, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Sammelband Kein Zugriff

The main lines of the jurisprudence of the Hungarian Constitutional Court

30 case studies from the 30 years of the Constitutional Court (1990 to 2020)
Herausgeber:innen:
Verlag:
 2022

Zusammenfassung

Die verfassungsrechtlichen Umbrüche Ungarns waren in den letzten Jahrzehnten enorm. Der Band untersucht die Rechtsprechung des ungarischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs und bietet damit die Möglichkeit eines tiefen Verständnisses des demokratischen Systems.

Schlagworte


Publikation durchsuchen


Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8561-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2982-6
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
548
Produkttyp
Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 16
  2. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. The constitutional regulation of the HCC in the Constitution and the Fundamental Law Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. 3. Organisation of the HCC Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. Autor:innen:
        1. 4.1.1. Preliminary and posterior norm control Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        2. 4.1.2. The judicial initiative and the constitutional complaint Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        3. 4.1.3. Interpretation of the FL and other competences Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Legal consequences Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Epilogue Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  3. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. In Hungary, every human being, regardless of their citizenship, has the inherent, inviolable and inalienable fundamental right to life and human dignity. Since the essential content of fundamenta... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. Human life and human dignity are values preceding the law that can only be construed in unity: one is a condition for the other. The protection of these values, which are untouchable for the law,... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Clash of the deontologist and utilitarian concepts of the unconstitutionality of the death penalty in the concurring opinions Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The role of the right to dignity—the joint conception of the life and dignity Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  4. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The interrelation of the right to life and the right to dignity (self-determination) with abortion requires that abortion be provided for by law. On the one hand, the exclusion of abortion direct... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The legal status of the human being includes two fundamental rights of substance which fill the formal category of legal capacity and express the human quality of the person: the right to life an... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. The protection of the life of the foetus is the state’s duty from the moment of conception. It follows from the state’s objective, institutional duty to protect life that the State cannot constit... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The right of freedom of conscience in the context of abortion means that the State may not force anyone into a situation which is incompatible with an essential conviction which defines his or he... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Formal unconstitutionality with substantive findings: right of self-determination versus the objective, institutional duty of the state to protect Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The preliminary question of the legal status of the foetus Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Additional substantive findings Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. The relationship between freedom of conscience and abortion Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. Autor:innen:
      1. 5.1. Decision 48/1998. (XI. 23.) AB – Abortion II. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 5.2. Protection of the foetus in the FL Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  5. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The rule of law cannot be established against the rule of law (and in particular against legal certainty). It is also part of the constitutional principle of the rule of law that the limits and c... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The re-criminalisation of offences for which the statute of limitations has already expired, the extension of the statutory limitation period for offences not yet statute-barred, the interruption... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. From the point of view of the limitation period, no constitutional distinction can be drawn between political and other reasons why the State has not asserted its criminal claim. Because of its i... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. Excluding the possibility of a full pardon (and limiting it to mitigation of the punishment) is unconstitutional [Article 30/A (1) (k) of the Constitution]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Objective-teleological reasoning vs. natural law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The self-regulatory nature of the legal system Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Conflict between legal certainty and justice in the specific historical context of the transition to the rule of law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. Doctrinal maximalism Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  6. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. Domestic legal background Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. International legal background Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 3. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Generally recognised norms of international law become parts of Hungarian law by means of general transformation, international treaties do so by means of a specific transformation, through promu... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The constitutionality of a rule connected to international law must be scrutinized from additional perspectives compared to a rule related exclusively to Hungarian law [Article 7 (1) of the Const... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Exclusion of statutory limitations may happen either according to Hungarian law, or by international law if there is an international legal obligation binding for Hungary [Article 7 (1) of the Co... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. The rules on the punishment of war crimes and crimes against humanity, as they fundamentally endanger humanity and international coexistence, are peremptory rules of international law [Article 7 ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 5.1. The relation between international law and domestic law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 5.2. Constitutional review of norms deriving from international law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 5.3. The assessment of the findings on statute of limitations Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 5.4. Classification of international crimes Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 6. Aftermaths of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  7. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. Information on persons exercising public authority or participating in political life, related to the fact that they were previously engaged in activities, or were members of an organization enga... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. Maintaining the confidentiality of political police records generated under a non-rule-of-law regime shall not restrict the right to informational self-determination of data subjects and other ri... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Data protection and data of public interest Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Informational self-determination: rights of persons under surveillance Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  8. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The decision of a terminally ill patient not to live until the natural end of his/her life when it is filled with suffering is part of the patient’s right to self-determination. This right can be... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The desire of a terminally ill patient to end their life with the active help of a physician cannot be regarded as such part of their right to self-determination that cannot be withdrawn, even in... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The doctrine of indivisibility and the doctrine of ‘living law’ Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Active euthanasia: an eternal dream? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  9. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. Registered Partnerships Act I Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. The notion of marriage in the Hungarian legal order and according to the interpretation of the HCC Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. Marriage is protected as an institution by the state and this protection is to be maintained in the future (Article 15 of Constitution). Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The formation of a cohabitation is related to the right to self-autonomy [Article 54 (1) of the Constitution]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. As same-sex persons cannot marry, their registered partnership does not hurt and endanger the protected heterosexual marriage (Article 15 of the Constitution). Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The registered partnership for heterosexual partners has factually the same legal consequences as marriage and this is contrary to Article 15 of the Constitution and it may empty the constitution... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The priority of the protection of marriage Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The merging of the definition of cohabitation and registered partnership into each other and the protection of cohabitation Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The registered partnership as an independent legal institution Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. The registered partnership for different-sex partners Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. Autor:innen:
      1. 5.1. Registered partnerships Act II Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 5.2. Decision 32/2010. (III. 25.) AB – Registered Partnership II. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 5.3. The registered partnership and the Act on the protection of the family in the decisions of the HCC Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 5.4. Decision 3003/2021. (I. 14.) AB on the close relative status of registered partners Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  10. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. Decision 184/2010. (X. 28.) AB – Special Tax I. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. New constitutional framework and new special tax rules Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. According to the Constitutional Court’s established case law, the tax’s primary function is to make natural and legal persons contribute to public burdens. Secondarily, it is also the means of st... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The retroactive taxation that applies to incomes given by law and earned without abuse in a tax year closed by a tax return violates the right to human dignity [Articles 54 (1) and 70/I (2) of th... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Limits of tax as a regulatory instrument Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Limits of retroactive taxation Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  11. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. 3. Decision and its reasoning Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. 4. Doctrinal analysis Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  12. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. If there is only a formal legal remedy against a provision of a statute, then this statute is a directly effective statute for the purposes of Article 26 (2) of the HCC Act, and there is a right ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The reference to the historical constitution in Article R (3) of the FL means that the historical background of each institution must be taken into account in its interpretation. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. Article R (3) of the FL also implies that when interpreting constitutional provisions, not only the individual provisions must be examined, but also their context, so that the FL remains a unifie... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The retirement age for judges cannot be deduced from Article 26 (1) of the FL (judicial independence and immovability). This is a matter for the legislature to decide, and there is no obstacle to... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The issues of admissibility Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The achievements of the historical constitution as a mean of interpretation Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The content and scope of the principle of judicial independence Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. The integrity of the FL—managing the tension between constitutional provisions Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. Autor:innen:
      1. 5.1. Influence on legislation Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 5.2. Influence on the judges effected Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 5.3. Influence on the jurisprudence of the HCC Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  13. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The declaration of a regulatory offence must also comply with the requirements of the rule of law in connection with the declaration of a criminal offence, the criminal law intervention and the c... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. By declaring the use of public areas for permanent living to be a regulatory offence, without a legitimate aim, the legislator criminalized a forced life situation threatening a serious crisis, e... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. Regulatory Offences Act does not meet the requirement of the ‘clarity of norms’ as an increased requirement against the norms establishing the punishment, if the act creates, in essence, practica... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The authorization given to the local authority to create sanctions (fines) meets the requirement of the rule of law only with the substantive legal guarantees and clear framework prescribed by la... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Rule of law requirements for constitutional law of regulatory offences Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Fundamental issues of sanctioning the use of public areas for long-term living Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The principle of the ‘clarity of norms’ and the question of strict liability Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. The basic conditions of the rule of law in the creation of local authority sanctions Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  14. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. The previous practice of the HCC Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. Legal background Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The TP cannot be classified as any source of law in the Hungarian legal system. The TP act as a ‘slide’ capable of continuously depriving the HCC of its review powers [Articles R (1) and T) of th... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. Transitory provisions cannot be regarded as amendments to the FL [Articles B) (1) and S) of the FL]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. It is a requirement stemming from the rule of law that the scope and content of the FL in force can be clearly found at any time. The amendments must be incorporated into the constitutional text ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The legislature included non-transitory rules in the Transitory Provisions, thus exceeding the scope of the authorization granted by the FL [Articles B (1) and S) of the FL]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The TP to the FL cannot be regarded as part of the FL Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Transitional Provisions cannot be considered as amendments to the FL Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The ‘coherency of substance and structure’ of the FL is a requirement of the rule of law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. The rules of the TP exceeding the authorization are invalid under public law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  15. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. Registration as a general mandatory requirement of the exercise of the right to vote is an unnecessary and disproportionate restriction on the right to vote; however, such a measure may be consti... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The ban on publishing political advertisements during electoral campaign periods in certain branches of the media as well as the ban on publishing the results of political surveys during the last... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Whether the justification of registration is convincing and whether the new constitutional context of fundamental rights is taken into account Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Whether advance electoral registration and the campaign-related restrictions amount to a limitation on exercising certain fundamental rights Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  16. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. Legal background and the former praxis of the HCC Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. International outlook Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The decision of ECtHR containing statements regarding the legal provisions examined by the HCC was a substantial circumstance from a legal perspective that necessitated a second revision process ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The criminalization of the use of totalitarian symbols may be justified, because behaviours related to the symbols of 20th century extremist political dictatorships may violate human dignity and ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. A requirement resulting from the provisions of the FL is a clear expression of what the legislative authority considers to be the protected legal interest and punishable conduct. The phrasing mus... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The HCC attaches great importance to whether the issue under consideration is subject to an already established judicial practice (case law) which is absolutely necessary to aid the enforcement a... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. On the necessity of repeated posterior norm control Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. On the criminalization of the use of totalitarian symbols and the protection of human dignity Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. On the clear articulation of the legislative intention Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. On judicial practice (case law) Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  17. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. It is a constitutional requirement that the legislative procedure takes place in accordance with the provisions of the Rules of the House [Articles B, 4 (1) and 5 (7) of the FL]. However, grantin... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. It is a constitutional requirement for the state to ensure the acquisition of church status, enabling religious communities to function independently and to acquire entitlements available to chur... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. The Parliament may establish specific rules for the operation of religious communities that allow greater freedom of internal organisation and regulation than associations. However, it is not a c... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Constitutional justification for terminating church legal status Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Dilemmas in the religious activity and public law definition of churches Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Two-level regulation instead of one-level regulation Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  18. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. The regulation in Hungary Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. Practice of the HCC Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 1.3. International outlook Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. In cases of exceptional constitutional complaint, which is directed at a norm, the examination of personal involvement is exceptionally important, since it is the personal, direct, and present ha... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The right to private life and the right to human dignity are tied to each other exceptionally closely. The right to human dignity forms the foundation of the protection of the inviolable sphere o... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. Secret intelligence gathering enables a forcible intrusion into all segments of private life (including the intimate ones) and might affect people other than the target of the observation; theref... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Differentiating between Exceptional Constitutional Complaint and Actio Popularis Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The Foundations of the Right to Private Life Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The Conflict between the Right to Private Life and National Security Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  19. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. Evolution of the Hungarian legislation Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. International outlook Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The designation of the acting court by a discretionary decision of the President of the NOJ violates the requirement of a fair process [Article XXVIII (1) of the FL]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The power of the President of the NOJ to transfer court cases does not comply with the right to a lawful judge either [Article 6 (1) of the ECHR]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. The definitive nature of the decision of the President of the NOJ violates the right to remedy [Article XXVIII (7) of the FL, Article 13 of the ECHR]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The decision of the President of the NOJ to transfer a court case does not qualify as an on‑the‑merits decision (Article 27 of the HCC Act). Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The so‑called objective test of the impartial administration of justice as one of the assessment criteria of the right to a fair trial Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The right to a lawful judge Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The qualification of the decision of the President of the NOJ and the right to remedy Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  20. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The carrying out of the commercial sale of tobacco products—in itself—does not entail that the said economic activity would constitute an acquired possession or a constitutionally protected propr... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The commercial retail of tobacco products carried out for a longer period is protected by the freedom of enterprise. The monopolisation of that activity by the state on general interest grounds d... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The constitutional protection of private property Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The constitutional protection of the freedom of enterprise Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  21. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. The regulation of concurrent three strikes Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. International outlook Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. It is contrary to the requirement of legal certainty if it is unpredictable in which cases the stricter concurrent sentences—constituting even mandatory life imprisonment—may be imposed [Article ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The threat of similar punishment for criminal offences of different material gravity undermines legal certainty by breaching the principle of proportionality, besides, narrowing judicial discreti... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Concurrent three strikes and the requirement of predictability arising from the requirement of legal certainty Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Concurrent three strikes and the constitutional criteria with respect to the penalty system governed by the rule of law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  22. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. It is the task of the HCC to examine whether the protection of human dignity justifies the restriction of the freedom of the press in the case at hand, i.e. whether the judgment complained of cre... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. Any reports of an assembly shall constitute a direct manifestation of the freedom of the press, the unencumbered provision of information, and of the role the press has in creating ‘a democratic ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. Image rights protect the external manifestation of the human personality and—broadcasting essential traits of personality—are indirectly used to identify it. Consequently, image rights are to be ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. As long as certain ways of providing information do not abuse the freedom of the press, references to image rights might rarely serve as grounds to limit the exercise of the freedom of the press.... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The extent of constitutional review of judicial decisions in civil law cases Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The scope of the freedom of the press Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The scope of the right to one’s image Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. Limiting the scope of the freedom of the press in order to protect the right to human dignity Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  23. Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. 1.1. Introductory remarks Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 1.2. International outlook Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. According to the consistent practice of the HCC, if the petitioner claims that the content of a new provision is unconstitutional, the HCC does not examine the unconstitutionality of the law enac... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The absolute prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment laid down in the ECHR and the FL requires that the space for life and movement provided for prisoners in multiple-person cells must in a... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Examination of the legislation incorporating the new provision Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Determination of the minimum amount of space to be provided for detainees Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  24. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. In the event of a serious crisis affecting the fundamental rights of the masses of the weaker parties, the protection of consumers’ rights and the duty to help the victims are the primary duty of... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. When assessing whether the rule of law infringes legal certainty, the calculation of the sufficient period of preparation and the assessment of retroactivity may also take into account whether it... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. The time limit for bringing an action and the length of the procedure are related to the fundamental right of access to a court, but do not violate the right to a fair trial [Articles XXVIII and ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. Although the set of special procedural rules creates a special procedural order which, due to the accumulation of legal restrictions, raises constitutional doubts as to the fairness of the proced... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. 3.5. EU law is not international law, so the HCC has no jurisdiction to examine whether a law is in breach of EU law, or whether it has been adopted in conformity with EU law in form or substance [Art... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Consumer protection in a financial crisis Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Criteria for legal certainty Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. The content of the right to a fair trial Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. Procedural obstacles—significant impediment to the exercise of fundamental rights Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. 4.5. Relationship between EU law and domestic law Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  25. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The Internet is not an area exempt from the law; the communication taking place there may be subject to legal regulation, and the enforcement of the rights and obligations enshrined in the FL is ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The ‘web 2.0’ sites are outside the scope of the services examined in the case, as in the specific case typical private expressions were published, addressing communication to a specific stakehol... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. It constitutes a restriction of the freedom of the press if the operator of a website may be held liable for any post published without moderation that is otherwise infringing (Article IX of the ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The assessment of proportionality depends on the amount of damages awarded for the infringement (Article IX of the FL). Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. 3.5. The liability of the website operator is based solely on the fact of the infringement and the moderation of comments or its absence is not a decisive factor; after the occurrence of the infringem... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Regulation of Internet communication Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The need for differentiation between online content services Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Liability for the content of the comment Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. The question of proportionality Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. 4.5. The importance of the infringing nature of the comment Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  26. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. 3. Decision and its reasoning Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. 4. Doctrinal analysis Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  27. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. In exercising its powers, the HCC may examine whether the joint exercise of certain powers by the EU violates human dignity, other fundamental rights, Hungary’s sovereignty or self-identity based... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The HCC attributes great importance to the constitutional dialogue within the EU [Article E) (2) of the FL]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. The new competence and the three tests Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The weaknesses of comparative analyses: constitutional dialogue in action Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  28. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The duty to preserve biodiversity has become a constitutional value, which should be taken into consideration when defining regulations within sectoral policies. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. When interpreting Article P) (1) of the FL, one should not forget the natural law foundations of biodiversity protection and the international commitments of Hungary. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. In connection with the state of natural assets, an absolute contextual canon results from Article P) of FL (rights of future generations and the subsequent obligations, the importance of long-ter... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. The alienation of the state-owned nature conservation areas is possible, but along the lines of strict legal guarantees, which are capable for the qualitative and quantitative protection of the v... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Rights of future generations and the associated obligations Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Precautions and long-term thinking Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Protecting biodiversity Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  29. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The scope of freedom of speech covers communicative acts which are part of the public social dialogue [Article IX (1) of the FL]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. Freedom of speech may cover non-verbal expressions. A necessary but not sufficient condition to this is that the perpetrator acts with the aim of expressing his or her opinion. In addition, the a... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. A specific act of disfigurement of public works of art and monuments may be considered political speech, falling within the scope of freedom of expression, but in other cases it may qualify as ba... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Scope of freedom of speech Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Non-verbal expression of opinion, symbolic speech Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Pouring paint over a monument and freedom of speech Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  30. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The facts of each offence must be determined by law. There is insufficient basis for inference with regard to the new facts of this Article of the Criminal Code to conclude that certain decisions... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The criminal facts of supporting illegal immigration should not include altruistic conduct which fulfils the obligation to help the vulnerable and the poor and which is not related to a prohibite... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Nullum crimen sine legerule Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The constitutional requirement Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  31. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. Only the HCC can find that national law violates the ECHR [Article 24 (2) f) of the FL]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. The Constitutional Court may directly apply findings of the ECtHR’s judgment, in case those were made in respect of the petitioner’s case (Article Q of the FL). Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3.3. Benefits are insurance-type benefits which fall under the scope of the 1st Additional Protocol. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 3.4. Signatory states have a wide margin of appreciation in setting the conditions for paying the benefit. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. 3.5. Even if the law appied in the concrete case does not violate the international agreement, its application may exceptionally result in a situation that is contrary to the ECHR as an international ... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      6. 3.6. The period of the payment of the benefit must be taken into consideration when calculating the insurance period for eligibility [Article Q (2) of the FL]. Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Leeway of the HCC to resolve the situation in contravention with the judgment of the ECtHR Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. Adoption of a constitutional requirement instead of annulment of the contested provision Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 4.3. Casuistic nature of the constitutional requirement adopted by the HCC Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4.4. Violations through continuous infringements following the decision of an international judicial forum Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. 4.5. An alternative to the HCC’s ‘bell rope’ practice? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      6. 4.6. Factual and temporal intricacies of the case Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. Aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  32. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Background Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. 2. Petition Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 3.1. The cases of special legal order constitute a special constitutional situation where certain fundamental rights, such as the freedom of expression, may be restricted to a greater extent than is g... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 3.2. It is not a breach of the principle of nullum crimen sine lege if a new criminal offence does not contain elements that are inherently unintelligible and therefore inapplicable, so that the lawma... Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    4. Autor:innen:
      1. 4.1. Restrictions on expression during special legal regimes Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 4.2. The new statutory definition of fear-mongering, the principle of nullum crimen sine lege and legal certainty Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    5. 5. The aftermath of the Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  33. Statistical Account Kein Zugriff Seiten 539 - 544
  34. List of Authors Kein Zugriff Seiten 545 - 548

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Recht allgemein, Übergreifende Werke und Sammlungen", "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: 100 Jahre Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in Liechtenstein
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Hilmar Hoch, Patricia M. Schiess Rütimann
100 Jahre Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit in Liechtenstein
Cover des Buchs: One share, one vote im deutschen und schweizerischen Aktienrecht
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jessica Ferreira Rocha
One share, one vote im deutschen und schweizerischen Aktienrecht
Cover des Buchs: Zukunftsfähige Regulierung Künstlicher Intelligenz durch die Europäische Union?
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Enrico Peuker, Ralf Peter Schenke
Zukunftsfähige Regulierung Künstlicher Intelligenz durch die Europäische Union?