Cover des Buchs: Conceptualising Transnational Corporate Groups for International Criminal Law
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Conceptualising Transnational Corporate Groups for International Criminal Law

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2017

Zusammenfassung

Der Band schlägt ein Konzept des transnationalen Konzerns für das Völkerstrafrecht vor. Die Analyse von Völkerrecht, EU-Kartellrecht, US- und englischem Recht sowie ökonomischer Theorien zeigt den Konzern als ökonomische Einheit, wenn Kontrollmacht und tatsächliche Kontrollausübung vorliegen. Das Buch ergänzt die strafrechtliche Debatte um einen bis jetzt vernachlässigten gesellschaftsrechtlichen Blickwinkel und schafft mehr Klarheit hinsichtlich der Konturen und notwendigen Elemente des transnationalen Konzerns. Die Kriterien entspringen einer gründlichen Analyse transnationaler, übergreifender Strukturmerkmale des Konzerns in den untersuchten Rechtsordnungen. Das Hauptaugenmerk liegt dabei auf der tatsächlichen Kontrollausübung und ihren verschiedenen Formen. Als Ergebnis der Synthese steht ein detailliertes und ökonomisch abgesichertes Konzept des transnationalen Konzerns, der als potenzieller Adressat völkerstrafrechtlicher Normen in Betracht kommt.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4094-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8403-3
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht
Band
31
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
409
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 14
      1. Status Quo in International Criminal Law Kein Zugriff
        1. Origins: The Rome Conference Kein Zugriff
        2. Focus on National Criminal Law Theory Kein Zugriff
        3. No Definition of the Object of Regulation Kein Zugriff
      3. Regulation Gap in National Law Kein Zugriff
        1. Independence from National Law Kein Zugriff
        2. Principle of Complementarity Kein Zugriff
        3. Criminal Law Premises Kein Zugriff
        4. Summary Kein Zugriff
        1. International Law Kein Zugriff
        2. EU Competition Law Kein Zugriff
        3. UK Law Kein Zugriff
        4. US Alien Tort Statute Kein Zugriff
        5. Comprehensive Analysis of Criteria Kein Zugriff
      2. Economic Analysis Kein Zugriff
      3. Case Study Kein Zugriff
    3. Possible Use of the Concept Kein Zugriff
      1. Arguments Concerning a de lege lata InternationalLegal Personality Kein Zugriff
      2. No Definition of the Object of Regulation Kein Zugriff
      1. Human Rights Treaties Kein Zugriff
      2. International Labour Law Kein Zugriff
      3. International Environmental Law Kein Zugriff
      4. Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. Investments of Transnational Corporate Groups Kein Zugriff
        1. Bilateral Investment Treaties Kein Zugriff
        2. Diplomatic Protection Kein Zugriff
        1. Consent to Apply Article 25 (2) b ICSID Convention Kein Zugriff
        2. General Criteria for Control Kein Zugriff
        3. Pyramidal Transnational Corporate Groups Kein Zugriff
        4. Limits to Corporate Group Structure Arguments Kein Zugriff
      4. Special Requirements in Bilateral Investment Treaties Kein Zugriff
      5. Abuse in International Investment Law Kein Zugriff
      6. Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. UN Norms and the Special Representative Kein Zugriff
      2. OECD Guidelines Kein Zugriff
      3. ILO Tripartite Declaration Kein Zugriff
      4. Summary Kein Zugriff
    5. Summary Kein Zugriff
    1. Corporate Groups as one Undertaking Kein Zugriff
        1. Presumption for Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Kein Zugriff
        2. Other Shareholdings Kein Zugriff
        1. Involvement in Day-to-Day Business Kein Zugriff
        2. Strategic Control Kein Zugriff
        3. Integrated Business Kein Zugriff
        4. Personnel Links Kein Zugriff
        5. Unified Appearance Kein Zugriff
        6. Reporting Obligations Kein Zugriff
        1. General Criteria Kein Zugriff
        2. Successful Rebuttals Kein Zugriff
      4. Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. A Corporate Group as a Perpetrator Kein Zugriff
      2. Jurisdiction Kein Zugriff
      3. Succession Kein Zugriff
      4. Fines Kein Zugriff
      5. Procedure Kein Zugriff
    4. Summary Kein Zugriff
    1. Attribution of Acts and Knowledge to Corporations Kein Zugriff
      1. The Salomon Principle Kein Zugriff
      2. Transfer to Corporate Groups Kein Zugriff
      1. Single Entity Kein Zugriff
      2. Piercing the Corporate Veil Kein Zugriff
      3. Agency within Corporate Groups Kein Zugriff
      4. Beneficial Ownership Kein Zugriff
      5. Direct Duty of Parent Kein Zugriff
      6. Interpretation of Contracts and Statutes Kein Zugriff
    4. Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. Subject Matter Kein Zugriff
        1. Private Actors Kein Zugriff
        2. Corporations Kein Zugriff
        1. General Standards Kein Zugriff
          1. General Agency Test Kein Zugriff
          2. Parental Control Kein Zugriff
        3. Alter Ego Kein Zugriff
        4. Enterprise Theory Kein Zugriff
          1. Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Kein Zugriff
          2. Rebuttal Kein Zugriff
        2. Forum Non Conveniens Kein Zugriff
      5. Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. Group Privilege Kein Zugriff
      2. Extension of Copperweld Jurisprudence Kein Zugriff
      3. No Single Economic Entity Doctrine Kein Zugriff
  7. Comprehensive Analysis of Criteria Kein Zugriff 253 - 258
    1. Methodology and Terminology Kein Zugriff
      1. Transaction Cost Economics Kein Zugriff
      2. Other Theories Kein Zugriff
      3. Summary Kein Zugriff
      1. Control via Shareholdings Kein Zugriff
        1. Decentralisation Kein Zugriff
        2. Relationships within Transnational Corporate Groups Kein Zugriff
        1. Vertical Integration Kein Zugriff
        2. Horizontal Integration Kein Zugriff
      4. Personnel Links Kein Zugriff
      5. Unified Appearance Kein Zugriff
      6. Reporting Obligations Kein Zugriff
      7. Summary and Limitations Kein Zugriff
      1. Limited Liability: A Short Introduction Kein Zugriff
        1. Fostering Innovation Kein Zugriff
        2. Specific Risks Kein Zugriff
      3. Summary Kein Zugriff
    5. Summary Kein Zugriff
    1. Material Allegations Kein Zugriff
    2. Corporate Group Structure Kein Zugriff
      1. Power to Control Kein Zugriff
        1. Involvement in Day-to-Day Management Kein Zugriff
        2. Strategic Control Kein Zugriff
        3. Integrated Business Kein Zugriff
        4. Personnel Links Kein Zugriff
        5. Unified Appearance Kein Zugriff
        6. Reporting Obligations Kein Zugriff
      3. Result Kein Zugriff
  10. Summary Kein Zugriff 327 - 336
  11. Outlook: Consequences for International Criminal Law Kein Zugriff 337 - 342
      1. PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE Kein Zugriff
      2. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Kein Zugriff
      3. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNALS UNDER CONTROLCOUNCIL LAW NO. 10 Kein Zugriff
      4. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Kein Zugriff
      5. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMERYUGOSLAVIA Kein Zugriff
      6. INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENTDISPUTES Kein Zugriff
      7. UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE Kein Zugriff
      8. HOC TRIBUNALS Kein Zugriff
      1. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS Kein Zugriff
      2. EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE Kein Zugriff
      3. GENERAL COURT Kein Zugriff
      4. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Kein Zugriff
      1. AUSTRALIAN HIGH COURT Kein Zugriff
      2. BUNDESGERICHTSHOF Kein Zugriff
      3. BUNDESKARTELLAMT Kein Zugriff
      4. HOUSE OF LORDS (UNITED KINGDOM) Kein Zugriff
      5. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDO Kein Zugriff
      6. PRIVY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED KINGDOM Kein Zugriff
      7. HER MAJESTY'S COURT OF APPEAL IN ENGLAND,CIVIL DIVISION Kein Zugriff
      8. HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES Kein Zugriff
      9. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Kein Zugriff
      10. UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS Kein Zugriff
      11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Kein Zugriff
      12. UNITED STATES STATE COURT Kein Zugriff
  13. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 379 - 409

Literaturverzeichnis (551)

  1. Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Aaronson, Susan/Hoigham, Ian, “Re-righting Business”. John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms, Human Rights Quarterly 2013, p. 333-364. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0032
  3. Aberle, Lukas, Sanktionsdurchgriff und wirtschaftliche Einheit im deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht, Köln 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Acconci, Pia, Determining the Internationally Relevant Link between a State and a Cor-porate Investor. Recent Trends concerning the Application of the Genuine Link Test, Journal of World Investment & Trade 2004, p. 139-176. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/221190004X00344
  5. Aceves, William, Relative Normativity. Challenging the Sovereignty Norm Through Human Rights Litigation, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 2002, p. 261-278. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Acharya, Upendra, Globalization and Hegemony Shift. Are States Merely Agents of Cor¬porate Capitalism?, Boston College Law Review 2013, p. 937-969. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Adam, Jendrik, Die Strafbarkeit juristischer Personen im Völkerstrafrecht, Baden-Baden 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845261720-225
  8. Ahrens, Börries, Gemeinschaftsunternehmen als wirtschaftliche Einheit, EuZW 2013, p. 899-903. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Alchian, Armen A./Demsetz, Harold, Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, Amercian Economic Review 1972, p. 777-795. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Allen, Michael Thad, The Business of Genocide. The SS, Slave Labor, and the Con-centration Camps, North Carolina 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Almus, Matthias/Nerlinger, Eric A., Growth of New Technology-Based Firms. Which Factors Matter?, Small Business Economics 1999, p. 141-154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1008138709724
  12. Amann, Diane Marie, Capital Punishment. Corporate Criminal Liability for Gross Violations of Human Rights, Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 2001, p. 327-337. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Amao, Olufemi O., The Foundation for a Global Company Law for Multinational Cor-porations, International Company and Commercial Law Review 2010, p. 275-288. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Ambos, Björn/Mahnke, Volker, How Do MNC Headquarters Add Value?, Manage¬ment International Review 2010, p. 403-412. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0040-5
  15. Ambos, Kai, Article 25 ICC, in: O. Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd Ed. München 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Ambos, Kai, Command Responsibility and Organisationsherrschaft. Ways of Attri-buting International Crimes to the 'Most Responsible', in: H. van der Wilt/ Google Scholar öffnen
  17. A. Nollkaemper (eds.), System Criminality in International Law, Cambridge 2009, p. 127-157. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596650
  18. Ambos, Kai, Treatise on International Criminal Law, Vol. I: Foundations and General Part, Oxford 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199657926.001.0001
  19. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Jurisdiction Ratione Personae under the Con¬vention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, British Yearbook of International Law 1974, p. 227-267. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, Jurisdiction of Specific International Tribunals, Leiden 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493928.001
  21. Anderes, Sabrina, Fremde im eigenen Land. Die Haftbarkeit transnationaler Unter-nehmen für Menschenrechtsverletzungen an indigenen Völkern, Zürich 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Andersson, Ulf/Björkman, Ingmar/Furu, Patrick, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity, MNC Headqarters' Control Stratagy and Transfer of Subsidiary Competencies, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Network Knowledge in International Business, Cheltenham 2002, p. 115-136. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781781950623.00014
  23. Antunes, José Augusto Quelhas Lima Engrácia, Liability of Corporate Groups. Autonomy and Control in Parent-Subsidiary Relationships in US, German, and EEC Law. An International and Comparative Perspective, Deventer 1994. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Antunes, José Engrácia, The Liability of Polycorporate Enterprises, Connecticut Journal of International Law 1999, p. 197-231. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Areeda, Phillip E./Hovenkamp, Herbert, Antitrust Law. An Analysis of Antitrust Princip¬les and Their Application. Volume VII, 3rd Ed. Austin 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Arnold, Denis G., Corporate Moral Agency, in: P. A. French/H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Boston 2006, p. 279-291. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2006.00140.x
  27. Arrow, Kenneth J., Innovation in Large and Small Firms, in: J. Ronen (ed.), Entrepreneurship. Price Institute for Entrepreneurial Studies, Toronto, Canada 1983, p. 15-28. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Arvidsson, Niklas/Birkinshaw, Julian, Identiying Leading-Edge Market Knowledge in Multinational Corporations, in: V. Mahnke/T. Pedersen (eds.), Knowledge Flows, Governance and the Multinational Enterprise. Frontiers in International Management Research, New York 2004, p. 151-176. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230523876_8
  29. Bainbridge, Stephen M., Corporation Law and Economics, New York 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Balke, S., Der IG-Farben Prozeß in Nürnberg, Chemie Ingenieur Technik 1949, p. 33-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/cite.330210111
  31. Bälz, Ulrich, Einheit und Vielfalt im Konzern, Festschrift für Ludwig Raiser zum 70. Geburtstag 1974, p. 287-338. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bälz, Ulrich, Verbundene Unternehmen, AG 1992, p. 277-311. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Barba Navaretti, Giorgio /Venables, Anthony J., Multinational Firms in the World Economy, Princeton 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Barbier de La Serre, Éric/Lagathu, Eileen, The Law on Fines Imposed in EU Competition Proceedings. Fifty Shades of Undertakings, Journal od European Competition Law & Practice 2015, p. 530-552. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpv021
  35. Bartlett, Christopher A./Ghoshal, Sumantra, Managing Across Borders. The Trans-national Solution, 2nd Ed. Harvard 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Becerra, Manuel, Theory of the Firm for Strategic Management, Cambridge 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626524
  37. Bennet, Matthew/Díaz, Franscisco Enrique González/Leupold, Henning/Vernet, Anna/ Woods, Donncadh, Horizontal Cooperation Agreements, in: J. Faull/A. Nikpay (eds.), The EU Law of Competition, Oxford 2014, p. 883-1022. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Berle, Adolf A., The Theory of Enterprise Entity, Columbia Law Review 1947, p. 343-358. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1118398
  39. Berle, Adolf A./Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York 1947 [1932]. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Bernardini, Piero, Nationality Requirements under BITs and Related Case Law, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  41. F. Ortino/L. Liberti/A. Sheppard/H. Warner (eds.), Investment Treaty Law. Current Issues II, London 2007, p. 17-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Betz, Demian, Holding Multinational Corporations Responsible for Human Rights Abuses Committed by Security Forces in Conflict-Ridden Nations, DePaul Business Law Journal 2001, p. 163-206. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Birkinshaw, Julian/Pedersen, Torben, Strategy and Management in MNE Subsidiaries, in: A. M. Rugman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, Oxford 2009, p. 367-388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234257.003.0014
  44. Bishop, R. Doak/Crawford, James/Reisman, W. Michael, Foreign Investment Disputes, Den Haag 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Bitros, George, Scale, Scope and Entrepreneurship, in: Y. Cassis/I. P. Minoglou (eds.), Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, New York p. 61-76. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Blanpain, Roger, The Badger Case and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Deventer 1977. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6040-5_3
  47. Blanpain, Roger, Multinational Enterprises and Codes of Conduct. The OECD Guidelines for MNEs in Perspective, in: R. Blanpain (ed.), Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, Alphen aan den Rijn 2007, p. 189-214. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Blumberg, Phillip I., The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law, Oxford 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Blumberg, Philipp I., The Transformation of Modern Corporation Law: The Law of Corporate Groups, Connecticut Law Review 2005, p. 605-618. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Blumberg, Philipp I./Strasser, Kurt A./Georgakopoulos, Nicholas L./Gouvin, Eric J., Blumberg On Corporate Groups, 2nd Ed. New York 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Borkin, Joseph, The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben, New York 1978. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Bouquet, André, Attribution of Cartel Liability. Public Enforcer, in: F. Wijckmans/ Google Scholar öffnen
  53. F. Tuytschaever (eds.), Horizontal Agreements and Cartels in EU Competition Law, Oxford 2015, p. 235-259. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Bourke, James, Parental Liability for Cartel Infringements, GCP Antitrust Chronicle 2009, p. 1-7. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Boyd, Brian K./Hoskisson, Robert E., Corporate Governance of Business Groups, in: A. M. Colpan/T. Hikino/J. R. Lincoln (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Oxford 2000, p. 670-695. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Braun, Tillmann Rudolf, Ausprägungen der Globalisierung. Der Investor als partielles Subjekt im Internationalen Investitionsrecht. Qualität und Grenzen dieser Wir¬kungs-einheit, Baden-Baden 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845236438
  57. Brilmayer, Lea/Paisley, Kathleen, Personal Jurisdiction and Substantive Legal Relations. Corporations, Conspiracies, and Agency, California Law Review 1986, p. 1-40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3480353
  58. Broberg, Morten, The Concept of Control in the Merger Control Regulation, European Competition Law Review 2004, p. 741-751. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Broder, Douglas, U.S. Antitrust Law and Enforcement, 2nd Ed. New York 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Bronckers, Marco/Vallery, Anne, No Longer Presumed Guilty? The Impact of Fundamental Rights on Certain Dogmas of EU Competition Law, World Com¬petition Law and Economic Review 2011, p. 535-570. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Bronstein, Arturo S., International Labour Law. Current Challenges, Basingstoke 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30076-7
  62. Broomhall, Bruce, International Justice and the International Criminal Court. Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law, Oxford 2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274246.003.0004
  63. Buckley, Peter J./Casson, Mark, Strategic Complexity in International Business, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  64. A. M. Rugman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, Oxford 2009, p. 90-124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234257.001.0001
  65. Buckley, Peter J./Casson, Mark, The Multinational Enterprise Revisited, London 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230250468
  66. Buell, Samuel W., The Blaming Function of Entity Criminal Liability, Indiana Law Journal 2006, p. 473-538. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Bunting, Nikolaus, Konzernweite Compliance. Pflicht oder Kür?, ZIP 2012, p. 1542-1549. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Bürger, Christian, Unternehmensinterne Aufteilung einer Geldbuße der Kommission, WuW 2015, p. 348-355. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Burghardt, Boris, Modes of Participation and their Role in a General Concept of Crimes under International Law, in: C. Burchard/O. Triffterer/J. Vogel (eds.), The Review Conference and the Future of the International Criminal Court. Proceedings of the First AIDP Symposium for Young Penalists in Tübingen, Germany, Co-organized by the AIDP YP Committtee, Köln 2010, p. 81-94. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Burnley, Richard, Group Liability for Antitrust Infringements. Responsibility and Accountability, World Competition Law and Economic Review 2010, p. 595-614. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Burton, Richard, Saint-Gobain. Recidivism Revisted, Journal of European Com¬petition Law & Practice 2014, p. 624-626. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpu068
  72. Cahn, Andreas/Donald, David C., Comparative Company Law. Text and Cases on the Laws Governing Corporations in Germany, the UK and the USA, Cambridge 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779909
  73. Calliess, Gralf-Peter, Introduction. Transnational Corporations Revisited, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2011, p. 601-615. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.2.601
  74. Calliess, Gralf-Peter/Mertens, Jens, Transnational Corporations, Global Competition Policy, and the Shortcomings of Private International Law, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2011, p. 834-872. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.2.843
  75. Calliess, Gralf-Peter/von Harder, Stefan, Intra-Firm Trade Law: Contract Enforce¬ment and Dispute Resolution in Transnational Corporations, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 211-246. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_8
  76. Cantwell, John A./Mudambi, Ram, Multinational Enterprises and Competence-Creating Knowledge Flows: A Theorectical Analysis, in: V. Mahnke/T. Pedersen (eds.), Knowledge Flows, Governance and the Multinational Enterprise. Frontiers in International Management Research, New York 2004, p. 38-57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230523876_3
  77. Caron, Francois, Innovation, in: Y. Cassis/I. P. Minoglou (eds.), Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, New York 2005, p. 111-126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230522633_5
  78. Carstensen, Angela, The Case of I.G. Farben, in: P. Zumbansen (ed.), Zwangsarbeit im Dritten Reich: Erinnerung und Verantwortung. NS-Forced Labor: Remembrance and Responsibility, Baden-Baden 2002, p. 119-136. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Cassese, Antonio, International Law, 2nd Ed. Oxford 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Cassese, Antonio; Gaeta, Paola, Cassese's International Criminal Law, 3rd Ed. Oxford 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199694921.001.0001
  81. Casson, Mark/Godley, Andrew, Entrepreneurship and Historical Explanations, in: Y. Cassis/I. P. Minoglou (eds.), Entrepreneurship in Theory and History, New York 2005, p. 25-60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230522633_2
  82. Casto, William, The New Federal Common Law of Tort Remedies for Violations of International Law, Rutgers Law Journal 2006, p. 635-669. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Caves, Richard E., Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, 3rd Ed. Cambridge 2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619113.002
  84. Cernic, Jernej Letnar, Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights. A Critical Analysis of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Hanse Law Review 2008, p. 71-100. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Chandler, Alfred D., Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge 1962. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Chandler, Alfred D., Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1990. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3115503
  87. Charney, Jonathan, Transnational Corporations and Developing Public International Law, Duke Law Journal 1983, p. 748-788. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1372465
  88. Childress, Donald, The Alien Tort Statute, Federalism, and the Next Wave of Transnational Litigation, The Gorgetown Law Journal 2012, p. 709-757. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Clapham, Andrew, The Question of Jurisdiction Under International Criminal Law Over Legal Persons. Lessons from the Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court, in: M. T. Kamminga (ed.), Liability of Multinational Corporations under International Law, The Hague 2000, p. 139. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Clapham, Andrew, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors, Oxford 2006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288465.001.0001
  91. Cleveland, Sarah, The Kiobel Presumption and Extraterritoriality, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 2013, p. 8-27. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Coase, Ronald H., The Nature of the Firm, Economica 1937, p. 386-405. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
  93. Cockayne, James, Corporate Criminal Liability in International Criminal Law. Three Hidden Thruths, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2008, p. 953-957. Google Scholar öffnen
  94.   Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Cohen, David L., Theories of the Corporation and the Limited Liability Company. How Should Courts and Legislatures Articulate Rules for Piercing the Veil, Fiduciary Responsibility and Securities Regulation for the Limited Liability Company?, Oklahoma Law Review 1998, p. 427-500. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Coleman, Kim, IG Farben and ICI, 1925-53. Strategies of Growth and Survival, New York 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Colino, Sandra Marco, Competition Law of the EU and UK, 7th Ed. Oxford 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Collis, David/Young, david/Goold, Michael, The Size and Composition of Corporate Headquarters in Multinational Companies. Empirical Evidence, Journal of Inter-national Management 2012, p. 260-275. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.06.002
  99. Colombani, Antoine/Kloub, Jindrich/Sakkers, Ewoud, Cartels, in: J. Faull/A. Nikpay (eds.), The EU Law of Competition, Oxford 2014, p. 1023-1362. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Colucci, Michele, Comparative Labour Law. Sources and Documentation, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  101. R. Blanpain (ed.), Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Indust¬rialized Market Economies, Alphen aan den Rijn 2007, p. 25-38. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Compa, Lance/Hinchliffe-Darricarrère, Tashia, Enforcing International Labor Rights through Corporate Codes of Conduct, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 1995, p. 663-689. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Connor, John, Has the European Commission Become More Severe in Punishing Cartels? Effects of the 2006 Guidelines, European Competition Law Review 2011, p. 27-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Conway, Madeleine, A New Duty of Care? Tort Liability from Voluntary Human Rights Due Diligence in Global Supply Chains, Queen's Law Journal 2015, p. 741-786. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Cook, John/Kerse, Christopher, EC Merger Control, 5th Ed. London 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Crawford, James, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law, 8th Ed. Oxford 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199699698.001.0001
  107. Crocco, Luca/Scordamaglia-Tousis, Andreas, YKK v Commission. How the 10% Fining Cap Works in Cases of Corporate Restructuring, Journal for European Competition Law & Practice 2015, p. 177-179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpu105
  108. d'Aspremont, Jean, International Customary Investment Law. Story of a Paradox, in: T. Gazzini/E. De Brabandere (eds.), International Investment Law. The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden 2012, p. 5-47. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Dähnert, Alexander, Der Eiserne Vorhang der Gesellschaft – Zum Haftungsdurchgriff im englischen Recht, NZG 2015, p. 258-265. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Dannecker, Gerhard/Biermann, Jörg, Vorbemerkungen zu Art. 23 f.: Unionsrechtliche Geldbußen und Zwangsgelder, in: U. Immenga/E.-J. Mestmäcker (eds.), Europäi-sches Kartellrecht, 5th Ed. München 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Dashwood, Hevina S., Canadian Mining Companies and Corporate Social Respons-ibility. Weighing the Impact of Global Norms, Canadian Journal of Political Science 2007, p. 129-156. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0008423907070047
  112. Davies, Paul L./Worthington, Sarah, Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Com-pany Law, 9th Ed. London 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. de Bronett, Georg-Klaus, Vorbemerkungen zu den Artikeln 17 bis 22, Europäisches Kartellverfahrensrecht 2nd Ed. Köln 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.15375/zwer-2012-0203
  114. de Doelder, Hans; Tiedemann, Klaus, La Criminalisation du Comportement Collectif. Criminal Liability of Corporations, The Hague 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Dearborn, Meredith, Enterprise Liability. Reaviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups, California Law Review 2009, p. 195-261. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Debroux, Michel, Sanction des cartel en droit communautaire. Définition et conséquence d’une “responsabilité de groupe”, Concurrences 2008, p. 1-10. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Deva, Surya, UN's Human Rights Norms for Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. An Imperfect Step in the Right Direction?, ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 2004, p. 493-523. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Deva, Surya, Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations. Humanizing Business, London 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4324/9780203125618
  119. Dietrich, Michael, The Nature of the Firm Revisited, in: M. Dietrich (ed.), Economics of the Firm, Oxon 2007, p. 19-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Diez, Carlos Gomez-Jara, Grundlagen des konstruktivistischen Unternehmens¬schuld-begriffes, ZStW 2007, p. 290-333. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Dignam, Alan J./Lowry, John P., Company Law, 6th Ed. Oxford 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Doyle, Ursula Tracy, The Evidence of Things Not Seen. Divining Balancing Factors from Kiobel's “Touch and Concern” Test, Hasting Law Journal 2015, p. 443-483. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Dumberry, Patrick, The Legal Standing of Shareholders before Arbitral Tribunals. Has Any Rule of Customary International Law Crystalised?, Michigan State University College Journal of International Law 2010, p. 353-374. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Dumberry, Patrick, International Investment Contracts, in: T. Gazzini/E. De Braban¬dere (eds.), International Investment Law. The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden 2012, p. 215-243. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/9789004214538_009
  125. Dunne, Niamh, Knowing When to See it. State Activities, Economic Activities, and the Concept of Undertaking, Columbia Journal of European Law 2010, p. 427-463. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Dunning, John H., The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production, in: C. N. Pitelis/ R. Sugden (eds.), The Nature of the Transnational Firm, London 2000, p. 119-139. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Dunning, John H., The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future, International Journal of the Economics of Business 2001, p. 173-190. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13571510110051441
  128. Dunning, John H., Location and the Multinational Enterprise. A Neglected Factor?, in: T. L. Brewer/S. Young/S. E. Guisinger (eds.), The New Economic Analysis of Multinationals. An Agenda for Management, Policy and Research, Cheltenham 2003, p. 45-69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781843766995.00011
  129. Dunning, John H./Lundan, Sarianna M., Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, 2nd Ed. Cheltenham 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  130.   Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Duruigbo, Emeka A., Multinational Corporations and International Law, Ardsley 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Dyekjaer-Hansen, Karen/Hoegh, Katja, Succession of Liability for Competition Law Infringements with Special Reference to Due Diligence and Warranty Claims, European Competition Law Review 2003, p. 203-212. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Easterbrook, Frank H./Fischel, Daniel R., Limited Liability and the Corporation, University of Chicago Law Review 1985, p. 89-117. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1599572
  134. Easterbrook, Frank H./Fischel, Daniel R., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Cambridge 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Egelhoff, William G., Organizing the Multinational Enterprise. An Information-Processing Perspective, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1988. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Egelhoff, William G., The Importance of the Strategy-Structure Relationship in MNCs, in: M. J. Gannon/K. L. Newman (eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Cross-Cultural Management, Oxford 2002, p. 99-120. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Egelhoff, William G., How the Parent Headquarters Adds Value to an MNC, Manage-ment International Review 2010, p. 413-431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0043-2
  138. Eichholtz, Dietrich, Zum Anteil des IG-Farben-Konzerns an der Vorbereitung des zweiten Weltkriegs, Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 1969, p. 83-105. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1524/jbwg.1969.10.2.83
  139. Elliott, Tara, Risky Business. The Alien Tort Claims Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Expand the Reach of U.S. Courts in a Global Economy, Rutgers Law Review 2009, p. 211-239. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Emmerich, Volker, § 17 AktG, in: V. Emmerich/M. Habersack (eds.), Aktien- und GmbH-Konzernrecht, 7th Ed. München 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Emmerich, Volker, § 18 AktG, in: V. Emmerich/M. Habersack (eds.), Aktien- und GmbH-Konzernrecht, 7th Ed. München 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Enneking, Liesabeth, The Future of Foreign Direct Liability. Exploring the Inter¬national Relevance of the Dutch Shell Nigeria Case, Utrecht Law Review 2014, p. 44-54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.18352/ulr.256
  143. Eroglu, Muzaffer, Multinational Enterprises and Tort Liabilities - An Interdisciplinary and Comparative Examination, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781848444980
  144. Eser, Albin, Individual Criminal Responsibility, in: A. Cassese/P. Gaeta/J. R. W. D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. A Commentary, Oxford 2002, p. 767-822. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Fastenrath, Ulrich, Die Verantwortlichkeiten transnationaler Unternehmen und an¬derer Wirtschaftsunternehmen im Hinblick auf die Menschenrechte, in: S. von Schorlemer (ed.), „Wir, die Völker (…)“ − Strukturwandel in der Weltorganisation, Frankfurt am Main 2006, p. 69-94. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Faull, Jonathan/Kjolbye, Lars/Leupold, Henning/Nikpay, Ali, Article 101 TFEU, in: J. Faull/A. Nikpay (eds.), The EU Law of Competition, Oxford 2014, p. 138-328. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Feinberg, Joel, Doing and Deserving. Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, Princeton 1974. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1974.tb00953.x
  148. Feldberg, Anja, Der Alien Tort Claims Act, Berlin 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Fischer, Peter, Transnational Enterprises, in: R. Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Amsterdam 2000, p. 921-926. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Fisher, Kirsten J., Moral Accountability and International Criminal Law, Oxon 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Fletcher, George P., Tort Liability for Human Rights Abuses, Portland 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Forsgren, Mats, Theories of the Multinational Firm. A Multidimensional Creature in the Global Economy, Chelterham 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Forsgren, Mats, The 'Parenting Advantage' and Innovation Processes in the Multi-national Firm: Does Top Management Mess Things Up?, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Trans-national Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 97-111. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_4
  154. Foss, Kirsten/Foss, Nicolai J./Nell, Phillip C., MNC Organizational Form and Subsidiary Motivation Problems. Controlling Intervention Hazards in the Network MNC, Journal of International Management 2012, p. 247-259. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.03.001
  155. Foss, Nicolai J./Pedersen, Torben, Sources of Subsidiary Knowledge and Knowledge Transfer in MNCs, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Network Knowledge in International Business, Cheltenham 2002, p. 91-114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781781950623.00013
  156. Freiling, Jörg, On the Firm's Raison d'Être and Competence-based Nature of the Firm, in: W. Kersten/J. Wittmann (eds.), FS Bellmann, Wiesbaden 2013, p. 29-38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03462-7_3
  157. Freiling, Jörg/Laudien, Sven M., Competence Building in Transnational Companies: The Role of Regional Headquarters in Subsidiary Coordination, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 247-270. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_9
  158. French, Derek/Mayson, Stephen W./Ryan, Christopher, Company Law, 30th Ed. Oxford 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. French, Peter A., Collective and Corporate Responsibility, New York 1984. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. French, Peter A., Integrity, Intentions, and Corporations American Business Law Journal 1996, p. 141-155. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.1996.tb00693.x
  161. Frulli, Micaela, Jurisdiction ratione personae, in: A. Cassese/P. Gaeta/J. R. W. D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Oxford 2002, p. 527-541. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Fuks, Igor, Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain and the Future of ATCA Litigation. Examining Bonded Labor Claims and Corporate Liability, Columbia Law Review 2006, p. 112-143. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Furse, Mark, The Criminal Law of Competition in the UK and in the US, Cheltenham 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9780857934314
  164. Furubotn, Eirik G./Richter, Rudolf, Institutions and Economic Theory. The Con¬tribution of the New Institutional Economics, 2nd Ed. Michigan 2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6715
  165. Gallagher, Katherine, Civil Litigation and Transnational Business. An Alien Tort Statute Primer, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2010, p. 745-767. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq035
  166. Gammelgaard, Jens/Holm, Ulf/Pedersen, Torben, The Dilemmas of MNC Subsidiary Transfer of Knowledge, in: V. Mahnke/T. Pedersen (eds.), Knowledge Flows, Governance and the Multinational Enterprise. Frontiers in International Manage¬ment Research, New York 2004, p. 195-207. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230523876_10
  167. Garrouste, Pierre/Saussier, Stéphane, The Theories of the Firm, in: É. Brousseau/ Google Scholar öffnen
  168. J.-M. Glachant (eds.), New Institutional Economics. A Guidebook, Cambridge 2008, p. 23-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754043.019
  169. Gatto, Alexandra, Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights. Obligations under EU Law and International Law, Cheltenham 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781849809016
  170. Gazzini, Tarcisio, Bilateral Investment Treaties, in: T. Gazzini/E. De Brabandere (eds.), International Investment Law. The Sources of Rights and Obligations, Leiden 2012, p. 99-131. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/9789004214538_006
  171. Geldermann, Heiner, Völkerrechtliche Pflichten multinationaler Unternehmen, Baden-Baden 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845220000
  172. Ghoshal, Sumantra/Bartlett, Christopher A., The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network, The Academy of Management Review 1990, p. 603-625. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/258684
  173. Ghoshal, Sumantra/Nohria, Nitin, Internal Differentiation Within Multinational Corporations, Strategic Management Journal 1989, p. 323-337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100403
  174. Glinski, Carola, Die rechtliche Bedeutung der privaten Regulierung globaler Produktionsstandards, Baden-Baden 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. González-Diaz, Manuel/Vázquez, Luis, Make-or-Buy Decisions. A New Institutional Economics Approach, in: É. Brousseau/J.-M. Glachant (eds.), New Institutional Economics. A Guidebook, Cambridge 2008, p. 255-271. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Goold, Michael/Campbell, Andrew, Parenting in Complex Structures, Long Range Planning 2002, p. 219-243. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00052-3
  177. Goold, Michael/Campbell, Andrew, Making Matrix Structures Work. Creating Clarity on Unit Roles and Responsibility, European Management Journal 2003, p. 351-363. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00048-3
  178. Goold, Michael/Campbell, Andrew/Alexander, Marcus, Corpoate Strategy and Parenting Theory, Long Range Planning 1998, p. 308-314. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00017-X
  179. Goold, Michael/Pettifer, David/Young, David, Redesigning the Corporate Centre, European Management Journal 2001, p. 83-91. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00073-6
  180. Goyder, Joanna/Albors-LLorens, Albertina, EC Competition Law, 5th Ed. Oxford 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Griffin, Stephen, Establishing the Liability of a Director of a Corporate Director. Issues Relevant to Disturbing Corporate Personality, Company Lawyer 2013, p. 135-145. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Grossfeld, Bernhard, Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Wirtschaftsrechts. Rechtsprobleme multinationaler Unternehmen, Reinbek 1975. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Grossman, Sanford D./Hart, Oliver, One Share/One Vote and the Market for Cor¬porate Control, Working Paper Series Nr. 2347, available at: http://www. nber.org/papers/w2347, last visited: 29.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Grossman, Sanford D./Hart, Oliver, Vertical Intergation and the Distribution of Property Rights, in: A. Razin/E. Sadka (eds.), Economic Policy in Theory & Practice, London 1987, p. 504-546. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18584-9_14
  185. Grubemann, Beatrice, Der Begriff der Investition in Schiedsgerichtsverfahren in der ICSID-Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit, Basel 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Grusic, Ugljesia, Responsibility in Groups of Companies and the Future of Inter¬national Human Rights and Environmental Litigation, Cambridge Law Journal 2015, p. 30-34. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Hackel, Stefan Siegfried, Konzerndimensionales Kartellrecht. Grundsatzfragen der Zurechnung und Haftung bei Bußgeldbescheiden gegen verbundene Unternehmen, Augsburg 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845240800
  188. Hadding, Walther/Kießling, Eric, § 718 BGB, in: W. Siebert (ed.), Soergel Band 11/1, 13th Ed. Stuttgart 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Hadding, Walther/Kießling, Eric, Vor § 705 BGB, in: W. Siebert (ed.), Soergel Band 11/1, 13th Ed. Stuttgart 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Hagström, Peter/Hedlund, Gunnar, A Three-Dimensional Model of Changing Internal Structure in the Firm, in: A. D. Chandler/P. Hagström/Ö. Sölvell (eds.), The Dynamic Firm. The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions Oxford 1999, p. 166-191. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/0198296045.003.0008
  191. Haigh, Kathryn, Extending the International Criminal Court's Jurisdiction to Corporations. Overcoming Complemntarity Concerns, Australian Journal of Human Rights 2008, p. 199-219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2008.11910850
  192. Hailer, Claudia, Die US-amerikanische Human Rights Litigation nach der Ent¬scheidung des Supreme Court im Fall Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, Archiv des Völker¬rechts 2006, p. 76-92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/000389206777270345
  193. Hall, Sarah M., Multinational Corporations' Post-Unocal Liabilities for Violations of International Law, George Washington International Law Review 2002, p. 401-433. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Halpern, Paul/Trebilcock, Michael/Turnbull, Stuart, An Economic Analysis of Limited Liability in Coporation Law, Toronoto L.J. 1980, p. 117-150. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/825483
  195. Hannigan, Brenda, Company Law, 2nd Ed. Oxford 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Hansen, Robin F, The International Legal Personality of Multinational Enterprises. Treaty, Custom and the Governance Gap, Global Jurist Advances 2010, p. 1-129. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2202/1934-2640.1341
  197. Hansen, Robin F, The Public Policy Dimensions of MNE Legal Personality. Is it Time to Unveil the Masters of Globalization?, in: A. Byrnes/M. Hayashi/C. Michaelsen (eds.), International Law in the New Age of Globalization, Leiden 2013, p. 241-266. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/9789004228818_011
  198. Hansmann, Henry/Kraakman, Reinier H., Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts, Yale Law Journal 1991, p. 1879-1934. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/796812
  199. Hart, Oliver, Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure, Oxford 1995. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/0198288816.001.0001
  200. Hart, Oliver D., An Economist's Perspective on the Theory of the Firm, Columbia Law Review 1989, p. 1757-1774. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1122818
  201. Haus, Florian, Die Entscheidung des BGH im Fall Calciumcarbid – (nicht nur) Regeln für den Innenregress bei gesamtschuldnerischer Bußgeldhaftung, Der Konzern 2015, p. 114-120. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Hayakawa, Yoshihisa, Business Corporations as Non-State Actors in International Law. A Brand-New International Law-Making Process through Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: A. Byrnes/M. Hayashi/C. Michaelsen (eds.), International Law in the New Age of Globalization, Leiden 2013, p. 347-363. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/9789004228818_015
  203. Hayes, Peter, Industry and Ideology. IG Farben in the Nazi Era, Cambridge 1987. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Hedlund, Gunnar, The Hypermodern MNC - A Heterarchy?, Human Resource Management 1986, p. 9-35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930250103
  205. Hedlund, Gunnar, A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation, Strategic Management Journal 1994, p. 73-90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151006
  206. Heidenreich, Martin/Baur, Nina, Locations of Corporate Headquarters in Europe: Between Inertia and Co-evolution, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 177-207. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_7
  207. Heinichen, Christian, Unternehmensbegriff und Haftungsnachfolge im Europäischen Kartellrecht, Baden-Baden 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845228174
  208. Heitzer, Eric, Konzerne im Europäischen Wettbewerbsrecht unter vergleichender Berücksichtigung ihrer wettbewerbsrechtlichen Behandlung durch Aufsichtsbe¬hörden und Gerichte in den USA, Heidelberg 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Henkin, Louis, The Universal Declaration at 50 and the Challenge of Global Markets, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 1999, p. 17-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2555346
  210. Hennart, Jean-Francois, A Theory of Multinational Enterprise, Ann Arbor 1982. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Hennart, Jean-Francois, Transaction Cost Theory and the Multinational Enterprise, in: C. N. Pitelis/R. Sugden (eds.), The Nature of the Transnational Firm, London, New York 2000, p. 72-118. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Hennart, Jean-Francois, Theories of the Multinational Enterprise, in: A. M. Rugman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, Oxford 2009, p. 125-145. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234257.003.0005
  213. Hicks, Andrew/Goo, Say-hak, Cases and Materials on Company Law, 6th Ed. Oxford 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Hillemanns, Carolin F., UN Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Cor-porations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, German Law Journal 2003, p. 1065-1080. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Hoegh, Katja, Succession of Liability for Competition Law Infringements − the Cement Judgment, European Competition Law Review 2004, p. 534-537. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Hoffman, Paul, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. First Impressions, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 2013, p. 28-52. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Hoffman, Paul L., Corporate Accountability Under the U.S. Alien Tort Claims Act, in: H. Nitzschke/K. Ballentine (eds.), Profiting from Peace. Managing the Resource Dimensions of Civil War, Boulder, Colorado 2005, p. 395-423. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Hofstetter, Karl/Ludescher, Melanie, Fines against Parent Companies in EU Antitrust Law. Setting Incentives for ‘Best Practice Compliance’, World Competition 2010, p. 55-76. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Holmström, Bengt/Milgrom, Paul, The Firm as an Incentive System, The Amercian Economic Review 1994, p. 972-991. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Holmström, Bengt/Roberts, John, The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited, Journal of Economic Perspectives 1998, p. 73-94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.73
  221. Horn, Norbert, International Rules for Multinational Enterprises: The ICC, OECD, and ILO Initiatives, American University Law Review 1980, p. 923-940. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Huntington, Samuel P., Transnational Organizations in World Politics, World Politics 1973, p. 333-368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2010115
  223. Hylton, Keith N., Antitrust Law. Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution, Cambridge 2003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610158
  224. Hymer, Stephen, The Efficiency (Contradictions) of Multinational Corporations, American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 1976, p. 441-448. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Hymer, Stephen, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1976. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Iacobucci, Donato/Rosa, Peter, The Growth of Business Groups by Habitual Entrepreneurs: The Role of Entrepreneurial Teams, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2010, p. 351-377. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00378.x
  227. Ijalaye, David Adedayo, The Extension of Corporate Personality in International Law, New York 1978. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Ireland, Paddy, Limited Liability, Shareholder Rights and the Problem of Corporate Irresponsibility, Cambridge Journal of Economics 2013, p. 837-856. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Jägers, Nicola Maryon Catharine Paula, The Legal Status of the Multinational Corporation Under International Law, in: M. K. Addo (ed.), Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations, London 1999, p. 259-270. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/15718049920962061
  230. Jägers, Nicola Maryon Catharine Paula, Corporate Human Rights Obligations. In Search of Accountability, Antwerpen 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Jenks, C. Wilfred, Multinational Entities in the Law of Nations, in: W. Friedmann/ Google Scholar öffnen
  232. L. Henkin/O. Lissitzyn (eds.), Transnational Law in a Changing Society, Columbia 1972, p. 70-83. Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Jensen, Michael/Meckling, William, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 1976, p. 305-360. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  234. Jeßberger, Florian, Origins of Individual Criminal Responsibility for Business Activity, Journal for International Criminal Law 2010, p. 783-802. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Jeßberger, Florian, Einführung, in: F. Jeßberger/W. Kaleck/T. Singelnstein (eds.), Wirtschaftsvölkerstrafrecht, Baden Baden 2015, p. 13-20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845262987-11
  236. Jeßberger, Florian/Geneuss, Julia, On the Application of a Theory of Indirect Perpetration in Al Bashir - German Doctrine at the Hague?, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2008, p. 853-869. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Jessup, Philip C., A Modern Law of Nations, New York 1950. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Ji, Ma, Multinational Enterprises' Liability for the Acts of their Offshore Subsidiaries. The Aftermath of Kiobel and Daimler, Michigan State International Law Review 2015, p. 397-435. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Jones, Alison/Sufrin, Brenda, EU Competition Law, 4th Ed. Oxford 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Jones, Geoffrey, Multinationals and Global Capitalism. From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-first Century, Oxford 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Jonge, Alice de, Transnational Corporations and International Law, Cheltenham 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Joseph, Sarah, Taming the Leviathans. Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights, Netherlands International Law Review 1999, p. 171-203. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00002394
  243. Joseph, Sarah, An Overview of the Human Rights Accountability of Multinational Enterprises, in: M. T. Kamminga/S. Zia-Zarifi (eds.), Liability of Multinational Corporations under International Law, Den Haag 2000, p. 75-93. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Joseph, Sarah, Corporations and Transnational Human Rights Litigation, London 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Kahn-Freund, Otto, Some Reflections on Company Law Reform, The Modern Law Review 1944, p. 54-66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1944.tb00969.x
  246. Kaleck, Wolfgang, Die Verantwortung von Unternehmen und Unternehmern für Völkerrechtsverbrechen – die Entwicklung seit den Nürnberger Prozessen, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  247. F. Jeßberger/W. Kaleck/T. Singelnstein (eds.), Wirtschaftsvölkerstrafrecht, Baden Baden 2015, p. 83-120. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Kamminga, Menno T., Holding Multinational Corporations Accountable for Human Rights Abuses. A Challenge for the EC, in: P. Alston (ed.), The EU and Human Rights, Oxford 1999, p. 553-569. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Karavias, Markos, Corporate Obligations under International Law, Oxford 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674381.003.0003
  250. Karl, Joachim, The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, in: M. K. Addo (ed.), Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corpora¬tions, The Hague, London, Boston 1999, p. 89-106. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Katuoka, Saulius/Dailidaitè, Monika, Responsibility of Transnational Corporations for Human Rights Violations. Deficiencies of International Legal Background and Solutions Offered by National and Regional Legal Tools, Jurisprudencija 2012, p. 1301-1316. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Kelley, Glen, Multilateral Investment Treaties. A Balanced Approach to Multinational Corporations, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 2001, p. 483-532. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Kersting, Christian, Wettbewerbsrechtliche Haftung im Konzern, Der Konzern 2011, p. 445-459. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Kienapfel, Philip, VO (EG) 1/2003 Artikel 23 Geldbußen, in: H. von der Groeben/ Google Scholar öffnen
  255. J. Schwarze/A. Hatje, Europäisches Unionsrecht, 7th Ed. Baden-Baden 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Kinley, David, Lawyers, Corporations and International Human Rights Law, Company Lawyer 2004, p. 298-302. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Kinley, David/Tadaki, Junko, From Talk to Walk. The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law, Virginia Journal of Inter-national Law 2004, p. 932-1023. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Kirchner, Christian, Ökonomische Überlegungen zum Konzernrecht, ZGR 1985, p. 214-234. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zgre.1985.14.2.214
  259. Klaiber, Oliver, Die Berücksichtigung von Compliance-Programmen bei den Rechts-folgen von Kartellverstößen, Frankfurt am Main 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Knight, F. H., Profit and Entrepreneurial Functions, The Journal of Economic History 1942, p. 126-132. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700083479
  261. Koch, Jens, Der kartellrechtliche Sanktionsdurchgriff im Unternehmensverbund, ZHR 2007, p. 554-598. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Koch, Jens, Compliance-Pflichten im Unternehmensverbund, WM 2009, p. 1013-1060. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Koch, Jens/Harnos, Rafael, Der Konzern als Außengesellschaft bürgerlichen Rechts?, in: J. Eisele/J. Koch/H. Theile (eds.), Der Sanktionsdurchgriff im Unternehmens-verbund, Tübingen 2014, p. 171-188. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Koebele, Michael, Corporate Responsibility under the Alien Tort Statute. Enforcement of International Law through US Torts Law, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004173651.i-414
  265. Koenen, Thomas, Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte - Staatliche Schutzpflichten auf der Basis regionaler und internationaler Menschenrechtsverträge, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-53698-6
  266. Kogut, Bruce/Zander, Udo, Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation, Journal of International Business Studies 1993, p. 625-645. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490248
  267. Kogut, Bruce/Zander, Udo, What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning, Organization Science 1996, p. 502-518. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.502
  268. Koh, Harold Hongju, Bringing International Law Home, Houston Law Review 1998, p. 623-681. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1342484
  269. Koh, Harold Hongju, How Is International Human Rights Law Enforced?, Indiana Law Journal 1998, p. 1397-1417. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1342484
  270. Kohl, Uta, Corporate Human Rights Accountability: The Objections of Western Governments to the Alien Tort Statute, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2014, p. 665-697. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0020589314000323
  271. Kohlhoff, Christian, Kartellstrafrecht und Kollektivstrafe, Berlin 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Kokkoris, Ioannis/Shelanski, Howard A., EU Merger Control. A Legal and Economic Analysis, Oxford 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Komninos, Assimakis P., Modernisation and Decentralisation. Retrospective and Prospective, in: G. Amato/C.-D. Ehlermann/A. P. Komninos (eds.), EC Com¬petition Law. A Critical Assessment, Oxford 2007, p. 629-674. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Koppensteiner, Hans-Georg, § 17 AktG, in: W. Zöllner/U. Noack (eds.), Kölner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 3rd Ed. Köln 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Koppensteiner, Hans-Georg, § 18 AktG, in: W. Zöllner/U. Noack (eds.), Kölner Kom-mentar zum Aktiengesetz, 3rd Ed. Köln 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Köster, Constantin, Die völkerrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit privater (multinationaler) Unternehmen für Menschenrechtsverletzungen, Berlin 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Krawiec, Kimberly D., Cosmetic Compliance and the Failure of Negotiated Governance, Washington University Law Quarterly 2003, p. 487-544. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.448221
  278. Kremnitzer, Mordechai, A Possible Case for Imposing Criminal Liability on Cor-porations in International Criminal Law, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2010, p. 909-918. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq036
  279. Kreß, Claus/von Holtzendorff, Leonie, The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2010, p. 1179-1217. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Kriebaum, Ursula, The Nature of Investment Disciplines, in: Z. Douglas/J. Pauwalyn/ J. E. Vinuales (eds.), The Foundations of International Investment Law. Brining Theory into Practice, Oxford 2014, p. 45-72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685387.003.0003
  281. Krispenz, Sabina, Das Merkmal der wirtschaftlichen Tätigkeit im Unternehmens¬begriff des Europäischen Kartellrechts, Baden-Baden 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Kyriakakis, Joanna, Corporations and the International Criminal Court. The Comple-mentarity Objection Stripped Bare, Criminal Law Forum 2007, p. 115-151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10609-007-9052-7
  283. Kyriakakis, Joanna, Corporate Criminal Liability and the ICC Statute. The Com¬parative Law Challenge, Northwestern Interdisciplinary Law Review 2009, p. 333-366. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X09003337
  284. La Rocca, Laura, The Controversial Issue of The Parent Company Liability for the Violation of EC Competition Rules by the Subsidiary, European Competition Law Review 2011, p. 68-76. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Landers, Jonathan M., A Unified Approach to Parent, Subsidiary, and Affiliate Questions in Bankruptcy, University of Chicago Law Review 1975, p. 589-652. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1599136
  286. Langer, Howard, Competition Law of the United States, Alphen aan den Rijn 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Langlois, Richard N., Economic Institutions and the Boundaries of Business Groups, in: A. M. Colpan/T. Hikino/J. R. Lincoln (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Oxford 2000, p. 650-669. Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Langlois, Richard N., The Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm and the Theory of the Entrepreneurial Firm, Journal of Management Studies 2007, p. 1107-1124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00728.x
  289. Laudien, Sven M./Freiling, Jörg, Overcoming Liabilities of Foreignness by Mode of Structural Coordination. Regional Headquarters and their Role in TNCs, in: C. G. Asmussen/T. Pedersen/T. M. Devinney/L. Tihanyi (eds.), Dynamics of Global-ization. Location-Specific Advantages or Liabilities of Foreignness?, Bingley 2011, p. 107-125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1108/S1571-5027(2011)0000024012
  290. Lee, Pey Woan, The Enigma of Veil-Piercing, International Company and Commercial Law Review 2015, p. 28-34. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Leupold, Bettina, Effective Enforcement of EU Competition Law Gone Too Far? Recent Case Law on the Presumption of Parental Liability, European Competition Law Review 2013, p. 570-582. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Lev, Eran Aharon, European Community Competition Law. Is the Corporate Veil Lifted Too Often?, Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 1993, p. 199-243. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Levine, Jennifer, Alien Tort Claims Act Litigation. Adjudicating on “Foreign Territory”, Suffolk Transnational Law Review 2007, p. 101-140. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Lindner, Stephan H, Hoechst. Ein I.G. Farben Werk im Dritten Reich, München 2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5414/ATP31030
  295. Lindsay, Valerie J./Chadee, Doren/Mattsson, Jan/Johnston, Robert, Knowledge Flows in International Services Firms: A Conceptual Model, in: V. Mahnke/T. Pedersen (eds.), Knowledge Flows, Governance and the Multinational Enterprise. Frontiers in International Management Research, New York 2004, p. 177-194. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230523876_9
  296.   Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Liste, Philip, The Politics of Space. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, Verfas¬sungs¬blog on Matters Constitutional, available at: http://www.verfassungsblog.de/de/the-politics-of-space-kiobel-v-royal-dutch-petroleum/#.Ue6FMm3eAcu, Google Scholar öffnen
  298. last visited: 29.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Lopez-Balboa, Victor/Myers, Jennifer, Jurisdictional Standards under EEC Com¬petition Law. The Evolution of the Economic Entity Test, Journal of Comparative Business and Capital Market Law 1984, p. 383-407. Google Scholar öffnen
  300. LoPucki, Lynn M., The Death of Liability, The Yale Law Journal 1996, p. 1-92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/797267
  301. LoPucki, Lynn M., The Essential Structure of Judgment Proofing, Stanford Law Review 1998, p. 147-160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1229257
  302. LoPucki, Lynn M., Virtual Judgment Proofing: A Rejoinder, Yale Law Journal 1998, p. 1413-1434. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/797402
  303. LoPucki, Lynn M., Toward a Trademark Based Liability System, UCLA Law Review 2002, p. 1099-1137. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Louri, Victoria, 'Undertaking' as a Jurisdictional Element for the Application of EC Competition Rules, Legal Issues of Economic Integration 2002, p. 143-176. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1016247715726
  305. Lowenfeld, Andreas F., International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness, Oxford 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Lugard, Paul, The New EU Competition Rules for the Assessment of Horizontal Agreements, CPI Antitrust Chronicle 2011, p. 1-8. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Lundan, Sarianna, The Coevolution of Transnationional Corporations and Institions, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2011, p. 639-663. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.2.639
  308. Lundan, Sarianna, The Cost of Crossing Borders in the Global Economy, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  309. S. Lundan (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690
  310. Maassarani, Tarek F., Four Counts of Corporate Complicity. Alternative Forms of Accomplice Liability under the Alien Tort Claims Act, New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 2006, p. 39-65. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. MacCulloch, Angus, The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in Competition In-vestigations. Theoretical Foundations and Practical Implications, Legal Studies 2006, p. 211-237. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2006.00012.x
  312. Mahnke, Volker/Ambos, Björn/Nell, Phillip C./Hobdari, Bersant, How do regional headquarters influence corporate decisions in networked MNCs?, Journal of Inter-national Management 2012, p. 293-301. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.04.001
  313. Malanczuk, Peter, Multinational Enterprises and Treaty-Making, in: V. Gowlland-Debbas (ed.), Multilateral Treaty-Making. The Current Status of Challenges to and Reforms Needed in the International Legislative Process, The Hague 2000, p. 45-72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6964-8_5
  314. Mamutse, Blanca/Fogleman, Valerie, Environmental Claims and Insolvent Com¬panies. The Contrasting Approaches of the United Kingdom and the United States, British Journal of American Legal Studies 2013, p. 579-633. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Manacorda, Stefano/Meloni, Chantal, Indirect Perpetration versus Joint Criminal Enterprise. Concurring Approaches in the Practice of International Criminal Law?, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2011, p. 159-178. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq074
  316. Mann, F. A., The Proper Law of Contracts Concluded by International Persons, British Yearbook of International Law 1959, p. 34-57. Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Manne, Henry G., Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Political Economy 1965, p. 110-120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1086/259000
  318. Manne, Henry G., Our Two Corporation Systems: Law and Economics, VA. L. Rev. 1967, p. 259-284. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1071435
  319. Mansdörfer, Marco/Timmerbeil, Sven, Zurechnung und Haftungsdurchgriff im Konzern − Eine rechtsgebietsübergreifende Betrachtung, WM 2004, p. 362-370. Google Scholar öffnen
  320. Mansdörfer, Marco/Timmerbeil, Sven, Das Modell der Verbandshaftung im euro-päischen Kartellbußgeldrecht, EuZW 2011, p. 214-218. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/ZSTW.2011.570
  321. Marin, Dalia/Verdier, Thierry, Competing in Organizations. Firm Heterogenity and International Trade, in: E. Helpman/D. Marin/T. Verdier (eds.), The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, London 2008, p. 142-172. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4159/9780674038547-005
  322. Markusen, James R., The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives 1995, p. 169-189. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.2.169
  323. Markusen, James R., Multinational Firms, Location and Trade, The World Economy 1998, p. 733-756. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00161
  324. Markusen, James R./Trofimenko, Natalia, Teaching Locals New Tricks. Foreign Experts as a Channel of Knowledge Transfers, NBER Working Paper Series, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/nber_w12872.pdf?abstractid =960447&mirid=1&type=2, last visited: 29.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Marooney, Richard T./Branch, George S., Corporate Liability under the Alien Tort Claims Act. United States Court Jurisdiction over Torts, International Trade Law Journal 2003, p. 3-11. Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Marxen, Klaus, Beteiligung an schwerem systematischen Unrecht. Bemerkungen zu einer völkerstrafrechtlichen Straftatlehre, in: K. Lüderssen (ed.), Aufgeklärte Kriminalpolitik oder Kampf gegen das Böse?, Baden-Baden 1998, p. 220-236. Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Masten, Scott E., A Legal Basis for the Firm, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1988, p. 181-198. Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Matheson, John H., The Modern Law of Corporate Groups: An Empirical Study of Piercing the Corporate Veil in the Parent-Subsidiary Context, North Carolina Law Review 2009, p. 1091-1156. Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Mattes, Jannika, Looking into the Innovation Process: How International Is Innovation in Multinational Companies?, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 145-176. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_6
  330. McBarnet, Doreen/Schmidt, Patrick, Corporate Accountability through Creative Enforcement. Human Rights, the Alien Tort Claims Act and the Limits of Legal Impunity, in: D. McBarnet/A. Voiculescu/T. Campbell (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, Cambridge 2007, p. 148-176. Google Scholar öffnen
  331. McBeth, Adam, International Economic Actors and Human Rights, London 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781849803373.00011
  332. McConnell, Lee J., Establishing Liability for Multinational Oil Companies in Parent/ Subsidiary Relationships, Environmental Law Review 2014, p. 50-59. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1350/enlr.2014.16.1.203
  333. McDougall, Patricia P./Oviatt, Benjamin M., International Entrepreneurship. The In¬ter-section of Two Research Paths, Academy of Management Journal 2000, p. 902-906. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1556418
  334. McKendall, Marie/DeMarr, Beverly/Jones-Rikkers, Catherine, Ethical Compliance Programs and Corporate Illegality. Testing the Assumption of the Corporate Sentencing Guidelines, Journal of Business Ethics 2002, p. 367-383. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1015287823807
  335. McLachlan, Campbell/Shore, Laurence/Weininger, Matthew, International Investment Arbitration. Substantive Principles, Oxford 2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780199286645.book.1
  336. Meier, Werner, Grenzüberschreitender Durchgriff in der Unternehmensgruppe nach US-amerikanischem Recht. Jurisdiktion- und Prozeßrecht, Kollisionsrecht, materi¬elles Recht, Frankfurt am Main 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Melitsky, Anton, The Alien Tort Statute, Separation of Powers, and the Limits of Federal-Common-Law Causes of Action, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 2013, p. 53-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  338. Meloni, Chantal, Command Responsibility in International Criminal Law, The Hague 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-605-3_1
  339. Mendelson, Nina A., A Control-Based Approach to Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts, Columbia Law Review 2002, p. 1203-1303. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1123672
  340. Menz, Michael, Wirtschaftliche Einheit und Kartellverbot. Die Stellung des Konzerns im Rahmen des Kartellverbots nach deutschem, europäischem und US-ameri¬kanischem Recht, Berlin 2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-51491-5
  341. Merlino, Pietro, Edison. A Glimpse of Hope for Parent Companies Seeking to Rebut the Parental Liability Presumption?, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2014, p. 463-466. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpu051
  342. Mertens, Jens M., Privatrechtsschutz und vertikale Integration im internationalen Handel, Tübingen 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151770-9
  343. Meyer, Frank, Multinationale Unternehmen und das Völkerstrafrecht, ZStrR 2013, p. 56-86. Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Montesa, Aitor/Givaja, Angel When Parents Pay for their Children's Wrongs. Attribution of Liability for EC Antitrust Infringements in Parent-Subsidiary Scenarios, World Competition Law and Economics Review 2006, p. 555-574. Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Moon, Myung Jae, The Pursuit of Managerial Entrepreneurship. Does Organization Matter?, Public Administration Review 1999, p. 31-43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/977477
  346. Morais, Luis Silva, Joint Ventures and EU Competition Law, Oxford 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Mostajelean, Bahareh, Foreign Alternatives to the Alien Tort Claims Act. The Success (or Is It Failure) of Bringing Civil Suits against Multinational Corporations that Commit Human Rights Violations, George Washington International Law Review 2008, p. 497-526. Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Muchlinski, Peter, Corporations In International Litigation. Problems of Jurisdiction and the United Kingdom Asbestos Cases, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2001, p. 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/iclq/50.1.1
  349. Muchlinski, Peter, Holding Multinationals to Account. Recent Developments in English Litigation and the Company Law Review, Company Lawyer 2002, p. 168-179. Google Scholar öffnen
  350. Muchlinski, Peter, Multinational Enterprises and the Law, 2nd Ed. Oxford 2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780199227969.book.1
  351. Muchlinski, Peter, Limited Liability and Multinational Enterprises. A Case for Reform?, Cambridge Journal of Economics 2010, p. 915-928. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/cje/beq023
  352. Muchlinski, Peter, The Changing Face of Transnational Business Governance. Private Corporate Law Liability and Accountability of Transnational Groups in a Post-financial Crisis World, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2011, p. 665-705. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.2.665
  353. Muchlinski, Peter, Operationalising the UN Business and Human Rights Framework: The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights and Due Diligence, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  354. S. Lundan (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 325-353. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690
  355. Mühlens, Jörg, Der so genannte Haftungsdurchgriff im deutschen und englischen Recht, Tübingen 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  356. Müller-Hoff, Claudia in: ECCHR; Brot für die Welt; MISEREOR (eds.) Making Corporations Respond to the Damage they Cause. Strategic Approaches to Compensation and Corporate Accountability, available at: http://www.ecchr.eu/en/docu ments/publications.html?file=tl_files/Dokumente/Publikationen/Making%20respond%202012-11.pdf, last visited: 29.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  357. Murphy, John/Witting, Christian, Street on Torts, 13th Ed. Oxford 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199554447.001.0001
  358. Myles, Kristin Linsley, Some Thoughts on the Alien Tort Statute as the Supreme Court considers Kiobel, Georgetown Journal of International Law 2012, p. 1087-1096. Google Scholar öffnen
  359. Nathan, K. V. S., ICSID Convention. The Law of the International Centre for Settle¬ment of Investment Disputes, New York 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  360. Nickerson, Jackson/Bigelow, Lyda, New Institutional Economics, Organization, and Strategy, in: É. Brousseau/J.-M. Glachant (eds.), New Institutional Economics. Google Scholar öffnen
  361. A Guidebook, Cambridge 2008, p. 183-208. Google Scholar öffnen
  362. Nickerson, Jackson/Zenger, Todd R., A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. The Prob¬lem-Solving Perspective, Organization Science 2004, p. 617-632. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0093
  363. Nowrot, Karsten, Die UN-Norms on the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights. Gelungener Beitrag zur transnationalen Rechtsverwirklichung oder das Ende des Global Compact?, Beiträge zum transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht 2003, p. Google Scholar öffnen
  364. Nowrot, Karsten, New Approaches to the International Legal Personality of Multi-national Corporations. Towards a Rebuttable Presumption of Normative Respons-ibilities European Society of International Law Research Forum: Contemporary Issues, available at: http://www.esil-sedi.eu/sites/default/files/Now rot.PDF, last visited: 29.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Nowrot, Karsten, Normative Ordnungsstruktur und private Wirkungsmacht. Konse-quenzen der Beteiligung transnationaler Unternehmen an den Rechtssetzungs-prozessen im internationalen Wirtschaftssystem, Berlin 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  366. Nowrot, Karsten, Reconceptualising International Legal Personality of Influential Non-State Actors. Towards a Rebuttable Presumption of Normative Respon¬sibilities, Philippine Law Journal 2006, p. 563-586. Google Scholar öffnen
  367. Odudu, Okeoghene, The Boundaries of EC Competition Law. The Scope of Article 81, Oxford 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  368. OECD, International Investment and Multinational Enterprises. Structure and Orga-nisation of Multinational Enterprises, Paris 1987. Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Okeke, Chris N., Controversial Subjects of Contemporary International Law, Rotter¬dam 1974. Google Scholar öffnen
  370. Olaerts, Mieke, Quimica. Further Developing the Rules on Parent Company Liability, European Competition Law Review 2011, p. 431-440. Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Ong, David M., Regulating Environmental Responsibility for the Multinational Oil Industry. Continuing Challenges for International Law, International Journal of the Law in Context 2015, p. 153-173. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S1744552315000051
  372. Orlikowski-Wolf, Sandra Maria, Rechtsnachfolge von Unternehmen im europäischen Kartellrecht. Ein Lösungsvorschlag aus deutscher Sicht, Baden-Baden 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  373. Osiel, Mark, The Banality of Good. Aligning Incentives against Mass Atrocity, Columbia Law Review 2005, p. 1751-1862. Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Osterloh, Margit /Frey, Bruno/Frost, Jetta, Was kann das Unternehmen besser als der Markt?, ZfB 1999, p. 1245-1262. Google Scholar öffnen
  375. Otto, Mathias, Der prozessuale Durchgriff. Die Nutzung forumansässiger Tochter-gesellschaften in Verfahren gegen ihre auswärtigen Muttergesellschaften im Recht der USA, der Europäischen Gemeinschaften und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, München 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  376. Palombo, Dalia, Chandler v. Cape. An Alternative to Piercing the Corporate Veil Beyond Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell, British Journal of American Legal Studies 2015, p. 453-471. Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Papakiriakou, Theodoros, Das Europäische Unternehmensstrafrecht in Kartellsachen. Beitrag zur materiellrechtlichen Ausgestaltung eines rechtsstaatlichen und effek¬tiven Verwaltungs- bzw. Unternehmensstrafrechts, Herbolzheim 2002. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-86226-319-6_2
  378. Parker, Simon C., The Economics of Entrepreneurship, Cambridge 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817441.007
  379. Pauer, Nada Ina, The Single Economic Entity Doctrine and Corporate Group Respons-ibility in European Antitrust Law, Alphen aan den Rijn 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  380. Paul, Joel R., Holding Multinational Corporations Responsible Under International Law, Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 2001, p. 285-296. Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Paust, Jordan, Human Rights Responsibilities of Private Corporations, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 2002, p. 801-826. Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Pentikäinen, Merja, Changing International Subjectivity and Rights and Obligations under International Law. Status of Corporations, Utrecht Law Review 2012, p. 145-154. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.18352/ulr.185
  383. Png, Cheong-Ann, Lifting the Veil of Incorporation. Creasey v. Breachwood Motors, Company Lawyer 1999, p. 122-125. Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Png, Cheong-Ann, Corporate Liability. A Study in Principles of Attribution, London 2001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1017527915160
  385. Pohlmann, Petra, Der Unternehmensverbund im Europäischen Kartellrecht, Berlin 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  386. Porter, Michael E., Changing Patterns of International Competition, California Manage-ment Review 1986, p. 9-40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/41165182
  387. Posner, Richard A., The Rights of Creditors of Affiliated Corporations, University of Chicago Law Review 1976, p. 499-526. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1599230
  388. Posner, Richard A./Scott, Kenneth E., Econmics of Corporation Law and Securities Regulation, Boston 1980. Google Scholar öffnen
  389. Puchert, Berthold, Aus der Praxis der IG Farben in Auschwitz-Monowitz, Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 1963, p. 203-211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1524/jbwg.1963.4.2.203
  390. Punch, Maurice, Why Corporations Kill and Get away With it. The Failure of Law to Cope With Crime in Organizations, in: A. Nollkaemper/H. van der Wilt (eds.), System Criminality in International Law, 2009, p. 42-68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596650.004
  391. Radandt, Hans, Fall 6. Ausgewählte Dokumente und Urteil des IG-Farben-Prozesses, Berlin 1970. Google Scholar öffnen
  392. Rahl, James A., Conspiracy and the Anti-Trust Laws, Illinois Law Review 1950, p. 743-768. Google Scholar öffnen
  393. Ramasastry, Anita, Corporate Complicity. From Nuremberg to Rangoon - An Exa-mination of Forced Labor Cases and Their Impact on the Liability of Multinational Corporations, Berkeley Journal of International Law 2012, p. 91-159. Google Scholar öffnen
  394. Ramasastry, Anita/Thompson, Robert C., Commerce, Crime and Conflict, Fafo-Report No. 536, available at: http://fafo.no/media/com_netsukii/536.pdf, last visited: 29.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  395. Reichow, Charlotte, Kartellrecht: Gesamtschuldnerausgleich bei Geldbußen der Kommission, EuZW 2015, p. 441-448. Google Scholar öffnen
  396. Reinschmidt, Bastian, The Law of Tort. A Useful Tool to Further Corporate Social Responsibility?, Company Lawyer 2013, p. 103-111. Google Scholar öffnen
  397. Renner, Moritz, Zwingendes transnationales Recht. Zur Struktur der Wirtschafts-verfassung jenseits des Staates, Baden-Baden 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  398. Reymann, Christoph, Immanente Schranken des europäischen Kartellverbots. Zur Wiederherstellung der systematischen Grundaussagen des Art. 81 EG, Baden-Baden 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  399. Riesenkampff, Alexander/Krauthausen, Udo, Liability of Parent Companies for Antitrust Violations of Their Subsidiaries, European Competition Law Review 2010, p. 38-41. Google Scholar öffnen
  400. Rixon, F. G., Lifting the Veil between Holding and Subsidiary Companies, Law Quartely Review 1986, p. 415-423. Google Scholar öffnen
  401. Rogall, Klaus, § 130 OWiG, in: L. Senge (ed.), Karlsruher Kommentar Ordnungs-widrigkeitengesetz, 4th Ed. Müchen 2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7445/40-1-510
  402. Rosenthal, Michael/Thomas, Stefan, European Merger Control, München 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  403. Roxin, Claus, Täterschaft und Tatherrschaft, 8th Ed. Berlin 2006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110921861.vii
  404. Ruggie, John G., Business and Human Rights. Mapping International Standards of Res-ponsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/4/35, 19 February 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  405. Ruggie, John G., Protect, Respect and Remedy. A Framework for Business and Human Rights, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/8/5, 7th April 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  406. Ruggie, John G., Clarifying the Concepts of »Sphere of influence« and »Complicity«, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/8/16, 15th May 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  407. Ruggie, John G., Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations »Protect, Respect and Remedy« Framework, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, A/HRC/17/31, 21st March 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/016934411102900206
  408. Ruggie, John G., The Construction of the UN “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for Business and Human Rights. The True Confessions of a Principled Pragmatist, European Human Rights Law Review 2011, p. 127-133. Google Scholar öffnen
  409. Ruggie, John G., Just Business. Multinational Corporations and Human Rights, New York 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  410. Rugman, Alan M./Verbeke, Alain, Subsidiary-Specific Advantages in Multinational Enterprises, Strategic Management Journal 2001, p. 237-250. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/smj.153
  411. Saage-Maaß, Miriam in: ECCHR; Brot für die Welt; MISEREOR (eds.) Holding Companies Accountable. Lessons from Transnational Human Rights Litigation, available at: http://www.ecchr.eu/en/documents/publications.html?file=tl_files/ Dokumente/Publikationen/Booklet_HoldingCompaniesAccountable.pdf, last visited: 29.01.2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  412. Rugman, Alan M./Verbeke, Alain, Location, Competitiveness, and the Multinational Enterprise, in: A. M. Rugman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, Oxford 2009, p. 146-180. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234257.003.0006
  413. Sacharoff, Ariadne K., Multinationals in Host Countries: Can They be Held Liable Under the Alien Tort Claims Act for Human Rights Violations?, Brooklyn Journal of Internatioanl Law 1997-1998, p. 927-964. Google Scholar öffnen
  414. Salacuse, Jeswald, The Three Laws of International Investment. National, Contractual, and International Frameworks for Foreign Capital, Oxford 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  415. Salazar, Claudia T., Applying International Human Rights Norms in the United States. Holding Multinational Corporations Accountable in the United States for International Human Rights Violations under the Alien Tort Claims Act, Saint John's Journal of Legal Commentary 2004, p. 111-156. Google Scholar öffnen
  416. Sanders, Pieter, Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company, California Asiatic Oil Com¬pany v The Government of the Libyan Arab Republic, Award, 19 January 1977, Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1979, p. 177-187. Google Scholar öffnen
  417. Sanger, Andrew, Crossing the Corporate Veil. The Duty of Care Owed by a Parent Company to the Employees of its Subsidary, Cambridge Law Journal 2012, p. 478-481. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000724
  418. Santer, Ashley L., A Soft Law Mechanism for Corporate Responsibility. How the Updated OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Promote Business for the Future, George Washington International Law Review 2011, p. 375-388. Google Scholar öffnen
  419. Saunders, Pammela Q, Rethinking Corporate Human Rights Accountability, Tulane Law Review 2015, p. 603-668. Google Scholar öffnen
  420. Scassellati-Sforzolini, Guiseppe/Garzaniti, Laurent, Liability of Successor Under¬takings for Infringements of EC Competition Law Committed Prior to Corporate Reorganisations, European Competition Law Review 1995, p. 348-353. Google Scholar öffnen
  421. Schabas, William A., Enforcing International Humanitarian Law. Catching the Accomplices, International Review of the Red Cross 2001, p. 439-459. Google Scholar öffnen
  422. Schabas, William A., The International Criminal Court. A Commentary of the Rome Statute, Oxford 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199560738.001.0001
  423. Schill, Stephan, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, Cambridge 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605451.004
  424. Schilling, Melissa A./Phelps, Corey, Interfirm Collaboration Networks. The Impact of Network Structure on Rates of Innovation, in: E. Sheshinski/R. J. Strom/ Google Scholar öffnen
  425. W. J. Baumol (eds.), Entrepreneurship, Innovation and the Growth Mechanism of the Free-Enterprise Economies, Princeton 2007, p. 100-131. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/sej.26
  426. Schmalenbach, Kirsten, Multinationale Unternehmen und Menschenrechte, Archiv des Völkerrechts 2001, p. 57-81. Google Scholar öffnen
  427. Schmid, Stefan/Schurig, Andreas/Kutschker, Michael, The MNC as a Network. A Closer Look at Intra-Organizational Flows, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Network Knowledge in International Business, Cheltenham 2002, p. 45-72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4337/9781781950623.00011
  428. Schmidt, Thomas M., Crimes of Business in International Law. Concepts of individual and corporate responsibility for the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Baden Baden 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845271576-369
  429. Schneckenburger, Artur, Die Geschichte des I.G.-Farben-Konzerns. Bedeutung und Rolle eines Großunternehmens, Köln 1988. Google Scholar öffnen
  430. Schnelle, Ulrich, Die Aufteilung von Bußgeldern im Konzern, WuW 2015, p. 332-348. Google Scholar öffnen
  431. Schreuer, Christoph, Shareholder Protection in International Investment Law, Fest¬schrift für/ Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat. Völkerrecht als Wertordnung. Common Values in International Law 2006, p. 601-619. Google Scholar öffnen
  432. Schreuer, Christoph, Article 25 ICSID, 2nd Ed. Cambridge 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596896.030
  433. Schuberth, Ernst-Markus, Konzernrelevante Regelungen im britischen Recht. Ein Beispiel für die Bewältigung konzernrechtlicher Fragestellungen durch Regeln des allgemeinen Gesellschafts-, Kapitalmarkt- und Insolvenzrechts, Vol. 10, München 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  434. Schütte, Hellmut, Between Headquarters and Subsidiaries. The RHQ Solution, in: J. Birkinshaw/N. Hood (eds.), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development, Oxford 1998, p. 102-137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26467-4_5
  435. Schwartz, Priscilla, Corporate Activities and Envirnmental Justice. Perspectives on Sierra Leone's Mining, in: P. N. Okowa/J. Ebbesson (eds.), Environmental Law and Justice in Context, Cambridge 2009, p. 429-446. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576027.023
  436. Scordamaglia-Tousis, Andreas, Cartel Proof, Imputation and Sanctioning in European Competition Law. Reconciling Effective Enforcement and Adequate Protection of Procedural Guarantees, The Competition Law Review 2010, p. 5-52. Google Scholar öffnen
  437. Scordamaglia-Tousis, Andreas, EU Cartel Enfocement. Reconciling Effective Public Enforcement with Fundamental Rights, Vol. 54, Alphen aan den Rijn 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  438. Seck, Sara L., Collective Responsibility and Transnational Corporate Conduct, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  439. T. Isaacs/R. Vernon (eds.), Accountability for Collective Wrongdoing, Cambridge 2011, p. 140-168. Google Scholar öffnen
  440. Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, Corporations in and under International Law, Cambridge 1987. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2203433
  441. Sethi, Deepak/Guisinger, Stephen, Liability of Foreignness to Competitive Advantage. How Multinational Enterprises Cope with the International Business Environment, Journal of International Management 2002, p. 223-240. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00067-4
  442. Shaw, Malcom N., International Law, 7th Ed. Cambridge 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  443. Silver, David, Collective Responsibility, Corporate Responsibility and Moral Taint, in: P. A. French/H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Boston 2006, p. 269-278. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2006.00139.x
  444. Simões, Vitor Corado/Biscaya, Rita/Nevado, Pedro, Subsidiary Decision-Making Autonomy: Competences, Integration and Local Responsiveness, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Network Knowledge in International Business, Cheltenham 2002, p. 137-166. Google Scholar öffnen
  445. Simon, Herbert A., Administrative Behaviour, 3rd Ed. New York 1976. Google Scholar öffnen
  446. Simon, Herbert A., Organizations and Markets, Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991, p. 25-44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.25
  447. Sjovoll, Kirsten, If the Shoe Does Not Fit. Why the ATS Does Not Work, Georgetown Journal of International Law 2012, p. 1077-1085. Google Scholar öffnen
  448. Skinner, Gwynne L., Beyond Kiobel. Providing Access to Judicial Remedies for Violations of International Human Rights Norms by Transnational Business In A New (Post-Kiobel) World, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 2014, p. 158-265. Google Scholar öffnen
  449. Skoczylas, Anna-Antonia, Verantwortlichkeit für kartellrechtliche Verstösse im Konzern im schweizerischen und europäischen Recht, Bern 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  450. Slawotsky, Joel, Doing Business around the World. Corporate Liability under The Alien Tort Act, Michigan State Law Review 2005, p. 1065-1112. Google Scholar öffnen
  451. Sluyterman, Kettie, A History of Royal Dutch Shell. Keeping Competitive in Turbulent Markets, 1973-2007, Vol. 3, Oxford 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  452. Slye, Ronald C., Corporations, Veils, and International Criminal Liability, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 2008, p. 955-974. Google Scholar öffnen
  453. Smalley, Katherine, Casenote on Daimler AG v Bauman, Tennessee Law Review 2015, p. 461-490. Google Scholar öffnen
  454. Smutny, Abby Cohen, Claims of Shareholders in International Investment Law, in: Google Scholar öffnen
  455. C. Binder/U. Kriebaum/A. Reinisch/S. Wittich (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Oxford 2008, p. 363-376. Google Scholar öffnen
  456. Solek, Lukas/Wartinger, Stefan, Parental Liability. Rebutting the Presumption of Decisive Influence, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2015, p. 73-84. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpu093
  457. Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, The International Law on Foreign Investment, 3rd Ed. Cambridge 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760235.006
  458. Squire, Richard, Strategic Libility in the Corporate Group, University of Chicago Law Review 2011, p. 605-669. Google Scholar öffnen
  459. Stanevicius, Mantas, Portielje. Bar Remains High for Rebutting Parental Liability Presumption, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2013, p. 24-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpt060
  460. Stephens, Beth, Corporate Liability. Enforcing Human Rights Through Domestic Litigation, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 2000, p. 401-413. Google Scholar öffnen
  461. Stephens, Beth, The Amorality of Profit. Transnational Corporations and Human Rights, Berkeley Journal of International Law 2002, p. 45-90. Google Scholar öffnen
  462. Stephens, Beth, Corporate Accountability. International Human Rights Litigation Against Corporations in US Courts, in: M. T. Kamminga/S. Zia-Zarifi (eds.), Liability of Multinational Corporations under Internatinal Law, Den Haag 2010, p. 209-229. Google Scholar öffnen
  463. Stephens, Beth/Chomsky, Judith/Green, Jennifer/Hoffman, Paul/Ratner, Michael, International Human Rights Litigation in U.S. Courts, 2nd Ed. Leiden 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/ej.9781571053534.i-620
  464. Stessens, Guy, Corporate Criminal Liability. A Comprehensive Perspective, Interna¬tional and Comparative Law Quarterly 1994, p. 493-520. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/43.3.493
  465. Stevenson, Howard H./Jarillo, J. Carlos, A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship. Entre-preneurial Management, Strategic Management Journal 1990, p. 17-27. Google Scholar öffnen
  466. Stewart, James G., A Pragmatic Critique of Corporate Criminal Theory. Lessons From The Extremity, New Criminal Law Review 2013, p. 261-299. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2013.16.2.261
  467. Stewart, James G., The Turn to Corporate Criminal Liability for International Crimes. Transcending the Alien Tort Statute, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 2014, p. 1-78. Google Scholar öffnen
  468. Stewart, Jennifer, Comment. The Intra-Enterprise Conspiracy Doctrine After Copper-weld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., Columbia Law Review 1986, p. 198-212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1122621
  469. Stiglitz, Joseph E., Multinational Corporations. Balancing Rights and Responsibilities, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law 2007, p. 3-60. Google Scholar öffnen
  470. Stockmann, Kurt, Reflections on Recent OECD Activities: Regulation of Multinational Corporate Conduct and Structure, Michigan Yearbook of International Legal Studies 1981, p. 223-267. Google Scholar öffnen
  471. Stoitchkova, Desislava, Towards Corporate Liability in International Criminal Law, Utrecht 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/016934411002800308
  472. Strasser, Kurt A., Piercing the Veil in Corporate Groups, Connecticut Law Review 2005, p. 637-665. Google Scholar öffnen
  473. Stürner, Michael, Transnationale Menschenrechtsverletzungen im internationalen Pri¬vat- und Verfahrensrecht, International Journal of Procedural Law 2014, p. 350-374. Google Scholar öffnen
  474. Sullivan, Lawrence/Grimes, Warren, The Law of Antitrust: An Integrated Handbook, 2nd Ed. St. Paul 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  475. Swart, Bert, International Trends towards Establishing some Form of Punishment for Corporations, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2008, p. 947-953. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm082
  476. Swepston, Lee, International Labour Law, in: R. Blanpain (ed.), Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies, Alphen aan den Rijn 2007, p. 137-161. Google Scholar öffnen
  477. Teece, David J., Transactions Cost Economics and the Multinational Enterprise − An Assessment, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1986, p. 21-45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(86)90020-X
  478. Teece, David J., Design Issues for Innovative Firms: Bureaucracy, Incentives and Industrial Structure, in: A. D. Chandler/P. Hagström/Ö. Sölvell (eds.), The Dynamic Firm, New York 1998, p. 134-165. Google Scholar öffnen
  479. Telesetsky, Anastasia, Co-Regulation and the Role of Transnational Corporations as Subjects in Implementing International Environmental Law, in: A. Byrnes/ Google Scholar öffnen
  480. M. Hayashi/C. Michaelsen (eds.), International Law in the New Age of Global-ization, Leiden 2013, p. 287-319. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/9789004228818_003
  481. Temming, Felipe, Der vertragsbeherrschende Dritte. Drittbeherrschte Schuldver¬hältnisse und Sonderverbindungen i.S.d. § 311 Abs. 3, 2 Nr. 3 BGB unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Konzernhaftungsrechts, Baden-Baden 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845260686-1002
  482. ter Meer, Fritz, Die I.G. Farben Industrie Akteingesellschaft, Düsseldorf 1953. Google Scholar öffnen
  483. Teubner, Gunther, Self-Constitutionalizing TNCs? On the Linkage of “Private” and "Public" Corporate Codes of Conduct, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2011, p. 617-638. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.18.2.617
  484. Tham, Chi Ho, Piercing the Corporate Veil. Searching for Appropriate Choice of Law Rules, Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 2007, p. 24-43. Google Scholar öffnen
  485. Thirlway, Hugh, The Sources of International Law, in: M. D. Evans (ed.), International Law, Oxford 2010, p. 95-121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199565665.003.0004
  486. Thomas, Stefan, Guilty of a Fault that One Has Not Committed. The Limits of the Group-Based Sanction Policy Carried out by the Commission and the European Courts in EU-Antitrust Law, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2012, p. 11-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpr073
  487. Thompson, Robert B., Piercing the Corporate Veil. An Empirical Study, Cornell Law Review 1991, p. 1036-1074. Google Scholar öffnen
  488. Thompson, Robert B., Piercing the Veil Within Corporate Groups, Connecticut Journal of International Law 1999, p. 379-394. Google Scholar öffnen
  489. Thompson, Robert B., Piercing the Veil: Is the Common Law the Problem?, Con¬necticut Law Review 2005, p. 619-636. Google Scholar öffnen
  490. Thompson, Robert C./Ramasastry, Anita/Taylor, Mark B., Translating Unocal: The Expanding Web of Liability for Business Entities Implicated in International Crimes, Washington International Law Review 2009, p. 841-902. Google Scholar öffnen
  491. Thornton, Patricia, The Sociology of Entrepreneurship, Annual Review of Sociology 1999, p. 19-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.19
  492. Thurner, Gabriel Wilhelm Bartalyos, Internationales Unternehmensstrafrecht. Konzernverantwortlichkeit für schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen, Wien 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  493. Tiedemann, Klaus, La Criminalisation du Comportement Collectif, in: H. T. de Doelder, Klaus (ed.), La criminalisation du comportement collectif. Criminal Liability of Corporations, The Hague 1996, p. 11-29. Google Scholar öffnen
  494. Todarello, Vincent, Corporations Don't Kill People. People Do. Exploring The Goals Of The United Kingdom's Corporate Homicide Bill, New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 2003, p. 481-496. Google Scholar öffnen
  495. Torres, Melissa, Labor Rights and the ATCA. Can the ILO's Fundamental Rights be Supported Through ACTA Litigation?, Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 2004, p. 447-483. Google Scholar öffnen
  496. Tschierschke, Anja, Ein Überblick über den Sanktionsdurchgriff in Unter¬neh¬mens-verbindungen de lege lata und de lege ferenda, in: J. Eisele/J. Koch/H. Theile (eds.), Der Sanktionsdurchgriff im Unternehmensverbund, Tübingen 2014, p. 137-151. Google Scholar öffnen
  497. Tully, Stephen, International Corporate Legal Responsibility, Alphen aan den Rijn 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  498. van den Herik, Larissa, Corporations as Future Subjects of the International Criminal Court. An Exploration of the Counterarguments and Consequences, in: C. Stahn/ Google Scholar öffnen
  499. L. van den Herik (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, The Hague 2010, p. 350-368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-495-0_16
  500. van den Herik, Larissa, Subjecting Corporations to the ICC Regime. Analyzing the Legal Counterarguments, in: C. Burchard/O. Triffterer/J. Vogel (eds.), The Review Conference and the Future of the International Criminal Court, Köln 2010, p. 155-174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-495-0_16
  501. van der Wilt, Harmen, Corporate Criminal Responsibility for International Crimes. Exploring the Possibilities, Chinese Journal of International Law 2013, p. 43-77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmt010
  502. Van Detta, Jeffrey A., Some Legal Considerations For E.U.-Based MNEs Contemplating High-Risk Foreign Direct Investments in The Energy Sector after Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Chevron Corporation v. Naranjo, South Carolina Journal of International Law & Business 2013, p. 161-282. Google Scholar öffnen
  503. Van Gerven, Walter, EC Jurisdiction in Antitrust Matters: The Wood Pulp Judgment, in: B. Hawk (ed.), Fordham Corporate Law Institute, New York 1989, p. 451-483. Google Scholar öffnen
  504. van Sliedregt, Elies, Criminal Responsibility in International Law, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 2006, p. 81-114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/157181706776986236
  505. Veljanovski, Cento, Deterrence, Recidivism, and European Cartel Fines, Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2011, p. 871-915. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhr017
  506. Verbeke, Alain/Greidanus, Nathan S., Bounded Reality: A New Behavioral Foundation for MNE Governance, in: S. Lundan (ed.), Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance, London 2015, p. 53-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9781137467690_3
  507. Verrydt, Lynn, Corporate Involvement in International Crimes. An Analysis of Hypethetical Extension of the International Criminal Court's Mandate to Include Legal Persons, in: D. Brodowski/E. d. l. M. d. l. Parra/K. Tiedemann/J. Vogel (eds.), Regulating Corproate Criminal Liability, Heidelberg 2014, p. 281-294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05993-8_23
  508. Verse, Dirk, Compliance im Konzern. Zur Legalitätskontrollpflicht der Geschäftsleiter einer Konzernobergesellschaft, ZHR 2011, p. 401-424. Google Scholar öffnen
  509. Vlasov, Dmitry, Liability of a Puppeteer for a Puppet. A Recent Development in Law on Piercing the Corporate Veil, Company Lawyer 2012, p. 356-359. Google Scholar öffnen
  510. Vlasov, Dmitry, To Pierce or Not to Pierce. Supreme Court Answers in the Negative in VTB Capital v Nutritek International, Company Lawyer 2013, p. 248-252. Google Scholar öffnen
  511. Vogel, Joachim, Individuelle Verantwortlichkeit im Völkerstrafrecht, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 2002, p. 403-436. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zstw.2002.114.2.403
  512. Vogel, Joachim, Unrecht und Schuld in einem Unternehmensstrafrecht, StV 2012, p. 427-432. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110285840.205
  513. von Harder, Stefan, Unternehmensinternes Vertragsrecht. Normsetzung, Streit¬schlich-tung und Vollstreckung im firmeninternen Handel, Baden-Baden 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
  514. Volk, Klaus, Zur Bestrafung von Unternehmen, JZ 1993, p. 429-480. Google Scholar öffnen
  515. Wachs, Stephan, Flucht aus der kartellrechtlichen Bußgeldverantwortung? Unterneh-mensrestrukturierung und Haftungsnachfolge im deutschen und europä¬ischen Bußgeldrecht, Frankfurt am Main 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02625-2
  516. Wackerbarth, Ulrich, Grenzen der Leitungsmacht in der internationalen Unterneh-mensgruppe, München 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  517. Wagner, Bernd C., IG Auschwitz. Zwangsarbeit und Vernichtung von Häftlingen des Lagers Monowitz 1941-1945, München 2000. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110958300
  518. Wagner, Gerhard, Haftung für Menschenrechtsverletzungen, RabelsZ 2016, p. 717-782. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/003372516X14697686262565
  519. Weigend, Thomas, Societas delinquere non potest? A German Perspective, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2008, p. 927-945. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqn069
  520. Weigend, Thomas, Perpetration through Organization. The Unexpected Career of a German Legal Concept, Journal of International Criminal Law 2011, p. 91-111. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq077
  521. Weiß, Carsten, Der Unternehmensbegriff im europäischen und deutschen Kartellrecht. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage gemeinschaftsrechtlich determinierter oder national autonomer Auslegung des kartellrechtlichen Unternehmensbegriffs, Vol. 112, Baden-Baden 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845242903
  522. Weissbrodt, David, Human Rights Standards concerning Transnational Corporations and Other Business Entities, Minnesota Journal of International Law 2014, p. 135-172. Google Scholar öffnen
  523. Weissbrodt, David/Kruger, Muria, Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Cor-porations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights, Amercian Journal of International Law 2003, p. 901-922. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3133689
  524. Wells, Celia, Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd Ed. Oxford 2001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267935.001.0001
  525. Wennekers, Sander/Thurik, Roy, Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, Small Business Economics 1999, p. 27-55. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1023/A:1008063200484
  526. Werle, Gerhard/Jeßberger, Florian, Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd Ed. Oxford 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
  527. Westney, D. Eleanor/Zaheer, Srilata, The Multinational Enterprise as an Organization, in: A. M. Rugman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, Oxford 2009, p. 341-366. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234257.003.0013
  528. Whish, Richard/Bailey, David, Competition Law, 7th Ed. Oxford 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  529. White, James J., Corporate Judgment Proofing: A Response to Lynn LoPucki's The Death of Liability, Yale Law Journal 1998, p. 1363-1412. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/797401
  530. Whitley, Richard, How and Why are International Firms Different? The Consequences of Cross-Border Managerial Coordination for Firm Characteristics and Behaviour, in: G. Morgan/P. H. Kristensen/R. Whitley (eds.), The Multinational Firm. Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides, Oxford 2001, p. 27-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  531. Wijckmans, Frank, Attribution of Cartel Liability. Private Practioner, in: F. Wijckmans /F. Tuytschaever (eds.), Horizontal Agreements and Cartels in EU Competition Law, Oxford 2015, p. 260-266. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpv012
  532. Wilhelm, Jan, Rechtsform und Haftung bei der juristischen Person, Köln 1981. Google Scholar öffnen
  533. Williamson, Dean, Organization, Control, and the Single Entity Defense in Antitrust, Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2009, p. 723-745. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhp012
  534. Williamson, Oliver E., Markets and Hierarchies. Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York 1975. Google Scholar öffnen
  535. Williamson, Oliver E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York 1985. Google Scholar öffnen
  536. Williamson, Oliver E., Transaction Cost Economics, in: R. Schmalensee/R. D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Amsterdam 1989, p. 136-182. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)01006-X
  537. Williamson, Oliver E., Markets, Hierarchies, and the Modern Corporation. An Unfolding Perspective, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1992, p. 335-352. Google Scholar öffnen
  538. Williamson, Oliver E., The Economics of Governance, American Economic Review 2005, p. 1-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1257/000282805774669880
  539. Williamson, Oliver E., Networks - Organizational Solutions to Future Challenges, in: T. Theurl (ed.), Economics of Interfirm Networks, Tübingen 2005, p. 3-27. Google Scholar öffnen
  540. Williamson, Oliver E., Transaction Cost Economics, in: C. Ménard/M. M. Shirley (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Dordrecht 2005, p. 41-65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_4
  541. Wils, Wouter, The Undertaking as a Subject of EC Competition Law and the Imputation of Infringements to Natural or Legal Persons, European Law Review 2000, p. 99-116. Google Scholar öffnen
  542. Wisner, Robert, Derivative Actions and Indirect Claims, in: F. Ortino/L. Liberti/ Google Scholar öffnen
  543. A. Sheppard/H. Warner (eds.), Investment Treaty Law. Current Issues II, London 2007, p. 73-83. Google Scholar öffnen
  544. Wisner, Robert/Gallus, Nick, Nationality Requirements in Investor-State Arbitration, Journal of World Investment & Trade 2004, p. 927-947. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1163/221190004X00119
  545. Woodroffe, Jessica, Regulating Multinational Corporations in a World of Nation States, in: M. K. Addo (ed.), Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations, London 1999, p. 131-142. Google Scholar öffnen
  546. Woodward, Susan E., Limited Liability in the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Insti¬tutional and Theoretical Economics 1985, p. 601-611. Google Scholar öffnen
  547. Yamin, Mohammad, A Critical Re-evaluation of Hymer's Contribution to the Theory of the Transnational Corporation, in: C. N. Pitelis/R. Sugden (eds.), The Nature of the Transnational Firm, London and New York 2000, p. 57-71. Google Scholar öffnen
  548. Yeaple, Stehen Ross, Firm Heterogeneity, Intra-Firm Trade, and the Role of Central Locations, in: E. Helpman/D. Marin/T. Verdier (eds.), The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, London 2008, p. 200-230. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4159/9780674038547-007
  549. Yiu, Daphne/Lu, Yuan/Bruton, Garry/Hoskisson, Robert E., Business Groups. An Integrated Model to Focus Future Research, Journal of Management Studies 2007, p. 1551-1579. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00735.x
  550. Zerbes, Ingeborg, Globales Wirtschaftshandeln als Gegenstand des Straf- und Straf-verfahrensrechts. Eine Bestandsaufnahme, in: F. Jeßberger/W. Kaleck/T. Singeln¬stein (eds.), Wirtschaftsvölkerstrafrecht, Baden Baden 2015, p. 205-240. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845262987-205
  551. Zia-Zarifi, Saman, Suing Multinational Corporations in the U.S. for Violating Inter-national Law, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 1999, p. 81-147. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Strafrecht & Kriminologie", "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Sekundäre Viktimisierung durch Strafverfahren wegen sexualisierter Gewalt
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Marie Törnig
Sekundäre Viktimisierung durch Strafverfahren wegen sexualisierter Gewalt
Cover des Buchs: Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Yannis Ockernahl
Unbeabsichtigte Normenkonflikte zwischen EU-Recht und nationalem Recht
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex