Cover of book: Aktuelle Herausforderungen des WTO-Streitbeilegungssystems
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Aktuelle Herausforderungen des WTO-Streitbeilegungssystems

Eine lösungsorientierte Analyse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des korrelativen Einflusses des WTO-Streitbeilegungssystems und der im WTO Agreement normierten Legislativverfahren
Authors:
Publisher:
 2024

Summary

Subject of the work is the solution-oriented analysis of the need for reform of the WTO in the context of its DSM, the judicial pillar of the WTO. Following the WTO DSM, the insufficiency of the legislative pillar of the WTO and the correlative influence of the two pillars are examined. In addition to a need for isolated reform within the pillars, the insights gained in this paper illustrate the necessity for a new understanding of existing concepts in the WTO, such as the WTO as a "member-driven organization", as well as the demand for an overarching reform. On this basis, existing reform proposals are legally and politically reassessed and own reform proposals are developed and drafted de lege ferenda.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2024
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-1904-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4795-0
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht - Studies on International Economic Law
Volume
41
Language
German
Pages
324
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
    1. I. Offene Fragen und Ziel der Arbeit No access
    2. II. Gang der Darstellung No access
      1. 1. Streitbeilegung im allgemeinen Völkerrecht No access
      2. 2. Streitbeilegung nach dem GATT-DSM No access
      3. 3. Verhandlungen zum WTO-DSM während der Uruguay-Runde No access
      1. 1. Organe und Beteiligte des Streitbeilegungsverfahrens No access
        1. a. Streitverfahren im engeren Sinn No access
        2. b. Überwachung der Umsetzung der DSB-Entscheidung und deren Durchsetzung No access
    3. III. Zwischenfazit No access
    1. I. Hintergrund der AB-Blockade No access
      1. 1. Rückgriff auf bestehende Streitbeilegungsmechanismen außerhalb des DSU No access
      2. 2. Übergehung der USA in der WTO oder Schaffung eines neuen Streitbeilegungsmechanismus bzw. einer neuen Welthandelsordnung ohne die USA No access
        1. a. Funktionsweise des MPIA No access
        2. b. Eignung des MPIA als (Interims-)AB-Ersatz No access
        3. c. Zwischenfazit No access
      1. 1. Erhöhung der 90-Tage-Frist No access
        1. a. Einführung eines Seitenlimits für Revisionsanträge No access
        2. b. Reduzierung der Anzahl der Sprachen eines AB-Berichts No access
        3. c. Übergangsregel für ausscheidende AB-Mitglieder (Rule 15) No access
        4. d. Reduzierung von Ausführungen, die nicht unmittelbar zur Entscheidung des Verfahrens beitragen No access
        1. a. Erhöhung der AB-Mitgliederzahl No access
        2. b. Anpassung des Stellenumfangs von Teilzeit auf Vollzeit No access
        3. c. Anhebung der Amtszeit von AB-Mitgliedern No access
      4. 4. Exkurs: Reform der dem AB-Verfahren vorgelagerten DSM-Ebenen No access
      5. 5. Zwischenfazit No access
      1. 1. Abstrakter Prüfungsumfang des AB nach dem DSU No access
        1. a. Historische Aufarbeitung der AB-Berichte zum Prüfungsumfang bei der Revision einer Auslegung nationalen Rechts No access
        2. b. Zulässigkeit des vom AB festgelegten Prüfungsumfangs bei der Revision einer Auslegung nationalen Rechts No access
      3. 3. Zwischenfazit No access
        1. a. Konzept(e) der Präzedenzwirkung und Anknüpfungspunkte hierfür im WTO-DSM No access
        2. b. Historische Aufarbeitung der AB-Berichte zur Präzedenzwirkung im WTO-DSM No access
          1. aa. Generelle Zulässigkeit von Präzedenzwirkung im WTO-DSM No access
          2. bb. Zulässigkeit der intensiven Präzedenzwirkung von AB-Berichten No access
        4. d. Zwischenfazit No access
        1. a. Beispiele für den Vorwurf materieller Kompetenzüberschreitung No access
        2. b. Rechtslage nach dem DSU und deren rechtliche Reformierbarkeit No access
        3. c. Zwischenfazit No access
      1. 1. Abschluss neuer WTO-Abkommen No access
      2. 2. Rechtsänderung i. S. d. Art. X WTO Agreement No access
        1. a. Waiver (Art. IX:3 und 4 WTO Agreement) No access
        2. b. Verbindliche Auslegung (Art. IX:2 WTO Agreement) No access
      4. 4. Zwischenfazit No access
      1. 1. Intensivierung und Optimierung der Arbeitsprozesse in der WTO sowie stärkere Institutionalisierung der WTO No access
      2. 2. Erhöhung der internen und externen Transparenz, Formalisierung der Agendaaufstellung und offizielle Einführung von Koalitionsbildungen No access
      3. 3. Vermeidung von konstruktiv mehrdeutigen Vertragstextformulierungen? No access
        1. a. Das Konsensprinzip als Modus Operandi No access
        2. b. Kritik am Konsensprinzip No access
        3. c. Reformvorschläge im Zusammenhang des Konsensprinzips No access
        4. d. Lehren aus der Beschlussfassungsreform der EU (EG) für die WTO No access
        5. e. Reformvorschläge im Zusammenhang des Single Undertaking-Grundsatzes No access
        1. a. Die WTO als member-driven Organisation – Modernes Verständnis eines veralteten Konzepts No access
          1. aa. Bewertung der Reformvorschläge an den WTO-Kernbereichs-legislativverfahren No access
          2. bb. Bewertung der Reformvorschläge an den Instandhaltungsverfahren des WTO-Rechts No access
          3. cc. Bewertung der Reformvorschläge zur Überwindung des Initiativedefizits zur Durchführung von legislativen Instandhaltungsverfahren No access
        1. a. Beispiel 1: EuGH und BVerfG No access
        2. b. Beispiel 2: IMF No access
        3. c. Beispiel 3: CETA No access
        4. d. Beispiel 4: ICSID und IGH No access
        5. e. Beispiel 5: NAFTA No access
        1. a. Adressat der Vorlagefrage No access
        2. b. Recht und/oder Pflicht zur Vorlage No access
        3. c. Vorgaben für die Form der Vorlage No access
        4. d. Dauer des Vorlageverfahrens No access
        5. e. Verfahren im GC No access
        6. f. Wer soll die Auslegungsfrage vorlegen? No access
      3. 3. Zwischenfazit No access
      1. 1. Möglicher Anwendungsbereich eines Gutachtenverfahrens in der WTO No access
        1. a. Antragsteller und Adressat der Gutachtenfrage No access
        2. b. Inhalt, Form und Ablauf des Gutachtenverfahrens No access
        3. c. Dauer des Gutachtenverfahrens No access
        4. d. Rechtsfolgen des Gutachtenverfahrens No access
      3. 3. Zwischenfazit No access
    5. V. Kommunikationsforum No access
  7. F. Gesamtfazit und Ausblick No access 283 - 298
    1. Literaturverzeichnis No access
    2. Institutionelle Quellen No access

Bibliography (235)

  1. Abbot, Frederick M., The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner at the WTO, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Juni 2002, 469 Open Google Scholar
  2. Abi-Saab, Georges, The Appellate Body and treaty interpretation, in: Sacerdoti/Yanovich/Bohanes (Hrsg.), The WTO at Ten – Contribution to the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge 2006, 453 Open Google Scholar
  3. Agon, Silvan S., International Adjudication on Trial – The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System, Oxford 2019 Open Google Scholar
  4. Alexy, Robert; Dreier, Ralf, Precedent in the Federal Republic of Germany, in: MacCormick/Summers (Hrsg.), Interpreting Precedents – A Comparative Study, Aldershot 1997, 17 Open Google Scholar
  5. Alschner, Wolfgang; Charlotin, Damien, The Growing Complexity of the International Court of Justice’s Self-Citation Network, in: European Journal of International Law, Mai 2018, 83 Open Google Scholar
  6. Alter, Karen J.; Helfer, Laurence R.; Rask Madsen, Mikael, International Court Authority, Oxford 2018 Open Google Scholar
  7. Andersen, Scott; Friedebacher, Todd; Lau, Christian; Lockhart, Nicolas; Remy, Jan Yves; Sandford, Iain, Using Arbitration under Articel 25 DSU to Ensure the Availability of Appeals, CTEI Working Papers (CTEI-2017–17), Graduate Institute Geneva (zit.: Andersen et al., Using Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU to Ensure the Availability of Appeals, CTEI 2017) Open Google Scholar
  8. Andujo, Marta, Mitgliedschaft von Venezuela im Mercosur suspendiert, in: amerika21, 06.08.2017, abrufbar im Internet: https://amerika21.de/2017/08/182048/mercosur-venezuela-suspendiert (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  9. Aust, Anthony, Advisory Opinion, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Februar 2010, 123 Open Google Scholar
  10. Babu, Rajesh R., Decision Making in the WTO: From Negotiated Law-making to Judicial Law-making, in: Chaisse/Lin (Hrsg.), International Economic Law and Governance: Essays in Honour of Mitsuo Matsushita, Oxford 2016, 487 Open Google Scholar
  11. Babu, Rajesh R., WTO Appellate Body Overreach and the Crisis at the Making: A View from the South, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 91 Open Google Scholar
  12. Bacchus, James, Echoing Trump, Biden Embraces International Trade Lawlessness, in: CATO Institute Blog, 12.12.2022, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.cato.org/blog/echoing-trump-biden-embraces-international-trade-lawlessness (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  13. Bacchus, James; Lester, Simon, Of Precedent and Persuasion – The Crucial Role of an Appeals Court in WTO Disputes, in: Free Trade Bulletin, 12.09.2019 Open Google Scholar
  14. Baetens, Freya, Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of Investor-State Dispute Settlement as Compared to WTO Dispute Settlement, in: Bourgeois/Bronckers/Quick (Hrsg.), WTO Dispute Settlement – Time to Take Stock, Bern 2017 Open Google Scholar
  15. Bahri, Amrita, Appellate Body Held Hostage“: Is Judicial Activism at Fair Trial?, in: IEL Working Papers, Paper 03/2019, Institute of European Law Open Google Scholar
  16. Baptista, Luiz O., A country boy goes to Geneva, in: Marceau (Hrsg.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO – The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System, Cambridge 2015, 559 Open Google Scholar
  17. Baquero Cruz, Julio, La unión de Merkel y el punto de vista europeo, in: Claves de Razón Práctica, März 2022, 60 Open Google Scholar
  18. Barrett, Amy C., Statutory Stare Decisis in the Courts of Appeals, in: George Washington Law Review, Januar 2005, 317 Open Google Scholar
  19. Bartels, Lorand, Regional Trade Agreements, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Open Google Scholar
  20. Bell, John, Judiciaries within Europe – A Comparative Review, Cambridge 2006 Open Google Scholar
  21. Bertelsmann Stiftung (Hrsg.), Revitalizing Multilateral Governance at the World Trade Organization – Report of the High-Level Board of Experts on the Future of Global Trade Governance, Gütersloh 2018 Open Google Scholar
  22. Bhala, Raj, The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part Two of a Triology), in: Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, Herbst 1999, 1 Open Google Scholar
  23. Biermann, Frank, The Rising Tide of Green Unilateralism in World Trade Law – Options for Reconciling the Emerging North–South Conflict, in: Journal of World Trade, Juni 2001, 421 Open Google Scholar
  24. Blackhurst, Richard; Hartridge, David, Improving the Capacity of WTO Institutions to Fulfil Their Mandate, in: Journal of International Economic Law, September 2004, 705 Open Google Scholar
  25. Blackhurst, Richard, The Capacity of the WTO to Fulfill Its Mandate, in: Krueger (Hrsg.), The WTO as an International Organization, Chicago 1998, 31 Open Google Scholar
  26. Blackhurst, Richard, The Role of the Director-General and the Secretariat, in: Daunton/Narlikar/Stern (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization, Oxford 2012, 141 Open Google Scholar
  27. Bohanes, Jan; Lockhart, Nicolas, Standard of Review in WTO Law, in: Bethlehem/McRae/Neufeld/Van Damme (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, 08.01.2009 Open Google Scholar
  28. Börnsen, Nils, Nationales Recht in Investitionsschiedsverfahren, Tübingen 2016 Open Google Scholar
  29. Bradley, Kieran, Vertical Precedent at the Court of Justice of the European Union: When Push Comes to Shove, in: Bradley/Travers/Whelan (Hrsg.), Of Courts and Constitutions – Liber Amicorum in Honour of Nial Fennelly, Oxford 2014 Open Google Scholar
  30. Broberg, Morten; Fenger, Niels, Das Vorabentscheidungsverfahren vor dem Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union, Baden-Baden 2014 Open Google Scholar
  31. Broberg, Morten; Fenger, Niels, If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On The Court Of Justice’s Revision Of The Acte Clair Doctrine, in: Common Market Law Review, Juni 2022, 711 Open Google Scholar
  32. Bronckers, Marco C. E. J., Better rules for a new millennium: a warning against undemocratic developments in the WTO, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Dezember 1999, 547 Open Google Scholar
  33. Callies, Christian; Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV – Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 6. Auflage, München 2022 (zit.: Bearbeiter, in: Callies/Ruffert (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV – Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta) Open Google Scholar
  34. Callies, Christian, Rechtsfortbildung und Richterrecht in der EU, in: Berliner Online-Beiträge zum Europarecht, Nr. 28, 28.07.2005, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.jura.fu-berlin.de/forschung/europarecht/bob/berliner_online_beitraege/Paper28-Calliess/Paper28---Rechtsfortbildung-und-Richterrecht-in-der-EU.pdf (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  35. Charnovitz, Steve, How American Rejectionism Undermines International Economic Law, in: Trade, Law and Development, Winter 2018, 226 Open Google Scholar
  36. Chen, Tsai-fang, Judicial Economy and Advisory Opinions of the Appellate Body – Potential Reform of Article 17.12 of the DSU, in Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 185 Open Google Scholar
  37. Condon, Bradly, Translation: Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law Open Google Scholar
  38. Cooper, Bennett E., Certification of questions of law to state supreme courts, Reuters, 22.06.2021, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/certification-questions-law-state-supreme-courts-2021-06-22/ (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  39. Cottier, Thomas; Takenoshita, Satoko, Decision-making and the Balance of Powers in WTO Negotiations: Towards Supplementary Weighted Voting, in: Griller (Hrsg.), At Crossroads: The World Trading System and the Doha Round, Wien 2008, 181 Open Google Scholar
  40. Cottier, Thomas, Recalibrating the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Strengthening the Panel Stage, CIGI Essay Series Modernizing the World Trade Organization, Centre for International Governance Innovation, April 2020, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.cigionline.org/articles/recalibrating-wto-dispute-settlement-system-strengthening-panel-stage/ (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  41. Cottier, Thomas, The WTO Permanent Panel Body: a Bridge Too Far?, in: Journal of International Economic Law, März 2003, 187 Open Google Scholar
  42. Craig, Paul; De Búrca, Gráinne (Hrsg.), The Evolution of EU Law, 3. Auflage, Oxford 2021 (zit.: Bearbeiter, in: Craig/de Búrca (Hrsg.), The Evolution of EU Law) Open Google Scholar
  43. Crawford, James R., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 9. Auflage, Oxford 2019 Open Google Scholar
  44. Creamer, Cosette D., From the WTO’s Crown Jewel to its Crown of Thorns, in: American Journal of International Law Unbound, Februar 2019, 51 Open Google Scholar
  45. Danish; Kwo, Aileen, Lights Go Out at the WTO’s Appellate Body Despite Concessions Offered to US, Policy Brief Nr. 70, in: South Centre, Dezember 2019 Open Google Scholar
  46. Dauses, Manfred A., Das Vorabentscheidungsverfahren nach Art. 177 EG-Vertrag, 2. Auflage, München 1995 Open Google Scholar
  47. De Andrade, Mariana C., Precedent in the WTO: Retrospective Reflections for a Prospective Dispute Settlement Mechanism, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Mai 2020, 262 Open Google Scholar
  48. De Bièvre, Dirk, Legislative and Judicial Decision Making in the World Trade Organization, in: Koenig-Archibugi/Zürn (Hrsg.), New Modes of Governance in the Global System, London 2006, 31 Open Google Scholar
  49. Ding, Ru, The „Public Body” Issue in the WTO: Proposing a Comparative Institutional Approach to International Issues on State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), Dissertation am Georgetown University Law Center, 2018 Open Google Scholar
  50. Dittert, Daniel, Europarecht, 5. Auflage, München 2017 Open Google Scholar
  51. Drazen, Pehar, Use of Ambiguities in Peace Agreements, in: Kurbalija/Slavik (Hrsg.), Language and Diplomacy, Genf/Malta 2001, 163 Open Google Scholar
  52. Dunoff, Jeffrey L.; Pollack, Mark A., The Judicial Trilemma, in: American Journal of International Law, September 2017, 225 Open Google Scholar
  53. Duxbury, Neil, The Nature and Authority of Precedent, Cambridge 2008 Open Google Scholar
  54. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter; Ehring, Lothar, Decision-Making in the World Trade Organization – Is the Consensus Practice of the World Trade Organization adequate for Making, Revising and Implementing Rules on International Trade?, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Januar 2005, 51 Open Google Scholar
  55. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, Six years on the bench of the „World Trade Court“– Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, in: Journal of World Trade, August 2002, 605 Open Google Scholar
  56. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter; Ehring, Lothar, The Authoritative Interpretation Under Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization: Current Law, Practice and Possible Improvements, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Dezember 2005, 803 Open Google Scholar
  57. Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter, The Workload of the WTO Appellate Body: Problems and Remedies, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Juli 2017, 705 Open Google Scholar
  58. Elgindy, Khaled, When Ambiguity is Destructive, in: Brookings Institution, 22.01.2014, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/when-ambiguity-is-destructive/ (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  59. Elsig, Manfred; Eckhardt, Jappe, The Creation of the Multilateral Trade Court: Design and Experiential Learning, in: World Trade Review, Juli 2015, 13 Open Google Scholar
  60. Elsig, Manfred, WTO Decision-Making: Can We Get a Little Help from the Secretariat and the Critical Mass?, in: Steger (Hrsg.), Redesigning the World Trade Organization for the Twenty-first Century, Ottawa 2009, 67 Open Google Scholar
  61. Enders, Theodor, Grundzüge des Internationalen Wirtschaftsrechts – Internationales Privatrecht, Europäisches Wirtschaftsrecht, Welthandelsrecht, 3. Auflage, München 2021 Open Google Scholar
  62. Epping, Volker; Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff (Hrsg.), Völkerrecht, 7. Auflage, München 2018 (zit.: Bearbeiter, in: Epping/Heintschel von Heinegg (Hrsg.), Völkerrecht) Open Google Scholar
  63. Erixon, Fredrik, After the Bali Agreement: Lessons from the Doha Round for the WTO’s Post-Bali Agenda, ECIPE Policy Brief, Nr. 02/2014, European Centre for International Political Economy Open Google Scholar
  64. Esty, Daniel C., Good Governance at the World Trade Organization: Building a Foundation of Administrative Law, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Juli 2007, 509 Open Google Scholar
  65. Fukunaga, Yuka, Interpretative Authority of the Appellate Body: Replies to the Criticism by the United States, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 167 Open Google Scholar
  66. Fukunaga, Yuka, The Appellate Body’s Power to Interpret the WTO Agreements and the WTO Members’ Power to Disagree with the Appellate Body, in: Journal of World Investment & Trade, Dezember 2019, 792 Open Google Scholar
  67. Furculita, Cornelia, FTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Alternative Fora for Trade Disputes – The Case of CETA and EUJEPA, in: Weiß/Furculita (Hrsg.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy. European Yearbook of International Law 2020, 89 Open Google Scholar
  68. Gallardo-Salazar, Natalia; Tijmes-Ihl, Jaime, Dispute Settlement at the World Trade Organization, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the Pacific Alliance, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Februar 2021, 638 Open Google Scholar
  69. Ganesan, Arumugamangalam V., The Appellate Body in its formative years – A personal perspective, in: Marceau (Hrsg.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO – The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System, Cambridge 2015 Open Google Scholar
  70. Gao, Henry, Dictum on Dicta: Obiter Dicta in WTO Disputes, in: World Trade Review, Mai 2018, 509 Open Google Scholar
  71. Gao, Henry, Disruptive Construction or Constructive Destruction? Reflections on the Appellate Body Crisis, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 215 Open Google Scholar
  72. Gazzini, Tarcisio, Can Authoritative Interpretation under Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the WTO Modify the Rights and Obligations of Members?, in: International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Januar 2008, 169 Open Google Scholar
  73. Glöckle, Caroline; Würdemann, Aike, Die Appellate Body-Krise der WTO – eine Analyse der US-Kritikpunkte, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Dezember 2018, 976 Open Google Scholar
  74. Gorbylev, Sergei; Novakovic, Milica, Retaliation under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing Problem“, in: The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, August 2013, 118 Open Google Scholar
  75. Grabitz, Eberhard; Hilf, Meinhard; Nettesheim, Martin (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union – EUV/ AEUV, 78. Ergänzungslieferung, München 2023 (zit.: Bearbeiter, in: Grabitz/Hilf/Nettesheim, Das Recht der Europäischen Union – EUV/AEUV) Open Google Scholar
  76. Guan, Wenwei, Consensus Yet Not Consented: A Critique of the WTO Decision-Making by Consensus, in Journal of International Economic Law, März 2014, 77 Open Google Scholar
  77. Herdegen, Matthias, Europarecht, 23. Auflage, München 2022 Open Google Scholar
  78. Herdegen, Matthias, Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 12. Auflage, München 2020 Open Google Scholar
  79. Herdegen, Matthias, Völkerrecht, 21. Auflage, München 2022 Open Google Scholar
  80. Hilf, Meinhard; Oeter, Stefan (Hrsg.), WTO-Recht, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden 2010 Open Google Scholar
  81. Hillebrand Pohl, Jens, Blueprint für a Plurilateral WTO Arbitration Agreement unter Article 25 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding, in: Prévost/Alexovicová/Hillebrand Pohl (Hrsg.), Restoring Trust in Trade. Liber Amicorum in Honour of Peter Van den Bossche, 13.12.2018, 139 Open Google Scholar
  82. Hillman, Jennifer A., A Reset of the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body, in: Council in Foreign Relations, 14.01.2020 Open Google Scholar
  83. Hillman, Jennifer A., Conflicts between Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO – What Should WTO Do, in: Cornell International Law Journal, Frühjahr 2009, 193 Open Google Scholar
  84. Hillman, Jennifer A., Independence at the Top of the Triangle: Best Resolution of the Judicial Trilemma?, in: American Journal of International Law, November 2017, 364 Open Google Scholar
  85. Hillman, Jennifer A., Three Approaches to fixing the World Trade Organizations’s Appellate Body: The good, the bad and the ugly?, Institute of International Economic Law Issues Brief, Dezember 2018 Open Google Scholar
  86. Hillman, Jennifer A., Transcript of the Remarks of Jennifer Hillman at the GBD Colloquium „DISPUTED COURT: A Look at the Challenges To (And From) The WTO Dispute Settlement System“, 20.12.2017, abrufbar im Internet: http://www.gbdinc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/C245-Transcript-HILLMAN-12-20-2017.pdf (Stand 02.11.2023) (zit.: Hillman, GBD Colloquium 2017) Open Google Scholar
  87. Hirsch, Günter, Der Richter im Spannungsverhältnis von Erster und Dritter Gewalt – Ansprache des Präsidenten des Bundesgerichtshofes Prof. Dr. Günter Hirsch beim Festakt aus Anlass des 10. Gründungstags des Brandenburgischen Oberlandesgerichts, 03.12.2003 (zit.: Hirsch, Der Richter im Spannungsverhältnis von Erster und Dritter Gewalt) Open Google Scholar
  88. Hoekman, Bernard M.; Mavroidis, Petros C., Burning Down the House? The Appellate Body in the Centre of the WTO Crisis, in: EUI Working Paper (RSCAS 2019/56), European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Open Google Scholar
  89. Hoekman, Bernard M., Proposals for WTO Reform: A Synthesis and Assessment, in: Daunton/Narlikar/Stern (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization, Oxford 2012, 743 Open Google Scholar
  90. Hoekman, Bernard M., Urgent and Important: Improving WTO Performance by Revisiting Working Practices, in: Journal of World Trade, Juni 2019, 373 Open Google Scholar
  91. Hoekman, Bernard M.; Mavroidis, Petros C., WTO-Reform: Back to the Past to Build for the Future, in: Global Policy, Special Issue, April 2021, 5 Open Google Scholar
  92. Howse, Robert, The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body, Jurisprudence on the Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power, in: Cottier/Mavroidis (Hrsg.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO, Michigan 2003, 11 Open Google Scholar
  93. Huber, Peter M., Warum der EuGH Kontrolle braucht, in: Sächsische Verwaltungsblätter, Oktober 2022, 273 Open Google Scholar
  94. Hufbauer, Gary C., Inconsistency Between Diagnosis and Treatment, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Juni 2005, 291 Open Google Scholar
  95. Hufbauer, Gary C.; Schott, Jeffrey J., Will the World Trade Organization Enjoy a Bright Future?, in: Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, Mai 2012 Open Google Scholar
  96. Hughes, Valerie, The Institutional Dimension, in: Bethlehem/McRae/Neufeld/Van Damme (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, Oxford 2009, 269 Open Google Scholar
  97. Jackson, John H., Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law, Cambridge 2006 Open Google Scholar
  98. Jackson, John H., The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2. Auflage, Cambridge 1997 Open Google Scholar
  99. Jackson, John H., The WTO ‚constitution’ and proposed reforms: seven ‚mantras’ revisited, in: Journal of International Economic Law, März 2001, 67 Open Google Scholar
  100. Jegen, Maya; Mérand, Frédéric, Constructive Ambiguity: Does it Work? – Comparing the European Union’s Energy and Defense Policies, in: West European Politics, Januar 2014, 182 Open Google Scholar
  101. Jones, Kent, The Doha Blues: Institutional Crisis and Reform in the WTO, Oxford 2009 Open Google Scholar
  102. Jorgensen, Sandra K.; McDonough, Patrick J.; Smith, Jennifer M.; Stewart, Terence P., The Increasing Recognition of Problems with WTO Appellate Body Decision-Making: Will the Message Be Heard?, in: Global Trade and Customs Journal, Dezember 2013, 390 Open Google Scholar
  103. Karttunen, Marianna B., Transparency in the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements – The Real Jewel in the Crown, Cambridge 2020 Open Google Scholar
  104. Kawase, Tsuyoshi; Nakagawa, Junji; Perezcano Diaz, Hugo; Wilson, Keith W. C.; Chi, Manjiao; Coelho, Carlos; Draper, Peter; Findlay, Christopher, Reforming the WTO AB: Short-term and Mid-term Options for DSU Reform, and Alternative Approaches in a Worst Case Scenario, Tokyo 2019 (zit.: Kawase et al., Reforming the WTO AB: Short-term and Mid-term Options for DSU Reform, and Alternative Approaches in a Worst Case Scenario) Open Google Scholar
  105. Kempen, Bernhard; Hillgruber, Christian, Völkerrecht, 2. Auflage, Heidelberg 2018 Open Google Scholar
  106. Kobayashi, Tomohiko, The Use of Panel Process to Improve the Function of the Appellate Body: A Proposal to Utilize the Expert Review Group, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 199 Open Google Scholar
  107. Kohen, Marcelo G.; Del Mar, Katherine, The Kosovo Advisory Opinion and UNSCR 1244 (1999): A Declaration of ‘Independence from International Law’?, in: Leiden Journal of International Law, März 2011, 109 Open Google Scholar
  108. König, Valériane, Präzedenzwirkung internationaler Schiedssprüche – Dogmatisch-empirische Analysen zur Handels- und Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Berlin 2014 Open Google Scholar
  109. Kotzampasakis, Manolis, The WTO Appellate Body Crisis: a legal assessment in search of a solution, in: ResearchGate, 15.05.2020 Open Google Scholar
  110. Krajewski, Markus, Völkerrecht, 3. Auflage, Baden-Baden 2023 Open Google Scholar
  111. Krajewski, Markus, Wirtschaftsvölkerrecht, 4. Auflage, Heidelberg 2017 Open Google Scholar
  112. Kuijper, Pieter Jan, The US attack on the WTO Appellate Body, in: ACIL Research Paper 2017–29, Amsterdam Center for International Law Open Google Scholar
  113. Lacerda Prazeres, Tatiana; Tinline, David, 5 reasons why the role of the WTO Directos-General matters, in: World Economic Forum, 05.06.2020, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/5-reasons-why-the-world-trade-organization-wto-director-general-position-matters-roberto-azevedo-step-down/ (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  114. Lamy, Pascal, Trump’s protectionism might just save the WTO, in: Washington Post, 12.11.2018 Open Google Scholar
  115. Lang, Andrew, The Judicial Sensibility of the WTO Appellate Body, in: European Journal of International Law, Januar 2016, 1095 Open Google Scholar
  116. Larsson, Olof, Political and constitutional overrides: the case of the Court of Justice of European Union, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Dezember 2021, 1932 Open Google Scholar
  117. Latzel, Clemens; Streinz, Thomas, Das richtige Vorabentscheidungsersuchen, in: Neue Juristische Online-Zeitschrift, Januar 2013, 97 Open Google Scholar
  118. Lawrence, Robert Z., Rulemaking Amidst Growing Diversity: A Club-of-Clubs Approach to WTO Reform and New Issue Selection, in: Journal of International Economic Law, November 2006, 823 Open Google Scholar
  119. Lee, Jaemin, The WTO Appellate Body as a Trailblazer – Facilitation of Appellate Mechanism Discussion in Other International Courts, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 303 Open Google Scholar
  120. Lee, Po-Ching, Appointment and Reappointment of the Appellate Body Members: Judiciary or Politics, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 255 Open Google Scholar
  121. Lehne, Jens, Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO AB by the USA Legally Justified?, Berlin 2019 Open Google Scholar
  122. Lester, Simon, The Appellate Body’s Review of the Meaning of Domestic Law, in: International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 04.03.2018, abrufbar im Internet: https://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2018/03/appellate-body-factual-questions.html (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  123. Li, Qi, Research on the Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, in: Studies in Law and Justice, März 2023, 50 Open Google Scholar
  124. Limante, Agne, Recent Developments in the Acte Clair Case Law of the EU Court of Justice: Towards a more Flexible Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, November 2016, 1384 Open Google Scholar
  125. Lo, Chang-fa, A Proper Balance Between WTO’s Members-Driven Nature and the Appellate Body’s Role as an Adjudicator – Careful Exercise of Judicial Activism, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 125 Open Google Scholar
  126. Lockhart, John; Voon, Tania, Reviewing Appellate Review in the WTO Dispute Settlement System, in: Melbourne Journal of International Law, Oktober 2005, 474 Open Google Scholar
  127. Loesewitz, Marc, Das WTO Dispute Settlement System in der Krise, in: Tietje/Kraft/Kumpan (Hrsg.), Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, Heft 165, Juni 2019 Open Google Scholar
  128. Low, Patrick, WTO Decision-Making for the Future, WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011–05, 02.05.2011 Open Google Scholar
  129. Lübbe-Wolff, Gertrude, Das Prinzip der praktischen Konkordanz, in: Herrmann/Krämer (Hrsg.), Festschrift für Christian Kirchberg zum 70. Geburtstag, Stuttgart 2017, 143 Open Google Scholar
  130. Lundmark, Thomas, The Methodology of Using Precedents, in: Clausen/Kronborg/Legind/Mortensen (Hrsg.), Festskrift til Hans Viggo Godsk Pedersen, Kopenhagen 2017, 335 Open Google Scholar
  131. Magnus, John, Transcript of the Remarks of John Magnus at the GBD Colloquium „DISPUTED COURT: A Look at the Challenges To (And From) The WTO Dispute Settlement System“, 20.12.2017, abrufbar im Internet: http://www.gbdinc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/C245-Dispute-Settlement-Transcript-of-Remarks-by-John-Magnus-12-20-2017.pdf (Stand 02.11.2023) (zit.: Magnus, GBD Colloquium 2017) Open Google Scholar
  132. Majchrowska, Elzbieta, EU’s Activities for the Modernisation of the WTO – Towards the Reconstruction of the Organization’s Position in the World Economy, in: Krkowskie Studia Miedzynarodowe 2021, 67 Open Google Scholar
  133. Marceau, Gabrielle, Wyatt, Julian, Dispute Settlement Regimes Intermingled, Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Februar 2010, 67 Open Google Scholar
  134. Martens, Sebastian A. E., Die Werte des Stare Decisis, Juristen Zeitung, April 2011 Open Google Scholar
  135. Matsushita, Mitsuo, Reforming the Appellate Body, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 43 Open Google Scholar
  136. Matsushita, Mitsuo, The Dispute Settlement Mechanism At The WTO: The Appellate Body – Assessment And Problems, in: Daunton/Narlikar/Stern (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization, Oxford 2012, 507 Open Google Scholar
  137. Mavroidis, Petros C., Amicus Curiae Briefs Before The WTO: Much Ado About Nothing, in: Jean Monnet Working Paper 2/01 Open Google Scholar
  138. Mavroidis, Petros C.; Prusa, Thomas J., Die Another Day – Zeroing in on Targeted Dumping: Did the AB Hit the Mark in US – Washing Machines?, in: EUI Working Paper (RSCAS 2018/01), European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Open Google Scholar
  139. Mayer, Franz C., Kompetenzüberschreitung und Letztentscheidung: Das Maastricht-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und die Letztentscheidung über Ultra vires-Akte in Mehrebenensystemen – Eine rechtsvergleichende Betrachtung von Konflikten zwischen Gerichten am Beispiel der EU und der USA, München 2000 Open Google Scholar
  140. Mayr, Teresa F.; Mayr-Singer, Jelka, Keep the Wheels Spinning: The Contributions of Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice to the Development of International Law, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 2016, 425 Open Google Scholar
  141. McDougall, Robert, Crisis in the WTO – Restoring the WTO Dispute Settlement Function, CIGI Papers Nr. 194, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Oktober 2018 Open Google Scholar
  142. McDougall, Robert, Impasse in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body: Consequences and Responses, European Centre for International Political Economy Policy Brief, Nr. 11/2018 Open Google Scholar
  143. McDougall, Robert, Regional Trade Agreement Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Modes, Challenges and Options for Effective Dispute Resolution, in: RTA Exchange, Issue Paper April 2018 Open Google Scholar
  144. Mead, Joseph W., Stare Decisis in the Inferior Courts of the United States, in: Nevada Law Journal, Herbst 2012, 787 Open Google Scholar
  145. Meagher, Niall, The Judicial Style of the Appellate Body, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 141 Open Google Scholar
  146. Mildner, Stormy-Annika; Unger, Eckard von; Tepper, Katherine, WTO – die Hüterin des Welthandels in der Krise, in: Wirtschaftsdienst, Mai 2020, 332 Open Google Scholar
  147. Miles, Tom, WTO should prepare for life without U.S., ex-chief Lamy says, in: Reuters, 19.02.2018, abrufbar im Internet https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-wto-idUSKCN1G326S (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  148. Millet, François-Xavier, Cilfit Still Fits – ECJ 6 October 2021, Case C-561/19, Consorzio Italian Management, in: European Constitutional Law Review, September 2022, 533 Open Google Scholar
  149. Möllers, Christoph, Gewaltengliederung – Legitimation und Dogmatik im nationalen und internationalen Rechtsvergleich, Tübingen 2005 Open Google Scholar
  150. Morgandi, Tibsay, Recognising the ILO Fundamental Labour Rights at the WTO: A Call for An Authoritative Interpretation, in: International Lawyers Assisting Workers Network, März 2022 Open Google Scholar
  151. Murphy, Sean D., Self-Defense and the Israeli Wall Advisory Opinion: An Ipse Dixit from the ICJ?, in: American Journal of International Law, Februar 2017, 62 Open Google Scholar
  152. Narayanan, Shri S., Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: Need for Improvement and Clarification, in: ICRIER Working Paper No. 117, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, Dezember 2003 Open Google Scholar
  153. Narlikar, Amrita, Collective Agency, Systemic Consequences: Bargaining Coalitions in the WTO, in: Daunton/Narlikar/Stern (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization, Oxford 2012, 184 Open Google Scholar
  154. Novak, Stéphanie, The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union, in: Journal of Common Law Market Studies, Juli 2013, 1 Open Google Scholar
  155. Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law – How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law, Cambridge 2003 Open Google Scholar
  156. Pauwelyn, Joost, The WTO’s Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA): What’s New?, in: World Trade Review, Juni 2023, 1 Open Google Scholar
  157. Pauwelyn, Joost, The WTO 20 Years On: ‘Global Governance by Judiciary’ or, Rather, Member-driven Settlement of (Some) Trade Disputes between (Some) WTO Members?, in: European Journal of International Law, Dezember 2016, 1119 Open Google Scholar
  158. Pauwelyn, Joost; Pelc, Krzysztof, Who Guards the „Guardians of the System“? The Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement, in American Journal of International Law, Juli 2022, 534 Open Google Scholar
  159. Pauwelyn, Joost, WTO Dispute Settlement Post 2019: What to expect? What choices to make?, in: Journal of International Economic Law, September 2019, 297 Open Google Scholar
  160. Payandeh, Mehrdad, Judikative Rechtserzeugung – Theorie, Dogmatik und Methodik der Wirkungen von Präjudizien, Tübingen 2017 Open Google Scholar
  161. Payosova, Tetyana; Hufbauer, Gary C.; Schott, Jeffrey J., The Dispute Settlement Crisis in the World Trade Organization: Causes and Cures, in: Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, März 2018 Open Google Scholar
  162. Pearson, Dan, Fix the WTO Appellate Body while we can, in: The HILL, 13.02.2020 Open Google Scholar
  163. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Between „Member-Driven Governance“ and „Judicialization“: Constitutional and Judicial Dilemmas in the World Trading System, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 15 Open Google Scholar
  164. Picker, Colin B., The AB Crisis as Symptomatic of the WTO’s Foundational Defects – or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the AB, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 53 Open Google Scholar
  165. Pomerance, Michla, Pomerance, The ICJ's Advisory Jurisdiction and the Crumbling Wall between the Political and the Judicial, in: American Journal of International Law, Januar 2005, 26 Open Google Scholar
  166. Preußler, Lukas, Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité – Perspektiven konkreter Normenkontrolle in Frankreich, Frankfurt am Main 2015 Open Google Scholar
  167. Price, Victoria C., New Institutional Development in GATT, in: Minnesota Journal of International Law, 1992, 87 Open Google Scholar
  168. Prieß, Hans-Joachim; Berrisch, Georg M. (Hrsg.), WTO-Handbuch, München 2003 (zit.: Bearbeiter, in: Prieß/Berrisch (Hrsg.), WTO-Handbuch) Open Google Scholar
  169. Raina, Akhil, Meditations in an Emergency: The Appellate Body Deadlock – What it is, why it is a Problem, and what to do about it, IIL Working Paper Nr. 199, Institute for International Law, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, März 2018 Open Google Scholar
  170. Reinisch, August, The Role of Precendent in ICSID Arbitration, in: Klausegger et al. (Hrsg.), Austrian Arbitration Yearbook 2008, Bern 2008 Open Google Scholar
  171. Roberts, Anthea, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, in: American Journal of International Law, April 2010, 179 Open Google Scholar
  172. Roessler, Frieder, Dispute Settlement in the WTO – From a Deliberately Designed to a Spontaneously Grown Order, in: Elsig/Hoekman/Pauwelyn (Hrsg.), Assessing the World Trade Organization. Fit for Purpose?, Cambridge 2017 Open Google Scholar
  173. Rubini, Luca, Guest Post: ‘The crown and the jewel’ The rise and fall of the WTO Appellate Body: a critical analysis, in: International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 15.10.2021, abrufbar im Internet: https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2021/10/guest-post-the-crown-and-the-jewel-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-wto-appellate-body-a-critical-analysis.html (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  174. Rudisch, Susanne, Die institutionelle Struktur der Welthandelsorganisation (WTO): Reformüberlegungen, in: Tietje/Kraft (Hrsg.), Arbeitspapiere aus dem Institut für Wirtschaftsrecht, Heft 2, April 2002 Open Google Scholar
  175. Sacerdoti, Giorgio, The Dispute Settlement System of the W.T.O.: Structure and Function in the Perspective of the First 10 Years, Bocconi University, IDC Research Paper Nr. 07–03, 2007, Institutes of Comparative Law Open Google Scholar
  176. Sacerdoti, Giorgio, The WTO Dispute Settlement System and the Challenges to Multilateralism: Consolidating a ’Common Global Good’, in: Prévost/Alexovicová/Hillebrand Pohl (Hrsg.), Restoring Trust in Trade. Liber Amicorum in Honour of Peter Van den Bossche, 13.12.2018, 87 Open Google Scholar
  177. Sacerdoti, Giorgio, The WTO Dispute Settlement System – Consolidating Success and Confronting New Challenges, in: Elsig/Hoekman/Pauwelyn (Hrsg.), Assessing the World Trade Organization – Fit for Purpose?, Cambridge 2017, 147 Open Google Scholar
  178. Sandrock, Corinna, Allgemeine Rechtsgrundsätze im Verfahrensrecht der WTO, Heidelberg 2004 Open Google Scholar
  179. Schmitt, Michael N., The International Court of Justice and the Use of Nuclear Weapons, in: Naval War College Review, Frühling 1998, 91 Open Google Scholar
  180. Schoenbaum, Thomas J., WTO Dispute Settlement: Praise and Suggestion for Reform, in: International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Juli 1998, 647 Open Google Scholar
  181. Schorkopf, Frank, Gesetzgebung durch Höchstgerichte und Parlamente – Zu Anspruch und Versuch einer gewaltenübergreifenden Korrektur von Rechtsprechungsrecht, in: Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, November 2019, 144 Open Google Scholar
  182. Siltala, Raimo, A Theory of Precedent – From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law, London 2000 Open Google Scholar
  183. Simões, Fernando D., Should Appellate Body Members Work Full Time?, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 273 Open Google Scholar
  184. Steger, Debra P., Improvements and Reform at the WTO Appellate Body, in: Ortino/Petersmann (Hrsg.), The WTO Dispute Settlement System, Alphen aan den Rijn 2004, 41 Open Google Scholar
  185. Steger, Debra P., Strengthening the WTO Rulemaking Function, in: Modernizing the World Trade Organization, CIGI Essay Series, Centre for International Governance Innovation, 11.05.2020, 97 Open Google Scholar
  186. Steger, Debra P., The founding of the Appellate Body, in: Marceau (Hrsg.), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO – The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System, Cambridge 2015, 447 Open Google Scholar
  187. Steger, Debra P., The Future of the WTO: The Case for Institutional Reform, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Dezember 2009 Open Google Scholar
  188. Stein, Torsten; Von Buttlar, Christian; Kotzur, Markus, Völkerrecht, 14. Auflage, München 2017 Open Google Scholar
  189. Steinberg, Richard H., In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO, in: International Organization, Juli 2002, 339 Open Google Scholar
  190. Steinberg, Richard H., Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints, in: American Journal of International Law, April 2004, 247 Open Google Scholar
  191. Stoler, Andrew, Crisis in the WTO Appellate Body and the Need for wider WTO Reform Negotiations, Policy Brief Nr. 01, University of Adelaide, Institute for International Trade, März 2019 Open Google Scholar
  192. Streinz, Rudolf, Europarecht, 12. Auflage, München 2023 Open Google Scholar
  193. Sutherland, Peter; Bhagwati, Jagdish; Botchwey, Kwesi; FitzGerald, Niall; Hamada, Koichi; Jackson, John H.; Lafer, Celso; De Montbrial, Thierry, The Future of the WTO – Addressing institutional challenges in the new millennium, Report by the Consultative Board to the Director-General Supachai Panitchpakdi, Genf 2004 Open Google Scholar
  194. Tams, Christian J., An Appealing Option? The Debate about an ICSID Appellate Structure, in: Tietje/Kraft/Kumpan (Hrsg.), Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, Heft 57, Juni 2006 Open Google Scholar
  195. Taruffo, Michel; La Torre, Massimo, Precedent in Italy, in: MacCormick/Summers (Hrsg.), Interpreting Precedents – A Comparative Study, Aldershot 1997, 141 Open Google Scholar
  196. Terhechte, Jörg P., Im Dienste der Demokratie? – Das institutionelle Gleichgewicht in der Gemeinsamen Handelspolitik der EU, in: EKH Discussion Paper Nr. 1/19, Europa Kolleg Hamburg – Institute for European Integration, August 2019 Open Google Scholar
  197. Tietje, Christian; Nowrot, Karsten (Hrsg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 3. Auflage, Berlin 2021 Open Google Scholar
  198. Tirkey, Aarshi, The WTO’s appellate body crisis: Implications for trade rules and multilateralism, in: Observer Research Foundation, 13.01.2020 Open Google Scholar
  199. Tirkey, Aarshi; Pradeep, Shiny, The WTO Crisis: Exploring Interim Solutions for India’s Trade Disputes, in: Observer Research Foundation, 22.09.2020 Open Google Scholar
  200. Tomuschat, Christian, Die gerichtliche Vorabentscheidung nach den Verträgen über die europäischen Gemeinschaften, Köln, Berlin 1964 Open Google Scholar
  201. Tomuschat, Christian, International Courts and Tribunals, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Open Google Scholar
  202. Torres, Hector, An Opportunity for the WTO, in: Project Syndicate, 30.10.2017, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/wto-ministerial-conference-reform-by-hector-r-torres-2017-10 (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  203. Torres, Hector, Argentina: An Opportunity to Rethink the WTO’s Working Practices, CIGI Papers Nr. 143, Centre for International Governance Innovation, September 2017 Open Google Scholar
  204. Troper, Michel; Grzegorczyk, Christophe, Precedent in France, in: MacCormick/Summers (Hrsg.), Interpreting Precedents – A Comparative Study, Aldershot 1997, 103 Open Google Scholar
  205. Tschentscher, Axel, Demokratische Legitimation der dritten Gewalt, Tübingen 2006 Open Google Scholar
  206. Urmersbach, Bruno, Die 20 größten Exportländer weltweit im Jahr 2020, 27.04.2021, abrufbar im Internet https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/37013/umfrage/ranking-der-top-20-exportlaender-weltweit/ (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  207. Urmersbach, Bruno, Die 20 größten Importländer weltweit im Jahr 2020, 27.04.2021, abrufbar im Internet https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/157858/umfrage/groesste-importlaender-weltweit/#professional (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  208. Urmersbach, Bruno, Ranking der 20 Länder mit dem größten BIP im Jahr 2020, 12.05.2021, abrufbar im Internet https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/157841/umfrage/ranking-der-20-laender-mit-dem-groessten-bruttoinlandsprodukt/ (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  209. Van Damme, Isabelle, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body, in: European Journal of International Law, August 2010, 605 Open Google Scholar
  210. Van den Bossche, Peter, Appellate Body: Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization (WTO), in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law Open Google Scholar
  211. Van den Bossche, Peter; Prévost, Denise, Essentials of WTO Law, Cambridge 2021 Open Google Scholar
  212. Van den Bossche, Peter, Farewell speech of Appellate Body member Peter Van den Bossche, 28.05.2019, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/farwellspeech_peter_van_den_bossche_e.htm (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  213. Van den Bossche, Peter, From Afterthought to Centerpiece – The WTO Appellate Body and its Rise to Prominence in the World Trading System, in: Maastricht Working Paper 2005/1, Universiteit Maastricht, Oktober 2005 Open Google Scholar
  214. Vidigal, Geraldo, Living without the Appellate Body: Multilateral, Bilateral and Plurilateral Solutions to the WTO Dispute Settlement Crisis, in: Journal of World Investment & Trade, Dezember 2019, 862 Open Google Scholar
  215. Vidigal, Geraldo, Sequencing: Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization (WTO), in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law Open Google Scholar
  216. Vidigal, Geraldo, Why Is There So Little Litigation under Free Trade Agreements? Retaliation and Adjudication in International Dispute Settlement, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Dezember 2017 Open Google Scholar
  217. Von Arnauld, Andreas¸ Völkerrecht, 2. Auflage, Heidelberg 2014 Open Google Scholar
  218. Von der Groeben, Hans; Schwarze, Jürgen; Hatje, Armin (Hrsg.), Europäisches Unionsrecht, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden 2015 (zit.: Bearbeiter, in: Von der Groeben/Schwarze/Hatje (Hrsg.), Europäisches Unionsrecht) Open Google Scholar
  219. Voon, Tania; Yanovich, Alan, The Facts Aside: The Limitation of WTO Appeals to Issues of Law, in: Journal of World Trade, April 2006, 239 Open Google Scholar
  220. Voßkuhle, Andreas, Der europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund, in: Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Januar 2010, 1 Open Google Scholar
  221. Wagner, Markus, The Impending Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: From Centrepiece to Historical Relic?, in: Lo/Nakagawa/Chen (Hrsg.), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Singapur 2020, 67 Open Google Scholar
  222. Walter, Konrad F., Rechtsfortbildung durch den EuGH – Eine rechtsmethodische Untersuchung ausgehend von der deutschen und französischen Methodenlehre, Berlin 2009 Open Google Scholar
  223. Walter, Maja K., Verfassungsprozessuale Umbrüche – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zur französischen Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité, Tübingen 2015 Open Google Scholar
  224. Warwick Commission, The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward?, Nottingham 2007 Open Google Scholar
  225. Wauters, Jasper M., The Role of the WTO Secretariat in WTO Disputes – Silent Witness or Ghost Expert?, in: Global Policy, Special Issue, April 2021, 83 Open Google Scholar
  226. Weber, Daniel, Prozessuale Aspekte der Streitbeilegung im institutionellen Rahmen der Welthandelsorganisation (WTO), Witten 2007 Open Google Scholar
  227. Weerth, Carsten, Europäische Union der verschiedenen Geschwindigkeiten, in: Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, 25.10.2018, abrufbar im Internet: https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/europaeische-union-der-verschiedenen-geschwindigkeiten-54512/version-339806 (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  228. Weiler, Joseph H. H., Cancelling Carl Schmitt?, in: EJIL Talk, 13.08.2021, abrufbar im Internet: https://www.ejiltalk.org/cancelling-carl-schmitt/ (Stand 02.11.2023) Open Google Scholar
  229. Weiler, Joseph H. H., The Transformation of Europe, in: The Yale Law Journal, Juni 1991, 2403 Open Google Scholar
  230. Widiatedja, I Gusti N. P., The Evolution of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Preferential Trade Agreements [PTAs]: The Case of Indonesia, in: Asian Journal of International Law, 28.08.2020 Open Google Scholar
  231. Wilkinson, Rorden, Of Butchery and Bicycles: The WTO and the ’Death’ of the Doha Development Agenda, in: The Political Quarterly, April 2012, 395 Open Google Scholar
  232. Wolfe, Robert, The WTO Single Undertaking as Negotiating Technique and Constitutive Metaphor, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Dezember 2009, 835 Open Google Scholar
  233. Wolff, Alan W., Revitalizing the World Trading System, Cambridge 2023 Open Google Scholar
  234. Zarbiyev, Fuad, Judicial Activism in International Law – A Conceptual Framework for Analysis, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Juni 2012, 247 Open Google Scholar
  235. Zhou, Weihuan; Gao, Henry S., ‚Overreaching’ or ‚Overreacting’? Reflections on the Judicial Function and Approaches of WTO Appellate Body, in: Journal of World Trade, Dezember 2019, 951 Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Book Titles No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex