Cover des Buchs: Kultivierungsforschung
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff

Kultivierungsforschung

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Zusammenfassung

Do pictures on television affect our perception of reality? Cultivation research has been dealing with this question since the 1970s. Through a systematic comparison of heavy and light television viewers, cultivation researchers explore how television shapes long-term perceptions of social reality. Formulated by George Gerbner, the approach is one of the most cited and most discussed in communication science. This book provides insights into the development of cultivation research from Gerbner’s sociological considerations to the efforts to clarify the cultivation effect from a cognitive and psychological perspective. The methodological approaches are discussed critically. Given the growing diversity of television services and the increasing use of catch-up television, the book also shows the conceptual challenges facing cultivation research.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4839-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9057-7
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Konzepte. Ansätze der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Band
21
Sprache
Deutsch
Seiten
112
Produkttyp
Lehrbuch

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 10
    1. Der Kern der Kultivierungshypothese Kein Zugriff
    2. Das Cultural Indicators-Projekt Kein Zugriff
    1. Kritik und Weiterentwicklung Kein Zugriff
    2. Erste Annahmen zu psychologischen Prozessen Kein Zugriff
    3. Weiterentwicklung der psychologischen Perspektive Kein Zugriff
    1. Institutional Process Analysis Kein Zugriff
    2. Message System Analysis Kein Zugriff
    3. Cultivation Analysis Kein Zugriff
      1. Implikationen des Erhebungsmodus Kein Zugriff
      1. Experimentelle Ansätze Kein Zugriff
      2. Längsschnittliche Ansätze Kein Zugriff
    1. Genrespezifische Kultivierung Kein Zugriff
      1. Kultivierung von (Wert- und) Moralvorstellungen Kein Zugriff
      2. Kultivierung von Geschlechtsrollen Kein Zugriff
      3. Kultivierung von politischen Einstellungen Kein Zugriff
      1. Eigenschaften des Rezipienten Kein Zugriff
      2. Eigenschaften der Fernsehbotschaft Kein Zugriff
    4. 3 Interaktion zwischen Fernsehbotschaft und Rezipient Kein Zugriff
        1. Streamingplattformen als neue Produzenten Kein Zugriff
      2. 2 Perspektiven der zukünftigen Kultivierungsforschung Kein Zugriff
    1. Uses and Gratifications Kein Zugriff
    2. Agenda-Setting Kein Zugriff
    3. Third-Person-Effekte Kein Zugriff
    4. Fallbeispieleffekte Kein Zugriff
    5. Theory of planned behavior Kein Zugriff
  8. „Top Ten“ der Forschungsliteratur Kein Zugriff 93 - 95
  9. Literaturverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 96 - 110
  10. Bisher in der Reihe erschienene Bände Kein Zugriff 111 - 112

Literaturverzeichnis (184)

  1. AGF. Durchschnittliche tägliche Fernsehdauer in Deutschland nach Altersgruppen in den Jahren 2016 und 2017 (in Minuten), Statista – Das Statistik-Portal. Zugriff am 17.7.2018. Verfügbar unter https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/152389/umfrage/durchschnittliche-fernsehdauer-pro-tag/ Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Arendt, F. (2010). Cultivation effects of a newspaper on reality estimates and explicit and implicit attitudes. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 147–159. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Beullens, K., Roe, K. & van den Bulck, J. (2011). The impact of adolescents' news and action movie viewing on risky driving behavior. A longitudinal study. Human Communication Research, 37, 488–508. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Bilandzic, H. & Busselle, R. W. (2008a). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: a model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255–280. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Bilandzic, H. (2002). Genrespezifische Kultivierung durch Krimirezeption. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 14, 60–68. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Bilandzic, H. (2006). The perception of distance in the cultivation process: A theoretical consideration of the relationship between television content, processing experience, and perceived distance. Communication Theory, 16 (3), 333–355. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Bilandzic, H. & Busselle, R. W. (2008b). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58, 508–529. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Bilandzic, H., Hastall, M. R. & Sukalla, F. (2017). The morality of television genres. Norm violations and their narrative context in four popular genres of serial fiction. Journal of Media Ethics, 32, 99–117. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Bilandzic, H. & Rössler, P. (2004). Life according to television. Implications of genre-specific cultivation effects: The Gratification/Cultivation model. Communications, 29, 295–326. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Breuer, J., Kowert, R., Festl, R. & Quandt, T. (2015). Sexist games=sexist gamers? A longitudinal study on the relationship between video game use and sexist attitudes. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 18 (4), 197–202. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Busselle, R. W. & Crandall, H. (2002). Television viewing and perceptions about race differences in socioeconomic success. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 265–282. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Busselle, R. W. & Shrum, L. J. (2003). Media exposure and exemplar accessibility. Media Psychology, 5, 255–282. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Busselle, R., Ryabovolova, A. & Wilson, B. (2004). Ruining a good story. Cultivation, perceived realism and narrative. Communications, 29, 365-378. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Busselle, R. W. & Greenberg, B. S. (2009). The nature of television realism judgments. A reevaluation of their conceptualization and measurement. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 249–268. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Carveth, R. & Alexander, A. (1985). Soap opera viewing motivations and the cultivation process. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29, 259–273. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Chory-Assad, R. M. & Tamborini, R. (2003). Television exposure and the public's perceptions of physicians. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 197–215. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Chung, J. E. (2014). Medical dramas and viewer perception of health. Testing cultivation effects. Human Communication Research, 40, 333–349. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Closepet, R. & Tsui, L.-S. (2002). An interview with Professor George Gerbner. In M. Morgan (Ed.), Against the mainstream. The selected works of George Gerbner (S. 492–499). New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Coenen, L. & van den Bulck, J. (2016a). The bricklayer effect: How accounting for method bias affects first-order cultivation relationships. Mass Communication and Society,19, 782-799. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Coenen, L. & van den Bulck, J. (2016b). Cultivating the opinionated: The need to evaluate moderates the relationship between crime drama viewing and scary world evaluations. Human Communication Research, 42, 421–440. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Coenen, L. & van den Bulck, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing cultivation. Implications for testing relationships between fiction exposure and self-reported alcohol use evaluations. Media Psychology, 35, 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification. A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245–264. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Cuklanz, L. M. (2000). Rape on prime time. Television, Masculinity, and Sexual Violence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Custers, K. & van den Bulck, J. (2013). The cultivation of fear of sexual violence in women: Processes and moderators of the relationship between television and fear. Communication Research, 40, 96–124. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Daalmans, S., Hijmans, E. & Wester, F. (2017). From good to bad and everything in between. An analysis of genre differences in the representation of moral nature. Journal of Media Ethics, 32, 28–44. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Daschmann, G. (2001). Der Einfluß von Fallbeispielen auf Leserurteile. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Medienwirkung. Konstanz: UVK. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Diefenbach, D. L. & West, M. D. (2007). Television and attitudes toward mental health issues. Cultivation analysis and the third-person effect. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 181–195. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Diefenbach, D. L. & West, M. D. (2012). Cultivation and the third-person effect. In: M. Morgan, J. Shanahan & N. Signorielli (Hrsg.), Living with television now. Advances in cultivation theory & research (S. 329–346). New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Dirikx, A., van den Bulck, J. & Parmentier, S. (2012). The police as societal moral agents: „Procedural justice” and the analysis of police fiction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 38–54. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Dixon, T. L. & Linz, D. (2000). Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 131–154. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Dixon, T. L. (2008). Crime news and racialized beliefs. Understanding the Relationship between local news viewing and perceptions of African Americans and crime. Journal of Communication, 58, 106–125. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Dohle, M. (2017). Third-Person-Effekt. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Donnerstag, J. (1996). Der engagierte Mediennutzer. Das Involvement-Konzept in der Massenkommunikationsforschung. München: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Doob, A. N. & Macdonald, G. E. (1979). Television viewing and fear of victimization: Is the relationship causal? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 170–179. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Dykema, J., Basson, D. & Schaeffer, N. C. (2008). Face to face surveys. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (S. 240–248). Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Eisend, M. & Möller, J. (2007). The influence of TV viewing on consumers' body images and related consumption behavior. Marketing Letters, 18, 101–116. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Eschholz, S., Blackwell, B. S., Gertz, M. & Chiricos, T. (2002). Race and attitudes toward the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 327–341. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Fahr, A., Modes, J. & Schwarz, S. (2013). Familien als Problem, Ehrlichkeit als Chance. Eine Studie zur Kultivierung durch Scripted-Reality-Sendungen. tv diskurs, 66, 68–73. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Ferris, A. L., Smith, S. W., Greenberg, B. S. & Smith, S. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Journal of Communication, 57, 490–510. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Fouts, G. & Vaughan, K. (2002). Television situation comedies. Male weight, negative references, and audience reactions. Sex Roles, 46, 439–442. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Früh, W. (2001). Gewaltpotentiale des Fernsehangebots. Programmangebot und zielgruppenspezifische Interpretation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Fujioka, Y. (1999). Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: Examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 52–75. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Gehrau, V. (2003). (Film-) Genres und die Reduktion von Unsicherheit. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51, 213–231. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Gerbner, G. (1972). The structure and process of television program content regulation in the United States. In G. A. Comstock & E. A. Rubinstein (Hrsg.), Television and social behavior. Vol. I: Content and control (S. 386–414). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Gerbner, G. & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 171–199. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1984). Political correlates of television viewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 283–300. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Gerbner, G. (1959a). Mental illness on television: A study of censorship. Journal of Broadcasting, 4, 293–303. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Gerbner, G. (1959b). Education and the challenge of mass culture. AV Communication Review, 7, 264–278. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Gerbner, G. (1965). Institutional pressures upon mass communicators. The Sociological Review, 13, 205–248. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Gerbner, G. (1966). Educations about education by mass media. The Educational Forum, 31, 7–15. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Gerbner, G. (1970). Cultural Indicators: The case of violence in television drama. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 388, 69–81. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Gerbner, G. & Gross, L. (1979). Editorial Response: A reply to Newcomb's 'Humanistic Critique.'. Communication Research, 6, 223–230. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1980). The „Mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile No. 11. Journal of Communication, 30, 10–29. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1982). Charting the mainstream: Television's contributions to political orientations. Journal of Communication, 32, 100–127. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Hrsg.), Perspectives on media effects (S. 17–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N. & Morgan, M. (1980). Aging with television: Images of television drama and conceptions of social reality. Journal of Communication, 30, 37–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Glynn, C. J., Huge, M., Reineke, J. B., Hardy, B. W. & Shanahan, J. (2007). When Oprah intervenes. Political correlates of daytime talk show viewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 228–244. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Grabe, M. E. & Drew, D. G. (2007). Crime cultivation. Comparisons across media genres and channels. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 147–171. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Grabe, M. E., Lang, A. & Zhao, X. (2003). News content and form. Communication Research, 30, 387–413. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Green, M. C. & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Gross, K. & Aday, S. (2003). The scary world in your living room and neighborhood: Using local broadcast news, neighborhood crime rates, and personal experience to test agenda setting and cultivation. Journal of Communication, 53, 411–426. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Harrison, K. & Cantor, J. (1997). The relationship between media consumption and eating disorders. Journal of Communication, 47, 40–67. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Hartmann, T. (2017). Parasoziale Interaktion und Beziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Hawkins, R. P. & Pingree, S. (1980). Some processes in the cultivation effect. Communiction Research, 7, 193–226. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Hawkins, R. P. & Pingree, S. (1981a). Uniform Messages and habitual viewing. Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291–301. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Hawkins, R. P. & Pingree, S. (1981b). Using television to construct social reality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 25, 347–364. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Hawkins, R. P. & Pingree, S. (1982). Television's influence on social reality. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet & J. B. Lazar (Hrsg.), Television and behavior. Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (S. 224–247). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Hawkins, R. P. & Pingree, S. (1990). Divergent psychological processes in constructing social reality from mass media content. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Hrsg.), Cultivation analysis. New directions in media effects research (S. 35–50). Newbury Park: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S. & Adler, I. (1987). Searching for cognitive processes in the cultivation effect. Adult and adolescent samples in the United States and Australia. Human Communication Research, 13, 553–577. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Herda, D. (2010). How many immigrants? Foreign-born population innumeracy in Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 674–695. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Hetsroni, A. (2007). Open or closed — this is the question. The influence of question format on the cultivation effect. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 215–226. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Hetsroni, A. (2009). If you must be hospitalized, television is not the place. Diagnoses, survival rates and demographic characteristics of patients in TV hospital dramas. Communication Research Reports, 26, 311–322. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Hetsroni, A. & Lowenstein, H. (2012). Cultivation and agenda-setting. In M. Morgan, J. Shanahan & N. Signorielli (Hrsg.), Living with television now. Advances in cultivation theory & research (S. 307–328). New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Higgins, E. T. & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In: N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Hrsg.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (S. 69–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Hirsch, P. (1980). The 'scary world' of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s cultivation analysis. Communication Research, 7, 403–456. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Hoffman, B. L., Shensa, A., Wessel, C., Hoffman, R. & Primack, B. A. (2017). Exposure to fictional medical television and health: a systematic review. Health education research, 32, 107–123. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Holbrook, A. L., Green, M. C. & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 79–125. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Hughes, M. (1980). The fruits of cultivation analysis: A reexamination of some effects of television watching. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 287–302. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Jarvis, W. B. G. & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172–194. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Jeffres, L. W., Neuendorf, K., Bracken, C. C. & Atkin, D. (2008). Integrating theoretical traditions in media effects. Using third-person effects to link agenda-setting and cultivation. Mass Communication & Society, 11, 470–491. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Kahlor, L. & Eastin, M. S. (2011). Television's role in the culture of violence toward women. A study of television viewing and the cultivation of rape myth acceptance in the United States. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 215–231. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Kahlor, L. & Morrison, D. (2007). Television viewing and rape myth acceptance among college women. Sex Roles, 56, 729–739. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Katz, E. & Fialkoff, Y. (2017). Six concepts in search of retirement. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 86–91. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Katz, E. & Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of the mass media as „Escape”: clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 377–388. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Kim, J. & Rubin, A. M. (1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107–135. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. King, C. M. (2000). Effects of humorous heroes and villains in violent action films. Journal of Communication, 50, 5–24. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Klimmt, C. (2011). Das Elaboration-Likelihood-Modell. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Krämer, B. (2015). Fallbeispieleffekte. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Krüger, U. M. & Erk, S. (2005). Das Bild der Migranten im WDR Fernsehen. Media Perspektiven, 3, 105–114. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Kupferschmitt, T. (2017). Onlinevideo: Gesamtreichweite stagniert, aber Streamingdienste punkten mit Fiction bei Jüngeren. Media Perspektiven, 9, 447–462. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Lent, J. A. (2002). Interview with George Gerbner. In: M. Morgan (Ed.), Against the mainstream. The selected works of George Gerbner (S. 21–33). New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Lücke, S. (2007). Ernährung im Fernsehen: Eine Kultivierungsstudie zur Darstellung und Wirkung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Martins, N. & Harrison, K. (2011). Racial and gender differences in the relationship between children’s television use and self-esteem. Communication Research, 39, 338–357. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Martins, N. & Wilson, B. J. (2012). Mean on the screen. Social aggression in programs popular with children. Journal of Communication, 62, 991–1009. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Mastro, D., Behm-Morawitz, E. & Ortiz, M. (2007). The cultivation of social perceptions of Latinos. A mental models approach. Media Psychology, 9, 347–365. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Mastro, D. & Tukachinsky, R. H. (2012). Cultivation of perceptions of marginalized groups. In: M. Morgan, J. Shanahan & N. Signorielli (Hrsg.), Living with television now. Advances in cultivation theory & research (S. 38–60). New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Maurer, M. (2010). Agenda-Setting. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail's mass communication theory. London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Meltzer, C. E. & Schnauber, A. (2015). Specific situations or specific people? How do extrinsic and intrinsic factors interact in cultivation research? International Journal of Communication, 9, 2838–2861. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Miller, M. M. & Reeves, B. (1976). Dramatic TV content and children's sex‐role stereotypes. Journal of Broadcasting, 20, 35–50. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. Communication Yearbook, 20, 1–45. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Morgan, M. (1982). Television and adolescents' sex role stereotypes. A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 947–955. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Morgan, M. (1983). Symbolic victimization and real world fear. Human Communication Research, 9, 146–157. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Morgan, M. (Ed.). (2002). Against the mainstream. The selected works of George Gerbner. New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Morgan, M. (2012). George Gerbner. A critical introduction to media and communication theory. New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. (1991). Television and the cultivation of political attitudes in Argentina. Journal of Communication, 41, 88–103. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. (2010). The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 337–355. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. (2017). Television and the cultivation of authoritarianism. A Return visit from an unexpected friend. Journal of Communication, 30, 47. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Morgan, M., Shanahan, J. & Signorielli, N. (Hrsg.). (2012). Living with television now. Advances in cultivation theory & research. New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Nabi, R. L. (2009). Cosmetic surgery makeover programs and intentions to undergo cosmetic enhancements. A consideration of three models of media effects. Human Communication Research, 35, 1–27. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Nabi, R. L. & Sullivan, J. L. (2001). Does television viewing relate to engagement in protective action against crime? A cultivation analysis from a theory of reasoned action perspective. Communication Research, 28, 802–825. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Netflix Medien-Center. (2017, 22. August). Ausgerechnet gut: Wie der Netflix-Algorithmus Zuschauern neue Entertainment-Erlebnisse serviert. Zugriff am 26.4.2018. Verfügbar unter https://media.netflix.com/de/press-releases/decoding-the-defenders-netflix-unveils-the-gateway-shows-that-lead-to-a-heroic-binge. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Newcomb, H. (1978). Assessing the violence profile studies of Gerbner and Gross: A Humanistic critique and suggestion. Communication Research, 5, 264–282. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Perse, E. M. (1986). Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 175–193. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Pfau, M., Mullen, L. J. & Garrow, K. (1995). The influence of television viewing on public perceptions of physicians. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 441–458. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Potter, W. J. (1990). Adolescents' perceptions of the primary values of television programming. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 67, 843–851. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Potter, W. J. (1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 159–174. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Potter, W. J. (1991a). Examining cultivation from a psychological perspective. Component subprocesses. Communication Research, 18, 77–102. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Potter, W. J. (1991b). The Relationships between first- and second-order measures of cultivation. Human Communication Research, 18, 92–113. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Potter, W. J. (1993). Cultivation theory and research: A conceptual critique. Human Communication Research, 19, 564–601. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Potter, W. J. (2014). A critical analysis of cultivation theory. Journal of Communication, 64, 1015–1036. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Potter, W. J. & Chang, I. C. (1990). Television exposure measures and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 313–333. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Potter, W. J. & Riddle, K. (2007). A content analysis of the media effects literature. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 90–104. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Potter, W. J. & Smith, S. (2000). The context of graphic portrayals of television violence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 301–323. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Potter, W.j. & Warren, R. (1998). Humor as camouflage of televised violence. Journal of Communication, 48, 40–57. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Prommer, E. & Linke, C. (Institut für Medienforschung, Philosophische Fakultät, Universität Rostock, Hrsg.). (2017). Audiovisuelle Diversität? Geschlechterdarstellungen in Film und Fernsehen in Deutschland. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Riddle, K. (2010). Always on my mind. Exploring how frequent, recent, and vivid television portrayals are used in the formation of social reality judgments. Media Psychology, 13, 155–179. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Riddle, K., Potter, W. J., Metzger, M. J., Nabi, R. L. & Linz, D. G. (2011). Beyond cultivation. Exploring the effects of frequency, recency, and vivid autobiographical memories for violent media. Media Psychology, 14, 168–191. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Ross, J. I. (2012). Policing issues. Challenges and controversies. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Rössler, P. & Brosius, H.-B. (2001). Do talk shows cultivate adolescents' views of the world? A prolonged-exposure experiment. Journal of Communication, 51, 143–163. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Rössler, P. (2010). Inhaltsanalyse. Konstanz: UVK. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Rössler, P. (2011). Skalenhandbuch Kommunikationswissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Rossmann, C. (2002). Die heile Welt des Fernsehens. Eine Studie zur Kultivierung durch Krankenhausserien. München: Fischer. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Rossmann, C. (2008). Fiktion Wirklichkeit. Ein Modell der Informationsverarbeitung im Kultivierungsprozess. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Rossmann, C. (2011). Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behaviour. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Rossmann, C. & Brosius, H.-B. (2004). The problem of causality in cultivation research. Communications, 29, 379–397. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Rossmann, C. & Brosius, H.-B. (2005). Vom hässlichen Entlein zum schönen Schwan? Zur Darstellung und Wirkung von Schönheitsoperationen im Fernsehen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 53, 507–532. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Rubin, A. M. (1993). Audience activity and media use. Communication Monographs, 60, 98–105. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Ruhrmann, G., Sommer, D. & Uhlemann, H. (2006). TV-Nachrichtenberichterstattung über Migranten – Von der Politik zum Terror. In R. Geißler & H. Pöttker (Hrsg.), Integration durch Massenmedien. Medien und Migration im internationalen Vergleich Media and Migration: A Comparative Perspective. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Saito, S. (2007). Television and the cultivation of gender-role attitudes in Japan. Does television contribute to the maintenance of the Status Quo? Journal of Communication, 57, 511–531. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Schallhorn, C. (2013). Der Einfluss von Fernsehübertragungen von Mega-Events auf die Wahrnehmung des Gastgeberlandes. Studies in Communication | Media, 2, 497–523. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Schallhorn, C. (2017). Kultivierung durch Sportgroßereignisse. Zum Einfluss der Medienberichterstattung über die Fußballweltmeisterschaft 2014 auf die Wahrnehmung des Gastgeberlandes Brasilien. Köln: Herbert von Halem. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Scharrer, E. & Blackburn, G. (2017a). Cultivating conceptions of masculinity. Television and perceptions of masculine gender role norms. Mass Communication & Society, 21, 149–177. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Scharrer, E. & Blackburn, G. (2017b). Is reality TV a bad girls club? Television use, docusoap reality television viewing, and the cultivation of the approval of aggression. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 29, 235-257. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Scharrer, E., Kim, D. D., Lin, K.-M. & Liu, Z. (2006). Working hard or hardly working? Gender, humor, and the performance of domestic chores in television commercials. Mass & Society, 9, 215–238. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Schlütz, D. (2016). Quality-TV als Unterhaltungsphänomen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Schnauber, A. & Meltzer, C. E. (2015). The impact of personal experience in cultivation. Studies in Communication | Media (SCM), 4, 7–27. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Schnell, C. & Bilandzic, H. K. (2017). Television stories and the cultivation of moral reasoning. The tole of genre exposure and narrative engageability. Journal of Media Ethics, 32, 202–220. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Segrin, C. & Nabi, R. L. (2002). Does television viewing cultivate unrealistic expectations about marriage? Journal of Communication, 52, 247–263. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Shanahan, J. (1995). Television viewing and adolescent authoritarianism. Journal of adolescence, 18, 271–288. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Shanahan, J. (1998). Television and authoritarianism. Exploring the concept of mainstreaming. Political Communication, 15, 483–495. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Shapiro, M. A. & Lang, A. (1991). Making television reality. Unconscious processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18, 685–705. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Shrum, L. J. (1995). Assessing the social influence of television: A social cognition perspective on cultivation effects. Communication Research, 22, 402–429. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Shrum, L. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct accessibility. Human Communication Research, 22, 404–429. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Shrum, L. J. (2001). Processing strategy moderates the cultivation effect. Human Communication Research, 27, 94–120. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Shrum, L. J. (2002). Media consumption and perceptions of social reality: Effects and underlying processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Hrsg.), Media effects. Advances in theory and research (S. 69–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Shrum, L. J. (2004). The cognitive processes underlying cultivation effects are a function of whether the judgments are on-line or memory based. Communications, 29, 327–344. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Shrum, L. J. (2007). The implications of survey method for measuring cultivation effects. Human Communication Research, 33, 64–80. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Shrum, L. J. & Bischak, V. D. (2001). Mainstreaming, resonance, and impersonal impact: Testing moderators of the cultivation effect for estimates of crime risk. Human Communication Research, 27, 187–215. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Shrum, L. J. & O'Guinn, T. C. (1993). Process and effects in the construction of social reality: Construct accessibility as an explanatory variable. Communication Research, 20, 436–471. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Shrum, L. J., Wyer, R. S. & O'Guinn, T. C. (1998). The effects of television consumption on social perceptions: The use of priming procedures to investigate psychological processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 447–458. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Sigelman, L. & Niemi, R. G. (2000). Innumeracy about minority populations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 86–94. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and conceptions about sex roles. Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21, 341–360. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Signorielli, N., Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. (2018). The violence profile. Five decades of cultural indicators research. Mass Communication and Society, 81, 1–28. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Sink, A. & Mastro, D. (2016). Depictions of gender on primetime television. A quantitative content analysis. Mass Communication & Society, 20, 3–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Turecek, O. & Roters, G. (2018). Home-Entertainment-Branche mit guten Ergebnissen. Videomarkt und Videonutzung 2017. Media Perspektiven, 6, 312-319. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Van den Bulck, J. (2004). Research note: The relationship between television fiction and fear of crime: an empirical comparison of three causal explanations. European Journal of Communication, 19, 239–248. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Van den Bulck, J. (2012). International cultivation. In M. Morgan, J. Shanahan & N. Signorielli (Hrsg.), Living with television now. Advances in cultivation theory & research (S. 237–260). New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Van den Bulck, J. (2002). The impact of television fiction on public expectations of survival following in hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by medical professionals. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 325–329. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Weimann, G. (1984). Images of life in America. The impact of American T.V. in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 185–197. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Woo, H.-J. & Dominick, J. R. (2001). Daytime television talk shows and the cultivation effect among U.S. and international students. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 598–614. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Woo, H.-J. & Dominick, J. R. (2003). Acculturation, cultivation, and daytime TV talk shows. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 109–127. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Wünsch, C., Nitsch, C. & Eilders, C. (2012). Politische Kultivierung am Vorabend. Ein prolonged-exposure-Experiment zur Wirkung der Fernsehserie „Lindenstraße“. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 60, 176–196. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Yamamoto, M. & Ran, W. (2014). Should men work outside and women stay home? Revisiting the cultivation of gender-role attitudes in Japan. Mass Communication & Society, 17, 920–942. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Zillien, N. & Haufs-Brusberg, M. (2014). Wissenskluft und Digital Divide. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Medienpolitik & Medienethik", "Medienwissenschaft, Kommunikationsforschung"
Cover des Buchs: Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Greta Olson, Christian Schmidt, Benno Zabel, Jochen Bung, Franziska Martinsen, Hanna Meißner
Law & Critique | Recht & Kritik
Cover des Buchs: Israel in deutschen Medien
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jonas Hessenauer, Lukas Uwira
Israel in deutschen Medien
Cover des Buchs: Konstruktiver Journalismus
Monographie Vollzugriff
Julia Faltermeier
Konstruktiver Journalismus
Cover des Buchs: Deepfakes und das Persönlichkeitsrecht
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Antonia Dicke
Deepfakes und das Persönlichkeitsrecht
Cover des Buchs: Trennen – Verbinden – Takten
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Patrick Wöhrle, Stephan Hein, Stefan Meißner
Trennen – Verbinden – Takten

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex