Cover of book: Precedents as Rules and Practice
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Edited Book No access

Precedents as Rules and Practice

New Approaches and Methodologies in Studies of Legal Precedents
Editors:
Publisher:
 2021

Summary

What is a legal precedent? How are precedents formed and how do they shape legal outcomes? Over the last decades, a number of studies have appeared that take a socio-legal perspective on the practices of the use of precedents by national and international courts and that have both renewed and extended previous doctrinal discussions on the topic. Based on a conference, this edited volume brings together contributions with different approaches to the study of precedents as both “rules” and “practice”. Rather than studying the binding effect of precedent, the chapters investigate the various conditions of its formation, its forms, and its functions. In so doing, they employ a broad range of methods and add new perspectives to the discussion. Thus, the book not only offers, inter alia, an exploration of the legal actors of precedents and their environment but also gives insights into recent developments in legal methodology for using and studying precedents that is relevant for legal practice and academia alike.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2021
Copyright year
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6757-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0829-6
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
English
Pages
242
Product type
Edited Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 6
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Introduction: A New Methodological Framework for Studies of Precedent No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Part I: Precedent as authority: Broadening the Range of Research Methods No access
        Authors:
      2. Part II: Actors and Languages of Precedent: Courts and their Communities No access
        Authors:
      3. Part III: Identifying Concepts of Precedents in Legal Systems No access
        Authors:
    3. Final Remarks No access
      Authors:
    4. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. A. Precedent and the law No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. B.I. Network analysis applied to the study of precedent No access
        Authors:
      2. B.II. The contributions of network analysis. No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. C.I. Finding Relevant Precedent No access
        Authors:
      2. C.II. Possibilities and Limitations No access
        Authors:
    4. D. Conclusion – What is precedent? No access
      Authors:
    5. E. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. I Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. A. The role of case law at ECtHR No access
        Authors:
      2. B. Case law citation network analysis No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. A. Selection of subset cases No access
        Authors:
      2. B. From numerical to judicial authority No access
        Authors:
      3. C. Preliminary conclusions No access
        Authors:
    4. IV. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
    5. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. A. Legal doctrinal orthodoxy No access
      Authors:
    2. B. Naturalism revisited No access
      Authors:
    3. C. The sociology of authority No access
      Authors:
    4. D. Hermeneutic understanding No access
      Authors:
    5. E. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
    6. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. A. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. I. Jurisprudential No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Rationalist No access
        Authors:
      3. III. Sociological No access
        Authors:
    3. C. Practices of Precedent within Communities of Practice No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. I. Respecting Formalities No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Furthering Interests No access
        Authors:
      3. III. Culture Clubs No access
        Authors:
    5. E. Towards a Sociology of International Precedent No access
      Authors:
    6. F. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
    7. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  7. Authors:
    1. I. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. 1. The Law No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. The Institution No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. 1. From a French model to a sui generis style No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Abstract reasoning with past cases No access
        Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. 1. Language No access
        Authors:
      2. 2. Collegiality and secret deliberations No access
        Authors:
      3. 3. Caseload No access
        Authors:
      4. 4. Discussion: Legitimacy Through Reasoning No access
        Authors:
    5. V. Concluding Remarks No access
      Authors:
    6. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  8. Authors:
    1. I. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. Authors:
        1. a. What Makes a Memory Institutional? No access
          Authors:
        2. b. Lawyers at the Court No access
          Authors:
        3. c. Facilities of the Court No access
          Authors:
        4. d. Panels and Specialization No access
          Authors:
        5. e. Archives No access
          Authors:
      2. Authors:
        1. a. What We Store is What We Retrieve No access
          Authors:
        2. Authors:
          1. i. Availability and Forgetting No access
            Authors:
          2. ii. Lost in Results No access
            Authors:
    3. III Curation of Memory No access
      Authors:
    4. IV Conclusion: The Court and its Past No access
      Authors:
    5. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  9. Authors:
    1. A. Introduction No access
      Authors:
    2. B. The Position of Early Civil Codes No access
      Authors:
    3. C. Theoretical Approaches over Time No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. I. The Role of Courts in a codified legal system No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Organization of the court system and case load No access
        Authors:
    5. Authors:
      1. I. Introduction No access
        Authors:
      2. II. France No access
        Authors:
      3. III. Germany and Austria No access
        Authors:
    6. F. Access to Court Decisions No access
      Authors:
    7. Authors:
      1. I. France No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Germany No access
        Authors:
      3. III. Austria No access
        Authors:
    8. Authors:
      1. I. Deviation from prior decisions No access
        Authors:
      2. II. Precedents as a Means of Concretization of Statutes No access
        Authors:
      3. III. Precedents and Leave to Appeal No access
        Authors:
      4. IV. Legal Malpractice and State Liability No access
        Authors:
    9. I. The “Authority” of Court Decisions No access
      Authors:
    10. J. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
    11. Bibliography No access
      Authors:
  10. Authors:
    1. 1. Definition of Precedent in the ICC Statute No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Identification of Precedent in ICC Case-Law No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. From Constant Jurisprudence to a Constant Change of Jurisprudence on the Standard of Proof No access
      Authors:
    4. Conclusion No access
      Authors:
    5. Bibliography No access
      Authors:

Bibliography (511)

  1. Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm, ‘Peek-A-Boo, It’s a Case Law System!: Comparing the European Court of Justice and the United States Supreme Court from a Network Perspective’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal, 647 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  2. Amalie Frese and Henrik Palmer Olsen, ‘Spelling It Out−Convergence and Divergence in the Judicial Dialogue between CJEU and ECtHR’ (2019) 88 Nordic Journal of International Law, 429 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  3. Marc A Jacob, Precedents and case-based reasoning in the European Court of Justice: Unfinished business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  4. Karl Larenz, ‘Über die Bindungswirkung von Präjudizien’ in Hans W Fasching (ed), Festschrift für Hans Schima zum 75. Geburtstag (Manz, Wien 1969) 247 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  5. D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers, ‘Introduction’ in D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Ashgate 1997) 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  6. Mehrdad Payandeh, Judikative Rechtserzeugung: Theorie, Dogmatik und Methodik der Wirkungen von Präjudizien (Mohr Siebeck 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  7. Aleksander Peczenik, ‘The Binding Force of Precedent’ in D. Neil MacCormick, Robert S Summers and Arthur L Goodhart (eds), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Taylor and Francis 1997) 461 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  8. Joseph Raz, The authority of law: Essays on law and morality (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1979). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  9. Nicollo Ridi, ‘Rule of Precedent and Rules on Precedent’, forthcoming in Eric de Brabandere et al (eds), Comparative Procedure in State-to-State Disputes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2020), Available at SSRN: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=3697226> accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  10. Hubert Rottleuthner, ‘Rechtswissenschaft als Sozialwissenschaft’ in Eric Hilgendorf and Jan C Joerden (eds), Handbuch Rechtsphilosophie (2nd edn, J.B. Metzler Verlag, Stuttgart 2021) 264 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  11. Urška Šadl and Henrik P Olsen, ‘Can Quantitative Methods Complement Doctrinal Legal Studies? Using Citation Network and Corpus Linguistic Analysis to Understand International Courts’ (2017) 30(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, 327 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-7
  12. Wolfgang Alschner, and Damien Charlotin, ‘The Growing Complexity of the International Court of Justice’s Self-Citation Network’ (2018) 29(1) European Journal of International Law, 83-112 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy002> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  13. Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir, ‘Res Interpretata, Erga Omnes Effect and the Role of the Margin of Appreciation in Giving Domestic Effect to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law, 819-43 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx045> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  14. Albert-László Barabási, and Réka Albert, ‘Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks’ (1999) 286 Science, 509-12 <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.­5⁠⁠0⁠9⁠> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  15. Rasmus Arler Bogetoft, ‘Er en dom et bedre præjudikat, hvis den har flere citationer? Om netværksanalyser baseret på citationstal.’ (2020) 133 Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 217-260. <https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2020-02-03-01> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  16. Armin von Bogdandy, and Ingo Venzke, International Judicial Lawmaking : On Public Authority and Democratic Legitimation in Global Governance (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  17. Michael J., II Bommarito, Daniel Katz, and Jon Zelner, ‘Law As a Seamless Web?: Comparison of Various Network Representations of the United States Supreme Court Corpus (1791-2005)’, in Association for Computing Machinery (ed), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL ’09 (ACM, New York 2009), 234-235 <https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568270> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  18. Damien Charlotin, ‘The Place of Investment Awards and WTO Decisions in International Law: A Citation Analysis’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law, 279-99 <https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgx010> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  19. Martin Lolle Christensen, Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Fabien Tarissan, ‘Identification of Case Content with Quantitative Network Analysis: An Example from the ECtHR’, in Floris Bex and Serena Villata (eds), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2016 (IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Washington 2016) <https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-726-9-53> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  20. Mattias Derlén, and Johan Lindholm, ‘Goodbye van Gend En Loos, Hello Bosman? Using Network Analysis to Measure the Importance of Individual CJEU Judgments’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal, 667-87 <https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12077> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  21. Neil Duxbury, The Nature and Authority of Precedent (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  22. Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1986) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  23. James H. Fowler, and Sangick Jeon, ‘The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent’ (2008) 30 Social Networks, 16-30 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.05.001> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  24. Amalie Frese and Henrik Palmer Olsen, ‘Citing Case Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Textbooks on European Human Rights Law’ (2019) 11 European Journal of Legal Studies, 41 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  25. John Gardner, ‘Some Types of Law’, in Douglas E Edlin (ed), Common Law Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007) 51-72 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  26. Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press, Berkeley 1967) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  27. Jon M, Kleinberg, ‘Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment’ (1999) 46 Journal of the ACM (JACM), 604-32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  28. Jan Komárek, ‘Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedent’ (2013) 61 American Journal of Comparative Law, 149-71 <https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0013> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  29. Jorge C. Leitão, Sune Lehmann, and Henrik Palmer Olsen, ‘Quantifying Long-Term Impact of Court Decisions’ (2019) 4 Applied Network Science, 1-15 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-018-0110-3> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  30. Yonatan Lupu, and Erik Voeten, ‘Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 42 British Journal of Political Science, 413-39 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000433> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  31. Mikael Rask Madsen, ‘The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash’ (2016) 79 Law & Contemp. Probs., 141 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  32. Frederic William Maitland, ‘Prologue to a History of English Law’ (1898) 14 Law Quarterly Review, 13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  33. John Henry Merryman, ‘The Authority of Authority’ (1954) 6 Stanford Law Review, 613 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  34. Nathan Miller, ‘An International Jurisprudence? The Operation of “Precedent” Across International Tribunals’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law, 483-526 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156502000249> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  35. Enys Mones, Piotr Sapieżyński, Simon Thordal, Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Sune Lehmann, ‘Emergence of Network Effects and Predictability in the Judicial System’ (2021) 11 Scientific Reports, 1 <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82430-x> accessed 8 June 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  36. Henrik Palmer Olsen and Martin Lolle Christensen, ‘Præjudikatsbrug og netværksanalyse - Svar til Bogetoft’ (2020) 133 Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 691-713 <https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2020-05-04> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  37. Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Magnus Esmark, ‘Needles in a Haystack: Using Network Analysis to Identify Cases That Are Cited for General Principles of Law by the European Court of Human Rights’, in Ryan Whalen (ed), Computational Legal Studies (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  38. Henrik Palmer Olsen, Jacob Livingston Slosser, Thomas Troels Hildebrandt, and Cornelius Wiesener, ‘What’s in the Box? The Legal Requirement of Explainability in Computationally Aided Decision-Making in Public Administration’ (2019) 162 iCourts Working Paper Series <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402974> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  39. Yannis Panagis, Martin Lolle Christensen, and Urska Sadl, ‘On Top of Topics: Leveraging Topic Modeling to Study the Dynamic Case-Law of International Courts.’, in Floris Bex and Serena Villata (eds), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2016 (IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Washington 2016) 161-66 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  40. Yannis Panagis, Urska Sadl, and Fabien Tarissan, ‘Giving Every Case Its (Legal) Due The Contribution of Citation Networks and Text Similarity Techniques to Legal Studies of European Union Law’, in Adam Wyner and Giovanni Casini (eds), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2017 (IOS Press, Luxembourg 2017) 59-68 <https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-838-9-59> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  41. Niccolò Ridi, ‘“Mirages of an Intellectual Dreamland”? Ratio, Obiter and the Textualization of International Precedent’ (2019) 10 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 361-95 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  42. Wolfgang Alschner, and Damien Charlotin, ‘The Growing Complexity of the International Court of Justice’s Self-Citation Network’ (2018) 29(1) European Journal of International Law, 83-112 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy002> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  43. Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir, ‘Res Interpretata, Erga Omnes Effect and the Role of the Margin of Appreciation in Giving Domestic Effect to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law, 819-43 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx045> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  44. Albert-László Barabási, and Réka Albert, ‘Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks’ (1999) 286 Science, 509-12 <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.­5⁠⁠0⁠9⁠> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  45. Rasmus Arler Bogetoft, ‘Er en dom et bedre præjudikat, hvis den har flere citationer? Om netværksanalyser baseret på citationstal.’ (2020) 133 Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 217-260. <https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2020-02-03-01> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  46. Armin von Bogdandy, and Ingo Venzke, International Judicial Lawmaking : On Public Authority and Democratic Legitimation in Global Governance (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  47. Michael J., II Bommarito, Daniel Katz, and Jon Zelner, ‘Law As a Seamless Web?: Comparison of Various Network Representations of the United States Supreme Court Corpus (1791-2005)’, in Association for Computing Machinery (ed), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL ’09 (ACM, New York 2009), 234-235 <https://doi.org/10.1145/1568234.1568270> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  48. Damien Charlotin, ‘The Place of Investment Awards and WTO Decisions in International Law: A Citation Analysis’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law, 279-99 <https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgx010> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  49. Martin Lolle Christensen, Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Fabien Tarissan, ‘Identification of Case Content with Quantitative Network Analysis: An Example from the ECtHR’, in Floris Bex and Serena Villata (eds), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2016 (IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Washington 2016) <https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-726-9-53> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  50. Mattias Derlén, and Johan Lindholm, ‘Goodbye van Gend En Loos, Hello Bosman? Using Network Analysis to Measure the Importance of Individual CJEU Judgments’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal, 667-87 <https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12077> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  51. Neil Duxbury, The Nature and Authority of Precedent (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  52. Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1986) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  53. James H. Fowler, and Sangick Jeon, ‘The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent’ (2008) 30 Social Networks, 16-30 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.05.001> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  54. Amalie Frese and Henrik Palmer Olsen, ‘Citing Case Law: A Comparative Study of Legal Textbooks on European Human Rights Law’ (2019) 11 European Journal of Legal Studies, 41 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  55. John Gardner, ‘Some Types of Law’, in Douglas E Edlin (ed), Common Law Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007) 51-72 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  56. Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press, Berkeley 1967) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  57. Jon M, Kleinberg, ‘Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment’ (1999) 46 Journal of the ACM (JACM), 604-32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  58. Jan Komárek, ‘Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedent’ (2013) 61 American Journal of Comparative Law, 149-71 <https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0013> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  59. Jorge C. Leitão, Sune Lehmann, and Henrik Palmer Olsen, ‘Quantifying Long-Term Impact of Court Decisions’ (2019) 4 Applied Network Science, 1-15 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-018-0110-3> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  60. Yonatan Lupu, and Erik Voeten, ‘Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 42 British Journal of Political Science, 413-39 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000433> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  61. Mikael Rask Madsen, ‘The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash’ (2016) 79 Law & Contemp. Probs., 141 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  62. Frederic William Maitland, ‘Prologue to a History of English Law’ (1898) 14 Law Quarterly Review, 13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  63. John Henry Merryman, ‘The Authority of Authority’ (1954) 6 Stanford Law Review, 613 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  64. Nathan Miller, ‘An International Jurisprudence? The Operation of “Precedent” Across International Tribunals’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law, 483-526 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156502000249> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  65. Enys Mones, Piotr Sapieżyński, Simon Thordal, Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Sune Lehmann, ‘Emergence of Network Effects and Predictability in the Judicial System’ (2021) 11 Scientific Reports, 1 <https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82430-x> accessed 8 June 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  66. Henrik Palmer Olsen and Martin Lolle Christensen, ‘Præjudikatsbrug og netværksanalyse - Svar til Bogetoft’ (2020) 133 Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap, 691-713 <https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2020-05-04> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  67. Henrik Palmer Olsen, and Magnus Esmark, ‘Needles in a Haystack: Using Network Analysis to Identify Cases That Are Cited for General Principles of Law by the European Court of Human Rights’, in Ryan Whalen (ed), Computational Legal Studies (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  68. Henrik Palmer Olsen, Jacob Livingston Slosser, Thomas Troels Hildebrandt, and Cornelius Wiesener, ‘What’s in the Box? The Legal Requirement of Explainability in Computationally Aided Decision-Making in Public Administration’ (2019) 162 iCourts Working Paper Series <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402974> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  69. Yannis Panagis, Martin Lolle Christensen, and Urska Sadl, ‘On Top of Topics: Leveraging Topic Modeling to Study the Dynamic Case-Law of International Courts.’, in Floris Bex and Serena Villata (eds), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2016 (IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Washington 2016) 161-66 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  70. Yannis Panagis, Urska Sadl, and Fabien Tarissan, ‘Giving Every Case Its (Legal) Due The Contribution of Citation Networks and Text Similarity Techniques to Legal Studies of European Union Law’, in Adam Wyner and Giovanni Casini (eds), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems JURIX 2017 (IOS Press, Luxembourg 2017) 59-68 <https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-838-9-59> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  71. Niccolò Ridi, ‘“Mirages of an Intellectual Dreamland”? Ratio, Obiter and the Textualization of International Precedent’ (2019) 10 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 361-95 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  72. Niccolò Ridi, ‘The Shape and Structure of the “Usable Past”: An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Precedent in International Adjudication’ (2019) 10 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 200-247 <https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idz007> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  73. Frederick Schauer, ‘Authority and Authorities’ (2008) 94 Virginia Law Review, 1931-61 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  74. Mohamed Shahabuddeen, Precedent in the World Court (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  75. Raimo Siltala, A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford 2000) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  76. Thomas A. Smith, ‘The Web of Law’ (2007) 44 San Diego Law Review, 309-54 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  77. Antoine Vauchez, ‘EU Law Classics in the Making: Methodological Notes on Grands Arrêts at the European Court of Justice’, in Fernanda Nicola and Bill Davies (eds), EU Law Stories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017), 21-34 <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316340479.002> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  78. , ‘The Shape and Structure of the “Usable Past”: An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Precedent in International Adjudication’ (2019) 10 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 200-247 <https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idz007> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  79. Frederick Schauer, ‘Authority and Authorities’ (2008) 94 Virginia Law Review, 1931-61 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  80. Mohamed Shahabuddeen, Precedent in the World Court (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  81. Raimo Siltala, A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law (Hart Publishing, Oxford 2000) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  82. Thomas A. Smith, ‘The Web of Law’ (2007) 44 San Diego Law Review, 309-54 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  83. Antoine Vauchez, ‘EU Law Classics in the Making: Methodological Notes on Grands Arrêts at the European Court of Justice’, in Fernanda Nicola and Bill Davies (eds), EU Law Stories (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017), 21-34 <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316340479.002> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-17
  84. Karen Alter, ‘The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals’ in Dunoff & Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013), 345. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  85. Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm,’Peek-A-Boo, It’s a Case Law System!: Comparing the European Court of Justice and the United States Supreme Court from a Network Perspective’ (2017) 18 German L.J., 647. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  86. Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, ‘Characteristics of Precedent: The Case Law of the European Court of Justice in Three Dimensions’ (2015) 16 German L.J., 1073. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  87. Mattias Derlén & Johan Lindholm, ‘Goodbye van Gen den Loos, Hello Bosman? Using Network Analysis to Measure the importance of Individual CJEU Judgments’ (2014) 20 Eur. L.J., 667. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  88. James H. Fowler et al., ‘Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the U.S. Supreme Court’ (2007) 15 Pol. Analysis, 324. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  89. James H. Fowler & Sangick Jeon, ‘The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent’ (2008) 30 Soc. Networks, 16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  90. Linton C. Freeman, ‘Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification’ (1978) 1, SOC. Networks, 215. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  91. Marc Jacob, Precedents and Case-based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice’: Unfinished Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  92. Jan Komárek, ‘Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedent’ (2013) 61 Am. J. Comp. L., 149. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  93. Jon M. Kleinberg, ‘Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment’ (1999) 46 J. ACM, 604. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  94. Tobias Lock, The European Court of Justice and International Courts (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  95. Yonatan Lupu & Erik Voeten, ‘Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by The European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 42 British J. Pol. Sci., 413. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  96. Mikael Rask Madsen, ‘The Challenging Authority of The European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash’ (2016) 79 Law and Contemporary Problems, 141. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  97. Mathias Siems, Comparative Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  98. Alec Stone Sweet, Governing with Judges, Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-41
  99. Karen Alter, The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton University Press, Princeton 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  100. Mónika Ambrus and Ramses Wessel, ‘Between Pragmatism and Predictability: Temporariness in International Law’ (2014) 45 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  101. Matej Avbelj, ‘Transnational law between modernity and post-modernity’ (2016) 7(3) Transnational Legal Theory, 406 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  102. Sir Frank Berman, ’Authority in International Law,’ KFG Working Paper Series, No. 22 (2018) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  103. Samantha Besson ‘Theorizing the Sources of International Law’ In Samantha Besson and John Tasioulas (eds.) The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010) 163 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  104. Samantha Besson, ‘International Legal Theory Qua Practice of International Law’ in Jean d’Aspremont et al (eds.) International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017) 343 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  105. A Bianchi, International Law Theories: an Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  106. Jack Balkin, ‘The Proliferation of Legal Truth’ (2003) 26(1) Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 5 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  107. Norman Blaikie, Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge (2nd edn. Polity Press, Malden 2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  108. Aldo Zammit Borda, ‘A Formal Approach to Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute from the Perspective of the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals’ (2013) European Journal of International Law, 649 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  109. Jutta Brunée and Stephen Toope, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  110. Dana Burchardt, ‘The Functions of Law and Their Challenges: The Differentiated Functionality of International Law’ (2019) 20(4) German Law Journal 409 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  111. Annabel Brett, ‘Sources in the Scholastic Legacy: the Reconstruction of the Ius Gentium in the Second Scholastic’ in Jean d’Aspremont and Samantha Besson (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017) 67 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  112. Hedley Bull, ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’ in Hedley Bull, Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts (eds) Hugo Grotius and International Relations (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1992) 63 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  113. Anthony Carty, Philosophy of international law (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  114. Basak Çali, The Authority of International Law: Obedience, Respect, and Rebuttal (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  115. Tony Cole, ‘Non-Binding Documents and Literature,’ in Tarcisio Gazinni and Eric de Brabandere (eds.) International Investment Law: Sources of Rights and Obligations (Brill, Leiden 2010) 289 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  116. Richard Collins and Alexandra Bohm, ‘International Law as a Professional Practice: Crafting the Autonomy of International Law’ in Jean d’Aspremont et. al. (eds) International Law as a Profession (2017) 67 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  117. Richard Collins, ‘The Problematic Concept of the International Legal Official’ (2016) 6 Transnational Legal Theory 608 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  118. Richard Collins, The Institutional Problem in Modern International Law (Hart, Oxford 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  119. Jean d’Aspremont, Formalism and the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  120. Shai Dothan, ‘Judicial Deference Allows European Consensus to Emerge’ (2018) 18(2) Chicago Journal of International Law, 393 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  121. George Duke, ‘Gadamer and Political Authority,’ (2013) 13(1) European Journal of Political Theory 25 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  122. Neil Duxbury, Jurists and Judges: an Essay on Influence (Hart, Oxford 2001) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  123. Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1986) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  124. Stanley Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1990) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  125. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method (Bloomsbury, London, 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  126. Leslie Green, ‘Legal Obligations and Authority’ in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Online) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  127. Jean Grodin, ‘Gadamer’s Interest for Legal Hermeneutics’ in Simone Glanert and Fabien Girard (eds) Law’s Hermeneutics and Other Investigations (Routledge, Abingdon 2017) 55 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  128. Monica Hakimi, ‘Why Should We Care About International Law?’ (2020) 118(6) Michigan Law Review, 1283 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  129. Ross Harrison, Hobbes, Locke and Confusion’s Masterpiece (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  130. HLA Hart, The Concept of Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  131. Sondre Torp Helmersen, ‘Finding ‘the Most Highly Qualified Publicists’: Lessons from the International Court of Justice’ (2019) 30(2) European Journal of International Law, 509 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  132. Sondre Torp Helmersen, ‘The Application of Teachings by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’ (2020) 11 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 11 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  133. Sondre Torp Helmersen, ‘the Use of Scholarship by the WTO Appellate Body,’ (2016) Goettingen Journal of International Law, 309 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  134. Sondre Torp Helmersen, The Applications of Teachings by the International Court of Justice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  135. Gleider Hernández, ‘A Divisible College?: Reflections on the International Legal Profession’ (2018) 29(3) European Journal of International Law 1003 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  136. Gleider Hernández, ‘International Judicial Law-Making’ in Catherine Brölmann and Yannick Radi (eds.) Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Law-Making (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2015) 200 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  137. Gleider Hernández, ‘The Activist Academic in International Law,’ European Society of International Law Reflections Series, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  138. Gleider Hernández, ‘The Responsibility of the International Legal Academic: Situating the Grammarian Within the “Invisible College”’ in Jean d’Aspremont et al (eds), International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017) 160 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  139. Gleider Hernández, The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  140. Robert Hume, ‘The Use of Rhetorical Sources by the U.S. Supreme Court,’ (2006) 40(4) Law and Society Review, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  141. Clarence Wilfred Jenks, ‘Craftsmanship and International Law’ (1956) 50 American Journal of International Law, 32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  142. Jörg Kammerhofer, ‘Law-Making by Scholars’ in Catherine Brölmann and Yannick Radi (eds.) Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Law-Making (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar 2015) 305 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  143. Jorg Kammerhofer, ‘Orthodox Generalists and Political Activists in International Legal Scholarship’ in Matthew Happold (ed) International Law in a Multipolar World (Routledge, Abingdon 2010) 129 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  144. Jörg Kammerhofer, Uncertainty in International Law: a Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge, Abingdon 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  145. Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law (2nd edn, University of California Press, Berkeley 1967) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  146. Alexandra Kemmerer, ‘Sources in the Meta-Theory of International Law: Hermeneutical Conversations’ in Jean d’Aspremont and Samantha Besson (ed.) The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017) 469 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  147. David Kennedy, A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  148. David Kennedy, ‘Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance’ (2005) 2 Sydney Law Review 5 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  149. Jan Klabbers, ‘Doing Justice? Bureaucracy, the Rule of Law and Virtue Ethics’ (2017) 1 Rivista di filosofia del diritto, 27 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  150. Thomas Kleinlein, ‘Matters of Interpretation: How to Conceptualize and Evaluate Change of Norms and Values in the International Legal Order,’ KFG Working Paper Series, No. 24 (2018) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  151. Outi Korhonen, International Law Situated. An Analysis of the Lawyer’s Stance Towards Culture, History and Community (Kluwer, Hague 2000) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  152. Martti Koskenniemi, ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’ (2009) 15(3) European Journal of International Relations 404 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  153. Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: the Structure of International Legal Argument (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  154. Nico Krisch, ‘Liquid authority in global governance’ (2017) 9(2) International Theory, 237 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  155. Cristina Lafont, ‘Heidegger’s Hermeneutics’ in Simone Glanert and Fabien Girard (eds) Law’s Hermeneutics and Other Investigations (Routledge, Abingdon 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  156. Gregory Lehy, Legal Hermeneutics, History, Theory and Practice (University of California Press, Berkeley 1992) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  157. Yonatan Lupu and Erik Voeten, ‘Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 43(2) British Journal of Political Science, 413 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  158. Mikael Rask Madsen, Laurence Helfer and Karen Alter (eds.) International Court Authority (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  159. John Henry Merryman, ‘The Authority of Authority: What the California Supreme Court Cited in 1950’ (1954) 6 Stanford Law Review, 613 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  160. Gregory Messenger, ‘International Law, Perception, and the Problem of Time’ in L Pasquet et al. (eds) International Law and Time: Narratives and Techniques (Forthcoming, Springer, 2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  161. Francis Mootz, ‘A Future Foretold: Neo-Aristotelian Praise of Postmodern Legal Theory’ (2003) 68(3) Brooklyn Law Review 683 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  162. Francis Mootz, ‘Interpretation’ in Austin Sarat et al (eds) Law and the Humanities: an Introduction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010) 359 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  163. Francis Mootz, ‘The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry Based on the Work of Gadamer, Habermas and Ricoeur’ (1988) 68 Boston University Law Review 523 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  164. Henrik Palmer Olsen and Stuart Toddington, ‘The End of an Era: Static and Dynamic Interpretation in International Courts’ (2004) 14 International Criminal Law Review, 920 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  165. Henrik Palmer Olsen and Stuart Toddington, ‘The Scandanavian Roots of a New Approach to Legal Knowledge’ (2012) 34 Retfærd, 57 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  166. Nicholas Onuf, ‘Lawmaking and the Global Community’ in Nicholas Onuf (ed.) International Legal Theory: Essays and Engagements 1966-2006 (Routledge, Abingdon 2008) 94 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  167. Alexander Orakhelashvili, ‘The Relevance of Theory and History - the Essence and Origins of International Law’ in Alexander Orakhelashvili, (ed) Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2008) 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  168. Anne Orford, ‘A Journal of the Voyage from Apology to Utopia’ (2006) 12 German Law Journal 993 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  169. Clive Parry, The Sources and Evidences of International Law (Manchester University Press, Manchester 1955) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  170. Andreas Paulus, ‘International Law after Postmodernism: Towards Renewal or Decline of International Law?’ (2001) 14(4) Leiden Journal of International Law 727 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  171. Joost Pauwelyn, Ramses Wessel, and Jan Wouters (eds.) Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  172. Michael Peil, ‘Scholarly Writings as a Source of Law: A Survey of the Use of Doctrine by the International Court of Justice’ (2012) 1(3) Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 136 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  173. Alain Pellet ‘Article 38,’ in Andreas Zimmermann, Christian Tomuschat, and Karin Oellers-Frahm (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006) 784 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  174. Anne Peters, ‘Realizing Utopia as a Scholarly Endeavour’ (2013) 24(2) European Journal of International Law, 347 Anne Peters, Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2018) 298 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  175. Teresa Phelps and Jenny Pits, ‘Questioning the Text: The Significance of Phenomenological Hermeneutics for Legal Interpretation’ (1095) 29 St Louis University Law Journal, 353 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  176. Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  177. Christian Reus-Smith, ‘Obligation through Practice’ (2011) 3(2) International Theory 339 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  178. Nicollo Ridi, ‘'Mirages of an Intellectual Dreamland’? Ratio, Obiter, and the Textualization of International Precedent’ (2019) 10(3) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 361 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  179. Niccolo Ridi, ‘Rule of Precedent and Rules on Precedent’ in Eric de Branderbare et al (eds.) Comparative Procedure in State to State Disputes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge forthcoming 2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  180. Anthea Roberts and Sandesh Sivukamaran, ‘The Theory and Reality of the Sources of International Law’ in Malcolm Evans (ed.) International Law (5th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018) 89 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  181. Edward Rubin, ‘Legal Scholarship’ in Dennis Patterson (ed.) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (2nd ed. Blackwell, Chichester 2010) 547 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  182. Edward Rubin, ‘What does prescriptive legal scholarship say and who is listening to it? A reply to Dan Cohen’ (1992) 63 University of Colorado Law Review, 731 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  183. Oscar Schachter, ‘The Invisible College of International Lawyers,’ (1977-1978) Northwestern University Law Review 217 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  184. Frederick Schauer, ‘Authority and Authorities,’ (2008) 94(8) Virginia Journal of International Law, 1931 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  185. Frederick Schauer, ‘Authority of Legal Scholarship’ (1991) 139 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  186. Frederick Schauer, Thinking like a lawyer: a new introduction to legal reasoning (Harvard University Press, Harvard 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  187. Iain Scobbie ‘Towards the Elimination of International Law: Some Radical Scepticism about Sceptical Radicalism’ (1990) 61(1) British Yearbook of International Law 33 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  188. Michael Sevel, ‘Practical Authority as Self-Knowledge’ in Leslie Green and Brian Leiter (eds.) Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law (Volume 4, forthcoming 2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  189. Fábio Shecaira, Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law (Springer, London 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  190. Fábio Shecaira, ‘Legal Arguments from Scholarly Authority’ (2017) 30(3) Ratio Juris 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  191. Brad Sherman, ‘Hermeneutics in Law’ (1988) 51(3) Modern Law Review 386 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  192. Sahab Singh, The Potential of International Law: Fragmentation and Ethics’ (2010) 24(1) Leiden Journal of International Law 23 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  193. Sandesh Sivakumaran, ‘The Influence of Teachings of Publicists on the Development of International Law’ (2017) International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  194. Jan Smits, The Mind and Method of the Legal Academic (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  195. Theresa Squatrito, ‘International Courts and the Politics of Legitimation and De-Legitimation’ (2018) 33 Temple International Law and Comparative Law Journal, 298 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  196. Nora Stappert, ‘A New Influence of Legal Scholars? The Use of Academic Writings at International Criminal Courts and Tribunals,’ (2018) 31(4) Leiden Journal of International Law, 963 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  197. Daniel Star and Candice Delmas, ‘Three Conceptions of Practical Authority’ (2011) 2(1) Jurisprudence 143 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  198. Charles Taylor, Philosophical Arguments (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1995) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  199. Hugh Thirlway, The Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  200. William Twinning, ‘General Jurisprudence’ (2007) 15 University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review, 3, 43/46 (2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  201. Ingo Venzke, How Interpretation Makes International Law: on Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  202. Ingo Venzke, ‘Semantic Authority’ in d’Aspremont and Singh, Fundamental Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (2019) 815 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  203. Ingo Venzke, ‘Semantic Authority, Legal Change and the Dynamics of International Law’ (2015) 12 No Foundations, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  204. Stephan Verosta, ‘History of International Law, 1648 to 1815’ in Rüdiger Wolfrum (ed.) Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (2007) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e707?prd=OPIL> accessed 8 June 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  205. Santiago Villalpando, ‘The “Invisible College of International Lawyers” Forty Years Later,’ European Society of International Law Conference Paper Series No. 5/2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  206. Emmanuel Voyiakis, ‘International Law, Interpretative Fidelity and the Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer’ (2011) 54 German Yearbook of International Law 385 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  207. Jeremy Waldron, ‘Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (In Florida)?’ (2003) 21 Law and Philosophy, 137 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  208. Neil Walker, Intimations of Global Law (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  209. Georgia Warnke, Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason (Polity, Cambridge, 1987) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  210. Max Weber, ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in David Owen and Tracy Strong (eds.) Max Weber: the Vocation Lectures (Hackett, Indianapolis 2004) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  211. Wouter Werner, ‘Concluding Remarks’ in Jean d’Aspremont et al (eds.) International Law as a Profession (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017) 432 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  212. Michael Wood, ‘Teachings of the Most Highly Qualified Publicists (Art. 38 (1) ICJ Statute)’ in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2016) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1480> accessed 08 June 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  213. Fuad Zarbiyev, ‘Saying Credibly What the Law Is: On Marks of Authority in International Law,’ (2018) 9(2) Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 291 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  214. Andraz Zidar, ‘Interpretation and the International Legal Profession,’ in Andrea Bianchi, Daniel Peat and Matthew Windsor (eds.) Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015) 142 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-67
  215. Emanuel Adler, Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations (Routledge, London 2005) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  216. Roger P. Alford, ‘The American Influence on International Arbitration’ (2003) 19 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol., 69 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  217. Kenneth Anderson, ‘The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences’ (2009) 20 Eur. J. Int’l L., 331 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  218. Mariana Clara de Andrade, ‘Precedent in the WTO: Retrospective Reflections for a Prospective Dispute Settlement Mechanism’ (2020) 11 J. Int’l Disp. Settlement, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  219. Pierre Bourdieu, ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’ (1987) 38 Hastings LJ, 805 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  220. Jutta Brunnée and Stephen J. Toope, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  221. Harlan Grant Cohen, ‘Lawyers and Precedent’ (2013) 46 Vanderbilt J. Int’l L., 1025 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  222. Harlan Grant Cohen, ‘Theorizing International Precedent’ in Andrea Bianchi, Daniel Peat, and Matthew Windsor (eds), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  223. Harlan Grant Cohen, ‘Undead Wartime Cases’ (2009) 15 Tulane L. Rev., 957 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  224. Lydia DePillis, ‘Robert Lighthizer Blew Up 60 Years of Trade Policy. Nobody Knows What Happens Next’ (13 October 2020) ProPublica <https://www.propublica.org/article/robert-lighthizer-blew-up-60-years-of-trade-policy-nobody-knows-what-happens-next> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  225. Yves Dezalay and Bryant G. Garth, Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1998) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  226. Iana Dreyer, ‘WTO: The Definitive End of Optimism on the Appellate Body’ (29 September 2020) Borderlex <https://borderlex.eu/2020/09/29/wto-the-definitive-end-of-optimism-on-the-appellate-body/> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  227. Laurence R. Helfer and Anne-Marie Slaughter, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Transnational Adjudication’ (1997) 107 Yale LJ, 273 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  228. Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  229. Daniel J. Ikenson and Robert E. Lighthizer, ‘Is the WTO Dispute Settlement System Fair?’ (26 February 2007) Council on Foreign Relations <https://www.cfr.org/article/wto-dispute-settlement-system-fair> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  230. Marc Jacob, ‘Precedents: Lawmaking Through International Adjudication’ (2011) 12 German LJ, 1005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  231. Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  232. Jeffrey Kucik and Sergio Puig, ‘Extending Trade Law Precedent’ (forthcoming 2021) Vanderbilt J. Int’l L Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  233. Jens Lehne, Crisis at the WTO: Is the Blocking of Appointments to the WTO Appellate Body by the United States Legally Justified? (Carl Grossman Publishers, Berlin 2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  234. Simon Lester and James Bacchus, ‘Of Precedent and Persuasion: The Crucial Role of an Appeals Court in WTO Disputes’ (2019) 74 Free Trade Bulletin Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  235. Robert E. Lighthizer, ‘How to Set World Trade Straight’ (20 August 2020) Wall St. J. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  236. Robert E. Lighthizer, ‘U.S. Trade Policy Priorities - Speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ (18 September 2017) <https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-trade-policy-priorities-robert-lighthizer-united-states-trade-representative> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  237. Katerina Linos, The Democratic Foundations of Policy Diffusion (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  238. David Luban, ‘Military Necessity and the Cultures of Military Law’ (2013) 26 Leiden J. Int’l L., 315 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  239. David MacArthur, ‘NAFTA Chapter 11: On an Environmental Collision Course with the World Bank’ [2003] Utah L. Rev., 913 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  240. Robert McDougall, ‘Crisis in the WTO: Restoring the WTO Dispute Settlement Function’ (October 2018) 194 CIGI Papers <https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.194.pdf> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  241. Joost Pauwelyn and Krzysztof Pelc, ‘Who Writes the Rulings of the World Trade Organization? A Critical Assessment of the Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2019) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3458872> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  242. Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  243. Niccolò Ridi, ‘The Shape and Structure of the “Usable Past”: An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Precedent in International Adjudication’ (2019) 10 J. Int’l Disp. Settlement, 200 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  244. Niccolò Ridi, ‘United States-Anti-Dumping Measures Applying Differential Pricing Methodology to Softwood Lumber from Canada’ (2020) 114 Am. J. Int’l. L., 735 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  245. Anthea Roberts, ‘Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System’ (2013) 107 Am. J. Int’l L., 45 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  246. Tommaso Soave, ‘Who Controls WTO Dispute Settlement? Socio-Professional Practices and the Crisis of the Appellate Body’ (2020) Italian Y.B. Int’l L., 13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  247. William M. Snyder, ‘Communities of Practice: Combining Organizational Learning and Strategy Insights to Create a Bridge to the 21st Century’ (August 1997) Community Intelligence Labs <http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/cols.shtml> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  248. Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 2392 (2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  249. U.S Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, ‘Statements by the United States at the Meeting of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body Geneva’ (18 December 2018) <https://geneva.usmission.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/290/Dec18.DSB_.Stmt_.as-deliv.fin_.public.pdf> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  250. U.S. Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, ‘Statements Delivered to the General Council by Ambassador Dennis Shea, U.S. Permanent Representative to the World Trade Organization’ (15 October 15 2019) <https://geneva.usmission.gov/2019/10/15/statements-by-the-united-states-at-the-wto-general-council-meeting/> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  251. USTR, ‘Appellee Submission of the US in US: Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology’ (1 December 2008) <https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/agreements/morocco/pdfs/dispute_settlement/ds350/asset_upload_file233_13332.pdf> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  252. USTR, ‘Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ (February 2020) <https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Report_on_the_Appellate_Body_of_the_World_Trade_Organization.pdf> accessed 18 October 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  253. USTR, ‘Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ (February 2020) <https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Report_on_the_Appellate_Body_of_the_World_Trade_Organization.pdf> accessed 18 October 2020, 50 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  254. USTR, ‘United States Prevails on “Zeroing” Again: WTO Panel Rejects Flawed Appellate Body Findings’ (9 April 2019) <https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2019/april/united-states-prevails-“zeroing”> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  255. Jakob Hanke Vela, ‘Charge of the Lighthizer Brigade’ (2 October 2018) Politico <https://www.politico.eu/article/the-charge-of-the-robert-lighthizer-brigade-trade-war-us-donald-trump/> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  256. Geraldo Vidigal, ‘Living Without the Appellate Body: Multilateral, Bilateral and Plurilateral Solutions to the WTO Dispute Settlement Crisis’ (2019) 20 J. World Investment & Trade, 862 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  257. Erik Voeten, ‘Does a Professional Judiciary Induce More Compliance?: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights’ (27 March 2012) <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2029786> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  258. WTO, Fostering a Discussion on the Functioning of the Appellate Body, Addressing the Issue of Precedent - Communication from Honduras (4 February 2019) WT/GC/W/761 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  259. WTO, Informal Process on Matters Related to the Functioning of the Appellate Body - Communication from Japan and Australia (18 April 2019) WT/GC/W/768 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  260. WTO, Japan: Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages - Report of the Appellate Body (4 October 1996) WT/DS8/AB/R, WT/DS10/AB/R and WT/DS11/AB/R14 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  261. WTO, Minutes of Meeting of Dispute Settlement Body (20 May 2008) WT/DSB/M/250 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  262. WTO, Minutes of Meeting of Dispute Settlement Body - Statement by Japan (19 January 2010) WT/DSB/M/278 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  263. WTO, Minutes of Meeting of Dispute Settlement Body - Statement by the US (17 December 2004) WT/DSB/M/180 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  264. WTO, Minutes of Meetings of Dispute Settlement Body (18 December 2018) WT/DSB/M/423 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  265. WTO, ‘Panels Established to Review Claims Against Trade Measures of Costa Rica, Russia, Saudi Arabia’ (18 December 2018) <https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news18_e/dsb_18dec18_e.htm> accessed 18 October 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  266. WTO, United States: Anti-Dumping Measures Applying Differential Pricing Methodology to Softwood Lumber from Canada - Report of the Panel (9 April 2019) WT/DS534/R Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  267. WTO, United States: Continued Existence and Application of Zeroing Methodology - Report of the Appellate Body (4 February 2009) WT/DS350/AB/R Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  268. WTO, United States: Final Anti-Dumping Measures on Stainless Steel from Mexico - Report of the Appellate Body (30 April 2008) WT/DS344/AB/R Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  269. WTO, United States: Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (Article 21.5- Malaysia) - Report of the Appellate Body (22 October 2001) WT/DS58/AB/RW Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  270. WTO, United States: Sunset Reviews of Anti-Dumping Measures on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina- Report of the Appellate Body (29 November 2004) WT/DS268/AB/R Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  271. WTO, United States: Use of Zeroing in Anti-Dumping Measures Involving Products from Korea (18 January 2011) WT/DS402/R Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-99
  272. Anthony Arnull, ‘The working language of the CJEU: time for a change?’ (2018) 43 European Law Review, 904 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  273. Louic Azoulai, ‘La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes et le paradigme de la traduction’, in Alain Bailleux et al (eds), Traduction et droits européens: enjeux d’une rencontre (Facultés universitaires Saint Louis, Bruxelles 2009), 119 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  274. Louic Azoulai, ‘La fabrication de la jurisprudence communautaire’, in Pascal Mbongo et al (eds), Dans la fabrique du droit européen: scènes, acteurs et publics de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes (Bruylant, Brussels 2009), 153 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  275. Joxerramon Bengoetxea, ‘Quality Standards in Judicial Adjudication: The European Court of Justice’, in Egon Müller et al (eds.), Festschrift für Heike Jung (Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden 2007), 47 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  276. Joxerramon Bengoetxea, ‘Multilingual and multicultural legal reasoning: The European Court of Justice, in Anne Lise Kjær and Silvia Adamo (eds), Linguistic Diversity and European Democracy (Ashgate Publishing, Farnham 2011), 97 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  277. Michal Bobek, ‘The Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2014) 2 Research Papers in Law 2/2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  278. Armin Cuyvers, ‘Preliminary References under EU Law’, in Emmanuel Ugirashebuja et al (eds), East African Community Law (Brill, Leiden 2017), 275 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  279. Matthias Derlén, Multilingual Interpretation of European Union Law (Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  280. Matthias Derlén and John Lindholm, ‘Goodbye van Gend en Loos, Hello Bosman? Using Network Analysis to Measure the Importance of Individual CJEU Judgments’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal, 667 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  281. David Edward, ‘How the Court of Justice Works’ (1995) 20 European Law Review, 539 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  282. David Fontana, ‘Docket control and the Success of Constitutional Courts’, in Tom Ginsburg & Rosalind Dixon (eds), Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2011), 624 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  283. Alicia Hinarejos, ‘Social Legitimacy and the Court of Justice of the EU: Some Reflections on the Role of the Advocate General' (2011-2012) 14 Cambridge YB EurLegal Stud, 615 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  284. Angela Huyne Zhang, ‘The Faceless Court’ (2015) King’s College London Law School Research Paper No 45 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  285. Marc Jacob, Precedents and Case-based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice - Unfinished Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  286. Niilo Jääskinen, ’Oma ja muiden oikeuskäytäntö oikeuslähteenä ylimpien suomalaisten ja eurooppalaisten tuomioistuimien ratkaisutoiminnassa’ (2020) 7-8 Lakimies, 1205 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  287. Katalin Kelemen, ‘Dissenting Opinions in Constitutional Courts’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal, 1345 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  288. Anne Lise Kjær, ‘Nonsense: The CILFIT Criteria Revisited: from the Perspective of Legal Linguistics’ in Joseph Weiler et al (eds), The New Legal Realism: Essays in Honour of Hjalte Rasmussen (Djøf Forlag, København 2010), 297 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  289. Kaisa Koskinen, Beyond Ambivalence. Postmodernity and the Ethics of Translation (Tampereen yliopistopaino, Tampere 2000) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  290. Koen Lenaerts, ‘The Unity of European Law and the Overload of the ECJ-The System of Preliminary Rulings Revisited’ (2005) 1 The Global Community: Y.B. Int’l L. Jurisprudence, 211 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  291. Koen Lenaerts, ‘How the ECJ thinks: a study in judicial legitimacy’ (2013) 36 Fordham Int'l L.J., 1302 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  292. Koen Lenaerts, & José Antonio Gutiérrez-Fons, ‘To say what the law of the EU is: methods of interpretation and the European Court of Justice’ (2014) 20 The Columbia Journal of European Law, 3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  293. Giuseppe Mancini and David Keeling, ‘Language, culture and politics in the life of the European Court of Justice’ (1995) 1 Columbia Journal of European Law, 397 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  294. Karen McAuliffe ‘La traduction dans l’office des juges européens’, in Alain Bailleux et al, (eds), Traduction et droits européens: enjeux d’une rencontre (Facultés universitaires Saint Louis, Bruxelles 2009), 24 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  295. Karen McAuliffe, ‘Precedent at the ECJ: The Linguistic Aspect’ (2013) 15 Current Legal Issues, 483 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  296. Karen McAuliffe, ‘The Limitations of a Multilingual Legal System’ (2013) 26 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 861 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  297. Karen McAuliffe, ‘Behind the Scenes at the Court Of Justice: Drafting EU Law Stories’ in Fernanda Nicola & Bill Davies (eds), EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017), 35 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  298. Elina Paunio, Legal Certainty in Multilingual EU Law: Language, Discourse and Reasoning at the European Court of Justice (Ashgate Publishing, Farnham 2013) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  299. Vlad Perju, ‘Reason and Authority in the European Court of Justice’ (2009) 49 Virginia Journal of International Law, 307 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  300. Sacha Prechal, Interview with judge Sacha Prechal of the Court of Justice: ‘Part I: Working at the CJEU’ of 18 December 2013. Available at <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2013/12/18/interview-with-judge-sacha-prechal-of-the-european-court-of-justice-part-i-working-at-the-cjeu/> accessed on 10 April 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  301. Leonardo Pierdominici, The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU: A Comparative Law Perspective (Palgrave MacMillan, Cham, 2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  302. Urska Šadl, ‘Precedent in the Sui Generis Legal Order: A Mine Run Approach’ (2014) 20 European Law Journal, 544 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  303. Konrad Schiemann ‘The application of general principles of Community law by English courts’, in Francis Jacobs et al (eds), European Community Law in the English Courts (Clarendon, Oxford 1998), 137 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  304. Takis Tridimas, ‘Precedent and the Court of Justice: A Jurisprudence of Doubt?’, in Julie Dickson et al (eds), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012), 307 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  305. Joseph Weiler, The Constitution of Europe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  306. Susan Wright ‘The Language of the Law in Multilingual Contexts: Unpicking the English of the EU Courts’ Judgments’ (2016) 37 Statute Law Review, 156 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  307. Special report of the Court of Auditors no 14/2017: Performance review of case management at the Court of Justice of the European Union, p. 19. Available at: <https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR17_14/SR_CJEU_EN.pdf> accessed 9 April 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  308. The Year in Review, Annual Report, Court of Justice of the European Union, 2019. Available at: <https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-05/ra_pan_2019_interieur_en_final.pdf> accessed 9 April 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-129
  309. Gabriele Aicher, ‘Geschichte der Generalprokuratur’ in Gerald Kohl and Ilse Reiter-Zatloukal (eds), "… das Interesse des Staates zu wahren": Staatsanwaltschaften und andere Einrichtungen zur Vertretung öffentlicher Interessen. Geschichte, Gegenwart, Perspektiven (Verlag Österreich, Wien 2018) 119 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  310. Marion Albers, ‘Höchstrichterliche Rechtsfindung und Auslegung gerichtlicher Entscheidungen: 1. Referat’ in Bernd Grzeszick, Christian Calliess and Georg Lienbacher (eds), Grundsatzfragen der Rechtsetzung und Rechtsfindung. Referate und Diskussionen auf der Tagung der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer in Münster vom 5. bis 8. Oktober 2011 (De Gruyter, Berlin 2012) 257 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  311. Amoroso G, ‘Nomofilachia e Massimario’ <<https://www.cortedicassazione.it/cassazione-resources/resources/cms/documents/Il_precedente_ed_il_ruolo_del_Massimario_s07.pdf>> accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  312. Kevin D Ashley, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  313. Reyer Baas, De meerwaarde van meervoud. Verschillen en overeenkomsten tussen meervoudige en enkelvoudige rechtspraak, in het bijzonder in civiele zaken (Wolters Kluwer, Deventer 2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  314. Otto Bähr, Gesammelte Aufsätze: Band 1: Juristische Abhandlungen (F. W. Grunow, Leipzig 1895) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  315. John H Baker, ‘Preface’ in John H Baker (ed), Judicial Records, Law Reports, and the Growth of Case Law (Duncker Humblot GmbH, Berlin 2013) 5 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  316. Robert C Berring, ‘Collapse of the Structure of the Legal Research Universe: The Imperative of Digital Information’ (1994) 69 Washington Law Review, 9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  317. Robert C Berring, ‘Legal Research and the World of Thinkable Thoughts’ (2000) 2 The Journal of Appelate Practice and Process, 305 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  318. Jon Bing, ‘Let there be LITE: a brief history of legal information retrieval’ (2010) 1 European Journal of Law and Technology < https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A240098684/AONE?u=43wien&sid=AONE&xid=a9328aaa > accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  319. Barbara Bintliff, ‘From Creativity to Computerese: Thinking Like a Lawyer in the Computer Age’ (1996) 88 Law Libr J, 338 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  320. Stefan Brink, Über die richterliche Entscheidungsbegründung: Funktion - Position - Methodik (Lang, Frankfurt am Main 1999) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  321. Micha-Manuel Bues, ‘Artifical Intelligence im Recht’ in Markus Hartung, Micha-Manuel Bues and Gernot Halbleib (eds), Legal Tech: Die Digitalisierung des Rechtsmarkts (C.H. Beck, Vahlen, Manz, München 2018) 275 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  322. Peter Bydlinski, ‘Die Regresskriterien bei der Schadenersatz-Gesamtschuld: Zugleich ein neuerliches Plädoyer gegen die Rechtssatz-Judikatur’ (2013) Richterzeitung, 57 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  323. Stephanie Cartier and Cristina Hosse, ‘The Role of Registries and Legal Secretariats in International Judicial Institutions’ in Cesare Romano, Karen J Alter and Yuval Shani (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International adjudication (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013) 711 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  324. Andrea Casey, Organizational identity and memory: A multidisciplinary approach (Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, London 2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  325. Alberto Cevolini, ‘Die Organisation des Gedächtnisses und das Gedächtnis der Organisation’ in Oliver Dimbath and Michael Heinlein (eds), Die Sozialität des Erinnerns: Beiträge zur Arbeit an einer Theorie des sozialen Gedächtnisses (Springer, Wiesbaden 2014) 167 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  326. Amanda Coffey, ‘Analysing Documents’ in Uwe Flick (ed), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (SAGE, London 2014) 367 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  327. Cosette D Creamer and Zuzanna Godzimirska, ‘Trust in the Court: The Role of the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2019) 30 European Journal of International Law, 665 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  328. Ezra Dodd Church, ‘Technological Conservatism: How Information Technology Prevents the Law from Changing’ (2004) 83 Texas Law Review, 561 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  329. Karl-Heinz Danzl and Herbert Hopf, Oberster Gerichtshof (3rd edn, NWV, Wien, Graz 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  330. René David, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol 2: The Legal Systems of the World, their Comparison and Unification: Chapter 3: Sources of Law (J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen 1984) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  331. Neal Devins and David Klein, ‘The Vanishing Common Law Judge?’ (2017) 165 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 595 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  332. Frank Diedrich, Präjudizien im Zivilrecht (Kovač, Hamburg 2004) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  333. Neil Duxbury, The Nature and Authority of Precedent (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  334. Mark Easterby-Smith and Marjorie A Lyles, ‘In Praise of Organizational Forgetting’ (2011) 20 Journal of Management Inquiry, 311 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  335. Hans W Fasching, ‘Zur verfassungsrechtlichen Rechtfertigung der Bindung des Obersten Gerichtshofes an seine Entscheidungen’ in Hans W Fasching (ed), Festschrift für Hans Schima zum 75. Geburtstag (Manz, Wien 1969) 133 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  336. Birgit Feldner, Verstärkte Senate beim Obersten Gerichtshof: Rechtsprechung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Unabhängigkeit, Richtigkeit und Einheitlichkeit (Springer, Wien [u.a.] 2001) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  337. Frédérique Ferrand, ‘Der Avocat général bei der Cour de cassation und die richterliche Rechtsfortbildung in Frankreich’ (2016) 80 Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 288 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  338. Marina Fiedler and Isabell Welpe, ‘How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory’ (2010) 31 Organization Studies, 381 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  339. Holger Fleischer, ‘Gesellschaftsrechts-Geschichten - eine Forschungsagenda’ in Holger Fleischer and Jan Thiessen (eds), Gesellschaftsrechts-Geschichten (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2018) 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  340. Holger Fleischer, ‘Höchstrichterliche Leitsätze und richterliche Normbildung im Gesellschaftsrecht’ (2018) 39 ZIP, 605 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  341. Holger Fleischer, ‘Schlussbetrachtung: Gesellschaftsrechtliche Zeitgeschichte im Fallformat’ in Holger Fleischer and Jan Thiessen (eds), Gesellschaftsrechts-Geschichten (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2018) 736 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  342. Hamid Foroughi and others, ‘Organizational Memory Studies’ (2020) 41 Organization Studies, 1725 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  343. Anton Geist, Rechtsdatenbanken und Relevanzsortierung (Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft, Wien 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  344. Hans Gerstenkorn, ‘Einführung: Die Dokumentation im Bereich der Bundesgerichte’, in Hans Gerstenkorn and Hildebert Kirchner (eds), Die Dokumentation der Bundesgerichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Österreichs und der Schweiz (Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages, Bonn 1964) 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  345. Hans Gerstenkorn and Hildebert Kirchner (eds), Die Dokumentation der Bundesgerichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Österreichs und der Schweiz (Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages, Bonn 1964) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  346. Groupe de travail sur la rédaction des décisions de la juridiction administrative présidé par le président Philippe Martin, ‘Rapport’ <<https://www.conseil-etat.fr/Media/actualites/documents/2012/rapport_redaction_decisions_juradm_2012>> accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  347. Veronika Haberler, Die höchstgerichtliche Entscheidung: Eine empirische Studie zur Entscheidungsfindung in Zivilrechtssachen am OGH (Wiener Advocatur Bureau, Wien 2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  348. F. A Hanson, ‘From Key Numbers to Keywords: How Automation Has Transformed the Law’ (2002) 94 Law Library Journal, 563 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  349. David Harvey, Collisions in the Digital Paradigm: Law and Rule Making in the Internet Age (Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portand Oregon 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  350. Ted Hedesstrom and Edgar Whitley, ‘What is Meant by Tacit Knowledge? Towards a Better Understanding of the Shape of Actions’ (2000) ECIS 2000 Proceedings <<https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2000/29>> accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  351. Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, Innovation und Recht, Recht und Innovation: Recht im Ensemble seiner Kontexte (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  352. Elisabeth Holzleithner and Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, ‘Das Zitat als grundloser Grund rechtlicher Legitimität’ in Birgit Feldner and Nikolaus Forgó (eds), Norm und Entscheidung: Prolegomena zu einer Theorie des Falls (Springer, Wien, New York 2000) 318 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  353. Michael Huber, ‘§ 299’ in Hans-Joachim Musielak and Wolfgang Voit (eds), Zivilprozessordnung (18th edn, Vahlen 2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  354. David J Ibbetson, ‘Case-Law and Doctrine’ in Reiner Schulze and Ulrike Seif (eds), Richterrecht und Rechtsfortbildung in der Europäischen Rechtsgemeinschaft (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2003) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  355. David J Ibbetson and Alain Wijffels, ‘Case Law in the Making: The Techniques and Methods of Judicial Records and Law Reports’ in Alain Wijffels (ed), Case Law in the Making: Vol 1: Essays (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1997) 29 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  356. Marc A Jacob, Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice: Unfinished Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  357. Dietmar Jahnel, ‘Rechtsdatenbanken für Wissenschaft und Praxis’ (1988) ÖJZ, 301 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  358. Amit Jain, ‘Is Organizational Memory a Useful Capability?: An Analysis of Its Effects on Productivity, Absorptive Capacity, and Adaption’ in Linda Argote and John M Levine (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, New York, NY 2020) 295 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  359. Richard F Jones, ‘The Role of Official Headnotes in Legal Research’ (1966) 59 Law Library Journal, 277 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  360. Anna B Kaiser, ‘Herstellung und Darstellung von Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ in Johannes Masing et al. (eds), Entscheidungen und Entscheidungsprozesse der Rechtsprechung: Décisions juridictionnelles et processus décisionnels. Dokumentation des 9. Treffens des Deutsch-Französischen Gesprächskreises für Öffentliches Recht 2018 (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2020) 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  361. Anna-Bettina Kaiser, Die Kommunikation der Verwaltung: Diskurse zu den Kommunikationsbeziehungen zwischen staatlicher Verwaltung und Privaten in der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  362. David Kästle-Lamparter, Welt der Kommentare (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  363. David Kästle-Lamparter, ‘Rezeption und Vergessen in der Welt der Kommentare’ in Nikolaus Marsch, Laura Münkler and Thomas Wischmeyer (eds), Apokryphe Schriften: Rezeption und Vergessen in der Wissenschaft vom Öffentlichen Recht (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2019) 93 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  364. M. E Katsh, The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law (Oxford University Press, New York, NY 1989) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  365. Sally J Kenney, ‘Beyond Principals and Agents’ (2000) 33 Comparative Political Studies, 593 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  366. Wolfgang Kilian, ‘Idee und Wirklichkeit der Rechtsinformatik in Deutschland’ (2017) 33 Computer und Recht, 202 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  367. Uwe Kischel, Die Begründung: Zur Erläuterung staatlicher Entscheidungen gegenüber dem Bürger (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2003) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  368. Georg Kodek, ‘Funktion und Arbeitsweise des OGH - die Binnensicht’ in Georg Kodek (ed), Zugang zum OGH: Vorträge des Symposiums "Zugang zum OGH in Zivil- und Strafsachen" (Manz, Wien 2012) 99 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  369. Hein Kötz, Über den Stil höchstrichterlicher Entscheidungen (Universitätsverlag GmbH, Konstanz 1973) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  370. Markus Krajewski, Paper Machines: About Cards & Catalogs, 1548-1929 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  371. Helmut Kramer, ‘Informationskrise des Rechts und Veröffentlichungspraxis’ (1976) ZRP, 84 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  372. Uwe Kranenpohl, Hinter dem Schleier des Beratungsgeheimnisses: Der Willensbildungs- und Entscheidungsprozess des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (VS Verl. für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  373. Thomas Kreppel, ‘Informationskrise, Verlagskrise und „Besseres Recht“’ (1975) NJW, 2325 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  374. Katrina F Kuh, ‘Electronically Manufactured Law’ (2008) 22 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 223 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  375. Katrina F Kuh and H. S Krieger, ‘Accessing Law: An Empirical Study Exploring the Influence of Legal Research Medium’ (2014) 16 Vand J Ent & Tech L, 757-808 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  376. William M Landes and Richard A Posner, ‘Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’ (1976) 19 The Journal of Law & Economics, 249 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  377. Katja Langenbucher, Die Entwicklung und Auslegung von Richterrecht: Eine methodologische Untersuchung zur richterlichen Rechtsfortbildung im deutschen Zivilrecht (Beck, München 1996) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  378. Rüdiger Lautmann, Justiz - die stille Gewalt: Teilnehmende Beobachtung und entscheidungssoziologische Analyse (Springer VS, Wiesbaden 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  379. Joachim Lege, ‘Die Realität des Rechts ist der Fall. 56 ketzerische Thesen im Geist des Pragmatismus’ (2019) 5 RphZ Rechtsphilosophie, 416 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  380. Oliver Lepsius, ‘Kontextualisierung als Aufgabe der Rechtswissenschaft’ (2019) 74 Juristenzeitung, 793 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  381. Molly W Lien, ‘Technocentrism and the Soul of the Common Law Lawyer’ (1998) 48 American University Law Review, 85 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  382. Niklas Luhmann, Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1964) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  383. Niklas Luhmann, Recht und Automation in der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Eine verwaltungswissenschaftliche Untersuchung (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1966) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  384. Thomas Lundmark, Charting the Divide Between Common and Civil Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  385. D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers, ‘Further General Reflections and Conclusions’ in D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Taylor and Francis, Florence 1997) 531 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  386. Susan N Mart, ‘The Algorithm as a Human Artifact: Implications for Legal [Re]Search’ (2017) 109 Law Library Journal, 387 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  387. Johannes Masing and others (eds), Entscheidungen und Entscheidungsprozesse der Rechtsprechung: Décisions juridictionnelles et processus décisionnels. Dokumentation des 9. Treffens des Deutsch-Französischen Gesprächskreises für Öffentliches Recht 2018 (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  388. Felix Maultzsch, Streitentscheidung und Normbildung durch den Zivilprozess: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zum deutschen, englischen und US-amerikanischen Recht (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  389. Martin Morlok, Ralf Kolbel and Agnes Launhardt, ‘Recht als Soziale Praxis: Eine Soziologische Perpektive in der Methodenlehre’ (2000) 31 Rechtstheorie, 15 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  390. K. Mortelmans, ‘The Court Under the Influence of its Advocates General: An Analysis of the Case Law on the Functioning of the Internal Market’ (2005) 24 Yearbook of European Law, 127 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  391. Marlene Nagelsmeier-Linke, Automatisierte juristische Informationssysteme: Gegenwärtiger Stand ihrer Entwicklung und ihre Bedeutung für die Bibliothekarische Praxis (K. G. Saur, München, New York, London 1980) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  392. Matthias Neumayr, ‘Die Judikaturdokumentation RIS-Justiz im österreichischen Rechtsinformationssystem’ (2015) ZZPint, 73 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  393. Matthias Neumayr, ‘Lauter Bäume, kein Wald’ in Gregor Christandl et al. (eds), Intra- und Interdisziplinarität im Zivilrecht: Jahrbuch junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler (Nomos, Baden-Baden 2018) 9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  394. Fernando Olivera, ‘Memory Systems In Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Of Mechanisms For Knowledge Collection, Storage And Access’ (2000) 37 Journal of Management Studies, 811 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  395. Elizabeth Outler, ‘Mapping the Achieved Values of Legal Reference Books onto the Digital Future’ (2015) 34 Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 177 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  396. Mehrdad Payandeh, Judikative Rechtserzeugung: Theorie, Dogmatik und Methodik der Wirkungen von Präjudizien (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  397. Theodore Plucknett, A Concise History of the Common Law (5th edn, Liberty Fund Inc, Indianapolis 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  398. Richard A Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (9th edn, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, New York, NY 2014) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  399. Bernhard M Prestel, Datenverarbeitung im Dienste juristischer Dokumentation: Ein Arbeits- und Funktionsvergleich zweier Systeme (De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston 1971) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  400. ‘Rapport de la Commission de réflexion sur la réforme de la Cour de cassation’ <<https://www.courdecassation.fr/IMG///Rapport%20sur%20la%20r%C3%A9forme%20de%20la%20Cour%20de%20cassation.pdf>> accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  401. Niccolò Raselli, ‘Gedanken über den Einfluss computergestützter Informationsverarbeitung auf die Rechtsprechung’ (2002) SJZ, 605 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  402. Robert Rebhahn, ‘Auf der Suche nach der ratio decidendi’ in Clemens Jabloner et al. (eds), Festschrift Heinz Mayer: Vom praktischen Wert der Methode (Manz, Wien 2011) 575 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  403. Robert Rebhahn, ‘Der Urteilsstil des OGH im Vergleich mit den Höchstgerichten Deutschlands, Frankreichs und Englands’ in Constanze Fischer-Czermak et al. (eds), Festschrift 200 Jahre ABGB (Manz, Wien 2011) 1539 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  404. Franz Reimer, Juristische Methodenlehre (2nd edn, Nomos, Baden-Baden 2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  405. Catherine Reiter, Gerichtsinterne Organisation: Best Practices (Schulthess, Zürich 2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  406. Dietrich Rethorn, Kodifikationsgerechte Rechtsprechung: Eine Untersuchung zur Bildung und zur Funktion von Leitsätzen (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1979) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  407. Niccolò Ridi, ‘The Shape and Structure of the ‘Usable Past’: An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Precedent in International Adjudication’ (2019) 10 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 200 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  408. Jürgen Rödig, ‘Axiomatisierbarkeit juristischer Systeme’ (1972) 1 Datenverarbeitung im Recht, 170 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  409. Andrea S Romito and Clara Tracogna, ‘Standardization of Judicial Practice in Italy’ (2013) 3 Union of Jurists of Romania Law Review, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  410. Richard J Ross, ‘The Memorial Culture of Early Modern English Lawyers: Memory as Keyword, Shelter, and Identity, 1560-1640’ (1998) 10 Yale JL & Human, 229 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  411. Maria Schlagböhmer, ‘Das automatisierte juristische Informationssystem des Kassationsgerichtshofes in Rom „Italgiure"’ (1975) 4 Datenverarbeitung im Recht, 61 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  412. Rainer Schliebs, ‘Dokumentationsstelle, Nachschlagewerk und Entscheidungsversand des Bundesgerichtshofs’ in Karlmann Geiß (ed), Festschrift aus Anlaß des fünfzigjährigen Bestehens von Bundesgerichtshof, Bundesanwaltschaft und Rechtsanwaltschaft beim Bundesgerichtshof (Heymanns, Köln 2000) 761 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  413. Johanna Schmidt-Räntsch, ‘Die Rechtsprechung der obersten Gerichtshöfe des Bundes (OGB)’ in Karl Riesenhuber (ed), Europäische Methodenlehre: Handbuch für Ausbildung und Praxis (3rd edn, De Gruyter, Berlin 2015) 519 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  414. Herbert Schneider, ‘Einfluß und Aufgaben der Anwaltschaft am Bundesgerichtshof’ in Gerda Krüger-Nieland (ed), 25 Jahre Bundesgerichtshof (Beck, München 1975) 71 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  415. Florian Scholz-Berger, ‘Access to the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof: Attempts to Strike a Balance Between Adequate Workload and Adequate Review’ in Pablo Bravo-Hurtado and Cornelis H van Rhee (eds), Supreme Courts under Pressure: Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice (Springer, Cham 2021) 105 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  416. Christoph Schönberger, ‘Höchstrichterliche Rechtsfindung und Auslegung gerichtlicher Entscheidungen: 2. Referat’ in Bernd Grzeszick, Christian Calliess and Georg Lienbacher (eds), Grundsatzfragen der Rechtsetzung und Rechtsfindung. Referate und Diskussionen auf der Tagung der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer in Münster vom 5. bis 8. Oktober 2011 (De Gruyter, Berlin 2012) 296 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  417. Werner Schubert and Hans P Glöckner, Nachschlagewerk des Reichsgerichts Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch: §§ 1 - 133 (Keip, Goldbach 1994) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  418. Jan C Schuhr, ‘Rechtsprechungsdatenbanken als Format rechtlicher Information - Hilfsmittel oder Ersatz für Kommentare?’ in Andreas Funke and Konrad Lachmayer (eds), Formate der Rechtswissenschaft (Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist 2017) 161 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  419. Erich Schweighofer, ‘Knowledge management and administration of justice’ (2004) 18 International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 47 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  420. Raimo Siltala, A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law (Hart, Oxford 2000) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  421. Spiros Simitis, Informationskrise des Rechts und Datenverarbeitung (C.F. Müller, Karlsruhe 1970) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  422. Peter Stegmaier, Wissen, was Recht ist: Richterliche Rechtspraxis aus wissenssoziologischethnografischer Sicht (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  423. Eric W Stein and Vladimir Zwass, ‘Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems’ (1995) 6 Information Systems Research, 85 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  424. Judith Stinson, ‘Why Dicta Becomes Holding and Why it Matters’ (2010) 76 Brooklyn Law Review, 219 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  425. Adolf Stölzel, Die Entwicklung des gelehrten Richterthums in deutschen Territorien: eine rechtsgeschichtliche Untersuchung mit vorzugsweiser Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse im Gebiete des ehemaligen Kurfürstenthums Hessen: Erster Band (J. G. Cotta'schen Buchhandlung, Stuttgart 1872) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  426. Hans-Joachim Strauch, ‘Wandel des Rechts durch juristische Datenbanken’ (2007) DVBl, 1000 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  427. Hans-Joachim Strauch, Methodenlehre des gerichtlichen Erkenntnisverfahrens: Prozesse richterlicher Kognition (Verlag Karl Alber, Freiburg, München 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  428. Michael Stürner, ‘Sharing Responsibility: The German Federal Court of Justice and the Civil Appellate System’ in Pablo Bravo-Hurtado and Cornelis H van Rhee (eds), Supreme Courts under Pressure: Controlling Caseload in the Administration of Civil Justice (Springer, Cham 2021) 75 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  429. Charles Szladits, Guide to Foreign Legal Materials: French German Swiss (Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law, New York 1959) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  430. Sandra Taal, Working separately together (Nomos/Stämpfli/Jan Sramek, Baden-Baden, Bern, Zürich 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  431. Michele Taruffo, ‘Institutional Factors Influencing Precedents’ in D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Taylor and Francis, Florence 1997) 437 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  432. Michele Taruffo and Massimo La Torre, ‘Precedent in Italy’ in D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers (eds), Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Taylor and Francis, Florence 1997) 141 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  433. Peter M Tiersma, ‘The Textualization of Precedent’ (2007) 82 Notre Dame Law Review, 1187 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  434. Peter M Tiersma, Parchment, Paper, Pixels: Law and the Technologies of Communication (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London 2010) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  435. Hans-Heinrich Trute, ‘Klugheit in juristischen Entscheidungen’ in Arno Scherzberg (ed), Klugheit: Begriff - Konzepte - Anwendungen (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2008) 129 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  436. Sigmar Uhlig, ‘Leitsatzbildung’ (1974) DRiZ, 75 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  437. Alan Uzelac, ‘Supreme Courts in the 21st Century: should organisation follow the function?’ (2019) Studia Iuridica, 125 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  438. Marc van Opijnen M and others, ‘On-line Publication of Court Decisions in the EU: Report of the Policy Group of the Project ‘Building on the European Case Law Identifier’’ (2017) <<https://www.bo-ecli.eu/uploads/deliverables/Deliverable%20WS0-D1.pdf>> accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  439. Marc van Opijnen and Cristiana Santos, ‘On the concept of relevance in legal information retrieval’ (2017) 25 Artif Intell Law, 65 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  440. Cornelia Vismann, Akten. Medientechnik und Recht (3rd edn, Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 2011) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  441. Friedemann Vogel, Stephan Pötters and Ralph Christensen, Richterrecht der Arbeit - empirisch untersucht: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen computergestützter Textanalyse am Beispiel des Arbeitnehmerbegriffs (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  442. Jonathan de Vries, ‘Legal Research, Legal Reasoning and Precedent in Canada in the Digital Age’ (2018) 487 Advocates’ Quarterly, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  443. Rainer Wahl, ‘Entwicklungspfade im Recht’ (2013) 68 Juristenzeitung, 369 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  444. Karl Wahle, ‘Vorwort’ in Redaktionsausschuss des Obersten Gerichtshofes (ed), Die Judikate und Sprüche des Obersten Gerichtshofes seit seinem Bestande (1950) III Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  445. Reinhard Walker, ‘Die richterliche Veröffentlichungspraxis in der Kritik’ (1998) 34 JurPC, Abs. 1 - 163 <https://www.jurpc.de/jurpc/show?id=19980034> accessed 12 July 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  446. James P Walsh and Gerardo R Ungson, ‘Organizational Memory’ (1991) 16 The Academy of Management Review, 57 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  447. Rolf Wank, Juristische Methodenlehre: Eine Anleitung für Wissenschaft und Praxis (Verlag Franz Vahlen, München 2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  448. Ruth K Weber, Der Begründungsstil von Conseil constitutionnel und Bundesverfassungsgericht: Eine vergleichende Analyse der Spruchpraxis (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  449. Westphal, ‘Grundzüge der Karteinutzung’ in Ewald Löser and Richard Couvé (eds), Reformen in den städtischen Verwaltungen (C. Heymann, Berlin 1930) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  450. Ewald Wiederin, ‘Der Leitsatz als juristisches Kommunikationsformat’ in Robert Kert and Andrea Lehner (eds), Vielfalt des Strafrechts im internationalen Kontext: Festschrift für Frank Höpfel zum 65. Geburtstag (NWV, Wien, Graz 2018) 765 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  451. Wilhelm Wolf, ‘Richterliche Entscheidungsroutinen als Gegenstand und Leitfaden der juristischen Methodenlehre: zivilrechtliche Perspektiven’ in Franz Reimer (ed), Juristische Methodenlehre aus dem Geist der Praxis? (Nomos, Baden-Baden 2016) 75 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-157
  452. Sir Carleton Kemp Allen, Law in the Making, (7th revised edn, Oxford University Press 1964) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  453. Marc Ancel, ‘Case Law in France’ (1934) 16 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  454. Marc Ancel, ‘Reflexions sur l'Etude Comparative des Cours Supremes et le Recours en Cassation’ (1938) 3 Annales de l'Institut de Droit Compare de l'Universite de Paris, 285 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  455. John Bell, ‘Comparing Precedent’ (1997) 82 Cornell Law Review, 1242 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  456. Raimund Bollenberger, ‘Drittpfandbestellung und Verbraucherschutz nach §§ 25c und 25d KSchG’ (2008) ÖBA, 650 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  457. Jean Carbonnier, ‘Authorities in civil law: France’ in J.E.C. Brierley (trans) and Joseph Dainow (ed), The role of judicial decisions and doctrine in civil law and in mixed jurisdictions (L.S.U. Press, Baton Rouge 1974) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  458. Charles, Baron De Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (Chez Barillot & Fils, Genf 1748) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  459. Laurent Cohen-Tanugi, ‘Case Law in a Legal System Without Binding Precedent: The French Example’ (2006) 17 Stanford Law School. Traditional Commentary <https://cgc.law.stanford.edu/commentaries/17-laurent-cohen-tanugi> accessed 13 April 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  460. Laurent Cohen-Tanugi, Le droit sans l'Etat (Law Without the State) (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1985), 79 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  461. James L. Dennis, ‘Interpretation and application of the civil code and the evaluation of judicial precedent’ (1993) 54 Louisiana Law Review, 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  462. Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi, ‘Judicial Precedents in Civil Law Systems: A Dynamic Analysis’ (2006) 26 International Review of Law and Economics, 519 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  463. Birgit Forgó-Feldner, ‘Der OGH und der Zugang zu seinen Entscheidungen in historischer Perspektive’ in Georg Kodek (ed), Zugang zum OGH. Vorträge des Symposiums „Zugang zum OGH in Zivil- und Strafsachen“ (Manz, Wien 2012) 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  464. Birgit Forgó-Feldner, Verstärkte Senate beim Obersten Gerichtshof. Rechtsprechung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Unabhängigkeit, Richtigkeit und Einheitlichkeit (Springer, Wien 2001) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  465. François Gény, Méthode d’interpretation et sources en droit privé positif I (L.G.D.J, 1919) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  466. Otto von Gierke, Deutsches Privatrecht (Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1936) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  467. Irmgard Griss, Georg Kathrein and Helmut Koziol, Entwurf eines neuen österreichischen Schadenersatzrechts (Verlag Österreich, Wien 2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  468. Harold Cooke Gutteridge, Comparative Law: An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1946) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  469. James Hardisty, ‘Reflections on Stare Decisis’ (1979) 55 Indiana Law Journal, 40 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  470. Tatjana Josipovic, ‘Das ABGB in Kroatien - historische Geltung und Bedeutung für die kroatische Zivilrechtsgesetzgebung von heute’ in Georg Kodek (ed), 200 Jahre Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (ABGB) und Europäisches Vertragsrecht (Manz, Wien 2012) 55 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  471. Georg Kodek, ‘Funktion und Arbeitsweise des OGH - die Binnensicht’ in Georg Kodek (ed), Zugang zum OGH. Vorträge des Symposiums “Zugang zum OGH in Zivil- und Strafsachen“ (Manz, Wien 2012) 99 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  472. Jan Komarek, Precedent and Judicial Lawmaking in Supreme Courts: The Court of Justice Compared to the US Supreme Court and the French Cour de Cassation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  473. Helmut Koziol, Haftpflichtrecht II (3rd edn, Jan Sramek, Wien 2018) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  474. Julius Ofner, Der Ur-Entwurf und die Berathungs-Protokolle des Österreichischen Allgemeinen Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches (Hölder, Wien 1889) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  475. D. K. Lipstein, ‘The Doctrine of Precedent in Continental Law with Special Reference to French and German Law’ (1946) 28 Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, 34 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  476. C. Sumner Lobingier, ‘Precedent in Past and Present Legal Systems’ (1946) 44 Michigan Law Review, 955 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  477. Karen McAuliffe, ‘Precedent at the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Linguistic Aspect’ (2013) 15 Current Legal Issues, 483 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  478. Andrei Marmor, Law in the Age of Pluralism (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  479. Richard D. Moreno, ‘Scott v. Cokern: Of precedent, jurisprudence constante, and the relationship between Louisiana commercial laws and Louisiana pledge jurisprudence’ (1995) 10 Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, 31 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  480. Thomas Olechowski, ‘Das ABGB - Rechtseinheit für Zentraleuropa’ in Georg Kodek (ed), 200 Jahre Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (ABGB) und Europäisches Vertragsrecht (Manz, Wien 2012) 33 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  481. Mehrdad Payandeh, Judikative Rechtserzeugung (Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  482. Leopold Pfaff and Franz Hofmann, Commentar zum österreichischen allgemeinen bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (Manz, Wien 1877) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  483. Robert Rebhahn, Staatshaftung wegen mangelnder Gefahrenabwehr (Manz, Wien 1997) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  484. Rudolf Reischauer, Karl Spielbüchler and Rudolf Welser, Reform des Schadenersatzrechts (Manz, Wien 2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  485. Peter Rummel and Meinhard Lukas (eds), ABGB (4th edn, Manz, Wien 2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  486. Bernd Rüthers, Die heimliche Revolution vom Rechtsstaat zum Richterstaat (2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  487. Bernhard Schima, Das Vorabentscheidungsverfahren vor dem EuGH (3rd edn, Ch. Beck in cooperation with Manz, München und Wien 2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  488. Bojan Spaić, ‘The Authority of Precedents in Civil Law Systems’ (2018) XXVII Studia Iuridica Lubliensia, 27 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  489. Reinhard Sprung, ‘Die Entwicklung der zivilgerichtlichen Begründungspflicht’ in Reinhard Sprung and Bernhard König (eds), Entscheidungsbegründung (Springer-Verlag, Wien 1974) 43 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  490. Igor Tokmadczic, ‘The Case for Case Law: Recognising Precedent in Civil Law Systems’ (Wellington 2016), <http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10063/5228/paper.pdf?se> Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  491. Michel Troper and Christophe Grzegorczyk, ‘Precedent in France’ in Neil MacCormick and Robert Summers (eds), Interpreting precedents: A comparative study (Ashgate/Dartmouth, Aldershot 1997) 103 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  492. Joseph Unger, System des österreichischen allgemeinen Privatrechts I (Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig 1856) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  493. Karl Wahle, ‘Vorwort’ in Die Judikate und Sprüche des Obersten Gerichtshofes seit seinem Bestande (Manz, Wien 1950) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  494. Reinhard Walker, ‘Die Entwicklung der Publikationsmedien im modernen Staat’ (1998) 97 JurPC Web-Dok <https://www.jurpc.de/jurpc/show?id=19980097> accessed 13 April 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  495. Benjamin Watt, ‘Why French Law Rejects Judicial Precedent’ (1997) International Business Lawyer, 18 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  496. Andreas Wiebe and Georg Kodek (eds), UWG (2nd edn, Manz, Wien 2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  497. Franz Zeiller, Commentar über das Allgemeine bürgerliche Gesetzbuch I (Geistinger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Wien und Triest 1811) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  498. Konrad Zweigert and Heinz Kötz, Introduction to Comparative Law (2nd edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-195
  499. Diane Marie Amann, ‘In Bemba and Beyond, Crimes Adjudged to Commit Themselves’, EJIL:Talk, 13 June 2018 <https://www.ejiltalk.org/in-bemba-and-beyond-crimes-adjudged-to-commit-themselves> accessed 31 May 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  500. Gilbert Bitti, ‘Article 21 and the Hierarchy of Sources of Law before the ICC’, in Carsten Stahn (ed.), The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015) 411 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  501. Claire Callejon, ‘Article 21. Droit applicable’, in Julian Fernandez and Xavier Pacreau (eds.), Commentaire du Statut de Rome (Éditions Pedone, Paris 2012) 763 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  502. Nathalie Clarenc Bicudo, ‘Article 21. Droit applicable’, in Julian Fernandez, Xavier Pacreau and Muriel Ubéda-Saillard (eds.), Commentaire du Statut de Rome, (Éditions Pedone, Paris 2019) 957 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  503. Gilbert Guillaume, ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’, (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 5 [‘Le précédent dans la justice et l'arbitrage international’ (2010) 3 Journal du droit international, 687] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  504. Kevin Jon Heller, ‘A Fascinating But Meritless OTP Gambit in Bemba’ (2018) OpinioJuris <http://opiniojuris.org/2018/07/04/a-fascinating-if-meritless-otp-gambit-in-bemba> accessed 31 May 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  505. Miles Jackson, ‘Commander's Motivations in Bemba’, EJIL:Talk, 15 June 2018 <https://www.ejiltalk.org/commanders-motivations-in-bemba> accessed 31 May 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  506. Miles Jackson, “Geographical Remoteness in Bemba”, EJIL:Talk, 30 July 2018 <https://www.ejiltalk.org/geographical-remoteness-in-bemba> accessed 31 May 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  507. Leila Sadat, ‘Fiddling While Rome Burns? The Appeals Chamber’s Curious Decision in Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo’, EJIL:Talk, 12 June 2018 < https://www.ejiltalk.org/fiddling-while-rome-burns-the-appeals-chambers-curious-decision-in-prosecutor-v-jean-pierre-bemba-gombo> accessed 31 May 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  508. Leila Sadat, ‘Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo’ (2019) 113 AJIL, 353 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  509. William Schabas, ‘Article 21. Applicable law / Droit applicable’, in Schabas (ed), The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016) 511 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  510. Société française de droit international, Le précédent en droit international (Éditions Pedone, Paris 2016) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231
  511. Jennifer Trahan, ‘Bemba Acquittal Rests on Erroneous Application of Appellate Review Standard’ (2018) OpinioJuris <http://opiniojuris.org/2018/06/25/bemba-acquittal-rests-on-erroneous-application-of-appellate-review-standard/> accessed 17 May 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748908296-231

Similar publications

from the topics "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover of book: One share, one vote im deutschen und schweizerischen Aktienrecht
Book Titles No access
Jessica Ferreira Rocha
One share, one vote im deutschen und schweizerischen Aktienrecht
Cover of book: Völkerrecht als Prüfungsmaßstab für Sekundärrechtsakte der Union
Book Titles No access
Daniel Eicke
Völkerrecht als Prüfungsmaßstab für Sekundärrechtsakte der Union
Cover of book: Die geographische Schiedsfähigkeit des Unionskartellrechts
Book Titles No access
Henri Kirner
Die geographische Schiedsfähigkeit des Unionskartellrechts
Cover of book: Zukunftsfähige Regulierung Künstlicher Intelligenz durch die Europäische Union?
Edited Book No access
Enrico Peuker, Ralf Peter Schenke
Zukunftsfähige Regulierung Künstlicher Intelligenz durch die Europäische Union?
Cover of book: Privatrechtliche Informationspflichten im Recht der Investmentfonds
Book Titles No access
Phillip Cannell
Privatrechtliche Informationspflichten im Recht der Investmentfonds

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex