Cover des Buchs: Leniency Policies in the Prosecution of Economic Crimes and Corruption
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff

Leniency Policies in the Prosecution of Economic Crimes and Corruption

Consensual Justice and Search for Truth in Brazilian and German Law
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2021

Zusammenfassung

Die Arbeit beinhaltet eine kritische Untersuchung des Einsatzes der Kronzeugenregelung in Brasilien. Im Rahmen eines Rechtsvergleichs mit dem deutschen Recht sowie einer empirischen Analyse der brasilianischen Praxis wird gezeigt, wie der Gebrauch der Kronzeugenregelung grundlegende Garantien des brasilianischen Strafprozessrechts unterwandert. Unter Rückgriff auf wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Literatur werden zudem ernstzunehmende, negative Externalitäten festgestellt. Die Arbeit kommt zu dem Schluss, dass der Einsatz solcher Methoden einer Privatisierung des Ermittlungsverfahrens und der Strafverfolgung gleichkommt. Die Verknüpfung der Kronzeugenregelung mit dem Ideal einer „konsensualen Justiz“ wird abgelehnt.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7849-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2259-9
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht
Band
48
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
345
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 - 16 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Introduction 17 - 28 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  3. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Introduction
      1. a. Competition law
      2. b. Criminal law
      1. a. The negotiation dynamic: consensual arrangements, written agreements and informal communication
        1. i. Benefits: immunities and reduction of penalties
        2. ii. Duties: cooperation with the investigations
      3. c. Signing and fulfillment of the agreement
        1. i. Granting of benefits not provided for by law
        2. ii. Exact definition of imprisonment penalties
        3. iii. Package deals and “unified punishment”
        4. iv. The serving of imprisonment penalties in advance
      2. b. Contractual freedom, tailor-made arrangements and unique consensual solutions
        1. i. The binding effect of collaboration agreements: pacta sunt servanda in criminal procedure
        2. ii. The principle of “res inter alios acta” and the prohibition of legal challenges by third parties
    5. 5. Conclusion: a contractualist approach to collaboration agreements
  4. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Operation Car Wash
      1. a. Collective goods, diffuse losses
      2. b. Legitimate and sophisticated organizations
      3. c. Major impacts on social life
    4. 4. Storming the castle: macro-delinquency, consensual justice and public support for leniency policies
    5. 5. Conclusion: the will and the way for the practice of collaboration agreements
  5. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Introduction
      1. a. Detection of crimes and gathering of evidence
      2. b. Prevention of illegal activities
      1. a. Misrepresentation of facts: under- and over-cooperation
      2. b. The dark side of leniency: amnesty effect, recidivism and the need for limits
      3. c. Distortion of incentives for enforcement authorities: leniency over-reliance, statistical boost and the overheated market for cooperation
      4. d. Gaming the leniency system: repeated games, sophisticated agents and reverse exploitation
    4. 4. Conclusion: leniency revolution and leniency religion
  6. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Introduction
      1. a. Search for truth, compulsory prosecution and consent in the German tradition
      2. b. Development of the practice of negotiated judgments
      3. c. Judicial acknowledgement
      4. d. The legislative regulation of negotiated judgments
      5. e. The 2013 ruling of the German Constitutional Court
      1. a. Development
      2. b. Structure
      3. c. Scope of application: investigative emergencies
      4. d. Investigative achievements, essential contributions and positive balances
      5. e. Inside and outside cooperators: the issue of the connection requirement
        1. i. Negotiated judgments and crown-witness regulation: parallels and differences
        2. ii. Consent and search for truth: different answers to similar questions? Disenchantment and re-enchantment with truth-finding in criminal procedure
        1. i. The tension over the boundaries of the room for negotiation and the troublesome taming of negotiated judgments
        2. ii. Negative externalities and abstinence from the search for truth
        3. iii. The 2013 ruling of the German Federal Constitutional Court and the case-law of the U.S. Supreme Court: unnoticed virtues?
    5. 5. Conclusion
  7. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Introduction
      1. a. Collaboration agreements as exceptional tools for investigative emergencies
      2. b. Due process, search for truth and the chain of events in criminal procedure
      3. c. Separation of functions in criminal procedure: the return of the inquisitorial process?
      4. d. Investigative achievements, information asymmetry and the risks of forward purchases in the practice of collaboration agreements
      1. a. Triangular relationships, not bilateral transactions
      2. b. Collaboration agreements as mechanism of consensual justice? Disenchantment and reenchantment with truth-searching in criminal procedure
      3. c. Collaboration agreements as public-private partnerships and the privatization of official investigations
      4. d. Is there a Brazilian system of plea bargaining? Legal transplants, legal translations and legal counterfeits
      5. e. The contractual redesign of Brazilian criminal law
      1. a. Pacta sunt servanda or nemo dat quod non habet? The issue of the binding effect
      2. b. Negative externalities, private gains and social costs: the distorted use of collaboration agreements as hedging mechanisms
      3. c. The overheated cooperation market and the problem of monopoly of selection: a case for broad and in-depth judicial control of collaboration agreements
    5. 5. Conclusion: the contractualist approach from a comparative perspective
  8. Download Kapitel (PDF)
    1. 1. Introduction
      1. a. The right of third parties to question collaboration agreements in court: protection of individual rights and of the public interest
      2. b. The array of leniency benefits: a case for numerus clausus
      3. c. The guarantee of equal treatment and the bazaar of punishment
      4. d. Disclosure and confidentiality: cooperators as the monopolists of truth
      5. e. Advanced enforcement of penalties and the paradox of investigating what has already been determined
      6. f. Preparatory acts, the control of the negotiation process and the duty to register
      1. a. Collaboration agreements, the anti-corruption movement and the dynamic of “governing through crime”
      2. b. Under the law, above the law
      3. c. Investigative achievements, failures and the effectiveness discourse: collaboration religion?
      4. d. The symbiotic relationship between collaboration agreements and the Brazilian anti-corruption movement
    4. 4. Conclusion: a prosperous life for consensual mechanisms in Brazilian criminal justice
  9. Conclusion 319 - 322 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  10. Annex – List of collaboration agreements analyzed 323 - 326 Download Kapitel (PDF)
  11. References 327 - 345 Download Kapitel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (315)

  1. Acconcia A and others, ‘Accomplice Witnesses and Organized Crime: Theory and Evidence from Italy’ (2014) 116 Scandinavian Journal of Economics 1116 Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Agator M, ‘Iraq: Overview of Corruption and Anti-Corruption’ (2013) 374 U4 Expert Answer Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Alonso G de O, ‘A Colaboração Premiada e o Princípio “Nulla Poena Sine Judicio”’ (2018) XIV Revista Magister de Direito Penal e Processual Penal 71 Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Alschuler AW, ‘Plea Bargaining and Its History’ (1979) 13 Law & Society Review 211 Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Altenhain K, Dietmeier F and May M, Die Praxis Der Absprachen in Strafverfahren (Nomos 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Altenhain K, Dietmeier F and May M, Die Praxis Der Absprachen in Strafverfahren (Nomos 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Altenhain K and Haimerl M, ‘Die Gesetzliche Regelung Der Verständigung Im Strafverfahren – Eine Verweigerte Reform’ (2010) JZ 327 Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Alves JC, ‘Justiça Consensual e “Plea Bargaining”’ in Rodrigo Leite Ferreira et al Cabral (ed), Acordo de não persecução penal - Resolução 181/2017 do CNMP com as alterações feitas pela Res. 183/2018 (Juspodivm 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Anderson PL, Bolema TR and Geckil IK, ‘Damages in Anti¬trust Cases’ (2007) 2 Anti¬trust Damages - Anderson Economic Group Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Anselmo MA, ‘Colaboração Premiada Como Novo Paradigma Do Processo Penal Brasileiro’, Estudos em homenagem ao professor Sérgio Moro (Instituto Memória Editora 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Aras V, ‘Acordos Penais No Brasil: Uma Análise à Luz Do Direito Comparado’ in Rodrigo Leite Ferreira et al Cabral (ed), Acordo de não persecução penal - Resolução 181/2017 do CNMP com as alterações feitas pela Res. 183/2018 (Juspodivm 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Aubert C, Rey P and Kovacic WE, ‘The Impact of Leniency and Whistle-Blowing Programs on Cartels’ (2006) 24 International Journal of Industrial Organization 1241 Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Badaró GH, ‘A Colaboração Premiada: Meio de Prova, Meio de Obtenção de Prova Ou Um Novo Modelo de Justiça Penal Não Epistêmica?’ in Maria Thereza de Assis Moura and Pierpaolo Cruz Bottini (eds), Colaboração premiada (Revista dos Tribunais 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Bannenberg B, Korruption in Deutschland Und Ihre Strafrechtliche Kontrolle (Hermann Luchterhand 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Bar-Gill O and Gazal Ayal O, ‘Plea Bargains Only for the Guilty’ (2006) XLIX Journal of Law and Economics 353 Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Barbosa Bittar W, Delação Premiada: Direito Estrangeiro, Doutrina e Jurisprudência (Lumen Juris 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Barbot L, ‘Money Laundering: An International Challenge’ (1995) 3 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Barkow RE, ‘Institutional Design and the Policing of Prosecutors: Lessons from Administrative Law’ (2009) 61 Stanford Law Review 869 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Barroso LR, ‘Thirty Years of the Brazilian Constitution: The Republic That Is Yet to Be’ (2018) SSRN Electronic Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Beaton-Wells C, ‘Leniency Policies: Revolution or Religion?’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-cartel enforcement in a contemporary age: leniency policies (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Beaton-Wells CY, ‘Immunity for Cartel Conduct: Revolution or Religion? An Australian Case Study’ (2014) 2 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 126 Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Berman DA, ‘Foreword: Beyond Blakely and Booker: Pondering Modern Sentencing Process’ (2005) 95 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 653 Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Bersch K, Praça S and Taylor MM, ‘State Capacity, Bureaucratic Politicization, and Corruption in the Brazilian State’ (2017) 30 Governance 105 Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bibas S, ‘Judicial Fact-Finding and Sentence Enhancements in a World of Guilty Pleas’ (2001) 110 The Yale Law Journal 1097 Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Bibas S, ‘Harmonizing Substantive-Criminal-Law Values and Criminal Procedure: The Case of Alford and Nolo Contendere Pleas’ (2003) 88 Cornell Law Review 1361 Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Bigoni M and others, ‘Fines, Leniency, and Rewards in Antitrust’ (2012) 43 RAND Journal of Economics 368 Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Bigoni M and others, ‘Trust, Leniency, and Deterrence’ (2015) 31 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 663 Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Borrell J-R, Jiménez JL and Garcia C, ‘Evaluating Antitrust Leniency Programs’ (2014) 10 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 107 Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Bos I and Wandschneider F, ‘A Note on Cartel Ringleaders and the Corporate Leniency Programme’ (2013) 20 Applied Economics Letters 1100 Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Bottini PC, ‘A Homologação e a Sentença Na Colaboração Premiada Na Ótica Do STF’ in Maria Thereza de Assis Moura and Pierpaolo Cruz Bottini (eds), Colaboração premiada (Revista dos Tribunais 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Bottino T, ‘Colaboração Premiada E Incentivos À Cooperação No Processo Penal : Uma Análise Crítica Dos Acordos Firmados Na “ Operação Lava Jato ”’ (2016) 122 Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais 359 Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Breucker M and Engberding ROM, Die Kronzeugenregelung - Erfahrungen, Anwendungsfalle, Entwicklungen (Richard Boorberg Verlag 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Brodowski D, ‘Die Verfassungsrechtliche Legitimation Des US-Amerikanischen „plea Bargaining“ – Lehren Für Verfahrensabsprachen Nach § 257 c StPO?’ (2013) 124 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 733 Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Brüning J, ‘Die Einstellung Nach § 153a StPO – Moderner Ablasshandel Oder Ret¬tungs¬anker Der Justiz?’ (2015) 12 Strafrecht - Jugendstrafrecht – Kriminal¬prä¬ven¬tion in Wissenschaft und Praxis 125 Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Buccirossi P and Spagnolo G, ‘Leniency Policies and Illegal Transactions’ (2006) 90 Journal of Public Economics 1281 Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Buell SW, ‘Is the White Collar Offender Privileged?’ (2014) 63 Duke Law Journal 823 Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Burnier P and Fernandes VO, ‘The “Car Wash Operation” in Brazil and Its Challenges for Antitrust Bid Rigging Enforcement’ in Paulo Burner da Silveira and William Evan Kovacic (eds), Global Competition Enforcement: New Players, New Challenges (Kluwer 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Buzari A, Kronzeugenregelungen in Straf- Und Kartellrecht Unter Besonderer Berück¬sich¬ti¬gung Des § 46b StGB (Strafrecht in Forschung Und Praxis) (Verlag Dr Kovac 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Cairns JW, ‘Watson, Walton, and the History of Legal Transplants’ (2013) 41 The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 637 Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Callegari A and Linhares R, Colaboração premiada: lições práticas e téoricas de acordo com a jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal (Livraria do Advogado 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Calliari M and Guimarães DA, ‘Brazilian Cartel Enforcement: From Revolution to The Challenges of Consolidation’ (2011) 25 Antitrust Magazine 67 Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Canotilho JJG and Brandão N, ‘Colaboração Premiada e Auxílio Judiciário Em Matéria Penal: A Ordem Pública Como Obstáculo à Cooperação Com a Operação Lava Jato’ (2016) 146 Revista de Legislação e Jurisprudência 16 Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Carduck VJ, ‘Quo Vadis, German Criminal Justice System? The Future of Plea Bargaining in Germany’ The Future of Plea Bargaining in Germany’ (2013) Warwick School of Law Research Paper 2013-17, 1 <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316828> accessed 20 September 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Caruso A, ‘Leniency Programmes and Protection of Confidentiality: The Experience of the European Commission’ (2010) 1 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 453 Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Carvalho NO, A Delação Premiada No Brasil (Lumen Juris 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Carvalho S de, ‘Colaboração Premiada e Aplicação Da Pena: Garantias e Incertezas Dos Acordos Realizados Na Operação Lava Jato’ in Américo Bedê Júnior and Gabriel Silveira de Queirós Campos (eds), Sentenca criminal e aplicação da pena: ensaios sobre discricionariedade, individualização e proporcionalidade (Juspodivm 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Castro A and Ansari S, ‘Contextual “Readiness” for Institutional Work. A Study of the Fight Against Corruption in Brazil’ (2017) 26 Journal of Management Inquiry 351 Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Castro MF de, ‘Abrenuntio Satanae! A Colaboração Premiada Na Lei No 12.850/2013: Um Novo Paradigma de Sistema Penal Contratual?’ (2018) Revista de Estudos Criminais 171 Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Cavali MC, ‘Duas Faces Da Colaboração Premiada: Visões “Conservadora” e “Arrojada” Do Instituto Na Lei 12.850/2013’ in Maria Thereza de Assis Moura and Pierpaolo Cruz Bottini (eds), Colaboração premiada (Revista dos Tribunais 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Cavazotte F, Cohen M and Brunelli M, ‘Business Ethics in Brazil: Analyzing Discourse and Practice of the Brazilian Contractors Involved in Operation Lava Jato’ in Christopher Stehr, Nina Dziatzko and Franziska Struve (eds), Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil (Springer, Cham 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Centonze F, ‘Public-Private Partnerships and Agency Problems: The Use of Incentives in Strategies to Combat Corruption’ in Springer International (ed), Preventing Corporate Corruption (Springer International Publishing 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Cheesman SJ, ‘Comparative Perspectives on Plea Bargaining in Germany and the U.S.A.’ (2014) <https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/7457/file/S113-151_aiup02.pdf> accessed 18 July 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Choi JP and Gerlach H, ‘Global Cartels, Leniency Programs and International Anti¬trust Cooperation’ (2012) 30 International Journal of Industrial Organization 528 Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Christoph S, Der Kronzeuge Im Strafgesetzbuch: Die Ermittlungshilfe Gemäß § 46b StGB Aus Dogmatischer Und Empirischer Perspektive (Nomos 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Colombo G, ‘Investigating and Prosecuting Large-Scale Corruption: The Italian Experience’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice 510 Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Cooter R and Freedman BJ, ‘The Fiduciary Relationship: Its Economic Character and Legal Consequences’ (1991) 66 New York University Law Review 1045 Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Crijns JH, Dubelaar MJ and Pitcher KM, Collaboration with Justice in the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Canada (Universiteit Leiden 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Dallagnol D and Pozzobon R, ‘Ações e Reações No Esforço Contra a Corrupção No Brasil’ in Maria Cristina Pinotti (ed), Corrupção: Lava Jato e Mãos Limpas (Portfolio-Penguin 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Damaska M, ‘Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure’ (1975) 84 The Yale Law Journal 480 Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Damaska M, ‘Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1018 Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Damaška M, ‘The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 839 Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Damaška M, ‘‘Symposium on Guilty Plea Part I: The Theoretical Background Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1018 Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Davies S and De O, ‘Ringleaders in Larger Number Asymmetric Cartels’ (2013) 123 Economic Journal 524 Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Davis E. K, Between Impunity and Imperialism: The Regulation of Transnational Bribery (Oxford 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  65. De Almeida MA and Zagaris B, ‘Political Capture in the Petrobras Corruption Scandal: The Sad Tale of an Oil Giant’ (2015) 39 The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 87 Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Deal D, ‘Aus Der Praxis. Der Strafprozessuale Vergleich’ (1982) Strafverteidiger 545 Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Dell’Osso V, ‘Empirical Features of International Bribery Practice: Evidence from Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Actions’ in Stefano Manacorda, Francesco Centonze and Gabrio Forti (eds), Preventing corporate corruption: the anti-bribery compliance model (Springer International Publishing 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  68. DeMarzo PM and Duffie D, ‘Corporate Incentives for Hedging and Hedge Accounting’ (1995) 8 The Review of Financial Studies 743 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Didier Jr. F and Bomfim D, ‘Colaboração Premiada (Lei n.12850/13): natureza jurídica e controle da validade por demanda autônoma – um diálogo com o Direito Processual Civil’ (2016) 7 Civil Procedure Review 135 Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Dino N, ‘A Colaboração Premiada Na Improbidade Administrativa: Possibilidade e Repercussão Probatória’ in Daniel de Resende Salgado and Ronaldo Pinheiro de Queiroz (eds), A prova no enfrentamento à macrocriminalidade (Juspodivm 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Dixon M and Kate E, ‘Too Much of a Good Thing? Is Heavy Reliance on Leniency Eroding Cartel Enforcement in the United States?’ (2014) 12 CPI Antitrust Chronicle 2 Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Dorfman A, ‘Property and Collective Undertaking: The Principle of Numerus Clausus’ (2011) 61 University of Toronto Law Journal 467 Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Dubber MD, ‘American Plea Bargains, German Lay Judges, and the Crisis of Criminal Procedure’ (1997) 49 Stanford Law Review 547 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Dubber MD and Hörnle T, Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Ellis CJ and Wilson WW, ‘What Doesn’t Kill Us Makes Us Stronger: An Analysis of Corporate Leniency Policy’ 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Engelhart M, ‘Development and Status of Economic Criminal Law in Germany’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 693 Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Estellita H, ‘A Delação Premiada Para a Identificação Dos Demais Coautores Ou Partícipes: Algumas Reflexões à Luz Do Devido Processo Legal’ (2009) 17 Boletim IBCCRIM 2 Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Ewald W, ‘Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants’ (1995) 43 The American Journal of Comparative Law 489 Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Fauvarque-Cosson B and others, European Contract Law: Materials for a Common Frame of Reference: Terminology, Guiding Principles, Model Rules (Sellier European Law Publishers 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Federal MP, ‘10 Medidas Contra Corrupção’ (Apoiadores, 2016) <http://www.dezmedidas.mpf.mp.br/campanha/apoiadores> accessed 17 July 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Feess E and Walzl M, ‘Quid-pro-Quo or Winner-Takes-It-All? An Analysis of Corporate Leniency Programs and Lessons to Learn for US and EU Policies’ (2005) METEOR Research Memorandum 059, Maastricht University School of Business and Economics <https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/portal/files/1144059/guid-89205720-706f-4ddb-89a8-3aa1e71508f8-ASSET1.0> accessed 18 June 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Fernandes AS, ‘O Equilíbrio Entre a Eficiência E O Garantismo E O Crime Organizado’ in Denise Provasi Vaz and others (eds), Eficiência e garantismo no processo penal, vol 70 (LiberArs 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Fernandes MCP, Contratos: Eficácia e Relatividade Nas Coligações Contratuais (Saraiva 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Findlay M, Governing through Globalised Crime: Futures for International Criminal Justice (Routledge 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  85. First H, ‘Branch Office of the Prosecutor: The New Role of the Corporation in Business Crime Prosecutions’ (2010) 89 North Carolina Law Review 23 Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Fischer D, ‘Em Busca Da Aplicação Correta e Justa Das Penas Perdidas: O Caos Decorrentes de Um Sistema Anacrônico e Repetitivo de “Precedentes-Ementas”’ in Américo Bedê Júnior and Gabriel Silveira de Queirós Campos (eds), Sentença criminal e aplicação da pena: ensaios sobre discricionariedade, individualização e proporcionalidade (Juspodivm 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Fissé B, ‘Reconditioning Corporate Leniency: The Possibility of Making Compliance Programmes a Condition of Immunity’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Fleischer D, ‘Political Corruption in Brazil: The Delicate Connection with Campaign Finance’ (1996) 25 Crime, Law and Social Change 297 Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Fogelklou A, ‘“The Regional Ombudsman as a Western (Swedish) Legal Transplant: ”, : Experiences from the Legislative Process in St. Petersburg’ (2003) 13, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 537 Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Fonseca CBG da, Colaboração Premiada (Del Rey 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Forrester IS and Berghe P, ‘Leniency: The Poisoned Chalice or the Pot at the End of the Rainbow?’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: Leniency Policies (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Frahm LN, Die Allgemeine Kronzeugenregelung: Dogmatische Probleme Und Rechtspraxis Des § 46b StGB (Duncker & Humblot 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Friederiszick HW and Maier-Rigaud FP, ‘Triggering Inspections Ex Officio: Moving beyond a Passive EU Cartel Policy’ (2008) 4 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 89 Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Fudenberg D and Maskin E, ‘The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information’ (1986) 54 Econometrica 533 Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Fundenberg D and Maskin E, ‘American Economic Association Evolution and Cooperation in Noisy Repeated Games’ (1990) 80 The American Economic Review 274 Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Fyfe N and Sheptycki J, ‘International Trends in the Facilitation of Witness Co-Operation in Organized Crime Cases’ (2006) 3 European Journal of Criminology 319 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Gambaro A, ‘Abuse of Rights in Civil Law Tradition’ (1995) 3 European Review of Private Law 561 Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Gambetta D and Reuter P, ‘Conspiracy among the Many: The Mafia in Legitimate Industries’ in Gianluca Fiorentini and Sam Peltzman (eds), The Economics of Organised Crime (Cambridge University Press 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Garoupa N and Ogus A, ‘A Strategic Interpretation of Legal Transplants’ (2006) 35 Journal of Legal Studies 339 Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Geller PE, ‘Legal Transplants in International Copyright: Some Problemas of Method’ (1994) 13 UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 199 Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Gifford DG, ‘Meaningful Reform of a Plea Bargaining: The Control of Prosecutorial Discretion’ (1983) University of Illinois Law Review 37 Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Goddin G, ‘The Pfleiderer Judgment on Transparency: The National Sequel of the Access to Document Saga’ (2012) 3 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 40 Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Gomes LF and Cervini R, Crime Organizado - Enfoques Criminológicos, Jurídicos (Lei 9.034/95) e Político-Criminal (Revista dos Tribunais 1997) Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Goodrich HF, ‘Privity of Contract and Tort Liability’ (1922) 21 Michigan Law Review 200 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Greco L, ‘„Fortgeleiteter Schmerz“ – Überlegungen Zum Verhältnis von Pro¬zess¬ab¬sprache, Wahrheitsermittlung Und Prozessstruktur’ (2016) 1 Goltdammer’s Ar¬chiv für Strafrecht 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Greco L, ‘Annäherungen an Eine Theorie Der Korruption’ (2016) 163 Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht 249 Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Greco L and Caracas C, ‘Internal Investigations Und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit’ (2015) 7 NStZ 7 Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Greco L and Leite A, ‘Die „Rezeption“ Der Tat- Und Organisationsherrschaft Im Brasilianischen Wirtschaftsstrafrecht’ (2014) 6 ZIS - Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtdogmatik 285 Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Greco L, Strafprozesstheorie Und Materielle Rechtskraft (Duncker & Humblot 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Greco L, ‘Reflexões Provisórias Sobre o Crime de Enriquecimento Ilícito’ in Alaor Leite and Adriano Teixeira (eds), Crime e política: corrupção, financiamento irregular de partidos políticos, caixa dois eleitoral e enriquecimento ilícito. (FGV Editora 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Greenblum BM, ‘What Happens to a Prosecution Deferred? Judicial Oversight of Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreements’ (2005) 105 Columbia Law Review 1863 Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Hagopian F, ‘Delegative Democracy Revisited Brazil’ s Accountability Paradox’ (2016) 27 Journal of Democracy 119 Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Halberstam M, ‘Towards Neutral Principles in the Administration of Criminal Justice: A Critique of Supreme Court Decisions Sanctioning the Plea Bargaining Process’ (1982) 73 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Hammond SD, ‘Detecting and Deterring Cartel Activity through an Effective Leniency Program’, International Workshop on Cartels (DOJ 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Hammond SD, ‘Cornerstones of an Effective Cartel Leniency Programme’ (2008) 4 Competition Law International 4 Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Harding C, Beaton-Wells C and Edwards J, ‘Leniency and Criminal Sanctions in Anti-Cartel Enforcement: Happily Married or Uneasy Bedfellows?’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-cartel enforcement in a contemporary age: leniency policies (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Harrington JE and Chang MH, ‘When Can We Expect a Corporate Leniency Program to Result in Fewer Cartels?’ (2015) 58 Journal of Law and Economics 417 Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Harrington Jr. JE, ‘Optimal Corporate Leniency Programs’ (2008) 56 The Journal of Industrial Economics 215 Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Hart O, Shleifer A and Vishny RW, ‘The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons’ (1997) The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1127 Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Hassemer W, ‘Kronzeugenregelung Bei Terroristischen Straftaten Thesen Zu Art. 3 Des Entwurfs Eines Gesetzes Zur Bekämpfung Des Terrorismus’ (1986) 550 StrafVert Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Hassemer W, ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda - Auch Im Strafprozess?’ (1989) 11 Juristische Schulung 890 Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Hassemer W, ‘Kennzeichen Und Krisen Des Modernen Strafrechts’ (1992) 25 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 378 Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Hassemer W, ‘Konsens Im Strafprozeß’ in Regina Michalke and others (eds), Festschrift für Rainer Hamm zum 65. Geburtstag am 24. Februar 2008 (De Gruyter 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Hassemer W, ‘Human Dignity in the Criminal Process: The Example of Truth-Finding’ (2011) 44 Israel Law Review 185 Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Hefendehl R, Kollektive Rechtsgüter Im Strafrecht (Carl Heymanns Verlag KG 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Hefendehl R, ‘Das Rechtsgut Als Materialer Angelpunkt Einer Strafnorm’, Die Rechts¬guts¬theorie: Legitimationsbasis des Strafrechts oder dogmatisches Glasperlenspiel? (Nomos 2003) Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Hefendehl R, ‘Enron, WorldCom, and the Consequences: Business Criminal Law Between Doctrinal Requirements and the Hopes of Crime Policy’ (2004) 8 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 51 Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Hefendehl R, ‘Enron, Worldcom Und Die Folgen: Das Wirtschaftsstrafrecht Zwischen Erfordernissen Kriminalpolitischen Erwartungen Und Dogmatischen E¬rfor¬der¬nis¬sen’ (2004) 59 JuristenZeitung 18 Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Hefendehl R, ‘Außerstrafrechtliche Und Strafrechtliche Instrumentarien Zur Eindämmung Der Wirtschaftskriminalität’ (2007) 119 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Straf¬rechts¬wis¬sen¬schaft 816 Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Hefendehl R, ‘Addressing White Collar Crime on a Domestic Level’ (2010) 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice 769 Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Hefendehl R, ‘Corporate Governance Und Business Ethics: Scheinberuhigung Oder Alternativen Bei Der Bekämpfung Der Wirtschaftskriminalität?’ (2016) 61 JuristenZeitung 119 Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Heger M, ‘Adversarial and Inquisitorial Elements in the Criminal Justice Systems of European Countries as a Challenge for the Europeanization of the Criminal Procedure’, in: BSU Law Faculty (ed.), Criminal proceeding based on the rule of law as the means to ensure human rights (Publishing Centre of BSU Minsk 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Heger M and Pest R, ‘Verständigungen Im Strafverfahren Nach Dem Urteil Des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’ (2014) 126 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 446 Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Heger M and Kutter-Lang H, Strafprozessrecht (Verlag W. Kohlhammer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Henderson J V., ‘Externalities in a Spatial Context. The Case of Air Pollution’ (1977) 7 Journal of Public Economics 89 Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Herre J and Rasch A, The Deterrence Effect of Excluding Ringleaders from Leniency Programs (University of Cologne 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Herrman J, ‘Bargaining Justice - A Bargain for German Criminal Justice?’ (1991) 53 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 755 Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Hesch M, ‘The Effects of Ringleader Discrimination on Cartel Stability and Deterrence - Experimental Insights’ (2012) 3 Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 9 Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Hessick III FA and Saujani RM, ‘Plea Bargaining and Convicting the Innocent: The Role of the Prosecutor, the Defense Counsel, and the Judge’ (2002) 16 Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 189 Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Hornle T, ‘Unterschiede Zwischen Strafverfahrensordnungen Und Ihre Kultu¬rel¬len Hintergründe’ (2006) 117 Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Straf¬rechts¬wis¬sen¬schaft 801 Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Hörnle T, ‘Die Vermögensstrafe: Ein Beispiel Für Die Unorganisierten Konse¬quen¬zen von Gesetz- Geberischen Anstrengungen Zur Bekämpfung Organisierter Kri¬mi¬na¬li¬tät’ (1996) 108 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 333 Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Hörnle T, ‘“Justice and Fairness”: Ein Modell Auch Für Das Strafverfahren?’ (2004) 35 Rechtstheorie 175 Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Hovenkamp H, The Antitrust Enterprise (Harvard University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Hoyer A, ‘Die Figur Des Kronzeugen: Dogmatische, Verfahrensrechtliche Und Kri¬mi¬nal¬politische Aspekte’ (1994) 49 JuristenZeitung 233 Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Hughes G, ‘Agreements for Cooperation in Criminal Cases’ (1992) 45 Vanderbilt Law Review 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  146. ICN, ‘Anti-Cartel Enforcement Manual’ (2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Issacharoff S and Karlan PS, ‘The Hydraulics of Campaign Finance Reform’ (2009) 77 Texas Law Review 1705 Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Jaeger M, ‘Der Kronzeuge Unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung von § 31 BtMG’ (Peter Lang 1986) Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Jahn M and Müller M, ‘Das Gesetz Zur Regelung Der Verständigung Im Strafverfahren – Legitimation Und Reglementierung Der Absprachenpraxis’ (2009) 62 Neue juristische Wochenschrift 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Janot R, ‘The Lessons of Car Wash’ (2018) Americas Quarterly <https://www.americasquarterly.org/content/lessons-car-wash> accessed 23 July 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Jaspers JD, ‘Managing Cartels: How Cartel Participants Create Stability in the Absence of Law’ (2017) 23 European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 319 Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Jeßberger F, Kooperation Und Strafzumessung: Der Kronzeuge Im Deutschen Und Amerikanischen Strafrecht (Duncker & Humblot GmbH 1999) Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Jeßberger F, ‘Nulla Poena Quamvis in Culpa: Ammerkungen Zur Kronzeugenregelung in § 46StGB’ in Christian Fahl and others (eds), Festschrift für Werner Beulke (C F Müller 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Jessel-Holst C, Kulms R and Trunk A, Private Law in Eastern Europe Autonomous Developments or Legal Transplants? (Mohr Siebeck 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Jul M and Pdf H, ‘PART I : THE THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Negotiated Justice in International Criminal Courts’ (2015) 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1018 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Jung H, ‘Der Kronzeuge – Garant Der Wahrheitsfindung Oder Instrument Der Überführung?’ (1986) 19 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 38 Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Justice D of, ‘Odebrecht and Braskem Plead Guilty and Agree to Pay at Least $3.5 Billion in Global Penalties to Resolve Largest Foreign Bribery Case in History’ (Department of Justice, 21 December 2016) <https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/odebrecht-and-braskem-plead-guilty-and-agree-pay-least-35-billion-global-penalties-resolve> accessed 1 October 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Kaspar J, ‘Stellungnahme Zum „Entwurf Eines…Strafrechtsänderungsgesetzes – Be¬schrän¬kung Der Möglichkeit Zur Strafmilderung Bei Aufklärungs- Und Prä¬ven¬tions¬hilfe“ (BT-Drucks. 17/9695)’ (2012) 86135 Augsburg 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Katz J, ‘Legality and Equality: Plea Bargaining in the Prosecution of White-Collar and Common Crimes’ (1979) 13 Law & Society Review 431 Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Kempf E, ‘Gesetzliche Regelung von Absprachen Im Strafverfahren? Oder: Soll In¬for¬mel¬les Formalisiert Werden?’ (2009) StV 269 Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Klijn EH and Teisman GR, ‘Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public-Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases’ (2003) 23 Public Money and Management 137 Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Kloub J, ‘Leniency as the Most Effective Tool in Combating Cartels’ (Latin American Competition Forum 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Kneba N, Die Kronzeugenregelung Des § 46 b StGB (Duncker 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Knizhnik S, ‘Failed Snitches and Sentencing Stitches: Substantial Assistance and the Cooperator’s Dilemma’ (2015) 90 New York University Law Review 1722 Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Kobayashi BH, ‘Antitrust, Agency, and Amnesty: An Economic Analysis of the Criminal Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws against Corporations’ (2001) 69 The George Washington Law Review 715 Google Scholar öffnen
  166. König S and Fassung G, ‘Kronzeuge – Abschaffen Oder Regulieren ?’ (2012) Strafverteidiger 113 Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Körner HH, ‘Der Aufklärungsgehilfe Nach § 31 BtMG’ (1984) Strafverteidiger 217 Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Kovacic WE, ‘A Case for Capping the Dosage: Leniency and Competition Authority Governance’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-cartel enforcement in a contemporary age: leniency policies (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Kulms R, ‘Optimistic Normativism after Two Decades of Legal Transplants and Autonomous Developments’, Private Law in Eastern Europe: Autonomous Developments or Legal Transplants? (Mohr Siebeck 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Kurtenbach S and Nolte D, ‘Latin America’s Fight against Corruption: The End of Impunity’ (2017) 3 GIGA Focus Latin America Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Labs K, Die Strafrechtliche Kronzeugenregelung - Legitimation Einer Rechtlichen Grauzone? (Tectum Wissenschaftsverlag 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Lambsdorff JG, ‘Causes and Consequences of Corruption: What Do We Know from a Cross-Section of Countries?’ in Susan Rose-Ackerman (ed), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption (Edward Elgar 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Lampe K von, ‘Bekämpfung Der Organisierten Kriminalität’ (2010) 3 SIAK-Journal − Zeitschrift für Polizeiwissenschaft und polizeiliche Praxis 50 Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Langbein JH, ‘Land without Plea Bargaining: How the Germans Do It’ (1979) 78 Michigan Law Review 204 Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Langer M, ‘From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure’ (2004) 45 Harvard International Law Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Legrand P, ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’ (1997) 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 111 Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Leite A and Teixeira A, Crime e Política (FGV Editora 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Lejeune S, ‘Brauchen Wir Eine Kronzeugenregelung Zur Verfolgung von Kor¬rup¬tions¬fällen?’ in Transparency International (ed), Korruption in Deutschland: Straf¬ver¬folgung der Korruption Möglichkeinten und Grenzen (2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Lenza P, Reis ACA and Gonçalves VER, Direito Processual Penal Esquematizado, vol 2014 (Saraiva 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Leslie CR, ‘Trust, Distrust and Antitrust’ (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 515 Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Leslie CR, ‘Antitrust Amnesty, Game Theory, and Cartel Stability’ (2006) 31 The Journal of Corporation Law 453 Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Levenstein M and Suslow VY, ‘Contemporary International Cartels and Developing Countries: Economic Effects and Implications for Competition Policy’ (2004) 71 Antitrust Law Journal 801 Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Lewin P, ‘Pollution Externalities: Social Cost and Strict Liability’ (1982) 2 Cato Journ1al 205 Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Li Q and others, ‘Buy Now and Price Later: Supply Contracts with Time-Consistent Mean–Variance Financial Hedging’ (2018) 268 European Journal of Operational Research 582 Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Lima RB de, Legislação Criminal Especial Comentada (Juspodivm 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Lima MB, ‘A Colaboração Premiada Como Instrumento Constitucionalmente Legítimo de Auxílio à Atividade Estatal de Persecução Criminal’ in Bruno Calabrich, Douglas Fischer and Eduardo Pelella (eds), Garantismo penal integral: questões penais e processuais, criminalidade moderna e a aplicação do modelo garantista no Brasil (Juspodivm 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Lindemann M, ‘Staatlich Organisierte Anonymität Als Ermittlungsmethode Bei Korruptions- Und Wirtschaftsdelikten’ (2006) 39 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 127 Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Lindner W, ‘Korruptionsbekämpfung Im Anonymen Dialog. Ein Webbasiertes Hinweisgebersystem Im Einsatz Bei Der Zentralstelle Korruptionsbekämpfung Des LKA Niedersachsens’ in Transparency International (ed), Korruption in Deutschland: Strafverfolgung der Korruption Möglichkeiten und Grenzen (allprintmedia 2004) Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Linhares AAM and Fidelis AL, ‘Nearly 16 Years of the Leniency Program in Brazil : Breakthroughs and Challenges in Cartel Prosecution’ (2016) 3 Antitrust Chronicle 39 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Luz RD and Spagnolo G, ‘Leniency, Collusion, Corruption, and Whistleblowing’ (2017) 13 Journal of Competition Law & Economics 729 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Maffei S, ‘Negotiations “on Evidence” and Negotiations “on Sentence”: Adversarial Experiments in Italian Criminal Procedure’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice 1050 Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Malek K, ‘Die Neue Kronzeugenregelung Und Ihre Auswirkungen Auf Die Praxis Der Strafverteidigung’ (2010) StV 200 Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Malek K, ‘Abschied von Der Wahrheitssuche’ (2011) StV 559 Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Markesinis BS, Unberath H and Johnston A, The German Law of Contract : A Comparative Treatise (Hart Publishing 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Marques ASP, ‘A Colaboração Premiada: Um Braço Da Justiça Penal Negociada’ (2014) 10 Revista Magister de Direito Penal e Processual Penal 32 Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Martín AN, ‘Internal Investigations, Whistle-Blowing, and Cooperation: The Struggle for Information in the Criminal Process’ in Stefano Manacorda, Francesco Centonze and Gabrio Forti (eds), Preventing Corporate Corruption (Springer 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Martinez AP, ‘Challenges Ahead of Leniency Programmes: The Brazilian Experience’ (2015) 6 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 260 Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Marvão C, ‘The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism’ (2016) 48 Review of Industrial Organization 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Marvão C, ‘The EU Leniency Programme and Recidivism’ (2016) 48 Review of Industrial Organization 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Marvão C and Spagnolo G, ‘What Do We Know about the Effectiveness of Leniency Policies? A Survey of the Empirical and Experimental Evidence’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-cartel enforcement in a contemporary age: leniency policies (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Masson C and Marçal V, Crime Organizado (Método 2006) Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Medinger JD, ‘Antitrust Leniency Programs: A Call for Increased Harmonization as Proliferating Programs Undermine Deterrence’ (2003) 52 Emory Law Journal 1439 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Mehrens S, Die Kronzeugenregelung Als Instrument Zur Bekämpfung Organisierter Kriminalität: Ein Beitrag Zur Deutsch-Italienischen Strafprozessrechtsvergleichung (Max-Planck-Institut 2001) Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Mello E and Spektor M, ‘Brazil: The Costs of Multiparty Presidentialism’ (2018) 29 Journal of Democracy 113 Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Melo MA, ‘Crisis and Integrity in Brazil’ (2016) 27 Journal of Democracy 50 Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Mendonça AB de, ‘Os Benefícios Possíveis Na Colaboração Premiada: Entre a Legalidade e a Autonomia Da Vontade’ in Maria Thereza de Assis Moura and Pierpaolo Cruz Bottini (eds), Colaboração premiada (Revista dos Tribunais 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Merrill TW and Smith HE, ‘Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle’ (2000) 110 Yale Law Journal 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Miller NH, ‘Strategic Leniency and Cartel Enforcement’ (2009) 99 American Economic Association 750 Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Ministério Público Federal, ‘Colaboração Premiada – Caso Lava Jato’ <http://www.mpf.mp.br/para-o-cidadao/caso-lava-jato/atuacao-na-1a-instancia/investigacao/colaboracao-premiada> accessed 28 September 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Ministério Público Federal, ‘Relatório de Resultados Do Procurador-Geral Da República: Diálogo, Unidade, Transparência, Profissionalismo, Efetividade: 2015-2017’ (2017) <http://www.mpf.mp.br/conheca-o-mpf/gestao-estrategica-e-modernizacao-do-mpf/sobre/publicacoes/pdf/relatorio-gestao-pgr-2015-2017.pdf> accessed 28 September 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Ministério Público Federal, ‘Orientação Conjunta No 1/2018: Acordos de Colaboração Premiada’ (2018) <http://www.mpf.mp.br/atuacao-tematica/ccr5/orientacoes/orientacao-conjunta-no-1-2018.pdf> accessed 28 September 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Miriam Prelle, ‘Opportunität Und Konsens: Verfahrensförmige Norm¬sus¬pen¬die¬rung Als Hilfe Für Die Überlast Im Kriminaljustizsystem?’ (2011) 94 Kriti¬sche Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft 331 Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Misner RL, ‘Recasting Prosecutorial Discretion’ (1996) 86 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Mistelis L, ‘Regulatory Aspects: Globalization, Harmonization, Legal Transplants, and Law Reform - Some Fundamental Observations’ (2000) 34 International Lawyer 1055 Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Moro SF, ‘Preventing Systemic Corruption in Brazil’ (2018) 147 Daedalus 157 Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Moss D, ‘The Gift of Repentance: A Maussian Perspective on Twenty Years of Pentimento in Italy’ (2001) 42 Archives Europeennes de Sociologie 297 Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Motchenkova E, ‘Effects of Leniency Programs on Cartel Stability’ (2004) Discussion Paper 2004–98 Center for Economic Research Tilburg University Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Motta M and Polo M, ‘Leniency Programs and Cartel Prosecution’ (2003) 21 International Journal of Industrial Organization 347 Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Mulligan C, ‘A Numerus Clausus Principle for Intellectual Property’ (2012) 80 SSRN Electronic Journal 235 Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Musco E, ‘Los Colaboradores de La Justicia Entre El Pentitismo y La Calumnia: Problemas y Perspectivas’ (1998) 2 Revista Penal 35 Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Mushoff T, ‘Die Renaissance Der Kronzeugenregelung’ (2007) 90 Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft 366 Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Nachbar JH, ‘Prediction, Optimization, and Learning in Repeated Games’ (1997) 65 Econometrica 275 Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Nagel S, Entwicklung Und Effektivität Internationaler Maßnahmen Zur Korruptionsbekämpfung (Nomos 2007) Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Naucke W, Der Begriff Der Politischen Wirtschaftsstraftat (LIT 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Neira Pena AM, ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: Tool or Obstacle to Prosecution?’ in Dominik Brodowski and others (eds), Regulating corporate criminal liability (Springer 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Nunes F and Melo CR, ‘Impeachment, Political Crisis and Democracy in Brazil’ (2017) 37 Revista de ciencia política 281 Google Scholar öffnen
  227. O’Brien A, ‘Leadership of Leniency’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-cartel enforcement in a contemporary age: leniency policies (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  228. OECD, Brazil - Peer Review of Competition Law and Policy 2005 (OECD 2005) Google Scholar öffnen
  229. OECD, ‘Fighting Hard-Core Cartels: Harm, Effective Sanctions and Leniency Programmes’ (OECD 2002) Google Scholar öffnen
  230. OECD, Competition Law and Policy in Brazil - a Peer Review (OECD IDB 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  231. OECD, ‘Leniency for Subsequent Applicants’ (OECD 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  232. OECD, ‘Use of Markers in Leniency Programs’ (Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement, 2014) <http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DAF/COMP/WP3(2014)9&doclanguage=en> accessed 4 March 2019 Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Pacelli E, Curso de Processo Penal, vol 53 (Atlas 2013) Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Paoli L, ‘Mafia and Organised Crime in Italy: The Unacknowledged Successes of Law Enforcement’ (2007) 30 West European Politics 854 Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Peglau J, ‘Überlegungen Zur Schaffung Neuer „Kronzeugenregelungen“’ (2001) 34 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 103 Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Pereira FV, ‘Compatibilização Constitucional Da Colaboração Premiada’ (2013) Revista CEJ 84 Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Pereira FV, Delação Premiada: Legitimidade e Procedimento (Juruá Editora 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Peters J, Urteilsabsprachen Im Strafprozess: Die Deutsche Regelung Im Vergleich Mit Entwicklungen in England & Wales, Frankreich Und Polen (Universitätsverlag 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Pieth M, ‘The Harmonization of Law Against Economic Crime’ (2013) 1 European Journal of Law Reform 527 Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Pinotti MC, ‘Corrupção, Instituições e Estagnação Econômica: Brasil e Itália’ in Maria Cristina Pinotti (ed), Corrupção: Lava Jato e Mãos Limpas (Portfolio-Penguin 2019) Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Pizzi WT, ‘Sentencing in the US: An Inquisitorial Soul in an Adversarial Body?’ in John Jackson, Máximo Langer and Peter Tillers (eds), Crime, procedure and evidence in a comparative and international context (Hart Publishing 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Polo M, ‘Internal Cohesion and Competition among Criminal Organisations’ in Gianluca Fiorentini and Sam Peltzman (eds), The Economics of Organised Crime (Cambridge University Press 1995) Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Prado MM and Carson L, ‘Corruption Scandals, the Evolution of Anti-Corruption Institutions, and Their Impact on Brazil’s Economy’ in Edmund Amann, Carlos R Azzoni and Werner Baer Print (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Brazilian Economy (Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Mosbacher A, ‘Praktische Auswirkungen Der Entscheidung Des BVerfG Zur Verständigung’ (2013) 2 BvR 201 Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Rabe P, Das Verständigungsurteil Des Bundesverfassungsgerichts Und Die Notwendigkeit von Reformen Im Strafprozess (Mohr Siebeck 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Ribeiro DC, Cordeiro N and Guimarães DA, ‘Interface between the Brazilian Antitrust, Anti-Corruption, and Criminal Organization Laws: The Leniency Agreements’ (2016) 22 Law and Business Review of the Americas 195 Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Richter H, ‘Zur Wirtschaftskriminalität’ in Christian Müller-Gugenberger and Klaus Bieneck (eds), Wirtschafts-strafrecht: Handbuch des Wirtschaftsstraf- und -ordnungswidrigkeitenrechts (Verlag Dr Otto Schmidt Koln 2011) Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Rödl F, ‘Contractual Freedom, Contractual Justice, and Contract Law (Theory)’ (2013) 76 Law and contemporary problems 57 Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Rodrigues Jr. OL, ‘A doutrina do terceiro cúmplice: autonomia da vontade, o princípio res inter alios acta, função social do contrato e a interferência alheia na execução dos negócios jurídicos’ (2004) 821 Revista dos Tribunais 80 Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Rosa AM da, ‘A Aplicação Da Pena Na Justiça Negocia: A Questão Da Vinculação Do Juiz Aos Temos Da Delação’, Sentença criminal e aplicação da pena: ensaios sobre discricionariedade, individualização e proporcionalidade (Juspodivm 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Roxin C and Schünemann B, Strafverfahrensrecht: Ein Studienbuch (29th edn, CHBeck 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Salditt F, ‘Allgemeine Honorierung Besonderer Aufklärungshilfe’ (2009) Straf¬ver¬tei¬di¬ger 375 Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Sarmento D, ‘Colaboração Premiada. Competência Do Relator Para Homologação e Limites à Sua Revisão Judicial Posterior. Proteção à Confiança, Princípio Acusatório e Proporcionalidade’, Direitos, democracia e República: escritos de direito constitucional (Fórum 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Schemmel A, Corell C and Richter N, ‘Plea Bargaining in Criminal Proceedings: Changes to Criminal Defense Counsel Practice as a Result of the German Constitutional Court Verdict of 19 March 2013?’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 43 Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Schiefler GHC, Diálogos Público-Privados: Da Opacidade à Visibilidade Na Administração Pública (Universidade de São Paulo 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Schinkel MP, ‘Forensic Economics in Competition Law Enforcement’ (2008) 4 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Schlüchter E, ‘Erweiterte Kronzeugenregelung?’ (1997) 30 Zeitschrift für Rechts¬politik 65 Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Schünemann B, ‘Die Verständigung Im Strafprozeß – Wunderwaffe Oder Bank¬rot⁠t¬erklärung Der Verteidigung?’ (1989) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1895 Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Schünemann B, ‘Gutachten, Kongressvortrag, Aufsatz | Absprachen Im Strafverfahren – Grund-la¬gen, Gegenstande Und Grenzen’ (1990) Deutscher Juristentag 58 b12 Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Schünemann B, ‘Zur Kritik Des Amerikanischen Strafprozessmodells’ in Edda Wesslau and Wolfgang Wohlers (eds), Festschrift für Gerhard Fezer zum 70. Geburtstag am 29. Oktober 2008 (De Gruyter 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Schünemann B, ‘Wohin Treibt Der Deutsche Strafprozess?’ (2009) 114 Zeitschrift für die ge-sam¬te Strafrechtswissenschaft 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Schünemann B, ‘Die Zukunft Des Strafverfahrens – Abschied Vom Rechtsstaat?’ (2007) 119 ZStW 945 Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Schünemann B, ‘Vom Unterschichts- Zum Oberschichtsstrafrecht: Ein Paradigmawechsel Im Moralischen Anspruch?’ in Hans-Heiner Kühne and Koichi Miyazawa (eds), Alte Strafrechtsstrukturen und neue gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen in Japan und Deutschland (Duncker unb Humblot 2000) Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Shapiro SP, ‘Thinking about White Collar Crime: Matters of Conceptualization and Research’ (1980) US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Shapiro SP, ‘Collaring the Crime, Not the Criminal: Reconsidering the Concept of White-Collar Crime’ (1990) 55 American Sociological Review 346 Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Shavell S, ‘Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship’ (1979) 10 The Bell Journal of Economics 55 Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Silveira FAM, ‘O Papel Do Juiz Na Homologação Do Acordo de Colaboração Premiada’ (2018) 17 Revistas de Estudos Criminais 107 Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Simon J, Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, vol 12 (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Simon J ´Governing Through Crime Metaphors´, (2002) 67 Brooklyn Law Review 1035 Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Smith CW and Stulz RM, ‘The Determinants of Firms’ Hedging Policies’ (1985) 20 The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 391 Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Smith R, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, vol 157 (Crown Business 2012) Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Souza AJG de, ‘Colaboração Premiada: A Necessidade de Controle Dos Atos de Negociação’ (2017) 25 Boletim IBCCRIM 12 Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Spagnolo G, ‘Leniency and Whistleblowers in Antitrust’ in Paolo Buccirossi (ed), Handbook of Antitrust Economics (The MIT Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Spratling GR, ‘Detection and Deterrence: Rewarding Informants for Reporting Violations’ (2001) 69 George Washington Law Review 798 Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Stephan A, ‘An Empirical Assessment of the European Leniency Notice’ (2008) 5 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 537 Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Stephan A and Nikpay A, ‘Leniency Decision-Making from a Corporate Perspective: Complex Realities’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: Leniency Policies (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Stoffer H, Wie Viel Privatisierung „verträgt“ Das Strasfprozessuale Ermittlungsverfahren? (Mohr Siebeck 2016) Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Strang RR, ‘Plea Bargaining, Cooperation Agreements and Immunity Orders.’(2014) 155th International Training Course Visiting Experts’ Papers Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Stucke ME, ‘Leniency, Whistle-Blowing and the Individual: Should We Create Another Race to the Competition Agency?’ in Caron Beaton-Wells and Christopher Tran (eds), Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age : Leniency Religion (Hart Publishing 2015) Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Swenson T, ‘The German “Plea Bargaining” Debate’ (1995) 7 Pace International Law Review 373 Google Scholar öffnen
  281. Tak PJP, ‘Deals with Criminals: Supergrasses, Crown Witnesses and Pentiti’ (1997) 5 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 2 Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Teubner G, ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies’ (2003) 61 The Modern Law Review 11 Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Thaman SC, ‘Plea-Bargaining , Negotiating Confessions and Consensual Resolution of Criminal Cases’ (2007) 113 Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Tiedemann K, ‘Der Entwurf Eines Ersteu Gesetzes Zur Bekämpfung Der Wirt¬schafts¬kriminalität’ (1975) 87 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Straf¬rechts¬wis¬sen¬schaft 253 Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Tourinho M, ‘Brazil in the Global Anticorruption Regime’ (2018) 61 Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 1 Google Scholar öffnen
  286. UNCTAD, ‘The Use of Leniency Programmes as a Tool for the Enforcement of Competition Law against Hardcore Cartels in Developing Countries’, Sixth United Nations conference to review all aspects of the set of multilaterally agreed equitable principles and rules for the control of restrictive business practices (UNCTAD 2010) Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Vasconcellos VG de, Colaboração Premiada No Processo Penal (Revista dos Tribunais 2018) Google Scholar öffnen
  288. Vasconcellos VG de, Barganha e Justiça Criminal Negocial : Análise Das Tendências de Expansão Dos Espaços de Consenso No Processo Penal Brasileiro (Editora IBCCRIM 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Vaughan D, ‘The Dark Side of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, and Disaster’ (1999) 25 Annual Review of Sociology 271 Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Vogel J, ‘How to Determine Individual Criminal Responsibility in Systemic Contexts: Twelve Models’ (2002) Cahiers de Défense Sociale 151 Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Vogel J, ‘Chancen Und Risiken Einer Reform Des Strafrechtlichen Ermittlungs¬ver¬fah¬rens’ (2004) 59 JuristenZeitung 827 Google Scholar öffnen
  292. von Lampe K and Ole Johansen P, ‘Organized Crime and Trust: On the Conceptualization and Empirical Relevance of Trust in the Context of Criminal Networks’ (2004) 6 Global Crime 159 Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Watson A, Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, vol 27 (Univesity of Georgia Press 1975) Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Watson A, ‘From Legal Transplants to Legal Formats’ (1995) 43 The American Journal of Comparative Law Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Weigend T, ‘Abgesprochene Gerechtigkeit — Effizienz Durch Kooperation Im Straf¬ver¬fahren?’ (1990) 45 JuristenZeitung 774 Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Weigend T, Absprachen in Ausländischen Strafverfahren: Eine Rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung Zu Konsensualen Elementen Im Strafprozess (Eigenverl Max-Planck-Inst für ausländisches und internat Strafrecht 1990) Google Scholar öffnen
  297. Weigend T, ‘Das „ Opportunitätsprinzip " Zwischen Einzelfallgerechtigkeit Und Systemeffizienz’ (1997) 109 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 103 Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Weigend T, ‘Unverzichtbares Im Strafverfahrensrecht’ (2001) 113 Zeitschrift für die ge¬sam¬te Strafrechtswissenschaft 271 Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Weigend T, ‘Neues Zur Verständigung Im Deutschen Strafverfahren?’ in Leblois-Happe, Jocelyne/Stuckenberg and Carl-Friedrich (eds), Was wird aus der Hauptverhandlung? Quel avenir pour l’audience de jugement? (Boon University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Weigend T, ‘The Decay of the Inquisitorial Ideal: Plea Bargaining Invades German Criminal Procedure’ in John Jackson and others (eds), Crime, Procedure and Evidence in a Comparative and International Context (Hart Publishing 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Weigend T and Turner JI, ‘The Constitutionality of Negotiated Criminal Judgments in Germany’ (2014) 15 German Law Journal 81 Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Weinstein I, ‘Regulating the Market for Snitches’ (1999) 47 Buffalo Law Review 563 Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Weir JA, ‘Contract - Rights of Third Persons under Contracts to Which They Are Not Parties’ (1943) 5 Alberta Law Quarterly 77 Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Weßlau E, ‘Waffengleichheit Mit Dem »Organisierten Verbrechen«? Zu Den Rechts¬staat¬lichen Und Bürgerrechtlichen Kosten Eines Anti-OK-Sonder¬rechts¬sys¬tems’ (1997) 80 Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechts¬wis¬sen¬schaft (KritV) 238 Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Weßlau E, ‘Wahrheit Und Legenden: Die Debatte Über Den Adversatorischen Straf¬pro¬zess’ (2014) 191 Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 558 Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Wheeler S and Rothman ML, ‘The Organization as Weapon in White-Collar Crime’ (1982) 80 Michigan Law Review 1403 Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Whitman J, ‘No Right Answer’ in John Jackson, Máximo Langer and Peter Tillers (eds), Crime, procedure and evidence in a comparative and international context: essays in honour of professor Mirjan Damaska (Hart Publishing 2008) Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Wieling HJ, ‘Venire Contra Factum Proprium Und Verschulden Gegen Sich S⁠e⁠l⁠b⁠s⁠t⁠’ (1976) 176 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 334 Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Wiener JB, ‘Something Borrowed for Something Blue: Legal Transplants and the Evolution of Global Environmental Law’ (2001) 27 Ecology Law Quarterly 1295 Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Wils WPJ, ‘Leniency in Antitrust Enforcement: Theory and Practice’ (2007) 24 Conferences on New Political Economy 203 Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Wils WPJ, ‘Recidivism in EU Antitrust Enforcement: A Legal and Economic Analysis’ (2012) 35 World Competition 5 Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Wils WPJ, ‘The Use of Leniency in EU Cartel Enforcement: An Assessment after Twenty Years’ (2016) 39 World Competition: Law and Economics Review 327 Google Scholar öffnen
  313. Winter B, ‘Brazil’s Never-Ending Corruption Crisis Why Radical Transparency Is the Only Fix’ (2017) 96 Foreign Affairs 87 Google Scholar öffnen
  314. Wunderlich A, ‘Colaboração Premiada: O Direito à Impugnação de Cláusulas e Decisões Judiciais Atinentes Aos Acordos’ in Maria Thereza de Assis Moura and Pierpaolo Cruz Bottini (eds), Colaboração premiada (Revista dos Tribunais 2017) Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Zimmermann A, ‘How Brazilian Judges Undermine the Rule of Law: A Critical Appraisal’ (2008) 11 International Trade and Business Law Review 179 Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Strafrecht & Kriminologie"
Cover des Buchs: Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Stefan Holzmaier
Das erlangte Etwas bei Steuerstraftaten
Cover des Buchs: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Cover des Buchs: Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Patricia Magdalena Labussek
Überobligatorische Compliance als Risiko strafrechtlicher Haftung
Cover des Buchs: Covid e impatto della pandemia sul diritto
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Esther Happacher, Margareth Helfer, Francesco A. Schurr
Covid e impatto della pandemia sul diritto
Cover des Buchs: Kriminologie
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Frank Neubacher
Kriminologie

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex