Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals

Dr. Astrid Wiik

doi:10.5771/9783845275925

Zusammenfassung

Seit Ende der 90er Jahre wächst die Teilnahme von amici curiae in Verfahren vor internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten, obwohl Umfang, Funktion und Mehrwert des amicus curiae und die Folgen seiner Einbindung für Verfahren und die internationale Streitbeilegung kaum untersucht worden sind. Dieses Werk unternimmt eine umfassende empirische Bestandsaufnahme des Instruments in der völkerrechtlichen Streitbeilegung. Es definiert und ordnet das Instrument ein in das Völkerprozessrecht. Darüber hinaus prüft die Arbeit, ob die Teilnahme von amici curiae von Nutzen oder Schaden ist für Verfahren und inzident für die internationale Streitbeilegung insbesondere, ob amicus curiae Schriftsätze in Urteilen Berücksichtigung finden, und ob amici curiae effiziente Vertreter öffentlicher Interessen sind, die Legitimität und Transparenz internationaler Gerichte und ihrer Urteile erhöhen, und die Kohärenz der Völkerrechts stärken.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2018
Erscheinungsdatum: 19.03.2018
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-3240-1
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-7592-5
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Successful Dispute Resolution
Band: 4
Sprache: Deutsch
Seiten: 734
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 24 Download Kapitel (PDF)
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. A. Structure
2. B. Methodology
3. C. Scope of the study
1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. I. Broader access to information
    2. II. Representation of ‘the’ public interest
    3. III. Legitimacy and democratization
    4. IV. Contribution to the coherence of international law
    5. V. Increased transparency
  2. 1. I. Practical burdens
    2. II. Compromising the parties’ rights
    3. III. Politicization of disputes, de-legitimization and lobbyism
    4. IV. Overwhelming developing countries
    5. V. Unmanageable quantities of submissions
    6. VI. Denaturing of the judicial function
  3. C. Conclusion
2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. I. The origins of amicus curiae
    2. II. Amicus curiae before the English courts
    3. III. Amicus curiae before the United States Federal Courts and the Supreme Court
    4. IV. Internationalization: amicus curiae in civil law systems and in inter- and supranational legal instruments
    5. V. Comparative analysis
  2. 1. I. International Court of Justice
    2. II. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    3. III. European Court of Human Rights
    4. IV. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    5. V. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    6. VI. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    7. VII. Investor-state arbitration
  3. C. Conclusion
3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. I. A procedural instrument
    2. II. A non-party and a non-party instrument
    3. III. Transmission of information
    4. IV. An interested participant
    5. V. An instrument of non-state actors?
  2. 1. I. Information-based amicus curiae
    2. 1. 1. International Court of Justice and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
      2. 2. European Court of Human Rights
      3. 3. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
      4. 4. WTO Appellate Body and panels
      5. 5. Investor-state arbitration
      6. 6. Comparative analysis
    3. III. Systemic amicus curiae
    4. 1. 1. The myth of ‘the’ international amicus curiae
      2. 2. An evolving concept
      3. 3. Are there limits to the functions amici curiae may assume?
  3. 1. I. International Court of Justice and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    2. II. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    3. III. Investor-state arbitration
    4. IV. Comparative analysis
  4. D. Conclusion
1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. I. International Court of Justice
    2. II. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    3. III. European Court of Human Rights
    4. IV. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    5. V. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    6. 1. 1. Panels
      2. 2. Appellate Body
    7. 1. 1. Clauses in investment treaties
      2. 2. Clauses in institutional procedural rules
      3. 3. Implied powers
      4. 4. Ad hoc agreements
    8. 1. 1. Codification and informal doctrine precedent?
      2. 2. Common regulatory approaches
  2. 1. I. International Court of Justice
    2. II. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    3. III. European Court of Human Rights
    4. IV. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    5. V. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    6. VI. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    7. 1. 1. Legal standards
      2. 2. Application
    8. VIII. Comparative analysis
  3. 1. 1. 1. Timing
      2. 2. Form and length
    2. 1. 1. International Court of Justice
      2. 2. European Court on Human Rights
      3. 3. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
      4. 4. WTO Appellate Body and panels
      5. a) Legal standards
        aa) Special knowledge or insight
        bb) Within the scope of the dispute
        cc) Significant interest in the arbitration
        dd) Public interest in the subject matter of the arbitration
        c) Assessment
    3. III. Full discretion: decision on admissibility
    4. IV. Comparative analysis
  4. D. Conclusion
2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. I. International Court of Justice
    2. II. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    3. III. European Court of Human Rights
    4. IV. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    5. V. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    6. VI. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    7. VII. Investor-state arbitration
    8. 1. 1. Confidential and/or private nature of the dispute settlement mechanism
      2. 2. Regulatory reasons
      3. 3. Efficiency, costs and control
      4. 4. Personal views of judges
  2. B. Recorded participation
  3. 1. 1. 1. Length
      2. 2. Language
      3. 3. Authentification
      4. 4. Failure to comply
    2. II. Comparative analysis
  4. 1. I. International Court of Justice and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    2. II. European Court of Human Rights
    3. III. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    4. IV. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    5. V. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    6. 1. 1. Legal standards
      2. 2. Particular knowledge or perspective: human rights and EU law?
      3. 3. Within the scope of the dispute
      4. 4. Applicable law and its limits
    7. VII. Comparative analysis
  5. E. Submission of evidence
  6. 1. I. International Court of Justice and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    2. II. European Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights and African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    3. III. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    4. IV. Investor-state arbitration
    5. V. Comparative analysis
  7. G. Conclusion
1. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. An obligation to consider?
  2. B. International Court of Justice
  3. C. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
  4. D. European Court of Human Rights
  5. E. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
  6. F. African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
  7. G. WTO Appellate Body and panels
  8. H. Investor-state arbitration
  9. 1. I. Why the hesitation?
    2. II. Elements of successful briefs
    3. III. Limits to the consideration of briefs
  10. J. Conclusion
2. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. 1. I. International Court of Justice
    2. II. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    3. III. European Court of Human Rights and African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
    4. IV. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    5. V. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    6. VI. Investor-state arbitration
    7. VII. Comparative analysis
  2. 1. I. International Court of Justice
    2. II. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
    3. III. European Court of Human Rights
    4. IV. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    5. V. WTO Appellate Body and panels
    6. VI. Investor-state arbitration
    7. 1. 1. The right agent?
      2. 2. Denaturation of judicial proceedings?
  3. 1. I. Procedural legitimacy
    2. II. Substantive legitimacy
    3. III. Conditions: representativity and accountability
  4. D. Increased coherence? Impact on international law
  5. E. Transparency: demise of confidentiality and access to the proceedings and case documents?
  6. F. Impact on locus standi: amicus curiae as a precursor to international legal standing?
  7. 1. 1. 1. Due process
      2. 2. Procedural fairness and equality between the parties
    2. 1. 1. Right to a speedy trial and undue delay?
      2. 2. Exploding costs?
  8. H. Conclusion
3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. What is it?
  2. B. Added value of amicus curiae participation in international dispute settlement
1. Methodology Download Kapitel (PDF)
Annex IISeiten 705 - 706 Download Kapitel (PDF)
BibliographySeiten 707 - 734 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (458 Einträge)

Aguilar Alvarez, G. and Park, W., The new face of investment arbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11, 28 The Yale Journal of International Law (2003), pp. 365-407 Google Scholar öffnen
Ala’ϊ, P., Judicial lobbying at the WTO – the debate over the use of amicus curiae briefs and the U.S. experience, 24 Fordham International Law Journal (2000), pp. 62-94 Google Scholar öffnen
Alberti, C., Iura novit curia in international commercial arbitration, in: S. Kröll/L. Mistelis/P. Perales Viscasillas/V. Rogers (Eds.), International arbitration and international commercial law – liber amicorum Eric Bergsten, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2011, pp. 3-32 Google Scholar öffnen
Aldrich, G., The jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1996 Google Scholar öffnen
Alford, R., Reflections on US-Zeroing: a study in judicial overreaching by the WTO Appellate Body (2006-07), 45 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2006), pp. 196-220 Google Scholar öffnen
Almqvist, J., The accessibility of European Integration Courts from an NGO perspective, in: T. Treves/M. Frigessi di Rattalma et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 271-291 Google Scholar öffnen
Alston, P., The ‘not-a-cat’ syndrome: can the international human rights regime accommodate non-state actors?, in: P. Alston (Ed.), Non-state actors and human rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005, pp. 3-36 Google Scholar öffnen
Amerasinghe, C., Evidence in international litigation, Nijhoff, Leiden 2005 Google Scholar öffnen
Andersen, S., Administration of evidence in WTO dispute settlement proceedings, in: R. Yerxa/B. Wilson (Eds.), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, pp. 177-189 Google Scholar öffnen
Anderson, D., Article 84, in: P. Chandrasekhara Rao/P. Gautier (Eds.), The Rules of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: a commentary, Nijhoff, Leiden 2006 Google Scholar öffnen
Angell, E., The amicus curiae – American development of English institutions, 16 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1967), pp. 1017-1044 Google Scholar öffnen
Antonietti, A., The 2006 amendments to the ICSID Rules and Regulations and the Additional Facility Rules, 21 ICSID Review (2006), pp. 427-448 Google Scholar öffnen
Appleton, A., Shrimp/turtle: untangling the nets, 2 Journal of International Economic Law (1999), pp. 477-496 Google Scholar öffnen
Appleton, A., Amicus curiae submissions in the Carbon Steel Case: another rabbit from the Appellate Body’s hat?, 3 Journal of International Economic Law (2000), pp. 691-699 Google Scholar öffnen
Appleton, A., Transparency, amicus curiae briefs and third party rights, discussion session, 5 Journal of World Investment and Trade (2004), pp. 341-348 Google Scholar öffnen
Ascensio, H., L’amicus curiae devant les juridictions internationales, 105 Revue générale de droit international public (2001), pp. 897-930 Google Scholar öffnen
Asteriti, A. and Tams, C., Transparency and representation of the public interest in investment treaty arbitration, in: S. Schill (Ed.), International investment law and comparative public law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010, pp. 787-816 Google Scholar öffnen
Atik, J., Legitimacy, transparency and NGO participation in the NAFTA Chapter 11 process, in: T. Weiler (Ed.), NAFTA investment law and arbitration: past issues, current practice, future prospects, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley, New York 2004, pp. 135-150 Google Scholar öffnen
Aust, A., Modern treaty law and practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000 Google Scholar öffnen
Balasko, A., Causes de la nullité de la sentence arbitrale en droit international public, Pedone, Paris 1938 Google Scholar öffnen
Balcerzak, F., Jurisdiction of tribunals in investor-state arbitration and the issue of human rights, 29 ICSID Review (2014), pp. 216-230 Google Scholar öffnen
Banifatemi, Y., The law applicable in investment treaty arbitration, in: K. Yannaca-Small (Ed.), Arbitration under international investment agreements: a guide to the key issues, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010, pp. 191-210 Google Scholar öffnen
Banner, S., The myth of the neutral amicus: American courts and their friends 1790-1890, 20 Constitutional Commentary (2003), pp. 111-130 Google Scholar öffnen
Barbier de La Serre, E.and Lavedan, M., Une leçon de la Cour sur l'ampleur de l'amitié: la Commission amicus curiae et les juridictions nationales, 21 Révue Lamy de la Concurrence: droit, économie, régulation, pp. 68-71 Google Scholar öffnen
Barker, L., Third parties in litigation: a systematic view of the judicial function, 29 The Journal of Politics (1967), pp. 41-69 Google Scholar öffnen
Bartholomeusz, L., The amicus curiae before international courts and tribunals, 5 Non-State Actors and International Law (2005), pp. 209-286 Google Scholar öffnen
Bastin, L., The amicus curiae in investor-state arbitration, 1 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law (2012), pp. 208-234 Google Scholar öffnen
Bazán, V., Amicus curiae, transparencia del debate judicial y debido proceso, Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano 2004, pp. 251-280 Google Scholar öffnen
Beharry, C. and Kuritzky, M., Going green: managing the environment through international investment arbitration, 30 American University International Law Review (2015), pp. 383-429 Google Scholar öffnen
Bellhouse, J. and Lavers, A., The modern amicus curiae: a role in arbitration?, 23 Civil Justice Quarterly (2004), pp. 187-200 Google Scholar öffnen
Bennaim-Selvi, O., Third parties in international investment arbitrations: a trend in motion, 6 Journal of World Investment and Trade (2005), pp. 773-807 Google Scholar öffnen
Benzing, M., Das Beweisrecht vor internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten in zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten, Springer, Heidelberg 2010 Google Scholar öffnen
Benzing, M., Community interests in the procedure of international courts and tribunals, 5 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2006), pp. 369-408 Google Scholar öffnen
Bergamini, E., L’intervento amicus curiae: recenti evoluzioni di uno strumento di common law fra Unione europea e Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo, 42 Diritto communitario e degli scambi internazionali (2003), pp. 177-188 Google Scholar öffnen
Berger, A., Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Vol. 43, American Philosophical Society 1968 Google Scholar öffnen
Bergman, N., Transparency of the proceedings and third party participation, in C. Giorgetti (Ed.), Litigating international investment disputes: a practitioner’s guide, Leiden 2014, pp. 375-410 Google Scholar öffnen
Bermann, G., Navigating EU law and the law of international arbitration, 28 Arbitration International (2012), pp. 397-445 Google Scholar öffnen
Bernhardt, R., Institut de Droit International, Judicial and arbitral settlement of disputes involving more than two states, Session 11 (Berlin), 68 Institute of International Law Annuaire (1999) Google Scholar öffnen
Bernhardt, R., Evolutive treaty interpretation, especially of the European Convention on Human Rights, 42 German Yearbook of International Law (1999), pp. 11-25 Google Scholar öffnen
Bianchi. A. (Ed.), Non-state actors and international law, Ashgate, Farnham 2009 Google Scholar öffnen
Biehler, G., Procedures in international law, Springer, Berlin 2008 Google Scholar öffnen
Bjorklund, A., The participation of amici curiae in NAFTA Chapter Eleven Cases, 2002, at: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/participate-e.pdf (last visited: 5.4.2015) Google Scholar öffnen
Bjorklund, A., Applicable law in international investment disputes, in: C. Giorgetti (Ed.), Litigating international investment disputes – a practitioner’s guide, Leiden et al. 2014, pp. 261-286 Google Scholar öffnen
Blackaby, N. and Richard, C., Amicus curiae: a panacea for legitimacy in investment arbitration?, in: M. Waibel et al. (Eds.), The backlash against investment arbitration: perceptions and reality, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, pp. 253-274 Google Scholar öffnen
Bluemel, E., Overcoming NGO accountability concerns in international governance, 31 Brooklyn Journal of International Law (2005), pp. 139-206 Google Scholar öffnen
Bogdan, M., General principles of law and the problem of lacunae in the law of nations, 46 Nordisk Tidsskrift Internasjonal Ret (1977), pp. 37-53 Google Scholar öffnen
Boisson de Chazournes, L., The World Bank Inspection Panel: about public participation and dispute settlement, in: T. Treves/M. Frigessi di Rattalma et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 187-203 Google Scholar öffnen
Boisson de Chazournes, L., Transparency and amicus curiae briefs, 5 Journal of World Investment and Trade (2004), pp. 333-336 Google Scholar öffnen
Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Mbengue, M., The amici curiae and the WTO dispute settlement system: the doors are open, 2 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2003), pp. 205-248 Google Scholar öffnen
Bolton, J., Should we take global governance seriously?, 1 Chicago Journal of International Law (2000), pp. 205-221 Google Scholar öffnen
Born, G., International arbitration: law and practice, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Bowett, D., Contemporary developments in legal techniques in the settlement of disputes, 180 Receuil des Cours (1983-II), pp. 169-235 Google Scholar öffnen
Boyle, A., Dispute settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: problems of fragmentation and jurisdiction, 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1997), pp. 37-54 Google Scholar öffnen
Bretton-Le Goff, G., NGOs’ perspectives on non-state actors, in: J. d’Aspremont (Ed.), Participants in the international legal system: multiple perspectives on non-state actors in international law, Routledge, London et al. 2011, pp. 248-266 Google Scholar öffnen
Brower, C., Obstacles and pathways to consideration of the public interest in investment treaty disputes, in: K. Sauvant (Ed.), Yearbook on international investment law & policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008-2009, pp. 347-378 Google Scholar öffnen
Brower, C., Structure, legitimacy and NAFTA’s investment chapter, 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2003), pp. 37-94 Google Scholar öffnen
Brower, C., The anatomy of fact-finding before international tribunals: an analysis and a proposal concerning the evaluation of evidence, in: R. Lillich (Ed.), Fact-finding by international tribunals: eleventh Sokol colloquium, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley-on-Hudson 1992, pp. 147-151 Google Scholar öffnen
Brown, C., A common law of international adjudication, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007 Google Scholar öffnen
Brown, C., The cross-fertilization of principles relating to procedure and remedies in the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals, 30 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (2008), pp. 219-245 Google Scholar öffnen
Brown, C., Bringing sustainable development issues before investment treaty tribunals, in: M.-C. Cordonier Segger/M. Gehring et al. (Eds.), Sustainable development in world investment law, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan Rijn 2011, pp. 171-188 Google Scholar öffnen
Brown, L. and Jacobs, F., The Court of Justice of the European Communities 3rd Ed., Sweet and Maxwell, London 1989 Google Scholar öffnen
Brownlie, I., Principles of public international law, Oxford University Press, 6th Ed. Oxford 2003 Google Scholar öffnen
Brownlie, I., The individual before tribunals exercising international justice, 11 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1962), pp. 701-720 Google Scholar öffnen
Brühwiler, C., Amicus curiae in the WTO dispute settlement procedure: a developing country’s foe?, 60 Aussenwirtschaft (2005), pp. 347-396 Google Scholar öffnen
Brus, M., Third party dispute settlement in an interdependent world: developing a theoretical framework, Nijhoff, Dordrecht et al. 1995 Google Scholar öffnen
Buergenthal, T., Advisory practice of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 79 American Journal of International Law (1985), pp. 1-27 Google Scholar öffnen
Buergenthal, T., Shelton, D. and Stewart, D., International human rights in a nutshell, 4th Ed., West, St. Paul 2009 Google Scholar öffnen
Burghardt, B., Die Rechtsvergleichung in der völkerstrafrechtlichen Rechtsprechung, in: S. Beck/C. Burchard/B. Fateh-Moghadam (Eds.), Strafrechtsvergleichung als Problem und Lösung, Nomos, Baden-Baden 2011, pp. 235-254 Google Scholar öffnen
Burgstaller, M., European law and investment treaties, 26 Journal of International Arbitration (2009), pp. 181-216 Google Scholar öffnen
Bürli, N. , Amicus curiae as a means to reinforce the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights, in: S. Flogaitis et al. (Eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and its discontents, Elgar, Cheltenham et al. 2013, pp. 135-146 Google Scholar öffnen
Caldeira, G. and Wright, J., Amici curiae before the Supreme Court: who participates, when and how much?, 32 Journal of Politics (1996), pp. 782-806 Google Scholar öffnen
Callewaert, J., The judgments of the court: background and content, in: R. Macdonald/F. Matscher/H. Petzold (Eds.), The European system for the protection of human rights, Nijhoff, Dordrecht 1993, pp. 713-731 Google Scholar öffnen
Cançado Trindade, A., The operation of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in: D. Harris/S. Livingstone (Eds.), The Inter-American system of human rights, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1998, pp. 133-149 Google Scholar öffnen
Cançado Trindade, A., The emancipation of the individual from his own state: the historical recovery of the human person as subject of the law of nations, in: S. Breitenmoser et al. (Eds.), Human rights, democracy and the rule of law – liber amicorum Luzius Wildhaber, Dike Verlag, Zürich et al. 2007, pp. 151-171 Google Scholar öffnen
Cançado Trindade, A., The right of access to justice in the inter-American system of human rights protection, 17 Italian Yearbook of International Law (2007), pp. 7-24 Google Scholar öffnen
Canivet, G., L’organisation de la Cour de cassation favorise-t-elle l’élaboration de sa jurisprudence?, in: N. Molfessis (Ed.), La Cour de cassation et l’élaboration du droit, Economica, Paris 2004, p. 3 Google Scholar öffnen
Cappelletti, M., Giudici legislatori?, Milan 1984 Google Scholar öffnen
Carvajal Isunza, G. and Gonzalez Rojas, F., Evidentiary issues in NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitration: searching for the truth between states and investors, in: T. Weiler (Ed.), NAFTA investment law and arbitration: past issues, current practice, future prospects, Transnational Publishers, New York 2004, pp. 287-312 Google Scholar öffnen
Cassel, J., Enforcing environmental human rights: selected strategies of U.S. NGOs, 6 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights (2007), pp. 104-127 Google Scholar öffnen
Center for International Environmental Law, Protecting the public interest in international dispute settlement: the amicus curiae phenomenon, 2009, at: http://www.ciel.org/Publications/Protecting_ACP_Dec09.pdf (last visited: 29.8.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Chandrasekhara Rao, P. and Gautier, P. (Eds.), The Rules of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: a commentary, Nijhoff, Leiden 2006 Google Scholar öffnen
Charney, J., The impact on the international legal system of the growth of international courts and tribunals, 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics (1999), pp. 697-708 Google Scholar öffnen
Charney, J., Is international law threatened by multiple international tribunals?, 271 Receuil des Cours (1998), pp. 101-382 Google Scholar öffnen
Charnovitz, S., Participation of nongovernmental organizations in the World Trade Organization, 17 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law (1996), pp. 331-357 Google Scholar öffnen
Charnovitz, S., Nongovernmental organizations and international law, 100 American Journal of International Law (2006), pp. 348-372 Google Scholar öffnen
Charnovitz, S., Opening the WTO to nongovernmental interests, 24 Fordham International Law Journal (2000), pp. 173-216 Google Scholar öffnen
Chen, P., The information role of amici curiae briefs in Gonzalez v. Raich, 31 Southern Illinois University Law Journal (2007), pp. 217-241 Google Scholar öffnen
Cheng, B., General principles of law as applied by international courts and tribunals, Stevens, London 1953 Google Scholar öffnen
Chinkin, C., Third parties in international law, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1993 Google Scholar öffnen
Chinkin, C., Article 63, in: A. Zimmernann/C. Tomuschat/K. Oellers-Frahm/C. Tams (Eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: a commentary, 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Chinkin, C. and Mackenzie, R., International organizations as ‘friends of the court’, in: L. Boisson de Chazournes et al. (Eds.), International organizations and international dispute settlement: trends and prospects, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley 2002, pp. 295-311 Google Scholar öffnen
Choudhury, B., Recapturing public power: is investment arbitration’s engagement of the public interest contributing to the democratic deficit?, 41 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2008), pp. 775-832 Google Scholar öffnen
Clark, D., Use of the amicus curiae brief in American judicial procedure in comparative perspective, 80 RabelsZ (2016), pp. 327-371 Google Scholar öffnen
Clark, P. and Morrison, P., Key procedural issues: transparency, 32 International Lawyer (1998), pp. 851-862 Google Scholar öffnen
Coe, J., Transparency in the resolution of investor-state disputes – adoption, adaptation, and NAFTA leadership, 54 Kansas Law Review (2006), pp. 1339-1385 Google Scholar öffnen
Cohen Smutny, A., Investment treaty arbitration and commercial arbitration: are they different ball games? The actual conduct, in: A. van den Berg (Ed.), 50 years New York Convention, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009, pp. 167-177 Google Scholar öffnen
Coleman, M. and Williams, K., South Africa’s bilateral investment treaties, black economic empowerment and mining: a fragmented meeting?, 9 Business Law International (2008), pp. 56-94 Google Scholar öffnen
Collins, P., Friends of the court: examining the influence of amicus curiae participation in US Supreme Court litigation, 38 Law & Society Review (2004), pp. 807-832 Google Scholar öffnen
Collins, P. and Martinek, W., Amicus participation in the US Court of Appeals, paper prepared for delivery at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, USA, 2010 (on file) Google Scholar öffnen
Coslin, C. and Lapillonne, D., France and the concept of amicus curiae: what lies ahead?, 4 Paris International Litigation Bulletin (2012), pp. 14-15 Google Scholar öffnen
Cossy, M., Panels’ consultations with scientific experts: the right to seek information under Article 13 of the DSU, in: R. Yerxa/B. Wilson (Eds.), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, pp. 204-220 Google Scholar öffnen
Couvreur, P., Le règlement juridictionnel, in: L. Lucchini (Ed.), Le processus de délimitation maritime: étude d’un cas fictif: Colloque international, Monaco, 27 au 29 mars 2003, Institut du Droit Économique de la Mer, Pedone, Paris 2004, pp. 349-388 Google Scholar öffnen
Covelli, N., Member intervention in World Trade Organization dispute settlement proceedings after “EC-Sardines”: the rules, jurisprudence, and controversy, 37 Journal of World Trade (2003), pp. 673-690 Google Scholar öffnen
Covey, F., Amicus curiae: friend of the court, 9 De Paul Law Review (1968-1969), pp. 30-37 Google Scholar öffnen
Crawford, J. and Marks, S., The global democracy deficit: an essay on international law and its limits, in: D. Archibugi/D. Held/M. Köhler (Eds.), Re-imagining political community, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1998, pp. 72-90 Google Scholar öffnen
Crema, L., Tracking the origins and testing the fairness of the instruments of fairness: amici curiae in international litigation, Jean Monnet Working Paper 09/12, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Crema, L., Investor rights and well-being: remarks on the interpretation of investment treaties in light of other rights, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Foreign investment, international law and common concerns, Routledge, London 2013, pp. 50-70 Google Scholar öffnen
Croley, S. and Jackson, J., WTO dispute procedures, standard of review, and deference to national governments, 90 American Journal of International Law (1996), pp. 193-213 Google Scholar öffnen
Crook, J., Consilium principis – imperial councils and counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1955 Google Scholar öffnen
Cutler, C., Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of international law and organization: a crisis of legitimacy, in: A. Bianchi (Ed.), Non-state actors and international law, Ashgate, Farnham 2009, pp. 19-36 Google Scholar öffnen
Damrosch, L. (Ed.), The International Court of Justice at a crossroads, Transnational Publishers, Dobbs Ferry 1987 Google Scholar öffnen
Daniel, T., Expert evidence before the ICJ, Paper presented at the Third Bi-Annual Conference of ABLOS 2003, at: http://www.iho.int/mtg_docs/com_wg/ABLOS/ABLOS_Conf3/PAPER1-3.PDF (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Davidson, S., The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Aldershot, Dartmouth 1992 Google Scholar öffnen
De Brabandere, E., Non-state actors in international dispute settlement: pragmatism in international law, in: J. d’Aspremont (Ed.), Participants in the international legal system: multiple perspectives on non-state actors in international law, Routledge, London et al. 2011, pp. 342-359 Google Scholar öffnen
De Brabandere, E., NGOs and the „public interest“ – the legality and rationale of amicus curiae interventions in international economic and investment disputes, 12 Chinese Journal of International Law (2011), pp. 85-113 Google Scholar öffnen
De Cesari, P., NGOs and the activities of the ad hoc criminal tribunals for former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 113-119 Google Scholar öffnen
De Palma, A., NAFTA’s powerful little secret: Obscure tribunals settle disputes, but go too far, critics say, The New York Times, 11 March 2001, at: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/11/business/nafta-s-powerful-little-secret-obscure-tribunals-settle-disputes-but-go-too-far.html (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
De Piérola y Balta, N. and Loayza Tamayo, C., Los Informes de Amici Curiae Ante La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, 12 Anuario de derecho internacional (1996), pp. 451-487 Google Scholar öffnen
De Schutter, O., Sur l’émergence de la société civile en droit international: le rôle des associations devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, 7 European Journal of International Law (1996), pp. 372-410 Google Scholar öffnen
Del Vecchio, A., International courts and tribunals, standing, in: R. Wolfrum et al. (Eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law online, Oxford University Press, New York, last updated 2010 Google Scholar öffnen
Delbez, L., Les principes généraux du contentieux international, Pichon et Durand-Auzias, Paris 1962 Google Scholar öffnen
Dolidze, A., The Arctic Sunrise and NGOs in international judicial proceedings, 18 ASIL Insight (2014), at: https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/18/issue/1/arctic-sunrise-and-ngos-international-judicial-proceedings (last visited: 28.9.2017). Google Scholar öffnen
Dolidze, A., Making international property law: the role of amici curiae in international judicial decision-making, 40 Syracuse Journal of International and Comparative Law (2013), pp. 119-153 Google Scholar öffnen
Dolidze, A., Bridging comparative and international law: amicus curiae as a vertical legal transplant, 26 European Journal of International Law (2016), pp. 851-880 Google Scholar öffnen
Dolle, T., Streitbeilegung im Rahmen von Freihandelsabkommen, Baden-Baden 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
Dumberry, P., The admissibility of amicus curiae briefs by NGOs in investor-states arbitration, 1 Non-state actors and international law (2001), pp. 201-214 Google Scholar öffnen
Dunoff, J., The misguided debate over NGO participation at the WTO, 4 Journal of International Economic Law (1998), pp. 433-456 Google Scholar öffnen
Dupuy, P., Unification rather than fragmentation of international law? The case of international investment law and human rights law, in: P. Dupuy et al. (Eds.), Human rights in international investment law and arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009, pp. 45-62 Google Scholar öffnen
Dupuy, P., Article 34, in: A. Zimmermann/C. Tomuschat/K. Oellers-Frahm/C. Tams (Eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice, 2nd Ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Durling, J. and Hardin, D., Amicus curiae participation in WTO dispute settlement: reflections on the past decade, in: R. Yerxa/B. Wilson (Eds.), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, pp. 221-231 Google Scholar öffnen
Eastman, Z., NAFTA’s Chapter 11: for whose benefit?, 16 Journal of International Arbitration (1999), pp. 105-118 Google Scholar öffnen
ECCHR, Human rights inapplicable in international investment arbitration? – A commentary on the non-admissibility of ECCHR and indigenous communities as amici curiae before the ICSID tribunal, online publication, July 2012, at: http://www.ecchr.de/worldbank.html (last visited: 28.9.2017). Google Scholar öffnen
Editors, Note on amici curiae, 34 Harvard Law Review (1921), pp. 773-776. Google Scholar öffnen
Ehlermann, C.-D., Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO, 6 Journal of International Economic Law (2003), pp. 695-708 Google Scholar öffnen
Ehlermann, C.-D., Six years on the bench of the World Trade Court, 36 Journal of World Trade (2002), pp. 605-639 Google Scholar öffnen
Ehring, L., Public access to dispute settlement hearings in the World Trade Organization, 11 Journal of International Economic Law (2008), pp. 1-14 Google Scholar öffnen
Elias, T., The limits of the right to intervention in a case before the International Court of Justice, in: R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung, internationale Gerichtsbarkeit und Menschenrechte, Festschrift für Hermann Mosler, Springer, Berlin et al. 1983, pp. 84-99. Google Scholar öffnen
Ennis, B., Effective amicus briefs, 33 Catholic University Law Review (1984), pp. 603-609 Google Scholar öffnen
Epstein, L., A comparative analysis of the evolution, rules, and, usage of amicus curiae briefs in the US Supreme Court and in state courts of last resort, Conference Paper 1989, at: http://epstein.wustl.edu/research/conferencepapers.1989SWPSA.pdf (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Esty, D., We the people: civil society and the World Trade Organization, in: M. Bronckers/R. Quick (Eds.), New directions in international economic law – essays in honour of John H. Jackson, Kluwer Law International,The Hague 2000, pp. 87-109 Google Scholar öffnen
Evans, D. and de Tarson Pereira, C., DSU review: a view from the inside, in: R. Yerxa/B. Wilson (Eds.), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, pp. 251-268 Google Scholar öffnen
Farber, D., When the court has a party, how many ‘friends’ show up? A note on the statistical distribution of amicus brief filings, 24 Constitutional Commentary (2007), pp. 19-42 Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer, G., Les rapports entre l’Organisation Internationale du Travail et la Cour permanente de Justice internationale: contribution à l’étude du problème de la séparation des pouvoirs dans le domaine international, Diss. Geneva, Pedone, Paris 1946 Google Scholar öffnen
Fitzmaurice, G., The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice, Vol. 2, Grotius, Cambridge 1986 Google Scholar öffnen
Forcese, C., Does the sky fall? NAFTA Chapter 11 dispute settlement and democratic accountability, 14 Michigan State Journal of International Law (2006), pp. 315-343 Google Scholar öffnen
Ford, C., What are friends for? In NAFTA Chapter 11 disputes, accepting amici would help lift the curtain of secrecy surrounding investor-state arbitrations, 11 Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas (2005), pp. 207-253 Google Scholar öffnen
Foster, C., Social science experts and amicus curiae briefs in international courts and tribunals: the WTO Biotech Case, 52 Netherlands International Law Review (2005), pp. 433-459 Google Scholar öffnen
Foster, W., Fact finding and the world court, 7 Canadian Yearbook of International Law (1969), pp. 150-191 Google Scholar öffnen
Franck, S., Empirically evaluating claims about investment arbitration, 86 North Carolina Law Review (2007), pp. 1-87 Google Scholar öffnen
French, D., Treaty interpretation and incorporation of extraneous legal rules, 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2006), pp. 281-314 Google Scholar öffnen
Frey, A., Amici curiae: friends of the court or nuisances?, 33 Litigation (2006-2007), pp. 5-7 Google Scholar öffnen
Frigessi di Rattalma, M., NGOs before the European Court of Human Rights: beyond amicus curiae participation, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 57-66 Google Scholar öffnen
Fry, J. and Repousis, O., Towards a new world for investor-state arbitration through transparency, 48 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics (2016), pp. 795-865 Google Scholar öffnen
Gaillard, E. and Banifatemi, Y., The meaning of “and” in Article 42(1), second sentence of the Washington Convention: the role of international law in the choice of law process, 18 ICSID Review (2003), pp. 375-411 Google Scholar öffnen
Gao, H., Amicus curiae in WTO dispute settlement: theory and practice, 1 China Rights Forum (2006), pp. 51-57 Google Scholar öffnen
Gautier, P., NGOs and law of the sea disputes, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 233-242 Google Scholar öffnen
Gerlich, O., More than a friend? The European Commission’s amicus curiae participation in investor-state arbitration, in: G. Adinolfi et al. (Eds.), International economic law, Springer 2017, pp. 253-269 Google Scholar öffnen
Giovannini, T., International arbitration and iura novit curia, in: B. Cremades/M. Fernández-Ballesteros (Eds.), Liber amicorum Bernardo Cremades, La Ley, Madrid 2010, pp. 495-509 Google Scholar öffnen
Gomien, D., Harris, D. and Zwaak, L., Law and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Social Charter, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg 1996 Google Scholar öffnen
González-Bueno, C. and Lozano, L., More than a friend of the court: the evolving role of the European Commission in investor-state arbitration, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 26 January 2015, at: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2015/01/26/more-than-a-friend-of-the-court-the-evolving-role-of-the-european-commission-in-investor-state-arbitration/ (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Göttsche, G., Die Anwendung von Rechtsprinzipien in der Spruchpraxis der WTO-Rechtsmittelinstanz, Diss. Hamburg 2004, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2005 Google Scholar öffnen
Gressman, E. et al. (Eds.), Supreme Court practice, 9th Ed., BNA Books, Washington 2007 Google Scholar öffnen
Gross, L., Participation of individuals in advisory proceedings before the International Court of Justice: question of equality between the parties, 52 American Journal of International Law (1958), pp. 16-40 Google Scholar öffnen
Gruner, M., Accounting for the public interest in international arbitration, 41 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2003), pp. 923-964 Google Scholar öffnen
Günther, K., Zulässigkeit und Grenzen der Intervention bei Streitigkeiten vor dem IGH, 34 Germany Yearbook of International Law (1991), pp. 254-295 Google Scholar öffnen
Haines-Ferrari, M., Mercosur: individual access and the dispute settlement mechanism, in: J. Cameron/ K. Campbell (Eds.), Dispute resolution in the World Trade Organization, Cameron May, London 1998, pp. 270-284 Google Scholar öffnen
Happ, R., Rule 37, in: R. Schütze (Ed.), Institutionelle Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Kommentar, 2nd Ed., Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne 2011 Google Scholar öffnen
Harlow, C., Public law and popular justice, 65 Modern Law Review (2002), pp. 1-18 Google Scholar öffnen
Harrington, J., Amici curiae in the federal courts of appeals: how friendly are they?, 55 Case Western Reserve Law Review (2005), pp. 667-699 Google Scholar öffnen
Harris, D., O’Boyle, M. and Warbrick, C., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009 Google Scholar öffnen
Harrison, J., Human rights arguments in “amicus curiae” submissions: promoting social justice?, in: P.M. Dupuy/F. Francioni/E.U. Petersmann (Eds.), Human rights in international investment law and arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009, pp. 396-421 Google Scholar öffnen
Helfer, L. and Slaughter, A., Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication, 107 Yale Law Journal (1997), pp. 273-391 Google Scholar öffnen
Hernandez, G., Non-state actors from the perspective of the International Court of Justice, in: J. d’Aspremont (Ed.), Participants in the international legal system: multiple perspectives on non-state actors in international law, Routledge, London 2011, pp. 140-164 Google Scholar öffnen
Hess, B. and Wiik, A., Affected individuals in proceedings before the ICJ, the ITLOS and the ECHR, in: H. Hestermeyer et al. (Eds.), Coexistence, cooperation and solidarity – liber amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum, Nijhoff, Leiden 2012, pp. 1639-1660 Google Scholar öffnen
Higgins, R.., Remedies and the International Court of Justice: an introduction, in: M. Evans (Ed.), Remedies in international law, Hart, Oxford 1998 Google Scholar öffnen
Higgins, R., Respecting sovereign states and running a tight courtroom, 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2001), pp. 121-132 Google Scholar öffnen
Higgins, R., International courts and tribunals – the challenges ahead, 7 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2008), pp. 261-264 Google Scholar öffnen
Higgins, R., International law in a changing international system, 58 Cambridge Law Journal (1999), pp. 78-95 Google Scholar öffnen
Highet, K., Evidence and proof of facts, in: L. Damrosch (Ed.), The International Court of Justice at a crossroads, Transnational Publishers, New York 1987, pp. 355-375 Google Scholar öffnen
Highet, K., Evidence, the Court and the Nicaragua case, 81 American Journal of International Law (1987), pp. 1-56 Google Scholar öffnen
Hirte, H., Der amicus-curiae-brief: Das amerikanische Modell und die deutschen Parallelen, 104 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess (1991), pp. 11-66 Google Scholar öffnen
Hitzig, H., Die Assessoren der römischen Magistrate und Richter, Ackermann, München 1893 Google Scholar öffnen
Hobér, K., Arbitration involving states, in: L. Newman/R. Hill (Eds.), The leading arbitrators’ guide to international arbitration, Juris Publishing, Huntington, New York 2008, Chapter 8 Google Scholar öffnen
Hoekman, B. and Howse, R., European Community–Sugar: subsidization and the World Trade Organization, Policy Research Working Paper 4336, 2007, at: http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-4336 (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Hollis, D., Private actors in public international law: amicus curiae and the case for the retention of state sovereignty, 25 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review (2002), pp. 235-255 Google Scholar öffnen
Housman, R., Symposium: democratizing international trade decision-making, 27 Cornell International Law Journal (1994), pp. 699-747 Google Scholar öffnen
Howse, R., Membership and its privileges: the WTO, civil society, and the amicus brief controversy, 9 European Journal of International Law (2003), pp. 496-510 Google Scholar öffnen
Howse, R., Adjudicative legitimacy and treaty interpretation in international trade law: the early years of WTO jurisprudence, in: J. Weiler (Ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA, Oxford 2000, pp. 35-69 Google Scholar öffnen
Howse, R., How to begin to think about the “democratic deficit at the WTO”, in: R. Howse (Ed.), The WTO system: law, politics and legitimacy, London 2007, pp. 57-75 Google Scholar öffnen
Hudson, M., The Permanent Court of International Justice, 1920-1942: a treatise, Macmillan Publishers, New York 1943 Google Scholar öffnen
Hunter, M. and Barbuk, A., Procedural aspects of non-disputing party interventions in Chapter 11 arbitrations, 3 Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law (2003), pp. 151-184 Google Scholar öffnen
Ishikawa, T., Third party participation in investment treaty arbitration, 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2010), pp. 373-412 Google Scholar öffnen
Jackson, J., The varied policies of international juridical bodies – reflections on theory and practice, 25 Michigan Journal of International Law (2004), pp. 869-878 Google Scholar öffnen
Jagusch S. and Sullivan, J., A comparison of ICSID and UNCITRAL arbitration: areas of divergence and concern, in: M. Waibel et al. (Eds.), The backlash against investment arbitration: perceptions and reality, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, pp. 79-109 Google Scholar öffnen
Jansen, B., Die Rolle der Privatwirtschaft im Streitschlichtungsverfahren der WTO, 3 Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien (2000), pp. 293-305 Google Scholar öffnen
Jenks, W., The status of international organizations in relation to the International Court of Justice, 32 Transactions of the Grotius Society (1946), pp. 1-41 Google Scholar öffnen
Jennings, R., The role of the International Court of Justice, 68 British Yearbook of International Law (1997), pp. 1-63 Google Scholar öffnen
Jennings, R., International lawyers and the progressive development of international law, in: J. Makarczyk (Ed.), Theory of international law at the threshold of the 21st century: essays in honour of Krzystof Skubiszewski, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996, pp. 413-424 Google Scholar öffnen
Jennings, R., The International Court of Justice after fifty years, 89 American Journal of International Law (1995), pp. 493-505 Google Scholar öffnen
JIEL Editors, Note by Editors, 3 Journal of International Economic Law (2000), pp. 701-706 Google Scholar öffnen
Jillmann, B., The access of individuals to international trade dispute settlement, 13 Journal of International Arbitration (1996), pp. 143-169. Google Scholar öffnen
Jiménez de Arechaga, E., Intervention under Article 62 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in: R. Bernhardt et al. (Eds.), Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung, internationale Gerichtsbarkeit und Menschenrechte, Festschrift für Hermann Mosler, Springer, Berlin et al. 1983, pp. 453-465 Google Scholar öffnen
Johnson, L. and Tuerk, E., CIEL’s experience in WTO dispute settlement: challenges and complexities from a practical point of view, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 243-260 Google Scholar öffnen
Jonas, O., The participation of the amicus curiae institution in human rights litigation in Botswana and South Africa: a tale of two jurisdictions, 58 Journal of African Law (2015), pp. 329-354 Google Scholar öffnen
Jörs, P., Geschichte und System des römischen Privatrechts, Springer, Berlin 1927 Google Scholar öffnen
Joseph, S., Democratic deficit, participation and the WTO, in: S. Joseph/D. Kinley/J. Waincymer, The World Trade Organization and human rights, Cheltenham and Northampton 2009, pp. 313-343 Google Scholar öffnen
JUSTICE/Public Law Project, A matter of public interest – Reforming the law and practice on interventions in public interest cases, 1996, at: http://booking.publiclawproject.org.uk/old-site/downloads/PublicInterest.pdf (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Karamanian, S., The place of human rights in investor-state arbitration, 17 Lewis & Clark Law Review (2013), pp. 423-447 Google Scholar öffnen
Kaser, M. and Hackel, K., Das römische Zivilprozessrecht, 2nd Ed., C.H. Beck, Munich 1996 Google Scholar öffnen
Kaufmann-Kohler, G., Non-disputing state submissions in investment arbitration: resurgence of diplomatic protection?, in: L. Boisson de Chazournes et al. (Eds.), Diplomatic and judicial means of dispute settlement, Nijhoff, Leiden 2013, pp. 307-326 Google Scholar öffnen
Kaufmann-Kohler, G., Interpretative powers of the Free Trade Commission and the rule of law, in: E. Gaillard et al. (Eds.), Fifteen years of NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitration, Juris Publishing, Inc., New York 2011, pp. 175-194 Google Scholar öffnen
Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Potestà, M., Can the Mauritius Convention serve as a model for the reform of investor-state arbitration in connection with the introduction of a permanent investment tribunal or an appeal mechanism?, CIDS Research Paper, 3 June 2016, at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/CIDS_Research_Paper_Mauritius.pdf (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Kawharu, A., Participation of non-governmental organizations in investment arbitration as amici curiae, in: M. Waibel et al. (Eds.), The backlash against investment arbitration: perceptions and reality, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, pp. 275-295 Google Scholar öffnen
Kay, R., Judicial policy making and the peculiar function of the law, 40 Connecticut Law Review (2008), pp. 1261-1286 Google Scholar öffnen
Kazazi, M. and Shifman, B., Evidence before international tribunals – introduction, 1 International Law Forum (1999), pp. 193-196 Google Scholar öffnen
Kearney, J. and Merrill, T., The influence of amicus curiae briefs on the Supreme Court, 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review (2000), pp. 743-853 Google Scholar öffnen
Kelsen, H., Principles of international law, Rinehart & Company, New York 1952 Google Scholar öffnen
Kelsen, H., General theory of law and state, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1949 Google Scholar öffnen
Kent, A. and Trinidad, J., International law scholars as amici curiae: an emerging dialogue (of the deaf)?, 29 Leiden Journal of International Law (2016), pp. 1081-1101 Google Scholar öffnen
Keohane, R., Global governance and democratic accountability, in: R. Wilkinson (Ed.), The global governance reader, Routledge, London 2005, pp. 121-139 Google Scholar öffnen
Kessedijan, C., La nécessité de generaliser l’institution de l’amicus curiae dans le contentieux privé international, in: H. Mansel et al. (Eds.), Festschrift für Erik Jayme, Sellier European Law Publishers, Munich 2004, Vol. I, pp. 403-408 Google Scholar öffnen
Kessedijan, C., Uniformity v. diversity in law in a global world – the example of commercial and procedural law, 61 Revue hellénique de droit international (2008), pp. 319-333 Google Scholar öffnen
Kessedjian, C., De quelques pistes pour l’encadrement procédural de l’intervention des amici curiae, 8 European Journal of Law Reform (2006), pp. 29-111 Google Scholar öffnen
Kessedjian, C., Codification du droit commercial international et droit international privé: de la gouvernance pour les relations économiques transnationales, 300 Receuil des cours (2002), pp. 79-308 Google Scholar öffnen
Knahr, C., Participation of non-state actors in the dispute settlement system of the WTO: benefit or burden?, Diss. Vienna, 2006, Lang, Frankfurt am Main 2007 Google Scholar öffnen
Knahr, C. and Reinisch, A., Transparency versus confidentiality in international investment arbitration – the Biwater Gauff compromise, 6 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2007), pp. 97-118 Google Scholar öffnen
Kochevar, S., Amici curiae in civil law jurisdictions, 122 Yale Law Journal (2013), pp. 1653-1669 Google Scholar öffnen
Koepp, J., Die Intervention im WTO-Streitbeilegungsverfahren, Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung im internationalen Verfahrensrecht, Diss. Hamburg 2001, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2002 Google Scholar öffnen
Kokott, J., Das interamerikanische System zum Schutze der Menschenrechte, Diss. Heidelberg 1985, Springer, Berlin 1986 Google Scholar öffnen
Kokott, J., Beweislastverteilung und Prognoseentscheidungen bei der Inanspruchnahme von Grund- und Menschenrechten, Habil. Heidelberg 1992, Springer, Berlin, 1993 Google Scholar öffnen
Kolb, R., General principles of procedural law, in: A. Zimmermann/C. Tomuschat/K. Oellers-Frahm/C. Tams (Eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: a commentary, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Kooijmans, P., The role of non-state actors and international dispute settlement, in: W. Heere (Ed.), From government to governance: the growing impact of non-state actors on the international and European legal system, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2003, pp. 21-27 Google Scholar öffnen
Krislov, S., The amicus curiae brief: from friendship to advocacy, 72 Yale Law Journal (1963), pp. 694-721 Google Scholar öffnen
Krommerdijk, J. and Morijn, J., ‘Proportional’ by what measure(s)? Balancing investor interests and human rights by way of applying the proportionality principle in investor-state arbitration, in: P.M. Dupuy/F. Francioni/ E.U. Petersmann (Eds.), Human rights in international investment law and arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009, pp. 422-451 Google Scholar öffnen
Kühne, U., Amicus Curiae, Heidelberg 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
Kulick, A., Global public interest in investment treaty arbitration, Diss. Tübingen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Kurkela, M. and Turunen, S., Due process in international commercial arbitration, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010 Google Scholar öffnen
Kuyper, P., The Appellate Body and the facts, in: M. Bronckers/R. W. Quick (Eds.), New directions in international economic law: essays in honour of John H. Jackson, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2000, pp. 309-323 Google Scholar öffnen
Lacarte, J., Transparency, public debate and participation by NGOs in the WTO: a WTO perspective, 7 Journal of International Economic Law (2004), pp. 683-686 Google Scholar öffnen
Lachs, M., Evidence in the procedure of the International Court of Justice: role of the Court, in: E. Bello/B. Ajibola (Eds.), Essays in honour of Judge Taslim Olawale Elias, Nijhoff, Dordrecht 1992, pp. 265-276 Google Scholar öffnen
Laidhold, M., Private party access to the WTO: do recent developments in international trade dispute resolution really give private organizations a voice in the WTO?, 12 The Transnational Lawyer (1999), pp. 427-450 Google Scholar öffnen
Lauterpacht, E., Principles of procedure in international litigation, 345 Receuil des Cours (2009), pp. 387-530 Google Scholar öffnen
Lauterpacht, H., The so-called Anglo-American and continental schools of thought in international law, 12 British Yearbook of International Law (1931), pp. 31-62 Google Scholar öffnen
Lauterpacht, H., The development of international law by the International Court, Stevens, London 1958 Google Scholar öffnen
Lauterpacht, H., The revision of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, 1 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2002), pp. 55-128 Google Scholar öffnen
Lauterpacht, H., The absence of an international legislature and the compulsory jurisdiction of international tribunals, 11 British Yearbook of International Law (1930), pp. 134-157 Google Scholar öffnen
Lester, A., Amici curiae: third-party interventions before the European Court of Human Rights, in: F. Matscher/H. Petzold (Eds.), Protecting human rights: the European dimension – studies in honour of Gérard J. Wiarda, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne 1988, pp. 341-350 Google Scholar öffnen
Levine, E., Amicus curiae in international investment arbitration: the implications of an increase in third-party participation, 29 Berkeley Journal of International Law (2011), pp. 200-224 Google Scholar öffnen
Lew, J., Iura novit curia and due process, in: L. Lévy/S. Lazareff (Eds.), Liber amicorum en l’honneur de Serge Lazareff, Pedone, Paris 2011, pp. 397-417 Google Scholar öffnen
Lim, C. L. , The amicus brief issue at the WTO, 4 Chinese Journal of International Law (2005), pp. 85-120 Google Scholar öffnen
Lindblom, A., Non-governmental organisations in international law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005 Google Scholar öffnen
Acosta López, J., The Cotton Field Case: gender perspective and feminist theories in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights jurisprudence, 21 Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional (2012), pp. 17-54 Google Scholar öffnen
Loukis, L., Standards of proof in proceedings under the European Convention of Human Rights, in: J. Velu (Ed.), Présence du droit public et des droits de l’homme, mélanges offerts à Jacques Velu, Vol. III, Bruylant, Brussels 1992, pp. 1431-1443 Google Scholar öffnen
Lowe, V., The function of litigation in international society, 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2012), pp. 209-222 Google Scholar öffnen
Lowe, V., Private disputes and the public interest in international law, in: D. French et al. (Eds.), International law and dispute settlement: new problems and techniques – liber amicorum John G. Merrills, Hart, Oxford 2010, pp. 3-16 Google Scholar öffnen
Lowman, M., The litigating amicus curiae: when does the party begin after the friends leave?, 41 American University Law Review (1992), p. 1243-1299 Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N., Legitimation durch Verfahren, 2nd Ed., Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. 1989 Google Scholar öffnen
Mackenzie, R., The amicus curiae in international courts: towards common procedural approaches, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 295-311 Google Scholar öffnen
Mackenzie, R., Romano, C., Shany, Y. and Sands, P., Manual on international courts and tribunals, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010 Google Scholar öffnen
Macklem, P. and Morgan, E., Indigenous rights in the Inter-American system: the amicus brief of the Assembly of First Nations in Awas Tingni v. Republic of Nicaragua, 22 Human Rights Quarterly (2000), pp. 569-602 Google Scholar öffnen
Mahoney, P., Developments in the procedure of the European Court of Human Rights: the revised rules of the court, 3 Yearbook of European Law (1983), pp. 127-167 Google Scholar öffnen
Mantakou, A., General principles of law and international arbitration, 58 Revue Hellenique de Droit International (2005), pp. 419-434 Google Scholar öffnen
Marceau, G., WTO dispute settlement and human rights, 13 European Journal of International Law (2002), pp. 753-814 Google Scholar öffnen
Marceau, G. and Stilwell, M., Practical suggestions for amicus curiae briefs before WTO adjudicating bodies, 4 Journal of International Economic Law (2001), pp. 155-187 Google Scholar öffnen
Marshall, F. and Mann, H., Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: good governance and the rules of law: express rules for investor-state arbitrations required, September 2006, at: at: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2006/investment_uncitral_rules_rrevision.pdf (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Matscher, F., Überlegungen über die Einführung der “Interpretationsintervention” im Verfahren vor dem Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, in: H. Miehsler (Ed.), Ius Humanitatis - Festschrift für Alfred Verdross zum 90. Geburtstag, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1980, pp. 533-546 Google Scholar öffnen
Matsushita, M., Transparency, amicus curiae briefs and third party rights, discussion round, 5 Journal of World Investment and Trade (2004), p. 329-344 Google Scholar öffnen
Mavroidis, P., Amicus curiae briefs before the WTO: much ado about nothing, in: A. v. Bogdandy et al. (Eds.), European integration and international coordination: studies in transnational economic law in honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002, pp. 317-329 and Harvard Jean Monnet working paper No. 02/01 (2001) Google Scholar öffnen
Mawdsley, A., Evidence before the International Court of Justice, in: R. Macdonald (Ed.), Essays in honour of Wang Tieya, Nijhoff, Dordrecht 1994, pp. 533-550 Google Scholar öffnen
McCann, T., The American Convention on Human Rights: toward uniform interpretation of human rights law, 6 Fordham International Law Journal (1983), pp. 610-635 Google Scholar öffnen
McCorquodale, R., An inclusive international legal system, 17 Leiden Journal of International Law (2004), pp. 477-504 Google Scholar öffnen
McLachlan, C., The principle of systemic integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2005), pp. 279-319 Google Scholar öffnen
McRae, D., What is the future of WTO dispute settlement?, 7 Journal of International Economic Law (2004), pp. 3-21 Google Scholar öffnen
Medina, C., The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: reflections on a joint venture, 12 Human Rights Quarterly (1990), pp. 439-464 Google Scholar öffnen
Menaker, A., Piercing the veil of confidentiality: the recent trend towards greater public participation and transparency in investor-state arbitration, in: K. Yannaca-Small (Ed.), Arbitration under international investment agreements – a guide to the key issues, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010, pp. 129-160 Google Scholar öffnen
Mendelson, M., Debate on transparency, amicus curiae briefs and third party participation, 5 Journal of World Investment and Trade (2004), p. 347 Google Scholar öffnen
Meshel, T., Human rights in investor-state arbitration: the human right to water and beyond, 6 Journal of International Dispute Settlement (2016), pp. 277-307 Google Scholar öffnen
Meyer-Ladewig, J., Kommentar zur europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, 3rd Ed., Nomos et al., Baden-Baden et al. 2011 Google Scholar öffnen
Mistelis, L., Confidentiality and third party participation: UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corp. v. United States, in: T. Weiler (Ed.), International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law, Cameron May, London 2005, pp. 169-199 Google Scholar öffnen
Mitchell, A., Due process in WTO disputes, in: R. Yerxa/B. Wilson (Eds.), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement – the first ten years, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, pp. 144-160 Google Scholar öffnen
Mohamed, A., Individual and NGO participation in human rights litigation before the African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights: lessons from the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights, 43 Journal of African Law (1999), pp. 201-213 Google Scholar öffnen
Mohan, S. C., The amicus curiae: friends no more?, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (2010), p. 352-374 Google Scholar öffnen
Mommsen, T., Römisches Staatsrecht, Vol. I, 2nd Ed., Hirzel, Leipzig 1876 Google Scholar öffnen
Mommsen, T., Römisches Staatsrecht, Vol. II, 3rd Ed., Hirzel, Leipzig 1887 Google Scholar öffnen
Moore, T., Greenpeace case gathers knots at ITLOS, 22 October 2013, at: http://www.cdr-news.co.uk/categories/arbitration-and-adr/featured/greenpeace-case-gathers-knots-at-itlos (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Morison, J. and Anthony, G., The place of public interest, in: G. Anthony et al (Eds.), Values in global administrative law, Hart, Oxford 2011, pp. 215-238 Google Scholar öffnen
Mosk, R., The role of facts in international dispute resolution, 304 Receuil des Cours (2003), pp. 9-179 Google Scholar öffnen
Mourre, A., Are amici curiae the proper response to the public’s concerns on transparency in innvestment arbitration?, 5 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2006), pp. 257-271 Google Scholar öffnen
Moyer, C., The role of “amicus curiae” in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in: la corte interamericana de derechos humanos, estudios y documentos, San José 1999, pp. 119-133 Google Scholar öffnen
Neill, P., Confidentiality in arbitration, 12 Arbitration International (1996), pp. 287-317 Google Scholar öffnen
Newcombe, A. and Paradell, L., Law and practice of investment treaties – standards of treatment, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009 Google Scholar öffnen
Nichols, P., Extension of standing in World Trade Organization disputes to nongovernment parties, 17 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law (1996), pp. 295-329 Google Scholar öffnen
Nolan, M. and Sourgens, F., Issues of proof of general principles of law in international arbitration, 3 World Arbitration and Mediation Review (2009), pp. 505-532 Google Scholar öffnen
Nowicki, M., NGOs before the European Commission and the Court of Human Rights, 14 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (1996), pp. 289-302 Google Scholar öffnen
Nsour, M., Fundamental facets of the United States-Jordan Free Trade Agreement: e-commerce, dispute resolution, and beyond, 27 Fordham Journal of International Law (2004), pp. 742-784 Google Scholar öffnen
O’Brien, Z., Did the courts make a new friend? Amicus curiae jurisdiction in Ireland, 7 Trinity College Law Review (2004), pp. 5-28 Google Scholar öffnen
Oda, S., Intervention in the International Court of Justice: Articles 62 and 63 of the Statute, in: R. Bernhardt et al (Eds.), Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung, internationale Gerichtsbarkeit und Menschenrechte, Festschrift für Hermann Mosler, Springer, Berlin et al. 1983, pp. 629-648 Google Scholar öffnen
Oda, S., The International Court of Justice viewed from the bench (1976-1993), 244 Receuil des Cours (1993 VII), pp. 9-190 Google Scholar öffnen
Odinkalu, C. and Christensen, C., The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights: the development of its non-state communication procedures, 20 Human Rights Quarterly (1998), pp. 235-280 Google Scholar öffnen
Oellers-Frahm, K., Die Intervention nach Art. 62 des Statuts des Internationalen Gerichtshofs: Überlegungen anlässlich der Entscheidung des Internationalen Gerichtshofs vom 14. April 1981 über die Intervention Maltas, 41 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (1981), pp. 579-588 Google Scholar öffnen
Oellers-Frahm, K., Lawmaking through advisory opinions, 12 German Law Journal (2011), pp. 1033-1056 Google Scholar öffnen
Oesch, M., Standards of review in WTO panel proceedings, in: R. Yerxa/B. Wilson (Eds.), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, pp. 161-176 Google Scholar öffnen
Ölz, M., Non-governmental organizations in regional human rights systems, 28 Columbia Human Rights Law Review (1997), pp. 307-374 Google Scholar öffnen
Oppermann, T., Classen, C. and Nettesheim, M., Europarecht, 5th Ed., C.H. Beck, Munich 2011 Google Scholar öffnen
Orakhelashvili, A., The position of the individual in international law, 31 California Western International Law Journal (2001), pp. 241-276 Google Scholar öffnen
Orrego Vicuña, F., International dispute settlement in an evolving global society: constitutionalization, accessibility, privatization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004 Google Scholar öffnen
Orrego-Vicuña, F., Law making in a global society: does consent still matter?, in: J. Bröhmer/G. Ress (Eds.), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. Januar 2005, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne 2005, pp. 191-206 Google Scholar öffnen
Padilla, D., The Inter-American Commission on Humans Rights of the Organization of American States: a case study, 9 American University Journal of International Law & Policy (1993), pp. 95-115 Google Scholar öffnen
Palchetti, P., Opening the International Court of Justice to third states: intervention and beyond, 6 Max-Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (2002), pp. 139-181 Google Scholar öffnen
Patrizia, C., Profaizer, J. and Timofeyev, I., Investment disputes involving the renewable energy industry under the Energy Charter Treaty, 2 October 2015, Global Arbitration Review, at: http://globalarbitrationreview.com/chapter/1036076/investment-disputes-involving-the-renewable-energy-industry-under-the-energy-charter-treaty (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Paulus, A., Die internationale Gemeinschaft im Völkerrecht: eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung des Völkerrechts im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, C.H. Beck, Munich 2001 Google Scholar öffnen
Paulus, A., Article 66, in: A. Zimmermann/C. Tomuschat/K. Oellers-Frahm/C. Tams (Eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Pauwelyn, J., The use of experts in WTO dispute settlement, 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2002), pp. 325-364 Google Scholar öffnen
Pauwelyn, J., The role of public international law in the WTO: how far can we go?, 95 American Journal of International Law (2001), pp. 535-578 Google Scholar öffnen
Payne, C., Mastering the evidence: improving fact-finding by international courts, 41 Environmental Law (2011), pp. 1191-1220 Google Scholar öffnen
Peel, J., Giving the public a voice in the protection of the global environment: avenues for participation by NGOs in dispute resolution at the European Court of Justice and World Trade Organization, 12 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy (2001), pp. 47-76 Google Scholar öffnen
Pellonpää, M. and Caron, D., The UNCITRAL arbitration rules as interpreted and applied: selected problems in light of the practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal, Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing, Helsinki 1994 Google Scholar öffnen
Perry, S. and Karadelis, K., Sun rises on Czech energy claims, Global Arbitration Review, 19 February 2014, at: http://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1033183/sun-rises-on-czech-energy-claims (last visited 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Peterson, L., Claimant in garbage disposal dispute with Canada seeks closed-door hearings and wants amicus curiae to pay $25,000 fee, 12 November 2008, at: http://www.iareporter.com/articles/20090930_7 (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Pham, H., Developing countries and the WTO: the need for more mediation in the DSU, 9 Harvard Negotiation Law Review (2004), pp. 331-389 Google Scholar öffnen
Pinto, M., NGOs and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 47-56 Google Scholar öffnen
Prévost, D., WTO Subsidies Agreement and privatised companies: Appellate Body amicus curiae briefs, 27 Legal Issues of Economic Integration (2000), pp. 279-394 Google Scholar öffnen
Prost, O., Confidentiality issues under the DSU: fact-finding process versus confidentiality, in: R. Yerxa/B. Wilson (Eds.), Key issues in WTO dispute settlement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, pp. 190-203 Google Scholar öffnen
Qureshi, A., Extraterritorial shrimps, ngos and the WTO Appellate Body, 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1999), pp. 199-206 Google Scholar öffnen
Razzaque, J., Changing role of friends of the court in the international courts and tribunals, 1 Non-state actors and international law (2001), pp. 169-200 Google Scholar öffnen
Reed, L., Paulsson, J. and Blackaby, N., Guide to ICSID arbitration, 2nd Ed., Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2011 Google Scholar öffnen
Reiner, C. and Schreuer, C., Human rights and international investment arbitration, in: P.M. Dupuy/F. Francioni/E.-U. Petersmann (Eds.), Human rights in international investment law and arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009, pp. 82-96 Google Scholar öffnen
Reinisch, A., The changing international legal framework for dealing with non-state actors, in: A. Bianchi (Ed.), Non-state actors and international law, Ashgate, Farnham 2009, pp. 411-463 Google Scholar öffnen
Reinisch, A. and Irgel, C., The participation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the WTO dispute settlement system, 1 Non-State Actors and International Law (2001), pp. 127-151 Google Scholar öffnen
Reisman, M., Nullity and revision: the review and enforcement of international judgments and awards, Yale University Press, New Haven 1971 Google Scholar öffnen
Rengeling, H., Middeke, A., Gellermann, M. and Andová, K. (Eds.), Handbuch des Rechtsschutzes in der Europäischen Union, 3rd Ed., C.H. Beck, Munich 2014 Google Scholar öffnen
Reusch, R., Die Legitimation des WTO-Streitbeilegungsverfahrens, Diss. Tübingen 2006, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2007 Google Scholar öffnen
Rivera Juaristi, F., The “amicus curiae” in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (1982 – 2013), in: Y. Haeck/O. Ruiz-Chiriboga/C. Burbano Herrera, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: theory and practice, present and future, Cambridge et al. 2015, pp. 103-131 Google Scholar öffnen
Robbins, J., False friends: amicus curiae and procedural discretion in WTO appeals under the Hot-Rolled Lead/Asbestos doctrine, 44 Harvard International Law Journal (2003), pp. 317-329 Google Scholar öffnen
Rogers, A. and Miller, D., Non-confidential arbitration proceedings, 12 Arbitration International (1996), pp. 319-345 Google Scholar öffnen
Romano, C. P., Alter, K. J. and Shany, Y., Mapping international adjudicative bodies, the issues, and players, in: C.P. Romano/K.J. Alter/Y. Shany (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of international adjudication, Oxford 2014, pp. 3-26 Google Scholar öffnen
Romano, C., The shift from the consensual to the compulsory paradigm in international adjudication: elements for a theory of consent, 39 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (2007), pp. 791-872 Google Scholar öffnen
Ronen, Y., Participation of non-state actors in ICJ proceedings, 11 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2012), pp. 77-110 Google Scholar öffnen
Rosenne, S., Reflections on the position of the individual in inter-state litigation, in: P. Sanders (Ed.), International arbitration – liber amicorum for Martin Domke, The Hague 1967, pp. 240-257 and reprinted in: S. Rosenne, An international law miscellany, Dordrecht 1993 Google Scholar öffnen
Rosenne, S., Intervention in the International Court of Justice, Nijhoff, Dordrecht 1993 Google Scholar öffnen
Rosenne, S., The law and practice of the International Court of Justice 1920-2005, 4th Ed. Nijhoff, Leiden 2006 Google Scholar öffnen
Rosenne, S., International Court of Justice, in: R. Wolfrum et al. (Eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law online, Oxford, last updated 2006 Google Scholar öffnen
Rosenne, S., The law and practice of the International Court, Sijthoff, Leiden 1965 Google Scholar öffnen
Rosenne, S., The law and practice of the International Court, Vol. 3: Procedure, Nijhoff, Leiden 2006 Google Scholar öffnen
Rosentreter, D., Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the principle of systemic integration in international investment law and arbitration, Baden-Baden 2015 Google Scholar öffnen
Rubagotti, G., The role of NGOs before the United Nations Human Rights Committee, in: T. Treves/M. Frigessi di Rattalma et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 67-92 Google Scholar öffnen
Rubins, N., Opening the investment arbitration process: at what cost, for what benefit?, in: R. Hofmann/C. Tams (Eds.), The International Convention on the Settlement of International Disputes (ICSID): taking stock after 40 years, Nomos, Baden-Baden 2007, pp. 213-222 Google Scholar öffnen
Ruiz Miguel, C., La fundación consultiva en el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos: crisálida de una jurisdicción supra-constitucional?, in: H. Fix-Zamudio (Ed.), Liber amicorum Héctor Fix-Zamudio, Vol. II San José 1998, pp. 1345-1363 Google Scholar öffnen
Ruthemeyer, T., Der amicus curiae brief im internationalen Investitionsrecht, Diss. University of Cologne, Baden-Baden 2014 Google Scholar öffnen
Sadeghi, K., The European Court of Human Rights: the problematic nature of the court’s reliance on secondary sources for fact-finding, 25 Connecticut Journal of International Law (2009), pp. 127-151 Google Scholar öffnen
Sandifer, D., Evidence before international tribunals, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville 1975 Google Scholar öffnen
Sands, P., Treaty, custom and the cross-fertilization of international law, 1 Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal (1998), pp. 85-105 Google Scholar öffnen
Santulli, C., Droit du contentieux international, Montchrestien, Paris 2005 Google Scholar öffnen
Sauer, H., Jurisdiktionskonflikte im Mehrebenensystem: Die Entwicklung eines Modells zur Lösung von Konflikten zwischen Gerichten unterschiedlicher Ebenen in vernetzten Rechtsordnungen, Diss. Düsseldorf 2005, Springer Berlin 2008 Google Scholar öffnen
Savarese, E., Amicus curiae participation in investor-state arbitral proceedings, 17 Italian Yearbook of International Law (2007), pp. 99-121 Google Scholar öffnen
Schachter, M., The utility of pro bono representation of U.S.-based amicus curiae in non-U.S. and multi-national courts as a means of advancing the public interest, 28 Fordham International Law Journal (2004), pp. 88-144 Google Scholar öffnen
Schadendorf, S., Human rights arguments in amicus curiae submissions: analysis of ICSID and NAFTA investor-state arbitrations, 10 Transnational Dispute Management (2013), pp. 1-23 Google Scholar öffnen
Schadendorf, S., Investor-state arbitrations and the human rights of the host state’s population: an empirical approach to the impact of amicus curiae submissions, in: N. Weiß/J.-M. Thouvenin, The influence of human rights on international law, Heidelberg 2015, pp. 167-181 Google Scholar öffnen
Schill, S., The multilateralization of international investment law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009 Google Scholar öffnen
Schill, S., Crafting the international economic order: the public function of investment treaty arbitration and its significance for the role of the arbitrator, 23 Leiden Journal of International Law (2010), pp. 401-430 Google Scholar öffnen
Schill, S. (Ed.), International investment law and comparative public law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010 Google Scholar öffnen
Schill, S., The Mauritius Convention on Transparency: a model for investment law reform?, EJIL:Talk!, 8 April 2015, at: http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-mauritius-convention-on-transparency-a-model-for-investment-law-reform/ (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Schleyer, G., Power to the people: allowing private parties to raise claims before the WTO dispute resolution system, 65 Fordham Law Review (1997), pp. 2275-2312 Google Scholar öffnen
Schneider, A., Democracy and dispute resolution: individual rights in international trade organizations, 19 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law (1998), pp. 587-638 Google Scholar öffnen
Schorm-Bernschütz, R., Die Tatsachenfeststellung im Verfahren vor dem Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung staatlicher Mitwirkungspflichten, Diss. Düsseldorf 2003, Lit Verlag, Münster 2004 Google Scholar öffnen
Schütze, R., Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und Rechtsvergleichung, 110 Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft (2011), pp. 89-97 Google Scholar öffnen
Schwarzenberger, G., International law as applied by international courts and tribunals, Vol. 4: international judicial law, Stevens, London 1986 Google Scholar öffnen
Scobbie, I., Legal reasoning and the judicial function in the International Court, University of Cambridge, Ph.D. Dissertation, 1990 Google Scholar öffnen
Scobbie, I., The theorist as a judge: Hersch Lauterpacht’s concept of the international judicial function, 8 European Journal of International Law (1997), pp. 264-298 Google Scholar öffnen
Shany, Y., The competing jurisdictions of international courts and tribunals, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003 Google Scholar öffnen
Shany, Y., One law to rule them all: should international courts be viewed as guardians of procedural order and legal uniformity?, in: O. Fauchald/A. Nollkaemper (Eds.), The practice of international courts and the (de-)fragmentation of international law, Hart, Oxford 2012, pp. 15-34 Google Scholar öffnen
Shany, Y., No longer a weak department of power? Reflections on the emergence of a new international judiciary, 20 European Journal of International Law (2009), pp. 73-91 Google Scholar öffnen
Shelton, D., The participation of non-governmental organizations in international judicial proceedings, 88 American Journal of International Law (1994), pp. 611-642 Google Scholar öffnen
Shelton, D., The International Court of Justice and non-governmental organisations, 9 International Community Law Review (2007), pp. 139-155 Google Scholar öffnen
Shelton, D., The jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 10 American University International Law Review (1994), pp. 333-372 Google Scholar öffnen
Sicilianos, L.-A., La tierce intervention devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, in: H. Ruiz-Fabri/J.-M. Sorel (Eds .), Les tiers à l’instance devant les juridictions internationales, Pedone, Paris 2005, pp. 123-150 Google Scholar öffnen
Simma, B., Foreign investment arbitration: a place for human rights?, 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2011), pp. 573-597 Google Scholar öffnen
Slotboom, M., Participation of NGOs before the WTO and EC tribunals: which court is the better friend?, 5 World Trade Review (2006), pp. 69-101 Google Scholar öffnen
Smith, R., Why third-party interventions in the judicial process benefit democracy, The Law Gazette of 12 November 2009, at: https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/analysis/why-third-party-interventions-in-the-judicial-process-benefit-democracy/53085.article (last visited: 29.8.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Spiro, P., Accounting for NGOs, 3 Chicago Journal of International Law (2002), pp. 161-169 Google Scholar öffnen
Steger, D., Amicus curiae: participant or friend? – the WTO and NAFTA experience, in: A. v. Bogdandy (Ed.), European integration and international co-ordination – studies in transnational economic law in honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002, pp. 419-450 Google Scholar öffnen
Stein, E., Lawyers, judges and the making of a transnational constitution, 75 American Journal of International Law (1981), pp. 1-27 Google Scholar öffnen
Steinberger, H., The ICJ, in: H. Mosler/R. Bernhardt (Eds.), Judicial settlement of international disputes, Springer, Berlin 1974, pp. 193-283 Google Scholar öffnen
Stern, B., The intervention of private entities and states as “friends of the court” in WTO dispute settlement proceedings, in: P. Macrory et al. (Eds.), World Trade Organization: legal, economic and political analysis, Vol. I, Springer, New York 2005, pp. 1427-1458 Google Scholar öffnen
Stern, B., L’entrée de la société civile dans l’arbitrage entre Etat et investisseur, 2 Revue de l’arbitrage (2002), pp. 329-345 Google Scholar öffnen
Sudre, F., Extradition et peine de mort: arrêt Soering de la cour européenne des droits de l’homme, du 7 juillet 1989, 94 Revue Générale de Droit International Public (1990), pp. 103-121 Google Scholar öffnen
Talmon, S., Der Internationale Seegerichtshof in Hamburg als Mittel der friedlichen Beilegung seerechtlicher Streitigkeiten, Juristische Schulung 2001, pp. 550-556 Google Scholar öffnen
Tams, C., Article 50, in: A. Zimmermann/C. Tomuschat/K. Oellers-Frahm/C. Tams (Eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice, 2nd Ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Tams, C. and Zoellner, C., Amici Curiae im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht, 45 Archiv des Völkerrechts (2007), pp. 217-243 Google Scholar öffnen
Teitelbaum, R., A look at the public interest in investment arbitration: is it unique? What should we do about it?, 5 Berkeley Journal of International Law (2010), pp. 54-62 Google Scholar öffnen
Tellegen-Couperus, O., The so-called consilium of the praetor and the development of Roman Law, 69 Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis (2001), pp. 11-20 Google Scholar öffnen
Thirlway, H., Dilemma or chimera? Admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in international adjudication, 78 American Journal of International Law (1984), pp. 622-641 Google Scholar öffnen
Thirlway, H., The International Court of Justice 1989-2009: at the heart of the dispute settlement system?, 57 Netherlands International Law Review (2010), pp. 347-395 Google Scholar öffnen
Thirlway, H., Article 30, in: A. Zimmermann/C. Tomuschat/K. Oellers-Frahm/C. Tams (Eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Thirlway, H., Procedural law and the International Court of Justice, in: V. Lowe/M. Fitzmaurice-Lachs/R. Jennings (Eds.), Fifty years of the International Court of Justice: essays in honour of Robert Jennings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996, pp. 389-405 Google Scholar öffnen
Thirlway, H., Unacknowledged legislators: some preliminary reflections on the limits of judicial lawmaking, in: R. Wolfrum et al. (Eds.), International dispute settlement: room for innovations, Springer, Heidelberg 2012, pp. 311-323 Google Scholar öffnen
Thirlway, H., Advisory opinions, in: R. Wolfrum et al. (Eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law online, last updated 2006, Oxford Google Scholar öffnen
Tienhaara, K., Third party participation in investment-environment disputes: recent developments, 16 Review of European Community Law and International Environmental Law (2007), pp. 230-242 Google Scholar öffnen
Tietje, C. and Wackernagel, C., Outlawing compliance? – the enforcement of intra-EU investment awards and EU state aid law, Policy Papers on Transnational Economic Law No. 14 (June 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
Treves, T., Conflicts between the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the International Court of Justice, 31 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics (1999), pp. 809-821 Google Scholar öffnen
Treves, T., Non-governmental organizations before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: the advisory opinion of 1 February 2011, in: G. Bastid-Burdeau et al. (Eds.), Le 90e anniversaire the Boutros Boutros-Ghalie: hommage du Curatorium à son Président/Académie de Droit international de la Haye, Nijhoff, Leiden 2012, pp. 255-262 Google Scholar öffnen
Treves, T., The procedure before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: the rules of the tribunal and related documents, 11 Leiden Journal of International Law (1998), pp. 565-594 Google Scholar öffnen
Treves, T. et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005 Google Scholar öffnen
Triantafilou, E., Is a connection to the “public interest” a meaningful prerequisite of third party participation in investment arbitration?, 5 Berkeley Journal of International Law (2010), pp. 38-46 Google Scholar öffnen
Triantafilou, E., Amicus submissions in investor state arbitration after Suez v. Argentina, 24 Arbitration International (2008), pp. 571-586 Google Scholar öffnen
Trocker, N., L’”Amicus Curiae” nel giudizio davanti alla Corte Europea dei Diritti Dell’Uomo, 35 Revista di Diritto Civile (1989), pp. 119-143 Google Scholar öffnen
Tweeddale, A., Confidentiality in arbitration and the public interest exception, 21 Arbitration International (2005), pp. 59-69 Google Scholar öffnen
Umbricht, G., An “amicus curiae brief” on amicus curiae briefs at the WTO, 4 Journal of International Economic Law (2001), pp. 773-794 Google Scholar öffnen
Urlings, R., De Commissie als amicus curiae en het fiscale karakter van een mededingingsboete, 15 Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht (2009), pp. 288-293 Google Scholar öffnen
Vadi, V., Beyond known worlds: climate change governance by arbitral tribunals?, 48 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2015), pp. 1285-1351 Google Scholar öffnen
Vajic, N., Some concluding remarks on NGOs and the European Court on Human Rights, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 93-104 Google Scholar öffnen
Valencia-Ospina, E., Non-governmental organizations and the International Court of Justice, in: T. Treves/M. Frigessi di Rattalma et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 227-232 Google Scholar öffnen
Valencia-Ospina, E., Evidence before the International Court of Justice, 1 International Law Forum (1999), pp. 202-207 Google Scholar öffnen
Van Aaken, A., Fragmentation of international law: the case of international investment protection, 17 Finnish Yearbook International Law (2006), pp. 91-130 Google Scholar öffnen
Van Damme, I., Treaty interpretation revisited, not revised, ILO Distinguished Scholar Series, 30 October 2008 Google Scholar öffnen
Van den Bossche, P. and Zdouc, W., The law and policy of the World Trade Organization: text, cases and materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013 Google Scholar öffnen
Van den Eynde, L., An empirical look at the amicus curiae practice of human rights NGOs before the European Court of Human Rights, 31 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (2013), pp. 271-313 Google Scholar öffnen
Van der Mei, A. P., The new African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: towards an effective human rights protection mechanism for Africa?, 18 Leiden Journal of International Law (2005), pp. 113-129 Google Scholar öffnen
Van Duzer, A., Enhancing the procedural legitimacy of investor-state arbitration through transparency and amicus curiae participation, 52 McGill Law Journal (2007), pp. 681-723 Google Scholar öffnen
Van Harten, G., Investment treaty arbitration and public law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007 Google Scholar öffnen
Van Harten, G. and Loughlin, M., Investment treaty arbitration as a species of global administrative law, 17 European Journal of International Law (2006), pp. 121-150 Google Scholar öffnen
Van het Kaar, B. and Kaplan, G., Airline dispute lands in ICJ: a commentary on the Swissair/Sabena case, 28 January 2010, at: http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/index.php?id=11397 (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Van Hof, J.J., Commentary on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: the application by the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, 1991 Google Scholar öffnen
Van Nuffel, P., Ode an die Freu(n)de – the European Commission as amicus curiae before European and national courts, in: I. Govaere/D. Hanf (Eds.), Scrutinizing internal and external dimensions of European law – liber amicorum Paul Demaret, Vol. I, Brussels 2013, pp. 267-278 Google Scholar öffnen
Viljoen, F. and K. Abebe, A., Amicus curiae participation before regional human rights bodies in Africa, 58 Journal of African Law (2014), pp. 22-44 Google Scholar öffnen
Viñuales, J., Foreign investment and the environment in international law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012 Google Scholar öffnen
Viñuales, J., Amicus intervention in investor-state arbitration, 61 Dispute Resolution Journal (2006-2007), pp. 72-81 Google Scholar öffnen
von Bogdandy, A., Verfassungsrechtliche Dimensionen der Welthandelsorganisation, Kritische Justiz (2001), pp. 264-281 Google Scholar öffnen
von Bogdandy, A. and Venzke, I., In whose name? An investigation of international courts’ public authority and its democratic justification, 23 European Journal of International Law (2012), pp. 7-41 Google Scholar öffnen
Voßkuhle, A. and Sydow, G., Die demokratische Legitimation des Richters, 57 Juristische Zeitung (2002), pp. 673-682 Google Scholar öffnen
Walbolt, S. and Lang, Jr., J., Amicus briefs revisited, 33 Stetson Law Review (2003), pp. 171-180 Google Scholar öffnen
Wälde, T., Improving the mechanisms for treaty negotiation and investment disputes – competition and choice as the path to quality and legitimacy, in: K. Sauvant (Ed.), Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy (2008-2009), pp. 505-584 Google Scholar öffnen
Wälde, T., Equality of arms in investment arbitration: procedural challenge, in: K. Yannaca-Small (Ed.), Arbitration under international investment agreements: a guide to the key issues, Oxford University Press, New York 2010, pp. 161-188 Google Scholar öffnen
Wälde, T., Procedural challenges in investment arbitration under the shadow of the dual role of the state: asymmetries and tribunals’ duty to ensure, pro-actively, the equality of arms, 26 Arbitration International (2010), pp. 3-42 Google Scholar öffnen
Waldock, C., The Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case, 28 British Yearbook of International Law (1951), pp. 114-171 Google Scholar öffnen
Ward, S., Friends of the court are friends of mine, 93 ABA Journal (2007), pp. 24-25, at: http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/friends_of_the_court_are_friends_of_mine (last visited: 28.9.2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Watts, A., Enhancing the effectiveness of procedures of international dispute settlement, 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (2001), pp. 21-39 Google Scholar öffnen
Watts, A., The ICJ’s practice directions of 30 July 2004, 3 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2004), pp. 385-394 Google Scholar öffnen
Wehland, H., The enforcement of intra-EU BIT awards: Micula v. Romania and beyond, 17 Journal of World Investment and Trade (2016), pp. 942-963 Google Scholar öffnen
Weiler, T., The Ethyl arbitration: first of its kind and a harbinger of things to come, 11 American Review of International Arbitration (2001), pp. 187-201 Google Scholar öffnen
White, G., The use of experts by international tribunals, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse 1965 Google Scholar öffnen
Wieland, P., Why the amicus curiae institution is ill-suited to address indigenous peoples’ rights before investor-state arbitration tribunals: Glamis Gold and the right of intervention, 3 Trade, Law and Development (2011), pp. 334-366 Google Scholar öffnen
Williams, S. and Woolaver, H., The role of amicus curiae before international criminal tribunals, 6 International Criminal Law Review (2006), pp. 151-189 Google Scholar öffnen
Willmott, L., White, B. and Cooper, D., Interveners or interferers: intervention in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment, 27 Sydney Law Review (2005), pp. 597-622 Google Scholar öffnen
Wittich, S., The judicial functions of the International Court of Justice, in: I. Buffard et al. (Eds.), International law between universalism and fragmentation – Festschrift in honour of Gerhard Hafner, Nijhoff, Leiden 2008, pp. 981-1000 Google Scholar öffnen
Wolfrum, R., Legitimacy of international law from a legal perspective: some introductory considerations, in: R. Wolfrum/V. Röben (Eds.), Legitimacy in international law, Springer, Berlin 2008, pp. 1-24 Google Scholar öffnen
Wolfrum, R., The legislative history of Articles 20 and 21 of the Statute of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, 63 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht (1999), pp. 342-349 Google Scholar öffnen
Wolfrum, R., International courts and tribunals: evidence, in: R. Wolfrum et al. (Eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law online, Oxford (2010) Google Scholar öffnen
Wolfrum, R., The taking and assessment of evidence by the European Court of Human Rights, in: S. Breitenmoser et al. (Eds.), Human rights, democracy and the rule of law – liber amicorum Luzius Wildhaber, Dike, Zürich et al. 2007, pp. 915-924 Google Scholar öffnen
Wolfrum, R., Vitzthum (Ed.), Handbuch des Seerechts, C. H. Beck, Munich 2006 Google Scholar öffnen
Wolfrum, R., Advisory opinions: are they a suitable alternative for the settlement of international disputes, in: R. Wolfrum et al. (Eds.), International dispute settlement: room for innovations?, Springer, Heidelberg 2013, pp. 35-129 Google Scholar öffnen
Wright-Carozza, P., Uses and misuses of comparative law in international human rights: some reflections on the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 73 Notre Dame Law Review (1998), pp. 1217-1237 Google Scholar öffnen
Zagorac, D., International courts and compliance bodies: the experience of Amnesty International, in: T. Treves et al. (Eds.), Civil society, international courts and compliance bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, pp. 11-39 Google Scholar öffnen
Zimmermann, A., International courts and tribunals, intervention in proceedings, in: R. Wolfrum et al. (Eds.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law online, Oxford University Press, New York, last updated 2006 Google Scholar öffnen
Zoellner, C., Third-party participation (NGO’s and private persons) and transparency in ICSID proceedings, in: R. Hoffmann/C. Tams (Eds.), The ICSID – taking stock after 40 years, Nomos, Baden-Baden 2007, pp. 179-208 Google Scholar öffnen
Zonnekeyn, G., The Appellate Body’s communication on amicus curiae briefs in the Asbestos Case – an Echternach procession?, 35 Journal of World Trade (2001), pp. 553-563 Google Scholar öffnen
Zwart, T., Would international courts be able to fill the accountability gap at the global level?, in: G. Anthony et al. (Eds.), Values in global administrative law, Hart, Oxford 2011, pp. 193-214 Google Scholar öffnen
Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H., Introduction to comparative law, 3rd Ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1998 Google Scholar öffnen