Cover of book: Eilschiedsrichterverfahren in der Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit aus rechtlicher und ökonomischer Perspektive
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Eilschiedsrichterverfahren in der Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit aus rechtlicher und ökonomischer Perspektive

Authors:
Publisher:
 18.02.2021

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2021
Publication date
18.02.2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7030-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1153-1
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht
Volume
36
Language
German
Pages
263
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 12
    1. A. Die Verbreitung des Eilschiedsrichters in der internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit No access
    2. B. Struktur und Ziele der Untersuchung No access
    3. C. Abgrenzung des Untersuchungsgegenstandes No access
    4. D. Terminologie und Begriffsbestimmungen No access
    1. A. Interessenlagen in Auslandsinvestitionssachverhalten No access
          1. a) Direktinvestitionen No access
          2. b) Portfolioinvestitionen No access
        2. 2. Investitionsbegriff in Investitionsschutzabkommen No access
        3. 3. Investitionsbegriff im Rahmen von Art. 25 ICSID-Konvention No access
      2. II. Investoren No access
      3. III. Zusammenfassung No access
    3. C. Historische Entwicklung des Investitionsrechts No access
            1. aa) NAFTA No access
            2. bb) ECT No access
            3. cc) WTO-Recht No access
            4. dd) ICSID-Übereinkommen No access
            1. aa) Allgemeines No access
              1. (1) Gerechte und billige Behandlung und das Gebot von Schutz und Sicherheit No access
              2. (2) Inländergleichbehandlung und Meistbegünstigung No access
              3. (3) Schutz vor Enteignungen No access
        2. 2. Völkergewohnheitsrecht No access
        3. 3. Allgemeine Rechtsgrundsätze No access
        4. 4. Nationale Investitionsgesetze No access
        5. 5. Investitionsverträge No access
        1. 1. Rechtsschutz vor nationalen Gerichten No access
        2. 2. Diplomatischer Schutz durch den Heimatstaat No access
        3. 3. Zwischenstaatliche Streitbeilegung No access
          1. a) Ausgestaltung der Schiedsklauseln No access
          2. b) Ablauf des Investitionsschiedsverfahrens No access
          1. a) Prima facie-Zuständigkeit No access
          2. b) Erforderlichkeit No access
          3. c) Dringlichkeit No access
          4. d) Prima facie-Begründetheit der Hauptsache No access
          5. e) Angemessenheit No access
        2. 2. Arten einstweiliger Maßnahmen No access
        1. 1. Anwendbarkeit der Verfahrensregeln zum Eilschiedsrichter No access
        2. 2. Ernennung des Eilschiedsrichters durch die Schiedsinstitution No access
          1. a) Standards für die Gewährung einstweiliger Maßnahmen No access
          2. b) Arten einstweiliger Maßnahmen No access
          3. c) Form der Eilmaßnahme No access
        1. 1. TSIKInvest LLC v. Moldova 2014 No access
        2. 2. Griffin v. Poland 2014 No access
        3. 3. JKX Oil v. Ukraine 2015 No access
        4. 4. Evrobalt LLC v. Moldova 2016 No access
        5. 5. Kompozit v. Moldova 2016 No access
        6. 6. Puma Energy Holding v. Benin 2017 No access
        7. 7. Mohammed Munshi v. Mongolia 2018 No access
        8. 8. Ergebnis No access
      2. II. Die Voraussetzungen des Eilschiedsrichterverfahrens in Investitionsschiedsverfahren No access
          1. a) Anhaltspunkte in den Schiedsregeln No access
            1. aa) Der Eilschiedsrichter – eine wesentliche Verfahrensänderung? No access
            2. bb) Dynamische oder statische Natur der Zustimmung No access
        2. 2. Ergebnis No access
        1. 1. Die grundsätzliche Problematik von Warteklauseln No access
        2. 2. Auswirkung auf das Eilschiedsrichterverfahren No access
        3. 3. Auswirkung einer MFN-Klausel auf die Warteklausel No access
        4. 4. Ergebnis No access
          1. a) Schiedsgerichtliche Eilentscheidung als finaler „Schiedsspruch“ No access
          2. b) „Vollstreckungsmaßnahmen“ des Schiedsgerichts No access
          3. c) Ergebnis No access
            1. aa) Definition „Schiedsrichter“ No access
            2. bb) Argumente für eine Qualifikation des Eilschiedsrichters als Schiedsrichter No access
            3. cc) Widerlegung von Argumenten gegen eine Qualifikation des Eilschiedsrichters als „Schiedsrichter“ No access
            4. dd) Ergebnis No access
          2. b) Charakter der Entscheidung des Eilschiedsrichters No access
        3. 3. Neuerungen in den nationalen Schiedsstatuten No access
        4. 4. Folgen der Missachtung der Eilschiedsrichterentscheidung No access
        5. 5. Ergebnis No access
      4. IV. Regelungshoheit v. Investorenschutz No access
      5. V. Prozessuale Fairness No access
      6. VI. Anwendbarkeit von Eilschiedsrichterverfahren durch MFN-Klauseln No access
      7. VII. Zusammenfassung No access
      1. I. Die Handlungstheorie No access
          1. a) Allgemeines No access
          2. b) Unbestimmt oft wiederholte Spiele No access
          3. c) Anwendung auf zwischenstaatliche Verhältnisse im Völkerrecht No access
        2. 2. Ergebnis No access
      1. I. Ökonomische Anreize in Investitionssachverhalten No access
      2. II. Dynamische Inkonsistenz No access
        1. 1. Anwendung auf das Rechtsschutzbedürfnis vor der Bildung des Schiedsgerichtes No access
          1. a) Reputation No access
          2. b) Gesetze und Sanktionen No access
          3. c) Anwendung auf das Eilschiedsrichterverfahren No access
    3. C. Ergebnis No access
      1. I. Die Schaffung eines internationalen Regelwerks zur Vollstreckung von Eilschiedsrichterentscheidungen No access
        1. 1. Vorschriften zum einstweiligen Rechtsschutz in Investitionsschutzabkommen No access
        2. 2. Vorschriften zum Eilschiedsrichterverfahren in Investitionsschutzabkommen No access
      1. I. Ergänzung der vorgeschlagenen Schiedsklauseln No access
        1. 1. Monetäre Entschädigung No access
        2. 2. Verschuldensunabhängiges Haftungselement No access
        3. 3. Strafen durch den Eilschiedsrichter No access
        4. 4. Verlängerung des Zeitrahmens des Eilschiedsrichterverfahrens No access
      3. III. Zusammenfassung und Bewertung der rechtlichen Lösungsvorschläge No access
    3. C. Fazit No access
  7. Literaturverzeichnis No access 241 - 263

Bibliography (377)

  1. Abbott, Kenneth, Modem International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers, Yale Journal of International Law 14 (1989), S. 335–411. Open Google Scholar
  2. —, Trust But Verify: The Production of Information in Arms Control Treaties and Other International Agreements, Cornell International Law Journal 26 (1993), S. 1–58. Open Google Scholar
  3. Abbott, Kenneth W., International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts, The American Journal of International Law 93 (1999), S. 361–379. Open Google Scholar
  4. Alexandroff, Alan/Laird, Ian A., Compliance and Enforcement; Recognition, Enforcement, and Execution of Investment Arbitration Awards, in: Muchlinski, Peter/Ortino, Federico/Schreuer, Christoph (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, 2008, S. 1175–1187. Open Google Scholar
  5. Allee, Todd/Peinhardt, Clint, Contingent Credibility – The Impact of Investment Treaty Violations on Foreign Direct Investment, International Organization 65 (2011), S. 401–432. Open Google Scholar
  6. Alnaber, Rania, Emergency Arbitration: Mere Innovation or Vast Improvement, Arbitration International 35 (2019) S. 441–472. Open Google Scholar
  7. Arnauld, Andreas von, Völkerrecht, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  8. Asteriti, Alexandra/Tams, Christian J., Transparency and the public Interest in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Schill, Stephan W. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford 2010, S. 787–816. Open Google Scholar
  9. Azelius, Krister/Bergqvist, Lina/Olsson, Emma, Making Use of the New SCC Rules on Emergency Arbitration. Why the Emergency Arbitrator’s decision cannot be enforced and how the new rules may be made useful nonetheless, Juridisk Tidskrifts 4 (2009-2010), S. 936–948. Open Google Scholar
  10. Bachofner, Eva/Grolimund, Pascal, Internationales Zivilprozessrecht, in: Kronke, Herbert/Bachofner, Eva (Hrsg.), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2016, S. 2012–2096. Open Google Scholar
  11. Baigel, Baruch, The Emergency Arbitrator Procedure under the 2012 ICC Rules: A Juridical Analysis, Journal of International Arbitration 31 (2014), S. 1–18. Open Google Scholar
  12. Baird, Douglas G./Gertner, Robert H./Picker, Randal C., Game Theory and the Law, Cambridge, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  13. Baldwin, Edward/Kantor, Mark/Nolan, Michael, Limits to Enforcement of ICSID Awards, Journal of International Arbitration 23 (2006), S. 1–24. Open Google Scholar
  14. Barrington, Louise, Emergency arbitrators: can they be useful to the construction industry?, Construction Law Internatioal 7 (2012), S. 39–42. Open Google Scholar
  15. Barro, Robert J./Gordon, David B., Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy, Journal of Monetary Economics 12 (1983), S. 123–125. Open Google Scholar
  16. —, A Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model, The Journal of Political Economy 91 (1983), S. 589–610. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bartholomae, Florian W./Wiens, Marcus, Spieltheorie – Ein anwendungsorientiertes Lehrbuch, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bassler, William G., The enforceability of emergency awards in the United States – Or when interim means final, Arbitration International 32 (2016), S. 559–574. Open Google Scholar
  19. Batifort, Simon/Heath, J. Benton, The New Debate on the Interpretation of MFN Clauses in Investment Treaties – Putting the Brakes on Multilateralization, American Journal of International Law 111 (2017), S. 873–913. Open Google Scholar
  20. Beckers-Schwarz, Dominic/Stompfe, Philipp, 8. Tagung des Krickenbecker Kreises zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht auf Schloss Gracht, Erftstadt, SchiedsVZ (2016), S. 210–215. Open Google Scholar
  21. Behnke, Joachim, Entscheidungs- und Spieltheorie, Baden-Baden/Stuttgart 2013. Open Google Scholar
  22. Beraudo, Jean-Paul, Recognition and Enforcement of Interim Measures of Protection Ordered by Arbitral Tribunals, Journal of International Arbitration 22 (2005), S. 245–254. Open Google Scholar
  23. Berg, Joyce/Dickhaut, John/McCabe, Kevin, Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History, Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995), S. 122–142. Open Google Scholar
  24. Berger, Klaus Peter, Die Rechtsstellung des Pre-Arbitral Referees, SchiedsVZ (2006), S. 176–182. Open Google Scholar
  25. Bergman, Neale H., Transparency of the Proceedings and Third Party Participation, in: Giorgetti, Chiara (Hrsg.), Litigating International Investment Disputes – A Practitioner’s Guide, Leiden, Boston 2014, S. 375-410. Open Google Scholar
  26. Bernardini, Piero, The Role of the International Arbitrator, Arbitration International 20 (2004), S. 113–122. Open Google Scholar
  27. Berninghaus, Siegfried K./Ehrhart, Karl-Martin/Güth, Werner, Strategische Spiele – Eine Einführung in die Spieltheorie, Berlin, Heidelberg 2010. Open Google Scholar
  28. Berz, Gregor, Spieltheoretische Verhandlungs- und Auktionsstrategien – Mit Praxisbeispielen von Internetauktionen bis Investmentbanking, 2. Aufl. 2014. Open Google Scholar
  29. Besson, Sébastien, Anti-Suit Injunctions by ICC Emergency Arbitrators, in: Carlevaris, Andrea/Lévy, Laurent u.a. (Hrsg.), International Arbitration Under Review: Essays in Honour of John Beechey, 2015, S. 69–89. Open Google Scholar
  30. Binder, Christina, Die Grenzen der Vertragstreue im Völkerrecht – Am Beispiel der nachträglichen Änderung der Umstände, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  31. Bischoff, Jan Asmus/ Happ, Richard, The Notion of Investment, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 495–544. Open Google Scholar
  32. Bishop, R. Doak/Crawford, James/Reisman, William Michael, Foreign Investment Disputes – Cases, Materials and Commentary, 2. Aufl., Den Haag 2014. Open Google Scholar
  33. Bismuth, Régis, Anatomy of the law and practice of interim protective measures in international investment arbitration, Journal of International Arbitration 26 (2009), S. 773–821. Open Google Scholar
  34. Bjorklund, Andrea K., State Immunity and the Enforcement of Investor-State Arbitral Awards, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 302–321. Open Google Scholar
  35. —, NAFTA’s Contributions to Investor-State Dispute Settlement, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 261–282. Open Google Scholar
  36. Blackaby, Nigel/Partasides, Constantine/Redfern, Alan/Hunter, Martin, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 6. Aufl., Oxford 2015. Open Google Scholar
  37. Blanchard, Olivier Jean/Fischer, Stanley, Lectures on Macroeconomics, 13. Aufl., Cambridge 1989. Open Google Scholar
  38. Blane, Alexis, Sovereign Immunity as a Bar to the Execution of International Arbitral Awards, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 41 (2009), S. 453–505. Open Google Scholar
  39. Blum, Ulrich/Dudley, Leonard/Leibbrand, Frank, Angewandte Institutionenökonomik – Theorien – Modelle – Evidenz, 2005. Open Google Scholar
  40. Böckstiegel, Karl-Heinz, Die allgemeinen Grundsätze des Völkerrechts über Eigentumsentziehung, 1963. Open Google Scholar
  41. —, Commercial and Investment Arbitration – How Different are they Today?: The Lalive Lecture 2012, Arbitration International 28 (2012), S. 577–590. Open Google Scholar
  42. Boecker, Martin/Köhn, Julia, Die Tragik der Finanzmärkte, in: Priddat, Birger P. (Hrsg.), Akteure, Verträge, Netzwerke – Der kooperative Modus der Ökonomie, Marburg 2012, S. 147–166. Open Google Scholar
  43. Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence, Rules of Interpretation and Investment Arbitration, in: Kinnear, Meg/Fischer, Geraldine/Minguez Almeida, Jara (Hrsg.), Building International Investment Law – The first 50 years of ICSID, 2016, S. 13–25. Open Google Scholar
  44. Bonnitcha, Jonathan, Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties – A Legal and Economic Analysis, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  45. Born, Gary, International Commercial Arbitration – International Arbitral Procedures, Volume 2, 2. Aufl., Austin u.a. 2014. Open Google Scholar
  46. —, International Arbitration – Law and Practice, New York/Alphen aan den Rijn 2015. Open Google Scholar
  47. —, International Commercial Arbitration – Volume 1, 2. Aufl. 2016. Open Google Scholar
  48. Bose, Raja/Meredith, Ian, Emergency Arbitration Procedures: A Comparative Analysis, International Arbitration Law Review (2012), S. 186–194. Open Google Scholar
  49. Brabandere, Eric de, Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law – Procedural Aspects and Implications, Cambridge 2014. Open Google Scholar
  50. Bredow, Jens, Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit in Deutschland, in: Kronke, Herbert/Bachofner, Eva (Hrsg.), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2016, S. 2293–2310. Open Google Scholar
  51. Brewster, Rachel, Pricing Compliance: When Formal Remedies Displace Reputational Sanctions, Harvard International Law Journal (2013), S. 259–314. Open Google Scholar
  52. Broches, Aron, Awards Rendered Pursuant to the ICSID Convention: Binding Force, Finality, Recognition, Enforcement, Execution, ICSID Review (1987), S. 287–334. Open Google Scholar
  53. Brower, Charles N./Blanchard, Sadie, What’s in a Meme? The Truth about Investor- State Arbitration: Why It Need Not, and Must Not, Be Repossessed by States, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2014), S. 690-–777. Open Google Scholar
  54. Brower, Charles N./Meyerstein, Ariel/Schill, Stephan W., The Power and Effectiveness of Pre-Arbitral Provisional Relief: The SCC Emergency Arbitrator in Investor-State Disputes, in: Franke, Ulf/Hobér, Kaj u.a. (Hrsg.), Between East and West – Essays in honour of Ulf Franke, Huntington, New York 2010, S. 61–75. Open Google Scholar
  55. Brown, Chester, Procedure in Investment Treaty Arbitration and the Relevance of Public Law, in: Schill, Stephan W. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford 2010, S. 659–688. Open Google Scholar
  56. —, Introduction, in: ders. (Hrsg.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties, Oxford 2013, S. 1–14. Open Google Scholar
  57. —, The Evolution of the Regime of International Investment Agreements: History, Economics and Politics, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 153–185. Open Google Scholar
  58. Brown Weiss, Edith, Rethinking compliance with international law, in: Benvenisti, Eyal/Hirsch, Moshe (Hrsg.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation – Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge 2004, S. 134–165. Open Google Scholar
  59. Brülhart, Marius/Usunier, Jean-Claude, Does the trust game measure trust?, Economics Letters 115 (2012), S. 20–23. Open Google Scholar
  60. Bungenberg, Marc/Griebel, Jörn/Hobe, Stephan/Reinisch, August, General Introduction to International Investment Law, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 1–5. Open Google Scholar
  61. Burgstaller, Mark G., Theories of Compliance with International Law, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  62. Butler, Nicolette/Subedi, Surya, The Future of International Investment Regulation – Towards a World Investment Organisation?, Netherlands International Law Review 64 (2017), S. 43–72. Open Google Scholar
  63. Caetano, Ana, Emergency Arbitrator – Is he or she a true arbitrator? – The single row consent of parties and portuguese overview, Young Arbitration Review 3 (2014), S. 40–52. Open Google Scholar
  64. Caher, Charlie/McMillan, John, Emergency Arbitration: The Default Option for Pre-Arbitral Relief?, The International Comparative Legal Guide to: International Arbitration (2015), S. 1–6. Open Google Scholar
  65. Calvo, Carlos, Le Droit International Théorique Et Pratique – précédé d’un exposé historique des progrès de la science du droit des gens, 1896. Open Google Scholar
  66. Cardosi, Joseph M., Precluding the Treasure Hunt: How the World Bank Group Can Help Investors Circumnavigate Sovereign Immunity Obstacles to ICSID Award Execution, Pepperdine Law Review 41 (2013), S. 117–156. Open Google Scholar
  67. Carlevaris, Andrea, Preliminary matters: Objections, Bi-Furcation, Request for Provisional Measures, in: Giorgetti, Chiara (Hrsg.), Litigating International Investment Disputes – A Practitioner’s Guide, Leiden, Boston 2014, S. 173–205. Open Google Scholar
  68. Carlevaris, Andrea, Feris, José Ricardo, Running in the ICC Emergency Arbitrator Rules: The First Ten Cases – E-Chapter from ICC Int Court of Arbitration, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 25 (2014), S. 25–37. Open Google Scholar
  69. Caron, David D./Caplan, Lee M., The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules – A Commentary ; (with an intedrated and comparartive discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules), 2. Aufl., Oxford 2013. Open Google Scholar
  70. Cavalieros, Philippe/Kim, Hyun Jeong, Emergency Arbitrators Versus the Courts: From Concurrent Jurisdiction to Practical Considerations, Journal of International Arbitration 35 (2017), S. 275–306. Open Google Scholar
  71. Chari, Varadarajan Venkata, Time Consistency and Optimal Policy Design, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quartely Review 12 (1988), S. 17–31. Open Google Scholar
  72. Charlie Caher, John McMillan, Emergency Arbitration: The Default Option for Pre-Arbitral Relief?, The International Comparative Legal Guide to: International Arbitration 2015, S. 1–6. Open Google Scholar
  73. Chinen, Mark A., Game Theory and Customary International Law: A Response to Professors Goldsmith and Posner, Michigan Journal of International Law 23 (2001), S. 143–189. Open Google Scholar
  74. Choong, John/Mangan, Mark/Lingard, Nicholas, A Guide to the SIAC Arbitration Rules, New York 2018. Open Google Scholar
  75. Chung, Kyongwha, Emergency Arbitrator Procedure in Investment Treaty Disputes – To Be or Not To Be, The Journal of World Investment & Trade 20 (2019), S. 98–145. Open Google Scholar
  76. Cirace, John, Law, Economics, and Game Theory, Lanham 2018. Open Google Scholar
  77. Collins, David, An Introduction to International Investment Law, Cambridge 2017. Open Google Scholar
  78. Collins, Erin, Pre-Tribunal Emergency Relief in International Commercial Arbitration, Loyola University Chicago International Law Review 10 (2012), S. 105–124. Open Google Scholar
  79. Collins, Lawrence, Essays in International Litigation and the Conflict of Laws, 1994. Open Google Scholar
  80. Commission, Jeffery/Moloo, Rahim, Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration, 2018. Open Google Scholar
  81. Coop, Graham/Nistal, Álvaro/Volterra, Robert/Fietta, Volterra, Sovereign immunities and investor-state awards: specificities of enforcing awards based on investment treaties, in: Enforcement of Investment Treaty Arbitration Awards: A Global Guide, S. 67–82. Open Google Scholar
  82. Cooter, Robert/Ulen, Thomas, Law and Economics, 6. Aufl., 2016. Open Google Scholar
  83. Cordero Moss, Giuditta, Commercial Arbitration and Investement Arbitration: Fertile Soil for False Friends?, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 782–797. Open Google Scholar
  84. Dahlquist, Joel, The First Known Investment Treaty Emergency Arbitration – TSIKInvest LLC v The Republic of Moldova, SCC Emergency Arbitration No EA 2014/053, 29 April 2014 (Kaj Hobér), The Journal of World Investment & Trade 17 (2016), S. 261–271. Open Google Scholar
  85. —, SCC emergency arbitrator orders Republic of Georgia to refrain from seizing assets belonging to conglomerate owned by Georgian businessman, IA Reporter, 4. April 2019, https://www.iareporter.com/articles/scc-emergency-arbitrator-orders-republic-of-georgia-to-refrain-from-seizing-assets-belonging-to-conglomerate-owned-by-georgian-businessman. Open Google Scholar
  86. Daly, Brooks/Poon, Fiona, Technical and Legal Experts in International Investment Disputes, in: Giorgetti, Chiara (Hrsg.), Litigating International Investment Disputes – A Practitioner’s Guide, Leiden, Boston 2014, S. 323–374. Open Google Scholar
  87. Davies, Martin, Court-ordered Interim Measures in Aid of International Commercial Arbitration, American Review of International Arbitration (2008), S. 299–334. Open Google Scholar
  88. Demirkol, Berk, Judicial Acts and Investment Treaty Arbitration, Cambridge 2018. Open Google Scholar
  89. Denters, Erik, Preferential Trade and Investment Treaties, in: Gazzini, Tarcisio/Brabandere, Eric de (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden 2012, S. 49–67. Open Google Scholar
  90. Desierto, Diane A., Public Policy in International Investment and Trade Law – Community Expectations and Functional Decision-Making, Florida Journal of International Law 26 (2014), S. 51–150." Open Google Scholar
  91. Diehl, Alexandra, Auf der Spur eines Erfolgsmodells oder „Das dichte Spinnennetz der BITs“ – Leitlinien der Entwicklung von bilateralen Verträgen über Freundschaft, Handel und Schifffahrt zu modernen Investitionsschutzverträgen, in: Knahr, Christina (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Probleme und Entwicklungen im Internationalen Investitionsrecht, Stuttgart, München 2008, S. 9–33. Open Google Scholar
  92. Diekmann, Andreas/Voss, Thomas, Die Theorie rationalen Handlens, in: dies. (Hrsg.), Rational-Choice-Theorie in den Sozialwissenschaften – Anwendungen und Probleme, München 2004, S. 13–29. Open Google Scholar
  93. Diel-Gligor, Katharina, Towards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence – A Preliminary Ruling System for ICSID Arbitration, Boston 2017. Open Google Scholar
  94. Dolzer, Rudolf, Eigentum, Enteignung und Entschädigung im geltenden Völkerrecht, 1985. Open Google Scholar
  95. Dolzer, Rudolf/Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford 2012. Open Google Scholar
  96. Dolzer, Rudolf/Tietje, Christian/Wackernagel, Clemens, Der rechtliche Schutz ausländischer Investitionen, in: Kornke, Herbert/Melis, Werner/Kouhn, Hans (Hrsg.), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2017, S. 1183–1268. Open Google Scholar
  97. Dolzer/Tietje/Wackernagel, Der rechtliche Schutz ausländischer Investitionen, in: Kronke, Herbert/Bachofner, Eva (Hrsg.), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2016, S. 1183–1268. Open Google Scholar
  98. Dornbusch, Rudiger/Fischer, Stanley/Startz, Richard, Makroökonomik, 8. Aufl., München 2003. Open Google Scholar
  99. Douglas, Zachary, The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration – Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2 (2011), S. 97–113. Open Google Scholar
  100. —, Property, Investment, and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations, in: ders. (Hrsg.), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory Into Practice, Oxford 2014, S. 363–406. Open Google Scholar
  101. Downs, George W./Jones, Michael A., Reputation, compliance and development, in: Benvenisti, Eyal/Hirsch, Moshe (Hrsg.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation – Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge 2004, S. 117–133. Open Google Scholar
  102. Dugan, Christopher/Wallace, Don/Rubins, Noah/Sabahi, Borzu, Investor-State Arbitration, Oxford 2011. Open Google Scholar
  103. Dumberry, Patrick, International Investment Contracts, in: Gazzini, Tarcisio/Brabandere, Eric de (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden 2012, S. 215–243. Open Google Scholar
  104. Dunoff, Jeffrey L./Trachtman, Joel P., Economic Analysis of International Law, Yale Journal of International Law 24 (1999), S. 1–59. Open Google Scholar
  105. Ehle, Bernd, Article I, in: Wolff, Reinmar/Borris, Christian (Hrsg.), New York Convention – Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958; Commentary, München 2012. Open Google Scholar
  106. —, Emergency Arbitration in Practice, in: Müller, Christoph/Rigozzi, Antonio (Hrsg.), New Developments in International Commercial Arbitration 2013, Zürich 2013, S. 87–110. Open Google Scholar
  107. Elkins, Zachary/Guzman, Andrew T./Simmons, Beth A., Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000, International Organization 60 (2006), S. 811–846. Open Google Scholar
  108. Elvy, Stacy-Ann, Theories of State Compliance with International Law: Assessing the African Union’s Ability to Ensure State Compliance with the African Charter and Constitutive Act, Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 41 (2014), S. 75–156. Open Google Scholar
  109. Escher, Alfred/Sliskovic, Violeta, Aktuelle Entwicklungen des Investitionsschutzrechts, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft (2016), S. 190–201. Open Google Scholar
  110. Faliszewski, Piotr/Rothe, Irene/Rothe, Jörg, Noncooperative Game Theory, in: Rothe, Jörg (Hrsg.), Economics and Computation – An Introduction to Algorithmic Game Theory, Computational Social Choice, and Fair Division, Berlin, Heidelberg 2016, S. 41–134. Open Google Scholar
  111. Farber, Daniel A., Rights as Signals, The Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2002), S. 83–98. Open Google Scholar
  112. Fearon, James D., Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation, International Organization 52 (1998), S. 269–305. Open Google Scholar
  113. Fischer, Stanley, Dynamic inconsistency, cooperation and the benevolent dissembling government, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2 (1980), S. 93–107. Open Google Scholar
  114. Foerster, Alexander, Stockholmer Regeln (SCC), in: Schütze, Rolf A. (Hrsg.), Institutionelle Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit – Kommentar, 3. Aufl., Köln 2018. Open Google Scholar
  115. Franck, Susan D./Wylie, Lindsey E., Predicting Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Duke Law Journal 65 (2015), S. 459–526. Open Google Scholar
  116. Frutos-Peterson, Claudia/Ziyaeva, Diora, Provisional Measures in ICSID Arbitration: The Irreparable Harm Requirement, in: Ziyaeva, Diora/Laird, Ian A. u.a. (Hrsg.), Interim and Emergency Relief in International Arbitration, Huntington, New York 2015, S. 209–233. Open Google Scholar
  117. Fry, Jason/Greenberg, Simon/Mazza, Francesca, The Secretariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration – A Practical Commentary on the 2012 ICC Rules of Arbitration from the Secretariat of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, Paris 2012. Open Google Scholar
  118. Gaillard, Emmanuel/Pinsolle, Philippe, The ICC Pre-Arbitral Referee – First Practical Experiences, Arbitration International 20 (2004), S. 13–38. Open Google Scholar
  119. Gaillard, Emmanuel, Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 403–416. Open Google Scholar
  120. Galagan, Dmytro, Enforcement of the JKX Oil & Gas Emergency Arbitrator Award: A Sign of Pro-arbitration Stance in Ukraine?, 27. Juli 2015, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/07/27/enforcement-of-the-jkx-oil-gas-emergency-arbitrator-award-a-sign-of-pro-arbitration-stance-in-ukraine. Open Google Scholar
  121. Garrett, Geoffrey/Weingast, Barry R., Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market, in: Goldstein, Judith./Keohane, Robert O. (Hrsg.), Ideas and Foreign Policy – Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, 1993, S. 173–206. Open Google Scholar
  122. Gazzini, Tarcisio, Bilateral Investment Treaties, in: Gazzini, Tarcisio/Brabandere, Eric de (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden 2012, S. 99–132. Open Google Scholar
  123. Gent, Stephen E./Shannon, Megan, Decision Control and the Pursuit of Binding Conflict Management, Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (2011), S. 710–734. Open Google Scholar
  124. Gerstenmaier, Klaus-Albrecht, Die Vollziehbarkeit von Entscheidungen des Eilschiedsrichters, in: Ebke, Werner F./Olzen, Dirk/Sandrock, Otto (Hrsg.), Festschrift für Siegfried H. Elsing zum 65. Geburtstag, Frankfurt am Main 2015, S. 153–164. Open Google Scholar
  125. Ghaffari, Amir/Walters, Emmylou, The Emergency Arbitrator – The Dawn of a New Age?, Arbitration International 30 (2014), S. 153–168. Open Google Scholar
  126. Ginsburg, Tom/McAdams, Richard H., Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution, William and Mary Law Review 45 (2004), S. 1229–1339. Open Google Scholar
  127. Goldsmith, Jack L./Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law, Oxford 2007. Open Google Scholar
  128. Goldstein, Marc J., A Glance Into History For The Emergency Arbitrator, Fordham International Law Journal 40 (2017), S. 779–798. Open Google Scholar
  129. Görs, Benjamin, Internationales Investitionsrecht – Vom völkerrechtlichen Enteignungsschutz zum europäischen Binnenmarkt, Frankfurt am Main 2005. Open Google Scholar
  130. Grabowski, Alex, The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini, Chicago Journal of International Law 15 (2014), S. 287–309. Open Google Scholar
  131. Greenberg, Simon/Mange, Flavia, Institutional and Ad Hoc Perspectives on the Temporal Conflict of Arbitral Rules, Journal of International Arbitration 27 (2010), S. 199–213. Open Google Scholar
  132. Griebel, Jörn, Internationales Investitionsrecht, München 2008. Open Google Scholar
  133. —, Einführung in den Deutschen Mustervertrag über die Förderung und den gegenseitigen Schutz von Kapitalanlagen von 2009, IPRax 30 (2010), S. 414–419. Open Google Scholar
  134. Grisel, Florian, The Sources of Foreign Investment Law, in: Douglas, Zachary (Hrsg.), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory Into Practice, Oxford 2014, S. 213–233. Open Google Scholar
  135. Grubenmann, Beatrice, Der Begrifrf der Investition in der ICSID-Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, in: Knahr, Christina (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Probleme und Entwicklungen im Internationalen Investitionsrecht Stuttgart, München 2008, S. 45–78. Open Google Scholar
  136. Guzman, Andrew, Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties, Virginia Journal of International Law 1998, S. 639–687. Open Google Scholar
  137. —, A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law, California Law Review 90 (2002), S. 1823–1887. Open Google Scholar
  138. Guzman, Andrew T., How International Law Works – A Rational Choice Theory, Oxford, New York 2008. Open Google Scholar
  139. —, Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties, in: Sauvant, Karl P./Sachs, Lisa E. (Hrsg.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment – Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows, Oxford 2009, S. 73–97. Open Google Scholar
  140. —, Against Consent, Virginia Journal of International Law 52 (2012), S. 747–790. Open Google Scholar
  141. Hahn, Michael, WTO Rules and Obligations Related to Investment, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 653–670. Open Google Scholar
  142. Hallward-Driemeier, Mary, Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Attract Foreign Direct Investment? – Only a Bit … and They Could Bite, Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3121, World Bank, Washington, D.C.. Open Google Scholar
  143. Hamama, Olga/Sendetska, Olga, Interim measures in support of arbitration in Ukraine – Lessons from JKX Oil & Gas et al v Ukraine and the recent reform of Ukrainian legislation, Arbitration International 34 (2018), S. 307–315. Open Google Scholar
  144. Hanessian, Grant, Legal Standards Applicable to Deciding Applications for Interim Refief, in: Betancourt, Julio César (Hrsg.), Defining Issues in International Arbitration, 2016, S. 158–166. Open Google Scholar
  145. Hanessian, Grant/Dosman, Alexandra, Songs Of Innocence and Experience: Ten Years of Emergency Arbitration, American Review of International Arbitration 27 (2016), S. 215–237. Open Google Scholar
  146. Happ, Richard, The Energy Charter Treaty, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 240–260. Open Google Scholar
  147. Havedal Ipp, Anja, SCC Practice Note Emergency Arbitrator Decisions Rendered 2015-2016, Juni 2017, http://www.sccinstitute.com/media/194250/ea-practice-note-emergency-arbitrator-decisions-rendered-2015-2016.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  148. Henkin, Louis, How Nations Behave – Law and foreign policy, 2. Aufl., New York 1979. Open Google Scholar
  149. Hepburn, Jarrod, ln-depth: Unpacking the Reasoning of the First SCC Emergency Arbitrator Ruling in a Russian Investment Treaty Claim, 17. Februar 2015, https://www.iareporter.com/articles/in-depth-unpacking-the-reasoning-of-the-first-scc-emergency-arbitrator-ruling-in-a-russian-investment-treaty-claim. Open Google Scholar
  150. —, Analysis: Stockholm arbitrator finds emergency measures justified against Benin where entire investment faces extinguishment due to alleged denial of justice, 14. Juni 2017, https://www.iareporter.com/articles/analysis-stockholm-arbitrator-finds-emergency-measures-justified-against-benin-where-entire-investment-faces-extinguishment-due-to-alleged-denial-of-justice. Open Google Scholar
  151. Herdegen, Matthias, Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht – Ein Studienbuch, 10. Aufl., München 2014. Open Google Scholar
  152. Hill, Jonathan, Is an Interim Measure of Protection Ordered by an Arbitral Tribunal an Arbitral Award?, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9 (2018), S. 590–608. Open Google Scholar
  153. Hirsch, Moshe, Compliance with Investment Treaties: When are States more likely to breach or comply with Investment Treaties?, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 865–876. Open Google Scholar
  154. —, Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 27 (2009), S. 503–510. Open Google Scholar
  155. Hobe, Stephan, The Development of the Law of Aliens, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 6–22. Open Google Scholar
  156. Hobér, Kaj, MFN Clauses and Dispute Resolution in Investment Treaties: Have we reached the End of the Road?, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 31–41. Open Google Scholar
  157. Hofmann, Rainer, The Protection of Individuals under Public International Law, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 46–63. Open Google Scholar
  158. Homann, Karl/Suchanek, Andreas, Ökonomik – Eine Einführung, 2. Aufl., Tübingen 2005. Open Google Scholar
  159. Horn, Norbert, Arbitration and the Protection of Foreign Investment: Concepts and Means, in: ders. (Hrsg.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes, The Hague 2004, S. 3–32. Open Google Scholar
  160. Horn, Simon, Der Eilschiedsrichter im institutionellen Schiedsverfahren, SchiedsVZ (2016), S. 22–30. Open Google Scholar
  161. Horodyski, Dominik/Kierska, Maria, Enforcement of emergency arbitrator’s decisions – legal problems and global trends, Kwartalnik ADR 33 (2016), S. 27–38. Open Google Scholar
  162. Hosking, James/Lindsey, Chaffetz, Emergency Arbitration: Innovation for Innovation’s Sake? AMINZ - ICCA International Arbitration Day, 20. April 2018, https://www.aminz.org.nz/Attachment?Action=Download&Attachment_id=835. Open Google Scholar
  163. ICSID, ICSID Annual Report 2016. Open Google Scholar
  164. ICSID Secretariat, Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules – Working Paper, 3. August 2018, https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/III.Amendments_Vol_3_AR.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  165. IMF, Balance of payments and international investment position manual, 6. Aufl., Washington D.C. 2009. Open Google Scholar
  166. Ipsen, Knut, Völkerrecht, 6. Aufl., München 2008. Open Google Scholar
  167. Jacob, Marc/Schill, Stephan, Fair and Equitable treatment: Content, Practice, Method, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 700–763. Open Google Scholar
  168. JKX, Press Release, 23. Juli 2015, http://www.jkx.co.uk/%7E/media/Files/J/JKX/press-release/2015/JKX%20International%20Arbitration%20Proceedings%20Interim%20Award%2023%2007%2015.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  169. Johannsen, Sven Leif Erik, Der Investitionsbegriff nach Art. 25 Abs. 1 der ICSID-Konvention, Halle 2009. Open Google Scholar
  170. Jones, Doug, Emergency Arbitrators and Court-Ordered Interim Measures – Is the Choice Important?, in: Betancourt, Julio César (Hrsg.), Defining Issues in International Arbitration, 2016, S. 149–157. Open Google Scholar
  171. Jones, Dough, Emergency Arbitrators and Interim Relief in International Commercial Arbitration, in: Carlevaris, Andrea/Lévy, Laurent u.a. (Hrsg.), International Arbitration Under Review: Essays in Honour of John Beechey, 2015, S. 203–213. Open Google Scholar
  172. Kacowicz, Arie M., Compliance and non-compliance with international norms in territorial disputes: the Latin American record of arbitrations, in: Benvenisti, Eyal/Hirsch, Moshe (Hrsg.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation – Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge 2004, S. 194–215. Open Google Scholar
  173. Kalderimis, Daniel/Love, Ben/Rubins, Noah, ICSID Convention, in: Mistelis (Hrsg.) 2015 – Concise International Arbitration. Open Google Scholar
  174. Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle/Antonietti, Aurelia, Interim Relief in International Investment Agreements, in: Yannaca-Small, Katia (Hrsg.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, 2010, S. 507–550. Open Google Scholar
  175. Keller, Moritz/Wendler López, Carsten, Is there a Common Approach to Provisional Measures? – An Overview of ICSID Case Law, SchiedsVZ (2011), S. 183–194. Open Google Scholar
  176. Kingsbury, Benedict/Krisch, Nico/Stewart, Richard B., The Emergency of Global Administrative Law, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (2005), S. 15–61. Open Google Scholar
  177. Kläger, Roland, Schwerpunktbereich – Einführung in das internationale Enteignungs- und Investitionsrecht, JuS (2008), S. 969–974. Open Google Scholar
  178. Knapp, Lotta, SCC Practice Emergency Arbitrator Decisions Rendered 2014, http://www.sccinstitute.com/media/62020/scc-practice-emergency-arbitrators-2014_final.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  179. Koboldt, Christian, Zeitinkonsistenz, Separabilität und Teilspielperfektheit, Homo Oeconomicus 10 (1993), S. 383–412. Open Google Scholar
  180. Koh, Harold Hongju/Chayes, Abram/Chayes, Antonia Handler/Franck, Thomas M., Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, The Yale Law Journal 106 (1997), S. 2599–2659. Open Google Scholar
  181. Kölsch, Axel, Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts, in: Lorenz, Sebastian/Machill, Marcel (Hrsg.), Transatlantik – Transfer von Politik, Wirtschaft und Kultur, Wiesbaden 1999, S. 293–312. Open Google Scholar
  182. Koremenos, Barbara, If Only Half of International Agreements Have Dispute Resolution Provisions, Which Half Needs Explaining?, The Journal of Legal Studies 36 (2007), S. 189–212. Open Google Scholar
  183. Koremenos, Barbara/Betz, Timm, The Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Agreements, in: Dunoff, Jeffrey L./Pollack, Mark A. (Hrsg.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations – The State of the Art, Cambridge 2013, S. 371–393. Open Google Scholar
  184. Koremenos, Barbara/Lipson, Charles/Snidal, Duncan, The Rational Design of International Institutions, International Organization 55 (2001), S. 761–799. Open Google Scholar
  185. Korzun, Vera, The Right to Regulate in Investor- State Arbitration: Slicing and Dicing Regulatory Carve-Outs, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2016), S. 355–-414. Open Google Scholar
  186. Kösters, Wim, Erfahrungen mit Geldmengenzielen und ihre Implikationen für die konzeptionelle Ausgestaltung der Geldpolitik, in: Gahlen, Bernhard/Meyer, Bernd/Jochen, Schumann (Hrsg.) (Hrsg.), Wirtschaftswachstum, Strukturwandel und dynamischer Wettbewerb – Ernst Helmstädter zum 65. Geburtstag, Berlin u.a. 1989, S. 107–124. Open Google Scholar
  187. Krajewski, Markus, Wirtschaftsvölkerrecht, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg u.a. 2012. Open Google Scholar
  188. Kreissl, Stephan, Mediation – Von der Alternative zum Recht zur Integration in das staatliche Konfliktlösungssystem, SchiedsVZ (2012), S. 230–244. Open Google Scholar
  189. Kriebaum, Ursula, Local Remedies and the Standards for the Protection of Foreign Investment, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 417–462. Open Google Scholar
  190. —, Arbitrary/Unreasonable or Discriminatory Measures, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 790–806. Open Google Scholar
  191. —, Expropriation, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 959–1030. Open Google Scholar
  192. Kröll, Stefan, Enforcement of Awards, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 1482–1504. Open Google Scholar
  193. Kuipers, Jacob A., Too Big to Nail: How Investor-State Arbitration Lacks an Appropriate Execution Mechanism for the Largest Awards, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 39 (2016), S. 417–451. Open Google Scholar
  194. Kydland, Finn E./Prescott, Edward C., Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans, The Journal of Political Economy 85 (1977), S. 473–492. Open Google Scholar
  195. Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law and Transnational Regulation, Transnational Legal Theory 3 (2015), S. 243–267. Open Google Scholar
  196. Lalive, Pierre, The First ‘World Bank’ Arbitration (Holiday Inns v. Morocco) – Some Legal Problems, British Yearbook of International Law 51 (1981), S. 123–162. Open Google Scholar
  197. Lamm, Carolyn B./Hellbeck, Eckhard R., The Enforcement of Awards, in: Giorgetti, Chiara (Hrsg.), Litigating International Investment Disputes – A Practitioner’s Guide, Leiden, Boston 2014, S. 462–496. Open Google Scholar
  198. Landbrecht, Johannes, Staatlicher Eilrechtsschutz am deutschen Schiedsort und grenzüberschreitende Vollstreckung, SchiedsVZ (2013), S. 241–248. Open Google Scholar
  199. Le Bars, Benoit/Fouchard Papaefstratiou, Athina, Interim Measures in International Investment Arbitration, in: Legum, Barton (Hrsg.), The Investment Treaty Arbitration Review, 2018, S. 79–93. Open Google Scholar
  200. Le Bars, Benoit/Shiroor, Tejas, Provisional Measures in Investment Arbitration: Wading through the Murky Waters of Enforcement, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law (2017), S. 24–42. Open Google Scholar
  201. Lee, Janice, Is the Emergency Arbitrator Procedure Suitable for Investment Arbitration?, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 10 (2017), S. 71–112. Open Google Scholar
  202. Legum, Barton, An Overview of Procedure in an Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Yannaca-Small, Katia (Hrsg.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, 2010, S. 91–103. Open Google Scholar
  203. Leng Sun, Chan/Tan, Weiyi, Making Arbitration Effective: Expedited Procedures, Emergency Arbitrators and Interim Relief, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 6 (2013), S. 349–371. Open Google Scholar
  204. Leonhardsen, Erlend. M., Trials of Ordeal in the International Court of Justice – Why States Seek Provisional Measures when non-Compliance Is to Be Expected, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5 (2014), S. 306–343. Open Google Scholar
  205. Lew, Julian D. M./Mistelis, Loukas A./Kröll, Stefan M., Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Den Haag u.a 2003. Open Google Scholar
  206. Liebscher, Christoph, Preliminary Remarks, in: Wolff, Reinmar/Borris, Christian (Hrsg.), New York Convention – Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958; Commentary, München 2012, S. 1–25. Open Google Scholar
  207. Lim, Jonathan/Prasad, Dharshini, A Brief Overview of the Draft SIAC Investment Arbitration Rules 2016, 12. März 2016, http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2016/03/12/a-brief-overview-of-the-draft-siac-investment-arbitration-rules-2016/. Open Google Scholar
  208. Lomfeld, Bertram, Die Gründe des Vertrages – Eine Diskurstheorie der Vertragsrechte, Tübingen 2015. Open Google Scholar
  209. Lörcher, Torsten, ICSID-Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, SchiedsVZ (2005), S. 11–21. Open Google Scholar
  210. Lörcher, Torsten/Ober, Boris, Schutzstandards im materiellen Investitionsrecht, Kölner Schrift zum Wirtschaftsrecht 2 (2011), S. 105–115. Open Google Scholar
  211. Lorz, Ralph, Protection and Security, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 764–789. Open Google Scholar
  212. Luttrell, Sam, ICSID provisional measures ‘in the round’, Arbitration International 31 (2015), S. 393–412. Open Google Scholar
  213. Lye, Kah Cheong/Yeo, Chuan Tat/Miller, William, Legal Status Of The Emergency Arbitrator Under The SIAC 2010 Rules – Neither Fish nor Fowl?, Singapore Academy of Law Journal (2011), S. 93–124. Open Google Scholar
  214. Ma, Arthur, Most Favoured Nation Treatment, in: Legum (Hg.) 2018 – The Investment Treaty Arbitration Review, S. 206–215. Open Google Scholar
  215. Magen, Stefan, Spieltheorie, in: Towfigh, Emanuel V./Petersen, Niels/Englerth, Markus (Hrsg.), Ökonomische Methoden im Recht – Eine Einführung für Juristen, Tübingen 2010, S. 71–116. Open Google Scholar
  216. Mahoney, Paul G./Sanchirico, Chris William, Norms, Repeated Games, and the Role of Law, California Law Review 91 (2003), S. 1281–1329. Open Google Scholar
  217. Malintoppi, Loretta, Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties request and what Tribunals order, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 157–184. Open Google Scholar
  218. Maniruzzaman, Munir, Protection in International Investment Arbitration: Challenge to State Sovereignty, in: Ziyaeva, Diora/Laird, Ian A. u.a. (Hrsg.), Interim and Emergency Relief in International Arbitration, Huntington, New York 2015, S. 183–197. Open Google Scholar
  219. Mas-Colell, Andreu/Whinston, Michael Dennis/Green, Jerry R., Microeconomic Theory, New York 1995. Open Google Scholar
  220. Mashigo, Kekeletso/Nohen, Alexis/Pohl, Joachim, OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2012. Open Google Scholar
  221. Matthews, Joseph/Stewart, Karen, Time to Evaluate the Standards for Issuance of Interim Measures of Protection in International Investment Arbitration, Arbitration International 25 (2009), S. 529–552. Open Google Scholar
  222. Maupin, Julie, MFN-based Jurisdiction in Investor-State Arbitration – Is There Any Hope for a Consistent Approach?, Journal of International Economic Law 14 (2011), S. 157–190. Open Google Scholar
  223. Mbengue, Makane Moïse, National Legislation and Unilateral Acts of States, in: Gazzini, Tarcisio/Brabandere, Eric de (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden 2012, S. 183–213. Open Google Scholar
  224. McAdams, Richard, Beyond the Prisoners’ Dilemma: Coordination, Game Theory, and Law, Southern California Law Review 82 (2009), S. 209–258. Open Google Scholar
  225. McGillivray, Fiona/Smith, Alastair, Trust and Cooperation Through Agent-specific Punishments, International Organization 54 (2000), S. 809–824. Open Google Scholar
  226. McLachlan, Campbell/Shore, Laurence/Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration – Substantive principles, Oxford 2008. Open Google Scholar
  227. Melis, Werner, UNCITRAL-Modellgesetz, in: Kronke, Herbert/Bachofner, Eva (Hrsg.), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2016, S. 2097–2129. Open Google Scholar
  228. —, UNCITRAL-Schiedsordnung, in: Kronke, Herbert/Bachofner, Eva (Hrsg.), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2016, S. 2130–2162. Open Google Scholar
  229. Michler, Albrecht F./van Treeck, Till, Stabilisierung: Konjunktur- und Wachstumspolitik, in: Mause, Karsten/Müller, Christian/Schubert, Klaus (Hrsg.), Politik und Wirtschaft – Ein integratives Kompendium, 2018, S. 219–246. Open Google Scholar
  230. Miles, Cameron A., Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge, New York 2017. Open Google Scholar
  231. Mistelis, Loukas, Award as an Investment – The Value of an Arbitral Award or the Cost of Non-Enforcement, ICSID Review 28 (2013), S. 64–87. Open Google Scholar
  232. Mizushima, Tononori, The Role of the State after an Award is Rendered in Investor-State-Arbitration, in: Lalani, Shaheeza/Lazo, Rodrigo Polanco (Hrsg.), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration, 2014, S. 274–292. Open Google Scholar
  233. Mortenson, Julian Davis, The Meaning of “Investment”: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010), S. 257–318. Open Google Scholar
  234. Moses, Margaret L., The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Cambridge 2017. Open Google Scholar
  235. Mouawad, Caline/Silbert, Elizabeth, A Guide to Interim Measures in Investor-State Arbitration, Arbitration International 29 (2013), S. 381–434. Open Google Scholar
  236. Nadakavukaren Schefer, Krista, International Investment Law – Text, cases and materials, Cheltenham u.a. 2013. Open Google Scholar
  237. Newcombe, Andrew/Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties – Standards and Treatment, Alphen aan den Rijn u.a. 2009. Open Google Scholar
  238. Norman, George/Trachtman, Joel P., The Customary International Law Game, The American Journal of International Law 99 (2005), S. 541–580. Open Google Scholar
  239. OECD, Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment – Fourth Edition – 2008. Open Google Scholar
  240. —, Appointing Authorities and the Selection of Arbitrators in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: An Overview Consultation Paper, März 2018, http://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/ISDS-Appointing-Authorities-Arbitration-March-2018.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  241. Oeter, Stefan, Legitimacy of Customary International Law, in: Eger, Thomas/Oeter, Stefan/Voigt, Stefan (Hrsg.), Economic Analysis of International Law – Contributions to the XIIIth Travemünde Symposium on the Economic Analysis of Law, Tübingen 2014, S. 1–22. Open Google Scholar
  242. Osadchiy, Maxim, Emergency Relief in Investment Treaty Arbitration – A Word of Caution, Journal of International Arbitration 34 (2017), S. 239–255. Open Google Scholar
  243. Palay, Marc S./Landon, Tanya, A Comparative Review of Emergency Arbitrator Provisions: Opportunities and Risks, The International Comparative Legal Guide to: International Arbitration 2012, S. 1–8. Open Google Scholar
  244. Paraguacuto-Mahéo, Diana/Lecuyer-Thieffry, Christine, Emergency Arbitrator: A New Player In The Field - The French Perspective, Fordham International Law Journal 40 (2017), S. 750–778. Open Google Scholar
  245. Parisi, Francesco/Pi, Daniel, The Economic Analysis of International Treaty Law, in: Kontorovich, Eugene/Parisi, Francesco (Hrsg.), Economic Analysis of International Law, Cheltenham 2016, S. 101–122. Open Google Scholar
  246. Park, William W., Explaining Arbitration Law, in: Betancourt, Julio César (Hrsg.), Defining Issues in International Arbitration, 2016, S. 7–19. Open Google Scholar
  247. Parker, Stephanie L., A BIT at a Time: The Proper Extension of the MFN Clause to Dispute Settlement Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, Arbitration Brief 2 (2012), S. 30–63. Open Google Scholar
  248. Parkin, Leonie/Wade, Shai, Emergency arbitrators and the State Courts – Will they work together?, Arbitration (London) 80 (2014), S. 48–54. Open Google Scholar
  249. Parra, Antania R., Advancing Reform at ICSID, in: Kalicki, Jean E./Joubin-Bret, Anna (Hrsg.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System – Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden 2015, S. 569–583. Open Google Scholar
  250. Patocchi, Paolo Michele/Niedermaier, Tilman, UNCITRAL-Schiedsgerichtsordnung, in: Schütze, Rolf A. (Hrsg.), Institutionelle Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit – Kommentar, 3. Aufl., Köln 2018. Open Google Scholar
  251. Paulsson, Jan, Arbitration Without Privity, ICSID Review 10 (1995), S. 232–257. Open Google Scholar
  252. Paulsson, Jan/Zachary, Douglas, Indirect Expropriation in Investment Treaty Arbitrations, in: Horn, Norbert (Hrsg.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes, The Hague 2004, S. 145–158. Open Google Scholar
  253. Pauwelyn, Joost, At the Edge of Chaos? – Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed, ICSID Review 29 (2014), S. 372–418. Open Google Scholar
  254. —, Rational Design or Accidental Evolution? The Emergence of International Investment Law, in: Douglas, Zachary (Hrsg.), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory Into Practice, Oxford 2014, S. 11–43. Open Google Scholar
  255. Perepelynska, Olena, Arbitrations against Ukraine and its State Bodies in Post-Revolution Period, 13. Mai 2015, http://www.cisarbitration.com/2015/05/13/arbitrations-against-ukraine-and-its-state-bodies-in-post-revolution-period. Open Google Scholar
  256. —, Enforceability of Emergency Arbitrator Awards in Ukraine, 7. Dezember 2015, http://www.cisarbitration.com/2015/12/07/enforceability-of-emergency-arbitrator-awards-in-ukraine. Open Google Scholar
  257. Perkams, Markus, Piercing the Corporate Veil, in: Knahr, Christina (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Probleme und Entwicklungen im Internationalen Investitionsrecht, Stuttgart, München 2008, S. 143–162. Open Google Scholar
  258. —, Internationale Investitionsschutzabkommen im Spannungsfeld zwischen effektivem Investitionsschutz und staatlichem Gemeinwohl – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung am Beispiel der Dichotomie von indirekten Enteignungen und nationalen Regulierungen in Investitionsschutzabkommen, Baden-Baden 2011. Open Google Scholar
  259. —, Protection for Legal Person, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 638–652. Open Google Scholar
  260. Peters, Anne, Die Zukunft der Völkerrechtswissenschaft: Wider den epistemischen Nationalismus, ZaöRV 67 (2007), S. 721–776. Open Google Scholar
  261. Peters, Hans J. M., Game Theory – A multi-leveled approach, 2. Aufl., Berlin, Heidelberg 2015. Open Google Scholar
  262. Petersen, Niels, How Rational is International Law?, European Journal of International Law 20 (2010), S. 1247–1262. Open Google Scholar
  263. Peterson, Luke, Investor takes emergency arbitrator award under Energy Charter Treaty to a Ukraine court and obtains enforcement of tax-freeze holding, 29. Juni 2015, https://www.iareporter.com/articles/investor-takes-emergency-arbitrator-award-under-energy-charter-treaty-to-a-ukraine-court-and-obtains-enforcement-of-tax-freeze-holdings. Open Google Scholar
  264. —, Investigation: New Details Emerge About Use of Emergency Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Cases, 8. Oktober 2015, https://www.iareporter.com/articles/investigation-new-details-emerge-about-use-of-emergency-arbitrators-in-investment-treaty-cases. Open Google Scholar
  265. Petrov, Yaroslav, JKX vs. Ukraine: An Update on the Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator’s Award, (12. August 2016), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/08/12/jkx-vs-ukraine-an-update-on-the-enforcement-of-emergency-arbitrators-award/?print=pdf. Open Google Scholar
  266. Pfaff, Christina, Investitionsschutz durch regionalen menschenrechtlichen Eigentumsschutz, in: Knahr, Christina (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Probleme und Entwicklungen im Internationalen Investitionsrecht, Stuttgart, München 2008, S. 163–192. Open Google Scholar
  267. Pinsolle, Philippe, A Call to Open the ICC Emergency Arbitrator Procedure to Investment Treaty Cases, in: Carlevaris, Andrea/Lévy, Laurent u.a. (Hrsg.), International Arbitration Under Review: Essays in Honour of John Beechey, 2015, S. 307–317. Open Google Scholar
  268. Pinsolle, Philippe/Voisin, Thomas, Enforcement of Interim Reliefs in Investor-State Arbitration, in: Fouret, Julien (Hrsg.), Enforcement of Investment Treaty Arbitration, 2015, S. 33–41. Open Google Scholar
  269. Pohl, Joachim/Mashigo, Kekeletso/Nohen, Alexis, Dispute Settlement Provisions in International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey – OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2012/02, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k8xb71nf628-en. Open Google Scholar
  270. Pörnbacher/Lederer, Die Reform der DIS-Schiedsgerichtsordnung, Betriebs-Berater (2018), S. 707–712. Open Google Scholar
  271. Posner, Eric A./Sykes, Alan O., Economic Foundations of International Law, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  272. Posner, Theodore R./Walter, Marguerite C., The Abiding Role of State-State Engagement in the Resolution of Investor-State Disputes, in: Kalicki, Jean E./Joubin-Bret, Anna (Hrsg.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System – Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden 2015, S. 381–393. Open Google Scholar
  273. Poudret, Jean-François/Besson, Sébastien, Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2. Aufl. 2007. Open Google Scholar
  274. Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard/Aisbett, Emma, When the Claim Hits – Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning, World Politics 65 (2013), S. 273–313. Open Google Scholar
  275. Prütting, Hanns, Die rechtliche Stellung des Schiedsrichters, SchiedsVZ (2011), S. 233–239. Open Google Scholar
  276. Pulkowski, Dirk, Testing Compliance Theories – Towards US Obedience of International Law in the Avena Case, Leiden Journal of International Law 19 (2006), S. 511–554. Open Google Scholar
  277. Raviv, Adam, Achieving a Faster ICSID, in: Kalicki, Jean E./Joubin-Bret, Anna (Hrsg.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System – Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden 2015, S. 653–717. Open Google Scholar
  278. Redfern, Alan, Interim Measures, in: Newman, Hill (Hrsg.) 2009 – The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide, S. 203–240. Open Google Scholar
  279. Reed, Lucy/Paulsson, Jan/Blackaby, Nigel, Guide to ICSID Arbitration, Den Haag u.a. 2011. Open Google Scholar
  280. Reed, Lucy F./Davis, Jonathan E., Who is a Protected Investor?, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 614–637. Open Google Scholar
  281. Reinisch, August, The Future of Investment Arbitration, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 894–916. Open Google Scholar
  282. —, Enforcement of Investment Awards, in: Yannaca-Small, Katia (Hrsg.), Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements, 2010, S. 671–697. Open Google Scholar
  283. —, Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht, in: Tietje, Christian/Götting, Horst-Peter (Hrsg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., Berlin 2015, S. 398–433. Open Google Scholar
  284. —, Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit zwischen Investoren und Staaten, in: Tietje, Christian/Götting, Horst-Peter (Hrsg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., Berlin 2015, S. 925–946. Open Google Scholar
  285. —, Most Favoured Nation Treatment, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 807–845. Open Google Scholar
  286. —, National Treatment, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 846–869. Open Google Scholar
  287. Richter, Rudolf/Furubotn, Eirik G., Neue Institutionenökonomik – Eine Einführung und kritische Würdigung, 4. Aufl., Tübingen 2010. Open Google Scholar
  288. Riechmann, Thomas, Spieltheorie, 4. Aufl., München 2014. Open Google Scholar
  289. Roberts, Anthea, State-to-State Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Hybrid Theory of Interdependent Rights and Shared Interpretive Authority, Harvard International Law Journal 55 (2014), S. 1–69. Open Google Scholar
  290. Roth, Marianne, Interim Measures, Journal of Dispute Resolution (2012), S. 425–435. Open Google Scholar
  291. Rothe, Jörg, Playing, Voting, and Dividing, in: ders. (Hrsg.), Economics and Computation – An Introduction to Algorithmic Game Theory, Computational Social Choice, and Fair Division, Berlin, Heidelberg 2016, S. 1–37. Open Google Scholar
  292. Rubins, Noah, The Notion of ‘Investment’ in International Investment Arbitration, in: Horn, Norbert (Hrsg.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes – [procedural and substantive legal aspects], Den Haag 2004, S. 283–324. Open Google Scholar
  293. Salacuse, Jeswald W., The Treatification of International Investment Law, Law and Business Review of the Americas 13 (2007), S. 155–166. Open Google Scholar
  294. —, The Emerging Global Regime for Investment: A Response, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010), S. 427–473. Open Google Scholar
  295. —, The Three Laws of International Investment – National, contractual, and international frameworks for foreign capital, Oxford 2013. Open Google Scholar
  296. —, The Law of Investment Treaties, 2. Aufl., Oxford 2015. Open Google Scholar
  297. Sandler, Todd M., Treaties: Strategic Considerations, University of Illinois Law Review (2008), S. 155–179. Open Google Scholar
  298. Santacroce, Fabio G., The emergency arbitrator – A full-fledged arbitrator rendering an enforceable decision?, Arbitration International 31 (2015), S. 283–312. Open Google Scholar
  299. Santens, Ank/Kudrna, Jaroslav, The State of Play of Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator Decisions, Journal of International Arbitration 34 (2017), S. 1–15. Open Google Scholar
  300. Sarooshi, Dan, Provisional Measures and Investment Treaty Arbitration, Arbitration International 29 (2013), S. 361–380. Open Google Scholar
  301. Sasse, Jan Peter, An Economic Analysis of Bilateral Investment Treaties, Wiesbaden 2011. Open Google Scholar
  302. Sasson, Monique, Investment Arbitration: Procedure, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 1288–1372. Open Google Scholar
  303. Sattorova, Mavluda, The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host State Behavior, in: Lalani, Shaheeza/Lazo, Rodrigo Polanco (Hrsg.), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration, 2014, S. 162–186. Open Google Scholar
  304. Savola, Mika, Interim Measures and Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings, The Croatian Arbitration Yearbook 2016, S. 73–97. Open Google Scholar
  305. SCC, SCC Emergency Arbitrator award before the Supreme Court in Ukraine - The Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, 9. Juni 2016, http://www.sccinstitute.com/about-the-scc/news/2016/scc-emergency-arbitrator-award-before-the-supreme-court-in-ukraine. Open Google Scholar
  306. Schäfer, Raphael, Einführung in das internationale Investitionsschutzrecht, JuS (2016), S. 795–799. Open Google Scholar
  307. Schecter, Stephen/Gintis, Herbert, Game Theory in Action – An introduction to classical and evolutionary models, Princeton/Oxford 2016. Open Google Scholar
  308. Schill, Stephan W., Allocating Adjudicatory Authority – Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas, Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2 (2011), S. 353–371. Open Google Scholar
  309. Schill, Stephan W., International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law - an Introduction, in: ders. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford 2010, S. 3–38. Open Google Scholar
  310. —, MFN Clauses as Bilateral Commitments to Multilateralism – A Reply to Simon Batifort and J. Benton Heath, American Journal of International Law 111 (2017), S. 914–935. Open Google Scholar
  311. Schöbener, Burkhard, Outlook on the Developments in Public International Law and the Law Relating to Aliens, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 64–79. Open Google Scholar
  312. Schöbener, Burkhard/Herbst, Jochen/Perkams, Markus, Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, Heidelberg u.a. 2010. Open Google Scholar
  313. School of International Arbitration, International Arbitration Study: Corporate Attitudes and Practices: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards, 2008, http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/IAstudy_2008.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  314. Schreuer, Christoph, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary – A commentary on the convention on the settlement of investment disputes between states and nationals of other states, 2. Aufl., Cambridge 2009. Open Google Scholar
  315. —, Do We Need Investment Arbitration?, in: Kalicki, Jean E./Joubin-Bret, Anna (Hrsg.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System – Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden 2015, S. 879–889. Open Google Scholar
  316. —, Streitbeilegung im Rahmen des ICSID, in: Kronke, Herbert/Bachofner, Eva (Hrsg.), Handbuch Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2. Aufl., 2016, S. 2270–2292. Open Google Scholar
  317. Schroth, Hans-Jürgen, Einstweiliger Rechtsschutz im deutschen Schiedsverfahren, SchiedsVZ (2003), S. 102–109. Open Google Scholar
  318. Schulte, Constanze, Compliance with decisions of the International Court of Justice, Oxford u.a. 2004. Open Google Scholar
  319. Schwab, Karl Heinz/Walter, Gerhard/Baumbach, Adolf, Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit – Systematischer Kommentar zu den Vorschriften der Zivilprozeßordnung, des Arbeitsgerichtsgesetzes, der Staatsverträge und der Kostengesetze über das privatrechtliche Schiedsgerichtsverfahren, 7. Aufl., München 2005. Open Google Scholar
  320. Schwuchow, Sören C., Völkerrecht als Restriktion für das Handeln von Regierungen – Diplomatie durch Zwang und internationales öffentliches Luftrecht, Wiesbaden 2015. Open Google Scholar
  321. Scott, Robert E./Stephan, Paul B., The Limits of Leviathan – Contract theory and the enforcement of International Law, Cambridge 2006. Open Google Scholar
  322. Semler, Franz-Jörg, Schiedsverfahren im Rahmen von Investitionsschutzabkommen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, SchiedsVZ (2003), S. 97–102. Open Google Scholar
  323. Sessler, Anke/Leimert, Corina, The Role of Expert Determination in Mergers and Acquisitions under German Law, Arbitration International 20 (2004), S. 151–166. Open Google Scholar
  324. Sessler, Anke/Voser, Nathalie, Die Revidierte ICC-Schiedsgerichtsordnung: Schwerpunkte, SchiedsVZ (2012), S. 120–129. Open Google Scholar
  325. Setear, John K., An Iterative Perspective on Treaties: a Synthesis of International Relations Theory and International Law, Harvard International Law Journal 37 (1996), S. 139–229. Open Google Scholar
  326. Sharpe, Jeremy, Representing a Respondent State in Investment Arbitration, in: Giorgetti, Chiara (Hrsg.), Litigating International Investment Disputes – A Practitioner’s Guide, Leiden, Boston 2014, S. 41–79. Open Google Scholar
  327. Shaughnessy, Patricia, Pre-arbitral Urgent Relief: The New sec- Emergency Arbitratar Rules, Journal of International Arbitration 27 (2010), S. 337–360. Open Google Scholar
  328. —, Emergency Arbitration: Justice on the Run, Scandinavian Studies in Law 63 (2017), S. 319–329. Open Google Scholar
  329. Shea, Donald Richard, The Calvo Clause – A Problem of Inter-American and International Law and Diplomacy, Minneapolis 1955. Open Google Scholar
  330. Sherwin, Peter/Rennie, Douglas, Interim Relief Under International Arbitration Rules and Guidelines: A Comparative Analysis, The American Review of International Arbitration (2010), S. 317–366. Open Google Scholar
  331. Sidhu, Karl, Die Regelung von Direktinvestitionen in der WTO 2004. Open Google Scholar
  332. Sieg, Gernot, Spieltheorie, 3. Aufl., München 2010. Open Google Scholar
  333. Simmons, Beth A., International Law and State Behavior – Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs, American Political Science Review 94 (2000), S. 819–835. Open Google Scholar
  334. —, Money and the Law: Why Comply with the Public International Law of Money?, Yale Journal of International Law 25 (2000), S. 323–362. Open Google Scholar
  335. Slaughter, Anne-Marie/Tulumello, Andrew S./Wood, Stepan, International Law and International Relations Theory – A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship, The American Journal of International Law 92 (1998), S. 367. Open Google Scholar
  336. Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment, 3. Aufl., Cambridge u.a. 2010. Open Google Scholar
  337. Stein, Harald D., Allocation Rules with outside Option in Cooperation Games with Time‐Inconsistency, Journal of Business Economics and Management 11 (2010), S. 56–96. Open Google Scholar
  338. Steinbach, Armin/van Aaken, Anne, Ökonomische Analyse des Völker- und Europarechts 2019. Open Google Scholar
  339. Steindl, Barbara Helene, The Emergency Arbitrator in International Construction Arbitration, in: Rovine, Arthur W. (Hrsg.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation – The Fordham papers 2012, Leiden 2013, S. 258–298. Open Google Scholar
  340. Stephan, Paul B., Treaty Enforcement, in: Kontorovich, Eugene/Parisi, Francesco (Hrsg.), Economic Analysis of International Law, Cheltenham 2016, S. 181–203. Open Google Scholar
  341. Stephens-Chu, Gisele Stephens, Is it Always All About the Money? – The Appropriateness of Non-Pecuniary Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Arbitration International 30 (2014), S. 661–686. Open Google Scholar
  342. Stern, Brigitte, Interim/Provisional Measures, in: Kinnear, Meg/Fischer, Geraldine/Minguez Almeida, Jara (Hrsg.), Building International Investment Law – The first 50 years of ICSID, 2016, S. 627–640. Open Google Scholar
  343. Sussman, Edna/Dosman, Alexandra, Evaluating the Advantages and Drawbacks of Emergency Arbitrators, Transnational Dispute Management (2015), S. 1–8. Open Google Scholar
  344. Swee Yen, Koh, The Use of Emergency Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration, ICSID Review 31 (2016), S. 534–548. Open Google Scholar
  345. Tan, David Isidore, ‘Enforcing’ national court judgments as arbitration awards under the New York convention, Arbitration International 34 (2018), S. 415–443. Open Google Scholar
  346. Tawil, Guido Santiago, Most Favoured Nation Clauses and Jurisdictional Clauses in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Binder, Christina/Kriebaum, Ursula u.a. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford 2009, S. 9–30. Open Google Scholar
  347. Thompson, Alexander, Applying Rational Choice Theory to International Law – The Promise and Pitfalls, The Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2002), 285–306. Open Google Scholar
  348. Tietje, Christian, Internationaler Investitionsschutz, in: Ehlers, Dirk/Schoch, Friedrich (Hrsg.), Rechtsschutz im Öffentlichen Recht, 2009. Open Google Scholar
  349. Titi, Aikaterini, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law, Baden-Baden 2014. Open Google Scholar
  350. Trachtman, Joel P., The Economic Structure of International Law, Cambridge, Mass. 2008. Open Google Scholar
  351. UNCTAD, Investor Nationality: Policy Challenges, New York/Geneva 2016. Open Google Scholar
  352. Valasek, Martin/Wilson, Frederic, Distinguishing Expert Determination from Arbitration – The Canadian Approach in a Comparative Perspective 29 (2013), S. 63–88. Open Google Scholar
  353. van Aaken, Anne, International Investment Law Between Commitment and Flexibility – A Contract Theory Analysis, Journal of International Economic Law 12 (2009), S. 507–538. Open Google Scholar
  354. van Aaken, Anne, Vom Nutzen der ökonomischen Theorie für das öffentliche Recht: Methode und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), Recht und Ökonomik – 44. AssÖR, 44. Assistententagung Öffentliches Recht, Jena 2004, München 2004, S. 1–32. Open Google Scholar
  355. —, Primary and Secondary Remedies in International Investment Law and National State Liability: A Functional and Comparative View, in: Schill, Stephan W. (Hrsg.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford 2010, 721–754. Open Google Scholar
  356. —, Control Mechanisms in International Investment Law, in: Douglas, Zachary (Hrsg.), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory Into Practice, Oxford 2014, S. 408–435. Open Google Scholar
  357. van der Bend, Bommel/Nijburg, Kristin, Netherlands, The European Arbitration Review 2017, S. 89–94. Open Google Scholar
  358. van Harten, Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford 2007. Open Google Scholar
  359. van Harten, Gus/Loughlin, Martin, Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law, European Journal of International Law 17 (2006), S. 121–150. Open Google Scholar
  360. Vandevelde, Kenneth J., Bilateral Investment Treaties – History, Policy, and Interpretation, Oxford u.a. 2010. Open Google Scholar
  361. Vasani, Sarah, The Emergency Arbitrator - An effective Option for urgent relief, Young Arbitration Review 4 (2015), S. 4–7. Open Google Scholar
  362. Vattel, Emer de, Le Droit des Gens, ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle, 2 vols. 1758. Open Google Scholar
  363. Viñuales, Jorge E./Bentolila, Dolores, The Use of Alternative (Non-Judicial) Means to Enforce Investment Awards against States, in: Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence/Kohen, Marcelo G./Viñuales, Jorge (Hrsg.), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement, Leiden 2013, S. 247–277. Open Google Scholar
  364. Voser, Nathalie/Boog, Christopher, ICC Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings: An Overview, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 22 (2011), S. 81–92. Open Google Scholar
  365. Waibel, Michael, Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and Admissibility, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 1212–1287. Open Google Scholar
  366. Wälde, Thomas W., Procedural Challenges in Investment Arbitration under the Shadow of the Dual Role of the State – Asymmetries and Tribunals’ Duty to Ensure, Pro-actively, the Equality of Arms, Arbitration International 26 (2010), S. 3–42. Open Google Scholar
  367. Wälde, Thomas W./Sabahi, Borzu, Compensation, Damages, and Valuation, in: Muchlinski, Peter/Ortino, Federico/Schreuer, Christoph (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, 2008, S. 1049–1124. Open Google Scholar
  368. Walter, André von, Investor-State Contracts in the Context of International Investment Law, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 80–92. Open Google Scholar
  369. Welser, Irene, Fast Track Proceedings, Expedited Procedure and emergency Arbitrator - Pros and Cons, in: Gessel-Kalinowska vel Kalisz, Beata/Rajski, Jerzy (Hrsg.), The Challenges and the Future of Commercial and Investment Arbitration – Liber amicorum Professor Jerzy Rajski, Warsaw 2015, S. 215–224. Open Google Scholar
  370. Werdnik, Rainer, The Enforceability of Emergency Arbitrators’ Decisions, in: Zeiler, Gerold/Welser, Irene u.a. (Hrsg.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2014, Wien 2014, S. 249–284. Open Google Scholar
  371. Wiegandt, Jan, Internationale Rechtsordnung oder Machtordnung? - Eine Anmerkung zum Verhältnis von Macht und Recht im Völkerrecht, ZaöRV (2011), S. 31–76. Open Google Scholar
  372. Wiens, Marcus, Vertrauen in der ökonomischen Theorie – Eine mikrofundierte und verhaltensbezogene Analyse, Berlin u.a. 2013. Open Google Scholar
  373. Williams, Zoe, Domestic Demands and International Agreements – What Causes Investor State Disputes?, in: Lalani, Shaheeza/Lazo, Rodrigo Polanco (Hrsg.), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration, 2014, S. 187–210. Open Google Scholar
  374. Winter, Stefan, Grundzüge der Spieltheorie – Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch für das (Selbst-)Studium, 2. Aufl., Berlin 2019. Open Google Scholar
  375. Wittich, Stephan, Investment Arbitration: Remedies, in: Bungenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, München 2015, S. 1391–1430. Open Google Scholar
  376. Yackee, Jason, Pacta Sunt Servanda and State Promises to Foreign Investors Before Bilateral Investment Treaties: Myth and Reality, Fordham International Law Journal 32 (2008), S. 1550–1613. Open Google Scholar
  377. Yeşilirmak, Ali, Provisional Measures in International Commercial Arbitration, Den Haag 2005. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Book Titles No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex