Cover of book: Die New Penology
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Die New Penology

Gouvernementalität und Risikomanagement im Umgang mit abweichendem Verhalten
Authors:
Series:
Studien zum Strafrecht, Volume 73
Publisher:
 31.05.2016

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2016
Publication date
31.05.2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3158-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7528-4
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zum Strafrecht
Volume
73
Language
German
Pages
420
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 10
    1. A. Untersuchungsgegenstand und Fragestellung No access
    2. B. Ziel der Arbeit No access
    3. C. Gang der Darstellung No access
      1. I. Souveränität und Disziplin No access
      2. II. Bio-Macht No access
        1. 1. Die Geschichte der Gouvernementalität No access
        2. 2. Souveränität – Disziplin – gouvernementale Verwaltung No access
        3. 3. Die Strafpolitik der US-amerikanischen Neoliberalen No access
        4. 4. Technologien des Selbst No access
      4. IV. Zusammenfassung und Ergebnis No access
      1. I. Rezeption und Weiterentwicklung No access
      2. II. Strategien, Technologien, Programme No access
      1. I. Die Konzeption des Risikos in den Gouvernementalitätsstudien No access
        1. 1. Die Verteidigung der Gesellschaft No access
          1. a. Die Technologie des Risikos No access
          2. b. Versicherungsförmige Kriminalitätskontrolle? No access
    4. D. Abgrenzung zur Theorie der Risikogesellschaft No access
      1. I. Von Strafe und Resozialisierung zum Management von Risikogruppen No access
      2. II. Prävention und Risikoreduzierung No access
      3. III. Rationalität und Effizienz des Kriminaljustizsystems No access
        1. 1. Parole und Probation im Überblick No access
        2. 2. Von der Normalisierung zum Management – Simons Untersuchung der Parole in Kalifornien No access
        1. 1. Selective Incapacitation No access
        2. 2. „Three Strikes and you are out” No access
      3. III. Pretrial (preventive) detention No access
        1. 1. Megan’s Law No access
        2. 2. Civil commitment No access
      5. V. Criminal Profiling No access
      6. VI. Situative Kriminalprävention und defensible space No access
    3. C. Zusammenfassung No access
    1. A. Rezeption und Problematik No access
      1. I. Der Ausgangspunkt: Risikomanagement statt Resozialisierung No access
        1. 1. Vorüberlegung zur Vereinbarkeit von Gouvernementalitätsstudien und empirischen Fragestellungen No access
          1. a. Floridas Kriminaljustizsystem (Lucken) No access
          2. b. Probation in Kalifornien (Lemert) No access
          3. c. Parole in Kalifornien (Lynch) No access
          4. d. Probation in England und Wales (Robinson) No access
          5. e. Zusammenfassung und Bewertung No access
      3. III. Foucaults Dreieck in der Analyse des Strafens No access
      4. IV. Ergebnis No access
      1. I. Der aktuarische Risikobegriff und seine Kritik No access
        1. 1. Quantitative und qualitative Formen des Risikos (Dean) No access
        2. 2. „Clinical risk“ (Weir) No access
        3. 3. Risiko und Unsicherheit (O’Malley) No access
        4. 4. Ein kategorischer Begriff des Risikos (Brown) No access
      3. III. Der Risikobegriff im Rahmen der Gouvernementalität No access
          1. a. Strafschärfungen für Wiederholungstäter und die Erforschung krimineller Karrieren No access
          2. b. Selective Incapacitation No access
          3. c. „Three Strikes and you are out“ No access
        2. 2. Risk/Need-Konzepte in Parole und Probation No access
        3. 3. Pretrial (preventive) detention No access
        4. 4. Megan’s Law No access
        5. 5. Civil commitment No access
        6. 6. Criminal Profiling No access
        1. 1. Die begrenzte Reichweite des aktuarischen Risikobegriffs No access
        2. 2. Die Feststellung, was an der New Penology „neu“ ist No access
      1. I. Die Frage der Praxis No access
        1. 1. Simons Untersuchung der kalifornischen Parole No access
        2. 2. Parole in Kalifornien (Lynch) No access
        3. 3. Intensive Supervised Probation im mittleren Westen (Bayens/Manske/Smykla) No access
        4. 4. Parole und Jugendliche in Arizona (Maupin) No access
        5. 5. Public Protection Panels in England und Wales (Kemshall/Maguire) No access
        6. 6. Weed and Seed in Seattle (Miller) No access
        7. 7. Zusammenfassung und Bewertung No access
      3. III. Die Rolle der Akteure im Rahmen der Gouvernementalität No access
      4. IV. Ergebnis No access
      1. I. Die Kritik No access
        1. 1. Die Perspektive der Gouvernementalität No access
        2. 2. Neoliberalismus und „New Right“ als Erklärungsansätze No access
      3. III. Ergebnis No access
  6. 5. Kapitel: Zusammenfassung No access 388 - 398
  7. Literaturverzeichnis No access 399 - 420

Bibliography (403)

  1. Abadinsky, Howard (2012), Probation and Parole: Theory and Practice, 11. ed., Boston Open Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Francis A. (1981), The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal. Penal Policy and Social Purpose, New Haven Open Google Scholar
  3. Alschuler, Albert W. (1991), The Failure of Sentencing Guidelines: A Plea for Less Aggregation, in: The University of Chicago Law Review 58 (3), S. 901-951 Open Google Scholar
  4. Ders. (2003), The Changing Purposes of Criminal Punishment: A Retrospective on the Past Century and Some Thoughts About the Next, in: The University of Chicago Law Review 70 (1), S. 1-22 Open Google Scholar
  5. Amelung, Knut (1972), Rechtsgüterschutz und Schutz der Gesellschaft: Untersuchungen zum Inhalt und zum Anwendungsbereich eines Strafrechtsprinzips auf dogmengeschichtlicher Grundlage. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der „Sozialschädlichkeit“ des Verbrechens, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  6. American Bar Association (2002), ABA Criminal Justice Standards on Pretrial Release, Third Edition Open Google Scholar
  7. American Friends Service Committee (1971), Struggle for Justice. A Report on Crime and Punishment in America, New York Open Google Scholar
  8. Ancel, Marc (1970), Die neue Sozialverteidigung (La défense sociale nouvelle). Eine Bewegung humanistischer Kriminalpolitik, Stuttgart Open Google Scholar
  9. Andrews, D. A./ Bonta, James (1998), The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 2. ed., Cincinnati Open Google Scholar
  10. Dies. (2010), The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 5. ed., New Providence Open Google Scholar
  11. Andrews, D. A./ Bonta, James/ Hoge, R. D. (1990), Classification for Effective Rehabilitation. Rediscovering Psychology, in: Criminal Justice and Behavior 17 (1), S. 19-52 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
  12. Andrews, D. A./ Dowden, Craig (2006), Risk Principle of Case Classification in Correctional Treatment. A Meta-Analytic Investigation, in: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 50 (1), S. 88-100 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05282556
  13. Andrews, D. A./ Bonta, James/ Cullen, Francis T. et al. (1990), Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta-Analysis, in: Criminology 28 (3), S. 369-404 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x
  14. Auerhahn, Kathleen (2003), Selective Incapacitation and Public Policy. Evaluating California’s Imprisonment Crisis, Albany Open Google Scholar
  15. Austin, James/ Clark, John/ Hardyman, Patricia et al. (1999), The Impact of ‘Three Strikes and You’re Out’, in: Punishment & Society 1 (2), S. 131-162 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/14624749922227757
  16. Ballucci, Dale (2008), Risk in Action: The Practical Effects of the Youth Management Assessment, in: Social & Legal Studies 17 (2), S. 175-197 Open Google Scholar
  17. Barry, Andrew/ Osborne, Thomas/ Rose, Nikolas (eds.) (1996), Foucault and Political Reason. Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, Chicago Open Google Scholar
  18. Baur, Alexander/ Burkhardt, Anika/ Kinzig, Jörg (2011), Am Pranger: Kriminalprävention durch Information? Über die Zulässigkeit und kriminalpolitische Wirksamkeit eines Präventivprangers für gefährliche Straftäter, in: JuristenZeitung 66 (3), S. 131-139 Open Google Scholar
  19. Bayens, Gerald J./ Manske, Michael W./ Smykla, John Ortiz (1998), The Impact of the New Penology on ISP, in: Criminal Justice Review 23 (1), S. 51-62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/073401689802300104
  20. Bayer, Ronald (1981), Crime, Punishment, and the Decline of Liberal Optimism, in: Crime & Delinquency 27 (2), S. 169-190 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/001112878102700201
  21. Beck, Ulrich (1986), Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  22. Ders. (1992), Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity, London Open Google Scholar
  23. Ders. (1993), Risikogesellschaft und Vorsorgestaat – Zwischenbilanz einer Diskussion, in: Ewald, François, Der Vorsorgestaat, Frankfurt a. M., S. 535-558 Open Google Scholar
  24. Ders. (1994), The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization, in: Beck, Ulrich/ Giddens, Anthony/ Lash, Scott, Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Cambridge, S. 1-55 Open Google Scholar
  25. Ders. (1999), World Risk Society, Cambridge Open Google Scholar
  26. Ders. (2007), Weltrisikogesellschaft. Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  27. Beck, Ulrich/ Bonß Wolfgang/ Lau, Christoph (2001), Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung – Fragestellungen, Hypothesen, Forschungsprogramme, in: Beck, Ulrich/ Bonß, Wolfgang (Hg.), Die Modernisierung der Moderne, Frankfurt a. M., S. 11-59 Open Google Scholar
  28. Becker, Gary S. (1968), Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, in: The Journal of Political Economy 76 (2), S. 169-217 Open Google Scholar
  29. Becton, Charles L. (1987), The Drug Courier Profile: ‘All Seems Infected That th’ Infected Spy, as All Looks Yellow to the Jaundic’d Eye’, in: North Carolina Law Review 65 (3), S. 417-480 Open Google Scholar
  30. Beirne, Piers (1987), Adolphe Quetelet and the Origins of Positivist Criminology, in: American Journal of Sociology 92 (5), S. 1140-1169 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/228630
  31. Ders. (1993), Inventing Criminology. Essays on the Rise of Homo Criminalis, Albany Open Google Scholar
  32. Belina, Bernd (2000), „Kriminalität“ und „Raum“. Zur Kritik der Kriminalgeographie und zur Produktion des Raumes, in: Kriminologisches Journal 32 (2), S. 129-147 Open Google Scholar
  33. Ders. (2006), Raum, Überwachung, Kontrolle. Vom staatlichen Zugriff auf städtische Bevölkerung, Münster Open Google Scholar
  34. Ders. (2008), „We may be in the slum, but the slum is not in us!” Zur Kritik kulturalistischer Argumentationen am Beispiel der Underclass-Debatte, in: Erdkunde 62 (1), S. 15-26 Open Google Scholar
  35. Beres, Linda S./ Griffith, Thomas D. (1998), Do Three Strikes Laws Make Sense? Habitual Offender Statutes and Criminal Incapacitation, in: Georgetown Law Journal 87 (1), S. 103-138 Open Google Scholar
  36. Berlin, Fred S./ Galbreath Nathan W./ Geary, Brendan et al. (2003), The Use of Actuarials at Civil Commitment Hearings to Predict the Likelihood of Future Sexual Violence, in: Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 15 (4), S. 377-382 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/107906320301500412
  37. Biebricher, Thomas (2005), Selbstkritik der Moderne. Foucault und Habermas im Vergleich, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i3.870
  38. Ders. (2009), Macht und Recht: Foucault, in: Buckel, Sonja/ Christensen, Ralph/ Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (Hg.), Neue Theorien des Rechts, 2. Auflage, Stuttgart, S. 135-156 Open Google Scholar
  39. Blackmore, John/ Welsh, Jane (1983), Selective Incapacitation: Sentencing According to Risk, in: Crime & Delinquency 29 (4), S. 504-528 Open Google Scholar
  40. Blokland, Arjan A. J./ Nieuwbeerta, Paul (2007), Selectively Incapacitating Frequent Offenders: Costs and Benefits of Various Penal Scenarios, in: Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23 (4), S. 327-353 Open Google Scholar
  41. Blomberg, Thomas G./ Lucken, Karol (2010), American Penology. A History of Control, 2. ed., New Brunswick Open Google Scholar
  42. Blumstein, Alfred/ Cohen, Jacqueline/ Roth, Jeffrey A. et al. (eds.) (1986), Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals”, Washington Open Google Scholar
  43. Bonta, James (1996), Risk-Needs Assessment and Treatment, in: Harland, Alan T. (ed.), Choosing Correctional Options that Work. Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply, Thousand Oaks, S. 18-32 Open Google Scholar
  44. Bottoms, Anthony E. (1983), Neglected Features of Contemporary Penal Systems, in: Garland, David/ Young, Peter (eds.), The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penality and Social Analysis, London, S. 166-202 Open Google Scholar
  45. Ders. (1995), The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing, in: Clarkson, Chris/ Morgan, Rod (eds.), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford, S. 17-49 Open Google Scholar
  46. Bougen, Philip D. (2003), Catastrophe Risk, in: Economy and Society 32 (2), S. 253-274 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/0308514032000073428
  47. Bröckling, Ulrich/ Krasmann, Susanne/ Lemke, Thomas (Hg.) (2000), Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  48. Brown, George K. (1945), The Treatment of the Recidivist in the United States, in: Canadian Bar Review 23 (8), S. 640-683 Open Google Scholar
  49. Brown, Mark (2000), Calculations of Risk in Contemporary Penal Practice, in: Brown, Mark/ Pratt, John (eds.), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, London, S. 93-108 Open Google Scholar
  50. Brown, Michelle (2006), The New Penology in a Critical Context, in: DeKeseredy, Walter S./ Perry, Barbara (eds.), Advancing Critical Criminology. Theory and Application, Lanham, S. 101-123 Open Google Scholar
  51. Brownlee, Ian (1998), New Labour – New Penology? Punitive Rhetoric and the Limits of Managerialism in Criminal Justice Policy, in: Journal of Law and Society, 25 (3), S. 313-335 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00094
  52. Buckel, Sonja (2007), Subjektivierung und Kohäsion. Zur Rekonstruktion einer materialistischen Theorie des Rechts, Weilerswist Open Google Scholar
  53. Burchell, Graham (1996), Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self, in: Barry, Andrew/ Osborne, Thomas/ Rose, Nikolas (eds.), Foucault and Political Reason. Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, Chicago, S. 19-36 Open Google Scholar
  54. Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.) (1991), The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality: With Two Lectures by and an Interview With Michel Foucault, Chicago Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001
  55. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2002), Summary of State Sex Offender Registries, 2001, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar
  56. Burgess, Ernest W. (1928), Factors Determining Success or Failure on Parole, in: Bruce, Andrew/ Harno, Albert/ Burgess, Ernest W. (eds.), The Workings of the Indeterminate Sentence Law and the Parole System in Illinois, Springfield, S. 205-249 Open Google Scholar
  57. Ders. (1936), Protecting the Public by Parole and by Parole Prediction, in: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 27 (4), S. 491-502 Open Google Scholar
  58. Busch, Tobias (1988), Selective Incapacitation. Ein Beispiel für den Versuch von Kriminalprävention durch Strafzumessung, München Open Google Scholar
  59. California Department of Corrections (1994), Monthly Report of Population as of Midnight June 30 Open Google Scholar
  60. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (2011a), Monthly Report of Population as of Midnight March 31 Open Google Scholar
  61. Dies. (2011b), Second and Third Striker Felons in the Adult Institution Population, March 31, 2011, Sacramento Open Google Scholar
  62. Canguilhem, Georges (1974), Das Normale und das Pathologische, München Open Google Scholar
  63. Ders. (2009), Die Erkenntnis des Lebens, Berlin Open Google Scholar
  64. Castel, Robert (1991), From Dangerousness to Risk, in: Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, S. 281-298 Open Google Scholar
  65. Cauchie, Jean-François/ Chantraine, Gilles (2005), Use of Risk in the Government of Crime (Jan. 2006), in: Champ Pénal Vol II Open Google Scholar
  66. Cavadino, Michael/ Dignan, James (2007), The Penal System. An Introduction, 4. ed., London Open Google Scholar
  67. Cavadino, Michael (2010), Penology, in: McLaughlin, Eugene/ Newburn, Tim (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Theory, London, S. 447-463 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9781446200926.n24
  68. Chang, Gyu Won (1993), Rückfall und Strafzumessung. Rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zur Behandlung des Rückfalls im deutschen und koreanischen Strafrecht und kritische Studie zur Strafschärfung wegen Rückfalls, Pfaffenweiler Open Google Scholar
  69. Cheliotis, Leonidas K. (2006a), How Iron is the Iron Cage of New Penology? The Role of Human Agency in the Implementation of Criminal Justice Policy, in: Punishment & Society 8 (3), S. 313-340 Open Google Scholar
  70. Ders. (2006b), Penal Managerialism from within: Implications for Theory and Research, in: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 29 (5), S. 397-404 Open Google Scholar
  71. Clark, John/ Austin, James/ Henry, D. Alan (1997), “Three Strikes and You’re Out”: A Review of State Legislation, in: National Institute of Justice (ed.), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., September Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1037/e520312006-001
  72. Cohen, Jacqueline (1984), Symposium: Prison Crowding: Selective Incapacitation: An Assessment, in: University of Illinois Law Review, S. 253-290 Open Google Scholar
  73. Cohen, Stanley (1985), Visions of Social Control. Crime, Punishment and Classification, Cambridge Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/228329
  74. Ders. (1994), Social Control and the Politics of Reconstruction, in: Nelken, David (ed.), The Futures of Criminology, London, S. 63-88 Open Google Scholar
  75. Cohen, Michelle/ Jeglic, Elizabeth L. (2007), Sex Offender Legislation in the United States. What Do We Know?, in: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 51 (4), S. 369-383 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06296235
  76. Coleman, Roy (2003), Images from a Neoliberal City: The State, Surveillance and Social Control, in: Critical Criminology 12 (1), S. 21-42 Open Google Scholar
  77. Coleman, Roy/ Sim, Joe (2005), Contemporary Statecraft and the ‘Punitive Obsession’: A Critique of the New Penology Thesis, in: Pratt, John/ Brown, David/ Brown, Mark et al. (eds.), The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives, Cullompton, S. 101-118 Open Google Scholar
  78. Coonen, Rose A. (2001), United States v. Gatewood: Does the Three Strikes Statute Violate Due Process and Undermine the Presumption of Innocence?, in: American Journal of Criminal Law 29, S. 83-113 Open Google Scholar
  79. Corrigan, Rose (2006), Making Meaning of Megan’s Law, in: Law & Social Inquiry 31 (2), S. 267-312 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00012.x
  80. Cullen, Francis T. (2005), The Twelve People Who Saved Rehabilitation: How the Science of Criminology Made a Difference, in: Criminology 43 (1), S. 1-42 Open Google Scholar
  81. Dahle, Klaus-Peter (2006), Grundlagen und Methoden der Kriminalprognose, in: Kröber, Hans-Ludwig u.a. (Hg.), Handbuch der forensischen Psychiatrie, Band 3: Psychiatrische Kriminalprognose und Kriminaltherapie, Darmstadt, S. 1-67 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/3-7985-1633-2_1
  82. Dean, Mitchell (1996), Putting the Technological into Government, in: History of the Human Sciences 9 (3), S. 47-68 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/095269519600900303
  83. Ders. (1998), Risk, Calculable and Incalculable, in: Soziale Welt 49 (1), S. 25-42 Open Google Scholar
  84. Ders. (2010), Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2. ed., London Open Google Scholar
  85. Defert, Daniel (1991), ‘Popular Life’ and Insurance Technology, in: Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, S. 211-233 Open Google Scholar
  86. Deflem, Mathieu (1997), Surveillance and Criminal Statistics: Historical Foundations of Governmentality, in: Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 17, S. 149-184 Open Google Scholar
  87. Demleitner, Nora V. (2003), Abusing State Power or Controlling Risk? Sex Offender Commitment and Sicherungsverwahrung, in: Fordham Urban Law Journal 30 (5), S. 1621-1696 Open Google Scholar
  88. Donzelot, Jacques (1979), The Poverty of Political Culture, in: Ideology & Consciousness 5, S. 73-86 Open Google Scholar
  89. Ders. (1984), L’invention du social. Essai sur le déclin des passions politiques, Paris Open Google Scholar
  90. Ders. (1988), The Promotion of the Social, in: Economy and Society 17 (3), S. 395-427 Open Google Scholar
  91. Downes, David (2006), Foreword, in: Cavadino, Michael/ Dignan, James, Penal Systems. A Comparative Approach, London, S. viii-ix Open Google Scholar
  92. Dubber, Markus D. (1990), The Unprincipled Punishment of Repeat Offenders. A Critique of California’s Habitual Offender Statute, in: Stanford Law Review 43 (1), S. 193-240 Open Google Scholar
  93. Ders. (1995), Recidivist Statutes as Arational Punishment, in: Buffalo Law Review 43, S. 689-724 Open Google Scholar
  94. Ders. (2005), Einführung in das US-amerikanische Strafrecht, München Open Google Scholar
  95. Durkheim, Émile (1973), Two Laws of Penal Evolution, in: Economy and Society 2 (3), S. 285-308 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000014
  96. Ders. (1977), Über die Teilung der sozialen Arbeit, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  97. Eason, Michael J. (1988), Eighth Amendment – Pretrial Detention: What Will Become of the Innocent?, in: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 78 (4), S. 1048-1079 Open Google Scholar
  98. Epperson, Douglas L. et al. (2005), Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool Revised (MnSOST-R), St. Paul Open Google Scholar
  99. Eribon, Didier (1991), Michel Foucault. Eine Biographie, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  100. Ericson, Richard V./ Doyle, Aaron (2004), Catastrophe Risk, Insurance and Terrorism, in: Economy and Society 33 (2), S. 135-173 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03085140410001677102
  101. Ericson, Richard V./ Haggerty Kevin D. (1997), Policing the Risk Society, Oxford Open Google Scholar
  102. Ewald, François (1991), Insurance and Risk, in: Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, S. 197-210 Open Google Scholar
  103. Ders. (1993), Der Vorsorgestaat, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  104. Feeley, Malcolm M. (1973), Untitled, in: The American Political Science Review 67 (4), S. 1352-1353 Open Google Scholar
  105. Ders. (1983), Court Reform on Trial. Why Simple Solutions Fail, New York Open Google Scholar
  106. Ders. (2004), Actuarial Justice and the Modern State, in: Bruinsma, Gerben/ Elffers, Henk/ de Keijser, Jan (eds.), Punishment, Places and Perpetrators, Cullompton, S. 62-77 Open Google Scholar
  107. Ders. (2006), The Origins of Actuarial Justice, in: Armstrong, Sarah/ McAra, Lesley (eds.), Perspectives on Punishment. The Contours of Control, Oxford, S. 217-232 Open Google Scholar
  108. Feeley, Malcolm M./ Simon, Jonathan (1992), The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications, in: Criminology 30 (4), S. 449-474 Open Google Scholar
  109. Dies. (1994), Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law, in: Nelken, David (ed.), The Futures of Criminology, London, S. 173-201 Open Google Scholar
  110. Feuerbach, Paul Johann Anselm von (1818), Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland gültigen peinlichen Rechts, 6. Auflage, Gießen Open Google Scholar
  111. Fischer, Wolfram (1985), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Europas 1850-1914, in: Ders. (Hg.), Handbuch der Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte, Band 5, Europäische Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte von der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts bis zum Ersten Weltkrieg, Stuttgart, S. 1-207 Open Google Scholar
  112. Fitzgibbon, Wendy/ Hamilton, Claire/ Richardson, Michelle (2010), A Risky Business: An Examination of Irish Probation Officers’ Attitudes towards Risk Assessment, in: Probation Journal 57 (2), S. 163-174 Open Google Scholar
  113. Foote, Caleb (1965a), The Coming Constitutional Crisis in Bail: I, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review 113 (7), S. 959-999 Open Google Scholar
  114. ders. (1965b), The Coming Constitutional Crisis in Bail: II, in: University of Pennsylvania Law Review 113 (8), S. 1125-1185 Open Google Scholar
  115. Foucault, Michel (1972), Theorien und Institutionen des Strafvollzugs, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band II, 1970-1975, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2002, S. 486-490 Open Google Scholar
  116. Ders.(1975), Gespräch über das Gefängnis; das Buch und seine Methode, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band II, 1970-1975, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2002, S. 913-932 Open Google Scholar
  117. Ders. (1976), Die Macht und die Norm, in: Ders., Mikrophysik der Macht: Über Strafjustiz, Psychiatrie und Medizin, Berlin 1976, S. 114-123 Open Google Scholar
  118. Ders. (1977a), Gespräch mit Michel Foucault, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band III, 1976-1979, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a.⁠ ⁠M. 2003, S. 186-213 Open Google Scholar
  119. Ders. (1977b), Sexualität und Wahrheit. Der Wille zum Wissen, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  120. Ders. (1977c), Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  121. Ders. (1977d), Vorlesung vom 14. Januar 1976, in: Ders., Analytik der Macht, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2005, S. 108-125 Open Google Scholar
  122. Ders. (1977e), Macht und Wissen, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band III, 1976-1979, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2003, S. 515-534 Open Google Scholar
  123. Ders. (1978a), Die Entwicklung des Begriffs des „gefährlichen Menschen“ in der forensischen Psychiatrie des 19. Jahrhunderts, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band III, 1976-1979, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2003, S. 568-594 Open Google Scholar
  124. Ders. (1978b), Gespräch über die Macht, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band III, 1976-1979, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a.⁠ ⁠M. 2003, S. 594-608 Open Google Scholar
  125. Ders. (1980a), Diskussion vom 20. Mai 1978, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band IV, 1980-1988, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a.⁠ ⁠M. 2005, S. 25-43 Open Google Scholar
  126. Ders. (1980b), Gespräch mit Ducio Trombadori, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band IV, 1980-1988, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2005, S. 51-119 Open Google Scholar
  127. Ders. (1981a), „Omnes et singulantim“: zu einer Kritik der politischen Vernunft, in: Ders., Analytik der Macht, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2005, S. 188-219 Open Google Scholar
  128. Ders. (1981b), Subjektivität und Wahrheit, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band IV, 1980-1988, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a.⁠ ⁠M. 2005, S. 258-264 Open Google Scholar
  129. Ders. (1982), Subjekt und Macht, in: Ders., Analytik der Macht, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2005, S. 240-263 Open Google Scholar
  130. Ders. (1984a), Politik und Ethik: ein Interview, in: Ders., Analytik der Macht, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2005, S. 264-271 Open Google Scholar
  131. Ders. (1984b), Die Ethik der Sorge um sich als Praxis der Freiheit, in: Ders., Analytik der Macht, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2005, S. 274-300 Open Google Scholar
  132. Ders. (1984c), Was heißt Strafen?, in: Ders., Schriften in vier Bänden: Dits et Ecrits, Band IV, 1980-1988, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M. 2005, S. 782-795 Open Google Scholar
  133. Ders. (1986a), Sexualität und Wahrheit. Der Gebrauch der Lüste, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  134. Ders. (1986b), Sexualität und Wahrheit. Die Sorge um sich, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  135. Ders. (1993), About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self. Two Lectures at Dartmouth, in: Political Theory 21 (2), S. 198-227 Open Google Scholar
  136. Ders. (1996), Diskurs und Wahrheit. Die Problematisierung der Parrhesia, Berlin Open Google Scholar
  137. Ders. (2001), In Verteidigung der Gesellschaft. Vorlesungen am Collège de France (1975-76), Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  138. Ders. (2003), Die Anormalen. Vorlesungen am Collège de France (1974-75), Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  139. Ders. (2004a), Sicherheit, Territorium, Bevölkerung. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität I, Vorlesung am Collège de France 1977-1978, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  140. Ders. (2004b), Die Geburt der Biopolitik. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität II, Vorlesung am Collège de France 1978-1979, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  141. Freeman, Naomi J./ Sandler, Jeffrey C. (2010), The Adam Walsh Act: A False Sense of Security or an Effective Public Policy Initiative?, in: Criminal Justice Policy Review 21 (1), S. 31-49 Open Google Scholar
  142. Gaenslen, Rüdiger (2005), Die Behandlung rückfallgefährdeter Sexualstraftäter. Forschung und Gesetzgebung in Deutschland, USA und den Niederlanden, Tübingen Open Google Scholar
  143. Gans, Herbert J. (1995), The War Against the Poor. The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy, New York Open Google Scholar
  144. Garland, David (1983), Durkheim’s Theory of Punishment: a Critique, in: Garland, David/ Young, Peters (eds.), The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penality and Social Analysis, London, S. 37-61 Open Google Scholar
  145. Ders. (1985a), Punishment and Welfare. A History of Penal Strategies, Aldershot Open Google Scholar
  146. Ders. (1985b), The Criminal and His Science. A Critical Account of the Formation of Criminology at the End of the Nineteenth Century, in: British Journal of Criminology 25 (2), S. 109-137 Open Google Scholar
  147. Ders. (1990), Punishment and Modern Society. A Study in Social Theory, Chicago Open Google Scholar
  148. Ders. (1997a), ‘Governmentality’ and the Problem of Crime: Foucault, Criminology, Sociology, in: Theoretical Criminology 1 (2), S. 173-214 Open Google Scholar
  149. Ders. (1997b), The Punitive Society: Penology, Criminology and the History of the Present, in: Edinburgh Law Review 1 (2), S. 180-199 Open Google Scholar
  150. Ders. (1997c), Probation and the Reconfiguration of Crime Control, in: Burnett, Ros (ed.), The Probation Service: Responding to Change, Oxford, S. 2-10 Open Google Scholar
  151. Ders. (2000), Ideas, Institutions and Situational Crime Prevention, in: von Hirsch, Andrew/ Garland, David/ Wakefield, Alison (eds.), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Oxford, S. 1-16 Open Google Scholar
  152. Ders. (2001), The Culture of Control. Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Chicago Open Google Scholar
  153. Ders. (2003), Penal Modernism and Postmodernism, in: Blomberg, Thomas/ Cohen, Stanley (eds.), Punishment and Social Control, 2. ed., New York 2003, S. 45-73 Open Google Scholar
  154. Garland, David/ Young, Peter (1983), Towards a Social Analysis of Penality, in: dies. (eds.), The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penality and Social Analysis, London, S. 1-36 Open Google Scholar
  155. Gescher, Norbert (1998), Boot-Camp-Programme in den USA: Ein Fallbeispiel zum Formenwandel in der amerikanischen Kriminalpolitik, Mönchengladbach Open Google Scholar
  156. Glaser, Daniel (1985), Who Gets Probation and Parole: Case Study Versus Actuarial Decision Making, in: Crime & Delinquency 31 (3), S. 367-378 Open Google Scholar
  157. Glueck, Sheldon/ Glueck, Eleanor (1930), Five Hundred Criminal Careers, New York Open Google Scholar
  158. Goldkamp, John S. (1985), Danger and Detention: A Second Generation of Bail Reform, in: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 76 (1), S. 1-74 Open Google Scholar
  159. Gooch, Graham/Williams, Michael (2007), A Dictionary of Law Enforcement, Oxford Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780192807021.001.0001
  160. Göppinger, Hans (Begr.)/ Bock, Michael (Hg.) (2008), Kriminologie, 6. Auflage, München Open Google Scholar
  161. Gordon, Colin (1980), Afterword, in: Foucault, Michel/ Gordon Colin (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York, S. 229-259 Open Google Scholar
  162. Ders. (1991), Governmental Rationality: An Introduction, in: Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, S. 1-51 Open Google Scholar
  163. Greenberg, David F. (1975), The Incapacitative Effect of Imprisonment: Some Estimates, in: Law and Society Review 9 (4), S. 541-580 Open Google Scholar
  164. Ders. (2002), Striking Out in Democracy, in: Punishment & Society 4 (2), S. 237-252 Open Google Scholar
  165. Ders. (2008), Review Essay: More Fictions About Predictions, in: Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (2), 64-81 Open Google Scholar
  166. Greenberg, David F./ Humphries, Drew (1980), The Cooptation of Fixed Sentencing Reform, in: Crime & Delinquency 26 (2), S. 206-225 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/001112878002600207
  167. Greenwood, Peter W./ Abrahamse, Allan (1982), Selective Incapacitation, Santa M⁠o⁠n⁠i⁠c⁠a Open Google Scholar
  168. Greenwood, Peter W./ Turner, Susan (1987), Selective Incapacitation Revisited. Why the High-Rate Offenders are Hard to Predict, Santa Monica Open Google Scholar
  169. Hacking, Ian (1990), The Taming of Chance, Cambridge Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
  170. Ders. (1991), How Should We Do the History of Statistics?, in: Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, S. 181-195 Open Google Scholar
  171. Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (1999), Moral Agent or Actuarial Subject: Risk and Canadian Womens’s Imprisonment, in: Theoretical Criminology 3 (1), S. 71-94 Open Google Scholar
  172. Dies. (2005), Criminogenic Needs and the Transformative Risk Subject. Hybridizations of Risk/Need in Penality, in: Punishment & Society 7 (1), S. 29-51 Open Google Scholar
  173. Dies. (2013), Punishment and Risk, in: Simon, Jonathan/ Sparks, Richard (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society, Los Angeles, S. 129-151 Open Google Scholar
  174. Hannah-Moffat, Kelly/ Maurutto, Paula (2010), Re-contextualizing Pre-sentence Reports. Risk and Race, in: Punishment & Society 12 (3), S. 262-286 Open Google Scholar
  175. Hannah-Moffat, Kelly/ Maurutto, Paula/ Turnbull, Sarah (2009), Negotiated Risk: Actuarial Illusions and Discretion in Probation, in: Canadian Journal of Law and Society 24 (3), S. 391-409 Open Google Scholar
  176. Hanson, R. Karl/ Thornton, David (1999), Static 99: Improving Actuarial Risk Assessments for Sex Offenders, 1999-02, Ottawa Open Google Scholar
  177. Harcourt, Bernard E. (2003a), From the Ne’er-Do-Well to the Criminal History Category: The Refinement of the Actuarial Model in Criminal Law, in: Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (3), S. 99-151 Open Google Scholar
  178. Ders. (2003b), The Shaping of Chance: Actuarial Models and Criminal Profiling at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century, in: The University of Chicago Law Review 70 (1), S. 105-128 Open Google Scholar
  179. Ders. (2007), Against Prediction. Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age, Chicago Open Google Scholar
  180. Hare, Robert D./ Neumann, Craig S. (2006), The PCL-R Assessment of Psychopathy. Development, Structural Properties, and New Directions, in: Patrick, Christopher, J. (ed.), Handbook of Psychopathy, New York, S. 58-88 Open Google Scholar
  181. Harris, Andrew J./ Lobanov-Rostovsky, Christopher (2010), Implementing the Adam Walsh Act’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Provisions: A Survey of the States, in: Criminal Justice Policy Review 21 (2), S. 202-222 Open Google Scholar
  182. Harris, Andrew J./ Lobanov-Rostovsky, Christopher/ Levenson, Jill S. (2010), Widening the Net. The Effects of Transitioning to the Adam Walsh Act’s Federally Mandated Sex Offender Classification System, in: Criminal Justice and Behavior 37 (5), S. 503-519 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0093854810363889
  183. Hart, Hornell (1923), Predicting Parole Success, in: Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 14 (3), S. 405-413 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1133642
  184. Hebenton, Bill/ Thomas, Terry (1996), Sexual Offenders in the Community: Reflections on Problems of Law, Community and Risk Management in the U.S.A., England and Wales, in: International Journal of the Sociology of Law 24 (4), S. 427-443 Open Google Scholar
  185. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1995), Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Hamburg Open Google Scholar
  186. Howard, John B. Jr. (1989), The Trial of Pretrial Dangerousness: Preventive Detention After United States v. Salerno, in: Virginia Law Review 75 (3), S. 639-679 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1073254
  187. Hudson, Barbara (1998), Punishment and Governance, in: Social & Legal Studies 7 (4), S. 553-559 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/096466399800700406
  188. Dies. (2002), Punishment and Control, in: Maguire, Mike/ Morgan, Rod/ Reiner, Robert (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3. ed., Oxford, S. 233-263 Open Google Scholar
  189. Janikowski, Richard W./ Giacopassi, David J. (1993), Pyrrhic Images, Dancing Shadows, and Flights of Fancy: The Drug Courier Profile as Legal Fiction, in: Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 9 (1), S. 60-69 Open Google Scholar
  190. Janus, Eric (2000), Civil Commitment as Social Control. Managing the Risk of Sexual Violence, in: Brown, Mark/ Pratt, John (eds.), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, London, S. 71-90 Open Google Scholar
  191. Jessop, Bob (1990), State Theory. Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place, Cambridge Open Google Scholar
  192. Ders. (2008), State Power. A Strategic-Relational Approach, Cambridge Open Google Scholar
  193. Jones, Trevor/ Newburn, Tim (2006), Three Strikes and You’re Out. Exploring Symbol and Substance in American and British Crime Control Politics, in: British Journal of Criminology 46 (5), S. 781-802 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl007
  194. Kant, Immanuel (1959), Metaphysik der Sitten, Hamburg Open Google Scholar
  195. Kemshall, Hazel (2003), Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice, Maidenhead Open Google Scholar
  196. Dies. (2008), Understanding the Community Management of High Risk Offenders, Maidenhead Open Google Scholar
  197. Kemshall, Hazel/ Maguire, Mike (2001), Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality. The Multi-Agency Risk Management of Sexual and Violent Offenders, in: Punishment & Society 3 (2), S. 237-264 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228311
  198. Kemshall, Hazel et al. (1997), Concepts of Risk in Relation to Organizational Structure and Functioning within the Personal Social Services and Probation, in: Social Policy & Administration 31 (3), S. 213-232 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00052
  199. Kerner, Hans-Jürgen (1993), Sanktionsforschung, Pönologie, in: Kaiser, Günther u.a. (Hg.), Kleines Kriminologisches Wörterbuch, 3. Auflage, Heidelberg, S. 440-444 Open Google Scholar
  200. Kleiman, Matthew/ Ostrom, Brian J./ Cheesman, Fred (2007), Using Risk Assessment to Inform Sentencing Decisions for Nonviolent Offenders in Virginia, in: Crime & Delinquency 53 (1), S. 106-132 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0011128706294442
  201. Konopatzki, Christoph (2006), Die Wirtschafts- und Kriminalpolitik der USA. Über die Ursprünge einer prototypischen Politikfeldverquickung, Hamburg Open Google Scholar
  202. Köstler-Loewe, Alexander (2008a), Strafrecht in den USA: "Three Strikes and You're Out!" – Eine Spielregel des Baseball-Sports als Patentrezept im Kampf gegen den Rückfall und das gesamte Kriminalitätsproblem?, Diss. Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  203. (http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2008/5741/) Open Google Scholar
  204. Ders. (2008b), Strafrecht US-Style: „Three Strikes and You’re Out!“ Baseball, Rückfall und Kriminalpolitik?, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  205. Krasmann, Susanne (1999), Regieren über Freiheit: Zur Analyse der Kontrollgesellschaft in foucaultscher Perspektive, in: Kriminologisches Journal 31 (2), S. 107-121 Open Google Scholar
  206. Dies. (2003), Die Kriminalität der Gesellschaft. Zur Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart, Konstanz Open Google Scholar
  207. Krasmann, Susanne/ Volkmer, Michael (Hg.) (2007), Michel Foucaults “Geschichte der Gouvernementalität“ in den Sozialwissenschaften, Bielefeld Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14361/9783839404881
  208. Kubink, Michael (2002), Strafen und ihre Alternativen im zeitlichen Wandel, Berlin Open Google Scholar
  209. Kunz, Karl-Ludwig (2005), „Gefährliche“ Rechtsbrecher und ihre Sanktionierung, in: Arnold, Jörg u.a. (Hg.), Menschengerechtes Strafrecht. Festschrift für Albin Eser zum 70. Geburtstag, München, S. 1375-1392 Open Google Scholar
  210. Ders. (2011), Kriminologie, 6. Auflage, Bern Open Google Scholar
  211. Kury, Helmut/ Kania, Harald/ Obergfell-Fuchs, Joachim (2004), Worüber sprechen wir, wenn wir über Punitivität sprechen?, in: Kriminologisches Journal, 8. Beiheft, S. 51-88 Open Google Scholar
  212. Kury, Helmut/ Obergfell-Fuchs, Joachim (2006), Punitivität in Deutschland. Zur Diskussion um eine neue „Straflust“, in: Feltes, Thomas/ Pfeiffer, Christian/ Steinhilper, Gernot, Festschrift für Hans-Dieter Schwind, Heidelberg, S. 1021-1043 Open Google Scholar
  213. Lacombe, Dany (2008), Consumed with Sex: The Treatment of Sex Offenders in Risk Society, in: British Journal of Criminology 48 (1), S. 55-74 Open Google Scholar
  214. La Fond, John Q. (2008), Sexually Violent Predator Laws and the Liberal State: An Ominous Threat to Individual Liberty, in: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 31 (2), S. 158-171 Open Google Scholar
  215. Lautmann, Rüdiger/ Klimke, Daniela (2004), Punitivität als Schlüsselbegriff für eine Kritische Kriminologie, in: Kriminologisches Journal, 8. Beiheft, S. 9-29 Open Google Scholar
  216. Lemert, Edwin M. (1993), Visions of Social Control: Probation Considered, in: Crime & Delinquency 39 (4), S. 447-461 Open Google Scholar
  217. Lemke, Thomas (1997), Eine Kritik der politischen Vernunft. Foucaults Analyse der modernen Gouvernementalität, Hamburg Open Google Scholar
  218. Ders. (2005), Geschichte und Erfahrung. Michel Foucault und die Spuren der Macht, in: Foucault, Michel, Analytik der Macht, hg. von Defert, Daniel/ Ewald, François, Frankfurt a. M., S. 317-347 Open Google Scholar
  219. Ders. (2007a), Gouvernementalität und Biopolitik, Wiesbaden Open Google Scholar
  220. Ders. (2007b), Eine unverdauliche Mahlzeit? Staatlichkeit, Wissen und die Analytik der Regierung, in: Krasmann, Susanne/ Volkmer, Michael (Hg.), Michel Foucaults “Geschichte der Gouvernementalität“ in den Sozialwissenschaften, Bielefeld, S. 47-73 Open Google Scholar
  221. Lemke, Thomas/ Krasmann, Susanne/ Bröckling, Ulrich (2000), Gouvernementalität, Neoliberalismus und Selbsttechnologien. Eine Einleitung, in: Bröckling, Ulrich/ Krasmann, Susanne/ Lemke, Thomas (Hg.), Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart: Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen, Frankfurt a. M., S. 7-40 Open Google Scholar
  222. Leps, Marie-Christine (1992), Apprehending the Criminal. The Production of Deviance in Nineteenth-Century Discourse, Durham Open Google Scholar
  223. Levenson, Jill S. (2004), Sexual Predator Civil Commitment: A Comparison of Selected and Released Offenders, in: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48 (6), S. 638-648 Open Google Scholar
  224. Dies. (2009), Sex Offense Recidivism, Risk Assessment, and the Adam Walsh Act, in: Sex Offender Law Report 10 (1), S. 1-6 Open Google Scholar
  225. Lieb, Roxanne/ Quinsey, Vernon/ Berliner, Lucy (1998), Sexual Predators and Social Policy, in: Crime and Justice 23, S. 43-114 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/449269
  226. Lieber, Franz (1845), Bruchstücke über Gegenstände der Strafkunde, besonders über das Eremitensystem, Hamburg Open Google Scholar
  227. Lipsey, Mark W. et al. (1992), Juvenile Delinquency Treatment: A Meta-Analytic Inquiry Into the Variability of Effects, in: Cook, Thomas D. et al. (eds.), Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook, New York, S. 83-127 Open Google Scholar
  228. Lipsey, Mark W./ Cullen, Francis T. (2007), The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews, in: Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3, S. 297-320 Open Google Scholar
  229. Lipton, Douglas/ Martinson, Robert/ Wilks, Judith (1975), The Effectiveness of Correctional Treatment. A Survey of Treatment Evaluation Studies, New York Open Google Scholar
  230. von Liszt, Franz (1883), Der Zweckgedanke im Strafrecht, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 3 (1), S. 1-47 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1883.3.1.1
  231. Ders. (1905), Strafrechtliche Aufsätze und Vorträge, Zweiter Band, Berlin Open Google Scholar
  232. Ders. (1912), XV. Landesversammlung der Landesgruppe Deutsches Reich zu München am 29. Mai bis 1. Juni 1912, in: Mitteilungen der Internationalen Kriminalistischen Vereinigung, Bd. 19, S. 376-400 Open Google Scholar
  233. Logan, Wayne A. (2000), A Study in “Actuarial Justice”: Sex Offender Classification Practice and Procedure, in: Buffalo Criminal Law Review 3 (2), S. 593-637 Open Google Scholar
  234. Ders. (2009), Knowledge as Power. Criminal Registration and Community Notification Laws in America, Stanford Open Google Scholar
  235. Lucken, Karol (1998), Contemporary Penal Trends. Modern or Postmodern?, in: British Journal of Criminology 38 (1), S. 106-123 Open Google Scholar
  236. Luna, Erik G. (1998), Foreword: Three Strikes in a Nutshell, in: Thomas Jefferson Law Review 20 (1), S. 1-95 Open Google Scholar
  237. Lynch, Mona (1998), Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting, and Parole Agent Identity, in: Law and Society Review 32 (4), S. 839-870 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/827741
  238. Dies. (2000), Rehabilitation as Rhetoric. The Ideal of Reformation in Contemporary Parole Discourse and Practices, in: Punishment & Society 2 (1), S. 40-65 Open Google Scholar
  239. Maguire, Mike/ Kemshall, Hazel/ Noaks, Lesley et al. (2001), Risk Management of Sexual and Violent Offenders: The Work of Public Protection Panels, London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228311
  240. Martinson, Robert (1974), What works? – Questions and Answers About Prison Reform, in: Public Interest 35, S. 22-54 Open Google Scholar
  241. Mathiesen, Thomas (1983), The Future of Control Systems – The Case of Norway, in: Garland, David/ Young, Peter (eds.), The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penality and Social Analysis, London, S. 130-145 Open Google Scholar
  242. Matthews, Roger (2005), The Myth of Punitiveness, in: Theoretical Criminology 9 (2), S. 175-201 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1362480605051639
  243. Maupin, James R. (1993), Risk Classification Systems and the Provision of Juvenile Aftercare, in: Crime & Delinquency 39 (1), S. 90-105 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0011128793039001006
  244. Maurutto, Paula/ Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (2006), Assembling Risk and the Restructuring of Penal Control, in: British Journal of Criminology 46 (3), S. 438-454 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi073
  245. McNeill, Fergus/ Burns, Nicola/ Halliday, Simon et al. (2009), Risk, Responsibility and Reconfiguration. Penal Adaptation and Misadaptation, in: Punishment & Society 11 (4), S. 419-442 Open Google Scholar
  246. Meier, Bernd-Dieter (2007), Sanktionsforschung, in: Schneider, Hans Joachim (Hg.), Internationales Handbuch der Kriminologie, Band 1: Grundlagen der Kriminologie, Berlin, S. 971-1010 Open Google Scholar
  247. Melossi, Dario (2008), Controlling Crime, Controlling Society: Thinking About Crime in Europe and America, Cambridge Open Google Scholar
  248. Melossi, Dario/ Pavarini, Massimo (1981), The Prison and the Factory. Origins of the Penitentiary System, London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27927-2_5
  249. Melzer, Michael (1970), Die Neue Sozialverteidigung und die deutsche Strafrechtsreformdiskussion, Tübingen Open Google Scholar
  250. Messinger, Sheldon L./ Berecochea, John E./ Rauma, David et al. (1985), The Foundations of Parole in California, in: Law and Society Review 19 (1), S. 69-106 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3053395
  251. Meyer, Frank (2006), Gesprengte Ketten? Zur Zukunft des Guidelines Sentencing im US-amerikanischen Strafzumessungsrecht, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 118 (2), S. 512-546 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/ZSTW.2006.018
  252. Michel, Boris (2005), Stadt und Gouvernementalität, Münster Open Google Scholar
  253. Miller, Lisa L. (2001), Looking for Postmodernism in all the Wrong Places: Implementing a New Penology, in: British Journal of Criminology 41 (1), S. 168-184 Open Google Scholar
  254. Miller, Peter/ Rose, Nikolas (1990), Governing Economic Life, in: Economy and Society 19 (1), S. 1-31 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03085149000000001
  255. Minkenberg, Michael (1990), Neokonservatismus und Neue Rechte in den USA: Neuere konservative Gruppierungen und Strömungen im Kontext sozialen und kulturellen Wandels, Baden-Baden Open Google Scholar
  256. Morris, Norval/ Miller, Marc (1985), Predictions of Dangerousness, in: Crime and Justice 6, S. 1-50 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/449103
  257. Müller-Dietz, Heinz (1969), Strafvollzugskunde als Lehrfach und wissenschaftliche Disziplin, Bad Homburg Open Google Scholar
  258. Ders. (1978), Strafvollzugsrecht, 2. Auflage, Berlin Open Google Scholar
  259. Ders. (1979), Grundfragen des strafrechtlichen Sanktionensystems, Heidelberg Open Google Scholar
  260. Ders. (1986), Franz Lieber – ein Theoretiker der „Straf“- und „Gefängniskunde“, in: Hirsch, Hans Joachim/ Kaiser, Günther/ Marquardt, Helmut (Hg.), Gedächtnisschrift für Hilde Kaufmann, Berlin, S. 451-473 Open Google Scholar
  261. National Association of Pretrial Service Agencies (2004), Standards on Pretrial Release, Third Edition Open Google Scholar
  262. National Crime Prevention Institute (1986), Crime Prevention, Louisville Open Google Scholar
  263. Naucke, Wolfgang (1982), Die Kriminalpolitik des Marburger Programms 1882, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 94 (3), S. 525-564 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1982.94.3.525
  264. Netter, Brian (2007), Using Group Statistics to Sentence Individual Criminals: An Ethical and Statistical Critique of the Virginia Risk Assessment Program, in: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 97 (3), S. 699-729 Open Google Scholar
  265. Newburn, Tim (2007), Criminology, Cullompton Open Google Scholar
  266. Newman, Oscar (1972), Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design, New York Open Google Scholar
  267. Niioka, Julia Maria (2013), “Naming and Shaming” – Ein neues ambulantes Sicherungsmittel im Umgang mit Sexualstraftätern?, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04841-4
  268. Nomos Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch (2013), Kindhäuser, Urs/ Neumann, Ulfrid/ Paeffgen, Hans-Ullrich (Hg.), 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, zit: NK-Bearbeiter Open Google Scholar
  269. O’Malley, Pat (1992), Risk, Power and Crime Prevention, in: Economy and Society 21 (3), S. 252-275 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03085149200000013
  270. Ders. (1994), Neo-Liberal Crime Control. Political Agendas and the Future of Crime Prevention in Australia, in: Chapell, Duncan/ Wilson, Paul (eds.), The Australian Criminal Justice System. The Mid 1990s, 4. ed., Sydney, S. 283-298 Open Google Scholar
  271. Ders. (1996), Risk and Responsibility, in: Barry, Andrew/ Osborne, Thomas/ Rose, Nikolas (eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, Chicago, S. 189-207 Open Google Scholar
  272. Ders. (ed.) (1998), Crime and the Risk Society, Aldershot Open Google Scholar
  273. Ders. (1999a), Governmentality and the Risk Society, in: Economy and Society 28 (1), S. 138-148 Open Google Scholar
  274. Ders. (1999b), Volatile and Contradictory Punishment, in: Theoretical Criminology 3 (2), S. 175-196 Open Google Scholar
  275. Ders. (2000), Risk Societies and the Government of Crime, in: Brown, Mark/ Pratt, John (eds.), Dangerous Offenders: Punishment and Social Order, London, S. 17-33 Open Google Scholar
  276. Ders. (2001), Discontinuity, Government and Risk: A Response to Rigakos and Hadden, in: Theoretical Criminology 5 (1), S. 85-92 Open Google Scholar
  277. Ders. (2002), Globalizing Risk? Distinguishing Styles of ‘Neo-Liberal’ Criminal Justice in Australia and the USA, in: Criminology and Criminal Justice 2 (2), S. 205-222 Open Google Scholar
  278. Ders. (2003), Governable Catastrophes: A Comment on Bougen, in: Economy and Society 32 (2), S. 275-279 Open Google Scholar
  279. Ders. (2004a), Risk, Uncertainty and Government, London Open Google Scholar
  280. Ders. (2004b), The Uncertain Promise of Risk, in: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 37 (3), S. 323-343 Open Google Scholar
  281. Ders. (2008), Experiments in Risk and Criminal Justice, in: Theoretical Criminology 12 (4), S. 451-469 Open Google Scholar
  282. Ders. (2010a), Crime and Risk, London Open Google Scholar
  283. Ders. (2010b), Governmental Criminology, in: McLaughlin, Eugene/ Newburn, Tim (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Theory, London, S. 319-336 Open Google Scholar
  284. O’Malley, Pat/ Hutchinson, Steven (2007), Reinventing Prevention. Why Did ʻCrime Preventionʼ Develop So Late?, in: British Journal of Criminology 47 (3), S. 373-389 Open Google Scholar
  285. O’Malley, Pat/ Weir, Lorna/ Shearing, Clifford (1997), Governmentality, Criticism, Politics, in: Economy and Society 26 (4), S. 501-517 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03085149700000026
  286. Ostrom, Brian/ Cheesman, Fred/ Jones, Ann et al. (1999), Truth-in-Sentencing in Virginia. Evaluating the Process and Impact of Sentencing Reform, National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg Open Google Scholar
  287. Ostrom, Brian/ Kleiman, Matthew/ Cheesman, Fred et al. (2002), Offender Risk Assessment in Virginia, National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg Open Google Scholar
  288. O. V. (1982), Selective Incapacitation: Reducing Crime Through Predictions of Recidivism, in: Harvard Law Review 96 (2), S. 511-533 Open Google Scholar
  289. Pasquino, Pasquale (1991), Criminology: The Birth of a Special Knowledge, in: Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, S. 235-250 Open Google Scholar
  290. Pearce, Frank/ Tombs, Steve (1996), Hegemony, Risk and Governance: ʻSocial Regulationʼ and the American Chemical Industry, in: Economy and Society 25 (3), S. 428-454 Open Google Scholar
  291. Peters, Helge (2005), Kühler Umgang oder Dramatisierung – Gibt es die New Penology?, in: Jahrbuch für Rechts- und Kriminalsoziologie, Baden-Baden, S. 181-188 Open Google Scholar
  292. Petersilia, Joan/ Greenwood, Peter W. (1978), Mandatory Prison Sentences: Their Projected Effects on Crime and Prison Populations, in: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 69 (4), S. 604-615 Open Google Scholar
  293. Petersilia, Joan/ Greenwood, Peter W./ Lavin, Marvin (1977), Criminal Careers of Habitual Felons, Santa Monica Open Google Scholar
  294. Petrunik, Michael G. (2002), Managing Unacceptable Risk: Sex Offenders, Community Response, and Social Policy in the United States and Canada, in: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 46 (4), S. 483-511 Open Google Scholar
  295. Pisciotta, Alexander W. (1983), Scientific Reform: The "New Penology" at Elmira, 1876-1900, in: Crime & Delinquency 29 (4), S. 613-630 Open Google Scholar
  296. Porter, Theodore M. (1986), The Rise of Statistical Thinking 1820-1900, Princeton Open Google Scholar
  297. Poulantzas, Nicos (2002), Staatstheorie. Politischer Überbau, Ideologie, Autoritärer Etatismus, Hamburg Open Google Scholar
  298. Pratt, John (1995), Dangerousness, Risk and Technologies of Power, in: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 28 (1), S. 3-31 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/000486589502800102
  299. Ders. (1997), Governing the Dangerous: Dangerousness, Law and Social Change, Annandale Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0950017097113012
  300. Ders. (2000), The Return of the Wheelbarrow Men; Or, the Arrival of Postmodern Penality?, in: British Journal of Criminology 40 (1), S. 127-145 Open Google Scholar
  301. Ders. (2007), Penal Populism, London Open Google Scholar
  302. Pratt, John/ Brown, David/ Brown, Mark et al. (eds.) (2005), The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives, Cullompton Open Google Scholar
  303. President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967), Task Force Report: Science and Technology, Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar
  304. Pretrial Justice Institute (2009), 2009 Survey of Pretrial Programs August 11, 2009, Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar
  305. Procacci, Giovanna (1991), Social Economy and the Government of Poverty, in: Burchell, Graham/ Gordon, Colin/ Miller, Peter (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, S. 151-168 Open Google Scholar
  306. Dies. (1993), Gouverner la Misère. La Question Sociale en France 1789-1848, Paris Open Google Scholar
  307. Quetelet, Adolphe (1831), Adolphe Quetelet’s Research on the Propensity for Crime at Different Ages, Cincinatti 1984 Open Google Scholar
  308. Quinn, James F./ Gould, Larry A. (2003), The Prioritization of Treatment Among Texas Parole Officers, in: The Prison Journal 83 (3), S. 323-336 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0032885503256328
  309. Radbruch, Gustav (1932), Rechtsphilosophie, 3. Auflage, Leipzig 1932, zitiert aus Radbruch, Gustav, Gesamtausgabe, Band 2, Rechtsphilosophie II, hg. von Kaufmann, Arthur, Heidelberg 1993 Open Google Scholar
  310. Radzinowicz, Leon/ Hood, Roger (1980), Incapacitating the Habitual Criminal: The English Experience, in: Michigan Law Review 78 (8), S. 1305-1389 Open Google Scholar
  311. Reichert, Christoph (1999), Intersubjektivität durch Strafzumessungsrichtlinien: Eine Untersuchung mit Bezug auf die “sentencing guidelines” in den USA, Berlin Open Google Scholar
  312. Reichert, Ramón (Hg.) (2004), Governmentality Studies: Analysen liberal-demokratischer Gesellschaften im Anschluss an Michel Foucault, Münster Open Google Scholar
  313. Reichman, Nancy (1986), Managing Crime Risks: Toward an Insurance Based Model of Social Control, in: Research in Law, Deviance and Social Control 8, S. 151-172 Open Google Scholar
  314. Rigakos, George S. (1999), Risk Society and Actuarial Criminology: Prospects for a Critical Discourse, in: Canadian Journal of Criminology 41 (2), S. 137-150 Open Google Scholar
  315. Ders. (2001), On Continuity, Risk and Political Economy: A Response to O’Malley, in: Theoretical Criminology 5 (1), S. 93-100 Open Google Scholar
  316. Rigakos, George S./ Hadden, Richard W. (2001), Crime, Capitalism and the ‘Risk Society’: Towards the Same Olde Modernity?, in: Theoretical Criminology 5 (1), S. 61-84 Open Google Scholar
  317. Robin, Gerald D. (1993), Inquisitive Cops, Investigative Stops and Drug Courier Hops: Returning to the Scene of the Crime, in: Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 9 (1), S. 41-59 Open Google Scholar
  318. Robinson, Gwen (1999), Risk Management and Rehabilitation in the Probation Service: Collision and Collusion, in: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 38 (4), S. 421-433 Open Google Scholar
  319. Dies. (2001), Power, Knowledge and ʻWhat Worksʼ in Probation, in: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 40 (3), S. 235-254 Open Google Scholar
  320. Dies. (2002), Exploring Risk Management in Probation Practice: Contemporary Developments in England and Wales, in: Punishment & Society 4 (1), S. 5-25 Open Google Scholar
  321. Dies. (2003), Implementing OASys: Lessons from Research into LSI-R and ACE, in: Probation Journal 50 (1), S. 30-40 Open Google Scholar
  322. Dies. (2008), Late-Modern Rehabilitation. The Evolution of a Penal Strategy, in: Punishment & Society 10 (4), S. 429-445 Open Google Scholar
  323. Roosevelt, Theodore (1913), The New Penology, in: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 46 (1), S. 4-7 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/000271621304600103
  324. Rose, Nikolas (1993), Government, Authority and Expertise in Advanced Liberalism, in: Economy and Society 22 (3), S. 283-299 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03085149300000019
  325. Ders. (2000), Government and Control, in: British Journal of Criminology 40 (2), S. 321-339 Open Google Scholar
  326. Rose, Nikolas/ Miller, Peter (1992), Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government, in: British Journal of Sociology 43 (2), S. 173-205 Open Google Scholar
  327. Rose, Nikolas/ O’Malley, Pat/ Valverde, Mariana (2006), Governmentality, in: Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2, S. 83-104 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
  328. Rose, William (2002), Crimes of Color: Risk, Profiling, and the Contemporary Racialization of Social Control, in: International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 16 (2), S. 179-205 Open Google Scholar
  329. Rothman, David J. (1980), Conscience and Convenience. The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America, Boston Open Google Scholar
  330. Ders. (2008), The Discovery of the Asylum. Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic, New Brunswick Open Google Scholar
  331. Roxin, Claus (2006), Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, Band I, 4. Auflage, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110921861.vii
  332. Rusche, Georg (1933), Arbeitsmarkt und Strafvollzug: Gedanken zur Soziologie der Strafjustiz, in: Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 2, S. 63-78 Open Google Scholar
  333. Rusche, Georg/ Kirchheimer, Otto (1939), Punishment and Social Structure, New York Open Google Scholar
  334. Dies. (1974), Sozialstruktur und Strafvollzug, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  335. Rzepka, Dorothea (2004), Punitivität in Politik und Gesetzgebung, in: Kriminologisches Journal, 8. Beiheft, S. 136-151 Open Google Scholar
  336. Sack, Fritz (2007), Die deutsche Kriminologie – von „draußen” betrachtet, in: Kriminologisches Journal, 9. Beiheft, S. 205-230 Open Google Scholar
  337. Ders. (2008), Die deutsche Kriminologie im Lichte des Werkes von D. Garland, in: Klimke, Daniela (Hg.), Exklusion in der Marktgesellschaft, Wiesbaden, S. 301-322 Open Google Scholar
  338. Sapir, Yoav (2008), Against Prevention? A Response to Harcourt’s Against Prediction on Actuarial and Clinical Predictions and the Faults of Incapacitation, in: Law & Social Inquiry 33 (1), S. 253-264 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00101.x
  339. Schiraldi, Vincent/ Colburn, Jason/ Lotke, Eric (2004), Three Strikes and You’re Out: An Examination of the Impact of 3-Strike Laws 10 Years After their Enactment, Justice Policy Institute, Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar
  340. Schmidt-Semisch, Henning (2000), Selber schuld: Skizzen versicherungsmathematischer Gerechtigkeit, in: Bröckling, Ulrich/ Krasmann, Susanne/ Lemke, Thomas (Hg.), Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart: Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen, Frankfurt a. M., S. 168-193 Open Google Scholar
  341. Schneider, Hans Joachim (2009), Rückfallprognose bei Sexualstraftätern, in: ders. (Hg.), Internationales Handbuch der Kriminologie, Band 2: Besondere Probleme der Kriminologie, Berlin, S. 909-946 Open Google Scholar
  342. Schnur, Alfred C. (1958), The New Penology: Fact or Fiction?, in: The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 49 (4), S. 331-334 Open Google Scholar
  343. Schöch, Heinz (1982), Das Marburger Programm aus der Sicht der modernen Kriminologie, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 94 (4), S. 864-887 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1982.94.4.864
  344. Schüler-Springorum, Horst (1969), Strafvollzug im Übergang: Studien zum Stand der Vollzugsrechtslehre, Göttingen Open Google Scholar
  345. Scott, David (2008), Penology, London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1057/9780230583948_1
  346. Scott, John/ Marshall, Gordon (2009), A Dictionary of Sociology, 3. ed., Oxford Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199533008.001.0001
  347. Sessar, Klaus (2010), Kriminalitätseinstellungen und sozialer Wandel. Gleichzeitig eine Auseinandersetzung mit Forschungen zur Verbrechensfurcht und Punitivität, Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform 93 (5), S. 361-381 Open Google Scholar
  348. Sennelart, Michel (2004), Situierung der Vorlesungen, in: Foucault, Michel, Sicherheit, Territorium, Bevölkerung. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität I, Vorlesung am Collège de France 1977-1978, Frankfurt a. M., S. 527-571 Open Google Scholar
  349. Shearing, Clifford D./ Stenning, Philip C. (1983), Private Security: Implications for Social Control, in: Social Problems 30 (5), S. 493-506 Open Google Scholar
  350. Dies. (1985), From the Panopticon to Disney World: The Development of Discipline, in: Doob, Anthony/ Greenspan, Edward (eds.), Perspectives in Criminal Law: Essays in Honour of John LI. J. Edwards, Ontario, S. 335-349 Open Google Scholar
  351. Shichor, David (1997), Three Strikes as a Public Policy: The Convergence of the New Penology and the McDonaldization of Punishment, in: Crime & Delinquency 43 (4), S. 470-492 Open Google Scholar
  352. Ders. (2000), Penal Policies at the Threshold of the Twenty-First Century, in: Criminal Justice Review 25 (1), S. 1-30 Open Google Scholar
  353. Shinnar, Shlomo/ Shinnar, Reuel (1975), The Effects of the Criminal Justice System on the Control of Crime: A Quantitative Approach, in: Law and Society Review 9 (4), S. 581-612 Open Google Scholar
  354. Silver, Eric/ Miller Lisa L. (2002), A Cautionary Note on the Use of Actuarial Risk Assessment Tools for Social Control, in: Crime & Delinquency 48 (1), S. 138-161 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0011128702048001006
  355. Simon, Jonathan (1987), The Emergence of a Risk Society: Insurance, Law, and the State, in: Socialist Review 95, S. 61-89 Open Google Scholar
  356. Ders. (1988), The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices, in: Law and Society Review 22 (4), S. 771-800 Open Google Scholar
  357. Ders.(1992), “In Another Kind of Wood”: Michel Foucault and Sociolegal Studies, in: Law & Social Inquiry 17 (1), S. 49-55 Open Google Scholar
  358. Ders. (1993), Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890 – 1990, Chicago Open Google Scholar
  359. Ders. (1995), They Died with Their Boots On: The Boot Camp and the Limits of Modern Penality, in: Social Justice 22 (2), S. 25-48 Open Google Scholar
  360. Ders. (1996), Criminology and the Recidivist, in: Shichor, David/ Sechrest, Dale K., Three Strikes and You’re Out: Vengeance as Public Policy, Thousand Oaks, S. 24-50 Open Google Scholar
  361. Ders. (1997a), Governing Through Crime, in: Friedman, Lawrence M./ Fisher, George (eds.), The Crime Conundrum, Boulder, S. 171-189 Open Google Scholar
  362. Ders. (1997b), Gewalt, Rache und Risiko. Die Todesstrafe im neoliberalen Staat, in: Trotha, Trutz von (Hg.), Soziologie der Gewalt, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 37, Opladen, S. 279-301 Open Google Scholar
  363. Ders. (1998), Managing the Monstrous: Sex Offenders and the New Penology, in: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 4 (1/2), S. 452-467 Open Google Scholar
  364. Ders. (2000), Megan’s Law: Crime and Democracy in Late Modern America, in: Law & Social Inquiry 25 (4), S. 1111-1150 Open Google Scholar
  365. Ders. (2005), Reversal of Fortune: The Resurgence of Individual Risk Assessment in Criminal Justice, in: Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1, S. 397-421 Open Google Scholar
  366. Ders. (2009), Governing Through Crime. How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, Oxford Open Google Scholar
  367. Simon, Jonathan/ Feeley, Malcolm M. (1995), True Crime: The New Penology and Public Discourse on Crime, in: Blomberg, Thomas/ Cohen, Stanley (eds.), Punishment and Social Control, 1. ed., New York, S. 147-180 Open Google Scholar
  368. Dies. (2003), The Form and Limits of the New Penology, in: Blomberg, Thomas/ Cohen, Stanley (eds.), Punishment and Social Control, 2. ed., New York, S. 75-116 Open Google Scholar
  369. Simon, Jonathan/ Sparks, Richard (2013), Punishment and Society: The Emergence of an Academic Field, in: dies. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society, Los Angeles, S. 1-20 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9781446247624.n1
  370. Singelnstein, Tobias (2009), Diskurs und Kriminalität: Außergesetzliche Anwendungsregeln als diskursive Praktiken im Wechselverhältnis zwischen Kriminalisierungsdiskursen und Strafrechtsanwendung, Berlin Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-12997-3
  371. Ders. (2011), Strafrecht und neoliberales Regieren. Entwicklungstendenzen des Strafrechts als Einschreibung von Regierungstechniken im Sinne der Gouvernementalität, in: Kritische Justiz 44 (1), S. 7-15 Open Google Scholar
  372. Singelnstein, Tobias/ Stolle, Peer (2008), Die Sicherheitsgesellschaft. Soziale Kontrolle im 21. Jahrhundert, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden Open Google Scholar
  373. Smart, Barry (1983), On Discipline and Social Regulation: A Review of Foucault’s Genealogical Analysis, in: Garland, David/ Young, Peter (eds.), The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penality and Social Analysis, London, S. 62-83 Open Google Scholar
  374. Sparks, Richard (2001), Degrees of Estrangement: The Cultural Theory of Risk and Comparative Penology, in: Theoretical Criminology 5 (2), S. 159-176 Open Google Scholar
  375. Stigler, George J. (1970), The Optimum Enforcement of Laws, in: The Journal of Political Economy 78 (3), S. 526-536 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/259646
  376. Stigler, Stephen M. (1986), The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900, Cambridge Open Google Scholar
  377. Stolzenberg, Lisa/ D’Alessio, Stewart J. (1997), "Three Strikes and You're Out": The Impact of California's New Mandatory Sentencing Law on Serious Crime Rates, in: Crime & Delinquency 43 (4), S. 457-469 Open Google Scholar
  378. Streng, Franz (2012), Strafrechtliche Sanktionen: Die Strafzumessung und ihre Grundlagen, 3. Auflage, Stuttgart Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/juru-2012-0249
  379. Stuckenberg, Carl-Friedrich (1998), Untersuchungen zur Unschuldsvermutung, Berlin Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110906349
  380. Tadros, Victor (1998), Between Governance and Discipline: The Law and Michel Foucault, in: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (1), S. 75-103 Open Google Scholar
  381. Teeters, Negley K. (1969), State of Prisons in the United States: 1870-1970, in: Federal Probation 33 (4), S. 18-23 Open Google Scholar
  382. Thomas, Wayne H. (1976), Bail Reform in America, Berkeley Open Google Scholar
  383. Tracy, Paul E./ Wolfgang, Marvin E./ Figlio, Robert M. (1990), Delinquency Careers in two Birth Cohorts, New York Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7050-5_1
  384. Turnbull, Sarah/ Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (2009), Under these Conditions. Gender, Parole and the Governance of Reintegration, in: British Journal of Criminology 49 (4), S. 532-551 Open Google Scholar
  385. U.S. Department of Justice (2008), The National Guidelines for the Sex Offender Registration and Notification, Final Guidelines June 2008, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, D.C. Open Google Scholar
  386. Valverde, Mariana (2007), Genealogies of European States: Foucauldian Reflections, in: Economy and Society 36 (1), S. 159-178 Open Google Scholar
  387. Dies. (2008), Beyond Discipline and Punish: Foucault’s Challenge to Criminology, in: Harcourt, Bernard E. (ed.), Carceral Notebooks, Vol. 4, S. 201-223 Open Google Scholar
  388. Dies. (2010), Specters of Foucault in Law and Society Scholarship, in: Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6, S. 45-59 Open Google Scholar
  389. VanNostrand, Marie/ Rose, Kenneth J. (2009), Pretrial Risk Assessment in Virginia, May 1, 2009 Open Google Scholar
  390. Vitiello, Michael (1997a), “Three Strikes” and the Romero Case: The Supreme Court Restores Democracy, in: Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 30, S. 1643-1708 Open Google Scholar
  391. Ders. (1997b), Three Strikes: Can We Return to Rationality?, in: The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 87 (2), S. 395-481 Open Google Scholar
  392. Vormbaum, Thomas (2011), Einführung in die moderne Strafrechtsgeschichte, 2. A⁠u⁠fl., Berlin Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16788-1_1
  393. Walker, Samuel (1993), Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice 1950-1990, New York Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195078206.003.0006
  394. Wandall, Rasmus H. (2006), Actuarial Risk Assessment. The Loss of Recognition of the Individual Offender, in: Law, Probability and Risk 5 (3-4), S. 175-200 Open Google Scholar
  395. Webber, Craig (2010), Psychology & Crime, London Open Google Scholar
  396. Weigend, Thomas (1982), “Neoklassizismus” – ein transatlantisches Mißverständnis, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 94 (3), S. 801-814 Open Google Scholar
  397. Weir, Lorna (1996), Recent Developments in the Government of Pregnancy, in: Economy and Society 25 (3), S. 372-392 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03085149600000020
  398. Wetzell, Richard F. (2000), Inventing the Criminal. A History of German Criminology, 1880-1945, Chapel Hill Open Google Scholar
  399. Wilson, William J. (1987), The Truly Disadvantaged. The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy, Chicago Open Google Scholar
  400. Witt, Philip H./ Barone, Natalie (2004), Assessing Sex Offender Risk: New Jersey’s Methods, in: Federal Sentencing Reporter 16 (3), S. 170-175 Open Google Scholar
  401. Wolfgang, Marvin E./ Figlio, Robert M./ Sellin, Thorsten (1972), Delinquency in a Birth Cohort, Chicago Open Google Scholar
  402. Zimring, Franklin E./ Hawkins, Gordon (1995), Incapacitation. Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime, New York Open Google Scholar
  403. Zimring, Franklin E./ Hawkins, Gordon/ Kamin, Sam (2001), Punishment and Democracy. Three Strikes and You’re Out in California, Oxford Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Criminal Law & Criminology"
Cover of book: Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Book Titles No access
Stefan Holzmaier
Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Book Titles No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Cover of book: Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Book Titles No access
Patricia Magdalena Labussek
Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Cover of book: Covid e impatto della pandemia sul diritto
Edited Book No access
Esther Happacher, Margareth Helfer, Francesco A. Schurr
Covid e impatto della pandemia sul diritto
Cover of book: Kriminologie
Educational Book No access
Frank Neubacher
Kriminologie

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex