@book{2006:caudill:no_magic_w,
title = {No Magic Wand},
year = {2006},
note = {Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as
gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable
scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however,
some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate
practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is
unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between
undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and LaRue draw on
the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better
understand its goals and limitations.},
edition = {1},
publisher = {Rowman & Littlefield},
address = {Lanham},
series = {},
volume = {},
author = {Caudill, David S. and LaRue, Lewis H.}
}