
Book Titles Open Access Full access
Legislative Remedies before Human Rights Courts
A comparative analysis- Authors:
- Series:
- Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, Volume 345
- Publisher:
- 2025
Summary
This book explores the remedial orders of human rights courts that demand from states the reform of domestic laws. This is the first comprehensive study of legislative remedies; comparatively analysing and normatively assessing the practice of the three regional human rights courts in this regard. It will inquire whether legislative remedies are a particularity of human rights adjudication, as well as when and how they are used and the consequences of this use. The book will also show that the use of legislative remedies reflects to a great extent the self-understanding of each human rights court, as well as the context in which they operate and their evolving role in the respective regions.
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2025
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-7560-2322-6
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-4971-8
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht
- Volume
- 345
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 426
- Product type
- Book Titles
Table of contents
ChapterPages
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- 1. “Legislative …”
- 2. “… Remedies …”
- 3. “…before Human Rights Courts”
- 1. Identifying Legislative Measures: the Special Case of Legislative Remedies before the ECtHR
- 2. Comparing the Three Regional Human Rights Courts
- III. Structure and Overview
- 1. General Obligations to Legislate
- a) Obligations to legislate in order to protect specific rights
- b) Obligations to legislate in order to protect specific groups
- c) Obligations to legislate in order to prevent and punish specific acts
- d) Obligations to modify or repeal domestic laws
- 3. Implicit Obligations to Legislate
- 4. From Obligations to Legislate to Legislative Remedies: Is There a Victims’ Right to Legislative Reforms?
- a) The ‘victim requirement’ before human rights courts
- i. Potential and possible victims before the ECtHR
- ii. Self-executing laws before the IACtHR
- iii. The absence of a victim requirement before the ACtHPR
- 2. The Advisory Review of Legislation
- 3. From the Review of Legislation to Legislative Remedies
- a) Diverging constitutional elements of regional human rights courts
- b) Individual vs. constitutional justice before human rights courts
- 2. Legislative Remedies as a Sign of Increased Constitutionalisation
- a) The effects on the domestic legal order
- b) The predominantly positive nature of legislative remedies before human rights courts
- c) The moment of the legislative process for issuing remedies
- a) The increased intrusiveness of legislative remedies
- b) The legitimacy of legislative remedies
- c) Legislative remedies and the efficiency of human rights courts
- Interim Conclusion: Domestic Laws in Three Stages of Human Rights Adjudication
- 1. The Legal Basis for the ICJ’s Remedial Competence
- 2. The Precedent at the PCIJ: Factory at Chorzów
- a) Cessation in the ICJ’s case law
- b) Legislative reforms as cessation
- a) Restitution in the ICJ’s case law
- b) Legislative reforms as restitution
- a) Compensation in the ICJ’s case law
- b) Legislative reforms as compensation
- a) Satisfaction in the ICJ’s case law
- b) Legislative reforms as satisfaction
- a) Guarantees of non-repetition in the ICJ’s case law
- b) Legislative reforms as guarantees of non-repetition
- Interim Conclusion: The Particular Functions of Remedies in General International Adjudication as a Barrier for Legislative Measures
- 1. The ARSIWA vis-à-vis the UN Basic Principles
- 2. The Special Function of Remedies in International Human Rights Adjudication
- a) The ECHR’s limited remedial provision
- b) The ACHR’s expansive remedial provision
- c) The ACHPR’s concise yet wide remedial provision
- 4. The Specialty of Remedies According to Human Rights Courts
- Interim Conclusion: The Progressive Specialisation of Remedies before Human Rights Courts
- a) The evolution of the ECtHR’s remedial practice
- b) The evolution of the IACtHR’s remedial practice
- c) The evolution of the ACtHPR’s remedial practice
- a) The remedial landscape before the European Court of Human Rights
- b) The remedial landscape before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights
- c) The remedial landscape before the African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights
- a) Restitution
- b) Compensation
- c) Satisfaction
- d) Rehabilitation
- e) Guarantees of Non-Repetition
- 1. The Special Case of Legislative Remedies before the ECtHR
- 2. Human Rights Courts: Positive or Negative Legislators?
- 3. Legislative Remedies as Guarantees of Non-Repetition?
- Interim Conclusion: The Self-Understanding of International Courts in Light of their Remedial Practice
- a) Indigenous communities
- b) Children
- c) Prisoners
- d) Women
- e) Persons with disabilities
- i) The independence of judges and prosecutors
- ii) Restrictions to the military jurisdiction
- b) The right to be judged within a reasonable time
- c) The right to appeal before a higher court
- d) The enforcement of domestic judgments
- e) Other due process rights
- a) Property rights in the context of transitions to democracy
- b) Property rights in the context of state succession
- c) Property rights in post-conflict situations
- d) Property rights of indigenous communities
- a) The incompatibility of electoral laws before the ACtHPR
- b) Prisoners’ voting rights before the ECtHR
- c) Political participation and the rights of elected officials before the IACtHR
- a) Statelessness in the context of state succession
- b) Deprivation of citizenship in the context of migration
- a) The offences of libel, slander and defamation
- b) The regulation of public access to information
- c) Other freedom of expression-related issues
- 7. Amnesty Laws
- 8. Mandatory Death Penalty
- 9. Constitutional Issues
- 10. Codification of Criminal Offences
- 11. Others
- II. Different Intensities in the Use of Legislative Remedies
- Interim Conclusion: A Common Understanding with Different Priorities
- a) Judicial review of legislation and parliamentary sovereignty
- b) The additional complexity of the international judicial review of legislation
- 2. Deference and Democratic Conditions
- 3. A ‘Margin of Deliberation’
- 1. The ECtHR’s Margin of Appreciation Doctrine vis-à-vis the Legislature
- 2. The IACtHR’s Conventionality Control Doctrine vis-à-vis the Legislature
- a) Negative legislative remedies and the specification of a provision
- b) Positive legislative remedies and the specification of an outcome
- c) Neutral legislative remedies and the attached discretion
- a) The European approach: prescribing the introduction of a domestic remedy
- b) The Inter-American approach: referrals to the reasoning
- c) The African approach: prioritising legislative incompatibilities
- Interim Conclusion: A Margin of Deliberation for Legislative Remedies
- a) Resisting the ECtHR
- b) Limiting access to the ACtHPR
- c) Exiting the ACHR
- a) The ‘Interlaken Process’ in Europe
- b) The ‘Five Presidents Declaration’ in the Americas
- 1. Empirical Studies on Compliance with Legislative Remedies
- 2. The Reasons for the Low Rates of Compliance with Legislative Remedies
- 3. Impact beyond Compliance
- 1. Changes in the Use of Legislative Remedies
- 2. Lowering of Compliance Requirements
- Interim Conclusion: System-Dependent Consequences of Legislative Remedies
- I. Main Findings
- II. Nomative Assessment
- BibliographyPages 367 - 396 Download chapter (PDF)
- A. Treaties
- 1. Permanent Court of International Justice
- 2. International Court of Justice
- 3. Inter-American Court of Human Rights
- 4. European Court of Human Rights
- 5. African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights
- 6. Domestic Courts
- 7. Arbitral Aawards
- 1. Organization of American States
- 2. Council of Europe
- 3. African Union
- 4. United Nations
- 5. Others




