Protecting Privacy in Private International and Procedural Law and by Data Protection: European and American Developments

Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Burkhard Hess; Dr. Cristina M. Mariottini

doi:10.5771/9783845265377

, to see if you have full access to this publication.

Edited Book No access

Protecting Privacy in Private International and Procedural Law and by Data Protection

European and American Developments

Editors:
Series:: Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, Volume 3
Publisher:: 2015

Summary

Im Hinblick auf das international betriebene Sammeln und Verarbeiten von persönlichen Daten gewinnt der Schutz von Privatsphäre immer stärker an Bedeutung.

Die jüngsten Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet – etwa die Möglichkeit der Steuerung eigener Daten, die Auswirkungen des „Rechts auf Vergessen“ oder die Entscheidungen des EuGH zu Persönlichkeitsrechten – prägen das Verständnis von Datenschutz und Privatsphäre neu. Dieses Buch untersucht die aktuellen Entwicklungen und weist auf notwendige Reformen auf europäischer und US-amerikanischer Ebene hin.

Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Burkhard Hess ist Direktor des Max-Planck-Institut Luxemburg für internationales, europäisches und regulatorisches Verfahrensrecht, Professor an der Universität Luxemburg sowie an der Universität Heidelberg.

Dr. Cristina M. Mariottini, LL.M. ist Senior Research Fellow am Max-Planck-Institut Luxemburg für internationales, europäisches und regulatorisches Verfahrensrecht.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2015
Copyright Year: 2015
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-2371-3
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-6537-7
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
Volume: 3
Language: English
Pages: 336
Product Type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 18
Authors:
1. A. Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. B. The Judgment No access
  Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Material Scope No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Territorial Scope No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Conditions for Exercise of the Right No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. Style of the Judgment No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The need for further information and enhanced cooperation: the scope of the problem No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Implementation of the Right No access
    Authors:
5. E. Conclusions No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. A. Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. B. The Rights of Data Subjects and the Obligations of Search Engine Operators No access
  Authors:
3. C. The Special Position of Search Engine Operators: The Case of Google No access
  Authors:
4. D. The Position of Publishers of Websites No access
  Authors:
5. E. Afterword: The Follow-Up of the CJEU Judgment at the Domestic Level No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. A. The CJEU’s Judgment in the Data Retention Case: Overview No access
  Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Scope of Application of EU Privacy Protection No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The Notion of Impairment No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Justification of an Impairment No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. The Lack of Necessity No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. The Struggle between the CJEU and Member State Constitutional Courts No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The Future Organization of Data Markets No access
    Authors:
Authors:
1. A. Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. B. Transnational Issues No access
  Authors:
3. C. The Distinction between ‘Retention’ and ‘Access’ No access
  Authors:
4. D. Harmonisation? No access
  Authors:
5. E. Conclusion No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. I. The Concept of Privacy and Its Different Facets from a Private Law Perspective No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The Constitutional Concept of Privacy No access
    Authors:
  3. III. The Relationship between Domestic Private Law and Constitutional Standards No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. Shevill No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. eDate Advertising and Olivier Martinez No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Recent and Current Cases: Pinckney, Wintersteiger, Hejduk No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Direct Infringements of Personality Rights (Libel and Slander) No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Infringement of Competition Law through Online Defamatory Statements No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Online Infringements of Patents No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Online Infringements of Copyrights No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Infringement of Database Rights No access
      Authors:
  3. III. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. The Exclusion of Privacy in Article 1(2)(g) of the Rome II Regulation No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Reform Proposals No access
    Authors:
4. D. Conclusion: In Search of a Balance between Legal Certainty and Efficient Judicial Protection No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. A. Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. B. The US Supreme Court’s Reading of the First Amendment Protection and the Court’s Departure from the Traditional Common Law Defamation Rule: New York Times v Sullivan… No access
  Authors:
3. C. …and Its Progeny No access
  Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. General Principles in Foreign Judgment Recognition in the US No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Public Policy Exception and Foreign Defamation Judgments No access
    Authors:
5. E. Libel Tourism: High Profile Cases No access
  Authors:
6. I. Mahfouz v Ehrenfeld No access
  Authors:
7. II. The ‘Chilling Effect’ of Libel Tourism and US States First Reactions No access
  Authors:
8. Authors:
  1. I. First Amendment Considerations No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Jurisdictional Considerations No access
    Authors:
  3. III. An Exception to the General Rule on Removal for Diversity Jurisdiction No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Granting the Judgment Debtor National Service of Process for Actions Seeking Declaratory Relief No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Reasonable Attorney’s Fee No access
    Authors:
9. Authors:
  1. I. Leodegaria Sanchez Pontigon No access
    Authors:
  2. II. InvestorsHub.com v Mina Mar No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Fifth Circuit’s First Amendment Considerations in Trout Point Lodge No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Jurisdictional Considerations in Trout Point Lodge No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. ‘Trout Point Lodge II’: Recovery of Attorney’s Fees under the SPEECH Act… No access
    Authors:
  5. V. …and More Litigation in Canada No access
    Authors:
10. Authors:
  1. I. Declaratory Judgments under 28 USC § 4104(b) No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The First Prong of the First Amendment Considerations: Retracing Bachchnan and Telnikoff No access
    Authors:
  3. III. The Second Prong of the First Amendment Considerations: An Unparalleled Chance for Recognition No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Interim Conclusions No access
    Authors:
11. I. A More Subtle Effect on Vertical Relationships. Conclusions No access
  Authors:
ANNEX I – eDate Advertising and Martinez No access Pages 169 - 182
ANNEX II – eDate Advertising and Martinez. Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón No access Pages 183 - 206
ANNEX III – Digital Rights Ireland. Judgment No access Pages 207 - 226
ANNEX IV – Digital Rights Ireland. Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón No access Pages 227 - 258
ANNEX V – Google Spain. Judgment No access Pages 259 - 282
ANNEX VI ‒ Google Spain. Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen No access Pages 283 - 316
ANNEX VII – Securing the Protection of our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act (SPEECH Act) No access Pages 317 - 322
ANNEX VIII – Defamation Act 2013 No access Pages 323 - 334
Index No access Pages 335 - 336