Online Dispute Resolution: New Challenges

Prof. Dr. Dário Moura Vicente; Prof. Dr. Elsa Dias Oliveira; Prof. Dr. João Gomes de Almeida

doi:10.5771/9783748931508

Zusammenfassung

Online Dispute Resolution - New Challenges ist ein Buch, das sich mit einem sehr aktuellen Thema mit praktischen Auswirkungen befasst: der Nutzung des Internets in Streitbeilegungsmechanismen, einschließlich Schiedsverfahren, Gerichtsverfahren und Mediation. Das Buch ist in drei Kapitel unterteilt, die die folgenden Themen behandeln: „Verfahrensgarantien und Online-Streitbeilegung“, „Online-Verhandlungen - insbesondere Beweismittel“ und „Vertraulichkeit, Datenschutz und Sicherheit“. Alle Aufsätze wurden von bekannten Schiedsrichter:innen, Wissenschaftler:innen, Anwält:innen und Richter:innen verfasst. Jeder Aufsatz versucht, die Perspektive einer anderen Gruppe von Interessenvertretern in Bezug auf die Bereiche darzustellen, in denen derzeit auf Online-Streitbeilegung zurückgegriffen wird. Die Herausgeber des Buches sind Professoren an der juristischen Fakultät der Universität Lissabon, zu deren Forschungsgebieten unter anderem internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Rechtsstreitigkeiten und Mediation gehören. Mit Beiträgen vonAntónio Abrantes Geraldes, Paula Costa e Silva, Madalena Dinis Ayala, Diego Fernandez Arroyo, Marc Henry, Catarina Monteiro Pires, Pilar Perales Viscasillas, Luís Filipe Pires de Sousa, Sofia Ribeiro Mendes, Juan Serrada Hierro, Joana Soares Correia, Bruno Sousa Rodrigues und Riu Vouga.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2022
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-8619-0
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-3150-8
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 241
Produkttyp: Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 18
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. A Judge's Perspective: Guarantees of a Fair Trial and Online Dispute ResolutionSeiten 21 - 36
  Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
2. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. Introduction
    Autor:innen:
  2. B. The Limits of Equal Treatment in Arbitration
    Autor:innen:
  3. C. Good Administration of Justice in Transnational Arbitration
    Autor:innen:
  4. D. Good Administration of Online Transnational Arbitration: the View from the Tribunal
    Autor:innen:
  5. E. Conclusion
    Autor:innen:
  6. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
3. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. Introduction
    Autor:innen:
  2. B. The Status Quo prior to the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Autor:innen:
  3. C. The Challenges of Online Dispute Resolution
    Autor:innen:
  4. D. Conclusions
    Autor:innen:
4. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. Autor:innen:
    1. I. Guarantees in Dispute Resolution
      Autor:innen:
    2. II. Simplification
      Autor:innen:
    3. III. Respect for the Will of the Parties and Flexibility.
      Autor:innen:
    4. IV. Procedural Momentum
      Autor:innen:
    5. V. Administrative and Logistical Assistance
      Autor:innen:
  2. B. Extraordinary Health Crisis Situation
    Autor:innen:
  3. C. Resolution of 16 March 2020
    Autor:innen:
  4. D. CIMA Briefing Note of 6 April 2020
    Autor:innen:
  5. E. CIMA Resolution of 2 June 2020
    Autor:innen:
  6. Autor:innen:
    1. I. Introduction
      Autor:innen:
    2. II. CIMA Audiovisual System
      Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 1. Identification of the Parties to the Hearing
        Autor:innen:
      2. 2. IP Address from which the Evidence or Statement is issued
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3. Measures to ensure simultaneous Visibility of all Participants
        Autor:innen:
      4. 4. Measures to ensure the Reliability of Evidence and Statements
        Autor:innen:
      5. 5. Measures to be taken to ensure the Isolation of Witnesses and Expert Witnesses
        Autor:innen:
      6. 6. Measures regarding the Presentation of Documents
        Autor:innen:
      7. 7. Recording of the Hearing
        Autor:innen:
  7. G. CIMA Virtual Hearing Organisation Protocol
    Autor:innen:
1. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. Online Examination of Witnesses: an Obstacle to Establishing their Truthfulness?
    Autor:innen:
  2. B. Is the Trier of Fact's Decision Affected by the mode of the Witness's Presentation to the Court?
    Autor:innen:
  3. C. Online Hearings and the Right to a Fair Trial
    Autor:innen:
  4. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
2. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. Introduction
    Autor:innen:
  2. B. Soft Law, the new Arbitration Rules and Practices
    Autor:innen:
  3. C. Witness and Expert Testimony
    Autor:innen:
  4. D. Other Evidence: Signature Recognition and On-site Visual Inspections
    Autor:innen:
  5. E. Conclusions
    Autor:innen:
  6. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
3. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
4. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
1. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. Confidentiality versus Transparency: Arguments For and Against Both
    Autor:innen:
  2. Autor:innen:
    1. I. ‘Confidentiality’ versus ‘Privacy’
      Autor:innen:
    2. Autor:innen:
      1. 1. National Arbitration Legislation is generally silent on Confidentiality
        Autor:innen:
      2. 2. Choice of Law Governing Confidentiality
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3. Party Autonomy as regards Confidentiality
        Autor:innen:
    3. III. Confidentiality under Institutional Arbitration Rules
      Autor:innen:
    4. IV. Implied Confidentiality Obligations
      Autor:innen:
    5. V. Scope and Limits of Confidentiality Obligations
      Autor:innen:
    6. VI. Secrecy of the Arbitrators' Deliberations
      Autor:innen:
    7. VII. Privacy and Confidentiality of Arbitration Hearings
      Autor:innen:
  3. C. Confidentiality in the Portuguese Voluntary Arbitration Law
    Autor:innen:
  4. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
2. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. Autor:innen:
    1. I. Confidentiality in the Arbitrator’s Data Storage Activity
      Autor:innen:
    2. II. Privacy in the Arbitrator’s Data Processing Activity
      Autor:innen:
  2. B. The Contribution of the Soldier Arbitrators to the Security of the Arbitral Hives
    Autor:innen:
  3. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
3. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. Introduction
    Autor:innen:
  2. Autor:innen:
    1. I. General Overview
      Autor:innen:
    2. II. Legal Framework for conducting Remote Hearings
      Autor:innen:
    3. III. Challenges and Practical Tips for holding Remote Hearings
      Autor:innen:
  3. Autor:innen:
    1. I. General Overview
      Autor:innen:
    2. II. Legal Basis for the Confidentiality of the Arbitration
      Autor:innen:
    3. III. Challenges and Practical Tips
      Autor:innen:
  4. Autor:innen:
    1. I. General Overview
      Autor:innen:
    2. II. Potential Threats to Cybersecurity
      Autor:innen:
    3. III. Practical Tips
      Autor:innen:
  5. E. Final Remarks
    Autor:innen:
  6. Bibliography
    Autor:innen:
4. Autor:innen:
  Download Kapitel (PDF)
  1. A. ARBITRARE’s Mandate
    Autor:innen:
  2. B. Parties involved in Disputes submitted to ARBITRARE
    Autor:innen:
  3. C. Procedure
    Autor:innen:
  4. D. Online Platform for Dispute Resolution
    Autor:innen:
  5. Autor:innen:
    1. I. Privacy
      Autor:innen:
    2. II. Confidentiality
      Autor:innen:
  6. F. ARBITRARE’s Track Record
    Autor:innen:

Literaturverzeichnis (166 Einträge)

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, V.3. 1131a10-b15; Politics, III.9.1280 a8-15, III. 12. 1282b18-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Sylvain Bollée, ‘Les pouvoirs inhérents des arbitres internationaux” (2021) 418 Recueil des cours, 21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Chester Brown, 'Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals' (2005) 76(1) British Yearbook of International Law, 195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Christophe de Bruet and Johannes Landbrecht, ‘Cloud computing and US-style discovery: new challenges for European companies’ (2016) 32 (2) Arbitration International, 297. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Bin Cheng, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Stevens & Sons Limited, London 1953). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Michael Chesterman, ‘Contempt: in the common law, but not in the civil law’ (1997) 46(3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 521. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Giuditta Cordero-Moss, ‘The Alleged Failure of Arbitration to Address Due Process Concerns: Is Arbitration under Attack?’ in Axel Calissendorff and Patrik Schöldström (eds), Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook (Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn 2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Yves Derains, ‘Une nouvelle approche de la procedure arbitrale internationale’ (2021-3) Revue de l’arbitrage, 629. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
John Fellas, ‘International Arbitration in the Midst of COVID-19: One Year Later’ (2021) New York Law Journal. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo, ‘Arbitrator’s Procedural Powers: The Last Frontier of Party Autonomy?’ in Franco Ferrari (ed), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris, New York 2016), 199. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo, ‘Nothing is for Free: The Prices to Pay for Arbitralizing Legal Disputes’ in Loïc Cadiet, Burkhard Hess and Marta Requejo Isidro (eds), Privatizing Dispute Resolution (Nomos, Baden-Baden 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Franco Ferrari and Friedrich Rosenfeld (eds), Inherent Powers of Arbitrators (Juris, New York 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Franco Ferrari, Friedrich Rosenfeld and Dietmar Czernich (eds), Due Process as a Limit to Discretion in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, Deventer 2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Emmanuel Gaillard, ‘Aspects philosophiques du droit de l’arbitrage international’ (2007), 329 Recueil des cours,49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Howard Holtzmann and Joseph Neuhaus, A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary (Kluwer Law International, Deventer 1989). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Günther Horvath and Stephan Wilske, Guerrilla Tactics in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, Deventer 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Charles Jarrosson, Sébastien Besson and Antonio Rigozzi, ‘La réforme du droit suisse de l’arbitrage international’ (2021) 1 Revue de l’arbitrage 11. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Philip Jessup, Transnational Law (Yale University Press, New Haven 1956). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Charles Kotuby and Luke Sobota, General Principles of Law and International Due Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Carole Malinvaud, “Will Electronic Evidence and e-discovery Change the Face of Arbitration?” in Teresa Giovannini and Alexis Mourre (eds), Written Evidence and Discovery in International Arbitration: New Issues and Tendencies (Kluwer Law International, Deventer 2009), 373. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Gaurav Natarajan Ramani, ‘One size doesn’t fit all: the General Data protection Regulation vis-à-vis international commercial arbitration’ (2020) 37(3) Arbitration International, 613. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Lucy Reed, ‘Ab(use) of due process: sword vs. shield’ (2017) 33(3) Arbitration International, 361. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Lisa Richman, ‘Compliance and Data Protection’ in Maxi Scherer, Lisa Richman and Rémy Gerbay (eds), Arbitrating under the 2020 LCIA Rules: A User's Guide (Kluwer Law International, Deventer, 2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Erik Schäfer, 'E-Signature of Arbitral Awards', in Maxi Scherer, Niuscha Bassiri et al. (eds), International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Kluwer Law International, Deventer, 2020), 151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Maxi Scherer, Dharshini Prasad and Dina Prokic, ‘The Principle of Equal Treatment in International Arbitration’ (2018) SSRN <<https://ssrn.com/abstract=3377237>>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Audley Sheppard, ‘The Lawyer’s Duty to Arbitrate in Good Faith and with Civility’ (2021) 37(2) Arbitration International, 535. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Ulpian, Inst. 1,1,3-4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
V.V. Veeder, ‘The 2001 Goff Lecture: The Lawyer’s Duty to Arbitrate in Good Faith’ (2002) 18(4) Arbitration International 431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-37
Michael Aamodt and Heather Custer, ‘Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception’ (2006) 15 The Forensic Examiner, 6.eng Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Mark Bennett, ‘Unspringing The Witness Memory and Demeanor Trap: What Every Judge And Juror Needs to Know About Cognitive Psychology And Witness Credibility’ (2015) 64 American University Law Review, 1331. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Glynis Bogaard, Ewout Meijer, Aldert Vrij and Harald Merckelbach, ‘Strong, but Wrong: Lay People’s and Police Officers’ Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception’, PLoS ONE 11(6): e0156615. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156615, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Vincent Denault, L’Incidence de la Communication Non Verbale Lors de Procès: Une Menace à l’Integrité du Système Judiciaire? (Master’s Thesis, Quebec, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Vincent Denault, Pierrich Plusquellec, Louise Jupe, Michel St-Yves, Norah Dunbar, Maria Hartwig, Siegfried Sporer, Jessica Rioux-Turcotte, Jonathan Jarry, Dave Walsh, Henry Otgaar, Andrei Viziteu, Victoria Talwar, David Keatley, Iris Blandón-Gitlin, Clint Townson, Nadine Deslauriers-Varin, Scott Lilienfeld, Miles Patterson, Igor Areh, Alfred Allan, Hilary Cameron, Rémi Boivin, Leanne ten Brinke, Jaume Masip, Ray Bull, Mireille Cyr, Lorraine Hope, Leif Strömwall, Stephanie Bennett, Faisal Al Menaiya, Richard Leo, Annelies Vredeveldt, Marty Laforest, Charles Honts, Antonio Manzanero, Samantha Mann, Pär-Anders Granhag, Karl Ask, Fiona Gabbert, Jean-Pierre Guay, Alexandre Coutant, Jeffrey Hancock, Valerie Manusov, Judee Burgoon, Steven Kleinman, Gordon Wright, Sara Landström, Ian Freckelton, Zarah Vernham and Peter van Koppen, ‘The Analysis of Nonverbal Communication: The Dangers of Pseudoscience in Security and Justice Contexts’ (2019) 30 Anuario de Psicologia Jurídica, 1.eng Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Vincent Denault and Miles Patterson, ‘Justice and Nonverbal Communication in a Post-pandemic World: An Evidence-Based Commentary and Cautionary Statement for Lawyers and Judges’ (2020) 45 Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Laurence Dumoulin and Christian Licoppe, ‘Videoconferencing, New Public Management, and Organizational Reform in the Judiciary’ (2016) 8 Policy & Internet, 313. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Mark Frank and Thomas Feeley, ‘To Catch a Liar: Challenges to Research in Lie Detection Training’ (2003) 31 Journal of Applied Communication Research, 58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Camille Gourdet, Amanda Witwer, Lynn Langton, Duren Banks, Michael Planty, Dulani Woods and Brian Jackson, Court Appearances in Criminal Proceedings Through Telepresence (RAND Corporation, <https://doi.org/10.7249/RR3222>, 2020), accessed on 2021-02-08. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Christie Marlene Fuller, High-Stakes, Real-World Deception: An Examination of the Process of Deception and Deception Detection Using Linguistic-Bases Cues (Dissertation, Oklahoma, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Antoine Garapon, Bem Julgar, Ensaio Sobre o Ritual Judiciário (Instituto Piaget, Lisboa, 1999). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Judith Hall, Terrence Horgan and Nora Murphy, ‘Nonverbal Communication’ (2019) 70 Annual Review of Psychology, 271.s Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Shannon Havener, Effects of Videoconferencing on Perception in the Courtroom, (Master’ Thesis, Arizona, 2014). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Valerie Hauch, Siegfried Sporer, Stephen Michael and Christian Meissner, ‘Does Training Improve the Detection of Deception? A Meta-Analysis’ (2016) 43 Communication Research, 283. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Sara Landström, Pär Granhag and Maria Hartwig, ‘Witnesses Appearing Live Versus on Video: Effects on Observers’ Perception, Veracity Assessments and Memory’ (2005) 19 Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 913. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Sara Landström, CCTV, Live and Videotapes, How Presentation Mode Affects the Evaluation of Witnesses (University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Sara Landström , Karl Ask and Charlotte Sommar, ‘The emotional male victim: Effects of presentation mode on judged credibility’ (2015) 56 Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Mouraz Lopes, A Fundamentação da Sentença no Sistema Penal Português: Legitimar, Diferenciar, Simplificar (Almedina, Coimbra, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Nuno Pissarra, ‘Audiências judiciais por teleconferência em processo civil’ (2020) 1-4 Revista de Direitos e Estudos Sociais, 167. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Marc-André Reinhard et al, ‘Listening, Not Watching: Situational Familiarity and the Ability to Detect Deception’ (2011) 101 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 467. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Cristian Contreras Rojas, La Valoración de la Prueba de Interrogatorio (Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Amy Salyzyn, ‘A New Lens: Reframing the Conversation about the Use of Video Conferencing in Civil Trials in Ontario’ (2012) 50 Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 429. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Julia Simon-Kerr, ‘Unmasking Demeanor’ (2020) 88 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo, 158. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Luís Filipe Pires de Sousa, Prova Testemunhal, Noções de Psicologia do Testemunho (Almedina, Coimbra, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Lisa Vavonese, Elizabeth Ling, Rosalie Joy and Samantha Kobor, How Video Changes the Conversation (Center for Court Innovation, New York, 2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Aldert Vrij, Detecting Lies and Deceit, Pitfalls and Opportunities (2nd, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Aldert Vrij and Pär Anders Granhag, ‘Eliciting Cues to Deception and Truth: What Matters are the Questions Asked’ (2012) 1 Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 110. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Aldert Vrij, Maria Harwig and Pär Anders Granhag, ‘Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception’ (2019) 70 Annual Review of Psychology, 295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Gemma Warren, Elisabeth Schertler and Peter Bull, ‘Detecting Deception from Emotional and Unemotional Cues’ (2009) 33 Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Aaron Williams, ‘The Noisy "Silent Witness": The Misperception and Misuse of Criminal Video Evidence’ (2019) 94 Indiana Law Journal, 1651. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
David Xu, Ronald Cenfetelli and Karl Aquino, ‘The Influence of Media Cue Multiplicity on Deceivers and Those Who Are Deceived’ (2012) 106 Journal of Business Ethics, 337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-87
Neil Ashton, Daniel Langley, and Elizabeth Davidson, ‘Creating Compelling Expert Testimony in International Arbitration Using Visual Aids’ (2019) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/11/23/creating-compelling-expert-testimony-in-international-arbitration-using-visual-aids/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Niuscha Bassiri, ‘Chapter 5. Conducting Remote Hearings: Issues of Planning, Preparation and Sample, Procedural Orders’” in Maxi Sherer, Mohamed Wahab and Niuscha Bassiri (eds), International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Wolkters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2021), 105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Gary Benton, ‘How Will the Coronavirus Impact International Arbitration?’ (2020) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/03/13/how-will-the-coronavirus-impact-international-arbitration/; Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Cherie Blair, ‘Getting ahead of the curve: how arbitration can better meet the needs of parties, people and planet’ (2020) Chartered Institute of Arbitrators 2020 Roebuck Lecture, available at: https://ciarb.org/media/10078/20200611-ciarb-2020-roebuck-lecture-by-cherie-blair-cbe-qc-mciarb.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Gary Born, Annliese Day and Hafez Virjee, ‘Chapter 7. Empirical Study of Experiences with Remote Hearings: A Survey of User´s Views’, in Maxi Sherer, Mohamed Wahab and Niuscha Bassiri (eds), International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Wolkters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2021), 137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Cesmarc, ‘A pandemia na maior arbitragem societária do país, a disputa pela Eldorado’ (2020), available at https://exame.com/negocios/a-pandemia-na-maior-arbitragem-societaria-do-pais-a-disputa-pela-eldorado/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Volterra Fietta, ‘Client Alert: The impact of COVID-19 on arbitration proceedings and due process’”, 9 April 2020, available at: https://www.volterrafietta.com/volterra-fietta-client-alert-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-arbitration-proceedings-and-due-process/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Jacky Fung, ‘Personal Takeaway from the Warzone: Organizing, Preparing and Attending a Two-Week Virtual Hearing’ (2020), Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/08/02/personal-takeaway-from-the-warzone-organizing-preparing-and-attending-a-two-week-virtual-hearing/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Ema Gojkovic and Michael McIlwrath, ‘International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution’, in Maxi Sherer, Mohamed Abdel Wahab and Niuscha Bassiri (eds), International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Wolkters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2021), 191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Sean Hardy and Jeremy Yeap, ‘How Sacred is the Right to be Heard in Arbitration?’ (2021) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/06/14/how-sacred-is-the-right-to-be-heard-in-arbitration/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Maria Hoyos and Carolina Botelho, “Portugal”, The ICCA Reports: Does a Right to a Physical Hearing Exist in International Arbitration? (2021) available at <https://www.arbitration-icca.org/right-to-a-physical-hearing-international-arbitration>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Sejin Kim, ‘Audiovisual Evidence in International Arbitration: Would 'seeing is believing' still work?’, in Carlos González Bueno (ed), 40 Under 40 International Arbitration (Dykinson, Madrid, 2021), 211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Malcolm Malca Vargas, Comunicación persuasiva para el litigio arbitral (Palestra, Lima, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Emma Martín, ‘The use of Technology in International Arbitration’, in Carlos González Bueno (ed), 40 Under 40 International Arbitration (Dykinson, Madrid, 2021) 337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Wendy Miles, ‘Chapter 6. Remote Advocacy, Witness Preparation & Cross-Examination: Practical Tips & Challenges’, in Maxi Sherer, Mohamed Wahab and Niuscha Bassiri (eds), International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Wolkters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2021), 121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Rebeca Mosquera, ‘Cybersecurity in times of virtual hearings’, in Carlos González Bueno (ed), 40 Under 40 International Arbitration (Dykinson, Madrid, 2021), 201. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Sophie Nappert and Mihaela Apostol, ‘Healthy Virtual Hearings’ (2020) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/07/17/healthy-virtual-hearings/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Ricardo Olmos, ‘Uso de realidad virtual y realidad aumentada en el arbitraje internacional’ (2020) 7 Latin American Journal of Trade Policy, 39. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Jim Pastore, ‘Practical Approaches to Cybersecurity in Arbitration’ (2017) 40-3 Fordham International Law Journal, 1023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Pilar Perales Viscasillas, ‘El arbitraje internacional durante la pandemia y más allá: soft law, audiencias virtuales y sostenibilidad’ in María Arias (ed), Anuario de Arbitraje 2022 (Civitas: Thomson-Reuters, Pamplona, 2022) (forthcoming). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Pilar Perales Viscasillas, ‘Audiencias virtuales y debido proceso’ (2021) 42 Spain Arbitration Review, 9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Catherine Rogers and Fahira Brodlija, ‘Chapter 3. Arbitrator Appointments in the Age of COVID-19. International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution’ in Maxi Sherer, Mohamed Wahab and Niuscha Bassiri (eds), International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Wolkters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2021), 49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Ignacio Santabaya and Paula Fernández, ‘The holding of virtual hearings in arbitration: main action protocols issued by national and international institutions’ (2021) 8 La Ley Arbitraje y Mediación, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Maxi Scherer, ‘Remote Hearings in International Arbitration <https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=es&prev=_t&sl=es&tl=en&u=https://www.viac.eu/images/COVID19/Maxi_SCHERER_Remote_Hearings_in_International_Arbitration_An_Analytical_Framework_May_2020.pdf>: An Analytical Framework’ (2020) 37-4 Journal of International Arbitration, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Maxi Scherer, ‘Asynchronous Hearings: The Next New Normal?’ (2020) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/09/09/asynchronous-hearings-the-next-new-normal/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Maxi Scherer, Franz Schwarz, Helmut Ortner and Ole Jensen, ‘In a 'First' Worldwide, Austrian Supreme Court Confirms Arbitral Tribunal's Power to Hold Remote Hearings Over One Party's Objection and Rejects Due Process Concerns’ (2020) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/10/24/in-a-first-worldwide-austrian-supreme-court-confirms-arbitral-tribunals-power-to-hold-remote-hearings-over-one-partys-objection-and-rejects-due-process-concerns/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Christopher Selby, Layne Hellrung and Stephanie Mills, ‘Canada: Crossing The Line: Misconduct During Virtual Examinations’, (Cassels, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Patricia Shaughnessy, ’Chapter 2. Initiating and Administering Arbitration Remotely. International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution’, in Maxi Sherer, Mohamed Wahab and Niuscha Bassiri (ed), International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Wolkters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2021), 27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Janet Walker, ‘Virtual Hearings: An Arbitrator's Perspective’ (2020), available at https://www.tribunalarbitraldesporto.pt/noticias/virtual-hearings-an-arbitrator-s-perspective. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Laura Zimmerman, ‘International Arbitration 2.0. Strategies for Tech-Savy Proceedings’, in Carlos González Bueno (ed), 40 Under 40 International Arbitration (Dykinson, Madrid, 2021), 185. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-107
Madalena Ayala, ‘The Rising Inefficiency in Arbitration: is Technology the Solution?’ (2021) XVI Revista Internacional de Arbitragem e Conciliação, 19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Gary Born, Anneliese Day and Hafez Virjee, ‘Videoconferencing technology in arbitration: new challenges for connectedness (2020 Survey)’ (2020) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/07/08/videoconferencing-technology-in-arbitration-new-challenges-for-connectedness-2020-survey/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Giacomo Elgueta, James Hosking and Yasmine Lalou, Does a Right to a Physical Hearing Exist in International Arbitration? (ICCA, The Hague, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
ICC, Checklist for a Protocol on Virtual Hearings and Suggested Clauses for Cyber-Protocols and Procedural Orders Dealing with the Organisation of Virtual Hearings (2021), available at https://iccwbo.org/publication/icc-checklist-for-a-protocol-on-virtual-hearings-and-suggested-clauses-for-cyber-protocols-and-procedural-orders-dealing-with-the-organisation-of-virtual-hearings/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Nika Madyoon, ‘Virtual Hearings in International Arbitration: Challenges, Solutions, and Threats to Enforcement’ (2021) 87-4 Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 597. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Saniya Mirani, ‘Due Process Concerns in Virtual Witness Testimonies: An Indian Perspective’ (2020) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/11/17/due-process-concerns-in-virtual-witness-testimonies-an-indian-perspective/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Rebeca Mosquera, ‘Chapter 13 Cybersecurity in Times of Virtual Hearings’ in Carlos González-Bueno (ed), 40 under 40 International Arbitration (Dykinson,, Madrid, 2021), 201. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Queen Mary University of London, School of International Arbitration (SIA), 2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World (2021), available at https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2021-international-arbitration-survey/#:~:text=The%202021%20International%20Arbitration%20Survey,the%20SIA%20Surveys%20to%20date. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Matthew Saunders, ‘Chapter 7: COVID-19 and the Embracing of Technology: A ‘New Normal’ for International Arbitration’, in Axel Calissendorff and Patrik Scholdstrom (eds), Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook 2020 (Stockholm Centre for Commercial Law, Stockholm, 2020), 99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Maxi Scherer, Niuscha Bassiri and Mohamed Wahab, International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution <https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Scherer-2020-Ch07?_ga=2.251405766.1903980069.1649153371-474818826.1643456529> (Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Seoul Protocol on Video Conferencing in International Arbitration, 2020, available at <http://www.kcabinternational.or.kr/user/Board/comm_notice_view.do?BBS_NO=548&BD_NO=169&CURRENT_MENU_CODE=MENU0025&TOP_MENU_CODE=MENU0024>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Kimberley Wade and Ula Cartwirght-Finch, ‘The Science of Witness Memory: Implications for Practice and Procedure in International Arbitration’ (2021) 39-1 Journal of International Arbitration, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Jeffrey Waincymer, ‘Online Arbitration’ (2020) IX-1 Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Rikard Wikstrom-Hermansen and Christopher Spreigl, ‘Chapter 13: Witness Examination in International Arbitration - Best Practices Regarding Cross-Examination and Related Issues’, in Axel Calissendorf and Patrik Scholdstrom (eds), Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook 2020 (Stockholm Centre for Commercial Law, Stockholm, 2020), 245. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-133
Jeremy Bailenson, ‘Nonverbal Overload: a Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue’ (2021) 2-1 Techonology, Mind, Behaviour, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Gary Born, Anneliese Day and Hafez Virjee, ‘Empirical Study of Experiences with Remote Hearings’, in International Arbitration and the COVID19 Revolution (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2020), 2. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Maria Burgos, ‘The Fear of The Sole Arbitrator’ (2018) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/08/07/the-fear-of-the-sole-arbitrator/, accessed on 22 December 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Michael Carter and Celene Fuller, ’Symbols, meaning, and action: The past, present, and future of symbolic interactionism’ (2016) 64-6 Current Sociology Review, 931. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Erica Cartmill, Sian Beilock and Susan Goldin-Meadow, ‘A word in the hand: action, gesture and mental representation in humans and non-human primates’ (2012) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Michael Corbalis, ‘Language as gesture’ (2009) 28-5 Human movement Science, 556. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Remy Gerbay, ‘Due Process Paranoia’ (2016) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2016/06/06/due-process-paranoia/, accessed on 22 December 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Leon Kopecky and Victoria Pernt, ‘A Bid for Strong Arbitrators’ (2016) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at https://www.google.com/search?q=A+Bid+for+Strong+Arbitrators&oq=A+Bid+for+Strong+Arbitrators&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i64l3j69i60l3.896j0j4&sourceId=chrome&ie=UTF-8, accessed on 22 December 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Gary Lupyan, ‘How Reliable is Perception’ (2017) 45-1 Philosophical Topics, 81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Sundaresh Menon, ‘Dispelling Due Process Paranoia: Fairness, Efficiency and the Rule of Law’ (2021) 17-1 Asian International Arbitration Journal, 1.eng Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Paris Merritt, Rob Jenkins and Alan Kingstone, ‘The Medusa effect reveals levels of mind perception in pictures’ (2021) 118-32 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Rutger Metsch and Rémy Gerbay, ‘Prospect Theory and due process paranoia: what behavioral models say about arbitrators’ assessment of risk and uncertainty’ (2020) 36-2 Arbitration International, 233. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Roby Nadler, ‘Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: Theorizing spatial Dynamics as third skins in computer-mediated communications’ (2020) 58 Computers and Composition, 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Miriam Novack and Susan Goldin-Meadow, ‘Gesture as representational action: A paper about function’ (2017) 24-3 Psychonnomic Bulletin & Review, 652.eng2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Bella De Paulo, James Lindsay, Brian Malone, Laura Muhlenbruck, Kelly Charlton and Harris Cooper, ‘Cues to deception’ (2003) 129 Psychological Bulletin, 74.eng2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Queen Mary's University of London, International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration, 2018, <https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2018/>, accessed on 22 December 2021.eng2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Maxi Scherer, Franz Schwarz, Helmut Ortner and J. Ole Jensen, ‘In a “First” Worldwide, Austrian Supreme Court Confirms Arbitral Tribunal’s Power to Hold Remote Hearings Over One Party’s Objection and Rejects due Process Concerns’ (2021) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 24 October 2021, available at <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/10/24/in-a-first-worldwide-austrian-supreme-court-confirms-arbitral-tribunals-power-to-hold-remote-hearings-over-one-partys-objection-and-rejects-due-process-concerns/>, accessed on 23 December 2021.eng2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Aldert Vrij, Maria Hartwig and Pär Granhag, ‘Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception’ (2019) Annual Review of Psychology, 295.eng2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-145
Manuel Barrocas, Lei da Arbitragem Comentada (Almedina, Coimbra, 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Gary Born, International Arbitration: Law and Practice (3rd edn, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Gary Born, International Commercial Arbitration, (3rd edn, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
António Caramelo, ‘Da Condução do Processo Arbitral / Comentário aos arts. 30.º a 38.º da Lei da Arbitragem Voluntária’ (2013) Ano 73-II/III Revista da Ordem dos Advogados, 669. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
António Cordeiro, Tratado da Arbitragem, (Almedina, Coimbra, 2016). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Mark Darian-Smith and Varun Ghosh, ‘The Fruit of the Arbitration Tree: Confidentiality in International Arbitration’ (2015) 81-4 Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 360. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Yves Fortier, ‘The Occasional Unwarranted Assumption of Confidentiality’ (1999) 15 Arb. Int’l, 131. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
José Júdice, ‘Confidencialidade e Transparência em Arbitragens de Direito Público’, in Marcelo de Sousa and Eduardo Pinto (eds.), Liber Amicorum Fausto de Quadros - Volume II, (Almedina, Coimbra, 20169, 87. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Armindo Mendes, Lei da Arbitragem Voluntária Anotada (4th edn, Almedina, Coimbra, 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
António Monteiro, Artur da Silva and Daniela Mirante, Manual de Arbitragem (Almedina, Coimbra, 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Mário Oliveira (coord.), Lei da Arbitragem Voluntária Comentada (Almedina, Coimbra, 2013). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Nayiber Pozo, ‘Confidencialidad, privacidad y transparencia en el arbitraje internacional’ (2021) 40 enero-junio Revista de Derecho Privado (Universidad Externado de Colombia), 465. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
UNCITRAL, Report of the Secretary-General: possible features of a model law on international commercial arbitration (XII Y.B. UNCITRAL, 1981), 75 (90). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-159
Roger Alford, ‘The Virtual World and the Arbitration World’ (2001) 18 Journal of International Arbitration, 449. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Marie-Charlotte Dalle, ‘L’arbitrage, une justice alternative pour une nouvelle offre de justice’ (2020) 7-8 La Semaine Juridique, 12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Allison Goh, ‘Digital Readiness Index for Arbitration Institutions: Challenges and Implications for Dispute Resolution under the Belt and Road Initiative’ (2021) 38-2 Journal of International Arbitration, 253. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Marc Henry, ‘Infraction pénale et confidentialité de l’arbitrage : devoirs et obligations des arbitres et des conseils’ (2019) 2019-1 Revue de l’Arbitrage, 65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Saniya Mirani, ‘Tackling Cyber Security Threats in Arbitration - Have We Done enough?’ (2020) ICAR, available at https://investmentandcommercialarbitrationreview.com/2020/09/tackling-cyber-security-threats-in-arbitration-have-we-done-enough/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Kathleen Paisley, ‘It’s All About the Data: The Impact of the EU General Data Protection Regulation on International Arbitration’ (2018) 41 Fordham Int’l L.J., 841 (856). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Kathleen Paisley, ‘Managing Arbitration Data under the GDPR’ (2018) Global Arbitration Review. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Diana Rahman, ‘The Role of Arbitral Institution in Cybersecurity and Data Protection in International Arbitration’ (2020) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/11/24/the-role-of-arbitral-institutions-in-cybersecurity-and-data-protection-in-international-arbitration/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Claire de Westgaver, ‘Cybersecurity in International Arbitration - A Necessity and An Opportunity For Arbitral Institutions’ (2017) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/10/06/cyber-security/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Claire de Westgaver, ‘Cybersecurity in International Arbitration: Don’t be The Weakest Link’ (2019) Kluwer Arbitration Blog, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/02/15/cybersecurity-in-international-arbitration-dont-be-the-weakest-link/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-181
Jalal El Ahdab, Pablo Berenguer, Michael Chik, Jonathan Choo, Jiri Jaeger, Nicholas Peacock, Lucas Pitts and Gavin Zuo, ‘Approaches to Evidence across Legal Cultures’ in Amy Kläsener, Martin Magál and Joseph Neuhaus (eds), The Guide to Evidence in International Arbitration, (GAR, London, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Nigel Blackaby, Constantine Partasides, Alan Redfern and Martin Hunter, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (5th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Gary Born, International Commercial Arbitration (2nd edn, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Gary Born, Anneliese Day and Hafez Virjee, ‘Empirical Study of Experiences with Remote Hearings’, in Maxi Scherer, Niuscha Bassiri and Mohamed Wahab (eds) International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2020), 2. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Sampaio Caramelo, ‘A Condução do Processo Arbitral - Comentários aos arts 30º a 38º da Lei de Arbitragem Voluntária’ (2013) 73-II/III ROA, 669. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
António Menezes Cordeiro, Tratado da Arbitragem - Comentário à Lei 63/2011, de 14 de Dezembro (Almedina, Coimbra, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Bernardo Cremades and Rodrigo Cortés ‘The Principle of Confidentiality in Arbitration: A Necessary Crisis’ (2013) 23-3 Journal of Arbitration Studies, 25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Carolina Pitta e Cunha ‘Arbitration in Portugal before and after the COVID-19 pandemic’ (2020) 12-12 Revista Internacional de Arbitragem e Conciliação, 189 <https://www.asf.com.pt/Biblioteca/Catalogo/winlibsrch.aspx?skey=8C986694E19C41888D24AA5121809D18&pesq=7&doc=29644>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Maria Hoyos and Carolina Sampaio, Does a right to a physical hearing exist in international arbitration?, ICCA Projects: 2-6, available at <https://cdn.arbitration-icca.org/s3fs-public/document/media_document/Portugal-Right-To-A-Physical-Hearing-Report.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Paul Fridland and Stavros Brekoulakis, 2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration (Queen Mary University of London and School of International Arbitration), available at <https://arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---The-Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2).PDF>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Howard Holtzmann and Joseph Neuhaus, A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (Legislative History and Commentary) (Kluwer Law, The Hague, 1989). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Sofia Ribeiro Mendes ‘Chapter 9: Evidence’ in André Pereira da Fonseca, Dário Moura Vicente, Mariana França Gouveia, Alexandra Nascimento Correia and Filipe Vaz Pinto (eds) International Arbitration in Portugal (Wolters Kluwer, The Hague, 2020), 97131. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
António Pedro Pinto Monteiro, Artur da Silva and Daniela Mirante, Manual de Arbitragem, (Almedina, Coimbra, 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Ana Serra e Moura, in ‘Chapter 7: The Conduct of Arbitral Proceedings’ in André Pereira da Fonseca, Dário Moura Vicente, Mariana França Gouveia, Alexandra Nascimento Correia and Filipe Vaz Pinto (eds) International Arbitration in Portugal (Wolters Kluwer, The Hague, 2020), 97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Elsa Dias Oliveira, Arbitragem Voluntária: uma Introdução (Almedina, Coimbra, 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Michael Ostrove, Kate Vejar, Ben Sanderson and Peter Anagnostou, Online Arbitration Hearings: A review of key developments in response to COVID-19, available online at <https://www.dlapiper.com/pt/portugal/insights/publications/2020/09/virtual-hearings-report>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Jan Paulsson and Nigel Rawding, ‘The Trouble with Confidentiality’ (1995) 11 ARB. INT’L 303. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Jean-François Poudret and Sébastien Besson, Comparative Law of International Arbitration (2nd Edn, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Maxi Scherer, ‘Remote Hearings in International Arbitration: An Analytical Framework’ (2020) 37-4 Journal of International Arbitration, 2. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
David Singer ‘Arbitration Privacy and Confidentiality In the Age of (Coronavirus) Technology’ (2020) 38-7 Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 107. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205
Mohamed Wahab, Exculpating the Fear to Virtually Hear: A Proposed Pathway to Virtual Hearing Considerations in International Arbitrations, 2020, available at <https://delosdr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Abdel-Wahab_Exculpating-the-Fear-to-Virtually-Hear_August-2020_NYSBA_NYDRL.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748931508-205

Online Dispute Resolution