Cover des Buchs: The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2022

Zusammenfassung

Die Unabhängigkeit von Schiedsrichtern ist für die internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung. In der letzten Zeit wurden immer häufiger Schiedssprüche wegen mangelnder schiedsrichterlicher Unabhängigkeit aufgehoben.Das vorliegende Werk ist dem praxisrelevanten Fragenkomplex der schiedsrichterlichen Unabhängigkeit und Unparteilichkeit gewidmet. Eingehend werden die ausgefeilten dogmatischen Strukturen und die relevante Rechtsprechung der für die internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit wichtigen Rechtsordnungen (Frankreich, England, Schweiz, Deutschland) auf der pro-arbitralen, arbitralen und post-arbitralen Verfahrensebene untersucht. Ein detailliertes Stichwortverzeichnis und eine umfangreiche Literaturliste runden die Arbeit ab. Aus dem Vorwort: “Dr. Angoura’s book provides a detailed, systematic and comprehensive analysis of the concepts of independence and impartiality of arbitrators in international commercial arbitration. In addition to exploring the arbitrator’s duties of impartiality and independence on a conceptual and theoretical level, provides a valuable tool for practice in international arbitration. Its careful examination of national court decisions, institutional rulings and other authorities is an important contribution to parties, lawyers, arbitrators, institutions and national courts to facilitate decisions on questions of disclosure and waiver and its application to impartiality at the different arbitration stages. This book contributes in particular to the ongoing discussion of the arbitrator’s impartiality as one of the (most frequently-invoked) grounds for annulment or non-recognition of arbitral awards. I congratulate the author for her very thorough research and thoughtful writing and her valuable contribution to the dialogue between academia and practice.”Gary B. Born, London, November 2021

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2022
Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8439-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2814-0
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Successful Dispute Resolution
Band
11
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
269
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 22
    1. I. Research Question Kein Zugriff
    2. II. Methodology Kein Zugriff
    3. III. Structure Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. The fair trial principle Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. National arbitration laws Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Institutional rules Kein Zugriff
    2. II. The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration as interpretation aid Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. The concept of impartiality Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. The concept of independence Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Impartiality applied to arbitrators Kein Zugriff
    4. IV. The question of ‘justifiable doubts’ Kein Zugriff
    1. I. General remarks Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Significant direct or indirect financial interest in the dispute Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Personal interest in the dispute Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Prior involvement in the dispute Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Arbitrator’s appointment in a related matter Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Publicly expressed legal opinion Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. General remarks Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Arbitrator’s employment by one of the parties Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Arbitrator acting as manager, director or member of the supervisory board of one of the parties Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Direct relationship Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Indirect relationship Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Prior business or financial relationship Kein Zugriff
        4. d) ‘Repeat arbitrator’ Kein Zugriff
        1. a) Close family relationship Kein Zugriff
        2. b) Close personal relationship Kein Zugriff
        3. c) Remote and insignificant social relationship Kein Zugriff
        4. d) Ex parte contacts Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Common nationality of presiding arbitrator with one of the parties Kein Zugriff
      6. 6. Arbitrator representing one of the parties Kein Zugriff
      7. 7. Arbitrator’s relationship with counsel representing one of the parties Kein Zugriff
    4. IV. Arbitrator’s relationship with another arbitrator, witness or arbitral secretary Kein Zugriff
    5. V. Arbitrator’s law firm relationship with one of the parties or counsel Kein Zugriff
    6. VI. Arbitrator’s conduct and expressions of opinion during arbitration Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Nature of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Timing of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Arbitrator’s investigation duty Kein Zugriff
        1. a) The applicable law to arbitrator’s disclosure duty Kein Zugriff
        2. b) The subjective and objective standards of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
        3. c) The interface between parties’ investigation duty and arbitrator’s disclosure duty Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. Consequences of breach of the duty of disclosure Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. The interplay between the principle of party autonomy and fair trial Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Challenge procedure and time limit Kein Zugriff
      3. 3. Subsidiary competence of the judge at the seat of the arbitral tribunal Kein Zugriff
      4. 4. Legal remedies against the decision on the challenge of the arbitrator Kein Zugriff
      5. 5. The objective standard of the disqualification of an arbitrator Kein Zugriff
        1. a) The violation of due process Kein Zugriff
        2. b) The irregular composition of the arbitral tribunal or violation of parties’ agreed arbitral proceedings Kein Zugriff
        3. c) The violation of public policy Kein Zugriff
      2. 2. Effect of bias on the arbitral award Kein Zugriff
    1. I. The object of waiver: the right to an impartial tribunal versus the right to contest arbitrator’s lack of impartiality Kein Zugriff
    2. II. The mechanism of waiver as an aspect of good faith Kein Zugriff
      1. 1. Knowledge of facts or circumstances giving rise to arbitrator’s lack of impartiality Kein Zugriff
        1. a) The specification and compliance with the set time limit Kein Zugriff
        2. b) The preclusive effect of waiver of the right to contest arbitrator’s lack of impartiality at different stages Kein Zugriff
    4. IV. Advance waiver Kein Zugriff
  7. § 6. Conclusions Kein Zugriff 212 - 218
  8. BIBLIOGRAPHY Kein Zugriff 219 - 250
  9. LIST OF CASES Kein Zugriff 251 - 264
  10. Biography Kein Zugriff 265 - 266
  11. Index Kein Zugriff 267 - 269

Literaturverzeichnis (560)

  1. Yessiou-Faltsi, P., Opinion, NoV, 2012, 1066 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  2. Whitesell, A.M., ‘Independence in ICC Arbitration: ICC Court Practice concerning the Appoint-ment, Confirmation, Challenge and Replacement of Arbitrators’, in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  3. Wieczorek, B., Schütze, R. and Gebauer, M. (eds), Zivilprozessordung und Nebengesetze (De Gruyter 2020) [cited as: Wieczorek/Schütze / author(s)]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  4. Wijnen, W.O., ‘The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration Three Years On’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 107. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  5. Wijnen, W.O., Voser, N., and Rao, N., ‘Background Information on the IBA Guidelines on Con-flicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2004) 5 Bus. L. Int’l 433. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  6. Wilske S., and Stock, M., ‘Rule 3.3.7 of the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in Interna-tional Arbitration- The Enlargement of the Usual Shortlist?’ (2005) 23 ASA Bull 45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  7. Wilson Koh, W.S., ‘Think Quality Not Quantity: Repeat Appointments and Arbitrator Challenges’ (2017) 34 J Intl Arb 711. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  8. Windsor, K., ‘Defining Arbitrator Evident Partiality: The Catch-22 of Commercial Litigation Dis-putes’ (2009) 6 Seton Hall Circuit Review 191-217. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  9. Wolff, R., ‘Article V (2)(b)’, in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C. H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Wolff, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 416-61. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  10. Wolfson, D., and Charlwood, S., ‘Chapter 25: Challenges to Arbitration Awards’, in Lew, J., Bor, H., et al. (eds), Arbitration in England, with chapters on Scotland and Ireland (Kluwer 2013) 527-562. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  11. Yang, P., ‘The Organisation of International Arbitration Proceedings’ in Pryles, M., and Moser, M. (eds), The Asian Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (JurisNet LLC 2007) 165-224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  12. Werner, J., ‘Editorial: The Independence of Party-appointed Arbitrators: for a Rule of Reason’ (1990) 7 J Intl Arb 5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  13. Yu, H. L., ‘Minmetals Germany GmbH v Ferco Steel Ltd. – A Step Further than Localisation?’ (1999) Int. A.L.R. 83. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  14. Yu, H. L., and Shore, L., ‘Independence, Impartiality and Immunity of Arbitrators-US and English Perspectives’ (2003) 52 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 935. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  15. Zöller, R., and Geimer, R., Zöller Zivilprozessordnung ZPO (32nd edn, Otto Schmidt) [cited as: Zöller/Geimer, ZPO, 32. Edn., § para]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  16. Analytical Commentary on Draft Text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, (1985) XVI YB 104 ff. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  17. IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration 2004 French (2004) Rev arb 991. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  18. ICC ‘Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the conduct of the Arbitration’, para 17 <https://iccwbo.org/publication/note-parties-arbitral-tribunals-conduct-arbitration/> accessed 20 December 2018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  19. ICCA, ‘ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention’ < https://www.arbitration-icca.org/publications/NYC_Guide.html> accessed 17 October 2018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  20. Report of the Secretary-General: preliminary draft set of arbitration rules for optional use in ad hoc arbitration relating to international trade (UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules) (A/CN.9/97), VI UN-CITRAL YB 1975. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  21. The IBA Conflicts of Interest Subcommittee, a Subcommittee of the IBA Arbitration Committee, ‘The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration: The First Five Years 2004-2009’ (2010) 4 Disp. Res. Int’l 5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  22. Wagner, G., Prozessverträge (Mohr Siebeck 1998). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  23. Velissaropoulos-Karakostas, J., ‘L’arbitrage dans la Grèce antique - Epoques archaïque et clas-sique’ (2000) Rev arb 9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  24. Verbist, H., Schäfer, E., and Imhoos, C., ICC Arbitration in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  25. Verveniotis, G., International Commercial Arbitration I, The New York Convention, Bilateral Treaties (Ant. Sakkoulas 1990). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  26. von Goeler, J., Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration and its Impact on Procedure (Kluwer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  27. von Segesser, G., and George, A., ‘SPILA, Article 179’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1199-1202. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  28. Voser, N., and Fischer, E., ‘Chapter 4: The Arbitral Tribunal’ in Geisinger, E. and Voser, N. (eds), International Arbitration in Switzerland: A Handbook for Practitioners (2nd edn, Kluwer 2013) 51-72. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  29. Voser, N., and Petti, A.M., ‘The Revised IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2015) 33 ASA Bull 6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  30. Wade, S., Clifford, P., and Clanchy J., A Commentary on the LCIA Arbitration Rules 2014 (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  31. Wagner, G., ‘Chapter I: General Provisions, § 1027-Loss of Right to Object’ in Nacimiento, P., Kröll, S. M., et al. (eds), Arbitration in Germany (Kluwer 2015) 71-75. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  32. Wagner, G., ‘Part 4: Country Reports: D. Germany’ in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Hand-book on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 685-829. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  33. Veit, M., ‘Chapter 11: How Online Sources Affect Counsel Strategies and Behavior in Arbitra-tion’ in Piers, M., and Aschauer, C. (eds), Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration (CUP 2018) 272-282. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  34. Walsh, T., and Teitelbaum, R., ‘The LCIA Court Decisions on Challenges to Arbitrators: An In-troduction’ in Park, W. (ed), Arbitration International Special Edition on Arbitrator Challenges (Kluwer 2011) 283-313. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  35. Walter, G. and Domej, T., Internationales Zivilprozessrecht der Schweiz (Haupt 2012) Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  36. Webster, T.H., ‘Selection of Arbitrators in a Nutshell’ (2002) 19 J Intl Arb 261. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  37. Webster, T.H., Handbook of UNCITRAL Arbitration (2nd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  38. Webster, T.H., and Bühler, M.W., Handbook of ICC Arbitration (4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  39. Wedam-Lukic, D., ‘Arbitration and Art. 6. of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1998) 64 Arbitration 16. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  40. Weigand, F.B., ‘Introduction’, in Weigand, F.B., Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbi-tration (Beck 2002) 1-102. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  41. Weigand, F.B., and Baumann, A., ‘Introduction’ in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, OUP 2009) 1-118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  42. Weiller, L., ‘épilogue de la saga Tecnimont: consécration du devoir d’investigation des parties ou l’accessibilité érigeé en notoriéte’ (2019) Procédures 15. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  43. Aguilar Alvarez, G., ‘The Challenge of Arbitrators’ (1990) 6 Arb Intl 203. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  44. Alcalá, J.M., Cardozo, C., and Segura, O.Jr., ‘Arbitrator’s Disclosure Standards: The Uncertainty Continues’ in ICDR Handbook on International Arbitration Practice (2nd edn, JurisNet 2017) 307-324. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  45. Alessi, D., ‘Enforcing Arbitrator’s Obligations: Rethinking International Commercial Arbitrators’ Liability’ (2014) 31 J Intl Arb 735. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  46. Allen, N., and Mallet, D., ‘Arbitrator Disclosure - No Room for the Colour Blind’ (2011) 7 Asian Intl Arb J 118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  47. Ambrose, C., Maxwell, K., and Collett, M., London Maritime Arbitration (Informa law 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  48. Andrews, N., Arbitration and Contract Law: Common Law Perspectives (Springer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  49. Angoura, S., ‘Aspects of Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2013) 8 Young Arbitration Review 32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  50. Angoura, S., ‘Interface Between Arbitrators’ Disclosure and Parties’ Investigation Duties, Note on decision of cour d’Appel de Paris. 27 Mars 2018, Chambre 1, 16/09386, SAAD Buzwair Automotive Co v. Audi Volkswagen Middle East Fze LLC’ (2018) 4 ASA Bull 913. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  51. Angoura, S., ‘Arbitrator’s Impartiality under Article V(1)(d) of the New York Convention’ (2019) 15 Asian Intl Arb J 29. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  52. Angoura, S., and Kastanidis, A., ‘The Issue of Pathological Clauses in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2018) 3 Diaitisia (Arbitration) 336 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  53. Angoura, S., and Kastanidis, A., ‘Les limites de l’autonomie de la volonté en droit de l’arbitrage commercial international dans les pays incorporant la loi type de la CNUDCI: L’example de la Gréce’ (2019) Rev arb 431. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  54. Arroyo, M., ‘Chapter 2, Part II: Commentary on Chapter 12 PILS, Article 190 [Finality, challenge: principle]’ in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 266-350. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  55. Baizeau, D., ‘Chapter 2, Part II: Commentary on Chapter 12 PILS, Article 192 [Waiver of annul-ment]' in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 283-94. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  56. Ball, M., ‘How Helpful Really Are the New IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration?' (2005) 21 Arb Intl 323. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  57. Balthasar, S., and Ziadé, R., ‘I. International Arbitration in France’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), Interna-tional Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analysis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 415-448. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  58. Balthasar, S., ‘J. International Arbitration in Germany’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Com-mercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analysis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 449-488. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  59. Bantekas, I., Ortolani. P., Ali S., Gómez, M.A. and Polkinghorne, M., UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: A Commentary (CUP 2020). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  60. Barak, A., ‘The Role of a Judge in a Democracy’ in Breitenmoser, S. Ehrenzeller,B., Sassoli,M., et al. (eds), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, Menschenrechte, Demokratie und Rechtsstaat, Droits de l’ home, démocratie et État de droit - Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Dike Nomos 2007) [cited as: LA Wildhaber] 939-960. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  61. Bärtsch, P. and Schramm, D., Arbitration Law of Switzerland: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  62. Bassiri, N., ‘Chapter 10: Arbitrators and Their Online Identity’ in Piers, M., and Aschauer, C. (eds), Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration (CUP 2018) 246-271. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  63. Batiffol, H., and Lagarde, P., Droit international privé vol 1 (LGDJ 1981). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  64. Baumann, A., and Pfitzner, T.V., ‘Introduction’ in Weigand, F. B., and Baumann, A. (eds), Practi-tioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 3-86. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  65. Beatson, J., ‘International Arbitration, Public Policy Considerations, and Conflicts of Laws: The Perspectives of Reviewing and Enforcing Courts’ (2017) 33 Arb Intl 175. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  66. Bedjaoui, M., ‘Des fortes vérités de Cassandre aux modestes correctifs de Némésis (Ou le sou-ci communément partagé de voir la liberté fondamentale de choisir un arbitre n'être ni un dan-ger ni en danger)’, in Dominicé, C., Patry, R., and Reymond, C., Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 1993) [cited as: LA Lalive] 385- 398. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  67. Beffa, L., ‘Challenge of International Arbitration Awards in Switzerland for Lack of Independ-ence and/or Impartiality of an Arbitrator – Is It time to Change the Approach?’ (2011) 29 ASA Bull 598. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  68. Beisteiner, L., ‘Section 594 Conduct of Arbitration Proceedings’ in Zeiler, G. (ed), Austrian Ar-bitration Law (NWV 2016) 108-115. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  69. Bellet, P., ‘Des arbitres neutres et non neutres’, in Dominicé, C., Patry, R., and Reymond, C., Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 1993) [cited as: LA Lalive] 399-409. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  70. Benedettelli, M.V., ‘Human Rights as a Litigation Tool in International Arbitration: Reflecting on the ECHR Experience’ (2015) 31 Arb Intl 631. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  71. Bensaude, D., ‘Obligation de révélation et charge de la recherche d’information’ (2014) Gaz. Pal. 18. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  72. Bensaude, D., ‘French Code of Civil Procedure (Book IV), Article 1456’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1147-1149. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  73. Bensaude, D., ‘French Code of Civil Procedure (Book IV), Article 1520’ in Mistelis L. (ed), Con-cise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1175-1185. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  74. Bensaude, D., ‘Obligation de révélation pesant sur l’arbitre versus recherche d’information à la charge des parties’ (2018) Gaz. Pal. 19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  75. Berger, B., and Kellerhals, F., International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland (3rd edn, Stämpfli 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  76. Berger, B., ‘Rights and Duties of Arbitrators in the Deliberations’ (2013) 31 ASA Bull 244. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  77. Bermann, G. A., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy in the Composition of the Arbitral Panel’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 83-125. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  78. Bernet, M., and Eschment, J., ‘Liability of Arbitrators under Swiss Law: Legal Basis and Limita-tions of Arbitral Immunity’ (2016) SchiedsVZ 189. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  79. Bernini, G., ‘Cultural Neutrality: A Prerequisite to Arbitral Justice’ (1989) 10 Mich. J. Int’l L. 39. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  80. Bernini, G., ‘The Conduct of the Arbitral Proceedings: Standards of Behavior of Arbitrators’ (Report) in The Arbitral Process and the Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Publ. No. 472 1991) 31-37. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  81. Bertrand, E., ‘The Brave New World of Arbitration: Third-Party Funding’ (2011) ASA Bull 607. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  82. Bertrou, G., and de Margerie, Q., ‘Obligation de révélation de l'arbitre: tentative de synthèse après la publication des nouvelles règles de l'IBA (2015) 1 Cah. Arb. 29. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  83. Besson, S., ‘Arbitration and Human Rights’ (2006) 24 ASA Bull 395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  84. Besson, S., ‘Arbitrage. Impartialité. Défaut d’impartialité. Con. EDH, art. 6§1. Liens associatifs ou scientifiques’ (2019) JDI 7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  85. Besson, S., and Rigozzi, A. ‘La réforme du droit suisse de l’arbitrage international’ (2021) Rev arb 11. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  86. Binder, P., International Commercial Arbitration and Conciliation in UNCITRAL Model Law Jurisdictions (Sweet & Maxwell 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  87. Bingham, T., The Business of Judging (OUP 2000). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  88. Bishop, D., and Reed, L., ‘Practical Guidelines for Interviewing, Selecting and Challenging Par-ty-Appointed Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1998) 14 Arb Intl 395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  89. Bishop, D., and Stevens, M., ‘Safeguarding the Fair Conduct of Proceedings-Report’ in van den Berg, A.J. (ed), International Arbitration: The Coming of a New Age? (2013) 17 ICCA Con-gress Series 473. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  90. Blackby, N., Partasides, C., et al., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th edn, OUP 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  91. Blessing, M., ‘The New International Arbitration Law in Switzerland: A Significant Step Towards Liberalism’ (1988) 5 J Intl Arb 9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  92. Böckstiegel K.H., ‘Use by a Party of Challenges to Delay or Disrupt the Arbitration’ in van den Berg, A. J. (ed), I. Preventing Delay and Disruption of Arbitration (Deventer 1991) 131-159. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  93. Böckstiegel, K.H., ‘Party Autonomy and Case Management - Experiences and Suggestions of an Arbitrator’ (2013) 11 SchiedsVZ 1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  94. Bogart, C. P., ‘Overview of Arbitration Finance’ in Cremandes, S.P. and Dimolitsa, A. (eds), Third -Party Funding in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2013) 50-56. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  95. Bollenberger, R., ‘Der Schiedsrichtervertrag’ in Liebscher, C., Oberhammer, P. and Rechber-ger, W. (eds), Schiedsverfahrensrecht (Österreich 2016) 587-626. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  96. Bond, S., ‘The Selection of ICC Arbitrators and the Requirement of Independence’ (1988) 4 Arb Intl 300. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  97. Bond, S., and Paralika, M., ‘ICC Rules of Arbitration, The Arbitral Tribunal, Article 11 [General Provisions]’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (Kluwer 2015) 374-378. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  98. Born, G., International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing (Kluwer 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  99. Born, G., International Arbitration: Law and Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  100. Born, G., International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, Kluwer 2021). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  101. Borris, C., and Hennecke, R., ‘Article V(1)(d)’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Borris and Hennecke, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 342-370. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  102. Borris, C., and Hennecke, R., ‘Article V’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recog-nition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Borris and Hennecke, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 250-279. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  103. Bratic, C., ‘The Parties Hereby Waive All Recourse…But Not That One.’ Why Parties Adopt Ex-clusion Agreements and Why Courts Hesitate to Enforce Them’ (2018) 12 Disp. Resol. Int’l 105. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  104. Brekoulakis, S., ‘The Notion of Superiority of Arbitration Agreements over Jurisdiction Agree-ments: Time to Abandon it?’ (2007) 24 J Intl Arb 341. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  105. Briner, R., and von Schlabrendorff, F., ‘Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and its Bearing upon International Arbitration’ in Briner, R., Fortier, L.Y. Berger, K.P. and Bredow, J. (eds), Law of International Business and Dispute Settlement in the 21st Century. Liber amicorum Karl- Heinz Böckstiegel (Heymanns 2001) [cited as: LA Böckstiegel] 89-109. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  106. Bucher, A., Le nouvel arbitrage international en Suisse (Helbing Lichtenhahn 1988). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  107. Bucher, E., ‘Was macht den Schiedsrichter?Abschied vom ‘Schiedsrichtersvertrag’ und Weite-res zu Prozessverträgen’ in Bachmann, B., Breidenbach, S., Coester-Waltjen, D., Hess, B., Nelle, A., and Wolf, C., Grenzüberschreitungen: Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrens-recht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit: Festschrift für Peter Schlosser zum 70 Geburtstag (Mohr Siebeck 2005) [cited as: FS Schlosser] 97-118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  108. Bühler, M., and Cartier, M., ‘Article 194 PILS’ in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 403-433. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  109. Bühler, M., and Feit, M., Section II. Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal, Confirmation of Arbitra-tors in Zuberbühler, T., Müller, C., and Habegger, P. (eds), Swiss Rules of International Arbi-tration (2nd edn, Juris Schulthess 2013) 69- 121. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  110. Bühler, M., and Jarvin, S., ‘The Arbitration Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce’ in Weigand, Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (Beck 2002) 103-397. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  111. Byrne, O., ‘A New Code of Ethics for Commercial Arbitrators: The Neutrality of Party - Appoint-ed Arbitrators on A Tripartite Panel’ (2003) 30 Ford. Urb. L.J. 1815. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  112. Cadiet, L., ‘Le renonciation à se prévaloir des irrégularities de la procédure arbitrale’ (1996) Rev arb 3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  113. Cadiet, L., Normand J., and Amrani-Mekki S., Théorie générale du process (2nd edn, Thémis 2013). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  114. Calavros, C., ‘Grundsätzliches zum Rechtsverhältnis zwischen Schiedrichtern und Parteien nach Griechischem Recht’ in Lindacher, W., Pfaff, D., Rott, G., Schlosser, P. and Wieser, E. (eds), Festschrift für Walter Habscheid zum 65. Geburtstag (Ernst und Werner Gieseking, 1989) [cited as: FS Habscheid] 65-78. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  115. Calavros, C., Das UNCITRAL Modellgesetz über die internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbar-keit (Ernst und Werner Gieseking, Bielefeld 1988). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  116. Calavros, C., International Commercial Arbitration, vol I, Law Decree No. 2735/1999, Article- by- Article Commentary (Sakkoulas 2019) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  117. Calvo, M., ‘The Challenge of ICC Arbitrators’ (1998) 15 J Intl Arb 63. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  118. Cappelletti, M., International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Civil Procedure (Mohr Sie-beck Vol. XVI). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  119. Carbonneau, T., The Law and Practice of United States Arbitration (6th edn, Juris 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  120. Cárdenas, E., and Rivkin, D.W., ‘A Growing Challenge for Ethics in International Arbitration’ in Aksen, G. (ed) Global Reflections on International Law, Commercial and Dispute Resolution (ICC 2005) [cited as: LA Briner] 191-202. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  121. Carlevaris, A., ‘The Bounds of Party Autonomy in Institutional Arbitration’ in Carlevaris, A., Lévy, L., Mourre, A., and Schwartz, E. A. (eds), International Arbitration Under Review: Essays in Honour of John Beechey (ICC 2015) 103-125. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  122. Carlevaris, A. and Digón, R., ‘Arbitrator Challenges under the ICC Rules and Practice’ (2016) ICC Disp. Res. Bull. 23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  123. Carlevaris, A., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy and Institutional Rules’, in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 1-36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  124. Caron, D., Caplan, L., and Pellonpää, M., The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, A Commentary (OUP 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  125. Carpasse, O., ‘Conflicts of interest: some practical considerations’ in Cox, K., Carpasse, O., de Ly, F., et al. (eds), Opening the Black Box of Conflicts of Interest (NAI Cepani bruylant 2016) 129-138. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  126. Carter, J., and Fellas, F., International Commercial Arbitration in New York (2nd edn, OUP 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  127. Carter, J., ‘Living with the Party-Appointed Arbitrator: Judicial Confusion, Ethical Codes and Practical Advice’ (1992) 3 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 153. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  128. Castres Saint–Martin, C., Conflits d’intérêts en arbitrage commercial international (PhD thesis, L’Harmattan 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  129. Chantebout, V., ‘«Nul n’est censé ignorer l’information accessible sur l’internet»: Obligation de révélation et exception de notoriété’ (2016) Cah. arb. 633. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  130. Chazli, E. K., L’impartialité de l’arbitre, étude de la mise en œuvre de l’exigence d’impartialité de l’arbitre (LGDJ 2020). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  131. Chazli, E.K., ‘The UK Supreme Court on Arbitrator’s Apparent Bias and Disclosure: Some Clari-fications and Missed Opportunities: Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd [2020] UKSC 48’ (2021) 40 C.J.Q. 75-85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  132. Chernick, R., Gaitis, J., and Holtzman, H., ‘Nonneutral Arbitrators’ in Gaitis, J. (ed), The College of Commercial Arbitrators, Guide to Best Practices in Commercial Arbitration (4th edn, Juris 2017) 37-53. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  133. Clay, T., ‘Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges’ D 2013, 2936. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  134. Clay, T., ‘Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges’ D 2018, 2448. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  135. Clay, T., ‘Arbitrage et modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges’ D 2019, 2435. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  136. Clay, T., L’arbitre (Dalloz 2001). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  137. Clay, T., ‘L’indépendence et l’impartialité de l’arbitre et les règles du procès équitable’ in van Compernolle, J. and Tarzia, G. (eds), L ‘impartialité du juge et de l’arbitre. Étude de droit com-paré (Bruylant 2006) 199-237. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  138. Clay, T., ‘Note-12 février 2009, Cour d’appel de Paris (1re Ch. C)’ (2009) Rev arb 190. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  139. Clay, T., ‘Tecnimont, saison 4: entre révélation et réaction' (2014) 3 Cah. arb. 547. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  140. Clay, T., ‘Tecnimont, saison 5: La dissolution de l'obligation de rélévation dans le devoir de ré-action’ (2016) Cah. arb. 447. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  141. Clay, T., Tecnimont, saison 6 : entre action et réaction’ (2019) 3 Cah. arb. 401. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  142. Cohen, D., ‘Indépendence des arbitres et conflicts d’interests’ (2011) Rev arb 611. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  143. Cohen, D., ‘Encore l’indépendence de l’arbitre et sort de l’exequatur de la sentence’ (2014) Cah. arb. 795. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  144. Constans, A., ‘L’épilogue de l’affaire J & P Avax - Tecnimont: les parties à un arbitrage sont te-nues de faire preuve de curiosité et de réactivité’ (2019) JCP EA 20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  145. Coulson, R., ‘An American Critique of the IBA’s Ethics for International Arbitrators’ (1987) 4 J Intl Arb 103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  146. Craig, L. and Jaeger, L., ‘The 2012 ICC Rules: Important Changes and Issues for Future Reso-lution’ (2012) Cah. arb. 15. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  147. Craig, L., Park, W., and Paulsson, J., International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration (3rd edn, Ocefana 2000). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  148. Craig, N., ‘Bias, the Right to Object and Waiver: The Problem with the Arbitration Act 1996’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  149. Cremades, B.M., ‘Third-Party Litigation Funding: Investing in Arbitration’ (2011) 8 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  150. Cremandes, B. M., ‘Good Faith in International Arbitration’ (2012) 27 Am. U. Int’L. Rev. 761. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  151. Cremandes, B., and Cairns, D., ‘National Report for Spain (2018)’ in Paulsson, J., and Bisman, L. (eds), ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer 2018) 1-38. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  152. Crivellaro, A., ‘Does the Arbitrators’ Failure to Disclose Conflicts of Interest Fatally Lead to An-nulment of the Award? The Approach of the European State Courts’ (2014) 4 The Arbitration Brief 121. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  153. Daele, K., Challenge and Disqualification of Arbitrators in International Arbitration (Kluwer 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  154. Dasser, F., and Gauthey, D., ‘La bonne foi dans l’ arbitrage’ (2015) Rev arb 239. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  155. de Boisséson, M., ‘La “Soft Law” dans l’arbitrage’ (2014) 3 Cah. arb. 519. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  156. de Fina, A.A., ‘The Party Appointed Arbitrator in International Arbitrations – Role and Selection’ (1999) 15 Arb Intl 381. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  157. de Ly, F., ‘Arbitration and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Lévy, L., and Derains, Y. (eds), Liber Amicorum en l’honneur de Serge Lazareff (Pedone 2011) [cited as: LA Laz-areff] 181-206. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  158. de Vareilles-Sommières, P., ‘La sentence arbitrale étrangère contraire à une loi d'ordre public du for (remarques en marge des solutions françaises envisagées sous le rapport de l'ordre pu-blic substantiel)’ (2014) JDI 813. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  159. Debourg, C., ‘Compte Rendu de l'atelier du groupe de pratique arbitrale du CFa: l'obligation de révélation: aspects pratiques pour les arbitres et pour les parties’ (2016) Rev arb 367. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  160. Debourg, C., ‘Obligation de révélation de l'arbitre et obligation de s'informer à la charge des parties: un équilibre encore perfectible’ (2019) Dalloz actualité, 1 February 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  161. Debourg, C., ‘Contours de l’ obligation de révélation de l’arbitre: l’exception de notoriété’ (2019) Dalloz actualité, 12 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  162. del Rosal Carmona, R. C., ‘Chapter 9: Lack of Impartiality or Independence as Grounds to Deny Enforcement under the New York convention’ in Fach Gomez, K. and Lopez-Rodrigues, A.M. (eds), 60 Years of the New York Convention: Key Issues and Future Challenges (Kluwer 2019) 137-52. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  163. Delanoy, L.C., ‘Les obligations respectives des arbitres et des parties en matière d’indépendence de l’arbitre, note sous Paris, 29 mai 2018 et Paris, 27 mars 2018’ (2019) Rev arb 532. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  164. Delanoy, L.C., ‘Indépendence de l’arbitre: la cour de Cassasion confirme la variabilité dans le temps de l’obligation de révélation, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 3 Octobre 2019’ (2020) Rev arb 422. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  165. Delvolvé, J.L., Pointon, G.H., and Rouche, J., French Arbitration Law and Practice: A Dynam-ic Civil Law Approach to International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  166. Derains, Y., ‘Le Professionnalisme des arbitres’ (2012) 4 Cah. dr. entrep. (dossier 19) 21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  167. Derains, Y., and Sicard-Mirabal, J., Introduction to Investor-State Arbitration (Kluwer 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  168. Derains, Y., and Schwarz, E., A Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration (Kluwer 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  169. Ditchev, A., ‘Le contrat d’arbitrage. Essai sur le contrat ayant pour objet la mission d’arbitrer’ (1981) Rev arb 395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  170. Domke, M., ‘’Towards an ‘International’ Public Policy in Commercial Arbitration’’ in Böckstiegel, K.H., and Glossner, O. (eds), Festschrift für Arthur Bülow zum 80. Geburtstag (Hezmanns 1981) [cited as: FS Bülow] 49-58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  171. Donahey, S., ‘The Independence and Neutrality of Arbitrators’ (1992) 9 J Intl Arb 31. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  172. dos Santos, C. ‘Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration: A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?’ (2017) 35 ASA Bull 918. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  173. dos Santos, C., ‘European Court of Human Rights upon Sports-Related Decision: Switzerland Condemned’ (2019) 37 ASA Bull 117. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  174. Duclercq, C., and Aronowicz, T., ‘Note: Societé Saad Buzwair Automotive Co v Societé Audi Volkswagen Middle East FZE LLC, Court of Appeal of Paris, Case No. 16/09386, 27 March 2018’ (2018) XV Rev. Bras. Arb. 159. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  175. Duclercq, C., and Savine Tronel, V., ‘English Court Rules on the Extent and Limits of the Role of the Secretary of the Arbitral Tribunal’ (2017) 10 Arbitraje 559. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  176. Dutoit, B., Droit international privé suisse: commentaire de la loi fédérale du 18 décembre 1987 (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  177. Eastwood, G., ‘A Real Danger of Confusion? The English Law Relating to Bias in Arbitrators’ (2001)17 Arb Intl 287. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  178. Eisemann, F., ‘Déontologie de l’ arbitrage commercial international’ (1969) Rev arb 217. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  179. Eisemann, F., ‘Indépendence de l’arbitre’ (1970) Rev arb 217. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  180. El-Kosheri, A.S., and Youssef, K.Y., ‘The Independence of International Arbitrators: An Arbitra-tor's Perspective’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 43. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  181. Epstein, L., ‘Arbitrator Independence and Bias: The View of a Corporate In- House Counsel’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 55. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  182. Farjat, G., Droit privé de l’ économie, 2. Théorie des obligations (Presses universitaires de France 1975). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  183. Fasching, H., Schiedsgericht und Schiedsverfahren im österreichischen und im internationa-len Recht (Manzsche 1973). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  184. Feerick, J., ‘The 1977 Code of Ethics for Arbitrators: An Outside Perspective’ (2002) 18 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 907. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  185. Fernández Arroyo, D., ‘Arbitrator’s Procedural Powers: The Last Frontier of Party Autonomy’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 199-231. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  186. Fernández Pérez, A., ‘Conflicts of Interests of Arbitrators in International Law Firms’ (2018) 34 Arb Intl 105. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  187. Fernández Rozas, J.C., ‘Clearer Ethics Guidelines and Comparative Standards for Arbitrators’ in Fernandez- Ballesteros, M.A. and Arias, D. (eds), Liber Amicorum Bernando Cremades (La Ley 2010) 413-449. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  188. Ferrier, D. and Magendie, J.C., ‘La transparence: une exigence raisonnable pour l’indépendece de l’arbitre ?’ D 2015, 29. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  189. Finizio, S., ‘The Partial Arbitrator: US Developments Relating to Arbitrator Bias’ (2004) 7 Int.A.L.R. 88. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  190. Flecke - Giammarco, G., ‘Advance Waivers: An Intriguing Concept… But: Do they impact ongo-ing disclosure obligations or insulate arbitrators against subsequent challenges?’ (2015) Dispute Resolution <https://www.disputeresolution-magazin.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/3_Flecke_DR_3_15.pdf> accessed 4 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  191. Fouchard, P., 'Note - Cour d'appel de Paris (1re Chambre A) 18 novembre 1987; Cour d'appel de Paris (1re Chambre A) 4 mai 1988; Tribunal de grande instance de Paris 23 juin 1988' (1988) Rev arb 657. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  192. Fouchard, P., ‘Relationships Between the Arbitrator and the Parties and the Arbitral Institution’, in The Status of the Arbitrator (ICC Ct. Bull. Spec. Supp. 1995) 12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  193. Fouchard, P., ‘La portée international de l’annulation de la sentence arbitrale dans son pays d’origine’ (1997) Rev arb 329. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  194. Fouchard, P., ‘Le statut de l’arbitre dans la jurisprudence francaise’ (1996) Rev arb 325. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  195. Fouchard, P., Gaillard, E., and Goldman, B., Traité de l’arbitrage commercial international (Litec 1996). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  196. Foustoucos, A., ‘Introductory Remarks 867-903’ in Kerameus, K., Kondylis, D., Nikas, Ν., Commentary Article-by-Article of the Code of Civil Procedure, Part II (Sakkoulas, Ant. Sak-koulas, Law and Economy P.N. Sakkoulas 2000) 1635-1639. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  197. Fragistas C., ‘Arbitrage étranger et arbitrage international en droit privé’ (1960) RCDIP 1-20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  198. Froitzheim, O., Die Ablehnung von schiedsrichtern wegen Befagenheit in der internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (Carl Heymanns 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  199. Fry, J., and Greenberg, S., ‘The Arbitral Tribunal: Applications of Articles 7–12 of the ICC Rules in Recent Cases’ (2009) 20 ICC Bulletin 12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  200. Fry, J., Greenberg, S., and Mazza, F., The Secretariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration (ICC 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  201. Gaillard, E., and Bermann, G.A., Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforce-ment of Foreign Arbitral Awards: UNCITRAL Secretariat (Brill Nijhoff 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  202. Gaillard, E., and Savage, J. (eds), Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer 1999). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  203. Gaillard, E., ‘Note-cour de cassation, 6 décembre 2001; Cour d’appel de Paris, 2 avril 2001; cour d’appel de Paris, 16 mai 2002’ (2003) Rev arb 1240. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  204. Gaillard, E., Legal Theory of International Arbitration (Nijhoff 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  205. Gaillard, E., ‘International Arbitration as a Transnational System of Justice’ in van den Berg, A.J. (ed), Arbitration -The Next Fifty Years (2012) 16 ICCA Congress Series 66. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  206. Gaillard, E., and Darrigade, C., ‘France’ in Weigand, F.B. and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 450-502. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  207. Gal, J., Die Haftung des Schiedsrichters in der Internationalen Handelsschiedsgerichtsbar-keit (Mohr Sieback 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  208. Gearing, M., ‘A Judge in his own Cause? Actual or Unconscious Bias?’ (2000) 3 Int. A.L.R. 46. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  209. Gill, J., ‘The IBA Conflicts Guidelines – Who’s Using Them and How?’ (2007) 1 Disp. Res. Int’l 58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  210. Giraldo-Carrillo, N., ‘The ‘Repeat Arbitrators’ Issue: A Subjective Concept’ (2011) 19 Int. Law: Rev. Colomb. Derecho Int. 75. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  211. Girsberger, D., and Voser, N., International Arbitration: Comparative and Swiss Perspectives (3rd edn, Nomos Schulthess 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  212. Girsberger, D., Heini, A., Keller, M., Kostkiewicz, J. K., Siehr, K., Vischer, F., Volken, P. (eds), Zürcher Kommentar zum IPRG, Kommentar zum Bundesgesetz über das Internationale Pri-vatrecht (IPRG) von 18. Dezember 1987 (2nd edn, Zürich 2004) [cited as: author(s), ZK IPRG]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  213. Glossner, O., ‘Sociological Aspects of International Commercial Arbitration’ in Schultz, J.C. and van den Berg, A.J. (eds), The Art of Arbitration: essays on international arbitration, liber ami-corum Pieter Sanders (Deventer Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1982) [cited as: LA Sanders] 143-152. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  214. Goode, R., ‘The Role of the Lex Loci Arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2001) 17 Arb Intl 19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  215. Goode, R., Kronke, H. and Mckendrick E., Transnational Commercial Law: Texts, Cases and Materials (OUP 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  216. Gordon-Vrba, L., and Vock, D., ‘Chapter 3, Part II: Commentary on the Swiss Rules, Article 9 [Independence and challenge of arbitrators, I]’ in Arroyo (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 558-570. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  217. Götz, A., ‘Der Schiedsrichter zwischen Dienstleistungserbringung und Richtertätigkeit – Zur sogenannten Spruchrichterprivileg im System der Schiedrichterhaftung’ (2012) 10 SchiedsVZ 311-17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  218. Greenberg, S., and Feris, J.R., ‘References to the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration when Deciding on Arbitrator Independence in ICC Cases’ (2009) 20 ICC Bulletin 33. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  219. Guinchard, S., ‘L’arbitrage et le respect du principe du contradictoire (à propos de quelques décisions rendues en 1996)’ (1996) Rev arb 185. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  220. Guinchard, S., ‘Indépendence et impartialité du juge. Les principes de droit fundamental’ in van Compernolle, J., and Tarzia, G. (eds), L’impartialité du juge et de l’arbitre. Étude de droit compa-ré (Bruylant 2006) 3-62. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  221. Gusy, M., and Hosking, J. M., A Guide to the ICDR International Arbitration Rules (2nd edn, OUP 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  222. Haas, U., Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer und internationaler Schieds-sprüche (Duncker and Humblot 1991). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  223. Haas, U., ‘Zur formellen und materiellen Wirksamkeit des Schiedsvertrages’ (1993) IPRAx 382. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  224. Haas, U., ‘Part 3: Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958’, in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 399-538. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  225. Haas, U., ‘The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’, in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 399-540. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  226. Haas, U., ‘Vertraulichkeit in Zusammenhang mit Schiedsverfahren’, in Geimer, R., and Schütze, R. (eds), Recht ohne Grenzen: Festschrift für Athanassios Kaissis zum 65. Geburtstag (Sellier European Law Publishers 2012) [cited as: FS Kaissis] 315-332. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  227. Haas, U., and Kahlert, H., ‘New York Convention’ in Weigand, F.B. and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 1572-1777. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  228. Habscheid, W., ‘Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Europäische Menschenrechtskommission’ in Gerhardt, W., Rimmelspacher, B., Diederichsen, U. and Costede, J. (eds), Festschrift für Wolf-ram Henckel zum 70. Geburtstag (Walter de Gruyter 1995) [cited as: FS Henckel] 341-352. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  229. Hahnkamper, W., ‘Chapter II: The Arbitrator and the Arbitration Procedure, Bias, Conflict and Challenge of Arbitrators, and their Duty to Disclose: Austrian Supreme Court Decisions in the period 2006-2016’ in Klausegger, C., Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz,N., Welser I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2017) Austrian YB 91-103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  230. Hammond, N.G.L., ‘Arbitration in Ancient Greece’ (1985) 1 Arb Intl 188. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  231. Hanefeld, I., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy Imposed by European Mandatory Law’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 401-417. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  232. Hanefeld, I., and Wittinghofer, M. A., ‘Schiedsklauseln in Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen’ (2005) SchiedsVZ 217. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  233. Hanotiau, B., ‘The 2014 IBA Revised Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitra-tion: Objectives and Challenges’ in Cox, K., Carpasse, O., de Ly, F., et al. (eds), Opening the Black Box of Conflicts of Interest (NAI Cepani bruylant 2016) 157-172. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  234. Hanotiau, B., and Caprasse, O., ‘Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration’ in Gaillard and di Pietro (eds), Enforcement of Arbitration agreements and International Arbitral Awards – The New York Convention in Practice (Cameron May 2008) 787-828. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  235. Hanusch, P., ‘Chapter II: The Arbitrator- Challenge of Arbitrators Under the New Austrian Arbi-tration Act’ in Klausegger, C. Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser, I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2007) Austrian YB 59. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  236. Harris, B., Planterose, R. and Tecks, J. (eds), The Arbitration Act 1996: A Commentary (5th edn, wiley 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  237. Hascher, D., ‘ICC Practice in Relation to the Appointment, Confirmation, Challenge and Re-placement of Arbitrators’ (1995) 6 ICC Bulletin 4. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  238. Hascher, D., ‘A Comparison between the Independence of State Justice and the Independence of arbitration’, in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 77. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  239. Hascher, D., ‘Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators: 3 Issues’ (2012) 27 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 789. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  240. Hausmaninger, C., ‘Civil Liability of Arbitrators – Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Re-form’ (1990) 7 J Intl Arb 7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  241. Hausmaninger, C., ‘Rights and Obligations of the Arbitrator with Regard to the Parties and the Arbitral Institution – A Civil Law Viewpoint’ in The Status of the Arbitrator (ICC Ct. Bull. Spec. Supp. 1995) 36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  242. Henry, M., ‘Les obligations d’indépendence et d’information de l’arbitre à la lumière de la juris-prudence récente’ (1999) Rev arb 193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  243. Henry, M., Le devoir d’impartialité de l’arbitre (LGDJ 2001). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  244. Henry, M., ‘Note-Cour d’appel de Paris. 29 janvier 2004; Cour d’appel de Paris, 10 février 2005; Cour d’appel de Paris; 17 février 2005; Tribunal de commerce de Paris, 6 juillet 2004’ (2005) Rev arb 720. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  245. Henry, M., ‘Indépendence et impartialité de l’arbitre: la Cour d’appel de Paris tire les enseigne-ments de l’arrêt Tecso de la Cour de cassation, note sous Paris, Pole 1 - Ch. 1, 2 juillet 2013’ (2013) Rev arb 1038. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  246. Henry, M., ‘Le chant de la rélévation: de profundis ou gloria de l’arbitrage?, note sous Paris, Pole 1- Ch. 1, 14 octobre 2014’ (2015) Rev arb 156. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  247. Henry, M., ‘En matière de révélation, la production d’une declaration vaut toujours mieux que l’abstention, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 31 mars 2016’ (2016) Rev arb 168. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  248. Henry, M., ‘La connaissance en arbitre de l’indépendance et l’impartialité, note Cass civ 1re, 16 décembre 2015’ (2016) Rev arb 538. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  249. Henry, M., ‘Tecnimont 2016: le devoir de réaction à l’ aune d’un arrêt réactionnaire, note sous Paris, Pole 1- Ch. 1,12 avril 2016’ (2017) Rev arb 955. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  250. Henry, M., Tecnimont 6: l’indépendance de l’arbitre sacrifiée de guerre lasse, note sous Cass. civ. 1re, 19 décembre 2018 (2020) Rev arb 409. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  251. Hermann, G., ‘The Role of the Courts under the UNCITRAL Model Law’ in Lew J., Contempo-rary Problems in International Arbitration (Springer 1987) 164-175. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  252. Hess, B., ‘Sportschiedsgerichte im Lichte der New York Convention’ (1998) 4 ZZPint 457. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  253. Hess, B., ‘L’ impartialité du juge en droit allemand’ in van Compernolle, J. and Tarzia, G. (eds), L’ impartialité du juge et de l’ arbitre- Étude de droit comparé (Bruylant 2006) 157-177. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  254. Hess, B., ‘Prozessuale Mindestgarantien in der Verbraucherschlichtung’ (2015) JZ 548. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  255. Hess, B., The Private-Public Divide in International Dispute Resolution (The Hague Academy of International Law 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  256. Hess, B., Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht (De Gruyter 2021). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  257. Higgins, F., Brown, W., and Roach, P., ‘Pitfalls in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1980) 35 The Business Lawyer 1035. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  258. Hirsch, A., ‘Les arbitres peuvent-ils connaître les avocats des parties?’ (1990) 8 ASA Bull 7. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  259. Hodges, P., ‘Equality of Arms in International Arbitration: Who is the Best Arbiter of Fairness in the Conduct of Proceedings’ in Menaker, A. (ed), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity (2017) 19 ICCA Congress Series 599-633. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  260. Hoffet, F., Rechtliche Beziehungen zwischen Schiedsrichtern und Parteien (Schulthess Poly-graphischer 1991). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  261. Hoffmann, A.K., ‘Duty of Disclosure and Challenge of Arbitrators: The Standard Applicable Un-der the New IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest and the German Approach’ (2005) 21 Arb Intl 427. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  262. Hoffmann, B., ‘Der international Schiedsrichtervertrag - eine kollisionsrechtliche Skizze’ in Plan-tey, A., Böckstiegel, K.H., and Bredow, J. (eds), Festschrift für Ottoarndt Glossner zum 70. Geburtstag (Recht und Wirtschaft 1994) [cited as: FS Glossner] 143-153. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  263. Hollander, P., ‘Arbitrators’ Bias Because of Previous Appointments: A Civil Law Perspective’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  264. Hollander, P., ‘Aspects de droit international privé (européen) du contrat de l’arbitre et du con-trat d’organisation d’arbitre’ (2013) 2 b-arbitra 405. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  265. Holtzmann, H.M., and Neuhaus, J. F., A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary (Kluwer 1989). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  266. Honsell, H., Vogt, N.P., Schnyder, A.K., and Berti S.(eds), Basler Kommentar, Internationales Privatrecht (3rd edn., Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag 2013) [cited as: BSK IPRG-author(s)]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  267. Hortoğlu, Y. ‘The Law Governing the Liability of Arbitrators’ in Ferrari, F. and Kröll, S. (eds), Conflict of Laws in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2019) 531-83. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  268. Hunter, M., and Paulsson, J., ‘A Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbi-tration’ (1985) 19 Int'l Bus. Law 153. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  269. Hunter, M., ‘Ethics of the International Arbitrator’ (1986) 4 ASA Bull 173. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  270. Hunter, M., and Philip, A., ‘The Duties of an Arbitrator’ in Newman, L.W. and Hill, R. D. (eds), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (3rd ed, Juris 2014) 477- 490. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  271. Hwang, M., ‘Arbitrators and Barristers in the Same Chambers, A Unsuccessful Challenge’ (2005) 6 Bus. L. Int’l 235. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  272. Hwang, M., and Chan, A., ‘Enforcement and Setting Aside of International Arbitral Awards’ in van den Berg, A.J. (ed), International Arbitration and National Courts: The Never Ending Story (Kluwer 2001) 145-164. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  273. Illmer, M., ‘H. International Arbitration in England and Wales’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analy-sis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 358-413. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  274. Inderkum, H., Der Schiedsrichtervertrag nach dem Recht der nicht internationalen Schiedsge-richtsbarkeit der Schweiz unter Mitberücksichtigung der Schiedsordnung des IPRG (PhD the-sis, Fribourg 1988). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  275. Inoue, O., ‘The Due Process Defense to Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in United States Federal Courts: A Proposal for a Standard’ (2000) Am. Rev. Int’l Arb. 247. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  276. Jacot-Guillarmod, O., ‘L’arbitrage privé face à l’ article 6 § 1 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’ homme’ in Matscher, F. and Petzold, H. (eds), Protecting Human Rights: The Eu-ropean Dimension, Protection des droits de l ‘homme: la dimension européenne, Mélanges en l’ honneur de Gérard J. Wiarda (Heymanns 1988) 281-294. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  277. Jacquet, J. M., ‘La lex arbitrii dans l’arbitrage commercial international : Mythe ou réalité’ in Al-land, D., Chetail, V., de Frouville, O., and Vinuales, J.E. (eds), Unité et diversité du droit inter-national, Écrits en l’honneur de Pierre-Marie Dupuy (Martinus Nijhoff 2014) 669-688. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  278. Jaeger, L., ‘Obligation de révélation: la fin de l’approche subjective, note sous Paris, Ch. Com. Int., Pôle 5 – Ch. 16, 25 février 2020’ (2020) Rev arb 511. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  279. Jaisli Kull, N., and Roth, A., ‘Challenging Arbitrators for Lack of Independence or Impartiality: Procedural Pitfalls from a Swiss Perspective’ in Klausegger, C., Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2019) Austrian YB 223-48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  280. Jaksic, A., ‘Procedural Guarantees of Human Rights in Arbitration Proceedings’ (2007) 24 J Intl Arb 159. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  281. Jana, A. L., Armer, A., and Kranenberg, J. K., ‘Article V(1)(b)’ in Kronke H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 231-256. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  282. Jarrosson, C., La notion d’arbitrage (Thèse, Université de Droit, D’ Economie et de Sciences Sociales de Paris 1985). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  283. Jarrosson, C., ‘Sixième colloque C.C.I.-C.I.R.D.I.-A.AA. la procédure arbitrale et l’ indépen-dence des arbitres’ (1988) Rev arb 748. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  284. Jarrosson, C., ‘L’arbitrage et la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme’ (1989) Rev Arb 573. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  285. Jarosson, C., ‘Note-22 janvier 2009, Cour d’appel de Paris (1re Ch. C)’ (2010) Rev arb 320. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  286. Jarosson, C., and Pellerin, J., ‘Le droit français de l'arbitrage après le décret du 13 janvier 2011’ (2011) Rev arb 5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  287. Jarosson, C., ‘A propos de l’obligation de révélation: une leçon de méthode de la Cour de cas-sation, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 10 octobre 2012’ (2013) Rev arb 130. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  288. Jarvin, S., ‘Irregularity in the Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal and the Arbitral Procedure’, in Gaillard, E. and di Petro, D. (eds), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice (Cameron May 2009) 729-756. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  289. Jauernig, O., and Hess, B., Zivilprozessrecht (30th edn, C.B. Beck 2011). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  290. Jourdan - Marques, J., ‘Chronique d’arbitrage: la fin de la saga Tecnimont’ Dalloz actualité, 29 November 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  291. Kaissis, A., The Annulment of Arbitral Awards (Sakkoulas 1989) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  292. Kaissis, A., Aspects of Public Policy in the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (Sakkoulas 2003) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  293. Kaissis, A., ‘Dissenting Opinions in International Arbitration’ in Schütze, R. (ed), Fairness, Jus-tice, Equity: Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer zum 80. Geburtstag (C.H. Beck 2017) [cited as: FS Geimer] 279-301. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  294. Kaissis, A., ‘Awards Set Aside in Their Country of Origin. Two Incompatible Schools of Thought’ in Benicke, C. and Huber, S. (eds), National, International, Transnational: Harmonischer Drei-klang im Recht (Gieseking Verlag 2020) [cited as: FS Kronke] 1433-1450. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  295. Kantor, M., ‘Arbitrator Disclosure and a Duty to Investigate?’ in Huber, S. and Sheppard, B. (eds), AAA Yearbook on Arbitration & the Law (23rd edn, Juris 2011) 327-344. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  296. Kapeliuk, D., ‘The Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators’ (2010) 96 Cornell Law Rev 47. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  297. Karrer, P., ‘Responsibility of Arbitrators and Arbitral Institutions’ in Newman, L.W. and Hill, R.D. (eds), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (JurisNet 2008) 607-620. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  298. Karrer, P., ‘Responsibility of Arbitrators and Arbitral Institutions’ in Newman, L.W. and Hill, R.D. (eds), The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (JurisNet 2014) 161-74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  299. Karrer, P., ‘Switzerland’ in Weigand, F.B. and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 826-885. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  300. Kastanidis, A., Action for Negative Declaratory Relief under the Greek and the European Pro-cedural Law (Sakkoulas 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  301. Kaufmann-Kohler, G., ‘Soft Law in International Arbitration: Codification and Normativity’ (2010) 1 JIDS 283. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  302. Kaufmann-Kohler, G., and Rigozzi, A., Arbitrage international. Droit et pratique à la lumière de la LDIP (2nd edn, Weblaw 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  303. Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Rigozzi, A., International Arbitration: Law and Practice in Switzer-land (OUP 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  304. Kendall, J., ‘Barristers, Independence and Disclosure’ (1992) 8 Arb Intl 287. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  305. Kendall, J., ‘Barristers, Independence and Disclosure Revisited’ (2000) 16 Arb Intl 343. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  306. Kerameus, K., ‘Greece’ in Shetreet, S. and Deschênes, J. (eds), Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate (Martinus Nijhoff 1985) 123-140. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  307. Kerameus, K., ‘Waiver of Setting-Aside Procedures in International Arbitration’ (1993) 41 Am. J. Comp. L. 73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  308. Kerameus, K., Kondylis, D. and Nikas, N., Commentary Article-by-Article of the Code of Civil Procedure, Part II (Sakkoulas, Ant. Sakkoulas, Law and Economy P.N. Sakkoulas 2000). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  309. Kerameus, K., Studia Iuridica V (Sakkoulas 2008). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  310. Kerameus, N., ‘The Institution of Third-Party Funding of Litigation or Arbitration Cases’ (2012) Greek Business and Company Law Review 915 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  311. Kessedjan, C., ‘Principe de la contradiction et arbitrage’ (1995) Rev arb 381. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  312. Kessedjian, C., ‘Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration: What are Mandatory Rules?’ (2007) 18 Am. Rev. Int’l Arb. 147. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  313. Kessedjian, C., ‘Le tiers impartial et indépendant en droit international Juge, arbitre, médiateur, conciliateur: cours général de droit international (Volume 403)’ in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law <http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_A9789004424685_02> 2 April 2021. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  314. King, B., ‘Party Autonomy, the “Right to Appoint, and the Rise of Strategic Challenges’, in Ferra-ri F. (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris 2016) 42-48. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  315. Kleiman, E., and Dehaudt-Delville Y., ‘Independence and impartiality: Supreme Court confirms stern approach to duty of disclose’ <https://www.internationallawoffice.com/Newsletters/Arbitration-ADR/France/Freshfields-Bruckhaus-Deringer-LLP/Independence-and-impartiality-Supreme-Court-confirms-stern-approach-to-duty-of-disclosure> accessed 27 november 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  316. Klein, F.E., ‘Autonomie de la volonté et arbitrage’ (1958) RCDIP 255. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  317. Kleinschmidt, J., Der Verzicht im Schuldrecht. Vertragsprinzip und einseitiges Rechtsge-schäft im deutschen und US-amerikanischen Recht (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2004). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  318. Knigge, M., and Ribbers, P., ‘Waiver of the Right to Set-Aside Proceedings in Light of Article 6 ECHR: Party-Autonomy on Top?’ (2017) 34 J Intl Arb 775. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  319. Knoll, J., ‘Art. 45 Exclusion of Liability’ in Zuberbühler, T., Müller, C., and Habegger, P. (eds), Swiss Rules of International Arbitration (2nd edn, Juris Schulthess 2013) 484-92. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  320. Koch, C., ‘Standards and Procedures for Disqualifying Arbitrators’ (2003) 20 J Intl Arb 325. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  321. Konrad, S., and Hunter, R., ‘LCIA Rules’ in Schütze, R. (ed), Institutional Arbitration: Article-by-Article Commentary (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2013) 413-500. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  322. Korland, L., ‘What an Arbitrator Should Investigate and Disclose: Proposing a New Test for Evi-dent Partiality under the Federal Arbitration Act’ (2003) 53 Case W. Res. L.Rev. 815. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  323. Kornblum, U., Probleme der schiedsrichterlichen Unabhängigkeit (C.H. Beck 1968). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  324. Kornblum, U., ‘Ordre public transnational, ordre public international und ordre public interne im Recht der privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit’ in Habscheid, W.J. and Schwab, K.H. (eds), Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrensrecht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit: Festschrift für Heinrich Nagel (Aschendorff Münster 1987) [cited as: FS Nagel] 140-156. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  325. Koussoulis, S., Arbitration, Commentary Article-by-Article (Sakkoulas 2004) (in Greek). eng Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  326. Koussoulis, S., Arbitration Law (Sakkoulas 2006) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  327. Krausz, N., ‘Waiver of Appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal: Recent Evolution of the Case Law and Compatibility with ECHR, Article 6’ (2011) 28 Arb Intl 137. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  328. Kreindler, R., ‘Impending Revision of the ICC Arbitration Rules: Opportunities and Hazards for Experienced and Inexperienced Users Alike’ (1996) 13 J Intl Arb 45-113. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  329. Kreindler, R. and Dimsey, M., ‘Chapter II: The Arbitrator and the Arbitration Procedure, The Applicable Law and Procedural Issues: Conceptions, Preconceptions and Misconceptions’ in Klausegger, C. Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2015) Austrian YB 149-168. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  330. Kreindler, R., Wolff, R., and Rieder, M.S., Commercial Arbitration in Germany (OUP 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  331. Kröll, M. S., ‘Party Pursuing Bias Claim Against Arbitrator Must Do So at Place of Arbitration, German Supreme Court Rules’ (2002) 17 Mealey’s I.A.R. 34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  332. Kröll, M. S., ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Germany’ (2002) 5 Int. A.L.R. 160. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  333. Kröll, M. S., ‘Die Schiedsvereinbarung im Verfahren zur Anerkennung und Vollstreckbarerklä-rung ausländischer Schiedssprüche’ (2004) 117 ZZP 453. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  334. Kröll, M. S., ‘Germany: German Court Dismisses Challenge of an Arbitrator’ (2007) 10 Int.A.L.R. N-48-49. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  335. Kröll, M. S., ‘Part II: Commentary on the German Arbitration Law, Chapter VIII: Recognition and Enforcement of Awards, Introduction to § 1060, 1061 ZPO’ in Nacimiento, P., Kröll, M. S. et al. (eds), Arbitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 421-427. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  336. Kröll, M. S., ‘Part II: Commentary on the German Arbitration Law, Chapter VIII: Recognition and Enforcement of Awards, § 1061- Foreign Awards’ in Nacimiento, P. Kröll, M.S., et al. (eds), Ar-bitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 443-504. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  337. Kröll, M.S. and Kraft, P., ‘Part II: Commentary on the German Arbitration Law, Chapter VII: Re-course against the Award, § 1059 - Application for Setting Aside’ in Nacimiento, P., Kröll, M.S., et al. (eds), Arbitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 383-420. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  338. Krüger, W., and Rauscher, T. (eds), Münchener Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordung (C.H. Beck 2017) [cited as: MüKoZPO/ author(s)]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  339. Kunz, C., ‘Waiver of Right to Challenge an International Arbitral Award is Not Incompatible with ECHR: Tabbane v Switzerland’ (2016) 5 EIAR 125. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  340. Kurkela, M., and Turunen, S., Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, OUP 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  341. Kuty, F., L’impartialité du juge en procédure pénale: de la confiance décrétée à la confiance justifiée (Larcier 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  342. Lachmann, J.P., ‘Gedanken zur Schiedsrichterablehnung aufgrund Sozietätszugehörigkeit‘ in Schütze, R. (ed), Einheit und Vielfalt des Rechts: Festschrift für Reinhold Geimer zum 65 Geburtstag (C.H. Beck 2002) [cited as: FS Geimer] 513-528. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  343. Lachmann, J. P., Handbuch für die Schiedsgerichtspraxis (Schmidt 2008). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  344. Lalive, P., ‘On the neutrality of arbitrators and the place of arbitration’, in Reymond, C., and Bucher, E. (eds), Swiss Essays on International Arbitration (Schulthess 1984) 23-33. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  345. Lalive, P., ‘Transnational (or Truly National) Public Policy and International Arbitration’ (1987) 3 ICCA Congress Series 258. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  346. Lalive, P., ‘Sur l’impartialité de l’arbitre international en Suisse’ (1990) SJ 362. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  347. Lalive, P., ‘Sur le irresponsabilité de l’arbitre’ in Haldy, J., Rapp, J.M., Ferrari, P. (eds), Études de procedure et d’arbitrage en l’honneur de Jean-François (Université. De Lausanne 1999) [cited as: FS Poudret] 419-435. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  348. Lalive, P., ‘Note – Cour d’appel de Paris (1re Ch. A) 15 Septembre 1998 – Société Cubic De-fense Systems Inc v. Chambre de commerce internationale’ (1999) Rev arb 113. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  349. Lalive, P., Poudret, J.F., and Reymond, C., Le droit de l ‘arbitrage interne et international en Suisse (Payot Lausanne 1989). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  350. Lambert, P., ‘Les procédures d’arbitrage et la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme’ in Présence du droit public et des droits de l’homme, Mélanges à Jacques Velu (Bruylant 1992) 1981-1291. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  351. Landau, T., ‘Composition and Establishment of the Tribunal’ (1998) 9 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  352. Lawson, A. D., ‘Advance Waivers on Future Conflicts of Interest: Financial Self-Interest Mus-cling a Principle Aside’ (2017) 14 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  353. Lawson, D., ‘Impartiality and Independence of International Arbitrators - Commentary on the 2004 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2005) 23 ASA Bull 22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  354. Le Bars, B., and Juvénal, J., ‘La révélation d'un courant d' affaires: comment apprécier l' indé-pendance de l'arbitre?’ (2010) JCP 1306. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  355. Le Bars, B., ‘Obligation de révélation des liens de l’arbitre avec l’avocat d’une des parties: il va falloir attendre encore un peu’ (2012) JCP 1268. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  356. Leaua C., ‘The Applicability of Party Autonomy in the Appointment of Arbitrators’ in Bêlohlávek A., and Rozenhnalová, N. (eds), CYArb: Party Autonomy versus Autonomy of Arbitrators (LexLata 2012) 134-50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  357. Leemann, M., ‘Challenging International Arbitration Awards in Switzerland on the Grounds of Lack of Independence and Impartiality of an Arbitrator’ (2011) 29 ASA Bull 10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  358. Levine, J., ‘Dealing with Arbitrator ‘Issue Conflicts’ in International Arbitration’ (2006) 61 Disp Resol. Int’l 60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  359. Levine, M., ‘The Immunity of Arbitrators and the Duty to Disclose’ (1995) 6 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 197. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  360. Lévy, L., and Bonnan, R., ‘Third-party funding. Disclosure, Joinder and Impact on Arbitral Pro-ceedings’ in Cremandes, B.M., and Dimolitsa, A. (eds), Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2013) 78-94. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  361. Lew, J., ‘The Law Applicable to the Form and Substance of the Arbitration Clause’ in Albert van den Berg, Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Appli-cation of the New York Convention, (1999) 9 ICCA Congress Series 114-145. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  362. Lew, J., ‘The Tribunal’s Rights and Duties: Why They Should Be More Involved in the Arbitral Process’ in Hanotiau, B. and Mourre, A. (eds), Players’ Interaction in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2012) 49-66. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  363. Lew, J., Mistelis, L., et al., Comparative International Commercial Law (Kluwer 2003). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  364. Liebscher, C., ‘Note-Cour Suprême d’autriche OGH 28 avril 1998- H GmbH v. HON’ (1999) Rev arb 395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  365. Liebscher, C., ‘Preliminary Remarks’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recogni-tion and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 – Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Liebscher, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Prel. Rem. para] 1-24. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  366. Lionnet, K., and Lionnet, A., Handbuch der internationalen und nationalen Schiedsgerichts-barkeit (Boorberg 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  367. Lionnet, K., ‘The Arbitrator’s Contract’ (1999) 15 Arb. Intl 161. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  368. Litina, E., ‘Independence and Impartiality of Maritime Arbitrators: Safeguards for the Reliability and Efficiency of Maritime Arbitration’ (2021) 18 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  369. Livingstone, M. L., ‘Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration: Popular Fallacy or Proven Fact’ (2008) 25 J Intl Arb 529. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  370. Llhyung, L., ‘Practice and Predicament: The Nationality of the International Arbitrator (with Sur-vey Results)’ (2008) 31 Ford. Int'l L.J. 603. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  371. Loquin, E., ‘L'obligation faite à l'arbitre de révéler les liens existant entre l'une des parties à l'ar-bitrage et la structure dans laquelle il exerce sa profession d'avocat’, in Abdel, R.M., Leboulan-ger, P., and Ziadé, N.G. (eds), From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration Festschrift Ahmed Sadeck El Kosheri (Kluwer 2015) [cited as: FS El Kosheri] 73-84. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  372. Loquin, E., ‘Les garanties de l’arbitrage’ in L’arbitrage: une question d’ actualité (2003) 197 LPA 13. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  373. Loquin, E., ‘La dualité des fonctions de l’obligation de révélation’ in Bureau, D. and Drummond, F. (eds), Liber amicorum Philippe Merle (Dalloz 2013) [cited as: LA Merle ] 487-499. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  374. Loquin, E., ‘L'obligation faite à l'arbitre de révéler les liens existant entre l'une des parties à l'ar-bitrage et la structure dans laquelle il exerce sa profession d'avocat’, in Abdel, R.M., Leboulan-ger, P. and Ziadé, N.G. (eds), From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration Festschrift Ahmed Sadeck El Kosheri (Kluwer 2015) [cited as: FS El Kosheri] 73-84. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  375. Loquin, E., L’arbitrage du commerce international (Joly éditions 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  376. Loquin, E., ‘La notoriété du fait non rélévé par l’arbitre’ (2016) RTD com 699. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  377. Loquin, E., ‘Arbitrage-La décision arbitrale-Voies de recours’ (2016) J-Cl. Pr. civ 1046. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  378. Loquin, E., ‘Autour de l’obligation de révélation, note sous Paris, Pôle 1- Ch. 1, 12 avril 2016’ (2017) Rev arb 240. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  379. Loquin, E., ‘L’ éssor de l’ obligation de curiosité ’ (2017) RTD com. 842 = (2018) JDI 149. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  380. Lotz, B., ‘Die Unparteilichkeit und Unabhängigkeit des parteiernannten Schiedsrichters’ (2002) AnwBl. 202. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  381. Lowenfeld, A., 'The Party-Appointed Arbitrator in International Controversies: Some Reflections' (1995) 30 Tex. Int’l. L. J. 59-69. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  382. Mankowski, P., ‘Die Ablehnung von Schiedsrichten’ (2004) SchiedsVZ 304. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  383. Mann, F. A., ‘Lex Facit Arbitrum’ in Sanders, P. (ed), International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Mar-tin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff 1967) 157-183. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  384. Mann, F. A., ‘Schiedsricher und Recht’ in Heinrich Jacobs, H., Knobbe-Keuk, B., Picker, E. and Wilhelm, J. (eds), Festschrift für Werner Flume zum 70. Geburtstag 12. Sep. 1978 (Otto Schmidt 1978) [cited as: FS Flume] 593-620. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  385. Marguerat, J., ‘Art 9, Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators’ in Zuberbühler, T., Müller, C., and Habegger, P. (eds), Swiss Rules of International Arbitration (2nd edn, Juris Schulthess 2013) 122-139. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  386. Marguerat, J., ‘Indépendence et impartialité de l’arbitre: le devoir de révéler de l’arbitre éclipsé’ Jusletter, 15 April 2013. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  387. Maridakis, G. S., The Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards according to Greek Law (1970). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  388. Martin Fletcher, N. H., ‘Halliburton Company v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Company, M, N & P [2018] EWCA Civ. 817, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, Civil Division, Case No. A3/2017/0623, 19 April 2018’ A Contribution by the ITA Board of Reporters, Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  389. Matray, D., and van den Berg, A. J., ‘L’indépendance et l’impartialité de l’arbitre’ (2008) 5 TDM 85 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  390. Matscher, F., ‘L'arbitrage et la Convention, article 6 (suite)’, in Pettiti, L.A., Decaux, E. and Im-bert, P.H. (eds), La Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. Commentaire article par article (Economica 1995) 281-292. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  391. Matscher, F., ‘Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und EMRK’ in Habscheid, W. and Schwab, K. H., Beiträge zum Internationalen Verfahrensrecht und zur Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Festschrift für Heinrich Nagel (Aschendorff Münster 1987) 227-245. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  392. Mavromati, D., and Reeb, M., The Code of the Court of Arbitration for Sport: Commentary, Cases and Materials (Kluwer 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  393. Mayer, P., ‘Le principe de bonne foi devant les arbitres du commerce international’ in Dominicé, C., Patry, R., and Reymond, C., Études de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Helbing and Lichtenhahn 1993) [cited as: LA Lalive] 543-556. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  394. Mayer, P., and Sheppard, A., ‘Final ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of In-ternational Arbitral Awards’ (2003) 19 Arb Intl 249. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  395. Mayer, P., ‘La Liberté de l ‘arbitre’ (2013) Rev arb 339. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  396. Maynard, S., ‘Laying the Fourth Arbitrator to Rest: Re-evaluating the Regulation of Arbitral Sec-retaries’ (2018) 34 Arb Intl 173. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  397. McKendrick, E., ‘Chapter 4: Arbitrations, Multiple References and Apparent Bias: A Case Study of Halliburton Co v. Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (2018)’ in Calissendorff, A. and Schöldstrom, P. (eds), (2019) 1 Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook Series 55-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  398. McLean, D. J., and Wilson, S. P., ‘Is Three A Crowd? Neutrality, Partiality and Partisanship in the Context of Tripartite Arbitrations’ (2008) 9 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  399. Meier, A., and Gerhardt, L., ‘The Arbitral Tribunal, Article 9: Impartiality and Independence of the Arbitrators, Duties of Disclosure’ in Flecke-Giammarco, Boog, C., et al. (eds), The DIS Arbi-tration Rules – An Article-by-Article Commentary (Kluwer 2020) 177-193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  400. Menétrey, S., ‘Conflits d’intérêts et contrôle de l’impartialité de l’arbitre’ in Saletti, A., van Com-pernolle, J., van Drooghenbroeck, J.F. (eds), L’arbitre et le juge étatique: Études de droit comparé à la mémoire de Giuseppe Tarzia (Bruylant 2014) 447-463. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  401. Menétrey, S., ‘Dialogues et communications entre juges : pour un pluralisme dialogal’ in Me-nétrey, S. and Hess, B. (eds), Les dialogues des juges en Europe (Larcier 2014) 115-127. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  402. Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Ethics Issues in Arbitration and Related Dispute Resolution Processes: What’s Happening and What’s Not’ (2002) 56 U. Miami L.Rv. 949. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  403. Menon, S., ‘Adjudicator, Advocate, or Something in Between? Coming to Terms with the Role of the Party-appointed Arbitrator’ (2017) 34 J Intl Arb 347. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  404. Merjian, A., ‘Caveat Arbitor: Laker Airways and the Appointment of Barristers as Arbitrators in Cases Involving Barrister - Advocates from the Same Chambers’ (2000) 17 J Intl Arb 31. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  405. Merkin, R., and Flannery, L., Arbitration Act 1996 (5th edn, informa law 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  406. Mezghani, A., and Arnaldez, J.J., ‘Les décisions des institutions arbitrales relatives aux récusa-tions et le sort de la sentence devant le juge de l’annulation, note sous Cass. Civ. 1re, 25 juin 2014’ (2015) Rev arb 88. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  407. Michelakis, E., The Object of Evidence (Ant. Sakkoulas 1944) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  408. Mistelis, L., ‘Reality Test: Current State of Affairs in Theory and Practice Relating to ‘’Lex ar-bitri’’’ (2006) 17 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb 155. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  409. Mitsopoulos, G., Civil Procedure, vol 1 (Ant. Sakkoulas 1972). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  410. Moitry, J. H., ‘Right to a Fair Trial and the European Convention on Human Rights: Some Re-marks on the République de Guinée Case’ (1989) 6 J Intl Arb 115. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  411. Moses, M., ‘Inherent and Implied Powers of Arbitrators’ Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-2015 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2501046##> accessed 5 June 2017. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  412. Moses, M., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, CUP 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  413. Mourre, A., ‘Conflict Disclosures: The IBA Guidelines and Beyond’ in Brekoulakis, S., Lew, J., et al. (eds), The Evolution and Future of International Arbitration (Kluwer 2016) 357-364. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  414. Müller, C., International Arbitration (Schmidt, Bruylant, Schulthess 2004). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  415. Mullerat, R., ‘Arbitrators’ Conflicts of Interest Revisited: A Contribution to the Revision of the Excellent IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2010) 4 Disp. Re-sol. Int’l 55. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  416. Mullerat R., ‘The IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest Revisited Another Contribution to the Revision of an Excellent Instrument, Which Needs a Slight Daltonism Treatment’ (2012) 2012 CEA 61. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  417. Musielak, H.J., and Voit, W., ZPO Zivilprozessordnung (Vahlen 2018) [Musielak/ Voit/ author ZPO, § para]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  418. Mutis Tellez, F., ‘Arbitrator’s Independence and Impartiality: A Review of SCC Board Decisions on Challenges to Arbitrators (2010-2012)’ <http://sccinstitute.se/media/30001/felipe-mutis-tellez_article-on-scc-challenges-on-arbitrators.pdf > accessed 22 November 2018. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  419. Mystill, M. J., ‘Transnational Arbitration in English Law’ (1984) 37 Current Legal Problems 133. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  420. Nacimiento, P., ‘Article V(1)(a)’, in Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and En-forcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 205-230. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  421. Nacimiento, P., ‘Article V(1)(d)’, in Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and En-forcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 281-300. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  422. Nagel, H., and Gottwald, P., Internationales Zivilprozessrecht (6th edn, Dr Otto Schmidt 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  423. Naon, H. A.G., ‘Factors to Consider in Choosing an Efficient Arbitrator’ in van den Berg, Improv-ing the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention (1999) 9 ICCA Congress Series 286-313. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  424. Nazzini, R. ‘Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards: Res Judicata, Issues Estoppel, and Abuse of Process in a Transnational Context’ (2018) 66 Am. J. Com. L. 603. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  425. Nesbitt, S., and Darowski, M., ‘LCIA Arbitration Rules, Article 5’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 480-486. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  426. Nicholas, G, and Partasides, C, ‘LCIA Court Decisions on Challenges to Arbitrators: A Proposal to Publish’ (2007) 23 Arb Intl 1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  427. Niedermaier, T., ‘S. International Arbitration in the U.S.’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analy-sis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 766- 802. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  428. Nikas, N., Civil Procedure, Part II (Sakkoulas 2005) (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  429. Noth, M., and Haas, U., ‘Chapter 15, Part II: Commentary on the CAS Procedural Rules, Article R33 [Independence and qualifications of arbitrators] in Arroyo, M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzer-land: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 1468-1476. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  430. Nueber, M., and Zeiler, G., ‘D. International Arbitration in Austria’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), Interna-tional Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Comparative Analysis (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 231-259. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  431. Öhrström, M., ‘Decisions by the SCC Institute Regarding Challenge of Arbitrators’ (2002) Band I Stockholm Arb. Rep. 35. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  432. Orelli, M., ‘Chapter 2, Part II: Commentary on Chapter 12 PILS, Article 180 [Arbitral Tribunal: challenge to an arbitrator]’ in Arroyo M. (ed), Arbitration in Switzerland: The Practitioner’s Guide (2nd edn, Kluwer 2018) 114-128. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  433. Osmanoglu, B., ‘Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitrator Con-flict of Interest’ (2015) 32 J Intl Arb 325. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  434. Palmer, S., ‘Repeat Arbitrators: Why Are They an Issue?’ (2016) 4 EIAR 17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  435. Pamboukis, H., Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention (Nomiki Vivliothiki 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  436. Park, W., ‘The Lex Loci Arbitri and International Commercial Arbitration’ (1983) 32 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  437. Park, W., ‘Rectitude in International Arbitration’ (2011) 27 Arb Intl 473. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  438. Park, W., ‘A Fair Right: Professional Guidelines in International Arbitration’ (2014) 30 Arb Intl 409. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  439. Partasides, C., ‘The Fourth Arbitrator? The Role of Secretaries to Tribunals in International Arbi-tration’ (2002) 18 Arb Intl 147. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  440. Patocchi, P.M., and Geisinger, E., Internationales Privatrecht (Orell Füssli 2000). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  441. Paulsson, J., ‘Arbitration Unbound: An Award Detached from the Law of Its Country of Origin’ (1981) 30 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 358. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  442. Paulsson, J., ‘Ethics, Elitism, Eligibility’ (1997) 14 J Intl Arb 13. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  443. Paulsson, J., ‘Moral Hazard in International Dispute Resolution’ (2010) 25 ICSID Rev 339-55. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  444. Paulsson, J., The Idea of Arbitration (OUP 2013). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  445. Paulsson, M., The 1958 New York Convention in Action (Kluwer 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  446. Pearson, N., ‘Nationalité et attaches de l’arbitre’ (1970) Rev arb 239. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  447. Pech, L., ‘VII. Article 47-Right to an Effective Remedy’ Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J. and Ward, A. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, A Commentary (C.H. Beck, Hart, No-mos 2014) 1250-1258. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  448. Petrochilos, G., Procedural Law in International Arbitration (OUP 2004). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  449. Petsche, A., and Riedl, K., ‘The Liability of Arbitrators under Austrian Law’, in Klausegger, C. Klein, P., Kremslehner, F., Petsche, A., Pitkowitz, N., Welser, I., and Zeiler, G. (eds) (2015) Austrian YB 321-331. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  450. Pfeifer, T., ‘Schiedsrichterbefangenheit und anwaltliche Versicherungsmandate’ in Geimer, R., and Schütze, R. (eds), Recht ohne Grenzen: Festschrift für Athanassios Kaissis zum 65. Geburtstag (Sellier European Law Publishers 2012) [cited as: FS Kaissis] 749-757. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  451. Pfister, L., ‘Who Decides Arbitrator Challenges? - A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Ap-proaches’ (2017) 15 SchiedsVZ 164. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  452. Pfister, L., Schiedsrichterablehnung in internationalen Schiedsverfahren (Nomos 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  453. Pinna, A., and Rigozzi, A., ‘Jurisprudence en matière d'arbitrage sportif’ (2008) Cah. arb. 22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  454. Pinsolle, P., ‘Note- 9 September 2010, Cour d’appel de Paris’ (2011) 29 ASA Bull 197. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  455. Pitkowitz, N., ‘Should there be Stricter Consequences for the Breach of the Arbitrator’s Disclo-sure Obligation? in Ebke, W., Olzen, D., and Sandrock, O. (eds), Festschrift für Siegfried H. Elsing zum 65. Geburtstag (Recht und Wirtschaft 2015) [cited as: FS Elsing] 403-16. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  456. Platte, Μ., ‘An Arbitrator’s Duty to Render Enforceable Awards’ (2003) 20 J Intl Arb 307. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  457. Platte, M., ‘Arbitrator’s Liability’ in Riegler, S., Petsche A., Fremuth-Wolf, A., Platte, M. and Lieb-scher, C. (eds), Arbitration Law of Austria: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2007) 682-92. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  458. Platte, M., ‘Section 588’ in Riegler, S., Petsche, A., Fremuth-Wolf, A., Platte, M. and Liebscher, C. (eds), Arbitration Law of Austria: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2007) 253-269. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  459. Platte, M., ‘Section 594’ in Riegler, S., Petsche A., Fremuth-Wolf, A., Platte, M. and Liebscher, C. (eds), Arbitration Law of Austria: Practice and Procedure (Juris 2007) 332-343. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  460. Podimata, E., ‘The teleologic foundation of the legal judgements’ in Studies of History, Meth-odology and Dogmatic of Procedural Law (Sakkoulas 2019) 89-119 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  461. Poncet, D., and Cambi Favre - Bulle, A., ‘Un arbitre indépendant et impartial aux termes de l ‘ Article 6, 1 de la Convention européenne des droits de l ‘homme: un point de vue de la Suisse’’ in Les droits de l’homme au seuil du troisième millénaire Mélanges en hommage à Pierre Lambert (Bruylant 2000) 655-671. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  462. Poplinger, A., ‘United States: Appeals Court in New York Heightens Standard for Establishing ‘Evident Partiality’ of a Non-Neutral Party-Appointed Arbitrator’ (2018) ICC Disp. Res. Bull. 17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  463. Poudret, J.F., and Besson S., Comparative Law of International Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  464. Prütting, H., and Gehrlein, M. (eds), ZPO Zivilprozessordnung Kommentar (10th edn, Lucht-erhand 2018) [cited as: PG/Prütting § para]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  465. Prütting, H., ‘Die rechtliche Stellung des Schiedsrichters’ (2011) SchiedsVZ 233. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  466. Pryles, M., ‘Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure’ (2007) 27 J Intl Arb 327. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  467. Qureshi, K., ‘Arbitration and Article 6’ (2007) 157 New Law Journal 46. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  468. Racine, J.B., L'arbitrage commercial international et l'ordre public (LGDJ 1999). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  469. Racine, J.B., ‘L’incidence en arbitrage’ in Kessedjian, C. (ed), Le financement de contentieux par un tiers, Third Party Litigation Funding (Panthéon Assas 2012) 95-111. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  470. Racine, J.B., ‘Sur l’idéologie de la transparence en droit de l’arbitrage’ in Heuzé, V., Libchaber, R., and de Vareillers-Sommières, P. (eds), Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Pierre Mayer (LGDJ 2015) 727-752. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  471. Racine, J.B., Droit de l ‘arbitrage (Thémis 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  472. Raeder, A., L’arbitrage international chez les Hellènes (Norwegian Nobel Institute Christiania 1912). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  473. Raeschke-Kessler, H., ‘Die Unparteilichkeit und Unabhängigkeit des Schiedsrichters-ein trans-nationales Rechtsproblem?‘ (2008) 26 ASA Bull 3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  474. Ralston, J.H., International Arbitration From Athens to Locarno (Stanford University Press 1929). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  475. Rau, A.S., ‘On Integrity in Private Judging’ (1998) 14 Arb Intl 115. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  476. Redfern, A., and Hunter, M., Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell 2004). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  477. Reichold, K., Hüsstege, R., and Seiler, C., Zivilprozessordnung Kommentar (C. H. Beck 2018) [cited as: Thomas/Putzo/ author(s) § para]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  478. Reiner, A., and Aschauer, C., ‘ICC Rules’ in Schütze, R. (ed), Institutional Arbitration: Article-by-Article Commentary (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2013) 25-201. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  479. Reiner, A., and Vanovac, S., GesRZ 2014, 130. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  480. Reymond, C., ‘Des connaissances personnelles de l'arbitre à son information privilégiée – Ré-flexions sur quelques arrêts récents’ (1991) Rev arb 3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  481. Richers, R., and Magliana, M., ‘R. International Arbitration in Switzerland’ in Balthasar, S. (ed), International Commercial Arbitration, International Conventions, Country Reports and Com-parative Analysis (C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2021) 727-765. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  482. Riezler, E., Venire contra factum proprium, Studien in römischen, englishen und deutschen Zivilrecht (Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot 1912). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  483. Rogers, C., ‘Regulating International Arbitrators: A Functional Approach to Developing Stand-ards of Conduct’ (2005) 41 Stan. J. Int'l L. 53. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  484. Rogers, R., Ethics in International Arbitration (OUP 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  485. Roney, D., and von der Weid, K., ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: New Oppor-tunities and Challenges’ in Müller, C. and Rigozzi, A. (eds), New Developments in Commercial Arbitration (Schulthess 2013) 183-207. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  486. Rosoff, J., ‘Hybrid Efficiency in Arbitration: Waiving Potential Conflicts for Dual Role Arbitrators in Med-Arb and Arb-Med Proceedings’ (2009) 26 J Intl Arb 89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  487. Rossein, M., and Hope, J., ‘Disclosure and Disqualification Standards for Neutral Arbitrators: How Far to Cast the Net and What is Sufficient to Vacate Award’ (2007) 81 St. John's Law Rev. 203. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  488. Roth, M., ‘Part 5: The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration’ in Weigand, F.B. (ed), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Arbitration (C.H. Beck 2002) 1153-1294. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  489. Roth, M., ‘UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration’ in ‘Weigand, F.B., and Baumann, A. (eds), Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration (3rd edn, OUP 2019) 1403- 1571. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  490. Rüßmann, H., and Timár, K., ‘The Laws Applicable to the Arbitration Agreement’ in Geimer, R. and Schütze, R. (eds), Recht ohne Grenzen: Festschrift für Athanassios Kaissis zum 65. Geburtstag (Sellier European Law Publishers 2012) [cited as: FS Kaissis] 837-859. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  491. Samuel, A., ‘Arbitration, Alternative Dispute Resolution Generally and the European Convention of Human Rights’ (2004) 21 J Intl Arb 413. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  492. Sanders, P., ‘Arbitration’ in Cappelletti, M., International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Vo. XVI. (Brill - Nijhoff 1987) [cited as: Arbitration: Int.Enc.Comp.L. XVI ch 12 (1987) p.] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  493. Sanubari, S., ‘Arbitrator’s Conduct on Social Media’ (2017) 8 JIDS 483. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  494. Saville, L. J., ‘Department Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law 1996 Report on Arbitration Bill’ (1997) 13 Arb Intl 275. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  495. Saville, L. J., ‘Department Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law 1996 Report on Arbitration Bill: The Last Part’ (1999) 15 Arb Intl 413. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  496. Schäfer, J., ‘The Arbitrator as a Private Judge’ in Keutgen, G. (ed.), Walking a Thin Line - What an Arbitrator Can Do, Must Do or Must Not Do (Bruylant 2010) 21-35. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  497. Scherer, Matthias, ‘New Case Law from Austria, Switzerland and Germany Regarding the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  498. Scherer, Matthias, ‘First Reference to the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration. Case Note on Swiss Supreme Court Decisions 4A_506/2007 and 4A_528/2007’ (2008) 26 Bull ASA 588. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  499. Scherer, Matthias, ‘Introduction to the Case Law Section’ (2013) 31 ASA Bull 45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  500. Scherer, Maxi, ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: Towards Mandatory Disclosure of Funding Agreements?’ in Cremandes, B.M. and Dimolitsa, A. (eds), Third Party Funding in International Arbitration (Dossier of the ICC Institute of World Business Law 2013) 95-100. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  501. Scherer Maxi, ‘Article V(1)(b)’ in Wolff, R. (ed), New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 - Commentary (2nd edn, C.H. Beck, Hart, Nomos 2019) [cited as: Scherer, in Wolff, NYC, 2nd edn 2019, Art V para] 291-321. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  502. Scherer, Maxi, and Goldsmith, A., ‘Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration in Europe: Part 1-Funder’s Perspectives’ (2012) Int’l Bus. L. J. 207. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  503. Scherer, Maxi, Richman, L., et al. (eds), Arbitrating under the 2014 LCIA Rules: A User’s Guide (Kluwer Law 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  504. Schlosser, P., ‘Die Unparteilichkeit des Schiedsrichteramtes’ (1980) 93 ZZP 121. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  505. Schlosser, P., Das Recht der internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck 1989). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  506. Schneider, M., ‘President’s Message: Yet another Opportunity to Waste Time and Money on Procedural Skirmishes: The IBA Guidelines on Party Representation’ (2013) 31 ASA Bull 497. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  507. Schramm, D., Geisinger, E. and Pinsolle, P., ‘Article II’ in Kronke, H., Nacimiento, P., et al. (eds), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer 2010) 38-115. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  508. Schütze, R., ‘Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Rechtsvergleichung‘ (2011) ZVglIRWiss 89. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  509. Schütze, R., ‘Die Verletzung der Offenbarungspficht im Schiedsverfahren’ in Ebke, W.F., Ol-zen, D. and Sandrock, O. (eds), Festschrift für Siegfried H. Elsing zum 65. Geburtstag (Recht und Wirtschaft 2015) [cited as: FS Elsing] 525-34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  510. Schütze, R., Schiedsgericht und Schiedsverfahren (6th edn, Beck 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  511. Schütze, R., Tscherning, D. and Wais, W., Handbuch des Schiedsverfahrens (2 nd edn, De Gruyter 1990). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  512. Schwab, K.H., and Walter, G., Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (7th edn, C.H. Beck, Helbing Lichten-hahn 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  513. Schwartz, E., The Rights and Duties of ICC Arbitrators, in The Status of the Arbitrator (ICC Ct. Bull. Spec. Supp. 1995) 67. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  514. Schwartz, E., ‘Challenging Awards for Arbitrator Bias: Two Recent U.S. Cases’ (2013) 3 Cah. arb. 609. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  515. Schwarz, F. and Konrad, C., The Vienna Rules: A Commentary on International Arbitration in Austria (Kluwer 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  516. Schwartz, F., and Ortner, H. ‘Chapter III: The Arbitration Procedure - Procedural Ordre Public and the Internationalization of Public Policy in Arbitration’ (2008) Austrian YB 133. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  517. Schwartze, A., ‘Introduction - Role and Functions of the Comparative Law Method’ in Riesenhu-ber, K. (ed), European Legal Methodology (Intersentia 2017) 62-85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  518. Schwebel, S.M., and Lahne, S. G., ‘Public Policy and Arbitral Procedure’ (1987) 3 ICCA Con-gress Series 205. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  519. Seraglini, C., and Ortscheibt, J., Droit de l’arbitrage interne et international (2nd edn, Lextenso 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  520. Shany, Y, ‘Squaring the Circle? Independence and Impartiality of Party-Appointed Adjudicators in International Legal Proceedings’ (2008) 30 LoyLa Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 473. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  521. Sheppard, A., ‘English Arbitration Act (Chapter 23), Part I, Miscellaneous, Section 73 [Loss of right to object]’ in Mistelis, L. (ed), Concise International Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer 2015) 1094 - 1095. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  522. Sheppard, B., ‘A New Era of Arbitrator Ethics for the United States: The 2004 Revision to the AAA/ABA Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes’ (2005) 21 Arb Intl 91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  523. Sheppard, B., ‘Interim ILA Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbi-tral Awards’ (2003) 19 Arb Intl 217. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  524. Shore, L., ‘Disclosure and Impartiality: An Arbitrator’s Responsibility Vis-à-vis Legal Standards’ (2008) 5 TDM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  525. Sievi, N., ‘Pre-Appointment Communications with Prospective Arbitrators - Limits, Disclosure and Documentation’ (2021) SchiedsVZ 1-6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  526. Slaoui, F.Z., ‘The Rising Issue of ‘Repeat Arbitrators’: A Call for Clarification’ (2009) 25 Arb Intl 103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  527. Smahi, N., ‘The Arbitrator’s Liability and Immunity Under Swiss Law – Part II’ (2017) 35 ASA Bull 67. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  528. Smit, R.H., ‘Courts and the Constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal: A Comparative Analysis of Standards of Arbitrator Independence and Impartiality’ in Ferrari, F. (ed), Forum Shopping in the International Commercial Arbitration Context (Sellier NYU 2013) 235-251. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  529. Smith, M., ‘Impartiality of the Party-Appointed Arbitrator’ (1990) 6 Arb Intl 320. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  530. Smith, M., ‘Contractual Obligations Owed by and to Arbitrators: Model Terms of Appointment’ (1992) 8 Arb Intl 17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  531. Solomon, D., Die Verbindlichkeit von Schiedssprüchen in der internationalen privaten Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (Sellier de Gruyter 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  532. Stanic, A., ‘Challenging Arbitrators and the Importance of Disclosure: Recent Cases and Reflec-tions’ (2009) 16 Croat. Arbit. Yearb. 205-36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  533. Steger, C., Die Präclusion von Versagunsgründen bei der Vollstreckung ausländischer Schiedssprüche (Mohr Siebeck 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  534. Stein, F., and Jonas, M., Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung (23 edn, Mohr Siebeck 2014) [cited as: Stein/Jonas/author23 § para]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  535. Steyn, L., ‘England: The Independence and/or Impartiality of Arbitrators in International Com-mercial Arbitration’ in Independence of Arbitrators (ICC Ct. Bull Spec. Supp. 2007) 91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  536. Stoffel-Munck, P., ‘La responsabilité de l’arbitre’ (2017) Rev arb 1123. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  537. Strohbach, H., ‘Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal and Making of the Award’ in Sanders, P. (ed), UNCITRAL’s Project for a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1984) 2 ICCA Congress Series 103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  538. Stutzer, H., and Bösch, M., ‘Multiple Appointments of an Arbitrator: Does the Swiss Federal Supreme Court Really See No Limit?’ 14 November 2012 <https://thouvenin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/20121114-Multiple-Appointments-of-an-Arbitrator_HJS_MBO.pdf> accessed 24 January 2020. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  539. Sutton, D.G., Gill, J., and Gearing, M., Russell on Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  540. Timmer, L., ‘The quality, independence and impartiality of the arbitrator in international commer-cial arbitration’ (2012) 78 Arbitration 348. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  541. Torres Lagarde, M., ‘Liability of Arbitrators in Dubai: Still a Safe Seat of Arbitration’ (2015) 33 ASA Bull 708. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  542. Touraille, J.D., and Borysewicz, E., ‘An Arbitrator Must Disclose Having Worked in the Same Firm as a Party’s Counsel, but Being a “Facebook Friend” with Counsel Did Not Give Rise to a Reasonable Doubt as to the Arbitrator’s Independence’ in The Baker & McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook 2011–2012 (JurisNet, LLC 2012) 176–77. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  543. Trakman, L., ‘The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators Reconsidered’ (2007) 10(4) Int. A. L.R. 124. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  544. Tsatsos, C., The Problem of the Interpretation of Law (Ant. Sakkoulas 1978). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  545. Tschanz, P.Y. ‘Art. 180’ in Bucher, A. (ed), Loi sur le droit international privé. Convention de Lugano (Helbing Lichtenhahn 2011) 1574-1586. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  546. Tupman, M., ‘Challenge and Disqualification of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitra-tion’ (1989) 38 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 26. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  547. Turner, P. and Mohtashami, R., A Guide to the LCIA Arbitration Rules (OUP 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  548. Tweeddale, A. and Tweeddale, K., Arbitration of Commercial Disputes, International and Eng-lish Law and Practice (OUP 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  549. Vallines García, E., ‘Impartiality and Independence of the Persons Entrusted with Consumer ADR’, in: Stürner, M., Gascón Inchausti, F., and Caponi, R. (eds), The Role of Consumer ADR in the Administration of Justice - New Trends in Access to Justice under EU Directive 2013/11 (Sellier - European Law Publishers 2014) 79-102. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  550. van den Berg, A.J., The New York Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpreta-tion (Kluwer Law and Taxation 1981). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  551. van den Berg, A.J., ‘National Report for Netherlands’ (1987) XII YCA 3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  552. van den Berg, A.J., ‘Justifiable Doubts as to the Arbitrator’s Impartiality or Independence’ (1997) 10 LJIL 509-519. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  553. van den Berg, A.J., ‘En⁠wforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia’ (2010) 27 J Intl Arb 179-198. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  554. van den Berg, A.J., ‘Dissenting Opinions by Party-Appointed Arbitrators in Investment Arbitra-tion’ in Mahnoush J.A., Cogan, J.K., Sloane, R.D., Wiessner, S. (ed), Looking to the future: es-says on international law in honor of W. Michael Reisman (Nijhoff 2011) [cited as: FS Reisman] 821-844. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  555. van Houtte, H. and McAsey, B., ‘The Liability of Arbitrators and Arbitral Institutions’ in Habegger, Hochstrasser, Nater-Bass and Weber-Stecher, Arbitral Institutions under Scrunity: ASA Special Series (JurisNet LLC 2013) 133-69. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  556. van Houtte, H., ‘The Rights of Defense in Multi-Party Arbitration’ (1989) 6 I.C.L.R. 395. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  557. Van Vechten Veeder Q.C., J. (Veeder V.V.), ‘Is There Any Need for Code of Ethics for Interna-tional Commercial Aribtrators?’ in Les arbitres internationaux (Societé de legislation comparée 2005) 187-193. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  558. Van Vechten Veeder Q.C., J. (Veeder V.V.), ‘L’indépendance et l’impartialité de l’arbitre dans l’arbitrage international’ in Cadiet, L., Clay, T., and Jeuland, E., Médiation et arbitrage. Alterna-tive Dispute Resolution. Justice alternative à la justice ou justice alternative? Perspectives comparatives (Litec 2005) 219-236. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  559. Várady, T., ‘Waiver in Arbitral Proceedings and Limitation on Waiver’ (2009) Annals Fac. L. Bel-grade Int’l 6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140
  560. Vassilakakis, E., ‘The Impartiality of the Arbitrator’ (2017) EpolD 449 (in Greek). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748928140

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Successful Dispute Resolution"
Cover des Buchs: The Governance of EU Justice Reforms
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Adriani Dori
The Governance of EU Justice Reforms
Cover des Buchs: Judicial Activism in the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Trung Nguyen
Judicial Activism in the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization
Cover des Buchs: Schiedsvereinbarung und Vollstreckung in arabischen Staaten
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Alexander Tobias Hiller
Schiedsvereinbarung und Vollstreckung in arabischen Staaten
Cover des Buchs: Die Business Judgment Rule im Prozess
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jan-Ole Jena
Die Business Judgment Rule im Prozess
Cover des Buchs: Die Aufrechnung im europäischen Kollisions- und Verfahrensrecht
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Georgia Koutsoukou
Die Aufrechnung im europäischen Kollisions- und Verfahrensrecht

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex