Cover des Buchs: The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 28.12.2021

Zusammenfassung

Die Unabhängigkeit von Schiedsrichtern ist für die internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung. In der letzten Zeit wurden immer häufiger Schiedssprüche wegen mangelnder schiedsrichterlicher Unabhängigkeit aufgehoben.Das vorliegende Werk ist dem praxisrelevanten Fragenkomplex der schiedsrichterlichen Unabhängigkeit und Unparteilichkeit gewidmet. Eingehend werden die ausgefeilten dogmatischen Strukturen und die relevante Rechtsprechung der für die internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit wichtigen Rechtsordnungen (Frankreich, England, Schweiz, Deutschland) auf der pro-arbitralen, arbitralen und post-arbitralen Verfahrensebene untersucht. Ein detailliertes Stichwortverzeichnis und eine umfangreiche Literaturliste runden die Arbeit ab. Aus dem Vorwort: “Dr. Angoura’s book provides a detailed, systematic and comprehensive analysis of the concepts of independence and impartiality of arbitrators in international commercial arbitration. In addition to exploring the arbitrator’s duties of impartiality and independence on a conceptual and theoretical level, provides a valuable tool for practice in international arbitration. Its careful examination of national court decisions, institutional rulings and other authorities is an important contribution to parties, lawyers, arbitrators, institutions and national courts to facilitate decisions on questions of disclosure and waiver and its application to impartiality at the different arbitration stages. This book contributes in particular to the ongoing discussion of the arbitrator’s impartiality as one of the (most frequently-invoked) grounds for annulment or non-recognition of arbitral awards. I congratulate the author for her very thorough research and thoughtful writing and her valuable contribution to the dialogue between academia and practice.”Gary B. Born, London, November 2021

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
Erscheinungsdatum
28.12.2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8439-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2814-0
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Successful Dispute Resolution
Band
11
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
269
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 22
    1. I. Research Question Kein Zugriff
    2. II. Methodology Kein Zugriff
    3. III. Structure Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. The fair trial principle Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. National arbitration laws Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Institutional rules Kein Zugriff
    2. II. The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration as interpretation aid Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. The concept of impartiality Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. The concept of independence Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Impartiality applied to arbitrators Kein Zugriff
    4. IV. The question of ‘justifiable doubts’ Kein Zugriff
    1. I. General remarks Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Significant direct or indirect financial interest in the dispute Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Personal interest in the dispute Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Prior involvement in the dispute Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Arbitrator’s appointment in a related matter Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Publicly expressed legal opinion Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. General remarks Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Arbitrator’s employment by one of the parties Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Arbitrator acting as manager, director or member of the supervisory board of one of the parties Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Direct relationship Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Indirect relationship Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Prior business or financial relationship Kein Zugriff
        4. d) ‘Repeat arbitrator’ Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Close family relationship Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Close personal relationship Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Remote and insignificant social relationship Kein Zugriff
        4. d) Ex parte contacts Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Common nationality of presiding arbitrator with one of the parties Kein Zugriff
      6. 6. Arbitrator representing one of the parties Kein Zugriff
      7. 7. Arbitrator’s relationship with counsel representing one of the parties Kein Zugriff
    4. IV. Arbitrator’s relationship with another arbitrator, witness or arbitral secretary Kein Zugriff
    5. V. Arbitrator’s law firm relationship with one of the parties or counsel Kein Zugriff
    6. VI. Arbitrator’s conduct and expressions of opinion during arbitration Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Nature of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Timing of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Arbitrator’s investigation duty Kein Zugriff
        1. a) The applicable law to arbitrator’s disclosure duty Kein Zugriff
        2. b) The subjective and objective standards of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
        3. c) The interface between parties’ investigation duty and arbitrator’s disclosure duty Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Consequences of breach of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. The interplay between the principle of party autonomy and fair trial Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Challenge procedure and time limit Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Subsidiary competence of the judge at the seat of the arbitral tribunal Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Legal remedies against the decision on the challenge of the arbitrator Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. The objective standard of the disqualification of an arbitrator Kein Zugriff
        1. a) The violation of due process Kein Zugriff
        2. b) The irregular composition of the arbitral tribunal or violation of parties’ agreed arbitral proceedings Kein Zugriff
        3. c) The violation of public policy Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Effect of bias on the arbitral award Kein Zugriff
    1. I. The object of waiver: the right to an impartial tribunal versus the right to contest arbitrator’s lack of impartiality Kein Zugriff
    2. II. The mechanism of waiver as an aspect of good faith Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Knowledge of facts or circumstances giving rise to arbitrator’s lack of impartiality Kein Zugriff
        1. a) The specification and compliance with the set time limit Kein Zugriff
        2. b) The preclusive effect of waiver of the right to contest arbitrator’s lack of impartiality at different stages Kein Zugriff
    4. IV. Advance waiver Kein Zugriff
  7. § 6. Conclusions Kein Zugriff 212 - 218
  8. BIBLIOGRAPHY Kein Zugriff 219 - 250
  9. LIST OF CASES Kein Zugriff 251 - 264
  10. Biography Kein Zugriff 265 - 266
  11. Index Kein Zugriff 267 - 269

Literaturverzeichnis (560)

  1. Aguilar Alvarez, G., ‘The Challenge of Arbitrators’ (1990) 6 Arb Intl 203. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Alcalá, J.M., Cardozo, C., and Segura, O.Jr., ‘Arbitrator’s Disclosure Standards: The Uncertainty Continues’ in ICDR Handbook on International Arbitration Practice (2nd edn, JurisNet 2017) 307-324. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Alessi, D., ‘Enforcing Arbitrator’s Obligations: Rethinking International Commercial Arbitrators’ Liability’ (2014) 31 J Intl Arb 735. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Allen, N., and Mallet, D., ‘Arbitrator Disclosure - No Room for the Colour Blind’ (2011) 7 Asian Intl Arb J 118. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Ambrose, C., Maxwell, K., and Collett, M., London Maritime Arbitration (Informa law 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Andrews, N., Arbitration and Contract Law: Common Law Perspectives (Springer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Angoura, S., ‘Aspects of Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2013) 8 Young Arbitration Review 32. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Angoura, S., ‘Interface Between Arbitrators’ Disclosure and Parties’ Investigation Duties, Note on decision of cour d’Appel de Paris. 27 Mars 2018, Chambre 1, 16/09386, SAAD Buzwair Automotive Co v. Audi Volkswagen Middle East Fze LLC’ (2018) 4 ASA Bull 913. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Angoura, S., ‘Arbitrator’s Impartiality under Article V(1)(d) of the New York Convention’ (2019) 15 Asian Intl Arb J 29. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Angoura, S., and Kastanidis, A., ‘The Issue of Pathological Clauses in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2018) 3 Diaitisia (Arbitration) 336 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Angoura, S., and Kastanidis, A., ‘Les limites de l’autonomie de la volonté en droit de l’arbitrage commercial international dans les pays incorporant la loi type de la CNUDCI: L’example de la Gréce’ (2019) Rev arb 431. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Arroyo, M., ‘Chapter 2, Part II: Commentary on Chapter 12 PILS, Article 190 [Finality, challenge: principle]’ in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 266-350. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Baizeau, D., ‘Chapter 2, Part II: Commentary on Chapter 12 PILS, Article 192 [Waiver of annul-ment]' in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 283-94. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Ball, M., ‘How Helpful Really Are the New IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration?' (2005) 21 Arb Intl 323. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Balthasar, S., and Ziadé, R., ‘I. International Arbitration in France’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), Interna-tional Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analysis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 415-448. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Balthasar, S., ‘J. International Arbitration in Germany’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Com-mercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analysis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 449-488. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bantekas, I., Ortolani. P., Ali S., Gómez, M.A. and Polkinghorne, M., UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary (CUP 2020). Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Barak, A., ‘The Role of a Judge in a Democracy’ in Breitenmoser, S. Ehrenzeller,B., Sassoli,M., et al. (eds), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, Menschenrechte, Demokratie und Rechtsstaat, Droits de l’ home, démocratie et État de droit - Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Dike Nomos 2007) [cited as: LA Wildhaber] 939-960. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Bärtsch, P. and Schramm, D., Arbitration Law of Switzerland: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Bassiri, N., ‘Chapter 10: Arbitrators and Their Online Identity’ in Piers, M., and Aschauer, C. (eds), Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration (CUP 2018) 246-271. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Batiffol, H., and Lagarde, P., Droit international privé vol 1 (LGDJ 1981). Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Baumann, A., and Pfitzner, T.V., ‘Introduction’ in Weigand, F. B., and Baumann, A. (eds), Practi-tioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 3-86. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Beatson, J., ‘International Arbitration, Public Policy Considerations, and Conflicts of Laws: The Perspectives of Reviewing and Enforcing Courts’ (2017) 33 Arb Intl 175. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bedjaoui, M., ‘Des fortes vérités de Cassandre aux modestes correctifs de Némésis (Ou le sou-ci communément partagé de voir la liberté fondamentale de choisir un arbitre n'être ni un dan-ger ni en danger)’, in Dominicé, C., Patry, R., and Reymond, C., Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 1993) [cited as: LA Lalive] 385- 398. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Beffa, L., ‘Challenge of International Arbitration Awards in Switzerland for Lack of Independ-ence and/or Impartiality of an Arbitrator – Is It time to Change the Approach?’ (2011) 29 ASA Bull 598. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Beisteiner, L., ‘Section 594 Conduct of Arbitration Proceedings’ in Zeiler, G. (ed), Austrian Ar-bitration Law (NWV 2016) 108-115. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Bellet, P., ‘Des arbitres neutres et non neutres’, in Dominicé, C., Patry, R., and Reymond, C., Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 1993) [cited as: LA Lalive] 399-409. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Benedettelli, M.V., ‘Human Rights as a Litigation Tool in International Arbitration: Reflecting on the ECHR Experience’ (2015) 31 Arb Intl 631. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Bensaude, D., ‘Obligation de révélation et charge de la recherche d’information’ (2014) Gaz. Pal. 18. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Bensaude, D., ‘French Code of Civil Procedure (Book IV), Article 1456’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1147-1149. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bensaude, D., ‘French Code of Civil Procedure (Book IV), Article 1520’ in Mistelis L. (ed), Con-cise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1175-1185. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bensaude, D., ‘Obligation de révélation pesant sur l’arbitre versus recherche d’information à la charge des parties’ (2018) Gaz. Pal. 19. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Berger, B., and Kellerhals, F., International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland (3rd edn, Stämpfli 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Berger, B., ‘Rights and Duties of Arbitrators in the Deliberations’ (2013) 31 ASA Bull 244. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Bermann, G. A., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy in the Composition of the Arbitral Panel’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 83-125. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bernet, M., and Eschment, J., ‘Liability of Arbitrators under Swiss Law: Legal Basis and Limita-tions of Arbitral Immunity’ (2016) SchiedsVZ 189. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Bernini, G., ‘Cultural Neutrality: A Prerequisite to Arbitral Justice’ (1989) 10 Mich. J. Int’l L. 39. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Bernini, G., ‘The Conduct of the Arbitral Proceedings: Standards of Behavior of Arbitrators’ (Report) in The Arbitral Process and the Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Publ. No. 472 1991) 31-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bertrand, E., ‘The Brave New World of Arbitration: Third-Party Funding’ (2011) ASA Bull 607. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Bertrou, G., and de Margerie, Q., ‘Obligation de révélation de l'arbitre: tentative de synthèse après la publication des nouvelles règles de l'IBA (2015) 1 Cah. Arb. 29. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Besson, S., ‘Arbitration and Human Rights’ (2006) 24 ASA Bull 395. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Besson, S., ‘Arbitrage. Impartialité. Défaut d’impartialité. Con. EDH, art. 6§1. Liens associatifs ou scientifiques’ (2019) JDI 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Besson, S., and Rigozzi, A. ‘La réforme du droit suisse de l’arbitrage international’ (2021) Rev arb 11. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Binder, P., International Commercial Arbitration and Conciliation in UNCITRAL Model Law Jurisdictions (Sweet & Maxwell 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Bingham, T., The Business of Judging (OUP 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Bishop, D., and Reed, L., ‘Practical Guidelines for Interviewing, Selecting and Challenging Par-ty-Appointed Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1998) 14 Arb Intl 395. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Bishop, D., and Stevens, M., ‘Safeguarding the Fair Conduct of Proceedings-Report’ in van den Berg, A.J. (ed), International Arbitration: The Coming of a New Age? (2013) 17 ICCA Con-gress Series 473. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Blackby, N., Partasides, C., et al., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th edn, OUP 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Blessing, M., ‘The New International Arbitration Law in Switzerland: A Significant Step Towards Liberalism’ (1988) 5 J Intl Arb 9. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Böckstiegel K.H., ‘Use by a Party of Challenges to Delay or Disrupt the Arbitration’ in van den Berg, A. J. (ed), I. Preventing Delay and Disruption of Arbitration (Deventer 1991) 131-159. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Böckstiegel, K.H., ‘Party Autonomy and Case Management - Experiences and Suggestions of an Arbitrator’ (2013) 11 SchiedsVZ 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Bogart, C. P., ‘Overview of Arbitration Finance’ in Cremandes, S.P. and Dimolitsa, A. (eds), Third -Party Funding in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2013) 50-56. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Bollenberger, R., ‘Der Schiedsrichtervertrag’ in Liebscher, C., Oberhammer, P. and Rechber-ger, W. (eds), Schiedsverfahrensrecht (Österreich 2016) 587-626. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Bond, S., ‘The Selection of ICC Arbitrators and the Requirement of Independence’ (1988) 4 Arb Intl 300. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Bond, S., and Paralika, M., ‘ICC Rules of Arbitration, The Arbitral Tribunal, Article 11 [General Provisions]’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (Kluwer 2015) 374-378. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Born, G., International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing (Kluwer 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Born, G., International Arbitration: Law and Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Born, G., International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, Kluwer 2021). Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Borris, C., and Hennecke, R., ‘Article V(1)(d)’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Borris and Hennecke, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 342-370. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Borris, C., and Hennecke, R., ‘Article V’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recog-nition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Borris and Hennecke, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 250-279. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Bratic, C., ‘The Parties Hereby Waive All Recourse…But Not That One.’ Why Parties Adopt Ex-clusion Agreements and Why Courts Hesitate to Enforce Them’ (2018) 12 Disp. Resol. Int’l 105. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Brekoulakis, S., ‘The Notion of Superiority of Arbitration Agreements over Jurisdiction Agree-ments: Time to Abandon it?’ (2007) 24 J Intl Arb 341. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Briner, R., and von Schlabrendorff, F., ‘Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its Bearing upon International Arbitration’ in Briner, R., Fortier, L.Y. Berger, K.P. and Bredow, J. (eds), Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21st Century. Liber amicorum Karl- Heinz Böckstiegel (Heymanns 2001) [cited as: LA Böckstiegel] 89-109. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Bucher, A., Le nouvel arbitrage international en Suisse (Helbing Lichtenhahn 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Bucher, E., ‘Was macht den Schiedsrichter?Abschied vom ‘Schiedsrichtersvertrag’ und Weite-res zu Prozessverträgen’ in Bachmann, B., Breidenbach, S., Coester-Waltjen, D., Hess, B., Nelle, A., and Wolf, C., Grenzüberschreitungen: Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrens-recht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit: Festschrift für Peter Schlosser zum 70 Geburtstag (Mohr Siebeck 2005) [cited as: FS Schlosser] 97-118. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Bühler, M., and Cartier, M., ‘Article 194 PILS’ in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 403-433. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Bühler, M., and Feit, M., Section II. Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal, Confirmation of Arbitra-tors in Zuberbühler, T., Müller, C., and Habegger, P. (eds), Swiss Rules of International Arbi-tration (2nd edn, Juris Schulthess 2013) 69- 121. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Bühler, M., and Jarvin, S., ‘The Arbitration Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce’ in Weigand, Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (Beck 2002) 103-397. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Byrne, O., ‘A New Code of Ethics for Commercial Arbitrators: The Neutrality of Party - Appoint-ed Arbitrators on A Tripartite Panel’ (2003) 30 Ford. Urb. L.J. 1815. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Cadiet, L., ‘Le renonciation à se prévaloir des irrégularities de la procédure arbitrale’ (1996) Rev arb 3. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Cadiet, L., Normand J., and Amrani-Mekki S., Théorie générale du process (2nd edn, Thémis 2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Calavros, C., ‘Grundsätzliches zum Rechtsverhältnis zwischen Schiedrichtern und Parteien nach Griechischem Recht’ in Lindacher, W., Pfaff, D., Rott, G., Schlosser, P. and Wieser, E. (eds), Festschrift für Walter Habscheid zum 65. Geburtstag (Ernst und Werner Gieseking, 1989) [cited as: FS Habscheid] 65-78. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Calavros, C., Das UNCITRAL Modellgesetz über die internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbar-keit (Ernst und Werner Gieseking, Bielefeld 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Calavros, C., International Commercial Arbitration, vol I, Law Decree No. 2735/1999, Article- by- Article Commentary (Sakkoulas 2019) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Calvo, M., ‘The Challenge of ICC Arbitrators’ (1998) 15 J Intl Arb 63. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Cappelletti, M., International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Civil Procedure (Mohr Sie-beck Vol. XVI). Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Carbonneau, T., The Law and Practice of United States Arbitration (6th edn, Juris 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Cárdenas, E., and Rivkin, D.W., ‘A Growing Challenge for Ethics in International Arbitration’ in Aksen, G. (ed) Global Reflections on International Law, Commercial and Dispute Resolution (ICC 2005) [cited as: LA Briner] 191-202. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Carlevaris, A., ‘The Bounds of Party Autonomy in Institutional Arbitration’ in Carlevaris, A., Lévy, L., Mourre, A., and Schwartz, E. A. (eds), International Arbitration Under Review: Essays in Honour of John Beechey (ICC 2015) 103-125. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Carlevaris, A. and Digón, R., ‘Arbitrator Challenges under the ICC Rules and Practice’ (2016) ICC Disp. Res. Bull. 23. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Carlevaris, A., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy and Institutional Rules’, in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 1-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Caron, D., Caplan, L., and Pellonpää, M., The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, A Commentary (OUP 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Carpasse, O., ‘Conflicts of interest: some practical considerations’ in Cox, K., Carpasse, O., de Ly, F., et al. (eds), Opening the Black Box of Conflicts of Interest (NAI Cepani bruylant 2016) 129-138. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Carter, J., and Fellas, F., International Commercial Arbitration in New York (2nd edn, OUP 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Carter, J., ‘Living with the Party-Appointed Arbitrator: Judicial Confusion, Ethical Codes and Practical Advice’ (1992) 3 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 153. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Castres Saint–Martin, C., Conflits d’intérêts en arbitrage commercial international (PhD thesis, L’Harmattan 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Chantebout, V., ‘«Nul n’est censé ignorer l’information accessible sur l’internet»: Obligation de révélation et exception de notoriété’ (2016) Cah. arb. 633. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Chazli, E. K., L’impartialité de l’arbitre, étude de la mise en œuvre de l’exigence d’impartialité de l’arbitre (LGDJ 2020). Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Chazli, E.K., ‘The UK Supreme Court on Arbitrator’s Apparent Bias and Disclosure: Some Clari-fications and Missed Opportunities: Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd [2020] UKSC 48’ (2021) 40 C.J.Q. 75-85. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Chernick, R., Gaitis, J., and Holtzman, H., ‘Nonneutral Arbitrators’ in Gaitis, J. (ed), The College of Commercial Arbitrators, Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration (4th edn, Juris 2017) 37-53. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Clay, T., ‘Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges’ D 2013, 2936. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Clay, T., ‘Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges’ D 2018, 2448. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Clay, T., ‘Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges’ D 2019, 2435. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Clay, T., L’arbitre (Dalloz 2001). Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Clay, T., ‘L’indépendence et l’impartialité de l’arbitre et les règles du procès équitable’ in van Compernolle, J. and Tarzia, G. (eds), L ‘impartialité du juge et de l’arbitre. Étude de droit com-paré (Bruylant 2006) 199-237. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Clay, T., ‘Note-12 février 2009, Cour d’appel de Paris (1re Ch. C)’ (2009) Rev arb 190. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Clay, T., ‘Tecnimont, saison 4: entre révélation et réaction' (2014) 3 Cah. arb. 547. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Clay, T., ‘Tecnimont, saison 5: La dissolution de l'obligation de rélévation dans le devoir de ré-action’ (2016) Cah. arb. 447. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Clay, T., Tecnimont, saison 6 : entre action et réaction’ (2019) 3 Cah. arb. 401. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Cohen, D., ‘Indépendence des arbitres et conflicts d’interests’ (2011) Rev arb 611. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Cohen, D., ‘Encore l’indépendence de l’arbitre et sort de l’exequatur de la sentence’ (2014) Cah. arb. 795. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Constans, A., ‘L’épilogue de l’affaire J & P Avax - Tecnimont: les parties à un arbitrage sont te-nues de faire preuve de curiosité et de réactivité’ (2019) JCP EA 20. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Coulson, R., ‘An American Critique of the IBA’s Ethics for International Arbitrators’ (1987) 4 J Intl Arb 103. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Craig, L. and Jaeger, L., ‘The 2012 ICC Rules: Important Changes and Issues for Future Reso-lution’ (2012) Cah. arb. 15. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Craig, L., Park, W., and Paulsson, J., International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration (3rd edn, Ocefana 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Craig, N., ‘Bias, the Right to Object and Waiver: The Problem with the Arbitration Act 1996’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Cremades, B.M., ‘Third-Party Litigation Funding: Investing in Arbitration’ (2011) 8 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Cremandes, B. M., ‘Good Faith in International Arbitration’ (2012) 27 Am. U. Int’L. Rev. 761. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Cremandes, B., and Cairns, D., ‘National Report for Spain (2018)’ in Paulsson, J., and Bisman, L. (eds), ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer 2018) 1-38. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Crivellaro, A., ‘Does the Arbitrators’ Failure to Disclose Conflicts of Interest Fatally Lead to An-nulment of the Award? The Approach of the European State Courts’ (2014) 4 The Arbitration Brief 121. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Daele, K., Challenge and Disqualification of Arbitrators in International Arbitration (Kluwer 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Dasser, F., and Gauthey, D., ‘La bonne foi dans l’ arbitrage’ (2015) Rev arb 239. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. de Boisséson, M., ‘La “Soft Law” dans l’arbitrage’ (2014) 3 Cah. arb. 519. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. de Fina, A.A., ‘The Party Appointed Arbitrator in International Arbitrations – Role and Selection’ (1999) 15 Arb Intl 381. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. de Ly, F., ‘Arbitration and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Lévy, L., and Derains, Y. (eds), Liber Amicorum en l’honneur de Serge Lazareff (Pedone 2011) [cited as: LA Laz-areff] 181-206. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. de Vareilles-Sommières, P., ‘La sentence arbitrale étrangère contraire à une loi d'ordre public du for (remarques en marge des solutions françaises envisagées sous le rapport de l'ordre pu-blic substantiel)’ (2014) JDI 813. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Debourg, C., ‘Compte Rendu de l'atelier du groupe de pratique arbitrale du CFa: l'obligation de révélation: aspects pratiques pour les arbitres et pour les parties’ (2016) Rev arb 367. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Debourg, C., ‘Obligation de révélation de l'arbitre et obligation de s'informer à la charge des parties: un équilibre encore perfectible’ (2019) Dalloz actualité, 1 February 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Debourg, C., ‘Contours de l’ obligation de révélation de l’arbitre: l’exception de notoriété’ (2019) Dalloz actualité, 12 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. del Rosal Carmona, R. C., ‘Chapter 9: Lack of Impartiality or Independence as Grounds to Deny Enforcement under the New York convention’ in Fach Gomez, K. and Lopez-Rodrigues, A.M. (eds), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges (Kluwer 2019) 137-52. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Delanoy, L.C., ‘Les obligations respectives des arbitres et des parties en matière d’indépendence de l’arbitre, note sous Paris, 29 mai 2018 et Paris, 27 mars 2018’ (2019) Rev arb 532. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Delanoy, L.C., ‘Indépendence de l’arbitre: la cour de Cassasion confirme la variabilité dans le temps de l’obligation de révélation, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 3 Octobre 2019’ (2020) Rev arb 422. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Delvolvé, J.L., Pointon, G.H., and Rouche, J., French Arbitration Law and Practice: A Dynam-ic Civil Law Approach to International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Derains, Y., ‘Le Professionnalisme des arbitres’ (2012) 4 Cah. dr. entrep. (dossier 19) 21. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Derains, Y., and Sicard-Mirabal, J., Introduction to Investor-State Arbitration (Kluwer 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Derains, Y., and Schwarz, E., A Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration (Kluwer 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Ditchev, A., ‘Le contrat d’arbitrage. Essai sur le contrat ayant pour objet la mission d’arbitrer’ (1981) Rev arb 395. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Domke, M., ‘’Towards an ‘International’ Public Policy in Commercial Arbitration’’ in Böckstiegel, K.H., and Glossner, O. (eds), Festschrift für Arthur Bülow zum 80. Geburtstag (Hezmanns 1981) [cited as: FS Bülow] 49-58. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Donahey, S., ‘The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators’ (1992) 9 J Intl Arb 31. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. dos Santos, C. ‘Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?’ (2017) 35 ASA Bull 918. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. dos Santos, C., ‘European Court of Human Rights upon Sports-Related Decision: Switzerland Condemned’ (2019) 37 ASA Bull 117. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Duclercq, C., and Aronowicz, T., ‘Note: Societé Saad Buzwair Automotive Co v Societé Audi Volkswagen Middle East FZE LLC, Court of Appeal of Paris, Case No. 16/09386, 27 March 2018’ (2018) XV Rev. Bras. Arb. 159. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Duclercq, C., and Savine Tronel, V., ‘English Court Rules on the Extent and Limits of the Role of the Secretary of the Arbitral Tribunal’ (2017) 10 Arbitraje 559. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Dutoit, B., Droit international privé suisse: commentaire de la loi fédérale du 18 décembre 1987 (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Eastwood, G., ‘A Real Danger of Confusion? The English Law Relating to Bias in Arbitrators’ (2001)17 Arb Intl 287. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Eisemann, F., ‘Déontologie de l’ arbitrage commercial international’ (1969) Rev arb 217. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Eisemann, F., ‘Indépendence de l’arbitre’ (1970) Rev arb 217. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. El-Kosheri, A.S., and Youssef, K.Y., ‘The Independence of International Arbitrators: An Arbitra-tor's Perspective’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 43. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Epstein, L., ‘Arbitrator Independence and Bias: The View of a Corporate In- House Counsel’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 55. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Farjat, G., Droit privé de l’ économie, 2. Théorie des obligations (Presses universitaires de France 1975). Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Fasching, H., Schiedsgericht und Schiedsverfahren im österreichischen und im internationa-len Recht (Manzsche 1973). Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Feerick, J., ‘The 1977 Code of Ethics for Arbitrators: An Outside Perspective’ (2002) 18 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 907. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Fernández Arroyo, D., ‘Arbitrator’s Procedural Powers: The Last Frontier of Party Autonomy’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 199-231. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Fernández Pérez, A., ‘Conflicts of Interests of Arbitrators in International Law Firms’ (2018) 34 Arb Intl 105. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Fernández Rozas, J.C., ‘Clearer Ethics Guidelines and Comparative Standards for Arbitrators’ in Fernandez- Ballesteros, M.A. and Arias, D. (eds), Liber Amicorum Bernando Cremades (La Ley 2010) 413-449. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Ferrier, D. and Magendie, J.C., ‘La transparence: une exigence raisonnable pour l’indépendece de l’arbitre ?’ D 2015, 29. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Finizio, S., ‘The Partial Arbitrator: US Developments Relating to Arbitrator Bias’ (2004) 7 Int.A.L.R. 88. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Flecke - Giammarco, G., ‘Advance Waivers: An Intriguing Concept… But: Do they impact ongo-ing disclosure obligations or insulate arbitrators against subsequent challenges?’ (2015) Dispute Resolution <https://www.disputeresolution-magazin.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/3_Flecke_DR_3_15.pdf> accessed 4 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Fouchard, P., 'Note - Cour d'appel de Paris (1re Chambre A) 18 novembre 1987; Cour d'appel de Paris (1re Chambre A) 4 mai 1988; Tribunal de grande instance de Paris 23 juin 1988' (1988) Rev arb 657. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Fouchard, P., ‘Relationships Between the Arbitrator and the Parties and the Arbitral Institution’, in The Status of the Arbitrator (ICC Ct. Bull. Spec. Supp. 1995) 12. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Fouchard, P., ‘La portée international de l’annulation de la sentence arbitrale dans son pays d’origine’ (1997) Rev arb 329. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Fouchard, P., ‘Le statut de l’arbitre dans la jurisprudence francaise’ (1996) Rev arb 325. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Fouchard, P., Gaillard, E., and Goldman, B., Traité de l’arbitrage commercial international (Litec 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Foustoucos, A., ‘Introductory Remarks 867-903’ in Kerameus, K., Kondylis, D., Nikas, Ν., Commentary Article-by-Article of the Code of Civil Procedure, Part II (Sakkoulas, Ant. Sak-koulas, Law and Economy P.N. Sakkoulas 2000) 1635-1639. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Fragistas C., ‘Arbitrage étranger et arbitrage international en droit privé’ (1960) RCDIP 1-20. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Froitzheim, O., Die Ablehnung von schiedsrichtern wegen Befagenheit in der internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (Carl Heymanns 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Fry, J., and Greenberg, S., ‘The Arbitral Tribunal: Applications of Articles 7–12 of the ICC Rules in Recent Cases’ (2009) 20 ICC Bulletin 12. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Fry, J., Greenberg, S., and Mazza, F., The Secretariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration (ICC 2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Gaillard, E., and Bermann, G.A., Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforce-ment of Foreign Arbitral Awards: UNCITRAL Secretariat (Brill Nijhoff 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Gaillard, E., and Savage, J. (eds), Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer 1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Gaillard, E., ‘Note-cour de cassation, 6 décembre 2001; Cour d’appel de Paris, 2 avril 2001; cour d’appel de Paris, 16 mai 2002’ (2003) Rev arb 1240. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Gaillard, E., Legal Theory of International Arbitration (Nijhoff 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Gaillard, E., ‘International Arbitration as a Transnational System of Justice’ in van den Berg, A.J. (ed), Arbitration -The Next Fifty Years (2012) 16 ICCA Congress Series 66. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Gaillard, E., and Darrigade, C., ‘France’ in Weigand, F.B. and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 450-502. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Gal, J., Die Haftung des Schiedsrichters in der Internationalen Handelsschiedsgerichtsbar-keit (Mohr Sieback 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Gearing, M., ‘A Judge in his own Cause? Actual or Unconscious Bias?’ (2000) 3 Int. A.L.R. 46. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Gill, J., ‘The IBA Conflicts Guidelines – Who’s Using Them and How?’ (2007) 1 Disp. Res. Int’l 58. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Giraldo-Carrillo, N., ‘The ‘Repeat Arbitrators’ Issue: A Subjective Concept’ (2011) 19 Int. Law: Rev. Colomb. Derecho Int. 75. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Girsberger, D., and Voser, N., International Arbitration: Comparative and Swiss Perspectives (3rd edn, Nomos Schulthess 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Girsberger, D., Heini, A., Keller, M., Kostkiewicz, J. K., Siehr, K., Vischer, F., Volken, P. (eds), Zürcher Kommentar zum IPRG, Kommentar zum Bundesgesetz über das Internationale Pri-vatrecht (IPRG) von 18. Dezember 1987 (2nd edn, Zürich 2004) [cited as: author(s), ZK IPRG]. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Glossner, O., ‘Sociological Aspects of International Commercial Arbitration’ in Schultz, J.C. and van den Berg, A.J. (eds), The Art of Arbitration: essays on international arbitration, liber ami-corum Pieter Sanders (Deventer Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1982) [cited as: LA Sanders] 143-152. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Goode, R., ‘The Role of the Lex Loci Arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2001) 17 Arb Intl 19. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Goode, R., Kronke, H. and Mckendrick E., Transnational Commercial Law: Texts, Cases and Materials (OUP 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Gordon-Vrba, L., and Vock, D., ‘Chapter 3, Part II: Commentary on the Swiss Rules, Article 9 [Independence and challenge of arbitrators, I]’ in Arroyo (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 558-570. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Götz, A., ‘Der Schiedsrichter zwischen Dienstleistungserbringung und Richtertätigkeit – Zur sogenannten Spruchrichterprivileg im System der Schiedrichterhaftung’ (2012) 10 SchiedsVZ 311-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Greenberg, S., and Feris, J.R., ‘References to the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration when Deciding on Arbitrator Independence in ICC Cases’ (2009) 20 ICC Bulletin 33. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Guinchard, S., ‘L’arbitrage et le respect du principe du contradictoire (à propos de quelques décisions rendues en 1996)’ (1996) Rev arb 185. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Guinchard, S., ‘Indépendence et impartialité du juge. Les principes de droit fundamental’ in van Compernolle, J., and Tarzia, G. (eds), L’impartialité du juge et de l’arbitre. Étude de droit compa-ré (Bruylant 2006) 3-62. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Gusy, M., and Hosking, J. M., A Guide to the ICDR International Arbitration Rules (2nd edn, OUP 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Haas, U., Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer und internationaler Schieds-sprüche (Duncker and Humblot 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Haas, U., ‘Zur formellen und materiellen Wirksamkeit des Schiedsvertrages’ (1993) IPRAx 382. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Haas, U., ‘Part 3: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958’, in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 399-538. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Haas, U., ‘The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’, in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 399-540. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Haas, U., ‘Vertraulichkeit in Zusammenhang mit Schiedsverfahren’, in Geimer, R., and Schütze, R. (eds), Recht ohne Grenzen: Festschrift für Athanassios Kaissis zum 65. Geburtstag (Sellier European Law Publishers 2012) [cited as: FS Kaissis] 315-332. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Haas, U., and Kahlert, H., ‘New York Convention’ in Weigand, F.B. and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 1572-1777. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Habscheid, W., ‘Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Europäische Menschenrechtskommission’ in Gerhardt, W., Rimmelspacher, B., Diederichsen, U. and Costede, J. (eds), Festschrift für Wolf-ram Henckel zum 70. Geburtstag (Walter de Gruyter 1995) [cited as: FS Henckel] 341-352. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Hahnkamper, W., ‘Chapter II: The Arbitrator and the Arbitration Procedure, Bias, Conflict and Challenge of Arbitrators, and their Duty to Disclose: Austrian Supreme Court Decisions in the period 2006-2016’ in Klausegger, C., Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz,N., Welser I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2017) Austrian YB 91-103. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Hammond, N.G.L., ‘Arbitration in Ancient Greece’ (1985) 1 Arb Intl 188. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Hanefeld, I., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy Imposed by European Mandatory Law’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 401-417. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Hanefeld, I., and Wittinghofer, M. A., ‘Schiedsklauseln in Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen’ (2005) SchiedsVZ 217. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Hanotiau, B., ‘The 2014 IBA Revised Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitra-tion: Objectives and Challenges’ in Cox, K., Carpasse, O., de Ly, F., et al. (eds), Opening the Black Box of Conflicts of Interest (NAI Cepani bruylant 2016) 157-172. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Hanotiau, B., and Caprasse, O., ‘Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration’ in Gaillard and di Pietro (eds), Enforcement of Arbitration agreements and International Arbitral Awards – The New York Convention in Practice (Cameron May 2008) 787-828. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Hanusch, P., ‘Chapter II: The Arbitrator- Challenge of Arbitrators Under the New Austrian Arbi-tration Act’ in Klausegger, C. Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser, I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2007) Austrian YB 59. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Harris, B., Planterose, R. and Tecks, J. (eds), The Arbitration Act 1996: A Commentary (5th edn, wiley 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Hascher, D., ‘ICC Practice in Relation to the Appointment, Confirmation, Challenge and Re-placement of Arbitrators’ (1995) 6 ICC Bulletin 4. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Hascher, D., ‘A Comparison between the Independence of State Justice and the Independence of arbitration’, in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 77. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Hascher, D., ‘Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators: 3 Issues’ (2012) 27 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 789. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Hausmaninger, C., ‘Civil Liability of Arbitrators – Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Re-form’ (1990) 7 J Intl Arb 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Hausmaninger, C., ‘Rights and Obligations of the Arbitrator with Regard to the Parties and the Arbitral Institution – A Civil Law Viewpoint’ in The Status of the Arbitrator (ICC Ct. Bull. Spec. Supp. 1995) 36. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Henry, M., ‘Les obligations d’indépendence et d’information de l’arbitre à la lumière de la juris-prudence récente’ (1999) Rev arb 193. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Henry, M., Le devoir d’impartialité de l’arbitre (LGDJ 2001). Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Henry, M., ‘Note-Cour d’appel de Paris. 29 janvier 2004; Cour d’appel de Paris, 10 février 2005; Cour d’appel de Paris; 17 février 2005; Tribunal de commerce de Paris, 6 juillet 2004’ (2005) Rev arb 720. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Henry, M., ‘Indépendence et impartialité de l’arbitre: la Cour d’appel de Paris tire les enseigne-ments de l’arrêt Tecso de la Cour de cassation, note sous Paris, Pole 1 - Ch. 1, 2 juillet 2013’ (2013) Rev arb 1038. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Henry, M., ‘Le chant de la rélévation: de profundis ou gloria de l’arbitrage?, note sous Paris, Pole 1- Ch. 1, 14 octobre 2014’ (2015) Rev arb 156. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Henry, M., ‘En matière de révélation, la production d’une declaration vaut toujours mieux que l’abstention, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 31 mars 2016’ (2016) Rev arb 168. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Henry, M., ‘La connaissance en arbitre de l’indépendance et l’impartialité, note Cass civ 1re, 16 décembre 2015’ (2016) Rev arb 538. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Henry, M., ‘Tecnimont 2016: le devoir de réaction à l’ aune d’un arrêt réactionnaire, note sous Paris, Pole 1- Ch. 1,12 avril 2016’ (2017) Rev arb 955. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Henry, M., Tecnimont 6: l’indépendance de l’arbitre sacrifiée de guerre lasse, note sous Cass. civ. 1re, 19 décembre 2018 (2020) Rev arb 409. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Hermann, G., ‘The Role of the Courts under the UNCITRAL Model Law’ in Lew J., Contempo-rary Problems in International Arbitration (Springer 1987) 164-175. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Hess, B., ‘Sportschiedsgerichte im Lichte der New York Convention’ (1998) 4 ZZPint 457. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Hess, B., ‘L’ impartialité du juge en droit allemand’ in van Compernolle, J. and Tarzia, G. (eds), L’ impartialité du juge et de l’ arbitre- Étude de droit comparé (Bruylant 2006) 157-177. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Hess, B., ‘Prozessuale Mindestgarantien in der Verbraucherschlichtung’ (2015) JZ 548. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Hess, B., The Private-Public Divide in International Dispute Resolution (The Hague Academy of International Law 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Hess, B., Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht (De Gruyter 2021). Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Higgins, F., Brown, W., and Roach, P., ‘Pitfalls in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1980) 35 The Business Lawyer 1035. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Hirsch, A., ‘Les arbitres peuvent-ils connaître les avocats des parties?’ (1990) 8 ASA Bull 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Hodges, P., ‘Equality of Arms in International Arbitration: Who is the Best Arbiter of Fairness in the Conduct of Proceedings’ in Menaker, A. (ed), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity (2017) 19 ICCA Congress Series 599-633. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Hoffet, F., Rechtliche Beziehungen zwischen Schiedsrichtern und Parteien (Schulthess Poly-graphischer 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Hoffmann, A.K., ‘Duty of Disclosure and Challenge of Arbitrators: The Standard Applicable Un-der the New IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest and the German Approach’ (2005) 21 Arb Intl 427. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Hoffmann, B., ‘Der international Schiedsrichtervertrag - eine kollisionsrechtliche Skizze’ in Plan-tey, A., Böckstiegel, K.H., and Bredow, J. (eds), Festschrift für Ottoarndt Glossner zum 70. Geburtstag (Recht und Wirtschaft 1994) [cited as: FS Glossner] 143-153. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Hollander, P., ‘Arbitrators’ Bias Because of Previous Appointments: A Civil Law Perspective’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Hollander, P., ‘Aspects de droit international privé (européen) du contrat de l’arbitre et du con-trat d’organisation d’arbitre’ (2013) 2 b-arbitra 405. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Holtzmann, H.M., and Neuhaus, J. F., A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary (Kluwer 1989). Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Honsell, H., Vogt, N.P., Schnyder, A.K., and Berti S.(eds), Basler Kommentar, Internationales Privatrecht (3rd edn., Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag 2013) [cited as: BSK IPRG-author(s)]. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Hortoğlu, Y. ‘The Law Governing the Liability of Arbitrators’ in Ferrari, F. and Kröll, S. (eds), Conflict of Laws in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2019) 531-83. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Hunter, M., and Paulsson, J., ‘A Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbi-tration’ (1985) 19 Int'l Bus. Law 153. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Hunter, M., ‘Ethics of the International Arbitrator’ (1986) 4 ASA Bull 173. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Hunter, M., and Philip, A., ‘The Duties of an Arbitrator’ in Newman, L.W. and Hill, R. D. (eds), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (3rd ed, Juris 2014) 477- 490. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Hwang, M., ‘Arbitrators and Barristers in the Same Chambers, A Unsuccessful Challenge’ (2005) 6 Bus. L. Int’l 235. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Hwang, M., and Chan, A., ‘Enforcement and Setting Aside of International Arbitral Awards’ in van den Berg, A.J. (ed), International Arbitration and National Courts: The Never Ending Story (Kluwer 2001) 145-164. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Illmer, M., ‘H. International Arbitration in England and Wales’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analy-sis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 358-413. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Inderkum, H., Der Schiedsrichtervertrag nach dem Recht der nicht internationalen Schiedsge-richtsbarkeit der Schweiz unter Mitberücksichtigung der Schiedsordnung des IPRG (PhD the-sis, Fribourg 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Inoue, O., ‘The Due Process Defense to Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in United States Federal Courts: A Proposal for a Standard’ (2000) Am. Rev. Int’l Arb. 247. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Jacot-Guillarmod, O., ‘L’arbitrage privé face à l’ article 6 § 1 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’ homme’ in Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds), Protecting Human Rights: The Eu-ropean Dimension, Protection des droits de l ‘homme: la dimension européenne, Mélanges en l’ honneur de Gérard J. Wiarda (Heymanns 1988) 281-294. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Jacquet, J. M., ‘La lex arbitrii dans l’arbitrage commercial international : Mythe ou réalité’ in Al-land, D., Chetail, V., de Frouville, O., and Vinuales, J.E. (eds), Unité et diversité du droit inter-national, Écrits en l’honneur de Pierre-Marie Dupuy (Martinus Nijhoff 2014) 669-688. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Jaeger, L., ‘Obligation de révélation: la fin de l’approche subjective, note sous Paris, Ch. Com. Int., Pôle 5 – Ch. 16, 25 février 2020’ (2020) Rev arb 511. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Jaisli Kull, N., and Roth, A., ‘Challenging Arbitrators for Lack of Independence or Impartiality: Procedural Pitfalls from a Swiss Perspective’ in Klausegger, C., Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2019) Austrian YB 223-48. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Jaksic, A., ‘Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings’ (2007) 24 J Intl Arb 159. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Jana, A. L., Armer, A., and Kranenberg, J. K., ‘Article V(1)(b)’ in Kronke H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 231-256. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Jarrosson, C., La notion d’arbitrage (Thèse, Université de Droit, D’ Economie et de Sciences Sociales de Paris 1985). Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Jarrosson, C., ‘Sixième colloque C.C.I.-C.I.R.D.I.-A.AA. la procédure arbitrale et l’ indépen-dence des arbitres’ (1988) Rev arb 748. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Jarrosson, C., ‘L’arbitrage et la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme’ (1989) Rev Arb 573. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Jarosson, C., ‘Note-22 janvier 2009, Cour d’appel de Paris (1re Ch. C)’ (2010) Rev arb 320. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Jarosson, C., and Pellerin, J., ‘Le droit français de l'arbitrage après le décret du 13 janvier 2011’ (2011) Rev arb 5. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Jarosson, C., ‘A propos de l’obligation de révélation: une leçon de méthode de la Cour de cas-sation, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 10 octobre 2012’ (2013) Rev arb 130. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Jarvin, S., ‘Irregularity in the Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal and the Arbitral Procedure’, in Gaillard, E. and di Petro, D. (eds), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice (Cameron May 2009) 729-756. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Jauernig, O., and Hess, B., Zivilprozessrecht (30th edn, C.B. Beck 2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Jourdan - Marques, J., ‘Chronique d’arbitrage: la fin de la saga Tecnimont’ Dalloz actualité, 29 November 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Kaissis, A., The Annulment of Arbitral Awards (Sakkoulas 1989) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Kaissis, A., Aspects of Public Policy in the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (Sakkoulas 2003) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Kaissis, A., ‘Dissenting Opinions in International Arbitration’ in Schütze, R. (ed), Fairness, Jus-tice, Equity: Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer zum 80. Geburtstag (C.H. Beck 2017) [cited as: FS Geimer] 279-301. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Kaissis, A., ‘Awards Set Aside in Their Country of Origin. Two Incompatible Schools of Thought’ in Benicke, C. and Huber, S. (eds), National, International, Transnational: Harmonischer Drei-klang im Recht (Gieseking Verlag 2020) [cited as: FS Kronke] 1433-1450. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Kantor, M., ‘Arbitrator Disclosure and a Duty to Investigate?’ in Huber, S. and Sheppard, B. (eds), AAA Yearbook on Arbitration & the Law (23rd edn, Juris 2011) 327-344. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Kapeliuk, D., ‘The Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators’ (2010) 96 Cornell Law Rev 47. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Karrer, P., ‘Responsibility of Arbitrators and Arbitral Institutions’ in Newman, L.W. and Hill, R.D. (eds), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (JurisNet 2008) 607-620. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Karrer, P., ‘Responsibility of Arbitrators and Arbitral Institutions’ in Newman, L.W. and Hill, R.D. (eds), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (JurisNet 2014) 161-74. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Karrer, P., ‘Switzerland’ in Weigand, F.B. and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 826-885. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Kastanidis, A., Action for Negative Declaratory Relief under the Greek and the European Pro-cedural Law (Sakkoulas 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Kaufmann-Kohler, G., ‘Soft Law in International Arbitration: Codification and Normativity’ (2010) 1 JIDS 283. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Kaufmann-Kohler, G., and Rigozzi, A., Arbitrage international. Droit et pratique à la lumière de la LDIP (2nd edn, Weblaw 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Rigozzi, A., International Arbitration: Law and Practice in Switzer-land (OUP 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Kendall, J., ‘Barristers, Independence and Disclosure’ (1992) 8 Arb Intl 287. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Kendall, J., ‘Barristers, Independence and Disclosure Revisited’ (2000) 16 Arb Intl 343. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Kerameus, K., ‘Greece’ in Shetreet, S. and Deschênes, J. (eds), Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate (Martinus Nijhoff 1985) 123-140. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Kerameus, K., ‘Waiver of Setting-Aside Procedures in International Arbitration’ (1993) 41 Am. J. Comp. L. 73. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Kerameus, K., Kondylis, D. and Nikas, N., Commentary Article-by-Article of the Code of Civil Procedure, Part II (Sakkoulas, Ant. Sakkoulas, Law and Economy P.N. Sakkoulas 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Kerameus, K., Studia Iuridica V (Sakkoulas 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Kerameus, N., ‘The Institution of Third-Party Funding of Litigation or Arbitration Cases’ (2012) Greek Business and Company Law Review 915 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Kessedjan, C., ‘Principe de la contradiction et arbitrage’ (1995) Rev arb 381. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Kessedjian, C., ‘Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration: What are Mandatory Rules?’ (2007) 18 Am. Rev. Int’l Arb. 147. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Kessedjian, C., ‘Le tiers impartial et indépendant en droit international Juge, arbitre, médiateur, conciliateur: cours général de droit international (Volume 403)’ in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law <http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789004424685_02> 2 April 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. King, B., ‘Party Autonomy, the “Right to Appoint, and the Rise of Strategic Challenges’, in Ferra-ri F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 42-48. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Kleiman, E., and Dehaudt-Delville Y., ‘Independence and impartiality: Supreme Court confirms stern approach to duty of disclose’ <https://www.internationallawoffice.com/Newsletters/Arbitration-ADR/France/Freshfields-Bruckhaus-Deringer-LLP/Independence-and-impartiality-Supreme-Court-confirms-stern-approach-to-duty-of-disclosure> accessed 27 november 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Klein, F.E., ‘Autonomie de la volonté et arbitrage’ (1958) RCDIP 255. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Kleinschmidt, J., Der Verzicht im Schuldrecht. Vertragsprinzip und einseitiges Rechtsge-schäft im deutschen und US-amerikanischen Recht (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Knigge, M., and Ribbers, P., ‘Waiver of the Right to Set-Aside Proceedings in Light of Article 6 ECHR: Party-Autonomy on Top?’ (2017) 34 J Intl Arb 775. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Knoll, J., ‘Art. 45 Exclusion of Liability’ in Zuberbühler, T., Müller, C., and Habegger, P. (eds), Swiss Rules of International Arbitration (2nd edn, Juris Schulthess 2013) 484-92. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Koch, C., ‘Standards and Procedures for Disqualifying Arbitrators’ (2003) 20 J Intl Arb 325. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Konrad, S., and Hunter, R., ‘LCIA Rules’ in Schütze, R. (ed), Institutional Arbitration: Article-by-Article Commentary (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2013) 413-500. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Korland, L., ‘What an Arbitrator Should Investigate and Disclose: Proposing a New Test for Evi-dent Partiality under the Federal Arbitration Act’ (2003) 53 Case W. Res. L.Rev. 815. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Kornblum, U., Probleme der schiedsrichterlichen Unabhängigkeit (C.H. Beck 1968). Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Kornblum, U., ‘Ordre public transnational, ordre public international und ordre public interne im Recht der privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit’ in Habscheid, W.J. and Schwab, K.H. (eds), Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrensrecht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit: Festschrift für Heinrich Nagel (Aschendorff Münster 1987) [cited as: FS Nagel] 140-156. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Koussoulis, S., Arbitration, Commentary Article-by-Article (Sakkoulas 2004) (in Greek). eng Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Koussoulis, S., Arbitration Law (Sakkoulas 2006) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Krausz, N., ‘Waiver of Appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal: Recent Evolution of the Case Law and Compatibility with ECHR, Article 6’ (2011) 28 Arb Intl 137. Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Kreindler, R., ‘Impending Revision of the ICC Arbitration Rules: Opportunities and Hazards for Experienced and Inexperienced Users Alike’ (1996) 13 J Intl Arb 45-113. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Kreindler, R. and Dimsey, M., ‘Chapter II: The Arbitrator and the Arbitration Procedure, The Applicable Law and Procedural Issues: Conceptions, Preconceptions and Misconceptions’ in Klausegger, C. Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2015) Austrian YB 149-168. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Kreindler, R., Wolff, R., and Rieder, M.S., Commercial Arbitration in Germany (OUP 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Kröll, M. S., ‘Party Pursuing Bias Claim Against Arbitrator Must Do So at Place of Arbitration, German Supreme Court Rules’ (2002) 17 Mealey’s I.A.R. 34. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Kröll, M. S., ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Germany’ (2002) 5 Int. A.L.R. 160. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Kröll, M. S., ‘Die Schiedsvereinbarung im Verfahren zur Anerkennung und Vollstreckbarerklä-rung ausländischer Schiedssprüche’ (2004) 117 ZZP 453. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Kröll, M. S., ‘Germany: German Court Dismisses Challenge of an Arbitrator’ (2007) 10 Int.A.L.R. N-48-49. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Kröll, M. S., ‘Part II: Commentary on the German Arbitration Law, Chapter VIII: Recognition and Enforcement of Awards, Introduction to § 1060, 1061 ZPO’ in Nacimiento, P., Kröll, M. S. et al. (eds), Arbitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 421-427. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Kröll, M. S., ‘Part II: Commentary on the German Arbitration Law, Chapter VIII: Recognition and Enforcement of Awards, § 1061- Foreign Awards’ in Nacimiento, P. Kröll, M.S., et al. (eds), Ar-bitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 443-504. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Kröll, M.S. and Kraft, P., ‘Part II: Commentary on the German Arbitration Law, Chapter VII: Re-course against the Award, § 1059 - Application for Setting Aside’ in Nacimiento, P., Kröll, M.S., et al. (eds), Arbitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 383-420. Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Krüger, W., and Rauscher, T. (eds), Münchener Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordung (C.H. Beck 2017) [cited as: MüKoZPO/ author(s)]. Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Kunz, C., ‘Waiver of Right to Challenge an International Arbitral Award is Not Incompatible with ECHR: Tabbane v Switzerland’ (2016) 5 EIAR 125. Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Kurkela, M., and Turunen, S., Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, OUP 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Kuty, F., L’impartialité du juge en procédure pénale: de la confiance décrétée à la confiance justifiée (Larcier 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Lachmann, J.P., ‘Gedanken zur Schiedsrichterablehnung aufgrund Sozietätszugehörigkeit‘ in Schütze, R. (ed), Einheit und Vielfalt des Rechts: Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer zum 65 Geburtstag (C.H. Beck 2002) [cited as: FS Geimer] 513-528. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Lachmann, J. P., Handbuch für die Schiedsgerichtspraxis (Schmidt 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Lalive, P., ‘On the neutrality of arbitrators and the place of arbitration’, in Reymond, C., and Bucher, E. (eds), Swiss Essays on International Arbitration (Schulthess 1984) 23-33. Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Lalive, P., ‘Transnational (or Truly National) Public Policy and International Arbitration’ (1987) 3 ICCA Congress Series 258. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Lalive, P., ‘Sur l’impartialité de l’arbitre international en Suisse’ (1990) SJ 362. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Lalive, P., ‘Sur le irresponsabilité de l’arbitre’ in Haldy, J., Rapp, J.M., Ferrari, P. (eds), Études de procedure et d’arbitrage en l’honneur de Jean-François (Université. De Lausanne 1999) [cited as: FS Poudret] 419-435. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Lalive, P., ‘Note – Cour d’appel de Paris (1re Ch. A) 15 Septembre 1998 – Société Cubic De-fense Systems Inc v. Chambre de commerce internationale’ (1999) Rev arb 113. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Lalive, P., Poudret, J.F., and Reymond, C., Le droit de l ‘arbitrage interne et international en Suisse (Payot Lausanne 1989). Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Lambert, P., ‘Les procédures d’arbitrage et la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme’ in Présence du droit public et des droits de l’homme, Mélanges à Jacques Velu (Bruylant 1992) 1981-1291. Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Landau, T., ‘Composition and Establishment of the Tribunal’ (1998) 9 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 45. Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Lawson, A. D., ‘Advance Waivers on Future Conflicts of Interest: Financial Self-Interest Mus-cling a Principle Aside’ (2017) 14 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Lawson, D., ‘Impartiality and Independence of International Arbitrators - Commentary on the 2004 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2005) 23 ASA Bull 22. Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Le Bars, B., and Juvénal, J., ‘La révélation d'un courant d' affaires: comment apprécier l' indé-pendance de l'arbitre?’ (2010) JCP 1306. Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Le Bars, B., ‘Obligation de révélation des liens de l’arbitre avec l’avocat d’une des parties: il va falloir attendre encore un peu’ (2012) JCP 1268. Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Leaua C., ‘The Applicability of Party Autonomy in the Appointment of Arbitrators’ in Bêlohlávek A., and Rozenhnalová, N. (eds), CYArb: Party Autonomy versus Autonomy of Arbitrators (LexLata 2012) 134-50. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Leemann, M., ‘Challenging International Arbitration Awards in Switzerland on the Grounds of Lack of Independence and Impartiality of an Arbitrator’ (2011) 29 ASA Bull 10. Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Levine, J., ‘Dealing with Arbitrator ‘Issue Conflicts’ in International Arbitration’ (2006) 61 Disp Resol. Int’l 60. Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Levine, M., ‘The Immunity of Arbitrators and the Duty to Disclose’ (1995) 6 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 197. Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Lévy, L., and Bonnan, R., ‘Third-party funding. Disclosure, Joinder and Impact on Arbitral Pro-ceedings’ in Cremandes, B.M., and Dimolitsa, A. (eds), Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2013) 78-94. Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Lew, J., ‘The Law Applicable to the Form and Substance of the Arbitration Clause’ in Albert van den Berg, Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Appli-cation of the New York Convention, (1999) 9 ICCA Congress Series 114-145. Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Lew, J., ‘The Tribunal’s Rights and Duties: Why They Should Be More Involved in the Arbitral Process’ in Hanotiau, B. and Mourre, A. (eds), Players’ Interaction in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2012) 49-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Lew, J., Mistelis, L., et al., Comparative International Commercial Law (Kluwer 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Liebscher, C., ‘Note-Cour Suprême d’autriche OGH 28 avril 1998- H GmbH v. HON’ (1999) Rev arb 395. Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Liebscher, C., ‘Preliminary Remarks’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recogni-tion and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 – Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Liebscher, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Prel. Rem. para] 1-24. Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Lionnet, K., and Lionnet, A., Handbuch der internationalen und nationalen Schiedsgerichts-barkeit (Boorberg 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Lionnet, K., ‘The Arbitrator’s Contract’ (1999) 15 Arb. Intl 161. Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Litina, E., ‘Independence and Impartiality of Maritime Arbitrators: Safeguards for the Reliability and Efficiency of Maritime Arbitration’ (2021) 18 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Livingstone, M. L., ‘Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration: Popular Fallacy or Proven Fact’ (2008) 25 J Intl Arb 529. Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Llhyung, L., ‘Practice and Predicament: The Nationality of the International Arbitrator (with Sur-vey Results)’ (2008) 31 Ford. Int'l L.J. 603. Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Loquin, E., ‘L'obligation faite à l'arbitre de révéler les liens existant entre l'une des parties à l'ar-bitrage et la structure dans laquelle il exerce sa profession d'avocat’, in Abdel, R.M., Leboulan-ger, P., and Ziadé, N.G. (eds), From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration Festschrift Ahmed Sadeck El Kosheri (Kluwer 2015) [cited as: FS El Kosheri] 73-84. Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Loquin, E., ‘Les garanties de l’arbitrage’ in L’arbitrage: une question d’ actualité (2003) 197 LPA 13. Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Loquin, E., ‘La dualité des fonctions de l’obligation de révélation’ in Bureau, D. and Drummond, F. (eds), Liber amicorum Philippe Merle (Dalloz 2013) [cited as: LA Merle ] 487-499. Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Loquin, E., ‘L'obligation faite à l'arbitre de révéler les liens existant entre l'une des parties à l'ar-bitrage et la structure dans laquelle il exerce sa profession d'avocat’, in Abdel, R.M., Leboulan-ger, P. and Ziadé, N.G. (eds), From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration Festschrift Ahmed Sadeck El Kosheri (Kluwer 2015) [cited as: FS El Kosheri] 73-84. Google Scholar öffnen
  333. Loquin, E., L’arbitrage du commerce international (Joly éditions 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Loquin, E., ‘La notoriété du fait non rélévé par l’arbitre’ (2016) RTD com 699. Google Scholar öffnen
  335. Loquin, E., ‘Arbitrage-La décision arbitrale-Voies de recours’ (2016) J-Cl. Pr. civ 1046. Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Loquin, E., ‘Autour de l’obligation de révélation, note sous Paris, Pôle 1- Ch. 1, 12 avril 2016’ (2017) Rev arb 240. Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Loquin, E., ‘L’ éssor de l’ obligation de curiosité ’ (2017) RTD com. 842 = (2018) JDI 149. Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Lotz, B., ‘Die Unparteilichkeit und Unabhängigkeit des parteiernannten Schiedsrichters’ (2002) AnwBl. 202. Google Scholar öffnen
  339. Lowenfeld, A., 'The Party-Appointed Arbitrator in International Controversies: Some Reflections' (1995) 30 Tex. Int’l. L. J. 59-69. Google Scholar öffnen
  340. Mankowski, P., ‘Die Ablehnung von Schiedsrichten’ (2004) SchiedsVZ 304. Google Scholar öffnen
  341. Mann, F. A., ‘Lex Facit Arbitrum’ in Sanders, P. (ed), International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Mar-tin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff 1967) 157-183. Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Mann, F. A., ‘Schiedsricher und Recht’ in Heinrich Jacobs, H., Knobbe-Keuk, B., Picker, E. and Wilhelm, J. (eds), Festschrift für Werner Flume zum 70. Geburtstag 12. Sep. 1978 (Otto Schmidt 1978) [cited as: FS Flume] 593-620. Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Marguerat, J., ‘Art 9, Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators’ in Zuberbühler, T., Müller, C., and Habegger, P. (eds), Swiss Rules of International Arbitration (2nd edn, Juris Schulthess 2013) 122-139. Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Marguerat, J., ‘Indépendence et impartialité de l’arbitre: le devoir de révéler de l’arbitre éclipsé’ Jusletter, 15 April 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Maridakis, G. S., The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards according to Greek Law (1970). Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Martin Fletcher, N. H., ‘Halliburton Company v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Company, M, N & P [2018] EWCA Civ. 817, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Civil Division, Case No. A3/2017/0623, 19 April 2018’ A Contribution by the ITA Board of Reporters, Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Matray, D., and van den Berg, A. J., ‘L’indépendance et l’impartialité de l’arbitre’ (2008) 5 TDM 85 Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Matscher, F., ‘L'arbitrage et la Convention, article 6 (suite)’, in Pettiti, L.A., Decaux, E. and Im-bert, P.H. (eds), La Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. Commentaire article par article (Economica 1995) 281-292. Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Matscher, F., ‘Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und EMRK’ in Habscheid, W. and Schwab, K. H., Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrensrecht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Festschrift für Heinrich Nagel (Aschendorff Münster 1987) 227-245. Google Scholar öffnen
  350. Mavromati, D., and Reeb, M., The Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Commentary, Cases and Materials (Kluwer 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  351. Mayer, P., ‘Le principe de bonne foi devant les arbitres du commerce international’ in Dominicé, C., Patry, R., and Reymond, C., Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 1993) [cited as: LA Lalive] 543-556. Google Scholar öffnen
  352. Mayer, P., and Sheppard, A., ‘Final ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of In-ternational Arbitral Awards’ (2003) 19 Arb Intl 249. Google Scholar öffnen
  353. Mayer, P., ‘La Liberté de l ‘arbitre’ (2013) Rev arb 339. Google Scholar öffnen
  354. Maynard, S., ‘Laying the Fourth Arbitrator to Rest: Re-evaluating the Regulation of Arbitral Sec-retaries’ (2018) 34 Arb Intl 173. Google Scholar öffnen
  355. McKendrick, E., ‘Chapter 4: Arbitrations, Multiple References and Apparent Bias: A Case Study of Halliburton Co v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (2018)’ in Calissendorff, A. and Schöldstrom, P. (eds), (2019) 1 Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook Series 55-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  356. McLean, D. J., and Wilson, S. P., ‘Is Three A Crowd? Neutrality, Partiality and Partisanship in the Context of Tripartite Arbitrations’ (2008) 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 167. Google Scholar öffnen
  357. Meier, A., and Gerhardt, L., ‘The Arbitral Tribunal, Article 9: Impartiality and Independence of the Arbitrators, Duties of Disclosure’ in Flecke-Giammarco, Boog, C., et al. (eds), The DIS Arbi-tration Rules – An Article-by-Article Commentary (Kluwer 2020) 177-193. Google Scholar öffnen
  358. Menétrey, S., ‘Conflits d’intérêts et contrôle de l’impartialité de l’arbitre’ in Saletti, A., van Com-pernolle, J., van Drooghenbroeck, J.F. (eds), L’arbitre et le juge étatique: Études de droit comparé à la mémoire de Giuseppe Tarzia (Bruylant 2014) 447-463. Google Scholar öffnen
  359. Menétrey, S., ‘Dialogues et communications entre juges : pour un pluralisme dialogal’ in Me-nétrey, S. and Hess, B. (eds), Les dialogues des juges en Europe (Larcier 2014) 115-127. Google Scholar öffnen
  360. Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Ethics Issues in Arbitration and Related Dispute Resolution Processes: What’s Happening and What’s Not’ (2002) 56 U. Miami L.Rv. 949. Google Scholar öffnen
  361. Menon, S., ‘Adjudicator, Advocate, or Something in Between? Coming to Terms with the Role of the Party-appointed Arbitrator’ (2017) 34 J Intl Arb 347. Google Scholar öffnen
  362. Merjian, A., ‘Caveat Arbitor: Laker Airways and the Appointment of Barristers as Arbitrators in Cases Involving Barrister - Advocates from the Same Chambers’ (2000) 17 J Intl Arb 31. Google Scholar öffnen
  363. Merkin, R., and Flannery, L., Arbitration Act 1996 (5th edn, informa law 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  364. Mezghani, A., and Arnaldez, J.J., ‘Les décisions des institutions arbitrales relatives aux récusa-tions et le sort de la sentence devant le juge de l’annulation, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 25 juin 2014’ (2015) Rev arb 88. Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Michelakis, E., The Object of Evidence (Ant. Sakkoulas 1944) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  366. Mistelis, L., ‘Reality Test: Current State of Affairs in Theory and Practice Relating to ‘’Lex ar-bitri’’’ (2006) 17 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb 155. Google Scholar öffnen
  367. Mitsopoulos, G., Civil Procedure, vol 1 (Ant. Sakkoulas 1972). Google Scholar öffnen
  368. Moitry, J. H., ‘Right to a Fair Trial and the European Convention on Human Rights: Some Re-marks on the République de Guinée Case’ (1989) 6 J Intl Arb 115. Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Moses, M., ‘Inherent and Implied Powers of Arbitrators’ Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-2015 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2501046##> accessed 5 June 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  370. Moses, M., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, CUP 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Mourre, A., ‘Conflict Disclosures: The IBA Guidelines and Beyond’ in Brekoulakis, S., Lew, J., et al. (eds), The Evolution and Future of International Arbitration (Kluwer 2016) 357-364. Google Scholar öffnen
  372. Müller, C., International Arbitration (Schmidt, Bruylant, Schulthess 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  373. Mullerat, R., ‘Arbitrators’ Conflicts of Interest Revisited: A Contribution to the Revision of the Excellent IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2010) 4 Disp. Re-sol. Int’l 55. Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Mullerat R., ‘The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest Revisited Another Contribution to the Revision of an Excellent Instrument, Which Needs a Slight Daltonism Treatment’ (2012) 2012 CEA 61. Google Scholar öffnen
  375. Musielak, H.J., and Voit, W., ZPO Zivilprozessordnung (Vahlen 2018) [Musielak/ Voit/ author ZPO, § para]. Google Scholar öffnen
  376. Mutis Tellez, F., ‘Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality: A Review of SCC Board Decisions on Challenges to Arbitrators (2010-2012)’ <http://sccinstitute.se/media/30001/felipe-mutis-tellez_article-on-scc-challenges-on-arbitrators.pdf > accessed 22 November 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Mystill, M. J., ‘Transnational Arbitration in English Law’ (1984) 37 Current Legal Problems 133. Google Scholar öffnen
  378. Nacimiento, P., ‘Article V(1)(a)’, in Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and En-forcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 205-230. Google Scholar öffnen
  379. Nacimiento, P., ‘Article V(1)(d)’, in Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and En-forcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 281-300. Google Scholar öffnen
  380. Nagel, H., and Gottwald, P., Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (6th edn, Dr Otto Schmidt 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Naon, H. A.G., ‘Factors to Consider in Choosing an Efficient Arbitrator’ in van den Berg, Improv-ing the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention (1999) 9 ICCA Congress Series 286-313. Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Nazzini, R. ‘Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards: Res Judicata, Issues Estoppel, and Abuse of Process in a Transnational Context’ (2018) 66 Am. J. Com. L. 603. Google Scholar öffnen
  383. Nesbitt, S., and Darowski, M., ‘LCIA Arbitration Rules, Article 5’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 480-486. Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Nicholas, G, and Partasides, C, ‘LCIA Court Decisions on Challenges to Arbitrators: A Proposal to Publish’ (2007) 23 Arb Intl 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  385. Niedermaier, T., ‘S. International Arbitration in the U.S.’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analy-sis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 766- 802. Google Scholar öffnen
  386. Nikas, N., Civil Procedure, Part II (Sakkoulas 2005) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  387. Noth, M., and Haas, U., ‘Chapter 15, Part II: Commentary on the CAS Procedural Rules, Article R33 [Independence and qualifications of arbitrators] in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzer-land: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 1468-1476. Google Scholar öffnen
  388. Nueber, M., and Zeiler, G., ‘D. International Arbitration in Austria’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), Interna-tional Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analysis (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 231-259. Google Scholar öffnen
  389. Öhrström, M., ‘Decisions by the SCC Institute Regarding Challenge of Arbitrators’ (2002) Band I Stockholm Arb. Rep. 35. Google Scholar öffnen
  390. Orelli, M., ‘Chapter 2, Part II: Commentary on Chapter 12 PILS, Article 180 [Arbitral Tribunal: challenge to an arbitrator]’ in Arroyo M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 114-128. Google Scholar öffnen
  391. Osmanoglu, B., ‘Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitrator Con-flict of Interest’ (2015) 32 J Intl Arb 325. Google Scholar öffnen
  392. Palmer, S., ‘Repeat Arbitrators: Why Are They an Issue?’ (2016) 4 EIAR 17. Google Scholar öffnen
  393. Pamboukis, H., Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention (Nomiki Vivliothiki 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  394. Park, W., ‘The Lex Loci Arbitri and International Commercial Arbitration’ (1983) 32 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 21. Google Scholar öffnen
  395. Park, W., ‘Rectitude in International Arbitration’ (2011) 27 Arb Intl 473. Google Scholar öffnen
  396. Park, W., ‘A Fair Right: Professional Guidelines in International Arbitration’ (2014) 30 Arb Intl 409. Google Scholar öffnen
  397. Partasides, C., ‘The Fourth Arbitrator? The Role of Secretaries to Tribunals in International Arbi-tration’ (2002) 18 Arb Intl 147. Google Scholar öffnen
  398. Patocchi, P.M., and Geisinger, E., Internationales Privatrecht (Orell Füssli 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  399. Paulsson, J., ‘Arbitration Unbound: An Award Detached from the Law of Its Country of Origin’ (1981) 30 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 358. Google Scholar öffnen
  400. Paulsson, J., ‘Ethics, Elitism, Eligibility’ (1997) 14 J Intl Arb 13. Google Scholar öffnen
  401. Paulsson, J., ‘Moral Hazard in International Dispute Resolution’ (2010) 25 ICSID Rev 339-55. Google Scholar öffnen
  402. Paulsson, J., The Idea of Arbitration (OUP 2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  403. Paulsson, M., The 1958 New York Convention in Action (Kluwer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  404. Pearson, N., ‘Nationalité et attaches de l’arbitre’ (1970) Rev arb 239. Google Scholar öffnen
  405. Pech, L., ‘VII. Article 47-Right to an Effective Remedy’ Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J. and Ward, A. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, A Commentary (C.H. Beck, Hart, No-mos 2014) 1250-1258. Google Scholar öffnen
  406. Petrochilos, G., Procedural Law in International Arbitration (OUP 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  407. Petsche, A., and Riedl, K., ‘The Liability of Arbitrators under Austrian Law’, in Klausegger, C. Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser, I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2015) Austrian YB 321-331. Google Scholar öffnen
  408. Pfeifer, T., ‘Schiedsrichterbefangenheit und anwaltliche Versicherungsmandate’ in Geimer, R., and Schütze, R. (eds), Recht ohne Grenzen: Festschrift für Athanassios Kaissis zum 65. Geburtstag (Sellier European Law Publishers 2012) [cited as: FS Kaissis] 749-757. Google Scholar öffnen
  409. Pfister, L., ‘Who Decides Arbitrator Challenges? - A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Ap-proaches’ (2017) 15 SchiedsVZ 164. Google Scholar öffnen
  410. Pfister, L., Schiedsrichterablehnung in internationalen Schiedsverfahren (Nomos 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  411. Pinna, A., and Rigozzi, A., ‘Jurisprudence en matière d'arbitrage sportif’ (2008) Cah. arb. 22. Google Scholar öffnen
  412. Pinsolle, P., ‘Note- 9 September 2010, Cour d’appel de Paris’ (2011) 29 ASA Bull 197. Google Scholar öffnen
  413. Pitkowitz, N., ‘Should there be Stricter Consequences for the Breach of the Arbitrator’s Disclo-sure Obligation? in Ebke, W., Olzen, D., and Sandrock, O. (eds), Festschrift für Siegfried H. Elsing zum 65. Geburtstag (Recht und Wirtschaft 2015) [cited as: FS Elsing] 403-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  414. Platte, Μ., ‘An Arbitrator’s Duty to Render Enforceable Awards’ (2003) 20 J Intl Arb 307. Google Scholar öffnen
  415. Platte, M., ‘Arbitrator’s Liability’ in Riegler, S., Petsche A., Fremuth-Wolf, A., Platte, M. and Lieb-scher, C. (eds), Arbitration Law of Austria: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2007) 682-92. Google Scholar öffnen
  416. Platte, M., ‘Section 588’ in Riegler, S., Petsche, A., Fremuth-Wolf, A., Platte, M. and Liebscher, C. (eds), Arbitration Law of Austria: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2007) 253-269. Google Scholar öffnen
  417. Platte, M., ‘Section 594’ in Riegler, S., Petsche A., Fremuth-Wolf, A., Platte, M. and Liebscher, C. (eds), Arbitration Law of Austria: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2007) 332-343. Google Scholar öffnen
  418. Podimata, E., ‘The teleologic foundation of the legal judgements’ in Studies of History, Meth-odology and Dogmatic of Procedural Law (Sakkoulas 2019) 89-119 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  419. Poncet, D., and Cambi Favre - Bulle, A., ‘Un arbitre indépendant et impartial aux termes de l ‘ Article 6, 1 de la Convention européenne des droits de l ‘homme: un point de vue de la Suisse’’ in Les droits de l’homme au seuil du troisième millénaire Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Lambert (Bruylant 2000) 655-671. Google Scholar öffnen
  420. Poplinger, A., ‘United States: Appeals Court in New York Heightens Standard for Establishing ‘Evident Partiality’ of a Non-Neutral Party-Appointed Arbitrator’ (2018) ICC Disp. Res. Bull. 17. Google Scholar öffnen
  421. Poudret, J.F., and Besson S., Comparative Law of International Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  422. Prütting, H., and Gehrlein, M. (eds), ZPO Zivilprozessordnung Kommentar (10th edn, Lucht-erhand 2018) [cited as: PG/Prütting § para]. Google Scholar öffnen
  423. Prütting, H., ‘Die rechtliche Stellung des Schiedsrichters’ (2011) SchiedsVZ 233. Google Scholar öffnen
  424. Pryles, M., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure’ (2007) 27 J Intl Arb 327. Google Scholar öffnen
  425. Qureshi, K., ‘Arbitration and Article 6’ (2007) 157 New Law Journal 46. Google Scholar öffnen
  426. Racine, J.B., L'arbitrage commercial international et l'ordre public (LGDJ 1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  427. Racine, J.B., ‘L’incidence en arbitrage’ in Kessedjian, C. (ed), Le financement de contentieux par un tiers, Third Party Litigation Funding (Panthéon Assas 2012) 95-111. Google Scholar öffnen
  428. Racine, J.B., ‘Sur l’idéologie de la transparence en droit de l’arbitrage’ in Heuzé, V., Libchaber, R., and de Vareillers-Sommières, P. (eds), Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Pierre Mayer (LGDJ 2015) 727-752. Google Scholar öffnen
  429. Racine, J.B., Droit de l ‘arbitrage (Thémis 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  430. Raeder, A., L’arbitrage international chez les Hellènes (Norwegian Nobel Institute Christiania 1912). Google Scholar öffnen
  431. Raeschke-Kessler, H., ‘Die Unparteilichkeit und Unabhängigkeit des Schiedsrichters-ein trans-nationales Rechtsproblem?‘ (2008) 26 ASA Bull 3. Google Scholar öffnen
  432. Ralston, J.H., International Arbitration From Athens to Locarno (Stanford University Press 1929). Google Scholar öffnen
  433. Rau, A.S., ‘On Integrity in Private Judging’ (1998) 14 Arb Intl 115. Google Scholar öffnen
  434. Redfern, A., and Hunter, M., Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  435. Reichold, K., Hüsstege, R., and Seiler, C., Zivilprozessordnung Kommentar (C. H. Beck 2018) [cited as: Thomas/Putzo/ author(s) § para]. Google Scholar öffnen
  436. Reiner, A., and Aschauer, C., ‘ICC Rules’ in Schütze, R. (ed), Institutional Arbitration: Article-by-Article Commentary (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2013) 25-201. Google Scholar öffnen
  437. Reiner, A., and Vanovac, S., GesRZ 2014, 130. Google Scholar öffnen
  438. Reymond, C., ‘Des connaissances personnelles de l'arbitre à son information privilégiée – Ré-flexions sur quelques arrêts récents’ (1991) Rev arb 3. Google Scholar öffnen
  439. Richers, R., and Magliana, M., ‘R. International Arbitration in Switzerland’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Com-parative Analysis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 727-765. Google Scholar öffnen
  440. Riezler, E., Venire contra factum proprium, Studien in römischen, englishen und deutschen Zivilrecht (Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot 1912). Google Scholar öffnen
  441. Rogers, C., ‘Regulating International Arbitrators: A Functional Approach to Developing Stand-ards of Conduct’ (2005) 41 Stan. J. Int'l L. 53. Google Scholar öffnen
  442. Rogers, R., Ethics in International Arbitration (OUP 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  443. Roney, D., and von der Weid, K., ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: New Oppor-tunities and Challenges’ in Müller, C. and Rigozzi, A. (eds), New Developments in Commercial Arbitration (Schulthess 2013) 183-207. Google Scholar öffnen
  444. Rosoff, J., ‘Hybrid Efficiency in Arbitration: Waiving Potential Conflicts for Dual Role Arbitrators in Med-Arb and Arb-Med Proceedings’ (2009) 26 J Intl Arb 89. Google Scholar öffnen
  445. Rossein, M., and Hope, J., ‘Disclosure and Disqualification Standards for Neutral Arbitrators: How Far to Cast the Net and What is Sufficient to Vacate Award’ (2007) 81 St. John's Law Rev. 203. Google Scholar öffnen
  446. Roth, M., ‘Part 5: The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration’ in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 1153-1294. Google Scholar öffnen
  447. Roth, M., ‘UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration’ in ‘Weigand, F.B., and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 1403- 1571. Google Scholar öffnen
  448. Rüßmann, H., and Timár, K., ‘The Laws Applicable to the Arbitration Agreement’ in Geimer, R. and Schütze, R. (eds), Recht ohne Grenzen: Festschrift für Athanassios Kaissis zum 65. Geburtstag (Sellier European Law Publishers 2012) [cited as: FS Kaissis] 837-859. Google Scholar öffnen
  449. Samuel, A., ‘Arbitration, Alternative Dispute Resolution Generally and the European Convention of Human Rights’ (2004) 21 J Intl Arb 413. Google Scholar öffnen
  450. Sanders, P., ‘Arbitration’ in Cappelletti, M., International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Vo. XVI. (Brill - Nijhoff 1987) [cited as: Arbitration: Int.Enc.Comp.L. XVI ch 12 (1987) p.] Google Scholar öffnen
  451. Sanubari, S., ‘Arbitrator’s Conduct on Social Media’ (2017) 8 JIDS 483. Google Scholar öffnen
  452. Saville, L. J., ‘Department Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law 1996 Report on Arbitration Bill’ (1997) 13 Arb Intl 275. Google Scholar öffnen
  453. Saville, L. J., ‘Department Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law 1996 Report on Arbitration Bill: The Last Part’ (1999) 15 Arb Intl 413. Google Scholar öffnen
  454. Schäfer, J., ‘The Arbitrator as a Private Judge’ in Keutgen, G. (ed.), Walking a Thin Line - What an Arbitrator Can Do, Must Do or Must Not Do (Bruylant 2010) 21-35. Google Scholar öffnen
  455. Scherer, Matthias, ‘New Case Law from Austria, Switzerland and Germany Regarding the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen
  456. Scherer, Matthias, ‘First Reference to the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration. Case Note on Swiss Supreme Court Decisions 4A_506/2007 and 4A_528/2007’ (2008) 26 Bull ASA 588. Google Scholar öffnen
  457. Scherer, Matthias, ‘Introduction to the Case Law Section’ (2013) 31 ASA Bull 45. Google Scholar öffnen
  458. Scherer, Maxi, ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: Towards Mandatory Disclosure of Funding Agreements?’ in Cremandes, B.M. and Dimolitsa, A. (eds), Third Party Funding in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2013) 95-100. Google Scholar öffnen
  459. Scherer Maxi, ‘Article V(1)(b)’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Scherer, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 291-321. Google Scholar öffnen
  460. Scherer, Maxi, and Goldsmith, A., ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration in Europe: Part 1-Funder’s Perspectives’ (2012) Int’l Bus. L. J. 207. Google Scholar öffnen
  461. Scherer, Maxi, Richman, L., et al. (eds), Arbitrating under the 2014 LCIA Rules: A User’s Guide (Kluwer Law 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  462. Schlosser, P., ‘Die Unparteilichkeit des Schiedsrichteramtes’ (1980) 93 ZZP 121. Google Scholar öffnen
  463. Schlosser, P., Das Recht der internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck 1989). Google Scholar öffnen
  464. Schneider, M., ‘President’s Message: Yet another Opportunity to Waste Time and Money on Procedural Skirmishes: The IBA Guidelines on Party Representation’ (2013) 31 ASA Bull 497. Google Scholar öffnen
  465. Schramm, D., Geisinger, E. and Pinsolle, P., ‘Article II’ in Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 38-115. Google Scholar öffnen
  466. Schütze, R., ‘Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Rechtsvergleichung‘ (2011) ZVglIRWiss 89. Google Scholar öffnen
  467. Schütze, R., ‘Die Verletzung der Offenbarungspficht im Schiedsverfahren’ in Ebke, W.F., Ol-zen, D. and Sandrock, O. (eds), Festschrift für Siegfried H. Elsing zum 65. Geburtstag (Recht und Wirtschaft 2015) [cited as: FS Elsing] 525-34. Google Scholar öffnen
  468. Schütze, R., Schiedsgericht und Schiedsverfahren (6th edn, Beck 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  469. Schütze, R., Tscherning, D. and Wais, W., Handbuch des Schiedsverfahrens (2 nd edn, De Gruyter 1990). Google Scholar öffnen
  470. Schwab, K.H., and Walter, G., Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (7th edn, C.H. Beck, Helbing Lichten-hahn 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  471. Schwartz, E., The Rights and Duties of ICC Arbitrators, in The Status of the Arbitrator (ICC Ct. Bull. Spec. Supp. 1995) 67. Google Scholar öffnen
  472. Schwartz, E., ‘Challenging Awards for Arbitrator Bias: Two Recent U.S. Cases’ (2013) 3 Cah. arb. 609. Google Scholar öffnen
  473. Schwarz, F. and Konrad, C., The Vienna Rules: A Commentary on International Arbitration in Austria (Kluwer 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  474. Schwartz, F., and Ortner, H. ‘Chapter III: The Arbitration Procedure - Procedural Ordre Public and the Internationalization of Public Policy in Arbitration’ (2008) Austrian YB 133. Google Scholar öffnen
  475. Schwartze, A., ‘Introduction - Role and Functions of the Comparative Law Method’ in Riesenhu-ber, K. (ed), European Legal Methodology (Intersentia 2017) 62-85. Google Scholar öffnen
  476. Schwebel, S.M., and Lahne, S. G., ‘Public Policy and Arbitral Procedure’ (1987) 3 ICCA Con-gress Series 205. Google Scholar öffnen
  477. Seraglini, C., and Ortscheibt, J., Droit de l’arbitrage interne et international (2nd edn, Lextenso 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  478. Shany, Y, ‘Squaring the Circle? Independence and Impartiality of Party-Appointed Adjudicators in International Legal Proceedings’ (2008) 30 LoyLa Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 473. Google Scholar öffnen
  479. Sheppard, A., ‘English Arbitration Act (Chapter 23), Part I, Miscellaneous, Section 73 [Loss of right to object]’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1094 - 1095. Google Scholar öffnen
  480. Sheppard, B., ‘A New Era of Arbitrator Ethics for the United States: The 2004 Revision to the AAA/ABA Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes’ (2005) 21 Arb Intl 91. Google Scholar öffnen
  481. Sheppard, B., ‘Interim ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbi-tral Awards’ (2003) 19 Arb Intl 217. Google Scholar öffnen
  482. Shore, L., ‘Disclosure and Impartiality: An Arbitrator’s Responsibility Vis-à-vis Legal Standards’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen
  483. Sievi, N., ‘Pre-Appointment Communications with Prospective Arbitrators - Limits, Disclosure and Documentation’ (2021) SchiedsVZ 1-6. Google Scholar öffnen
  484. Slaoui, F.Z., ‘The Rising Issue of ‘Repeat Arbitrators’: A Call for Clarification’ (2009) 25 Arb Intl 103. Google Scholar öffnen
  485. Smahi, N., ‘The Arbitrator’s Liability and Immunity Under Swiss Law – Part II’ (2017) 35 ASA Bull 67. Google Scholar öffnen
  486. Smit, R.H., ‘Courts and the Constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal: A Comparative Analysis of Standards of Arbitrator Independence and Impartiality’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Forum Shopping in the International Commercial Arbitration Context (Sellier NYU 2013) 235-251. Google Scholar öffnen
  487. Smith, M., ‘Impartiality of the Party-Appointed Arbitrator’ (1990) 6 Arb Intl 320. Google Scholar öffnen
  488. Smith, M., ‘Contractual Obligations Owed by and to Arbitrators: Model Terms of Appointment’ (1992) 8 Arb Intl 17. Google Scholar öffnen
  489. Solomon, D., Die Verbindlichkeit von Schiedssprüchen in der internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (Sellier de Gruyter 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  490. Stanic, A., ‘Challenging Arbitrators and the Importance of Disclosure: Recent Cases and Reflec-tions’ (2009) 16 Croat. Arbit. Yearb. 205-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  491. Steger, C., Die Präclusion von Versagunsgründen bei der Vollstreckung ausländischer Schiedssprüche (Mohr Siebeck 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  492. Stein, F., and Jonas, M., Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung (23 edn, Mohr Siebeck 2014) [cited as: Stein/Jonas/author23 § para]. Google Scholar öffnen
  493. Steyn, L., ‘England: The Independence and/or Impartiality of Arbitrators in International Com-mercial Arbitration’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 91. Google Scholar öffnen
  494. Stoffel-Munck, P., ‘La responsabilité de l’arbitre’ (2017) Rev arb 1123. Google Scholar öffnen
  495. Strohbach, H., ‘Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal and Making of the Award’ in Sanders, P. (ed), UNCITRAL’s Project for a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1984) 2 ICCA Congress Series 103. Google Scholar öffnen
  496. Stutzer, H., and Bösch, M., ‘Multiple Appointments of an Arbitrator: Does the Swiss Federal Supreme Court Really See No Limit?’ 14 November 2012 <https://thouvenin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/20121114-Multiple-Appointments-of-an-Arbitrator_HJS_MBO.pdf> accessed 24 January 2020. Google Scholar öffnen
  497. Sutton, D.G., Gill, J., and Gearing, M., Russell on Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  498. Timmer, L., ‘The quality, independence and impartiality of the arbitrator in international commer-cial arbitration’ (2012) 78 Arbitration 348. Google Scholar öffnen
  499. Torres Lagarde, M., ‘Liability of Arbitrators in Dubai: Still a Safe Seat of Arbitration’ (2015) 33 ASA Bull 708. Google Scholar öffnen
  500. Touraille, J.D., and Borysewicz, E., ‘An Arbitrator Must Disclose Having Worked in the Same Firm as a Party’s Counsel, but Being a “Facebook Friend” with Counsel Did Not Give Rise to a Reasonable Doubt as to the Arbitrator’s Independence’ in The Baker & McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook 2011–2012 (JurisNet, LLC 2012) 176–77. Google Scholar öffnen
  501. Trakman, L., ‘The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators Reconsidered’ (2007) 10(4) Int. A. L.R. 124. Google Scholar öffnen
  502. Tsatsos, C., The Problem of the Interpretation of Law (Ant. Sakkoulas 1978). Google Scholar öffnen
  503. Tschanz, P.Y. ‘Art. 180’ in Bucher, A. (ed), Loi sur le droit international privé. Convention de Lugano (Helbing Lichtenhahn 2011) 1574-1586. Google Scholar öffnen
  504. Tupman, M., ‘Challenge and Disqualification of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitra-tion’ (1989) 38 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 26. Google Scholar öffnen
  505. Turner, P. and Mohtashami, R., A Guide to the LCIA Arbitration Rules (OUP 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  506. Tweeddale, A. and Tweeddale, K., Arbitration of Commercial Disputes, International and Eng-lish Law and Practice (OUP 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  507. Vallines García, E., ‘Impartiality and Independence of the Persons Entrusted with Consumer ADR’, in: Stürner, M., Gascón Inchausti, F., and Caponi, R. (eds), The Role of Consumer ADR in the Administration of Justice - New Trends in Access to Justice under EU Directive 2013/11 (Sellier - European Law Publishers 2014) 79-102. Google Scholar öffnen
  508. van den Berg, A.J., The New York Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpreta-tion (Kluwer Law and Taxation 1981). Google Scholar öffnen
  509. van den Berg, A.J., ‘National Report for Netherlands’ (1987) XII YCA 3. Google Scholar öffnen
  510. van den Berg, A.J., ‘Justifiable Doubts as to the Arbitrator’s Impartiality or Independence’ (1997) 10 LJIL 509-519. Google Scholar öffnen
  511. van den Berg, A.J., ‘En⁠wforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia’ (2010) 27 J Intl Arb 179-198. Google Scholar öffnen
  512. van den Berg, A.J., ‘Dissenting Opinions by Party-Appointed Arbitrators in Investment Arbitra-tion’ in Mahnoush J.A., Cogan, J.K., Sloane, R.D., Wiessner, S. (ed), Looking to the future: es-says on international law in honor of W. Michael Reisman (Nijhoff 2011) [cited as: FS Reisman] 821-844. Google Scholar öffnen
  513. van Houtte, H. and McAsey, B., ‘The Liability of Arbitrators and Arbitral Institutions’ in Habegger, Hochstrasser, Nater-Bass and Weber-Stecher, Arbitral Institutions under Scrunity: ASA Special Series (JurisNet LLC 2013) 133-69. Google Scholar öffnen
  514. van Houtte, H., ‘The Rights of Defense in Multi-Party Arbitration’ (1989) 6 I.C.L.R. 395. Google Scholar öffnen
  515. Van Vechten Veeder Q.C., J. (Veeder V.V.), ‘Is There Any Need for Code of Ethics for Interna-tional Commercial Aribtrators?’ in Les arbitres internationaux (Societé de legislation comparée 2005) 187-193. Google Scholar öffnen
  516. Van Vechten Veeder Q.C., J. (Veeder V.V.), ‘L’indépendance et l’impartialité de l’arbitre dans l’arbitrage international’ in Cadiet, L., Clay, T., and Jeuland, E., Médiation et arbitrage. Alterna-tive Dispute Resolution. Justice alternative à la justice ou justice alternative? Perspectives comparatives (Litec 2005) 219-236. Google Scholar öffnen
  517. Várady, T., ‘Waiver in Arbitral Proceedings and Limitation on Waiver’ (2009) Annals Fac. L. Bel-grade Int’l 6. Google Scholar öffnen
  518. Vassilakakis, E., ‘The Impartiality of the Arbitrator’ (2017) EpolD 449 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  519. Veit, M., ‘Chapter 11: How Online Sources Affect Counsel Strategies and Behavior in Arbitra-tion’ in Piers, M., and Aschauer, C. (eds), Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration (CUP 2018) 272-282. Google Scholar öffnen
  520. Velissaropoulos-Karakostas, J., ‘L’arbitrage dans la Grèce antique - Epoques archaïque et clas-sique’ (2000) Rev arb 9. Google Scholar öffnen
  521. Verbist, H., Schäfer, E., and Imhoos, C., ICC Arbitration in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  522. Verveniotis, G., International Commercial Arbitration I, The New York Convention, Bilateral Treaties (Ant. Sakkoulas 1990). Google Scholar öffnen
  523. von Goeler, J., Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration and its Impact on Procedure (Kluwer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  524. von Segesser, G., and George, A., ‘SPILA, Article 179’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1199-1202. Google Scholar öffnen
  525. Voser, N., and Fischer, E., ‘Chapter 4: The Arbitral Tribunal’ in Geisinger, E. and Voser, N. (eds), International Arbitration in Switzerland: A Handbook for Practitioners (2nd edn, Kluwer 2013) 51-72. Google Scholar öffnen
  526. Voser, N., and Petti, A.M., ‘The Revised IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2015) 33 ASA Bull 6. Google Scholar öffnen
  527. Wade, S., Clifford, P., and Clanchy J., A Commentary on the LCIA Arbitration Rules 2014 (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  528. Wagner, G., ‘Chapter I: General Provisions, § 1027-Loss of Right to Object’ in Nacimiento, P., Kröll, S. M., et al. (eds), Arbitration in Germany (Kluwer 2015) 71-75. Google Scholar öffnen
  529. Wagner, G., ‘Part 4: Country Reports: D. Germany’ in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Hand-book on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 685-829. Google Scholar öffnen
  530. Wagner, G., Prozessverträge (Mohr Siebeck 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
  531. Walsh, T., and Teitelbaum, R., ‘The LCIA Court Decisions on Challenges to Arbitrators: An In-troduction’ in Park, W. (ed), Arbitration International Special Edition on Arbitrator Challenges (Kluwer 2011) 283-313. Google Scholar öffnen
  532. Walter, G. and Domej, T., Internationales Zivilprozessrecht der Schweiz (Haupt 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  533. Webster, T.H., ‘Selection of Arbitrators in a Nutshell’ (2002) 19 J Intl Arb 261. Google Scholar öffnen
  534. Webster, T.H., Handbook of UNCITRAL Arbitration (2nd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  535. Webster, T.H., and Bühler, M.W., Handbook of ICC Arbitration (4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  536. Wedam-Lukic, D., ‘Arbitration and Art. 6. of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1998) 64 Arbitration 16. Google Scholar öffnen
  537. Weigand, F.B., ‘Introduction’, in Weigand, F.B., Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbi-tration (Beck 2002) 1-102. Google Scholar öffnen
  538. Weigand, F.B., and Baumann, A., ‘Introduction’ in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, OUP 2009) 1-118. Google Scholar öffnen
  539. Weiller, L., ‘épilogue de la saga Tecnimont: consécration du devoir d’investigation des parties ou l’accessibilité érigeé en notoriéte’ (2019) Procédures 15. Google Scholar öffnen
  540. Werner, J., ‘Editorial: The Independence of Party-appointed Arbitrators: for a Rule of Reason’ (1990) 7 J Intl Arb 5. Google Scholar öffnen
  541. Whitesell, A.M., ‘Independence in ICC Arbitration: ICC Court Practice concerning the Appoint-ment, Confirmation, Challenge and Replacement of Arbitrators’, in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  542. Wieczorek, B., Schütze, R. and Gebauer, M. (eds), Zivilprozessordung und Nebengesetze (De Gruyter 2020) [cited as: Wieczorek/Schütze / author(s)]. Google Scholar öffnen
  543. Wijnen, W.O., ‘The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration Three Years On’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 107. Google Scholar öffnen
  544. Wijnen, W.O., Voser, N., and Rao, N., ‘Background Information on the IBA Guidelines on Con-flicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2004) 5 Bus. L. Int’l 433. Google Scholar öffnen
  545. Wilske S., and Stock, M., ‘Rule 3.3.7 of the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in Interna-tional Arbitration- The Enlargement of the Usual Shortlist?’ (2005) 23 ASA Bull 45. Google Scholar öffnen
  546. Wilson Koh, W.S., ‘Think Quality Not Quantity: Repeat Appointments and Arbitrator Challenges’ (2017) 34 J Intl Arb 711. Google Scholar öffnen
  547. Windsor, K., ‘Defining Arbitrator Evident Partiality: The Catch-22 of Commercial Litigation Dis-putes’ (2009) 6 Seton Hall Circuit Review 191-217. Google Scholar öffnen
  548. Wolff, R., ‘Article V (2)(b)’, in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C. H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Wolff, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 416-61. Google Scholar öffnen
  549. Wolfson, D., and Charlwood, S., ‘Chapter 25: Challenges to Arbitration Awards’, in Lew, J., Bor, H., et al. (eds), Arbitration in England, with chapters on Scotland and Ireland (Kluwer 2013) 527-562. Google Scholar öffnen
  550. Yang, P., ‘The Organisation of International Arbitration Proceedings’ in Pryles, M., and Moser, M. (eds), The Asian Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (JurisNet LLC 2007) 165-224. Google Scholar öffnen
  551. Yessiou-Faltsi, P., Opinion, NoV, 2012, 1066 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen
  552. Yu, H. L., ‘Minmetals Germany GmbH v Ferco Steel Ltd. – A Step Further than Localisation?’ (1999) Int. A.L.R. 83. Google Scholar öffnen
  553. Yu, H. L., and Shore, L., ‘Independence, Impartiality and Immunity of Arbitrators-US and English Perspectives’ (2003) 52 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 935. Google Scholar öffnen
  554. Zöller, R., and Geimer, R., Zöller Zivilprozessordnung ZPO (32nd edn, Otto Schmidt) [cited as: Zöller/Geimer, ZPO, 32. Edn., § para]. Google Scholar öffnen
  555. Analytical Commentary on Draft Text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, (1985) XVI YB 104 ff. Google Scholar öffnen
  556. IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration 2004 French (2004) Rev arb 991. Google Scholar öffnen
  557. ICC ‘Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the conduct of the Arbitration’, para 17 <https://iccwbo.org/publication/note-parties-arbitral-tribunals-conduct-arbitration/> accessed 20 December 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  558. ICCA, ‘ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention’ < https://www.arbitration-icca.org/publications/NYC_Guide.html> accessed 17 October 2018. Google Scholar öffnen
  559. Report of the Secretary-General: preliminary draft set of arbitration rules for optional use in ad hoc arbitration relating to international trade (UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules) (A/CN.9/97), VI UN-CITRAL YB 1975. Google Scholar öffnen
  560. The IBA Conflicts of Interest Subcommittee, a Subcommittee of the IBA Arbitration Committee, ‘The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration: The First Five Years 2004-2009’ (2010) 4 Disp. Res. Int’l 5. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung", "Handelsrecht & Wirtschaftsrecht & Gesellschaftsrecht"
Cover des Buchs: Recognition of Restructuring Plans under the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency
Monographie Vollzugriff
Abbas Abbasov
Recognition of Restructuring Plans under the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency
Cover des Buchs: Geschäftsleiter versus Gesellschafter unter dem StaRUG
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Maximilian Kaul
Geschäftsleiter versus Gesellschafter unter dem StaRUG
Cover des Buchs: Auftrag, Dienst- und Arbeitsvertrag
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Chia-Te Hsiao
Auftrag, Dienst- und Arbeitsvertrag
Cover des Buchs: Mehrfachbeteiligungen an Personengesellschaften
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hannah Stieghorst-Roggermaier
Mehrfachbeteiligungen an Personengesellschaften
Cover des Buchs: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex