
Edited Book Open Access Full access
International Judicial Legitimacy
New Voices and Approaches- Editors:
- | | |
- Series:
- Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, Volume 20
- Publisher:
- 2020
Summary
Armin von Bogdandy und Ingo Venzke stellten mit “In Whose Name?” bereits 2014 die grundsätzliche Frage nach der Legitimität internationaler Gerichtshöfe. Der vorliegende Band führt die Debatte weiter: Woraus schöpfen internationale Organisationen und Gerichte ihre Legitimität und wie tragen sie zur Demokratisierung des Völkerrechts bei? Wie steht es um die demokratische Legitimität internationaler Menschenrechtsgerichtshöfe? Der Band bietet eine breite Diskussion zu aktuellen Fragen des internationalen Rechts.
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Edition
- 1/2020
- Copyright Year
- 2020
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-6762-5
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-0866-1
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
- Volume
- 20
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 300
- Product Type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
ChapterPages
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 1 - 8 Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- The central issues at stakeAuthors: |
- The structure of the bookAuthors: |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- From Analogy to Utopia?Authors:
- The Legitimacy of International InstitutionsAuthors:
- Authors:
- A European AgendaAuthors:
- Authors:
- An unachievable common project?Authors:
- Authors:
- A. Constitutionalist approachesAuthors:
- Authors:
- The global administrative law projectAuthors:
- The public law theory and global projectsAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- Non-identified political objectsAuthors:
- The rise of the unelectedAuthors:
- Regulatory agencies in EuropeAuthors:
- Regulatory agencies in the USAuthors:
- Authors:
- The output legitimacy of regulatory agenciesAuthors:
- The delegation of public authorityAuthors:
- The independence of non-majoritarian institutionsAuthors:
- Procedural accountability: the road to input legitimacyAuthors:
- Legitimacy through impartiality and transparencyAuthors:
- Democratic legitimacy beyond the stateAuthors:
- ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. The origin and the design of ICsAuthors:
- 2. Compulsory jurisdictionAuthors:
- 3. Enforcement and complianceAuthors:
- B. The Isolation and Diversity of ICsAuthors:
- C. Separation of PowersAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Why Interdependence?Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. State governmentsAuthors:
- 2. International political institutionsAuthors:
- 3. Domestic courtsAuthors:
- 4. International courtsAuthors:
- IV. Concluding remarksAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Democratic Inclusion and ExclusionAuthors:
- B. Who is the Fairest of Them All? The Legitimating Force of Impartiality and IndependenceAuthors:
- III. Conclusion: The Road to Inequality is Paved with Democratic IntentionsAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. The MotivationAuthors:
- III. The Fabula and the SyuzhetAuthors:
- IV. The HeroAuthors:
- V. The VoiceAuthors:
- VI. The ThemeAuthors:
- VII. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. Conceptualizing Authority for International InstitutionsAuthors:
- III. Democracy as Public Value for International InstitutionsAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The Potential for International Institutions to Create Public and Democratic GeneralitiesAuthors:
- B. The Potential of International CourtsAuthors:
- C. The Potential of International OrganizationsAuthors:
- ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- 1. IntroductionAuthors:
- 2. The Court’s Jurisdictional Rulings in Croatia v SerbiaAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. The Court’s Sequencing of the Issues in ContentionAuthors:
- b. The Court’s Treatment of the Monetary Gold PrincipleAuthors:
- 4. The Court as Fact-FinderAuthors:
- 5. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntrodructionAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Prompt release proceedingsAuthors:
- 2. Provisional measuresAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. Virginia GAuthors:
- b. Bangladesh/MyanmarAuthors:
- 4. Advisory opinionAuthors:
- III. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. The roots of the consensual mythAuthors:
- 2. Keeping the consensual myth alive: The legal strategies of the CAS and the SFTAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- a. The realism of the doctrineAuthors:
- b. The confession of the SFT in the Cañas caseAuthors:
- Authors:
- a. The ruling of the LG München: Not in Claudia Pechstein’s name!Authors:
- b. The ruling of the OLG München: Forced CAS arbitration as an abuse of ISU’s monopolyAuthors:
- c. The ruling of the BGH: Saving the consensual foundations of the CASAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. In the name of… the StatesAuthors:
- B. In the name of…efficiencyAuthors:
- C. In the name of… proximityAuthors:
- D. In the name of… equalityAuthors:
- III. Conclusion: Democratize the CAS!Authors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Society, Community and International InstitutionsAuthors:
- B. Communitarian Institutions in the WTO AgreementsAuthors:
- C. Communitarian Institutions and Bilateral EnforcementAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The Prospect of a Trade-Focused CommunityAuthors:
- B. From Trade Regime to Text Regime: The Appellate Body’s Intervention in US – Shrimp and BeyondAuthors:
- C. Legitimate Non-Trade Values beyond the Four Corners: the Delegation of Authority and the Voices of the International CommunityAuthors:
- D. Delegated Authority and the Voice of the International CommunityAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Communitization as a Legitimacy-Enhancing ApproachAuthors:
- B. The Communitization of InterpretationsAuthors:
- C. Communitization and the Challenge of Value-Laden RegionalismAuthors:
- V. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- 1. Standard of review and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights:Authors:
- 2. Gelman and the no-deference standardAuthors:
- 3. Regional democracy, political embeddedness, and the Inter-American community of human rights practice:Authors:
- 4. Conclusion: Good faith in standard of review definitionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:
- A. The judges: judicial independence and composition of the CourtAuthors:
- B. The functions of the CourtAuthors:
- II. Procedural legitimacyAuthors:
- III. Legitimacy through sound and reasoned decisionsAuthors:
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- I. AgendaAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- A. The IssueAuthors: |
- B. The Club of Liberal DemocraciesAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- A. The Development of the MandateAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 1. Court Authority in Times of CrisesAuthors: |
- 2. Limits of the Case Law on State of EmergencyAuthors: |
- 3. Core RightsAuthors: |
- 4. The Abuse of RightsAuthors: |
- 5. The Exhaustion of Domestic RemediesAuthors: |
- 6. The Procedural Margin of AppreciationAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- A. Domestic Buffering of the ECtHR’s AuthorityAuthors: |
- B. Legitimacy through ControlAuthors: |




