Technocracy and Selectivity

Maurício Palma

doi:10.5771/9783748901051

Summary

Durch die Analyse der Beziehungen zwischen NGOs, dem UN-Sicherheitsrat und den Menschenrechten wird in diesem Buch argumentiert, dass sowohl NGOs als auch der UN-Sicherheitsrat die Menschenrechtssemantik selektiv in Bezug auf die Orte und Akteure, die sie betreffen, anwenden. Es beobachtet Wissen und Macht als Kräfte, die sich gegenseitig beeinflussen, was eine Erklärung dafür sein kann, wie Global Governance funktioniert. Darüber hinaus untersucht das Buch die Idee, dass Recht, abgesehen von der Durchdringung traditioneller Strukturen, von der Basis der Gesellschaft in Richtung institutioneller Bereiche aufsteigen kann. In diesem Zusammenhang schlägt der Autor vor, dass das Zusammenspiel zwischen nichtstaatlichen Akteuren und politischen Institutionen die Bottom-up-Prozesse im Zusammenhang mit der Gesetzgebung und der Gestaltung politischer Entscheidungen fördert. In Anbetracht der kritischen Probleme, die sowohl die NRO als auch der UN-Sicherheitsrat in Bezug auf Repräsentation und Reaktionsfähigkeit haben, stellt die Arbeit fest, dass die Beziehung zwischen ihnen auf eine ausschließende, technokratische und arkane Weise stattfindet.

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Publication year: 2019
Publication date: 11.07.2019
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-5989-7
ISBN-Online: 978-3-7489-0105-1
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Zentrum und Peripherie
Volume: 14
Language: English
Pages: 262
Product type: Book Titles

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 10
Introduction No access Pages 11 - 14
1. 1. 1.1.1 Old and Novel Semantics for Security Themes No access
  2. 1.1.2 Rule of Law in non-state areas? No access
  3. 1.1.3 International institutions, politicization, and legal backlashes: the (trans)constitutional conundrums No access
2. 1. 1.2.1. The grammars of democracy, constitutionalism, and human rights No access
  2. 1.2.2 Non-state constitutions No access
  3. 1.2.3 Social claims and non-state constitutions No access
1. 2.1 Placing the UNSC in the international orbit No access
2. 2.2 The international, the global, and the legal regime of UNSC No access
3. 2.3 UNSC between legal acts and politics No access
4. 2.4 The Executive–Legislative Side: UNSC and normative expectations No access
5. 2.5 Post–Cold War Resolutions and Global Governance No access
1. 1. 3.1.1 The “Monster” and the UN Charter’s Purposes and Principles No access
  2. 3.1.2 Article 39 and Its Boundaries No access
2. 1. 3.2.1 Jus Cogens No access
  2. 3.2.2 Obligations Erga Omnes No access
  3. 3.2.3 The end of global Human Rights or: the affirmation of human rights at global political organs may lead to their annihilation No access
3. 3.3 Final Remarks: The United Nations, Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes, and Human Rights No access
1. 1. 4.1.1 NGOs’ First Steps and Law No access
  2. 4.1.2 Conceiving Transnational NGOs No access
  3. 4.1.3 NGOs’ Former Practices in the UN and in the UNSC No access
  4. 4.1.4 NGO Working Group on the Security Council No access
  5. 4.1.5 The Arria formula, the Somavía Meeting, and their Challenges No access
2. 4.2 NGOs as Peripheral Components of the UNSC Regime No access
3. 4.3 The uses of human rights vocabulary by the UNSC, and the NGOs No access
4. 4.4 Broaching Human Rights in the UN Arena No access
5. 4.5 Selective Addressing of Human Rights No access
1. 5.1 Introduction No access
2. 5.2 Before publicity, against publicity: the notion of arcanum (or: publicity as a risk) No access
3. 5.3 Religion, politics and Nazism: the return of the arcanum in Schmitt No access
4. 5.4 Arcanum, democracy, and non-state governance No access
5. 5.5 NGOs, Representation, and Expertise: Combating Arcane Arrangements with Technocracy No access
Conclusion No access Pages 233 - 236
References No access Pages 237 - 262

Bibliography (326 entries)

Ackerman, B. (2015). Three paths to constitutionalism–and the crisis of the European Union. British Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 705-714. Open Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (2019). The Rise of World Constitutionalism. Volume 1: Revolutionary Constitutions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (in press). Open Google Scholar
Aguiar, T. (2011). A demofobia na democracia moderna. Dados, 54(4), 609-650. Open Google Scholar
Akande, D. (1997). The International Court of Justice and the Security Council: Is There Room for Judicial Control of Decisions of the Political Organs of the United Nations? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 46(02), 309-343. Open Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E. (1996). Judging the security council. American Journal of International Law, 1-39. Open Google Scholar
Albert, M. (2016). A Theory of World Politics (Vol. 141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Ambos, K. (2002). International Criminal Law has Lost its Innocence. German Law Journal, 3(10), 6. Open Google Scholar
Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Aragão, E. J. G. d. (2007). Strategien zur Durchsetzung der völkerrechtlichen Verpflichtung zur Strafverfolgung der Folter am Beispiel Brasiliens: Eine Untersuchung zum Verhältnis zwischen Völkerstrafrecht und Staatenverantwortlichkeit (Vol. 1). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Araujo, C. (2013). Carl Schmitt, teologia política e secularização. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 28(83), 217-224. Open Google Scholar
Arcari, M. (2012). Limits to Security Council Powers under the UN Charter and Issues of Charter Interpretation. polish yearbook of international law, 32, 239-257. Open Google Scholar
Aristotle. (1998). Politics (E. Barker & R. F. r. Stalley, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Assange, J. (2006). Conspiracy as Governance, 3 December, URL http://cryptome.org/0002/ja-conspiracies.pdf. Open Google Scholar
Aurélio, D. P. (2012). Antinomias da razão de estado Razão de Estado e Democracia (pp. 25-50). Coimbra: Bento António. Open Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1861). The province of jurisprudence determined (Vol. 2): J. Murray. Open Google Scholar
Avant, D. D. (2005). The market for force: The consequences of privatizing security. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Bachur, J. P. (2009). Distância e crítica: limites e possibilidades da teoria de sistemas de Niklas Luhmann. (PhD), USP, São Paulo. Open Google Scholar
Barbosa, S. (2009). Jus cogens como aporia: o crepúsculo do direito internacional clássico. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia, 233, 39-92. Open Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Bendix, R. (1977). Nation-building and citizenship: studies of our changing social order. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2005). Social movements beyond borders: understanding two eras of transnational activism. In D. Della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism (pp. 203-226). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1838-1843). Essay on political tactics. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (Vol. 2). Edinburgh: William Tait. Open Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (2010 [written around 1780]). Of the limits of the penal branch of jurisprudence (P. Schofield Ed.). Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
Binder, M. (2008). The politicization of international security institutions: The UN security council and NGOs. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, held on 28 31 August 2008 in Boston, Massachusetts, Social Science Research Center Berlin, available online at http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/files/usbkoeln/2009/903/14611_politizationofinternationalsecurityinstitutions.pdf, (visited 08 Jun 2015), pp. 1-25. Open Google Scholar
Binder, M. (2013). Die Politisierung internationaler Sicherheitsinstitutionen? Der UN-Sicherheitsrat und NGOs. In M. Zürn & M. Ecker-Ehrhardt (Eds.), Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. This article is the modified, English version of Binder (2008). Open Google Scholar
Bloch, M. (2005). Feudal Society, V. 2: Social Classes and Political Organization (L. A. Manyon, Trans.). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1997). A democracia e o poder invisível. O futuro da democracia: uma defesa das regras do jogo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra. Open Google Scholar
Botero, G. (1948). Della ragione di stato: con tre libri delle cause della grandezza della città. Turin: Unione Tipografico - Editrice Torinese. Open Google Scholar
Brandão, L. C. (2001). A literatura sobre movimentos sociais: interações entre a política institucional e não institucional. BIB, 71(1o Semestre), 123-143. Open Google Scholar
Brazil, Canada, Zealand, N., & Africa, S. (2002). S/2002/754 Letter, 12 July 2002, from the Permanent Representatives of Brazil, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council. New York: UN. Open Google Scholar
Brühl, T. (2003). Nichtregierungsorganisationen als Akteure internationaler Umweltverhandlungen: ein Erklärungsmodell auf der Basis der situationsspezifischen Ressourcennachfrage. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity: from Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community, trans. J. Flynn: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, H. (2014a). Auswege aus der technokratischen Falle? Die unbeachtete Wirtschaftsverfassung Europas. Leviathan, 4, 508-523. Open Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, H. (2014b). Solidarity in times of crisis: Constitutional evolution and Europe. In A. Laitinen & A. B. Pessi (Eds.), Solidarity: Theory and practice (pp. 178-237). Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1791). Letter from the New to the Old Whigs. London: Printed for J. Dodsley, Pall-Mall. Open Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1854-56). Speech to the Electors of Bristol (3 Nov. 1774) The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke (Vol. 6 vols.). London: Henry G. Bohn. Open Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1890). Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Printed for J. Dodsley, in Pall-Mall. Open Google Scholar
Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: the populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54-67. Open Google Scholar
Carmola, K. (2010). Private Security Contractors and New Wars: Risk, Law, and Ethics. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
Centeno, M. A. (1993). The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22(3), 307-335. Open Google Scholar
Centeno, M. A., & Wolfson, L. (1997). Redefiniendo la tecnocracia. Desarrollo económico, 37(146), pp. 215-240. Open Google Scholar
Chacon, V. (1997). A recepção de Carl Schmitt no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Filosofia, XLVII(185), 55-66. Open Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (1996). Two centuries of participation: NGOs and international governance. Mich. J. Int'l L., 18, 183. Open Google Scholar
Clapmarius, A. (2014 [1605]). De Arcanis Rerumpublicarum libri sex (U. Wehner, Trans.). Stuttgart Bad-Cannstatt: Günter Frank. Open Google Scholar
Coalition for the International Criminal Court (2004). Compilation of Documents on UN Security Council Resolutions 1422 / 1487: Controversial resolutions proposed by the United States seeking immunity from the International Criminal Court. New York. Open Google Scholar
Cohen, C. P. (1990). The Role of Nongovernmental Organizations in the Drafting of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Human Rights Quarterly, 12(1)137-147. Open Google Scholar
Comparato, F. K. (1997). Variações sobre o conceito de povo no regime democrático. Estud. av. [online], 11(31), 211-222. Open Google Scholar
Criddle, E. J., & Fox-Decent, E. (2009). A fiduciary theory of Jus Cogens. Yale Journal of International Law, 34(311). Open Google Scholar
Cutler, A. C. (2010). The legitimacy of private transnational governance: experts and the transnational market for force. Socio-Economic Review, 8(1). Open Google Scholar
D'Amato, A. (1990). It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's Jus Cogens. Conn. J. Int'l L., 6, 1. Open Google Scholar
Da Silva, V. A. (2008). O Judiciário e as políticas públicas: entre transformação social e obstáculo à realização dos direitos sociais. In C. P. d. S. Neto & D. Sarmento (Eds.), Direitos sociais: fundamentação, judicialização e direitos sociais em espécies (pp. 587-599). Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris. Open Google Scholar
Daase, C. (2010). Der erweiterte Sicherheitsbegriff (working paper). http://www.sicherheitskultur.org/WorkingPapers/01 - Daase.pdf] Open Google Scholar
Daase, C. (2013). Von der nationalen zur menschlichen Sicherheit: Politische und rechtliche Konsequenzen des erweiterten Sicherheitsbegriffs. In A. Fischer-Lescano & P. Mayer (Eds.), Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit: Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze (Vol. 17). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Das, O. (2013). Environmental protection, security and armed conflict: A sustainable development perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar
de Albuquerque, R. C. (2010). A companhia das índias ocidentais: uma sociedade anônima? Revista da Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de São Paulo, 105, 25-38. Open Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, A. (2002). Democracy in America. Translated, Edited, and with an Introduction by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
de Wet, E. (2004a). The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart. Open Google Scholar
de Wet, E. (2004b). The prohibition of torture as an international norm of jus cogens and its implications for national and customary law. European Journal of International Law, 15(1), 97-121. Open Google Scholar
de Wet, E. (2006). The international constitutional order. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(01), 51-76. Open Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1981). Economimesis. Diacritics, 11(2), 2-25. Open Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1992). The Mystical Foundation of Authority. In D. Cornell & M. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York and London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The sociological review, 40(1), 1-25. Open Google Scholar
Dreher, A., & Vreeland, J. R. (2014). The political economy of the United Nations Security Council. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Eurostep, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Global Policy Forum, North-South Institute, Social Watch, Third World Institute, WEDO, World Federalist Movement, Institute for Global Policy. (2006). Paper on NGO Participation at the United Nations. Paper presented at the Global Policy Forum. Open Google Scholar
Falk, R. A. (1994). The United Nations and the Rule of Law. Transnat'l L. & Comtemp. Probs., 4, 611. Open Google Scholar
Fassbender, B. (2011). The Role for Human Rights in the Decision-Making Process of the UN Security Council. In Fassbender, B. (Ed.). Securing Human Rights? Advancements and Challenges of the UN Security Council, 74-97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Ferreira, B. (2004). O risco do político: crítica ao liberalismo e teoria política no pensamento de Carl Schmitt. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Open Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A. (2005). Globalverfassung: Die Geltungsbegründung der Menschenrechte. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. Open Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A. (2005b). Redefining Sovereignty via International Constitutional Moments. ConWEB, 1, 10. Open Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A. (2013). Rechtskraft. Köln: August Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Liste, P. (2005). Völkerrechtspolitik. Zu Trennung und Verknüpfung von Politik und Recht der Weltgesellschaft. Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen, 209-249. Open Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Möller, K. (2012). Der Kampf um globale soziale Rechte: zart wäre das Gröbste. Berlin: Wagenbach. Open Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2004). Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25, 999. Open Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., & Teubner, G. (2006). Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage. Open Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984, 30 June - 1st July). Face aux gouvernements, les droits de l’homme. Libération, p. 22. Retrieved from http://www.fondamentaux.org/2013/05/16/michel-foucault-face-aux-gouvernements-les-droits-de-lhomme/ Open Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social text, 25/26, 56-80. Open Google Scholar
Galindo, G. R. B. (2010). Constitutionalism forever. The Finnish Yearbook of International Law 21.1, 137-170. Open Google Scholar
GAO (2005). Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed to Improve Use of Private Security Providers. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office. Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar
Gibbons, E., & Garfield, R. (1999). The impact of economic sanctions on health and human rights in Haiti, 1991-1994. American Journal of Public Health, 89(10), 1499-1504. Open Google Scholar
Ginty, R. M. (2012). Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(3), 287-308. Open Google Scholar
Glennon, M. J. (2014). National security and double government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Goede, N. (2014). Der UN-Sicherheitsrat als organisierte Anarchie: Kontingenz und Mehrdeutigkeit bei Entscheidungen des Sicherheitrats. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Gohn, M. d. G. M. (1997). Teorias dos movimentos sociais: paradigmas clássicos e contemporâneos. São Paulo: Edições Loyola. Open Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. (2003). Bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized politics. In J. Goldstone (Ed.), States, parties, and social movements (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Gowlland-Debbas, V. (1994). Security Council Enforcement Action And Issues of State Responsibility. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(55). Open Google Scholar
Grimm, D. (2004). Can the post-national constellation be re-constitutionalized? TranState working papers [Original: Die Verfassung im Prozess der Entstaatlichung. In: Brenner, Michael; Huber, Peter M.; Möstl, Markus (orgs.). Der Staat des Grundgesetzes – Kontinuität und Wandel: Festschrift für Peter Badura zum siebzigen Geburtstag. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004, pp. 145-67]. Open Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2005). Eine politische Verfassung für die pluralistische Weltgesellschaft? Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion: Philosophische Aufsätze (pp. 324-365). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2015). The lure of technocracy. (C. Cronin, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity. Open Google Scholar
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1994 [1961]). The concept of law (Second Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A. (2005). Between power and principle: An integrated theory of international law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 469-536. Open Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A., Brower, J., Liss, R., Thomas, T. M., & Victor, J. M. (2013). Consent-Based Humanitarian Intervention: Giving Sovereign Responsibility Back to the Sovereign. Cornell Int'l LJ, 46(499). Open Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp. Open Google Scholar
Heinze, E. A. (2006). Humanitarian intervention and the war in Iraq: Norms, discourse, and state practice. Parameters, 36(1). Open Google Scholar
Hill, F., Aboitiz, M., & Poehlman‐Doumbouya, S. (2003). Nongovernmental organizations' role in the buildup and implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325. Signs, 28(4), 1255-1269. Open Google Scholar
Hinsley, F. H. (1967). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1998 [1651]). Leviathan. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Holmes, P. (2012). Verfassungsevolution in der Weltgesellschaft: Differenzierungsprobleme des Rechts und der Politik im Zeitalter der Global Governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
Haubrich, D. (2003). September 11, Anti-Terror Laws and Civil Liberties: Britain, France and Germany Compared 1. Government and Opposition, 38(1), 3-28. Open Google Scholar
Horn, E. (2011). Logics of political secrecy. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7-8), 103-122. Open Google Scholar
Hullman, C. (2005). Konsens oder Zwang: Völkerrechtliche Friedensregelungen der internationalen Gemeinschaft für Bosnien-Herzegowina und Irak. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Hunt, L. A. (2007). Inventing human rights: A history. New York: WW Norton & Company. Open Google Scholar
Hurd, I. (2007). After Anarchy: legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. (2011). A Ceasefire and Negotiations the Right Way to Resolve the Libya Crisis Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/publication-type/media-releases/2011/a-ceasefire-and-negotiations-the-right-way-to-resolve-the-libya-crisis.aspx, acessed on 12/12/2015. Open Google Scholar
International Law Commission. (2006). Fragmentation of international law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law Fifty-eighth Session, Geneva, a/cn (Vol. 4, pp. l). International Law Commission. Open Google Scholar
Izaias, R. S. (2010). A legitimação do Estado democrático de direito na modernidade periférica: uma observação a partir do caso brasileiro. Master's thesis. Universidade de São Paulo. Open Google Scholar
Joas, H. (2011). Die Sakralität der Person: Eine neue Genealogie der Menschenrechte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Jordan, L., & Van Tuijl, P. (2000). Political responsibility in transnational NGO advocacy. World development, 28(12), 2051-2065. Open Google Scholar
Joyner, D. (2012). The Security Council as a legal hegemon. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 43, 225. Open Google Scholar
Kadelbach, S. (2006). Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and Other Rules – the Identification of Fundamental Norms. In C. T. Tomuschat, J-M. (Ed.), The fundamental rules of the international legal order: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes (pp. 32). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. Open Google Scholar
Kahan, A. S. (1992). Aristocratic liberalism: the social and political thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Kahler, M. (2004). Defining accountability up: The global economic multilaterals. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 132-158. Open Google Scholar
Kaldor, M. (2007). New & Old Wars. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. (1959). Secretos de Estado (un concepto absolutista y sus tardios origenes medievales). Estudios Políticos, 104(Marzo/Abril), 37-70. Open Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. (1997). The king's two bodies: A study in medieval political theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998a). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998b). Transnational advocacy networks in the movement society. In Meyer D.S. & Tarrow S. (Eds). The social movement society: contentious politics for a new century, 217-238. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
Keen, D. (2006). Endless war? Hidden functions of the" War on Terror". Ann Arbor: Pluto Press. Open Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1948). Collective security and collective self-defense under the Charter of the United Nations. Am. J. Int'l L., 42, 783. Open Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1950). The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems. New York: F.A. Praeger. Open Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2003). Principles of international law. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange. Open Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
Keohane, R. o., & Nye, J. S. (1972). Transnational relations and world politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
Kessler, O., & Albert, M. (2013). Die Transformation von Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit aus der Perspektive der Systemtheorie. In A. Fischer-Lescano & P. Mayer (Eds.), Recht und Politik globaler Sicherheit: Bestandsaufnahme und Erklärungsansätze. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The emergence of global administrative law. Law and contemporary problems, 68(15)15-61. Open Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, O. (1996). Legality and Legitimacy. In W. E. Scheuerman (Ed.), The rule of law under siege: Selected essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer. Berkeley: University of California Press Berkeley. Open Google Scholar
Koh, H. H. (1997). Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599-2659. Open Google Scholar
Kokott, J. (1999). Der Schutz der Menschenrechte im Völkerrecht. In Brunkhorst, H.; Köhler, W.; Lutz-Bachmann, M. (Eds.), Recht auf Menschenrechte. Menschenrechte, Demokratie und internationale Politik (pp. 176-198). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Kolb, R. (2015). Peremptory International Law-Jus Cogens: A General Inventory. Oxford; Portland: Hart. Open Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (1988). Critique and Crisis. Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Open Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: on the semantics of historical time (K. Tribe, Trans.). New York: University Press. Open Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (1995). The police in the temple - Order, justice and the UN: a dialectical view. 6 EJIL 325-348. Open Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From Apology to Utopia: the Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2010). Human rights mainstreaming as a strategy for institutional power. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 1(1), 47-58. Open Google Scholar
Kreuder-Sonnen, & Zangl, B. (2014). International organizations between constitutionalism and authoritarianism. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 568-594. Open Google Scholar
Kriesberg, L. (1997). Social movements and global transformation. In Smith, J., Chatfield, C., & Pagnucco, R. (Eds.). Transnational social movements and global politics: solidarity beyond the state. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Open Google Scholar
Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569-598. Open Google Scholar
Kusche I. (2016). Social Movements and Sociological Systems Theory. In Roose J., Dietz H. (eds), Social Theory and Social Movements. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (2007). Emancipation(s). London, New York: Verso. Open Google Scholar
Lailach, M. (1998). Die Wahrung des Weltfriedens und der internationalen Sicherheit als Aufgabe des Sicherheitsrates der Vereinten Nationen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
Lance Bennett, W., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the US. Political Communication, 25(3), 269-289. Open Google Scholar
Laqueur, W. (2003). Krieg dem Westen: Terrorismus im 21. Jahrhundert. München: Propyläen Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H. (1953). Annuaire de la Comission du droit internacional.–– Publications des Nations Unies., A/CN.4/SER. A, 1953, vol. II, A/CN.4/63. , 106. http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/Ybkvolumes%28e%29/ILC_1953_v2_e.pdf Open Google Scholar
Llobet, M. (2012). Terrorism: Limits Between Crime and War. The Fallacy of the Slogan ‘War on Terror’ Post 9/11 and the State of Permanent Legal Emergency (pp. 101-117). Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Locke, J. (2003). Second Treatise of Civil Government Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New Haven and New York: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1975a). Die Weltgesellschaft. In Soziologische Aufklärung 2 (pp. 51-71). Opladen: Westdeutscher. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1975b). Selbst-Thematisierung des Gesellschaftssystems: Über die Kategorie der Reflexion aus der Sicht der Systemtheorie. In Soziologische Aufklärung 2 (pp. 72-102). Opladen: Westdeutscher. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1978). Organisation und entscheidung. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1980). Gesellschaftliche Struktur und semantische Tradition. Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, 1, (pp. 9–71). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1983). Sistema Jurídico y Dogmatica Jurídica. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1987). Rechtssoziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1989). Geheimnis, Zeit und Ewigkeit. In N. Luhmann & P. Fuchs (Eds.), Reden und Schweigen (pp. 101-138). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1990). Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft. Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9, 176-220. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1991). Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin, Nova York: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1992). Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1993a). Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Franfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1993b). Staat und Staatsräson im Übergang von traditionaler Herrschaft zu moderner Politik Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft (Band 3). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995a). Das Paradox der Menschenrechte und drei Formen seiner Entfaltung. In N. Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung, 6, 229-236. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1995b). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1997). Globalization or world society: how to conceive of modern society? International review of sociology, 7(1), 67-79. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1999). Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts: Beiträge zur Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2000). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2008a). Die Form “Person” (3. Auflage ed.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2008b). Sinn, Selbstreferez und soziokulturelle Evolution Ideenevolution: Beiträge zur Wissensoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2009). Risiko und Gefahr Soziologische Aufklärung 5: Konstrutivistische Perspektiven (pp. 126-162). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2014). Sociología Política. Trans. by I. O. Rodrígues. Madrid: Trotta. Open Google Scholar
Lynch, C. (2013). Neoliberal Ethics, the Humanitarian International, and Practices of Peacebuilding. In E. Verdeja & J. Smith (Eds.), Globalization, Social Movements, and Peacebuilding. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press. Open Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1998 [1532]). The prince. Trans. by Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (2012 [1531]). Discourses on Livy. Trans. by N. H. Thomson. Mineola, NY: Dover. Open Google Scholar
Manusama, K. (2006). The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV. Open Google Scholar
Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3), 271-285. Open Google Scholar
Martens, K. (2004a). An Appraisal of Amnesty International's Work at the United Nations: Established Areas of Activities and Shifting Priorities Since the 1990s. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 1050-1070. Open Google Scholar
Martens, K. (2004b). NGOs in the UN System: Examining Formal and Informal Mechanisms of Interaction. 2 Int'l J. Civ. Soc'y L. 11. Open Google Scholar
Martens, K. (2005). NGOs and the United Nations: Institutionalization, professionalization, and adaptation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1962). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Erster Band). Berlin: Dietz Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2008). Manifest der kommunistischen Partei. Metalibri. Open Google Scholar
Maus, I. (1999). Menschenrechte als Ermächtigungsnormen internationaler Politik oder: der zerstörte Zusammenhang von Menschenrechten und Demokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Maus, I. (2002). Vom Nationalstaat zum Globalstaat oder: der Niedergang der Demokratie. In M. Lutz-Bachmann & J. Bohman (Eds.), Weltstaat oder Staatenwelt? Für und wider die Idee einer Weltrepublik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Maus, I. (2007a). Über Volkssouveränität: Elemente einer Demokratietheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Maus, I. (2007b). Verfassung oder Vertrag. Zur Verrechtlichung globaler Politik. In P. Niesen, and Benjamin Herborth (Ed.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Maus, I. (2010). Verfassung und Verfassungsgebung: Zur Kritik des Theorems einer "Emergenz" supranationaler und transnationaler Verfassungen. In R. Kreide & A. Niederberger (Eds.), Staatliche Souveranität und transnationales Recht (pp. 27-70). München und Merging: Rainer Hampp. Open Google Scholar
Mausama, K. (2006). The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
McDonnell, D., & Valbruzzi, M. (2014). Defining and classifying technocrat‐led and technocratic governments. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 654-671. Open Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International security 19(3), 5-49. Open Google Scholar
Meisterhans, N. (2010). Menschenrechte als weltgesellschaftliche Herrschaftspraxis: Zur Konstitutionalisierung und Demokratisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
Miguel, L. F. (2013). Democracia e representação: territórios em disputa. São Paulo: Editora Unesp. Open Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1873). Principles of political economy. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, And Dyer. Open Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1874). On the Treatment of Barbarous Nations Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical (pp. 252-253). Open Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1977). Rationale of Representation. In Robson, John M. (Ed.). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society Part I (On Liberty). Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegal Paul, 1977. Open Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (2010a). Civilization. In On liberty and other essays. Digireads.com Publishing. Open Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (2010b). On Liberty. In On liberty and other essays. Digireads.com Publishing. Open Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (2010c). On Representative Government On liberty and other essays: Digireads.com Publishing. Open Google Scholar
Mittelman, J. (2010). Hyperconflict: globalization and insecurity: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Möller, K. (2014). Postdemokratie als Verfassungsproblem. Zur Bedeutung globaler sozialer Rechte. Neue Soziale Bewegungen, 27(1). Open Google Scholar
Möllers, C. (2005). Transnationale Behördenkooperation: Verfassungs- und völkerrechtliche Probleme transnationaler administrativer Standardsetzung. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 65, 351-389. Open Google Scholar
Montejo, M. F. C. (2008). Los derechos humanos laborales: el núcleo duro de derechos (core rights) y el ius cogens laboral. Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, 8(111). Open Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C. (1989). The Spirit of the Laws (A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller & H. S. Stone, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (2004). Is there a ‘democratic deficit’in world politics? A framework for analysis. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 336-363. Open Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among Nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Open Google Scholar
Moyn, S. (2010). The last utopia: Human Rights in history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
Müller, F. (1984). Strukturierende Rechtslehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
Müller, F. (2003). Was die Globalisierung der Demokratie antut—und was die Demokratien gegen die Globalisierung tun können Demokratie zwischen Staatsrecht und Weltrecht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
Münkler, H. (2011). Die neuen kriege. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar
Mutua, M. W. (2001). Human rights international NGOs: a critical evaluation. In Claude E. Welch, Jr. (Ed.), NGOs and Human Rights: Promisse and Performance (pp. 151-163). Philadelphia: Universisty of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
Neves, M. (1992). Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: eine theoretische Betrachtung und Interpretation des Falls Brasilien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
Neves, M. (2006). Entre Têmis e Leviatã: uma relação difícil: o Estado Democrático de Direito a partir e além de Luhmann e Habermas. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. Open Google Scholar
Neves, M. (2007a). A constitucionalização simbólica: Martins Fontes. Open Google Scholar
Neves, M. (2007b). The symbolic force of human rights. Philosophy Social Criticism, 33 (4), 411-444. Open Google Scholar
Neves, M. (2013). Transconstitutionalism. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar
Neves, M. (2015). Ideias em outro lugar? Constituição liberal e codificação do direito privado na virada do século XIX para o século XX no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 30(88). Open Google Scholar
NGO Working Group on the Security Council. (2019). Meetings Avaiable at http://www.ngowgsc.org/content/meetings, access on 12 Feb 2019. Open Google Scholar
Nowrot, K. (1999). Legal Consequences of Globalization: The Status of Non-Governmental Organizations under International Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6(2, Article 7). Open Google Scholar
O'Neill, O. (2005). The dark side of human rights. International Affairs, 81(2), 427-439. Open Google Scholar
Obama, B. (2013). Remarks by the President at the National Defense University. Washington. Retrieved from https://http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university. Open Google Scholar
Oeter, S. (2008). Humanitäre Intervention und die Grenzen des völkerrechtlichen Gewaltverbots – Wen oder was schützt das Völkerrecht: Staatliche Souveränität, kollektive Selbstbestimmung oder individuelle Autonomie? In H. Münkler & K. Malowitz (Eds.), Humanitäre Intervention: ein Instrument außenpolitischer Konfliktbearbeitung. Grundlagen und Diskussion. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Oosthuizen, G. H. (1999). Playing the devil's advocate: The United Nations Security Council is unbound by law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 12(03), 549-563. Open Google Scholar
Ottmann, H. (2016). Protestantische Schulphilosophie in Deutschland: Arnisaeus und Conring. In Horn, C., & Neschke-Hentschke, A. (Eds). Politischer Aristotelismus: Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 218-231). Stuttgart and Weimar: J.B. Metzler. Open Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of English. (Ed.) (2010). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 27 Jan. 2016, from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199571123.001.0001/m_en_gb0160850. Open Google Scholar
Palma, M. (2018a). As coalizões do “presidencialismo de coalizão” no Brasil: a gênese legislativa na experiência constitucional de 1988. Revista de Direito Brasileira, 20(8), 408-428. Open Google Scholar
Palma, M. (2018b). The rhetoric of the dissolution of state borders and the question of global governance within the security regime. In D. Zaidan et. al. (Ed.), Law, society and institutions : a transdisciplinary perspective. (pp. 67-100). Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris. Open Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of influence. Public opinion quarterly, 27(1), 37-62. Open Google Scholar
Paul, J. (2003). The Arria Formula. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/18545/1/The Arria Formula.pdf?1. https://http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/185-general/40088-the-arria-formula.html Open Google Scholar
Paul, J. (2004a). NGOs and the Security Council. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved from http://www. globalpolicy. org/security/ngowkgrp/gpfpaper.htm Open Google Scholar
Paul, J. (2004b). Working with Nongovernmental Organizations. In D. Malone (Ed.), The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st Century. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner. Open Google Scholar
Pastorella, G. (2016). Technocratic governments in Europe: getting the critique right. Political studies, 64(4), 948-965. Open Google Scholar
Permanent Mission of Japan to the United Nations. (2006). Handbook on the Working Methods of the Security Council. Retrieved from https://www.un.emb-japan.go.jp/jp/handbook.pdf. Open Google Scholar
Petersohn, U. (2017). Private military and security companies (PMSCs), military effectiveness, and conflict severity in weak states, 1990–2007. Journal of conflict resolution, 61(5), 1046-1072. Open Google Scholar
Pfister, J. (2017). Protest Policing als transnationale bürokratische Herrschaft. In C. Daase, N. Deitelhoff, B. Kamis, J. Pfister & P. Wallmeier (Eds.), Herrschaft in den Internationalen Beziehungen (pp. 95-118). Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. (1996-1997). Networks in international economic integration: fragmented states and the dilemmas of neo-liberalism. Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus., 17, 1014-1056. Open Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
Plato. (1926). Cratylus; Parmenides ; Greater Hippias ; Lesser Hippias (translated by Fowler, H. N.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
Plato. (2000). The Republic. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Ragazzi, M. (2000). The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
Rajagopal, B. (2002). International law and social movements: challenges of theorizing resistance. Colum. J. Transnat'l L., 41, 397. Open Google Scholar
Reisman, W. M. (1993). The Constitutional Crisis in the United Nations. American Journal of International Law, 87(1), 83-100. Open Google Scholar
Ribeiro, P. H. Entre eclusas e espelhos: a esférica pública vista a partir de uma leitura crítica de Niklas Luhmann e de debates contemporâneos. Master’s thesis. Universidade de São Paulo. Open Google Scholar
Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction. In S. C. Ropp & a. K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights: international norms and domestic change (Vol. 66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). Structures of governance and transnational relations: what have we learned? In T. Risse-Kappen (Ed.), Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions (Vol. 42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Ritzi, C. (2017). Das Geheimnis und die Demokratie. (In-) Transparenz als politische Herausforderung im digitalen Zeitalter. In R. Voigt (Ed.), Staatsgeheimnisse: Arkanpolitik im Wandel der Zeiten (pp. 179-204). Wiesbanden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Robert Dahl. (1999). Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View. In I. Shapiro & C. Hacker-Cordon (Eds.), Democracy’s Edges (pp. 19-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston, L., & Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and the quest for social justice, 1919-2009. Open Google Scholar
Rodríguez, D. (2010). Los Límites del Estado en la sociedad mundial: de la política al derecho. Neves, M. (Coord.); Lima, M. C. A. (Ed.). Transnacionalidade do direito: novas perspectivas dos conflitos entre ordens jurídicas (pp. 25-52). São Paulo: Editora Quartier Latin. Open Google Scholar
Rosand, E. (2004). The Security Council as Global Legislator: Ultra Vires or Ultra Innovative? Fordham International Law Journal, 28(3). Open Google Scholar
Rubenstein, J. (2014). Between Samaritans and States: The Political Ethics of Humanitarian INGOs: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1991). Der Begriff des Politischen: Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1994). Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1996). Roman Catholicism and political form (G. L. Ulmen, Trans.). Westport: Greenwood Publishing. Open Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2014). Dictatorship: From the beginning of the modern concept of sovereignty to the proletarian class-struggle. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
Schweigman, D. (2001). The authority of the Security Council under Chapter VII of the UN Charter: legal limits and the role of the International Court of Justice (Vol. 8): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Open Google Scholar
Seelaender, A., & Castro, A. R. d. (2010). Um jurisconsulto adaptável - Francisco Campos (1891-1968). In C. G. Mota & N. Salinas (Eds.), Os juristas na formação do Estado-Nação brasileiro (Vol. 3). São Paulo: Saraiva. Open Google Scholar
Senellart, M. (2006). As artes de governar: do" regimen" medieval ao conceito de governo. São Paulo: Editora 34. Open Google Scholar
Sievers, L., & Daws, S. (2014). The Procedure of the UN Security Council. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
Sikkink, K. (2002). Restructuring World Politics: The Limits and Asymmetries of Soft Power. In Khagram, S, Riker, J. V. & Sikkink, K. (Eds.), Restructuring world politics: transnational social movements, networks, and norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1950). The secret and the secret society. In Wolff, K. (ed.), The Sociology of George Simmel. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar
Singer, P. W. (2008). Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
Singh, N. (1988). Sustainable Development as a principle of International Law. In de Waart, P.; Peters, P.; Denven, E. International law and development (pp. 1-11). Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht. Open Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1988). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. In J. Tully (Ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M. (2003). A Chance to Reshape the UN. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/Commentary/WPChancetoReshapeUN.pdf Open Google Scholar
Slim, H. (2004). With or against? Humanitarian agencies and coalition counter-insurgency. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 23(4), 34-47. Open Google Scholar
Smith, J., Pagnucco, R., & Lopez, G. A. (1998). Globalizing human rights: the work of transnational human rights NGOs in the 1990s. Human Rights Quarterly, 379-412. Open Google Scholar
Souza, J. (2003). A construção social da subcidadania: para uma sociologia política da modernidade periférica. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Open Google Scholar
Stahn, C. (2003). The Ambiguities of Security Council Resolution 1422 (2002). European Journal of International Law, 14(1), 85-104. Open Google Scholar
Starck, D. (2000). Die Rechtmäßigkeit von UNO-Wirtschaftssanktionen in Anbetracht ihrer Auswirkungen auf die Zivilbevölkerung: Grenzen der Kompetenzen des Sicherheitsrates am Beispiel der Maßnahmen gegen den Irak und die Bundesrepublik Jugoslawien (1. Auflage ed.). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot GmbH. Open Google Scholar
Steffek, J. (2011). Tales of function and form: The discursive legitimation of international technocracy: Normative Orders Working Paper. Open Google Scholar
Stichweh, R. (2002). Die Entstehung einer Weltöffentlichkeit. In Kaelble, H.; Kirsch, M; and Schmidt-Gernig, A. (Eds). Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert (pp. 57–66). Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Open Google Scholar
Stichweh, R. (2005). Inklusion und Exklusion: Studien zur Gesellschaftstheorie: transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar
Swindells, F. (1996/1997). U.N. sanctions in Haiti: A contradiction under articles 41 and Open Google Scholar
55 of the U.N. Charter. Fordham Int'l L.J., 20(1878). Open Google Scholar
Tacitus, C. (1931). The Histories, Books IV-V; The Annals, Books I-III (Loeb Classical Library) (Vol. II of III). London, New York: William Heinemann Ltd; Putnam's Sons. Open Google Scholar
Tacitus, C. (1980). Histories. Books I-III (Loeb Calssical Library No. 111) (Vol. II of V). Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. Open Google Scholar
Tacke, V. (2010). Soziale Netzwerkbildungen in Funktionssystemen der Gesellschaft. Vergleichende Perspektiven. Netzwerke in der funktional differenzierten Gesellschaft (pp. 89-117). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1998). Fishnets, internets, and catnets: Globalization and transnational collective action. In Hanagan, M. P.; Moch, L. P.; te Brake, W., Challenging authority: The historical study of contentious politics (pp. 228-244). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2009). Outsiders inside e insiders outside: entre a ação pública nacional e transnacional em prol dos direitos humanos. Caderno CRH, 22(55), 151-161. Open Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1987). Hyperzyklus in Recht und Organisation Zum Verhältnis von Selbstbeobachtung, Selbstkonstitution und Autopoiese. In Haferkamp, H. & Schmid, M. (Eds.), Sinn, Kommunikation und soziale Differenzierung: Beiträge zu Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2003). Globale Zivilverfassungen: Alternativen zur staatszentrierten Verfassungstheorie. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 63(1), 1-28. Open Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2004). Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in world society? In K.-H. Ladeur (Ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (pp. 71-87). Ashgate: Aldershot. Open Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2006). The anonymous matrix: Human Rights Violations by 'Private' Transnational Actors. The Modern Law Review, 69(3), 327-346. Open Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2011). A Constitutional Moment: The Logics of 'Hit the Bottom'. In Kjaer, P & Teubner, G. (Eds.). The financial crisis in constitutional perspective: the dark side of functional differentiation. Oxford: Hart. Open Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2012). Verfassungsfragmente: Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. [English version: Constitutional fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press]. Open Google Scholar
Thomas, D. C. (2001). The Helsinki effect: International norms, human rights, and the demise of communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2013). A Sociology of Constituent Power: The Political Code of Transnational Societal Constitutions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 551-603. Open Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In M. Giuni, D. McAdam & C. Tilly (Eds.). How social movements matter (pp. 253-270). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing the Debate on Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes – Concluding Observations. In C. T. Tomuschat, J-M. (Ed.), The fundamental rules of the international legal order (pp. 32). Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. Open Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C. (2015). The Security Council and Jus Cogens. Gaetano Morelli Lectures Series, 1, 7-98. Open Google Scholar
Trindade, A. A. C. (2003). Direito das organizações internacionais. Belo Horizonte: Editora del Rey. Open Google Scholar
Tryggestad, T. L. (2009). Trick or Treat? The UN and Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security. Global Governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, 15(4), 539-557. Open Google Scholar
Tunkin, G. I. (1974). Theory of international law. London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2008). Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law, The. Va. J. Int'l L., 49, 985. Open Google Scholar
Ulmen, G. L. (1996). Introduction (G. L. Ulmen, Trans.) Roman Catholicism and political form. Westport: Greenwood Publishing. Open Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2000). Representation as advocacy: a study of democratic deliberation. Political theory, 28(6), 758-786. Open Google Scholar
Varella, M. D. (2013). Internacionalização do Direito: direito internacional, globalização e complexidade. Brasília: UniCEUB. Open Google Scholar
Verdross, A. (1937). Forbidden Treaties in International Law. The American Journal of Internacional Law, 31, 571-577. Open Google Scholar
Verdross, A. (1953). Idées Directrices de l’Organisation des Nations Unies. Recueil des Cours de l ́Académie de Droit International, 83. Leiden: Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar
Viellechner, L. (2007). Können Netzwerke die Demokratie ersetzen? Zur Legitimation der Regelbildung im Globalisierungsprozess. In Bühring, F; Franzius, C.; Herbst, T; Kötter, M.; Kreutz, A; von Lewinski, K.; Meinel, F.; Nolte, J. & Schönrock, S. (Eds.). Netzwerke: 47. Assistententagung Öffentliches Recht. Nomos: Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar
Viellechner, L. (2013). Transnationalisierung des Rechts. Velbrück: Weilerswist. Open Google Scholar
Villas Bôas, P. C. B. (2011). Secularização inacabada: política e direito em Carl Schmitt. Curitiba: Appris. Open Google Scholar
Vitullo, G. E. (2007). O lugar do conflito na teoria democrática contemporânea. São Cristóvão-SE: Tomo, 10, 61-83. Open Google Scholar
Voeten, E. (2005). The political origins of the UN Security Council's ability to legitimize the use of force. International Organization, 59(03), 527-557. Open Google Scholar
Voigt, R. (2017). Das Staatsgeheimnis als instrument der Arkanpolitik. In R. Voigt (Ed.), Staatsgeheimnisse: Arkanpolitik im Wandel der Zeiten. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1973). Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In J. Winckelmann (Ed.), M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 146-214). Tübingen: Mohr. Open Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1975). Wissenschaft als Beruf. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. Open Google Scholar
Weber, W. (1996). Ratio status, et quae eo pertinent. Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 78(1), 145-178. Open Google Scholar
Willetts, P. (1996). The conscience of the world: The influence of non-governmental organisations in the UN system. London: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers. Open Google Scholar
Willetts, P. (2002). What is a non-governmental organization? in: UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Section 1, Institutional and Infrastructure Resource Issues, Article 1.44.3.7. Retrieved from http://www.staff.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/CS-NTWKS/NGO-ART.HTM. Open Google Scholar
Wisotzki, S. (2008). Negotiating human security at the UN: Transnational civil society, arms control and disarmament. . In L. Joachim J., B. (Ed.), Transnational Activism in the UN and the EU: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1999). Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations (G. E. M. Ascombe, Trans. Second Edition ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R. (2003). The Attack of September 11, 2001, the Wars Against the Taliban and Iraq: Is There a Need to Reconsider International Law on the Recourse to Force and the Rules in Armed Conflict? Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 7(1), 1-78. Open Google Scholar
Woodward, B. K. (2010). Global civil society in international lawmaking and global governance: theory and practice. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar
Zangl, B. (2005). Is there an emerging international rule of law? European Review, 13(S1), 73-91. Open Google Scholar
Zangl, B., & Zürn, M. (2003). Frieden und Krieg: Sicherheit in der nationalen und postnationalen Konstellation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Zolo, D. (2007). The Rule of Law: A Critical Reappraisal. In Costa P., Zolo D. (Eds), The Rule of Law History, Theory and Criticism (pp. 3-71). Dordrecht: Springer. Open Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P. (2001). Die vergangene Zukunft des Völkerrechts. Kritische Justiz, 34(1), 46-68. Open Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2009). Wer regiert die Welt und mit welchem Recht? Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2013). Politisierung als Konzept der Internationalen Beziehungen. In M. Zürn & M. Ecker-Ehrhardt (Eds.), Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2018). Contested Global Governance. Global Policy, 9(1), 138-145. Open Google Scholar
Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(01), 69-106. Open Google Scholar