Technocracy and Selectivity

Maurício Palma

doi:10.5771/9783748901051

Zusammenfassung

Durch die Analyse der Beziehungen zwischen NGOs, dem UN-Sicherheitsrat und den Menschenrechten wird in diesem Buch argumentiert, dass sowohl NGOs als auch der UN-Sicherheitsrat die Menschenrechtssemantik selektiv in Bezug auf die Orte und Akteure, die sie betreffen, anwenden. Es beobachtet Wissen und Macht als Kräfte, die sich gegenseitig beeinflussen, was eine Erklärung dafür sein kann, wie Global Governance funktioniert. Darüber hinaus untersucht das Buch die Idee, dass Recht, abgesehen von der Durchdringung traditioneller Strukturen, von der Basis der Gesellschaft in Richtung institutioneller Bereiche aufsteigen kann. In diesem Zusammenhang schlägt der Autor vor, dass das Zusammenspiel zwischen nichtstaatlichen Akteuren und politischen Institutionen die Bottom-up-Prozesse im Zusammenhang mit der Gesetzgebung und der Gestaltung politischer Entscheidungen fördert. In Anbetracht der kritischen Probleme, die sowohl die NRO als auch der UN-Sicherheitsrat in Bezug auf Repräsentation und Reaktionsfähigkeit haben, stellt die Arbeit fest, dass die Beziehung zwischen ihnen auf eine ausschließende, technokratische und arkane Weise stattfindet.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Erscheinungsjahr: 2019
Erscheinungsdatum: 11.07.2019
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-5989-7
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-0105-1
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Zentrum und Peripherie
Band: 14
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 262
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 10
Introduction Kein Zugriff Seiten 11 - 14
1. 1. 1.1.1 Old and Novel Semantics for Security Themes Kein Zugriff
  2. 1.1.2 Rule of Law in non-state areas? Kein Zugriff
  3. 1.1.3 International institutions, politicization, and legal backlashes: the (trans)constitutional conundrums Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 1.2.1. The grammars of democracy, constitutionalism, and human rights Kein Zugriff
  2. 1.2.2 Non-state constitutions Kein Zugriff
  3. 1.2.3 Social claims and non-state constitutions Kein Zugriff
1. 2.1 Placing the UNSC in the international orbit Kein Zugriff
2. 2.2 The international, the global, and the legal regime of UNSC Kein Zugriff
3. 2.3 UNSC between legal acts and politics Kein Zugriff
4. 2.4 The Executive–Legislative Side: UNSC and normative expectations Kein Zugriff
5. 2.5 Post–Cold War Resolutions and Global Governance Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 3.1.1 The “Monster” and the UN Charter’s Purposes and Principles Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.1.2 Article 39 and Its Boundaries Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 3.2.1 Jus Cogens Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.2.2 Obligations Erga Omnes Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.2.3 The end of global Human Rights or: the affirmation of human rights at global political organs may lead to their annihilation Kein Zugriff
3. 3.3 Final Remarks: The United Nations, Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes, and Human Rights Kein Zugriff
1. 1. 4.1.1 NGOs’ First Steps and Law Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.1.2 Conceiving Transnational NGOs Kein Zugriff
  3. 4.1.3 NGOs’ Former Practices in the UN and in the UNSC Kein Zugriff
  4. 4.1.4 NGO Working Group on the Security Council Kein Zugriff
  5. 4.1.5 The Arria formula, the Somavía Meeting, and their Challenges Kein Zugriff
2. 4.2 NGOs as Peripheral Components of the UNSC Regime Kein Zugriff
3. 4.3 The uses of human rights vocabulary by the UNSC, and the NGOs Kein Zugriff
4. 4.4 Broaching Human Rights in the UN Arena Kein Zugriff
5. 4.5 Selective Addressing of Human Rights Kein Zugriff
1. 5.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
2. 5.2 Before publicity, against publicity: the notion of arcanum (or: publicity as a risk) Kein Zugriff
3. 5.3 Religion, politics and Nazism: the return of the arcanum in Schmitt Kein Zugriff
4. 5.4 Arcanum, democracy, and non-state governance Kein Zugriff
5. 5.5 NGOs, Representation, and Expertise: Combating Arcane Arrangements with Technocracy Kein Zugriff
Conclusion Kein Zugriff Seiten 233 - 236
References Kein Zugriff Seiten 237 - 262

Literaturverzeichnis (326 Einträge)

Ackerman, B. (2015). Three paths to constitutionalism–and the crisis of the European Union. British Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 705-714. Google Scholar öffnen
Ackerman, B. (2019). The Rise of World Constitutionalism. Volume 1: Revolutionary Constitutions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (in press). Google Scholar öffnen
Aguiar, T. (2011). A demofobia na democracia moderna. Dados, 54(4), 609-650. Google Scholar öffnen
Akande, D. (1997). The International Court of Justice and the Security Council: Is There Room for Judicial Control of Decisions of the Political Organs of the United Nations? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46(02), 309-343. Google Scholar öffnen
Alvarez, J. E. (1996). Judging the security council. American Journal of International Law, 1-39. Google Scholar öffnen
Albert, M. (2016). A Theory of World Politics (Vol. 141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Ambos, K. (2002). International Criminal Law has Lost its Innocence. German Law Journal, 3(10), 6. Google Scholar öffnen
Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Aragão, E. J. G. d. (2007). Strategien zur Durchsetzung der völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtung zur Strafverfolgung der Folter am Beispiel Brasiliens: Eine Untersuchung zum Verhältnis zwischen Völkerstrafrecht und Staatenverantwortlichkeit (Vol. 1). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Araujo, C. (2013). Carl Schmitt, teologia política e secularização. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 28(83), 217-224. Google Scholar öffnen
Arcari, M. (2012). Limits to Security Council Powers under the UN Charter and Issues of Charter Interpretation. polish yearbook of international law, 32, 239-257. Google Scholar öffnen
Aristotle. (1998). Politics (E. Barker & R. F. r. Stalley, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Assange, J. (2006). Conspiracy as Governance, 3 December, URL http://cryptome.org/0002/ja-conspiracies.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Aurélio, D. P. (2012). Antinomias da razão de estado Razão de Estado e Democracia (pp. 25-50). Coimbra: Bento António. Google Scholar öffnen
Austin, J. (1861). The province of jurisprudence determined (Vol. 2): J. Murray. Google Scholar öffnen
Avant, D. D. (2005). The market for force: The consequences of privatizing security. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Bachur, J. P. (2009). Distância e crítica: limites e possibilidades da teoria de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann. (PhD), USP, São Paulo. Google Scholar öffnen
Barbosa, S. (2009). Jus cogens como aporia: o crepúsculo do direito internacional clássico. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia, 233, 39-92. Google Scholar öffnen
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Bendix, R. (1977). Nation-building and citizenship: studies of our changing social order. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Bennett, W. L. (2005). Social movements beyond borders: understanding two eras of transnational activism. In D. Della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 203-226). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
Bentham, J. (1838-1843). Essay on political tactics. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Vol. 2). Edinburgh: William Tait. Google Scholar öffnen
Bentham, J. (2010 [written around 1780]). Of the limits of the penal branch of jurisprudence (P. Schofield Ed.). Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Binder, M. (2008). The politicization of international security institutions: The UN security council and NGOs. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, held on 28 31 August 2008 in Boston, Massachusetts, Social Science Research Center Berlin, available online at http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/files/usbkoeln/2009/903/14611_politizationofinternationalsecurityinstitutions.pdf, (visited 08 Jun 2015), pp. 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen
Binder, M. (2013). Die Politisierung internationaler Sicherheitsinstitutionen? Der UN-Sicherheitsrat und NGOs. In M. Zürn & M. Ecker-Ehrhardt (Eds.), Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. This article is the modified, English version of Binder (2008). Google Scholar öffnen
Bloch, M. (2005). Feudal Society, V. 2: Social Classes and Political Organization (L. A. Manyon, Trans.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Bobbio, N. (1997). A democracia e o poder invisível. O futuro da democracia: uma defesa das regras do jogo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra. Google Scholar öffnen
Botero, G. (1948). Della ragione di stato: con tre libri delle cause della grandezza della città. Turin: Unione Tipografico - Editrice Torinese. Google Scholar öffnen
Brandão, L. C. (2001). A literatura sobre movimentos sociais: interações entre a política institucional e não institucional. BIB, 71(1o Semestre), 123-143. Google Scholar öffnen
Brazil, Canada, Zealand, N., & Africa, S. (2002). S/2002/754 Letter, 12 July 2002, from the Permanent Representatives of Brazil, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council. New York: UN. Google Scholar öffnen
Brühl, T. (2003). Nichtregierungsorganisationen als Akteure internationaler Umweltverhandlungen: ein Erklärungsmodell auf der Basis der situationsspezifischen Ressourcennachfrage. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity: from Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community, trans. J. Flynn: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Brunkhorst, H. (2014a). Auswege aus der technokratischen Falle? Die unbeachtete Wirtschaftsverfassung Europas. Leviathan, 4, 508-523. Google Scholar öffnen
Brunkhorst, H. (2014b). Solidarity in times of crisis: Constitutional evolution and Europe. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 178-237). Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen
Burke, E. (1791). Letter from the New to the Old Whigs. London: Printed for J. Dodsley, Pall-Mall. Google Scholar öffnen
Burke, E. (1854-56). Speech to the Electors of Bristol (3 Nov. 1774) The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke (Vol. 6 vols.). London: Henry G. Bohn. Google Scholar öffnen
Burke, E. (1890). Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Printed for J. Dodsley, in Pall-Mall. Google Scholar öffnen
Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: the populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54-67. Google Scholar öffnen
Carmola, K. (2010). Private Security Contractors and New Wars: Risk, Law, and Ethics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Centeno, M. A. (1993). The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22(3), 307-335. Google Scholar öffnen
Centeno, M. A., & Wolfson, L. (1997). Redefiniendo la tecnocracia. Desarrollo económico, 37(146), pp. 215-240. Google Scholar öffnen
Chacon, V. (1997). A recepção de Carl Schmitt no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia, XLVII(185), 55-66. Google Scholar öffnen
Charnovitz, S. (1996). Two centuries of participation: NGOs and international governance. Mich. J. Int'l L., 18, 183. Google Scholar öffnen
Clapmarius, A. (2014 [1605]). De Arcanis Rerumpublicarum libri sex (U. Wehner, Trans.). Stuttgart Bad-Cannstatt: Günter Frank. Google Scholar öffnen
Coalition for the International Criminal Court (2004). Compilation of Documents on UN Security Council Resolutions 1422 / 1487: Controversial resolutions proposed by the United States seeking immunity from the International Criminal Court. New York. Google Scholar öffnen
Cohen, C. P. (1990). The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in the Drafting of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Human Rights Quarterly, 12(1)137-147. Google Scholar öffnen
Comparato, F. K. (1997). Variações sobre o conceito de povo no regime democrático. Estud. av. [online], 11(31), 211-222. Google Scholar öffnen
Criddle, E. J., & Fox-Decent, E. (2009). A fiduciary theory of Jus Cogens. Yale Journal of International Law, 34(311). Google Scholar öffnen
Cutler, A. C. (2010). The legitimacy of private transnational governance: experts and the transnational market for force. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1). Google Scholar öffnen
D'Amato, A. (1990). It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's Jus Cogens. Conn. J. Int'l L., 6, 1. Google Scholar öffnen
Da Silva, V. A. (2008). O Judiciário e as políticas públicas: entre transformação social e obstáculo à realização dos direitos sociais. In C. P. d. S. Neto & D. Sarmento (Eds.), Direitos sociais: fundamentação, judicialização e direitos sociais em espécies (pp. 587-599). Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris. Google Scholar öffnen
Daase, C. (2010). Der erweiterte Sicherheitsbegriff (working paper). http://www.sicherheitskultur.org/WorkingPapers/01 - Daase.pdf] Google Scholar öffnen
Daase, C. (2013). Von der nationalen zur menschlichen Sicherheit: Politische und rechtliche Konsequenzen des erweiterten Sicherheitsbegriffs. In A. Fischer-Lescano & P. Mayer (Eds.), Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit: Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze (Vol. 17). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Das, O. (2013). Environmental protection, security and armed conflict: A sustainable development perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
de Albuquerque, R. C. (2010). A companhia das índias ocidentais: uma sociedade anônima? Revista da Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo, 105, 25-38. Google Scholar öffnen
De Tocqueville, A. (2002). Democracy in America. Translated, Edited, and with an Introduction by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
de Wet, E. (2004a). The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen
de Wet, E. (2004b). The prohibition of torture as an international norm of jus cogens and its implications for national and customary law. European Journal of International Law, 15(1), 97-121. Google Scholar öffnen
de Wet, E. (2006). The international constitutional order. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(01), 51-76. Google Scholar öffnen
Derrida, J. (1981). Economimesis. Diacritics, 11(2), 2-25. Google Scholar öffnen
Derrida, J. (1992). The Mystical Foundation of Authority. In D. Cornell & M. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The sociological review, 40(1), 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen
Dreher, A., & Vreeland, J. R. (2014). The political economy of the United Nations Security Council. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Eurostep, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Global Policy Forum, North-South Institute, Social Watch, Third World Institute, WEDO, World Federalist Movement, Institute for Global Policy. (2006). Paper on NGO Participation at the United Nations. Paper presented at the Global Policy Forum. Google Scholar öffnen
Falk, R. A. (1994). The United Nations and the Rule of Law. Transnat'l L. & Comtemp. Probs., 4, 611. Google Scholar öffnen
Fassbender, B. (2011). The Role for Human Rights in the Decision-Making Process of the UN Security Council. In Fassbender, B. (Ed.). Securing Human Rights? Advancements and Challenges of the UN Security Council, 74-97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Ferreira, B. (2004). O risco do político: crítica ao liberalismo e teoria política no pensamento de Carl Schmitt. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer-Lescano, A. (2005). Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer-Lescano, A. (2005b). Redefining Sovereignty via International Constitutional Moments. ConWEB, 1, 10. Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer-Lescano, A. (2013). Rechtskraft. Köln: August Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Liste, P. (2005). Völkerrechtspolitik. Zu Trennung und Verknüpfung von Politik und Recht der Weltgesellschaft. Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, 209-249. Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Möller, K. (2012). Der Kampf um globale soziale Rechte: zart wäre das Gröbste. Berlin: Wagenbach. Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2004). Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 999. Google Scholar öffnen
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2006). Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage. Google Scholar öffnen
Foucault, M. (1984, 30 June - 1st July). Face aux gouvernements, les droits de l’homme. Libération, p. 22. Retrieved from http://www.fondamentaux.org/2013/05/16/michel-foucault-face-aux-gouvernements-les-droits-de-lhomme/ Google Scholar öffnen
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social text, 25/26, 56-80. Google Scholar öffnen
Galindo, G. R. B. (2010). Constitutionalism forever. The Finnish Yearbook of International Law 21.1, 137-170. Google Scholar öffnen
GAO (2005). Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed to Improve Use of Private Security Providers. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office. Government Printing Office. Google Scholar öffnen
Gibbons, E., & Garfield, R. (1999). The impact of economic sanctions on health and human rights in Haiti, 1991-1994. American Journal of Public Health, 89(10), 1499-1504. Google Scholar öffnen
Ginty, R. M. (2012). Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(3), 287-308. Google Scholar öffnen
Glennon, M. J. (2014). National security and double government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Goede, N. (2014). Der UN-Sicherheitsrat als organisierte Anarchie: Kontingenz und Mehrdeutigkeit bei Entscheidungen des Sicherheitrats. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Gohn, M. d. G. M. (1997). Teorias dos movimentos sociais: paradigmas clássicos e contemporâneos. São Paulo: Edições Loyola. Google Scholar öffnen
Goldstone, J. (2003). Bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized politics. In J. Goldstone (Ed.), States, parties, and social movements (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Gowlland-Debbas, V. (1994). Security Council Enforcement Action And Issues of State Responsibility. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(55). Google Scholar öffnen
Grimm, D. (2004). Can the post-national constellation be re-constitutionalized? TranState working papers [Original: Die Verfassung im Prozess der Entstaatlichung. In: Brenner, Michael; Huber, Peter M.; Möstl, Markus (orgs.). Der Staat des Grundgesetzes – Kontinuität und Wandel: Festschrift für Peter Badura zum siebzigen Geburtstag. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004, pp. 145-67]. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, J. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, J. (2005). Eine politische Verfassung für die pluralistische Weltgesellschaft? Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätze (pp. 324-365). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, J. (2015). The lure of technocracy. (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. Google Scholar öffnen
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Hart, H. L. A. (1994 [1961]). The concept of law (Second Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Hathaway, O. A. (2005). Between power and principle: An integrated theory of international law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 469-536. Google Scholar öffnen
Hathaway, O. A., Brower, J., Liss, R., Thomas, T. M., & Victor, J. M. (2013). Consent-Based Humanitarian Intervention: Giving Sovereign Responsibility Back to the Sovereign. Cornell Int'l LJ, 46(499). Google Scholar öffnen
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Heinze, E. A. (2006). Humanitarian intervention and the war in Iraq: Norms, discourse, and state practice. Parameters, 36(1). Google Scholar öffnen
Hill, F., Aboitiz, M., & Poehlman‐Doumbouya, S. (2003). Nongovernmental organizations' role in the buildup and implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325. Signs, 28(4), 1255-1269. Google Scholar öffnen
Hinsley, F. H. (1967). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Hobbes, T. (1998 [1651]). Leviathan. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Holmes, P. (2012). Verfassungsevolution in der Weltgesellschaft: Differenzierungsprobleme des Rechts und der Politik im Zeitalter der Global Governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Haubrich, D. (2003). September 11, Anti-Terror Laws and Civil Liberties: Britain, France and Germany Compared 1. Government and Opposition, 38(1), 3-28. Google Scholar öffnen
Horn, E. (2011). Logics of political secrecy. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7-8), 103-122. Google Scholar öffnen
Hullman, C. (2005). Konsens oder Zwang: Völkerrechtliche Friedensregelungen der internationalen Gemeinschaft für Bosnien-Herzegowina und Irak. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Hunt, L. A. (2007). Inventing human rights: A history. New York: WW Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen
Hurd, I. (2007). After Anarchy: legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
International Crisis Group. (2011). A Ceasefire and Negotiations the Right Way to Resolve the Libya Crisis Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/publication-type/media-releases/2011/a-ceasefire-and-negotiations-the-right-way-to-resolve-the-libya-crisis.aspx, acessed on 12/12/2015. Google Scholar öffnen
International Law Commission. (2006). Fragmentation of international law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law Fifty-eighth Session, Geneva, a/cn (Vol. 4, pp. l). International Law Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
Izaias, R. S. (2010). A legitimação do Estado democrático de direito na modernidade periférica: uma observação a partir do caso brasileiro. Master's thesis. Universidade de São Paulo. Google Scholar öffnen
Joas, H. (2011). Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Jordan, L., & Van Tuijl, P. (2000). Political responsibility in transnational NGO advocacy. World development, 28(12), 2051-2065. Google Scholar öffnen
Joyner, D. (2012). The Security Council as a legal hegemon. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 43, 225. Google Scholar öffnen
Kadelbach, S. (2006). Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and Other Rules – the Identification of Fundamental Norms. In C. T. Tomuschat, J-M. (Ed.), The fundamental rules of the international legal order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (pp. 32). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. Google Scholar öffnen
Kahan, A. S. (1992). Aristocratic liberalism: the social and political thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Kahler, M. (2004). Defining accountability up: The global economic multilaterals. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 132-158. Google Scholar öffnen
Kaldor, M. (2007). New & Old Wars. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Kantorowicz, E. (1959). Secretos de Estado (un concepto absolutista y sus tardios origenes medievales). Estudios Políticos, 104(Marzo/Abril), 37-70. Google Scholar öffnen
Kantorowicz, E. (1997). The king's two bodies: A study in medieval political theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998a). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998b). Transnational advocacy networks in the movement society. In Meyer D.S. & Tarrow S. (Eds). The social movement society: contentious politics for a new century, 217-238. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen
Keen, D. (2006). Endless war? Hidden functions of the" War on Terror". Ann Arbor: Pluto Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Kelsen, H. (1948). Collective security and collective self-defense under the Charter of the United Nations. Am. J. Int'l L., 42, 783. Google Scholar öffnen
Kelsen, H. (1950). The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. New York: F.A. Praeger. Google Scholar öffnen
Kelsen, H. (2003). Principles of international law. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange. Google Scholar öffnen
Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Keohane, R. o., & Nye, J. S. (1972). Transnational relations and world politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Kessler, O., & Albert, M. (2013). Die Transformation von Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit aus der Perspektive der Systemtheorie. In A. Fischer-Lescano & P. Mayer (Eds.), Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit: Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The emergence of global administrative law. Law and contemporary problems, 68(15)15-61. Google Scholar öffnen
Kirchheimer, O. (1996). Legality and Legitimacy. In W. E. Scheuerman (Ed.), The rule of law under siege: Selected essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer. Berkeley: University of California Press Berkeley. Google Scholar öffnen
Koh, H. H. (1997). Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599-2659. Google Scholar öffnen
Kokott, J. (1999). Der Schutz der Menschenrechte im Völkerrecht. In Brunkhorst, H.; Köhler, W.; Lutz-Bachmann, M. (Eds.), Recht auf Menschenrechte. Menschenrechte, Demokratie und internationale Politik (pp. 176-198). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Kolb, R. (2015). Peremptory International Law-Jus Cogens: A General Inventory. Oxford; Portland: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen
Koselleck, R. (1988). Critique and Crisis. Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: on the semantics of historical time (K. Tribe, Trans.). New York: University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Koskenniemi, M. (1995). The police in the temple - Order, justice and the UN: a dialectical view. 6 EJIL 325-348. Google Scholar öffnen
Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From Apology to Utopia: the Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Koskenniemi, M. (2010). Human rights mainstreaming as a strategy for institutional power. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 1(1), 47-58. Google Scholar öffnen
Kreuder-Sonnen, & Zangl, B. (2014). International organizations between constitutionalism and authoritarianism. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 568-594. Google Scholar öffnen
Kriesberg, L. (1997). Social movements and global transformation. In Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (Eds.). Transnational social movements and global politics: solidarity beyond the state. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569-598. Google Scholar öffnen
Kusche I. (2016). Social Movements and Sociological Systems Theory. In Roose J., Dietz H. (eds), Social Theory and Social Movements. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Laclau, E. (2007). Emancipation(s). London, New York: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen
Lailach, M. (1998). Die Wahrung des Weltfriedens und der internationalen Sicherheit als Aufgabe des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen
Lance Bennett, W., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the US. Political Communication, 25(3), 269-289. Google Scholar öffnen
Laqueur, W. (2003). Krieg dem Westen: Terrorismus im 21. Jahrhundert. München: Propyläen Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Lauterpacht, H. (1953). Annuaire de la Comission du droit internacional.–– Publications des Nations Unies., A/CN.4/SER. A, 1953, vol. II, A/CN.4/63. , 106. http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes%28e%29/ILC_1953_v2_e.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Llobet, M. (2012). Terrorism: Limits Between Crime and War. The Fallacy of the Slogan ‘War on Terror’ Post 9/11 and the State of Permanent Legal Emergency (pp. 101-117). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Locke, J. (2003). Second Treatise of Civil Government Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven and New York: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1975a). Die Weltgesellschaft. In Soziologische Aufklärung 2 (pp. 51-71). Opladen: Westdeutscher. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1975b). Selbst-Thematisierung des Gesellschaftssystems: Über die Kategorie der Reflexion aus der Sicht der Systemtheorie. In Soziologische Aufklärung 2 (pp. 72-102). Opladen: Westdeutscher. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1978). Organisation und entscheidung. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1980). Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition. Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, 1, (pp. 9–71). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1983). Sistema Jurídico y Dogmatica Jurídica. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1987). Rechtssoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1989). Geheimnis, Zeit und Ewigkeit. In N. Luhmann & P. Fuchs (Eds.), Reden und Schweigen (pp. 101-138). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1990). Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft. Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9, 176-220. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1991). Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin, Nova York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1992). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1993a). Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Franfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1993b). Staat und Staatsräson im Übergang von traditionaler Herrschaft zu moderner Politik Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft (Band 3). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1995a). Das Paradox der Menschenrechte und drei Formen seiner Entfaltung. In N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung, 6, 229-236. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1995b). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1997). Globalization or world society: how to conceive of modern society? International review of sociology, 7(1), 67-79. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (1999). Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts: Beiträge zur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (2000). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (2008a). Die Form “Person” (3. Auflage ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (2008b). Sinn, Selbstreferez und soziokulturelle Evolution Ideenevolution: Beiträge zur Wissensoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (2009). Risiko und Gefahr Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstrutivistische Perspektiven (pp. 126-162). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Luhmann, N. (2014). Sociología Política. Trans. by I. O. Rodrígues. Madrid: Trotta. Google Scholar öffnen
Lynch, C. (2013). Neoliberal Ethics, the Humanitarian International, and Practices of Peacebuilding. In E. Verdeja & J. Smith (Eds.), Globalization, Social Movements, and Peacebuilding. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Machiavelli, N. (1998 [1532]). The prince. Trans. by Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Machiavelli, N. (2012 [1531]). Discourses on Livy. Trans. by N. H. Thomson. Mineola, NY: Dover. Google Scholar öffnen
Manusama, K. (2006). The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV. Google Scholar öffnen
Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3), 271-285. Google Scholar öffnen
Martens, K. (2004a). An Appraisal of Amnesty International's Work at the United Nations: Established Areas of Activities and Shifting Priorities Since the 1990s. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 1050-1070. Google Scholar öffnen
Martens, K. (2004b). NGOs in the UN System: Examining Formal and Informal Mechanisms of Interaction. 2 Int'l J. Civ. Soc'y L. 11. Google Scholar öffnen
Martens, K. (2005). NGOs and the United Nations: Institutionalization, professionalization, and adaptation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
Marx, K. (1962). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Erster Band). Berlin: Dietz Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2008). Manifest der kommunistischen Partei. Metalibri. Google Scholar öffnen
Maus, I. (1999). Menschenrechte als Ermächtigungsnormen internationaler Politik oder: der zerstörte Zusammenhang von Menschenrechten und Demokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Maus, I. (2002). Vom Nationalstaat zum Globalstaat oder: der Niedergang der Demokratie. In M. Lutz-Bachmann & J. Bohman (Eds.), Weltstaat oder Staatenwelt? Für und wider die Idee einer Weltrepublik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Maus, I. (2007a). Über Volkssouveränität: Elemente einer Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Maus, I. (2007b). Verfassung oder Vertrag. Zur Verrechtlichung globaler Politik. In P. Niesen, and Benjamin Herborth (Ed.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Maus, I. (2010). Verfassung und Verfassungsgebung: Zur Kritik des Theorems einer "Emergenz" supranationaler und transnationaler Verfassungen. In R. Kreide & A. Niederberger (Eds.), Staatliche Souveranität und transnationales Recht (pp. 27-70). München und Merging: Rainer Hampp. Google Scholar öffnen
Mausama, K. (2006). The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
McDonnell, D., & Valbruzzi, M. (2014). Defining and classifying technocrat‐led and technocratic governments. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 654-671. Google Scholar öffnen
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International security 19(3), 5-49. Google Scholar öffnen
Meisterhans, N. (2010). Menschenrechte als weltgesellschaftliche Herrschaftspraxis: Zur Konstitutionalisierung und Demokratisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Miguel, L. F. (2013). Democracia e representação: territórios em disputa. São Paulo: Editora Unesp. Google Scholar öffnen
Mill, J. S. (1873). Principles of political economy. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, And Dyer. Google Scholar öffnen
Mill, J. S. (1874). On the Treatment of Barbarous Nations Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical (pp. 252-253). Google Scholar öffnen
Mill, J. S. (1977). Rationale of Representation. In Robson, John M. (Ed.). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society Part I (On Liberty). Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegal Paul, 1977. Google Scholar öffnen
Mill, J. S. (2010a). Civilization. In On liberty and other essays. Digireads.com Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Mill, J. S. (2010b). On Liberty. In On liberty and other essays. Digireads.com Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Mill, J. S. (2010c). On Representative Government On liberty and other essays: Digireads.com Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Mittelman, J. (2010). Hyperconflict: globalization and insecurity: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Möller, K. (2014). Postdemokratie als Verfassungsproblem. Zur Bedeutung globaler sozialer Rechte. Neue Soziale Bewegungen, 27(1). Google Scholar öffnen
Möllers, C. (2005). Transnationale Behördenkooperation: Verfassungs- und völkerrechtliche Probleme transnationaler administrativer Standardsetzung. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 65, 351-389. Google Scholar öffnen
Montejo, M. F. C. (2008). Los derechos humanos laborales: el núcleo duro de derechos (core rights) y el ius cogens laboral. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 8(111). Google Scholar öffnen
Montesquieu, C. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws (A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller & H. S. Stone, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Moravcsik, A. (2004). Is there a ‘democratic deficit’in world politics? A framework for analysis. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 336-363. Google Scholar öffnen
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among Nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Google Scholar öffnen
Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia: Human Rights in history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Müller, F. (1984). Strukturierende Rechtslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen
Müller, F. (2003). Was die Globalisierung der Demokratie antut—und was die Demokratien gegen die Globalisierung tun können Demokratie zwischen Staatsrecht und Weltrecht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen
Münkler, H. (2011). Die neuen kriege. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Google Scholar öffnen
Mutua, M. W. (2001). Human rights international NGOs: a critical evaluation. In Claude E. Welch, Jr. (Ed.), NGOs and Human Rights: Promisse and Performance (pp. 151-163). Philadelphia: Universisty of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Neves, M. (1992). Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: eine theoretische Betrachtung und Interpretation des Falls Brasilien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen
Neves, M. (2006). Entre Têmis e Leviatã: uma relação difícil: o Estado Democrático de Direito a partir e além de Luhmann e Habermas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. Google Scholar öffnen
Neves, M. (2007a). A constitucionalização simbólica: Martins Fontes. Google Scholar öffnen
Neves, M. (2007b). The symbolic force of human rights. Philosophy Social Criticism, 33 (4), 411-444. Google Scholar öffnen
Neves, M. (2013). Transconstitutionalism. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Neves, M. (2015). Ideias em outro lugar? Constituição liberal e codificação do direito privado na virada do século XIX para o século XX no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 30(88). Google Scholar öffnen
NGO Working Group on the Security Council. (2019). Meetings Avaiable at http://www.ngowgsc.org/content/meetings, access on 12 Feb 2019. Google Scholar öffnen
Nowrot, K. (1999). Legal Consequences of Globalization: The Status of Non-Governmental Organizations under International Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6(2, Article 7). Google Scholar öffnen
O'Neill, O. (2005). The dark side of human rights. International Affairs, 81(2), 427-439. Google Scholar öffnen
Obama, B. (2013). Remarks by the President at the National Defense University. Washington. Retrieved from https://http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university. Google Scholar öffnen
Oeter, S. (2008). Humanitäre Intervention und die Grenzen des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbots – Wen oder was schützt das Völkerrecht: Staatliche Souveränität, kollektive Selbstbestimmung oder individuelle Autonomie? In H. Münkler & K. Malowitz (Eds.), Humanitäre Intervention: ein Instrument außenpolitischer Konfliktbearbeitung. Grundlagen und Diskussion. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Oosthuizen, G. H. (1999). Playing the devil's advocate: The United Nations Security Council is unbound by law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 12(03), 549-563. Google Scholar öffnen
Ottmann, H. (2016). Protestantische Schulphilosophie in Deutschland: Arnisaeus und Conring. In Horn, C., & Neschke-Hentschke, A. (Eds). Politischer Aristotelismus: Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 218-231). Stuttgart and Weimar: J.B. Metzler. Google Scholar öffnen
Oxford Dictionary of English. (Ed.) (2010). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 27 Jan. 2016, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199571123.001.0001/m_en_gb0160850. Google Scholar öffnen
Palma, M. (2018a). As coalizões do “presidencialismo de coalizão” no Brasil: a gênese legislativa na experiência constitucional de 1988. Revista de Direito Brasileira, 20(8), 408-428. Google Scholar öffnen
Palma, M. (2018b). The rhetoric of the dissolution of state borders and the question of global governance within the security regime. In D. Zaidan et. al. (Ed.), Law, society and institutions : a transdisciplinary perspective. (pp. 67-100). Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris. Google Scholar öffnen
Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of influence. Public opinion quarterly, 27(1), 37-62. Google Scholar öffnen
Paul, J. (2003). The Arria Formula. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/18545/1/The Arria Formula.pdf?1. https://http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/185-general/40088-the-arria-formula.html Google Scholar öffnen
Paul, J. (2004a). NGOs and the Security Council. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from http://www. globalpolicy. org/security/ngowkgrp/gpfpaper.htm Google Scholar öffnen
Paul, J. (2004b). Working with Nongovernmental Organizations. In D. Malone (Ed.), The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar öffnen
Pastorella, G. (2016). Technocratic governments in Europe: getting the critique right. Political studies, 64(4), 948-965. Google Scholar öffnen
Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations. (2006). Handbook on the Working Methods of the Security Council. Retrieved from https://www.un.emb-japan.go.jp/jp/handbook.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
Petersohn, U. (2017). Private military and security companies (PMSCs), military effectiveness, and conflict severity in weak states, 1990–2007. Journal of conflict resolution, 61(5), 1046-1072. Google Scholar öffnen
Pfister, J. (2017). Protest Policing als transnationale bürokratische Herrschaft. In C. Daase, N. Deitelhoff, B. Kamis, J. Pfister & P. Wallmeier (Eds.), Herrschaft in den Internationalen Beziehungen (pp. 95-118). Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Picciotto, S. (1996-1997). Networks in international economic integration: fragmented states and the dilemmas of neo-liberalism. Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus., 17, 1014-1056. Google Scholar öffnen
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Plato. (1926). Cratylus; Parmenides ; Greater Hippias ; Lesser Hippias (translated by Fowler, H. N.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Plato. (2000). The Republic. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Ragazzi, M. (2000). The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Rajagopal, B. (2002). International law and social movements: challenges of theorizing resistance. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 41, 397. Google Scholar öffnen
Reisman, W. M. (1993). The Constitutional Crisis in the United Nations. American Journal of International Law, 87(1), 83-100. Google Scholar öffnen
Ribeiro, P. H. Entre eclusas e espelhos: a esférica pública vista a partir de uma leitura crítica de Niklas Luhmann e de debates contemporâneos. Master’s thesis. Universidade de São Paulo. Google Scholar öffnen
Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction. In S. C. Ropp & a. K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change (Vol. 66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). Structures of governance and transnational relations: what have we learned? In T. Risse-Kappen (Ed.), Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions (Vol. 42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Ritzi, C. (2017). Das Geheimnis und die Demokratie. (In-) Transparenz als politische Herausforderung im digitalen Zeitalter. In R. Voigt (Ed.), Staatsgeheimnisse: Arkanpolitik im Wandel der Zeiten (pp. 179-204). Wiesbanden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Robert Dahl. (1999). Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordon (Eds.), Democracy’s Edges (pp. 19-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston, L., & Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919-2009. Google Scholar öffnen
Rodríguez, D. (2010). Los Límites del Estado en la sociedad mundial: de la política al derecho. Neves, M. (Coord.); Lima, M. C. A. (Ed.). Transnacionalidade do direito: novas perspectivas dos conflitos entre ordens jurídicas (pp. 25-52). São Paulo: Editora Quartier Latin. Google Scholar öffnen
Rosand, E. (2004). The Security Council as Global Legislator: Ultra Vires or Ultra Innovative? Fordham International Law Journal, 28(3). Google Scholar öffnen
Rubenstein, J. (2014). Between Samaritans and States: The Political Ethics of Humanitarian INGOs: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmitt, C. (1991). Der Begriff des Politischen: Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmitt, C. (1994). Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmitt, C. (1996). Roman Catholicism and political form (G. L. Ulmen, Trans.). Westport: Greenwood Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmitt, C. (2014). Dictatorship: From the beginning of the modern concept of sovereignty to the proletarian class-struggle. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Schweigman, D. (2001). The authority of the Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: legal limits and the role of the International Court of Justice (Vol. 8): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
Seelaender, A., & Castro, A. R. d. (2010). Um jurisconsulto adaptável - Francisco Campos (1891-1968). In C. G. Mota & N. Salinas (Eds.), Os juristas na formação do Estado-Nação brasileiro (Vol. 3). São Paulo: Saraiva. Google Scholar öffnen
Senellart, M. (2006). As artes de governar: do" regimen" medieval ao conceito de governo. São Paulo: Editora 34. Google Scholar öffnen
Sievers, L., & Daws, S. (2014). The Procedure of the UN Security Council. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Sikkink, K. (2002). Restructuring World Politics: The Limits and Asymmetries of Soft Power. In Khagram, S, Riker, J. V. & Sikkink, K. (Eds.), Restructuring world politics: transnational social movements, networks, and norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Simmel, G. (1950). The secret and the secret society. In Wolff, K. (ed.), The Sociology of George Simmel. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Singer, P. W. (2008). Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Singh, N. (1988). Sustainable Development as a principle of International Law. In de Waart, P.; Peters, P.; Denven, E. International law and development (pp. 1-11). Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht. Google Scholar öffnen
Skinner, Q. (1988). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. In J. Tully (Ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Slaughter, A.-M. (2003). A Chance to Reshape the UN. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/Commentary/WPChancetoReshapeUN.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Slim, H. (2004). With or against? Humanitarian agencies and coalition counter-insurgency. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 23(4), 34-47. Google Scholar öffnen
Smith, J., Pagnucco, R., & Lopez, G. A. (1998). Globalizing human rights: the work of transnational human rights NGOs in the 1990s. Human Rights Quarterly, 379-412. Google Scholar öffnen
Souza, J. (2003). A construção social da subcidadania: para uma sociologia política da modernidade periférica. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Google Scholar öffnen
Stahn, C. (2003). The Ambiguities of Security Council Resolution 1422 (2002). European Journal of International Law, 14(1), 85-104. Google Scholar öffnen
Starck, D. (2000). Die Rechtmäßigkeit von UNO-Wirtschaftssanktionen in Anbetracht ihrer Auswirkungen auf die Zivilbevölkerung: Grenzen der Kompetenzen des Sicherheitsrates am Beispiel der Maßnahmen gegen den Irak und die Bundesrepublik Jugoslawien (1. Auflage ed.). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen
Steffek, J. (2011). Tales of function and form: The discursive legitimation of international technocracy: Normative Orders Working Paper. Google Scholar öffnen
Stichweh, R. (2002). Die Entstehung einer Weltöffentlichkeit. In Kaelble, H.; Kirsch, M; and Schmidt-Gernig, A. (Eds). Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 57–66). Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Google Scholar öffnen
Stichweh, R. (2005). Inklusion und Exklusion: Studien zur Gesellschaftstheorie: transcript Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
Swindells, F. (1996/1997). U.N. sanctions in Haiti: A contradiction under articles 41 and Google Scholar öffnen
55 of the U.N. Charter. Fordham Int'l L.J., 20(1878). Google Scholar öffnen
Tacitus, C. (1931). The Histories, Books IV-V; The Annals, Books I-III (Loeb Classical Library) (Vol. II of III). London, New York: William Heinemann Ltd; Putnam's Sons. Google Scholar öffnen
Tacitus, C. (1980). Histories. Books I-III (Loeb Calssical Library No. 111) (Vol. II of V). Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen
Tacke, V. (2010). Soziale Netzwerkbildungen in Funktionssystemen der Gesellschaft. Vergleichende Perspektiven. Netzwerke in der funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft (pp. 89-117). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar öffnen
Tarrow, S. (1998). Fishnets, internets, and catnets: Globalization and transnational collective action. In Hanagan, M. P.; Moch, L. P.; te Brake, W., Challenging authority: The historical study of contentious politics (pp. 228-244). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Tarrow, S. (2009). Outsiders inside e insiders outside: entre a ação pública nacional e transnacional em prol dos direitos humanos. Caderno CRH, 22(55), 151-161. Google Scholar öffnen
Teubner, G. (1987). Hyperzyklus in Recht und Organisation Zum Verhältnis von Selbstbeobachtung, Selbstkonstitution und Autopoiese. In Haferkamp, H. & Schmid, M. (Eds.), Sinn, Kommunikation und soziale Differenzierung: Beiträge zu Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Teubner, G. (2003). Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 63(1), 1-28. Google Scholar öffnen
Teubner, G. (2004). Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in world society? In K.-H. Ladeur (Ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (pp. 71-87). Ashgate: Aldershot. Google Scholar öffnen
Teubner, G. (2006). The anonymous matrix: Human Rights Violations by 'Private' Transnational Actors. The Modern Law Review, 69(3), 327-346. Google Scholar öffnen
Teubner, G. (2011). A Constitutional Moment: The Logics of 'Hit the Bottom'. In Kjaer, P & Teubner, G. (Eds.). The financial crisis in constitutional perspective: the dark side of functional differentiation. Oxford: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen
Teubner, G. (2012). Verfassungsfragmente: Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. [English version: Constitutional fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press]. Google Scholar öffnen
Thomas, D. C. (2001). The Helsinki effect: International norms, human rights, and the demise of communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Thornhill, C. (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Thornhill, C. (2013). A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitutions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 551-603. Google Scholar öffnen
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York: Random House. Google Scholar öffnen
Tilly, C. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In M. Giuni, D. McAdam & C. Tilly (Eds.). How social movements matter (pp. 253-270). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Tomuschat, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing the Debate on Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes – Concluding Observations. In C. T. Tomuschat, J-M. (Ed.), The fundamental rules of the international legal order (pp. 32). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. Google Scholar öffnen
Tomuschat, C. (2015). The Security Council and Jus Cogens. Gaetano Morelli Lectures Series, 1, 7-98. Google Scholar öffnen
Trindade, A. A. C. (2003). Direito das organizações internacionais. Belo Horizonte: Editora del Rey. Google Scholar öffnen
Tryggestad, T. L. (2009). Trick or Treat? The UN and Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security. Global Governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, 15(4), 539-557. Google Scholar öffnen
Tunkin, G. I. (1974). Theory of international law. London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
Tushnet, M. (2008). Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law, The. Va. J. Int'l L., 49, 985. Google Scholar öffnen
Ulmen, G. L. (1996). Introduction (G. L. Ulmen, Trans.) Roman Catholicism and political form. Westport: Greenwood Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as advocacy: a study of democratic deliberation. Political theory, 28(6), 758-786. Google Scholar öffnen
Varella, M. D. (2013). Internacionalização do Direito: direito internacional, globalização e complexidade. Brasília: UniCEUB. Google Scholar öffnen
Verdross, A. (1937). Forbidden Treaties in International Law. The American Journal of Internacional Law, 31, 571-577. Google Scholar öffnen
Verdross, A. (1953). Idées Directrices de l’Organisation des Nations Unies. Recueil des Cours de l ́Académie de Droit International, 83. Leiden: Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen
Viellechner, L. (2007). Können Netzwerke die Demokratie ersetzen? Zur Legitimation der Regelbildung im Globalisierungsprozess. In Bühring, F; Franzius, C.; Herbst, T; Kötter, M.; Kreutz, A; von Lewinski, K.; Meinel, F.; Nolte, J. & Schönrock, S. (Eds.). Netzwerke: 47. Assistententagung Öffentliches Recht. Nomos: Baden-Baden. Google Scholar öffnen
Viellechner, L. (2013). Transnationalisierung des Rechts. Velbrück: Weilerswist. Google Scholar öffnen
Villas Bôas, P. C. B. (2011). Secularização inacabada: política e direito em Carl Schmitt. Curitiba: Appris. Google Scholar öffnen
Vitullo, G. E. (2007). O lugar do conflito na teoria democrática contemporânea. São Cristóvão-SE: Tomo, 10, 61-83. Google Scholar öffnen
Voeten, E. (2005). The political origins of the UN Security Council's ability to legitimize the use of force. International Organization, 59(03), 527-557. Google Scholar öffnen
Voigt, R. (2017). Das Staatsgeheimnis als instrument der Arkanpolitik. In R. Voigt (Ed.), Staatsgeheimnisse: Arkanpolitik im Wandel der Zeiten. Wiesbaden: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Weber, M. (1973). Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In J. Winckelmann (Ed.), M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 146-214). Tübingen: Mohr. Google Scholar öffnen
Weber, M. (1975). Wissenschaft als Beruf. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen
Weber, W. (1996). Ratio status, et quae eo pertinent. Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 78(1), 145-178. Google Scholar öffnen
Willetts, P. (1996). The conscience of the world: The influence of non-governmental organisations in the UN system. London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen
Willetts, P. (2002). What is a non-governmental organization? in: UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Section 1, Institutional and Infrastructure Resource Issues, Article 1.44.3.7. Retrieved from http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/CS-NTWKS/NGO-ART.HTM. Google Scholar öffnen
Wisotzki, S. (2008). Negotiating human security at the UN: Transnational civil society, arms control and disarmament. . In L. Joachim J., B. (Ed.), Transnational Activism in the UN and the EU: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations (G. E. M. Ascombe, Trans. Second Edition ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen
Wolfrum, R. (2003). The Attack of September 11, 2001, the Wars Against the Taliban and Iraq: Is There a Need to Reconsider International Law on the Recourse to Force and the Rules in Armed Conflict? Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 7(1), 1-78. Google Scholar öffnen
Woodward, B. K. (2010). Global civil society in international lawmaking and global governance: theory and practice. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen
Zangl, B. (2005). Is there an emerging international rule of law? European Review, 13(S1), 73-91. Google Scholar öffnen
Zangl, B., & Zürn, M. (2003). Frieden und Krieg: Sicherheit in der nationalen und postnationalen Konstellation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Zolo, D. (2007). The Rule of Law: A Critical Reappraisal. In Costa P., Zolo D. (Eds), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism (pp. 3-71). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen
Zumbansen, P. (2001). Die vergangene Zukunft des Völkerrechts. Kritische Justiz, 34(1), 46-68. Google Scholar öffnen
Zürn, M. (2009). Wer regiert die Welt und mit welchem Recht? Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen
Zürn, M. (2013). Politisierung als Konzept der Internationalen Beziehungen. In M. Zürn & M. Ecker-Ehrhardt (Eds.), Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
Zürn, M. (2018). Contested Global Governance. Global Policy, 9(1), 138-145. Google Scholar öffnen
Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(01), 69-106. Google Scholar öffnen