Cover des Buchs: Narrative Persuasion
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff

Narrative Persuasion

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Zusammenfassung

Narrationen – ob als Filme, Fernsehserien, Romane oder Computerspiele – ermöglichen es uns, in andere Welten einzutauchen und die Perspektiven der Figuren einzunehmen. Inwiefern diese Erfahrungen die Überzeugungen, Einstellungen, Intention und Verhalten der Rezipienten beeinflussen, untersucht das Forschungsfeld der narrativen Persuasion. Dieser Band stellt die zentralen kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Ansätze und Modelle zur Erklärung narrativer Persuasion vor, erläutert das typische methodische Vorgehen und gibt einen systematischen Überblick über den Forschungsstand. Abschließend werden kritische theoretische und methodische Aspekte diskutiert und aktuelle Entwicklungen im Forschungsfeld skizziert.

Das Buch eignet sich für Studierende und Lehrende der Kommunikationswissenschaft und für andere Interessierte als Einführung, Nachschlage- oder Überblickswerk zu zentralen Konzepten, Prozessen und Befunden narrativer Persuasion.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4146-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8366-1
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Band
22
Sprache
Deutsch
Seiten
146
Produkttyp
Lehrbuch

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 10
    1. 1.1 Definition der Kernbegriffe Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Verarbeitung von Narrationen Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 Entwicklungsgeschichte der Forschung zur narrativen Persuasion Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 Das Transportation-Imagery-Modell (Green & Brock, 2000, 2002) Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 Das Extended-Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell (Slater & Rouner, 2002) Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 Entertainment-Overcoming-Resistance-Modell (Moyer-Gusé, 2008) Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 Modell des Narrativen Verstehens und Erlebens (Busselle & Bilandzic, 2008) Kein Zugriff
    1. 3.1 Typische Forschungsdesigns Kein Zugriff
    2. 3.2 Operationalisierung der Schlüsselvariablen Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 Die persuasive Wirkung von Narrationen Kein Zugriff
    2. 4.2 Wirkungsmechanismen Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.3.1 Eigenschaften des Texts und des Kontexts Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.3.2 Rezipienteneigenschaften: Persönlichkeitsmerkmale Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3.3 Rezipienteneigenschaften im Zusammenhang mit dem Text Kein Zugriff
    1. 5.1 Kritik und Desiderata Kein Zugriff
    2. 5.2 Aktuelle Entwicklungen Kein Zugriff
    1. 6.1 Abgrenzung von verwandten Ansätzen Kein Zugriff
    2. 6.2 Abschließende Würdigung Kein Zugriff
    1. Einführung Kein Zugriff
    2. Grundlagen Kein Zugriff
    3. Aktuelle Entwicklungen Kein Zugriff
    4. Spannende Studien Kein Zugriff
  9. 8 Literatur Kein Zugriff 103 - 144
  10. Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände Kein Zugriff 145 - 146

Literaturverzeichnis (441)

  1. Aaronovitch, D. (2014). Reel drama. Index on Censorship, 43(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306422014523227 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  2. Abbott, H. P. (2000). The evolutionary origins of the storied mind: Modeling the prehistory of narrative consciousness and its discontents. Narrative, 8(3), 247–256. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  3. Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  5. Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Hrsg.). (2005). The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  6. Albarracin, D., Zanna, M. P., Johnson, B. T., & Kumkale, G. T. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), The handbook of attitudes (S. 3–19). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  7. Allen, M., Bruflat, R., Fucilla, R., Kramer, M., McKellips, S., Ryan, D. J., & Spiegelhoff, M. (2000). Testing the persuasiveness of evidence: Combining narrative and statistical forms. Communication Research Reports, 17(4), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090009388781 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  8. Allen, M., & Dilbeck, K. (2017). Meta-analysis. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0153 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  9. Allen, M., & Preiss, R. W. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta‐analysis. Communication Research Reports, 14(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388654 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  10. Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Fact vs fiction--how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss098 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  11. Appel, M. (2006). Deutschsprachige Transportation-Skala für die Filmrezeption. Unpubliziertes Manuskript. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  12. Appel, M. (2011). A story about a stupid person can make you act stupid (or smart): Behavioral assimilation (and contrast) as narrative impact. Media Psychology, 14(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.573461 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  13. Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. C. (2015). The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.987400 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  14. Appel, M., & Malečkar, B. (2012). The influence of paratext on narrative persuasion: Fact, fiction, or fake? Human Communication Research, 38(4), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01432.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  15. Appel, M., & Mara, M. (2013). The persuasive influence of a fictional character’s trustworthiness. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 912–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12053 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  16. Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007). Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychology, 10(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701301194 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  17. Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13(2), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213261003799847 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  18. Aristoteles, & Fuhrmann, M. (2005). Poetik. Stuttgart: Reclam. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  19. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2000). Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review. Psychology & Health, 15(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400299 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  20. Asbeek Brusse, E. D., Fransen, M. L., & Smit, E. G. (2015). The more you say, the less they hear. The effect of disclosures in entertainment-education. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 27(4), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000135 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  21. Auswärtiges Amt. (2016). Filmförderung. Abgerufen 12. Juli 2017, von http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Aussenpolitik/Themen/KulturDialog/10_Kulturprogramme/Film.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  22. Bae, H.-S., Lee, D., & Bae, R. E. (2014). Emotional engagement with the plot and characters. Narrative Inquiry, 24(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.24.2.07bae Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  23. Baesler, E. J., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). The temporal effects of story and statistical evidence on belief change. Communication Research, 21(5), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021005002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  24. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  25. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  26. Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers, & M. Sabido (Hrsg.), Entertainment-Education and social change. History, research, and practice (S. 75–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  27. Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (S. 94–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  28. Banerjee, S. C., & Greene, K. (2012a). ‘I quit’ versus ‘I’m sorry I used’: A preliminary investigation of variations in narrative ending and transportation. Psychology & Health, 27(11), 1308–1322. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.675063 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  29. Banerjee, S. C., & Greene, K. (2012b). Role of transportation in the persuasion process: Cognitive and affective responses to antidrug narratives. Journal of Health Communication, 17(5), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.635779 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  30. Banerjee, S. C., & Greene, K. (2013). Examining narrative transportation to anti-alcohol narratives. Journal of Substance Use, 18(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.3109/14659891.2012.661020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  31. Barraza, J. A., Alexander, V., Beavin, L. E., Terris, E. T., & Zak, P. J. (2015). The heart of the story: Peripheral physiology during narrative exposure predicts charitable giving. Biological Psychology, 105, 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.01.008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  32. Barriga, C. A., Shapiro, M. A., & Fernandez, M. L. (2010). Science information in fictional movies: Effects of context and gender. Science Communication, 32(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009340338 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  33. Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/468419 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  34. Bartsch, A., Vorderer, P., Mangold, R., & Viehoff, R. (2008). Appraisal of emotions in media use: Toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701813447 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  35. Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In Jean Decety & W. Ickes (Hrsg.), The social neuroscience of empathy (S. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  36. Bhatnagar, N., & Wan, F. (2011). Is self-character similarity always beneficial? The moderating role of immersion in product placement effects. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400203 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  37. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. W. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00397.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  38. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. W. (2011). Enjoyment of films as a function of narrative experience, perceived realism and transportability. Communications, 36(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2011.002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  39. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. W. (2013). Narrative persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (S. 200–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  40. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. W. (2017). Beyond metaphors and traditions. Exploring the conceptual boundaries of narrative engagement. In F. Hakemulder, M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. Doicaru (Hrsg.), Narrative absorption (S. 11–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  41. Bilandzic, H., & Kinnebrock, S. (2006). Persuasive Wirkungen narrativer Unterhaltungsangebote: Theoretische Überlegungen zum Einfluss von Narrativität auf Transportation. In W. Wirth, H. Schramm, & V. Gehrau (Hrsg.), Unterhaltung durch Medien: Theorie und Messung (S. 102–126). Köln: Halem. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  42. Bilandzic, H., & Rössler, P. (2004). Life according to television. Implications of genre-specific cultivation effects: The Gratification/Cultivation model. Communications, 29(3), 295–326. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  43. Bischof-Köhler, D. (1994). Selbstobjektivierung und fremdbezogene Emotionen. Identifikation des eigenen Spiegelbildes, Empathie und prosoziales Verhalten im 2. Lebensjahr. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202(4), 349–377. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  44. Bischof-Köhler, D. (2010). Empathie, Theory of Mind und die Fähigkeit, auf mentale Zeitreise zu gehen. Zur Phylogenese und Ontogenese sozial-kognitiver Kompetenzen. In: B. Mayer & H.-J. Kornadt (Hrsg.), Psychologie – Kultur – Gesellschaft (S. 47–69). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  45. Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  46. Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  47. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 177–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(79)90009-4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  48. Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247(4938), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2403694 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  49. Braddock, K., & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  50. Braverman, J. (2008). Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages the moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research, 35(5), 666–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321785 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  51. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  52. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  53. Brewer, N. T., Weinstein, N. D., Cuite, C. L., & Herrington Jr., J. E. (2004). Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  54. Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6(5–6), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90021-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  55. Britton, B. K., Graesser, A. C., Glynn, S. M., Hamilton, T., & Penland, M. (1983). Use of cognitive capacity in reading: Effects of some content features of text. Discourse Processes, 6(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538309544553 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  56. Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90031-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  57. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  58. Bruner, J. S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1343711 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  59. Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J., & Voulodakis, M. (2002). Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance: Communicating threats to attitudinal freedom. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Hrsg.), The persuasion handbook: Theory and practice (S. 213–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  60. Busselle, R. W., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  61. Busselle, R. W., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  62. Busselle, R. W., & Greenberg, B. S. (2000). The nature of television realism judgments: A reevaluation of their conceptualization and measurement. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2–3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_05 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  63. Busselle, R. W., Ryabovolova, A., & Wilson, B. (2004). Ruining a good story: Cultivation, perceived realism and narrative. Communications, 29(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  64. Busselle, R. W., & Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and exemplar accessibility. Media Psychology, 5(3), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0503_02 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  65. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.116 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  66. Cao, X. (2015). The influence of fiction versus nonfiction on political attitudes. Communication Research Reports, 32(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.989979 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  67. Cao, X., & Decker, D. (2015). Psychological distancing: The effects of narrative perspectives and levels of access to a victim’s inner world on victim blame and helping intention. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1514 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  68. Caputo, N. M., & Rouner, D. (2011). Narrative processing of entertainment media and mental illness stigma. Health Communication, 26(7), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.560787 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  69. Carpenter, J. M., & Green, M. C. (2012). Flying with Icarus: Narrative transportation and the persuasiveness of entertainment. In L. J. Shrum (Hrsg.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (S. 169–194). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  70. Carroll, N. (2002). The wheel of virtue: Art, literature, and moral knowledge. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6245.00048 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  71. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  72. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Hrsg.), Unintended thought (S. 212–252). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  73. Chang, C. (2013). Imagery fluency and narrative advertising effects. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749087 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  74. Chatterjee, J. S., Bhanot, A., Frank, L. B., Murphy, S. T., & Power, G. (2009). The importance of interpersonal discussion and self-efficacy in knowledge, attitude, and practice models. International Journal of Communication, 3. Abgerufen von https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/444 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  75. Chen, M., Bell, R. A., & Taylor, L. D. (2016). Narrator point of view and persuasion in health narratives: The role of protagonist-reader similarity, identification, and self-referencing. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177147 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  76. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (S. 73–96). New York: Guilford. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  77. Cho, Hichang, Lee, J.-S., & Chung, S. (2010). Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: Testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 987–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.012 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  78. Cho, Hyunyi, Shen, L., & Wilson, K. (2014). Perceived realism dimensions and roles in narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 41(6), 828–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212450585 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  79. Christy, K. R. (2018). I, you, or he: Examining the impact of point of view on narrative persuasion. Media Psychology, 21(4), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1400443 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  80. Chung, A. H., & Slater, M. D. (2013). Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12050 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  81. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  82. Cohen, J. (2014). Identification with media characters. In P. Moy (Hrsg.), Oxford bibliographies in communication. New York: Oxford University Press. Abgerufen von http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0144.xml Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  83. Cohen, J., Tal-Or, N., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2015). The tempering effect of transportation: Exploring the effects of transportation and identification during exposure to controversial two-sided narratives. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12144 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  84. Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2018). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion? Media Psychology, 21(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  85. Coleridge, S. T. (1956). Biographia literaria. London: Dent. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  86. Cooper, H. M. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  87. Costabile, K. A., & Klein, S. B. (2008). Understanding and predicting social events: The effects of narrative construction on inference generation. Social Cognition, 26(4), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.4.420 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  88. Costabile, K. A., & Terman, A. W. (2013). Effects of film music on psychological transportation and narrative persuasion. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 35(3), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2013.785398 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  89. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  90. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: BasicBooks. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  91. Cuesta, U., Martínez, L., & Cuesta, V. (2017). Effectiveness of narrative persuasion on facebook: Change of attitude and intention towards HPV. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 11(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v11i2.p100-109 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  92. Cui, D., Wang, Z., & Raney, A. (2017). Narrative persuasion in historical films: Examining the importance of prior knowledge, existing attitudes, and culture. International Journal of Communication, 11, 19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  93. Dahlstrom, M. F. (2010). The role of causality in information acceptance in narratives: An example from science communication. Communication Research, 37(6), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210362683 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  94. Dahlstrom, M. F. (2012). The persuasive influence of narrative causality: Psychological mechanism, strength in overcoming resistance, and persistence over time. Media Psychology, 15(3), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.702604 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  95. Dahlstrom, M. F. (2015). The moderating influence of narrative causality as an untapped pool of variance for narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 42(6), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213487374 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  96. Dahlstrom, M. F. (2017). A story about stories in strategic communication. In A. Dudo & L. Kahlor (Hrsg.), Strategic communication. New agendas in communication (S. 1–19). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  97. Dahlstrom, M. F., & Ho, S. S. (2012). Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science. Science Communication, 34(5), 592–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012454597 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  98. Dahlstrom, M. F., Niederdeppe, J., Gao, L., & Zhu, X. (2017). Operational and conceptual trends in narrative persuasion research: Comparing health- and non-health-related contexts. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4865–4885. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  99. Dahlstrom, M. F., & Rosenthal, S. (2018). Third-person perception of science narratives: The case of climate change denial. Science Communication, 40(3), 340–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018766556 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  100. Dal Cin, S., Gibson, B., Zanna, M. P., Shumate, R., & Fong, G. T. (2007). Smoking in movies, implicit associations of smoking with the self, and intentions to smoke. Psychological Science, 18(7), 559–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01939.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  101. Dal Cin, S., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2004). Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Hrsg.), Resistance and persuasion (S. 175–191). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  102. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of selected Documents in Psychology, 10(4), 85–105. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  103. Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  104. de Graaf, A. (2014). The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: Similarity influences health beliefs through self-referencing. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  105. de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2009). The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 34(4), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.024 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  106. de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  107. de Graaf, A., Putte, B. van den, Nguyen, M.-H., Zebregs, S., Lammers, J., & Neijens, P. (2017). The effectiveness of narrative versus informational smoking education on smoking beliefs, attitudes and intentions of low-educated adolescents. Psychology & Health, 32(7), 810–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1307371 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  108. de Graaf, A., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H. (2016). Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: A review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research. Review of Communication Research, 4, 88–131. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  109. De Mulder, H. N. M., Hakemulder, F., Berghe, R. van den, Klaassen, F., & Berkum, J. J. A. van. (2017). Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction. Scientific Study of Literature, 7(1), 129–169. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  110. Decety, Jean. (2011). Dissecting the Neural Mechanisms Mediating Empathy. Emotion Review, 3(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910374662 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  111. Decety, Jean, & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  112. Dillard, A. J., & Hisler, G. (2015). Enhancing the effects of a narrative message through experiential information processing: An experimental study. Psychology & Health, 30(7), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.996565 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  113. Dillard, A. J., & Main, J. L. (2013). Using a health message with a testimonial to motivate colon cancer screening associations with perceived identification and vividness. Health Education & Behavior, 40(6), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112473111 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  114. Dillard, A. J., McCaul, K. D., & Klein, W. M. P. (2006). Unrealistic optimism in smokers: Implications for smoking myth endorsement and self-protective motivation. Journal of Health Communication, 11(sup001), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730600637343 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  115. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  116. Dithmar, R. (1997). Die Fabel: Geschichte, Struktur, Didaktik. Paderborn: UTB. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  117. Djikic, M., Oatley, K., Zoeterman, S., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). On being moved by art: How reading fiction transforms the self. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633392 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  118. Donne, L., Hoeks, J., & Jansen, C. (2017). Using a narrative to spark safer sex communication. Health Education Journal, 76(6), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896917710967 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  119. Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., & Hewitt, L. E. (Hrsg.). (1995). Deixis in narrative. A cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  120. Duffy, M., & Thorson, E. (Hrsg.). (2016). Persuasion ethics today. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  121. Dunlop, S. M., Wakefield, M., & Kashima, Y. (2010). Pathways to persuasion: Cognitive and experiential responses to health-promoting mass media messages. Communication Research, 37(1), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209351912 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  122. Dunn, M., Thomas, J. O., Swift, W., & Burns, L. (2012). Elite athletes’ estimates of the prevalence of illicit drug use: Evidence for the false consensus effect. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00307.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  123. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  124. Eisenberg, N. (2002). Distinctions among various modes of empathy-related reactions: A matter of importance in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02350015 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  125. Emmott, C. (1997). Narrative comprehension. A discourse perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  126. Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  127. Escalas, J. E. (2007). Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/510216 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  128. Fazio, L. K., Dolan, P. O., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Learning misinformation from fictional sources: Understanding the contributions of transportation and item-specific processing. Memory, 23(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.877146 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  129. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  130. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  131. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  132. Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  133. Fisher, W. R. (1985). The narrative paradigm: In the beginning. Journal of Communication, 35(4), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02974.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  134. Fisher, W. R. (1989). Clarifying the narrative paradigm. Communication Monographs, 56(1), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390249 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  135. Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia, SC: Univ. of South Carolina Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  136. Fludernik, M. (1996). Towards a „natural“ narratology. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  137. Fludernik, M. (2010). Erzähltheorie. Eine Einführung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  138. Förstl, H. (2012). Theory of Mind: Anfänge und Ausläufer. In H. Förstl (Hrsg.), Theory of Mind (S. 3–11). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  139. Frank, L. B., Murphy, S. T., Chatterjee, J. S., Moran, M. B., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2015). Telling stories, saving lives: Creating narrative health messages. Health Communication, 30(2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974126 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  140. Früh, W., & Wünsch, C. (2009). Empathie und Medienempathie. Publizistik, 54(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-009-0038-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  141. Galbraith, M. (1995). Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative. In Judith F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Hrsg.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (S. 19–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  142. Gardner, L., & Leshner, G. (2016). The role of narrative and other-referencing in attenuating psychological reactance to diabetes self-care messages. Health Communication, 31(6), 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.993498 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  143. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  144. Gendler, T. S., & Kovakovich, K. (2005). Genuine rational fictional emotions. In M. Kieran (Hrsg.), Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art (S. 241–253). Boston, MS: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  145. Genette, G., & Levonas, A. (1976). Boundaries of narrative. New Literary History, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/468611 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  146. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  147. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The „mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01987.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  148. Gerdes, K. E. (2011). Empathy, sympathy, and pity: 21st-century definitions and implications for practice and research. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.564027 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  149. Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  150. Gerrig, R. J., & Rapp, D. N. (2004). Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-2-265 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  151. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  152. Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Malone, P. S. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  153. Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.221 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  154. Glaser, M., Garsoffky, B., & Schwan, S. (2012). What do we learn from docutainment? Processing hybrid television documentaries. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.006 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  155. Gnambs, T., Appel, M., Schreiner, C., Richter, T., & Isberner, M.-B. (2014). Experiencing narrative worlds: A latent state-trait analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.034 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  156. Good, H., & Dillon, M. J. (2002). Media ethics goes to the movies. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  157. Graesser, A. C. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  158. Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L. (1998). The construction of causal inferences while reading expository texts on science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  159. Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). The generation of knowledge-based inferences during narrative comprehension. In G. Rickheit & H. Strohner (Hrsg.), Inferences in text processing (S. 53–94). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  160. Graesser, A. C., Hoffman, N. L., & Clark, L. F. (1980). Structural components of reading time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90132-2 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  161. Graesser, A. C., Olde, B., & Klettke, B. (2002). How does the mind construct and represent stories. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Hrsg.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (S. 229–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  162. Graesser, A. C., & Ottati, V. (1995). Why stories? Some evidence, questions, and challenges. In R. S. Wyer (Hrsg.), Knowledge and memory: The real story (S. 121–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  163. Graesser, A. C., Robertson, S. P., & Anderson, P. A. (1981). Incorporating inferences in narrative representations: A study of how and why. Cognitive Psychology, 13(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90002-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  164. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  165. Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  166. Green, M. C. (2006). Resisting social influence. In N. Mulholland (Hrsg.), The psychology of Harry Potter (S. 299–310). Dallas, TX: BinBella. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  167. Green, M. C. (2008). Research challenges in narrative persuasion. Information Design Journal (IDJ), 16(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.1.07gre Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  168. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  169. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Hrsg.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (S. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  170. Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  171. Green, M. C., & Dill, K. E. (2013). Engaging with stories and characters: Learning, persuasion, and transportation into narrative worlds. In K. E. Dill (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of media psychology (S. 449–461). New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  172. Green, M. C., & Donahue, J. K. (2011). Persistence of belief change in the face of deception: The effect of factual stories revealed to be false. Media Psychology, 14(3), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.598050 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  173. Green, M. C., Garst, J., & Brock, T. C. (2004). The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries. In L. J. Shrum (Hrsg.), The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (S. 161–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  174. Green, M. C., Garst, J., Brock, T. C., & Chung, S. (2006). Fact versus fiction labeling: Persuasion parity despite heightened scrutiny of fact. Media Psychology, 8(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_4 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  175. Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802492000 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  176. Greenberg, B. S., & Woods, M. G. (1999). The soaps: Their sex, gratifications, and outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 36(3), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551995 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  177. Hakemulder, J. (2000). The moral laboratory. Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  178. Hall, A. E. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences’ evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02914.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  179. Hall, A. E., & Bracken, C. C. (2011). „I really liked that movie.” Testing the relationship between trait empathy, transportation, perceived realism, and movie enjoyment. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000036 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  180. Hamby, A., Brinberg, D., & Daniloski, K. (2017). Reflecting on the journey: Mechanisms in narrative persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  181. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  182. Hartmann, T. (2010). Parasoziale Interaktion und Beziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  183. Hartmann, T., Schramm, H., & Klimmt, C. (2004). Personenorientierte Medienrezeption: Ein Zwei-Ebenen-Modell parasozialer Interaktionen. Publizistik, 49(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-004-0003-6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  184. Hartung, F., Withers, P., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M. (2017). When fiction is just as real as fact: No differences in reading behavior between stories believed to be based on true or fictional events. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01618 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  185. Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  186. Hether, H. J., Huang, G. C., Beck, V., Murphy, S. T., & Valente, T. W. (2008). Entertainment-education in a media-saturated environment: Examining the impact of single and multiple exposures to breast cancer storylines on two popular medical dramas. Journal of Health Communication, 13(8), 808–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802487471 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  187. Hillerbrand, H. J. (2006). On book burnings and book burners: Reflections on the power (and powerlessness) of ideas. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 74(3), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfj117 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  188. Hoeken, H., & Fikkers, K. M. (2014). Issue-relevant thinking and identification as mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Poetics, 44, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2014.05.001 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  189. Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M., & Sanders, J. (2016). Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12076 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  190. Hoeken, H., & Sinkeldam, J. (2014). The role of identification and perception of just outcome in evoking emotions in narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12114 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  191. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  192. Hoffner, C. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364360 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  193. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In: J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Hrsg.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (S. 63–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  194. Hoffner, C., & Levine, K. J. (2005). Enjoyment of mediated fright and violence: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 7(2), 207–237. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  195. Holbert, R. L. (2005). A typology for the study of entertainment television and politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(3), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205279419 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  196. Holbert, R. L., Pillion, O., Tschida, D. A., Armfield, G. G., Kinder, K., Cherry, K. L., & Daulton, A. R. (2003). The West Wing as endorsement of the U.S. presidency: Expanding the bounds of priming in political communication. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02600.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  197. Holbert, R. L., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Political implications of prime-time drama and sitcom use: Genres of representation and opinions concerning women’s rights. Journal of Communication, 53(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb03004.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  198. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1521/00332747.1956.11023049 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  199. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  200. Igartua, J. J. (2010). Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications, 35(4), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2010.019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  201. Igartua, J. J., & Barrios, I. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  202. Igartua, J. J., & Vega Casanova, J. (2016). Identification with characters, elaboration, and counterarguing in entertainment-education interventions through audiovisual fiction. Journal of Health Communication, 21(3), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1064494 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  203. Innerhofer, R. (1996). Deutsche Science Fiction 1870-1914: Rekonstruktion und Analyse der Anfänge einer Gattung. Wien: Böhlau Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  204. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  205. Jensen, J. D. (2011). Knowledge acquisition following exposure to cancer news articles: A test of the cognitive mediation model. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01549.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  206. Jensen, J. D., Bernat, J. K., Wilson, K. M., & Goonewardene, J. (2011). The delay hypothesis: The manifestation of media effects over time. Human Communication Research, 37(4), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01415.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  207. Johnson, B. K., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2018). (Don’t) tell me how it ends: Spoilers, enjoyment, and involvement in television and film. Media Psychology, 21(4), 582–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1338964 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  208. Johnson, D. R. (2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.08joh Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  209. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1981). Comprehension as the construction of mental models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 295(1077), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1981.0145 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  210. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  211. Jones, M. D. (2014). Communicating climate change: Are stories better than „just the facts”? Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 644–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12072 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  212. Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  213. Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  214. Keer, M., van den Putte, B., de Wit, J., & Neijens, P. (2013). The effects of integrating instrumental and affective arguments in rhetorical and testimonial health messages. Journal of Health Communication, 18(9), 1148–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.768730 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  215. Kim, H. K., & Lee, T. K. (2017). Conditional effects of gain-loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change. Journal of Health Communication, 22(12), 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  216. Kim, H. K., & Lee, T. K. (2018). Curious or afraid of using study drugs? The effects of self-referent thoughts and identification on anticipated affect. International Journal of Communication, 12, 22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  217. Kim, H. K., & Shapiro, M. A. (2016). When bad things happen to a protagonist like you: The role of self in resistance to negatively framed health narratives. Journal of Health Communication, 21(12), 1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1240268 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  218. Kim, H. S., Bigman, C. A., Leader, A. E., Lerman, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2012). Narrative health communication and behavior change: The influence of exemplars in the news on intention to quit smoking. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01644.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  219. Kim, T., & Biocca, F. (1997). Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00073.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  220. Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2013). The effects of tv and film exposure on knowledge about and attitudes toward mental disorders. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(8), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21581 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  221. Kinnebrock, S., & Bilandzic, H. (2010). Boulevardisierung der politischen Berichterstattung? Konstanz und Wandel von Nachrichtenfaktoren und Narrativitätsfaktoren in der politischen Berichterstattung. In: K. Arnold, S. Classen, S. Kinnebrock, E. Lersch, & H.-U. Wagner (Hrsg.), Von der Politisierung der Medien zur Medialisierung des Politischen? Zum Verhältnis von Medien und Politik im 20. Jahrhundert (S. 347–362). Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  222. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  223. Kintsch, W., & Greene, E. (1978). The role of culture‐specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories. Discourse Processes, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638537809544425 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  224. Klimmt, C. (2011). Das Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  225. Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. A. (2004). The importance of resistance to persuasion. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Hrsg.), Resistance and persuasion (S. 3–9). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  226. Koopman, E. M., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  227. Kopfman, J. E., Smith, S. W., Yun, J. K. A., & Hodges, A. (1998). Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365508 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  228. Krakow, M. M., Yale, R. N., Jensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., & Ratcliff, C. L. (2018). Comparing mediational pathways for narrative- and argument-based messages: Believability, counterarguing, and emotional reaction. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy002 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  229. Krämer, B. (2015). Fallbeispieleffekte. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  230. Kreuter, M. W., Buskirk, T. D., Holmes, K., Clark, E. M., Robinson, L., Si, X., … Mathews, K. (2008). What makes cancer survivor stories work? An empirical study among African American women. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-007-0041-y Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  231. Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., … Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  232. Kreuter, M. W., Holmes, K., Alcaraz, K., Kalesan, B., Rath, S., Richert, M., … Clark, E. M. (2010). Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, Supplement 1, S6–S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  233. Kuiken, D., Phillips, L., Gregus, M., Miall, D., Verbitsky, M., & Tonkonogy, A. (2004). Locating self-modifying feelings within literary reading. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_6 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  234. Lamarque, P. (2004). On not expecting too much from narrative. Mind & Language, 19(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00265.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  235. Landreville, K. D., & LaMarre, H. L. (2011). Working through political entertainment: How negative emotion and narrative engagement encourage political discussion intent in young Americans. Communication Quarterly, 59(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.563441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  236. Lang, A. (1989). Effects of chronological presentation of information on processing and memory for broadcast news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158909364093 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  237. Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N. (2005). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  238. Larkey, L. K., & Hecht, M. (2010). A model of effects of narrative as culture-centric health promotion. Journal of Health Communication, 15(2), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730903528017 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  239. LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  240. Lemal, M., & Van den Bulck, J. (2010). Testing the effectiveness of a skin cancer narrative in promoting positive health behavior: A pilot study. Preventive Medicine, 51(2), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.04.019 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  241. Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Morwinski, S. (2013). Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1743 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  242. Lien, N.-H., & Chen, Y.-L. (2013). Narrative ads: The effect of argument strength and story format. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  243. Lu, A. S., Thompson, D., Baranowski, J., Buday, R., & Baranowski, T. (2012). Story immersion in a health videogame for childhood obesity prevention. Games for Health Journal, 1(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2011.0011 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  244. Ma, Z., & Nan, X. (2018). Role of narratives in promoting mental illnesses acceptance. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 26(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2018.1471925 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  245. Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.694156 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  246. Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2009). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  247. Mar, R. A. (2004). The neuropsychology of narrative: story comprehension, story production and their interrelation. Neuropsychologia, 42(10), 1414–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.016 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  248. Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  249. Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  250. Marks, D. F. (1995). New directions for mental imagery research. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19(3–4), 153–167. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  251. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  252. Marsh, E. J., Butler, A. C., & Umanath, S. (2012). Using fictional sources in the classroom: Applications from cognitive psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9204-0 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  253. Marsh, E. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2006). Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193260 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  254. Marsh, E. J., Meade, M. L., & Roediger III, H. L. (2003). Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00092-5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  255. Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  256. Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W. (2010). This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376600 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  257. McKinley, C. J. (2013). Reexamining the link between cultivation factors and viewer involvement: Investigating viewing amount as a catalyst for the transportation process. Communication Studies, 64(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.731466 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  258. McQueen, A., Kreuter, M. W., Kalesan, B., & Alcaraz, K. I. (2011). Understanding narrative effects: The impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women. Health Psychology, 30(6), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025395 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  259. Meer, S. (2005). Uncle Tom mania: Slavery, minstrelsy, and transatlantic culture in the 1850s. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  260. Mellmann, K. (2002). E-Motion: Being moved by fiction and media? Notes on fictional worlds, virtual contacts and the reality of emotions. PSYART: A Hyperlink Journal for the Psychological Study of the Arts. Abgerufen von http://www.psyartjournal.com/article/show/mellmann-e_motion_being_moved_by_fiction_and_medi Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  261. Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV. New York: New York Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  262. Mongeau, P. A. (2013). Fear appeals. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (S. 184–199). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  263. Morgan, M. (2009). Cultivation analysis and media effects. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (S. 69–82). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  264. Morgan, S. E., Movius, L., & Cody, M. J. (2009). The power of narratives: The effect of entertainment television organ donation storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and nondonors. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01408.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  265. Moyer‐Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  266. Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A. H., & Jain, P. (2011). Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  267. Moyer‐Gusé, E., & Dale, K. (2017). Narrative persuasion theories. In P. Rössler, C. Hoffner, & L. van Zoonen (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of media effects (S. 1345–1355). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0082 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  268. Moyer-Gusé, E., Jain, P., & Chung, A. H. (2012). Reinforcement or reactance? Examining the effect of an explicit persuasive appeal following an entertainment-education narrative. Journal of Communication, n/a–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01680.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  269. Moyer-Gusé, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 26–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  270. Mulligan, K., & Habel, P. (2013). The implications of fictional media for political beliefs. American Politics Research, 41(1), 122–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X12453758 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  271. Murphy, F. C., Wilde, G., Ogden, N., Barnard, P. J., & Calder, A. J. (2009). Assessing the automaticity of moral processing: Efficient coding of moral information during narrative comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802254441 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  272. Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Moran, M. B., & Patnoe‐Woodley, P. (2011). Involved, transported, or emotional? Exploring the determinants of change in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in entertainment‐education. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01554.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  273. Murphy, S. T., Hether, H. J., Felt, L. J., & de Castro Buffington, S. (2012). Public diplomacy in prime time: Exploring the potential of entertainment education in international public diplomacy. American Journal of Media Psychology, 5(1–4), 5–32. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  274. Nabi, R. L., & Green, M. C. (2015). The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  275. Nan, X., Dahlstrom, M. F., Richards, A., & Rangarajan, S. (2015). Influence of evidence type and narrative type on HPV risk perception and intention to obtain the HPV vaccine. Health Communication, 30(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.888629 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  276. Nan, X., Futerfas, M., & Ma, Z. (2017). Role of narrative perspective and modality in the persuasiveness of Public Service Advertisements promoting HPV vaccination. Health Communication, 32(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1138379 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  277. Nelissen, S., Beullens, K., Lemal, M., & Van den Bulck, J. (2015). Fear of cancer is associated with cancer information seeking, scanning and avoiding: a cross-sectional study among cancer diagnosed and non-diagnosed individuals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 32(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12100 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  278. Neumann, B., & Nünning, A. (2008). An introduction to the study of narrative fiction. Stuttgart: Klett. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  279. Nickel-Bacon, I., Groeben, N., & Schreier, M. (2000). Fiktionssignale pragmatisch: Ein medienübergreifendes Modell zur Unterscheidung von Fiktion(en) und Realität(en). Poetica, 32(3/4), 267–300. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  280. Niederdeppe, J., Bu, Q. L., Borah, P., Kindig, D. A., & Robert, S. A. (2008). Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities. Milbank Quarterly, 86(3), 481–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00530.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  281. Niederdeppe, J., Heley, K., & Barry, C. L. (2015). Inoculation and narrative strategies in competitive framing of three health policy issues. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 838–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12162 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  282. Niederdeppe, J., Kim, H. K., Lundell, H., Fazili, F., & Frazier, B. (2012). Beyond counterarguing: Simple elaboration, complex integration, and counterelaboration in response to variations in narrative focus and sidedness. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01671.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  283. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  284. Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311699 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  285. Oatley, K. (1995). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  286. Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  287. O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory & Cognition, 15(5), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197731 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  288. Ohler, P. (1994). Kognitive Filmpsychologie. Münster: Maks. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  289. Oliver, M. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00304.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  290. Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  291. Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  292. Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  293. Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  294. Pajares, F., Prestin, A., Chen, J., & Nabi, R. L. (2009). Social cognitive theory and media effects. In: R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (S. 283–297). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  295. Peng, Z. (2016). Online resistance to censorship among Chinese fans of The Big Bang Theory. The Journal of Popular Culture, 49(5), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12452 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  296. Perloff, R. M. (2017). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  297. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  298. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In: L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (S. 123–205). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  299. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer Science & Business Media. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  300. Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T., & Brock, T. C. (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  301. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies. In: S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (S. 41–72). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  302. Pikulik, L. (2007). Schiller und das Theater: Über die Entwicklung der Schaubühne zur theatralen Kunstform. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  303. Plato, & Jowett, B. (o. J.). The Republic. Champaign, IL: Project Gutenberg. Abgerufen von http://www.gutenberg.org/files/150/150.txt Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  304. Potter, W. J. (1988). Perceived reality in television effects research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 32(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158809386682 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  305. Potter, W. J., & Smith, S. (1999). Consistency of contextual cues about violence across narrative levels. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02820.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  306. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  307. Prentice, D. A., Gerrig, R., & Bailis, D. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(3), 416–420. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210803 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  308. Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  309. Prince, G. J. (1988). A dictionary of narratology. Aldershot: Scolar Press. Abgerufen von http://opac.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/InfoGuideClient.ubasis/start.do?Login=iguba&Query=540="0-85967-749-4" Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  310. Prince, G. J. (2003). Surveying narratology. In: T. Kindt & H.-H. Müller (Hrsg.), What is narratology? Questions and answers regarding the status of a theory (S. 1–16). Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  311. Pürer, H. (Hrsg.). (2003). Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Ein Handbuch. Konstanz: UVK. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  312. Quick, B. L., Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion. In: J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (S. 167–183). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  313. Quintero Johnson, J. M., Harrison, K., & Quick, B. L. (2013). Understanding the effectiveness of the entertainment-education strategy: An investigation of how audience involvement, message processing, and message design influence health information recall. Journal of Health Communication, 18(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.688244 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  314. Quintero Johnson, J. M., & Sangalang, A. (2017). Testing the explanatory power of two measures of narrative involvement: An investigation of the influence of transportation and narrative engagement on the process of narrative persuasion. Media Psychology, 20(1), 144–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1160788 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  315. Radford, C., & Weston, M. (1975). How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 49, 67–93. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  316. Rapaport, W., Segal, E. M., Shapiro, S., Zubin, D., Bruder, G. A., Duchan, J. F., … Yuhan, A. (1989). Deictic centers and the cognitive structure of narrative comprehension (Tech. Rep. No. 89-01). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York, Department of Computer Science. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  317. Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers’ trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2789 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  318. Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension. An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00380.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  319. Reinhart, A. M., & Anker, A. E. (2012). An exploration of transportation and psychological reactance in organ donation PSAs. Communication Research Reports, 29(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.704601 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  320. Reinhart, A. M., & Feeley, T. (2007). Comparing the persuasive effects of narrative versus statistical messages: A meta-analytic review (S. 1). Gehalten auf der Annual Conference of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL. Abgerufen von http://proxy.mul.missouri.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=35505877&site=ehost-live&scope=site Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  321. Rhodes, N., Toole, J., & Arpan, L. M. (2016). Persuasion as reinforcement: Strengthening the pro-environmental attitude-behavior relationship through ecotainment programming. Media Psychology, 19(3), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1106322 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  322. Richter, T., Appel, M., & Calio, F. (2014). Stories can influence the self-concept. Social Influence, 9(3), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2013.799099 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  323. Richter, T., Schroeder, S., & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014038 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  324. Riddle, K. (2010). Always on my mind: Exploring how frequent, recent, and vivid television portrayals are used in the formation of social reality judgments. Media Psychology, 13(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213261003800140 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  325. Rimal, R. N., Limaye, R. J., Roberts, P., Brown, J., & Mkandawire, G. (2013). The role of interpersonal communication in reducing structural disparities and psychosocial deficiencies: Experience from the Malawi BRIDGE Project. Journal of Communication, 63(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12000 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  326. Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory, 13(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00288.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  327. Rinck, M. (2000). Situationsmodelle und das Verstehen von Erzähltexten: Befunde und Probleme. Psychologische Rundschau, 51(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1026//0033-3042.51.3.115 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  328. Roberts, D. F., & Maccoby, N. (1973). Information processing and persuasion: Counterarguing behavior. In: P. Clarke (Hrsg.), New models for mass communication research (S. 269–307). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  329. Rosselli, F., Skelly, J. J., & Mackie, D. M. (1995). Processing rational and emotional messages: The cognitive and affective nediation of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1008 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  330. Rothmund, J., Schreier, M., & Groeben, N. (2001). Fernsehen und erlebte Wirklichkeit I: Ein kritischer Überblick über die Perceived Reality-Forschung. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 13(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-6383.13.1.33 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  331. Rousselin, M. (2013). Turkish Soap power: International perspectives and domestic paradoxes. Euxeinos: Online Journal of the Center for Governance and Culture in Europe, (10), 16–22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  332. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In: R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (S. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  333. Ryan, M.-L. (2004). Narrative across media. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  334. Ryan, M.-L. (2007). Toward a definition of narrative. In D. Herman (Hrsg.), The Cambridge companion to narrative (S. 22–35). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  335. Sapolsky, B., & Zillmann, D. (1978). Experience and empathy: Affective reactions to witnessing childbirth. The Journal of Social Psychology, 105(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1978.9924099 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  336. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  337. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In: R. S. Wyer (Hrsg.), Knowledge and memory: The real story. Advances in social cognition (S. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  338. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  339. Schneider, R. (2001). Toward a cognitive theory of literary character: The dynamics of mental-model construction. Style, 35(4), 607–639. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  340. Schnell, C., & Bilandzic, H. K. (2017). Television stories and the cultivation of moral reasoning: The role of genre exposure and narrative engageability. Journal of Media Ethics, 32(4), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2017.1371022 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  341. Schreiner, C., Appel, M., Isberner, M.-B., & Richter, T. (2018). Argument strength and the persuasiveness of stories. Discourse Processes, 55(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1257406 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  342. Segal, E. M. (1995). A cognitive-phenomenological theory of fictional narrative. In: J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. E. Hewitt (Hrsg.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (S. 61–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  343. Segal, E. M., Duchan, J. F., & Scott, P. J. (1991). The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults’ interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes, 14(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544773 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  344. Sestir, M., & Green, M. C. (2010). You are who you watch: Identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept. Social Influence, 5(4), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2010.490672 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  345. Shafer, D. M., & Raney, A. A. (2012). Exploring how we enjoy antihero narratives. Journal of Communication, 62(6), 1028–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01682.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  346. Shapiro, M. A., Barriga, C. A., & Beren, J. (2010). Causal attribution and perceived realism of stories. Media Psychology, 13(3), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.502874 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  347. Shapiro, M. A., & Chock, T. M. (2003). Psychological processes in perceiving reality. Media Psychology, 5(2), 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0502_3 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  348. Shapiro, M. A., & Lang, A. (1991). Making television reality. Unconscious processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18(5), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365091018005007 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  349. Shen, F., Ahern, L., & Baker, M. (2014). Stories that count: Influence of news narratives on issue attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013514414 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  350. Shen, F., & Han, J. (2014). Effectiveness of entertainment education in communicating health information: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Communication, 24(6), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.927895 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  351. Shen, F., Sheer, V. C., & Li, R. (2015). Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018467 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  352. Shen, L. (2010a). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  353. Shen, L. (2010b). On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, 74(5), 504–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512278 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  354. Shen, L., Seung, S., Andersen, K. K., & McNeal, D. (2017). The psychological mechanisms of persuasive impact from narrative communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 17(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2017.02.003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  355. Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00318.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  356. Shrum, L. J. (2001). Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00777.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  357. Shrum, L. J. (2009). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In: J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (S. 50–73). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  358. Simons, J. J. P., & Green, M. C. (2013). Distracted by details: Narrative influence following conflicting stories. Media Psychology, 16(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.784694 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  359. Singhal, A., Cody, M. J., Rogers, E. M., & Sabido, M. (Hrsg.). (2004). Entertainment education and social change. History, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  360. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment education: A communication strategy for social change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  361. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2004). The status of entertainment-education worldwide. In: A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers, & M. Sabido (Hrsg.), Entertainment-education and social change. History, research, and practice (S. 3–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  362. Sklar, H. (2013). The art of sympathy in fiction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  363. Slater, M. D. (2002). Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Hrsg.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (S. 157–181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  364. Slater, M. D., Johnson, B. K., Cohen, J., Comello, M. L. G., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2014). Temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self: Motivations for entering the story world and implications for narrative effects. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12100 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  365. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research, 23(2), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023002003 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  366. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  367. Slater, M. D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  368. So, J., & Nabi, R. (2013). Reduction of perceived social distance as an explanation for media’s influence on personal risk perceptions: A test of the Risk Convergence Model. Human Communication Research, 39(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12005 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  369. Strange, J. J. (2002). How fictional tales wag real-world beliefs. Models and mechanisms of narrative influence. In: M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Hrsg.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (S. 263–286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  370. Strange, J. J., & Leung, C. C. (1999). How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem’s urgency, causes, and cures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  371. Strick, M., de Bruin, H. L., de Ruiter, L. C., & Jonkers, W. (2015). Striking the right chord: Moving music increases psychological transportation and behavioral intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000034 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  372. Suckfüll, M., & Scharkow, M. (2009). Modes of reception for fictional films. Communications, 34(4), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.023 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  373. Sukalla, F. (2018). Narrative Persuasion und Einstellungsdissonanz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  374. Sukalla, F., Bilandzic, H., Bolls, P. D., & Busselle, R. W. (2016). Embodiment of narrative engagement. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(4), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000153 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  375. Sukalla, F., Shoenberger, H., & Bolls, P. D. (2016). Surprise! An investigation of orienting responses to test assumptions of narrative processing. Communication Research, 43(6), 844–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215596363 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  376. Sukalla, F., Wagner, A. J. M., & Rackow, I. (2017). Dispelling fears and myths of organ donation: How narratives that include information reduce ambivalence and reactance. International Journal of Communication, 11, 5027–5047. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  377. Tal-Or, N. (2016). How co-viewing affects attitudes: The mediating roles of transportation and identification. Media Psychology, 19(3), 381–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1082918 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  378. Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  379. Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2016). Unpacking engagement: Convergence and divergence in transportation and identification. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735255 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  380. Tal-Or, N., & Tsfati, Y. (2016). When Arabs and Jews watch TV together: The joint effect of the content and context of communication on reducing prejudice. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 646–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12242 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  381. Tal-Or, N., & Tsfati, Y. (2018). Does the co-viewing of sexual material affect rape myth acceptance? The role of the co-viewer’s reactions and gender. Communication Research, 45(4), 577–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215595073 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  382. Tan, E. S. H. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  383. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences („absorption“), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036681 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  384. Thompson, R., & Haddock, G. (2012). Sometimes stories sell: When are narrative appeals most likely to work? European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.850 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  385. Toolan, M. J. (2001). Narrative. A critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  386. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544959 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  387. Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  388. Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating with the world: U.S. public diplomacy overseas. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  389. Tukachinsky, R. (2014). Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873777 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  390. Tukachinsky, R., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013). The effects of engagement with entertainment. Communication Yearbook, 37, 287–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679153 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  391. Tullman, K. (2012). HOT emotions: Dissolving the paradox of fiction. Contemporary Aesthetics, 10. Abgerufen von http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.7523862.0010.009 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  392. Tullman, K., & Buckwalter, W. (2013). Does the paradox of fiction exist? Erkenntnis, 79(4), 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-013-9563-z Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  393. Tun, P. A. (1989). Age differences in processing expository and narrative text. Journal of Gerontology, 44(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/44.1.P9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  394. van den Broek, P. (1989). The effects of causal structure on the comprehension of narratives: Implications for education. Reading Psychology, 10(1), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271890100103 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  395. van den Broek, P., & Gustafson, M. (1999). Comprehension and memory for texts: Three generations of reading research. In: S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Hrsg.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence (S. 15–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  396. van den Broek, P., Lorch, E. P., & Thurlow, R. (1996). Children’s and adults’ memory for television stories: The role of causal factors, story-grammar categories, and hierarchical level. Child Development, 67(6), 3010–3028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01900.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  397. van den Hende, E. A., Dahl, D. W., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Snelders, D. (2012). Narrative transportation in concept tests for really new products: The moderating effect of reader-protagonist similarity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00961.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  398. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  399. van Krieken, K., & Sanders, J. (2017). Engaging doctors and depressed patients: Effects of referential viewpoint and role similarity in health narratives. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4988–5006. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  400. van Laer, T., Ruyter, K. D., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1086/673383 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  401. Volkman, J. E., & Parrott, R. L. (2012). Expressing emotions as evidence in osteoporosis narratives: Effects on message processing and intentions. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 429–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01433.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  402. Vorderer, P. (1993). Audience involvement and program loyalty. Poetics, 22(1–2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(93)90022-9 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  403. Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., & Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00321.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  404. Walker, K. K., & Burns, K. (2018). #13ReasonsWhy health professionals and educators are tweeting: A systematic analysis of uses and perceptions of show content and learning outcomes. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1461171 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  405. Walter, H. (2012). Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits, and genes. Emotion Review, 4(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911421379 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  406. Walter, N., Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2017). Each medium tells a different story: The effect of message channel on narrative persuasion. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1286471 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  407. Walter, N., Murphy, S. T., & Gillig, T. K. (2018). To walk a mile in someone else’s shoes: How narratives can change causal attribution through story exploration and character customization. Human Communication Research, 44(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12112 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  408. Walton, K. L. (1978). Fearing fictions. The Journal of Philosophy, 75(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025831 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  409. Wang, J., & Calder, B. J. (2006). Media transportation and advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1086/506296 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  410. Weinstein, N. D. (2003). Exploring the links between risk perceptions and preventive health behavior. In: J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Hrsg.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (S. 22–53). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  411. Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.1 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  412. Wentzel, D., Tomczak, T., & Herrmann, A. (2010). The moderating effect of manipulative intent and cognitive resources on the evaluation of narrative ads. Psychology & Marketing, 27(5), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20341 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  413. Wheeler, C., Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (1999). Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(1), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210821 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  414. Williams, J. H., Green, M. C., Kohler, C., Allison, J. J., & Houston, T. K. (2011). Stories to communicate risks about tobacco. Development of a brief scale to measure transportation into a video story – The ACCE project. Health Education Journal, 70(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896910373171 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  415. Winston, B. (2014). The Rushdie fatwa and after: A lesson to the circumspect. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  416. Winterbottom, A., Bekker, H. L., Conner, M., & Mooney, A. (2008). Does narrative information bias individual’s decision making? A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 2079–2088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.037 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  417. Wirth, W., Hofer, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01434.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  418. Wirth, W., & Kühne, R. (2013). Grundlagen der Persuasionsforschung. In: W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 313–332). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18967-3_16 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  419. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  420. Wojcieszak, M., & Kim, N. (2016). How to improve attitudes toward disliked groups: The effects of narrative versus numerical evidence on political persuasion. Communication Research, 43(6), 785–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618480 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  421. Wolf, H. (2006). Index: Der Vatikan und die verbotenen Bücher. München: C. H. Beck. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  422. Wolfe, M. B. W. (2005). Causal and semantic relatedness in discourse understanding and representation. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651678 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  423. Wulff, H. J. (2005). Moral und Empathie im Kino: Vom Moralisieren als einem Element der Rezeption. In: M. Brütsch, V. Hediger, U. von Keitz, A. Schneider, & M. Tröhler (Hrsg.), Kinogefühle. Emotionalität und Film (S. 377–394). Marburg: Schüren. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  424. Wyer, R. S. (2004). Social comprehension and judgment: The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  425. Wyer, R. S., & Albarracin, D. (2005). Belief formation, organization, and change: Cognitive and motivational influences. In: D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), The handbook of attitudes (S. 273–322). New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  426. Wyer, R. S., & Shrum, L. J. (2015). The role of comprehension processes in communication and persuasion. Media Psychology, 18(2), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912584 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  427. Yale, R. N. (2013). Measuring narrative believability: Development and validation of the narrative believability scale (NBS-12). Journal of Communication, 63(3), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12035 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  428. Zebregs, S., van den Putte, B., Neijens, P., & de Graaf, A. (2015). The differential impact of statistical and narrative evidence on beliefs, attitude, and intention: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 30(3), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.842528 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  429. Zheng, L. (2014). Narrative transportation in radio advertising: A study of the effects of dispositional traits on mental transportation. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 21(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2014.891213 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  430. Zhou, S., & Shapiro, M. A. (2017). Reducing resistance to narrative persuasion about binge drinking: The role of self-activation and habitual drinking behavior. Health Communication, 32(10), 1297–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1219931 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  431. Zillmann, D. (1994). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23(1–2), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00020-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  432. Zillmann, D. (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532785xmep0101_5 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  433. Zillmann, D. (2006). Empathy: Affective reactivity to others’ emotional experiences. In: J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Hrsg.), Psychology of entertainment (S. 151–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  434. Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H.-B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  435. Zillmann, D., Hay, T. A., & Bryant, J. (1975). The effect of suspense and its resolution on the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Research in Personality, 9(4), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(75)90005-7 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  436. Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Univ. Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  437. Zwaan, R. A. (2015). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  438. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  439. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  440. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661
  441. Zwarun, L., & Hall, A. (2012). Narrative persuasion, transportation, and the role of need for cognition in online viewing of fantastical films. Media Psychology, 15(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.700592 Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783845283661

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft"
Cover des Buchs: Diffusionstheorie
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Veronika Karnowski
Diffusionstheorie
Cover des Buchs: Medialisierung und Mediatisierung
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Thomas Birkner
Medialisierung und Mediatisierung
Cover des Buchs: Priming
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Bertram Scheufele
Priming
Cover des Buchs: Theory of Reasoned Action - Theory of Planned Behavior
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Constanze Rossmann
Theory of Reasoned Action - Theory of Planned Behavior
Cover des Buchs: Fallbeispieleffekte
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Benjamin Krämer
Fallbeispieleffekte

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex