Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Risk and Mental Element

An Analysis of National and International Law on Core Crimes
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2014

Zusammenfassung

Können mentale Einstellungen unterhalb der Schwelle sicheren Wissens der Tatbestandsverwirklichung eine strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit für völkerrechtliche Verbrechen begründen? Die Antwort auf diese Problematik ist dadurch bestimmt, ob beim Eingehen eines solchen Risikos die subjektiven Tatbestandsvoraussetzungen, die in einem Strafrechtssystem auf völkerrechtliche Verbrechen anwendbar sind, als erfüllt angesehen werden. Diese Untersuchung identifiziert die Lösungen, die in Deutschland, den USA, der Rechtsprechung der UN-ad-hoc-Tribunale und dem IStGH-Statut entwickelt worden sind.

Übergeordnetes Ziel der Analyse ist es, nicht nur einen umfassenden Überblick über die gegenwärtige Rechtslage zu liefern, sondern auch Reformvorschläge zu entwickeln, die das Zusammenspiel von nationalen und internationalen Gerichten bei der Verfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen berücksichtigen.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2014
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1593-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5607-8
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht
Band
15
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
272
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 14
  2. Abbreviations Kein Zugriff 15 - 16
  3. Introduction Kein Zugriff 17 - 22
    1. Mental Element and the German Völkerstrafgesetzbuch Kein Zugriff 23 - 78
    2. Mental Element and the US Federal Criminal Code Kein Zugriff 79 - 114
    1. Mental Element in the Jurisprudence of the ad hoc Tribunals and Other Recent Developments in Customary International Law Kein Zugriff 115 - 174
    2. Mental Element in the ICC Statute: the Early Jurisprudence of the ICC Kein Zugriff 175 - 234
  6. Conclusions and Recommendations Kein Zugriff 235 - 242
  7. Appendix: Materials on (International) Criminal Law in the World Wide Web Kein Zugriff 243 - 244
  8. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 245 - 258
  9. Table of Cases Kein Zugriff 259 - 272

Literaturverzeichnis (569)

  1. Hirad Abtahi and Philippa Webb, The Genocide Convention: the travaux préparatoires (2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004164185.i-2236
  2. Larry Alexander, ‘Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Liability’, 88 California Law Review (2000), pp. 931 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3481200
  3. Enrico Amati and Matteo Costi, ‘Autoria e forme di compartecipazione criminosa’, in Enrico Amati, Valentina Caccamo, Matteo Costi, Emanuela Fronza and Antonio Vallini, Introduzione al diritto penale internazionale, 2nd edn. (2010), pp. 110 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Kai Ambos, ‘Afghanistan-Einsatz der Bundeswehr und Völker(straf)recht’, 63 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2010), pp. 1725 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Kai Ambos, ‘Art. 25 ICC Statute: Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 743 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.118
  6. Kai Ambos, Der allgemeine Teil des Völkerstrafrechts: Ansätze einer Dogmatisierung (2002). Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Kai Ambos, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law in the Rome Statute’, 10 Criminal Law Forum (1999), pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1009495423352
  8. Kai Ambos, ‘Immer mehr Fragen im internationalen Strafrecht’, 21 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2001), pp. 628 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Kai Ambos, Internationales Strafrecht: Strafanwendungsrecht, Völkerstrafrecht, Europäisches Strafrecht, Rechtshilfe. Ein Studienbuch, 3rd edn. (2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Kai Ambos, ‘Superior Responsibility’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 823 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Kai Ambos, ‘The First Judgment of the International Criminal Court (Prosecutor v. Lubanga): a Comprehensive Analysis of the Legal Issues’, 12 International Criminal Law Review (2012), pp. 115 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/157181212X639644
  12. Kai Ambos, ‘§ 9 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen gegen Eigentum und sonstige Rechte’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1278 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Kai Ambos, Treatise on International Criminal Law, vol. 1: ‘Foundations and General Part’ (2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199657926.001.0001
  14. American Law Institute, Model Penal Code and Commentaries (Official Draft and Revised Comments), I, vol. 1: ‘General Provisions, §§ 1.01 to 2.13’ (1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Roberta Arnold, ‘Art. 28 ICC Statute: Responsibility of Commanders and Other Superiors. Analysis and Interpretation of Elements’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 824 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Roberta Arnold, ‘The mens rea of Genocide Under the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, 14 Criminal Law Forum (2003), pp. 127 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1026303731268
  17. Günther Arzt, ‘Leichtfertigkeit und Recklessness’, in W. Stree (ed.), Gedächtnisschrift für Horst Schröder (1978), pp. 119 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84244-2_5
  18. Cécile Aptel, ‘The Intent to Commit Genocide in the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’, 13 Criminal Law Forum (2002), pp. 273 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1023344825934
  19. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Dolus eventualis and the Rome Statute without it?’, 12 New Criminal Law Review (2009), pp. 433 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2009.12.3.433
  20. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Drawing the Boundaries of mens rea in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, 6 International Criminal Law Review (2006), pp. 313 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/157181206778553905
  21. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Mens rea – Mistake of Law and Mistake of Fact in German Criminal Law: A Survey for International Criminal Tribunals’, 5 International Criminal Law Review (2005), pp. 203 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Rethinking mens rea in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda’, in Olaoluwa Olusanya (ed.), Rethinking International Criminal Law: The Substantive Part (2007), pp. 13 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Mohamed Elewa Badar, The Concept of mens rea in International Criminal Law. The Case for a Unified Approach (2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘The Mental Element in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary from a Comparative Criminal Law Perspective’, 19 Criminal Law Forum (2008), pp. 473 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10609-008-9085-6
  25. Ilias Bantekas, International Criminal Law (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Carl Ludwig von Bar, ‘Dolus eventualis?’, 18 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1898), pp. 534 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1898.18.1.534
  27. M. Cherif Bassiouni, ‘International Crimes’, in M. Cherif Bassiouni (ed.), International Criminal Law’, 3rd edn. (2008), vol. 1: ‘Sources, Subjects, and Contents’, pp. 129 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004165328.i-1086
  28. M. Cherif, Bassiouni, The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court: an Article-by-Article Evolution of the Statute (2005), vol. 2. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 4 (1770). Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Karl Binding, Die Normen und ihre Übertretung: eine Untersuchung über die rechtsmäßige Handlung und die Arten des Delikts, vol. 2/2: ‘Der rechtswidrige Vorsatz’, 2nd edn. (1916). Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Christian Birnbaum, Die Leichtfertigkeit: zwischen Fahrlässigkeit und Vorsatz (2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Gideon Boas, James L. Bischoff and Natalie R. Reid, Elements of Crimes Under International Law (2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576003.009
  33. Gideon Boas, James L. Bischoff and Natalie R. Reid, Forms of Responsibility in International Criminal Law (2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Hans Boddens Hosang, ‘Art. 8(2)(b)(xvi) ICC Statute’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 176 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Michael Bohlander, Principles of German Criminal Law (2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Michael Bohlander, The German Criminal Code: a Modern English Translation (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Riccardo Borsari, Diritto punitivo sovranazionale come sistema (2007). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/10550490601184498
  38. Kathrin Bremer, Nationale Strafverfolgung internationaler Verbrechen gegen das humanitäre Völkerrecht. Am Beispiel einer Rechtsvergleichung Deutschlands, der Schweiz, Belgiens und Großbritanniens (1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Boris Burghardt, ‘Die Vorgesetztenverantwortlichkeit nach Völkerstrafrecht und deutschem Recht (§ 4 VStGB)’, 5 Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik (2010), pp. 695 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Stefano Canestrari, Dolo eventuale e colpa cosciente: ai confini tra dolo e colpa nella struttura delle tipologie delittuose (1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Francesco Carrara, Programma del corso di diritto criminale: del delitto e della pena (reprinted 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Antonio Cassese, ‘Crimes Against Humanity’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 353 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Antonio Cassese, International Criminal Law. Cases and Commentary (2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Antonio Cassese, ‘The Proper Limits of Individual Criminal Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise’, 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007), pp. 109 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Antonio Cassese, ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections’, 10 European Journal of International Law (1999), pp. 144 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta, Laurel Baig, Mary Fan, Christopher Gosnell and Alex Whiting, Cassese’s International Criminal Law, 3rd edn. (2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199694921.003.0021
  47. Chatham House, Milestones in International Criminal Justice: Recent Legal Controversies at the UN Yugoslav Tribunal (2013). Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Roger Clark, ‘Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings’, 19 Criminal Law Review Forum (2008), pp. 519 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10609-008-9074-9
  49. Roger Clark, ‘The Mental Element in International Criminal Law: the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Elements of Offences’, 12 Criminal Law Forum (2001), pp. 291 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Walter W. Cook, ‘Act, Intention, and Motive in the Criminal Law’, 26 Yale Law Journal (1917), pp. 645 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/786267
  51. Robert Cryer, Hakan Friman, Darryl Robinson and Elizabeth Wilmshurst, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd edn. (2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760808
  52. Francesca Curi, Tertium datur: dal common law al civil law per una scomposizione tripartita dell'elemento soggettivo del reato (2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Tobias Darge, Kriegsverbrechen im nationalen und internationalen Recht: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Bestimmtheitsgrundsatztes (2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11642-1
  54. Mireille Delmas-Marty, ‘Droit comparé et droit international: interaction et internormativité’, in Mario Chiavario (ed.), La justice pénale internationale entre passé et avenir (2003), pp. 11 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Alberto Di Martino, ‘Dolus eventualis’, in Antonio Cassese (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (2009), pp. 302 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Henri Decœur, ‘Avoiding Strict Liability in Mixed Conflicts: a Subjectivist Approach to the Contextual Elements of War Crimes’, 13 International Criminal Law Review (2013), pp. 473 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01302004
  57. Knut Dörmann, Elements of War Crimes Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary (2003). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495144
  58. Knut Dörmann, ‘§ 11 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen des Einsatzes verbotener Methoden der Kriegsführung’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1302 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Joshua Dressler, Cases and Materials on Criminal Law, 5th edn. (2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Joshua Dressler, Understanding Criminal Law, 5th edn. (2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Markus D. Dubber and Mark G. Kelman, American Criminal Law: Cases, Statutes and Comments, 2nd edn. (2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Udo Ebert, ‘Völkerstrafrecht und Gesetzlichkeitsprinzip’, in Guido Britz (ed.), Grundfragen staatlichen Strafens. Festschrift für Heinz Müller-Dietz zum 70. Geburtstag (2001), pp. 171 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Karl Engisch, Untersuchungen über Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit im Strafrecht (1930). Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Albin Eser, ‘Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 767 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Albin Eser, ‘Mental Elements – Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 889 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Albin Eser, Strafrecht I, 3rd edn. (1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Albin Eser, ‘§ 220a StGB: Völkermord’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 26th edn. (2001), pp. 1790 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Albin Eser and Bernd Hecker, ‘Vorbemerkungen vor § 1 StGB’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 13 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes (2003–2006). Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Luciano Eusebi, ‘In tema di accertamento del dolo: confusioni tra dolo e colpa’, 30 Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale (2000), pp. 1060 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Luciano Eusebi, Il dolo come volontà (1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Ward N. Ferdinandusse, Direct Application of International Criminal Law in National Courts (2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-707-4_2
  73. George P. Fletcher, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (1998). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1525/nclr.1998.1.2.275
  74. George P. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law (1978). Google Scholar öffnen
  75. George P. Fletcher, The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International (2007), vol. 1: ‘Foundations’. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Fletcher, George P., Ohlin, Jens D., ‘The Commission of Inquiry on Darfur and Its Follow-up: A Critical View. Reclaiming Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law in the Darfur Case’, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2005), pp. 539 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi049
  77. Giovanni Fiandaca and Enzo Musco, Diritto penale, parte generale, 6th edn. (2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Sarah Finnin, Elements of Accessorial Modes of Liability. Article 25(3)(b) and (c) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/9789004228092_002
  79. Sarah Finnin, ‘Mental Elements Under Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Comparative Analysis’, 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2012), pp. 325 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0020589312000152
  80. Giacomo Forte, ‘Ai confini tra dolo e colpa: dolo eventuale o colpa cosciente?’, 42 Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale (1999), pp. 228 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Dario Franzin, ‘L’elemento soggettivo nello Statuto della Corte Penale Internazionale’, in Enrico Mezzetti (ed.), Diritto penale internazionale, 2nd edn. (2010), vol. 2: ‘Studi’, pp. 143 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Georg Freund, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil. Personale Straftatlehre, 2nd edn. (2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79398-4
  83. Wolfgang Frisch, Vorsatz und Risiko. Grundfragen des tatbestandsmäßigen Verhaltens und des Vorsatzes; zugleich ein Beitrag zur Behandlung außertatbestandlicher Möglichkeitsvorstellungen (1983). Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Emanuela Fronza, ‘Riflessioni sulla nascita di un sistema penale internazionale: il ruolo della comparazione’, in Luigi Foffani (ed.), Diritto penale comparato, europeo e internazionale: prospettive per il XXI secolo (2006), pp. 171 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Erkin Gadirov revised by Roger S. Clark, ‘Art. 9 ICC Statute: Elements of Crimes’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 505 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.118
  86. Marcello Gallo, ‘Dolo (diritto penale)’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. 13 (1964), pp. 750 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Émile Garçon, Code pénal annoté (1952). Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Charles Garraway, ‘Art. 8(2)(b)(xii) ICC Statute’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 169 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Klaus Geppert, ‘Zur Abgrenzung von bedingtem Vorsatz und bewußter Fahrlässigkeit’, 8 Jura (1986), pp. 610 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Alicia Gil Gil, Derecho penal internacional (1999). Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Alicia Gil Gil, Juan Manuel Lacruz López, Mariano Melendo Pardos and José Núñez Fernández, Curso de derecho penal, parte general (2011). Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Alexander K.A. Greenwalt, ‘Rethinking Genocidal Intent: the Case for a Knowledge-Based Interpretation’, 99 Columbia Law Review (1999), pp. 2259 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Helmut Gropengießer and Helmut Kreicker, ‘Deutschland’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 1: ‘Deutschland’ (2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Walter Gropp, ‘Conduct that the Actor Should Realise Creates a Substantial and Unreasonable Risk’, in Manfred Heinrich and Christian Jäger (eds.), Strafrecht als scientia universalis. Festschrift für Claus Roxin zum 80. Geburtstag am 15. Mai 2011 (2011), vol. 1, pp. 779 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110255287.779
  95. Cristopher K. Hall, ‘Art. 7 ICC Statute: Crimes Against Humanity’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 159 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.118
  96. Herman von Hebel, ‘The Making of the Elements of Crimes – Introduction’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 3 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Herman von Hebel and Maria Kelt, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law and Elements of Crimes’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 19 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘Vorbemerkungen zu den §§ 25 ff. StGB’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 478 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘§ 25 StGB: Täterschaft’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 517 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘§ 26 StGB: Anstiftung’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 538 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘§ 27 StGB: Beihilfe’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 545 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Kevin J. Heller, ‘The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Kevin J. Heller and Markus D. Dubber (eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (2011), pp. 593 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554317.003.0013
  103. Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol. 1: ‘Rules’ (reprinted 2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804700
  104. Rolf D. Herzberg, ‘Das Wollen beim Vorsatzdelikt und dessen Unterscheidung vom bewußt fahrlässigen Verhalten – Teil 2’, 43 Juristen Zeitung (1988), pp. 635 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Rolf D. Herzberg, ‘Die Abgrenzung von Vorsatz und bewußter Fahrlässigkeit – ein Problem des objektiven Tatbestandes’, 26 Juristische Schulung (1986), pp. 249 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Rolf D. Herzberg, Täterschaft und Teilnahme (1977). Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Robert von Hippel, Die Grenze von Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit: eine dogmatische Studie (1903). Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Tatjana Hörnle, ‘Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: the “Reasonable Person” in a Comparative Perspective’, 11 New Criminal Law Review (2008), pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2008.11.1.1
  109. Joachim Hruschka, Strukturen der Zurechnung (1976). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110902945
  110. Douglas N. Husak and Craig A. Callender, ‘Wilful Ignorance, Knowledge, and the “Equal Culpability” Thesis: a Study of the Deeper Significance of the Principle of Legality’, Wisconsin Law Review (1994), pp. 29 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Gaetano Insolera, ‘Concorso di persone nel reato’, in Digesto delle discipline penalistiche, vol. 2 (1988), pp. 437 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Günther Jakobs, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil. Die Grundlagen und die Zurechnungslehre, 2nd edn. (1991). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110906424
  113. Konstanze Jarvers and Christoph Grammer, ‘Italien’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 4 (2005), pp. 337 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Hans-Heinrich Jescheck, Die Verantwortlichkeit der Staatsorgane nach Völkerstrafrecht: eine Studie zu den Nürnberger Prozessen (1952). Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Hans-Heinrich Jescheck, ‘The General Principles of International Criminal Law Set Out in Nuremberg, as Mirrored in the ICC Statute’, 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2004), pp. 38 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/2.1.38
  116. Hans-Heinrich Jescheck and Thomas Weigend, Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, allgemeiner Teil, 5th edn. (1996). Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Florian Jeßberger, ‘The Definition and the Elements of the Crime of Genocide’, in Paola Gaeta (ed.), The UN Genocide Convention: a Commentary (2009), pp. 87 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199570218.001.0001
  118. Christopher C. Joyner, ‘United States: Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987’, 28 International Legal Materials (1989), pp. 751 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.141038
  119. Sanford H. Kadish, Stephen J. Schulhofer and Carol S. Steiker, Criminal Law and Its Processes. Cases and Materials, 8th edn. (2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Nora Karsten, Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit des nicht-militärischen Vorgesetzten: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zu Artikel 28 IStGH-Statut (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Armin Kaufmann, ‘Der dolus eventualis im Deliktsaufbau’, 70 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1958), pp. 64 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1958.70.1.64
  122. W. Page Keeton (ed.), Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, 5th edn., student edn. (1984). Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Kirsten Keith, ‘The mens rea of Superior Responsibility as Developed by the ICTY Jurisprudence’, 14 Leiden Journal of International Law (2001), pp. 617 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0922156501000309
  124. Urs Kindhäuser, ‘Vorsatz als Zurechnungskriterium’, 96 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1984), pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1984.96.1.1
  125. Claus Kreß, ‘Ruth Rissing-van Saans Begegnung mit dem Völkerstrafrecht’, in Thomas Fischer and Klaus Bernsmann (eds.), Festschrift für Ruth Rissing-van Saan zum 65. Geburtstag am 25. Januar 2011 (2011), pp. 317 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783899498288.317
  126. Claus Kreß, ‘The Darfur Report and Genocidal Intent’, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2005), pp. 562 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Claus Kreß, Vom Nutzen eines deutschen Völkerstrafgesetzbuchs (2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Claus Kreß, ‘§ 6 VStGB: Völkermord’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1084 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Volker Krey, German Criminal Law, General Part. Textbook in German and English, vol. 2: ‘Legal Elements of the Intentional Offence Committed by Action’ (2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Kristian Kühl, ‘Vorbemerkung Täterschaft und Teilnahme’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 28th edn. (2014), pp. 209 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Kristian Kühl, ‘§ 15 StGB: Vorsätzliches und fahrlässiges Handeln’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 28th edn. (2014), pp. 111 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Kristian Kühl, ‘§ 27 StGB: Beihilfe’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 28th edn. (2014), pp. 233 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Kristian Kühl, ‘§ 220a StGB: Völkermord’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 24th edn. (2001), pp. 831 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Milan Kuhli, Das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch und das Verbot der Strafbegründung durch Gewohnheitsrecht: zur Frage der Zulässigkeit von strafgesetzlichen Verweisungen auf Völkergewohnheitsrecht im Hinblick auf das Verbot der Strafbegründung durch Gewohnheitsrecht nach Artikel 103 Absatz 2 des Grundgesetzes (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Wayne R. LaFave, Criminal Law, 5th edn., stud. edn. (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Angelo R. Latagliata, ‘Concorso di persone nel reato (diritto penale)’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. 8 (1961), pp. 568 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Juliette Lelieur-Fischer, ‘Frankreich’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 4 (2005), pp. 225 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/1571812054940184
  138. Sascha R. Lüder and T. Vormbaum (eds.), Materialien zum Völkerstrafgesetzbuch: Dokumentation des Gesetzgebungsverfahrens (2002). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1019907224118
  139. Ferrando Mantovani, ‘The General Principles of International Criminal Law: the Viewpoint of a National Criminal Lawyer’, 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2003), pp. 26 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/1.1.26
  140. Iryna Marchuk, The Fundamental Concept of Crime in International Criminal Law. A Comparative Law Analysis (2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28246-1
  141. Jenny S. Martinez, ‘Understanding mens rea in Command Responsibility: from Yamashita to Blaški? and Beyond’, 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007), pp. 638 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm031
  142. Chantal Meloni, ‘I primi passi della Corte Penale Internazionale: la decisione che conferma le accuse contro Thomas Lubanga Dyilo’, Il corriere del merito (2007), pp. 885 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Gue?nae?l Mettraux, International Crimes and the ad hoc Tribunals (2005). Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Enrico Mezzetti, ‘L’elemento soggettivo dei crimini internazionali’, in Giorgio Lattanzi and Vito Monetti (eds.), La Corte Penale Internazionale. Organi-competenza-reati-processo (2006), pp. 313 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Alan C. Michaels, ‘Acceptance: the Missing Mental State’, 71 Southern California Law Review (1998), pp. 953 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.86088
  146. Ingo Müller, ‘Der Vorsatz der Rechtsbeugung’, 33 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1980), pp. 2390 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Group Think: the Law of Conspiracy and Collective Reason’, 98 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2007), pp. 147 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Joint Criminal Confusion’, 12 New Criminal Law Review (2009), pp. 406 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2009.12.3.406
  149. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Joint Intentions to Commit International Crimes’, 11 Chicago Journal of International Law (2011), pp. 693 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Targeting and the Concept of Intent’, 35 Michigan Journal of International Law (2013), pp. 79 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2215088
  151. Antonio Pagliaro, La responsabilità del partecipe per il reato diverso da quello voluto (1966). Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Daniele Panfilo, La commissione preparatoria della Corte Penale Internazionale (2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0407-1_67
  153. Alain Pellet, ‘Applicable Law’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 2, pp. 1051 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Rollin M. Perkins, ‘A Rationale of mens rea’, 52 Harvard Law Review (1939), pp. 905 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1334184
  155. Donald K. Piragoff and Darryl Robinson, ‘Art. 30 ICC Statute: Mental Element’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 849 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Nicola Pisani, ‘The Mental Element in International Crime’, in Flavia Lattanzi and William A. Schabas (eds.), Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2004), vol. 2, pp. 121 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165310.010
  157. Mauro Politi, ‘Elements of Crimes’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 443 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Ellen S. Podgor and Roger S. Clark, Understanding International Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Jean Pradel, Droit pénal général, 18th edn. (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Salvatore Prosdocimi, Dolus eventualis. Il dolo eventuale nella struttura delle fattispecie penali (1993). Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Ingeborg Puppe, ‘§ 16 StGB: Irrtum über Tatumstände’, in Urs Kindhäuser, Ulfrid Neumann and Hans-Ullrich, Paeffgen (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 1, 4th edn. (2013), pp. 690 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Fabián O. Raimondo, General Principles of Law in the Decisions of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals (2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004170476.i-214
  163. Ira P. Robbins, ‘The Ostrich Instruction: Deliberate Ignorance as a Criminal mens rea’, 81 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1991), pp. 191 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Darryl Robinson, ‘Art. 7(1)(f) ICC Statute’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 90 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Paul H. Robinson, ‘United States’, in Kevin J. Heller and Markus D. Dubber (eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (2011), pp. 563 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Paul H. Robinson and Markus D. Dubber, ‘The American Model Penal Code: a Brief Overview’, 10 New Criminal Law Review (2000), pp. 319 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Paul H. Robinson and Jane A. Grall, ‘Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability: the Model Penal Code and Beyond’, 35 Stanford Law Review (1983), pp. 681 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1228658
  168. Mario Romano, Commentario sistematico del codice penale, vol. 1 (2004). Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Alf Roos, Über den Vorsatz: Studien zur dänischen, englischen, deutschen und schwedischen Lehre und Rechtsprechung (1979). Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Ulrich Roßkopf, Die innere Tatseite des Völkerrechtsverbrechens: ein Beitrag zur Auslegung des Art. 30 IStGH-Statut (2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Claus Roxin, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil, vol. 1: ‘Grundlagen: der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre’, 4th edn. (2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110921861.vii
  172. Claus Roxin, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil, vol. 2: ‘Besondere Erscheinungsformen der Straftat’ (2003). Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Claus Roxin, Täterschaft und Tatherrschaft, 8th edn. (2006). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110921861.vii
  174. Christoph J.M. Safferling, ‘Anmerkung zu einem Beschluss des BGH vom 17.06.2010 (AK 3/10; JZ 2010, 960) – Verantwortung des militärischen Befehlshabers im Sinne des § 4 VStGB’, 65 Juristenzeitung (2010), pp. 965 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Christoph J.M. Safferling and Stefan Kirsch, ‘Die Strafbarkeit von Bundeswehrangehörigen bei Auslandseinsätzen: Afghanistan ist kein rechtsfreier Raum’, 42 Juristische Arbeitsblätter (2010), pp. 81 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Per Saland, ‘International Criminal Law Principles’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: the Making of the Rome Statute. Issues, Negotiations and Results (1999), pp. 189 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Helmut Satzger, ‘German Criminal Law and the Rome Statute – A Critical Analysis of the New German Code of Crimes Against International Law’, 2 International Criminal Law Review (2002), pp. 261 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/157181202401057204
  178. Wilhelm Sauer, Allgemeine Strafrechtslehre: eine lehrbuchmäßige Darstellung (1955). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783111700953
  179. Francis B. Sayre, ‘Mens rea’, 45 Harvard Law Review (1932), pp. 974 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1332142
  180. Massimo Scaliotti, ‘Mens rea’, in Gaetano Carlizzi, Gabriele Della Morte, Siliana Laurenti and Antonio Marchesi (eds.), La Corte Penale Internazionale. Problemi e prospettive (2003), pp. 305 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. William A. Schabas, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law in the International Criminal Court Statute (Part III)’, 6 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (1998), pp. 84 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/15718179820518638
  182. William A. Schabas, Genocide in International Law: the Crime of Crimes (2000). Google Scholar öffnen
  183. William A. Schabas, ‘Mens rea and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, 37 New England Law Review (2003), pp. 1015 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. William A. Schabas, The International Criminal Court: a Commentary on the Rome Statute (2010). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199560738.001.0001
  185. Eberhard Schmidhäuser, ‘Die Grenze zwischen vorsätzlicher und fahrlässiger Straftat’, 20 Juristische Schulung (1980), pp. 241 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Eberhard Schmidhäuser, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil. Lehrbuch, 2nd edn. (1975). Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Friedrich-Christian Schroeder, Der Täter hinter dem Täter: ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der mittelbaren Täterschaft (1965). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-41370-6
  188. Horst Schröder, ‘Aufbau und Grenzen des Vorsatzbegriffes’, in Festschrift für Wilhelm Sauer: zu seinem 70. Geburtstag am 24. Juni 1949 (1949), pp. 207 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783111716473-012
  189. Ulrich Schroth, Vorsatz als Aneignung der unrechtskostituirenden Merkmale (1994). Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Rosaria Sicurella, Per una teoria della colpevolezza nel sistema dello Statuto della Corte Penale Internazionale (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Emily Silverman, ‘United States of America’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 5 (2005), pp. 411 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/1571812054940184
  192. Elies van Sliedregt, The Criminal Responsibility of Individuals for Violations of International Humanitarian Law (2003). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-581-0_12
  193. Elies van Sliedregt, Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law (2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560363.003.0008
  194. Dominik Steiger and Jelena Bäumler, ‘Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit deutscher Soldaten bei Auslandseinsätzen’, 48 Archiv des Völkerrechts (2010), pp. 189. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/000389210791646103
  195. Detlev Sternberg-Lieben and Frank Schuster, ‘§ 15 StGB: Vorsätzliches und fahrlässiges Handeln’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 246 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Günter Stratenwerth, ‘Zur Individualisierung des Sorgfaltsmaßstabes beim Fahrlässigkeitsdelikt’, in Theo Vogler (ed.), Festschrift für Hans-Heinrich Jescheck zum 70. Geburtstag (1985), vol. 1, pp. 285 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg, Vorstudien zu Vorsatz und Irrtum im Völkerstrafrecht (2007). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110921953.vii
  198. Greg Taylor, ‘The Intention Debate in German Criminal Law’, 17 Ratio Juris (2004), pp. 346 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2004.00273.x
  199. Cécile Tournaye, ‘Genocidal Intent Before the ICTY’, 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2003), pp. 447 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/iclq/52.2.447
  200. David M. Treiman, ‘Recklessness and the Model Penal Code’, 9 American Journal of Criminal Law (1981), pp. 281 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Otto Triffterer, ‘Can the “Elements of Crimes” Narrow or Broaden Responsibility for Criminal Behaviour Defined in the Rome Statute?’, in Carsten Stahn and Göran Sluiter (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (2009), pp. 381 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Otto Triffterer, ‘Genocide, Its Particular Intent to Destroy in Whole or in Part the Group as Such’, 14 Leiden Journal of International Law (2001), pp. 399 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0922156501000206
  203. Otto Triffterer, Österreichisches Strafrecht?, allgemeiner Teil?, 2nd edn. (1994). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6647-5
  204. Klaus Uekötter, Das Merkmal Leichtfertigkeit bei strafrechtlichen Erfolgsdelikten und erfolgsqualifizierten Delikten (1992). Google Scholar öffnen
  205. US Department of the Army, US Army Field Manual 27-10: the Law of Land Warfare (1956, with changes required in 1976). Google Scholar öffnen
  206. US Department of the Navy, Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (2007). Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Antonio Vallini, ‘Intent’, in Antonio Cassese (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (2009), pp. 376 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Antonio Vallini, ‘La colpevolezza, tra comparazione e diritto internazionale penale’, Studium iuris (2008), pp. 1082 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Antonio Vallini, ‘La mens rea’, in Enrico Amati, Valentina Caccamo, Matteo Costi, Emanuela Fronza and Antonio Vallini, Introduzione al diritto penale internazionale, 2nd edn. (2010), pp. 175 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Antonio Vallini, ‘L’elemento soggettivo nei crimini di competenza della Corte Penale Internazionale’, in Antonio Cassese, Mario Chiavario and Giovannangelo De Francesco, Problemi attuali della giustizia penale internazionale (2005), pp. 41 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Antonio Vallini, ‘Mens rea’, in Antonio Cassese (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (2009), pp. 412 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Hans Vest, ‘A Structure-Based Concept of Genocidal Intent’, 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007), pp. 781 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm036
  213. Sergio Vinciguerra, Diritto penale inglese comparato. I principi, 2nd edn. (2002). Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Joachim Vogel, ‘§ 15 StGB: Vorsätzliches und fahrlässiges Handeln’, in Heinrich Wilhelm Laufhütte (ed.), Strafgesetzbuch: Leipziger Kommentar, vol. 1: ‘Einleitung, §§ 1–31 StGB’, 12th edn. (2007), pp. 991 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Claus Volk, ‘Dolus ex re’, in Fritjof Haft, Winfried Hassemer, Ulfrid Neumann, Wolfgang Schild und Ulrich Schroth (eds.), Strafgerechtigkeit: Festschrift für Arthur Kaufmann zum 70. Geburtstag (1993), pp. 611 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Claus Volk, Wahrheit und materielles Recht im Strafprozess (1980). Google Scholar öffnen
  217. War Crimes Research Office, American University Washington College of Law, Modes of Liability and the Mental Element. Analyzing the Early Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court (2010). Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Thomas Weigend, ‘Das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch – nationale Kodifikation internationalen Rechts’, in O. Triffterer (ed.), Gedächtnisschrift für Theo Vogler (2004), pp. 197 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Thomas Weigend, ‘Intent, Mistake of Law, and Co-Perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on the Confirmation of Charges’, 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2008), pp. 471 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqn034
  220. Thomas Weigend, ‘Zwischen Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit’, 93 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1981), pp. 657 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 2 VStGB: Anwendung des allgemeinen Rechts’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1030 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 4 VStGB: Verantwortlichkeit militärischer Befehlshaber und anderer Vorgesetzter’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1057 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 13 VStGB: Verletzung der Aufsichtspflicht’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1367 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 14 VStGB: Unterlassen der Meldung einer Straftat’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1377 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Baruch Weiss, ‘What Were They Thinking?: the Mental States of the Aider and Abettor and the Causer Under Federal Law’, 70 Fordham Law Review (2002), pp. 1341 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Roberto Wenin, ‘La categoria della “Leichtfertigkeit” nell’esperienza tedesca ed europea’, Indice Penale (2005), pp. 239 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Roberto Wenin, La mens rea nello Statuto di Roma: un’analisi esegetico-sistematica dell’art. 30 in chiave comparata (2012). Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Gerhard Werle, ‘Die deutsche Rechtsprechung zur Zerstörungsabsicht beim Völkermord und die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention’, in Michael Hettinger, Jan Zopfs, Thomas Hillenkamp, Michael Köhler, Jürgen Rath, Franz Streng and Jürgen Wolter (eds.), Festschrift für Wilfried Küper zum 70. Geburtstag (2007), pp. 675 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/002268807780864329
  229. Gerhard Werle, ‘Einleitung VStGB’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 979 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Gerhard Werle, ‘Konturen eines deutschen Völkerstrafrechts’, 56 Juristenzeitung (2001), pp. 885 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Gerhard Werle, ‘Menschenrechtsschutz durch Völkerstrafrecht’, 109 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1997), pp. 808 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1997.109.4.808
  232. Gerhard Werle, Principles of International Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (2009). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-559-9
  233. Gerhard Werle, Völkerstrafrecht, 3rd edn. (2012). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/002268812800261978
  234. Gerhard Werle, ‘Völkerstrafrecht und deutsches Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 67 Juristenzeitung (2012), pp. 373 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/002268812800261978
  235. Gerhard Werle and Wulf Burchards, ‘§ 7 VStGB: Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1131 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Gerhard Werle and Florian Jeßberger, ‘Das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 57 Juristenzeitung (2002), pp. 725 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1022222620759
  237. Gerhard Werle and Florian Jeßberger, ‘International Criminal Justice is Coming Home: the New Code of Crimes Against International Law’, 13 Criminal Law Forum (2002), pp. 191 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1022222620759
  238. Gerhard Werle and Florian Jeßberger, ‘Unless Otherwise Provided: Article 30 of the ICC Statute and the Mental Element of Crimes Under International Criminal Law’, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2005), pp. 35 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/3.1.35
  239. Johannes Wessels, Werner Beulke and Helmut Satzger, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil, 43rd edn. (2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845259994_290
  240. Glanville Williams, ‘Oblique Intention’, 46 Cambridge Law Journal (1987), pp. 417 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300117453
  241. Johan D. van der Vyver, ‘The International Criminal Court and the Concept of mens rea in International Criminal Law’, 57 University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review (2004), pp. 57 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Alexander Zahar and Göran Sluiter, International Criminal Law: a Critical Introduction (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Andreas Zimmermann, ‘Auf dem Weg zu einem deutschen Völkerstrafgesetzbuch. Entstehung, völkerrechtlicher Rahmen und wesentliche Inhalte’, 35 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (2002), pp. 97 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Andreas Zimmermann, ‘Bestrafung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen durch deutsche Gerichte nach In-Kraft-Treten des Völkerstrafgesetzbuchs’, 55 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2002), pp. 3068 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Andreas Zimmermann and Robin Geiß, ‘§ 8 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1213 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Andreas Zimmermann and Robin Geiß, ‘§ 10 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen gegen humanitäre Operationen und Embleme’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1290 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Bruno Zimmermann, ‘Art. 85 AP I: Repression of Breaches of This Protocol’, in Yves Sandoz, Christophe Swinarski and Bruno Zimmermann (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (1986), pp. 989 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. ? Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Table of Cases Google Scholar öffnen
  250. A. British Courts Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Trial of Erich Heyer and Six Others (The Essen Lynching Case), British Military Court of Essen, judgment of 22 December 1945, UNWCC, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 1, pp. 88 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. B. European Court of Human Rights Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Kononov v. Latvia, ECHR (Grand Chamber), judgment of 17 May 2010, application no. 36376/04. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. C. Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Prosecutor v. Kaing Guek Eav (‘Duch Case’), ECCC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 20 May 2010, case no. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 38). Google Scholar öffnen
  256. D. French Courts Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Hermann Roechling et al., Superior Military Government Court of the French Occupation Zone in Germany, judgment of 23 January 1949, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. 14, Appendix B, pp. 1097 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. E. German Courts Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Bundesverfassungsgericht, decision of 12 December 2000, 53 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2000), pp. 1848 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 12 February 1953, BGHSt 4, pp. 107 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 July 1954, BGHSt 6, pp. 359 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 11 February 1955, BGHSt 7, pp. 307 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 22 April 1955, BGHSt 7, pp. 363 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 15 May 1959, BGHSt 13, pp. 162 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 23 February 1961, BGHSt 16, pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 6 February 1962, BGHSt 18, pp. 246 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 5 May 1964, BGHSt 19, pp. 295 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 10 December 1965, BGHSt 20, pp. 315 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 26 July 1967, BGHSt 21, pp. 83 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 February 1968, 21 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1968), pp. 660 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 February 1968, 21 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1968), pp. 660 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 16 December 1969, BGHSt 23, pp. 203 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 22 September 1971, BGHSt 24, pp. 213 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 12 March 1974, 28 Monatsschrift für deutsches Recht (1974), pp. 547 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 May 1980, 34 Monatsschrift für deutsches Recht (1980), pp. 812 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 15 September 1981, 2 Neue Zeischrift für Strafrecht (1982), pp. 27 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 6 November 1984, 5 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1985), pp. 165 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 November 1984, BGHSt 33, pp. 66 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 23 January 1985, 39 Monatsschrift für deutsches Recht (1985), pp. 446 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 14 February 1985, 5 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1985), pp. 318 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 April 1986, BGHSt 34, pp. 63 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 3 July 1986, 6 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1986), pp. 549 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 6 February 1987, 7 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1987), pp. 364 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 10 February 1987, 42 Juristenzeitung (1987), pp. 877 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 April 1987, 7 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1987), pp. 424 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 25 November 1987, 8 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1988), pp. 175 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 March 1988, 8 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1988), pp. 361 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 4 November 1988, BGHSt 36, pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 23 February 1994, 14 Strafverteidiger (1994), pp. 480 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 26 July 1994, BGHSt 40, pp. 218 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 4 March 1996, BGHSt 42, pp. 65 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 18 April 1996, BGHSt 42, pp. 135 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 17 October 1996, 17 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1997), pp. 82 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 12 February 1998, 51 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1998), pp. 2149 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 30 April 1999, BGHSt 45, pp. 65 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 20 September 1999, 20 Strafverteidiger (2000), pp. 479 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 November 1999, 53 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2000), pp. 443 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 20 January 2000, BGHSt 45, pp. 373 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 1 August 2000, BGHSt 46, pp. 107 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 February 2001, BGHSt 46, pp. 292 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 21 February 2001, 54 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2001), pp. 2732 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 March 2001, 54 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2001), pp. 2409 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 July 2002, 22 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2002), pp. 597 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 13 November 2003, BGHSt 49, pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 26 May 2004, BGHSt 49, pp. 166 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 15 September 2004, 25 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2005), pp. 261 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 1 February 2005, BGHSt 50, pp. 11 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 29 September 2005, 26 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2006), pp. 94 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 18 October 2006, BGHSt 51, pp. 100 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 18 January 2007, 27 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2007), pp. 331 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 2 September 2009, BGHSt 54, pp. 140 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Bundesgerichtshof, case Kongo, decision of 17 June 2010, available on-line at http://www.intcrim.uni-hamburg.de/category/forschung/ (visited 30 June 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 17 May 2011, BGHSt 56, pp. 239 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Reichsgericht, judgment of 23 December 1881, RGSt 5, pp. 314 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Reichsgericht, judgment of 18 March 1898, RGSt 31, pp. 80 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  316. Reichsgericht, judgment of 7 December 1899, RGSt 33, pp. 4 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Reichsgericht, decision of 8 January 1915, RGSt 49, pp. 140 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Reichsgericht, judgment of 29 June 1920, RGSt 55, pp. 60 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Reichsgericht, judgment of 21 February 1921, RGSt 55, pp. 257 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Reichsgericht, judgment of 7 December 1929, RGZ 126, pp. 329 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Reichsgericht, judgment of 3 May 1932, RGSt 66, pp. 236 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Reichsgericht, judgment of 26 May 1933, RGSt 141, pp. 129 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, judgment of 18 September 1959, 18 Verkehrsrechtssammlung (1960), pp. 365 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Generalbundesanwalt, case Kundus, decision of 16 April 2010, available on-line at http://www.intcrim.uni-hamburg.de/category/forschung/ (visited 30 June 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Generalbundesanwalt, case Pakistan, decision of 20 June 2013, available on-line at Google Scholar öffnen
  326. http://www.intcrim.uni-hamburg.de/category/forschung/ (visited 30 June 2014). Google Scholar öffnen
  327. F. International Court of Justice Google Scholar öffnen
  328. ICJ, judgment of 20 November 1950 (Case Concerning Colombian–Peruvian Asylum), ICJ Reports (1950), pp. 266 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  329. ICJ, judgment of 20 February 1969 (Case Concerning North Sea Continental Shelf), ICJ Reports (1969), pp. 3 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  330. ICJ, judgment of 27 June 1986 (Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1986), pp. 14 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  331. G. International Criminal Court Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Prosecutor v. Abu Garda, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 8 February 2010, case no. ICC-02/05-02/09. Google Scholar öffnen
  333. Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 4 March 2009, case no. ICC-02/05-01/09. Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Separate and Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Anita Ušacka to Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 4 March 2009, case no. ICC-02/05-01/09. Google Scholar öffnen
  335. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 15 June 2009, case no. ICC-01/05-01/08. Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 30 September 2008, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Anita Ušacka to Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 30 September 2008, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Prosecutor v. Katanga, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 March 2014, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Google Scholar öffnen
  339. Minority Opinion of Judge Christine van den Wyngaert to Prosecutor v. Katanga, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 March 2014, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Google Scholar öffnen
  340. Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 29 January 2007, case no. ICC-01/04-01/06. Google Scholar öffnen
  341. Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 March 2012, case no. ICC-01/04-01/06. Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Separate Opinion of Judge Adrian Fulford to Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 March 2012, case no. ICC-01/04-01/06. Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Prosecutor v. Mbarushimana, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 16 December 2011, case no. ICC-01/04-01/10. Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng to Prosecutor v. Mbarushimana, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 16 December 2011, case no. ICC-01/04-01/10. Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Prosecutor v. Muthaura, Kenyatta and Ali, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 23 January 2012, case no. ICC-01/09-02/11. Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Concurring Opinion of Judge Christine van der Wyngaert to Prosecutor v. Ngudjolo Chui, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 18 December 2012, case no. ICC-01/04-02/12. Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Prosecutor v. Ruto, Kosgey and Sang, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 23 January 2012, case no. ICC-01/09-01/11. Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 10 February 2006, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, ICC (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 13 July 2006, case no. ICC-01/04. Google Scholar öffnen
  350. Situation in Lybia, ICC (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 21 May 2014, case no. ICC-01/11-01/11. Google Scholar öffnen
  351. H. International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Google Scholar öffnen
  352. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 25 June 1999, case no. IT-95-14/1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  353. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 24 March 2000, case no. IT-95-14/1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  354. Prosecutor v. Babi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 18 July 2005, case no. IT-03-72-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  355. Prosecutor v. Blagojevi? and Joki?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 17 January 2005, case no. IT-02-60-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  356. Prosecutor v. Blagojevi? and Joki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 9 May 2007, case no. IT-02-60-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  357. Prosecutor v. Blaški?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 3 March 2000, case no. IT-95-14-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  358. Prosecutor v. Blaški?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 29 July 2004, case no. IT-95-14-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  359. Prosecutor v. Boškoski and Tarc?ulovski, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 10 July 2008, case no. IT-04-82-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  360. Prosecutor v. Boškoski and Tarc?ulovski, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 19 May 2010, case no. IT-04-82-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  361. Prosecutor v. Br?anin, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 1 September 2004, case no. IT-99-36-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  362. Prosecutor v. Br?anin, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 April 2007, case no. IT-99-36-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  363. Prosecutor v. Delali?, Muci?, Deli? and Landžo (‘?elebi?i case’), ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 16 November 1998, case no. IT-96-21-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  364. Prosecutor v. Delali?, Muci?, Deli? and Landžo (‘?elebi?i case’), ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 20 February 2001, case no. IT-96-21-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Prosecutor v. Deli?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 September 2008, case no. IT-04-83-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  366. Prosecutor v. Furundžija, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 10 December 1998, case no. IT-95-17/1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  367. Prosecutor v. Furundžija, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 21 July 2000, case no. IT-95-17/1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  368. Prosecutor v. Gali?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 5 December 2003, case no. IT-98-29-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Prosecutor v. Gali?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 30 November 2006, case no. IT-98-29-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  370. Prosecutor v. Gotovina, ?ermak and Marka?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 April 2011, case no. IT-06-90-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Prosecutor v. Gotovina and ?ermak, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 16 November 2012, case no. IT-06-90-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  372. Prosecutor v. Hadzihasanovic and Kubura, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), decision of 16 July 2003, case no. IT-01-47-AR72. Google Scholar öffnen
  373. Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanovi? and Kubura, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 March 2006, case no. IT-01-47-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Prosecutor v. Halilovi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 16 November 2005, case no. IT-01-48-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  375. Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj and Brahimaj, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 3 April 2008, case no. IT-04-84-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  376. Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 29 November 2012, case no. IT-04-84bis-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Prosecutor v. Jelisi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 5 July 2001, case no. IT-95-10-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  378. Prosecutor v. Josipovic?, Šantic?, Kupreškic?, Kupreškic?, Kupreškic? and Papic, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 January 2000, case no. IT-95-16-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  379. Prosecutor v. Kordi? and ?erkez, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 26 February 2001, case no. IT-95-14/2-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  380. Prosecutor v. Kordi? and ?erkez, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 December 2004, case no. IT-95-14/2-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 September 2006, case no. IT-00-39-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 March 2009, case no. IT-00-39-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  383. Prosecutor v. Krnojelac, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 March 2002, case no. IT-97-25-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Prosecutor v. Krnojelac, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 September 2003, case no. IT-97-25-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  385. Prosecutor v. Krsti?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 August 2001, case no. IT-98-33-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  386. Prosecutor v. Krsti?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 19 April 2004, case no. IT-98-33-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  387. Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kova? and Vucovi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 22 February 2001, cases no. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  388. Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kova? and Vucovi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 12 June 2002, cases no. IT-96-23-A and IT-96-23/1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  389. Prosecutor v. Kvo?ka, Kos, Radi?, Žici? and Prca?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 November 2001, case no. IT-98-30/1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  390. Prosecutor v. Kvo?ka, Radi?, Žici? and Prca?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2005, case no. IT-98-30/1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  391. Prosecutor v. Limaj, Bala and Musliu, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 30 November 2005, case no. IT-03-66-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  392. Prosecutor v. Marti?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 12 June 2007, case no. IT-95-11-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  393. Prosecutor v. Marti?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 8 October 2008, case no. IT-95-11-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  394. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Miloševi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 12 September 2007, case no. IT-98-29/1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  395. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Miloševi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 12 November 2009, case no. IT-98-29/1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  396. Prosecutor v. Milutinovi?, Šainovi? and Ojdani?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), decision of 21 May 2003, case no. IT-99-37-AR72. Google Scholar öffnen
  397. Prosecutor v. Mrkši?, Radi? and Šljivan?anin, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 September 2007, case no. IT-95-3/1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  398. Prosecutor v. Mrkši? and Šljivan?anin, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 5 September 2009, case no. IT-95-3/1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  399. Prosecutor v. Naletili? and Martinovi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 31 March 2003, case no. IT-98-34-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  400. Prosecutor v. Naletili? and Martinovi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 May 2006, case no. IT-98-34-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  401. Prosecutor v. Ori?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 30 June 2006, case no. IT-03-68-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  402. Prosecutor v. Ori?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 July 2008, case no. IT-03-68-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  403. Prosecutor v. Periši?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2013, case no. IT-04-81-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  404. Joint Separate Opinion of Judges Theodor Meron and Carmel Agius to Prosecutor v. Periši?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2013, case no. IT-04-81-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  405. Opinion séparée du Juge Ramaroson sur la question de la vise spécifique dans la complicité par aide et encouragement to Prosecutor v. Periši?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2013, case no. IT-04-81-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  406. Prosecutor v. Šainovi?, Pavkovi?, Lazarevi? and Luki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 23 January 2014, case no. IT-05-87-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  407. Dissenting Opinion of Judge Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov to Prosecutor v. Šainovi?, Pavkovi?, Lazarevi? and Luki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 23 January 2014, case no. IT-05-87-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  408. Prosecutor v. Simi?, Tadi? and Zari?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 17 October 2003, case no. IT-95-9-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  409. Prosecutor v. Staki?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 31 July 2003, case no. IT-97-24-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  410. Prosecutor v. Staki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 22 March 2006, case no. IT-97-24-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  411. Prosecutor v. Strugar, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 31 January 2005, case no. IT-01-42-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  412. Prosecutor v. Strugar, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 July 2008, case no. IT-01-42-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  413. Prosecutor v. Tadi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), decision of 2 October 1995, case no. IT-94-1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  414. Prosecutor v. Tadi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 May 1997, case no. IT-94-1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  415. Prosecutor v. Tadi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 15 July 1999, case no. IT-94-1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  416. Prosecutor v. Vasiljevi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 29 November 2002, case no. IT-98-32-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  417. Prosecutor v. Vasiljevi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 25 February 2004, case no. IT-98-32-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  418. I. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Google Scholar öffnen
  419. Prosecutor v. Akayesu, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 September 1998, case no. ICTR-96-4-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  420. Prosecutor v. Akayesu, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 1 June 2001, case no. ICTR-96-4-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  421. Prosecutor v. Bagilishema, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 June 2001, case no. ICTR-95-1A-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  422. Prosecutor v. Bagilishema, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 July 2002, case no. ICTR-95-1A-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  423. Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabazuke and Nsegiyumva, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 18 December 2008, case no. ICTR-98-41-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  424. Prosecutor v. Bagosora and Nsegiyumva, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 14 December 2011, case no. ICTR-98-41-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  425. Prosecutor v. Bikindi, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 December 2008, case no. ICTR-01-72-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  426. Prosecutor v. Bisengimana, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 13 April 2006, case no. ICTR-00-60-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  427. Prosecutor v. Gacumbitsi, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 7 July 2006, case no. ICTR-2001-64-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  428. Prosecutor v. Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 21 May 1999, case no. ICTR-95-1-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  429. Prosecutor v. Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 1 June 2001, case no. ICTR-95-1-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  430. Prosecutor v. Kajelijeli, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 1 December 2003, case no. ICTR-98-44A-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  431. Prosecutor v. Kamuhanda, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 22 January 2003, case no. ICTR-99-54A-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  432. Prosecutor v. Karera, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 December 2007, case no. ICTR-01-74-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  433. Prosecutor v. Mpambara, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 11 September 2006, case no. ICTR-01-65-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  434. Prosecutor v. Muhimana, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 28 April 2005, case no. ICTR-95-1B-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  435. Prosecutor v. Musema, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 January 2001, case no. ICTR-96-13-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  436. Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza and Ngeze, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 November 2007, case no. ICTR-99-52-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  437. Prosecutor v. Niyitegeka, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 9 July 2004, case no. ICTR-96-14-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  438. Prosecutor v. Elizaphan Ntakirutimana and Gérard Ntakirutimana, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 13 December 2004, cases no. ICTR-96-10-A and ICTR-96-17-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  439. Prosecutor v. Ntawukulilyayo, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 14 December 2011, case no. ICTR-05-82-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  440. Prosecutor v. Renzaho, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 July 2009, case no. ICTR-9731-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  441. Prosecutor v. Rukundo, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 February 2009, case no. ICTR-2001-70-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  442. Prosecutor v. Rukundo, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 20 October 2010, case no. ICTR-2001-70-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  443. Prosecutor v. Semanza, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 May 2003, case no. ICTR-97-20-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  444. Prosecutor v. Semanza, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 20 May 2005, case no. ICTR-97-20-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  445. Prosecutor v. Seromba, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 12 March 2008, case no. ICTR-2001-66-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  446. Prosecutor v. Simba, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 13 December 2005, case no. ICTR-01-76-T. Google Scholar öffnen
  447. Prosecutor v. Simba, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 27 November 2007, case no. ICTR-01-76-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  448. J. Italian Courts Google Scholar öffnen
  449. Corte di Cassazione, decision of 2 February 2001, Rivista penale (2001), pp. 764 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  450. Corte di Cassazione, decision of 14 June 2001, Cassazione penale (2002), pp. 3096 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  451. Corte di Cassazione, decision of 14 February 2012, case no. 31449. Google Scholar öffnen
  452. Corte di Assise di Appello Brescia, judgment of 26 September 2000, Foro italiano (2001), II, pp. 285 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  453. Corte di Assise di Appello Firenze, judgment of 1 December 2010, Il corriere del merito (2012), pp. 394 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  454. Tribunale Cremona, judgment of 14 October 1999, Foro italiano (2000), II, pp. 348 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  455. Corte di Assise Arezzo, judgment of 14 July 2009, Il corriere del merito (2009), pp. 1239 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  456. ? Google Scholar öffnen
  457. K. Special Court for Sierra Leone Google Scholar öffnen
  458. Prosecutor v. Taylor, SCSL (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 26 September 2013, case no. SCSL-03-01-A. Google Scholar öffnen
  459. L. Special Tribunal for Lebanon Google Scholar öffnen
  460. Prosecutor v. Ayyash, STL (Appeals Chamber), decision of 16 February 2011, case no. STL-11-01/I. Google Scholar öffnen
  461. M. United States Courts Google Scholar öffnen
  462. Hicks v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 27 November 1893, 150 US 442. Google Scholar öffnen
  463. United States v. Murdock, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 11 December 1933, 290 US 389. Google Scholar öffnen
  464. Townsend v. United States, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 7 February 1938, 95 F.2d 352. Google Scholar öffnen
  465. United States v. Falcone, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 9 December 1940, 311 US 205. Google Scholar öffnen
  466. Screws v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 7 May 1945, 325 US 91. Google Scholar öffnen
  467. Trial of General Tomoyuki Yamashita, Supreme Court of the US, judgment of 4 February 1946, UNWCC, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 4, pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  468. Pinkerton v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 10 June 1946, 328 US 640. Google Scholar öffnen
  469. United States v. Sheridan, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 23 December 1946, 329 US 379. Google Scholar öffnen
  470. Nye and Nissen v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 18 April 1949, 336 US 613. Google Scholar öffnen
  471. Pereira v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 1 February 1954, 347 US 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  472. United States v. Bishop, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 29 May 1973, 412 US 346. Google Scholar öffnen
  473. United States v. United States Gypsum Co., Supreme Court of the US, decision of 29 June 1978, 438 US 422. Google Scholar öffnen
  474. United States v. Bailey, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 21 January 1980, 444 US 394. Google Scholar öffnen
  475. Tison v. Arizona, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 21 April 1987, 481 US 137. Google Scholar öffnen
  476. Cheek v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 8 January 1991, 498 US 192. Google Scholar öffnen
  477. Ratzlaf v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 11 January 1994, 510 US 135. Google Scholar öffnen
  478. Staples v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 23 May 1994, 511 US 600. Google Scholar öffnen
  479. Concurring Opinion of Justice Ginsburg joined by Justice O’Connor to Staples v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 23 May 1994, 511 US 600. Google Scholar öffnen
  480. Bryan v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 15 June 1998, 524 US 184. Google Scholar öffnen
  481. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Burr, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 4 June 2007, 551 US 47. Google Scholar öffnen
  482. Fitzgerald v. State, Supreme Court of Alabama, decision of 24 November 1896, 112 Ala. 34. Google Scholar öffnen
  483. Bussard v. State, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, decision of 7 November 1939, 233 Wis. 11. Google Scholar öffnen
  484. Commonwealth v. Welansky, Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, decision of 5 June 1944, 55 N.E.2d 902. Google Scholar öffnen
  485. Trujillo v. People, Supreme Court of Colorado, decision of 30 January 1956, 133 Colo. 186. Google Scholar öffnen
  486. United States v. Peoni, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 12 December 1938, 100 F.2d 401. Google Scholar öffnen
  487. Backun v. United States, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 10 June 1940, 112 F.2d 635. Google Scholar öffnen
  488. United States v. Tannuzzo, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 11 April 1949, 174 F.2d 177. Google Scholar öffnen
  489. Quirk v. United States, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 26 December 1957, 250 F.2d 909. Google Scholar öffnen
  490. United States v. Gordon, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 19 February 1958, 253 F.2d 177. Google Scholar öffnen
  491. United States v. Cherry, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 6 November 1961, 295 F.2d 842. Google Scholar öffnen
  492. United States v. Campisi, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 23 July 1962, 306 F.2d 308. Google Scholar öffnen
  493. United States v. Jones, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 17 August 1962, 308 F.2d 26. Google Scholar öffnen
  494. United States v. Cianchetti, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 21 March 1963, 315 F.2d 584. Google Scholar öffnen
  495. United States v. Kierschke, US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, decision of 5 April 1963, 315 F.2d 315. Google Scholar öffnen
  496. Nicolopoulos v. United States, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 27 May 1964, 332 F.2d 247. Google Scholar öffnen
  497. King v. United States, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 29 July 1966, 364 F.2d 235. Google Scholar öffnen
  498. United States v. Pardee, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 14 September 1966, 368 F.2d 368. Google Scholar öffnen
  499. United States v. Luxenberg, US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, decision of 17 February 1967, 374 F.2d 241. Google Scholar öffnen
  500. United States v. Masters, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 7 March 1972, 456 F.2d 1060. Google Scholar öffnen
  501. United States v. John, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 6 January 1975, 508 F.2d 1134. Google Scholar öffnen
  502. United States v. Lozano, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 18 February 1975, 511 F.2d 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  503. United States v. Feola, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 19 March 1975, 420 US 671. Google Scholar öffnen
  504. United States v. Ludwig, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 8 October 1975, 523 F.2d 705. Google Scholar öffnen
  505. United States v. Micciche, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 30 October 1975, 525 F.2d 544. Google Scholar öffnen
  506. United States v. Jewell, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 27 February 1976, 532 F.2d 697. Google Scholar öffnen
  507. United States v. Kelner, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 9 April 1976, 534 F.2d 1020. Google Scholar öffnen
  508. United States v. Rapoport, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 4 November 1976, 545 F.2d 802. Google Scholar öffnen
  509. United States v. Cowden, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 16 November 1976, 545 F.2d 257. Google Scholar öffnen
  510. United States v. Monroe, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 22 February 1977, 552 F.2d 860. Google Scholar öffnen
  511. United States v. Murrieta-Bejarano, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 21 March 1977, 552 F.2d 1323. Google Scholar öffnen
  512. United States v. Beil, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 11 August 1978, 577 F.2d 1313. Google Scholar öffnen
  513. United States v. Wieschenberg, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 9 October 1979, 604 F.2d 326. Google Scholar öffnen
  514. United States v. Beck, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 4 February 1980, 615 F.2d 441. Google Scholar öffnen
  515. United States v. Marvin, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 3 September 1982, 687 F.2d 1221. Google Scholar öffnen
  516. Sanders/Miller v. Logan, US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, decision of 13 June 1983, 710 F.2d 645. Google Scholar öffnen
  517. McAllister v. United States, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 20 November 1984, 747 F.2d 1273. Google Scholar öffnen
  518. United States v. Guzman, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 12 February 1985, 754 F.2d 482. Google Scholar öffnen
  519. United States v. Paone, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 29 March 1985, 758 F.2d 774. Google Scholar öffnen
  520. United States v. Fountain, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 8 July 1985, 768 F.2d 790. Google Scholar öffnen
  521. United States v. Markowski, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 10 September 1985, 772 F.2d 358. Google Scholar öffnen
  522. United States v. Mann, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 25 February 1987, 811 F.2d 495. Google Scholar öffnen
  523. United States v. Stern, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 27 September 1988, 858 F.2d 1241. Google Scholar öffnen
  524. United States v. Iredia, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 3 February 1989, 866 F.2d 114. Google Scholar öffnen
  525. United States v. Pino-Perez, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 10 March 1989, 870 F.2d 1230. Google Scholar öffnen
  526. United States v. Bruno, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 17 April 1989, 873 F.2d 555. Google Scholar öffnen
  527. United States v. Johnson, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 25 September 1989, 886 F.2d 1120. Google Scholar öffnen
  528. United States v. Judd, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 29 November 1989, 889 F.2d 1410. Google Scholar öffnen
  529. United States v. Valencia, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 16 July 1990, 907 F.2d 671. Google Scholar öffnen
  530. United States v. Powell, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 5 April 1991, 929 F.2d 724. Google Scholar öffnen
  531. United States v. de Francisco-Lopez, US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, decision of 17 July 1991, 939 F.2d 1405. Google Scholar öffnen
  532. United States v. Torres, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 8 October 1992, 977 F.2d 321. Google Scholar öffnen
  533. United States v. Rodriguez, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 14 January 1993, 983 F.2d 455. Google Scholar öffnen
  534. United States v. Williams, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 24 February 1993, 985 F.2d 749. Google Scholar öffnen
  535. United States v. Curran, US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, decision of 30 March 1994, 20 F.3d 560. Google Scholar öffnen
  536. United States v. Thomas, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 26 July 1994, 34 F.3d 44. Google Scholar öffnen
  537. Roy v. United States, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 5 October 1994, 652 A.2d 1098, Google Scholar öffnen
  538. United States v. Ortega, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 4 January 1995, 44 F.3d 505. Google Scholar öffnen
  539. United States v. Boyles, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 8 June 1995, 57 F.3d 535. Google Scholar öffnen
  540. United States v. Wills, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 26 June 1996, 88 F.3d 704. Google Scholar öffnen
  541. United States v. Randolph, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 22 August 1996, 93 F.3d 656. Google Scholar öffnen
  542. United States v. Burgos, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 23 August 1996, 94 F.3d 849. Google Scholar öffnen
  543. United States v. De Santiago-Flores, US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, decision of 28 February 1997, 107 F.3d 1472. Google Scholar öffnen
  544. United States v. Sayetsitty, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 28 February 1997, 107 F.3d 1405. Google Scholar öffnen
  545. United States v. Pearson, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 14 May 1997, 113 F.3d 758. Google Scholar öffnen
  546. United States v. Everett, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 23 July 1997, 1997 US App. LEXIS 19279. Google Scholar öffnen
  547. United States v. McHugh, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 4 September 1997, 122 F.3d 153. Google Scholar öffnen
  548. United States v. Croft, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 5 September 1997, 124 F.3d 1109. Google Scholar öffnen
  549. United States v. Nelson, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 26 February 1998, 137 F.3d 1094. Google Scholar öffnen
  550. United States v. Trie, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 17 July 1998, 21 F. Supp. 2d 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  551. United States v. Hanousek, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 19 March 1999, 176 F.3d 1116. Google Scholar öffnen
  552. United States v. Zichettello, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 30 March 2000, 208 F.3d 72. Google Scholar öffnen
  553. United States v. Samaria, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 23 January 2001, 239 F.3d 228. Google Scholar öffnen
  554. United States v. Arzate-Picasso, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 9 August 2001, 18 Fed. Appx. 484. Google Scholar öffnen
  555. United States v. Hunt, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 29 November 2001, 272 F.3d 488. Google Scholar öffnen
  556. United States v. Garcia, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 11 March 2005, 400 F.3d 816. Google Scholar öffnen
  557. United States v. Heredia, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 24 October 2005, 429 F.3d 820. Google Scholar öffnen
  558. United States v. Ndiaye, US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, decision of 6 January 2006, 434 F.3d 1270. Google Scholar öffnen
  559. United States v. Dowden, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 28 April 2006, 178 Fed. Appx. 370. Google Scholar öffnen
  560. United States v. Flores, US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, decision of 21 July 2006, 454 F.3d 149. Google Scholar öffnen
  561. United States v. Duran, US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, decision of 16 February 2010, 596 F.3d 1283. Google Scholar öffnen
  562. United States v. Stinn, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 26 May 2010, 379 Fed. Appx. 19. Google Scholar öffnen
  563. Trial of General Tomoyuki Yamashita, US Military Commission Manila, decision of 8 October–7 December 1945, UNWCC, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 4, pp. 1 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  564. Wilhelm List et al. (The Hostage Case), US Military Tribunal Nuremberg, judgment of 19 February 1948, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. 11, pp. 1230 et seq. Google Scholar öffnen
  565. United States v. Wright, US District Court, District of Delaware, decision 22 March 2002, 194 F. Supp. 2d 287. Google Scholar öffnen
  566. United States v. Kim, US District Court, District of Connecticut, decision of 29 June 2003, US Dist. LEXIS 24793. Google Scholar öffnen
  567. Nguyen Thang Loi v. Dow Chem. Co. (In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig.), US District Court, Eastern District of New York, decision of 10 March 2005, 373 F. Supp. 2d 7. Google Scholar öffnen
  568. United States v. Richardson, US District Court, District of Louisiana, decision of 5 December 2006, 2006 US Dist. LEXIS 88648. Google Scholar öffnen
  569. United States v. Heras, US District Court, Eastern District of New York, decision of 29 June 2009, 2009 US Dist. LEXIS 54767 Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Yannis Ockernahl
Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex