Nicht zu Fassen…“’ (2020) 12 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 508 Google Scholar öffnen
  419. Pernice I, ‘Europäisches und nationales Verfassungsrecht’, Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer (De Gruyter 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  420. Pernice I, in Horst Dreier (ed), Grundgesetz Kommentar, vol 2 (2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  421. Pernice I, ‘Der Schutz Nationaler Identität in Der Europäischen Union’ (2011) 136 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 185 Google Scholar öffnen
  422. Pernice I, Das Verhältnis europäischer zu nationalen Gerichten im europäischen Verfassungsverbund (De Gruyter 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  423. Pernice I, Der Europäische Verfassungsverbund (Nomos 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  424. Peters B, ‘A New Look at “National Identity”: How Should We Think about “collective” or “National Identities”?’ (2002) 43 European Journal of Sociology 3 Google Scholar öffnen
  425. Petersen N, ‘Karlsruhe Not Only Barks, But Finally Bites – Some Remarks on the OMT Decision of the German Constitutional Court’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 321 Google Scholar öffnen
  426. Phelan W, ‘The Role of the German and Italian Constitutional Courts in the Rise of EU Human Rights Jurisprudence: A Response to Delledonne & Fabbrini’ [2020] TRiSS Working Paper Series Google Scholar öffnen
  427. Pinelli C, ‘Theories Concerning the Hierarchy of Norms’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  428. Piris J-C, The Constitution for Europe: A Legal Analysis (Cambridge University Press 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  429. Pítrová L, ‘The Judgment of the Czech Constitutional Court in the “Slovak Pensions” Case and Its Possible Consequences (In Light of the Fortiter In Re Suaviter In Modo Principle)’ (2013) 3 The Lawyer Quarterly 86 Google Scholar öffnen
  430. Pörksen U, Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language (Penn State University Press 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  431. Plato, ‘Cratylus’ (Benjamin Jowett tr, 360AD) Google Scholar öffnen
  432. Plato, Plato: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus (Harold N Fowler tr, Loeb Classical Library 1914) Google Scholar öffnen
  433. Platon S and Pech L, ‘Judicial Independence under Threat: The Court of Justice to the Rescue in the ASJP Case’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1827 Google Scholar öffnen
  434. Pollicino O, ‘The New Relationship between National and the European Courts after the Enlargement of Europe: Towards a Unitary Theory of Jurisprudential Supranational Law?’ (2010) 29 Yearbook of European Law 65 Google Scholar öffnen
  435. Polzin M, ‘Irrungen Und Wirrungen Um Den Pouvoir Constituant: Die Entwicklung Des Konzepts Der Verfassungsidentität Im Deutschen Verfassungsrecht Seit 1871’ (2014) 53 Der Staat 61 Google Scholar öffnen
  436. Polzin M, ‘Constitutional Identity, Unconstitutional Amendments and the Idea of Constituent Power: The Development of the Doctrine of Constitutional Identity in German Constitutional Law’ (2016) 14 International Journal of Constitutional Law 411 Google Scholar öffnen
  437. Polzin M, ‘Constitutional Identity as a Constructed Reality and a Restless Soul’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 1595 Google Scholar öffnen
  438. Polzin M, Verfassungsidentität, vol 272 (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  439. Pozen DE, ‘CODA: Edward Snowden, National Security Whistleblowing, and Civil Disobedience’ in Kaeten Mistry and Hannah Gurman (eds), Whistleblowing Nation (Columbia University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  440. Pracht R, Residualkompetenzen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts ultra vires, Solange II, Verfassungsidentität (1. edn, Mohr Siebeck 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  441. Rawls J, Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press 1993) Google Scholar öffnen
  442. Rawls J, A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition (2nd edn, Harvard University Press 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  443. Raz J, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford University Press 1979) Google Scholar öffnen
  444. Raz J, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Reprint edition, Oxford University Press 1983) Google Scholar öffnen
  445. Rideau J, ‘The Case-Law of the Polish, Hungarian and Czech Constitutional Courts on National Identity and the" German Model"’ in Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz and Carina Alcoberro Llivina (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration, vol 4 (Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  446. Rosenfeld M, The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture, and Community (Routledge 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  447. Rosenfeld M, ‘Constitutional Identity’ in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  448. Rosenfeld M, ‘Rethinking the Boundaries between Public Law and Private Law for the Twenty First Century: An Introduction’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 125 Google Scholar öffnen
  449. Rosenfeld M, ‘The Conscience Wars in Historical and Philosophical Perspective: The Clash between Religious Absolutes and Democratic Pluralism’ in Michel Rosenfeld and Susanna Mancini (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  450. Rossi LS, ‘The Principle of Equality Among Member States of the European Union’ in Lucia S Rossi and Federico Casolari (eds), The Principle of Equality in EU Law (Springer 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  451. Roznai Y, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers (Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  452. Roznai Y, ‘Constitutional Transformation: Hungary’ in David S Law (ed), Constitutionalism in Context (Cambridge University Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  453. Ruffert M, ‘Verfahren eingestellt, Problem gelöst?: Die EU-Kommission und das Bundesverfassungsgericht’ (Verfassungsblog, Dezember 2021) <https://verfassungsblog.de/verfahren-eingestellt-problem-gelost/> accessed 24 February 2023 Google Scholar öffnen
  454. Saada J and Antaki M, ‘Conscience and Its Claims: A Philosophical History of Conscientious Objection’ in Michel Rosenfeld and Susanna Mancini (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  455. Sachs M, ‘GG Art. 79 Änderungen des Grundgesetzes’ in Michael Sachs (ed), Grundgesetz Kommentar (8th edn, C. H. Beck 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  456. Šadl U, ‘When is a Court a Court?’ (Verfassungsblog, 20 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  457. Šadl U and Mair S, ‘Mutual Disempowerment: Case C-441/14 Dansk Industri, Acting on Behalf of Ajos A/S v Estate of Karsten Eigil Rasmussen and Case No. 15/2014 Dansk Industri (DI) Acting for Ajos A/S v The Estate Left by A’ (2017) 13 European Constitutional Law Review 347 Google Scholar öffnen
  458. Sadowski J, ‘Amendments of 2020 to the Russian Constitution as an Update to Its Symbolic and Identity Programme’ (2022) 35 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 723 Google Scholar öffnen
  459. Sadurski W, ‘European Constitutional Identity?’ (European University Institute 2006) Working Paper Google Scholar öffnen
  460. Sadurski W, ‘Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler’ (2019) 11 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 63 Google Scholar öffnen
  461. Sadurski W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  462. Sadurski W, ‘The Disciplinary Chamber May Go – but the Rotten System will Stay’ (Verfassungsblog, 11 August 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  463. Saitto F, ‘Do Not Forget Solange I: The Protection of Fundamental Rights in Europe and the Struggle Over the Concretisation of the European Legal Order’ Google Scholar öffnen
  464. Saiz Arnaiz A and Llivinia CA, National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  465. Samek Lodovici M et al., ‘Integration of Refugees in Greece, Hungary and Italy Comparative Analysis’ (European Parliament, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  466. Sanders A and Danwitz L von, ‘Selecting Judges in Poland and Germany: Challenges to the Rule of Law in Europe and Propositions for a New Approach to Judicial Legitimacy’ (2018) 19 German Law Journal 769 Google Scholar öffnen
  467. Sarmiento D, ‘The EU’s Constitutional Core’ in Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz and Carina Alcoberro Llivina (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration, vol 4 (Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  468. Sarmiento D, ‘Requiem for Judicial Dialogue’ (2020) 16 EU Law Live 9 Google Scholar öffnen
  469. Sauer H, ‘Substantive EU Law Review Beyond the Veil of Democracy’ (2020) 16 EU Law Live 2 Google Scholar öffnen
  470. Schäffer H, ‘Die Grundrechte im Spannungsverhältnis von nationaler und europäischer Perspektive’ (2007) 62 Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  471. Scharpf F, ‘Negative and Positive Integration’ in Fritz Scharpf (ed), Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford University Press 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  472. Scheppele KL and Pech L, ‘Was the Commission Right to Activate pre-Article 7 and Article 7(1) Procedures Against Poland?’ (Verfassungsblog, 7 March 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  473. Scheuerman WE, Civil Disobedience (1st edn, Polity 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  474. Scheuerman WE, ‘Can Political Institutions Commit Civil Disobedience?’ (2020) 82 The Review of Politics 269 Google Scholar öffnen
  475. Scheuerman WE, ‘Introduction: Why, Once Again, Civil Disobedience?’ in William E Scheuerman (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  476. Scheuerman WE, ‘Whistleblowing as Civil Disobedience’ in William E Scheuerman (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  477. Schilling T, ‘The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order: An Analysis of Possible Foundations’ (1996) 37 Harvard International Law Journal 389 Google Scholar öffnen
  478. Schlink B, ‘Conscientious Objections’ in Michel Rosenfeld and Susanna Mancini (eds), The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  479. Schlütter B, ‘Principles of European Constitutional Law’ (2011) 22 European Journal of International Law 605 Google Scholar öffnen
  480. Schmid CU, ‘All Bark and No Bite: Notes on the Federal Constitutional Court’s “Banana Decision”’ (2001) 7 European Law Journal 95 Google Scholar öffnen
  481. Schmidt M, ‘The Principle of Non-Discrimination in Respect of Age: Dimensions of the ECJ’s Mangold Judgment’ (2006) 7 German Law Journal 505 Google Scholar öffnen
  482. Schmitt C, Constitutional Theory (Jeffrey Seitzer tr, Duke University Press Books 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  483. Schmitt C, Strauss L and Strong TB, The Concept of the Political (George Schwab tr, Reprint edition, University of Chicago Press 1996) Google Scholar öffnen
  484. Schneider K, ‘The Constitutional Status of Karlsruhe’s Novel “Jurisdiction” in EU Fundamental Rights Matters: Self-Inflicted Institutional Vulnerabilities’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 19 Google Scholar öffnen
  485. Schneider K, ‘Gauging “Ultra-Vires”: The Good Parts’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 968 Google Scholar öffnen
  486. Schneider L, ‘Responses by the CJEU to the European Crisis of Democracy and the Rule of Law’ (2020) 2 re:construction Working Papers, Forum Transregionale Studien 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  487. Schnettger A, ‘Article 4(2) TEU as a Vehicle for National Constitutional Identity in the Shared European Legal System’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  488. Scholtes J, ‘Abusing Constitutional Identity’ (2021) 22 German Law Journal 534 Google Scholar öffnen
  489. Scholtes J, ‘Populism and the Crisis of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Adam Czarnota, Martin Krygier and Wojciech Sadurski (eds), Anti-Constitutional Populism (Cambridge University Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  490. Scholz R, in Günter Dürig and Theodor Maunz (eds), Grundgesetz Kommentar, vol 55 (C. H. Beck 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  491. Scholz R, ‘GG Art. 23’ in Theodor Maunz and Günter Dürig (eds), Grundgesetz-Kommentar (69th edn, C. H. Beck 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  492. Schönberger C, ‘Lisbon in Karlsruhe: Maastricht’s Epigones At Sea’ (2009) 10 German Law Journal 1201 Google Scholar öffnen
  493. Schönberger C, ‘Identitäterä: Verfassungsidentität zwischen Widerstandsformel und Musealisierung des Grundgesetzes’ (2015) 63 Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 41 Google Scholar öffnen
  494. Schorkopf F, ‘Value Constitutionalism in the European Union’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 956 Google Scholar öffnen
  495. Schramm M, ‘“Grundrechtsvielfalt” als Allzweckwaffe im Recht­sprechungs­verbund: Anmerkungen zu der Recht auf Vergessen I-Entscheidung des BVerfG’ (Verfassungsblog, 5 December 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  496. Schütze R, ‘Constitutional History: From Paris to Lisbon’ in Robert Schütze (ed), European Constitutional Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  497. Schwehm J, ‘Die EU als „Staatenverbund“’, Theorie und Kontext (Nomos 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  498. Schwehm J, Theorie und Kontext: Reflexionen über Demokratie und Frieden zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts (Nomos 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  499. Sharpston E, ‘Preface’ in Elke Cloots, Geert De Baere and Stefan Sottiaux (eds), Federalism in the European Union (Hart Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  500. Shipton P, ‘Relationships between Ethnicity and Stability’ in Frances Stewart et al. (eds), Ethnic Diversity and Economic Instability in Africa: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  501. Shúilleabháin MN, ‘Cross-Border (Non-)Recognition of Marriage and Registered Partnership: Free Movement and EU Private International Law’ in Elena Bargelli and Jens M Scherpe (eds), The Interaction between Family Law, Succession Law and Private International Law: Adapting to Change (Intersentia 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  502. Siems M, Comparative Law (Cambridge University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  503. Simon S and Rathke H, ‘“Simply Not Comprehensible.” Why?’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 950 Google Scholar öffnen
  504. Singer P, Democracy and Disobedience (Oxford University Press 1973) Google Scholar öffnen
  505. Singer P, Animal Liberation: The Definitive Classic of the Animal Movement (Upd, Harper Perennial Modern Classics 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  506. Śledzińska-Simon A, ‘Constitutional Identity in 3D: A Model of Individual, Relational, and Collective Self and Its Application in Poland’ (2015) 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 124 Google Scholar öffnen
  507. Śledzińska-Simon A, ‘The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Government in Poland: On Judicial Reform Reversing Democratic Transition’ (2018) 19 German Law Journal 1839 Google Scholar öffnen
  508. Śledzińska-Simon A and Ziółkowski M, ‘Constitutional Identity in Poland: Is the Emperor Putting On the Old Clothes of Sovereignty?’ in Christian Calliess and Gerhard van der Schyff (eds), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  509. Smirnova M, ‘Russian Constitutional Court Affirms Russian Constitution’s Supremacy over ECtHR Decisions’ (UK Constitutional Law Association, 17 July 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  510. Smith W, ‘Deliberative Democratic Disobedience’ in William E Scheuerman (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience (Cambridge University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  511. Somek A, The Legal Relation: Legal Theory after Legal Positivism (Cambridge University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  512. Sophocles and Hall E, The World’s Classics: Antigone; Oedipus the King; Electra (HDF Kitto tr, Oxford University Press 1994) Google Scholar öffnen
  513. Spaventa E, ‘Federalisation versus Centralisation: Tensions in Fundamental Rights Discourse in the EU’ in Michael Dougan and Samantha Currie (eds), 50 Years of the European Treaties: Looking Back and Thinking Forward (Hart Publishing 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  514. Spaventa E, ‘Should We “Harmonize” Fundamental Rights in the EU? Some Reflections about Minimum Standards and Fundamental Rights Protection in the EU Composite Constitutional System’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 997 Google Scholar öffnen
  515. Spieker LD, ‘Breathing Life into the Union’s Common Values: On the Judicial Application of Article 2 TEU in the EU Value Crisis’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 1182 Google Scholar öffnen
  516. Spieker LD, ‘Framing and Managing Constitutional Identity Conflicts: How to Stabilize the Modus Vivendi between the Court of Justice and National Constitutional Courts’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 361 Google Scholar öffnen
  517. Spieker LD, ‘Defending Union Values in Judicial Proceedings. On How to Turn Article 2 TEU into a Judicially Applicable Provision’ in Armin von Bogdandy and others (eds), Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States: Taking Stock of Europe’s Actions (Springer 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  518. Spieker LD, EU Values Before the Court of Justice Foundations, Potential, Risks (Oxford University Press 2023) (forthcoming) Google Scholar öffnen
  519. Starski P, The Unwilling or Unable State as a Challenge to International Law (2023) (forthcoming) Google Scholar öffnen
  520. Stein SK, ‘Dobbs kills Roe’ (Verfassungsblog, 27 June 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  521. Stein T, ‘Always Steering a Straight Course? The German Federal Constitutional Court and European Integration’ (2011) 12 ERA Forum 219 Google Scholar öffnen
  522. Steinbeis M, ‘Not All Right’ (Verfassungsblog, 11 November 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  523. Sterck J, ‘Sameness and Selfhood: The Efficiency of Constitutional Identities in EU Law’ (2018) 24 European Law Journal 281 Google Scholar öffnen
  524. Stöver B, ‘Eastern Europe’ in Richard H Immerman and Petra Goedde (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War (Oxford University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  525. Streinz R, ‘GG Art. 24 Zwischenstaatliche Einrichtungen; Kollektives Sicherheitssystem’ in Michael Sachs (ed), Grundgesetz Kommentar (8th edn, 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  526. Strumia F, ‘When Managed Recognition Turns into Outright Denial’ (Verfassungsblog, 18 May 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  527. Stucki S, ‘In Defence of Green Civil Disobedience’ (Verfassungsblog, 30 October 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  528. Szente Z, ‘Constitutional Identity as a Normative Constitutional Concept’ (2022) 63 Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 3 Google Scholar öffnen
  529. Takemura H (ed), ‘Right to Conscientious Objection in European Human Rights Law’, International Human Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service and Individual Duties to Disobey Manifestly Illegal Orders (Springer 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  530. Taylor C, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Reprint edition, Harvard University Press 1992) Google Scholar öffnen
  531. Ten CL, ‘Mill on Self-Regarding Actions’ (1968) 43 Philosophy 29 Google Scholar öffnen
  532. Theil S, ‘What Red Lines, If Any, Do the Lisbon Judgments of European Constitutional Courts Draw for Future EU Integration?’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 599 Google Scholar öffnen
  533. Thomas DC, The Limits of Europe: Membership Norms and the Contestation of Regional Integration (Oxford University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  534. Thym D, ‘Supranational Differentiation and Enhanced Cooperation’ in Robert Schütze and Takis Tridimas (eds), Oxford Principles Of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order: Volume I (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  535. Tiedeke AS, ‘Are We Taking the State (Too) Seriously? Anna Sophia Tiedeke’ (Colloquium of the Center for Global Constitutionalism 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  536. Tomkins A and Chalmers D (eds), ‘Sovereignty and Federalism: The Authority of EU Law and Its Limits’, European Union Public Law: Text and Materials (Cambridge University Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  537. Tomuschat C, ‘The Defence of National Identity by the German Constitutional Court’ in Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz and Carina Alcoberro Llivina (eds), National constitutional identity and European integration (Intersentia 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  538. Traut F, ‘Playing the chicken game: The conflict over Italy’s draft budget reveals a construction flaw in the EMU’ (Verfassungsblog, 2 November 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  539. Tribe LH, ‘A Constitution We Are Amending: In Defense of a Restrained Judicial Role’ (1983) 97 Harvard Law Review 433 Google Scholar öffnen
  540. Tridimas T, The General Principles of EU Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  541. Tridimas T and Gentile G, ‘The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 794 Google Scholar öffnen
  542. Tripkovic B, The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  543. Tripkovic B, ‘Constitutional Identity’ in Bosko Tripkovic (ed), The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  544. Troper M, ‘Behind the Constitution? The Principle of Constitutional Identity in France’ in Andras Sajo and Renata Uitz (eds), Constitutional Topography: Values and Constitutions (Eleven 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  545. Tuck R (ed), ‘Preface’, The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy (Cambridge University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  546. Tushnet M, ‘How Do Constitutions Constitute Constitutional Identity?’ (2010) 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 671 Google Scholar öffnen
  547. Tzanakopoulos A, Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  548. Uitz R, ‘National Constitutional Identity in the European Constitutional Project: A Recipe for Exposing Cover Ups and Masquerades’ (Verfassungsblog, 11 November 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  549. Ukrow J, Richterliche Rechtsfortbildung durch den EuGH (Nomos 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  550. Valcke P and Verschaeve S, ‘Going Dark or Living Forever: The Right to Be Forgotten, Search Engines and Press Archives’ in Elisa Stefanini et al. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Information Technology, Life Sciences and Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  551. van Ballegooij W and Bárd P, ‘The CJEU in the Celmer case: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back for Upholding the Rule of Law Within the EU’ (Verfassungsblog, 29 July 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  552. van den Brink M, ‘When Can Religious Employers Discriminate? The Scope of the Religious Ethos Exemption in EU Law’ (2022) 1 European Law Open 89 Google Scholar öffnen
  553. van der Schyff G, ‘The Constitutional Relationship between the European Union and Its Member States: The Role of National Identity in Article 4(2) TEU’ (2012) 37 European Law Review 563 Google Scholar öffnen
  554. van der Schyff G, ‘Constitutional Identity of the EU Legal Order: Delineating Its Roles and Contours’ [2021] Ancilla Iuris 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  555. van Ooyen RC, Die Staatstheorie des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und Europa (2nd edn, Nomos 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  556. Villotti J, ‘National Constitutional Identities and the Legitimacy of the European Union – Two Sides of the European Coin’ (2015) 4 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 475 Google Scholar öffnen
  557. von Bogdandy A, ‘Founding Principles’ in Armin von Bogdandy and Jürgen Bast (eds), Principles of European Constitutional Law (2nd edn, Hart/C.H. Beck 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  558. von Bogdandy A, ‘How to protect European Values in the Polish Constitutional Crisis’ (Verfassungsblog, 31 March 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  559. von Bogdandy A, ‘Tyrannei Der Werte? Herausforderungen Und Grundlagen Einer Europäischen Dogmatik Systemischer Defizite’ [2019] Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 503 Google Scholar öffnen
  560. von Bogdandy A, ‘Towards a Tyranny of Values? Principles on Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States’ in Armin von Bogdandy et al. (eds), Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States: Taking Stock of Europe’s Actions (Springer 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  561. von Bogdandy A, Antpöhler C and Ioannidis M, ‘Protecting EU Values: Reverse Solange and the Rule of Law Framework’ in András Jakab and Dimitry Kochenov (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  562. von Bogdandy A and Krenn C, ‘Zur demokratischen Legitimation von Europas Richtern eine vergleichende Rekonstruktion der Richterauswahl zu EGMR und EuGH’ (2014) 69 JuristenZeitung 529 Google Scholar öffnen
  563. von Bogdandy A and Schill SW, ‘Overcoming Absolute Primacy: Respect for National Identity under the Lisbon Treaty’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 1417 Google Scholar öffnen
  564. von Bogdandy A and Spieker LD, ‘Countering the Judicial Silencing of Critics: Article 2 TEU Values, Reverse Solange, and the Responsibilities of National Judges’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 391 Google Scholar öffnen
  565. Voßkuhle A, ‘Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’ [2010] Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  566. Voßkuhle A, ‘“European Integration Through Law”: The Contribution of the Federal Constitutional Court’ (2017) 58 European Journal of Sociology 145 Google Scholar öffnen
  567. Voβkuhle A, ‘Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’ (2010) 6 European Constitutional Law Review 175 Google Scholar öffnen
  568. Vranes E, ‘German Constitutional Foundations of, and Limitations to, EU Integration: A Systematic Analysis’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 75 Google Scholar öffnen
  569. Vyhnánek L, ‘The Eternity Clause in the Czech Constitution as Limit to European Integration’ (2015) 9 Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law Journal 240 Google Scholar öffnen
  570. Walker N, ‘Post-Constituent Constitutionalism? The Case of the European Union’ in Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  571. Walker N, ‘Constitutionalism and Pluralism’ in Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek (eds), The Federal Constitutional Court Rules for a Bright Future of Constitutional Pluralism (Hart Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  572. Walker N, ‘When Sovereigns Stir’ (2018) Paper No. 2019/01 Edinburgh School of Law Research Google Scholar öffnen
  573. Walker N, ‘Liberal Nationalism’s Precarious Prospects’ in Uladzislau Belavusau and Aleksandra Gliszczynska-Grabias (eds), Constitutionalism under Stress (Oxford University Press 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  574. Waluchow WJ, A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree (1st edn, Cambridge University Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  575. Weiler JHH, ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 The Yale Law Journal 2403 Google Scholar öffnen
  576. Weiler JHH, ‘Der Staat “über Alles” Demos, Telos Und Die Maastricht-Entscheidung Des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ (Jean Monnet Chair 1995) 7 Google Scholar öffnen
  577. Weiler JHH, ‘The Reformation of European Constitutionalism’ (1997) 35 Journal of Common Market Studies 97 Google Scholar öffnen
  578. Weiler JHH, ‘Federalism Without Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg’ in Kalypso Nicolaidis and Robert Howse (eds), The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union (Oxford University Press 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  579. Weiler JHH, ‘A Constitution for Europe? Some Hard Choices’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies 563 Google Scholar öffnen
  580. Weiler JHH, ‘On the Power of the Word: Europe’s Constitutional Iconography’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 173 Google Scholar öffnen
  581. Weiler JHH, ‘Taking (Europe’s) Values Seriously’ in Rainer Hofmann and Stefan Kadelbach (eds), Law Beyond the State (Campus Verlag 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  582. Weiler JHH and Haltern UR, ‘The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order-Through the Looking Glass’ (1996) 37 Harvard International Law Journal 411 Google Scholar öffnen
  583. Weinstock D, ‘How Democratic Is Civil Disobedience?’ (2016) 10 Criminal Law and Philosophy 707 Google Scholar öffnen
  584. Wendel M, Permeabilität Im Europäischen Verfassungsrecht, vol 4 (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  585. Wendel M, ‘Lisbon Before the Courts: Comparative Perspectives’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review 96 Google Scholar öffnen
  586. Wendel M, ‘Exceeding Judicial Competence in the Name of Democracy: The German Federal Constitutional Court’s OMT Reference’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review 263 Google Scholar öffnen
  587. Wendel M, ‘Das Bundesverfassungsgericht Als Garant Der Unionsgrundrechte’ (2020) 75 JuristenZeitung 157 Google Scholar öffnen
  588. Wendel M, ‘Taking Up the European Mandate: The Charter Before German Courts’ in Michal Bobek and Jeremias Adams-Prassl (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Member States (Hart Publishing 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  589. Wendel M, ‘Paradoxes of Ultra-Vires Review: A Critical Review of the PSPP Decision and Its Initial Reception’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 979 Google Scholar öffnen
  590. Wendel M, ‘The Fog of Identity and Judicial Contestation: Preventive and Defensive Constitutional Identity Review in Germany’ (2021) 27 European Public Law Google Scholar öffnen
  591. Wendt A, ‘The State as Person in International Theory’ (2004) 30 Review of International Studies 289 Google Scholar öffnen
  592. Wetz K, Funktionen von Verfassungsidentität Als Gerichtliches Konzept in Der Europäischen Union, vol 18 (1st edn, Mohr Siebeck 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  593. White J, ‘Principled Disobedience in the EU’ (2017) 24 Constellations 637 Google Scholar öffnen
  594. Whitehead AN, Process and Reality (Free Press 1978) Google Scholar öffnen
  595. Williams AT, ‘Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 549 Google Scholar öffnen
  596. Williams CJF, ‘Is Identity a Relation?’ (1979) 80 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81 Google Scholar öffnen
  597. Wischmeyer T, ‘Nationale Identität Und Verfassungsidentität. Schutzgehalte, Instrumente, Perspektiven’ (2015) 140 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 415 Google Scholar öffnen
  598. Wójcik A, ‘On the PM Morawiecki Motion to the Constitutional Tribunal Regarding EU Treaties Conformity with the Polish Constitution (Case K 3/21)’ (Rule of Law, 27 April 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
  599. Wójcik A, ‘Keeping the Past and the Present Apart’ (Verfassungsblog, 26 April 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
  600. Wouters J, ‘From an Economic Community to a Union of Values: The Emergence of the EU’s Commitment to Human Rights’ in Manfred Nowak et al. (eds), The European Union and Human Rights Law and Policy (2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  601. Wouters J and Schmitt P, ‘Equality Among Member States and Differentiated Integration in the EU’ in Lucia S Rossi and Federico Casolari (eds), The Principle of Equality in EU Law (Springer 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  602. Zbíral R, ‘Czech Constitutional Court, Judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12. – A Legal Revolution or Negligible Episode? Court of Justice Decision Proclaimed Ultra Vires’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review 1475 Google Scholar öffnen
  603. Zerilli LMG, ‘Against Civility: A Feminist Perspective’ in Austin Sarat (ed), Civility, Legality, and Justice in America (Cambridge University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  604. Zillén K, ‘Religious Refusals in Health Care as a Matter of Freedom of Religion’ in Hedvig Bernitz and Victoria Enkvist (eds), Freedom of Religion: An Ambiguous Right in the Contemporary European Legal Order (Hart Publishing 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
  605. Zimmermann R, ‘Roman Law in the Modern World’ in David Johnston (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  606. Ziółkowski M and Grabowska-Moroz B, ‘Enforcement of EU Values and the Tyranny of National Identity – Polish Examples and Excuses’ (Verfassungsblog, 26 November 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  607. Zorkin V, Legal Path of Russia (Norma Publishing House 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  608. Arendt H, The Human Condition: Second Edition (Margaret Canovan and Danielle Allen eds, 2nd edn, University of Chicago Press 2018) 125 Google Scholar öffnen
  609. Berlin I, ‘A Matter of Life’ in Clara Urquhart (ed), A Matter of Life (Jonathan Cape Thirty Bedford Square 1963) 39 Google Scholar öffnen
  610. Dworkin R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1978) Google Scholar öffnen
  611. Fromm E, ‘A Matter of Life’ in Clara Urquhart (ed), A Matter of Life (Jonathan Cape Thirty Bedford Square 1963) 222 Google Scholar öffnen
  612. Fukuyama F, Identity: Contemporary Identity Politics and the Struggle for Recognition (Main edition, Profile Books 2018) 183 Google Scholar öffnen
  613. Hobbes T, Leviathan (Christopher Brooke ed, 1st edn, Penguin Classics 2017) Chapter XXIX Google Scholar öffnen
  614. Locke J, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (25th ed., with the author’s last additions and corrections, Tegg 1825) iii Google Scholar öffnen
  615. Locke J, Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (Ian Shapiro ed, 1st edn, Yale University Press 2003) 170, § 157 Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover des Buchs: »Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hans G. Gnodtke
»Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex