Cover of book: Das Aufhebungsverfahren nach Artikel 52 der ICSID-Konvention
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Das Aufhebungsverfahren nach Artikel 52 der ICSID-Konvention

Zur Unterscheidung zwischen Prüfungsgegenstand (subject of review) und Prüfungsmaßstab (standard of review)
Authors:
Publisher:
 02.11.2016

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2016
Publication date
02.11.2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-3421-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7829-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Schriften zur Europäischen Integration und Internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung
Volume
37
Language
German
Pages
238
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 14
  2. Einleitung No access 15 - 20
  3. Problemstellung No access 21 - 26
  4. Gang der Untersuchung No access 27 - 30
    1. A. Historische Hintergründe und theoretische Grundlagen zur Überprüfung völkerrechtlicher Schiedssprüche No access
      1. I. Nachrangigkeit der historischen Auslegung – Auslegungsregeln der Wiener Vertragsrechtskonvention No access
        1. 1. Die Vorentwürfe zu Artikel 52 ICSID-Konvention No access
        2. 2. Nicht ordnungsgemäße Bildung des Schiedsgerichts No access
        3. 3. Offenkundige Überschreitung der Befugnisse des Schiedsgerichts No access
        4. 4. Korruption aufseiten eines Mitglieds des Schiedsgerichts No access
        5. 5. Schwerwiegender Verstoß gegen eine fundamentale Verfahrensvorschrift No access
        6. 6. Fehlende Begründung des Schiedsspruchs No access
        7. 7. Keine inhaltliche Überprüfung des Schiedsspruchs No access
    3. C. Eine Zusammenfassung des 1. Teils in Thesen No access
    1. A. Die Evolution der ICSID-Aufhebungsentscheidungen No access
        1. 1. Klöckner v. Cameroon I (Klöckner I) No access
        2. 2. Amco v. Indonesia I (Amco I) No access
          1. a) Kritik an den fallbezogenen Entscheidungen No access
          2. b) Kritik an den grundsätzlichen Ausführungen zur Auslegung von Artikel 52 ICSID-Konvention No access
            1. aa) Hintergründe No access
            2. bb) Die Debatte No access
            3. cc) Anmerkungen No access
        4. 4. Zusammenfassung No access
        1. 1. Mitchell v. Congo (Mitchell) No access
        2. 2. Im Schrifttum geäußerte Kritik an der Mitchell-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
        3. 3. MHS v. Malaysia (MHS) No access
        4. 4. Sondervotum (dissenting opinion) und im Schrifttum geäußerte Kritik an der MHS-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
        5. 5. Zusammenfassung No access
        1. 1. Sachverhaltshintergründe No access
          1. a) Verletzungen der materiell-rechtlichen Schutzstandards No access
            1. aa) CMS No access
            2. bb) Enron No access
            3. cc) Sempra No access
        3. 3. CMS-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
        4. 4. Enron-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
        5. 5. Sempra-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
          1. a) CMS No access
          2. b) Enron No access
          3. c) Sempra No access
        7. 7. Zusammenfassung No access
        1. 1. Helnan v. Egypt (Helnan) No access
        2. 2. Im Schrifttum geäußerte Kritik an der Helnan-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
        3. 3. Vivendi v. Argentina II (Vivendi II) No access
        4. 4. Im Schrifttum geäußerte Kritik an der Vivendi-II-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
          1. a) Schiedsverfahren No access
          2. b) Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
        6. 6. Durch die Philippinen öffentlich und im Schrifttum geäußerte Kritik an der Fraport I-Aufhebungsentscheidung No access
        7. 7. Zusammenfassung No access
        1. 1. Aufhebungsgründe No access
        2. 2. Anerkennung und Vollstreckung No access
        1. 1. Metalclad v. Mexico (Metalclad) No access
        2. 2. Anmerkungen No access
        3. 3. BG Group v. Argentina (BG Group) No access
        4. 4. Anmerkungen No access
      3. III. Zusammenfassung No access
    4. D. Eine Zusammenfassung des 2.Teils in Thesen No access
    1. A. Notwendigkeit einer Verbesserung No access
        1. 1. Berufungsinstanz No access
        2. 2. Wiedervorlageverfahren No access
        1. 1. Verzicht auf die Ausübung No access
          1. a) Ständiger Aufhebungsspruchkörper (Standing Body of Jurists) No access
          2. b) Informelles Konsultationsverfahren (Party Consultation) No access
        3. 3. Einholung eines Rechtsgutachtens vom IGH (Advisory Opinion) No access
        4. 4. Beschleunigtes Verfahren gemäß ICSID Arbitration Rule 41 Abs. 5 No access
        5. 5. Änderung der gegenwärtigen Aufhebungsgründe des Übereinkommens No access
        6. 6. Erlass offizieller Auslegungsrichtlinien durch den ICSID-Verwaltungsrat No access
        7. 7. Einheitliche Auslegung und Anwendung der ICSID-Aufhebungsgründe durch Ad-hoc-Komitees No access
      3. III. Zusammenfassung und Anmerkungen No access
      1. I. Unterscheidung zwischen Aufhebung und Berufung No access
          1. a) Prüfungsmethodik No access
          2. b) Offenkundigkeit No access
          3. c) Zuständigkeitsentscheidungen No access
          4. d) Nichtanwendung des anwendbaren Rechts No access
        2. 2. Schwerwiegender Verstoß gegen eine fundamentale Verfahrensvorschrift No access
        3. 3. Fehlen einer Begründung No access
    4. D. Eine Zusammenfassung des 3. Teils in Thesen No access
  8. 4. Teil: Schlussbetrachtung No access 213 - 214
  9. Epilog No access 215 - 218
  10. Literaturverzeichnis No access 219 - 234
    1. ICSID-Aufhebungsentscheidungen No access
    2. Staatliche Gerichtsurteile No access
    3. Schiedssprüche No access
    4. Urteil des Internationalen Gerichtshofs No access

Bibliography (233)

  1. Alfons, Claudia, Recognition and Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards, An Analysis of the Legal Framework and its Interpretation in Case Law and Literature, Frankfurt a.M. u.a. 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3726/978-3-631-60378-9
  2. Alvarez, Guillermo Aguilar/Reisman, Michael, The Reasons Requirement in International Investment Arbitration, Leiden 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166325.i-373.5
  3. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan, F., Submission to the Jurisdiction of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, in J. Mar. L. & Com. 1973-1974, S. 211-250. Open Google Scholar
  4. Antonietti, Auriélia, Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25), (Award, August 16, 2007), in 22 ICSID Rev-FILJ 2007, S. 438-445. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/22.2.438
  5. Arnoldt, Thomas, Praxis des Weltbankübereinkommen (ICSID), Anwendbares Recht und Kontrollverfahren beim Internationalen Zentrum zur Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten, Baden-Baden 1997. Open Google Scholar
  6. Aronson, Benjamin M., A New Framework for ICSID Annulment Jurisprudence: Rethinking the Three Generations, in 6 Vienna J. on Int'l Const. L. 2012, S. 3-40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/icl-2012-0102
  7. Avila, Gabriela A., ICSID Annulment Procedure: A Balancing Exercise Between Correctness and Finality, in A. J. van den Berg (Hg.), Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times, ICCA Congress Series, 2010 Rio Volume 15, S. 289-305. Open Google Scholar
  8. Balaš, Vladimír, Review of Awards, in P. Muchlinski, F. Ortino et al. (Hg.), Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press 2008, S. 1125-1153. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.001.0001
  9. Baldwin, Edward/Kantor, Mark/Nolan, Michael, Limits to Enforcement of ICSID Awards, in J. Int`l Arb. 2006, S. 1-24. Open Google Scholar
  10. Barrat, James W./Michael, Margarita M., The „Automatic“ Enforcement of ICSID Awards: The Elephant in the Room?, in The European, Middle Eastern and African Arbitration Review 2014. Open Google Scholar
  11. Becker, Moritz, Supreme Court erklärt Vereinbarungen zur Erweiterung des gerichtlichen Überprüfungsmaßstabs von Schiedssprüchen für unwirksam – Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., in SchiedsVZ 2009, S. 205-209. Open Google Scholar
  12. Ben Hamida, Walid, Two Nebulous ICSID Features: The Notion of Investment and the Scope of Annulment Control – Ad Hoc Committee`s Decision in Patrick Mitchell v. Democratic Republic of Congo, in J. Int`l Arb. 2007, S. 287-306. Open Google Scholar
  13. Benzing, Markus, Beweisrecht vor internationalen Schiedsgerichten in zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten, Heidelberg u.a. 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11647-6
  14. Berman, Franklin, Review of the Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction in ICSID Arbitration, in E. Gaillard (Hg.), The Review of International Arbitral Awards, Huntington 2010, S. 253-263. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bernadini, Piero, ICSID Versus Non-ICSID Investment Treaty Arbitration, in M. Á. Fernández-Ballesteros, D. Arias (Hg.), Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades, Madrid 2010, S. 159-188. Open Google Scholar
  16. Bickel, Matthias, Die Argentinien-Krise aus ökonomischer Sicht: Herausforderung an Finanzsystem und Kapitalmarkt, 38 Beiträge zum Internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht 2005. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bishop, R. Doak/Marchili, Sylvia M., Annulment under the ICSID Convention, Oxford University Press 2012. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bjorklund, Andrea K., The Continuing Appeal of Annulment: Lessons from Amco Asia and CME, in T. Weiler (Hg.), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law, London 2005, S. 471-521. Open Google Scholar
  19. Bluntschli, Johann Caspar, Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staten. Als Rechtsbuch dargestellt, 3. Aufl., Nördlingen 1878. Open Google Scholar
  20. Born, Gary B., International Commercial Arbitration, 2. Aufl., Alphen aan den Rijn 2014. Open Google Scholar
  21. Bottini, Gabriel, Reform of the investor-State arbitration regime: the appeal proposal, in J. Kalicki, A. Joubin-Bret (Hg.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System. Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden 2015, S. 455-473. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/9789004291102_021
  22. Braun, Tillmann R., Ausprägungen der Globalisierung: Der Investor als partielles Subjekt im Internationalen Investitionsrecht, Baden-Baden u.a. 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845236438
  23. Briese, Robyn/Schill, Stephan, Djibouti v France: Self-Judging Clauses before the International Court of Justice, in Melb. J. Int'l L. 2009, S. 308-328. Open Google Scholar
  24. Broches Aaron, Awards Rendered Pursuant to the ICSID Convention: Binding Force, Finality, Recognition, Enforcement, Execution, in 2 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1987, S. 287-334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/2.2.287
  25. Broches, Aaron, Observations on the Finality of ICSID Awards, in 6 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1991,S. 321-379. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/6.2.321
  26. Broches, Aaron, On the Finality of Awards: A Reply to Michael Reisman, in 8 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1993, S. 92-103. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/8.1.92
  27. Broches, Aaron, Selected Essays, World Bank, ICSID, and Other Subjects of Public and Private International Law, Dordrecht 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/10.1.162
  28. Brower, II, Charles H., Investor-State Disputes Under NAFTA: The Empire Strikes Back, in Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 2001, S. 43-88. Open Google Scholar
  29. Bubrowski, Helene, Internationale Investitionsschiedsverfahren und nationale Gerichte, Tübingen 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-152507-0
  30. Buckley, Ross P., Now We Have Come to the ICSID Party: Are Its Awards Final and Enforceable?, in 14 Sydney L. Rev. 1992, S. 358-372. Open Google Scholar
  31. Bulmerincq, August von, Die Staatsstreitigkeiten und ihre Entscheidung ohne Krieg, in F. von Holtzendorff (Hg.), Handbuch des Völkerrechts. Auf Grundlage Europäischer Staatenpraxis, Band IV, Hamburg 1889. Open Google Scholar
  32. Burgstaller, Markus/Rosenberg, Charles B., Challening International Arbitral Awards: To ICSID or not to ICSID?, in Arb. Int’l 2011, S. 91-108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/27.1.91
  33. Burke-White, William W./von Staden, Andreas, Private Litigation in a Public Sphere: The Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitrations, in Yale J. Int’l Law 2012, S. 283-404. Open Google Scholar
  34. Caron, David D., Framing the Work of ICSID Annulment Committee, in 6 World Arbitration and Mediation Review 2012, S. 173-199. Open Google Scholar
  35. Caron, David D., Reputation and Reality in the ICSID Annulment Process: Understanding the Distinction Between Annulment and Appeal, in 7 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1992, S. 21-54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/7.1.21
  36. Cheng, Thai-Heng, Reconsidering ICSID Awards, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 11.5.2011 (abrufbar unter: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2011/05/11/reconsidering-icsid-awards/, zuletzt besucht: 17.5.2015). Open Google Scholar
  37. Cheng, Thai-Heng, The Role of Justice in Annulling Investor-State Arbitration Awards, in Berkeley J. Int’l Law 2013, S. 236-290. Open Google Scholar
  38. Clapham, Jason, Finality of Investor-State Arbitral Awards: Has the Tide Turned and is there a Need for Reform?, in J. Int`l Arb. 2007, S. 437-466. Open Google Scholar
  39. Corporate Europe Observatory, Profiting from Injustice, How law firms, arbitrators and financiers are fuelling an investment arbitration boom, November 2012 (abrufbar unter: http://corporateeurope.org/international-trade/2012/11/profiting-injustice, zuletzt besucht: 25.2.2015). Open Google Scholar
  40. Craig, William L., Uses and Abuses of Appeal from Awards, Arb. Int’l 1988, S. 174-227. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/4.3.174
  41. Crawford, James, Continuity and Discontinuity in International Dispute Settlement, in C. Binder, U. Kriebaum et al. (Hg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, New York 2009, S. 801-817. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0040
  42. Crawford, James, The International Law Commission`s Articles on State Responsibility. Introduction, Text and Commentaries, Cambridge u.a. 2002. Open Google Scholar
  43. Cremades, Bernardo, The Use of Preliminary Objections in ICSID Annulment Proceedings, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 4.9.2013 (abrufbar unter: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2013/09/04/the-use-of-preliminary-objections-in-icsid-annulment-proceedings-2/, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  44. Crivellaro, Antonio, Annulment of ICSID Awards: back to the first Generation?, in L. Lévy, Y. Derains (Hg.), Liber amicorum en l'honneur de Serge Lazareff, S. 145-175. Open Google Scholar
  45. Crook, John R., CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8)-Annulment Proceeding – Decision of September 25, 2007, in 22 ICSID Rev-FILJ 2007, S. 455-465. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/22.2.455
  46. Cullemark, Jonas, Continued Hesitations Regarding “Manifest Disregard of the Law” as a Basis for Setting Aside Awards, in Young Scholars in International Arbitration. A collection of essays prepared for the ICCA 2014 Congress, S. 149-182. Open Google Scholar
  47. Dahm, Georg/ Delbrück, Jost/ Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht. Die Formen des rechtlichen Handelns. Die inhaltliche Ordnung der internationalen Gemeinschaft, Band I/3, 2. Aufl., Berlin 2002. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110906967
  48. De Berranger, Thibaut, L'article 52 de la Convention de Washington du 18 mars 1965 et les premiers enseignements de sa pratique, in Rev. Arb. 1988, S. 93-116. Open Google Scholar
  49. Delaume, Georges R., The Finality of Arbitration Involving States: Recent Developments, in Arb. Int’l 1989, S. 21-34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/5.1.21
  50. Dennis, William C., The Orinoco Steamship Company Case before the Hague Tribunal, in AJIL 1911, S. 35 – 64. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2186764
  51. Diel-Gligor, Katharina, Systemic Deficiencies of ICSID Investment Arbitration?: an Inspection of the Annulment Mechanism, in R. Wolfrum, I. Gätzschmann (Hg.), International dispute settlement: room for innovations?, Heidelberg u.a. 2013, S. 359-392. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34967-6
  52. Di Rosa, Paolo, The Recent Waves of Arbitrations against Argentina under Bilateral Investment Treaties: Background and Principal Legal Issues, in 36 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 2004, S. 41-74. Open Google Scholar
  53. Dolzer, Rudolph/Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, 2. Aufl., Oxford 2012. Open Google Scholar
  54. Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims, Cambridge 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581137.007
  55. Eckardt, Melanie N., Die Entwicklung des Individualrechtsschutzes im internationalen Investitionsschutzrecht, Baden-Baden 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845250274
  56. EU Commission, Press release: CETA: EU and Canada agree on new approach on investment in trade agreement, 29.2.2016 (abrufbar unter http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-399_en.htm, zuletzt besucht: 1.7.2016). Open Google Scholar
  57. EU Commission, Press release: Commission proposes new Investment Court System for TTIP and other EU trade and investment negotiations, 16.9.2015 (abrufbar unter http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5651_en.htm, zuletzt besucht: 1.7.2016). Open Google Scholar
  58. EU Commission, Press release: EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement Now Available Online, 1.2.2016 (abrufbar unter: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-184_en.htm, zuletzt besucht: 1.7.2016). Open Google Scholar
  59. Franke, Florian, Der personelle Anwendungsbereich des internationalen Investitionsschutzrechts, Baden-Baden 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845246659
  60. Feldman, Mark B., The Annulment Proceedings and the Finality of ICSID Arbitral Awards,in 2 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1987, S. 85-109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/2.1.85
  61. Fernández-Armesto, Juan, Different Systems for the Annulment of Investment Awards, in 26 ICSID-Rev-FILJ 2011, S. 128-146. Open Google Scholar
  62. Friedland, Paul/Brumpton, Paul, Rabid Redux: The Second Wave of Abusive ICSID Annulments, in 27 Am. U. Int’L. L. Rev. 2012, S. 727-760. Open Google Scholar
  63. Gaillard, Emmanuel, A Black Year for ICSID, in 4 TDM 2007. Open Google Scholar
  64. Gaillard, Emmanuel/Banifatemi, Yas, The Meaning of the word „and“ in Article 42 (1), Second Sentence, of the Washington Convention: The Role of International Law in the ICSID Choice of Law Process, in 18 ICSID Rev-FILJ 2003, S. 375-411. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/18.2.375
  65. Gaillard, Emmanuel, Centre International pour le Règlement des Différends relatifs aux Investissements (C.I.R.D.I.): Chroniques des sentences arbitrales, 114 Journal du Droit International 1987, S. 135-191. Open Google Scholar
  66. Gaillard, Emmanuel, Centre International pour le Règlement des Différends relatifs aux Investissements (C.I.R.D.I.): Chroniques des sentences arbitrales, in 175 Journal du Droit International 2008, S. 311-364. Open Google Scholar
  67. Gaillard, Emmanuel, Some Notes on the Drafting of ICSID Arbitration Clauses, in 3 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1991, S. 136-146. Open Google Scholar
  68. GAR, EU proposes global investment court, 6.5.2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2015.76.2.66
  69. Gharavi, Hamid, The International Effectiveness of the Annulment of an Arbitral Award, The Hague 2002. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/A:1021272811036
  70. Golsong, Heribert, Schwächung des Schiedsdispositivs bei Investitionsstreitigkeiten, in W. F. Lindacher, D. Pfaff et al. (Hg.) Festschrift für Walther J Habscheid zum 65. Geburtstag, Bielefeld 1989, S. 113-117. Open Google Scholar
  71. Griebel, Jörn, Internationales Investitionsrecht, München 2008. Open Google Scholar
  72. Griebel, Jörn, Lehren aus der Erfolgsgeschichte des internationalen Investitionsrechts, in KSzW 2011, S. 99-104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.9785/ovs-kszw-2011-99
  73. Grotius, Hugo, De Jure belli ac pacis – libri tres. Drei Bücher vom Recht des Krieges und des Friedens, Paris 1625, nebst einer Vorrede von Christian Thomasius zur ersten deutschen Ausgabe des Grotius vom Jahre 1707, in W. Schätzel (Hg.), Die Klassiker des Völkerrechts in modernen deutschen Übersetzungen, Band I, Tübingen 1950. Open Google Scholar
  74. Guillaume, Gilbert, Can Arbitral Awards Constitute a Source of International Law under Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice?, in E. Gaillard, Y. Banifatemi (Hg.), Precedent in International Arbitration, Juris Publishing, Huntington 2008, S. 105-112. Open Google Scholar
  75. Hamamoto, Shotaro, New Challenges for the ICSID Annulment System: Another Private-Public Problem in the International Investment Dispute Settlement, in R. Wolfrum, I. Gätzschmann (Hg.), International dispute settlement: room for innovations?, Heidelberg u.a. 2013, S. 393-416. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34967-6
  76. Happ, Richard, Schiedsverfahren zwischen Staat und Investor nach Artikel 26 Energiechartavertrag, Frankfurt am Main 2000. Open Google Scholar
  77. Harhay, Leah D., The Argentine annulments: The uneasy application of ICSID article 52 inparallel claims, in K. P. Sauvant (Hg.), in Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2011/2012, S. 419-445. Open Google Scholar
  78. Heiskanen, Veijo/Halonen, Laura, Post-Award Remedies, in C. Giorgetti (Hg.), Litigating International Investment Disputes, Leiden 2014, S. 497-526. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/9789004276574_017
  79. Herdegen, Matthias, Interpretation in International Law, in R. Wolfrum (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (MPEPIL), March 2013, Online-Edition (abrufbar unter: www.mpepil.com, zuletzt besucht: 17.5.2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e723
  80. Hirsch, Moshe, The Arbitration Mechanism of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, Dordrecht 1993. Open Google Scholar
  81. Hobér, Kaj/Eliasson, Nils, Review of Investment Treaty Awards by Municipal Courts, in K. Yannaca-Small (Hg.) Arbitration under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues, New York 2010, S. 635-669. Open Google Scholar
  82. Hofmann, Rainer, The Protection of Individuals under Public International Law, in M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel et al. (Hg.) International Investment Law, Baden–Baden u.a. 2015, S. 47-63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845258997-95
  83. Hofmann, Rainer/Tsolakidis, Nikolaos, § 8 Internationaler Investitionsschutz, in D. Ehlers, M. Fehling et al. (Hg.) Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, Bd. 1, Öffentliches Wirtschaftsrecht, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg u.a. 2012, S. 202-235. Open Google Scholar
  84. Holmes, Jr., Oliver Wendell, The Path of Law, in 10 Harvard Law Review 1897, S. 457 (abrufbar unter: http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm, zuletzt besucht: 27.8.2015). Open Google Scholar
  85. Honlet, Jean-Christophe/Legum, Barton/Crevon, Anna, ICSID Annulment, in M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel et al. (Hg.) International Investment Law, Baden-Baden u.a. 2015, S. 1431-1459. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845258997-1480
  86. IBRD, Report of the Executive Directors on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 4 I.L.M. 1965, S. 524-531. Open Google Scholar
  87. ICSID Annual Report 1988, (abrufbar unter: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/resources/Pages/ICSID-Annual-Report.aspx, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  88. ICSID, Background Paper on Annulment for the Administrative Council of ICSID, August 10, 2012, in 27 ICSID Rev-FILJ 2012, S. 443-492 (mit zusätzlichen Annexen abrufbar unter: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/08/16755063/background-paper-annulment-administrative-council-icsid, zuletzt besucht: 23.2.2015; siehe auch die aktualisierte Version unter: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/Pages/News.aspx?CID=201&ListID=74f1e8b5-96d0-4f0a-8f0c-2f3a92d84773&variation=en_us, zuletzt besucht: 1.7.2016). Open Google Scholar
  89. ICSID, History of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and nationals of Other States, Vol. 2, Part 1 and Part 2, ICSID Publication, Washington D.C. 1968. Open Google Scholar
  90. ICSID, Possible Improvements of the Framework for ICSID Arbitration vom 22.10.2004, (abrufbar unter: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/Pages/AllNewsItems.bak.aspx, zuletzt besucht: 25.2.2015). Open Google Scholar
  91. ICSID, Report of the Secretary-General to the Administrative Council, ICSID Doc. No. AC/86/4, Oct 2, 1986. Open Google Scholar
  92. ICSID, Suggested Changes to the ICSID Rules and Regulations, 12.5.2005, (abrufbar unter: http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/ViewNewsReleases.jsp, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  93. ILC, Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly, Doc. A/3859, Report of the International Law Commission covering the work of ist tenth session, 28 April-4 July 1958, in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1958, Vol. II (abrufbar unter: http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes(e)/ILC_1958_v2_e.pdf, zuletzt besucht: 29.3.2015). Open Google Scholar
  94. ILC, Report of the International Law Commission to the General Assembly on its Fifth Session, Doc. A/2456, Report of the International Law Commission covering the work of its fifth session, in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1953, Vol. II (abrufbar unter: http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes(e)/ILC_1953_v2_e.pdf, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  95. ILC, Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its fifty-third session (23 April-1 June and 2 July-10 August 2001), in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 2001, Vol. II, Part 2 (abrufbar unter: http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes(e)/ILC_2001_v2_p2_e.pdf, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  96. ILC, Summary Records of the Fifth Session, in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1953, Vol. I (abrufbar unter: http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes(e)/ILC_1953_v1_e.pdf, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  97. ILC, Summary Records of the Fourth Session, in Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1952, Vol. I (abrufbar unter: http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes(e)/ILC_1952_v1_e.pdf, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  98. Institut de Droit International, Extension de l'arbitrage obligatoire, Session de New York 1929 (abrufbar unter: http://www.idi-iil.org/idiF/resolutionsF/1929_nyork_04_fr.pdf, zuletzt besucht 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  99. Institut de Droit International, Projet de règlement pour la procédure arbitrale internationale, Session de La Haye – 1875 (abrufbar unter: http://www.idi-iil.org/idiF/resolutionsF/1875_haye_01_fr.pdf, zuletzt besucht 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  100. Jacob, Kenneth S., Reinvigorating ICSID With a New Mission and With Renewed Respect for Party Autonomy, in 33 Va. J. Int'l L. 1992-1993, S. 123-159. Open Google Scholar
  101. Joubin-Bret, Anna, Why we need a global appellate mechanism for international investment law, in K. Sauvant, A. Torres (Hg.), Columbia FDI Perspectives, Nr. 146, 27.4.2015 (abrufbar unter: http://us6.campaign-archive1.com/?u=ab15cc1d53&id=e810f9d487, zuletzt besucht: 17.5.2015). Open Google Scholar
  102. Kahn, Philippe, Le Contrôle des Sentences Arbitrales Rendues Par Un Tribunal CIRDI, in Société française pour le Droit International (Hg.), La Juridiction Internationale Permanente, Paris 1987, S. 363-382. Open Google Scholar
  103. Kalb, Johanna, Creating an ICSID Appellate Body, in 10 UCLA J. Int’L & Foreign Aff. 2005, S. 179-220. Open Google Scholar
  104. Kalnina, Ieva/Di Pietro, Domenico, The Scope of ICSID Review, in C. Binder, U. Kriebaum et al. (Hg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford University Press, New York 2009, S. 221-250. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0014
  105. Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, Annulment of ICSID Awards in Contract and Treaty, Arbitrations: Are There Differences?, in E. Gaillard, Y. Banifatemi (Hg.) Annulment of ICSID Awards, IAI International Arbitration Series, New York 2004, S. 189-222. Open Google Scholar
  106. Kautz, Timothy, What is “Manifest Disregard of the Law”, in SchiedsVZ 2011, S. 20-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000395205.88237.5a
  107. Kim, Dohyun, The Annulment Committee's Role in Multiplying Inconsistency in ICSID Arbitration: The Need to Move Away From an Annulment-Based System, in 86 NYU Law Review 2011, S. 242-279. Open Google Scholar
  108. Kim, Yun-I, Investment Law and the Individual, in M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel et al. (Hg.) International Investment Law, Baden-Baden u.a. 2015, S. 1585-1601. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845258997-1634
  109. Kinnear, Meg, Current Problems & Developments in Investment Arbitration, SchiedsVZ 2013, S. 65-68. Open Google Scholar
  110. Kinnear, Meg N./Bjorklund, Andrea K./Hannaford, John F. G., Investment Disputes under NAFTA: An Annotated Guide to NAFTA Chapter 11, Alphen aan der Rijn 2006. Open Google Scholar
  111. Knahr, Christina, Annulment and Its Role in the Context of Conflicting Awards, in M- Waibel, A. Kaushal et al. (Hg.) The Backclash Against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, S. 151-163. Open Google Scholar
  112. Koa, Christopher M., The international Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Dispute Resolution: Conciliating and Arbitrating with China Through the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 24 NYU J. Int’l L. Pol. 1991, S. 439-502. Open Google Scholar
  113. Koch, Christopher, The Enforcement of Annulled Awards in their Place of Origin, The French and US experience, in J. Int`l Arb. 2009, S. 267-292. Open Google Scholar
  114. Kraft, Peter/Kröll, Stefan Michael, Part II – Commentary on the German Arbitration Law (10th Book of the German Code of Civil Procedure), Chapter VII – Recourse Against the Award, § 1059 – Application for Setting Aside in K.-H. Böckstiegel, S. M. Kröll, et al. (Hg.), Arbitration in Germany: The Model Law in Practice, 2. Aufl., Alphen aan den Rijn 2015, S. 383-420. Open Google Scholar
  115. Krajewski, Markus, Wirtschaftsvölkerrecht, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg u.a. 2012. Open Google Scholar
  116. Kreindler, Richard/Schäfer, Jan K./Wolff, Reinmar, Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit. Kompendium für die Praxis, Frankfurt am Main 2006. Open Google Scholar
  117. Kühn, Wolfgang, Aktuelle Fragen zur Anwendung der New Yorker Konvention von 1958 im Hinblick auf die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Schiedssprüche, SchiedsVZ 2009, S. 53-61. Open Google Scholar
  118. Kulick, Andreas, Vier Geschichten des Internationalen Investitionsrechts, in SchiedsVZ 2010, S. 257-265. Open Google Scholar
  119. Laird, Ian/Askew, Rebecca, Finality Versus Consistency: Does Investor-State Arbitration Need An Appellate System?, in J. App. Prac. & Process 2005, S. 285-302. Open Google Scholar
  120. Lalive, Pierre, Absolute Finality of Arbitral Awards?, in Revista Internacional de Arbitragem e Conciliaçao 2008, S. 109-127. Open Google Scholar
  121. Lamm, Carolyn, Internationalization of the Practice of Law and Important Emerging Issues for Investor-State Arbitration, in 354 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye/Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 2011, S. 9-63. Open Google Scholar
  122. Lammasch, Heinrich, Die Rechtskraft internationaler Schiedssprüche, in Publications de l'Institut Nobel Norvegien, Paris u.a. 1913. Open Google Scholar
  123. Lattanzi, Flavia, Convenzione di Washington sulle Controversic Relative ad Investimenti e Invaliditi delle Sentenze Arbitrali, in Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 1987, S. 521-547. Open Google Scholar
  124. League of Nations, Committee of Jurists on the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Minutes of the Session held at Geneva, Mar 11-19, 1929 (abrufbar unter: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/other-documents.php?p1=9&p2=8, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  125. League of Nations, Proposal of the Government of Finland to Confer on the Permanent Court of International Justice Jurisdiction as a Tribunal of Appeal in Respect of Arbitral Tribunals Established by States, Report of the Committee Appointed by the Council, in 11 League of Nations OJ 1930, S. 1359-1365. Open Google Scholar
  126. Legum, Barton, Options to Establish an Appellate Mechanism for Investment Disputes, in K. P. Sauvant (Hg.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, Oxford 2008, S. 231-239. Open Google Scholar
  127. Lew, Julian D. M./Mistelis, Loukas A./Kröll, Stefan M., Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, The Hague 2003. Open Google Scholar
  128. Lim, Jonathan W., BG Group v Argentina: Would ICSID Arbitration Have Been Different? Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 4.2.2014, (abrufbar unter: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2014/02/04/bg-group-v-argentina-would-icsid-arbitration-have-been-different/, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  129. Lim, Jonathan W./Saffer, Luis M. V., Opportunities and Risks in the Upcoming BG Group v Argentina Decision, in 3 TDM 2014. Open Google Scholar
  130. Lörcher, Torsten, ICSID-Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, in SchiedsVZ 2005, S. 11-21. Open Google Scholar
  131. Mangoldt, Hans von, Die Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit als Mittel internationaler Streitschlichtung. Zur Beilegung von Rechtsstreitigkeiten auf der Grundlage der Achtung vor dem Rechte, Berlin u.a. 1974. Open Google Scholar
  132. Marboe, Irmgard, The Annulment of ICSID Awards, in C. Knahr, C. Koller et al. (Hg.), Investment and Commercial Arbitration – Similarities and Divergences, Vienna 2010, S. 97-129. Open Google Scholar
  133. Marboe, Irmgard, ICSID Annulment Decisions: Three Generations Revisited, in C. Binder, U. Kriebaum et al. (Hg.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, New York 2009, S. 221-250. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0013
  134. Markert, Lars, Preliminary Objections Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41 (5) – Soon to Become the Preliminary Objection of Choice?, in KSzW 2011, S. 142-151. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.9785/ovs-kszw-2011-142
  135. Markert, Lars, Streitschlichtungsklauseln in Investitionsschutzabkommen. Zur Notwendigkeit der Differenzierung von jurisdiction und admissibility in Investitionsschiedsverfahren, Baden-Baden 2010. Open Google Scholar
  136. Markert, Lars/Bubrowski, Helene, National Setting Aside Proceedings in Investment Arbitration, M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel et al. (Hg.) International Investment Law, Baden-Baden u.a. 2015, S. 1460-1481. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845258997-1509
  137. Mayer, Pierre, To What Extent Can an Ad Hoc Committee Review the Factual Findings of an Arbitral Tribunal, in E. Gaillard, Y. Banifatemi (Hg.), Annulment of ICSID Awards, IAI International Arbitration Series, New York 2004, S. 243-250. Open Google Scholar
  138. Mazzuoli, Valerio de Oliveira/Massa, Diego Luis Alonso, Analysis of the Decision Rendered by the U.S. Supreme Court in Re BG Group plc v. Republic of Argentina: Do All Roads Lead to Rome?, in in J. Int`l Arb. 2015, S. 215-236. Open Google Scholar
  139. McClure, Mike, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards that have been Set Aside at the Seat: The Consistently Inconsistent Approach across Europe, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 26.1.2012 (abrufbar unter: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2012/06/26/enforcement-of-arbitral-awards-that-have-been-set-aside-at-the-seat-the-consistently-inconsistent-approach-across-europe/, zuletzt besucht 16.2.2015). Open Google Scholar
  140. McLachlan, Campbell/Shore, Laurence/Weiniger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration. Substantive Principles, Oxford 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780199286645.book.1
  141. McRae, Donald, The WTO Appellate Body: A Model for an ICSID Appeals Facility?, in 1 J Int. Disp. Settlement 2010, S. 371-387. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq003
  142. Mistelis, Loucas A./di Pietro, Domenico, New York Convention 1958, in L. Mistelis (Hg.), Concise International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International: Alphen aan den Rijn 2010, S. 1-32. Open Google Scholar
  143. Muchlinski, Peter M., Dispute Settlement Under the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes, in W.E. Butler (Hg.), Control over Compliance with International Law, Dordrecht 1991, S. 173-193. Open Google Scholar
  144. Nair, Promod/Ludwig, Claudia, ICSID annulment awards: The fourth generation?, in 5 GAR (Issue 5) 2010. Open Google Scholar
  145. Nelson, Timothy G., Annulment of International Arbitration Awards: The Orinoco Steamship Case Sails On, in 28 ASA Bulletin 2010, S. 205-229. Open Google Scholar
  146. Newcombe, Andrew/Paradell, Lluís, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties, aan der Rijn 2009. Open Google Scholar
  147. Niggemann, Friedrich, Das Washingtoner Übereinkommen von 1965 – Das Nichtigkeitsverfahren im Ad-Hoc-Komitee, in 4 Jahrbuch für die Praxis der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit 1990, S. 97-120. Open Google Scholar
  148. Nippold, Otfried, Der Orinoko-Streitfall zwischen den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und den Vereinigten Staaten von Venezuela (Schiedsspruch vom 25. Oktober 1910 aufgrund des Kompromisses vom13. Februar 1909), in W. Schücking (Hg.), Das Werk vom Haag, Die gerichtlichen Entscheidungen, Erster Band, Die Judikatur des Ständigen Schiedsgerichtshofs von 1899 – 1913, Dritter Teil, München u.a. 1914. Open Google Scholar
  149. Nys, Ernest, La revision du sentence arbitrale, in R.D.I.L.C. 1910, S. 595 – 641. Open Google Scholar
  150. Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Recent Practice on the Principles of Treaty Interpretation, in A.Orakhelashvili, S. Williams (Hg.), 40 Years of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, BIICL, London 2010, S. 117-154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/157181010X12668401899156
  151. Pagel, Roderic, Die Aufhebung von Schiedssprüchen in der ICSID-Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Die schiedsinterne aufhebende Überprüfung internationaler Schiedssprüche gemäß Art. 52 des Übereinkommens zur Beilegung von Investitionsstreitigkeiten zwischen Staaten und Privaten anderer Staaten von 1965, Frankfurt am Main et al. 1998. Open Google Scholar
  152. Park, William W., Why Courts Review Arbitral Awards, in R. Briner, Y. Fortier et al., (Hg.) Law of international dispute settlement in the 21st century. Liber Amicorum Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, Köln 2001, S. 595-606. Open Google Scholar
  153. Parra, Antonio R., The History of ICSID, Oxford 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660568.001.0001
  154. Paulsson, Jan, Arbitration Without Privity, in 10 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1995, S. 232-257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/10.2.232
  155. Paulsson, Jan, Avoiding Unintended Consequences, in K. P. Sauvant (Hg.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, Oxford 2008, S. 241-265. Open Google Scholar
  156. Paulsson, Jan, Enforcing Arbitral Awards Notwithstanding a Local Standard Annulment, in ICC Bulletin 1998, S. 14-31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/18758444.1998.11788058
  157. Paulsson, Jan, ICSID's Achievements and Prospects, in 6 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1991, S. 380-399. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/6.2.380
  158. Paulsson, Jan, Jurisdiction and Admissibility, in G. Aksen, K.-H. Böckstiegel et al. (Hg.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution. Liber Amicorum in honour of Robert Briner, Paris 2005, S. 601-617. Open Google Scholar
  159. Paulsson, Jan, The New York Convention in International Practice – Problems Of Assimilation, in M. Blessing (Hg.) The New York Convention of 1958, S. 100-144. Open Google Scholar
  160. Penuliski, Ilija M., A Dispute Systems Design Diagnosis, in M. Waibel, A. Kaushal et al. (Hg.), The Backclash against Investment Arbitration, Alphen aan der Rijn 2010, S. 507-536. Open Google Scholar
  161. Pinsolle, Philippe, Jurisdictional Review of ICSID Awards, in J. World Inv. 2004, S. 613-620. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/221190004X00407
  162. Pirrwitz, Björn, Annulment of Arbitral Awards Under Article 52 of the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, in 23 Tex. Int. L.J. 1988, S. 73-116. Open Google Scholar
  163. Qureshi, Asif H., An Appellate System in International Investment Arbitration?, in P. Muchlinski, F. Ortino et al. (Hg.), Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, New York 2008, S. 1154-1170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.013.0028
  164. Qureshi, Asif H./Khan, Shandana G., Implications of An Appellate Body for Investment Disputes from a Developing Country Point of View, in K. P. Sauvant (Hg.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, Oxford 2008, S. 267-278. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.013.0028
  165. Radbruch, Gustav, Gesetzliches Unrecht und übergesetzliches Recht, in Süddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung 1946, S. 105-108. Open Google Scholar
  166. Rambaud, Patrick, L'annulation des sentences Klöckner et Amco, in 32 Annuaire français de droit international 1986, S. 259-274. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3406/afdi.1986.2718
  167. Redfern, Alan, ICSID-Losing its Appeal?, in Arb. Int’l 1987, S. 98-118. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/3.2.98
  168. Redfern, Alan/Hunter, Martin J,/Blackaby, Nigel/Partasides, Constantine, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Oxford 2009. Open Google Scholar
  169. Reed, Lucy/Mandelli, Giorgio F., Ad hoc or ad arbitrium? An Audit of Recent ICSID Annulment Decisions, in A. W. Rovine (Hg.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation, The Fordham Papers 2011, S. 70-92. Open Google Scholar
  170. Reed, Lucy/ Paulsson, Jan/ Blackaby, Nigel, Guide to ICSID Arbitration, 2. Aufl., Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2011. Open Google Scholar
  171. Reinisch, August, § 16. Die internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit und andere Formen der Streitbeilegung, in C. Tietje (Hg.), Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 1. Aufl., Berlin 2009, S. 745-762. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783899496642.745
  172. Reinisch, August, Necessity in International Investment Arbitration – An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent ICSID Cases? Comments on CMS v. Argentina and LG&E v. Argentina, 3 TDM 2006. Open Google Scholar
  173. Reinisch, August, Sachverständigengutachten zur Frage des Bestehens und der Wirkung des völkerrechtlichen Rechtfertigungsgrundes „Staatsnotstand“, in ZaöRV 2008, S. 3-43. Open Google Scholar
  174. Reisman, Michael, Nullity and Revision, The Review and Enforcement of International Judgments and Awards, Yale 1971. Open Google Scholar
  175. Reisman, Michael, Reflections on the Control Mechanism of the ICSID System, in E. Gaillard (Hg.), The Review of International Arbitral Awards, Huntington 2010, S. 197-252. Open Google Scholar
  176. Reisman, Michael, Repairing ICSID’s Control System: Some Comments on Aaron Broches’ Observations on the Finality of ICSID Awards, 7 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1992, S. 196-211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/7.1.196
  177. Reisman, Michael, The Breakdown of the Control Mechanism in ICSID Arbitration, in Duke L.J. 1989, S. 739-807. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1372633
  178. Reisman, Michael, The ICSID Experiment: The Breakdown of the Control Mechanism in ICSID Arbitration, in Systems of Control in International Adjudication and Arbitration, Breakdown and Repair, Duke University Press 1992, S. 46-88. Open Google Scholar
  179. Reisman, Michael, The Regime for Lacunae in the ICSID Choice of Law Provision and the Question of Its Threshold, in 15 ICSID Rev-FILJ 2000, S. 362-381. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/15.2.362
  180. Roberts, Anthea/Trahanas, Christina, Judicial Review of Investment Treaty Awards: BG Group v. Argentina, in AJIL 2014, S. 750-763. Open Google Scholar
  181. Roth, Marianne, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, in F. B. Weigand (Hg.) Practitioner’s Handbook on International Commercial Arbitration, 2. Aufl., Oxford 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199534869.003.0014
  182. Sandrock, Otto, Wann wird ein ausländischer Schiedsspruch im Sinne des Art. V Abs. 1 Buchst. (e) der New Yorker Konvention und des § 1044 ZPO „verbindlich“?, in F. G. von Westphalen, O. Sandrock (Hg.), Lebendiges Recht – Von den Sumerern bis zur Gegenwart. Festschrift für Reinhold Trinker zum 65. Geburtstag, Heidelberg 1995, S. 669-701. Open Google Scholar
  183. Sacerdoti, Giorgio/Recanati, Matilde, From Annulment to Appeal in Investor-State Arbitration: Is the WTO Appeal Mechanism a Model?, in J. A. Huerta-Goldman, A. Romanetti et al. (Hg.), WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, And Commercial Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn 2013, S. 327-356. Open Google Scholar
  184. Sauvant, Karl P. (Hg.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, Oxford University Press, New York 2008. Open Google Scholar
  185. Schill, Stephan W., Auf zu Kalypso? Staatsnotstand und Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht – Anmerkung zur ICSID-Entscheidung LG&E Energy Corp v. Argentina, in SchiedsVZ 2007, S. 178-186. Open Google Scholar
  186. Schill, Stephan W., From Calvo to CMS: Burying an International Law Legacy – Argentina's Currency Reform in the Face of Investment Protection: The ICSID Case CMS v. Argentina, in SchiedsVZ 2005, S. 285-292. Open Google Scholar
  187. Schill, Stephan W., The German Debate on International Investment Law, in J. World Inv. 2015, S. 1-9. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/22119000-01601001
  188. Schill, Stephan W., The Multilateralization of Investment Law, Cambridge 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605451.004
  189. Schlechtriem, Peter, Zur Überprüfbarkeit von ICSID-Schiedssprüchen: Die Aufhebungsentscheidung im Falle Klöckner/Kamerun, in IPRax 1986, S. 69-73. Open Google Scholar
  190. Schreuer, Christoph, Failure to Apply the Governing Law in International Investment Arbitration, in 7 Aus Rev Int'l & Eur L. 2002, S. 147-196. Open Google Scholar
  191. Schreuer, Christoph, From ICSID Annulment to Appeal, Half Way Down the Slippery Slope, in 10 Law & Prac Int’l Cts & Tribunals 2011, S. 211-225. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/157180311X582125
  192. Schreuer, Christoph/Malintoppi, Loretta/Reinisch, August/Sinclair, Anthony, The ICSID-Convention – A Commentary, 2. Aufl., Cambridge 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596896.007
  193. Schreuer, Christoph, Preliminary Rulings in Investment Arbitration, in K. P. Sauvant (Hg.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, Oxford 2008, S. 207-212. Open Google Scholar
  194. Schreuer, Christoph, Revising the System of Review of Investment Awards, abrufbar unter http://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/wordpress/pdf/99_rev_invest_awards.pdf (zuletzt besucht 28.2.2015), S. 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  195. Schreuer, Christoph, Three Generations of ICSID Annulment Proceedings, in E. Gaillard, Y. Banifatemi (Hg.), Annulment of ICSID Awards, New York 2004, S. 17-42. Open Google Scholar
  196. Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, Die Aufhebung von ICSID Schiedssprüchen, in 3 Jahrbuch für die Praxis der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit 1989, S. 100-117. Open Google Scholar
  197. Shihata, Ibrahim, F.I./Parra, Antonio, R., Applicable Substantive Law in Disputes Between States and Private Foreign Parties: The Case of Arbitration under the ICSID Convention, in 9 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1994, S. 183-213. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/9.2.183
  198. Shihata, Ibrahim F. I., Towards a Greater Depoliticization of Investment Disputes: The Roles of ICSID and MIGA, in 1 ICSID Rev-FILJ 1986, S. 1-25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/1.1.1
  199. Silberman, Mallory B., ICSID Annulment Reform: Are we looking at the Right Problem?, in J. Kalicki, A. Joubin-Bret (Hg.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System. Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden 2015, S. 853-863. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/9789004291102_038
  200. Sushama, Deepo Jojo, Appellate Structure and Need for Legal Certainty in Investment Arbitration, in Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 1.5.2014 (abrufbar unter: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2014/05/01/appellate-structure-and-need-for-legal-certainty-in-investment-arbitration/, zuletzt besucht: 24.2.2015). Open Google Scholar
  201. Tams, Christian J., An Appealing Option? The Debate about an ICSID Appellate Structure, in 4 TDM 2007, S. 8-59. Open Google Scholar
  202. Tams, Christian J., Is there A Need for an ICSID Appellate Structure?, in R. Hofmann, C. Tams (Hg.), The International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), Baden-Baden 2007, S. 223-250. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845203317-223
  203. Tettenborn, Alwine, Das Haager Schiedsgericht. Eine völkerrechtliche Studie, Bonn 1911. Open Google Scholar
  204. Thadikkaran, Manu, Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards: What Is and What Ought to Be?, in J. Int’l Arb. 2014, S. 575-608. Open Google Scholar
  205. Thompson, Dennis, The Klöckner v. Cameroon Appeal: A note on jurisdiction, in 3 J. Int’l Arb. 1986, S. 93-100. Open Google Scholar
  206. Timmer, Laurens J. E., Manifest Excess of Powers as a Ground for Annulment of ICSID Awards, in J. World Inv. 2013, S. 775-803. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/22129000-01405001
  207. Tomuschat, Christian, Völkerrecht, Textsammlung, 4. Aufl., Baden-Baden 2009. Open Google Scholar
  208. Trooboff, Peter D., To What Extent May an Ad Hoc Committee Review the Factual Findings of an Arbitral Tribunal Based on a Procedural Error, in E. Gaillard, Y. Banifatemi (Hg.), Annulment of ICSID Awards, IAI International Arbitration Series, New York 2004, S. 251-265. Open Google Scholar
  209. Tsatsos, Aristides, Die Rechtsprechung der ICSID-Schiedsgerichte: Zwischen Homogenität und Heterogenität, Die Debatte über die Schaffung einer ICSID-Berufungsinstanz, Berlin 2008. Open Google Scholar
  210. Tsatsos, Aristides, ICSID Jurisprudence: Between Homogeneity and Heterogeneity A Call for Appeal?, in 6 TDM 2009. Open Google Scholar
  211. Tsolakidis, Nikolaos, ICSID Annulment Standards: Who Has Finally Won the Reisman vs. Broches Debate From Two Decades Ago?, in J. Kalicki, A. Joubin-Bret (Hg.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System. Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden 2015, S. 828-852. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/9789004291102_037
  212. Uchkunova, Inna, Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules: The Sleeping Beauty of the ICSID system, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 27.5.2014 (abrufbar unter: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2014/06/27/rule-415-of-the-icsid-arbitration-rules-the-sleeping-beauty-of-the-icsid-system/, zuletzt besucht: 17.5.2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siu014
  213. UNCITRAL, 2006 Recommendation regarding the interpretation of Article II (2) and Article VII (1) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958), (abrufbar unter: http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/2006recommendation.html, zuletzt besucht: 5.4.2015). Open Google Scholar
  214. UNCTAD, IIA Issues Note, Recent Trends in IIAs and ISDS (IIA Issues Note, No. 1, February 2015), (abrufbar unter http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaepcb2015d1_en.pdf, zuletzt besucht: 25.2.2015). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18356/f1034123-en
  215. UNCTAD, IIA Issues Note, Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Roadmap (IIA Issues Note, No. 2, June 2013), (abrufbar unter http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaepcb2013d4_en.pdf, zuletzt besucht: 17.5.2015). Open Google Scholar
  216. van den Berg, Albert Jan, Enforcement of Annulled Awards?, in ICC Bulletin 1998, Vol. 9 No. 2, S. 15-21. Open Google Scholar
  217. van Harten, Gus, A Case for an International Investment Court, Society of International Economic Law (SIEL) Inaugural Conference Paper, (15–17 July 2008). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1153424
  218. Vattel, Emer, Le Droit des gens ou principes de la loi naturelle, appliqués à la conduite et aux affaires des nations et des souverains. Das Völkerrecht oder Grundsätze des Naturrechts, angewandt auf das Verhalten und die Angelegenheiten der Staaten und Staatsoberhäupter 1758, deutsche Übersetzung von Euler, Einleitung von Guggenheim, in W. Schätzel (Hg.), Die Klassiker des Völkerrechts in modernen deutschen Übersetzungen, Band III, Tübingen 1959. Open Google Scholar
  219. Verhoosel, Gaëtan, Annulment and Enforcement Review of Treaty Awards: To ICSID or Not to ICSID, in 23 ICSID Rev-FILJ 2008, S. 119-154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/23.1.119
  220. Orrego Vicuña, Francisco, Annulling the Annulment: More on Contracts and Treaties, in A. W. Rovine (Hg.), Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation, The Fordham Papers 2009, S. 83-99. Open Google Scholar
  221. Orrego Vicuña, Francisco, The Other Side of the Coin: Recent Paradoxes of International Investment Arbitration, in R. Hofmann, C. Tams (Hg.), International Investment Law and Its Others, Frankfurt am Main 2012, S. 15-23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845243436-15
  222. von Staden, Andreas, Towards Greater Doctrinal Clarity in Investor-State Arbitration, in Czech Yearbook of International Law 2011, S. 207-229. Open Google Scholar
  223. Waibel, Michael, Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and Admissibility, in M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel et al. (Hg.) International Investment Law, Baden-Baden u.a. 2015, S. 1212-1287. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845258997-1261
  224. Walsh, Thomas W., Substantive Review of ICSID Awards, Berkeley Journal of International Law 2006, S. 444-462. Open Google Scholar
  225. Warner, Hugo/Sheppard, Audley (Hg.), Appeals and Challenges to Investment Treaty Awards: Is it Time for An International Appellate System?, 2 TDM 2005 (Special Issue). Open Google Scholar
  226. Wehberg, Hans, Kommentar zu dem Haager „Abkommen betreffend die friedliche Erledigung internationaler Streitigkeiten“ vom 18. Oktober 1907, Tübingen 1911. Open Google Scholar
  227. Weiler, Todd, Metalclad v. Mexico, A Play in Three Parts, in J. World Inv. 2001, S. 685-711. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/221190001X00022
  228. Weiler, Todd/Cheng, Thai-Heng, The virtue of judicial restraint: two comments on Laos v Sanum, in GAR, 12.3.2015. Open Google Scholar
  229. Weinacht, Felix, Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards in Germany, in J. Int`l Arb. 2002, S. 313 – 336. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1023/A:1019706804669
  230. Williams, David A. R., Challenging Investment Treaty Arbitration Awards: Issues concerning the Forum Arising from the Metalclad Case, in A. J. van den Berg (Hg.), International commercial arbitration: Important Contemporary Questions, The Hague 2003, S. 444-467. Open Google Scholar
  231. Wilske, Stephan/Mackay, Nigel, The Myth of the ’Manifest Disregard of the Law’ Doctrine: Is this Challenge to the Finality of Arbitral Awards Confined to U.S. Domestic Arbitrations or Should International Arbitration Practitioners be Concerned?, in 24 ASA Bulletin 2006, S. 216–228. Open Google Scholar
  232. Yannaca-Small, Katia, Improving the System of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The OECD Government’s Perspective, in K. P. Sauvant (Hg.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, Oxford 2008, S. 223-228. Open Google Scholar
  233. Živković, Patricia, Enforcement of an Award Set Aside: the So-Called “Preferred Approach” and its Application under English Law, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 8.4.2015 (abrufbar unter: http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/blog/2015/04/08/enforcement-of-an-award-set-aside-the-so-called-preferred-approach-and-its-application-under-english-law/, zuletzt besucht: 12.4.2015). Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: »Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«
Book Titles No access
Hans G. Gnodtke
»Free Speech« v »Political Correctness«

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex