Cover des Buchs: Technocracy and Selectivity
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Technocracy and Selectivity

NGOs, the UN Security Council and Human Rights
Autor:innen:
Reihe:
Zentrum und Peripherie, Band 14
Verlag:
 2019

Zusammenfassung

Durch die Analyse der Beziehungen zwischen NGOs, dem UN-Sicherheitsrat und den Menschenrechten wird in diesem Buch argumentiert, dass sowohl NGOs als auch der UN-Sicherheitsrat die Menschenrechtssemantik selektiv in Bezug auf die Orte und Akteure, die sie betreffen, anwenden. Es beobachtet Wissen und Macht als Kräfte, die sich gegenseitig beeinflussen, was eine Erklärung dafür sein kann, wie Global Governance funktioniert. Darüber hinaus untersucht das Buch die Idee, dass Recht, abgesehen von der Durchdringung traditioneller Strukturen, von der Basis der Gesellschaft in Richtung institutioneller Bereiche aufsteigen kann. In diesem Zusammenhang schlägt der Autor vor, dass das Zusammenspiel zwischen nichtstaatlichen Akteuren und politischen Institutionen die Bottom-up-Prozesse im Zusammenhang mit der Gesetzgebung und der Gestaltung politischer Entscheidungen fördert. In Anbetracht der kritischen Probleme, die sowohl die NRO als auch der UN-Sicherheitsrat in Bezug auf Repräsentation und Reaktionsfähigkeit haben, stellt die Arbeit fest, dass die Beziehung zwischen ihnen auf eine ausschließende, technokratische und arkane Weise stattfindet.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2019
Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5989-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0105-1
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Zentrum und Peripherie
Band
14
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
262
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 10
  2. Introduction Kein Zugriff 11 - 14
      1. 1.1.1 Old and Novel Semantics for Security Themes Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.1.2 Rule of Law in non-state areas? Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.1.3 International institutions, politicization, and legal backlashes: the (trans)constitutional conundrums Kein Zugriff
      1. 1.2.1. The grammars of democracy, constitutionalism, and human rights Kein Zugriff
      2. 1.2.2 Non-state constitutions Kein Zugriff
      3. 1.2.3 Social claims and non-state constitutions Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 Placing the UNSC in the international orbit Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 The international, the global, and the legal regime of UNSC Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 UNSC between legal acts and politics Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 The Executive–Legislative Side: UNSC and normative expectations Kein Zugriff
    5. 2.5 Post–Cold War Resolutions and Global Governance Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 The “Monster” and the UN Charter’s Purposes and Principles Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.1.2 Article 39 and Its Boundaries Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.2.1 Jus Cogens Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2.2 Obligations Erga Omnes Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.2.3 The end of global Human Rights or: the affirmation of human rights at global political organs may lead to their annihilation Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.3 Final Remarks: The United Nations, Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes, and Human Rights Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.1.1 NGOs’ First Steps and Law Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.1.2 Conceiving Transnational NGOs Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.1.3 NGOs’ Former Practices in the UN and in the UNSC Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.1.4 NGO Working Group on the Security Council Kein Zugriff
      5. 4.1.5 The Arria formula, the Somavía Meeting, and their Challenges Kein Zugriff
    2. 4.2 NGOs as Peripheral Components of the UNSC Regime Kein Zugriff
    3. 4.3 The uses of human rights vocabulary by the UNSC, and the NGOs Kein Zugriff
    4. 4.4 Broaching Human Rights in the UN Arena Kein Zugriff
    5. 4.5 Selective Addressing of Human Rights Kein Zugriff
    1. 5.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
    2. 5.2 Before publicity, against publicity: the notion of arcanum (or: publicity as a risk) Kein Zugriff
    3. 5.3 Religion, politics and Nazism: the return of the arcanum in Schmitt Kein Zugriff
    4. 5.4 Arcanum, democracy, and non-state governance Kein Zugriff
    5. 5.5 NGOs, Representation, and Expertise: Combating Arcane Arrangements with Technocracy Kein Zugriff
  8. Conclusion Kein Zugriff 233 - 236
  9. References Kein Zugriff 237 - 262

Literaturverzeichnis (326)

  1. Ackerman, B. (2015). Three paths to constitutionalism–and the crisis of the European Union. British Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 705-714. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  2. Ackerman, B. (2019). The Rise of World Constitutionalism. Volume 1: Revolutionary Constitutions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (in press). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  3. Aguiar, T. (2011). A demofobia na democracia moderna. Dados, 54(4), 609-650. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  4. Akande, D. (1997). The International Court of Justice and the Security Council: Is There Room for Judicial Control of Decisions of the Political Organs of the United Nations? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46(02), 309-343. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  5. Alvarez, J. E. (1996). Judging the security council. American Journal of International Law, 1-39. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  6. Albert, M. (2016). A Theory of World Politics (Vol. 141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  7. Ambos, K. (2002). International Criminal Law has Lost its Innocence. German Law Journal, 3(10), 6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  8. Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  9. Aragão, E. J. G. d. (2007). Strategien zur Durchsetzung der völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtung zur Strafverfolgung der Folter am Beispiel Brasiliens: Eine Untersuchung zum Verhältnis zwischen Völkerstrafrecht und Staatenverantwortlichkeit (Vol. 1). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  10. Araujo, C. (2013). Carl Schmitt, teologia política e secularização. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 28(83), 217-224. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  11. Arcari, M. (2012). Limits to Security Council Powers under the UN Charter and Issues of Charter Interpretation. polish yearbook of international law, 32, 239-257. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  12. Aristotle. (1998). Politics (E. Barker & R. F. r. Stalley, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  13. Assange, J. (2006). Conspiracy as Governance, 3 December, URL http://cryptome.org/0002/ja-conspiracies.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  14. Aurélio, D. P. (2012). Antinomias da razão de estado Razão de Estado e Democracia (pp. 25-50). Coimbra: Bento António. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  15. Austin, J. (1861). The province of jurisprudence determined (Vol. 2): J. Murray. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  16. Avant, D. D. (2005). The market for force: The consequences of privatizing security. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  17. Bachur, J. P. (2009). Distância e crítica: limites e possibilidades da teoria de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann. (PhD), USP, São Paulo. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  18. Barbosa, S. (2009). Jus cogens como aporia: o crepúsculo do direito internacional clássico. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia, 233, 39-92. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  19. Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  20. Bendix, R. (1977). Nation-building and citizenship: studies of our changing social order. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  21. Bennett, W. L. (2005). Social movements beyond borders: understanding two eras of transnational activism. In D. Della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 203-226). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  22. Bentham, J. (1838-1843). Essay on political tactics. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Vol. 2). Edinburgh: William Tait. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  23. Bentham, J. (2010 [written around 1780]). Of the limits of the penal branch of jurisprudence (P. Schofield Ed.). Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  24. Binder, M. (2008). The politicization of international security institutions: The UN security council and NGOs. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, held on 28 31 August 2008 in Boston, Massachusetts, Social Science Research Center Berlin, available online at http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/files/usbkoeln/2009/903/14611_politizationofinternationalsecurityinstitutions.pdf, (visited 08 Jun 2015), pp. 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  25. Binder, M. (2013). Die Politisierung internationaler Sicherheitsinstitutionen? Der UN-Sicherheitsrat und NGOs. In M. Zürn & M. Ecker-Ehrhardt (Eds.), Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. This article is the modified, English version of Binder (2008). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  26. Bloch, M. (2005). Feudal Society, V. 2: Social Classes and Political Organization (L. A. Manyon, Trans.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  27. Bobbio, N. (1997). A democracia e o poder invisível. O futuro da democracia: uma defesa das regras do jogo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  28. Botero, G. (1948). Della ragione di stato: con tre libri delle cause della grandezza della città. Turin: Unione Tipografico - Editrice Torinese. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  29. Brandão, L. C. (2001). A literatura sobre movimentos sociais: interações entre a política institucional e não institucional. BIB, 71(1o Semestre), 123-143. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  30. Brazil, Canada, Zealand, N., & Africa, S. (2002). S/2002/754 Letter, 12 July 2002, from the Permanent Representatives of Brazil, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council. New York: UN. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  31. Brühl, T. (2003). Nichtregierungsorganisationen als Akteure internationaler Umweltverhandlungen: ein Erklärungsmodell auf der Basis der situationsspezifischen Ressourcennachfrage. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  32. Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity: from Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community, trans. J. Flynn: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  33. Brunkhorst, H. (2014a). Auswege aus der technokratischen Falle? Die unbeachtete Wirtschaftsverfassung Europas. Leviathan, 4, 508-523. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  34. Brunkhorst, H. (2014b). Solidarity in times of crisis: Constitutional evolution and Europe. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 178-237). Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  35. Burke, E. (1791). Letter from the New to the Old Whigs. London: Printed for J. Dodsley, Pall-Mall. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  36. Burke, E. (1854-56). Speech to the Electors of Bristol (3 Nov. 1774) The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke (Vol. 6 vols.). London: Henry G. Bohn. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  37. Burke, E. (1890). Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Printed for J. Dodsley, in Pall-Mall. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  38. Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: the populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54-67. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  39. Carmola, K. (2010). Private Security Contractors and New Wars: Risk, Law, and Ethics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  40. Centeno, M. A. (1993). The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22(3), 307-335. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  41. Centeno, M. A., & Wolfson, L. (1997). Redefiniendo la tecnocracia. Desarrollo económico, 37(146), pp. 215-240. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  42. Chacon, V. (1997). A recepção de Carl Schmitt no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia, XLVII(185), 55-66. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  43. Charnovitz, S. (1996). Two centuries of participation: NGOs and international governance. Mich. J. Int'l L., 18, 183. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  44. Clapmarius, A. (2014 [1605]). De Arcanis Rerumpublicarum libri sex (U. Wehner, Trans.). Stuttgart Bad-Cannstatt: Günter Frank. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  45. Coalition for the International Criminal Court (2004). Compilation of Documents on UN Security Council Resolutions 1422 / 1487: Controversial resolutions proposed by the United States seeking immunity from the International Criminal Court. New York. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  46. Cohen, C. P. (1990). The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in the Drafting of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Human Rights Quarterly, 12(1)137-147. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  47. Comparato, F. K. (1997). Variações sobre o conceito de povo no regime democrático. Estud. av. [online], 11(31), 211-222. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  48. Criddle, E. J., & Fox-Decent, E. (2009). A fiduciary theory of Jus Cogens. Yale Journal of International Law, 34(311). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  49. Cutler, A. C. (2010). The legitimacy of private transnational governance: experts and the transnational market for force. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  50. D'Amato, A. (1990). It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's Jus Cogens. Conn. J. Int'l L., 6, 1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  51. Da Silva, V. A. (2008). O Judiciário e as políticas públicas: entre transformação social e obstáculo à realização dos direitos sociais. In C. P. d. S. Neto & D. Sarmento (Eds.), Direitos sociais: fundamentação, judicialização e direitos sociais em espécies (pp. 587-599). Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  52. Daase, C. (2010). Der erweiterte Sicherheitsbegriff (working paper). http://www.sicherheitskultur.org/WorkingPapers/01 - Daase.pdf] Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  53. Daase, C. (2013). Von der nationalen zur menschlichen Sicherheit: Politische und rechtliche Konsequenzen des erweiterten Sicherheitsbegriffs. In A. Fischer-Lescano & P. Mayer (Eds.), Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit: Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze (Vol. 17). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  54. Das, O. (2013). Environmental protection, security and armed conflict: A sustainable development perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  55. de Albuquerque, R. C. (2010). A companhia das índias ocidentais: uma sociedade anônima? Revista da Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo, 105, 25-38. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  56. De Tocqueville, A. (2002). Democracy in America. Translated, Edited, and with an Introduction by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  57. de Wet, E. (2004a). The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  58. de Wet, E. (2004b). The prohibition of torture as an international norm of jus cogens and its implications for national and customary law. European Journal of International Law, 15(1), 97-121. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  59. de Wet, E. (2006). The international constitutional order. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(01), 51-76. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  60. Derrida, J. (1981). Economimesis. Diacritics, 11(2), 2-25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  61. Derrida, J. (1992). The Mystical Foundation of Authority. In D. Cornell & M. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  62. Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The sociological review, 40(1), 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  63. Dreher, A., & Vreeland, J. R. (2014). The political economy of the United Nations Security Council. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  64. Eurostep, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Global Policy Forum, North-South Institute, Social Watch, Third World Institute, WEDO, World Federalist Movement, Institute for Global Policy. (2006). Paper on NGO Participation at the United Nations. Paper presented at the Global Policy Forum. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  65. Falk, R. A. (1994). The United Nations and the Rule of Law. Transnat'l L. & Comtemp. Probs., 4, 611. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  66. Fassbender, B. (2011). The Role for Human Rights in the Decision-Making Process of the UN Security Council. In Fassbender, B. (Ed.). Securing Human Rights? Advancements and Challenges of the UN Security Council, 74-97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  67. Ferreira, B. (2004). O risco do político: crítica ao liberalismo e teoria política no pensamento de Carl Schmitt. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  68. Fischer-Lescano, A. (2005). Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  69. Fischer-Lescano, A. (2005b). Redefining Sovereignty via International Constitutional Moments. ConWEB, 1, 10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  70. Fischer-Lescano, A. (2013). Rechtskraft. Köln: August Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  71. Fischer-Lescano, A., & Liste, P. (2005). Völkerrechtspolitik. Zu Trennung und Verknüpfung von Politik und Recht der Weltgesellschaft. Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, 209-249. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  72. Fischer-Lescano, A., & Möller, K. (2012). Der Kampf um globale soziale Rechte: zart wäre das Gröbste. Berlin: Wagenbach. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  73. Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2004). Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 999. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  74. Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2006). Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  75. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  76. Foucault, M. (1984, 30 June - 1st July). Face aux gouvernements, les droits de l’homme. Libération, p. 22. Retrieved from http://www.fondamentaux.org/2013/05/16/michel-foucault-face-aux-gouvernements-les-droits-de-lhomme/ Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  77. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  78. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social text, 25/26, 56-80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  79. Galindo, G. R. B. (2010). Constitutionalism forever. The Finnish Yearbook of International Law 21.1, 137-170. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  80. GAO (2005). Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed to Improve Use of Private Security Providers. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office. Government Printing Office. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  81. Gibbons, E., & Garfield, R. (1999). The impact of economic sanctions on health and human rights in Haiti, 1991-1994. American Journal of Public Health, 89(10), 1499-1504. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  82. Ginty, R. M. (2012). Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(3), 287-308. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  83. Glennon, M. J. (2014). National security and double government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  84. Goede, N. (2014). Der UN-Sicherheitsrat als organisierte Anarchie: Kontingenz und Mehrdeutigkeit bei Entscheidungen des Sicherheitrats. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  85. Gohn, M. d. G. M. (1997). Teorias dos movimentos sociais: paradigmas clássicos e contemporâneos. São Paulo: Edições Loyola. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  86. Goldstone, J. (2003). Bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized politics. In J. Goldstone (Ed.), States, parties, and social movements (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  87. Gowlland-Debbas, V. (1994). Security Council Enforcement Action And Issues of State Responsibility. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(55). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  88. Grimm, D. (2004). Can the post-national constellation be re-constitutionalized? TranState working papers [Original: Die Verfassung im Prozess der Entstaatlichung. In: Brenner, Michael; Huber, Peter M.; Möstl, Markus (orgs.). Der Staat des Grundgesetzes – Kontinuität und Wandel: Festschrift für Peter Badura zum siebzigen Geburtstag. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004, pp. 145-67]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  89. Habermas, J. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  90. Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  91. Habermas, J. (2005). Eine politische Verfassung für die pluralistische Weltgesellschaft? Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätze (pp. 324-365). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  92. Habermas, J. (2015). The lure of technocracy. (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  93. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  94. Hart, H. L. A. (1994 [1961]). The concept of law (Second Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  95. Hathaway, O. A. (2005). Between power and principle: An integrated theory of international law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 469-536. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  96. Hathaway, O. A., Brower, J., Liss, R., Thomas, T. M., & Victor, J. M. (2013). Consent-Based Humanitarian Intervention: Giving Sovereign Responsibility Back to the Sovereign. Cornell Int'l LJ, 46(499). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  97. Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  98. Heinze, E. A. (2006). Humanitarian intervention and the war in Iraq: Norms, discourse, and state practice. Parameters, 36(1). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  99. Hill, F., Aboitiz, M., & Poehlman‐Doumbouya, S. (2003). Nongovernmental organizations' role in the buildup and implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325. Signs, 28(4), 1255-1269. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  100. Hinsley, F. H. (1967). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  101. Hobbes, T. (1998 [1651]). Leviathan. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  102. Holmes, P. (2012). Verfassungsevolution in der Weltgesellschaft: Differenzierungsprobleme des Rechts und der Politik im Zeitalter der Global Governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  103. Haubrich, D. (2003). September 11, Anti-Terror Laws and Civil Liberties: Britain, France and Germany Compared 1. Government and Opposition, 38(1), 3-28. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  104. Horn, E. (2011). Logics of political secrecy. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7-8), 103-122. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  105. Hullman, C. (2005). Konsens oder Zwang: Völkerrechtliche Friedensregelungen der internationalen Gemeinschaft für Bosnien-Herzegowina und Irak. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  106. Hunt, L. A. (2007). Inventing human rights: A history. New York: WW Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  107. Hurd, I. (2007). After Anarchy: legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  108. International Crisis Group. (2011). A Ceasefire and Negotiations the Right Way to Resolve the Libya Crisis Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/publication-type/media-releases/2011/a-ceasefire-and-negotiations-the-right-way-to-resolve-the-libya-crisis.aspx, acessed on 12/12/2015. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  109. International Law Commission. (2006). Fragmentation of international law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law Fifty-eighth Session, Geneva, a/cn (Vol. 4, pp. l). International Law Commission. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  110. Izaias, R. S. (2010). A legitimação do Estado democrático de direito na modernidade periférica: uma observação a partir do caso brasileiro. Master's thesis. Universidade de São Paulo. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  111. Joas, H. (2011). Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  112. Jordan, L., & Van Tuijl, P. (2000). Political responsibility in transnational NGO advocacy. World development, 28(12), 2051-2065. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  113. Joyner, D. (2012). The Security Council as a legal hegemon. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 43, 225. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  114. Kadelbach, S. (2006). Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and Other Rules – the Identification of Fundamental Norms. In C. T. Tomuschat, J-M. (Ed.), The fundamental rules of the international legal order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (pp. 32). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  115. Kahan, A. S. (1992). Aristocratic liberalism: the social and political thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  116. Kahler, M. (2004). Defining accountability up: The global economic multilaterals. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 132-158. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  117. Kaldor, M. (2007). New & Old Wars. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  118. Kantorowicz, E. (1959). Secretos de Estado (un concepto absolutista y sus tardios origenes medievales). Estudios Políticos, 104(Marzo/Abril), 37-70. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  119. Kantorowicz, E. (1997). The king's two bodies: A study in medieval political theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  120. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998a). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  121. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998b). Transnational advocacy networks in the movement society. In Meyer D.S. & Tarrow S. (Eds). The social movement society: contentious politics for a new century, 217-238. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  122. Keen, D. (2006). Endless war? Hidden functions of the" War on Terror". Ann Arbor: Pluto Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  123. Kelsen, H. (1948). Collective security and collective self-defense under the Charter of the United Nations. Am. J. Int'l L., 42, 783. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  124. Kelsen, H. (1950). The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. New York: F.A. Praeger. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  125. Kelsen, H. (2003). Principles of international law. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  126. Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  127. Keohane, R. o., & Nye, J. S. (1972). Transnational relations and world politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  128. Kessler, O., & Albert, M. (2013). Die Transformation von Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit aus der Perspektive der Systemtheorie. In A. Fischer-Lescano & P. Mayer (Eds.), Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit: Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  129. Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The emergence of global administrative law. Law and contemporary problems, 68(15)15-61. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  130. Kirchheimer, O. (1996). Legality and Legitimacy. In W. E. Scheuerman (Ed.), The rule of law under siege: Selected essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer. Berkeley: University of California Press Berkeley. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  131. Koh, H. H. (1997). Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599-2659. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  132. Kokott, J. (1999). Der Schutz der Menschenrechte im Völkerrecht. In Brunkhorst, H.; Köhler, W.; Lutz-Bachmann, M. (Eds.), Recht auf Menschenrechte. Menschenrechte, Demokratie und internationale Politik (pp. 176-198). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  133. Kolb, R. (2015). Peremptory International Law-Jus Cogens: A General Inventory. Oxford; Portland: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  134. Koselleck, R. (1988). Critique and Crisis. Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  135. Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: on the semantics of historical time (K. Tribe, Trans.). New York: University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  136. Koskenniemi, M. (1995). The police in the temple - Order, justice and the UN: a dialectical view. 6 EJIL 325-348. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  137. Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From Apology to Utopia: the Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  138. Koskenniemi, M. (2010). Human rights mainstreaming as a strategy for institutional power. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 1(1), 47-58. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  139. Kreuder-Sonnen, & Zangl, B. (2014). International organizations between constitutionalism and authoritarianism. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 568-594. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  140. Kriesberg, L. (1997). Social movements and global transformation. In Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (Eds.). Transnational social movements and global politics: solidarity beyond the state. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  141. Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569-598. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  142. Kusche I. (2016). Social Movements and Sociological Systems Theory. In Roose J., Dietz H. (eds), Social Theory and Social Movements. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  143. Laclau, E. (2007). Emancipation(s). London, New York: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  144. Lailach, M. (1998). Die Wahrung des Weltfriedens und der internationalen Sicherheit als Aufgabe des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  145. Lance Bennett, W., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the US. Political Communication, 25(3), 269-289. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  146. Laqueur, W. (2003). Krieg dem Westen: Terrorismus im 21. Jahrhundert. München: Propyläen Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  147. Lauterpacht, H. (1953). Annuaire de la Comission du droit internacional.–– Publications des Nations Unies., A/CN.4/SER. A, 1953, vol. II, A/CN.4/63. , 106. http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes%28e%29/ILC_1953_v2_e.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  148. Llobet, M. (2012). Terrorism: Limits Between Crime and War. The Fallacy of the Slogan ‘War on Terror’ Post 9/11 and the State of Permanent Legal Emergency (pp. 101-117). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  149. Locke, J. (2003). Second Treatise of Civil Government Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven and New York: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  150. Luhmann, N. (1975a). Die Weltgesellschaft. In Soziologische Aufklärung 2 (pp. 51-71). Opladen: Westdeutscher. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  151. Luhmann, N. (1975b). Selbst-Thematisierung des Gesellschaftssystems: Über die Kategorie der Reflexion aus der Sicht der Systemtheorie. In Soziologische Aufklärung 2 (pp. 72-102). Opladen: Westdeutscher. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  152. Luhmann, N. (1978). Organisation und entscheidung. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  153. Luhmann, N. (1980). Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition. Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, 1, (pp. 9–71). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  154. Luhmann, N. (1983). Sistema Jurídico y Dogmatica Jurídica. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  155. Luhmann, N. (1987). Rechtssoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  156. Luhmann, N. (1989). Geheimnis, Zeit und Ewigkeit. In N. Luhmann & P. Fuchs (Eds.), Reden und Schweigen (pp. 101-138). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  157. Luhmann, N. (1990). Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft. Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9, 176-220. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  158. Luhmann, N. (1991). Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin, Nova York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  159. Luhmann, N. (1992). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  160. Luhmann, N. (1993a). Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Franfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  161. Luhmann, N. (1993b). Staat und Staatsräson im Übergang von traditionaler Herrschaft zu moderner Politik Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft (Band 3). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  162. Luhmann, N. (1995a). Das Paradox der Menschenrechte und drei Formen seiner Entfaltung. In N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung, 6, 229-236. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  163. Luhmann, N. (1995b). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  164. Luhmann, N. (1997). Globalization or world society: how to conceive of modern society? International review of sociology, 7(1), 67-79. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  165. Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  166. Luhmann, N. (1999). Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts: Beiträge zur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  167. Luhmann, N. (2000). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  168. Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  169. Luhmann, N. (2008a). Die Form “Person” (3. Auflage ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  170. Luhmann, N. (2008b). Sinn, Selbstreferez und soziokulturelle Evolution Ideenevolution: Beiträge zur Wissensoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  171. Luhmann, N. (2009). Risiko und Gefahr Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstrutivistische Perspektiven (pp. 126-162). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  172. Luhmann, N. (2014). Sociología Política. Trans. by I. O. Rodrígues. Madrid: Trotta. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  173. Lynch, C. (2013). Neoliberal Ethics, the Humanitarian International, and Practices of Peacebuilding. In E. Verdeja & J. Smith (Eds.), Globalization, Social Movements, and Peacebuilding. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  174. Machiavelli, N. (1998 [1532]). The prince. Trans. by Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  175. Machiavelli, N. (2012 [1531]). Discourses on Livy. Trans. by N. H. Thomson. Mineola, NY: Dover. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  176. Manusama, K. (2006). The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  177. Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3), 271-285. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  178. Martens, K. (2004a). An Appraisal of Amnesty International's Work at the United Nations: Established Areas of Activities and Shifting Priorities Since the 1990s. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 1050-1070. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  179. Martens, K. (2004b). NGOs in the UN System: Examining Formal and Informal Mechanisms of Interaction. 2 Int'l J. Civ. Soc'y L. 11. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  180. Martens, K. (2005). NGOs and the United Nations: Institutionalization, professionalization, and adaptation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  181. Marx, K. (1962). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Erster Band). Berlin: Dietz Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  182. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2008). Manifest der kommunistischen Partei. Metalibri. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  183. Maus, I. (1999). Menschenrechte als Ermächtigungsnormen internationaler Politik oder: der zerstörte Zusammenhang von Menschenrechten und Demokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  184. Maus, I. (2002). Vom Nationalstaat zum Globalstaat oder: der Niedergang der Demokratie. In M. Lutz-Bachmann & J. Bohman (Eds.), Weltstaat oder Staatenwelt? Für und wider die Idee einer Weltrepublik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  185. Maus, I. (2007a). Über Volkssouveränität: Elemente einer Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  186. Maus, I. (2007b). Verfassung oder Vertrag. Zur Verrechtlichung globaler Politik. In P. Niesen, and Benjamin Herborth (Ed.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  187. Maus, I. (2010). Verfassung und Verfassungsgebung: Zur Kritik des Theorems einer "Emergenz" supranationaler und transnationaler Verfassungen. In R. Kreide & A. Niederberger (Eds.), Staatliche Souveranität und transnationales Recht (pp. 27-70). München und Merging: Rainer Hampp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  188. Mausama, K. (2006). The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  189. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  190. McDonnell, D., & Valbruzzi, M. (2014). Defining and classifying technocrat‐led and technocratic governments. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 654-671. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  191. Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International security 19(3), 5-49. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  192. Meisterhans, N. (2010). Menschenrechte als weltgesellschaftliche Herrschaftspraxis: Zur Konstitutionalisierung und Demokratisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  193. Miguel, L. F. (2013). Democracia e representação: territórios em disputa. São Paulo: Editora Unesp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  194. Mill, J. S. (1873). Principles of political economy. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, And Dyer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  195. Mill, J. S. (1874). On the Treatment of Barbarous Nations Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical (pp. 252-253). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  196. Mill, J. S. (1977). Rationale of Representation. In Robson, John M. (Ed.). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society Part I (On Liberty). Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegal Paul, 1977. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  197. Mill, J. S. (2010a). Civilization. In On liberty and other essays. Digireads.com Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  198. Mill, J. S. (2010b). On Liberty. In On liberty and other essays. Digireads.com Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  199. Mill, J. S. (2010c). On Representative Government On liberty and other essays: Digireads.com Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  200. Mittelman, J. (2010). Hyperconflict: globalization and insecurity: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  201. Möller, K. (2014). Postdemokratie als Verfassungsproblem. Zur Bedeutung globaler sozialer Rechte. Neue Soziale Bewegungen, 27(1). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  202. Möllers, C. (2005). Transnationale Behördenkooperation: Verfassungs- und völkerrechtliche Probleme transnationaler administrativer Standardsetzung. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 65, 351-389. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  203. Montejo, M. F. C. (2008). Los derechos humanos laborales: el núcleo duro de derechos (core rights) y el ius cogens laboral. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 8(111). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  204. Montesquieu, C. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws (A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller & H. S. Stone, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  205. Moravcsik, A. (2004). Is there a ‘democratic deficit’in world politics? A framework for analysis. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 336-363. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  206. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among Nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  207. Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia: Human Rights in history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  208. Müller, F. (1984). Strukturierende Rechtslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  209. Müller, F. (2003). Was die Globalisierung der Demokratie antut—und was die Demokratien gegen die Globalisierung tun können Demokratie zwischen Staatsrecht und Weltrecht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  210. Münkler, H. (2011). Die neuen kriege. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  211. Mutua, M. W. (2001). Human rights international NGOs: a critical evaluation. In Claude E. Welch, Jr. (Ed.), NGOs and Human Rights: Promisse and Performance (pp. 151-163). Philadelphia: Universisty of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  212. Neves, M. (1992). Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: eine theoretische Betrachtung und Interpretation des Falls Brasilien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  213. Neves, M. (2006). Entre Têmis e Leviatã: uma relação difícil: o Estado Democrático de Direito a partir e além de Luhmann e Habermas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  214. Neves, M. (2007a). A constitucionalização simbólica: Martins Fontes. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  215. Neves, M. (2007b). The symbolic force of human rights. Philosophy Social Criticism, 33 (4), 411-444. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  216. Neves, M. (2013). Transconstitutionalism. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  217. Neves, M. (2015). Ideias em outro lugar? Constituição liberal e codificação do direito privado na virada do século XIX para o século XX no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 30(88). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  218. NGO Working Group on the Security Council. (2019). Meetings Avaiable at http://www.ngowgsc.org/content/meetings, access on 12 Feb 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  219. Nowrot, K. (1999). Legal Consequences of Globalization: The Status of Non-Governmental Organizations under International Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6(2, Article 7). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  220. O'Neill, O. (2005). The dark side of human rights. International Affairs, 81(2), 427-439. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  221. Obama, B. (2013). Remarks by the President at the National Defense University. Washington. Retrieved from https://http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  222. Oeter, S. (2008). Humanitäre Intervention und die Grenzen des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbots – Wen oder was schützt das Völkerrecht: Staatliche Souveränität, kollektive Selbstbestimmung oder individuelle Autonomie? In H. Münkler & K. Malowitz (Eds.), Humanitäre Intervention: ein Instrument außenpolitischer Konfliktbearbeitung. Grundlagen und Diskussion. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  223. Oosthuizen, G. H. (1999). Playing the devil's advocate: The United Nations Security Council is unbound by law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 12(03), 549-563. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  224. Ottmann, H. (2016). Protestantische Schulphilosophie in Deutschland: Arnisaeus und Conring. In Horn, C., & Neschke-Hentschke, A. (Eds). Politischer Aristotelismus: Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 218-231). Stuttgart and Weimar: J.B. Metzler. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  225. Oxford Dictionary of English. (Ed.) (2010). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 27 Jan. 2016, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199571123.001.0001/m_en_gb0160850. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  226. Palma, M. (2018a). As coalizões do “presidencialismo de coalizão” no Brasil: a gênese legislativa na experiência constitucional de 1988. Revista de Direito Brasileira, 20(8), 408-428. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  227. Palma, M. (2018b). The rhetoric of the dissolution of state borders and the question of global governance within the security regime. In D. Zaidan et. al. (Ed.), Law, society and institutions : a transdisciplinary perspective. (pp. 67-100). Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  228. Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of influence. Public opinion quarterly, 27(1), 37-62. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  229. Paul, J. (2003). The Arria Formula. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/18545/1/The Arria Formula.pdf?1. https://http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/185-general/40088-the-arria-formula.html Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  230. Paul, J. (2004a). NGOs and the Security Council. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from http://www. globalpolicy. org/security/ngowkgrp/gpfpaper.htm Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  231. Paul, J. (2004b). Working with Nongovernmental Organizations. In D. Malone (Ed.), The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  232. Pastorella, G. (2016). Technocratic governments in Europe: getting the critique right. Political studies, 64(4), 948-965. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  233. Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations. (2006). Handbook on the Working Methods of the Security Council. Retrieved from https://www.un.emb-japan.go.jp/jp/handbook.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  234. Petersohn, U. (2017). Private military and security companies (PMSCs), military effectiveness, and conflict severity in weak states, 1990–2007. Journal of conflict resolution, 61(5), 1046-1072. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  235. Pfister, J. (2017). Protest Policing als transnationale bürokratische Herrschaft. In C. Daase, N. Deitelhoff, B. Kamis, J. Pfister & P. Wallmeier (Eds.), Herrschaft in den Internationalen Beziehungen (pp. 95-118). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  236. Picciotto, S. (1996-1997). Networks in international economic integration: fragmented states and the dilemmas of neo-liberalism. Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus., 17, 1014-1056. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  237. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  238. Plato. (1926). Cratylus; Parmenides ; Greater Hippias ; Lesser Hippias (translated by Fowler, H. N.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  239. Plato. (2000). The Republic. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  240. Ragazzi, M. (2000). The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  241. Rajagopal, B. (2002). International law and social movements: challenges of theorizing resistance. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 41, 397. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  242. Reisman, W. M. (1993). The Constitutional Crisis in the United Nations. American Journal of International Law, 87(1), 83-100. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  243. Ribeiro, P. H. Entre eclusas e espelhos: a esférica pública vista a partir de uma leitura crítica de Niklas Luhmann e de debates contemporâneos. Master’s thesis. Universidade de São Paulo. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  244. Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction. In S. C. Ropp & a. K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change (Vol. 66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  245. Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). Structures of governance and transnational relations: what have we learned? In T. Risse-Kappen (Ed.), Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions (Vol. 42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  246. Ritzi, C. (2017). Das Geheimnis und die Demokratie. (In-) Transparenz als politische Herausforderung im digitalen Zeitalter. In R. Voigt (Ed.), Staatsgeheimnisse: Arkanpolitik im Wandel der Zeiten (pp. 179-204). Wiesbanden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  247. Robert Dahl. (1999). Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordon (Eds.), Democracy’s Edges (pp. 19-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  248. Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston, L., & Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919-2009. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  249. Rodríguez, D. (2010). Los Límites del Estado en la sociedad mundial: de la política al derecho. Neves, M. (Coord.); Lima, M. C. A. (Ed.). Transnacionalidade do direito: novas perspectivas dos conflitos entre ordens jurídicas (pp. 25-52). São Paulo: Editora Quartier Latin. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  250. Rosand, E. (2004). The Security Council as Global Legislator: Ultra Vires or Ultra Innovative? Fordham International Law Journal, 28(3). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  251. Rubenstein, J. (2014). Between Samaritans and States: The Political Ethics of Humanitarian INGOs: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  252. Schmitt, C. (1991). Der Begriff des Politischen: Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  253. Schmitt, C. (1994). Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  254. Schmitt, C. (1996). Roman Catholicism and political form (G. L. Ulmen, Trans.). Westport: Greenwood Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  255. Schmitt, C. (2014). Dictatorship: From the beginning of the modern concept of sovereignty to the proletarian class-struggle. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  256. Schweigman, D. (2001). The authority of the Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: legal limits and the role of the International Court of Justice (Vol. 8): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  257. Seelaender, A., & Castro, A. R. d. (2010). Um jurisconsulto adaptável - Francisco Campos (1891-1968). In C. G. Mota & N. Salinas (Eds.), Os juristas na formação do Estado-Nação brasileiro (Vol. 3). São Paulo: Saraiva. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  258. Senellart, M. (2006). As artes de governar: do" regimen" medieval ao conceito de governo. São Paulo: Editora 34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  259. Sievers, L., & Daws, S. (2014). The Procedure of the UN Security Council. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  260. Sikkink, K. (2002). Restructuring World Politics: The Limits and Asymmetries of Soft Power. In Khagram, S, Riker, J. V. & Sikkink, K. (Eds.), Restructuring world politics: transnational social movements, networks, and norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  261. Simmel, G. (1950). The secret and the secret society. In Wolff, K. (ed.), The Sociology of George Simmel. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  262. Singer, P. W. (2008). Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  263. Singh, N. (1988). Sustainable Development as a principle of International Law. In de Waart, P.; Peters, P.; Denven, E. International law and development (pp. 1-11). Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  264. Skinner, Q. (1988). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. In J. Tully (Ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  265. Slaughter, A.-M. (2003). A Chance to Reshape the UN. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/Commentary/WPChancetoReshapeUN.pdf Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  266. Slim, H. (2004). With or against? Humanitarian agencies and coalition counter-insurgency. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 23(4), 34-47. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  267. Smith, J., Pagnucco, R., & Lopez, G. A. (1998). Globalizing human rights: the work of transnational human rights NGOs in the 1990s. Human Rights Quarterly, 379-412. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  268. Souza, J. (2003). A construção social da subcidadania: para uma sociologia política da modernidade periférica. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  269. Stahn, C. (2003). The Ambiguities of Security Council Resolution 1422 (2002). European Journal of International Law, 14(1), 85-104. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  270. Starck, D. (2000). Die Rechtmäßigkeit von UNO-Wirtschaftssanktionen in Anbetracht ihrer Auswirkungen auf die Zivilbevölkerung: Grenzen der Kompetenzen des Sicherheitsrates am Beispiel der Maßnahmen gegen den Irak und die Bundesrepublik Jugoslawien (1. Auflage ed.). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  271. Steffek, J. (2011). Tales of function and form: The discursive legitimation of international technocracy: Normative Orders Working Paper. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  272. Stichweh, R. (2002). Die Entstehung einer Weltöffentlichkeit. In Kaelble, H.; Kirsch, M; and Schmidt-Gernig, A. (Eds). Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 57–66). Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  273. Stichweh, R. (2005). Inklusion und Exklusion: Studien zur Gesellschaftstheorie: transcript Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  274. Swindells, F. (1996/1997). U.N. sanctions in Haiti: A contradiction under articles 41 and Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  275. 55 of the U.N. Charter. Fordham Int'l L.J., 20(1878). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  276. Tacitus, C. (1931). The Histories, Books IV-V; The Annals, Books I-III (Loeb Classical Library) (Vol. II of III). London, New York: William Heinemann Ltd; Putnam's Sons. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  277. Tacitus, C. (1980). Histories. Books I-III (Loeb Calssical Library No. 111) (Vol. II of V). Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  278. Tacke, V. (2010). Soziale Netzwerkbildungen in Funktionssystemen der Gesellschaft. Vergleichende Perspektiven. Netzwerke in der funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft (pp. 89-117). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  279. Tarrow, S. (1998). Fishnets, internets, and catnets: Globalization and transnational collective action. In Hanagan, M. P.; Moch, L. P.; te Brake, W., Challenging authority: The historical study of contentious politics (pp. 228-244). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  280. Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  281. Tarrow, S. (2009). Outsiders inside e insiders outside: entre a ação pública nacional e transnacional em prol dos direitos humanos. Caderno CRH, 22(55), 151-161. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  282. Teubner, G. (1987). Hyperzyklus in Recht und Organisation Zum Verhältnis von Selbstbeobachtung, Selbstkonstitution und Autopoiese. In Haferkamp, H. & Schmid, M. (Eds.), Sinn, Kommunikation und soziale Differenzierung: Beiträge zu Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  283. Teubner, G. (2003). Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 63(1), 1-28. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  284. Teubner, G. (2004). Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in world society? In K.-H. Ladeur (Ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (pp. 71-87). Ashgate: Aldershot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  285. Teubner, G. (2006). The anonymous matrix: Human Rights Violations by 'Private' Transnational Actors. The Modern Law Review, 69(3), 327-346. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  286. Teubner, G. (2011). A Constitutional Moment: The Logics of 'Hit the Bottom'. In Kjaer, P & Teubner, G. (Eds.). The financial crisis in constitutional perspective: the dark side of functional differentiation. Oxford: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  287. Teubner, G. (2012). Verfassungsfragmente: Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. [English version: Constitutional fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press]. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  288. Thomas, D. C. (2001). The Helsinki effect: International norms, human rights, and the demise of communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  289. Thornhill, C. (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  290. Thornhill, C. (2013). A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitutions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 551-603. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  291. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York: Random House. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  292. Tilly, C. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In M. Giuni, D. McAdam & C. Tilly (Eds.). How social movements matter (pp. 253-270). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  293. Tomuschat, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing the Debate on Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes – Concluding Observations. In C. T. Tomuschat, J-M. (Ed.), The fundamental rules of the international legal order (pp. 32). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  294. Tomuschat, C. (2015). The Security Council and Jus Cogens. Gaetano Morelli Lectures Series, 1, 7-98. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  295. Trindade, A. A. C. (2003). Direito das organizações internacionais. Belo Horizonte: Editora del Rey. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  296. Tryggestad, T. L. (2009). Trick or Treat? The UN and Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security. Global Governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, 15(4), 539-557. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  297. Tunkin, G. I. (1974). Theory of international law. London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  298. Tushnet, M. (2008). Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law, The. Va. J. Int'l L., 49, 985. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  299. Ulmen, G. L. (1996). Introduction (G. L. Ulmen, Trans.) Roman Catholicism and political form. Westport: Greenwood Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  300. Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as advocacy: a study of democratic deliberation. Political theory, 28(6), 758-786. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  301. Varella, M. D. (2013). Internacionalização do Direito: direito internacional, globalização e complexidade. Brasília: UniCEUB. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  302. Verdross, A. (1937). Forbidden Treaties in International Law. The American Journal of Internacional Law, 31, 571-577. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  303. Verdross, A. (1953). Idées Directrices de l’Organisation des Nations Unies. Recueil des Cours de l ́Académie de Droit International, 83. Leiden: Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  304. Viellechner, L. (2007). Können Netzwerke die Demokratie ersetzen? Zur Legitimation der Regelbildung im Globalisierungsprozess. In Bühring, F; Franzius, C.; Herbst, T; Kötter, M.; Kreutz, A; von Lewinski, K.; Meinel, F.; Nolte, J. & Schönrock, S. (Eds.). Netzwerke: 47. Assistententagung Öffentliches Recht. Nomos: Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  305. Viellechner, L. (2013). Transnationalisierung des Rechts. Velbrück: Weilerswist. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  306. Villas Bôas, P. C. B. (2011). Secularização inacabada: política e direito em Carl Schmitt. Curitiba: Appris. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  307. Vitullo, G. E. (2007). O lugar do conflito na teoria democrática contemporânea. São Cristóvão-SE: Tomo, 10, 61-83. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  308. Voeten, E. (2005). The political origins of the UN Security Council's ability to legitimize the use of force. International Organization, 59(03), 527-557. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  309. Voigt, R. (2017). Das Staatsgeheimnis als instrument der Arkanpolitik. In R. Voigt (Ed.), Staatsgeheimnisse: Arkanpolitik im Wandel der Zeiten. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  310. Weber, M. (1973). Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In J. Winckelmann (Ed.), M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 146-214). Tübingen: Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  311. Weber, M. (1975). Wissenschaft als Beruf. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  312. Weber, W. (1996). Ratio status, et quae eo pertinent. Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 78(1), 145-178. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  313. Willetts, P. (1996). The conscience of the world: The influence of non-governmental organisations in the UN system. London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  314. Willetts, P. (2002). What is a non-governmental organization? in: UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Section 1, Institutional and Infrastructure Resource Issues, Article 1.44.3.7. Retrieved from http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/CS-NTWKS/NGO-ART.HTM. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  315. Wisotzki, S. (2008). Negotiating human security at the UN: Transnational civil society, arms control and disarmament. . In L. Joachim J., B. (Ed.), Transnational Activism in the UN and the EU: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  316. Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations (G. E. M. Ascombe, Trans. Second Edition ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  317. Wolfrum, R. (2003). The Attack of September 11, 2001, the Wars Against the Taliban and Iraq: Is There a Need to Reconsider International Law on the Recourse to Force and the Rules in Armed Conflict? Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 7(1), 1-78. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  318. Woodward, B. K. (2010). Global civil society in international lawmaking and global governance: theory and practice. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  319. Zangl, B. (2005). Is there an emerging international rule of law? European Review, 13(S1), 73-91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  320. Zangl, B., & Zürn, M. (2003). Frieden und Krieg: Sicherheit in der nationalen und postnationalen Konstellation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  321. Zolo, D. (2007). The Rule of Law: A Critical Reappraisal. In Costa P., Zolo D. (Eds), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism (pp. 3-71). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  322. Zumbansen, P. (2001). Die vergangene Zukunft des Völkerrechts. Kritische Justiz, 34(1), 46-68. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  323. Zürn, M. (2009). Wer regiert die Welt und mit welchem Recht? Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  324. Zürn, M. (2013). Politisierung als Konzept der Internationalen Beziehungen. In M. Zürn & M. Ecker-Ehrhardt (Eds.), Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  325. Zürn, M. (2018). Contested Global Governance. Global Policy, 9(1), 138-145. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051
  326. Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(01), 69-106. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748901051

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Zentrum und Peripherie"
Cover des Buchs: Die Ökonomisierung des Rechts
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Douglas Elmauer
Die Ökonomisierung des Rechts
Cover des Buchs: Constitution
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Fábio Portela Lopes de Almeida
Constitution
Cover des Buchs: Standards guter Arbeit
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Dorothea Alewell, Wenzel Matiaske
Standards guter Arbeit
Cover des Buchs: Balkan Pathologies of Modernity
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Vanja Grujic
Balkan Pathologies of Modernity
Cover des Buchs: Resilienz bei Arbeitsplatzverlust
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Christine Tschöll
Resilienz bei Arbeitsplatzverlust

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex