The legal framework for refugee resettlement to the European Union with lessons from the American model

Dr. Janine Prantl LL.M. (Columbia), B.A.

doi:10.5771/9783748934707

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Buch wird der völker- und europarechtliche Rahmen für die Neuansiedlung von Schutzsuchenden in der EU erläutert. Erstens schafft es Klarheit über das Konzept der Neuansiedlung. Zweitens werden die auf die Neuansiedlung anwendbaren völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtungen der involvierten Staaten aufgezeigt, und drittens werden die einschlägigen EU-Rechtsgrundlagen für die Zuständigkeit und die Kompetenzausübungsschranken dargelegt. Schließlich dienen die rechtsdogmatische Analyse sowie ein Vergleich mit der Neuansiedlungspraxis in den Vereinigten Staaten als Grundlage für Empfehlungen für einen künftigen EU-Rechtsrahmen.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr: 2023
Erscheinungsdatum: 01.06.2023
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-9007-4
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-3470-7
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Schriften zum Migrationsrecht
Band: 41
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 359
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 16 Download Kapitel (PDF)
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1.1 Resettlement in the EU context
2. 1.2 US resettlement policy as point of reference
3. 1.3 Relevance of the topic
4. 1.4 Methodology and structure
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. 2.1.1 Responsibility sharing at the international level: left to the discretion of states
  2. 2.1.2 Responsibility sharing at the EU level: mandatory relocation failed
  3. 2.1.3 Preliminary conclusion
2. 1. 2.2.1 The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
  2. 2.2.2 The European Union
  3. 2.2.3 The United States of America
  4. 2.2.4 Preliminary conclusion
3. 1. 2.3.1 The beginning of systematic and organized resettlement
  2. 2.3.2 Resettlement under the UNHCR
  3. 2.3.3 Adjustments in US immigration law
  4. 2.3.4 The Hungarian exodus
  5. 2.3.5 Towards a more diverse US immigration policy
  6. 2.3.6 The mechanized resettlement of Vietnamese
  7. 2.3.7 The 1980 Refugee Act
  8. 2.3.8 The disintegration of Yugoslavia
  9. 2.3.9 The decade of voluntary repatriation and reconceptualization of resettlement
  10. 2.3.10 Convention Plus
  11. 2.3.11 The terrorist attacks of 9/11
  12. 2.3.12 Harmonization efforts
  13. 2.3.13 Regained recognition of resettlement
  14. 2.3.14 The 2015-2016 refugee crisis
  15. 2.3.15 The Trump administration
  16. 2.3.16 Afghan mass displacement and the revival of parole power
  17. 2.3.17 Attempts towards private sponsorship
  18. 2.3.18 Preliminary conclusion
4. 1. 2.4.1 Functions
  2. 2.4.2 US motives
  3. 2.4.3 EU motives
  4. 2.4.4 Preliminary conclusion
5. 1. 2.5.1 States
  2. 1. 2.5.2.1 Legal basis, mandate and funding
    2. 2.5.2.2 The UNHCR and the US
    3. 2.5.2.3 The UNHCR and the EU
    4. 2.5.2.4 Criticism and shortfalls
  3. 1. 2.5.3.1 Voluntary resettlement agencies in the US
    2. 2.5.3.2 From state-orientation to greater NGO-involvement in Europe
  4. 1. 2.5.4.1 Refugee and subsidiary protection status in the EU
    2. 2.5.4.2 US refugee definition
    3. 2.5.4.3 Climate migrants
  5. 2.5.5 Preliminary conclusion
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 3.1 The relevant human rights and refugee law framework
2. 1. 1. 3.2.1.1 Legal standard
    2. 3.2.1.2 Relevant ECtHR case law, decisions of other regional courts and UN Treaty bodies
  2. 3.2.2 Extraterritorial application of refugee law
  3. 3.2.3 Preliminary conclusion
3. 1. 1. 1. 3.3.1.1.1 Art 3 para 1 CAT
      2. 3.3.1.1.2 Arts 6 and 7 ICCPR
      3. 3.3.1.1.3 Art 37 lit a CRC
      4. 3.3.1.1.4 Arts 2 and 3 ECHR
    2. 3.3.1.2 Refugee law
    3. 3.3.1.3 Concluding remarks
  2. 1. 3.3.2.1 Human rights
    2. 3.3.2.2 Refugee law
    3. 3.3.2.3 Concluding remarks on the right to leave and to seek asylum
  3. 1. 3.3.3.1 Human rights
    2. 3.3.3.2 Refugee law
    3. 3.3.3.3 Concluding remarks
  4. 1. 3.3.4.1 Human rights
    2. 3.3.4.2 Refugee law
    3. 3.3.4.3 Concluding remarks
  5. 1. 3.3.5.1 Human rights
    2. 3.3.5.2 Refugee law
    3. 3.3.5.3 Concluding remarks
  6. 1. 3.3.6.1 Human rights
    2. 3.3.6.2 Refugee law
    3. 3.3.6.3 Concluding remarks
  7. 3.3.7 Preliminary conclusion
4. 1. 3.4.1 Responsibility for complicity with the country of (first) refuge
  2. 1. 3.4.2.1 Dual attribution
    2. 3.4.2.2 Derivative responsibility
  3. 3.4.3 Attribution of conduct of other non-state actors and private actors
  4. 3.4.4 Preliminary conclusion
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 1. 1. 4.1.1.1 Centralized assessment
    2. 4.1.1.2 Extraterritorial processing
    3. 4.1.1.3 Cooperation with third countries
  2. 1. 4.1.2.1 Solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility
    2. 4.1.2.2 A policy in accordance with international refugee law and international and European human rights
    3. 4.1.2.3 Consistency
  3. 4.1.3 Preliminary conclusion
2. 1. 4.2.1 Intergovernmental rapprochement by three Conventions
  2. 4.2.2 First attempts on solidarity and responsibility sharing
  3. 4.2.3 Calling upon resettlement
  4. 4.2.4 Protection in the region
  5. 4.2.5 Proposal for extraterritorial processing and third-country partnerships
  6. 4.2.6 A Joint EU Resettlement Program
  7. 4.2.7 Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM)
  8. 4.2.8 The Lisbon Treaty, mutual trust, and Dublin III
  9. 4.2.9 The 2015 European Resettlement Scheme
  10. 4.2.10 EU-Turkey Statement
  11. 1. 4.2.11.1 The legal nature of the Proposal
    2. 4.2.11.2 Resettlement definition
    3. 4.2.11.3 Criteria to determine countries of (first) refuge
    4. 4.2.11.4 Eligibility criteria
  12. 4.2.12 Current resettlement policy
  13. 4.2.13 Preliminary conclusion
3. 1. 4.3.1 Support through funding
  2. 4.3.2 Support through agencies
  3. 4.3.3 Accountability and legal protection
  4. 4.3.4 Preliminary conclusion
4. 1. 4.4.1 Resettlement processing – national or EU level?
  2. 4.4.2 Implementation of the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibilities – discretion or mandatory quota?
  3. 4.4.3 A comprehensive CEAS – protection or migration management tool?
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. 5.1 European and US resettlement practice in comparison
2. 1. 5.2.1 Selection procedures and practices of the UNHCR and EUMS
  2. 5.2.2 US procedure and practice
  3. 1. 5.2.3.1 Referral entities
    2. 5.2.3.2 Status determination
    3. 5.2.3.3 Resettlement of prioritized groups
    4. 5.2.3.4 Family reunification
    5. 5.2.3.5 Potential to integrate
    6. 5.2.3.6 Firm resettlement
    7. 5.2.3.7 Exclusion grounds
    8. 5.2.3.8 Security screening and health checks
    9. 5.2.3.9 Right to appeal the selection decision
    10. 5.2.3.10 Resettlement contract
  4. 5.2.4 Preliminary conclusion
3. 1. 5.3.1 Programs of EUMS
  2. 5.3.2 US program and practice
  3. 1. 5.3.3.1 Pre-departure orientation
    2. 5.3.3.2 Placement
    3. 5.3.3.3 Cooperation with local governments and receiving communities
    4. 5.3.3.4 Reception conditions
  4. 5.3.4 Preliminary conclusion
4. 1. 5.4.1 EU law and practice of EUMS
  2. 5.4.2 US law and practice
  3. 1. 5.4.3.1 Temporary approach versus long-term integration
    2. 5.4.3.2 Economic benefits
    3. 5.4.3.3 Harmonization of permanent residence status
    4. 5.4.3.4 Naturalization
    5. 5.4.3.5 Re-resettlement
  4. 5.4.4 Preliminary conclusion
6 ConclusionSeiten 312 - 318 Download Kapitel (PDF)
Download Kapitel (PDF)
1. General
2. Europe
3. US
4. Cases
5. ICJ
6. ECtHR and European Commission on Human Rights
7. CJEU
8. US Supreme Court
9. Other courts
10. Legal texts and International Treaties
11. EU secondary legislation
12. US legislation

Literaturverzeichnis (197 Einträge)

Kenneth W ABBOTT and Duncan SNIDAL, 'Hard and Soft Law in International Governance', in (2000) 54 Legalization and World Politics 3, Special Issue, 'International Organization', 421-456 Google Scholar öffnen
Tendayi ACHIUME, 'Migration as Decolonialization' in (2020) 71 Stanford Law Review, 1509-1574 Google Scholar öffnen
Giorgio AGAMBEN, Homo Sacer Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford University Press 1998) Google Scholar öffnen
AIDA and ECRE, 'Country Report: Introduction to the asylum context in Turkey' (last updated 30 November 2020) <https://asylumineurope.org/reports/country/turkey/introduction-asylum-context-turkey/> accessed 16 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Jean ALLAIN, 'The Jus Cogens Nature of Non-Refoulement' in (2002) 13 International Journal of Refugee Law, 533-558 Google Scholar öffnen
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL, 'Refugee Rights in 2018' (2018) <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2018/12/rights-today-2018-refugees/> accessed 20 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Elena ANDREEVSKA, 'The Legal Protection of Refugee: Western Balkanas' in (2016) 23 Lex ET Scientia International Journal 2, 85-99 Google Scholar öffnen
Kiran BANERJEE, 'Rethinking the Global Governance of International Protection' in (2018) 56 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 313-326 Google Scholar öffnen
Ilias BANTEKAS and Lutz OETTE, International Human Rights Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press 3rd ed 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
Carol BATCHELOR and Edwina O'SHEA, 'The internationalization of resettlement: lessons from Syria and Bhutan' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 9-11 <https://www.refworld.org/docid/58cbcb314.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Alexander BETTS and Jean François DURIEUX, 'Convention Plus as a Norm-Setting Exercise' in (2007) 20 Journal of Refugee Studies 3, 509-530 Google Scholar öffnen
Albert BLECKMANN, 'Das Souveränitätsprinzip im Völkerrecht' in (1985) 23 Archiv des Völkerrechts 4, 450-477 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/40798156?seq=1> accessed 20 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Albert BLECKMANN, 'Zur Verbindlichkeit des allgemeinen Völkerrechts für internationale Organisationen' in (1977) 37 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 107-121 Google Scholar öffnen
Michael BOTHE, 'Legal and Non-Legal Norms – a meaningful distinction in international relations?' in (1980) 11 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 65-95 Google Scholar öffnen
Başak ÇALI, 'General Comment No 6: Treatment of Unaccompanied and Separated Children Outside Their Country of Origin ' for extra-territorial jurisdiction come of age? Karlsruhe, too, has spoken, now it’s Strasbourg's turn' (EJIL: Talk!, 21 July 2020) <https://www.ejiltalk.org/has-control-over-rights-doctrine-for-extra-territorial-jurisdiction-come-of-age-karlsruhe-too-has-spoken-now-its-strasbourgs-turn/> accessed 27 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Brendon J CANNON and Hirotaka FUJIBAYASHI, 'Security, structural factors and sovereignty: Analyzing reactions to Kenya's decision to close the Dadaab refugee camp complex' in (2018) 27 African Security Review 1, 20-41 Google Scholar öffnen
David CANTOR, Nikolas FEITH TAN, Marianna GKILIATI, Elisabeth MAVROPOULOU et al, 'Externalisation, Access to Territorial Asylum, and International Law' in (2022) International Journal of Refugee Law, 1-37 Google Scholar öffnen
Randy CAPPS et al, 'Integrating refugees in the United States: The successes and challenges of resettlement in a Global context' in (2015) Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 341-367 Google Scholar öffnen
Amanda CELLINI, 'The resettlement of Hungarian refugees in 1956' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 6-8 <https://www.refworld.org/docid/58cbcb314.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Vincent CHETAIL, International Migration Law (Oxford University Press 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
Vincent CHETAIL and Céline BAULOZ (eds), Research Handbook on International Law and Migration (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
Bhupinder S CHIMNI, 'The Geopolitics of Refugee Studies: A View from the South' in (1998) 11 Journal of Refugee Studies 4, 350-374 Google Scholar öffnen
COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE, 'General Comment No 4 (2017) on the implementation of Article 3 of the Convention in the context of Article 22', CAT/C/GC/4 (4 September 2018) <https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT%2fC%2fGC%2f4&Lang=en> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, 'General Comment No 24 on State obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the context of business activities', UN Doc E/C.12/GC/24 (10 August 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN, 'General recommendation No 32 on the gender-related dimensions of refugee status, asylum, nationality and statelessness of women', UN Doc CEDAW/C/GC/32 (14 November 2014) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/54620fb54.html> accessed 21 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, 'Decision adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure in respect of Communication No 104/2019: Sacchi et al v Argentina', UN Doc CRC/C/88/D/104/2019 (8 October 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, 'Decision adopted by the Committee under the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure, concerning communications No 79/2019 and No 109/2019', UN Doc CRC/C/85/D/79/2019 – CRC/C/85/D/109/2019 (2 November 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, 'General Comment No 6: Treatment of Unaccompanied and Separated Children Outside Their Country of Origin' (1 September 2006) <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/566055?ln=en> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
James CRAWFORD, Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 9th ed 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
James CRAWFORD, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
James CRAWFORD, 'The ILC's Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect' in (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 4, 874-890 Google Scholar öffnen
James CRAWFORD and Martti KOSKENNIEMI (eds), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
Mary CROCK, Laura SMITH-KAHN, Ron MCCALLUM and Ben SAUL, The Legal Protection of Refugees with Disabilities, Forgotten and Invisible? (Elgar Publishing 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
Christian DAHLMAN, 'The function of Opinio Juris in Customary International Law' in (2012) Nordic Journal of International Law, 328-339 Google Scholar öffnen
Milka DIMITROVSKA, 'The Concept of International Responsibility of State in the International Public Law System' in (2015) 1 Journal of Liberty and International Affairs 2, 1-16 Google Scholar öffnen
Annika DIPPEL, Extraterritorialer Grundrechtsschutz gemäß Art 16a GG (Duncker & Humboldt 2020) Google Scholar öffnen
Oliver DÖRR and Kirsten SCHMALENBACH (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
Melonee DOUGLAS, Rachel LEVITAN and Lucy W KIAMA, 'Expanding the role of NGOs in resettlement' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 34-37 Google Scholar öffnen
Rebecca DOWD and Jane Mc ADAM, 'International Cooperation and Responsibility-Sharing to Protect Refugees: What, Why, and How?' in (2017) 66 International and Comparative Law Quaterly, 863-892 Google Scholar öffnen
ECOSOC, 'Guiding Principles on International Displacement', UN Doc E/CN4/1998/53/Add2 (11 February 1998) <https://undocs.org/E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2> accessed 20 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Alice EDWARDS, 'Human Rights, Refugees and the Right 'to Enjoy' Asylum' in (2005) 17 International Journal of Refugee Law, 293-330 Google Scholar öffnen
Molli FEE, 'Pre-resettlement experiences: Iranians in Vienna' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 23-24 Google Scholar öffnen
Erika FELLER and Anja KLUG, 'Refugees, United Nations High Commissioner for (UNHCR)' (MPIL, January 2013) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e530> accessed 20 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Susan FRATZKE and Lena KAINZ, 'Preparing for the unknown: Designing effective predeparture orientation for resettling refugees' (May 2019) 1-38 <https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/designing-effective-predeparture-orientation-resettling-refugees> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Bill FRELICK, Ian M KYSEL and Jennifer PODKUL, 'The Impact of Externalization of Migration Controls on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Other Migrants' in (2016) 4 Journal on Migration and Security 4, 190-220 <https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/supporting_resources/jmhs.pdf> accessed 21 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Michael Lysander FREMUTH, 'Access Denied? – Human Rights Approaches to Compensate forthe Absence of a Right to Be Granted Asylum' in (2020) 4 University of Vienna Law Review 1 Special Issue: Slovenian-Austrian Law Conference, 79-115 Google Scholar öffnen
Georgio GAJA, 'Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations' (9 December 2011) <https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ario/ario.html> accessed 21 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Thomas GAMMELTOFT-HANSEN, Access to asylum: international refugee law and the globalisation of migration control (Cambridge University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
Thomas GAMMELTOFT-HANSEN and James C HATHAWAY, 'Non-Refoulement in World of Cooperative Deterrence' in (2015) 53 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 2, 235-284 Google Scholar öffnen
Thomas GAMMELTOFT-HANSEN and Jens VEDSTED-HANSEN (eds), Human rights and the dark side of globalisation: Transnational law enforcement and migration control (Routledge 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
Adèle GARNIER, 'The COVID-19 Resettlement Suspension: Impact, Exemptions and the Road Ahead' (FluchtforschungsBlog, 16 June 2020) <https://blog.fluchtforschung.net/the-covid-19-resettlement-suspension/> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Adèle GARNIER, 'Migration Management and Humanitarian Protection: The UNHCR's 'Resettlement Expansionism' and its Impact on Policy-Making in the EU and Australia' in (2014) 40 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 6, 942-959 Google Scholar öffnen
Adèle GARNIER, Kristin Bergtora SANDVIK and Amanda CELLINI, 'The COVID-19 Resettlement Freeze: Towards a Permanent Suspension?' (14 April 2020) <https://www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au/publication/covid-19-resettlement-freeze-towards-permanent-suspension> accessed 28 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Adèle GARNIER, Liliana Lyra JUBILUT and Kristin Bergtora SANDVIK (eds), Refugee Resettlement: Power, Politics, and Humanitarian Governance (Berghahn 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
N Ela GÖKALP Aras and Zeynep Sahin MENCÜTEK, 'Refugee Protection: Turkey Report', Paper 2020/30 (January 2020) <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zeynep-Mencutek/publication/340236818_Refugee_Protection_Turkey_Report_Working_Papers_Global_Migration_Consequences_and_Responses/links/5e7e4ee192851caef4a56b41/Refugee-Protection-Turkey-Report-Working-Papers-Global-Migration-Consequences-and-Responses.pdf> accessed 16 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Guy S OODWIN-GILL, 'Article 31 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees: non-penalization, detention, and protection' (2001) <https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/publications/legal/419c778d4/refugee-protection-international-law-article-31-1951-convention-relating.html> accessed 8 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
Guy S GOODWIN-GILL, The Refugee in International Law (Oxford University Press 1983) Google Scholar öffnen
Guy S GOODWIN-GILL, Jane Mc ADAM and Emma DUNLOP, The Refugee in International Law (Oxford University Press 4th ed 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
Guy S GOODWIN-GILL, and Jane Mc ADAM, The Refugee in International Law (Oxford University Press 3rd ed 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
Guy S GOODWIN-GILL and Philippe WECKEL (eds), Migration & Refugee Protection in the 21st Century: Legal Aspects – The Hague Academy of International Centre for Research (Martinus Nijhoff 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
Atle GRAHL-MADSEN, Commentary on the Refugee Convention 1951: Articles 2-11, 13-37 (Division of International Protection of the UNHCR 1997) <https://www.unhcr.org/3d4ab5fb9.pdf> accessed 21 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Atle GRAHL-MADSEN, The Status of Refugees in International Law: Volume II (AW Sijthoff 1972) Google Scholar öffnen
Naoko HASHIMOTO, 'Refugee Resettlement as an Alternative to Asylum' in (2018) 37 Refugee Survey Quarterly, 162-186 Google Scholar öffnen
James C HATHAWAY, The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (Cambridge University Press 2nd ed 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
James C HATHAWAY, The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
James C HATHAWAY and R Alexander NEVE, 'Making international Refugee Law Relevant again: A proposal of Collectivized and Solution-Orientated Protection' in (1997) 10 Harvard Human Rights Journal, 115-211 Google Scholar öffnen
Arthur C HELTON, 'What Is Refugee Protection' in (1990) 2 International Journal of Refugee Law, 119-129 Google Scholar öffnen
Stephan HOBE, 'Non-Governmental Organizations' (MPIL, June 2019) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e968?rskey=LXvy3A&result=1&prd=MPIL> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Constantin HRUSCHKA (ed), Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention: Handkommentar (Nomos 2022) Google Scholar öffnen
Chris INGLESE, 'Soft law' in (1993) 20 Polish Yearbook of International Law, 75-90 Google Scholar öffnen
ILC, 'Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations, with commentaries' (ARIO Commentary 2011) <https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_11_2011.pdf> accessed 27 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
ILC, 'Seventh report on the responsibility of international organizations (prepared by G Gaja, Special Rapporteur)', UN Doc A CN4/610 (2009) <https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_610.pdf> accessed 21 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE, CARITAS EUROPE, EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON REFUGEES AND EXILES, INTERNATIONAL CATHOLIC MIGRATION COMMISSION, CURCHES' COMMISSION FOR MIGRANTS IN EUROPE, SHARE NETWORK AND RED CROSS EU OFFICE, 'Joint Resettlement: Resettlement Can't Wait' (23 September 2020) <https://www.ecre.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Joint-Statement.-Resettlement-can‘t-wait.pdf> accessed 17 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
IOM, 'Resettlement' <https://eea.iom.int/resettlement> accessed 11 September 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
IOM, 'UNHCR announce temporary suspension of resettlement travel for refugees' (Press release, 17 April 2020) <https://www.iom.int/news/iom-unhcr-announce-temporary-suspension-resettlement-travel-refugees> accessed 27 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
IOM, 'First IOM International Charter Flight from Ethiopia Brings 154 Refugees to New Homes in Germany' (18 October 2019) <https://www.iom.int/news/first-iom-international-charter-flight-ethiopia-brings-154-refugees-new-homes-germany> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
IOM, 'Glossary on Migration No 34' (2019) <https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml_34_glossary.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Anne IRFAN, 'Rejecting resettlement: the case of Palestinians' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 68-71 Google Scholar öffnen
Miles JACKSON, Complicity in International Law (Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
Stian Øby JOHANSEN, 'Human Rights Accountability of CSDP Missions on Migration' (Eumigrationlawblog.eu, 8 October 2020) <http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/human-rights-accountability-of-csdp-missions-on-migration/#more-2839> accessed 28 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Stian Øby JOHANSEN, 'Dual Attribution of Conduct to both an International Organization and a Member State' in (2019) 6 Oslo Law Review 3, 178-197 Google Scholar öffnen
Will JONES and Alexander TEYTELBOYM, ''Matching' refugees' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 25 Google Scholar öffnen
Sarah JOSEPH and Melissa CASTAN, The International Covenant on Civil and Politcal Rights: Cases, Materials and Commentary (Oxford University Press 3rd ed 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
Satvinder Singh JUSS (ed), Research Handbook on International Refugee Law (Edward Elgar 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
Walter KÄLIN and Jörg KÜNZLI, The Law of International Human Rights Protection (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
Ibrahim KANALAN, 'Extraterritorial State Obligations Beyond the Concept of Jurisdiction' in (2018) 19 German Law Journal 1, 43-63 Google Scholar öffnen
Susan KNEEBONE (ed), Refugees, asylum seekers and the rule of law: comparative perspectives (Cambridge University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
Dieter KUGELMANN, 'Refugees' (MPIL, March 2010) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e866> accessed 4 July 2021. Google Scholar öffnen
Tally KRITZMAN-AMIR, 'Not In My Backyard: On the Morality of Responsibility Sharing in Refugee Law' in (2009) 34 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 2, 355-393 Google Scholar öffnen
Mark LICHTBACK and Ellen ZUCKERMAN (eds), Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure (Cambridge University Press 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
Annelisa LINDSAY, 'Surge and selection: power in the refugee resettlement regime' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 11-13 <https://www.refworld.org/docid/58cbcb314.html> accessed 28 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Gil LOESCHER, The UNHCR and World Politics: A perilious path (Oxford University Press 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
Gil LOESCHER, 'The UNHCR and World Politics: State Interest vs Institutional Autonomy' in (2001) 35 The International Migration Review 1, Special Issue, 'UNHCR at 50: Past, Present and Future of Refugee Assistance', 33-56 Google Scholar öffnen
Gil LOESCHER and James MILNER, 'Understanding the challenge' in (2009) 33 Forced Migration Review, 9-11 <https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/ en/FMRpdfs/FMR33/FMR33.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Ian MACGIBBON, 'The Scope of Acquiescence in International Law' in (1954) 31 British Yearbook of International Law, 143-186 Google Scholar öffnen
Jane MCADAM, 'Protecting People Displaced by the Impacts of Climate Change: The UN Human Rights Committee and the Principle of Non-refoulement' (2020) 114 American Journal of International Law 4, 708-725 Google Scholar öffnen
Rutsel MARTHA and Stephen BAILEY, 'The right to enter his or her own country' (EJIL: Talk!, 23 June 2020) <https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-right-to-enter-his-or-her-own-country/> accessed 27 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Giuseppe de MICHELIS, Conference international de l'émigration et de l'immigration, Rome 15-31 mai 1924 (Imprimerie de la Chambre des Députés – Raison C Colombo 1925) Google Scholar öffnen
David MILLER, Strangers in our midst (Harvard University Press 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
Harriet MOYNIHAN, 'Aiding or Assisting: Challenges in Armed Conflict' (November 2016) <https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2016-11-11-aiding-assisting-challenges-armed-conflict-moynihan.pdf> accessed 27 August 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
Haruno NAKASHIBA, 'Clarifying UNHCR Resettlement: A few considerations from a legal perspective', UNHCR Research Paper no264 (November 2013) <https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/528e0a139/clarifying-unhcr-resettlement-few-considerations-legal-perspective-haruno.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Haruno NAKASHIBA, 'Postmillennial UNHCR refugee resettlement: New developments and challenges', UNHCR Research Paper no265 (November 2013) <https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/528e15259/postmillenial-unhcr-refugee-resettlement-new-developments-old-challenges.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
James P NIESSEN, 'The Culture of Welcome and the January, 1957 Austrian Refugee Quota Proposal' (2016) <https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/50546/PDF/1/play/> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Gregor NOLL and Joanne van SELM, 'Rediscovering Resettlement' in (2003) 3 Migration Policy Institute Insight <https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/rediscovering-resettlement> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Leomoi OCHAN, Abikar ABDIKAR and Kim HAEUNH, 'Educating for return: Somali refugees in Dadaab' in (2019) Forced Migration Review, 36-37 <https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/return/leomoi-abikar-kim.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 3042/2017: AS, DI, OI and GD v Italy', UN Doc CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 (27 January 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 2728/2016: Ione Teitiota v New Zealand', UN Doc CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 (23 September 2020) <https://demaribus.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/2728-2016.pdf> accessed 19 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Spain's age assessment procedures violate migrant children's rights, UN committee finds' (13 October 2020) <https://ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=26375&LangID=E> accessed 21 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General Comment No 36: Article 6 (Right to Life)', UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/36 (3 September 2019) <https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/ Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/GC/36&Lang=en> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment', UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/36 (7 August 2015) <https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/a77502-interim-report-special-rapporteur-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman> accessed 5 May 2023 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 1539/2006: Mohammad Munaf v Romania', UN Doc CCPR/C/96/D/1539/2006 (21 August 2009) <https://www.refworld.org/cases,HRC,4acf500d2.html> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 1493/2006: Lecraft v Spain', UN Doc CCPR/C/96/D/1493/2006 (17 August 2009) <https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G09/442/84/PDF/G0944284.pdf?OpenElement> accessed 10 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 1477/2006: Maksudov and Others v Kyrgyzstan', UN Doc CCPR/C/93/D/1461,1462,1476 and 1477/2006 (31 July 2008) <https://www.refworld.org/cases,HRC,4a93a0cd2.html> accessed 18 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General Comment No 32: Article 14: Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial', UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/32 (23 August 2007) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/478b2b2f2.html> accessed 18 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 1136/2002: Bozov v Estonia', UN Doc CCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002 (25 August 2004) <http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/html/1136-2002.html> accessed 21 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General comment No 31: The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on States Parties to the Covenant', UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev1/Add13 (26 May 2004) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/478b26ae2.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 864/1999: Alfonso Ruiz Agudo v Spain', UN Doc CCPR/C/76/D/864/1999 (31 October 2002) <http://www.worldcourts.com/hrc/eng/decisions/2002.10.31_Ruiz_Agudo_v_Spain.htm > accessed 21 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 919/2000: Mr Michael Andreas Müller and Imke Engelhard v Namibia', UN Doc CCPR/C/74/D/919/2000 (26 March 2002) <http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/919-2000.html> accessed 20 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General Comment No 27: Article 12 (Freedom of Movement)', UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev1/Add9 (2 November 1999) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/45139c394.html> accessed 16 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General Comment No 20: Article 7 (Prohibition of torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment)', UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev9 (Vol I) (10 March 1992) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fb0.html> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General Comment No 19: Article 23 (The Family) Protection of the Family, the Right to Marriage and Equality of the Spouses' (27 July 1990) <https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/45139bd74.pdf> accessed 21 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'Communication No 196/1985: Gueye v France' (1989) <http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/session35/196-1985.html> accessed 10 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General Comment No 18: Non-discrimination', UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev9 (Vol I) (10 November 1989) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fa8.html> accessed 20 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'General Comment No 16: Article 17 (Right to Privacy), The Right to Respect of Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence, and Protection of Honour and Reputation', UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev9 (Vol I) (8 April 1988) <www.refworld.org/docid/453883f922.html> accessed 21 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
OHCHR, 'CCPR General Comment No 15: The position of aliens under the Covenant' UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev1 (11 April 1986) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/45139acfc.html> accessed 20 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Obiora Chinedu OKAFOR, 'Cascading towards "De-Solidarity"? The Unfolding of Global Refugee Protection' in (30 August 2019) TWAILR Reflections 2 <https://twailr.com/cascading-toward-de-solidarity-the-unfolding-of-global-refugee-protection/> accessed 27 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Brian OPESKIN, Richard PERRUCHOUD and Jillyann REDPATH-CROSS (eds), Foundations of International Migration Law (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
Maria O'SULLIVAN, 'Can States cease the protection status of resettled refugees?' (Asylum Insight, November 2019) <https://www.asyluminsight.com/maria-osullivan#.Xd0yrndFzt4> accessed 27 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Annick PIJNENBURG, 'Containment Instead of Refoulement: Shifting State Responsibility in the Age of Cooperative Migration Control' in (2020) Human Rights Law Review, 306-322 Google Scholar öffnen
Margret AM PIPER, Paul POWER and Graham THOM, 'Refugee Resettlement: 2012 and Beyond', UNHCR Research Paper no253 (February 2013) <https://www.unhcr.org/research/working/510bd3979/refugee-resettlement-2012-beyond-margaret-piper-paul-power-dr-graham-thom.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Janine PRANTL, Mark J WOOD and Michael W DOYLE, 'Principles of Responsibility Sharing: Proximity, Culpability, Moral Accountability and Capability’ in (June 2022) California Law Review 3 <https://www.californialawreview.org/print/principles-for-responsibility-sharing-proximity-culpability-moral-accountability-and-capability/> accessed 16 August 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA, 'Global resettlement statistics' (as of 2 August 2019) <https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/global-resettlement-statistics/> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
August REINISCH (ed) Österreichisches Handbuch des Völkerrechts I (Manz 5th ed 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
Kristin Bergtora SANDVIK and Katja Lindskov JACOBSEN (eds), UNHCR and the Struggle for Accountability (Routledge 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
William SCHABAS, The Customary International Law of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
Olivier de SCHUTTER, International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary (Cambridge University Press 3rd ed 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
Joanne van SELM, 'Public-Private Partnerships in Refugee Resettlement: Europe and the US' in (2003) 4 Journal of International Migration and Integration 2, 157-174 Google Scholar öffnen
William SEWELL, 'Three Temporalities: Toward a Sociology of the Event', CSST Working Paper No 58, CRSO Working Paper No 448 (October 1990) <https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/51215/448.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Yuval SHANY, 'Taking Universality Seriously: A Functional Approach to Extraterritoriality in International Human Rights Law' in (2013) 7 Law and Ethics of Human Rights, 47-71 Google Scholar öffnen
Malcolm SHAW, International Law (Cambridge University Press 6th ed 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
Wiebke SIEVERS, Rainer BAUBÖCK, Christoph REINPRECHT (eds), Flucht und Asyl – Internationale und österreichische Perspektiven (VÖAW 2021) Google Scholar öffnen
James C SIMEON (ed), The UNHCR and the Supervision of International Refugee Law (Cambridge University Press 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
Nikolaos SITAOPOULOS, 'Why International Migration Law Does not Give a License to Discriminate' (EJIL: Talk!, 20 May 2015) <https://www.ejiltalk.org/why-international-migration-law-does-not-give-a-license-to-discriminate/> accessed 20 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Amy SLAUGHTER, 'How NGOs have helped shape resettlement' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, 32-34 Google Scholar öffnen
Maja SMRKOLJ, 'International Institutions and Individualized Decision-Making: An Example of UNHCR's Refugee Status Determination' in (2008) 9 German Law Journal 11, 1779-1803 Google Scholar öffnen
Clara STRAIMER, 'Vulnerable or invisible? asylum seekers with disabilities in Europe', Research Paper No 194 (November 2010) <https://www.unhcr.org/4cd9765b9.pdf> accessed 21 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Astri SUHRKE, 'Burden-sharing during Refugee Emergencies: The Logic of Collective versus National Action' in (1998) 11 Journal of Refugee Studies 4, 396-415 Google Scholar öffnen
William Lacy SWING, 'Practical considerations for effective resettlement' in (2017) 54 Forced Migration Review, <https://www.refworld.org/docid/58cbcb314.html> accessed 27 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
TAGUNGSDOKUMENTATION, Resettlement und komplementäre Zugangswege: Neue Wege – neue Länder (Frankfurt am Main 13-14 May 2019) <https://resettlement.de/wp-content/uploads/Dokumentation-Fachtagung-Resettlement-Mai-2019.pdf> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Daniel THÜRER, 'Soft law' (MPIL, March 2019) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1469> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Tullio TREVES, 'Customary International Law' (MPIL, November 2006) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1393> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Garry G TROELLER, 'UNHCR Resettlement: Evolution and Future Direction' in (2002) 14 International Journal of Refugee Law 1, 85-95 Google Scholar öffnen
Garry G TROELLER, 'UNHCR Resettlement as an Instrument of International Protection: Constraints and Obstacles in the Arena of Competition for Scarce Humanitarian Resources' in (1991) 3 International Journal of Refugee Law 3, 564-578 Google Scholar öffnen
Volker TÜRK, 'Prospects for Responsibility Sharing in the Refugee Context' in (2016) 4 Journal on Migration and Human Security 3, 45-58 Google Scholar öffnen
UN, 'COVID-19: Agencies temporarily suspend refugee resettlement travel' (17 March 2020) <https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/03/1059602> accessed 27 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UN, 'Interview: "Refugees are the responsibility of the world… Proximity doesn't define responsibility." – Peter Sutherland' (UN News, 2 October 2015) <https://news.un.org/en/story/2015/10/511282-interview-refugees-are-responsibility-world-proximity-doesnt-define> accessed 16 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 'Final Act of the United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Status of Refugees and Stateless Persons', Recommendation D (25 July 1951) <https://www.unhcr.org/protection/travaux/40a8a7394/final-act-united-nations-conference-plenipotentiaries-status-refugees-stateless.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Contributions' (as of 29 June 2022) <https://reporting.unhcr.org/contributions> accessed 29 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Procedural Standards for Refugee Status Determination under UNHCR's Mandate' <https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/42d66dd84.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Projected Global Resettlement Needs 2023' (June 2022) <https://www.unhcr.org/62b18e714> accessed 24 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Resettlement Data' <https://www.unhcr.org/resettlement-data.html> accessed 24 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'The Executive Committee's origins and mandate' <https://www.unhcr.org/executive-committee.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'The 10-Point Plan', Chapter 7 Solutions <https://www.unhcr.org/50a4c17f9.pdf> accessed 24 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Refugee Data Finder' (as of 16 June 2022) <https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/> accessed 27 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, '2020 Planning Summary' (20 December 2019) <http://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/pdfsummaries/GA2020-Turkey-eng.pdf> accessed 21 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Global Refugee Forum pledges collective action for better refugee inclusion, education, jobs' (Press release, 18 December 2019) <https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2019/12/5dfa56b54/global-refugee-forum-pledges-collective-action-better-refugee-inclusion.html> accessed 27 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'UNHCR troubled by latest US refugee resettlement cut' (Press release, 4 November 2019) <https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2019/11/5dbd87337/unhcr-troubled-latest-refugee-resettlement-cut.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2018' (20 June 2019) <https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, Report 'Global compact on refugees', UN Doc A/73/12 (Part II) (13 September 2018) <https://www.unhcr.org/gcr/GCR_English.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Conclusions on International Protection: Adopted by the Executive Committee of the UNHCR Programme 1975-2017 (Conclusion No 1 – 114)', UN Doc HCR/IP/3/Eng/REV 2017 (October 2017) <https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5a2ead6b4.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Union Resettlement Framework and amending Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council, COM(2016) 468 final 2016/0225 (COD): UNHCR's Observations and Recommendations' (November 2016) <https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5890b1d74.pdf> accessed 21 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Frequently Asked Questions about Resettlement' (September 2013) <https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4ac0d7e52.pdf> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, Resettlement Handbook (revised ed July 2011) <http://www.unhcr.org/protection/resettlement/46f7c0ee2/unhcr-resettlement-handbook-complete-publication.html?query=resettlement> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Comments by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to the Legislative Proposal amending the Citizenship Law', Nr 52/ Lp11 (August 2012) <https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/57ed07954.pdf> accessed 24 July 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Protection Policy Paper: Maritime interception operations and the processing of international protection claims: legal standards and policy considerations with respect to extraterritorial processing' (November 2010) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/4cd12d3a2.html> accessed 21 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol' (26 January 2007) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/45f17a1a4.html> accessed 16 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Multilateral Framework of Understandings on Resettlement', FORUM/2004/6 (16 September 2004) <https://www.unhcr.org/protection/convention/414aa7e54/multilateral-framework-understandings-resettlement-emforum20046em.html?query=Multilateral%20Framework%20of% 20Understandings%20on%20Resettlement> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Framework for durable solutions for refugees and persons of concern' (2003) <https://www.unhcr.org/partners/partners/3f1408764/framework-durable-solutions-refugees-persons-concern.html> accessed 24 June 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'The Strategic Use of Resettlement', EC/53/SC/CRP.10/Add.1 (3 June 2003) <https://www.unhcr.org/excom/standcom/3edf57cd4/strategic-use-resettlement.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'UNHCR receives report on Nairobi' (Press release, 25 January 2002) <https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2002/1/3c513a284/unhcr-receives-report-nairobi-investigation.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, The Haitian Interdiction Case 1993, Brief Amicus Curiae in (1994) 6 International Journal of Refugee Law 85, 94-97 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status (1992) <https://www.unhcr.org/publications/legal/5ddfcdc47/handbook-procedures-criteria-determining-refugee-status-under-1951-convention.html> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Resettlement as an Instrument of Protection: Traditional Problems Achieving This Durable Solution and New Directions in the 1990s', EC/SCP/65 (9 July 1991) <https://www.unhcr.org/excom/scip/3ae68ccc10/resettlement-instrument-protection-traditional-problems-achieving-durable.html> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR, 'Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees', UN Doc A/3585/Rev.1 (1 January 1958) <https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae68c710.html> accessed 17 June 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR EXCOM Conclusion No 8 (XXVIII) 'Determination of Refugee Status' (1977) <https://www.unhcr.org/excom/exconc/3ae68c6e4/determination-refugee-status.html> accessed 6 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNHCR EXCOM Conclusion No 30 (XXXIV) 'The Problem of Manifestly Unfounded or Abusive Applications for Refugee Status or Asylum' (1983) <https://www.unhcr.org/excom/exconc/3ae68c6118/problem-manifestly-unfounded-abusive-applications-refugee-status-asylum.html> accessed 6 July 2022 Google Scholar öffnen
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL, 'The Michigan Guidelines on Refugee Freedom of Movement' (May 2017) para 10 <https://www.refworld.org/docid/592ee6614.html> accessed 14 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
UN Treaty Collection, Chapter V Refugees and Stateless Persons: Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (as of 19 September 2020) <https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=V-5&chapter=5#EndDec> accessed 21 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Sibel URANUES, '"Pushback" – Rechtliches über das "Unwort des Jahres" 2021 (Teil I)' (Blogasyl, June 30, 2022) <https://www.blogasyl.at/2022/06/pushback-teil-1/> accessed 6 July 2022. Google Scholar öffnen
Markus WAGNER, 'Non-State Actors' (MPIL, July 2013) <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1445?rskey=0oAy0H&result=1&prd=MPIL> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
WH, 'Why climate migrants do not have refugee status' (The Economist, 6 March 2018) <https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2018/03/06/why-climate-migrants-do-not-have-refugee-status> accessed 13 February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Michael WOOD, 'Customary international law and human rights' (Working Paper EUI 2016) <https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/44445> accessed 10 July 2021 Google Scholar öffnen
Jan WOUTERS et al (eds), Accountability for Human Rights Violations (Intersentia 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
Marjoleine ZIECK, 'Refugees and the Right to Freedom of Movement: From Flight to Return' in (2018) 39 Michigan Journal of International Law 1, 19-116 Google Scholar öffnen
Marjoleine ZIECK, 'Doomed to Fail from the Outset? UNHCR's Convention Plus Initiative Revisited' in (2009) 21 International Journal of Refugee Law 3, 387-420 Google Scholar öffnen
Marjoleine ZIECK, UNHCR's worldwide presence in the field (Wolf Legal Publishers 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
Andreas ZIMMERMANN (ed), The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen