Balkan Pathologies of Modernity

Dr. Vanja Grujic

doi:10.5771/9783845290638

Zusammenfassung

Im Mittelpunkt dieser Arbeit steht die Möglichkeit, Modernität und modernes Recht zu überdenken und zu kritisieren. Bei Hegel steht zunächst das Wort "modern" im Mittelpunkt, während das Werk von Jürgen Habermas ein weiteres Ziel und eine Möglichkeit für die moderne Welt vorlegt – die Intersubjektivität. Die Welt ist sozial, aber kann die moderne Welt den intersubjektiven Charakter unserer Gesellschaften erfassen? Diese Arbeit folgt den Argumenten von Jürgen Habermas und gerade dort, wo Defizite erkennbar sind, tritt die Kritik an der Moderne hervor. Jene Kritik stützt und fokussiert sich auf die Theorie von Carl Schmitt, die die Konzepte der liberalen Demokratie, Legitimität und Legalität in Frage stellt und dabei Raum lässt, um die Ideen und Säulen der liberalen Demokratie und ihres Rechts neu zu überdenken.

Vanja Grujić, Postdoktorandin im Bereich der politischen und rechtlichen Philosophie, Universität Brasília.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Erscheinungsjahr: 2018
Erscheinungsdatum: 27.06.2018
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-4845-7
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-9063-8
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Zentrum und Peripherie
Band: 12
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 235
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 12
Preface Kein Zugriff Seiten 13 - 14
Abbreviations Kein Zugriff Seiten 15 - 16
Introduction Kein Zugriff Seiten 17 - 24
1. 1.1 Introduction to the chapter Kein Zugriff
2. 1.2 Geist in the world history Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 1.3.1 Possibility of freedom after the conflict Kein Zugriff
  2. 1.3.2 Three features of tragedy Kein Zugriff
  3. 1.3.3 Tragedy as the part of the political and legal theory Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 1.4.1 The inner-dialectic Kein Zugriff
  2. 1.4.2 The external dialectic Kein Zugriff
5. 1. 1.5.1 The French Revolution and the birth of modernity Kein Zugriff
  2. 1.5.2 The reason coming from the French Revolution Kein Zugriff
  3. 1.5.3 Possibility of the social recognition in modernity Kein Zugriff
6. 1.6 Conclusion to the chapter Kein Zugriff
1. 2.1 Introduction to the chapter Kein Zugriff
2. 2.2 From the freedom of the bourgeois public sphere to the instrumentalized liberal public sphere Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 2.3.1 Social systems and their crises Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.3.2 Work vs. interaction Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 2.4.1 Instrumental and communicative action Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.4.2 Naïve and reflective levels of the speech Kein Zugriff
  3. 2.4.3 Social development and social integration Kein Zugriff
  4. 2.4.5 Durkheim’s two-level social development Kein Zugriff
5. 1. 2.5.1 Different possibilities for the dual-model society Kein Zugriff
6. 1. 2.6.1 The discourse theory and law Kein Zugriff
7. 1. 2.7.1 Equality Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.7.2 Rationalization – another condition of practical discourse Kein Zugriff
8. 1. 2.8.1 Deliberative democracy between liberal and republican political theory Kein Zugriff
  2. 2.8.2 External tension in law Kein Zugriff
  3. 2.8.3 Normative structure of deliberative democracy Kein Zugriff
9. 1. 2.9.1 The European Constitution Kein Zugriff
10. 2.10 Conclusion to the chapter Kein Zugriff
1. 3.1 Introduction to the chapter Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 3.2.1 Neo-Kantianism Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.2.2 Positivism Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 3.3.1 Guardian of the Constitution Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.3.2 Authority in the constitutionalism Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.3.3 Schmitt’s main arguments regarding legal sovereignty Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 3.4.1 The political as a central and supreme domain – historical changes of the central domain Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.4.2 A political unity as a supreme unity Kein Zugriff
5. 1. 3.5.1 Speculation in the “friend-foe” relation Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.5.2 The Dezisionismus Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.5.3 Ausnahmzustand as the definition of sovereignty Kein Zugriff
6. 1. 1. 3.6.1.1 Jurisdiction state Kein Zugriff
    2. 3.6.1.2 Governmental/administrative state Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.6.1.3 Legislative state Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.6.2 Principles of legality in the legislative state Kein Zugriff
7. 3.7 Legality as the concept that comes after legitimacy in the theory of democracy Kein Zugriff
8. 1. 3.8.1 Homogeneous societies Kein Zugriff
  2. 3.8.2 Politics of equal chances Kein Zugriff
  3. 3.8.3 Politics of majorities Kein Zugriff
  4. 3.8.4 Politics of consensus Kein Zugriff
  5. 3.8.5 Politics of depoliticization Kein Zugriff
  6. 3.8.6 The bureaucracy Kein Zugriff
9. 3.9 Conclusion to the chapter Kein Zugriff
1. 4.1 Introduction to the chapter Kein Zugriff
2. 1. 4.2.1 Political and legal debate prior to the Constitution of 1974 Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.2.2 Yugoslavian nationalism as the specific consequence of the Yugoslavian communism Kein Zugriff
  3. 4.2.3 At least two arguments to think nationalism in former Yugoslavia Kein Zugriff
3. 1. 4.3.1 War as the strategic action Kein Zugriff
4. 1. 4.4.1 Remaining possibilities of modernity Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.4.2 Post-traditional society and new rationality Kein Zugriff
5. 1. 4.5.1 Cosmopolitan law as “humanist” law: Schmitt’s critique Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.5.2 Cosmopolitan law as “humanist” law: Habermas’s answer Kein Zugriff
  3. 4.5.3 Possibility of equality in modernity Kein Zugriff
6. 1. 4.6.1 Future of nationalism Kein Zugriff
7. 1. 4.7.1 Critique of liberalism in a nutshell Kein Zugriff
8. 1. 4.8.1 Re-thinking of “friend-enemy” relation Kein Zugriff
  2. 4.8.2 The social impossibility of closure Kein Zugriff
  3. 4.8.3 Towards the new model of agonistic democracy Kein Zugriff
9. 4.9 Conclusion to the chapter Kein Zugriff
Conclusion Kein Zugriff Seiten 223 - 227
References Kein Zugriff Seiten 228 - 235

Literaturverzeichnis (127 Einträge)

Adams, Nicholas: Habermas and theology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
Adorno, Theodor W.: Hegel – Three studies, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The MIT Press, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Negative dialectics, trans. E.B. Ashton. London and New York: Routledge, edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Education after Auschwitz’. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: http://josswinn.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AdornoEducation.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Agamben, Giorgio: State of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, Stanford California: Stanford University Press, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
Antaki, Mark: ‘Carl Schmitt’s Nomos of the earth’, in Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 42(2), pp. 317-334, 2004. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Aristotle: Politics, trans. H. Rackham, London: William Heinemannn Ltd, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959. Google Scholar öffnen
Arendt, Hannah: The human condition, Second edition, Introduction by Margared Canovan, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
Bernstein, Jay: The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991. Used a digital version of the book without page numbers. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘The causality of fate: Modernity and modernism in Habermas’, in Maurizio Passerin D’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on ‘The philosophical discourse of modernity’, pp. 245-269, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
Billings, Joshua: Genealogy of the tragic: Greek tragedy and German philosophy, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen
Borradori, Giovanna: Philosophy in a time of terror: dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacque Derrida, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
Butler, Judith: Antigone’s claim. Kinship between life and death, New York: Colombia University Press, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
Castrucci, Emanuele: ‘Jürgen Habermas and the political realism: A critique’, in Sociology and Anthropology, 3(6), pp. 285-294, 2015. Web. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.13189/sa.2015.030601
Coole, Diana: ‘Habermas and the question of alterity’, in Maurizio Passerin D’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on ‘The philosophical discourse of modernity’, pp. 221-245, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
Crowder, George: Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic democracy, paper presented to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Newcastle, 2006. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Georg Diez: ‘Habermas, the last European: A philosopher’s mission to save the EU’, in Spiegel Online, 25/11/2011. Retrieved 03/03/2018 from: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/habermas-the-last-european-a-philosopher-s-mission-to-save-the-eu-a-799237.html Google Scholar öffnen
Đinđić, Zoran: Subjektivnost i nasilje, Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije, 1982. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Jugoslavija kao nedovršena država, Beograd: Narodna biblioteka Srbije, Fond Dr. Zoran Đinđić, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
Engels, Frederick: Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/ Google Scholar öffnen
Falk, Hjalmar: ‘The ‘Theological Nihilism’ of Friedrich Gogarten. On a context in Karl Löwith’s critique of Carl Schmitt’, in European Review, 22, pp. 217-230, 2014.Web. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S1062798714000064
García-Salmones, Mónica: ‘On Carl Schmitt’s reading of Hobbes: Lessons for constitutionalism in the international law’, in NoFo, 4, (61-82), 2007. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Greiff, ‘Habermas on nationalism and cosmopolitanism’, in Ratio Juris, 15(4), pp. 418-438, 2002. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, Jürgen: The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory, eds. Cronin and De Greiff, Cambridge, Massachussetts: The MIT Press, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization, Vol. 1, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1983. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and System: A critique of functionalist reason, Vol. 2, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press, 1984. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Knowledge and human interests, trans. by Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston: Beacon Press, 1972. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, trans. William Rehg, Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 1996 Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures, trans. Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge and Oxford: Polity Press, 1987. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical Essays, trans. Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Legitimation crisis, trans. Thomas McCarthy, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro, Boston: Beacon Press, 1989. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Truth and justification, trans. Barbara Fultner, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The postnational constellation: political essays, trans. and ed. Max Pensky, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Theory and practice, trans. John Viertel, Boston: Beacon Press, 1974. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Modernity: an unfinished project’, in in Maurizio Passerin D’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib (eds.), Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: Critical essays on ‘The philosophical discourse of modernity’, pp. 38-59, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The lure of technocracy, trans. Ciaran Cronin, Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Why the development of the European Union into a transnational democracy is necessary and how it is possible’, in European Law Journal 21(4), pp. 431–565, 2015. This work was using the pdf copy of the article, pp. 1-17. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Why Europe needs a constitution?’, in New Left Review, 11, pp. 5-26, 2001. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Questions and counterquestions’, in Richard J. Bernestein (ed.) Habermas and modernity, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1985. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Bestiality and humanity: a war on the border between law and morality’ [original title: ‘Bestialität und Humanität: Ein Krieg an der Grenze zwischen Recht und Moral’, in Die Zeit 18, 1999], trans. Stephen Meyer and Wiliam E. Scheuerman, in Constellation, 6(3), 1999. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Comentários à ética do discurso [original title Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1991], trans. Gilda Lopes Encarnação, Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Sobre a constituição da Europa [original title: Zur Verfassung Europa – Ein Essay, Suhrkamp Verlag, 2011], trans. Denislon Luis Werle, Luiz Repa and Rúrion Melo, São Paulo: Editroa UNESP, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, Jürgen/Ratzinger, Jozeph: Dijalektika sekularizacije [original title: Dialektik der Säkularisierung], Beograd: Dosije, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
Habermas, Jürgen/Bofinger, Peter/ Nida-Rümelin, Julian: ‘Protiv fasadne demokratije’ [original title: ‘Einspruch gegen die Fassadendemokratie’, in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 03.08.2012.], trans. Miroslav Marković in Peščanik, 11/08/2012. Web. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich: Political writings, eds. Laurence Dickey and H. B. Nisbet, trans. H.B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences, ed. Michael John Petry, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1970. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Aesthetics: Lectures on fine art, trans. T. M. Knox, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. _________: Phenomenology of spirit, trans. A. V. Miller, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Allen W. Wood, trans. B. Nisbet., Cambridge: University Press, first published 1991, eight printing 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
Hölderlin, Friedrich: Hyperion and selected poems, ed. Eric L. Santner, New York: Continuum, 1990. Google Scholar öffnen
Hirst, Paul: ‘Carl Schmitt’s decisionism’, in Chantal Mouffe (ed.), The challenge of Carl Schmitt, pp. 7-18, London and New York: Verso, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
Ivković, Marjan: ‘Habermasova koncepcija sistemske kolonizacije sveta života’, in Sociologija, 7(1), pp. 1-22, 2010. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Jović, Dejan: Jugoslavija – država koja je odumrla: uspon, kriza i pad Kardeljeve Jugoslavije (1974–1990), Zagreb: Prometej, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
Johnson, Jack: ‘Habermas on communicative and strategic action’, in Political Theory, 19(2), pp. 181-201, 1991. Web. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0090591791019002003
Jovanov, Rastko: Hegelovo pravo naroda, Beograd: IP ‘Albatros plus’, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
Juncker, Jean-Claude, Speech in the European Parliament held on 04/07/2017. Retrieved 02/03/2018 from: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-40492396 Google Scholar öffnen
Kervégan, Jean-François: Hegel, Carl Schmitt: O político entre a especulação e a positividade [original title: Hegel, Carl Schmitt – Le politique entre spéculation et positivité, Presses Universitaires De France, 2005], trans. Carolina Huang, São Paulo: Manole, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
Kelsen, Hans, ‘The nature and development of constitutional adjudication’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 22-78, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.003
_________: ‘Who ought to be the guardian of the Constitution?’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 174-221, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.006
Kirchherimer, Otto: ‘Remarks on Carl Schmitt’s Legality and legitimacy (1933)’, in William E. Scheuerman (ed.), The Rule of Law under Siege. Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer, pp. 64-101, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Legality and legitimacy (1932)’, in William E. Scheuerman (ed.), The Rule of Law under Siege. Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer, pp. 44-64, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
Laclau, Ernesto/Mouffe, Chantal: Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics, 1st and 2nd edition, London: Verso, 1985/2001. Google Scholar öffnen
Lievens, Matthias, ‘Carl Schmitt’s Metapolitics’, in Constellations, 20(1), 2013. Web. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/cons.12022
Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong: Politik und Gewalt. Giorgio Agamben und Jürgen Habermas im Vergleich, München: Herbert Utz Verlag, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
Marcuse, Herbert: Reason and revolution - Hegel and the rise of social theory, London: Routledge&Kegan Paul Ltd, 1955. Google Scholar öffnen
Marx, Karl: Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’, ed. Joseph O’Malley, trans. Anette Jolin and Joseph O’Malley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The poverty of philosophy. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Poverty-Philosophy.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Marx, Karl/Engels, Fridrich: The holy family or critique of critical critique, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1956. Google Scholar öffnen
Milović, Miroslav: Zajednica razlike, Gradac: Biblioteka Lađa, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Política e metafísica, São Paulo: Editora Max Limonad, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘As metáforas do poder na Iugoslávia’, working paper at Faculdade de direito, Universidade de Brasília. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Emancipação como reflexão: Habermas, working paper at Faculdade de Direito, Universidade de Brasília. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Filosofia da Comunicação - para uma crítica da modernidade, Brasilia: Plano Editora, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
Molnar, Aleksandar: Sunce mita i dugačka senka Karla Šmita. Ustavno zlopaćenje Srbije u prvoj dekadi 21. veka, Beograd: Službeni glasnik&Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
Mouffe, Chantal: On the political, London and New York: Routledge, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The democratic paradox, Lodon and New York: Verso, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The return of the political, London and New York: Verso, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Democracy in Europe: The challenge of right-wing populism’, lecture held in CCCB (Centre de Cultura Contemporània de Barcelona), 2002. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: http://www.cccb.org/rcs_gene/mouffe.pdf Google Scholar öffnen
Neves, Marcelo: ‘The Symbolic Force of Human Rights’, in Philosophy & Social Criticism, 33(4), pp. 411–444, 2007. Web. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0191453707077014
Nicodemus, Everlyn: ‘Modernity as a Mad Dog: on art and trauma’, in Gerardo Mosquera and Jean Fisher (eds.), Over here: International perspectives on art and culture, pp 258-278, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
Oliveira de, Nythamar: ‘Rawls’s normative conception of the person: A Kantian reinterpretation’, in Veritas, 52(1), pp. 171-183, 2007. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Parkinson, John: ‘Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy’, in Political Studies, 51(1), pp. 180-196, 2003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00419
_________: Deliberating in the real world. Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
Petrović, Tanja: YUROPA Jugoslovensko nasleđe i politike budućnosti u postjugoslovenskim društvima, Beograd: Edicija REČ, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
Pešić, Vesna: Serbian nationalism and the origins of the Yugoslav Crisis, in Peaceworks, No.8, Washington: United States Institute of Peace, 1996. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Posner, Eric/Vermeule, Adrian: ‘Demystifying Schmitt’, working paper in Public law and legal theory working papers, No.333, University of Chicago, 2011. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Przeworski, Adam: ‘Deliberation and ideological domination’, in Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005.008
Ramet, Sabrina P.: Thinking about Yugoslavia. Scholarly debates about the Yugoslav breakup and the Wars in Bosnia and Kosovo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
Reese-Schäfer, Walter: ‘Jürgen Habermas i deliberativna demokracija’, trans. Tomislav Martinović, in Politička misao, 41(4), pp. 3-21, 2004. Web. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81349-7_5
Roche, Mark Wiliam: Tragedy and comedy: A systematic study and a critique of Hegel. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Introduction to Hegel’s theory of tragedy’, in PhaenEx, 1(2), pp. 11-20, 2006. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph: The philosophy of art, ed., trans. and Introduction, Douglas W. Stott, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989. Google Scholar öffnen
Scheuerman, William: Carl Schmitt: the end of law, Lanham, Boulder, New York and Oxford: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
Schmitt, Carl: Constitutional theory, trans. and ed. by Jeffrey Seitzer, Forward by Ellen Kennedy, Durham and London: Duke University Press: 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589-031
_________: Political romanticism, trans. Guy Oakes, Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 1986. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: State, movement, people: The triadic structure of the political unity (1933) and The question of legality (1950), ed., trans. and Preface by Simona Dragichi, Corvallis: Plutarch Press, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Legality and legitimacy, ed. and trans. Jeffrey Seitzer with an introduction by John P. McCormick, Durham&London: Duke University Press, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The crisis of parliamentary democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy, Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of Jus Publicum Europaeum, trans. and annotations G. L. Ulmen, New York: Telos Press Publishing, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: The concept of the political, expanded ed., trans., Introduction and notes by George Schwab, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: Political theology. Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty, trans. Schwab, Foreword by Tracy B. Strong, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘Jews in Jurisprudence’, text in Das Judentum in der Rechtswissenschaft Band: Die deutsche Rechtswissenschaft im Kampf gegen den juedischen Geist, trans. Tomislav Sunić. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: https://archive.org/stream/CarlSchmittsjewsInJurisprudence/CarlSchmittsJewsInJurisprudence_djvu.txt Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘The age of neutralization and depoliticizations’, trans. Matthias Konzen and John P. McCormick, in Schmitt, The concept of the political, expanded edition, trans., Introduction and notes by George Schwab, pp. 80-96, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
_________: ‘The guardian of the Constitution’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 79-173, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.005
_________: ‘Closing statement before Staatsgerichtshof in Leipzig’. Translation in Vinx (ed.), The guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, pp. 222-227, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.007
Schmitt, Carl/Kojève, Alexandre: ‘Alexandre Kojève – Carl Schmitt correspondence and Alexandre Kojève ‘Colonialism from a European perspective’’, ed. and trans. Erik De Vries, in Interpretation, 29(1), pp. 91-130, 2001, Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Seitzer, Jeffrey/Thornhill, Christopher: ‘An Introduction to Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional Theory: Issues and Context’, in Schmitt, Constitutional theory, trans. and ed. by Jeffrey Seitzer, Forward by Ellen Kennedy, Durham and London: Duke University Press: 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589-001
Sjöholm, Cecilia: ‘Naked Life; Arendt and the exile at Colonus’, in S. E. Wilmer and Audrone Zukauskaite (eds.), Interrogating Antigone in postmodern philosophy and criticism, pp. 48-66, Oxford: University Press, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559213.003.0003
Sophocles: Antigone Google Scholar öffnen
Stern, Robert: Hegel and the ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’, Routledge, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
Stolzenberg, Jürgen: ‘Hermann Cohen’s theoretical philosophy’, in Makkreel and Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in contemporary philosophy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
Strauss, Leo: ‘Notes on the concept of the political’, in Schmitt, The concept of the political, expanded edition, trans., Introduction and notes by George Schwab, pp. 97-117, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738840.001.0001
Szondi, Peter: An essay on the tragic, trans. Paul Fleming, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
Šarčević, Abdulah: ‘Afterwords’, in Theodor W. Adorno, Tri studije o Hegelu, pp. 139-181, trans. Aleksa Buha, Sarajevo: IP ‘Veselin Masleša, 1972. Google Scholar öffnen
The Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1974 in Snežana Trifunovska (ed.), Yugoslavia through documents: From its creation to its dissolution, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994. Google Scholar öffnen
The Constitution of the Weimar Republic, in ‘Apendix’ to Schmitt, Constitutional theory, pp. 409-440, trans. and ed. by Jeffrey Seitzer, Durham and London: Duke University Press: 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589-028
Theunissen, Michael: ‘The repressed intersubjectivity in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right’, in Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David Carlson (eds.), Hegel and Legal Theory, pp. 3-64, London: Routledge, dig. print., 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
Tindemans, Klaas: ‘Antigone and the law: Legal theory and the ambiguities of performance’, in S. E. Wilmer and Audrone Zukauskaite (eds.) Interrogating Antigone in postmodern philosophy and criticism, pp. 185-193, Oxford: University Press, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559213.003.0011
Tuori, Kaarlo: Ration and voluntas: the tension between reason and will in law, London and New York: Routledge, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen
Vinx, Lars: The guardian of the constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen
Weber, Max: Protestantska etika i duh kapitalizma [original title: Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus], trans. Tamara Božić, Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
Williams, Robert R.: Hegel’s ethics of recognition, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
White, Stephen K.: The recent work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, justice & modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598265.001
White, Angela D.: ‘A Rawlsian idea of deliberative democracy’, in Electronic thesis and dissertation repository, number 357, 2001. Web. Google Scholar öffnen
Žižek, Slavoj/Đinđić, Zoran, ‘Interview’ in Dvogled [origanally published in Süddeutsche Zeitung, No. 34, 27. 08. 1999.], trans. B. Mikulić. Retrieved 04/03/2018 from: http://dvogled.rs/2013/03/slavoj-zizek-i-zoran-dindic-razgovor-27-08-1999/ Google Scholar öffnen