, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access
No Magic Wand
The Idealization of Science in Law
Authors:
|
Publisher:
2006
Summary
Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and LaRue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.
Search publication
Bibliographic data
Edition
1/2006
Copyright Year
2006
ISBN-Print
978-0-7425-5022-3
ISBN-Online
978-1-4616-4036-3
Publisher
Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Language
English
Pages
153
Product Type
Monograph
Table of contents
ChapterPages
Contents No access
Acknowledgments No access
Foreword No access
Introduction No access
1 What's the Problem? No access Pages 1 - 14
2 On Judges Who Are Too Strict No access Pages 15 - 30
3 On Judges Who Are Too Gullible No access Pages 31 - 48
4 The Idealizations of Legal Scholars No access Pages 49 - 84
5 Science Is a Pragmatic Activity No access Pages 85 - 130
6 Science Studies for Law No access Pages 131 - 150
Index No access Pages 151 - 152
About the Authors No access Pages 153 - 153
Similar publications
from the topics "Recht allgemein, Übergreifende Werke und Sammlungen"
