Cover of book: Bioethics and the Patent Eligibility of Human Embryonic Stem Cells-Related Inventions in Europe
Monograph Open Access Full access

Bioethics and the Patent Eligibility of Human Embryonic Stem Cells-Related Inventions in Europe

Authors:
Publisher:
 2014

Summary

Neu entstehende Technologien wie die Biotechnologie stellen eine Kontroverse und Herausforderung für das Patentrecht dar. Das Werk analysiert die neuesten Entwicklungen in der Rechtsprechung zur Zulässigkeit von Patenten im Rahmen der Stammzellen-Forschung in Europa.

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2014
Copyright Year
2014
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1471-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5514-9
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies
Volume
22
Language
English
Pages
86
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 10 Download chapter (PDF)
  2. Introduction 11 - 12 Download chapter (PDF)
  3. Background to the Science 13 - 16 Download chapter (PDF)
  4. Legal Provisions Applicable to the Patent Eligibility of hESC‑Related Inventions 17 - 20 Download chapter (PDF)
  5. Ethics and Stem Cell Related Patents 21 - 34 Download chapter (PDF)
  6. The Panorama in Europe 35 - 46 Download chapter (PDF)
  7. EPO’s Web of Precedents 47 - 54 Download chapter (PDF)
  8. CJEU’s Brüstle Judgment 55 - 71 Download chapter (PDF)
  9. Conclusion 72 - 74 Download chapter (PDF)
  10. Annex 75 - 80 Download chapter (PDF)
  11. List of Works Cited 81 - 86 Download chapter (PDF)

Bibliography (97)

  1. Bundesgerichtshof [BGH] [Federal Court of Justice] Dec. 17, 2009, Case No: Xa ZR 58/07, (Christopher Heath (trans.), 7 IIC at 853 (2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  2. Reports, Opinions and Discussion Papers Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  3. T 1374/04, Stem cells/ WARF, Apr. 07, 2006, EPO OJ 5/2007G 2/06, Use of embryos/WARF, Nov. 25, 2008, EPO OJ 5/2009 (Technical Board of Appeal of EPO) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  4. T 0356/93, Plant Cells / PLANT GENETIC SYSTEMS, EPO O.J.1995, 511 (Technical Board of Appeal of EPO) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  5. T 19/90, Onco-mouse/HARVARD, O.J EPO 12/1990 (Technical Board of Appeal of EPO) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  6. Onco-mouse/HARVARD,Decision of the Opposition Division, Nov. 07, 2001, O.J EPO, 10/2003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  7. International Stem Cell Corporation v. Comptroller General of Patents [2013] EWCH 807 (Ch). available at http://bailii.org Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  8. Greenpeace UK v. Plant Genetic Systems N.V.,Opposition Division Decision EPO, (1992) 24 IIC, 618 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  9. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303, 317 (1980) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  10. C-34/10, Oliver Brüstle v. Greenpeace e.V., Court of Justice of the European Union, [CJEU], 2011 CURIA (Oct. 18, 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  11. C-456/03, Commission v. Italy, 2005 ECJ CURIA, ¶78 (June 16, 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  12. C-377/98, Netherlands v. Parliament and Council 2001 ECJ CURIA, ¶38 (Oct. 10, 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  13. Bundesgerichtshof [BGH] [Federal Court of Justice] Nov. 27, 2012, Case No: X ZR 58/07, available at http://juris.bundesgerichtshof.de (last visited Nov.11, 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  14. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council, Human Embryo, – A Biological Definition (Discussion Paper) available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/research/embryos/reports/humanembryo.pdf (last visited 8.8.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  15. Bundespatentgericht [BPatG] [Federal Court for Patent Matters], Dec.5, 2006, 3 Ni 42/04 Entscheidungen des Bundespatentgerichts (F.R.G) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  16. Cases Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  17. European Parliament Resolution on Patents for Biotechnological Inventions, P6_TA(2005)0407, ¶I, Oct. 26, 2005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  18. Council Directive 98/44 Directive, recital 1, 1998 O.J. (L 213) (EC) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  19. European Union Legislative Sources Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  20. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  21. European Convention of Human Rights [ECHR], Sep 3, 1953 (Council of Europe) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  22. EPO Notice Concerning the Amendment of the Implementing Regulations to the European Patent Convention, 8-9/1999 O.J EPO, ¶1, at 573 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  23. Convention on the Grant of European Patents ratified, Oct. 5, 1973, revised Dec.13, 2007 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  24. Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property, Apr. 15, 1994 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  25. International Treaties Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  26. Reproductive Genetics Institute website available at http://reproductivegenetics.com/frozen_embryo.html (last visited 23.7.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  27. Prof. Margo Bagley, Biotechnology and IP course slides at Munich Intellectual Property Law Center on June 22, 2012 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  28. Prof. Joseph Straus, Protection of Biotechnological Inventions (June 5-6, 2012), (unpusblished slides used in summer term class of the Munich Intellectual Property Law Center) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  29. MIPLC Class Materials Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  30. The Oxford English Dictionary 421 (2nd ed. 1989) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  31. Dictionaries Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  32. Dismay, Confusion Greet Human Stem Cell Patent Ban, 334 SCIENCE (2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  33. Renewed Vigour, 486 NATURE 293 (2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  34. Stem Cell Treatment Helps Heal Stroke Victims, THE TELEGRAPH, June 15, 2012 available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/archive/2012-6-15.html (last visited Sep 2, 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  35. BBC News Health, available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-15181015 (last visited Aug. 28, 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  36. News Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  37. The Nat’l. Inst. of Health, Stem Cells Basics, Resource for stem cell research, www.stemcells.nih.gov (last visited Aug. 11, 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  38. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development-The Information and Communication Services Division, Resource Book on TRIPS and Development 376 (Cambridge University Press 2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  39. Modern Biotechnology and the OECD, OECD Policy Brief at 1 (1999) available at http://www.oecd.org/science/biotech/1890904.pdf (last visited Nov. 08, 2013) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  40. Euro Stem Cell, FAQ about Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, available at http://www.eurostemcell.org/stem-cell-faq/introduction-stem-cells#t14n43 (last visited Aug 11, 2012 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  41. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cell Definitions, http://www.cirm.ca.gov/StemCellBasics_Definitions#2 (last visited Aug. 11, 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  42. Fact Sheets Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  43. UK IPO, Practive Notice, Inventions Involving Human Embryonic Stem Cells, May 17 2012, http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-patent/p-law/p-pn/p-pn-stemcells-20120517.htm (last visited 10.8.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  44. UK IPO, Practice Notice, Inventions Involving Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Feb. 3, 2009, http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-patent/p-law/p-pn/p-pn-stemcells-20090203.htm Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  45. Member of European Parliament (Rothley), Report on the Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions, COM/95/0661, June 25,1997 available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  46. Report on the Protection of the Human Embryo in vitro, Steering Committee on Bioethics, CDBI-CO-GT3 (Council of Europe, June 19, 2003) at 37 available at http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/texts_and_documents/CDBI-CO-GT3(2003)13E.pdf (last visited 2.8.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  47. Opion of Advocate General Bot, Case 34/10 Oliver Brüstle v. Greenpeace eV. CJEU Mar. 10, 2011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  48. Opinion of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission 16, Ethical Aspects of Patenting Inventions Involving Human Stem Cells, § 2.3, May 7, 2002 available at http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/european-group-ethics/docs/avis16_complet_en.pdf (last visited Aug. 05, 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  49. A.Plomer et al., Stem Cell Patents: European Patent Law and Ethics Report 78 (European Commission, 2006), 78. available at http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~llzwww/StemCellProject/project.report.pdf (last visited 1.8.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  50. Grund, Martin & Farmer, Stacey J., Brüstle v. Greenpeacce: The End of Road for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Patents, 12 BIO-SCIENCE L. REV. 44, (2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  51. Porter, Gerard, The Drafting History of The European Biotechnology Directive, in EMBRYONIC STEM CELL PATENTS 10 (Aurora Plomer&Paul Torremans, eds., Oxford University Press, 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  52. Plomer&Torremans, Towards Systemic Legal Conflict: Article 6(2)(c) of the EU Directive on Biotechnological Inventions, in EMBRYONIC STEM CELL PATENTS (Aurora Plomer&Paul Torremans, eds., Oxford University Press, 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  53. Plomer, Aurora, After Brüstle: EU Accession to the ECHR and the Future of European Patent Law, 2 QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 110, 125 (2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  54. Oduncu, Fuat S., Stem Cell Research in Germany: Ethics of Healing vs. Human Dignity, MED., HEALTH CARE AND PHIL. 5, 12 (2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  55. Nielsen, T.Hviid, What Happened to the Stem Cells?, 34 J. MED. ETHICS 852, 853 (2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  56. Moufang, Rainer, Patenting of Human Genes, Cells and Parts of the Body? – The Ethical Dimensions of Patent Law, 4 IIC 487 at 503, (1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  57. Manninen, Bertha Alvarez, Are Human Embryos Kantian Persons?: Kantian Considerations in favor of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 3 PHIL, ETHICS and HUMAN in MED 4 (BioMed Central, 2008), available at http://www.peh-med.com/content/3/1/4 (last visited 18.7.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  58. Machlup, Fritz, An Economic Review of the Patent System, 15 Study of the Subcomittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate 23 (1958) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  59. Liddell, Kathleen, Immmorality and Patents: The Exclusion of Inventions Contrary to Ordre Public and Morality in NEW FRONTIERS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 140, 168 (Annabelle Lever, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  60. Karet, Bryan, Moral Dilemmas in the History of Patent Legislation, in EPOSIUM 1992 GENETIC ENGINEERING -THE NEW CHALLENGE (Cookson et al.eds., European Patent Office, 1993) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  61. Isasi, Rosario M.& Knoppers, Bartha M., Towards Commonality? Policy Approaches to Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Europe, in EMBRYONIC STEM CELL PATENTS (Aurora Plomer&Paul Torremans, eds., Oxford University Press, 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  62. Porter, Gerard, Human Embryos, Patents, And Global Trade: Assessing the Scope and Contents of the TRIPS Morality Exception, EMBRYONIC STEM CELL PATENTS (Aurora Plomer&Paul Torremans, eds., Oxford University Press, 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  63. Goldman, Steve, Stem and Progenitor Cell-Based Therapy of the Human Central Nervous System, 23 NATURE BIOTECH. 862, 867 (2005) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  64. Gambari, Roberto & Finotti, Alessia, Bioethics and Freedom of Scientific Research in Gene Therapy and Stem Cell Biology, in BIOTECH INNOVATION and FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 120 (Bin et al. eds, Springer 2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  65. Elstner, A. et al., The Changing Landscape of European and International Regulation on Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 2 STEM CELL RESEARCH 101,104-105 (2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  66. Egerer, Peter Who in Our Society Should Take on the Responsibility of Deciding What Is Ethically or Morally Just, and What Are the Criteria Upon Which Decisions Should Be Based, in EPOSIUM 1992 GENETIC ENGINEERING -THE NEW CHALLENGE 332(Cookson et al.eds., European Patent Office, 1993) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  67. Ding, Sheng & Schultz, Peter G., A Role for Chemistry in Stem Cell Biology, 22 NATURE BIOTECH. 833,839 (2004) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  68. Byrne, J.A et al. Producing Primate Embryonic Stem Cells by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, 450 NATURE, 497, 497 (2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  69. Burley, Justine, An Abstract Approach to the Regulation of Human Genetics: Law, morality and Social Policy in THE REGULATORY CHALLENGE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY REGULATION SERIES 86 (Han Somsen ed., Edward Elgar Publishing 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  70. Bonadio, Enrico, Biotech Patents Morality After Brüstle, 7 EUROPEAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REVIEW [E.I.P.R] 441 (2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  71. Bassil, Nick, Developments in the Patentability of Inventions Relating to Human Embryonic Stem Cells, 12 BIO-SCIENCE L. REV., 6 (2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  72. Bagley, Margo, Patent First, Ask Questions Later: Morality and Biotechnology in Patent Law, 45 WM. & MARY.L. REV. 469, 534 (2003) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  73. Annas, George J., A French Homunculus in a Tennessee Court, 19 The HASTINGS CENTER REP. 20, 22 (1989) available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3561982 (last visited 11.8.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  74. Torremans, Paul, The Construction of The Directive’s Moral Exclusions under the EPC, EMBRYONIC STEM CELL PATENTS (Aurora Plomer&Paul Torremans, eds., Oxford University Press, 2009) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  75. Singer, Margarate & Stauder, Dieter, European Patent Convention- A Commentary (3rd edition, Carl Heymanns 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  76. Pires de Carvalho, Nuno, The Trips Regime of Patent Rights, 298 (Kluwer Law International, 2010) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  77. Cornish, W.et al., Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights ¶21-24 at 946 (Sweet&Maxvell,7.ed, 2010) (1981) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  78. Budinger, Thomas F. & Budinger, Miriam D., Ethics of Emerging Technologies, 342 (John Wiley&Sons, 2006) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  79. Monographies Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  80. Zimmerli, Walther Christoph, Discussion Session Comment in PATENTING OF HUMAN GENES AND LIVING ORGANISMS 148, 148(F. Vogel & R.Grunwald, eds. Springer 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  81. Yamanaka, Shinya, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Past, Present, and Future, 10 CELL STEM CELL 678, 678 (2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  82. Warren-Jones, Amanda, Vital Parameters for Patent Morality- A Question of Form, 2 J. INTELL. PROP. L& PRAC. 832, 835 (Oxford University Press, 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  83. Warren-Jones, Amanda, Finding a “Common Morality Codex” for Biotech – A Question of Substance, 6 INTERNATIONAL REVIEW of INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and COMPETITION LAW [IIC] 644 (2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  84. Vrtovec, Katja Triller & Scott Christopher Thomas, The European Court of Justice Ruling in Brüstle v. Greenpeace: The Impacts on Patenting of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Europe, 9 CELL STEM CELL 502, 503 (2011). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  85. Treichel, Pierre, G 2/06 and the Verdict of Immorality, 4 IIC 450, 459 (2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  86. Articles Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  87. Torremans, Paul, Legal Problems Raised by Patents on Human Stem Cell-Based Inventions, in TRANSLATIONAL STEM CELL RESEARCH, STEM CELL BIOLOGY AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE 287, 305 (K.Hug&G. Hermerén, eds.,Humana Press, 2011) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  88. Straus, Joseph, Implications of the TRIPs Agreement in the Field of Patent Law, in FROM GATT TO TRIPS THE AGREEMENT ON TRADE RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 160, 180 (Friedrich-Karl Beier&Gerhard Scricker eds., VCH, 1996) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  89. Straus, Joseph Intellectual Property Rights: Ethical Aspects, 11 INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE SOCIAL&BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 7621 (Neil J.Smelser&Paul B.Baltes eds, Elsevier, 2001) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  90. Straus, Joseph, Biotechnology and Patents, 54 CHIMIA 294 (2000) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  91. Straus, Joseph, Patenting Human Genes and Living Organisms – The Legal Situation in Europe, in PATENTING of HUMAN GENES and LIVING ORGANISMS (F. Vogel & R.Grunwald, eds. Springer 1994) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  92. Steinbock, Bonnie, Moral Status, Moral Value, and Human Embryos: Implications for Stem Cell Research in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF BIOETHICS 416,421 (Bonnie Steinbock ed., Oxford University Press 2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  93. Sterckx, Sigrid & Cockbain, Julian, Assessing the Morality of the Commercial Exploitation of Inventions Concerning Uses of Human Embryos and The Relevance of Moral Complicity: Comments on the EPO’s WARF Decision, 7 SCRIPTed 83, 94 (2010) available at http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol7-1/sterckx.pdf (last visited 9.8.2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  94. Solanki, Gurpreet, Preliminary Ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Oliver Brüstle v. Greenpeace e.V: Impacts on Patenting of Human Embryonic Stem Cells in Europe, 2 BIOTECH. L. REP. 135, (2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  95. Shevde, Nirupama, Flexible Friends, 483 NATURE, S23 (2012) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  96. Shell, Susan M., Kant’s Concept of Human Dignity as a Resource for Bioethics, in HUMAN DIGNITY and BIOETHICS: ESSAYS COMMISSIONED by the PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL on BIOETHICS,334 (The President’s Council on Bioethics, 2008) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149
  97. Resnik, David, Embryonic Stem Cell Patents and Human Dignity, 15(3) HEALTH CARE ANAL, 211, 215 (2007) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255149

Similar publications

from the series "Munich Intellectual Property Law Center - MIPLC Studies"
Cover of book: The Relationship between Law and Biomedical Sciences in the Context of Article 53(a) of the European Patent Convention
Monograph Full access
Jurgita Randakevičiūtė-Alpman
The Relationship between Law and Biomedical Sciences in the Context of Article 53(a) of the European Patent Convention
Cover of book: Personality Merchandising and the GDPR: An Insoluble Conflict?
Monograph Full access
Jingzhou Sun
Personality Merchandising and the GDPR: An Insoluble Conflict?
Cover of book: Merger Regulation in Eastern and Southern Africa
Monograph Full access
Vincent Angwenyi
Merger Regulation in Eastern and Southern Africa
Cover of book: The Notion of Secrecy
Monograph Full access
Teresa Trallero Ocaña
The Notion of Secrecy
Cover of book: Unlocking the Right to Data Portability
Monograph Full access
Stephanie Elfering
Unlocking the Right to Data Portability

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex