Researches in European Private Law and Beyond: Contributions in Honour of Reiner Schulze’s Seventieth Birthday

Prof. Dr. André Janssen; Prof. Dr. Hans Schulte-Nölke

doi:10.5771/9783845298467

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2020
Copyright year: 2020
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-5714-5
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-9846-7
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language: German
Pages: 414
Product type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 10
1. Authors:
  1. I. Ein Jurist, der sich der Entwicklung des europäischen Privatrechts, sowie dem kulturellen Austausch mit Kollegen anderer Länder widmet No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Rechtsgeschichte und Rechtsvergleichung - die wissenschaftliche Methode des Reiner Schulze für die Harmonisierung des europäischen Privatrechts No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Wandel von der nationalen zu einer europäischen Rechtskultur: Der Einfluss des Softlaw No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Der Beitrag von Reiner Schulze in den Arbeitsgruppen für die Ausarbeitung eines europäischen Privatrechts und für den Erfolg der ZEuP No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Die Entwicklung der nationalen Rechtsordnungen unter dem Einfluss der europäischen Gesetzgebung No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Die Rolle der Generalklauseln im Harmonisierungsprozess des europäischen Vertragsrechts No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Entwicklung des europäischen Privatrechts und Schutz der Person No access
    Authors:
  8. VIII. Die Notwendigkeit der Ausbildung von europäischen Juristen im Lichte der europäischen Rechtskultur No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. A Restless Quest for Further Integration Through Private Law No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Why Business Law? No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. International and European Business Law Commentary No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The European Business Code No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Delimitation Between Business and Consumer Law No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Place of General Contract Law No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Competence, Proportionality and Subsidiarity No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Begrüßung No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Short ‘story’ of the Amended Proposal No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Subjective scope No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Objective scope No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The ‘optional instrument’ No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. The hierarchy of remedies against the lack of conformity No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The duration of the legal guarantees No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The time limit for the notice No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. The presumption of pre-existence of the lack of conformity No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Amended Proposal & EU Parlament (& EU Council) No access
    Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. First Grundfrage: is the consumer still a cives or a Bürger under the allgemeiner Teil? No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Second Grundfrage: who is supposed to act on pre-existing non-harmonised law? No access
      Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Data as Counter-performance No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Data Access and Data Sharing between Data-Haves and Data-Have-Nots No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Platforms No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Cloud No access
        Authors:
      4. Authors:
        aa) General Approach No access
        Authors:
        bb) Data Access Right on FRAND Basis No access
        Authors:
        cc) Rules on Fairness Control of Business-to-Business (B2B) Contracts adapted to the Digital Economy No access
        Authors:
  3. III. Some final words No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. Working out the defectiveness standard No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The high water mark of legitimate expectations? A v National Blood Authority No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Challenging the usefulness of the legitimate expectations test No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Challenging the harmful characteristic approach No access
    Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. Risk:benefit, avoidability and cost No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Role of learned intermediaries No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Compliance with standards and regulations No access
      Authors:
  6. VI. Defeating expectations of safety – the pivotal role of warnings No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Conclusions No access
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. AI Algorithms and Machine Learning No access
    Authors:
  3. III. The Current European Framework and the Strategy for the Future No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. The Product Liability Directive of 1985: An outdated piece of legislation No access
    Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. The Development Risk Defence No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. How to Discover a Defect in the Design No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. A Duty to ‘Observe’ the Product No access
      Authors:
  6. VI. Conclusive Remarks No access
    Authors:
6. Authors:
  1. I. Contractual freedom as a main principle of contract law No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The freedom of contract in European law No access
    Authors:
  3. III. The protection of the weaker party by means of mandatory rules No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Control of standard terms of business No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Pre-contractual duties and effective party autonomy No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. General clauses as a limit to freedom of contract: abusive conducts and unfair contracts in the framework of § 138 BGB No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Other rules regarding cases of abuse in private autonomy No access
    Authors:
  8. IIX. Broadening the area of vitiated consent No access
    Authors:
7. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Some facts No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The Aziz judgment and the Spanish case law mishmash No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. The legislature intervenes and creates confusion: if the interest is legal, can it be unfair? No access
      Authors:
    4. Authors:
      1. a) The Supreme Court of Spain’s new assessment criteria No access
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        aa) What is the parties’ hypothetical will? No access
        Authors:
        bb) What if there is an imbalance but legal default interest is not high? No access
        Authors:
        cc) Ordinary interest is a malleable benchmark No access
        Authors:
        dd) Tension arises between the mandatory rule and the control of unfairness No access
        Authors:
        ee) More food for thought at CJEU level No access
        Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Unfair default interest terms are invalid and cannot be moderated No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Moreover, the default law is not applied to close the gap No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. A new Supreme Court of Spain doctrine regarding default interest No access
    Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. In consumers’ favour: judge-made criteria is as binding as a legal black list No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. In banking’s favour: the courts must only stop applying the unfair term No access
      Authors:
  6. VI. What conclusions can be drawn from this fruitful dialogue between courts? No access
    Authors:
8. Authors:
  1. I. The PECL and their functions No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The legal nature of soft law instruments No access
    Authors:
  3. III. The impact of the PECL (and PICC) on national laws of Member States No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. The impact of the PECL (and PICC) on the European Union’s law No access
    Authors:
  5. V. The freedom of a contracting parties to choose PECL as the law applicable to their contract No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. The mandatory limits to the contracting parties’ freedom of choice No access
    Authors:
9. Authors:
  1. I. The formations of the Court of Justice No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The Advocates-General No access
    Authors:
  3. III. First example: Forum selection agreements No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Second example: Director’s liability in insolvency No access
    Authors:
  5. V. The third example: Prescription of air passengers’ claims No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
10. Authors:
  1. I. First translation level: what happens inside any National Legal System No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. The EU Law-Making Process: how it “ought to be” along the Treaties … No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) First Linguistic & Terminological Check-Point: Commission’s Legal Revisers Group No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Second Check-Point: DG Translation No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Third Check-Point: Parliament and Council’s Lawyer-Linguists No access
        Authors:
      4. d) Fourth Check-Point: Council’s Language Service of the General Secretariat No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. Translation within the EU Law-Making Process No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Approximate Equivalence And Implicit Meanings No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Expectation bias No access
      Authors:
    6. 6. Collective agency bias No access
      Authors:
    7. 7. Abandoning perfect equivalence No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Impact of EU legislation on national legal systems No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Being ‘mother’ in case law No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Being ‘mother’ in public documents No access
        Authors:
    3. 3. ‘Son of’ (two mothers or two fathers) within the Italian legal system No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Epilogue No access
    Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. Prologue No access
    Authors:
  2. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. European and national laws: Synergistic relationship No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. a) Soft law as hard law and hard law as soft law No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Soft law and its prescriptive dimension No access
        Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. View of law harmonization: Political and economic perspectives No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Public-Private law distinction No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. 1. Hard and soft law again No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Story of the Uniform Commercial Code No access
      Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. Success of the European Union No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. European private law as competitive advantage No access
      Authors:
  7. VI. Concluding Remarks No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. I. Zueignung No access
    Authors:
  2. II. CISG No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a) Allgemeines No access
        Authors:
      2. b) Übereinstimmung in der Grundstruktur No access
        Authors:
      3. c) Auslegung No access
        Authors:
      4. c) „Verbrauchsgüter“ und „Waren“ No access
        Authors:
      5. d) Ausgeschlossene Gegenstände No access
        Authors:
      6. e) Fehlerbegriff No access
        Authors:
      7. f) Rechtsbehelfe No access
        Authors:
      8. g) Bewertung No access
        Authors:
    2. 2. CESL No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Richtlinien für den digitalen Kauf No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Reiserecht No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Sonstiges Verbraucherrecht No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Einfluss auf Soft Law No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Folgerungen No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Advantages of party autonomy No access
    Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. Substantive issues No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Notification No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Protection of bona fide assignees No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Prohibition of security assignments No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. 1. Meaning of ‘third-party effects’ No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Proprietary effects and third-party effects of assignment No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Priority No access
      Authors:
    4. 4. Public filing No access
      Authors:
    5. 5. Interim conclusion No access
      Authors:
  5. V. Party autonomy in the single market No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Party Autonomy in the Commission Proposal No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Example No access
    Authors:
  8. IIX. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. The four dimensions of recognition No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Recognition of authenticity No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Understanding the language: are translations required? No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Difficulties concerning the facts No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. The recognition of the content (legal effects) No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Attention needed for secondary recognition No access
    Authors:
  8. VIII. Concluding remarks No access
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  1. I. Einleitung No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Entstehung der Rechtsvergleichung in Deutschland No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Bedeutung der Rechtsvergleichung im Studium No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Bedeutung der Rechtsvergleichung in der deutschen Forschung No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Bedeutung der Rechtsvergleichung in der deutschen Rechtsberatungslandschaft No access
    Authors:
  6. Authors:
    1. 1. Ausländische Rechtsordnungen No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Internationales Einheitsrecht No access
      Authors:
    3. 3. Soft Law-Instrumente No access
      Authors:
  7. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. a. Zulässigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung bei der Auslegung nationalen Rechts No access
        Authors:
      2. b. Status quo der Rechtsvergleichung bei der Auslegung nationalen Zivilrechts No access
        Authors:
    2. 2. Internationales Einheitsrecht No access
      Authors:
  8. VIII. Schluss No access
    Authors:
6. Authors:
  1. I. Die soziale Aufgabe des Privatrechts No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Die soziale Aufgabe des Privatrechts und das europäische Privatrecht No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Die Wirkung des Leitgedankens „Unser Privatrecht wird sozialer sein, oder es wird nicht sein“ in den Niederlanden No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. Die soziale Aufgabe des Privatrechts und das neue niederländische Bürgerliche Gesetzbuch (1992) No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Schlussbetrachtungen No access
    Authors:
7. Authors:
  1. I. Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. II. La condition suspensive ou résolutoire No access
    Authors:
  3. III. La nullité No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. La résolution pour inexécution No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Conclusion No access
    Authors:
8. Authors:
  1. I. Non-contractual civil liability in the Civil Code No access
    Authors:
  2. II. Ex delicto civil liability No access
    Authors:
  3. III. Effects of its regulation in the Criminal Code No access
    Authors:
  4. IV. The weight of historical tradition No access
    Authors:
  5. V. Criminal Code of 1822 No access
    Authors:
  6. VI. Criminal Code of 1848 No access
    Authors:
  7. VII. Criminal Code of 1870 No access
    Authors:
  8. VIII. Epilogue No access
    Authors:
9. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. 1. Methodology (C. Amato) No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. Legal Context (E. Poillot) No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. 1. Academic Teaching Between Theory and Praxis No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. From a Dogmatic to a Problematic Approach: Clinical Teaching in Action No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. 1. The Distinctive Social Features of European Clinics No access
      Authors:
    2. 2. The Distinctive Academic Features of European Clinics No access
      Authors:
  4. IV. Final Remarks (E. Poillot) No access
    Authors:
Author Index No access Pages 413 - 414