Cover of book: Inhärente Befugnisse internationaler Schiedsgerichte
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Inhärente Befugnisse internationaler Schiedsgerichte

Eine Untersuchung anhand der investitionsschiedsgerichtlichen Kompetenz zur Wiederbefassung (reconsideration) mit Teilentscheidungen
Authors:
Publisher:
 12.05.2022

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2022
Publication date
12.05.2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7318-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1328-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht
Volume
44
Language
German
Pages
394
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
    1. § 1 Einleitung und Problemaufriss No access
      1. „Wer?“ No access
      2. „Was?“ No access
      3. „In welcher Weise?“ No access
    3. § 3 Gang der Untersuchung No access
    1. § 1 Entwicklung der Rechtsfigur der inhärenten Befugnisse No access
    2. § 2 Begriff der inhärenten Befugnis No access
        1. 1. Entstehung allgemeiner Rechtsgrundsätze des Völkerrechts No access
        2. 2. Inhärente Befugnisse als allgemeine Rechtsgrundsätze No access
      2. II. Inhärente Befugnisse als Folge aus der Benennung als Schiedsgericht No access
      3. III. Inhärente Befugnisse als implizite Befugnisse (doctrine of implied powers) No access
        1. 1. Allgemeine Funktionen internationaler Spruchkörper (Kernfunktionen) No access
        2. 2. Typenspezifische Funktionen internationaler Spruchkörper No access
        3. 3. Verhältnis zwischen allgemeinen und typenspezifischen Funktionen No access
        4. 4. Erfüllung allgemeiner Gerichtsfunktionen durch Ausübung inhärenter Befugnisse No access
          1. a) Allgemeine Funktion internationaler Investitionsschiedsgerichte No access
          2. b) Typenspezifische Funktion internationaler Investitionsschiedsgerichte No access
      5. V. Vorzugswürdiger Herleitungsansatz: Funktionale Begründung No access
      1. I. Der Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz im internationalen Recht No access
        1. 1. Legitimer Zweck und Geeignetheit No access
          1. a) Von der Ausübung inhärenter Befugnisse potentiell betroffene Prinzipien No access
          2. b) Durchführung der Erforderlichkeits- und Angemessenheitsprüfung No access
    5. § 5 Abdingbarkeit von inhärenten Befugnissen No access
    6. § 6 Fazit: Folgerungen aus der Zugrundelegung des funktionalen Ansatzes No access
      1. I. Zweck einer Bifurkation No access
          1. a) Bifurkation der Zuständigkeitsentscheidung gemäß Art. 41(2) ICSID-Konvention No access
          2. b) Reform der ICSID Rules: Umfassende Kodifikation der Bifurkation No access
        2. 2. Bifurkation der Zuständigkeitsentscheidung gemäß Art. 23(3) UNCITRAL Rules No access
      3. III. Ausdrückliche Befugnis durch Vereinbarung der Parteien No access
          1. a) Allgemeine Bedeutung des Art. 44 ICSID-Konvention No access
          2. b) Bedeutung des Art. 44 ICSID-Konvention im Hinblick auf Bifurkation No access
          1. a) Allgemeine Bedeutung des Art. 17(1) UNCITRAL Rules No access
          2. b) Bedeutung des Art. 17(1) UNCITRAL Rules im Hinblick auf Bifurkation No access
      5. V. Inhärente Befugnis zur Bifurkation No access
        1. 1. Mögliche methodische Herangehensweisen No access
        2. 2. Internationaler Kontext No access
        3. 3. Nationaler Kontext No access
        4. 4. Praktische Auswirkungen des uneinheitlichen Verständnisses am Beispiel der UNCITRAL Rules No access
        5. 5. Bewertung No access
      2. II. Rechtsregimeunabhängige Herleitung von Schiedsspruchcharakteristika: Funktionale Herangehensweise No access
      3. III. „Substance Over Form“ No access
        1. 1. „deciding forum“ No access
          1. a) Substantielle Gegenstände No access
          2. b) Potentiell verfahrensbeendende Gegenstände No access
          3. c) Zwischenergebnis No access
        3. 3. Finalität No access
        4. 4. Zwischenergebnis No access
      5. V. Funktionale Einordnung verfahrensphasenbeendender Entscheidungen No access
      6. VI. Implikationen für Verfahren unter den UNCITRAL Rules und für eine etwaige Wiederbefassungsbefugnis No access
      1. I. Bindungswirkung No access
      2. II. Functus Officio der Schiedsrichter No access
      3. III. Präklusionswirkung No access
      4. IV. Vermeidung des Begriffs „res judicata“ No access
      5. V. Zwischenergebnis No access
    4. § 4 Implikationen für eine etwaige inhärente Wiederbefassungsbefugnis No access
    5. § 5 Fazit No access
      1. I. Teilentscheidungen als „Award“ i.S.v. Art. 48(3) ICSID-Konvention? No access
        1. 1. Erster Ansatz: Keine Finalität von Teilentscheidungen unter ICSID No access
        2. 2. Zweiter Ansatz: Teilentscheidungen als res judicata No access
        3. 3. Dritter Ansatz: Nur interne Bindungswirkung von Teilentscheidungen No access
          1. a) Begriff des self-contained regime No access
          2. b) Die ICSID-Konvention als self-contained regime? No access
        2. 2. Erfassung von Teilentscheidungen durch etwaiges self-contained regime? No access
        3. 3. Rückgriff auf allgemeines internationales Recht für Teilentscheidungen No access
        4. 4. Vorgehensweise für eine funktionale Analyse von Teilentscheidungen unter ICSID No access
        5. 5. Funktionale Analyse von Teilentscheidungen unter ICSID No access
            1. (1) Interne Bindungswirkung No access
            2. (2) Externe Bindungswirkung No access
            3. (3) Zwischenergebnis No access
          2. b) Functus Officio der Schiedsrichter No access
          3. c) Präklusionswirkung No access
      4. IV. Fazit und Schlussfolgerungen für das weitere Vorgehen No access
      1. I. Ausklammerung von Art. 44 ICSID-Konvention No access
          1. a) Planwidrige Regelungslücke No access
          2. b) Vergleichbare Interessenlage No access
          1. a) Bekanntwerden neuer Tatsachen No access
          2. b) Anwendung der Fristenregelung in Art. 51(2) ICSID-Konvention No access
        3. 3. Zwischenergebnis No access
        1. 1. Verhältnis zwischen Rule 41(1) und Rule 41(2) No access
          1. a) Handhabung einer Verfristung des Vorbringens in der Praxis No access
            1. (1) Zwingende und abdingbare Voraussetzungen der jurisdiction/competence No access
            2. (2) Konsequenz einer Verfristung von Parteivorbringen No access
          3. c) Zwischenergebnis No access
          1. a) Argumente für die Zulassung einer Wiederbefassung unter Rule 41(1) No access
          2. b) Voraussetzungen der Rule 41(1) No access
          3. c) Zwischenergebnis No access
        4. 4. Exkurs: Abgrenzung einer Wiederbefassung von einer überholenden Entscheidung notwendig? No access
          1. a) Erfassung der Wiederbefassung von Rule 41(2) No access
          2. b) Anwendung der Rule 41(2) auf Wiederbefassungssituationen No access
          3. c) Konturierung der Wiederbefassungskompetenz durch Analogiebildung No access
          4. d) Zwischenergebnis No access
        6. 6. Wiederbefassung sua sponte nach Erlass einer decision on jurisdiction No access
    3. § 3 Fazit No access
    1. § 1 Einleitung No access
      1. I. Zentrale Ratio der Entscheidungsfinalität: Auflösung eines Dilemmas No access
        1. 1. Beteiligte Interessen im Falle der Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit No access
          1. a) Öffentliches Interesse pro Entscheidungsfinalität No access
          2. b) Privates Interesse pro Entscheidungsfinalität No access
          3. c) Interessen contra Entscheidungsfinalität No access
      3. III. Konsequenz für die Interessenabwägung und weiteres Vorgehen No access
      4. IV. Fazit No access
      1. I. Praxis internationaler (Schieds-)Gerichte No access
      2. II. Meinungsstand in der Fachliteratur No access
      3. III. Fazit No access
        1. 1. Legitimer Zweck und Geeignetheit No access
          1. a) Erforderlichkeit des Rückgriffs auf ungeschriebene Kompetenz No access
          2. b) Erforderlichkeit der Wiederbefassung im Falle von setting-aside options No access
          3. c) Erforderlichkeit der Wiederbefassung angesichts anderer Richtigstellungsmöglichkeiten No access
          4. d) Erforderlichkeit der Fehlerkorrektur und Richtigstellung No access
        3. 3. Angemessenheit (Verhältnismäßigkeit im engeren Sinne) No access
      2. II. Kein Antragserfordernis No access
      3. III. Anforderungen an die Beweisführung (standard of proof) No access
      4. IV. Zwischenergebnis No access
        1. 1. Grundkonstellation im Fall ConocoPhillips Petrozuata v. Venezuela No access
          1. a) Allgemeine Feststellungen zur Situation No access
          2. b) Legitimer Zweck und Geeignetheit No access
          3. c) Erforderlichkeit No access
          4. d) Angemessenheit (Verhältnismäßigkeit im engeren Sinne) No access
        3. 3. Zwischenergebnis No access
        1. 1. Grundkonstellation im Fall Burlington v. Ecuador No access
        2. 2. Inhärente Befugnis zur Wiederbefassung? No access
        3. 3. Addendum: Wiederbefassung bei tatsächlichem error of law? No access
    5. § 5 Fazit No access
  7. Ausblick No access 357 - 358
    1. Inhärente Befugnisse No access
    2. Teilentscheidungen und ihre Wirkungen No access
    3. Teilentscheidungen und Wiederbefassung unter den ICSID-Regelwerken No access
    4. Inhärente Befugnis zur Wiederbefassung mit Teilentscheidungen No access
  9. Literaturverzeichnis No access 363 - 394

Bibliography (573)

  1. Alexy, Robert: Theorie der Grundrechte, 1. Auflage (1985), Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  2. [zitiert als: Alexy, Theorie der Grundrechte (1985), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  3. Alter, Karen J.: Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context, in: European Journal of International Relations, Volume 14 (2008), S. 33-63 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  4. [zitiert als: Alter, Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context, in: 14 European Journal of International Relations (2008) 33 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  5. Álvarez Zárate, José Manuel/Baltag, Crina/Behn, Daniel/Bonnitcha, Jonathan/De Luca, Anna/Hestermeyer, Holger/Langford, Malcolm/Mistelis, Loukas/López Rodríguez, Clara/Shaffer, Gregory/Weber, Simon: Duration of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Proceedings, in: Journal of World Investment & Trade, Volume 21 (2020), S. 300-335 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  6. [zitiert als: Álvarez Zárate et al., Duration of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Proceedings, in: 21 JWIT (2020) 300 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  7. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix: Local Remedies in International Law, 2nd Edition (2004), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  8. [zitiert als: Amerasinghe, Local Remedies in International Law (2004), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  9. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix: The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and Development through the Multinational Corporation, in: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Volume 9 (1976), No. 4, S. 793-816 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  10. [zitiert als: Amerasinghe, ICSID and Development through the Multinational Corporation, in: 9 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1976) 793 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  11. Andreeva, Yulia: Interpreting Consent to Arbitration as a Unilateral Act of State: A Case Against Conventions, in: Arbitration International, Volume 27 (2011), No. 2, S. 129-147 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  12. [zitiert als: Andreeva, Interpreting Consent to Arbitration as a Unilateral Act of State, in: 27 ArbInt (2011) 129 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  13. von Arnauld, Andreas: Völkerrecht, 4. Auflage (2019), C. F. Müller Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  14. [zitiert als: von Arnauld, Völkerrecht (2019), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  15. Bachand, Frédéric (ed.): Fifteen Years of NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration – Joint McGill University / International Arbitration Institute, Conference Montreal – 25 September 2009, IAI Series No. 7 (2011), JurisNet Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  16. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Bachand (ed.), Fifteen Years of NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration (2011), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  17. Baltag, Crina (ed.), ICSID Convention after 50 Years: Unsettled Issues (2016), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  18. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Baltag (ed), ICSID Convention after 50 Years (2016), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  19. Barnett, Peter: Res Judicata, Estoppel, and Foreign Judgments – The Preclusive Effects of Foreign Judgments in Private International Law (2001), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  20. [zitiert als: Barnett, Res Judicata, Estoppel, and Foreign Judgments (2001), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  21. Bassiouni, M. Cherif: A Functional Approach to General Principles of International Law, in: Michigan Journal of International Law (1990), Volume 11, S. 768-818 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  22. [zitiert als: Bassiouni, A Functional Approach to General Principles of International Law, in: Michigan JIL (1990), Vol. 11, S. 768 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  23. Beatty, David M.: The Ultimate Rule of Law (2004), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  24. [zitiert als: Beatty, The Ultimate Rule of Law (2004), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  25. Bechky, Perry S.: Salini’s Nature: Arbitrators‘ Duty of Jurisdictional Policing, in: The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Volume 17 (2018), S. 145-159 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  26. [zitiert als: Bechky, Salini’s Nature: Arbitrators‘ Duty of Jurisdictional Policing, in: 17 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2018) 145 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  27. Beharry, Christina L. (ed.): Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (2018), Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  28. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Beharry (ed.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  29. Benedettelli, Massimo V.: To Bifurcate or Not To Bifurcate? That is the (Ambiguous) Question, in: Arbitration International, Volume 29 (2013), Issue 3, S. 493–506 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  30. [zitiert als: Benedettelli, To Bifurcate or Not To Bifurcate?, in: 29 ArbInt (2013) 493 (Seite)]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  31. van den Berg, Albert Jan: Appeal Mechanism for ISDS Awards: Interaction with the New York and ICSID Conventions, in: ICSID Review, Volume 34 (2019), Issue 1, S. 156-189 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  32. [zitiert als: van den Berg, Appeal Mechanism for ISDS Awards, in: 34 ICSID Review (2019) 156 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  33. van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.): Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times (2011), ICCA Congress Series, Volume 15, ICCA & Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  34. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: van den Berg (ed.), Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times (2011), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  35. van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed): International Arbitration in a Changing World (1994), ICCA Congress Series, Volume 6, ICCA & Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  36. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: van den Berg (ed), International Arbitration in a Changing World (1994), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  37. van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.): Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1999, Vol. XXIVa, ICCA & Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  38. [zitiert als: van den Berg (ed), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1999 – Vol. XXIVa, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  39. van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.): Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 2000, Vol. XXV, Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  40. [zitiert als: van den Berg (ed), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 2000 – Vol. XXV, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  41. van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.): 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (2009), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  42. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: van den Berg (ed.), 50 Years of the New York Convention (2009), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  43. Berger, Klaus Peter: International Economic Arbitration (1993), Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer/Boston Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  44. [zitiert als: Berger, International Economic Arbitration (1993), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  45. Berger, Klaus Peter: The Power of Arbitrators to Fill Gaps and Revise Contracts to Make Sense, in: Arbitration International, Volume 17 (2001), S. 1-17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  46. [zitiert als: Berger, The Power of Arbitrators to Fill Gaps and Revise Contracts to Make Sense, in: 17 ArbInt (2001) 1 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  47. Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.): Interim Measures Indicated by International Courts (1994), Beiträge zum ausländischen und öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht – Band 117, Springer-Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  48. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Bernhardt, Interim Measures Indicated by International Courts (1994), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  49. Blackaby, Nigel/Partasides, Constantine/Redfern, Alan/Hunter, Martin: Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration – Student Version, 6th Edition (2015), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  50. [zitiert als: Blackaby et al., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (2015), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  51. Blair, Cherie/Vidak-Gojkovic, Ema: WikiLeaks and Beyond: Discerning an International Standard for the Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence, in: ICSID-Review, Volume 33 (2018), Issue 1, S. 235-259 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  52. [zitiert als: Blair/Vidak-Gojkovic, WikiLeaks and Beyond: Discerning an International Standard for the Admissibility of Illegally Obtained Evidence, in: 33 ICSID-Review (2018) 235 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  53. Blandfort, Fabian Tobias: Investitionsschutz im Mehrebenensystem – Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung des Investitionsschutzes im Energiesektor durch den Energy Charter Treaty, das Grundgesetz, die EMRK und das Unionsrecht (2020), Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  54. [zitiert als: Blandfort, Investitionsschutz im Mehrebenensystem (2020), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  55. Bleckmann, Albert: Analogie im Völkerrecht, in: Archiv des Völkerrechts, 17. Band, No. 2 (1977), S. 161-180 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  56. [zitiert als: Bleckmann, Analogie im Völkerrecht, in: Archiv des Völkerrechts (1977), 161 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  57. Binder, Peter: Analytical Commentary to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (2013), Sweet & Maxwell, London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  58. [zitiert als: Binder, Analytical Commentary to the UNCITRAL Rules (2013), [Seite][Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  59. Bismuth, Régis: Anatomy of the Law and Practice of Interim Protective Measures in International Investment Arbitration, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 26 (2009), Issue 6, S. 773-821 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  60. [zitiert als: Bismuth, Anatomy of the Law and Practice of Interim Protective Measures in International Investment Arbitration, in: 26 JIntArb (2009) 773 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  61. Blyschak, Paul Michael: State Consent, Investor Interests and the Future of Investment Arbitration: Reanalyzing the Jurisdiction of Investor-State Tribunals in Hard Cases, in: Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law, Volume 9 (2009), S. 99-170 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  62. [zitiert als: Blyschak, State Consent, Investor Interests and the Future of Investment Arbitration, in: 9 Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law (2009) 99 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  63. Bocharova, Nataliya: The Scope of the Arbitral Award Binding Effect (Interests of «Third Parties» in International Arbitration), in: Russian Law Journal, Volume 5 (2017), Issue 2, S. 75-94 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  64. [zitiert als: Bocharova, The Scope of the Arbitral Award Binding Effect, in: 5 Russian LJ (2017) 75 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  65. Bockelmann, Paul/Gallas, Wilhelm: Festschrift für Eberhard Schmidt zm 70. Geburtstag (1961), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  66. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Bockelmann/Gallas, Festschrift für Eberhard Schmidt (1961), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  67. von Bogdandy, Armin/Venzke, Ingo: In wessen Namen? Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens (2014), Suhrkamp Verlag Berlin Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  68. [zitiert als: von Bogdandy/Venzke, In wessen Namen?, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  69. Bohmer, Lisa M.: Finality in ICSID Arbitration Revisited, in: ICSID Review, Volume 31 (2016), No. 1, S. 236-245 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  70. [zitiert als: Bohmer, Finality in ICSID Arbitration Revisited, in: 31 ICSID Review (2016) 236 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  71. Boo, Lawrence GS: Ruling on Arbitral Jurisdiction – Is that an Award?, Asian International Arbitration Journal, Volume 3 (2007), No. 2, S. 125-141 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  72. [zitiert als: Boo, Ruling on Arbitral Jurisdiction – Is that an Award?, 3 Asian International Arbitration Journal (2007) 125 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  73. Bordin, Fernando Lusa: The Analogy Between States and International Organizations (2019), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  74. [zitiert als: Bordin, The Analogy Between States and International Organizations (2019), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  75. Born, Gary B.: International Arbitration: Cases and Materials, 2nd Edition (2015), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  76. [zitiert als: Born, International Arbitration: Cases and Materials (2015), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  77. Born, Gary B.: International Arbitration: Law and Practice, 2nd Edition (2015), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  78. [zitiert als: Born, International Arbitration: Law and Practice (2015), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  79. Born, Gary B.: International Commercial Arbitration, 3rd Edition (2021), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  80. [zitiert als: Born, International Commercial Arbitration (2021), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  81. Bos, Maarten: The International Law Commission's Draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure in the General Assembly of the United Nations, in: Netherlands International Law Review, Volume 3 (1956), Issue 3, S. 234-261 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  82. [zitiert als: Bos, The ILC’s Draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure in the General Assembly of the UN, in: 3 Netherlands IntLRev (1956) 234 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  83. Bottini, Gabriel: Present and Future of ICSID Annulment: The Path to an Appellate Body?, in: ICSID Review, Volume 31 (2016), No. 3, S. 712-727 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  84. [zitiert als: Bottini, Present and Future of ICSID Annulment, in: 31 ICSID Review (2016) 712 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  85. De Brabandere, Eric: Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law – Procedural Aspects and Implications (2014), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  86. [zitiert als: De Brabandere, Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law (2014), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  87. Braun, Tillmann Rudolf: Ausprägungen der Globalisierung: Der Investor als partielles Subjekt im Internationalen Investitionsrecht – Qualität und Grenzen dieser Wirkungseinheit (2011), Studien zum Internationalen Investitionsrecht, Band 5, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  88. [zitiert als: Braun, Ausprägungen der Globalisierung (2011), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  89. Brekoulakis, Stavros: The Effect of an Arbitral Award and Third Parties in International Arbitration: Res Judicata Revisited, in: American Review of International Arbitration, Volume 16 (2005), No. 1, S. 177-209 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  90. [zitiert als: Brekoulakis, The Effect of an Arbitral Award and Third Parties in International Arbitration, in: 16 American Review of International Arbitration (2005) 177 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  91. Broches, Aron: Awards Rendered Pursuant to the ICSID Convention: Binding Force, Finality, Recognition, Enforcement, Execution, in: ICSID Review, Volume 2 (1987), Issue 2, S. 287-334 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  92. [zitiert als: Broches, Awards Rendered Pursuant to the ICSID Convention, in: 2 ICSID Review (1987) 287 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  93. Broches, Aron: Observations on the Finality of ICSID Awards, in: ICSID Review, Volume 6 (1991), Issue 2, S. 321-380 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  94. [zitiert als: Broches, Observations on the Finality of ICSID Awards, in: 6 ICSID Review (1991) 321 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  95. Brower, Charles N./Henin, Paula F.: Res Judicata, in: Kinnear et al. (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID, 2015, Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  96. [zitiert als: Brower/Henin, Res Judicata, in: Kinnear et al. (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID (2015), (Seite)] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  97. Brown, Chester: A Common Law of International Adjudication, Oxford University Press 2007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  98. [zitiert als: Brown, A Common Law of International Adjudication (2007), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  99. Brown, Chester: The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals, in: British Yearbook of International Law, Volume 76 (2005), Issue 1, S. 195-244 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  100. [zitiert als: Brown, Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals, in: 76 British YbIL (2005) 195 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  101. Bücheler, Gebhard: Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration, Oxford University Press (2015) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  102. [zitiert als: Bücheler, Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration (2015), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  103. Bungenberg, Marc/Griebel, Jörn/Hobe, Stephan/Reinisch, August (Hrsg.): International Investment Law – A Handbook (2015), C.H. Beck – Hart – Nomos, Baden-Baden Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  104. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Bungenberg et al., International Investment Law (2015), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  105. Bungenberg, Marc/Reinisch, August: From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court – Options Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 2nd Edition (2020), Springer-Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  106. [zitiert als: Bungenberg/Reinisch, From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court (2020), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  107. Burch, Elizabeth Chamblee: Calibrating Participation: Reflections on Procedure versus Procedural Justice, in: DePaul Law Review, Volume 65 (2016), No. 2, S. 323-356 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  108. [zitiert als: Burch, Calibrating Participation: Reflections on Procedure versus Procedural Justice, in: 65 DePaul LRev(2016) 323 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  109. Bursak, Alexandra: Preclusions, in: New York University Law Review, Volume 91, No. 6, S. 1651-1683 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  110. [zitiert als: Bursak, Preclusions, in: 91 NYU LRev (2016) 1651 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  111. Cabrera Colorado, Orlando Federico: The Freedom of Arbitrators to Conduct Collective Proceedings When the Rules are Silent: Considerations in the Wake of the Abaclat Decision, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 6 (2015), S. 163-187 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  112. [zitiert als: Cabrera Colorado, The Freedom of Arbitrators to Conduct Collective Proceedings When the Rules are Silent, in: 6 JIDS (2015) 163 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  113. Calamita, Nicolas Jansen/Sardinha, Elsa: The Bifurcation of Jurisdictional and Admissibility Objections in Investor-State Arbitration, in: The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Volume 16 (2017), S. 44-70 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  114. [zitiert als: Calamita/Sardinha, The Bifurcation of Jurisdictional and Admissibility Objections in Investor-State Arbitration, in: 16 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2017) 44 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  115. Cantelmo, Tobia: The Inherent Power of Reconsideration in Recent ICSID Case Law, in: Journal of World Investment and Trade, Volume 18 (2017), S. 232-270 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  116. [zitiert als: Cantelmo, The Inherent Power of Reconsideration in Recent ICSID Case Law, in: 18 JWIT (2017) 232 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  117. Carlston, Kenneth Smith: The Process of International Arbitration, Erstdruck: Columbia University Press 1946, Reprint: Greenwood Press Publishers 1972 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  118. [zitiert als: Carlston, The Process of International Arbitration (1946), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  119. Caron, David D.: Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals, in: Berkeley Journal of International Law, Volume 24 (2007), S. 401-423 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  120. [zitiert als: Caron, Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals, in: 24 Berkeley JIL (2007) 401 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  121. Caron, David D./Caplan Lee M.: The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules – A Commentary, 2nd Edition (2013), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  122. [zitiert als: Caron/Caplan, UNCITRAL Rules Commentary (2013), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  123. Carreteiro, Mateus Aimoré: Burden and standard of proof in international arbitration: proposed guidelines for promoting predictability, in: Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, Volume XIII (2016), Issue 49, S. 82-109 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  124. [zitiert als: Carreteiro, Burden and standard of proof in international arbitration, in: 13 Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem (2016) 82 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  125. Chayes, Abram: The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, in: Harvard Law Review, Volume 89 (1976), No. 7, S. 1281-1316 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  126. [zitiert als: Chayes, The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation, in: 89 Harvard LRev (1976) 1281 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  127. Cheng, Bin: General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (1953), Stevens & Sons, London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  128. [zitiert als: Cheng, General Principles of Law (1953), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  129. Choi, Susan: Judicial Enforcement of Arbitration Awards under the ICSID and New York Conventions, in: New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Volume 28 (1996), S. 175-216 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  130. [zitiert als: Choi, Judicial Enforcement of Arbitration Awards under the ICSID and New York Conventions, in: 28 New York University JIL and Politics (1996) 175 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  131. Clapham, Jason: Finality of Investor-State Arbitral Awards: Has the Tide Turned and is there a Need for Reform?, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 26 (2009), Issue 3, S. 437-466 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  132. [zitiert als: Clapham, Finality of Investor-State Arbitral Awards, in: 26 JIntArb (2009) 437 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  133. Cleary, Edward W.: Res Judicata Reexamined, in: Yale Law Journal, Volume 57 (1948), No. 3, S. 339-350 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  134. [zitiert als: Cleary, Res Judicata Reexamined, in: 57 Yale LJ (1948) 339 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  135. Cogan, Jacob Katz: International Criminal Courts and Fair Trials: Difficulties and Prospects, in: Yale Journal of International Law, Volume 27 (2002), S. 111-140 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  136. [zitiert als: Cogan, International Criminal Courts and Fair Trials: Difficulties and Prospects, in: 27 Yale JIL (2002) 111 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  137. Cohen-Eliya, Moshe/Porat, Iddo: American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins, in: International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 8 (2010), S. 263-286 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  138. [zitiert als: Cohen-Eliya/Porat, American Balancing and German Proportionality, in: 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law (2010) 263 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  139. Commission, Jeffery/Moloo, Rahim: Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration, Oxford International Arbitration Series (Series Editor: Loukas Mistelis), Oxford University Press (2018) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  140. [zitiert als: Commission/Moloo, Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration (2018), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  141. Cottier, Thomas/Echandi, Roberto/Leal-Arcas, Rafael/Liechti, Rachel/Payosova, Tetyana/Sieber-Gasser, Charlotte: The Principle of Proportionality in International Law, Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR), Trade Working Papers, Working Paper No 2012/38 (December 2012) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  142. [zitiert als: Cottier et al., The Principle of Proportionality in International Law, NCCR Trade Working Papers, Working Paper No 2012/38 (December 2012), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  143. Craig, Paul: Proportionality, Rationality and Review, in: New Zealand Law Review (2010), No. 2, S. 265-302 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  144. [zitiert als: Craig, Proportionality, Rationality and Review, in: New Zealand LRev (2010), 265 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  145. Cremades, Bernardo M./Madalena, Ignacio: Parallel Proceedings in International Arbitration, in: Arbitration International, Volume 24 (2008), No. 4, S. 507-539 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  146. [zitiert als: Cremades/Madalena, Parallel Proceedings in International Arbitration, in: 24 ArbInt (2008) 507 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  147. Dietl, Clara Erika/Lorenz, Egon: Wörterbuch Recht, Wirtschaft und Politik, 7. Auflage (2016), Band 1: Englisch-Deutsch, C.H. Beck Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  148. [zitiert als: Dietl/Lorenz, Wörterbuch Recht, Wirtschaft und Politik (2016), Band 1, Stichwort: [„…“]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  149. Dörr, Oliver/Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.): Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary, 2nd Edition, Springer Verlag (2018) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  150. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Dörr/Schmalenbach, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2018), [Artikel] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  151. Dolzer, Rudolf/Schreuer, Christoph: Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd Edition (2012), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  152. [zitiert als: Dolzer/Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (2012), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  153. Douglas, Zachary: The International Law of Investment Claims (2009), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  154. [zitiert als: Douglas, International Law of Investment Claims (2009), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  155. Dreier, Horst (Hrsg.): Grundgesetz Kommentar, Band I – Artikel 1-19, 3. Auflage (2013), Mohr Siebeck Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  156. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Dreier, GG Kommentar (2013), Band I, [Vorschrift] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  157. Duden Online, Dudenredaktion, abrufbar unter: https://www.duden.de/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  158. Dundas, Hew R.: Challenging Awards and Arbitrators: a Losing Game?, in: Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, Volume 71 (2005), Issue 4, S. 353-363 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  159. [zitiert als: Dundas, Challenging Awards and Arbitrators, in: 71 The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management (2005) 353 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  160. Dworkin, Ronald: Taking Rights Seriously (1977), Duckworth & Co. Ltd., London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  161. [zitiert als: Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (1977), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  162. Earnest, Davis L.: The Duty of Arbitrators to Deliminate Between Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investor-State Arbitration: A Developed Consensus or an Enduring Lacuna?, in: The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Volume 17 (2018), S. 135-144 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  163. [zitiert als: Earnest, The Duty of Arbitrators to Deliminate Between Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investor-State Arbitration, in: 17 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2018) 135 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  164. Eggett, Craig: The Role of Principles and General Principles in the ‘Constitutional Processes’ of International Law, in: Netherlands International Law Review, Volume 66 (2019), S. 197-217 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  165. [zitiert als: Eggett, The Role of Principles and General Principles in the ‘Constitutional Processes’ of International Law, in: 66 Netherlands IntLRev (2019) 197 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  166. Elsig, Manfred/Pollack, Mark A.: Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization, in: European Journal of International Relations, Volume 20 (2014), S. 391-415 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  167. [zitiert als: Elsig/Pollack, Agents, Trustees, and International Courts, in: 20 European Journal of International Relations (2014) 391 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  168. Engle, Eric: The History of the General Principle of Proportionality: An Overview, in: Dartmouth Law Journal, Volume 10 (Winter 2012), S. 1-11 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  169. [zitiert als: Engle, The History of the General Principle of Proportionality, in: 10 Dartmouth LJ (2012) 1 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  170. Epping, Volker/Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff (Hrsg.): Knut Ipsen – Völkerrecht, 7. Auflage (2018), C. H. Beck Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  171. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Ipsen, Völkerrecht (2018), [Paragraph][Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  172. Fernandez-Ballester, Miguel Angel/Lozano, David Arias (eds): Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades (2010), La Ley, Madrid Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  173. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Fernandez-Ballester/Lozano (eds), Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades (2010), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  174. Ferrari, Franco/Rosenfeld, Friedrich (eds.): Inherent Powers of Arbitrators, NYU – Center for Transnational Litigation, Arbitration and Commercial Law: Juris Publishing (2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  175. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Ferrari/Rosenfeld (eds.), Inherent Powers of Arbitrators (2019), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  176. Fiss, Owen M.: Against Settlement, in: Yale Law Journal, Volume 93 (1983-1984), S. 1073-1090 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  177. [zitiert als: Fiss, Against Settlement, in: 93 Yale LJ (1983-1984) 1073 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  178. Fitzmaurice, Gerald: The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, Volume II (1986), Grotius Publications Limited, Cambridge Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  179. [zitiert als: Fitzmaurice, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice (1986), Volume II, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  180. Fontanelli, Filippo/Tanzi, Attila: Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investment Arbitration - A View from the Bridge at the Practice, in: The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Volume 16 (2017), S. 3-20 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  181. [zitiert als: Fontanelli/Tanzi, Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investment Arbitration, in: 16 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2017) 3 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  182. Foster, Caroline: A New Stratosphere? Investment Treaty Arbitration as ‘Internationalized Public Law‘, in: International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Volume 64 (2015), Issue 2, S. 461-485 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  183. [zitiert als: Foster, A New Stratosphere? Investment Treaty Arbitration as ‘Internationalized Public Law‘, in: 64 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2015) 461 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  184. Fouret, Julien/Gerbay, Rémy/Alvarez, Gloria M. (eds): The ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules – A Practical Commentary (2019), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  185. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Fouret/Gerbay/Alvarez (eds), ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules – A Practical Commentary (2019), [Vorschrift] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  186. Franck, Susan D.: Arbitration Costs – Myths and Realities in Investment Treaty Arbitration (2019), Oxford University Press, Oxford Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  187. [zitiert als: Franck, Arbitration Costs (2019), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  188. Franck, Susan D.: The Role of International Arbitrators, in: ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, Volume 12 (2006), No. 2, S. 499-522 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  189. [zitiert als: Franck, The Role of International Arbitrators, in: 12 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law (2006) 499 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  190. Gaffney, John P.: The Liberty of Decision of the Arbitral Tribunal, in: Transnational Dispute Management, Volume 6 (2009), Issue 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  191. [zitiert als: Gaffney, The Liberty of Decision of the Arbitral Tribunal, in: 6 TDM (2009), Issue 1, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  192. Gaillard, Emmanuel: Legal Theory of International Arbitration (2010), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  193. [zitiert als: Gaillard, Legal Theory of International Arbitration (2010), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  194. Gaillard, Emmanuel/Savage, John (eds.), Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (1999), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  195. [zitiert als: Gaillard/Savage (eds), Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (1999), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  196. Garner, Bryan A.: Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th Edition (2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  197. [zitiert als: Black’s Law Dictionary (2019), [Stichwort]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  198. Ginsburg, Tom: International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance, in: International Review of Law and Economics, Volume 25 (2005), S. 107-123 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  199. [zitiert als: Ginsburg, International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions, in: 25 International Review of Law and Economics (2005) 107 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  200. Goode, Roy: The Role of the lex loci arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration, in: Arbitration International, Volume 17 (2001), No. 1, S. 19-39 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  201. [zitiert als: Goode, The Role of the lex loci arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration, in: 17 ArbInt (2001) 19 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  202. Grabenwarter, Christoph/Pabel, Katharina: Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, 6. Auflage (2016), C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  203. [zitiert als: Grabenwarter/Pabel, EMRK (2016), [§] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  204. Greenwood, Lucy: Does Bifurcation Really Promote Efficiency?, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 28 (2011), Issue 2, Seite 105-111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  205. [zitiert als: Greenwood, Does Bifurcation Really Promote Efficiency?, in: 28 JIntArb (2011) 105 (Seite)] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  206. Grenig, Jay E.: After the Arbitration Award: Not Always Final and Binding, in: Marquette Sports Law Review, Volume 25 (2014), Issue 1, S. 65-99 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  207. [zitiert als: Grenig, After the Arbitration Award: Not Always Final and Binding, in: 25 Marquette Sports LRev (2014) 65 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  208. Gunn, T. Jeremy: Deconstructing Proportionality in Limitations Analysis, in: Emory International Law Review, Volume 19 (Summer 2005), No. 2, S. 465-498 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  209. [zitiert als: Gunn, Deconstructing Proportionality in Limitations Analysis, in: 19 Emory IntLRev ( 2005) 465 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  210. Hanotiau, Bernard: The Res Judicata Effect of Arbitral Awards, in: ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Complex Arbitrations – Special Supplement (2003), S. 43-51 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  211. [zitiert als: Hanotiau, The Res Judicata Effect of Arbitral Awards, in: ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Complex Arbitrations – Special Supplement (2003) 43 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  212. Happ, Richard/Wuschka, Sebastian: From the Jay Treaty Commissions Towards A Multilateral Investment Court: Addressing the Enforcement Dilemma, in: Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, Volume 6 (2017), Issue 1, S. 113-132 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  213. [zitiert als: Happ/Wuschka, From the Jay Treaty Commissions Towards A Multilateral Investment Court, in: 6 Indian Journal of Arbitration Law (2017), 113 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  214. Harbo, Tor-Inge: Introducing Procedural Proportionality Review in European Law, in: Leiden Journal of International Law, Volume 30 (2017), No. 1, S. 25-48 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  215. [zitiert als: Harbo, Introducing Procedural Proportionality Review in European Law, in: 30 Leiden JIL (2017) 25 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  216. Harbo, Tor-Inge: The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU Law, in: European Law Journal, Volume 16 (2010), No. 2, S. 158-185 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  217. [zitiert als: Harbo, The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU Law, in: 16 European LJ (2010) 158 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  218. van Harten, Gus: Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (2007), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  219. [zitiert als: van Harten, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (2007), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  220. van Harten, Gus/Loughlin, Martin: Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law, in: European Journal of International Law, Volume 17 No. 1 (2006), S. 121-150 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  221. [zitiert als: van Harten/Loughlin, Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law, in: 17 EJIL (2006) 121 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  222. Hay, Bruce L.: Some Settlement Effects of Preclusion, in: University of Illinois Law Review Volume 1993 (1993), No. 1, S. 21-52 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  223. [zitiert als: Hay, Some Settlement Effects of Preclusion, in: 1993 University of Illinois LRev (1993) 21 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  224. Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr.: Preclusion as to Issues of Law: The Legal System's Interest, in: Iowa Law Review, Volume 70 (1984), No. 1, S. 81-94 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  225. [zitiert als: Hazard, Preclusion as to Issues of Law, in: 70 Iowa LRev (1984) 81 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  226. Henckels, Caroline: Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitration, in: Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 15 (2012), Issue 1, S. 223-255 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  227. [zitiert als: Henckels, Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate, in: 15 Journal of International Economic Law (2012), 223 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  228. Herdegen, Matthias: Völkerrecht, 19. Auflage (2020), C. H. Beck Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  229. [zitiert als: Herdegen, Völkerrecht (2020), [Paragraph][Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  230. Hilgard, Mark/Bruder, Ana Elilsa: Unauthorised Amiable Compositeur, in: Dispute Resolution International, Volume 8 (2014), No. 1, S. 51-62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  231. [zitiert als: Hilgard/Bruder, Unauthorised Amiable Compositeur, in: 8 Dispute Resolution International (2014) 51 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  232. Hill, Jonathan: Is an Interim Measure of Protection Ordered by an Arbitral Tribunal an Arbitral Award?, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 9 (2018), Issue 4, S. 590-608 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  233. [zitiert als: Hill, Is an Interim Measure of Protection Ordered by an Arbitral Tribunal an Arbitral Award?, in: 9 JIDS (2018) 590 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  234. Hobe, Stephan: Einführung in das Völkerrecht – Begründet von Otto Kimminich, 11. Auflage (2020), A. Francke Verlag Tübingen Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  235. [zitiert als: Hobe, Einführung in das Völkerrecht (2020), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  236. Hobér, Kaj: Res Judicata and Lis Pendens in International Arbitration, in: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Volume 366 (2014), S. 284 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  237. [zitiert als: Hobér, Res Judicata and Lis Pendens in International Arbitration, Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (2014), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  238. Horn, Norbert (ed.): Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes (2004), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  239. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Horn (ed.), Arbitrating Foreign Investment Disputes (2004), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  240. Horvath, Günther J.: The Duty of the Tribunal to Render an Enforceable Award, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 18 (2001), Issue 2, S. 135-158 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  241. [zitiert als: Horvath, The Duty of the Tribunal to Render an Enforceable Award, in: 18 JIntArb (2001) 135 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  242. Hunt, David: The International Criminal Court – High Hopes, Creative Ambiguity and an Unfortunate Mistrust in International Judges, in: Journal of International Criminal Justice, Volume 2 (2004), S. 56-70 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  243. [zitiert als: Hunt, The International Criminal Court, in: 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2004) 56 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  244. Huscroft, Grant/Miller, Bradley W./Webber, Grégoire (eds.): Proportionality and the Rule of Law (2014), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  245. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Huscroft/Miller/Webber (eds.), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (2014), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  246. Jacob, I. H.: The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court, in: Current Legal Problems, Volume 23 (1970), Issue 1, Seite 23-52 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  247. [zitiert als: Jacob, The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court, in: 23 Current Legal Problems (1970) 23 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  248. Jacob, Kenneth S.: Reinvigorating ICSID with a New Mission and with Renewed Respect for Party Autonomy, in: Virginia Journal of International Law, Volume 33 (1992), No. 1, S. 123-160 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  249. [zitiert als: Jacob, Reinvigorating ICSID with a New Mission and with Renewed Respect for Party Autonomy, in: 33 Virginia JIL (1992) 123 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  250. Jalet, Frances T. Freeman: The Quest for the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations – A Study, in: University of California Los Angeles Law Review (1963), Volume 10, S. 1041-1086 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  251. [zitiert als: Jalet, The Quest for the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations, in: 10 UCLA LRev (1963) 1041 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  252. Jans, Jan H.: Proportionality Revisited, in: Legal Issues of Economic Integration, Volume 27 (2000) S. 239-265 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  253. [zitiert als: Jans, Proportionality Revisited, in: 27 Legal Issues of Economic Integration (2000) 239 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  254. Jellinek, Georg: Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3. Auflage, 6. Neudruck (unveränderter Nachdruck des 5. Neudrucks der 3. Auflage) (1959), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  255. [zitiert als: Jellinek, Allgemeine Staatslehre (1959), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  256. Joecks, Wolfgang/Miebach, Klaus (Hrsg.): Münchener Kommentar zum StGB, Band 1 (§§ 1-37), 4. Auflage (2020), Verlag C. H. Beck, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  257. [zitiert als: [Bearbeiter], in: MüKo StGB (2020), [Vorschrift], [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  258. Kaplan, Neil/Moser, Michael J. (eds.): Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum Michael Pryles (2018), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  259. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Kaplan/Moser, Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum Michael Pryles (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  260. Kelsen, Hans: Principles of International Law, 2. Auflage (1966), Revised and Edited by Robert W. Tucker, Holt Rinehart and Winston Inc. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  261. [zitiert als: Kelsen, Principles of International Law (1966), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  262. Kern, Carsten: Schiedsgericht und Generalklausel (2017), Mohr Siebeck Verlag Tübingen Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  263. [zitiert als: Kern, Schiedsgericht und Generalklausel (2017), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  264. Kingreen, Thorsten/Poscher, Ralf: Grundrechte – Staatsrecht II, 36. Auflage (2020), C.F. Müller Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  265. [zitiert als: Kingreen/Poscher, Staatsrecht II (2020), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  266. Kingsbury, Benedict/Schill, Stephan: Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law, in: Transnational Dispute Management, Volume 8 (2011), Issue 2, New York University, Institute for International Law & Justice, Working Paper 2009/6 (Global Administrative Law Series), abrufbar über: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1700 (zuletzt abgerufen am 08.03.2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  267. [zitiert als: Kingsbury/Schill, Investor-State Arbitration as Governance, in: 8 TDM (2011), NYU Institute for International Law & Justice, Working Paper 2009/6 (Global Administrative Law Series), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  268. Kinnear, Meg/Bjorklund, Andrea K./Hannaford, John F.G.: Investment Disputes under NAFTA: An Annotated Guide to NAFTA Chapter 11, Kluwer Law International (2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  269. [zitiert als: Kinnear et al., Investment Disputes under NAFTA (2006), [Artikel][Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  270. Kirby, Jennifer: Finality and Arbitral Rules: Saying An Award Is Final Does Not Necessarily Make It So, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 29 (2012), Issue 1, S. 119-128 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  271. [zitiert als: Kirby, Finality and Arbitral Rules, in: 29 JIntArb (2012) 119 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  272. Klabbers, Jan/Peters, Anne/Ulfstein, Geir: The Constitutionalization of International Law (2009), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  273. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Klabbers/Peters/Ulfstein, The Constitutionalization of International Law (2009), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  274. Klatt, Matthias/Meister, Moritz: The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (2012), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  275. [zitiert als: Klatt/Meister, The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (2012), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  276. Kleinheisterkamp, Jan: Investment Treaty Law and the Fear for Sovereignty: Transnational Challenges and Solutions, in: Modern Law Review, Volume 78 (2015), Issue 5, S. 793-825 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  277. [zitiert als: Kleinheisterkamp, Investment Treaty Law and the Fear for Sovereignty, in: 78 Modern LRev (2015) 793 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  278. Klement, Dorothee: Rechtskraft des Schiedsspruchs - Die Gewährleistung der Einmaligkeit von Entscheidungen der Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit zwischen individuellem Rechtsschutz und öffentlichen Interessen (2018), Nomos Verlangsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  279. [zitiert als: Klement, Rechtskraft des Schiedsspruchs (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  280. Klingler, Joseph/Parkhomenko, Yuri/Salonidis, Constantinos (eds.): Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (2018), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  281. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Klingler et al., Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  282. Knauer, Christoph/Kudlich, Hans/Schneider, Hartmut: Münchener Kommentar zur StPO, Band 1 (§§ 1-150 StPO), 1. Auflage (2014), Verlag C. H. Beck, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  283. [zitiert als: [Bearbeiter], in: MüKo StPO (2014), Band 1, [Vorschrift], [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  284. Kolb, Robert: The International Court of Justice (2013) Hart Publishing, Oxford Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  285. [zitiert als: Kolb, The International Court of Justice (2013), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  286. Kolo, Abba: Witness Intimidation, Tampering and Other Related Abuses of Process in Investment Arbitration: Possible Remedies Available to the Arbitral Tribunal, in: Arbitration International, Volume 26 (2010), Issue 1, S. 43-86 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  287. [zitiert als: Kolo, Witness Intimidation, Tampering and Other Related Abuses of Process in Investment Arbitration, in: 26 ArbInt (2010) 43 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  288. Kotuby, Charles T./Sobota, Luke A.: General Principles of Law and International Due Process – Principles and Norms Applicable in Transnational Disputes (2017), Oxford University Press, Oxford Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  289. [zitiert als: Kotuby/Sobota, General Principles of Law and International Due Process (2017), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  290. Kremslehner, Florian: Chapter III: The Arbitration Procedure - Lis pendens and res judicata in International Commercial Arbitration, in: Klausegger, Christian et al. (Hrsg.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (2007), S. 127-162 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  291. [zitiert als: Kremslehner, Chapter III: The Arbitration Procedure - Lis pendens and res judicata in International Commercial Arbitration, in: Austrian YbIntArb (2007), 127 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  292. Kröll, Stefan: Recourse against Negative Decisions on Jurisdiction, in: Arbitration International, Volume 20 (2004), Issue 1, S. 55-72 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  293. [zitiert als: Kröll, Recourse against Negative Decisions on Jurisdiction, in: 20 ArbInt (2004) 55 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  294. Kube, Hanno/Mellinghoff, Rudolf/Morgenthaler, Gerd/Palm, Ulrich/Puhl, Thomas/Seiler, Christian: Leitgedanken des Rechts – Paul Kirchhof zum 70. Geburtstag, Band I – Staat und Verfassung (2013), C. F. Müller Verlag Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  295. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Kube et al., Leitgedanken des Rechts, Band I (2013), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  296. Kulick, Andreas: Global Public Interest in International Investment Law (2012), Dissertation, Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  297. [zitiert als: Kulick, Global Public Interest in International Investment Law (2012), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  298. Laird, Ian A./Weiler, Todd J. (eds.): Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law – Volume 5 (2012), JurisNet Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  299. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Laird/Weiler, Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law (2012), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  300. Lalani, Shaheeza/Polanco Lazo, Rodrigo (eds): The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (2015), Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  301. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Lalani/Polanco Lazo (eds), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (2015), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  302. Lammasch, Heinrich: Die Rechtskraft internationaler Schiedssprüche (1913), Duncker & Humblot, München/Leipzig Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  303. [zitiert als: Lammasch, Die Rechtskraft internationaler Schiedssprüche (1913), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  304. Langenscheidt-Redaktion (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Englisch (2005), Teil I, Englisch-Deutsch Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  305. [zitiert als: Langenscheidt, Handwörterbuch Englisch (2005), Stichwort: [„…“]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  306. Lauterpacht, Elihu: Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (1991), Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures, Grotius Publications Limited, Cambridge Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  307. [zitiert als: Lauterpacht, Aspects of the Administration of International Justice (1991), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  308. Lauterpacht, Elihu (ed.): International Law Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, Volume I (1970), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  309. [zitiert als: Lauterpacht, International Law Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht (1970), Vol. I, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  310. Lauterpacht, Hersch: The Development of International Law by the International Court (1958), Stevens & Sons Limited, London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  311. [zitiert als: Lauterpacht, The Development of International Law by the International Court (1958), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  312. Lauterpacht, Hersch: The Function of Law in the International Community (1933), Oxford Clarendon Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  313. [zitiert als: Lauterpacht, The Function of Law in the International Community (1933), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  314. Leonhardsen, Erlend M.: Looking for Legitimacy: Exploring Proportionality Analysis in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 3 (2012), No. 1, S. 95-136 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  315. [zitiert als: Leonhardsen, Looking for Legitimacy: Exploring Proportionality Analysis in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: 3 JIDS (2012) 95 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  316. Lew, Julian D. M./Bor, Harris/Fullelove, Gregory Roy/Greenaway, Joanne et al. (eds), Arbitration in England, with chapters on Scotland and Ireland (2013), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  317. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Lew/Bor et al. (eds), Arbitration in England, with chapters on Scotland and Ireland (2013), [Paragraph]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  318. Lew, Julian D. M./Mistelis, Loukas A./Kroll, Stefan Michael, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (2003), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  319. [zitiert als: Lew/Mistelis/Kröll, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (2003), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  320. Liang, Jessica: The Inherent Jurisdiction and Inherent Powers of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals: An Appraisal of Their Application, in: New Criminal Law Review – An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, Volume 15 (2012), pp. 375-413 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  321. [zitiert als: Liang, The Inherent Jurisdiction and Inherent Powers of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals, in: 15 New Criminal LRev (2012) 375 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  322. Lindroos, Anja/Mehling, Michael: Dispelling the Chimera of ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ International Law and the WTO, in: European Journal of International Law, Volume 16 (2006), No. 5, S. 857-877 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  323. [zitiert als: Lindroos/Mehling, Dispelling the Chimera of ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ International Law and the WTO, in: 16 EJIL (2006) 857 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  324. Lowe, Vaughan/Fitzmaurice, Malgosia; Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice – Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (1996), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  325. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Lowe/Fitzmaurice, Fifty Years of the ICJ (1996), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  326. Malintoppi, Loretta: How May Investment Tribunals Cope With and Sanction Guerrilla Tactics of the Parties/their Counsel?, in: Transnational Dispute Management, Volume 7 (November 2010), Issue 2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  327. [zitiert als: Malintoppi, How May Investment Tribunals Cope With and Sanction Guerrilla Tactics of the Parties/their Counsel?, in: 7 TDM (November 2010), [Abschnittsnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  328. Mann, F.A. (Frederick Alexander): State Contracts and International Arbitration, in: British Yearbook of International Law, Volume 42 (1967), S. 1-38 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  329. [zitiert als: Mann, State Contracts and International Arbitration, in: 42 British YbIL (1967) 1 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  330. Manssen, Gerrit: Staatsrecht II – Grundrechte, 17. Auflage (2020), C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  331. [zitiert als: Manssen, Staatsrecht II (2020), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  332. von Mehren, Arthur Taylor: Limitations on Party Choice of the Governing Law: Do They Exist for International Commercial Arbitration, in: Pakistan Law Review, Volume 1 (2001), S. 138-150 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  333. [zitiert als: von Mehren, Limitations on Party Choice of the Governing Law, in: 1 Pakistan LRev (2001) 138 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  334. von Mehren, Arthur Taylor/Salomon, Claudia: Submitting Evidence in an International Arbitration: The Common Lawyer's Guide, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 20 (2003), Issue 3, S. 285-294 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  335. [zitiert als: von Mehren/Salomon, Submitting Evidence in an International Arbitration: The Common Lawyer's Guide, in: 20 JIntArb (2003) 285 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  336. Menaker, Andrea (ed.): International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity, International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Congress Series No. 19 (2017), Wolters Kluwer Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  337. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Menaker (ed.), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity (2017), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  338. Merrills, John G.: International Dispute Settlement, 6th Edition (2017), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  339. [zitiert als: Merrills, International Dispute Settlement (2017), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  340. Möller, Kai: Proportionality: Challenging the Critics, in: International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 10 (2012), Issue 3, S. 709-731 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  341. [zitiert als: Möller, Proportionality: Challenging the Critics, in: 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law (2012) 709 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  342. Moore, John Bassett: History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a Party Together with Appendices Containing the Treaties Relating to such Arbitrations, and Historical and Legal Notes on Other International Arbitrations Ancient and Modern, and on the Domestic Commissions of the United States for the Adjustment of International Claims – In Six Volumes, herausgegeben durch das US Government Printing Office, Volume III (1898) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  343. [zitiert als: John Bassett Moore, History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a Party, Vol. III (1898), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  344. Morris, John K.: Nonparties and Preclusion by Judgment: The Privity Rule Reconsidered, in: California Law Review, Volume 56 (1968), No. 4, S. 1098-1133 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  345. [zitiert als: Morris, Nonparties and Preclusion by Judgment, in: 56 California LRev (1968) 1098 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  346. Moses, Margaret L.: Inherent and Implied Powers of Arbitrators, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-015, Loyola University of Chicago School of Law, August 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  347. [zitiert als: Moses, Inherent and Implied Powers of Arbitrators (August 2014), Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-015, Loyola University of Chicago School of Law, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  348. Moses, Margaret L.: The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 3rd Edition (2017), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  349. [zitiert als: Moses, Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (2017), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  350. Musielak, Hans-Joachim/Voit, Wolfgang: Zivilprozessordnung mit Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz – Kommentar, 17. Auflage (2020), Verlag Hans Vahlen, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  351. [zitiert als: [Bearbeiter], in: Musielak/Voit, ZPO (2020), [§] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  352. Nathan, Kathigamar V. S. K.: Submissions to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes in Breach of the Convention, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 12 (1995), Issue 1, S. 27-52 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  353. [zitiert als: Nathan, Submissions to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes in Breach of the Convention, in: 12 JIntArb (1995) 27 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  354. Neef, Manfred: Die Rechtskraft des Schiedsspruchs (1933), Eduard Klinz Buchdruck-Werkstätten, Halle (Saale) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  355. [zitiert als: Neef, Die Rechtskraft des Schiedsspruchs (1933), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  356. Newcombe, Andrew/Paradell, Lluís: Law and Practice of Investment Treaties – Standards of Treatment (2009), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  357. [zitiert als: Newcombe/Paradell, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties (2009), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  358. Newman, Lawrence W./Hill, Richard D. (eds.): The Leading Arbitrators‘ Guide to International Arbitration, 3rd Edition (2014), JurisNet LLC Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  359. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Newman/Hill (eds.), The Leading Arbitrators‘ Guide to International Arbitration (2014), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  360. Nolte, Jakob Julius: Die Eigenart des verwaltungsgerichtlichen Rechtsschutzes – Grund und Grenzen der Anwendung des Zivilprozessrechts im Verwaltungsprozess (2015), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  361. [zitiert als: Nolte, Die Eigenart des verwaltungsgerichtlichen Rechtsschutzes (2015), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  362. Oxford University Press (OUP), Oxford English Dictionary, Online-Version, abrufbar unter: www.lexico.com (abgerufen am: 29.01.2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  363. [zitiert als: Oxford English Dictionary (Online-Version), [Stichwort], abrufbar unter: [Link] (abgerufen am [Datum])] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  364. Park, William W.: Private Disputes and the Public Good: Explaining Arbitration Law, in: American University International Law Review, Volume 20 (2005), Issue 5, S. 903-906 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  365. [zitiert als: Park, Private Disputes and the Public Good, in: 20 American University IntLRev (2005) 903 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  366. Parsons, Frank: Legal Doctrine and Social Progress (1911), Verlag B. W. Huebsch, New York Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  367. [zitiert als: Parsons, Legal Doctrine and Social Progress (1911), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  368. Paulsson, Jan: Delocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why It Matters, in: The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Volume 32 (1983), No. 1, S. 53-61 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  369. [zitiert als: Paulsson, Delocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration, in: 32 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly (1983) 53 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  370. Pauwelyn, Joost: Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  371. [zitiert als: Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law (2003), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  372. Pennock, J. Roland/Chapman, John W. (eds.): Due Process: Nomos XVIII (1977), New York University Press, New York Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  373. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Pennock/Chapman (eds.), Due Process (1977), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  374. Peters, Anne (seit 2021)/Wolfrum, Rüdiger (2004-2020) (Hrsg.): The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online-Ausgabe, Oxford University Press, [www.mpepil.com] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  375. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: MPEPIL, [Randziffer] [Abrufdatum]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  376. Peters, Paul: Dispute Settlement Arrangements in Investment Treaties, in: Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, Volume 22 (1991), S. 91-161 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  377. [zitiert als: Peters, Dispute Settlement Arrangements in Investment Treaties, in: 22 Netherlands YbIL (1991) 91 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  378. Peters, Philipp/Koller, Christian: Chapter III: The Award and the Courts – The Notion of Arbitral Award: An Attempt to Overcome a Babylonian Confusion, in: Klausegger, Christian et al. (Hrsg.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (2010), S. 137-169 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  379. [zitiert als: Peters/Koller, The Notion of Arbitral Award, in: Austrian YbIntArb (2010) 137 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  380. Petersen, Niels: Customary Law without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation, in: American University International Law Review, Volume 23 (2007), S. 275-310 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  381. [zitiert als: Petersen, Customary Law without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation, in: 23 American University IntLRev (2007) 275 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  382. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich: International Rule of Law and Constitutional Justice in International Investment Law and Arbitration, in: Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Volume 16 (2009), No. 2, S. 513-534 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  383. [zitiert als: Petersmann, International Rule of Law and Constitutional Justice in International Investment Law and Arbitration, in: 16 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (2009) 513 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  384. Pika, Maximilian: Third-party Effects of Arbitral Awards – Res Judicata Against Privies, Non-Mutual Preclusion and Factual Effects (2019), Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn (Niederlanden) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  385. [zitiert als: Pika, Third-party Effects of Arbitral Awards (2019), [Absatznummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  386. Platt, Rowan: The Appeal of Appeal Mechanisms in International Arbitration: Fairness over Finality?, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 30 (2013), Issue 5, S. 531-560 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  387. [zitiert als: Platt, The Appeal of Appeal Mechanisms in International Arbitration, in: 30 JIntArb (2013) 531 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  388. Portuese, Aurelien: Principle of Proportionality as Principle of Economic Efficiency, in: European Law Journal, Volume 19 (2013), No. 5, S. 612-635 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  389. [zitiert als: Portuese, Principle of Proportionality as Principle of Economic Efficiency, in: 19 European LJ (2013) 612 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  390. Poudret, Jean-François/Besson, Sébastien: Comparative Law of International Arbitration, 2nd Edition (2007), Thomson Sweet & Maxwell, London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  391. [zitiert als: Poudret/Besson, Comparative Law of International Arbitration (2007), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  392. Pryles, Michael: Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 24 (2007), Issue 3, S. 327-339 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  393. [zitiert als: Pryles, Limits to Party Autonomy in Arbitral Procedure, in: 24 JIntArb (2007) 327 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  394. Ranjan, Prabhash: Using the Public Law Concept of Proportionality to Balance Investment Protection with Regulation in International Investment Law: A Critical Appraisal, in: Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 3 (2014), Issue 3, S. 853-883 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  395. [zitiert als: Ranjan, Using the Public Law Concept of Proportionality to Balance Investment Protection with Regulation in International Investment Law, in: 3 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law (2014) 853 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  396. Rauscher, Thomas/Krüger, Wolfgang: Münchener Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung mit Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen, Band 3, 5. Auflage (2017), C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  397. [zitiert als: [Bearbeiter], in: MüKo ZPO (2017), [§] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  398. Redfern, Allan/Reymond, Claude/Reiner, Andreas/Hanotiau, Bernard/Eveleigh, Edward/Menzies, Ian W.: The Standards and Burden of Proof in International Arbitration, in: Arbitration International, Volume 10 (1994), Issue 3, S. 317-364 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  399. [zitiert als: Redfern/Reymond/et al., The Standards and Burden of Proof in International Arbitration, in: 10 ArbInt (1994) 317 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  400. Reed, Lucy/Paulsson, Jan/Blackaby, Nigel: Guide to ICSID Arbitration, 2nd Edition (2010), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  401. [zitiert als: Reed/Paulsson/Blackaby, Guide to ICSID Arbitration (2010), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  402. Reinisch, August: The Use and Limits of Res Judicata and Lis Pendens as Procedural Tools to Avoid Conflicting Dispute Settlement Outcomes, in: The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Volume 3 (2004), Issue 1, S. 37-77 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  403. [zitiert als: Reinisch, The Use and Limits of Res Judicata and Lis Pendens as Procedural Tools to Avoid Conflicting Dispute Settlement Outcomes, in: 3 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2004) 37 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  404. Riegler, Stefan: Chapter III: The Award and the Courts: Remission of the Case from the State Court to the Arbitral Tribunal, in: Klausegger, Christian et al. (Hrsg.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (2012), S. 231-243 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  405. [zitiert als: Riegler, The Award and the Courts: Remission of the Case from the State Court to the Arbitral Tribunal, in: Austrian YbIntArb (2012) 231 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  406. Riehm, Thomas: Abwägungsentscheidungen in der praktischen Rechtsanwendung: Argumentation – Beweis – Wertung (2006), C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  407. [zitiert als: Riehm, Abwägungsentscheidungen in der praktischen Rechtsanwendung (2006), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  408. Rivers, Julian: Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review, in: Cambridge Law Journal, Volume 65 (2006), Issue 1, S. 174-207 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  409. [zitiert als: Rivers, Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review, in: 65 Cambridge LJ (2006) 174 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  410. Roberts, Anthea: Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System, in: American Journal of International Law, Volume 107 (2013), S. 45-94 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  411. [zitiert als: Roberts, Clash of Paradigms, in: 107 American JIL (2013) 45 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  412. Roberts, Anthea: Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, in: American Journal of International Law, Volume 104 (2010), No. 2, S. 179-225 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  413. [zitiert als: Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation, in: 104 American JIL (2010) 179 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  414. Rodriguez Ferrere, Marcelo: Inherent Jurisdiction and Its Limits, in: Otago Law Review, Volume 13 (2013), S. 107-143 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  415. [zitiert als: Rodriguez Ferrere, Inherent Jurisdiction and Its Limits, in: 13 Otago LRev (2013) 107 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  416. Romano, Cesare P. R.: The Price of International Justice, in: Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, Volume 4 (2005), S. 281-328 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  417. [zitiert als: Romano, The Price of International Justice, in: 4 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2005) 281 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  418. Romano, Cesare P. R./Alter, Karen J./Shany, Yuval: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (2014), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  419. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Romano/Alter/Shany, The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (2014), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  420. Rosenfeld, Friedrich: The Inherent Powers of International Adjudicators to Reconsider and Revise Their Decisions, in: European International Arbitration Review, Volume 6 (2017), Issue 2, S. 127-147 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  421. [zitiert als: Rosenfeld, The Inherent Powers of International Adjudicators to Reconsider and Revise Their Decisions, in: 6 European International Arbitration Review (2017) 127 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  422. Rouche, Jean/Pointon, Gerald H./Delvolvé, Jean-Louis: French Arbitration Law and Practice: A Dynamic Civil Law Approach to International Arbitration, 2nd Edition (2009), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  423. [zitiert als: Rouche/Pointon/Delvolvé, French Arbitration Law and Practice: A Dynamic Civil Law Approach to International Arbitration (2009), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  424. Sabahi, Borzu/Rubins, Noah/Wallace Jr., Don: Investor-State-Arbitration, 2nd Edition (2019), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  425. [zitiert als: Sabahi/Rubins/Wallace Jr., Investor-State-Arbitration (2019), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  426. Samuel, Adam: Jurisdictional Problems in International Commercial Arbitration: A Study of Belgian, Dutch, English, French, Swedish, Swiss, U.S., and West German Law (1989), Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, Zürich Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  427. [zitiert als: Samuel, Jurisdictional Problems in International Commercial Arbitration (1989), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  428. Sanders, Pieter: International Arbitration – Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (1967), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  429. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Sanders, International Arbitration – Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (1967), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  430. Sanders, Pieter: Quo Vadis Arbitration? Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice (1999), Kluwer Law International, The Hague Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  431. [zitiert als: Sanders, Quo Vadis Arbitration? (1999), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  432. von Savigny, Friedrich Carl: System des heutigen Römischen Rechts (1847), Band 6, Veit, Berlin Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  433. [zitiert als: von Savigny, System des heutigen Römischen Rechts VI (1847), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  434. Schild, Wolfgang: Der Strafrichter in der Hauptverhandlung (1983), R. v. Decker’s Verlag, G. Schenck, Heidelberg, Hamburg Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  435. [zitiert als: Schild, Der Strafrichter in der Hauptverhandlung (1983), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  436. Schill, Stephan W.: Crafting the International Economic Order: The Public Function of Investment Treaty Arbitration and Its Significance for the Role of the Arbitrator, in: Leiden Journal of International Law, Volume 23 (2010), S. 401-430 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  437. [zitiert als: Schill, Crafting the International Economic Order, in: 23 Leiden JIL (2010) 401 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  438. Schill, Stephan W.: Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Re-conceptualizing the Standard of Review, in: Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 3 (2012), No. 3, S. 577-607 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  439. [zitiert als: Schill, Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: 3 JIDS (2012) 577 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  440. Schill, Stephan W. (ed.): International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (2010), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  441. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (2010), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  442. Schill, Stephan W.: Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht und Vergleichendes Öffentliches Recht: Grundlagen und Methode eines öffentlich-rechtlichen Leitbildes für die Investitionsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV), Volume 71 (2011), S. 247-289 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  443. [zitiert als: Schill, Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht und Vergleichendes Öffentliches Recht, in: 71 ZaöRV (2011) 247 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  444. Schill, Stephan W.: Investitionsschutzrecht als Entwicklungsvölkerrecht, in: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV), Volume 72 (2012), S. 261-308 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  445. [zitiert als: Schill, Investitionsschutzrecht als Entwicklungsvölkerrecht, in: 72 ZaöRV (2012) 261 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  446. Schlesinger, Rudolf B.: Research on the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations, in: The American Journal of International Law (1957), Volume 51, S. 734-753 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  447. [zitiert als: Schlesinger, Research on the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations, in: 51 American JIL (1957) 734 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  448. Schmidt, Felix: Der Schiedsspruch, in: Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren (SchiedsVZ) 2013, S. 32-41 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  449. [zitiert als: Schmidt, Der Schiedsspruch, in: SchiedsVZ 2013, 32 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  450. Schomburg, Wolfgang: The Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Promoting Respect for Fair Trial Rights, in: Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, Volume 8 (2009), Issue 1, S. 1-29 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  451. [zitiert als: Schomburg, The Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Promoting Respect for Fair Trial Rights, in: 8 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights (2009) 1 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  452. Schreuer, Christoph H./Malintoppi, L./Reinisch A./Sinclair A.: The ICSID Convention: A Commentary – A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, 2nd Edition (2009), Cambridge University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  453. [zitiert als: Schreuer et al., The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (2009), [Artikel][Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  454. Schütze, Rolf A. (ed.): Institutional Arbitration – Article-by-Article Commentary (2013), C. H. Beck – Hart – Nomos, München/Oxford/Baden-Baden Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  455. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Schütze (ed.), Institutional Arbitration (2013), [Vorschrift][Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  456. Schultz, Thomas/Dupont, Cédric: Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-empowering Investors?, in: European Journal of International Law, Volume 25 (2015), No. 2, S. 1147-1168 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  457. [zitiert als: Schultz/Dupont, Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-empowering Investors?, in: 25 EJIL (2015) 1147 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  458. Shany, Yuval: The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  459. [zitiert als: Shany, The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (2003), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  460. Shapiro, Martin: Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (1981), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  461. [zitiert als: Shapiro, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (1981), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  462. Shell, G. Richard: Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Effects of Commercial Arbitration, in: UCLA Law Review, Volume 35 (1988), No. 4, S. 623-676 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  463. [zitiert als: Shell, Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel Effects of Commercial Arbitration, in: 35 UCLA LRev (1988) 623 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  464. Shelton, Dinah: Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts, in: Chicago Journal International Law, Volume 9 (2009), Number 2, S. 537-571 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  465. [zitiert als: Shelton, Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts, in: 9 Chicago JIL (2009) 537 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  466. Sicard-Mirabal, Josefa/Derains, Yves: Introduction to Investor-State Arbitration (2018), Kluwer Law International Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  467. [zitiert als: Sicard-Mirabal/Derains, Introduction to Investor-State Arbitration (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  468. Simma, Bruno/Alston, Philip: The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles, in: Australian Year Book of International Law (1988/1989), Volume 12, S. 82-108 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  469. [zitiert als: Simma/Alston, The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles, in: 12 Australian YbIL (1988/1989) 82 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  470. Simma, Bruno/Pulkowski, Dirk: Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law, in: European Journal of International Law, Volume 17 (2006), No. 3, S. 483-529 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  471. [zitiert als: Simma/Pulkowski, Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law, in: 17 EJIL (2006) 483 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  472. Sluiter, Göran: The ICTY and Offences against the Administration of Justice, in: Journal of International Criminal Justice, Volume 2 (2004), No. 2, S. 631-641 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  473. [zitiert als: Sluiter, The ICTY and Offences against the Administration of Justice, in: 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2004) 631 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  474. Sodan, Helge/Ziekow, Jan: Grundkurs Öffentliches Recht – Staats- und Verwaltungsrecht, 9. Auflage (2020), C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  475. [zitiert als: Sodan/Ziekow, Grundkurs Öffentliches Recht (2020), [§] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  476. Söderlund, Christer: Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 22 (2005), S. 301-322 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  477. [zitiert als: Söderlund, Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings, in: 22 JIntArb (2005) 301 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  478. Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy: Power and Justice in Foreign Investment Arbitration, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 14 (1997), Issue 3, S. 103-140 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  479. [zitiert als: Sornarajah, Power and Justice in Foreign Investment Arbitration, in: 14 JIntArb (1997) 103 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  480. Sourgens, Frédéric G./Duggal, Kabir/Laird, Ian: Evidence in International Investment Arbitration (2018), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  481. [zitiert als: Sourgens/Duggal/Laird, Evidence in International Investment Arbitration (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  482. Stein, Torsten/von Buttlar, Christian/Kotzur, Markus: Völkerrecht, 14. Auflage (2017), Verlag Franz Vahlen, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  483. [zitiert als: Stein/von Buttlar/Kotzur, Völkerrecht (2017), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  484. Steingruber, Andrea Marco: Consent in International Arbitration (2012), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  485. [zitiert als: Steingruber, Consent in International Arbitration (2012), [Paragraph]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  486. Sweet, Alec Stone/Cananea, Giacinto Della: Proportionality, General Principles of Law, and Investor-State Arbitration: A Response to Jose Alvarez, in: New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Volume 46 (2014), No. 3, S. 911-954 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  487. [zitiert als: Sweet/Cananea, Proportionality, General Principles of Law, and Investor-State Arbitration, in: 46 New York University JIL and Politics (2014), 911 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  488. Sweet, Alec Stone/Mathews, Jud: Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism, in: Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Volume 47 (2008), No. 1, S. 72-164 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  489. [zitiert als: Sweet/Mathews, Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism, in: 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2008) 72 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  490. Tallerico, Thomas J./Behrendt, J. Adam: The Use of Bifurcation and Direct Testimony Witness Statements in International Commercial Arbitration Proceedings, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 20 (2003), S. 295-305 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  491. [zitiert als: Tallerico/Behrendt, The Use of Bifurcation and Direct Testimony Witness Statements in International Commercial Arbitration Proceedings, in: 20 JIntArb (2003) 295 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  492. Thirlway, Hugh: The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989: Part Nine, in: British Yearbook of International Law, Volume 69 (1998), Issue 1, p. 1-83 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  493. [zitiert als: Thirlway, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989: Part Nine, in: 69 British YbIL (1998) 1 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  494. Titi, Catherine: Res Iudicata and Interlocutory Decision under the ICSID Convention: Antinomies over the Power of Tribunals to Review, in: ICSID Review, Volume 33 (2018), No. 2, S. 358-379 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  495. [zitiert als: Titi, Res Iudicata and Interlocutory Decision under the ICSID Convention, in: 33 ICSID Review (2018) 358 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  496. Trenor, John A. (ed.): Global Arbitration Review – The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, 3rd Edition (2018) (Altauflage) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  497. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Trenor (ed.), Global Arbitration Review – The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  498. Trittmann, Rolf: When Should Arbitrators Issue Interim or Partial Awards and or Procedural Orders?, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 20 (2003), Issue 3, S. 255-265 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  499. [zitiert als: Trittmann, When Should Arbitrators Issue Interim or Partial Awards and or Procedural Orders?, in: 20 JIntArb (2003) 255 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  500. Uruena, René: Subsidiarity and the Public-Private Distinction in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Law and Contemporary Problems, Volume 79 (2016), No. 2, S. 99-121 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  501. [zitiert als: Uruena, Subsidiarity and the Public-Private Distinction in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: 79 Law and Contemporary Problems (2016) 99 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  502. Vadi, Valentina: Proportionality, Reasonableness and Standards of Review in International Investment Law and Arbitration (2018), Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  503. [zitiert als: Vadi, Proportionality, Reasonableness and Standards of Review in International Investment Law and Arbitration (2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  504. Verdross, Alfred: Die Quellen des universellen Völkerrechts – Eine Einführung (1973) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  505. [zitiert als: Verdross, Die Quellen des universellen Völkerrechts (1973), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  506. Vestal, Allen D.: Rationale of Preclusion, in: St. Louis University Law Journal, Volume 9 (1964), No. 1, S. 29-55 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  507. [zitiert als: Vestal, Rationale of Preclusion, in: 9 St. Louis University LJ (1964) 29 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  508. Vohrah, Lal Chand/Pocar, Fausto/Featherstone, Yvonne/Fourmy, Olivier/Graham, Christine/Hocking, John/Robson, Nicholas: Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese, Kluwer Law International (2003) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  509. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Vohrah et al., Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (2003), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  510. Vorwerk, Volkert/Wolf, Christian (Hrsg.): Beck’scher Online-Kommentar zur ZPO (BeckOK ZPO), 39. Edition, Stand: 01.12.2020, C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  511. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: BeckOK ZPO (39. Edition, Stand: 01.12.2020), [§] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  512. Wachter, Robert: Chapter II: The Arbitrator and the Arbitration Procedure: On the Inherent Powers of Arbitral Tribunals in International Commercial Arbitration, in: Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (2012), Manz’sche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, S. 65-83 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  513. [zitiert als: Wachter, Chapter II: The Arbitrator and the Arbitration Procedure, in: Austrian YbIntArb (2012), S. 65 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  514. Wälde, Thomas W.: Procedural Challenges in Investment Arbitration under the Shadow of the Dual Role of the State – Asymmetries and Tribunals‘ Duty to Ensure, Pro-actively, the Equality of Arms, in: Arbitration International, Volume 26 (2010), Issue 1, S. 3-42 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  515. [zitiert als: Wälde, Procedural Challenges in Investment Arbitration, in: 26 ArbInt (2010) 3 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  516. Waincymer, Jeffrey: Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  517. [zitiert als: Waincymer, Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration (2012), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  518. Walters, Gretta: Fitting a Square Peg into a Round Hole: Do Res Judicata Challenges in International Arbitration Constitute Jurisdictional or Admissibility Problems?, in: Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 29 (2012), Issue 6, S. 651-680 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  519. [zitiert als: Walters, Fitting a Square Peg into a Round Hole, in: 29 JIntArb (2012) 651 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  520. Weber, Klaus (Hrsg.): Creifelds – Rechtswörterbuch, 25. Edition (2020), C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  521. [zitiert als: Weber (Hrsg.), Creifelds – Rechtswörterbuch (2020), Stichwort: […]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  522. Weigend, Thomas: Unverzichtbares im Strafverfahren, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, Band 113 (2001), S. 271-304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  523. [zitiert als: Weigend, Unverzichtbares im Strafverfahren, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 2001, 271 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  524. Weiß, Wolfgang: Allgemeine Grundsätze des Völkerrechts, in: Archiv des Völkerrechts, 39. Band (2001), S. 394-431 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  525. [zitiert als: Weiß, Allgemeine Grundsätze des Völkerrechts, in: AVR 2001, 394 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  526. Wolff, Reinmar (Hrsg.): New York Convention – Convention on the Reconition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 – Article-by-Article Commentary, 2nd Edition (2019), C.H. Beck Verlag, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  527. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Wolff (ed.), New York Convention (2019), [Artikel] [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  528. Yannaca-Small, Katia (ed.): Arbitration under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues, 1st Edition (2010) (Altauflage), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  529. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Yannaca-Small (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements (Erstauflage 2010), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  530. Yannaca-Small, Katia (ed.): Arbitration under International Investment Agreements – A Guide to the Key Issues, 2nd Edition (2018), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  531. [zitiert als: [Autor], [Titel], in: Yannaca-Small (ed.), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements (2018), [Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  532. Zarra, Giovanni: Right to Regulate, Margin of Appreciation and Proportionality: Current Status in Investment Arbitration in Light of Philip Morris v. Uruguay, in: Brazilian Journal of International Law, Volume 14 (2017), No. 2, S. 95-121 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  533. [zitiert als: Zarra, Right to Regulate, Margin of Appreciation and Proportionality, in: 14 Brazilian JIL (2017) 95 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  534. Zimmermann, Andreas/ Tams, Christian J./ Oellers-Frahm, Karin/Tomuschat, Christian (eds.): The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A Commentary, 3rd Edition (2019), Oxford University Press Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  535. [zitiert als: [Autor], in: Zimmermann/Tomuschat/Oellers-Frahm/Tams (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice – A Commentary (2019), [Artikel][Randnummer]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  536. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Report of the Executive Directors on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (18 March 1965), abrufbar über die ICSID-Homepage: https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/ICSID%20Convention%20English.pdf (zuletzt abgerufen am 26.01.2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  537. [zitiert als: Report of the Executive Directors on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), [Paragraph]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  538. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), History of the ICSID Convention, Analysis of Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention, Volume I (1970) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  539. [zitiert als: History of the ICSID Convention, Volume I (1970), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  540. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), History of the ICSID Convention, Analysis of Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention, Volume II-1 (1968) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  541. [zitiert als: History of the ICSID Convention, Volume II-1 (1968), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  542. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), History of the ICSID Convention, Analysis of Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention, Volume II-2 (1968) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  543. [zitiert als: History of the ICSID Convention, Volume II-2 (1968), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  544. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules – Working Paper, Volume 3 (2 August 2018) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  545. [zitiert als: ICSID Secretariat, Proposals for Amendment of the ICSID Rules – Working Paper, Volume 3 (2 August 2018), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  546. ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) Final Report on Interim and Partial Awards, in: ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Volume 1 (1990), No. 2, abrufbar über die Homepage der ICC (zuletzt abgerufen am 26.01.2021): https://library.iccwbo.org/content/dr/COMMISSION_REPORTS/CR_0001.htm?l1=Commission+Reports Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  547. [zitiert als: ICC Final Report on Interim and Partial Awards (1990), ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin (Vol. 1, No. 2), [Paragraph]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  548. ICCA’s (International Council for Commercial Arbitration) Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention (2011), abrufbar über die ICCA-Homepage: https://www.arbitration-icca.org/publications/NYC_Guide.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  549. [zitiert als: ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention (2011), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  550. International Law Association (ILA), Annex to Resolution No. 4/2016, Inherent and Implied Powers of International Arbitral Tribunals, Committee on International Commercial Arbitration Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  551. [zitiert als: International Law Association, Annex to Resolution No. 4/2016, Inherent and Implied Powers of International Arbitral Tribunals, Committee on International Commercial Arbitration] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  552. International Law Association (ILA), Final Report on Res Judicata and Arbitration, Seventy-Second ILA Conference on International Commercial Arbitration, Toronto (4-8 June 2006), abgedruckt in: Arbitration International, Volume 25 (2009), Issue 1, S. 67-82 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  553. [zitiert als: International Law Association, Final Report on Res Judicata and Arbitration, Seventy-Second ILA Conference on International Commercial Arbitration, Toronto (4-8 June 2006), der Report ist abgedruckt in: 25 ArbInt (2009) 67 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  554. International Law Association (ILA), Interim Report on Res Judicata and Arbitration, ILA Conference on International Commercial Arbitration, Berlin (2004), abgedruckt in: Arbitration International, Volume 25 (2009), Issue 1, 35-66 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  555. [zitiert als: International Law Association, Interim Report on Res Judicata and Arbitration, ILA Conference on International Commercial Arbitration, Berlin (2004), der Report ist abgedruckt in: 25 ArbInt (2009) 35 [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  556. International Law Association (ILA), Johannesburg Conference 2016, Report for the Biennial Conference in Washington D.C. 2014, Committee on International Commercial Arbitration Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  557. [zitiert als: International Law Association, Johannesburg Conference 2016, Report for the Biennial Conference in Washington D.C. 2014, Committee on International Commercial Arbitration [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  558. International Law Association (ILA), Rio de Janeiro Conference (2008), Conference Report, Committee on International Law on Foreign Investment Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  559. [zitiert als: International Law Association, Rio de Janeiro Conference (2008), Committee on International Law on Foreign Investment, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  560. International Law Association (ILA), Sydney Conference (2018), Conference Report, Committee on the Rule of Law and International Investment Law Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  561. [zitiert als: International Law Association, Sydney Conference (2018), Committee on the Rule of Law and International Investment Law, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  562. International Law Commission (ILC), 5th Session, Commentary on the Draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure, A/CN.4/92 (1955) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  563. [zitiert als: ILC Commentary on the Draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure, A/CN.4/92 (1955), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  564. International Law Commission (ILC), 58th Session, Report of the ILC Study Group on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising From the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, A/CN.4/L.682 (2006) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  565. [zitiert als: Report of the ILC Study Group on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising From The Diversification and Expansion of International Law, A/CN.4/L.682 (2006), [Paragraph]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  566. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Secretariat: Guide on the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York 1958), 2016 Edition, abrufbar über: https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/NY-conv/2016_Guide_on_the_Convention.pdf (zuletzt abgerufen am 26.01.2021) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  567. [zitiert als: UNCITRAL Guide on the New York Convention (2016), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  568. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL): Report of the Working Group on Arbitration and Conciliation on the work of its forty-seventh session (Vienna, 10-14 September 2007), 41st Session, A/CN.9/641 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  569. [zitiert als: Report of the Working Group on Arbitration and Conciliation on the work of its forty-seventh session (Vienna, 10-14 September 2007), UNCITRAL, 41st Session, A/CN.9/641, [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  570. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Dispute Settlement, International Commercial Arbitration, „5.6 Making the Award and Termination of Proceedings”, UNCTAD/EDM/Misc.232/Add.41 (2005) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  571. [zitiert als: UNCTAD, Dispute Settlement, International Commercial Arbitration, „5.6 Making the Award and Termination of Proceedings”, UNCTAD/EDM/Misc.232/Add.41 (2005), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  572. United Nations – Office of Legal Affairs, Handbook on the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes between States (1992), United Nations Publication, New York Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283
  573. [zitiert als: United Nations, Handbook on the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes between States (1992), [Seite]] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748913283

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Book Titles No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex