The Implementation of the New Insolvency Regulation

Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Burkhard Hess; Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Paul Oberhammer; Prof. Dr. Stefania Bariatti; Prof. Dr. Christian Koller; Dr. Björn Laukemann M.A.; Prof. Dr. Marta Requejo Isidro; Prof. Dr. Francesca Clara Villata

doi:10.5771/9783845286976

, to see if you have full access to this publication.

Edited Book No access

The Implementation of the New Insolvency Regulation

Improving Cooperation and Mutual Trust

Editors:
Series:: Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, Volume 10
Publisher:: 08.12.2017

Summary

Die Neufassung der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung stand vor der Aufgabe, den tiefgreifenden Veränderungen Rechnung zu tragen, die die Insolvenzrechte der EU-Mitgliedstaaten in den letzten Jahren durchlaufen haben. Die vorliegende Studie greift drei zentrale Themenkomplexe der Reform auf: (1) Die Erweiterung der Verordnung auf Verfahren im Vorfeld der Insolvenz (sog. pre-insolvency proceedings). Umgesetzt wird damit das rechtspolitische Anliegen, eine grenzüberschreitende Restrukturierung von Schuldnerunternehmen zu erleichtern. (2) Die Einführung neuartiger Koordinierungsinstrumente. Sie sollen unerwünschte Parallelverfahren verhindern, jedenfalls aber die Kooperation zwischen den Verfahrensbeteiligten fördern. (3) Und schließlich die Schaffung eines Regelwerks zur koordinierten Abwicklung von Konzerninsolvenzen.

Die Studie wendet sich zum einen an die Rechtspraxis. Zum anderen will sie den wissenschaftlichen Dialog anregen. Eine systematische Darstellung der rechtlichen Änderungen sowie Empfehlungen zur Bewältigung zentraler Problemfelder sollen Insolvenzrichtern wie Verwaltern bei der Anwendung und Auslegung der neuen Verordnung verlässlich zur Seite stehen.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2017
Publication date: 08.12.2017
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-4448-0
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-8697-6
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
Volume: 10
Language: English
Pages: 320
Product type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 24
1. I. Genesis of the Study No access
2. II. Methodology, scope and objective of the Study No access
3. 1. 1. Widening the scope of the Regulation: opening up for rescue culture (Part 1) No access
  2. 1. 2.1 Judicial cooperation: from soft law to innovative hard law No access
    2. 2.2 Synthetic proceedings: from practice to regulation No access
  3. 3. Group of companies: contractual flexibility versus procedural overregulation (Part 3) No access
4. IV. Distribution of responsibilities No access
1. 1. 1. 1. 1.1 A new European approach to business failure and insolvency No access
        1.2.1 Article 1(1) EIR No access
        1.2.2 Proceedings ‘based on laws relating to insolvency for the purpose of rescue, adjustment of debt, reorganisation or liquidation’ No access
        1.2.3 ‘Public’ No access
        1.2.4 ‘Collective’ No access
        1.2.5 Which entail some kind of ‘interference’ upon the individual rights of the debtor and/or its creditors… No access
        1.2.6 …and which may leave the debtor in possession No access
        1.3 Territorial scope No access
      2. 2.1.1 The title of the EIR: is it still up-to-date? No access
        2.1.2 The notion of insolvency (recital 17 EIR) No access
        2.1.3 Scope of secondary proceedings No access
        2.1.4 The COMI presumption for pre-insolvency proceedings No access
        2.2.1 Pre-insolvency and hybrid proceedings before a ‘judgment opening insolvency proceedings’ is rendered No access
        2.2.2 Article 34, 2nd s. EIR No access
        2.2.3 The territorial scope No access
      3. 3. Theses and recommendations No access
  2. 1. 1. 1.1 The framework under the EIR 2000 No access
        1.2 The proposals to amend the EIR 2000 No access
        1.3.1 As to the nature of Annex A... No access
        1.3.2 …and as to the amendment of Annex A No access
      2. 2.1.1 The underlying policy No access
        2.1.2 The role of Article 1(1) EIR No access
        2.1.3 Amendments to Annex A No access
        2.1.4 A tentative alternative interpretation No access
        2.2.1 The shortcomings of ordinary legislative procedure No access
        2.2.2 How to deal with the difficulty to amend Annex A No access
        2.2.3 Two problematic cases No access
        2.2.4 The ‘duty’ to notify new national procedures No access
      3. 3. Theses and recommendations No access
  3. 1. 1. 1.1 Introduction No access
        1.2.1 Pre-insolvency proceedings and hybrid proceedings No access
        1.2.2 Annex A EIR No access
        1.2.3 The notion of ‘insolvency-related’ actions No access
        1.3 The EIR 2015 No access
      2. 2.1.1 Setting-up the relationship between Brussels Ibis and the EIR No access
        2.1.2 Loopholes No access
        2.1.3 Overlaps No access
        2.2.1 Circumvention of the scope of the EIR by putting insolvency rules in general company law No access
        2.2.2 Recital 16 and insolvency-related actions No access
      3. 3. Theses and recommendations No access
  4. 1. 1. 1. Legal framework No access
      2. 2.1 The notion of ‘insolvency-related’ actions No access
        2.2 Recital 16 EIR and insolvency-related actions No access
        2.3 Overlaps between the EIR and Brussels Ibis No access
        2.4 Insolvency-related actions and secondary proceedings No access
        2.5 Insolvency-related actions against third state defendants No access
      3. 3. Theses and recommendations No access
1. 1. 1. 1. 1.1 Introduction No access
        1.2.1 Procedural function and conflict of laws mechanism No access
        1.2.2.1 Local assets and liabilities (scope ratione materiae) No access
        1.2.2.2 Personal scope No access
        1.2.2.3 Law referred to by an undertaking and third parties’ rights in rem No access
        1.2.3 Proposal and formal requirements No access
        1.2.4 Approval No access
        1.2.5.1 Direct effects of the undertaking as to the estate and the applicable law No access
        1.2.5.2 Effects on the opening of secondary proceedings No access
        1.2.5.3 Removal of local assets No access
        1.2.6.1 Remedies No access
        1.2.6.2 Liability of an insolvency practitioner under Article 36(10) EIR No access
        1.2.6.3 Information of creditors and publication No access
        1.3 The stay of proceedings No access
      2. 2.1.1 Article 36 EIR as a non-mandatory rule? No access
        2.1.2 Deferred and concerted secondary proceedings as an alternative option No access
        2.1.3.1 Approval by the known local creditors No access
        2.1.3.2 Voidability and replacement of an approved undertaking No access
        2.1.3.3 Approval by the creditors of the main proceedings? No access
        2.1.3.4 Approval of an undertaking after the opening of secondary proceedings No access
        2.1.4.1 The start of time limit to request the opening of secondary proceedings No access
        2.1.4.2 The court’s criterion to reject the opening of secondary proceedings, Article 38(2) EIR No access
        2.1.5 Undertaking and corporate group insolvencies No access
        2.2.1 Criteria to be taken into account by an insolvency practitioner when giving an undertaking No access
        2.2.2 Identification and information of local creditors / publication No access
      3. 3.1 Scope of undertakings No access
        3.2 Giving of an undertaking No access
        3.3 Assessing the adequacy and efficacy of Article 36 EIR No access
        3.4.1 Creditors should be informed of… No access
        3.4.2 Means of communication No access
        3.4.3 Creditors’ information on the (dis-)approval of the undertaking No access
        3.5 The start of time limit to request the opening of secondary proceedings (Article 37(2) EIR) No access
        3.6 Temporary stay of the opening of secondary proceedings No access
        3.7 Implementing Regulation No access
  2. 1. 1. 1. Introduction No access
      2. 2. Legal framework No access
      3. 3.1.1 Introducing and explaining the rules No access
        3.1.2 Raising awareness and promoting the use of soft law instruments No access
        3.1.3 Spreading the knowledge about case law No access
        3.2.1 Taking stock No access
        3.2.2 Removing obstacles, paving the way No access
        3.2.3 Valuable clarifications; pro-cooperation orientations No access
        3.3 To the national interpreter and authorities applying the law No access
        3.4 To the academia No access
  3. 1. 1. 1. Introduction No access
      2. 2.1 ‘Agreements or protocols’: scope of the analysis No access
        2.2 Cooperation ‘not incompatible with the rules applicable to each of the proceedings’ – legal basis for the conclusion of agreements or protocols No access
        2.3 Content of an insolvency protocol: derogation from the coordination rules of the EIR? No access
        2.4 Insolvency protocols and protection of local creditors’ interests No access
        2.5 Protocols and Article 36 undertakings: comparative advantages and disadvantages No access
      3. 3.1 Circumstances supporting the use of insolvency agreements or protocols No access
        3.2 Negotiations No access
        3.3 Authorization and parties to an insolvency agreement or protocol No access
        3.4 Language of the insolvency agreement or protocol No access
        3.5 Terminology and interpretative rules No access
        3.6 Determining the purpose of the insolvency agreement or protocol No access
        3.7.1 Communication No access
        3.7.2 Preservation of the debtor’s assets No access
        3.7.3 Notification of the debtor’s creditors No access
        3.7.4 Lodgement of the creditors’ claims by insolvency practitioners No access
        3.7.5 Verification of the debtor’s liabilities No access
        3.7.6 Administration of the insolvency estate No access
        3.7.7 Preventing conflict of powers among insolvency practitioners No access
        3.7.8 Distribution of the proceeds No access
        3.7.9 Conflict-of-laws issues No access
        3.7.10 Costs of the proceedings No access
        3.8 Legal effects and effectiveness of insolvency agreements or protocols No access
        3.9 Flexibility of insolvency agreements or protocols No access
        3.10 Safeguards No access
        3.11 Dispute resolution clauses No access
1. 1. I. Introduction No access
  2. 1. 1. 1.1 Legal framework No access
      2. 1.2.1 Recommendations No access
        1.2.2 Guidelines No access
    2. 1. 2.1 Legal framework No access
      2. 2.2 Evaluation No access
      3. 2.3.1 Recommendations No access
        2.3.2 Guideline No access
    3. 1. 3.1 Legal framework No access
      2. 3.2 Evaluation No access
      3. 3.3.1 Recommendations No access
        3.3.2 Guidelines No access
  3. 1. 1. Legal framework No access
    2. 2. Evaluation No access
    3. 1. 3.1 Recommendations No access
      2. 3.2 Guidelines No access
  4. 1. 1. Legal framework No access
    2. 2. Evaluation No access
    3. 1. 3.1 Recommendations No access
      2. 3.2 Guidelines No access
  5. 1. 1. Legal framework No access
    2. 1. 2.1 Recommendations No access
      2. 2.2 Guideline No access
1. 1. 1. 1. Insolvency proceedings which fall within the scope Annex A of Regulation 848/2015 No access
    2. 2. Italian insolvency proceedings which fall within the scope of Regulation 848/2015 No access
    3. 3. Italian proceedings which may be included or qualified as a sub-category of insolvency proceedings listed in Annex A No access
    4. 4. Does ‘convenzione di moratoria’ fall within the scope of insolvency proceedings as defined in Article 1(1) Regulation 848/2015? No access
    5. 5. Effects of a ‘convenzione di moratoria’ on foreign dissenting banks and financial institutions No access
2. 1. 1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. Aim of interconnected insolvency registers No access
    3. 3. Part of existing effort in building EU-wide interconnection of national insolvency registers No access
    4. 4. Establishment of insolvency registers No access
    5. 5. Mandatory information No access
    6. 6. Consumers No access
    7. 7. Legal effect of information in the registers No access
    8. 8. Interconnection of insolvency registers No access
    9. 9. Conditions of access to information via the system of interconnection No access
    10. 10. Conclusion No access
3. 1. 1. 1. Key features of the new law No access
    2. 2. Are secondary proceedings useful? No access
    3. 3. The undertaking (Articles 36 ff EIR) No access
    4. 4. The new law on cooperation and communication (Articles 41 ff EIR) No access
4. 1. 1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. Article 31 EIR 2000, and its application in Italy No access
    3. 3. Taking lessons from the Illochroma and Eurofood cases: legal uncertainty produces ‘prisoner’s dilemmas’ No access
    4. . Taking lessons from reluctance to conclude agreements and protocols: accepting that these forms of cooperation require courts and insolvency practitioners to make a choice between alternative ruling... No access
    5. 1. 5.1 Improvements aimed at specifying the logic of the duty of cooperation and information No access
      2. 5.2 Improvements aimed at specifying the limits of the duty of cooperation and information in terms of consistency with the system as a whole No access
    6. 6. Concluding remarks: from cooperating ‘in the shadow of soft-law’ to cooperating ‘in the shadow of hard-law’. Corollaries No access
    7. 1. 7.1 Article 36 EIR No access
      2. 7.2 Articles 41-44 EIR No access
      3. 7.3 Protocols No access
5. 1. Professor Dr. Reinhard Bork No access
6. 1. 1. 1. Introduction No access
    2. 2. The European Insolvency Regulation (2000): no provisions for groups No access
    3. 3. The practice since 2002: group centralizations No access
    4. 4. The case of Interedil (2011): adoption of central administration as a key connecting factor No access
    5. 5. The parliament proposals (2011): centralization as the primary solution No access
    6. 6. The recast Insolvency Regulation (2015): a shift to cooperation and coordination No access
    7. 7. Progress or concern? No access
    8. 8. Conclusion and a way forward No access
1. 1. CJEU case-law No access
2. 2. National case-law No access
3. 3. Literature No access
4. 4. Legal texts No access
5. 5. Other No access

Bibliography (234 entries)

Albrecht, Achim, Die Reform der EuInsVO ist abgeschlossen – eine Übersicht, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Insolvenzrecht (ZInsO) 23 (2015), p 1077 ff; Open Google Scholar
Altman, Jamie, A Test Case in International Bankruptcy Protocols: The Lehman Brothers Insolvency, San Diego International Law Journal (San Diego Int’l L.J.) 12 (2011), p 463 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4016/34979.01
Amey, Robert, Case Review – C-327/13 Burgo Group SpA v Illochroma SA (in liquidation), International Corporate Rescue – Special Issue, South Square Articles 2015, p 8 ff; Open Google Scholar
Armour, John, Who Should Make Corporate Law? EC Legislation versus Regulatory Competition, Current Legal Problems (CLP) 58 (2005), p 369 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/clp/58.1.369
Andres, Dirk/Grund, Andreas, Die Flucht vor deutschen Insolvenzgerichten nach England – Die Entscheidungen in dem Insolvenzverfahren Hans Brochier Holdings Ltd., Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 3 (2007), p 137 ff; Open Google Scholar
Anzenberger, Philipp, Sekundärinsolvenz auch im Sitzstaat der Schuldnerin, Anmerkungen zu EuGH C-327/13, Burgo Group SpA/Illochroma SA in Liquidation, Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht und Kreditschutz (ZIK) 2015, p 5 ff; Open Google Scholar
Armour, John, Abuse of European Insolvency Law? A Discussion, in: de la Feria, Rita/Vogenauer, Stefan (eds), Prohibition of Abuse of Law, Oxford and Portland, Oregon 2011, p 157 ff; Open Google Scholar
Arts, Robert, Main and Secondary Proceedings in the recast of the European Insolvency Regulation – The only good secondary proceeding is a synthetic secondary proceeding, Norton Journal of Bankruptcy Law and Practice (Norton J. Bankr. L. & Prac.) 24 (2015), p 436 ff, available at: https://www.iiiglobal.org/sites/default/files/media/Arts%20-%20Main%20and%20Secondary%20Proceedings.pdf; Open Google Scholar
Atanasov, Vladimir A./Black, Bernard S./Ciccotello, Conrad S., Law and Tunneling, Journal of Corporation Law (JCL) 37 (2011), p 1 ff; Open Google Scholar
Bariatti, Stefania/Corno, Giorgio, Il Regolamento (UE) 2015/848 del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio del 20 maggio 2015 relativo alle procedure di insolvenza (rifusione). Una prima lettura, available at: ilfallimentarista.it, 2015; Open Google Scholar
Bariatti, Stefania/Corno, Giorgio, Centro degli interessi principali, available at: ilfallimentarista.it, 2016; Open Google Scholar
Baumert, Andreas J., EuGH: Eröffnung eines Sekundärinsolvenzverfahrens auch am satzungsmäßigen Sitz der Gesellschaft, Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 4.9.2014 – C-327/13 – „Burgo Group SpA./. Illochroma SA in Liquidation“, Lindenmaier-Möhring-Kommentierte BGH-Rechtsprechung (LMK) 2014, 362606; Open Google Scholar
Berends, André, Insolventie in het internationaal privaatrecht, Deventer 2005; Open Google Scholar
Bewick, Samantha, The EU Insolvency Regulation, Revisited, International Insolvency Review (Int. Insolv. Rev.) 24 (2015), p 172 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/iir.1240
Biermeyer, Thomas, Case Note – Case C-396/09 Interedil Srl, Judgment of the Court of 20 October 2011, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (MJ) 18 (2011), p 581 ff; Open Google Scholar
Böcker, Philipp, Gesellschaftsrecht oder Insolvenzrecht? Keine »Einheit der Rechtsordnung« im IPR – Besprechung des EuGH-Urteils vom 10.12.2015 – Rs.C-594/14 – Kornhaas, DZWIR, 2016, 180, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Insolvenzrecht (DZWIR) 26 (2016), p 174 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/dwir-2016-0051
Bork, Reinhard/van Zwieten, Kristin (eds), Commentary on the European Insolvency Regulation, Oxford 2016; Open Google Scholar
Bork, Reinhard/Mangano, Renato, European Cross-Border Insolvency Law, Oxford 2016; Open Google Scholar
Bork, Reinhard, Moratoria (or “stays”) under the new European Insolvency Regulation, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 29 (2016), p 1 ff; Open Google Scholar
Bork, Reinhard (ed), Principles of Cross-border Insolvency Law, Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland 2017; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/iir.1282
Bork, Reinhard/McCormack, Gerard (eds), Security rights and the European Insolvency Regulation, Cambridge/Antwerp/Portland 2017; Open Google Scholar
Bornemann, Alexander/Brinkmann, Moritz /Herchen, Axel (eds), European Insolvency Regulation – Commentary, Munich 2017; Open Google Scholar
Braun, Eberhard/Tashiro, Annerose, Cross-border Insolvency Protocol Agreements between Insolvency Practitioners and their Effect on the Rights of Creditors, available at: https://www.iiiglobal.org/sites/default/files/BraunTashiroandBraunCBProtocols.pdf; Open Google Scholar
Braun, Eberhard, Der neue Sport in Europa: Forumshopping in Insolvenzverfahren oder: die moderne Form von Britannia rules the waves, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 1 (2004), Editorial; Open Google Scholar
Braun, Eberhard (ed), Insolvenzordnung, 7th edn, Munich 2017; Open Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Moritz, Grenzüberschreitende Sanierung und europäisches Insolvenzrecht, Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht – Konkurs, Treuhand, Sanierung (KTS) 4 (2014), p 381 ff; Open Google Scholar
Brünkmans, Christian, Die Renaissance der Sitztheorie im europäischen Insolvenzrecht, Kölner Schrift zum Wirtschaftsrecht (KSzW) 3 (2012), p 319 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.9785/ovs-kszw-2012-319
Bufford, Samuel L., Center of Main Interests, International Insolvency Case Venue, and Equality of Arms: The Eurofood Decision and the European Court of Justice, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business (Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus.) 27 (2007), p 351 ff; Open Google Scholar
Bufford, Samuel L., Revision of the European Union Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings – Recommendations, International Insolvency Law Review (IILR) 3 (2012), p 341 ff; Open Google Scholar
Busch, Peter/Remmert, Andreas/Rüntz, Stephanie/Vallender, Heinz, Kommunikation zwischen Gerichten in Grenzüberschreitenden Insolvenzen: Was geht und was geht nicht, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 11 (2010), p 417 ff; Open Google Scholar
Canaris, Klaus-Wilhelm/Larenz, Karl, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3rd edn, Berlin 1995; Open Google Scholar
Canuel, Edward T., United States – Canadian Insolvencies: Reviewing Conflicting Legal Mechanisms, Challenges and Opportunities for Cross-Border Cooperation, Journal of International Business and Law (J. Int’l Bus. & L.) 4 (2005), p 8 ff; Open Google Scholar
Carballo Piñeiro, Laura, Vis attractiva concursus in the European Union: its development by the European Court of Justice, Revista para el Análisis del Derecho 2010; Open Google Scholar
Carrasco Perera, Angel/Torralba Mendiola, Elisa, UK “schemes of arrangement” are “outside” the scope of the European Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings. What does “outside” actually mean?, available at: http://www.gomezacebo-pombo.com/media/k2/attachments/uk-schemes-of-arrangement-are-outside-the-scope-of-the-european-regulation-on-insolvency-proceedings-what-does-outside-actually-mean.pdf; Open Google Scholar
Castagnola, Angelo, Regolamento CE 1346/2000 e vis attractiva concursus: verso un’universalità meno limitata?, Rivista di diritto processuale (Riv. dir. proc.) 2010, p 925 ff; Open Google Scholar
Cohen, Adrian/Dammann, Reinhard/Sax, Stefan, Final text for the Amended EU Regulation on Insolvency proceedings, International Insolvency Law Review (IILR) 2 (2015), p 117 ff; Open Google Scholar
Commandeur, Anja/Römer, Alexander, Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Insolvenzrecht – Neufassung der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (NZG) 25 (2015), p 988 ff; Open Google Scholar
Csöke, Andrea, EIR Recast: Some tiny interesting details, eurofenix Spring 2016, p 29 ff; Open Google Scholar
Dammann, Reinhard/Müller, Friederike, Erste Anwendung der Interedil-Rechtsprechung des EuGH zum COMI im Coeur Défense-Urteil der Cour d’appel von Versailles vom 19.1.2012, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 16 (2012), p 643 ff; Open Google Scholar
Dammann, Reinhard/Rapp, Alexis, La clarification du rôle joué par la procédure secondaire dans l’architecture du règlement relatif aux procédures d’insolvabilité transfrontalières, Recueil Dalloz 2015, p 45 ff; Open Google Scholar
Dammann, Reinhard/Menjucq, Michel/Roussel, Galle, Le nouveau règlement européen sur les procedures d’insolvabilité, Revue des procédures collectives (Rev. proc. coll.) 2015, p 10 ff; Open Google Scholar
Dammann, Reinhard, Sinn und Zweck von Sekundärverfahren nach der Reform der EuInsVO, in: Exner, Joachim/Paulus, Christoph G. (eds), Festschrift für Siegfried Beck zum 70. Geburtstag, Munich 2016, p 73 ff; Open Google Scholar
De Cesari, Patrizia, Il Regolamento 2015/848e il nuovo approccio europeo alla crisi dell´impresa, Il Fallimento e le altre procedure concorsuali (Il Fall.) 2015, p 1033 ff; Open Google Scholar
Didone, Antonio, Gli accordi di ristrutturazione del debitit (ART. 182-Bis L. Fall). Presupposti, procedimento ed effetti della anticipazione delle misure protettive dell´impresa in crisi, Il diritto fallimentare (Il dir. fallim.) 2011, p 23 ff; Open Google Scholar
Dugue, Ronan/Becker, Manuela, The European Insolvency Regulation in theory and practice – The new European insolvency register portal, in: Insolvency and Restructuring in Germany, Yearbook (2017), Achern 2016, p 30 ff; Open Google Scholar
Eble, Maximilian J., Die Unternehmensgruppe in der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung 2017, in: Ebke, Werner/Seagon, Christopher/Blatz, Michael (eds), Unternehmensrestrukturierung und Unternehmensinsolvenz, Baden-Baden 2015, p 131 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845272450-131
Eble, Maximilian J., Auf dem Weg zu einem europäischen Konzerninsolvenzrecht – Die "Unternehmensgruppe" in der EuInsVO 2017, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 4 (2016), p 115 ff; Open Google Scholar
Eble, Maximilian J., Der Gruppenkoordinator in der reformierten EuInsVO – Bestellung, Abberufung und Haftung, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 34 (2016), p 1619 ff; Open Google Scholar
Eckert, Georg, Internationales Gesellschaftsrecht. Das internationale Privatrecht grenzüberschreitend tätiger Gesellschaften, Vienna 2010; Open Google Scholar
Ehricke, Ulrich, Die neue Europäische Insolvenzverordnung und grenzüberschreitende Konzerninsolvenzen, Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht (EWS) 3 (2002), p 101 ff; Open Google Scholar
Ehricke, Ulrich, Die Zusammenarbeit der Insolvenzverwalter bei grenzüberschreitenden Insolvenzen nach der EuInsVΟ, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen (WM) 9 (2005), p 397 ff; Open Google Scholar
Eidenmüller, Horst/van Zwieten, Kristin, Restructuring the European Business Enterprise: The EU Commission Recommendation on a New Approach to Business Failure and Insolvency, available at: papers.ssrn.com; Open Google Scholar
Eidenmüller, Horst, Der nationale und der internationale Insolvenzverwaltungsvertrag, Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess (ZZP) 114 (2001), p 3 ff; Open Google Scholar
Eidenmüller, Horst, Free Choice in International Company Insolvency Law in Europe, European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 6 (2005), p 423 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1566752905004234
Eidenmüller, Horst, Gesellschaftsstatut und Insolvenzstatut, Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht (RabelsZ) 70 (2006), p 474 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/003372506777880106
Eidenmüller, Horst, Abuse of Law in the Context of European Insolvency Law, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 6 (2009), p 1 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2009.1
Eidenmüller, Horst, A New Framework for Business Restructuring in Europe: The EU Commission’s Proposals for a Reform of the European Insolvency Regulation and Beyond, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law (MJ) 20 (2013), p 133 ff, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2230690; Open Google Scholar
Eidenmüller, Horst, What is an insolvency proceeding?, European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) – Law Working Paper No. 335/2016; Open Google Scholar
Enriques, Luca/Gatti, Matteo, Is There a Uniform EU Securities Law After the Financial Services Action Plan?, Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance (Stan. J.L Bus. & Fin.) 14 (2008), p 43 ff; Open Google Scholar
Espiniella Menendez, Angel, Los protocolos concursales, 10 Anuario de Derecho Concursal (2007), p 165 ff; Open Google Scholar
Esser, H. Philipp, Reform of the EU Regulation: New Framework for Insolvent Company Groups: Part I, American Bankruptcy Institute Journal (Am. Bankr. Inst. J.) 2015, p 38 ff; Open Google Scholar
Fabiani, Massimo, L’ulteriore upgrade degli accordi di ristrutturazione e l’incentivo ai finanziamenti nelle soluzioni concordate, Il Fallimento (Il Fall.) 2010, p 904 ff; Open Google Scholar
Fabiani, Massimo, La convenzione di moratoria diretta a disciplinare in via provvisoria gli effetti della crisi, Il diritto fallimentare (Il dir. fallim.) 2015, p 1269 ff; Open Google Scholar
Fehrenbach, Markus, Die reformierte Europäische Insolvenzverordnung (Teil II), Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (GPR) 1 (2017), p 38 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.9785/gpr-2017-0113
Ferran, Eilis, Corporate Law, Codes and Social Norms-Finding the Right Regulatory Combination and Institutional Structure, Journal of Corporate Law Studies (JCLS) 2 (2001), p 381 ff, available at: <ssrn.com/ abstract=294462>; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2001.11419867
Flaschen, Evan D./Silverman, Ronald J., Cross-border Insolvency Cooperation Protocols, Texas International Law Journal (Tex. Int’l L. J.) 33 (1998), p 587 ff; Open Google Scholar
Fletcher, Ian, The European Insolvency Regulation recast: the main features of the new law, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 28 (2015), p 97 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/iir.1245
Fritz, Daniel, Die Neufassung der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung: Erleichterung bei der Restrukturierung in grenzüberschreitenden Fällen? (Teil 1), Der Betrieb (DB) 33 (2015), p 1882 ff; Open Google Scholar
Fritz, Daniel, Besser Sanieren in Deutschland? Wesentliche Aspekte der Einpassung der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung in das deutsche Recht, Betriebsberater (BB) 2017, p 131 ff; Open Google Scholar
Garcimartìn, Francisco, The review of the EU Insolvency Regulation: some proposals for amendment, NVRII Preadviezen/Reports 2011, p 17 ff; Open Google Scholar
Garcimartìn, Francisco, The review of the Insolvency Regulation: Hybrid procedures and other issues, International Insolvency Law Review (IILR) 3 (2011), p 321 ff; Open Google Scholar
Garcimartín, Francisco, The EU Insolvency Regulation Recast: Scope, Jurisdiction and Applicable Law, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP) 4 (2015), p 694 ff; Open Google Scholar
Garcimartìn, Francisco, The EU Insolvency Regulation Recast: Scope and Rules on Jurisdiction, available at: papers.ssrn.com 2016; Open Google Scholar
Geimer, Reinhold/ Schütze, Rolf A., Europäisches Zivilverfahrensrecht, 3rd edn, Munich 2010; Open Google Scholar
Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten/ Schuster, Edmund, The Costs of Separation: Friction Between Company and Insolvency Law in the Single Market, Journal of Corporate Law Studies (JCLS) 14 (2014), p 287 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5235/14735970.14.2.287
Gerner-Beuerle, Carsten et al., Study on the Law Applicable to Companies. Final Report (2016), Luxembourg, p 294 ff; Open Google Scholar
Geroldinger, Andreas, Die Koordinierung von Parallelverfahren nach der EuInsVO, in: Clavora, Selena/Garber, Thomas (eds), Grenzüberschreitende Insolvenzen im europäischen Binnenmarkt – die EuInsVO (2011), p 123 ff; Open Google Scholar
Gopalan, Sandeep/Guihot, Michael, Cross-Border Insolvency Law and Multinational Enterprise Groups: Judicial Innovation as an International Solution, The George Washington International Law Review (The Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev.) 48 (2016), p 549 ff; Open Google Scholar
Gottwald, Peter (ed), Insolvenzrechtshandbuch, 5th edn, Munich 2015; Open Google Scholar
Grossman, Sanford J./Hart, Oliver D., The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration, 94 Journal of Political Economy (1986), p 691 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/261404
Hart, Oliver D., Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications, The Economic Journal 105 (1995), p 678 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2235027
Haas, Ulrich/Vogel, Oliver, Durchsetzung gesellschaftsrechtlicher und insolvenzrechtlicher Haftungsansprüche im internationalen Konzern, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (NZG) 12 (2011), p 457 ff; Open Google Scholar
Haidmayer, Barbara, Zum Interessenmittelpunkt einer Tochtergesellschaft in der Konzerninsolvenz – Anmerkungen zu OLG Wien 28 R 370/13g1, Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht und Kreditschutz (ZIK) 2014, p 4 ff; Open Google Scholar
Hedemann, Justus Wilhelm, Die Flucht in die Generalklauseln: eine Gefahr für Recht und Staat, Tübingen 1933; Open Google Scholar
Henry, Laurence Caroline, Le nouveau règlement ‘insolvabilité’: entre continuité et innovations, Recueil Dalloz 2015, p 979 ff; Open Google Scholar
Hess, Burkhard, Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht (2010), § 9; Open Google Scholar
Hess, Burkhard, Hybride Sanierungsinstrumente zwischen der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung und der Verordnung Brüssel I, in: Bruns, Alexander et al. (eds), Festschrift für Rolf Stürner zum 70. Geburtstag, Tübingen 2013, p 1253 ff; Open Google Scholar
Hess, Burkhard/Oberhammer, Paul/Pfeiffer, Thomas (eds), European Insolvency Law – Heidelberg-Luxembourg-Vienna Report, Munich 2014; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845258959-285
Hess, Burkhard/Koutsoukou, Georgia, in: Kronke, Herbert/Melis, Werner/Kuhn, Hans (eds), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2nd edn, Cologne 2017, Teil O; Open Google Scholar
Hirte, Heribert, Towards a Framework for the Regulation of Corporate Groups’ Insolvencies, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 5 (2008), p 213 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2008.213
Honorati, Costanza/Corno, Giorgio, A double lesson from Interedil: higher courts, lower courts and preliminary ruling and further clarifications on COMI and establishment under EC Insolvency Regulation, International Insolvency Law Review (IILR) 1 (2013), p 18 ff; Open Google Scholar
Janger, Edward, Virtual Territoriality, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (Colum. J. Transnat´l L.) 48 (2010), p 401 ff; Open Google Scholar
Jault-Seseke, Fabienne/Robine, David, Le règlement 2015/848: le vin nouveau et les vieilles outres, Revue critique de droit international privé 2016, p 21 ff; Open Google Scholar
Kamalnath, Akshaya, Cross-Border Insolvency Protocols: A Success Story?, International Journal of Legal Studies and Research (IJLSR) 2 (2013), p 172 ff; Open Google Scholar
Kindler, Peter/Sakka, Sami, Die Neufassung der europäischen Insolvenzordnung, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 12 (2015), p 460 ff; Open Google Scholar
Kindler, Peter, Insolvenzrecht: Zuständigkeit nach EuInsVO für Klagen gegen Geschäftsführer nach § 64 GmbHG, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 4 (2015), p 141 ff; Open Google Scholar
Kindler, Peter, Insolvenzrecht als Tätigkeitsausübungsregel – Die sachliche Reichweite der Niederlassungsfreiheit nach dem Kornhaas-Urteil des EuGH, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 4 (2016), p 136 ff; Open Google Scholar
Kirchhof, Hans-Peter/Stürner, Rolf/Eidenmüller, Horst (eds), Münchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung, Vol. 4, 3rd edn, Munich 2016; Open Google Scholar
Koller, Christian, Zielkonflikt im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht: Präventive Sanierung versus territoriale Liquidation, Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 2014, p 490 ff; Open Google Scholar
Konecny, Andreas, Thesen zum Mittelpunkt der hauptsächlichen Schuldnerinteressen gem art 3 Abs 1 EuInsVO, Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht und Kreditschutz (ZIK) 2005, p 2 ff; Open Google Scholar
Kuipers, Jan-Jaap, Schemes of arrangement and voluntary collective redress: a gap in the Brussels I Regulation, Journal of Private International Law (J.Priv.Int.L.) 8 (2012), p 225 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5235/JPRIVINTL.8.2.225
Latella, Dario, The “COMI” Concept in the Revision of the European Insolvency Regulation, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 11 (2015), p 479 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2014-0479
Laukemann, Björn, Präventive Schutzverfahren im Spannungsfeld von Universalität und Territorialität, ecolex 2013, p 373 ff; Open Google Scholar
Laukemann, Björn, Avoidance actions against third state defendants: jurisdictional justice or curtailment of legal protection? European Court of Justice 16 January 2014, Case C-328/12 – Schmid/Hertel, International Insolvency Law Review (IILR) 2 (2014), p 101 ff; Open Google Scholar
Laukemann, Björn, Regulatory copy and paste: The allocation of assets in cross-border insolvencies – methodological perspectives from the Nortel decision, Journal of Private International Law (J.Priv.Int.L.) 12 (2016), p 379 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2016.1206710
Leandro, Antonio, Amending the European Insolvency Regulation to strengthen main proceedings, Rivista di diritto internazionale private e processuale (Riv. dir. intern. priv. e proc.) 2014, p 317 ff; Open Google Scholar
Leandro, Antonio, A First Critical Appraisal of The New European Insolvency Regulation, Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea (dUE) 2 (2016), p 215 ff; Open Google Scholar
Legrand, Véronique, Le nouveau règlement européen relative aux procédures d’insolvabilité transfrontalières: premier aperçu, in: Petites affiches 22 janvier 2015, N° 16, p 8 ff; Open Google Scholar
Leible, Stefan/Reichert, Jochem (eds), Münchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts, VI, Munich 2013; Open Google Scholar
Lener, Raffaele/Rosato, Giovanna, in: Leonard, Bruce (ed), Restructuring & Insolvency, London 2015, p 226 ff, this statement is also available at: https://gettingthedealthrough.com/area/35/jurisdiction/15/restructuring-insolvency-2016-italy; Open Google Scholar
Linna, Tuula, Cross-Border Debt Adjustment – Open Questions in European Insolvency Proceedings, International Insolvency Review (Int. Insolv. Rev.) 23 (2014), p 20 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/iir.1216
Linna, Tuula, Actio pauliana and res judicata in EU insolvency proceedings, Journal of Private International Law (J.Priv.Int.L.) 11 (2015), p 568 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2015.1102472
MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, Oxford 2003; Open Google Scholar
Madaus, Stephan, Insolvency proceedings for corporate groups under the new Insolvency Regulation, International Insolvency Law Review (IILR) 3 (2015), p 235 ff; Open Google Scholar
Madaus, Stephan, As simple as it can be? – Anregungen zum Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EU) 2015/848 über Insolvenzverfahren (BT-Drs. 18/10823), Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 2017, p 203 ff; Open Google Scholar
Madaus, Stephan, Die Zusicherung nach Art. 36 EuInsVO – Das Ende virtueller Sekundärinsolvenzverfahren?, in: Kayser, Godehard/Smid, Stefan/Riedemann, Susanne (eds), Festschrift für Klaus Pannen zum 65. Geburtstag, Munich 2017, p 223 ff; Open Google Scholar
Magnus, Robert, Anwendbarkeit der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung auf die Haftung eines Geschäftsführers für Zahlungen in der Krise – Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 04. Dezember 2014, C-295/13 „H/H.K.“, Lindenmaier-Möhring-Kommentierte BGH-Rechtsprechung (LMK) 2015, 366550; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter, Zuständigkeit des Insolvenzgerichts am Sitz der Konzernmutter bei Leitung der Verwaltung der Schuldnerin – Hettlage, Anmerkung zu AG München, Beschluss vom 4. 5. 2004 – 1501 IE 1276/04, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 8 (2004), p 450 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter, Kurzkommentar zu AG Siegen 1.7.2004 – 25 IN 154/04 (NZI) 2004, 673), Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht (EWiR) 4 (2005), p 175 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter, Zulässigkeit von Sonderzahlungen zur Vermeidung eines Sekundärinsolvenzverfahrens – MG Rover – Anmerkung zu High Court of Justice Birmingham, Beschluß vom 30. 3. 2006 – No. 2377/2006, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 7 (2006), p 416 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter, EuGH: „Enger Zusammenhang” zwischen Zivilklage und Konkursverfahren – Anerkennung von Entscheidungen eines anderen Mitgliedstaats, Anmerkung zu EuGH, 2 July 2009 – C-111/08 (SCT Industri AB i likvidation/Alpenblume AB), Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 10 (2009), p 570 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter, EuGH: Antragsbefugnis für die Eröffnung eines Sekundärinsolvenzverfahrens, Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 4.9.2014 − C-327/13 (Burgo Group SpA/Illochroma SA in Liquidation), Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 22 (2014), p 964 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter, Zusicherungen zur Vermeidung von Sekundärinsolvenzen unter Art. 36 EuInsVO – Systhetische Sekundärverfahren, Neue Zeitschrift für das Recht der Insolvenz und Sanierung (NZI) 23 (2015), p 961 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter/Müller, Michael/Schmidt, Jessica, EuInsVO 2015, Munich 2016; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/zinso-2016-4109
Mankowski, Peter, Insolvenzrecht gegen Gesellschaftsrecht 2:0 im europäischen Spiel um § 64 GmbHG – Anmerkung zu EuGH, NZG 2016, 115 – Kornhaas, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (NZG) 8 (2016), p 281 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mankowski, Peter, The European World of Insolvency Tourism: Renewed, But Still Brave?, Netherlands International Law Review (NILR) 64 (2017), p 95 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s40802-017-0080-7
Martínez Casado, Valentin, El tratamiento de la insolvencia de un grupo de sociedades francés implantado en España, Anuario de Derecho Concursal, 21/2010, p 235 ff; Open Google Scholar
Martins Costa, Cintia/Richter, Dirk/Gerber-Lemaire, Martine/Marchand, Aurore, Regulation No. 1346/2000 on insolvency proceedings: The difficult COMI determination, the treatment of groups of companies and forum shopping in light of the CJEU´s and domestic case law, and the modernization of the Regulation, ALJB Droit bancaire et financier au Luxembourg 2014, p 3281 ff; Open Google Scholar
McCormack, Gerard, Jurisdictional Competition and Forum Shopping in Insolvency Proceedings, Cambridge Law Journal (CLJ) 68 (2009), p 169 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000075
McCormack, Gerard, Reconstructing European insolvency law – putting in place a new paradigm, Legal Studies (LS) 30 (2010), p 126 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00147.x
McCormack, Gerard, Reforming The European Insolvency Regulation: A Legal And Policy Perspective, Journal of Private International Law (J.Priv.Int.L.) 10 (2014), p 41 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5235/17441048.10.1.41
McCormack, Gerard, Something Old, Something New: Recasting the European Insolvency Regulation, The Modern Law Review (MLR) 79 (2016), p 121 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12169
McCormack, Gerard/Keay, Andrew/Brown, Sarah, European Insolvency Law: Reform and Harmonization, Cheltenham 2017; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4337/9781786433312
Mendiola, Elisa Torralba, ‘Synthetic’ insolvency proceedings, November 2015, available at: http://www.gomezacebo-pombo.com/media/k2/attachments/synthetic-insolvency-proceedings.pdf; Open Google Scholar
Mevorach, Irit, The Road to a Suitable and Comprehensive Global Approach to Insolvencies Within Multinational Corporate Groups, Norton Journal of Bankruptcy Law and Practice (Norton J. Bankr. L. & Prac.) 15 (2006), p 455 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mevorach, Irit, The Home Country of a Multinational Enterprise Group Facing Insolvency, International and Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ) 57 (2008), p 427 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0020589308000250
Mevorach, Irit, Insolvency within Multinational Enterprise Groups, Oxford 2009; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544721.003.0006
Mevorach, Irit, Jurisdiction in Insolvency: A Study of European Courts´ Decision, Journal of Private International Law (J.Priv.Int.L.) 6 (2010), p 327 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5235/174410410792166502
Mevorach, Irit, Enterprise Groups in Insolvency, Recent International Developments, in: Sarra, Janis P./Romaine, Barbara (eds), Annual Review of Insolvency Law, Toronto 2013, p 285 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mevorach, Irit, Forum shopping in times of crisis: a directors’ duties perspective, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 10 (2013), p 523 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2013-0523
Mevorach, Irit, Cross-border insolvency of enterprise groups: the choice of law challenge, Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial and Commerical Law (Brook.J.Corp.Fi.&Com.L.) 9 (2014), p 226 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H./Kornhauser, Lewis, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce, The Yale Law Journal (Yale L.J.) 88 (1979), p 950 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/795824
Mock, Sebastian, Das (geplante) neue europäische Insolvenzrecht nach dem Vorschlag der Kommission zur Reform der EuInsVO, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (GPR) 3 (2013), p 156 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/gpr.2013.10.3.156
Monsèrié-Bon, Commentaire de l’article 1er, in Règlement (UE) n°2015/848 du 20 mai 2015 relatif aux procédures d’insolvabilité, Commentaire article par article, 2015, p 35 ff; Open Google Scholar
Moss, Gabriel/Paulus, Christoph G., The European Insolvency Regulation – the case for urgent reform, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 19 (2006), p 1 ff; Open Google Scholar
Moss, Gabriel, Group Insolvency – Choice of Forum and Law: The European Experience under the Influence of English Pragmatism. (Symposium: Bankruptcy in the Global Village the Second Decade), Brooklyn Journal of International Law (Brook J Int’l L) 32 (2007), p 1005 ff; Open Google Scholar
Moss, Gabriel, Group Insolvency – Forum – EC Regulation and Model Law Under the Influence of English Pragmatism Revisited, Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial and Commercial Law (Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L.) 9 (2014), p 250 ff; Open Google Scholar
Moss, Gabriel, ECJ takes worldwide jurisdiction, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 28 (2015), p 6 ff; Open Google Scholar
Moss Gabriel/Fletcher, Ian/Isaacs, Stuart (eds), The EU Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings, 3rd edn, Oxford 2016; Open Google Scholar
Mucciarelli, Federico, Not just efficiency: insolvency law in the EU and its political dimension, European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 14 (2013), p 175 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1566752912001127
Mucciarelli, Federico, Private international law rules in the Insolvency Regulation Recast: a reform or a restatement of the status quo?, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 13 (2016), p 1 ff; Open Google Scholar
Mucciarelli, Federico, Procedure concorsuali secondary, localizzazione dei beni del debitore e protezione di interessi locali, Giurisprudenza commerciale (Giur. comm.) 2016, p 13 ff; Open Google Scholar
Muzsalyi, Robert, Directors´Liability: What Should Be the Minimum Degree of Harmonisation in the EU? (October 2016), available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2914600; Open Google Scholar
Oberhammer, Paul, Im Holz sind Wege: EuGH SCT./. Alpenblume und der Insolvenztatbestand des Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. b) EUGVVO, Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 4 (2010), p 318 ff; Open Google Scholar
Omar, Paul, Communication and co-operation between insolvency courts and personnel, International Company and Commercial Law Review (ICCLR) 17 (2006), p 120 ff; Open Google Scholar
Omar, Paul, Addressing the reform of the Insolvency Regulation: wishlist or fancies?, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 20 (2007), p 7 ff; Open Google Scholar
Pannen, Klaus/Riedemann, Susanne, Der Begriff des „centre of main interests” i.S. des Art. 3 I 1 EuInsVO im Spiegel aktueller Fälle aus der Rechtsprechung, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 12 (2004), p 646 ff; Open Google Scholar
Pannen, Klaus (ed), European Insolvency Regulation, Berlin 2007; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110901337.19
Panzani, Luciano, Scope of application of the Council Regulation 1346/2000, available at: iiiglobal.org; Open Google Scholar
Paulus, Christoph G., Die europäische Insolvenzverordnung und der deutsche Insolvenzverwalter, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 10 (2001), p 505 ff; Open Google Scholar
Paulus, Christoph G., Überlegungen zu einem modernen Konzerninsolvenzrecht, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 44 (2005), p 1948 ff; Open Google Scholar
Paulus, Christoph G., Die ersten Jahre mit der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung, Erfahrungen und Erwartungen, Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht (RabelsZ) 70 (2006), p 458 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/003372506777880043
Paulus, Christoph G., Die EuInsVO – wo geht die Reise hin?, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 1 (2008), p 1 ff; Open Google Scholar
Paulus, Christoph G., Europäische Insolvenzverordnung, 4rd edn, Frankfurt on the Main 2013; Open Google Scholar
Paulus, Christoph G., Internationales Restrukturierungsrecht, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft (RIW) 9 (2013), p 577 ff; Open Google Scholar
Paulus, Christoph G., The ECJ’s understanding of the universality principle, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 27 (2014), p 70 ff; Open Google Scholar
Payne, Jennifer, Cross-Border Schemes of Arrangement and Forum Shopping, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 68/2013; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1566752912001309
Penzlin, Dietmar/ Riedemann, Susanne, Bestimmung des Mittelpunkts der hauptsächlichen Interessen des Schuldners – MG Rover – Anmerkung zu High Court of Justice Birmingham, Beschluß vom 18. 4. 2005, Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 8 (2005), p 467 ff; Open Google Scholar
Penzlin, Dietmar, Kurzkommentar zu Tribunal de Commerce de Nanterre, Urt. v. 15.2.2006 – PCL 2006J00174, Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht (EWiR) 7 (2006), p 207 ff; Open Google Scholar
Piekenbrock, Andreas, Das Europäische Insolvenzrecht im Umbruch, Kölner Schrift zum Wirtschaftsrecht (KSzW) 3 (2015), p 191 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.9785/kszw-2015-0304
Pluta, Michael/Keller, Christoph, Das virtuelle Sekundärinsolvenzverfahren nach der reformierten Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung, in: Graf-Schlicker, Marie Luise/Prütting, Hanns/Uhlenbruck, Wilhelm (eds), Festschrift für Heinz Vallender zum 65. Geburtstag, Cologne 2015, p 437 ff; Open Google Scholar
Poertzgen, Christoph/Adam, Dietmar, Die Bestimmung des ›centre of main interests‹ gem. Art. 3 Abs. 1 EuInsVO, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Insolvenzrecht (ZInsO) 10 (2006), p 505 ff; Open Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe, The future of the Common Law, Harvard 1937; Open Google Scholar
Prager, Martin/Keller, Christoph, Der Entwicklungsstand des Europäischen Insolvenzrechts, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Bankenrecht, Wertpapier-Mitteilungen (WM) 17 (2015), p 805 ff; Open Google Scholar
Raykin, Alla/Wouters, Nora, Corporate group cross-border between the United States & European Union: Legal & economic developments, Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal (EBDJ) 29 (2013), p 387 ff; Open Google Scholar
Reumers, Michele, Cooperation between Liquidators and Courts in Insolvency Proceedings of Related Companies under the Proposed Revised EIR, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 10 (2013), p 554 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2013-0554
Reumers, Michele, What is in a Name? Group Coordination or Consolidation Plan — What is Allowed Under the EIR Recast?, International Insolvency Review (Int.Insolv.Rev.) 25 (2016), p 225 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/iir.1263
Reuß, Philipp M., „Forum Shopping“ in der Insolvenz, Tübingen 2011; Open Google Scholar
Ringe, Wolf-Georg, Forum Shopping Under the EU Insolvency Regulation, European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 9 (2008), p 579 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S156675290800579X
Ringe, Wolf-Georg, Haftung des "Director" einer englischen "Limited" gemäß § 64 GmbHG (Anmerkung zu EuGH Urt. vom 10.12.2015 – Rs C-594/14, Kornhaas), Juristen Zeitung (JZ) 71 (2016), p 573 ff; Open Google Scholar
Santen, Bernard, Communication and cooperation in international insolvency: on best practices for insolvency office holders and cross-border communication between courts, 16 ERA Forum (2015), p 229 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s12027-015-0398-8
Schall, Alexander, Das Kornhaas-Urteil gibt grünes Licht für die Anwendung des § 64 GmbHG auf eine Limited mit Sitz in Deutschland – Alles klar dank EuGH! – Zugleich Besprechung EuGH v. 10. 12. 2015 – Rs C-594/14, ZIP 2015, 2468 – Kornhaas, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 7 (2016), p 289 ff; Open Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jessica, Das Prinzip "eine Person, ein Vermögen, eine Insolvenz" und seine Durchbrechungen vor dem Hintergrund der aktuellen Reformen im europäischen und deutschen Recht, Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht (KTS) 1 (2015), p 19 ff; Open Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jessica, Group insolvencies under the EIR recast, eurofenix Autumn 2015, p 17 ff; Open Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jessica, The Opt-out and opt-in rules for group coordination proceedings in the EIR: a critical evaluation and focus on large-scale insolvencies, in: Parry, Rebecca/Omar, Paul J. (eds), Banking and financial insolvencies: the European regulatory framework, Nottingham 2016, p 87 ff; Open Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jessica, Opt-out und Opt-in in Gruppen-Koordinationsverfahren nach der EuInsVO 2015, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft (ZVglRWiss) 116 (2017), p 93 ff; Open Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karsten (ed), Insolvenzordnung: mit EuInsVO, 19th edn, Munich 2016; Open Google Scholar
Schulz, Patrick, Bestimmung des COMI von Gesellschaften eines internationalen Reederei-Konzerns – Anmerkung zu High Court London, Entsch. vom 22.1.2015 − 2015 EWHC 121 (Ch) (Re Northsea Base Investment), Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 8 (2015), p 338 ff; Open Google Scholar
Schulz, Patrick, Die Bestimmung des COMI nach Art. 3 EuInsVO aF bei Immobilien-SPV – Anmerkung zu High Court London, Entsch. vom 17.1.2017 – 2017 EWHC 25 (CH) (Re Frogmore Real Estate Partners), Neue Zeitschrift für Insolvenz- und Sanierungsrecht (NZI) 5 (2017), p 142 ff; Open Google Scholar
Skauradszun, Dominik, Die ‘tatsächlichen Annahmen’ der Zusicherung nach Art. 36 Abs. 1 Satz 2 EuInsVO n.F., Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 33 (2016), p 1563 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/kts-2016-0402
Skauradszun, Dominik, Einstweilige Maßnahmen und Sicherungsmaßnahmen nach Art. 36 Abs. 9 EuInsVO n.F., Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht (KTS) 2016, p 419 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/kts-2016-0402
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A Global Community of Courts, Harvard International Law Journal (Harv. Int´l L.J.) 44 (2003), p 191 ff, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201212/20121219ATT58300/20121219ATT58300EN.pdf; Open Google Scholar
Stadler, Astrid, International Jurisdiction under the Regulation 1346/2000/EC on Insolvency Proceedings, in: Stürner, Rolf/Kawano, Masanori (eds), Cross Border Insolvency, Intellectual Property Litigation, Arbitration and Ordre Public, Tübingen 2011, p 13 ff; Open Google Scholar
Steffek, Felix, Insolvenz und Sanierung deutscher Unternehmen in England, in: Leible, Stefan/Reichert, Jochem (eds), Münchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts, Vol. 6, 4th edn, Munich 2013, p 755 ff; Open Google Scholar
Szydlo, Marek, Prevention of Forum Shopping in European Insolvency Law, European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 11 (2010), p 253 ff; Open Google Scholar
Szirányi, Pal, EU-wide Interconnection of Insolvency Registers, in: Parry, Rebecca/ Omar, Paul J. (eds), Reimagining Rescue, Nottingham 2016, p 27 ff; Open Google Scholar
Tabb, Charles Jordan, Law of Bankruptcy, 4th edn, St. Paul 2016, p 475; Open Google Scholar
Terranova, Giuseppe, Elogio dell´approssimazione. Il diritto come esperienza comunicativa, Pisa 2015; Open Google Scholar
Thole, Christoph, Gläubigerschutz durch Insolvenzrecht, Tübingen 2010; Open Google Scholar
Thole, Christoph, Vom Totengräber zum Heilsbringer – Insolvenzkultur und Insolvenzrecht im Wandel, Juristenzeitung (JZ) 15/16 (2011), p 765 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/002268811796943130
Thole, Christoph/Swierczok, Arthur, Der Kommissionsvorschlag zur Reform der EuInsVO, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 12 (2013), p 550 ff; Open Google Scholar
Thole, Christoph, Die Reform der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung – Zentrale Aspekte des Kommissionsvorschlags und offene Fragen, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP) 1 (2014), p 39 ff; Open Google Scholar
Thole, Christoph/Dueñas, Manuel, Some Observations on the New Group Coordination Procedure of the Reformed European Insolvency Regulation, International Insolvency Review (Int. Insolv. Rev.) 24 (2015), p 214 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/iir.1242
Trenker, Martin, Anwendung der EuInsVO auf Organhaftungsansprüche wegen Gläubigerbevorzugung – Anmerkungen zu EuGH C-295/13 H/H.K., Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht und Kreditschutz (ZIK) 2015, p 8 ff; Open Google Scholar
Undritz, Sven-Holger; Sekundärinsolvenzverfahren nach der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung – Eine Geschichte von „loyalen Dienern", „Störenfrieden“ und „virtuellen Welten“, in: Graf-Schlicker, Marie Luise/Prütting, Hanns/Uhlenbruck, Wilhelm (eds), Festschrift für Heinz Vallender zum 65. Geburstag, Cologne 2015, p 745 ff; Open Google Scholar
Vaccarella, Romano, Recognition in Italy of an English Order endorsing an agreement between a company and its creditors. Parere pro veritate, Corriere trimestrale della litigation internazionale (Int’l Lis) 2014, p 52 ff; Open Google Scholar
Valiante, Diego, Harmonising insolvency laws in the Euro Area: rationale, stock-taking and challenges. What role for the Eurogroup, Study prepared for the EU Parliament (2016), p 15; Open Google Scholar
Vallender, Heinz, Europaparlament gibt den Weg frei für eine neue Europäische Insolvenzverordnung, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 32 (2015), p 1513 ff; Open Google Scholar
Vallens, Jean-Luc, Réviser le règlement communautaire CE 1346/2000 sur les procédures d’insolvabilité, Revue des procédures collectives (Rev. proc. coll.) 2010, p 25 ff; Open Google Scholar
Van Calster, Geert, COMIng, and here to stay. The Review of the European Insolvency Regulation, available at: papers.ssrn.com, 2016; Open Google Scholar
Van Galen, Robert, The Recast Insolvency Regulation and groups of companies, ERA Forum (2015) 16:241; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s12027-015-0399-7
Virgós, Miguel/Schmit, Etienne, Report on the Convention on Insolvency Proceedings (1996), Council of the EU Document, available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/952; Open Google Scholar
Virgós, Miguel/Garcimartín, Francisco Javier, The European Insolvency Regulation: Law and practice, The Hague 2004; Open Google Scholar
Wautelet, Patrick R., Insolvabilité européenne et procédures secondaires (June 8, 2015), available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2687625; Open Google Scholar
de Weijs, Rolef J./Breeman, Martijn, Comi-migration: Use or Abuse of European Insolvency Law?, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 4 (2014), p 495 ff; Open Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael, Bridge over Troubled Water: The Revised Insolvency Regulation, International Insolvency Review (Int. Insolv. Rev.) 24 (2015), p 192 ff; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/iir.1241
Wessels, Bob/Markell, Bruce A./Kilborn, Jason, International Cooperation in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Matters, Oxford 2009; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob, The role of courts in solving cross-border insolvency cases, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 24 (2011), p 65 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob, Cross-border insolvency agreements: what are they and are they here to stay?, in: Prof. mr. N.E.D. Faber, Prof. mr. J.J. van Hees, Mr. N.S.G.J. Vermunt, Overeenkomsten en insolventie, Deventer 2012, p 359 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob, International Insolvency Law, 3rd edn, Deventer 2012; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4337/9781781006108.00038
Wessels, Bob, Contracting Out of Secondary Insolvency Proceedings: The Main Liquidator’s Undertaking in the meaning of Article 18 in the Proposal to Amend the EU Insolvency Regulation, Brooklyn Journal of Corporate Financial and Commercial Law (Brook.J.Corp.Fi.&Com.L.) 9 (2014), p 63 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob, Themes of the future: rescue businesses and cross-border cooperation, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 27 (2014), p 4 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob, Towards a next step in cross-border judicial cooperation, Insolvency Intelligence (Insolv. Int.) 27 (2014), p 100 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob (ed), EU Cross-Border Insolvency Court-to-Court Cooperation Principles, Hague 2015; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob, CJEU Case Note: CJEU 10 December 2015, C-594/14 (Kornhaas v. Dithmar), European Company Law (ECL) 13 (2016), p 82 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wessels, Bob, The European Union Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings (Recast): The First Commentaries, European Company Law (ECL) 13 (2016), p 129 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wimmer, Klaus, “Übersicht zur Neufassung der EuInsVO”, juris-PR InsR 7/2015, Anm. 1, II 7b; Open Google Scholar
Wimmer, Klaus /Bornemann, Alexander /Lienau, Marc D., Die Neufassung der EuInsVO, Cologne 2016; Open Google Scholar
Wimmer, Klaus, Die Regelungen zu den synthetischen Sekundarinsolvenzverfahren in der Neufassung der EulnsVO, in: Exner, Joachim/Paulus, Christoph G. (eds), Festschrift für Siegfried Beck zum 70. Geburtstag, Munich 2016, p 587 ff; Open Google Scholar
Wimmer, Klaus, Das Gesetz zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EU) 2015/848 über Insolvenzverfahren, jurisPR-InsR 11/2017 Anm. 1; Open Google Scholar
Wolf, Ulrich M., Der europäische Gerichtsstand bei Konzerninsolvenzen, Tübingen 2012; Open Google Scholar
Wright, David /Fenwick, Sam, Bankruptcy tourism – what it is, how it works and how creditors can fight back, International Insolvency Law Review (IILR) 1 (2012), p 45 ff; Open Google Scholar
Zumbro, Paul H., Cross-border insolvencies and international protocols, Business Law International (Bus. L. Int’l) 11 (2010), p 157 ff; Open Google Scholar
Zweigert, Konrad/Kötz, Hein, Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung: Auf dem Gebiet des Privatrechts, 3rd edn, Tübingen 1996; Open Google Scholar