
Edited Book Open Access Full access
International Law and Litigation
A Look into Procedure- Editors:
- Series:
- Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, Volume 15
- Publisher:
- 2019
Summary
Mit der voranschreitenden Jurisdiktionalisierung des Völkerrechts wächst stetig das Interesse von Wissenschaftlern und Praktikern an völkerrechtlichen Streitigkeiten. Den verfahrenstechnischen Aspekten internationaler Streitbeilegung wurde bisher allerdings wenig Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt.
Der Band untersucht auf der Basis aktueller rechtswissenschaftlicher Forschung die Rolle von Verfahren in Bereichen des Völkerrechts, des internationalen Wirtschaftsrechts, der Menschenrechte und des EU-Rechts.
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Edition
- 1/2019
- Copyright Year
- 2019
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-5742-8
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-8452-9905-1
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
- Volume
- 15
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 724
- Product Type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
ChapterPages
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 1 - 4 Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors: |
- 1. Bernhard Windscheid (1817-1892)Authors: |
- 2. Max Huber (1874-1960)Authors: |
- 3. Nicholas Politis (1872-1942)Authors: |
- 4. Gaetano Morelli (1900-1990)Authors: |
- 5. Shabtai Rosenne (1917-2010)Authors: |
- 6. Elihu Lauterpacht (1928-2017)Authors: |
- II. International Procedural Law: between Unity and DiversityAuthors: |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Un exemple récent et topique en droit interne françaisAuthors:
- B. La procéduralisation devant les juridictions internationalesAuthors:
- III. Les mille visages de la procédure selon les acteurs du procèsAuthors:
- IV. La confusion entre la procéduralisation et la légitimationAuthors:
- V. La transformation progressive de l’idée de justice à travers la procéduralisationAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. Distinguishing Substantive and Procedural Rules in International AdjudicationAuthors:
- III. Points of Entry to the Interaction Between Substance and ProcedureAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Intervention in the ICJ – Procedure as House-KeepingAuthors:
- B. Procedure as Transmission of Substance – The Case of the ‘Legal Interest’Authors:
- V. ConclusionsAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. The Procedural Principles of International Water LawAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Facilitation of compliance with the substantive principles of equitable and reasonable utilization and no significant harmAuthors:
- B. Eliciting cooperation between states in the management of shared fresh water resourcesAuthors:
- IV. ConclusionAuthors:
- Brief Remarks on the Effect of Judgments on International LawPages 91 - 98Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. Advisory Opinions by the International Court of JusticeAuthors:
- III. Advisory Opinions in the Context of the Dispute Settlement Regime under the UN Convention on the Law of the SeaAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Identification and status of expertsAuthors:
- B. Due process rightsAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Positive exercise of discretionary power: addressing the need for expert adviceAuthors:
- 2. Negative exercise of discretionary power: circumventing the need for ex curia expertsAuthors:
- B. Mandatory recourse to expertsAuthors:
- C. Seeking expert advice as a requirement of the judicial function?Authors:
- Authors:
- A. Authority of expert evidenceAuthors:
- B. Assessment of expert evidenceAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. La question de l’accès direct éclipsée par le débat sur la subjectivitéAuthors:
- 2. Une généalogie idéologique différenteAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Une diversité résultant des travaux préparatoiresAuthors:
- 2. Une diversité dépendant de la relation de l’individu à l’ÉtatAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Un droit fondamental au recours devant la juridiction européenneAuthors:
- 2. Le débat sur la titularité des droits et les contre-mesures touchant l’investisseurAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Deux analyses différentes de la place de l’ÉtatAuthors:
- 2. Deux analyses différentes de l’origine de la protection internationaleAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Hindu Law and Its PracticesAuthors:
- B. Mohammadan Law and Its PracticesAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. From Deference to Displacement: The Evolution of the Colonial StrategyAuthors:
- B. A Procedural Alteration of Substantive LawsAuthors:
- IV. The Myth of the Procrustean Bed of Colonial LawsAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. Introduction: Treatment as a key component of 19th century legal instruments for the international suppression of the slave tradeAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Emancipated individuals treated as servants and sailors are not slaves: the Uniao case (1844)Authors:
- B. Emancipated individuals deported overseas against their will are slaves: the Sénégambie case (1840)Authors:
- Authors:
- A. Even an abolitionist state can be found guilty of treating people as slaves: the Regina Cœli and Charles-et-Georges cases (1857-1858)Authors:
- B. Toward freedom from slavery as a universal human right: the Maria Luz case (1872-1875)Authors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:
- A. La reconnaissance : des enjeux multiplesAuthors:
- B. La reconnaissance : éléments de définitionAuthors:
- C. Reconnaissance de jure et reconnaissance procédurale de l’État : champ de l’étude et problématiqueAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Une mise en œuvre indifférente aux caractéristiques générales de l’organisation juridictionnelle et de l’instanceAuthors:
- 2. Le dépassement d’obstacles potentiels à la mise en œuvre du mécanismeAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Le triomphe du raisonnement logico-déductifAuthors:
- 2. Fait, effectivité et reconnaissanceAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. L’étendue des droits accordésAuthors:
- 2. Des effets limités au cas de l’espèceAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Les obligations de l’État reconnu procéduralementAuthors:
- 2. Le souci de bonne administration de la justiceAuthors:
- IV. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. Introduction: The Dangers of the Digital DomainAuthors:
- II. General International Law and its GapsAuthors:
- III. The Law of International Dispute Settlement as Adjudicatory StrategyAuthors:
- IV. Evidence Procured through Cyber Espionage: Too Hot to Handle?Authors:
- V. Concluding RemarksAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. La légalité contestée des monnaies privées en droit américainAuthors:
- 2. L’ascension et la chute de Liberty ReserveAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. US Security and Exchange Commission v. Trendon ShaversAuthors:
- 2. L’affaire Silk RoadAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Les enjeux de fiscalité : Skatteverket v. HedqvistAuthors:
- B. Les enjeux de sécurité financière : State of Florida v. EspinozaAuthors:
- IV. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. Introduction: The BackdropAuthors:
- II. Lis Pendens and Forum Non Conveniens in their Traditional FormsAuthors:
- III. Contemporary Application of Lis Pendens at the International LevelAuthors:
- IV. Connexité, Related Actions and Consolidation in a Contemporary ContextAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Investment LawAuthors:
- B. Trade LawAuthors:
- VI. Comity: Paving Its WayAuthors:
- VII. Other Attempts to Order Coexisting Jurisdiction in the Trade and Investment FieldsAuthors:
- VIII. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. Historical Overview of International Law and Investor ProtectionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Investment treaty commitments as an investment incentiveAuthors:
- B. A substitute for domestic rule of lawAuthors:
- C. International JusticeAuthors:
- D. Anti-ProtectionismAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The incentive rationaleAuthors:
- B. The rule of law substitute rationaleAuthors:
- C. The international justice rationaleAuthors:
- D. The anti-protectionism rationaleAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The incentive rationaleAuthors:
- B. The rule of law substitute rationaleAuthors:
- C. The international justice rationaleAuthors:
- D. The anti-protectionism rationaleAuthors:
- VI. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. Jurisdiction and Applicable LawAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Restrictive Interpretation of Unilateral Acts?Authors:
- B. The Intention of the State Adopting the LegislationAuthors:
- C. Criteria for the Interpretation of Unilateral ActsAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Existence of a Valid Offer to Arbitrate in National LegislationAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Statutory Provisions without a Reference to ICSID ArbitrationAuthors:
- 2. Statutory Provisions Containing a Reference to ICSID ArbitrationAuthors:
- V. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The Use and Abuse of Trade RemediesAuthors:
- B. The Trade Remedy Investigation ProcessAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Reasons for and Legal Basis of Judicial ReviewAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. The Domestic Forum for the Judicial Review of Trade Remedy DeterminationsAuthors:
- 2. The Multilateral Forum for the Judicial Review of Trade Remedy DeterminationsAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. StandingAuthors:
- 2. Standard of ReviewAuthors:
- 3. Available RemediesAuthors:
- IV. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- A. The practice in general international lawAuthors: |
- B. The authors of the practiceAuthors: |
- C. The practice as soft law?Authors: |
- Authors: |
- A. The GATT as a de facto UN specialised agencyAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 1. In the functioning of the GATT Council and Committees and the Tokyo Round CommitteesAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- a. The creation of panels and the general evolution of the system of dispute settlementAuthors: |
- b. The use of the so-called chairman statementAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- A. General codification of GATT practicesAuthors: |
- B. Codification of the practice of decision-making by consensusAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 1. “GATT 1994”Authors: |
- 2. “GATT Acquis”Authors: |
- 3. The impact of the distinction between the GATT Acquis and the GATT 1994Authors: |
- Authors: |
- A. “Practice” at the WTO system of dispute settlementAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 1. The expansion of consensusAuthors: |
- 2. The formal recognition of the customary practice of decision-makingAuthors: |
- 3. The adoption of decisions by consensus by the General Council and other bodies, and their subsequent and sustained practices by the MembersAuthors: |
- C. The WTO practice in negotiation proceedingsAuthors: |
- VI. Concluding discussionAuthors: |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. A Closer Look at the AI PolicyAuthors:
- III. The Structure of the AI Procedure: a Two-Stage Appeals ProcessAuthors:
- IV. The Nature of the AI Procedure: a Quasi-Judicial Appeals ProcessAuthors:
- V. Concluding Remarks: Procedural Innovation, the World Bank, and the OthersAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The Modern Uses of Law to Regulate ProceduresAuthors:
- B. Conceptualizing Due Process for International InstitutionsAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. The World Bank Inspection Panel’s ProceduresAuthors:
- 2. The Compliance Advisory Ombudsman Operational GuidelinesAuthors:
- B. Between Judicial and Administrative Procedures in Accountability MechanismsAuthors:
- IV. Concluding RemarksAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. The EU Judicial SystemAuthors:
- III. The Preliminary Ruling ProcedureAuthors:
- IV. When Does the ECJ Have Jurisdiction to Give a Ruling?Authors:
- V. The Request for a Preliminary RulingAuthors:
- VI. A Single Judicial SystemAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Legal effectsAuthors:
- B. Direct and Individual ConcernAuthors:
- C. Does the EU create legal effects extraterritorially?Authors:
- Authors:
- A. The General Court DecisionAuthors:
- B. Before the CJEUAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. Legal Effects and the Fiduciary Nature of AuthorityAuthors:
- B. The Relative Effect of Treaties RevisitedAuthors:
- V. Conclusion: A gap in the complete system of remediesAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. In Search of a Sound Methodology for the Determination of State Responsibility in Extraterritorial SituationsAuthors:
- III. Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human RightsAuthors:
- IV. Attribution of Conduct to a StateAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The Principle of Territoriality: Scope and ExceptionsAuthors:
- B. State Jurisdiction under the Personal ModelAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Northern CyprusAuthors:
- 2. TransnistriaAuthors:
- 3. Nagorno-Karabakh and Surrounding DistrictsAuthors:
- VI. The Function of Attribution Rules in Determining State Responsibility under the ConventionAuthors:
- VII. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- I. IntroductionAuthors:
- II. The European Union and the European Convention on Human RightsAuthors:
- Authors:
- A. The Responsibility of Member States for the Conduct of International OrganisationsAuthors:
- B. Human Rights Negative and Positive ObligationsAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. BosphorusAuthors:
- 2. MichaudAuthors:
- 3. AvotinsAuthors:
- B. Combined Action and Failure to ActAuthors:
- C. Double Failures to ActAuthors:
- V. ConclusionAuthors:




