Balkan Pathologies of Modernity

Dr. Vanja Grujic

doi:10.5771/9783845290638

Summary

The possibility of thinking and criticising modernity and modern law lies at the heart of this work. Hegel’s works firstly focus on the word ‘modern’, while the oeuvre of Jürgen Habermas offers another goal and possibility for the modern world – intersubjectivity. The world is social, but can the modern world grasp the intersubjective nature of our societies? This work follows Habermas’s arguments, and it is on the basis of their shortcomings that its criticism of modernity arises, a criticism that is focused around the theory of Carl Schmitt, which challenges the concepts of liberal democracy, legitimacy and legality, leaving us the door open to rethink the ideas and pillars of liberal democracy and its laws.

Vanja Grujić is a postdoctoral researcher in the fields of law, and political and legal philosophy at the University of Brasília.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2018
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-4845-7
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-9063-8
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Zentrum und Peripherie
Volume: 12
Language: English
Pages: 235
Product type: Book Titles

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 12
Preface No access Pages 13 - 14
Abbreviations No access Pages 15 - 16
Introduction No access Pages 17 - 24
1. 1.1 Introduction to the chapter No access
2. 1.2 Geist in the world history No access
3. 1. 1.3.1 Possibility of freedom after the conflict No access
  2. 1.3.2 Three features of tragedy No access
  3. 1.3.3 Tragedy as the part of the political and legal theory No access
4. 1. 1.4.1 The inner-dialectic No access
  2. 1.4.2 The external dialectic No access
5. 1. 1.5.1 The French Revolution and the birth of modernity No access
  2. 1.5.2 The reason coming from the French Revolution No access
  3. 1.5.3 Possibility of the social recognition in modernity No access
6. 1.6 Conclusion to the chapter No access
1. 2.1 Introduction to the chapter No access
2. 2.2 From the freedom of the bourgeois public sphere to the instrumentalized liberal public sphere No access
3. 1. 2.3.1 Social systems and their crises No access
  2. 2.3.2 Work vs. interaction No access
4. 1. 2.4.1 Instrumental and communicative action No access
  2. 2.4.2 Naïve and reflective levels of the speech No access
  3. 2.4.3 Social development and social integration No access
  4. 2.4.5 Durkheim’s two-level social development No access
5. 1. 2.5.1 Different possibilities for the dual-model society No access
6. 1. 2.6.1 The discourse theory and law No access
7. 1. 2.7.1 Equality No access
  2. 2.7.2 Rationalization – another condition of practical discourse No access
8. 1. 2.8.1 Deliberative democracy between liberal and republican political theory No access
  2. 2.8.2 External tension in law No access
  3. 2.8.3 Normative structure of deliberative democracy No access
9. 1. 2.9.1 The European Constitution No access
10. 2.10 Conclusion to the chapter No access
1. 3.1 Introduction to the chapter No access
2. 1. 3.2.1 Neo-Kantianism No access
  2. 3.2.2 Positivism No access
3. 1. 3.3.1 Guardian of the Constitution No access
  2. 3.3.2 Authority in the constitutionalism No access
  3. 3.3.3 Schmitt’s main arguments regarding legal sovereignty No access
4. 1. 3.4.1 The political as a central and supreme domain – historical changes of the central domain No access
  2. 3.4.2 A political unity as a supreme unity No access
5. 1. 3.5.1 Speculation in the “friend-foe” relation No access
  2. 3.5.2 The Dezisionismus No access
  3. 3.5.3 Ausnahmzustand as the definition of sovereignty No access
6. 1. 1. 3.6.1.1 Jurisdiction state No access
    2. 3.6.1.2 Governmental/administrative state No access
    3. 3.6.1.3 Legislative state No access
  2. 3.6.2 Principles of legality in the legislative state No access
7. 3.7 Legality as the concept that comes after legitimacy in the theory of democracy No access
8. 1. 3.8.1 Homogeneous societies No access
  2. 3.8.2 Politics of equal chances No access
  3. 3.8.3 Politics of majorities No access
  4. 3.8.4 Politics of consensus No access
  5. 3.8.5 Politics of depoliticization No access
  6. 3.8.6 The bureaucracy No access
9. 3.9 Conclusion to the chapter No access
1. 4.1 Introduction to the chapter No access
2. 1. 4.2.1 Political and legal debate prior to the Constitution of 1974 No access
  2. 4.2.2 Yugoslavian nationalism as the specific consequence of the Yugoslavian communism No access
  3. 4.2.3 At least two arguments to think nationalism in former Yugoslavia No access
3. 1. 4.3.1 War as the strategic action No access
4. 1. 4.4.1 Remaining possibilities of modernity No access
  2. 4.4.2 Post-traditional society and new rationality No access
5. 1. 4.5.1 Cosmopolitan law as “humanist” law: Schmitt’s critique No access
  2. 4.5.2 Cosmopolitan law as “humanist” law: Habermas’s answer No access
  3. 4.5.3 Possibility of equality in modernity No access
6. 1. 4.6.1 Future of nationalism No access
7. 1. 4.7.1 Critique of liberalism in a nutshell No access
8. 1. 4.8.1 Re-thinking of “friend-enemy” relation No access
  2. 4.8.2 The social impossibility of closure No access
  3. 4.8.3 Towards the new model of agonistic democracy No access
9. 4.9 Conclusion to the chapter No access
Conclusion No access Pages 223 - 227
References No access Pages 228 - 235

Bibliography (127 entries)

Adams, Nicholas: Habermas and theology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Open Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W.: Hegel – Three studies, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The MIT Press, 1993. Open Google Scholar
_________: Negative dialectics, trans. E.B. Ashton. London and New York: Routledge, edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Education after Auschwitz’. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: http://josswinn.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AdornoEducation.pdf Open Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio: State of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Open Google Scholar
_________: Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, Stanford California: Stanford University Press, 1999. Open Google Scholar
Antaki, Mark: ‘Carl Schmitt’s Nomos of the earth’, in Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 42(2), pp. 317-334, 2004. Web. Open Google Scholar
Aristotle: Politics, trans. H. Rackham, London: William Heinemannn Ltd, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959. Open Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah: The human condition, Second edition, Introduction by Margared Canovan, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 1998. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
Bernstein, Jay: The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991. Used a digital version of the book without page numbers. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘The causality of fate: Modernity and modernism in Habermas’, in Maurizio Passerin D’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on ‘The philosophical discourse of modernity’, pp. 245-269, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. Open Google Scholar
Billings, Joshua: Genealogy of the tragic: Greek tragedy and German philosophy, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2014. Open Google Scholar
Borradori, Giovanna: Philosophy in a time of terror: dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacque Derrida, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Open Google Scholar
Butler, Judith: Antigone’s claim. Kinship between life and death, New York: Colombia University Press, 2000. Open Google Scholar
Castrucci, Emanuele: ‘Jürgen Habermas and the political realism: A critique’, in Sociology and Anthropology, 3(6), pp. 285-294, 2015. Web. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.13189/sa.2015.030601
Coole, Diana: ‘Habermas and the question of alterity’, in Maurizio Passerin D’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on ‘The philosophical discourse of modernity’, pp. 221-245, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. Open Google Scholar
Crowder, George: Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic democracy, paper presented to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Newcastle, 2006. Web. Open Google Scholar
Georg Diez: ‘Habermas, the last European: A philosopher’s mission to save the EU’, in Spiegel Online, 25/11/2011. Retrieved 03/03/2018 from: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/habermas-the-last-european-a-philosopher-s-mission-to-save-the-eu-a-799237.html Open Google Scholar
Đinđić, Zoran: Subjektivnost i nasilje, Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije, 1982. Open Google Scholar
_________: Jugoslavija kao nedovršena država, Beograd: Narodna biblioteka Srbije, Fond Dr. Zoran Đinđić, 2010. Open Google Scholar
Engels, Frederick: Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/ Open Google Scholar
Falk, Hjalmar: ‘The ‘Theological Nihilism’ of Friedrich Gogarten. On a context in Karl Löwith’s critique of Carl Schmitt’, in European Review, 22, pp. 217-230, 2014.Web. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S1062798714000064
García-Salmones, Mónica: ‘On Carl Schmitt’s reading of Hobbes: Lessons for constitutionalism in the international law’, in NoFo, 4, (61-82), 2007. Web. Open Google Scholar
Greiff, ‘Habermas on nationalism and cosmopolitanism’, in Ratio Juris, 15(4), pp. 418-438, 2002. Web. Open Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen: The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory, eds. Cronin and De Greiff, Cambridge, Massachussetts: The MIT Press, 1998. Open Google Scholar
_________: The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization, Vol. 1, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1983. Open Google Scholar
_________: The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and System: A critique of functionalist reason, Vol. 2, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1984. Open Google Scholar
_________: Knowledge and human interests, trans. by Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston: Beacon Press, 1972. Open Google Scholar
_________: Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, trans. William Rehg, Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 1996 Open Google Scholar
_________: The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures, trans. Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press, 1987. Open Google Scholar
_________: Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical Essays, trans. Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008. Open Google Scholar
_________: Legitimation crisis, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992. Open Google Scholar
_________: Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston: Beacon Press, 1989. Open Google Scholar
_________: Truth and justification, trans. Barbara Fultner, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2003. Open Google Scholar
_________: The postnational constellation: political essays, trans. and ed. Max Pensky, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2001. Open Google Scholar
_________: Theory and practice, trans. John Viertel, Boston: Beacon Press, 1974. Open Google Scholar
_________: The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Modernity: an unfinished project’, in in Maurizio Passerin D’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on ‘The philosophical discourse of modernity’, pp. 38-59, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. Open Google Scholar
_________: The lure of technocracy, trans. Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Why the development of the European Union into a transnational democracy is necessary and how it is possible’, in European Law Journal 21(4), pp. 431–565, 2015. This work was using the pdf copy of the article, pp. 1-17. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Why Europe needs a constitution?’, in New Left Review, 11, pp. 5-26, 2001. Web. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Questions and counterquestions’, in Richard J. Bernestein (ed.) Habermas and modernity, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1985. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Bestiality and humanity: a war on the border between law and morality’ [original title: ‘Bestialität und Humanität: Ein Krieg an der Grenze zwischen Recht und Moral’, in Die Zeit 18, 1999], trans. Stephen Meyer and Wiliam E. Scheuerman, in Constellation, 6(3), 1999. Web. Open Google Scholar
_________: Comentários à ética do discurso [original title Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1991], trans. Gilda Lopes Encarnação, Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1999. Open Google Scholar
_________: Sobre a constituição da Europa [original title: Zur Verfassung Europa – Ein Essay, Suhrkamp Verlag, 2011], trans. Denislon Luis Werle, Luiz Repa and Rúrion Melo, São Paulo: Editroa UNESP, 2012. Open Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen/Ratzinger, Jozeph: Dijalektika sekularizacije [original title: Dialektik der Säkularisierung], Beograd: Dosije, 2007. Open Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen/Bofinger, Peter/ Nida-Rümelin, Julian: ‘Protiv fasadne demokratije’ [original title: ‘Einspruch gegen die Fassadendemokratie’, in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 03.08.2012.], trans. Miroslav Marković in Peščanik, 11/08/2012. Web. Web. Open Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich: Political writings, eds. Laurence Dickey and H. B. Nisbet, trans. H.B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Open Google Scholar
_________: Encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences, ed. Michael John Petry, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1970. Open Google Scholar
_________: Aesthetics: Lectures on fine art, trans. T. M. Knox, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. _________: Phenomenology of spirit, trans. A. V. Miller, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. Open Google Scholar
_________: Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Allen W. Wood, trans. B. Nisbet., Cambridge: University Press, first published 1991, eight printing 2003. Open Google Scholar
Hölderlin, Friedrich: Hyperion and selected poems, ed. Eric L. Santner, New York: Continuum, 1990. Open Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul: ‘Carl Schmitt’s decisionism’, in Chantal Mouffe (ed.), The challenge of Carl Schmitt, pp. 7-18, London and New York: Verso, 1999. Open Google Scholar
Ivković, Marjan: ‘Habermasova koncepcija sistemske kolonizacije sveta života’, in Sociologija, 7(1), pp. 1-22, 2010. Web. Open Google Scholar
Jović, Dejan: Jugoslavija – država koja je odumrla: uspon, kriza i pad Kardeljeve Jugoslavije (1974–1990), Zagreb: Prometej, 2003. Open Google Scholar
Johnson, Jack: ‘Habermas on communicative and strategic action’, in Political Theory, 19(2), pp. 181-201, 1991. Web. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0090591791019002003
Jovanov, Rastko: Hegelovo pravo naroda, Beograd: IP ‘Albatros plus’, 2013. Open Google Scholar
Juncker, Jean-Claude, Speech in the European Parliament held on 04/07/2017. Retrieved 02/03/2018 from: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40492396 Open Google Scholar
Kervégan, Jean-François: Hegel, Carl Schmitt: O político entre a especulação e a positividade [original title: Hegel, Carl Schmitt – Le politique entre spéculation et positivité, Presses Universitaires De France, 2005], trans. Carolina Huang, São Paulo: Manole, 2006. Open Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘The nature and development of constitutional adjudication’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 22-78, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.003
_________: ‘Who ought to be the guardian of the Constitution?’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 174-221, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.006
Kirchherimer, Otto: ‘Remarks on Carl Schmitt’s Legality and legitimacy (1933)’, in William E. Scheuerman (ed.), The Rule of Law under Siege. Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer, pp. 64-101, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1996. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Legality and legitimacy (1932)’, in William E. Scheuerman (ed.), The Rule of Law under Siege. Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer, pp. 44-64, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1996. Open Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto/Mouffe, Chantal: Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics, 1st and 2nd edition, London: Verso, 1985/2001. Open Google Scholar
Lievens, Matthias, ‘Carl Schmitt’s Metapolitics’, in Constellations, 20(1), 2013. Web. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/cons.12022
Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong: Politik und Gewalt. Giorgio Agamben und Jürgen Habermas im Vergleich, München: Herbert Utz Verlag, 2007. Open Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert: Reason and revolution - Hegel and the rise of social theory, London: Routledge&Kegan Paul Ltd, 1955. Open Google Scholar
Marx, Karl: Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’, ed. Joseph O’Malley, trans. Anette Jolin and Joseph O’Malley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Open Google Scholar
_________: The poverty of philosophy. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Poverty-Philosophy.pdf Open Google Scholar
Marx, Karl/Engels, Fridrich: The holy family or critique of critical critique, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1956. Open Google Scholar
Milović, Miroslav: Zajednica razlike, Gradac: Biblioteka Lađa, 2008. Open Google Scholar
_________: Política e metafísica, São Paulo: Editora Max Limonad, 2017. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘As metáforas do poder na Iugoslávia’, working paper at Faculdade de direito, Universidade de Brasília. Open Google Scholar
_________: Emancipação como reflexão: Habermas, working paper at Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de Brasília. Open Google Scholar
_________: Filosofia da Comunicação - para uma crítica da modernidade, Brasilia: Plano Editora, 2002. Open Google Scholar
Molnar, Aleksandar: Sunce mita i dugačka senka Karla Šmita. Ustavno zlopaćenje Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka, Beograd: Službeni glasnik&Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2010. Open Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal: On the political, London and New York: Routledge, 2005. Open Google Scholar
_________: The democratic paradox, Lodon and New York: Verso, 2005. Open Google Scholar
_________: The return of the political, London and New York: Verso, 1993. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Democracy in Europe: The challenge of right-wing populism’, lecture held in CCCB (Centre de Cultura Contemporània de Barcelona), 2002. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: http://www.cccb.org/rcs_gene/mouffe.pdf Open Google Scholar
Neves, Marcelo: ‘The Symbolic Force of Human Rights’, in Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33(4), pp. 411–444, 2007. Web. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0191453707077014
Nicodemus, Everlyn: ‘Modernity as a Mad Dog: on art and trauma’, in Gerardo Mosquera and Jean Fisher (eds.), Over here: International perspectives on art and culture, pp 258-278, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004. Open Google Scholar
Oliveira de, Nythamar: ‘Rawls’s normative conception of the person: A Kantian reinterpretation’, in Veritas, 52(1), pp. 171-183, 2007. Web. Open Google Scholar
Parkinson, John: ‘Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy’, in Political Studies, 51(1), pp. 180-196, 2003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00419
_________: Deliberating in the real world. Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Open Google Scholar
Petrović, Tanja: YUROPA Jugoslovensko nasleđe i politike budućnosti u postjugoslovenskim društvima, Beograd: Edicija REČ, 2012. Open Google Scholar
Pešić, Vesna: Serbian nationalism and the origins of the Yugoslav Crisis, in Peaceworks, No.8, Washington: United States Institute of Peace, 1996. Web. Open Google Scholar
Posner, Eric/Vermeule, Adrian: ‘Demystifying Schmitt’, working paper in Public law and legal theory working papers, No.333, University of Chicago, 2011. Web. Open Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam: ‘Deliberation and ideological domination’, in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005.008
Ramet, Sabrina P.: Thinking about Yugoslavia. Scholarly debates about the Yugoslav breakup and the Wars in Bosnia and Kosovo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Open Google Scholar
Reese-Schäfer, Walter: ‘Jürgen Habermas i deliberativna demokracija’, trans. Tomislav Martinović, in Politička misao, 41(4), pp. 3-21, 2004. Web. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81349-7_5
Roche, Mark Wiliam: Tragedy and comedy: A systematic study and a critique of Hegel. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Introduction to Hegel’s theory of tragedy’, in PhaenEx, 1(2), pp. 11-20, 2006. Web. Open Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph: The philosophy of art, ed., trans. and Introduction, Douglas W. Stott, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989. Open Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William: Carl Schmitt: the end of law, Lanham, Boulder, New York and Oxford: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999. Open Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl: Constitutional theory, trans. and ed. by Jeffrey Seitzer, Forward by Ellen Kennedy, Durham and London: Duke University Press: 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589-031
_________: Political romanticism, trans. Guy Oakes, Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1986. Open Google Scholar
_________: State, movement, people: The triadic structure of the political unity (1933) and The question of legality (1950), ed., trans. and Preface by Simona Dragichi, Corvallis: Plutarch Press, 2001. Open Google Scholar
_________: Legality and legitimacy, ed. and trans. Jeffrey Seitzer with an introduction by John P. McCormick, Durham&London: Duke University Press, 2004. Open Google Scholar
_________: The crisis of parliamentary democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy, Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 2000. Open Google Scholar
_________: The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of Jus Publicum Europaeum, trans. and annotations G. L. Ulmen, New York: Telos Press Publishing, 2006. Open Google Scholar
_________: The concept of the political, expanded ed., trans., Introduction and notes by George Schwab, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007. Open Google Scholar
_________: Political theology. Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty, trans. Schwab, Foreword by Tracy B. Strong, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2005. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘Jews in Jurisprudence’, text in Das Judentum in der Rechtswissenschaft Band: Die deutsche Rechtswissenschaft im Kampf gegen den juedischen Geist, trans. Tomislav Sunić. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: https://archive.org/stream/CarlSchmittsjewsInJurisprudence/CarlSchmittsJewsInJurisprudence_djvu.txt Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘The age of neutralization and depoliticizations’, trans. Matthias Konzen and John P. McCormick, in Schmitt, The concept of the political, expanded edition, trans., Introduction and notes by George Schwab, pp. 80-96, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007. Open Google Scholar
_________: ‘The guardian of the Constitution’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 79-173, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.005
_________: ‘Closing statement before Staatsgerichtshof in Leipzig’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 222-227, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.007
Schmitt, Carl/Kojève, Alexandre: ‘Alexandre Kojève – Carl Schmitt correspondence and Alexandre Kojève ‘Colonialism from a European perspective’’, ed. and trans. Erik De Vries, in Interpretation, 29(1), pp. 91-130, 2001, Web. Open Google Scholar
Seitzer, Jeffrey/Thornhill, Christopher: ‘An Introduction to Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional Theory: Issues and Context’, in Schmitt, Constitutional theory, trans. and ed. by Jeffrey Seitzer, Forward by Ellen Kennedy, Durham and London: Duke University Press: 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589-001
Sjöholm, Cecilia: ‘Naked Life; Arendt and the exile at Colonus’, in S. E. Wilmer and Audrone Zukauskaite (eds.), Interrogating Antigone in postmodern philosophy and criticism, pp. 48-66, Oxford: University Press, 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559213.003.0003
Sophocles: Antigone Open Google Scholar
Stern, Robert: Hegel and the ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’, Routledge, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002. Open Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, Jürgen: ‘Hermann Cohen’s theoretical philosophy’, in Makkreel and Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in contemporary philosophy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2010. Open Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo: ‘Notes on the concept of the political’, in Schmitt, The concept of the political, expanded edition, trans., Introduction and notes by George Schwab, pp. 97-117, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738840.001.0001
Szondi, Peter: An essay on the tragic, trans. Paul Fleming, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. Open Google Scholar
Šarčević, Abdulah: ‘Afterwords’, in Theodor W. Adorno, Tri studije o Hegelu, pp. 139-181, trans. Aleksa Buha, Sarajevo: IP ‘Veselin Masleša, 1972. Open Google Scholar
The Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1974 in Snežana Trifunovska (ed.), Yugoslavia through documents: From its creation to its dissolution, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994. Open Google Scholar
The Constitution of the Weimar Republic, in ‘Apendix’ to Schmitt, Constitutional theory, pp. 409-440, trans. and ed. by Jeffrey Seitzer, Durham and London: Duke University Press: 2008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589-028
Theunissen, Michael: ‘The repressed intersubjectivity in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right’, in Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David Carlson (eds.), Hegel and Legal Theory, pp. 3-64, London: Routledge, dig. print., 2010. Open Google Scholar
Tindemans, Klaas: ‘Antigone and the law: Legal theory and the ambiguities of performance’, in S. E. Wilmer and Audrone Zukauskaite (eds.) Interrogating Antigone in postmodern philosophy and criticism, pp. 185-193, Oxford: University Press, 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559213.003.0011
Tuori, Kaarlo: Ration and voluntas: the tension between reason and will in law, London and New York: Routledge, 2016. Open Google Scholar
Vinx, Lars: The guardian of the constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar
Weber, Max: Protestantska etika i duh kapitalizma [original title: Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus], trans. Tamara Božić, Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing, 2011. Open Google Scholar
Williams, Robert R.: Hegel’s ethics of recognition, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1997. Open Google Scholar
White, Stephen K.: The recent work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, justice & modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598265.001
White, Angela D.: ‘A Rawlsian idea of deliberative democracy’, in Electronic thesis and dissertation repository, number 357, 2001. Web. Open Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj/Đinđić, Zoran, ‘Interview’ in Dvogled [origanally published in Süddeutsche Zeitung, No. 34, 27. 08. 1999.], trans. B. Mikulić. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: http://dvogled.rs/2013/03/slavoj-zizek-i-zoran-dindic-razgovor-27-08-1999/ Open Google Scholar