Cover of book: Die Staatenhaftung im Völkerrecht
Book Titles Open Access Full access

Die Staatenhaftung im Völkerrecht

am Beispiel von informationstechnischen Gefährdungslagen
Authors:
Publisher:
 2021

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2021
Copyright year
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7216-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1228-6
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht
Volume
309
Language
German
Pages
372
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 24
    Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Gegenstand und Gang der Untersuchung 25 - 27
    Download chapter (PDF)
  3. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. I. Staatenverantwortlichkeit
          1. a) Anwendungsbereich gemäß den AIL von 1996
          2. b) Schadensvermeidung gemäß den AIL von 1996
          3. c) Wiedergutmachung gemäß den AIL von 1996
          1. a) Anwendungsbereich der Haftungsstudie
          2. b) Prävention grenzüberschreitender Schäden durch gefährliche Aktivitäten
          3. c) Verlustzuweisung bei grenzüberschreitenden Schäden durch gefährliche Aktivitäten
        1. 1. Staatenverantwortlichkeit
        2. 2. Schadensprävention und Verlustzuweisung
        3. 3. Staatenhaftung
        1. 1. Verhaltensbezogene und ergebnisbezogene Pflichten
        2. 2. Verfahrensbezogene und materielle Pflichten
          1. a) Haftungsart und -standard
          2. b) Schnittstelle zwischen Schadensvermeidungspflicht und Verhinderungspflicht
        1. 1. Völkerrechtlich verbotene Handlungen
        2. 2. Nicht-staatliche Verbrechen
        3. 3. Menschenrechtsverletzungen
      3. III. Ergebnis
        1. 1. Gut Dam-Fall
        2. 2. Fluss Mur-Fall
        3. 3. Juliana-Fall
        4. 4. Cosmos 954-Fall
        5. 5. Fukuyu Maru-Fall
        6. 6. Tschernobyl-Fall
        7. 7. Aerial Herbicide Spraying-Fall
        8. 8. Ergebnis
        1. 1. Cherry Point-Fall
        2. 2. Sandoz Rhein-Fall
        3. 3. Baia Mare-Fall
        4. 4. Montara Oil Spill-Fall
        5. 5. Deepwater Horizon-Fall
        6. 6. Ergebnis
          1. a) Verschuldensabhängige Haftung
          2. b) Verschuldensunabhängige Haftung
        2. 2. Anlage VI zum Umweltschutzprotokoll zum Antarktisvertrag
        3. 3. VN-Wasserlaufkonvention
          1. a) Allgemeines Zoll- und Handelsabkommen
          2. b) Übereinkommen über Subventionen und Ausgleichsmaßnahmen
          3. c) Internationale Investitionsschutzverträge
        1. 1. Zivilrechtliche Haftung nach den Nuklearhaftungsabkommen
        2. 2. Staatliche Haftung nach den Nuklearhaftungsabkommen
        1. 1. Subsidiäre Haftung nach den Nuklearhaftungsabkommen
        2. 2. Subsidiäre Haftung im antarktischen Haftungssystem
        1. 1. Kausaler Schaden durch besonders gefährliche Aktivität
        2. 2. Haftungsstandard
          1. a) Schadensverursacher
          2. b) Entschädigungsfonds bei Überschreiten der Haftungshöchstgrenze
          3. c) Entschädigungsfonds bei Nachweisproblemen
      5. V. Ergebnis
      1. I. Grundsatz der guten Nachbarschaft
        1. 1. Grundsatz der Schadensprävention
        2. 2. Grundsatz angemessener Nutzung
        3. 3. Vorsorgegrundsatz
      3. III. Verursachergrundsatz
      4. IV. Haftungsgrundsätze in den nationalen Rechtsordnungen
      5. V. Ergebnis
    6. F. Zusammenfassung
  4. Download chapter (PDF)
        1. 1. Verletzung negativer Verpflichtungen
          1. a) Territorium bzw. Hoheitsgewalt
          2. b) Reale Handlungsmöglichkeit
          3. c) Kenntnis
      2. II. Konsequenzen der Staatenverantwortlichkeit
        1. 1. Schaden
        2. 2. (Hoch-)gefährliche Aktivität
        3. 3. Kausalität
      2. II. Schadensvermeidung und Schadenskompensation
      3. III. Gebotene Sorgfalt
      4. IV. Haftungsart und -standard
    3. C. Zusammenfassung
  5. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. I. Informationsangriffe
      2. II. Informationsausbeutung
      1. I. Informationsangriffe auf Estland und Georgien
      2. II. Informationsangriff durch Schadprogramm „Stuxnet“
      3. III. Informationsausbeutung durch Schadprogramme „Duqu“ und „Flame“
      4. IV. Informationsausbeutung durch Geheimdienste „Five Eyes“
      5. V. Informationsausbeutung durch Hackergruppe „Guardians of Peace“
      6. VI. Informationsausbeutung und -angriff auf das „Democratic National Committee“
        1. 1. Informationsangriff als Gewalt im Sinne der VN-Charta
        2. 2. Informationsangriff als Angriff im Sinne des humanitären Völkerrechts
        3. 3. Informationskrieg und Informationskriegsführung in der internationalen Praxis
        1. 1. Informationstechnische Systeme als domaine réservé
        2. 2. Informationsangriff als unerlaubter Zwang
        3. 3. Informationseinmischung als Souveränitätsverletzung
        4. 4. Informationsintervention in der internationalen Praxis
        1. 1. Völkerrechtliche Verbote zur Informationsspionage
        2. 2. Informationsspionage in der internationalen Praxis
      1. I. Zurechnungsregeln
      2. II. Zurechnung in der internationalen Praxis
      1. I. Territorium bzw. Hoheitsgewalt
      2. II. Reale Handlungsmöglichkeit
      3. III. Kenntnis
      4. IV. Positive Verpflichtungen in der internationalen Praxis
    6. F. Zusammenfassung
  6. Download chapter (PDF)
      1. I. Analogiebasis
      2. II. Bedürfnis der Übertragbarkeit
      3. III. Vergleichbarkeit
      4. IV. Ergebnis
        1. 1. Schaden
        2. 2. (Hoch-)Gefährliche Aktivität
        3. 3. Kausalität
        1. 1. Schadensprävention
          1. a) Kooperation
          2. b) Risikoanalyse
          3. c) Beste Schutzpraktiken
        3. 3. Schadensminderung
        4. 4. Schadenskompensation
      3. III. Gebotene Sorgfalt
          1. a) Primäre Staatenhaftung für staatliche und staatlich befürwortete Informationsoperationen
          2. b) Subsidiäre und ergänzende Haftung des Ursprungsstaates für nicht-staatliche Informationsoperationen
          3. c) Errichtung eines Entschädigungsfonds für eine subsidiäre Haftung bei nicht feststellbarem Ursprung der Informationsoperation und für eine ergänzende Haftung bei begrenzter Einstandspflicht des Ursp...
        2. 2. Haftungsstandard
  7. Schlussbetrachtung 333 - 336
    Download chapter (PDF)
  8. Bibliografie 337 - 372
    Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (509)

  1. Schmitt, Michael N., Cyber Responses “By The Numbers” in International Law, EJIL: Talk!, 4 August 2015, abrufbar unter: https://www.ejiltalk.org/cyber-responses-by-the-numbers-in-international-law/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  2. Rao, Pemmaraju S. (Special Rapporteur), Third report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law (prevention of transboundary damage from hazardous activities), YBILC 2000-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/510. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  3. Rao, Pemmaraju S. (Special Rapporteur), First report on the legal regime for allocation of loss in case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities, YBILC 2003-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/531. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  4. Rao, Pemmaraju S. (Special Rapporteur), Second report on the legal regime for the allocation of loss in case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities, YBILC 2004-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/540. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  5. Rao, Pemmaraju S. (Special Rapporteur), Third report on the legal regime for allocation of loss in case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities, YBILC 2006-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/566. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  6. Robb, David, Sony Hack: A Timeline, DEADLINE, 22 December 2014, abrufbar unter: http://deadline.com/2014/12/sony-hack-timeline-any-pascal-the-interview-north-korea-1201325501 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  7. Roberts, Dan, Obama imposes new sanctions against North Korea in response to Sony Hack, The Guardian, 2 January 2015, abrufbar unter: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/02/obama-imposes-sanctions-north-korea-sony-hack-the-interview (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  8. Rötzer, Florian, DDoS-Angriffe auf estnische Server waren kein "Cyberwar", heise online, 12. Juni 2007, abrufbar unter: https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/DDoS-Angriffe-auf-estnische-Server-waren-kein-Cyberwar-138918.html (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  9. Sanger, David E., Obama Ordered Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran, The New York Times, 1 June 2012, abrufbar unter: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/world/middleeast/obama-ordered-wave-of-cyberattacks-against-iran.html (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  10. Sanger, David E./Savage, Charlie, U.S. Says Russia Directed Hacks to Influence Elections, The New York Times, 7 October 2016, abrufbar unter: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc-emails.html (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  11. Schaller, Christian, Internationale Sicherheit und Völkerrecht im Cyberspace: Für klarere Regeln und mehr Verantwortung, SWP-Studie 18/2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  12. Rao, Pemmaraju S. (Special Rapporteur), First report on prevention of transboundary damage from hazardous activities, YBILC 1998-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/487 and Add.1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  13. Schulze, Matthias, Hacking back? Technische und politische Implikationen digitaler Gegenschläge, SWP-Aktuell 59/2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  14. Shoard, Catherine, Sony Hack: the plot to kill The Interview – a timeline so far, The Guardian, 18 December 2014, abrufbar unter: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/dec/18/sony-hack-the-interview-timeline (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  15. Soesanto, Stefan/D`Incau, Fosca, The UN GGE is dead: Time to fall forward, European Council on Foreign Relations, 15 August 2017, abrufbar unter: https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_time_to_fall_forward_on_cyber_governance (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  16. Stubbs, Jack/Bing, Christopher, Hacking the hackers: Russian group hijacked Iranian spying operation, officials say, Reuters, 21 October 2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-cyber/hacking-the-hackers-russian-group-hijacked-iranian-spying-operation-officials-say-idUSKBN1X00AK (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  17. Sucharitkul, Sompong, Responsibility and Liability for Environmental Damage Under International Law, Golden Gate University Law Digital Commons 664 (1996), abrufbar unter: https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/pubs/664 (geprüft am 15.05.2020), S. 1–31. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Statement by the President on Actions in Response to Russian Malicious Cyber Activity and Harassment, 29 December 2016, abrufbar unter: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/29/statement-president-actions-response-russian-malicious-cyber-activity (geprüft am 15.05.2020). United Nations Environment Programme, Expert Group on Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practices, Development of Guidelines on Best Available Techniques and Provisional Guidance on Best Environmental Practices Relevant to Art. 5 and Annex C of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants: Use of the Terms Best Available Techniques, Best Environmental Practices and Related Concepts in International Environmental Instruments, Note by Secretariat, 29 January 2003, UNEP/POPS/EGB.1/INF/3, Annex, abrufbar unter: http://chm.pops.int/Portals/0/docs/from_old_website/documents/meetings/bat_bep/1st_session/EGB1_INF3_terms3.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, Developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, Fact Sheet, abrufbar unter: https://s3.amazonaws.com/unoda-web/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Information-Security-Fact-Sheet-July2018.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). US Department of the Treasury, Press Center, Treasury Imposes Sanctions Against the Government of the Democratic People’s Republic Of Korea, 2 January 2015, abrufbar unter: https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl9733.aspx (geprüft am 15.05.2020). US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Cyberspace Operations, Joint Pub 3–12, 8 June 2018, abrufbar unter: https://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/jp3_12.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  18. Vega-Barbosa, Giovanny/Aboagye, Lorraine, A Commentary on the Advisory Opinion of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Environment and Human Rights, Note e commenti, DPCE Online 34 (2018), abrufbar unter: http://www.dpceonline.it/index.php/dpceonline/article/view/506 (geprüft am 15.05.2020), Rn. 291–298. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  19. Weeramantry, Christopher G., Nukleare Reaktorkatastrophe in Japan: Ein offener Brief an die Umweltminister aller Staaten, 14. März 2011, abrufbar unter: https://www.ialana.de/files/pdf/veröffentlichungen/Offener_Brief_von_C__Weeramantry_Fukushima.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  20. Wilson, Christopher/Gaidosch, Tamas/Adelmann, Frank/Morozova, Anastasiia, Cybersecurity Risk Supervision, International Monetary Fund, Monetary and Capital Markets Departmental Paper Series No.19/15, Washington, D.C. 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  21. Wilson, Clay, Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress, US Congressional Research Report of 29 January 2008, No RL32114, abrufbar unter: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/terror/RL32114.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  22. Zetter, Kim, Critics Say New Evidence Linking North Korea to the Sony Hack Is Still Flimsy, WIRED, 8 January 2015, abrufbar unter: http://www.wired.com/2015/01/critics-say-new-north-korea-evidence-sony-still-flimsy (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  23. Mercado, Virginia/Soto, Luis A., Fischer gegen Ölmulti, Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit Online, 19. März 2017, abrufbar unter: https://www.dandc.eu/de/article/sieben-jahre-nach-dem-untergang-der-oelbohrplattform-deepwater-horizon-kaempft-mexiko-noch, (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  24. Janowitz, Nathaniel, Revealed: Documents Show BP Quietly Paid Just $25 Million to Mexico After The Worst Oil Spill Of The Century, BuzzFeedNews, 28 September 2018, abrufbar unter: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nathanieljanowitz/bp-mexico-deepwater-horizon-oil (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  25. Jeppesen, Helle, Haftung verschoben auf irgendwann, Deutsche Welle Online, 25. Februar 2013, abrufbar unter: https://www.dw.com/de/haftung-verschoben-auf-irgendwann/a-16623112 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  26. Kahn, Matthew, FBI Director Christopher Wray’s Remarks on Encryption to the International Conference on Cyber Security, LAWFARE, 9 January 2018, abrufbar unter: https://www.lawfareblog.com/fbi-director-christopher-wrays-remarks-encryption-international-conference-cyber-security (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  27. Kang, Cecilia, Sony Pictures Hack cost the movie studio at least $15 million, The Washington Post, 4 February 2015, abrufbar unter: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2015/02/04/sony-pictures-hack-cost-the-movie-studio-at-least-15-million/?utm_term=.db5b8a3b9915 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  28. Knake, Robert K., Untangling Attribution: Moving to Accountability in Cyberspace, Statement Before the Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation, Committee on Science and Technology, United States House of Representatives 2nd Session, 111th Congress, 2010, abrufbar unter: https://www.cfr.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2010/07/Knake%20-Testimony%20071510.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  29. Langenfeld, Christine/Minnerop, Petra, Environmental Liability Provisions in International Law, in: Umweltbundesamt (Hg.), Environmental Liability in International Law: Towards a Coherent Conception, Berichte des Umweltbundesamtes, Band 02/05, Berlin 2005, S. 3–158. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  30. Langner, Ralph, Der Langner-Report: Stuxnet und Die Folgen: Was die Schöpfer von Stuxnet erreichen wollten, was sie erreicht haben, und was das für uns alle bedeutet, München, August 2017, abrufbar unter: https://www.langner.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Stuxnet-und-die-Folgen.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  31. Lewis, James Andrew, Assessing the Risks of Cyber Terrorism, Cyber War and Other Cyber Threats, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Report of 1 November 2002, abrufbar unter: http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/021101_risks_of_cyberterror.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  32. Lewis, James Andrew, The Economic Impact of Cybercrime – No Slowing Down, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Report of 21 February 2018, abrufbar unter: https://www.csis.org/analysis/economic-impact-cybercrime (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  33. Lewis, James Andrew/Baker, Stewart, The Economic Impact of Cybercrime and Cyber Espionage, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Report of 22 July 2013, abrufbar unter: https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/60396rpt_cybercrime-cost_0713_ph4_0.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). McElroy, Damien/Williams, Christopher, Flame: world's most complex computer virus exposed, The Telegraph, 28 May 2012, abrufbar unter: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9295938/Flame-worlds-most-complex-computer-virus-exposed.html (geprüft am 15.05.2020). McGurk, Seán P. (Acting Director, National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center Office of Cybersecurity and Communications National Protection and Programs Directorate Department of Homeland Security), Statement for the Record Before the United States Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Washington DC, 17 November 2010, abrufbar unter: http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/2010-11-17-mcgurk-testimony-revised (geprüft am 15.05.2020). McKay, Angela/Neutze, Jan/Nicholas, Paul/Sullivan, Kevin, International Cyber Security Norms: Reducing conflict in an Internet-dependent world, Microsoft Whitepaper 2014, abrufbar unter: https://query.prod.cms.rt.microsoft.com/cms/api/am/binary/REVroA (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  34. Hollis, Duncan B., Russia and the DNC Hack: What Future for a Duty of Non-Intervention?, OpinoJuris, 25 July 2016, abrufbar unter: http://opiniojuris.org/2016/07/25/russia-and-the-dnc-hack-a-violation-of-the-duty-of-non-intervention/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Human Rights Council, Frank La Rue (Special Rapporteur), Report on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, 16 May 2011, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/27. Institut de Droit International, Eighth Commission, Francisco Orrego Vicuña (Rapporteur) Session of Strasbourg, 1997 – Second Part, Responsibility and Liability under International Law for Environmental Damage, Resolution of 4 September 1997, IDI-Yearbook 1998–67/II, S. 487–513. International Atomic Energy Agency, International Expert Group on Nuclear Liability, The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage – Explanatory Texts, IAEA International Law Series No. 3 (Revised), Wien 2017. International Bar Association, Section on Business Law, Committee F (international environmental law), Patricia Thomas (Chairman), Environmental Liability: 7th Residential Seminar on Environmental Law, 9–13 June 1990 Montreux Switzerland, London [u.a.] 1991. International Committee of the Red Cross, International humanitarian law and the challenges of contemporary armed conflicts, Report on the 32nd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent (32IC/15/11), October 2015, abrufbar unter: http://rcrcconference.org/app//uploads/2015/10/32IC-Report-on-IHL-and-challenges-of-armed-conflicts.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). International Law Association, Dietrich Rauschning (Rapporteur), Montreal Rules of International Law Applicable to Transfrontier Pollution, Umwelt- und Planungsrecht 1 (1983), S. 21–22. International Law Association, Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, Tim Stephens (Rapporteur)/Duncan French (Chair), Second Report, 20 July 2016, abrufbar unter: http://www.ila-hq.org/index.php/study-groups?study-groupsID=63 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). International Law Commission, Report on the work of its twenty-first session, YBILC 1969-II, UN Doc. A/7610/Rev.1. International Law Commission, Summary records of the twenty-fifth session, 1204th meeting, YBILC 1973-I, UN Doc. A/CN.4/217 and Add.l; A/CN.4/233; A/CN.4/246 and Add.l to 3; A/CN.4/264 and Add.l. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its twenty-fifth session, YBILC 1973-II, UN Doc. A/9010/Rev.1. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its twenty-sixth session, YBILC 1974-II/1, UN Doc. A/9610/Rev.1. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its thirtieth session, YBILC 1978-II/2, UN Doc. A/33/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its thirty-second session, YBILC 1980-II/2, UN Doc. A/35/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its thirty-eighth session, YBILC 1986-II/2, UN Doc. A/41/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its forty-second session, YBILC 1990-II/2, UN Doc. A/45/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its forty-fourth session, YBILC 1992-II/2, UN Doc. A/47/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its forty-sixth session, YBILC 1994-II/2, UN Doc. A/49/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its forty-ninth session, YBILC 1997-II/2, UN Doc. A/52/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its fifty-third session, YBILC 2001-II/2, UN Doc. A 56/10 (and Corr. 1.). International Law Commission, Report on the work of its fifty-fourth session, YBILC 2002-II/2, UN. Doc. A/57/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its fifty-fifth session, YBILC 2003-II/2, UN Doc. A/58/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its fifty-eighth session, YBILC 2006-II/2, UN Doc. A/61/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its sixtieth session, YBILC 2008-II/2, UN Doc. A/63/10. International Law Commission, Report on the work of its seventieth session, UN Doc. A/73/10, 2018. International Law Commission, Secretariat, Topical summary of the discussion on the report of the International Law Commission on the work of its thirty-second session (1980) in the Sixth Committee during the thirty-fifth session of the General Assembly, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.326, 1981. International Law Commission, Secretariat, Survey of practice relevant to international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1985-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/384. International Law Commission, Secretariat, Survey of liability regimes relevant to the topic of international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, (international liability in case of loss from trans-boundary harm arising out of hazardous activities), YBILC 1995-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/471. International Law Commission, Secretariat, Survey of liability regimes relevant to the topic of international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law (international liability in case of loss from transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities), YBILC 2004-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/543. International Law Commission, Working Group, Report on international liability for injurious consequence arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.533 and Add.1, in: International Law Commission, Report on the work of its forty-eighth session, YBILC 1996-II/2, UN Doc. A/51/10, Annex I. International Law Commission, Working Group, Report on international liability for injurious consequence arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.284 and Corr 1., in: International Law Commission, Report on the work of its thirtieth session, YBILC 1978-II/2, UN Doc. A/33/10, Annex. International Law Commission, Working Group, Report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.536, 1997. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  35. Myers, Steven Lee, Youth Groups Created by Kremlin Serve Putin's Cause, The New York Times, 8 July 2007, abrufbar unter: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/world/europe/08moscow.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=A2CDBA35318FF4A9402F71EECFBA0E21&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  36. Nikièma, Suzy H., Compensation for Expropriation, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Best Practices Series, March 2013, abrufbar unter: https://www.iisd.org/pdf/2013/best_practice_compensation_expropriation_en.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Norddeutscher Rundfunk/Das Erste, "Snowden exklusiv": der Wortlaut des Interviews von NDR Autor Hubert Seipel, 26 Januar 2014, abrufbar unter: https://www.presseportal.de/pm/69086/2648795 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Cyber Defence Pledge, 8 July 2016, abrufbar unter: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133177.htm (geprüft am 15.05.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  37. Pernice, Ingolf, Vom Völkerrecht des Netzes zur Verfassung des Internets: Privacy und Digitale Sicherheit im Zeichen eines schrittweisen Paradigmenwechsels, HIIG Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No. 2017–02, abrufbar unter: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2959257 (geprüft am 15.05.2020), S. 1–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  38. Pernik, Piret, A Playbook for Hybrid War in Cyberspace?, International Center for Defence and Security, 29 August 2014, abrufbar unter: https://icds.ee/a-playbook-for-hybrid-war-in-cyberspace/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  39. Peters, Anne, Surveillance without Borders: The Unlawfulness of the NSA-Panopticon, Part II, EJIL: Talk!, 4 November 2013, abrufbar unter: https://www.ejiltalk.org/surveillance-without-borders-the-unlawfulness-of-the-nsa-panopticon-part-ii/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  40. Quentin-Baxter, Robert Q. (Special Rapporteur), Preliminary report on international liability for injurious consequences of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1980-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/334 and Add.l and 2. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  41. Quentin-Baxter, Robert Q. (Special Rapporteur), Second report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1981-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/346 and Add.1 and 2. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  42. Quentin-Baxter, Robert Q. (Special Rapporteur), Third report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1982-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/360. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  43. Quentin-Baxter, Robert Q. (Special Rapporteur), Fourth report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1983-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/373. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  44. Abdullah, Nuraisyah Chua/Shah, Rohani Mohd/Husin, Zaliha Hj/Rahman, Hamisah Abd., Antarctic Tourism: The responsibilities and liabilities of tour operators and state parties, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 202 (2015), S. 227–233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  45. Ago, Roberto, Das Verschulden im völkerrechtlichen Unrecht, Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 20 (1940), S. 449–484. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  46. Akehurst, Michael B., International Liability for Injurious Consequences out of Acts not Prohibited by International Law, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 16 (1985), S. 3–16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  47. Almhofer, Martina, Die Haftung der Europäischen Union für rechtswidrige Bankenaufsicht, Tübingen 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  48. Anderson, Mark, Derivative versus Direct Liability as a Basis for State Liability for Transboundary Harms, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge 2006, S. 99–108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  49. Anton, Donald K., The Principle of Residual Liability in the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The Advisory Opinion on Responsibility and Liability for International Seabed Mining (ITLOS Case No. 17), McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy 7 (2011–2012), S. 242–257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  50. Anton, Donald K./Makgill, Robert A./Payne, Cymie R., Seabed Mining: Advisory Opinion on Responsibility and Liability, Environmental Policy and Law 41 (2011), S. 60–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  51. Antonopoulos, Constantine, State Responsibility in Cyberspace, in: Tsagourias, Nicholas/Buchan, Russell (Hg.), Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace, Cheltenham [u.a.] 2015, S. 55–71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  52. Arangio-Ruiz, Gaetano, State Fault and the Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility: Questions of Attribution and Relevance, in: Le Droit International au Service de la Paix, de la Justice et du Développement, Mélanges Michel Virally, Paris 1991, S. 25–42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  53. Aréchaga, Eduardo Jiménez de, International law in the past third of a century, Recueil des Cours 159 (1978-I), S. 1–344. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  54. Areng, Liina, International Cyber Crisis Management and Conflict Resolution Mechanisms, in: Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 565–594. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  55. Arnauld, Andreas von, Völkerrechtliche Informationspflichten bei Naturkatastrophen, Archiv des Völkerrechts, 43 (2005), S. 279–311. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  56. Arnauld, Andreas von, Völkerrecht, 4. Auflage, Heidelberg 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  57. Arndt, Birger, Das Vorsorgeprinzip im EU-Recht, Tübingen 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  58. Ashmore, William C., Impact of Alleged Russian Cyber Attacks, Baltic Security & Defence Review 11 (2009), S. 4–40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  59. Atapattu, Sumudu A., Emerging Principles of International Environmental Law, Ardsley, N.Y. 2006. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  60. Aust, Helmut Philipp, Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility, Cambridge [u.a.] 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  61. Banks, William, State Responsibility and Attribution of Cyber Intrusions After Tallinn 2.0, Texas Law Review 95 (2017), S. 1487–1513. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  62. Bannelier-Christakis, Karine, Cyber Diligence: A Low-Intensity Due Diligence Principle for Low-Intensity Cyberspace?, Baltic Yearbook of International Law 14 (2014), S. 23–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  63. Bantekas, Ilias, Trust Funds, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  64. Barboza, Julio, Liability: Can We Put Humpty-Dumpty Together Again?, Chinese Journal of International Law 1 (2002), S. 499–526. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  65. Barboza, Julio, The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law, Leiden [u.a.] 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  66. Bassiouni, M. Cherif, A Functional Approach to "General Principles of International Law", Michigan Journal of International Law 11 (1990), S. 768–818. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  67. Bastmeijer, Kees, Antarctica, in: Nollkaemper, André/Plakokefalos, Ilias (Hg.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law, Cambridge 2017, S. 399–425. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  68. Bäumler, Jelena, Das Schädigungsverbot im Völkerrecht: Eine Untersuchung anhand des Umwelt-, Welthandels- und Finanzvölkerrechts, Berlin [u.a.] 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  69. Beaucamp, Guy/Treder, Lutz, Methoden und Technik der Rechtsanwendung, 3. Auflage, Heidelberg 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  70. Beck, Ulrich, Weltrisikogesellschaft: Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit, 3. Auflage, Frankfurt am Main 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  71. Benatar, Marco, The Use of Cyber Force: Need for Legal Justification?, Goettingen Journal of International Law 1 (2009), S. 375–396. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  72. Bencsáth, Boldizsár/Pék, Gábor/Buttyán, Levente/Félegyházi, Márk, The Cousins of Stuxnet: Duqu, Flame, and Gauss, Future Internet 4 (2012), S. 971–1003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  73. Benzing, Markus, Das Beweisrecht vor internationalen Gerichten und Schiedsgerichten in zwischenstaatlichen Streitigkeiten, Berlin [u.a.] 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  74. Bergkamp, Lucas, Liability and Environment: Private and Public Law Aspects of Civil Liability for Environmental Harm in an International Context, Den Haag [u.a.] 2001. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  75. Berwick, Teresa A., Responsibility and Liability for Environmental Damage: A Roadmap for International Environmental Regimes, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 10 (1997–1998), S. 257–267. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  76. Beyerlin, Ulrich, Grenzüberschreitender Umweltschutz und allgemeines Völkerrecht, in: Hailbronner, Kay/Ress, Georg/Stein, Torsten (Hg.), Staat und Völkerrechtsordnung: Festschrift für Karl Doehring, Berlin [u.a.] 1989, S. 37–62. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  77. Beyerlin, Ulrich/Marauhn, Thilo, International Environmental Law, Oxford 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  78. Bhuta, Nehal/Pantazopoulous, Stavros-Evdokimos, Autonomy and uncertainty: increasingly autonomous weapons systems and the international legal regulation of risk, in: Bhuta, Nehal/Beck, Susanne/Geiß, Robin/Liu, Hin-Yan/Kreß, Claus (Hg.), Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy, Cambridge 2016, S. 284–300. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  79. Binder, Christina, Die Grenzen der Vertragstreue im Völkerrecht: am Beispiel der nachträglichen Änderung der Umstände, Heidelberg [u.a.] 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  80. Binder, Christina/Schreuer, Christoph, Unjust Enrichment, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  81. Birnie, Patricia W./Boyle, Alan E./Redgwell, Catherine, International Law and the Environment, 3. Auflage, Oxford 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  82. Blank, Stephen, Cyber War and Information War à la Russe, in: Perkovich, George/Levite, Ariel E. (Hg.), Understanding Cyber Conflict: 14 Analogies, Washington, D.C. 2017, S. 81–98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  83. Bleckmann, Albert, Analogie im Völkerrecht, Archiv des Völkerrechts 17 (1977), S. 161–180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  84. Bleckmann, Albert, Zur Feststellung und Auslegung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 37 (1977), S. 504–529. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  85. Bleckmann, Albert, Die Aufgaben einer Methodenlehre des Völkerrechts: Probleme der Rechtsquellenlehre im Völkerrecht, Heidelberg [u.a.] 1978. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  86. Bleckmann, Albert, Grundprobleme und Methoden des Völkerrechts, Freiburg [u.a.] 1982. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  87. Bodansky, Daniel, Customary (And Not So Customary) International Environmental Law, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 3 (1995), S. 105–119. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  88. Bodansky, Daniel, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law, Cambridge [u.a.] 2010. Boisson de Chazounes, Laurence/Campanelli, Danio, Neighbour States, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2006. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  89. Borda, Aldo Zammit, A Formal Approach to Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute from the Perspective of the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals, European Journal of International Law 24 (2013), S. 649–661. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  90. Bordin, Fernando Lusa, Reflections of Customary International Law: The Authority of Codification Conventions and ILC Draft Articles in International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 63 (2014), S. 535–567. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  91. Bornheim, Gaby, Haftung für grenzüberschreitende Umweltbeeinträchtigungen im Völkerrecht und im Internationalen Privatrecht, Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  92. Bos, Maarten, Prolegomena to the Identification of Custom in International Law, in: T. M. C. Asser Instituut (Hg.), Essays on International & Comparative Law in Honour of Judge Erades, Den Haag 1983, S. 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  93. Böschen, Stefan/Weis, Kurt, Die Gegenwart der Zukunft: Perspektiven zeitkritischer Wissenspolitik, Wiesbaden 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  94. Bosma, Shane/Underwood, Josh, Compensation claims arising from the Montara Oil Spill, in: Handl, Günther/Svendsen, Kristoffer (Hg.), Managing the Risk of Offshore Oil and Gas Accidents: The International Legal Dimension, Cheltenham [u.a.] 2019, S. 425–446. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  95. Bothe, Michael, Die Bedeutung der Rechtsvergleichung in der Praxis internationaler Gerichte, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 36 (1976), S. 280–299. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  96. Boyle, Alan E., Nuclear Energy and International Law: An Environmental Perspective, British Yearbook of International Law 60 (1989), S. 257–313. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  97. Boyle, Alan E., State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 39 (1990), S. 1–26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  98. Boyle, Alan E., Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law, Journal of Environmental Law 17 (2005), S. 3–26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  99. Boyle, Alan E., Polluter Pays, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  100. Boyle, Alan E., Liability for injurious consequence arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, in: Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Hg.), The Law of International Responsibility, Oxford 2010, S. 95–104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  101. Boyle, Alan E., Transboundary air pollution: a tale of two paradigms, in: Jayakumar, Shunmugam/Koh, Tommy/Beckman, Robert/Phan, Hao Duy (Hg.), Transboundary Pollution: Evolving Issues of International Law and Policy, Cheltenham [u.a.] 2015, S. 233–262. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  102. Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A., Introduction, in: dies. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 1–10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  103. Brent, Kerryn Anne, The Certain Activities case: what implications for the no-harm rule?, Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 20 (2017), S. 28–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  104. Brownlie, Ian, International Law and the Use of Force by States, Oxford 1963. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  105. Brunnée, Jutta, "Common Interest" – Echoes from an Empty Shell?: Some Thoughts on Common Interest and International Environmental Law, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 49 (1989) S. 791–808. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  106. Brunnée, Jutta, Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53 (2004), S. 351–367. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  107. Brunnée, Jutta, Common Areas, Common Heritage, Common Concern, in: Bodansky, Daniel/dies./Hey, Ellen (Hg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford 2007, S. 550–573. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  108. Brunnée, Jutta, Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  109. Brunnée, Jutta/Meshel, Tamar, Teaching an Old Law New Tricks: International Environmental Law Lessons for Cyberspace Governance, German Yearbook of International Law 58 (2015), S. 129–168. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  110. Bruns, Viktor, Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung I., Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1 (1929), S. 1–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  111. Brüggemeier, Gert, Umwelthaftungsrecht: Ein Beitrag zum Recht der »Risikogesellschaft«?, Kritische Justiz 22 (1989), S. 209–230. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  112. Bryde, Brun-Otto, Umweltschutz durch allgemeines Völkerrecht?, Archiv des Völkerrechts 31 (1993), S. 1–12. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  113. Buchan, Russell, Cyber Attacks: Unlawful Uses of Force or Prohibited Interventions?, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 17 (2012), S. 212–227. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  114. Buchan, Russell, Cyberspace, Non-State Actors and the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm, Journal of Conflict & Security Law 21 (2016), S. 429–453. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  115. Byers, Michael, Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, A New Age, McGill Law Journal 47 (2002), S. 389–431. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  116. Calliess, Christian, Art. 191 AEUV (ex-Art. 174 EGV): Umweltpolitische Ziele; Schutzmaßnahmen; internationale Zusammenarbeit, in: ders./Ruffert, Matthias (Hg.), EUV/AEUV: Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, Kommentar, 5. Auflage, München 2016, Rn. 38–40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  117. Cameron, James/Abouchar, Juli, The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law, in: Freestone, David/Hey, Ellen (Hg.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation, Den Haag [u.a.] 1996, S. 29–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  118. Campanelli, Danio, Principle of Solidarity, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  119. Carmody, Chios, A Theory of WTO Law, Journal of International Economic Law 11 (2008), S. 527–557. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  120. Caron, David D., The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship between Form and Authority, American Journal of International Law 96 (2002), S. 857–873. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  121. Cassese, Antonio, The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia, European Journal of International Law 18 (2007), S. 649–668. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  122. Castillo-Laborde, Lilian del, Case Law on International Watercourses, in: Dellapenna, Joseph W./Gupta, Joyeeta (Hg.), The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water, Dordrecht 2009, S. 319–336. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  123. Castillo-Laborde, Lilian del, Equitable Utilization of Shared Resources, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  124. Charme, Joni S., Transnational Injury and Ultra-Hazardous Activity: An Emerging Norm or International Strict Liability, Journal of Law and Technology 4 (1989), S. 75–92. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  125. Chemain, Régis, The 'Polluter Pays' Principle, in: Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Hg.), The Law of International Responsibility, Oxford 2010, S. 877–885. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  126. Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law: As Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge 1987. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  127. Condorelli, Luigi, La réparation des dommages catastrophiques causés par les activités spatiales, in: Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Droit de l’Université Catholique de Louvain (Hg.), La réparation des dommages catastrophiques: Les risques technologiques majeurs en droit international et en droit communautaire, Brüssel 1990, S. 263–300. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  128. Condron, Sean M., Getting it Right: Protecting American Critical Infrastructure in Cyberspace, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 20 (2007), S. 403–422. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  129. Corn, Gary P./Taylor, Robert, Symposium on Sovereignty, Cyberspace, and Tallinn Manual 2.0, Sovereignty in the Age of Cyber, American Journal of International Law Unbound 111 (2017), S. 207–212. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  130. Crawford, James, The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility, 3. Auflage, Cambridge [u.a.] 2005. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  131. Crawford, James, State Responsibility, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2006. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  132. Crawford, James, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 9. Auflage, Oxford 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  133. Crespo, Laura/Wanner, Bastien/Ghernaouti, Solange, Cybersecurity Capacity Building: A Swiss Approach, in: Bartsch, Michael/Frey, Stefanie (Hg.), Cybersecurity Best Practices: Lösungen zur Erhöhung der Cyberresilienz für Unternehmen und Behörden, Wiesbaden 2018, S. 525–537. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  134. Crootof, Rebecca, International Cybertorts: Expanding State Accountability in Cyberspace, Cornell Law Review 103 (2018), S. 565–644. D'Oliveira, Hans Ulrich Jessurun, The Sandoz Blaze: The Damage and the Public and Private Liabilities, in: Francioni, Francesco/Scovazzi, Tullio (Hg.), International Responsibility for Environmental Harm, London [u.a.] 1991, S. 429–445. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  135. Dahm, Georg/Delbrück, Jost/Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Völkerrecht, Band I/1 Die Grundlagen. Die Völkerrechtssubjekte, 2. Auflage, Berlin [u.a.] 1989. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  136. Dam, Cees van, European Tort Law, 2. Auflage, Oxford 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  137. Damrosch, Lori Fisler, Politics Across Borders: Nonintervention and Nonforcible Influence over Domestic Affairs, American Journal of International Law 83 (1989), S. 1–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  138. Davis, John S. II/Boudreaux, Benjamin/Welburn, Jonathan William/Aguirre, Jair/Ogletree, Cordaye/McGovern, Geoffrey/Chase, Michael S., Stateless Attribution: Toward International Accountability in Cyberspace, Santa Monica 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  139. Dederer, Hans-Georg, Staatenverantwortlichkeit (“State responsibility”) und Haftung (“liability”) im Bereich der “ultrahazardous activities”, in: Hecker, Bernd/Hendler, Reinhard/Proelß, Alexander/Reiff, Peter (Hg.), Verantwortlichkeit und Haftung für Umweltschäden, Berlin 2013, S. 13–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  140. Dicke, Detlev Christian, Die Intervention mit wirtschaftlichen Mitteln im Völkerrecht: zugleich ein Beitrag zu den Fragen der wirtschaftlichen Souveränität, Baden-Baden, 1978. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  141. Diekmann, Jochen, Verstärkte Haftung und Deckungsvorsorge für Schäden nuklearer Unfälle: Notwendige Schritte zur Internalisierung externer Effekte, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht 34 (2001), S. 119–132. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  142. Diggelmann, Oliver/Hadorn, Nina, Gewalt- und Interventionsverbot bei Cyberangriffen: Ausgewählte Schlüsselfragen, in: Fakultät für Vergleichende Staats- und Rechtswissenschaften der Andrássy Gyula Universität Budapest/Schubel, Christian/Kirste, Stephan/Müller-Graff, Peter-Christian/ders./Hufeld, Ulrich (Hg.), Jahrbuch für Vergleichende Staats- und Rechtswissenschaften – 2016/2017, Baden-Baden 2017, S. 255–274. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  143. Dinniss, Heather Harrison, Cyber Warfare and the Laws of War, Cambridge [u.a.] 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  144. Dittmar, Falko, Angriffe auf Computernetzwerke: Ius ad bellum und ius in bello, Berlin 2005. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  145. Dolzer, Rudolf, Eigentum, Enteignung und Entschädigung im geltenden Völkerrecht, Berlin [u.a.] 1985. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  146. Dolzer, Rudolf/Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law, 2. Auflage, Oxford 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  147. Dörr, Oliver, Staatshaftung in Europa: Vergleichende Bestandsaufnahme, in: ders. (Hg.) Staatshaftung in Europa: Nationales und Unionsrecht, Berlin [u.a.] 2014, S. 1–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  148. Dörr, Oliver, Obligations of the State of Origin of a Cyber Security Incident, German Yearbook of International Law 58 (2015), S. 87–100. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  149. Dörr, Oliver, Weitere Rechtsquellen des Völkerrechts, in: Ipsen, Knut, Völkerrecht, 7. Auflage München 2018, § 19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  150. Dörr, Oliver, Völkerrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit, in: Ipsen, Knut, Völkerrecht, 7. Auflage München 2018, § 29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  151. Douhan, Alena, Liability for Environmental Damage, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  152. Drumbl, Mark A., Trail Smelter and the International Law Commission`s Work on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and State Liability, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 85–98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  153. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago’s Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility, European Journal of International Law 10 (1999), S. 371–385. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  154. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Droit International public, 5. Auflage, Paris 2000. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  155. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie/Hoss, Cristina, Trail Smelter and Terrorism: International Mechanisms to Combat Transboundary Harm, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 225–239. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  156. Duvic-Paoli, Leslie-Anne, The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law, Cambridge [u.a.] 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  157. Efrony, Dan/Shany, Yuval, A Rule Book on the Shelf? Tallinn Manual 2.0 on Cyberoperations and Subsequent State Practice, American Journal of International Law 112 (2018), S. 583–657. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  158. Egan, Brian J., International Law and Stability in Cyberspace, Berkeley Journal of International Law 35 (2017), S. 169–180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  159. Ellis, Jaye, Has International Law Outgrown Trail Smelter?, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 56–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  160. Engelhard, Esther/Broek, Berthy van den/Jong, Ferry de/Keirse, Anne/Kezel, Evelien de, Let’s Think Twice before We Revise! ‘Égalité’ as the Foundation of Liability for Lawful Public Sector Acts, Utrecht Law Review 10 (2014), S. 55–76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  161. Epiney, Astrid, Die völkerrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit von Staaten für rechtswidriges Verhalten im Zusammenhang mit Aktionen Privater, Baden-Baden, 1992. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  162. Epiney, Astrid, Das „Verbot erheblicher grenzüberschreitender Umweltbeeinträchtigungen“: Relikt oder konkretisierungsfähige Grundnorm?, Archiv des Völkerrechts 33 (1995), S. 309–360. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  163. Epiney, Astrid, Umweltvölkerrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für Entwicklungsprojekte, in: Meng, Werner/Magnus, Ulrich/Schlemmer-Schulte, Sabine/Cottier, Thomas/Stoll, Peter-Tobias/dies. (Hg.), Das internationale Recht im Nord-Süd-Verhältnis, Heidelberg 2005, S. 329–381. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  164. Epiney, Astrid, „Gerechtigkeit“ im Umweltvölkerrecht, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 24 (2007), S. 31–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  165. Epiney, Astrid, Zur Rechtsfigur des de facto-Organs im Recht der Staatenverantwortlichkeit, in: Fischer-Lescano, Andreas/Gasser, Hans-Peter/Marauhn, Thilo/Ronzitti, Natalino (Hg.), Frieden in Freiheit: Festschrift für Michael Bothe zum 70. Geburtstag, Baden-Baden 2008, S. 883–896. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  166. Epiney, Astrid, Gegenstand, Entwicklung, Quellen und Akteure des internationalen Umweltrechts, in: Proelß, Alexander (Hg.), Internationales Umweltrecht, 2017, S. 1–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  167. Epiney, Astrid/Scheyli, Martin, Strukturprinzipien des Umweltvölkerrechts, Baden-Baden 1998. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  168. Erben, Cosima, Das Vorsorgegebot im Völkerrecht, Berlin 2005. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  169. Erichsen, Sven, Das Liability-Projekt der ILC: Fortentwicklung des allgemeinen Umweltrechts oder Kodifizierung einer Haftung für besonders gefährliche Aktivitäten?, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 51 (1991), S. 94–144. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  170. Erichsen, Sven, Der ökologische Schaden im internationalen Umwelthaftungsrecht: Völkerrecht und Rechtsvergleichung, Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] 1993. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  171. Esposito, Roberto, The ICJ and the Future of Transboundary Harm Disputes: A Preliminary Analysis of the Case Concerning Aerial Herbicide Spraying (Ecuador v. Columbia), Pace International Law Review Online Companion 2 (2010), abrufbar unter: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1014&context=pilronline (geprüft am 15.05.2020), S. 1–53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  172. Fastenrath, Ulrich, Lücken im Völkerrecht: Zu Rechtscharakter, Quellen, Systemzusammenhang, Methodenlehre und Funktionen des Völkerrechts, Berlin 1991. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  173. Fayette, Louise A. de la, The ILC and International Liability: A Commentary, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 6 (1997), S. 322–333. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  174. Fayette, Louise A. de la, The Concept of Environmental Damage in International Liability Regimes, in: Bowman, Michael/Boyle, Alan E. (Hg.), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law: Problems of Definition and Valuation, Oxford [u.a.] 2002, S. 149–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  175. Fayette, Louise A. de la, International liability for damage to the environment, in: Fitzmaurice, Malgosia/Ong, David M./Merkouris, Panos (Hg.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law, Cheltenham [u.a.] 2010, S. 320–360. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  176. Feria-Tinta, Monica/Milnes, Simon C., The Rise of Environmental Law in International Dispute Resolution: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Issues a Landmark Advisory Opinion on the Environment and Human Rights, Yearbook of International Environmental 27 (2016), S. 64–81. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  177. Fidler, David P., Was Stuxnet an Act of War?: Decoding a Cyberattack, IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine 9 (2011), S. 56–59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  178. Fidler, David P., Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Duqu: Why cyberespionage is more dangerous than you think, International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 5 (2012), S. 28–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  179. Fitzmaurice, Gerald, Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law, in: Koskenniemi, Martti (Hg.), Sources of International Law, Aldershot [u.a.] 2000, S. 57–80. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  180. Forcese, Craig, Spies Without Borders: International Law and Intelligence Collection, Journal of National Security Law and Policy 5 (2011), S. 179–210. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  181. Förster, Susanne, Internationale Haftungsregeln für schädliche Folgewirkungen gentechnisch veränderter Organismen: Europäische und internationale Entwicklungen und Eckwerte für ein Haftungsregime im internationalen Recht, Berlin [u.a.] 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  182. Foster, Caroline, The ILC Draft Principles on the Allocation of Loss in the Case of Transboundary Harm Arising out of Hazardous Activities: Privatizing Risk?, Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law 14 (2005), S. 265–282. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  183. Francioni, Francesco, Liability for Damage to the Antarctic Environment, in: ders./Tullio Scovazzi (Hg.), International Law for Antarctica, The Hague [u.a.] 1996, S. 581–602. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  184. Franzese, Patrick W., Sovereignty in Cyberspace: Can it Exist?, Air Force Law Review 64 (2009), S. 1–42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  185. Frenz, Walter/Götzkes, Vera, Anmerkung zur Entscheidung FIAMM des EuGH (Große Kammer) vom 9. September 2008 – C-120/06 P und C-121/06 P, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 16 (2009), S. 1052–1053. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  186. Gaines, Sanford E., The Polluter-Pays Principle: From Economic Equity to Environmental Ethos, Texas International Law Journal 26 (1991), S. 463–496. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  187. Gärditz, Klaus Ferdinand, Ungeschriebenes Völkerrecht durch Systembildung, Archiv des Völkerrechts 45 (2007), S. 1–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  188. Gaycken, Sandro, Cyberwar: Das Internet als Kriegsschauplatz, München 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  189. Gaycken, Sandro, Die vielen Plagen des Cyberwar, in: Schmidt-Radefeldt, Roman/Meissler, Christine (Hg.), Automatisierung und Digitalisierung des Krieges: Drohnenkrieg und Cyberwar als Herausforderungen für Ethik, Völkerrecht und Sicherheitspolitik, Baden-Baden 2012, S. 89–116. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  190. Gaycken, Sandro/Karger, Michael, Entnetzung statt Vernetzung: Paradigmenwechsel bei der IT-Sicherheit, Multimedia und Recht 1 (2011), S. 3–8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  191. Gehring, Thomas/Jachtenfuchs, Markus, Haftung und Umwelt: Interessenkonflikte im internationalen Weltraum-, Atom- und Seerecht, Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] 1988. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  192. Gehring, Thomas/Jachtenfuchs, Markus, Liability for Transboundary Environmental Damage Towards a General Liability Regime?, European Journal of International Law 4 (1993), S. 92–106. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  193. Geiß, Robin/Lahmann, Henning, Freedom and Security in Cyberspace: Shifting the Focus away from Military Responses towards Non-forcible Countermeasures and Collective Threat-Prevention, in: Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 621–657. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  194. Gervais, Michael, Cyber Attacks and the Laws of War, Berkeley Journal of International Law 30 (2012), S. 525–579. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  195. Goldie, Louis Frederick Edward, Liability for Damage and the Progressive Development of International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 14 (1965), S. 1189–1264. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  196. Goldie, Louis Frederick Edward, Concepts of Strict and Absolute Liability and the Ranking of Liability in terms of Relative Exposure to Risk, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 16 (1985), S. 175–248. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  197. Greenwood, Christopher, Self-Defence, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  198. Gross, Oren, Cyber Responsibility to Protect: Legal Obligations of States Directly Affected by Cyber-Incidents, Cornell International Law Journal 48 (2015), S. 481–511. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  199. Gündling, Lothar, Verantwortlichkeit der Staaten für grenzüberschreitende Umweltbeeinträchtigungen, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 45 (1985), S. 265–292. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  200. Gündling, Lothar, The Status in International Law of the Principle of Precautionary Action, in: Freestone, David/IJlstra, Ton (Hg.), The North Sea: Perspectives on Regional Environment Co-operation, London [u.a.] 1990, S. 23–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  201. Haack, Stefan, Die außervertragliche Haftung der EG für rechtmäßiges Verhalten – Zum Urteil des Gerichts erster Instanz (EuG) vom 28.4.1998, Rs. T-184/95, Dorsch Consult Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH/Rat der Europäischen Union und Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Europarecht 3 (1999), S. 395–403. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  202. Haack, Stefan, Grundsätzliche Anerkennung der außervertraglichen Haftung der EG für rechtmäßiges Verhalten nach Art. 288 Abs. 2 EG – Anmerkungen zum Urteil des Gerichts erster Instanz (EuG) vom 14.12.2005, Rs. T-69/00, Europarecht 5 (2006), S. 696–705. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  203. Hach, Renate, Völkerrechtliche Pflichten zur Verminderung grenzüberschreitender Luftverschmutzung in Europa, Berlin [u.a.] 1993. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  204. Hafner, Gerhard/Buffard, Isabelle, Obligations of Prevention and the Precautionary Principle, in: Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Olleson, Simon (Hg.), The Law of International Responsibility, Oxford [u.a.] 2010, S. 521–534. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  205. Hagen, Andreas, The Russo-Georgian War 2008, in: Healey, Jason (Hg.), A Fierce Domain: Conflict in Cyberspace, 1986–2012, Washington, D.C. 2013, S. 194–204. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  206. Hakimi, Monica, State Bystander Responsibility, European Journal of International Law 21 (2010), S. 341–385. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  207. Handl, Günther, Territorial Sovereignty and the Problem of Transnational Pollution, American Journal of International Law 69 (1975), S. 50–76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  208. Handl, Günther, State Liability for Accidental Transnational Environmental Damage by Private Persons, American Journal of International Law 74 (1980), S. 525–565. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  209. Handl, Günther, Liability as an obligation established by a primary rule of international law: Some basic reflections on the International Law Commission's work, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 16 (1985), S. 49–79. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  210. Handl, Günther, Trail Smelter in Contemporary International Environmental Law: Its Relevance in the Nuclear Energy Context, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 125–139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  211. Handl, Günther, International Accountability for Transboundary Environmental Harm Revisited: What Role for “State Liability”?, Environmental Policy and Law 37 (2007), S. 116–125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  212. Handl, Günther, International Law and the Liability for Catastrophic Environmental Damage, Remarks, American Society of International Law Proceedings 105 (2011), S. 427–430. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  213. Handl, Günther, Transboundary Impacts, in: Bodansky, Daniel/Brunnée, Jutta/Hey, Ellen (Hg.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford [u.a.] 2008, S. 531–549. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  214. Handl, Günther, Allocating transboundary loss from offshore oil and gas accidents, in: ders./Svendsen, Kristoffer (Hg.), Managing the Risk of Offshore Oil and Gas Accidents: The International Legal Dimension, Cheltenham [u.a.] 2019, S. 253–284. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  215. Handl, Günther/Simma, Bruno, Grenzüberschreitende Auswirkungen von Kernkraftanlagen und Völkerrecht, Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 39 (1988), S. 1–8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  216. Hanqin, Xue, Transboundary Damage in International Law, Cambridge [u.a.] 2003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  217. Haratsch, Andreas/Koenig, Christian/Pechstein, Matthias, Europarecht, 11. Auflage, Tübingen 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  218. Hardy, M. J. L., International Protection Against Nuclear Risks, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 10 (1961), S. 739–759. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  219. Hare, Forrest, The Significance of Attribution to Cyberspace Coercion: A Political Perspective, in: Czosseck, Christian/Ottis, Rain/Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict, Tallinn 2012, S. 125–139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  220. Hartmann, Bernd J., Haftung in der Europäischen Union, in: Dörr, Oliver (Hg.) Staatshaftung in Europa: Nationales und Unionsrecht, Berlin [u.a.] 2014, S. 31–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  221. Hathaway, Oona A., The Drawbacks and Dangers of Active Defense, in: Brangetto, Pascal/Maybaum, Markus/Stinissen, Jan, 2014 6th International Conference on Cyber Conflict, Tallinn 2014, S. 39–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  222. Hathaway, Oona A./Crootof, Rebecca/Levitz, Philip/Nix, Haley/Nowlan, Aileen/Perdue, William/Spiegel, Julia, The Law of Cyber-Attack, California Law Review 100 (2012), S. 817–885. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  223. Hathaway, Oona A./Nielsen, Elizabeth/Nowlan, Aileen/Perdue, William/Purvis, Chelsea/Solow, Sara/Spiegel, Julia, Human Rights Abroad: When do Human Rights Treaty Obligations Apply Extraterritorially?, Arizona State Law Journal 43 (2011), S. 389–426. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  224. Healey, Jason/Pitts, Hannah, Applying International Environmental Legal Norms to Cyber Statecraft, I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 8 (2012), S. 356–387. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  225. Heathcote, Sarah, State omissions and due diligence: aspects of fault, damage and contribution to injury in the law of state responsibility, in: Bannelier, Karine/Christakis, Théodore/dies. (Hg.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The enduring impact of the Corfu Channel case, London [u.a.] 2012, S. 295–314. Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, Informationskrieg und Völkerrecht – Angriffe auf Computernetzwerke in der Grauzone zwischen nachweisbarem Recht und rechtspolitischer Forderung, in: Epping, Volker/Fischer, Horst/ders. (Hg.), Brücken bauen und begehen: Festschrift für Knut Ipsen zum 65. Geburtstag, München 2000, S. 129–156. Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, Cyberspace – ein völkerrechtliches Niemandsland, in: Schmidt-Radefeldt, Roman/Meissler, Christine (Hg.), Automatisierung und Digitalisierung des Krieges: Drohnenkrieg und Cyberwar als Herausforderungen für Ethik, Völkerrecht und Sicherheitspolitik, Baden-Baden, 2012, S. 159–174. Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, Legal Implications of Territorial Sovereignty in Cyberspace, in: Czosseck, Christian/Ottis, Rain/Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict, Tallinn 2012, S. 7–19. Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, Territorial Sovereignty and Neutrality in Cyberspace, International Law Studies 89 (2013), S. 123–156. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  226. Hemmings, Alan D., Liability postponed: the failure to bring Annex VI of the Madrid Protocol into force, The Polar Journal 8 (2018), S. 315–332. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  227. Herczegh, Géza, General principles of international law and the international legal order, Budapest 1969. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  228. Herdegen, Matthias, Possible Legal Framework and Regulatory Models for Cyberspace: Due Diligence Obligations and Institutional Models for Enhanced Inter-State Cooperation, German Yearbook of International Law 85 (2015), S. 169–185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  229. Herzog, Stephen, Revisiting the Estonian Cyber Attacks: Digital Threats and Multinational Responses, Journal of Strategic Security 4 (2011), S. 49–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  230. Hey, Ellen, The Precautionary Concept in Environmental Policy and Law: Institutionalizing Caution, Georgetown International Law Review, 4 (1992), S. 303–318. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  231. Hey, Ellen, The Watercourse Convention: To What Extent Does it Provide a Basis for Regulating Uses of International Watercourses?, Review of European Comparative International Environmental Law 7 (1998), S. 291–300. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  232. Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It, Oxford 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  233. Higgins, Rosalyn, International Law in a Changing International System, Cambridge Law Journal 58 (1999), S. 78–95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  234. Hinds, Caroline, Das Prinzip „sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas“ und seine Bedeutung im internationalen Umweltrecht, Archiv des Völkerrechts 30 (1992), S. 298–235. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  235. Hinkle, Katharine C., Countermeasures in the Cyber Context: One More Thing to Worry About, Yale Journal of International Law Online 37 (2011), abrufbar unter: http://www.yjil.org/docs/pub/o-37-hinkle-countermeasures-in-the-cyber-context.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020), S. 11–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  236. Hinteregger, Monika, Atomhaftung in Europa – Bestand und Perspektiven, in: Apathy, Peter/Bollenberger, Raimund/Bydlinski, Peter/Iro, Gert/Karner, Ernst/Karollus, Martin (Hg.), Festschrift für Helmut Koziol zum 70. Geburtstag, Wien 2010, S. 667–680. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  237. Hipp, Margarete, The International Sea Bed Authority, in: Ehlers, Peter/Lagoni, Rainer (Hg.), International Maritime Organisations and Their Contribution Towards a Sustainable Marine Development, Hamburg 2006, S. 135–155. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  238. Hobe, Stephan, Die Zukunft des Völkerrechts im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Archiv des Völkerrechts 37 (1999), S. 253–282. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  239. Hobe, Stephan, Europarecht, 9. Auflage, München 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  240. Hofmann, Rainer, Modernes Investitionsschutzrecht: Ein Beispiel für entstaatlichte Setzung und Durchsetzung von Recht, in: Kadelbach, Stefan/Günther, Klaus (Hg.), Recht ohne Staat?: Zur Normativität nichtstaatlicher Rechtsetzung, Frankfurt [u.a.] 2011, S. 119–145. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  241. Hofmann, Rainer, Modern International Investment Law as an Example of Extra-territorial Law-making and Law-enforcement, in: Handl, Günther/Zekoll, Joachim/Zumbaansen, Peer (Hg.), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalisation, Leiden 2012, S. 439–461. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  242. Hohmann, Harald, Präventive Rechtspflichten und -prinzipien des modernen Umweltvölkerrechts: Zum Stand des Umweltvölkerrechts zwischen Umweltnutzung und Umweltschutz, Berlin, 1992. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  243. Hollis, Duncan B., Why States Need an International Law for Information Operations, Lewis & Clark Law Review 11 (2007), S. 1023–1061. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  244. Hollis, Duncan B., An e-SOS for Cyberspace, Harvard International Law Journal 52 (2011), S. 373–432. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  245. Horbach, Nathalie Louisa Johanna Theodora, Liability versus responsibility under international law: Defending strict state responsibility for transboundary damage, Leiden 1996. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  246. Jakab, András, Prinzipien, Rechtstheorie 37 (2006), S. 49–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  247. Jenks, C. Wilfred, Liability for Ultra-Hazardous Activities in International Law, Recueil des Cours 117 (1966-I), S. 99–200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  248. Jensen, Eric Talbot, Cyber Sovereignty: The Way Ahead, Texas International Law Journal 50 (2014) S. 275–304. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  249. Jensen, Eric Talbot/Watts, Sean, A Cyber Duty of Due Diligence: Gentle Civilizer or Crude Destabilizer?, Texas Law Review 95 (2017), S. 1555–1577. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  250. Jessen, Henning, Staatenverantwortlichkeit und seevölkerrechtliche Haftungsgrundsätze für Umweltschäden durch Tiefseebodenbergbau, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 2 (2012), S. 71–81. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  251. Jinks, Derek, State Responsibility for the Acts of Private Armed Groups, Chicago Journal of International Law 4 (2003), S. 83–96. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  252. Jolley, Jason D., Attribution, State Responsibility, and the Duty to Prevent Malicious Cyber-Attacks in International Law, Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, 2017, abrufbar unter: http://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/8452 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  253. Joyner, Christopher C./Lotrionte, Catherine, Information Warfare as International Coercion: Elements of a Legal Framework, European Journal of International Law 12 (2001), S. 825–865. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  254. Jung, Han-Wei, Rechtserkenntnis und Rechtsfortbildung im Völkergewohnheitsrecht: Das Verhältnis zwischen Methodik und Rechtsquellenlehre, Göttingen 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  255. Kadelbach, Stefan, Zwingendes Völkerrecht, Berlin 1992. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  256. Kadelbach, Stefan, Ethik des Völkerrechts unter Bedingungen der Globalisierung, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 64 (2004), S. 1–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  257. Kadelbach, Stefan, The Concept of State Responsibility for Private Acts under General International Law, in: Hobe, Stephan/Freeland, Steven/Schmidt-Tedd, Bernhard (Hg.), In Heaven as on Earth?: The Interaction of Public International Law on the Legal Regulation of Outer Space, Bonn 2013, S. 105–119. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  258. Kadelbach, Stefan/Kleinlein, Thomas, Überstaatliches Verfassungsrecht, Zur Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht, Archiv des Völkerrechts 44 (2006), S. 235–266. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  259. Kadelbach, Stefan/Kleinlein, Thomas, International Law – a Constitution of Mankind?: An Attempt at a Re-appraisal with an Analysis of Constitutional Principles, German Yearbook of International Law 50 (2007), S. 303–347. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  260. Kadens, Emily/Young, Ernest A., How customary is customary international law?, William & Mary Law Review 54 (2013), S. 885–920. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  261. Kahl, Wolfgang, Umweltprinzip und Gemeinschaftsrecht: Eine Untersuchung zur Rechtsidee des "bestmöglichen Umweltschutzes" im EWG-Vertrag, Heidelberg 1993. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  262. Kälin, Walter/Künzli, Jörg, Universeller Menschenrechtsschutz: Der Schutz des Individuums auf globaler und regionaler Ebene, 4. Auflage, Basel [u.a.] 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  263. Kämmerer, Jörn Axel, Der Schutz des Eigentums im Völkerrecht, in: 42. Bitburger Gespräche: Eigentum – Ordnungsidee, Zustand und Entwicklungen, München, Jahrbuch 2004/I, S. 143–168. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  264. Kammerhofer, Jörg, Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems, European Journal of International Law 15 (2004), S. 523–553. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  265. Kanalan, Ibrahim, Extraterritoriale Staatenpflichten jenseits der Hoheitsgewalt: Ein neues Konzept für umfassende extraterritoriale Staatenpflichten, Archiv des Völkerrechts 52 (2014), S. 495–521. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  266. Kanuk, Sean P., Recent Developments: Information Warfare: New Challenges for Public International Law, Harvard International Law Journal 37 (1996), 272–285. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  267. Keber, Tobias O./Roguski, Przemysław Nick, Ius ad bellum electronicum?: Cyberangriffe im Lichte der UN-Charta und aktueller Staatenpraxis, Archiv des Völkerrechts 49 (2011), S. 399–434. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  268. Kelemen, Daniel/Knievel, Tim, The United States, the European Union, and international environmental law: The domestic dimensions of green diplomacy, International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (2015), S. 945–965. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  269. Kelson, John M., State Responsibility and the Abnormally Dangerous Activity, Harvard International Law Journal 13 (1972) S. 197–244. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  270. Kettemann, Matthias C., Das Internet als internationales Schutzgut: Entwicklungsperspektiven des Internetvölkerrechts anlässlich des Arabischen Frühlings, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 72 (2012), S. 469–482. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  271. Kilovaty, Ido, Doxfare: Politically Motivated Leaks and the Future of the Norm on Non-Intervention in the Era of Weaponized Information, Harvard National Security Journal 9 (2018), S. 146–179. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  272. Kim, Dae-Won, Non-violation complaints in WTO law: Theory and Practice, Bern [u.a.] 2006. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  273. Kimminich, Otto, Völkerrechtliche Haftung für das Handeln Privater im Bereich des internationalen Umweltschutzes, Archiv des Völkerrechts 22 (1984), S. 241–282. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  274. Kiss, Alexandre, The Rights and Interests of Future Generations and the Precautionary Principle, in: Freestone, David/Hey, Ellen (Hg.), The Precautionary Principle and International Law: The Challenge of Implementation, Den Haag [u.a.] 1996, S. 19–28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  275. Klein, Eberhard, Umweltschutz im völkerrechtlichen Nachbarrecht, Berlin 1976. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  276. Kleinlein, Thomas, Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht: Konstruktion und Elemente einer idealistischen Völkerrechtslehre, Berlin [u.a.] 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  277. Koivurova, Timo, Due Diligence, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  278. Kojima, Chie, Compensation Fund, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  279. Kolb, Robert, Principles as sources of international law (with special reference to good faith), Netherlands International Law Review 53 (2006), S. 1–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  280. Kolb, Robert, Reflections on Due Diligence Duties and Cyberspace, German Yearbook of International Law 58 (2015), S. 113–128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  281. Köndgen, Johannes, Überlegungen zur Fortbildung des Umwelthaftpflichtrechts, Umwelt- und Planungsrecht 11–12 (1983), S. 345–356. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  282. Korff, Douwe, First Do No Harm: The Potential of Harm Caused to Fundamental Rights and Freedoms by State Cybersecurity interventions, in: Wagner, Ben/Kettemann, Matthias C./Vieth, Kilian (Hg.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Digital Technology: Global Politics, Law and International Relations, Cheltenham 2019, S. 129–155. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  283. Krajewski, Markus, Wirtschaftsvölkerrecht, 4. Auflage, Heidelberg 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  284. Kranz, Jerzy, Die völkerrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit für die Anwendung militärischer Gewalt: Maßstäbe der Zurechenbarkeit, Archiv des Völkerrechts 48 (2010), S. 281–337. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  285. Krieger, Heike, Die Verantwortlichkeit Deutschlands nach der EMRK für seine Streitkräfte im Auslandseinsatz, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 62 (2002), S. 669–702. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  286. Krieger, Heike, Krieg gegen anonymous: Völkerrechtliche Regelungsmöglichkeiten bei unsicherer Zurechnung im Cyberwar, Archiv des Völkerrechts 50 (2012), S. 1–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  287. Kulesza, Joanna, State responsibility for acts of cyber‐terrorism, Global Internet Governance Academic Network, Annual Symposium, Vilnius 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  288. Kulesza, Joanna, Due Diligence in Cyberspace in: Portela, Irene Maria/Almeida, Fernando (Hg.), Cyberspace, Organizational, Legal, and Technological Dimensions of Information System Administration, Hershey PA 2014, S. 76–95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  289. Kulesza, Joanna, Due Diligence in International Law, Leiden [u.a.] 2016. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  290. Kumm, Mattias, The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20 (2013), S. 605–628. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  291. Kunig, Phillip, Prohibition of Intervention, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  292. Kypraios, Christos/Carpanelli, Elena, Space Debris, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  293. Lammers, Johan G., Pollution of the International Watercourses: A Search for Substantive Rules and Principles of Law, Boston [u.a.] 1984. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  294. Lammers, Johan G., International Responsibility and Liability for Damage Caused by Environmental Interferences, Environmental Policy and Law 31 (2001), S. 42–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  295. Lapidoth, Ruth, International Straits, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  296. Larenz, Karl/Canaris, Claus-Wilhelm, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3. Auflage, Berlin [u.a.] 1995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  297. Lauterpacht, Hersch, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law: with special references to international arbitration, London [u.a.] 1927. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  298. Lefeber, René, Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origin of State Liability, Den Haag 1996. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  299. Libicki, Martin C., Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar, Santa Monica 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  300. Liu, Ian Yuying, State Responsibility and Cyberattacks: Defining Due Diligence Obligations, Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law 4 (2017), S. 191–260. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  301. Liu, Ian Yuying, The due diligence doctrine under Tallinn Manual 2.0, Computer Law & Security Review 33 (2017), S. 390–395. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  302. Lotrionte, Catherine, Cyber Operations: Conflict Under International Law, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, (2012), S. 15–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  303. Lotrionte, Catherine, Reconsidering the Consequences for State-Sponsored Hostile Cyber Operations Under International Law, The Cyber Defense Review 3, (2018), S. 73–114. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  304. Louka, Elli, International Environmental Law: Fairness, Effectiveness, and World Order, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  305. Loures, Flavia Rocha/Rieu-Clarke, Alistair/Dellapenna, Joseph W./Lammers, Johan, The authority and function of the UN Watercourses Convention, in: Loures, Flavia Rocha/Rieu-Clarke, Alistair (Hg.), The UN Watercourses Convention in Force: Strengthening international law for transboundary water management, Abingdon Oxon 2013, S. 49–66. MacCormick, Neil, Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, Oxford 1978. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  306. Maddocks, Jennifer, Outsourcing of Governmental Functions in Contemporary Conflict: Rethinking the Issue of Attribution, Virginia Journal of International Law 59 (2019), S. 47–95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  307. Maestral, Armand Lever Claude de (Hg.), Canadian Practice in International Law during 1972 as Reflected in Resolutions of the House of Commons and in Government Statements in the House of Commons, Canadian Yearbook of International Law 11 (1973), S. 314–346. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  308. Mager, Ute, Die Entwicklung des Wasserwirtschaftsrechts – Referenzgebiet für ein materiell-rechtlich fundiertes internationales Verwaltungsrecht, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 70 (2010), S. 789–818. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  309. Magraw, Daniel Barstow, The International Law Commission’s Study of International Liability for Nonprohibited Acts as it Relates to Developing States, Washington Law Review 61 (1986), S. 1041–1060. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  310. Magraw, Daniel Barstow, Transboundary Harm: The International Law Commission`s Study of „International Liability“, American Journal of International Law 80 (1986), S. 305–330. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  311. Mahmoudi, Said, Gut Dam Claims, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  312. Malanczuk, Peter, Akehurst`s Modern Introduction to International Law, 7. Auflage, London [u.a.] 1997. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  313. Malone, Linda A., The Chernobyl Accident: A Case Study in International Law Regulating State Responsibility for Transboundary Nuclear Pollution, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 12 (1987), S. 203–241. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  314. Mandsager, Dennis (Hg.), Sanremo Handbook on Rules of Engagement, Sanremo 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  315. Marauhn, Thilo, Customary Rules of International Environmental Law – Can they Provide Guidance for Developing a Peacetime Regime for Cyberspace?, in: Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 465–484. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  316. Marboe, Irmgard, The Importance of Guidelines and Codes of Conduct for Liability of States and Private Actors, in: dies. (Hg.), Soft Law in Outer Space, Böhlau [u.a.] 2012, S. 119–144. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  317. Matsui, Yoshiro, The Transformation of the Law of State Responsibility, in: Provost, René (Hg.), State Responsibility in International Law, Aldershot [u.a.], 2002, S. 5–65. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  318. Matsushita, Mitsuo/Schoenbaum, Thomas J./Mavroidis, Petros C./Hahn, Michael, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy, 3. Auflage, Oxford 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  319. Matz-Lück, Nele, Meeresschutz, in: Proelß, Alexander (Hg.), Internationales Umweltrecht, Berlin [u.a.] 2017, S. 393–454. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  320. Maurmann, Dorothee, Rechtsgrundsätze im Völkerrecht am Beispiel des Vorsorgeprinzips, Baden-Baden, 2008. McCaffrey, Stephen. C., Expediting the Provision of Compensation to Accident Victims, in: G. Handl/R. Lutz (Hg.), Transferring Hazardous Technologies and Substances: The International Legal Challenge, London [u.a.] 1989, S. 199–239. McCaffrey, Stephen C., Of Paradoxes, Precedents, and Progeny: The Trail Smelter Arbitration 65 Years Later, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 34–45. McCaffrey, Stephen C., The 1997 U.N. Watercourses Convention: Retrospect and Prospect, Global Business & Development Law Journal 21 (2008), S. 165–173. McCaffrey, Stephen C., International Watercourses, Environmental Protection, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2011. McDougal, Myres S./Schlei, Norbert A., The Hydrogen Bomb Tests in Perspective: Lawful Measures for Security, Yale Law Journal 64 (1955), S. 648–710. McIntryre, Owen, The Role of Customary Rules and Principles of International Environmental Law in the Protection of Shared International Freshwater Resources, Natural Resources Journal 46 (2006), S. 157–210. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  321. Mellor, Justin, Radioactive Waste and Russia's Northern Fleet: Sinking the Principles of International Environmental Law, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 28 (1999), S. 51–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  322. Melzer, Nils, Cyberwarfare and International Law, Geneva 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  323. Menzel, Eberhard, Grundprobleme der Ermittlung, Anwendung und Geltung von völkerrechtlichen Normen, Juristische Schulung 1963, S. 41–51. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  324. Messerschmidt, Jan E., Hackback: Permitting Retaliatory Hacking by Non-State Actors as Proportionate Countermeasures to Transboundary Cyberharm, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52 (2013), S. 275–324. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  325. Mickelson, Karin, Rereading Trail Smelter, Canadian Yearbook of International Law 31 (1993), S. 219–234. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  326. Miquelon-Weismann, Miriam F., The Convention on Cybercrime: A Harmonized Implementation of International Penal Law: What Prospects for Procedural Due Process?, The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law 23 (2005), S. 329–362. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  327. Morth, Todd A., Considering Our Position: Viewing Information Warfare as a Use of Force Prohibited by Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 30 (1998), S. 567–600. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  328. Morton, Chris, Stuxnet, Flame, and Duqu – the Olympic Games, in: Healey, Jason (Hg.), A Fierce Domain: Conflict in Cyberspace, 1986–2012, Washington, D.C. 2013, S. 212–231. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  329. Mosler, Hermann, General Principles of Law, in: Bernhardt, Rudolf (Hg.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Band II, Amsterdam [u.a.] 1995, S. 511–527. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  330. Mrozek, Marius, Europäisches Marktordnungsrecht, die WTO und die Osterweiterung: Das Steuerungsinstrumentarium des EU-Agrarrechts am Beispiel der Marktordnungen für Getreide und Zucker im Lichte der WTO und zugleich eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse der Agrarordnung Polens in der Vorbeitrittsphase, Berlin 2003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  331. Murphy, Sean D., Prospective Liability Regimes for the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Wastes, American Journal of International Law 88 (1994), S. 24–75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  332. Nanda, Ved P./Pring, George (Rock), International Environmental Law and Policy for the 21st Century, 2. Auflage, Leiden [u.a.] 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  333. Nanteuil, Arnaud de, Droit international de l’investissement, Paris 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  334. Nedzel, Nadia E., Antidumping and Cotton Subsidies: A Market-based Defense of Unfair Trade Remedies, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 28 (2008), S. 215–272. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  335. Nguyen, Reese, Navigating Jus Ad Bellum in the Age of Cyber Warfare, California Law Review 101 (2013), S. 1079–1129. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  336. Notz, Konstantin von, Der demokratische Rechtsstaat und das Geheimnis der Dienste – Neubewertung eines Spannungsverhältnisses, Die Friedens-Warte 90 (2015), S. 17–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  337. Noyes, John E./Smith, Brian D., State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Several Liability, Yale Journal of International Law 13 (1988), S. 225–267. O’Connell, Mary Ellen, Cyber Security without Cyber War, Journal of Conflict & Security Law 17 (2012), S. 187–209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  338. Odendahl, Kerstin, Die Umweltpflichtigkeit der Souveränität: Reichweite und Schranken territorialer Souveränitätsrechte über die Umwelt und die Notwendigkeit eines veränderten Verständnisses staatlicher Souveränität, Berlin 1998. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  339. Okowa, Phoebe N., State Responsibility for Transboundary Air Pollution in International Law, Oxford [u.a.] 2000. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  340. Owens, William A./Dam, Kenneth W./Lin, Herbert S. (Hg.), Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities, Washington, D.C. 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  341. Parrish, Austen L., Trail Smelter Déjà Vu: Extraterritoriality, International Environmental Law and the Search for Solutions to Canadian-U.S. Transboundary Water Pollution Disputes, Boston University Law Review 85 (2005), S. 363–429. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  342. Payne, Thomas, Teaching Old Law New Tricks: Applying and Adapting State Responsibility to Cyber Operations, Lewis & Clark Law Review 20 (2016), S. 683–715. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  343. Peavey-Joanis, Jennifer, A Pyrrhic Victory: Applying the Trail Smelter Principle to State Creation of Refugees, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 254–267. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  344. Pedrazzi, Marco, Outer Space, Liability for Damage, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  345. Peil, Michael, Scholarly Writings as a Source of Law: A Survey of the Use of Doctrine by the International Court of Justice, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 1 (2012), S. 136–161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  346. Pellet, Allain, The ILC`s Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and Related Texts, in: Crawford, James/ders./Olleson, Simon (Hg.), The Law of International Responsibility, Oxford [u.a.] 2010, S. 75–94. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  347. Pihelgas, Mauno, Back-Tracing and Anonymity in Cyberspace, in: Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 31–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  348. Pirker, Benedikt, Territorial Sovereignty and Integrity and the Challenges of Cyberspace, in: Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 189–216. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  349. Pisillo-Mazzeschi, Riccardo, Forms of International Responsibility for Environmental Harm, in: Francioni, Francesco/Scovazzi, Tullio (Hg.), International Responsibility for Environmental Harm, London [u.a.] 1991, S. 15–35. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  350. Porras, Ileana M., The Rio Declaration: A New Basis for International Cooperation, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 1 (1992), S. 245–253. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  351. Proelß, Alexander, Raum und Umwelt im Völkerrecht, in: Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf/ders. (Hg.), Völkerrecht, 7. Auflage, Berlin [u.a.] 2016, S. 361–454. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  352. Proelß, Alexander, Prinzipien des internationalen Umweltrechts, in: ders. (Hg.), Internationales Umweltrecht, Berlin [u.a.] 2017, S. 69–104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  353. Pyhälä, Minna/Brusendorff, Anne Christine/Paulomäki, Hanna, The precautionary principle, in: Fitzmaurice, Malgosia/Ong, David M./Merkouris, Panos (Hg.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law, Cheltenham [u.a.] 2010, S. 203–226. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  354. Randelzhofer, Albrecht, Probleme der völkerrechtlichen Gefährdungshaftung, in: Rauschning, Dietrich/ders., Staatenverantwortlichkeit: Berichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Völkerrecht, Heft 24, Heidelberg 1984, S. 35–78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  355. Randelzhofer, Albrecht/Simma, Bruno, Das Kernkraftwerk an der Grenze: Eine „ultra-hazardous activity“ im Schnittpunkt von internationalem Nachbarrecht und Umweltschutz, in: Blumenwitz, Dieter/Randelzhofer, Albrecht (Hg.), Festschrift für Friedrich Berber zum 75. Geburtstag, München 1973, S. 389–432. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  356. Ranke, Ulrich, Klima und Umweltpolitik, Berlin [u.a.] 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  357. Ratner, Steven R., Compensation for Expropriations in a World of Investment Treaties: Beyond the Lawful/Unlawful Distinction, American Journal of International Law 111 (2017), S. 7–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  358. Rau, Markus, IGH v. 9.4.1949 – Korfu-Kanal, Souveränität verpflichtet! Unterlassenshaftung und Beweiserleichterung im Recht der Staatenverantwortlichkeit, in: Menzel, Jörg/Pierlings, Tobias/Hoffmann, Jeannine (Hg.), Völkerrechtsprechung, Tübingen 2005, S. 756–760. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  359. Rauschning, Dietrich, Allgemeine Völkerrechtsregeln zum Schutz gegen Umweltbeeinträchtigungen, in: Münch, Ingo von (Hg.), Staatsrecht, Völkerrecht, Europarecht: Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen Schlochauer zum 75. Geburtstag am 28. März 1981, Berlin [u.a.] 1981, S. 557–576. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  360. Read, John E., The Trail Smelter Dispute, Canadian Yearbook of International Law 1 (1963), S. 213–229. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  361. Reinisch, August/Beham, Markus, Mitigating Risks: Inter-State Due Diligence Obligations in Case of Harmful Cyber-Incidents and Malicious Cyber-Activity – Obligations of the Transit State, German Yearbook of International Law 58 (2015), S. 101–112. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  362. Rensmann, Thilo, Wertordnung und Verfassung: Das Grundgesetz im Kontext grenzüberschreitender Konstitutionalisierung, Tübingen 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  363. Riemer, Carsten Ludwig, Staatengemeinschaftliche Solidarität in der Völkerrechtsordnung: Eine normative Analyse staatengemeinschaftlicher Solidarkonzepte in Bezug auf die internationale Staatenpraxis aus den Bereichen Friedenswahrung, Entwicklungshilfe, Wirtschaft und Umweltschutz, Düsseldorf 2003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  364. Ripinsky, Sergey/Williams, Kevin, Damages in International Investment Law, London 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  365. Rivera, Rose, U.S. State Responsibility á la Trail Smelter: Arms Trafficking and Transboundary Harm to Mexico, Mexican Law Review 5 (2012), S. 3–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  366. Roberts, Anthea Elizabeth, Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation, American Journal of International Law 95 (2001), S. 757–791. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  367. Ronzoni, Miriam, The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-Dependent Account, Philosophy & Public Affairs 37 (2009), S. 229–256. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  368. Roscini, Marco, Cyber Operations and the Use of Force in International Law, Oxford 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  369. Roscini, Marco, Evidentiary Issues in International Disputes Related to State Responsibility for Cyber Operations, in: Ohlin, Jens David/Govern, Kevin/Finkelstein, Claire (Hg.), Cyberwar: Law and Ethics for Virtual Conflict, Oxford 2015, S. 215–248. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  370. Rosenstock, Robert, The ILC and State Responsibility, American Journal of International Law, 96 (2002), S. 792–797. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  371. Rubin, Alfred P., Pollution by Analogy: The Trail Smelter Arbitration, Oregon Law Review 50 (1971), S. 259–282. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  372. Rudolf, Walter, Haftung für rechtmäßiges Verhalten im Völkerrecht, in: Damrau, Jürgen (Hg.), Festschrift für Otto Mühl zum 70. Geburtstag, Stuttgart [u.a.] 1981, S. 535–552. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  373. Ruys, Tom, ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice, Cambridge [u.a.] 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  374. Ryan, Daniel J./Dion, Maeve/Tikk, Eneken/Ryan, Julie J. C. H., International Cyberlaw: A Normative Approach, Georgetown Journal of International Law 42 (2011), S. 1161–1199. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  375. Sadeleer, Nicolas de, Les principes du pollueur-payeur, de prévention et de précaution, Essai sur la genèse et la portée juridique de quelques principes du droit de l'environnement, Brüssel [u.a.] 1999. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  376. Sadeleer, Nicolas de, Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules, Oxford [u.a.] 2002. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  377. Sands, Philippe J., The Environment, Community and International Law, Harvard International Law Journal 30 (1989), S. 393–420. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  378. Sands, Philippe/Peel, Jacqueline, Principles of International Environmental Law, 4. Auflage, Cambridge [u.a.] 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  379. Saxler, Barbara/Siegfried, Jule/Proelss, Alexander, International liability for transboundary damage arising from stratospheric aerosol injections, Law, Innovation and Technology (7) 2015, S. 112–147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  380. Scanlan, Kevin P., The International Law Commission’s First Ten Draft Articles on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses: Do They Adequately Address All the Major Issues of Water Usage in the Middle East?, Fordham International Law Journal 19 (1996), S. 2179–2229. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  381. Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice: General Course in Public International Law, Dordrecht [u.a.] 1991. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  382. Schmahl, Stefanie, Cybersecurity, in: Dethloff, Nina/Nolte, Georg/Reinisch, August (Hg.), Freiheit und Regulierung in der Cyberwelt – Rechtsidentifikation zwischen Quelle und Gericht, Heidelberg 2016, S. 159–196. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  383. Schmalenbach, Kirsten, Verantwortlichkeit und Haftung, in: Proelß, Alexander (Hg.), Internationales Umweltrecht, Berlin [u.a.] 2017, S. 211–242. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  384. Schmidt, Andreas, The Estonian Cyber Attacks, in: Healey, Jason (Hg.), A Fierce Domain: Conflict in Cyberspace, 1986–2012, Washington, D.C. 2013, S. 174–193. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  385. Schmitt, Daniela M., Staatenverantwortlichkeit für Schäden an der biologischen Vielfalt, Baden-Baden 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  386. Schmitt, Michael N., Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 37 (1999), S. 885–937. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  387. Schmitt, Michael N., Preemptive Strategies in International Law, Michigan Journal of International Law 24 (2003), S. 513–548. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  388. Schmitt, Michael N., The ‘Use of Force’ in Cyberspace: A Reply to Dr Ziolkowski, in: Czosseck, Christian/Ottis, Rain/Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict, Tallinn 2012, S. 311–317. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  389. Schmitt, Michael N. (Hg.), Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, Prepared by the International Groups of Experts at the Invitation of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, Cambridge [u.a.] 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  390. Schmitt, Michael N., “Below the Threshold” Cyber Operations: The Countermeasures Response Option and International Law, Virginia Journal of International Law 54 (2014), S. 697–732. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  391. Schmitt, Michael N., The Law of Cyber Warfare: Quo Vadis?, Stanford Law & Policy Review 25 (2014), S. 269–299. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  392. Schmitt, Michael N., In Defense of Due Diligence in Cyberspace, The Yale Law Journal Forum 125 (2015), S. 68–81. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  393. Schmitt, Michael N. (Hg.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations, Prepared by the International Groups of Experts at the Invitation of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, 2. Auflage, Cambridge [u.a.] 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  394. Schmitt, Michael N., Grey Zones in the International Law of Cyberspace, The Yale Journal of International Law Online 42 (2017), abrufbar unter: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/campuspress.yale.edu/dist/8/1581/files/2017/08/Schmitt_Grey-Areas-in-the-International-Law-of-Cyberspace-1cab8kj.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020), S. 1–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  395. Schmitt, Michael N./Vihul, Liis, The Nature of International Law Cyber Norms, in: Osula, Anna-Maria/Rõigas, Henry, International Cyber Norms: Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives, Tallinn 2016, S. 23–47. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  396. Schmitt, Michael N./Vihul, Liis, Respect for Sovereignty in Cyberspace, Texas Law Review 95 (2017), S. 1639–1670. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  397. Schreuer, Christoph H., The Concept of Expropriation under the ETC and other Investment Protection Treaties, Transnational Dispute Management 5 (2005), S. 1–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  398. Schröder, Meinhard, Umweltschutz als Gemeinschaftsziel und Grundsätze des Umweltschutzes, in: Rengeling, Hans-Werner (Hg.), Handbuch zum europäischen und deutschen Umweltrecht: Eine systematische Darstellung des europäischen Umweltrechts mit seinen Auswirkungen auf das deutsche Recht und mit rechtspolitischen Perspektiven, Band I Allgemeines Umweltrecht, 2. Auflage, Köln [u.a.] 2003, S. 199–238. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  399. Schröder, Meinhard, Precautionary Approach/Principle, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  400. Schulze, Sven-Hendrik, Cyber-„War“ – Testfall der Staatenverantwortlichkeit, Tübingen 2015. Schütz, Raimund, Solidarität im Wirtschaftsvölkerrecht: Eine Bestandsaufnahme zentraler entwicklungsspezifischer Solidarrechte und Solidarpflichten im Völkerrecht, Berlin 1994. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  401. Schwabach, Aaron, The Sandoz Spill: The Failure of International Law to Protect the Rhine from Pollution, Ecology Law Quarterly 16 (1989) S. 443–480. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  402. Schwartz, Priscilla, The polluter-pays principle, in: Fitzmaurice, Malgosia/Ong, David M./Merkouris, Panos (Hg.), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law, Cheltenham [u.a.] 2010, S. 243–261. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  403. Schwarzenberger, Georg, The Principles and Standards of International Economic Law, Recueil des Cours 117 (1966-I), S. 1–98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  404. Seibert-Fohr, Anja, Die völkerrechtliche Verantwortung des Staats für das Handeln von Privaten: Bedarf nach Neuorientierung?, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 73 (2013), S. 37–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  405. Shackelford, Scott J., From Nuclear War to Net War: Analogizing Cyber Attacks in International Law, Berkeley Journal of International Law 27 (2009), S. 192–251. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  406. Shackelford, Scott J./Andres, Richard B., State Responsibility for Cyber Attacks: Competing Standards for a Growing Problem, Georgetown Journal of International Law 42 (2010–2011), S. 971–1016. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  407. Shackelford, Scott J./Russell, Scott/Kuehn, Andreas, Unpacking the International Law on Cybersecurity Due Diligence: Lessons from the Public and Private Sectors, Chicago Journal of International Law 17 (2016), S. 1–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  408. Sharp, Walter Gary Sr., Cyberspace and the Use of Force, North Falls Church 1999. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  409. Simma, Bruno/Alston, Philip, The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles, Australian Yearbook of International Law 12 (1992), S. 82–108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  410. Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Influence of Teachings of Publicists on the Development of International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 66 (2017), S. 1–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  411. Sklerov, Matthew J., Solving the Dilemma of State Response to Cyberattacks: A Justification for the Use of Active Defenses Against States Who Neglect Their Duty to Prevent, Military Law Review 201 (2009), S. 1–85. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  412. Smets, Henri, The Polluter Pays Principle in the Early 1990s, in: Campiglio, Luigi/Pineschi, Laura/Siniscalco, Domenico/Treves, Tullio (Hg.), The Environment After Rio: International Law and Economics, London 1994, S. 131–144. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  413. Sohn, Louis B., The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment, Harvard International Law Journal 14 (1973), S. 423–515. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  414. Soto, Max Valverde, General Principles of International Environmental Law, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 3 (1996), S. 193–209. Spiecker genannt Döhmann, Indra, Staatliche Entscheidungen unter Unsicherheit – juristische und ökonomische Vorgaben, Bonn 2000. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  415. Springer, Allen L., Cases of Conflict: Transboundary Disputes and the Development of International Law, 2016. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  416. Staiger, Robert W./Sykes, Alan O., How Important Can the Non-Violation Clause Be for the GATT/WTO?, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 9 (2017), S. 149–187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  417. Stein, Torsten/Marauhn, Thilo, Völkerrechtliche Aspekte von Informationsoperationen, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 60 (2000), S. 1–40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  418. Stelter, Christian, Gewaltanwendung unter und neben der UN-Charta, Berlin 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  419. Stephens, Tim, International Courts and Environmental Protection, Cambridge 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  420. Stubbe, Peter, State Accountability for Space Debris: A Legal Study of Responsibility for Polluting the Space Environment and Liability for Damage Caused by Space Debris, Leiden [u.a.] 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  421. Suchartikul, Sompong, State Responsibility and International Liability under International Law, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 18 (1996), S. 821–839. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  422. Suy, Erik, La protection des diplomates, in: Tittel, Josef (Hg.), Festschrift für Wilhelm Wengler zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Band 1 Allgemeine Rechtslehre und Völkerrecht, Berlin 1973, S. 591–622. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  423. Tanzi, Attila, The UN Convention on International Watercourses as a Framework for the Avoidance and Settlement of Waterlaw Disputes, Leiden Journal of International Law 11 (1998), S. 441–472. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  424. Tanzi, Attila, Liability for Lawful Acts, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  425. Theuerkauf, Thomas, Informationsoperationen, Europäische Sicherheit 2 (2000), S. 14–18. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  426. Thiel, Markus, Die „Entgrenzung“ der Gefahrenabwehr: Grundfragen von Freiheit und Sicherheit im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Tübingen 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  427. Thies, Anne, International Trade Disputes and EU Liability, Cambridge [u.a.] 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  428. Tiirmaa-Klaar, Heli, Cyber Diplomacy: Agenda, Challenges and Mission, in: Ziolkowski, Katharina (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 509–532. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  429. Tikk, Eneken/Kadri, Kaska/Vihul, Liis, International Cyber Incidents: Legal Considerations, Tallinn 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  430. Tikk, Eneken/Kaska, Kadri/Rünnimeri, Kristel/Kert, Mari/Talihärm, Anna-Maria/Vihul, Liis, Cyber Attacks Against Georgia: Legal Lessons Identified, Tallinn 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  431. Többens, Hans W., Wirtschaftsspionage und Konkurrenzausspähung in Deutschland, Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 10 (2000), S. 505–512. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  432. Tomuschat, Christian, The International Law Commission – An Outdated Institution?, German Yearbook of International Law 49 (2006), S. 77–105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  433. Townley, Stephen, The Rise and Risk in International Law, Chicago Journal of International Law 18 (2018), S. 594–646. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  434. Tsagourias, Nicholas, Cyber-attacks, self-defence and the problem of attribution, Journal of Conflict & Security Law 17 (2012), S. 229–244. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  435. Tsolkas, Alexander/Wimmer, Friedrich, Wirtschaftsspionage und Intelligence Gathering: Neue Trends der wirtschaftlichen Vorteilsbeschaffung, Wiesbaden 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  436. Türk, Helmut, Water in the Contemporary World, in: Hestermeyer, Holger P./König, Doris/Matz-Lück, Nele/Röben, Volker/Seibert-Fohr, Anja/Stoll, Peter-Tobias/Vöneky, Silja (Hg.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Americum Rüdiger Wolfrum, Band 2, Leiden [u.a.] 2012, S. 1037–1064. Van Dyke, Jon M., Liability and Compensation for Harm Caused by Nuclear Activities, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy35 (2006), S. 13–46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  437. Ventre, Daniel, Cyberwar and Information Warfare, London 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  438. Verdross, Alfred, Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft, Wien [u.a.] 1926. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  439. Verheyen, Roda, Climate Change Damage and International Law: Prevention Duties and State Responsibility, Leiden [u.a.] 2005. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  440. Vicuña, Francisco Orrego, Responsibility and Liability for Environmental Damage under International Law: Issues and Trends, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 10 (1998), S. 279–308. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  441. Vinnem, Jan-Erik/Røed, Willy, Offshore Risk Assessment Band 1: Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies, 4. Auflage, London 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  442. Viñuales, Jorge E., The Contribution of the International Court of Justice to the Development of International Environmental Law: A Contemporary Assessment, Fordham International Law Journal 32 (2008), S. 232–258. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  443. Virally, Michel, The Sources of International Law, in: Sørensen, Max (Hg.), Manual of Public International Law, London [u.a.], 1968, S. 116–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  444. Voigt, Christina, The Role of General Principles in International Law and their Relationship to Treaty Law, Retfærd Årgang 31 (2008) Nr. 2/121, S. 3–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  445. Vöneky, Silja, Analogy in International Law, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  446. Vöneky, Silja/Addison-Agyei, Sange, Antarctica, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  447. Waibel, Michael, Corfu Channel Case, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  448. Walter, Christian, Cyber Security als Herausforderung für das Völkerrecht, Juristenzeitung 14 (2015), S. 685–693. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  449. Walter, Christian, Obligations of States Before, During, and After a Cyber Security Incident, German Yearbook of International Law 58 (2015), S. 67–86. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  450. Walton, Beatrice A., Duties Owed: Low-Intensity Cyber Attacks and Liability for Transboundary Torts in International Law, The Yale Law Journal 126 (2017), S. 1460–1519. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  451. Wehling, Philine, Wasserrechte am Nil: Der Einfluss des internationalen Wasserrechts auf die Entwicklung eines Vertragsregimes zur Nutzungsverteilung und gemeinsamen Wasserwirtschaft am Beispiel des Nils, Berlin [u.a.] 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  452. Weissbrodt, David, Cyber-Conflict, Cyber-Crime, and Cyber-Espionage, Minnesota Journal of International Law 22 (2013), S. 347–387. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  453. Weiß, Wolfgang, Allgemeine Rechtsgrundsätze des Völkerrechts, Archiv des Völkerrechts 39 (2001), S. 394–431. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  454. Wenzel, Nicola, Human Rights, Treaties, Extraterritorial Application and Effects, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  455. Whiteman, Marjorie M., Digest of international law, Band 4, Washington, D.C. 1965. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  456. Williams, Robert D., (Spy) Game Change: Cyber Networks, Intelligence Collection, and Covert Action, The George Washington Law Review 79 (2011), S. 1162–1200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  457. Wins, Elmar, Weltraumhaftung im Völkerrecht, Berlin 2000. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  458. Wolf, Joachim, Die gegenwärtige Entwicklung der Lehre über die völkerrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit der Staaten: Untersucht am Beispiel des Urteils des Internationalen Gerichtshofs in der Teheraner Geiselaffaire, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 31 (1983), S. 481–536. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  459. Wolf, Joachim, Die Haftung der Staaten für Privatpersonen nach Völkerrecht, Berlin 1997. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  460. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, The Principle of the Common Heritage of Mankind, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (43) 1983, S. 312–337. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  461. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Purposes and Principles of International Environmental Law, German Yearbook of International Law 33 (1990), S. 308–330. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  462. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Hohe See und Tiefseeboden (Gebiet), in: Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf (Hg.), Handbuch des Seerechts, München 2006, S. 287–346. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  463. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Liability for Environmental Damage in Antarctica: Supplement to the Rules on State Responsibility or a Lost Opportunity?, in: Buffard, Isabelle/Crawford, James/Pellet, Alain/Wittich, Stephan (Hg.), International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerard Hafner, Leiden 2008, S. 817–827. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  464. Wolfrum, Rüdiger, General International Law (Principles, Rules, and Standards), in: ders. (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  465. Wolfrum, Rüdiger/Langenfeld, Christine, Umweltschutz durch internationales Haftungsrecht, Heidelberg 1999. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  466. Wolfrum, Rüdiger/Möldner, Mirka, International Courts and Tribunals, Evidence, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  467. Woltag, Johann-Christoph, Computer Network Operations Below the Level of Armed Force, ESIL Conference Paper Series 1 (2011), S. 1–18. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  468. Woltag, Johann-Christoph, Cyber Warfare: Military Cross-Border Computer Network Operations under International Law, Cambridge [u.a.] 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  469. Wood, Michael, Teachings of the Most Highly Qualified Publicists (Art. 38 (1) ICJ Statute), in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  470. Wussow, Philipp von, „Cyberkrieg“: Geschichte und Gegenwart eines umkämpften Begriffs, Konfliktzone Cyberspace: Perspektiven für Sicherheit und Frieden, Ethik und Militär – Kontroversen in Militärethik & Sicherheitspolitik 1 (2019), abrufbar unter: http://www.ethikundmilitaer.de/fileadmin/ethik_und_militaer/Ethik-und-Militaer-2019-1.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020), S. 11–17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  471. Yasuhiro, Shigeta, Some Reflections on the Relationship between the Principle of Equitable Utilization of International Watercourses and the Obligation not to Cause Transfrontier Pollution Harm, Asian Yearbook of International Law 9 (2000), S. 147–189. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  472. Zemanek, Karl, State Responsibility and Liability, in: Lang, Winfried/Neuhold, Hanspeter/ders. (Hg.), Environmental Protection and International Law, London [u.a.] 1991, S. 187–201. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  473. Zemanek, Karl, Armed Attack, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  474. Ziegler, Katja S., Domaine Réservé, in: Wolfrum, Rüdiger (Hg.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Online Edition www.mpepil.com, Stand: 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  475. Ziolkowski, Katharina, Confidence Building Measures for Cyberspace, in: dies. (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 553–564. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  476. Ziolkowski, Katharina, General Principles of International Law as Applicable in Cyberspace, in: dies. (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace: International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 135–188. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  477. Ziolkowski, Katharina, Peacetime Cyber Espionage – New Tendencies in Public International Law, in: dies. (Hg.), Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace, International Law, International Relations and Diplomacy, Tallinn 2013, S. 425–464. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  478. Zumbansen, Peer, The Conundrum of Corporate Social Responsibility: Reflections on the Changing Nature of Firms and State, in: Bratspies, Rebecca M./Miller, Russell A. (Hg.), Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration, Cambridge [u.a.] 2006, S. 240–253. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  479. Aaltola, Mika/Sipilä, Joonas/Vuorisalo, Valtteri, Securing Global Commons: A Small State Perspective, The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Working Paper 71, June 2011, abrufbar unter: https://www.fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/wp71.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  480. Albright, David/Brannan, Paul/Walrond, Christina, Stuxnet Malware and Natanz: Update of ISIS December 22, 2010 Report, Institute for Science and International Security Report, 15 February 2011, abrufbar unter: http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/stuxnet_update_15Feb2011.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  481. Anderson, Nate, Massive DDOS attacks target Estonia; Russia accused, ars Technica, 14 May 2007, abrufbar unter: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2007/05/massive-ddos-attacks-target-estonia-russia-accused/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  482. Arimatsu, Louise, International Law Applicable to Naval Mines, Chatham House, International Security Department, Workshop Summary, October 2014, abrufbar unter: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/20140226NavalMines.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  483. Aust, Helmut Philipp, Stellungnahme zur Sachverständigenanhörung am 5. Juni 2014 im 1. Untersuchungsausschuss der 18. Wahlperiode des Deutschen Bundestages, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 27. Mai 2014, abrufbar unter: https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/282870/fc52462f2ffd254849bce19d25f72fa2/mat_a_sv-4-1_aust-pdf-data.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  484. Barboza, Julio (Special Rapporteur), Preliminary report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1985-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/394. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  485. Barboza, Julio (Special Rapporteur), Third report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1987-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/405. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  486. Barboza, Julio (Special Rapporteur), Fourth report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1988-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/413. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  487. Barboza, Julio (Special Rapporteur), Sixth report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1990-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/428 and Add.l. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  488. Barboza, Julio (Special Rapporteur), Eighth report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1992-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/443. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  489. Barboza, Julio (Special Rapporteur), Tenth report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, YBILC 1994-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/459. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  490. Barlow, John Perry, A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 8 February 1996, abrufbar unter: https://www.eff.org/de/cyberspace-independence (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  491. Bendiek, Annegret, Kritische Infrastrukturen, Cybersicherheit, Datenschutz: Die EU schlägt Pflöcke für digitale Standortpolitik ein, SWP-Aktuell 35/2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  492. Bendiek, Annegret, Umstrittene Partnerschaft: Cybersicherheit, Internet Governance und Datenschutz in der transatlantischen Zusammenarbeit, SWP-Studie 26/2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  493. Berkes, Antal, A New Extraterritorial Jurisdictional Link Recognised by the IACtHR, EJIL: Talk!, 28 March 2018, abrufbar unter: https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-new-extraterritorial-jurisdictional-link-recognised-by-the-iacthr/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Bio Intelligence Service/Stevens & Bolton LLP and Cardiff University/Naider/TME, Study to explore the feasibility of creating a fund to cover environmental liability and losses occurring from industrial accidents, Final Report prepared for European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment, 17 April 2013, abrufbar unter: ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/liability/eld/eldfund/pdf/Final%20report%20ELD%20Fund%20BIO%20for%20web2.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  494. Bothe, Michael/Gündling, Lothar/Hofmann, Rainer/Rumpf, Christian, Neuere Tendenzen des Umweltrechts im internationalen Vergleich, in: Umweltbundesamt (Hg.), Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministers für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit: Umweltplanung, Ökologie, Berichte des Umweltbundesamtes, Band 2/90, Berlin 1990, S. 1–310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  495. Bradner, Eric, Obama: North Korea’s Hack not war, but ‘cybervandalism’, CNN, 24 December 2014, abrufbar unter: http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/21/politics/obama-north-koreas-hack-not-war-but-cyber-vandalism (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  496. Brinded, Lianna, The Interview tipped to cost Sony Pictures $200m following hack and cancellation, International Business Times, 18 December 2014, abrufbar unter: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/interview-tipped-cost-sony-pictures-200m-total-followinghack-cancellation-1480157 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  497. Brunnée, Jutta, Procedure and Substance in International Environmental Law: Confused at a Higher Level?, ESIL Reflections 5 (2016), abrufbar unter: https://esil-sedi.eu/post_name-123/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Bundesministerium des Innern (Hg.), Cyber-Sicherheitsstrategie für Deutschland, Berlin 2016, abrufbar unter: https://www.bmi.bund.de/DE/themen/it-und-digitalpolitik/it-und-cybersicherheit/cyber-sicherheitsstrategie/cyber-sicherheitsstrategie-node.html (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  498. Christiansen, Sabine/Jaeckel, Aline/Houghton, Katherine, Ecological safeguards for deep seabed mining, German Environment Agency, Final Report 113 (2019), abrufbar unter: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/2019–07–11_texte_113–2019_deep-seabed-mining.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Council of Europe, Ad-hoc Advisory Group on Cross-border Internet, Interim Report to the Steering Committee on the Media and New Communication Services incorporating Analysis of Proposals for International and Multi-stakeholder Cooperation on Cross-border Internet, H/Inf(2010)10, abrufbar unter: http://humanrightseurope.blogspot.com/2011/01/proposals-for-international-cooperation.html (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  499. Crawford, James (Special Rapporteur), Second report on State responsibility, YBILC 1999-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/498 and Add.1 – 4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  500. Crawford, James (Special Rapporteur), Fourth report on State Responsibility, YBILC 2001-II/1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/517 and Add. 1. European Commission, Green paper on remedying environmental damage, Document COM (93) 47 final, Brussels, 14 May 1993, abrufbar unter: http://aei.pitt.edu/950/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). European Commission, Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: An Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace, 7 February 2013, abrufbar unter: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/policies/eu-cyber-security/cybsec_comm_en.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Experts Group on Environmental Law of the World Commission on Environment and Development, R. D. Munro (Chairman)/J. G. Lammers (Rapporteur), Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development: Legal Principles and Recommendations, London [u.a.] 1987. Five Country Ministerial and Quintet Meeting of Attorneys General, Statement of Principles on Access to Evidence and Encryption, Australia 2018, abrufbar unter: https://www.ag.gov.au/About/CommitteesandCouncils/Documents/joint-statement-principles-access-evidence.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  501. Flook, Kara, Russia and the Cyber Threat, Critical Threats, 13 May 2009, abrufbar unter: http://www.criticalthreats.org/russia/russia-and-cyber-threat (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  502. Garrie, Daniel/Reeves, Shane R., So You’re Telling Me There’s A Chance: How the Articles on State Responsibility Could Empower Corporate Responses to State-Sponsored Cyber Attacks, Harvard National Security Journal Online Features, 17 December 2015, abrufbar unter: https://harvardnsj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2016/01/Garrie-and-Reeves-Non-State-Actor-and-Self-Defense.pdf, (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  503. Gaßner, Hartmut/Buchholz, Georg, Atomhaftung in Europa und Deutschland – Defizite und Empfehlungen zur Fortentwicklung, Gutachten im Auftrag der Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, 14. März 2013, abrufbar unter: https://www.zeit-lupe.com/mediapool/132/1322391/data/Gutachten_Atomhaftung_B90_Gruene_Maerz_2013_.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  504. Goldsmith, Jack, Cybersecurity Treaties: A Skeptical View, Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law, Future Challenges Essay, 9 March 2011, abrufbar unter: http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/FutureChallenges_Goldsmith.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  505. Goldsmith, Jack, The Sony Hack: Attribution Problems, and the Connection to Domestic Surveillance, LAWFARE, 19 December 2014, abrufbar unter: https://www.lawfareblog.com/sony-hack-attribution-problems-and-connection-domestic-surveillance (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  506. Goldsmith, Jack, Yet More Thoughts on the DNC Hack: Attribution and Precedent, LAWFARE, 27 July 2016, abrufbar unter: https://www.lawfareblog.com/yet-more-thoughts-dnc-hack-attribution-and-precedent (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  507. Gostev, Alexander, Cyber weapons, Kaspersky Security Bulletin 2012, abrufbar unter: https://securelist.com/kaspersky-security-bulletin-2012-cyber-weapons/36762/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Hamburger, Tom/Tumulty, Karen, WikiLeaks releases thousands of documents about Clinton and internal deliberations, The Washington Post, 22 July 2016, abrufbar unter: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/22/on-eve-of-democratic-convention-wikileaks-releases-thousands-of-documents-about-clinton-the-campaign-and-internal-deliberations/ (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  508. Hauck, Mirjam/Kuhn, Johannes, Computervirus Duqu entdeckt: Wie gefährlich ist der Stuxnet-Bruder?, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 19. Oktober 2011, abrufbar unter: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/computervirus-duqu-entdeckt-wie-gefaehrlich-ist-der-stuxnet-bruder-1.1168324 (geprüft am 15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286
  509. Hollis, David, Cyberwar Case Study: Georgia 2008, Small Wars Journal, 6 January 2011, abrufbar unter: https://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/journal/docs-temp/639-hollis.pdf (geprüft am 15.05.2020), S. 1–9. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748912286

Similar publications

from the series "Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht"
Cover of book: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Edited Book Full access
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover of book: Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights
Book Titles No access
Augusto Wiegand Cruz
Human Dignity in the General Theory of Fundamental Rights
Cover of book: The Animal in Public International Law
Book Titles No access
Joseph Reeves
The Animal in Public International Law
Cover of book: Legislative Remedies before Human Rights Courts
Book Titles Full access
Lucas Sánchez de Miquel
Legislative Remedies before Human Rights Courts
Cover of book: Die Ausbürgerung von Terroristen
Book Titles Full access
Samuel Hartwig
Die Ausbürgerung von Terroristen

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex