Cover of book: Risk and Mental Element
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Risk and Mental Element

An Analysis of National and International Law on Core Crimes
Authors:
Publisher:
 2014

Summary

Can criminal responsibility for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community be established even if the agent lacked a clear awareness of the unlawful outcome? The answer to this crucial question depends on whether a criminal system views the mental element applicable to core international crimes as encompassing forms of risk-taking. The study explores the legal solutions that have been developed in Germany, the USA, before the UN ad hoc Tribunals and the ICC.

The overarching goal of the survey is not only to provide a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape, but also to suggest ways in which existing accounts of responsibility can be revisited in light of the interplay of domestic and international courts in prosecuting core international crimes.

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2014
Copyright Year
2014
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1593-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5607-8
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht
Volume
15
Language
English
Pages
272
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 14
  2. Abbreviations No access 15 - 16
  3. Introduction No access 17 - 22
    1. Mental Element and the German Völkerstrafgesetzbuch No access 23 - 78
    2. Mental Element and the US Federal Criminal Code No access 79 - 114
    1. Mental Element in the Jurisprudence of the ad hoc Tribunals and Other Recent Developments in Customary International Law No access 115 - 174
    2. Mental Element in the ICC Statute: the Early Jurisprudence of the ICC No access 175 - 234
  6. Conclusions and Recommendations No access 235 - 242
  7. Appendix: Materials on (International) Criminal Law in the World Wide Web No access 243 - 244
  8. Bibliography No access 245 - 258
  9. Table of Cases No access 259 - 272

Bibliography (569)

  1. United States v. Duran, US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, decision of 16 February 2010, 596 F.3d 1283. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  2. United States v. Stinn, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 26 May 2010, 379 Fed. Appx. 19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  3. Trial of General Tomoyuki Yamashita, US Military Commission Manila, decision of 8 October–7 December 1945, UNWCC, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 4, pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  4. Wilhelm List et al. (The Hostage Case), US Military Tribunal Nuremberg, judgment of 19 February 1948, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. 11, pp. 1230 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  5. United States v. Wright, US District Court, District of Delaware, decision 22 March 2002, 194 F. Supp. 2d 287. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  6. United States v. Kim, US District Court, District of Connecticut, decision of 29 June 2003, US Dist. LEXIS 24793. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  7. Nguyen Thang Loi v. Dow Chem. Co. (In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig.), US District Court, Eastern District of New York, decision of 10 March 2005, 373 F. Supp. 2d 7. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  8. United States v. Richardson, US District Court, District of Louisiana, decision of 5 December 2006, 2006 US Dist. LEXIS 88648. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  9. United States v. Heras, US District Court, Eastern District of New York, decision of 29 June 2009, 2009 US Dist. LEXIS 54767 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  10. Hirad Abtahi and Philippa Webb, The Genocide Convention: the travaux préparatoires (2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  11. Larry Alexander, ‘Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Liability’, 88 California Law Review (2000), pp. 931 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  12. Enrico Amati and Matteo Costi, ‘Autoria e forme di compartecipazione criminosa’, in Enrico Amati, Valentina Caccamo, Matteo Costi, Emanuela Fronza and Antonio Vallini, Introduzione al diritto penale internazionale, 2nd edn. (2010), pp. 110 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  13. Kai Ambos, ‘Afghanistan-Einsatz der Bundeswehr und Völker(straf)recht’, 63 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2010), pp. 1725 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  14. Kai Ambos, ‘Art. 25 ICC Statute: Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 743 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  15. Kai Ambos, Der allgemeine Teil des Völkerstrafrechts: Ansätze einer Dogmatisierung (2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  16. Kai Ambos, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law in the Rome Statute’, 10 Criminal Law Forum (1999), pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  17. Kai Ambos, ‘Immer mehr Fragen im internationalen Strafrecht’, 21 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2001), pp. 628 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  18. Kai Ambos, Internationales Strafrecht: Strafanwendungsrecht, Völkerstrafrecht, Europäisches Strafrecht, Rechtshilfe. Ein Studienbuch, 3rd edn. (2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  19. Kai Ambos, ‘Superior Responsibility’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 823 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  20. Kai Ambos, ‘The First Judgment of the International Criminal Court (Prosecutor v. Lubanga): a Comprehensive Analysis of the Legal Issues’, 12 International Criminal Law Review (2012), pp. 115 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  21. Kai Ambos, ‘§ 9 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen gegen Eigentum und sonstige Rechte’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1278 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  22. Kai Ambos, Treatise on International Criminal Law, vol. 1: ‘Foundations and General Part’ (2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  23. American Law Institute, Model Penal Code and Commentaries (Official Draft and Revised Comments), I, vol. 1: ‘General Provisions, §§ 1.01 to 2.13’ (1980). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  24. Roberta Arnold, ‘Art. 28 ICC Statute: Responsibility of Commanders and Other Superiors. Analysis and Interpretation of Elements’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 824 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  25. Roberta Arnold, ‘The mens rea of Genocide Under the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, 14 Criminal Law Forum (2003), pp. 127 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  26. Günther Arzt, ‘Leichtfertigkeit und Recklessness’, in W. Stree (ed.), Gedächtnisschrift für Horst Schröder (1978), pp. 119 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  27. Cécile Aptel, ‘The Intent to Commit Genocide in the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’, 13 Criminal Law Forum (2002), pp. 273 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  28. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Dolus eventualis and the Rome Statute without it?’, 12 New Criminal Law Review (2009), pp. 433 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  29. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Drawing the Boundaries of mens rea in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, 6 International Criminal Law Review (2006), pp. 313 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  30. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Mens rea – Mistake of Law and Mistake of Fact in German Criminal Law: A Survey for International Criminal Tribunals’, 5 International Criminal Law Review (2005), pp. 203 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  31. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘Rethinking mens rea in the Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda’, in Olaoluwa Olusanya (ed.), Rethinking International Criminal Law: The Substantive Part (2007), pp. 13 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  32. Mohamed Elewa Badar, The Concept of mens rea in International Criminal Law. The Case for a Unified Approach (2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  33. Mohamed Elewa Badar, ‘The Mental Element in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary from a Comparative Criminal Law Perspective’, 19 Criminal Law Forum (2008), pp. 473 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  34. Ilias Bantekas, International Criminal Law (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  35. Carl Ludwig von Bar, ‘Dolus eventualis?’, 18 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1898), pp. 534 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  36. M. Cherif Bassiouni, ‘International Crimes’, in M. Cherif Bassiouni (ed.), International Criminal Law’, 3rd edn. (2008), vol. 1: ‘Sources, Subjects, and Contents’, pp. 129 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  37. M. Cherif, Bassiouni, The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court: an Article-by-Article Evolution of the Statute (2005), vol. 2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  38. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 4 (1770). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  39. Karl Binding, Die Normen und ihre Übertretung: eine Untersuchung über die rechtsmäßige Handlung und die Arten des Delikts, vol. 2/2: ‘Der rechtswidrige Vorsatz’, 2nd edn. (1916). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  40. Christian Birnbaum, Die Leichtfertigkeit: zwischen Fahrlässigkeit und Vorsatz (2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  41. Gideon Boas, James L. Bischoff and Natalie R. Reid, Elements of Crimes Under International Law (2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  42. Gideon Boas, James L. Bischoff and Natalie R. Reid, Forms of Responsibility in International Criminal Law (2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  43. Hans Boddens Hosang, ‘Art. 8(2)(b)(xvi) ICC Statute’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 176 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  44. Michael Bohlander, Principles of German Criminal Law (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  45. Michael Bohlander, The German Criminal Code: a Modern English Translation (2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  46. Riccardo Borsari, Diritto punitivo sovranazionale come sistema (2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  47. Kathrin Bremer, Nationale Strafverfolgung internationaler Verbrechen gegen das humanitäre Völkerrecht. Am Beispiel einer Rechtsvergleichung Deutschlands, der Schweiz, Belgiens und Großbritanniens (1999). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  48. Boris Burghardt, ‘Die Vorgesetztenverantwortlichkeit nach Völkerstrafrecht und deutschem Recht (§ 4 VStGB)’, 5 Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik (2010), pp. 695 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  49. Stefano Canestrari, Dolo eventuale e colpa cosciente: ai confini tra dolo e colpa nella struttura delle tipologie delittuose (1999). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  50. Francesco Carrara, Programma del corso di diritto criminale: del delitto e della pena (reprinted 1993). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  51. Antonio Cassese, ‘Crimes Against Humanity’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 353 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  52. Antonio Cassese, International Criminal Law. Cases and Commentary (2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  53. Antonio Cassese, ‘The Proper Limits of Individual Criminal Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise’, 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007), pp. 109 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  54. Antonio Cassese, ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections’, 10 European Journal of International Law (1999), pp. 144 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  55. Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta, Laurel Baig, Mary Fan, Christopher Gosnell and Alex Whiting, Cassese’s International Criminal Law, 3rd edn. (2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  56. Chatham House, Milestones in International Criminal Justice: Recent Legal Controversies at the UN Yugoslav Tribunal (2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  57. Roger Clark, ‘Drafting a General Part to a Penal Code: Some Thoughts Inspired by the Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and by the Court’s First Substantive Law Discussion in the Lubanga Dyilo Confirmation Proceedings’, 19 Criminal Law Review Forum (2008), pp. 519 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  58. Roger Clark, ‘The Mental Element in International Criminal Law: the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Elements of Offences’, 12 Criminal Law Forum (2001), pp. 291 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  59. Walter W. Cook, ‘Act, Intention, and Motive in the Criminal Law’, 26 Yale Law Journal (1917), pp. 645 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  60. Robert Cryer, Hakan Friman, Darryl Robinson and Elizabeth Wilmshurst, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd edn. (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  61. Francesca Curi, Tertium datur: dal common law al civil law per una scomposizione tripartita dell'elemento soggettivo del reato (2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  62. Tobias Darge, Kriegsverbrechen im nationalen und internationalen Recht: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Bestimmtheitsgrundsatztes (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  63. Mireille Delmas-Marty, ‘Droit comparé et droit international: interaction et internormativité’, in Mario Chiavario (ed.), La justice pénale internationale entre passé et avenir (2003), pp. 11 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  64. Alberto Di Martino, ‘Dolus eventualis’, in Antonio Cassese (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (2009), pp. 302 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  65. Henri Decœur, ‘Avoiding Strict Liability in Mixed Conflicts: a Subjectivist Approach to the Contextual Elements of War Crimes’, 13 International Criminal Law Review (2013), pp. 473 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  66. Knut Dörmann, Elements of War Crimes Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary (2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  67. Knut Dörmann, ‘§ 11 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen des Einsatzes verbotener Methoden der Kriegsführung’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1302 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  68. Joshua Dressler, Cases and Materials on Criminal Law, 5th edn. (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  69. Joshua Dressler, Understanding Criminal Law, 5th edn. (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  70. Markus D. Dubber and Mark G. Kelman, American Criminal Law: Cases, Statutes and Comments, 2nd edn. (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  71. Udo Ebert, ‘Völkerstrafrecht und Gesetzlichkeitsprinzip’, in Guido Britz (ed.), Grundfragen staatlichen Strafens. Festschrift für Heinz Müller-Dietz zum 70. Geburtstag (2001), pp. 171 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  72. Karl Engisch, Untersuchungen über Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit im Strafrecht (1930). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  73. Albin Eser, ‘Individual Criminal Responsibility’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 767 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  74. Albin Eser, ‘Mental Elements – Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 889 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  75. Albin Eser, Strafrecht I, 3rd edn. (1980). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  76. Albin Eser, ‘§ 220a StGB: Völkermord’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 26th edn. (2001), pp. 1790 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  77. Albin Eser and Bernd Hecker, ‘Vorbemerkungen vor § 1 StGB’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 13 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  78. Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes (2003–2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  79. Luciano Eusebi, ‘In tema di accertamento del dolo: confusioni tra dolo e colpa’, 30 Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale (2000), pp. 1060 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  80. Luciano Eusebi, Il dolo come volontà (1993). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  81. Ward N. Ferdinandusse, Direct Application of International Criminal Law in National Courts (2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  82. George P. Fletcher, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  83. George P. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law (1978). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  84. George P. Fletcher, The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International (2007), vol. 1: ‘Foundations’. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  85. Fletcher, George P., Ohlin, Jens D., ‘The Commission of Inquiry on Darfur and Its Follow-up: A Critical View. Reclaiming Fundamental Principles of Criminal Law in the Darfur Case’, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2005), pp. 539 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  86. Giovanni Fiandaca and Enzo Musco, Diritto penale, parte generale, 6th edn. (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  87. Sarah Finnin, Elements of Accessorial Modes of Liability. Article 25(3)(b) and (c) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  88. Sarah Finnin, ‘Mental Elements Under Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Comparative Analysis’, 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2012), pp. 325 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  89. Giacomo Forte, ‘Ai confini tra dolo e colpa: dolo eventuale o colpa cosciente?’, 42 Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale (1999), pp. 228 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  90. Dario Franzin, ‘L’elemento soggettivo nello Statuto della Corte Penale Internazionale’, in Enrico Mezzetti (ed.), Diritto penale internazionale, 2nd edn. (2010), vol. 2: ‘Studi’, pp. 143 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  91. Georg Freund, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil. Personale Straftatlehre, 2nd edn. (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  92. Wolfgang Frisch, Vorsatz und Risiko. Grundfragen des tatbestandsmäßigen Verhaltens und des Vorsatzes; zugleich ein Beitrag zur Behandlung außertatbestandlicher Möglichkeitsvorstellungen (1983). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  93. Emanuela Fronza, ‘Riflessioni sulla nascita di un sistema penale internazionale: il ruolo della comparazione’, in Luigi Foffani (ed.), Diritto penale comparato, europeo e internazionale: prospettive per il XXI secolo (2006), pp. 171 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  94. Erkin Gadirov revised by Roger S. Clark, ‘Art. 9 ICC Statute: Elements of Crimes’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 505 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  95. Marcello Gallo, ‘Dolo (diritto penale)’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. 13 (1964), pp. 750 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  96. Émile Garçon, Code pénal annoté (1952). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  97. Charles Garraway, ‘Art. 8(2)(b)(xii) ICC Statute’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 169 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  98. Klaus Geppert, ‘Zur Abgrenzung von bedingtem Vorsatz und bewußter Fahrlässigkeit’, 8 Jura (1986), pp. 610 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  99. Alicia Gil Gil, Derecho penal internacional (1999). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  100. Alicia Gil Gil, Juan Manuel Lacruz López, Mariano Melendo Pardos and José Núñez Fernández, Curso de derecho penal, parte general (2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  101. Alexander K.A. Greenwalt, ‘Rethinking Genocidal Intent: the Case for a Knowledge-Based Interpretation’, 99 Columbia Law Review (1999), pp. 2259 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  102. Helmut Gropengießer and Helmut Kreicker, ‘Deutschland’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 1: ‘Deutschland’ (2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  103. Walter Gropp, ‘Conduct that the Actor Should Realise Creates a Substantial and Unreasonable Risk’, in Manfred Heinrich and Christian Jäger (eds.), Strafrecht als scientia universalis. Festschrift für Claus Roxin zum 80. Geburtstag am 15. Mai 2011 (2011), vol. 1, pp. 779 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  104. Cristopher K. Hall, ‘Art. 7 ICC Statute: Crimes Against Humanity’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 159 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  105. Herman von Hebel, ‘The Making of the Elements of Crimes – Introduction’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 3 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  106. Herman von Hebel and Maria Kelt, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law and Elements of Crimes’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 19 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  107. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘Vorbemerkungen zu den §§ 25 ff. StGB’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 478 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  108. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘§ 25 StGB: Täterschaft’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 517 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  109. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘§ 26 StGB: Anstiftung’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 538 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  110. Günter Heine and Bettina Weißer, ‘§ 27 StGB: Beihilfe’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 545 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  111. Kevin J. Heller, ‘The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Kevin J. Heller and Markus D. Dubber (eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (2011), pp. 593 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  112. Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol. 1: ‘Rules’ (reprinted 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  113. Rolf D. Herzberg, ‘Das Wollen beim Vorsatzdelikt und dessen Unterscheidung vom bewußt fahrlässigen Verhalten – Teil 2’, 43 Juristen Zeitung (1988), pp. 635 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  114. Rolf D. Herzberg, ‘Die Abgrenzung von Vorsatz und bewußter Fahrlässigkeit – ein Problem des objektiven Tatbestandes’, 26 Juristische Schulung (1986), pp. 249 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  115. Rolf D. Herzberg, Täterschaft und Teilnahme (1977). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  116. Robert von Hippel, Die Grenze von Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit: eine dogmatische Studie (1903). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  117. Tatjana Hörnle, ‘Social Expectations in the Criminal Law: the “Reasonable Person” in a Comparative Perspective’, 11 New Criminal Law Review (2008), pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  118. Joachim Hruschka, Strukturen der Zurechnung (1976). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  119. Douglas N. Husak and Craig A. Callender, ‘Wilful Ignorance, Knowledge, and the “Equal Culpability” Thesis: a Study of the Deeper Significance of the Principle of Legality’, Wisconsin Law Review (1994), pp. 29 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  120. Gaetano Insolera, ‘Concorso di persone nel reato’, in Digesto delle discipline penalistiche, vol. 2 (1988), pp. 437 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  121. Günther Jakobs, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil. Die Grundlagen und die Zurechnungslehre, 2nd edn. (1991). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  122. Konstanze Jarvers and Christoph Grammer, ‘Italien’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 4 (2005), pp. 337 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  123. Hans-Heinrich Jescheck, Die Verantwortlichkeit der Staatsorgane nach Völkerstrafrecht: eine Studie zu den Nürnberger Prozessen (1952). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  124. Hans-Heinrich Jescheck, ‘The General Principles of International Criminal Law Set Out in Nuremberg, as Mirrored in the ICC Statute’, 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2004), pp. 38 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  125. Hans-Heinrich Jescheck and Thomas Weigend, Lehrbuch des Strafrechts, allgemeiner Teil, 5th edn. (1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  126. Florian Jeßberger, ‘The Definition and the Elements of the Crime of Genocide’, in Paola Gaeta (ed.), The UN Genocide Convention: a Commentary (2009), pp. 87 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  127. Christopher C. Joyner, ‘United States: Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987’, 28 International Legal Materials (1989), pp. 751 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  128. Sanford H. Kadish, Stephen J. Schulhofer and Carol S. Steiker, Criminal Law and Its Processes. Cases and Materials, 8th edn. (2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  129. Nora Karsten, Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit des nicht-militärischen Vorgesetzten: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zu Artikel 28 IStGH-Statut (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  130. Armin Kaufmann, ‘Der dolus eventualis im Deliktsaufbau’, 70 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1958), pp. 64 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  131. W. Page Keeton (ed.), Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, 5th edn., student edn. (1984). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  132. Kirsten Keith, ‘The mens rea of Superior Responsibility as Developed by the ICTY Jurisprudence’, 14 Leiden Journal of International Law (2001), pp. 617 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  133. Urs Kindhäuser, ‘Vorsatz als Zurechnungskriterium’, 96 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1984), pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  134. Claus Kreß, ‘Ruth Rissing-van Saans Begegnung mit dem Völkerstrafrecht’, in Thomas Fischer and Klaus Bernsmann (eds.), Festschrift für Ruth Rissing-van Saan zum 65. Geburtstag am 25. Januar 2011 (2011), pp. 317 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  135. Claus Kreß, ‘The Darfur Report and Genocidal Intent’, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2005), pp. 562 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  136. Claus Kreß, Vom Nutzen eines deutschen Völkerstrafgesetzbuchs (2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  137. Claus Kreß, ‘§ 6 VStGB: Völkermord’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1084 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  138. Volker Krey, German Criminal Law, General Part. Textbook in German and English, vol. 2: ‘Legal Elements of the Intentional Offence Committed by Action’ (2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  139. Kristian Kühl, ‘Vorbemerkung Täterschaft und Teilnahme’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 28th edn. (2014), pp. 209 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  140. Kristian Kühl, ‘§ 15 StGB: Vorsätzliches und fahrlässiges Handeln’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 28th edn. (2014), pp. 111 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  141. Kristian Kühl, ‘§ 27 StGB: Beihilfe’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 28th edn. (2014), pp. 233 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  142. Kristian Kühl, ‘§ 220a StGB: Völkermord’, in Karl Lackner and Kristian Kühl (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 24th edn. (2001), pp. 831 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  143. Milan Kuhli, Das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch und das Verbot der Strafbegründung durch Gewohnheitsrecht: zur Frage der Zulässigkeit von strafgesetzlichen Verweisungen auf Völkergewohnheitsrecht im Hinblick auf das Verbot der Strafbegründung durch Gewohnheitsrecht nach Artikel 103 Absatz 2 des Grundgesetzes (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  144. Wayne R. LaFave, Criminal Law, 5th edn., stud. edn. (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  145. Angelo R. Latagliata, ‘Concorso di persone nel reato (diritto penale)’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. 8 (1961), pp. 568 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  146. Juliette Lelieur-Fischer, ‘Frankreich’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 4 (2005), pp. 225 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  147. Sascha R. Lüder and T. Vormbaum (eds.), Materialien zum Völkerstrafgesetzbuch: Dokumentation des Gesetzgebungsverfahrens (2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  148. Ferrando Mantovani, ‘The General Principles of International Criminal Law: the Viewpoint of a National Criminal Lawyer’, 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2003), pp. 26 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  149. Iryna Marchuk, The Fundamental Concept of Crime in International Criminal Law. A Comparative Law Analysis (2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  150. Jenny S. Martinez, ‘Understanding mens rea in Command Responsibility: from Yamashita to Blaški? and Beyond’, 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007), pp. 638 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  151. Chantal Meloni, ‘I primi passi della Corte Penale Internazionale: la decisione che conferma le accuse contro Thomas Lubanga Dyilo’, Il corriere del merito (2007), pp. 885 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  152. Gue?nae?l Mettraux, International Crimes and the ad hoc Tribunals (2005). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  153. Enrico Mezzetti, ‘L’elemento soggettivo dei crimini internazionali’, in Giorgio Lattanzi and Vito Monetti (eds.), La Corte Penale Internazionale. Organi-competenza-reati-processo (2006), pp. 313 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  154. Alan C. Michaels, ‘Acceptance: the Missing Mental State’, 71 Southern California Law Review (1998), pp. 953 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  155. Ingo Müller, ‘Der Vorsatz der Rechtsbeugung’, 33 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1980), pp. 2390 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  156. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Group Think: the Law of Conspiracy and Collective Reason’, 98 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2007), pp. 147 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  157. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Joint Criminal Confusion’, 12 New Criminal Law Review (2009), pp. 406 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  158. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Joint Intentions to Commit International Crimes’, 11 Chicago Journal of International Law (2011), pp. 693 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  159. Jens D. Ohlin, ‘Targeting and the Concept of Intent’, 35 Michigan Journal of International Law (2013), pp. 79 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  160. Antonio Pagliaro, La responsabilità del partecipe per il reato diverso da quello voluto (1966). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  161. Daniele Panfilo, La commissione preparatoria della Corte Penale Internazionale (2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  162. Alain Pellet, ‘Applicable Law’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 2, pp. 1051 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  163. Rollin M. Perkins, ‘A Rationale of mens rea’, 52 Harvard Law Review (1939), pp. 905 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  164. Donald K. Piragoff and Darryl Robinson, ‘Art. 30 ICC Statute: Mental Element’, in Otto Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, 2nd edn. (2008), pp. 849 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  165. Nicola Pisani, ‘The Mental Element in International Crime’, in Flavia Lattanzi and William A. Schabas (eds.), Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2004), vol. 2, pp. 121 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  166. Mauro Politi, ‘Elements of Crimes’, in Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John R.W.D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: a Commentary (2002), vol. 1, pp. 443 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  167. Ellen S. Podgor and Roger S. Clark, Understanding International Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  168. Jean Pradel, Droit pénal général, 18th edn. (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  169. Salvatore Prosdocimi, Dolus eventualis. Il dolo eventuale nella struttura delle fattispecie penali (1993). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  170. Ingeborg Puppe, ‘§ 16 StGB: Irrtum über Tatumstände’, in Urs Kindhäuser, Ulfrid Neumann and Hans-Ullrich, Paeffgen (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 1, 4th edn. (2013), pp. 690 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  171. Fabián O. Raimondo, General Principles of Law in the Decisions of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals (2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  172. Ira P. Robbins, ‘The Ostrich Instruction: Deliberate Ignorance as a Criminal mens rea’, 81 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1991), pp. 191 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  173. Darryl Robinson, ‘Art. 7(1)(f) ICC Statute’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (2001), pp. 90 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  174. Paul H. Robinson, ‘United States’, in Kevin J. Heller and Markus D. Dubber (eds.), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law (2011), pp. 563 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  175. Paul H. Robinson and Markus D. Dubber, ‘The American Model Penal Code: a Brief Overview’, 10 New Criminal Law Review (2000), pp. 319 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  176. Paul H. Robinson and Jane A. Grall, ‘Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability: the Model Penal Code and Beyond’, 35 Stanford Law Review (1983), pp. 681 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  177. Mario Romano, Commentario sistematico del codice penale, vol. 1 (2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  178. Alf Roos, Über den Vorsatz: Studien zur dänischen, englischen, deutschen und schwedischen Lehre und Rechtsprechung (1979). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  179. Ulrich Roßkopf, Die innere Tatseite des Völkerrechtsverbrechens: ein Beitrag zur Auslegung des Art. 30 IStGH-Statut (2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  180. Claus Roxin, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil, vol. 1: ‘Grundlagen: der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre’, 4th edn. (2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  181. Claus Roxin, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil, vol. 2: ‘Besondere Erscheinungsformen der Straftat’ (2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  182. Claus Roxin, Täterschaft und Tatherrschaft, 8th edn. (2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  183. Christoph J.M. Safferling, ‘Anmerkung zu einem Beschluss des BGH vom 17.06.2010 (AK 3/10; JZ 2010, 960) – Verantwortung des militärischen Befehlshabers im Sinne des § 4 VStGB’, 65 Juristenzeitung (2010), pp. 965 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  184. Christoph J.M. Safferling and Stefan Kirsch, ‘Die Strafbarkeit von Bundeswehrangehörigen bei Auslandseinsätzen: Afghanistan ist kein rechtsfreier Raum’, 42 Juristische Arbeitsblätter (2010), pp. 81 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  185. Per Saland, ‘International Criminal Law Principles’, in Roy S. Lee (ed.), The International Criminal Court: the Making of the Rome Statute. Issues, Negotiations and Results (1999), pp. 189 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  186. Helmut Satzger, ‘German Criminal Law and the Rome Statute – A Critical Analysis of the New German Code of Crimes Against International Law’, 2 International Criminal Law Review (2002), pp. 261 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  187. Wilhelm Sauer, Allgemeine Strafrechtslehre: eine lehrbuchmäßige Darstellung (1955). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  188. Francis B. Sayre, ‘Mens rea’, 45 Harvard Law Review (1932), pp. 974 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  189. Massimo Scaliotti, ‘Mens rea’, in Gaetano Carlizzi, Gabriele Della Morte, Siliana Laurenti and Antonio Marchesi (eds.), La Corte Penale Internazionale. Problemi e prospettive (2003), pp. 305 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  190. William A. Schabas, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law in the International Criminal Court Statute (Part III)’, 6 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (1998), pp. 84 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  191. William A. Schabas, Genocide in International Law: the Crime of Crimes (2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  192. William A. Schabas, ‘Mens rea and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, 37 New England Law Review (2003), pp. 1015 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  193. William A. Schabas, The International Criminal Court: a Commentary on the Rome Statute (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  194. Eberhard Schmidhäuser, ‘Die Grenze zwischen vorsätzlicher und fahrlässiger Straftat’, 20 Juristische Schulung (1980), pp. 241 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  195. Eberhard Schmidhäuser, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil. Lehrbuch, 2nd edn. (1975). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  196. Friedrich-Christian Schroeder, Der Täter hinter dem Täter: ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der mittelbaren Täterschaft (1965). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  197. Horst Schröder, ‘Aufbau und Grenzen des Vorsatzbegriffes’, in Festschrift für Wilhelm Sauer: zu seinem 70. Geburtstag am 24. Juni 1949 (1949), pp. 207 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  198. Ulrich Schroth, Vorsatz als Aneignung der unrechtskostituirenden Merkmale (1994). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  199. Rosaria Sicurella, Per una teoria della colpevolezza nel sistema dello Statuto della Corte Penale Internazionale (2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  200. Emily Silverman, ‘United States of America’, in Albin Eser, Ulrich Sieber and Helmut Kreicker (eds.), Nationale Strafverfolgung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen – National Prosecution of International Crimes, vol. 5 (2005), pp. 411 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  201. Elies van Sliedregt, The Criminal Responsibility of Individuals for Violations of International Humanitarian Law (2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  202. Elies van Sliedregt, Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law (2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  203. Dominik Steiger and Jelena Bäumler, ‘Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit deutscher Soldaten bei Auslandseinsätzen’, 48 Archiv des Völkerrechts (2010), pp. 189. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  204. Detlev Sternberg-Lieben and Frank Schuster, ‘§ 15 StGB: Vorsätzliches und fahrlässiges Handeln’, in Adolf Schönke and Horst Schröder (eds.), Strafgesetzbuch: Kommentar, 29th edn. (2014), pp. 246 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  205. Günter Stratenwerth, ‘Zur Individualisierung des Sorgfaltsmaßstabes beim Fahrlässigkeitsdelikt’, in Theo Vogler (ed.), Festschrift für Hans-Heinrich Jescheck zum 70. Geburtstag (1985), vol. 1, pp. 285 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  206. Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg, Vorstudien zu Vorsatz und Irrtum im Völkerstrafrecht (2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  207. Greg Taylor, ‘The Intention Debate in German Criminal Law’, 17 Ratio Juris (2004), pp. 346 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  208. Cécile Tournaye, ‘Genocidal Intent Before the ICTY’, 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2003), pp. 447 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  209. David M. Treiman, ‘Recklessness and the Model Penal Code’, 9 American Journal of Criminal Law (1981), pp. 281 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  210. Otto Triffterer, ‘Can the “Elements of Crimes” Narrow or Broaden Responsibility for Criminal Behaviour Defined in the Rome Statute?’, in Carsten Stahn and Göran Sluiter (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (2009), pp. 381 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  211. Otto Triffterer, ‘Genocide, Its Particular Intent to Destroy in Whole or in Part the Group as Such’, 14 Leiden Journal of International Law (2001), pp. 399 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  212. Otto Triffterer, Österreichisches Strafrecht?, allgemeiner Teil?, 2nd edn. (1994). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  213. Klaus Uekötter, Das Merkmal Leichtfertigkeit bei strafrechtlichen Erfolgsdelikten und erfolgsqualifizierten Delikten (1992). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  214. US Department of the Army, US Army Field Manual 27-10: the Law of Land Warfare (1956, with changes required in 1976). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  215. US Department of the Navy, Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  216. Antonio Vallini, ‘Intent’, in Antonio Cassese (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (2009), pp. 376 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  217. Antonio Vallini, ‘La colpevolezza, tra comparazione e diritto internazionale penale’, Studium iuris (2008), pp. 1082 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  218. Antonio Vallini, ‘La mens rea’, in Enrico Amati, Valentina Caccamo, Matteo Costi, Emanuela Fronza and Antonio Vallini, Introduzione al diritto penale internazionale, 2nd edn. (2010), pp. 175 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  219. Antonio Vallini, ‘L’elemento soggettivo nei crimini di competenza della Corte Penale Internazionale’, in Antonio Cassese, Mario Chiavario and Giovannangelo De Francesco, Problemi attuali della giustizia penale internazionale (2005), pp. 41 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  220. Antonio Vallini, ‘Mens rea’, in Antonio Cassese (ed.), The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (2009), pp. 412 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  221. Hans Vest, ‘A Structure-Based Concept of Genocidal Intent’, 5 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2007), pp. 781 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  222. Sergio Vinciguerra, Diritto penale inglese comparato. I principi, 2nd edn. (2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  223. Joachim Vogel, ‘§ 15 StGB: Vorsätzliches und fahrlässiges Handeln’, in Heinrich Wilhelm Laufhütte (ed.), Strafgesetzbuch: Leipziger Kommentar, vol. 1: ‘Einleitung, §§ 1–31 StGB’, 12th edn. (2007), pp. 991 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  224. Claus Volk, ‘Dolus ex re’, in Fritjof Haft, Winfried Hassemer, Ulfrid Neumann, Wolfgang Schild und Ulrich Schroth (eds.), Strafgerechtigkeit: Festschrift für Arthur Kaufmann zum 70. Geburtstag (1993), pp. 611 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  225. Claus Volk, Wahrheit und materielles Recht im Strafprozess (1980). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  226. War Crimes Research Office, American University Washington College of Law, Modes of Liability and the Mental Element. Analyzing the Early Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  227. Thomas Weigend, ‘Das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch – nationale Kodifikation internationalen Rechts’, in O. Triffterer (ed.), Gedächtnisschrift für Theo Vogler (2004), pp. 197 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  228. Thomas Weigend, ‘Intent, Mistake of Law, and Co-Perpetration in the Lubanga Decision on the Confirmation of Charges’, 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2008), pp. 471 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  229. Thomas Weigend, ‘Zwischen Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit’, 93 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1981), pp. 657 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  230. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 2 VStGB: Anwendung des allgemeinen Rechts’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1030 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  231. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 4 VStGB: Verantwortlichkeit militärischer Befehlshaber und anderer Vorgesetzter’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1057 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  232. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 13 VStGB: Verletzung der Aufsichtspflicht’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1367 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  233. Thomas Weigend, ‘§ 14 VStGB: Unterlassen der Meldung einer Straftat’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1377 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  234. Baruch Weiss, ‘What Were They Thinking?: the Mental States of the Aider and Abettor and the Causer Under Federal Law’, 70 Fordham Law Review (2002), pp. 1341 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  235. Roberto Wenin, ‘La categoria della “Leichtfertigkeit” nell’esperienza tedesca ed europea’, Indice Penale (2005), pp. 239 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  236. Roberto Wenin, La mens rea nello Statuto di Roma: un’analisi esegetico-sistematica dell’art. 30 in chiave comparata (2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  237. Gerhard Werle, ‘Die deutsche Rechtsprechung zur Zerstörungsabsicht beim Völkermord und die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention’, in Michael Hettinger, Jan Zopfs, Thomas Hillenkamp, Michael Köhler, Jürgen Rath, Franz Streng and Jürgen Wolter (eds.), Festschrift für Wilfried Küper zum 70. Geburtstag (2007), pp. 675 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  238. Gerhard Werle, ‘Einleitung VStGB’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 979 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  239. Gerhard Werle, ‘Konturen eines deutschen Völkerstrafrechts’, 56 Juristenzeitung (2001), pp. 885 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  240. Gerhard Werle, ‘Menschenrechtsschutz durch Völkerstrafrecht’, 109 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft (1997), pp. 808 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  241. Gerhard Werle, Principles of International Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  242. Gerhard Werle, Völkerstrafrecht, 3rd edn. (2012). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  243. Gerhard Werle, ‘Völkerstrafrecht und deutsches Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 67 Juristenzeitung (2012), pp. 373 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  244. Gerhard Werle and Wulf Burchards, ‘§ 7 VStGB: Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1131 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  245. Gerhard Werle and Florian Jeßberger, ‘Das Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 57 Juristenzeitung (2002), pp. 725 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  246. Gerhard Werle and Florian Jeßberger, ‘International Criminal Justice is Coming Home: the New Code of Crimes Against International Law’, 13 Criminal Law Forum (2002), pp. 191 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  247. Gerhard Werle and Florian Jeßberger, ‘Unless Otherwise Provided: Article 30 of the ICC Statute and the Mental Element of Crimes Under International Criminal Law’, 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2005), pp. 35 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  248. Johannes Wessels, Werner Beulke and Helmut Satzger, Strafrecht, allgemeiner Teil, 43rd edn. (2013). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  249. Glanville Williams, ‘Oblique Intention’, 46 Cambridge Law Journal (1987), pp. 417 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  250. Johan D. van der Vyver, ‘The International Criminal Court and the Concept of mens rea in International Criminal Law’, 57 University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review (2004), pp. 57 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  251. Alexander Zahar and Göran Sluiter, International Criminal Law: a Critical Introduction (2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  252. Andreas Zimmermann, ‘Auf dem Weg zu einem deutschen Völkerstrafgesetzbuch. Entstehung, völkerrechtlicher Rahmen und wesentliche Inhalte’, 35 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (2002), pp. 97 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  253. Andreas Zimmermann, ‘Bestrafung völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen durch deutsche Gerichte nach In-Kraft-Treten des Völkerstrafgesetzbuchs’, 55 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2002), pp. 3068 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  254. Andreas Zimmermann and Robin Geiß, ‘§ 8 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1213 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  255. Andreas Zimmermann and Robin Geiß, ‘§ 10 VStGB: Kriegsverbrechen gegen humanitäre Operationen und Embleme’, in Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, vol. 8: ‘Nebenstrafrecht III, Völkerstrafgesetzbuch’, 2nd edn. (2013), pp. 1290 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  256. Bruno Zimmermann, ‘Art. 85 AP I: Repression of Breaches of This Protocol’, in Yves Sandoz, Christophe Swinarski and Bruno Zimmermann (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (1986), pp. 989 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  257. ? Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  258. Table of Cases Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  259. A. British Courts Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  260. Trial of Erich Heyer and Six Others (The Essen Lynching Case), British Military Court of Essen, judgment of 22 December 1945, UNWCC, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 1, pp. 88 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  261. B. European Court of Human Rights Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  262. Kononov v. Latvia, ECHR (Grand Chamber), judgment of 17 May 2010, application no. 36376/04. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  263. C. Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  264. Prosecutor v. Kaing Guek Eav (‘Duch Case’), ECCC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 20 May 2010, case no. 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 38). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  265. D. French Courts Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  266. Hermann Roechling et al., Superior Military Government Court of the French Occupation Zone in Germany, judgment of 23 January 1949, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, vol. 14, Appendix B, pp. 1097 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  267. E. German Courts Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  268. Bundesverfassungsgericht, decision of 12 December 2000, 53 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2000), pp. 1848 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  269. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 12 February 1953, BGHSt 4, pp. 107 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  270. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 July 1954, BGHSt 6, pp. 359 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  271. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 11 February 1955, BGHSt 7, pp. 307 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  272. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 22 April 1955, BGHSt 7, pp. 363 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  273. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 15 May 1959, BGHSt 13, pp. 162 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  274. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 23 February 1961, BGHSt 16, pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  275. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 6 February 1962, BGHSt 18, pp. 246 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  276. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 5 May 1964, BGHSt 19, pp. 295 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  277. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 10 December 1965, BGHSt 20, pp. 315 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  278. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 26 July 1967, BGHSt 21, pp. 83 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  279. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 February 1968, 21 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1968), pp. 660 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  280. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 February 1968, 21 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1968), pp. 660 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  281. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 16 December 1969, BGHSt 23, pp. 203 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  282. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 22 September 1971, BGHSt 24, pp. 213 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  283. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 12 March 1974, 28 Monatsschrift für deutsches Recht (1974), pp. 547 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  284. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 May 1980, 34 Monatsschrift für deutsches Recht (1980), pp. 812 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  285. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 15 September 1981, 2 Neue Zeischrift für Strafrecht (1982), pp. 27 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  286. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 6 November 1984, 5 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1985), pp. 165 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  287. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 November 1984, BGHSt 33, pp. 66 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  288. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 23 January 1985, 39 Monatsschrift für deutsches Recht (1985), pp. 446 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  289. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 14 February 1985, 5 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1985), pp. 318 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  290. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 April 1986, BGHSt 34, pp. 63 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  291. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 3 July 1986, 6 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1986), pp. 549 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  292. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 6 February 1987, 7 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1987), pp. 364 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  293. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 10 February 1987, 42 Juristenzeitung (1987), pp. 877 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  294. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 April 1987, 7 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1987), pp. 424 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  295. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 25 November 1987, 8 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1988), pp. 175 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  296. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 March 1988, 8 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1988), pp. 361 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  297. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 4 November 1988, BGHSt 36, pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  298. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 23 February 1994, 14 Strafverteidiger (1994), pp. 480 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  299. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 26 July 1994, BGHSt 40, pp. 218 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  300. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 4 March 1996, BGHSt 42, pp. 65 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  301. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 18 April 1996, BGHSt 42, pp. 135 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  302. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 17 October 1996, 17 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (1997), pp. 82 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  303. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 12 February 1998, 51 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (1998), pp. 2149 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  304. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 30 April 1999, BGHSt 45, pp. 65 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  305. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 20 September 1999, 20 Strafverteidiger (2000), pp. 479 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  306. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 November 1999, 53 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2000), pp. 443 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  307. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 20 January 2000, BGHSt 45, pp. 373 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  308. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 1 August 2000, BGHSt 46, pp. 107 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  309. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 21 February 2001, BGHSt 46, pp. 292 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  310. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 21 February 2001, 54 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2001), pp. 2732 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  311. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 8 March 2001, 54 Neue juristische Wochenschrift (2001), pp. 2409 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  312. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 9 July 2002, 22 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2002), pp. 597 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  313. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 13 November 2003, BGHSt 49, pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  314. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 26 May 2004, BGHSt 49, pp. 166 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  315. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 15 September 2004, 25 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2005), pp. 261 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  316. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 1 February 2005, BGHSt 50, pp. 11 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  317. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 29 September 2005, 26 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2006), pp. 94 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  318. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 18 October 2006, BGHSt 51, pp. 100 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  319. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 18 January 2007, 27 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (2007), pp. 331 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  320. Bundesgerichtshof, decision of 2 September 2009, BGHSt 54, pp. 140 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  321. Bundesgerichtshof, case Kongo, decision of 17 June 2010, available on-line at http://www.intcrim.uni-hamburg.de/category/forschung/ (visited 30 June 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  322. Bundesgerichtshof, judgment of 17 May 2011, BGHSt 56, pp. 239 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  323. Reichsgericht, judgment of 23 December 1881, RGSt 5, pp. 314 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  324. Reichsgericht, judgment of 18 March 1898, RGSt 31, pp. 80 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  325. Reichsgericht, judgment of 7 December 1899, RGSt 33, pp. 4 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  326. Reichsgericht, decision of 8 January 1915, RGSt 49, pp. 140 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  327. Reichsgericht, judgment of 29 June 1920, RGSt 55, pp. 60 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  328. Reichsgericht, judgment of 21 February 1921, RGSt 55, pp. 257 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  329. Reichsgericht, judgment of 7 December 1929, RGZ 126, pp. 329 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  330. Reichsgericht, judgment of 3 May 1932, RGSt 66, pp. 236 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  331. Reichsgericht, judgment of 26 May 1933, RGSt 141, pp. 129 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  332. Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart, judgment of 18 September 1959, 18 Verkehrsrechtssammlung (1960), pp. 365 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  333. Generalbundesanwalt, case Kundus, decision of 16 April 2010, available on-line at http://www.intcrim.uni-hamburg.de/category/forschung/ (visited 30 June 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  334. Generalbundesanwalt, case Pakistan, decision of 20 June 2013, available on-line at Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  335. http://www.intcrim.uni-hamburg.de/category/forschung/ (visited 30 June 2014). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  336. F. International Court of Justice Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  337. ICJ, judgment of 20 November 1950 (Case Concerning Colombian–Peruvian Asylum), ICJ Reports (1950), pp. 266 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  338. ICJ, judgment of 20 February 1969 (Case Concerning North Sea Continental Shelf), ICJ Reports (1969), pp. 3 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  339. ICJ, judgment of 27 June 1986 (Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports (1986), pp. 14 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  340. G. International Criminal Court Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  341. Prosecutor v. Abu Garda, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 8 February 2010, case no. ICC-02/05-02/09. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  342. Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 4 March 2009, case no. ICC-02/05-01/09. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  343. Separate and Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Anita Ušacka to Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 4 March 2009, case no. ICC-02/05-01/09. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  344. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 15 June 2009, case no. ICC-01/05-01/08. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  345. Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 30 September 2008, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  346. Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Anita Ušacka to Prosecutor v. Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 30 September 2008, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  347. Prosecutor v. Katanga, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 March 2014, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  348. Minority Opinion of Judge Christine van den Wyngaert to Prosecutor v. Katanga, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 March 2014, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  349. Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 29 January 2007, case no. ICC-01/04-01/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  350. Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 March 2012, case no. ICC-01/04-01/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  351. Separate Opinion of Judge Adrian Fulford to Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 March 2012, case no. ICC-01/04-01/06. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  352. Prosecutor v. Mbarushimana, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 16 December 2011, case no. ICC-01/04-01/10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  353. Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng to Prosecutor v. Mbarushimana, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 16 December 2011, case no. ICC-01/04-01/10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  354. Prosecutor v. Muthaura, Kenyatta and Ali, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 23 January 2012, case no. ICC-01/09-02/11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  355. Concurring Opinion of Judge Christine van der Wyngaert to Prosecutor v. Ngudjolo Chui, ICC (Trial Chamber), judgment of 18 December 2012, case no. ICC-01/04-02/12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  356. Prosecutor v. Ruto, Kosgey and Sang, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 23 January 2012, case no. ICC-01/09-01/11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  357. Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, ICC (Pre-Trial Chamber), decision of 10 February 2006, case no. ICC-01/04-01/07. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  358. Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, ICC (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 13 July 2006, case no. ICC-01/04. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  359. Situation in Lybia, ICC (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 21 May 2014, case no. ICC-01/11-01/11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  360. H. International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  361. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 25 June 1999, case no. IT-95-14/1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  362. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 24 March 2000, case no. IT-95-14/1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  363. Prosecutor v. Babi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 18 July 2005, case no. IT-03-72-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  364. Prosecutor v. Blagojevi? and Joki?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 17 January 2005, case no. IT-02-60-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  365. Prosecutor v. Blagojevi? and Joki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 9 May 2007, case no. IT-02-60-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  366. Prosecutor v. Blaški?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 3 March 2000, case no. IT-95-14-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  367. Prosecutor v. Blaški?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 29 July 2004, case no. IT-95-14-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  368. Prosecutor v. Boškoski and Tarc?ulovski, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 10 July 2008, case no. IT-04-82-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  369. Prosecutor v. Boškoski and Tarc?ulovski, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 19 May 2010, case no. IT-04-82-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  370. Prosecutor v. Br?anin, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 1 September 2004, case no. IT-99-36-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  371. Prosecutor v. Br?anin, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 April 2007, case no. IT-99-36-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  372. Prosecutor v. Delali?, Muci?, Deli? and Landžo (‘?elebi?i case’), ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 16 November 1998, case no. IT-96-21-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  373. Prosecutor v. Delali?, Muci?, Deli? and Landžo (‘?elebi?i case’), ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 20 February 2001, case no. IT-96-21-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  374. Prosecutor v. Deli?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 September 2008, case no. IT-04-83-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  375. Prosecutor v. Furundžija, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 10 December 1998, case no. IT-95-17/1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  376. Prosecutor v. Furundžija, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 21 July 2000, case no. IT-95-17/1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  377. Prosecutor v. Gali?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 5 December 2003, case no. IT-98-29-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  378. Prosecutor v. Gali?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 30 November 2006, case no. IT-98-29-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  379. Prosecutor v. Gotovina, ?ermak and Marka?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 April 2011, case no. IT-06-90-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  380. Prosecutor v. Gotovina and ?ermak, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 16 November 2012, case no. IT-06-90-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  381. Prosecutor v. Hadzihasanovic and Kubura, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), decision of 16 July 2003, case no. IT-01-47-AR72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  382. Prosecutor v. Hadžihasanovi? and Kubura, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 March 2006, case no. IT-01-47-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  383. Prosecutor v. Halilovi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 16 November 2005, case no. IT-01-48-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  384. Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, Balaj and Brahimaj, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 3 April 2008, case no. IT-04-84-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  385. Prosecutor v. Haradinaj, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 29 November 2012, case no. IT-04-84bis-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  386. Prosecutor v. Jelisi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 5 July 2001, case no. IT-95-10-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  387. Prosecutor v. Josipovic?, Šantic?, Kupreškic?, Kupreškic?, Kupreškic? and Papic, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 January 2000, case no. IT-95-16-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  388. Prosecutor v. Kordi? and ?erkez, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 26 February 2001, case no. IT-95-14/2-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  389. Prosecutor v. Kordi? and ?erkez, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 December 2004, case no. IT-95-14/2-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  390. Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 September 2006, case no. IT-00-39-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  391. Prosecutor v. Krajišnik, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 March 2009, case no. IT-00-39-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  392. Prosecutor v. Krnojelac, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 March 2002, case no. IT-97-25-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  393. Prosecutor v. Krnojelac, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 September 2003, case no. IT-97-25-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  394. Prosecutor v. Krsti?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 August 2001, case no. IT-98-33-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  395. Prosecutor v. Krsti?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 19 April 2004, case no. IT-98-33-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  396. Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kova? and Vucovi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 22 February 2001, cases no. IT-96-23-T and IT-96-23/1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  397. Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kova? and Vucovi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 12 June 2002, cases no. IT-96-23-A and IT-96-23/1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  398. Prosecutor v. Kvo?ka, Kos, Radi?, Žici? and Prca?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 November 2001, case no. IT-98-30/1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  399. Prosecutor v. Kvo?ka, Radi?, Žici? and Prca?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2005, case no. IT-98-30/1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  400. Prosecutor v. Limaj, Bala and Musliu, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 30 November 2005, case no. IT-03-66-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  401. Prosecutor v. Marti?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 12 June 2007, case no. IT-95-11-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  402. Prosecutor v. Marti?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 8 October 2008, case no. IT-95-11-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  403. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Miloševi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 12 September 2007, case no. IT-98-29/1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  404. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Miloševi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 12 November 2009, case no. IT-98-29/1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  405. Prosecutor v. Milutinovi?, Šainovi? and Ojdani?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), decision of 21 May 2003, case no. IT-99-37-AR72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  406. Prosecutor v. Mrkši?, Radi? and Šljivan?anin, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 September 2007, case no. IT-95-3/1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  407. Prosecutor v. Mrkši? and Šljivan?anin, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 5 September 2009, case no. IT-95-3/1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  408. Prosecutor v. Naletili? and Martinovi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 31 March 2003, case no. IT-98-34-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  409. Prosecutor v. Naletili? and Martinovi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 May 2006, case no. IT-98-34-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  410. Prosecutor v. Ori?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 30 June 2006, case no. IT-03-68-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  411. Prosecutor v. Ori?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 July 2008, case no. IT-03-68-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  412. Prosecutor v. Periši?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2013, case no. IT-04-81-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  413. Joint Separate Opinion of Judges Theodor Meron and Carmel Agius to Prosecutor v. Periši?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2013, case no. IT-04-81-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  414. Opinion séparée du Juge Ramaroson sur la question de la vise spécifique dans la complicité par aide et encouragement to Prosecutor v. Periši?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 February 2013, case no. IT-04-81-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  415. Prosecutor v. Šainovi?, Pavkovi?, Lazarevi? and Luki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 23 January 2014, case no. IT-05-87-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  416. Dissenting Opinion of Judge Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov to Prosecutor v. Šainovi?, Pavkovi?, Lazarevi? and Luki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 23 January 2014, case no. IT-05-87-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  417. Prosecutor v. Simi?, Tadi? and Zari?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 17 October 2003, case no. IT-95-9-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  418. Prosecutor v. Staki?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 31 July 2003, case no. IT-97-24-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  419. Prosecutor v. Staki?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 22 March 2006, case no. IT-97-24-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  420. Prosecutor v. Strugar, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 31 January 2005, case no. IT-01-42-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  421. Prosecutor v. Strugar, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 17 July 2008, case no. IT-01-42-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  422. Prosecutor v. Tadi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), decision of 2 October 1995, case no. IT-94-1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  423. Prosecutor v. Tadi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 May 1997, case no. IT-94-1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  424. Prosecutor v. Tadi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 15 July 1999, case no. IT-94-1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  425. Prosecutor v. Vasiljevi?, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 29 November 2002, case no. IT-98-32-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  426. Prosecutor v. Vasiljevi?, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 25 February 2004, case no. IT-98-32-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  427. I. International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  428. Prosecutor v. Akayesu, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 September 1998, case no. ICTR-96-4-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  429. Prosecutor v. Akayesu, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 1 June 2001, case no. ICTR-96-4-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  430. Prosecutor v. Bagilishema, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 June 2001, case no. ICTR-95-1A-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  431. Prosecutor v. Bagilishema, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 3 July 2002, case no. ICTR-95-1A-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  432. Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabazuke and Nsegiyumva, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 18 December 2008, case no. ICTR-98-41-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  433. Prosecutor v. Bagosora and Nsegiyumva, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 14 December 2011, case no. ICTR-98-41-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  434. Prosecutor v. Bikindi, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 2 December 2008, case no. ICTR-01-72-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  435. Prosecutor v. Bisengimana, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 13 April 2006, case no. ICTR-00-60-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  436. Prosecutor v. Gacumbitsi, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 7 July 2006, case no. ICTR-2001-64-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  437. Prosecutor v. Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 21 May 1999, case no. ICTR-95-1-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  438. Prosecutor v. Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 1 June 2001, case no. ICTR-95-1-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  439. Prosecutor v. Kajelijeli, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 1 December 2003, case no. ICTR-98-44A-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  440. Prosecutor v. Kamuhanda, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 22 January 2003, case no. ICTR-99-54A-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  441. Prosecutor v. Karera, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 7 December 2007, case no. ICTR-01-74-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  442. Prosecutor v. Mpambara, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 11 September 2006, case no. ICTR-01-65-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  443. Prosecutor v. Muhimana, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 28 April 2005, case no. ICTR-95-1B-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  444. Prosecutor v. Musema, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 January 2001, case no. ICTR-96-13-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  445. Prosecutor v. Nahimana, Barayagwiza and Ngeze, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 28 November 2007, case no. ICTR-99-52-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  446. Prosecutor v. Niyitegeka, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 9 July 2004, case no. ICTR-96-14-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  447. Prosecutor v. Elizaphan Ntakirutimana and Gérard Ntakirutimana, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 13 December 2004, cases no. ICTR-96-10-A and ICTR-96-17-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  448. Prosecutor v. Ntawukulilyayo, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 14 December 2011, case no. ICTR-05-82-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  449. Prosecutor v. Renzaho, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 14 July 2009, case no. ICTR-9731-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  450. Prosecutor v. Rukundo, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 27 February 2009, case no. ICTR-2001-70-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  451. Prosecutor v. Rukundo, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 20 October 2010, case no. ICTR-2001-70-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  452. Prosecutor v. Semanza, ICTR (Trial Chamber), judgment of 15 May 2003, case no. ICTR-97-20-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  453. Prosecutor v. Semanza, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 20 May 2005, case no. ICTR-97-20-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  454. Prosecutor v. Seromba, ICTR (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 12 March 2008, case no. ICTR-2001-66-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  455. Prosecutor v. Simba, ICTY (Trial Chamber), judgment of 13 December 2005, case no. ICTR-01-76-T. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  456. Prosecutor v. Simba, ICTY (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 27 November 2007, case no. ICTR-01-76-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  457. J. Italian Courts Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  458. Corte di Cassazione, decision of 2 February 2001, Rivista penale (2001), pp. 764 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  459. Corte di Cassazione, decision of 14 June 2001, Cassazione penale (2002), pp. 3096 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  460. Corte di Cassazione, decision of 14 February 2012, case no. 31449. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  461. Corte di Assise di Appello Brescia, judgment of 26 September 2000, Foro italiano (2001), II, pp. 285 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  462. Corte di Assise di Appello Firenze, judgment of 1 December 2010, Il corriere del merito (2012), pp. 394 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  463. Tribunale Cremona, judgment of 14 October 1999, Foro italiano (2000), II, pp. 348 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  464. Corte di Assise Arezzo, judgment of 14 July 2009, Il corriere del merito (2009), pp. 1239 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  465. ? Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  466. K. Special Court for Sierra Leone Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  467. Prosecutor v. Taylor, SCSL (Appeals Chamber), judgment of 26 September 2013, case no. SCSL-03-01-A. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  468. L. Special Tribunal for Lebanon Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  469. Prosecutor v. Ayyash, STL (Appeals Chamber), decision of 16 February 2011, case no. STL-11-01/I. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  470. M. United States Courts Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  471. Hicks v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 27 November 1893, 150 US 442. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  472. United States v. Murdock, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 11 December 1933, 290 US 389. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  473. Townsend v. United States, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 7 February 1938, 95 F.2d 352. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  474. United States v. Falcone, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 9 December 1940, 311 US 205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  475. Screws v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 7 May 1945, 325 US 91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  476. Trial of General Tomoyuki Yamashita, Supreme Court of the US, judgment of 4 February 1946, UNWCC, Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, vol. 4, pp. 1 et seq. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  477. Pinkerton v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 10 June 1946, 328 US 640. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  478. United States v. Sheridan, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 23 December 1946, 329 US 379. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  479. Nye and Nissen v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 18 April 1949, 336 US 613. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  480. Pereira v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 1 February 1954, 347 US 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  481. United States v. Bishop, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 29 May 1973, 412 US 346. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  482. United States v. United States Gypsum Co., Supreme Court of the US, decision of 29 June 1978, 438 US 422. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  483. United States v. Bailey, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 21 January 1980, 444 US 394. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  484. Tison v. Arizona, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 21 April 1987, 481 US 137. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  485. Cheek v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 8 January 1991, 498 US 192. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  486. Ratzlaf v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 11 January 1994, 510 US 135. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  487. Staples v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 23 May 1994, 511 US 600. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  488. Concurring Opinion of Justice Ginsburg joined by Justice O’Connor to Staples v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 23 May 1994, 511 US 600. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  489. Bryan v. United States, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 15 June 1998, 524 US 184. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  490. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Burr, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 4 June 2007, 551 US 47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  491. Fitzgerald v. State, Supreme Court of Alabama, decision of 24 November 1896, 112 Ala. 34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  492. Bussard v. State, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, decision of 7 November 1939, 233 Wis. 11. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  493. Commonwealth v. Welansky, Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, decision of 5 June 1944, 55 N.E.2d 902. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  494. Trujillo v. People, Supreme Court of Colorado, decision of 30 January 1956, 133 Colo. 186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  495. United States v. Peoni, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 12 December 1938, 100 F.2d 401. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  496. Backun v. United States, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 10 June 1940, 112 F.2d 635. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  497. United States v. Tannuzzo, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 11 April 1949, 174 F.2d 177. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  498. Quirk v. United States, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 26 December 1957, 250 F.2d 909. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  499. United States v. Gordon, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 19 February 1958, 253 F.2d 177. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  500. United States v. Cherry, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 6 November 1961, 295 F.2d 842. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  501. United States v. Campisi, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 23 July 1962, 306 F.2d 308. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  502. United States v. Jones, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 17 August 1962, 308 F.2d 26. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  503. United States v. Cianchetti, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 21 March 1963, 315 F.2d 584. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  504. United States v. Kierschke, US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, decision of 5 April 1963, 315 F.2d 315. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  505. Nicolopoulos v. United States, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 27 May 1964, 332 F.2d 247. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  506. King v. United States, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 29 July 1966, 364 F.2d 235. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  507. United States v. Pardee, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 14 September 1966, 368 F.2d 368. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  508. United States v. Luxenberg, US Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, decision of 17 February 1967, 374 F.2d 241. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  509. United States v. Masters, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 7 March 1972, 456 F.2d 1060. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  510. United States v. John, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 6 January 1975, 508 F.2d 1134. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  511. United States v. Lozano, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 18 February 1975, 511 F.2d 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  512. United States v. Feola, Supreme Court of the US, decision of 19 March 1975, 420 US 671. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  513. United States v. Ludwig, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 8 October 1975, 523 F.2d 705. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  514. United States v. Micciche, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 30 October 1975, 525 F.2d 544. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  515. United States v. Jewell, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 27 February 1976, 532 F.2d 697. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  516. United States v. Kelner, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 9 April 1976, 534 F.2d 1020. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  517. United States v. Rapoport, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 4 November 1976, 545 F.2d 802. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  518. United States v. Cowden, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 16 November 1976, 545 F.2d 257. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  519. United States v. Monroe, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 22 February 1977, 552 F.2d 860. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  520. United States v. Murrieta-Bejarano, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 21 March 1977, 552 F.2d 1323. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  521. United States v. Beil, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 11 August 1978, 577 F.2d 1313. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  522. United States v. Wieschenberg, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 9 October 1979, 604 F.2d 326. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  523. United States v. Beck, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 4 February 1980, 615 F.2d 441. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  524. United States v. Marvin, US Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, decision of 3 September 1982, 687 F.2d 1221. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  525. Sanders/Miller v. Logan, US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, decision of 13 June 1983, 710 F.2d 645. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  526. McAllister v. United States, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 20 November 1984, 747 F.2d 1273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  527. United States v. Guzman, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 12 February 1985, 754 F.2d 482. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  528. United States v. Paone, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, decision of 29 March 1985, 758 F.2d 774. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  529. United States v. Fountain, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 8 July 1985, 768 F.2d 790. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  530. United States v. Markowski, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 10 September 1985, 772 F.2d 358. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  531. United States v. Mann, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 25 February 1987, 811 F.2d 495. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  532. United States v. Stern, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 27 September 1988, 858 F.2d 1241. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  533. United States v. Iredia, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 3 February 1989, 866 F.2d 114. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  534. United States v. Pino-Perez, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 10 March 1989, 870 F.2d 1230. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  535. United States v. Bruno, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 17 April 1989, 873 F.2d 555. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  536. United States v. Johnson, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 25 September 1989, 886 F.2d 1120. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  537. United States v. Judd, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 29 November 1989, 889 F.2d 1410. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  538. United States v. Valencia, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 16 July 1990, 907 F.2d 671. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  539. United States v. Powell, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 5 April 1991, 929 F.2d 724. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  540. United States v. de Francisco-Lopez, US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, decision of 17 July 1991, 939 F.2d 1405. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  541. United States v. Torres, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 8 October 1992, 977 F.2d 321. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  542. United States v. Rodriguez, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 14 January 1993, 983 F.2d 455. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  543. United States v. Williams, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 24 February 1993, 985 F.2d 749. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  544. United States v. Curran, US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, decision of 30 March 1994, 20 F.3d 560. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  545. United States v. Thomas, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 26 July 1994, 34 F.3d 44. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  546. Roy v. United States, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 5 October 1994, 652 A.2d 1098, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  547. United States v. Ortega, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 4 January 1995, 44 F.3d 505. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  548. United States v. Boyles, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 8 June 1995, 57 F.3d 535. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  549. United States v. Wills, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 26 June 1996, 88 F.3d 704. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  550. United States v. Randolph, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 22 August 1996, 93 F.3d 656. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  551. United States v. Burgos, US Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, decision of 23 August 1996, 94 F.3d 849. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  552. United States v. De Santiago-Flores, US Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, decision of 28 February 1997, 107 F.3d 1472. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  553. United States v. Sayetsitty, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 28 February 1997, 107 F.3d 1405. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  554. United States v. Pearson, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 14 May 1997, 113 F.3d 758. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  555. United States v. Everett, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 23 July 1997, 1997 US App. LEXIS 19279. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  556. United States v. McHugh, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 4 September 1997, 122 F.3d 153. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  557. United States v. Croft, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 5 September 1997, 124 F.3d 1109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  558. United States v. Nelson, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 26 February 1998, 137 F.3d 1094. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  559. United States v. Trie, US Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, decision of 17 July 1998, 21 F. Supp. 2d 7. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  560. United States v. Hanousek, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 19 March 1999, 176 F.3d 1116. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  561. United States v. Zichettello, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 30 March 2000, 208 F.3d 72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  562. United States v. Samaria, US Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, decision of 23 January 2001, 239 F.3d 228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  563. United States v. Arzate-Picasso, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 9 August 2001, 18 Fed. Appx. 484. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  564. United States v. Hunt, US Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, decision of 29 November 2001, 272 F.3d 488. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  565. United States v. Garcia, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 11 March 2005, 400 F.3d 816. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  566. United States v. Heredia, US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, decision of 24 October 2005, 429 F.3d 820. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  567. United States v. Ndiaye, US Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, decision of 6 January 2006, 434 F.3d 1270. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  568. United States v. Dowden, US Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, decision of 28 April 2006, 178 Fed. Appx. 370. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078
  569. United States v. Flores, US Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, decision of 21 July 2006, 454 F.3d 149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845256078

Similar publications

from the series "Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht"
Cover of book: Enforced Disappearances
Edited Book No access
Claudia Cárdenas Aravena, Kai Cornelius, Milan Kuhli, Juan Pablo Mañalich Raffo
Enforced Disappearances
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monograph No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Cover of book: Die Zulässigkeit grenzüberschreitender Beweise in der EU
Monograph No access
Alba Hernández Weiss
Die Zulässigkeit grenzüberschreitender Beweise in der EU
Cover of book: Der Richtervorbehalt in Art. 31 Abs. 3 EUStA-VO
Monograph No access
Ronja Zerbst
Der Richtervorbehalt in Art. 31 Abs. 3 EUStA-VO
Cover of book: Postkoloniales Völkerstrafrecht?
Edited Book Full access
Markus Abraham, Georgia Stefanopoulou
Postkoloniales Völkerstrafrecht?

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex