Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Der Schutz der Privatsphäre vor staatlichen Überwachungsmaßnahmen durch die US-amerikanische Bundesverfassung

Eine Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Schutzes der Privatsphäre in der Öffentlichkeit
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2014

Zusammenfassung

Schon seit „Boyd v. United States“ (1886) verheißt der 4. Verfassungszusatz US-Bürgern Schutz vor staatlichen Eingriffen in „the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life“. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht Ursprünge und dogmatische Entwicklung des hieraus abgeleiteten „right to privacy“ und zeigt auf, warum der 4. Verfassungszusatz der staatlichen Überwachungstätigkeit (insbesondere) in der Öffentlichkeit dennoch bis heute kein stimmiges Schutzkonzept und keine wirksame Garantie der individuellen Privatsphäre entgegenhalten kann. Hierbei stützt sie sich auf eine gründliche Analyse des Normtexts und seiner Entstehungsgeschichte, behandelt verschiedene amerikanische Privatheitskonzepte und erörtert funktionale und vor allem politische Einflüsse auf die Rechtsprechung.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2014
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1021-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5223-0
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Materialien zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Medien- und Informationsforschung
Band
72
Sprache
Deutsch
Seiten
876
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 26
    1. Einleitung Kein Zugriff 27 - 34
    2. Die US-Verfassung als mögliche Quelle des Privatsphärenschutzes Kein Zugriff 35 - 49
    1. Das „right to privacy“ als Ausdruck eines allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechts? Kein Zugriff 50 - 60
    2. Entstehung und Inhalt der „reasonable expectation of privacy“-Formel: Vom Besitzschutz zum Schutz der Privatsphäre? Kein Zugriff 61 - 145
    3. Entscheidungsmaßstäbe der Rechtsprechung jenseits der „reasonable expectation of privacy”-Formel Kein Zugriff 146 - 283
    4. Unbeachtliche Faktoren Kein Zugriff 284 - 328
    5. Das Privatheitsverständnis des Supreme Court bei der Auslegung des Vierten Verfassungszusatzes Kein Zugriff 329 - 369
    1. Wortlaut des Vierten Verfassungszusatzes Kein Zugriff 370 - 394
    2. Entstehungsgeschichte des Vierten Verfassungszusatzes Kein Zugriff 395 - 442
    3. Grundlegend anderes Privatheitsverständnis in der US-amerikanischen Gesellschaft? Kein Zugriff 443 - 525
    4. Prägung der Schutzbereichsrechtsprechung durch das Rechtfertigungsregime Kein Zugriff 526 - 639
    5. Prägung der Schutzbereichsrechtsprechung durch die „exclusionary rule“ Kein Zugriff 640 - 701
    6. Aushöhlung des verfassungsrechtlichen Schutzes der Privatsphäre als Folge gezielter politischer Beeinflussung der Besetzung des Supreme Court Kein Zugriff 702 - 785
    1. Fazit: Weitgehende Erosion des „right to privacy“ als Folge einer gezielten Einflussnahme auf die Gerichtsbesetzung Kein Zugriff 786 - 802
    2. Ausblick: Auswirkungen des Fehlens verfassungsrechtlicher Mindeststandards am Beispiel der staatlichen Videoüberwachung in der Öffentlichkeit Kein Zugriff 803 - 812
  6. Literaturverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 813 - 862
  7. Sachverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 863 - 876

Literaturverzeichnis (784)

  1. Abramowicz, Michael: Constitutional Circularity, UCLA Law Review 49 (2001), S. 1– 90. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Abril, Patricia S.: Recasting Privacy Protection Torts in a Spaceless World, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 21 (2007), S. 1–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Adler, Michael: Cyberspace, General Searches, and Digital Contraband: The Fourth Amendment and the Net-Wide Search, Yale Law Journal 105 (1996), S. 1093– 1120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/797247
  4. Alschuler, Albert W.: Failed Pragmatism: Reflections on the Burger Court, Harvard Law Review 100 (1987), S. 1436–1456. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1341167
  5. Alschuler, Albert W.: The Exclusionary Rule and Causation: Hudson v. Michigan and Its Ancestors, Iowa Law Review 93 (2008), S. 1741–1817. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Alschuler, Albert W.: Herring v. United States: A Minnow or a Shark?, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 7 (2009), S. 463–513. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Amar, Akhil R.: The Bill of Rights as a Constitution, Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), S. 1131–1210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/796690
  8. Amar, Akhil R.: Fourth Amendment First Principles, Harvard Law Review 107 (1994), S. 757–818. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1341994
  9. Amar, Akhil R.: The Fourth Amendment, Boston, and the Writs of Assistance, Suffolk University Law Review 30 (1996), S. 53–80. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Amsterdam, Anthony G.: The Supreme Court and the Rights of Suspects in Criminal Cases, New York University Law Review 45 (1970), S. 785–815. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Amsterdam, Anthony G.: Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment, Minnesota Law Review 58 (1974), S. 349–477. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Angell, Robert: California v. Acevedo and the Shrinking Fourth Amendment, Capital University Law Review 21 (1992), S. 707–734. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Arbus, Melissa: A Legal U-Turn: The Rehnquist Court Changes Direction and Steers Back to the Privacy Norms of the Warren Era, Virginia Law Review 89 (2003), S. 1729–1777. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3202362
  14. Arcila, Fabio JR.: In the Trenches: Searches and the Misunderstood Common-Law History of Suspicion and Probable Cause, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (2007), S. 1–63. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Aronov, Rita F.: Privacy in a Public Setting: The Constitutionality of Street Surveillance, Quinnipiac Law Review 22 (2004), S. 769–810. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Arzt, Clemens: Polizeiliche Eingriffsbefugnisse in den USA, Die Polizei 2004, S. 71– 78. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Arzt, Clemens: Data Protection Versus Fourth Amendment Privacy: A New Approach Towards Police Search and Seizure, Criminal Law Forum 16 (2005), S. 183– 230. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10609-005-4143-9
  18. Ashdown, Gerald G.: The Fourth Amendment and the 'Legitimate Expectation of Privacy', Vanderbilt Law Review 34 (1981), S. 1289–1345. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Ashdown, Gerald G.: Drugs, Ideology, and the Deconstitutionalization of Criminal Procedure, West Virginia Law Review 95 (1992), S. 1–54. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Ashdown, Gerald G.: The Blueing of America: The Bridge between the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism, University of Pittsburgh Law Review 67 (2006), S. 753–802. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2006.54
  21. Aynes, Richard L.: Katz and the Fourth Amendment: A Reasonable Expectation of Privacy or, A Man's Home Is His Fort, Cleveland State Law Review 23 (1974), S. 63–89. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Bacigal, Ronald J.: Making the Right Gamble: The Odds on Probable Cause, Mississippi Law Journal 74 (2004), S. 279–340. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Balkin, Jack M. / Levinson, Sanford: The Processes of Constitutional Change: From Partisan Entrenchment to the National Surveillance State, Fordham Law Review 75 (2006), S. 489–535. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bar-Gill, Oren / Friedman, Barry: Taking Warrants Seriously, Northwestern University Law Review 106 (2012), S. 1609–1674. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Barnett, Randy E.: An Originalism for Nonoriginalists, Loyola Law Review 45 (1999), S. 611–654. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Bascuas, Ricardo J.: Property and Probable Cause: The Fourth Amendment's Principled Protection of Privacy, Rutgers Law Review 60 (2008), S. 575–645. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Beaney, William M.: The Constitutional Right to Privacy in the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Review 1962 (1962), S. 212–251. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Belair, Robert R. / Bock, Charles D.: Police Use of Remote Camera Systems for Surveillance of Public Streets, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 4 (1972), S. 143–202. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Bellin, Jeffrey: Crime-Severity Distinctions and the Fourth Amendment: Reassessing Reasonableness in a Changing World, Iowa Law Review 97 (2011), S. 1–48. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Bender, Eric D.: The Fourth Amendment in the Age of Aerial Surveillance: Curtains for the Curtilage?, New York University Law Review 60 1985, S. 725–760. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Benner, Laurence A.: Diminishing Expectations of Privacy in the Rehnquist Court, John Marshall Law Review 22 (1989), S. 825–876. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Benner, Laurence A. / Hartman, Marshall J. / Singer, Shelvin R. / Lyon, Andrea D. / Albert-Goldberg, Nancy: Criminal Justice in the Supreme Court: An Analysis of United States Supreme Court Criminal Court and Habeas Corpus Decisions, California Western Law Review 38 (2001), S. 87–188. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Berner, Bruce G.: The Supreme Court and the Fall of the Fourth Amendment, Valparaiso University Law Review 25 (1991), S. 383–405. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Bignami, Francesca: European Versus American Liberty: A Comparative Privacy Analysis of Antiterrorism Data Mining, Boston College Law Review 48 (2007), S. 609–698. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Bleich, Jeff / Powell, Daniel / Feinberg, Aimee / Friedland, Michelle: Justice John Paul Stevens: A Maverick, Liberal, Libertarian, Conservative Statesman on the Court, Oregon State Bar Bulletin 67-Oct (2007), S. 26–31. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Blitz, Marc J.: Video Surveillance and the Constitution of Public Space: Fitting the Fourth Amendment to a World that Tracks Image and Identity, Texas Law Review 82 (2004), S. 1349. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Bloustein, Edward J.: Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser, New York University Law Review 39 (1964), S. 962–1007. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Blumenthal, Jeremy A. / Adya, Meera / Mogle, Jacqueline: The Multiple Dimensions of Privacy: Testing Lay 'Expectations of Privacy', University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 11 (2009), S. 331–373. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bookspan, Phyllis T.: Reworking the Warrant Requirement: Resuscitating the Fourth Amendment, Vanderbilt Law Review 44 (1991), S. 473–530. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Borchard, Edwin M.: Government Liability in Tort, Yale Law Journal 34 (1924), S. 1– 45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/788496
  41. Bork, Robert H.: Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems, Indiana Law Journal 47 (1971), S. 1–35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2199294
  42. Boxbaum, Edward M.: Florida v. Brady: Can Katz Survive In Open Fields?, American University Law Review 32 (1983), S. 921–943. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Bradford, C. S.: Following Dead Precedent: The Supreme Court's Ill-Advised Rejection of Anticipatory Overruling, Fordham Law Review 59 (1990), S. 39– 90. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Bradley, Craig M.: Two Models of the Fourth Amendment, Michigan Law Review 83 (1985), S. 1468–1501. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1288896
  45. Bradley, Craig M.: Criminal Procedure in the Rehnquist Court: Has the Rehnquisition Begun?, Indiana Law Journal 62 (1987), S. 273–294. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Bradley, Gerard V.: The Constitutional Theory of the Fourth Amendment, DePaul Law Review 39 (1989), S. 817–872. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Braswell, Mark K. / Scheb, John M. II.: Conservative Pragmatism Versus Liberal Principles: Warren E. Burger on the Supression of Evidence, 1956 - 1986, Creighton Law Review 20 (1987), S. 789–831. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Bratman, Benjamin E.: Brandeis and Warren's 'The Right to Privacy' and the Birth of the Right to Privacy, Tennessee Law Review 69 (2002), S. 623–651. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Brenner, Susan W. / Frederiksen, Barbara A.: Computer Searches and Seizures: Some Unresolved Issues, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 8 (2002), S. 39–114. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Breyer, Stephen: Our Democratic Constitution, New York University Law Review 77 (2002), S. 245–272. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Broeder, Dale W.: The Decline and Fall of Wolf v. Colorado, Nebraska Law Review 41 (1961), S. 185–219. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Brown, Jeremy: Pan, Tilt, Zoom: Regulating the Use of Video Surveillance of Public Places, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 23 (2008), S. 755–781. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Brugger, Winfried: Der grundrechtliche Schutz der Privatsphäre in den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, Archiv des Öffentlichen Rechts 108 (1983), S. 25–67. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Brugger, Winfried: Vom Rehnquist Court zum Roberts und Alito Court. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Ein konservativer Wendepunkt im U.S. Supreme Court?, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 66 (2006), S. 415–434. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Büllesbach, Alfred / Garstka, Hans-Jürgen: Meilensteine auf dem Weg zu einer datenschutzgerechten Gesellschaft, Computer und Recht 2005, S. 720–724. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.9785/ovs-cr-2005-720
  57. Burbank, Stephen B.: Alternative Career Resolution II: Changing the Tenure of Supreme Court Justices, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154 (2006), S. 1511–1550. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/40041346
  58. Burbules, Nicolas C.: Privacy, Surveillance and Classroom Communication on the Internet, Access 16 [1] (1997), S. 42–50. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Burger, Warren E.: Who Will Watch the Watchman?, American University Law Review 14 (1964), S. 1–23. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Burrows, Quentin: Scowl Because Your're on Candid Camera: Privacy and Video Surveillance, Valparaiso University Law Review 31 (1997), S. 1079–1138. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Burten, Courtney: Unwarranted! Privacy in a Technological Age: The Fourth Amendment Difficulty in Protecting Against Warrantless GPS Tracking and the Substantive Due Process and First Amendment Boost, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 21 (2012), S. 359–402. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Butterfoss, Edwin J.: A Suspicionless Search and Seizure Quagmire: The Supreme Court Revives the Pretext Doctrine and Creates Another Fine Fourth Amendment Mess, Creighton Law Review 40 (2007), S. 419–496. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Calabresi, Guido: The Exclusionary Rule, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 26 (2003), S. 111–118. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Caminker, Evan H.: Why Must Inferior Courts Obey Superior Court Precedents?, Stanford Law Review 46 (1994), S. 817–873. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Casey, Timothy: Electronic Surveillance and the Right to Be Secure, U.C. Davis Law Review 41 (2008), S. 977–1033. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Castiglione, John D.: Human Dignity Under the Fourth Amendment, Wisconsin Law Review 2008 (2008), S. 655–711. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Cate, Fred H.: The Changing Face of Privacy Protection in the European Union and the United States, Indiana Law Review 33 (1999), S. 173–232. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Cate, Fred H.: Government Data Mining: The Need for a Legal Framework, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 43 (2008), S. 435–489. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Chanenson, Steven L.: Get the Facts, Jack! Empirical Research and the Changing Constitutional Landscape of Consent Searches, Tennessee Law Review 71 (2004), S. 399–470. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Chemerinsky, Erwin: The Role of Prosecutors in Dealing with Police Abuse: The Lessons of Los Angeles, Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 8 (2001), S. 305–327. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Chen, Alan K.: Rosy Pictures and Renegade Officials: The Slow Death of Monroe v. Pape, UMKC Law Review 78 (2010), S. 889–929. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Cicchini, Michael D.: An Economics Perspective on the Exclusionary Rule and Deterrence, Missouri Law Review 75 (2010), S. 459–491. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Clancy, Thomas K.: What is a 'Search' Within the Meaning of the Fourth Amendment, Albany Law Review 70 (2006), S. 1–54. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Clancy, Thomas K.: The Fourth Amendment As a Collective Right, Texas Tech Law Review 43 (2010), S. 255–298. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Clancy, Thomas K.: The Framer's Intent: John Adams, His Era, and the Fourth Amendment, Indiana Law Journal 86 (2011), S. 979–1061. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Clancy, Thomas K: The Irrelevancy of the Fourth Amendment in the Roberts Court, Chicago-Kent Law Review 85 (2010), S. 191–208. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Clarke, Roger: Information Technology and Dataveillance, Communications of the ACM 31 (1988), S. 498–512, http://www.rogerclarke.com/DV/CACM88.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Clarke, Roger: While You Were Sleeping… Surveillance Technology Arrived, Australian Quarterly 73 [1] (2001), S. 10–14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/20637967
  79. Cloud, Morgan: Pragmatism, Positivism, and Principles in Fourth Amendment Theory, UCLA Law Review 41 (1993), S. 199–302. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Cloud, Morgan: Searching through History; Searching for History, University of Chicago Law Review 63 (1996), S. 1707–1747. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1600285
  81. Cloud, Morgan: Rube Goldberg Meets the Constitution: The Supreme Court, Technology and the Fourth Amendment, Mississippi Law Journal 72 (2002), S. 5–50. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Cloud, Morgan: A Liberal House Divided: How the Warren Court Dismantled the Fourth Amendment, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 3 (2005), S. 33–73. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Cloud, Morgan: A Conclusion in Search of a History to Support It, Texas Tech Law Review 43 (2010), S. 29–49. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Cohen, Julie E.: A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at 'Copyright Management' in Cyberspace, Connecticut Law Review 38 (1996), S. 981– 1058. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Cohen, Julie E.: Examined Lives: Informational Privacy and the Subject as Object, Stanford Law Review 52 (2000), S. 1373–1438. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1229517
  86. Colb, Sherry F.: Innocence, Privacy, and Targeting in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Columbia Law Review 96 (1996), S. 1456–1525. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1123325
  87. Colb, Sherry F.: The Qualitative Dimension of Fourth Amendment 'Reasonableness', Columbia Law Review 98 (1998), S. 1642–1725. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1123463
  88. Colb, Sherry F.: What is a Search? Two Conceptual Flaws in Fourth Amendment Doctrine and Some Hints of a Remedy, Stanford Law Review 55 (2002), S. 119–189. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1229591
  89. Colby, Thomas B.: The Sacrifice of the New Originalism, Georgetown Law Journal 99 (2011), S. 713–778. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Conom, Derek T.: Sense-enhancing Technology and the Search in the Wake of Kyllo v. United States: Will Prevalence Kill Privacy?, Willamette Law Review 41 (2005), S. 749–776. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Cordray, Richard A. / Vradelis, James T.: The Emerging Jurisprudence of Justice O'Connor, University of Chicago Law Review 52 (1985), S. 389–459. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1599664
  92. Covey, Russell D.: Pervasive Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment, Mississippi Law Journal 80 (2011), S. 1289–1318. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Craven, J. B. JR.: Personhood: The Right to Be Let Alone, Duke Law Journal (1976), S. 699–720. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1371935
  94. Crowther, Brandon T.: (Un)reasonable Expectation of Privacy, Brigham Young University Law Review 2012 (2012), S. 343–369. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Cuddihy, William J. / Hardy, B. C.: A Man's House Was Not His Castle: Origins of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, William and Mary Quarterly 37 (1980), S. 371–400. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1923809
  96. Cumberland, Emily C.: Originalism, In a Nutshell, Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society's Practice Groups 11 (2010), S. 52–55. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Davies, Thomas Y.: A Hard Look at What We Know (and Still Need to Learn) About the 'Costs' of the Exclusionary Rule: The NIJ Study and Other Studies of 'Lost' Arrests, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1983 (1983), S. 611–690. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1983.tb00887.x
  98. Davies, Thomas Y.: Recovering the Original Fourth Amendment, Michigan Law Review 98 (1999), S. 547–750. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1290314
  99. Davies, Thomas Y.: The Fictional Character of Law-and-Order Originalism: A Case Study of the Distortions and Evasions of Framing-Era Arrest Doctrine in Atwater v. Lago Vista, Wake Forest Law Review 37 (2002), S. 239–437. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Davies, Thomas Y.: An Account of Mapp v. Ohio That Misses the Larger Exclusionary Rule Story, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 4 (2007), S. 619–639. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Davies, Thomas Y.: The Supreme Court Giveth and the Supreme Court Taketh Away: The Century of Fourth Amendment 'Search and Seizure' Doctrine, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100 (2010), S. 933–1041. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Davies, Thomas Y.: Can You Handle the Truth? The Framers Preserved Common-Law Criminal Arrest and Search Rules in 'Due Process Of Law' - 'Fourth Amendment Reasonableness' is Only a Modern, Destructive, Judicial Myth, Texas Tech Law Review 43 (2010), S. 51–136. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. DeFilippis, Andrew J.: Securing Informationships: Recognizing a Right to Privity in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Yale Law Journal 115 (2006), S. 1086– 1121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/20455646
  104. DeGroat, Diane M.: When Students Test Positive, Their Privacy Fails: The Unconstitutionality of South Carolina's HIV/AIDS Reporting Requirement, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 17 (2009), S. 751–782. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Denniston, Lyle: Rehnquist to Roberts: The 'Reagan Revolution' Fulfilled?, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 155 (2007), S. 63–73. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Denvir, John: Justice Rehnquist and Constitutional Interpretation, Hastings Law Journal 34 (1983), S. 1011–1053. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Dery, George M. III: 'This Bitter Pill': The Supreme Court's Distaste for the Exclusionary Rule in Davis v. United States Makes Evidence Suppression Impossible to Swallow, George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal 23 (2012), S. 1–28. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Diggelmann, Oliver: Grundrechtsschutz der Privatheit, Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 70 (2011), S. 50–81. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. DiTullio, James E. / Schochet, John B.: Saving This Honorable Court: A Proposal to Replace Life Tenure on the Supreme Court with Staggered, Nonrenewable Eighteen-Years Terms, Virginia Law Review 90 (2004), S. 1093–1149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3202417
  110. Dodson, Robert D.: Ten Years of Randomized Jurisprudence: Amending the Special Needs Doctrine, South Carolina Law Review 51 (2000), S. 258–289. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Donohue, Laura K.: Anglo-American Privacy and Surveillance, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 96 (2006), S. 1059–1208. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Donohue, Laura K.: Technological Leap, Statutory Gap, and Constitutional Abyss: Remote Biometric Identification Comes of Age, Minnesota Law Review 97 (2012), S. 407–559. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Dorsen, Norman: John Marshall Harlan, Civil Liberties, and the Warren Court, New York Law School Law Review 36 (1991), S. 81–107. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Dripps, Donald A.: The Fourth Amendment and the Fallacy of Composition: Determinacy Versus Legitimacy in a Regime of Bright-Line Rules, Mississippi Law Journal 74 (2004), S. 341–421. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Dripps, Donald A.: Justice Harlan on Criminal Procedure: Two Cheers for the Legal Process School, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 3 (2005), S. 125–168. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Dripps, Donald A.: The Fourth Amendment, the Exclusionary Rule, and the Roberts Court: Normative and Empirical Dimensions of the Over-Deterrence Hypothesis, Chicago-Kent Law Review 85 (2010), S. 209–239. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Dripps, Donald A.: The 'New' Exclusionary Rule Debate: From 'Still Preoccupied with 1985' to 'Virtual Deterrence', Fordham International Law Journal 37 (2010), S. 743–801. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Dworkin, Roger B.: Fact Style Adjucation and the Fourth Amendment: The Limits of Lawyering, Indiana Law Journal 48 (1973), S. 329–368. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Dworkin, Ronald: Law's Ambition for Itself, Virginia Law Review 71 (1985), S. 173– 187. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Elfenbein, Donald: The Myth of Conservativism as a Constitutional Philosophy, Iowa Law Review 71 (1986), S. 401–488. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Emas, Kevin / Pallas, Tamara: United States v. Jones: Does Katz Still Have Nine Lives?, Saint Thomas Law Review 24 (2012), S. 116–168. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Epstein, Lee / Martin, Andrew D. / Quinn, Kevin M. / Segal, Jeffrey A.: The Bush Imprint on the Supreme Court: Why Conservatives Should Continue to Yearn and Liberals Should Not Fear, Tulsa Law Review 43 (2008), S. 651–671. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Evans-Pughe, Christine: Road Watch, Engineering & Technology 1 [4] (2006), S. 36– 39. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Feinberg, Joel: Autonomy, Souvereignty, and Privacy: Moral Ideals in the Constitution?, Notre Dame Law Review 58 (1983), S. 445–492. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Fisher, Gregory S.: Cracking Down on Soccer Moms and Other Urban Legends On the Frontier of the Fourth Amendment: Is It Finally Time to Re-define Searches and Seizures, Willamette Law Review 38 (2002), S. 137–185. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Flagg, Barbara J.: The Algebra of Pluralism: Subjective Experience as a Constitutional Variable, Vanderbilt Law Review 47 (1994), S. 273–338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3480937
  127. Floridi, Luciano: The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy, Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2005), S. 185–200. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0001-7
  128. Foley, Brian J.: Policing from the Gut: Anti-Intellectualism in American Criminal Procedure, Maryland Law Review 69 (2010), S. 261–343. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Foote, Caleb: Tort Remedies for Police Violations of Individual Rights, Minnesota Law Review 39 (1955), S. 493–516. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Foster, Bradley F.: Warrantless Aerial Surveillance and the Right to Privacy: The Flight of the Fourth Amendment, Journal of Air Law and Commerce 56 (1991), S. 719–763. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Fradella, Henry F. / Morrow, Weston J. / Fischer, Ryan G. / Ireland, Connie: Quantifying Katz: Empirically Measuring 'Reasonable Expectations Of Privacy' in the Fourth Amendment Context, American Journal of Criminal Law 38 (2011), S. 289–373. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Fried, Charles: Privacy, Yale Law Journal 77 (1968), S. 475–493. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/794941
  133. Fried, Charles: The Conservatism of Justice Harlan, New York Law School Law Review 36 (1991), S. 33–52. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Friedman, Barry: The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. Arizona), Georgetown Law Journal 99 (2010), S. 1–62. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Friendly, Henry J.: The Bill of Rights as a Code of Criminal Procedure, California Law Review 53 (1965), S. 929–956. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3478984
  136. Froh, Amanda S.: Rethinking Canine Sniffs: The Impact of Kyllo v. United States, Seattle University Law Review 26 (2002), S. 337–363. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Gallo, Jon J. / Robin, Kenneth D. / Mason, Stefan M. / Stabile, Gary D. / Meisinger, Louis M. / Wynne, Robert J.: The Consenting Adult Homosexual and the Law: An Empirical Study of Enforcement and Administration in Los Angeles County, UCLA Law Review 13 (1966), S. 643–832. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Gavison, Ruth: Privacy and the Limits of Law, Yale Law Journal 89 (1980), S. 421– 471. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/795891
  139. Gerety, Tom: Redefining Privacy, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 12 (1977), S. 233–296. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Gewirtz, Paul: The Pragmatic Passion of Stephen Breyer, Yale Law Journal 115 (2006), S. 1675–1698. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/20455665
  141. Gilbert, Helen L.: Minors' Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy, University of Chicago Law Review 74 (2007), S. 1375–1410. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/20141865
  142. Gilman, Michele E.: The Class Differential in Privacy Law, Brooklyn Law Review 77 (2012), S. 1389–1445. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2133916
  143. Ginsburg, Ruth B.: Tribute to Yale Kamisar, Michigan Law Review 102 (2004), S. 1673–1676. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4141955
  144. Ginsburg, Ruth B.: 'A Decent Respect to the Opinions of [Human]Kind': The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjucation, American Society of International Law Proceedings 99 (2005), S. 351–359. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Godkin, E.L: Libel and its Legal Remedy, Journal of Social Science 12 (1880), S. 69– 83. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Godkin, E.L: The Rights of the Citizen, IV. - To His Own Reputation, Scribner's Magazine 8 [1] (1890), S. 58–68. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Goldberg, Arthur J.: Escobedo and Miranda Revisited, Akron Law Review 18 (1984), S. 177–182. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Goldfoot, Josh: The Physical Computer and the Fourth Amendment, Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 16 (2011), S. 112–166. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Goldman, Stanley A.: Searching for the Fourth Amendment: Looking for Law in All the Wrong Cases, Search and Seizure Law Report 38 (2011), No. 2. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Goldstein, Joel K.: Leading the Court: Studies in Influence as Chief Justice, Stetson Law Review 40 (2011), S. 717–761. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Gordley, James: When is the Use of Foreign Law Possible? A Hard Case: The Protection of Privacy in Europe and the United States, Louisiana Law Review 67 (2007), S. 1073–1102. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Gottschall, Jon: Reagan's Appointments to the U.S. Courts of Appeals: The Continuation of a Judicial Revolution, Judicature 70 (1986), S. 48–54. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Granholm, Jennifer M.: Video Surveillance of Public Streets: The Constitutionality of Invisible Citizen Searches, University of Detroit Law Review 64 (1987), S. 687–713. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Grano, Joseph D.: Perplexing Questions About Three Basic Fourth Amendment Issues: Fourth Amendment Activity, Probable Cause and the Warrant Requirement, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 69 (1978), S. 425– 463. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Grano, Joseph D.: Rethinking the Fourth Amendment Warrant Requirement, American Criminal Law Review 19 (1982), S. 603–650. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Greenawalt, Kent: The Consent Problem in Wiretapping & Eavesdropping: Surreptitious Monitoring with the Consent of a Participant in a Conversation, Columbia Law Review 68 (1968), S. 189–240. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Greenhalgh, William W. / Yost, Mark J.: In Defense of the 'Per Se' Rule: Justice Stewart's Struggle to Preserve the Fourth Amendment's Warrant Clause, American Criminal Law Review 31 (1994), S. 1013–1098. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Greenhouse, Linda: Harry Blackmun, Independence and Path Dependence, Hastings Law Journal 56 (2005), S. 1235–1247. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Greer, Olivia J.: No Cause of Action: Video Surveillance in New York City, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 18 (2012), S. 589–626. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Gross, Hyman: The Concept of Privacy, New York University Law Review 42 (1967), S. 34–54. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Gruber, Aya: Garbage Pails and Puppy Dog Tails: Is That What Katz is Made of?, U.C. Davis Law Review 41 (2008), S. 781–838. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Gutterman, Melvin: Fourth Amendment Privacy and Standing: 'Wherever the Twain Shall Meet', North Carolina Law Review 60 (1981), S. 1–57. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Gutterman, Melvin: A Formulation of the Value and Means Models of the Fourth Amendment in the Age of Technologically Enhanced Surveillance, Syracuse Law Review 39 (1988), S. 647–735. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Hall, Connor: Evidence and the Fourth Amendment, American Bar Association Journal 8 (1922), S. 646–647. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Halliburton, Christian M.: How Privacy Killed Katz: A Tale of Cognitive Freedom and the Property of Personhood as Fourth Amendment Norm, Akron Law Review 42 (2009), S. 803–884. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Hancock, Catherine: Warrants for Wearing a Wire: Fourth Amendment Privacy and Justice Harlan's Dissent in United States v. White, Mississippi Law Journal 79 (2009), S. 35–96. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Hansen, Marit / Weichert, Thilo: Das Recht auf Privatheit - The Right to Privacy, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 2012, S. 755–766. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11623-012-0244-x
  168. Harper, Jim: Left Out in the Cold? The Chilling of Speech, Association, and the Press in Post-9/11 America, American University Law Review 57 (2008), S. 1381– 1403. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Harris, David A.: Superman's X-Ray Vision and the Fourth Amendment: The New Gun Detection Technology, Temple Law Review 69 (1996), S. 1–60. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Harris, David A.: How Accountability-based Policing Can Reinforce - or Replace - the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 7 (2009), S. 149–213. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Haun, William J.: The Philosopher in Action: A Tribute to the Honorable Edwin Meese III, Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society's Practice Groups 13 (2012), S. 4–9. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Heffernan, William C.: Fourth Amendment Privacy Interests, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 92 (2001), S. 1–126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1144208
  173. Henderson, Stephen E.: Nothing New Under the Sun? A Technologically Rational Doctrine of Fourth Amendment Search, Mercer Law Review 56 (2005), S. 507–563. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Henderson, Stephen E.: Learning from All Fifty States: How to Apply the Fourth Amendment and Its State Analogs to Protect Third Party Information from Unreasonable Search, Catholic University Law Review 55 (2006), S. 373–438. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Henderson, Stephen E.: The Timely Demise of the Fourth Amendment Third Party Doctrine, Iowa Law Review Bulletin 96 (2011), S. 39–51. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Henderson, Stephen E.: After United States v. Jones, after the Fourth Amendment Third Party Doctrine, North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology 14 (2013), S. 431–459. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Henkin, Louis: Privacy and Autonomy, Columbia Law Review 74 (1974), S. 1410– 1433. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1121541
  178. Hickey, Thomas J. / Capsambelis, Christopher / LaRose, Anthony: Constitutional Issues in the Use of Video Surveillance in Public Places, Criminal Law Bulletin 39 [5] (2003), Art. 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Hirsch, Milton / Markus, David O.: Should the Katz Test for Fourth Amendment Interest Be Abandoned?, Champion Magazine 27-Nov (2003), S. 36–40. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Holmes, Oliver W.: The Path of the Law, Harvard Law Review 10 (1897), S. 457–478. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Howard, A. E. D.: Out of Infancy: The Roberts Court at Seven, Virginia Law Review in Brief 98 (2012), S. 76–107. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Iraola, Roberto: New Detection Technologies and the Fourth Amendment, South Dakota Law Review 47 (2002), S. 8–31. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Jeffries, John C. JR.: In Praise of the Eleventh Amendment and Section 1983, Virginia Law Review 84 (1998), S. 47–82. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Jeffries, John C. JR.: The Liability Rule for Constitutional Torts, Virginia Law Review 99 (2013), S. 207–270. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Joh, Elizabeth E.: Breaking the Law to Enforce It: Undercover Police Participation in Crime, Stanford Law Review 62 (2009), S. 155–198. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Johnson, Christopher M.: Post-Trial Judicial Review of Criminal Convictions: A Comparative Study of the United States and Finland, Maine Law Review 64 (2012), S. 425–476. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Johnson, Jeffery L.: Immunity from the Focused Attention of Others: A Conceptual and Normative Model of Personal and Legal Privacy, Florida A&M University Law Review 2 (2007), S. 131–183. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Johnson, Scott P.: The Judicial Career of Justice David H. Souter and his Impact on the Rights of Criminal Defendants, Wyoming Law Review 13 (2013), S. 263– 302. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Jourard, Sidney M.: Some Psychological Aspects of Privacy, Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1966), S. 307–318. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1190673
  190. Julie, Richard S.: High-Tech Surveillance Tools and the Fourth Amendment: Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in the Technological Age, American Criminal Law Review 37 (2000), S. 127–143. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Junker, John M.: The Structure of the Fourth Amendment: The Scope of the Protection, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 79 (1989), S. 1105– 1183. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1143755
  192. Kagan, Elena: Presidential Administration, Harvard Law Review (2001), S. 2245– 2385. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1342513
  193. Kagehiro, Dorothy K.: Perceived Voluntariness of Consent to Warrantless Police Searches, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18 [1] (1988), S. 38–49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00003.x
  194. Kagehiro, Dorothy K.: Psycholegal Research on the Fourth Amendment, Psychological Science 1 [3] (1990), S. 187–193. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00196.x
  195. Kagehiro, Dorothy K. / Laufer, William S. / Taylor, Ralph B.: Social Perceptions of Third-Party Consent and the Reasonableness Test of Illinois v. Rodriguez, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 29 [2] (1992), S. 217–228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0022427892029002007
  196. Kagehiro, Dorothy K. / Taylor, Ralph B. / Harland, Alan T.: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy and Third-party Consent Searches, Law and Human Behavior 15 [2] (1991), S. 121–138. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/BF01044614
  197. Kagehiro, Dorothy K. / Taylor, Ralph B. / Laufer, William S. / Harland, Alan T.: Hindsight Bias and Third-Party Consentors to Warrantless Police Searches, Law and Human Behavior 15 [3] (1991), S. 305–314, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1394117. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Kalk, Bruce H.: The Carswell Affair: The Politics of a Supreme Court Nomination in the Nixon Administration, American Journal of Legal History 42 (1998), S. 261–287. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/846177
  199. Kalven, Harry JR.: Privacy in Tort Law - Were Warren and Brandeis Wrong?, Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1966), S. 326–341. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1190675
  200. Kalven, Harry JR.: The Supreme Court, 1970 Term - Foreword: Even When a Nation Is At War, Harvard Law Review 85 (1971), S. 3–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1339708
  201. Kamisar, Yale: The Warren Court and Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Tulsa Law Journal 31 (1995), S. 1–55. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Kamisar, Yale: The Writings of John Barker Waite and Thomas Davies on the Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rule, Michigan Law Review 100 (2002), S. 1821– 1866. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1556077
  203. Kamisar, Yale: In Defense of the Search and Seizure Exclusionary Rule, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 26 (2003), S. 119–140. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Kamisar, Yale: The Rise, Decline and Fall (?) of Miranda, Washington Law Review 87 (2012), S. 965–1040. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Kamlah, Ruprecht: Verfassungsmäßige Schranken der elektronischen Überwachung von Gesprächen im deutschen und amerikanischen Recht, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 1970, S. 44–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Kang, Jerry: Information Privacy in Cyberspace Transactions, Stanford Law Review 50 (1998), S. 1193–1294. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1229286
  207. Kannar, George: The Constitutional Catechism of Antonin Scalia, Yale Law Journal 99 (1990), S. 1297–1357. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/796738
  208. Karst, Kenneth L.: 'The Files': Legal Controls over the Accuracy and Accessibility of Stored Personal Data, Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1966), S. 342– 376. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1190676
  209. Katyal, Neal K.: Internal Separation of Powers: Checking Today's Most Dangerous Branch From Within, Yale Law Journal 115 (2006), S. 2314–2349. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Katz, Lewis R.: In Search of a Fourth Amendment for the Twenty-First Century, Indiana Law Journal 65 (1990), S. 549–590. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Kearns, Thomas B.: Technology and the Right to Privacy: The Convergence of Surveillance and Information Privacy Concerns, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 7 (1999), S. 975–1011. Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Kerr, Orin S.: The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution, Michigan Law Review 102 (2004), S. 801–887. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Kerr, Orin S.: Searches and Seizures in a Digital World, Harvard Law Review 119 (2005), S. 531–585. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Kerr, Orin S.: Four Models of Fourth Amendment Protection, Stanford Law Review 60 (2007), S. 503–551. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Kerr, Orin S.: Do We Need a New Fourth Amendment?, Michigan Law Review 107 (2009), S. 951–966. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Kerr, Orin S.: The Case for the Third-Party Doctrine, Michigan Law Review 107 (2009), S. 560–602. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Kerr, Orin S.: Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data, Yale Law Journal 119 (2010), S. 700–724. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Kerr, Orin S.: Applying the Fourth Amendment to the Internet: A General Approach, Stanford Law Review 62 (2010), S. 1005–1049. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Kerr, Orin S.: An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment, Harvard Law Review 125 (2011), S. 476–543. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Kerr, Orin S.: The Mosaic Theory of the Fourth Amendment, Michigan Law Review 111 (2012), S. 311–354. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Kerr, Orin S.: The Curious History of Fourth Amendment Searches, Supreme Court Review 2012 (2013), S. 67–97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1086/670228
  222. Kerr, Orin S.: Foreword: Accounting for Technological Change, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 36 (2013), S. 403–408. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Kitch, Edmund W.: Katz v. United States: The Limits of the Fourth Amendment, Supreme Court Review 1968 (1968), S. 133–152. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Kraska, Peter B. / Cubellis, Louis J.: Militarizing Mayberry and Beyond: Making Sense of American Paramilitary Policing, Justice Quarterly 14 (1997), S. 607– 929. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093521
  225. Kreimer, Seth F.: Sunlight, Secrets, and Scarlet Letters: The Tension Between Privacy and Disclosure in Constitutional Law, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140 (1991), S. 1–147. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3312321
  226. Ku, Raymond S. R.: The Founder's Privacy: The Fourth Amendment and the Power of Technological Surveillance, Minnesota Law Review 86 (2002), S. 1325–1378. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Laba, Jonathan T.: If You Can't Stand the Heat, Get Out of the Drug Business: Thermal Imagers, Emerging Technologies, and the Fourth Amendment, California Law Review 84 (1996), S. 1437–1486. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3480998
  228. LaFave, Wayne R.: Fourth Amendment Vagaries (of Improbable Cause, Imperceptible Plain View, Notorious Privacy, and Balancing Askew), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 74 (1983), S. 1171–1224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1143049
  229. LaFave, Wayne R.: The Forgotten Motto of Obsta Principiis in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Arizona Law Review 28 (1986), S. 291–310. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. LaFave, Wayne R.: The Fourth Amendment: A Bicentennial 'Checkup', Valparaiso University Law Review 26 (1991), S. 223–241. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. LaFave, Wayne R.: The Present and Future Fourth Amendment, University of Illinois Law Review 1995 (1995), S. 111–121. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1229227
  232. LaFave, Wayne R.: The 'Routine Traffic Stop' From Start to Finish: Too Much 'Routine,' Not Enough Fourth Amendment, Michigan Law Review 102 (2004), S. 1843–1905. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4141969
  233. LaFave, Wayne R.: The Smell of Herring: A Critique of the Supreme Court's Latest Assault on the Exclusionary Rule, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 99 (2009), S. 757–787. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Laurin, Jennifer E.: Trawling for Herring: Lessons in Doctrinal Borrowing and Convergence, Columbia Law Review 111 (2011), S. 670–744. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Laurin, Jennifer E.: Messerschmidt and Convergence in Action: A Reply to Comments on Trawling for Herring, Columbia Law Review Sidebar 112 (2012), S. 119–133. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Lee, Cynthia: Package Bombs, Footlockers, and Laptops: What the Disappearing Container Search Doctrine Can Tell Us About the Fourth Amendment, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100 (2010), S. 1403–1494. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Lee, Cynthia: Reasonableness with Teeth: The Future Of Fourth Amendment Reasonableness Analysis, Mississippi Law Journal 81 (2012), S. 1133–1182. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Leiman, John M.: The Rule of Four, Columbia Law Review 57 (1957), S. 975–990. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1119533
  239. Leipold, Andrew D.: Why Grand Juries Do Not (And Cannot) Protect the Accused, Cornell Law Review 80 (1995), S. 260–324. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Levinson, Daryl J.: Making Government Pay: Markets, Politics, and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs, University of Chicago Law Review 67 (2000), S. 345– 420. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1600491
  241. Levinson, Rosalie B.: Time to Bury the Shocks the Conscience Test, Chapman Law Review 13 (2010), S. 307–356. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Levit, Janet K.: The Fourth Amendment: Reflections on the 1994 October Term, Tulsa Law Journal 31 (1996), S. 473–483. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Levy, Joshua S.: Towards a Brighter Fourth Amendment: Privacy and Technological Change, Virginia Journal of Law & Technology 16 (2011), S. 499–536. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Lin, Elbert: Prioritizing Privacy: A Constitutional Response to the Internet, Berkeley Technology Law Journal 17 (2002), S. 1085–1154. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Lochner, Sabrina: Saving Face: Regulating Law Enforcement's Use of Mobile Face Recognition Technology & Iris Scans, Arizona Law Review 55 (2013), S. 201–233. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Loewy, Arnold H.: The Fourth Amendment As a Device for Protecting the Innocent, Michigan Law Review 81 (1983), S. 1229–1272. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Luna, Erik G.: Sovereignty and Suspicion, Duke Law Journal 48 (1999), S. 787–889. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Maclin, Tracey: The Central Meaning of the Fourth Amendment, William and Mary Law Review 35 (1993), S. 197–249. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Maclin, Tracey: When the Cure for the Fourth Amendment is Worse Than the Disease, Southern California Law Review 68 (1994), S. 1–72. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Maclin, Tracey: What Can Fourth Amendment Doctrine Learn from Vagueness Doctrine?, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 3 (2001), S. 398–454. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Maclin, Tracey: Let Sleeping Dogs Lie: Why the Supreme Court Should Leave Fourth Amendment History Unabridged, Boston University Law Review 82 (2002), S. 895–973. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Maclin, Tracey: Katz, Kyllo, and Technology: Virtual Fourth Amendment Protection in the Twenty-First Century, Mississippi Law Journal 72 (2002), S. 51–142. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Maclin, Tracey / Mirabella, Julia: Framing the Fourth, Michigan Law Review 109 (2011), S. 1049–1076. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Maclin, Tracey / Rader, Jennifer: No More Chipping Away: The Roberts Court Uses an Axe to Take Out the Exclusionary Rule, Mississippi Law Journal 81 (2012), S. 1183–1227. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Maggs, Gregory E.: Which Original Meaning of the Constitution Matters to Justice Thomas?, New York University Journal of Law & Liberty 4 (2009), S. 494–516. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Malone, George III.: The Applicability of the 'Open Fields Doctrine' to the Fourth Amendment Right Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: United States v. Dunn, Southern University Law Review 14 (1987), S. 283–293. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Maltese, John A.: Confirmation Gridlock: The Federal Judicial Appointments Process under Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 5 (2003), S. 1–28. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Marceau, Justin F.: The Fourth Amendment at a Three-way Stop, Alabama Law Review 62 (2011), S. 687–755. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Martin, Andrew D. / Quinn, Kevin M.: Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999, Political Analysis 10 (2002), S. 134–155. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Martin, Andrew D. / Quinn, Kevin M. / Epstein, Lee: The Median Justice on the United States Supreme Court, North Carolina Law Review 83 (2005), S. 1275–1320. Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Mason, Caleb: New Police Surveillance Technologies and the Good-Faith Exception: Warrantless GPS Tracker Evidence after United States v. Jones, Nevada Law Journal 13 (2012), S. 60–94. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. McAdams, Richard H.: Tying Privacy in Knotts: Beeper Monitoring and Collective Fourth Amendment Rights, Virginia Law Review 71 (1985), S. 297–341. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Mcarthur, Eric D.: The Search and Seizure of Privileged Attorney-Client Communications, University of Chicago Law Review 72 (2005), S. 729–756. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. McCall, Michael / Smith, Christopher E. / McCall, Madhavi: Criminal Justice and the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009-2010 Term, Cumberland Law Review 41 (2011), S. 227–282. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. McCloskey, H. J.: Privacy and the Right to Privacy, Philosophy 55 (1980), S. 17–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100063725
  266. McDonald Hutchins, Renée: Tied Up in Knotts? GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment, UCLA Law Review 55 (2007), S. 409–465. Google Scholar öffnen
  267. McDonald Hutchins, Renée: The Anatomy of a Search: Intrusiveness and the Fourth Amendment, University of Richmond Law Review 44 (2010), S. 1185–1212. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. Michalk, Craig S.: Alabama v. White, 110 S. Ct. 2412 (1990): The Supreme Court's Latest Attack on Fourth Amendment Protections Against Warrantless Seizures, Thurgood Marshall Law Review 16 (1991), S. 333–353. Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Miller, Eric J.: The Warren Court's Regulatory Revolution in Criminal Procedure, Connecticut Law Review 43 (2010), S. 1–82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1575356
  270. Milligan, Christopher S.: Facial Recognition Technology, Video Surveillance, and Privacy, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 9 (1999), S. 295– 333. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Moran, David A.: The End of the Exclusionary Rule, Among Other Things: The Roberts Court Takes On the Fourth Amendment, Cato Supreme Court Review 2006 (2006), S. 283–309. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Moran, David A.: Hangin On By a Thread: The Exclusionary Rule (or What's Left of It) Lives for Another Day, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law (2011), S. 363– 380. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Morrison, Steven R.: What the Cops Can't Do, Internet Service Providers Can: Preserving Privacy in Email Contents, Virginia Journal of Law & Technology 16 (2011), S. 253–300. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. Murchison, Kenneth M.: Four Terms of the Kennedy Court: Projecting the Future of Constitutional Doctrine, University of Baltimore Law Review 39 (2009), S. 1– 62. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Murphy, Michael J.: Judicial Review of Police Methods in Law Enforcement, Texas Law Review 44 (1966), S. 939–953. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Murphy, Richard S.: Property Rights in Personal Information: An Economic Defense of Privacy, Georgetown Law Journal 84 (1996), S. 2381–2417. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Oaks, Dallin H.: Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure, University of Chicago Law Review 37 (1970), S. 665–757. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1598840
  278. Ohm, Paul: The Olmsteadian Seizure Clause: The Fourth Amendment and the Seizure of Intangible Property, Stanford Technology Law Review 2008, 2. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. ohne Verfasserangabe: Municipal Tort Liability: An Abandonment of Sovereign Immunity, Note, Duke Law Journal 7 (1958), S. 143–149. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. ohne Verfasserangabe: From Private Places to Personal Privacy: A Post-Katz Study of Fourth Amendment Protection, Note, New York University Law Review 43 (1968), S. 968–987. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. ohne Verfasserangabe: The Supreme Court, 1970 Term - The Statistics, Harvard Law Review 85 (1971), S. 344–353. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. ohne Verfasserangabe: The Changing Social Vision of Justice Blackmun, Harvard Law Review 96 (1983), S. 717–736. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Oliver, Philip D.: Assessing and Addressing the Problems Caused by Life Tenure on the Supreme Court, Journal of Appellate Practice and Process 13 (2012), S. 11–32. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Packer, Herbert L.: The Courts, the Police, and the Rest of Us, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 57 (1966), S. 238–243. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Parent, W. A.: Privacy, Morality, and the Law, Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 [4] 1983, S. 269–288, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265374. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3504563
  286. Parker, Richard B.: A Definition of Privacy, Rutgers Law Review 27 (1974), S. 275– 296. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus: Persönlichkeitsschutz und Internet - Anforderungen und Grenzen einer Regulierung, Juristenzeitung 2012, S. 851–859. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/002268812802759604
  288. Peikoff, Amy L.: The Right to Privacy: Contemporary Reductionists and Their Critics, Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 13 (2006), S. 474–551. Google Scholar öffnen
  289. Pongrace, Donald R C.: Stereotypification of the Fourth Amendment's Public/Private Distinction: An Opportunity for Clarity, American University Law Review 34 (1985), S. 1191–1214. Google Scholar öffnen
  290. Posner, Richard A.: The Right of Privacy, Georgia Law Review 12 (1978), S. 393– 422. Google Scholar öffnen
  291. Posner, Richard A.: The Uncertain Protection of Privacy by the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Review 1979 (1979), S. 173–216. Google Scholar öffnen
  292. Post, Robert C. / Siegel, Reva B.: Originalism as a Political Practice: The Right's Living Constitution, Fordham Law Review 75 (2006), S. 545–574. Google Scholar öffnen
  293. Powe, L.A JR.: Judges Struck by Lightning: Some Observations on the Politics of Recent Supreme Court Appointments, Arizona State Law Journal 39 (2007), S. 875–894. Google Scholar öffnen
  294. Power, Robert C.: Changing Expectations of Privacy and the Fourth Amendment, Widener Law Journal 16 (2006), S. 43–70. Google Scholar öffnen
  295. Primus, Eve B.: Disentangling Administrative Searches, Columbia Law Review 111 (2011), S. 254–312. Google Scholar öffnen
  296. Primus, Richard A.: Bolling Alone, Columbia Law Review 104 (2004), S. 975–1041. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4099366
  297. Prosser, William L.: Privacy, California Law Review 48 (1960), S. 383–423. Google Scholar öffnen
  298. Pye, Kenneth A.: The Warren Court and Criminal Procedure, Michigan Law Review 67 (1968), S. 249–268. Google Scholar öffnen
  299. Rachels, James: Why Privacy is Important, Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 (1975), S. 323–333. Google Scholar öffnen
  300. Rasdan, Afsheen J.: The Case for Stewart over Harlan on 24/7 Physical Surveillance, Texas Law Review 88 (2010), S. 1475–1500. Google Scholar öffnen
  301. Ravishankar, Poornima L.: Planned Parenthood is Not a Bank: Closing the Clinic Doors to the Fourth Amendment Third Party Doctrine, Seton Hall Law Review 34 (2004), S. 1093–1120. Google Scholar öffnen
  302. Rehnquist, William H.: Is an Expanded Right of Privacy Consistent with Fair and Effective Law Enforcement? Or: Privacy, You've Come a Long Way, Baby, University of Kansas Law Review 23 (1974), S. 1–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  303. Reidenberg, Joel R.: Setting Standards for Fair Information Practice in the U.S. Private Sector, Iowa Law Review 80 (1995), S. 497–551. Google Scholar öffnen
  304. Reiman, Jeffrey H.: Privacy, Intimacy and Personhood, Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (1976), S. 26–44. Google Scholar öffnen
  305. Reiman, Jeffrey H.: Driving to the Panopticon: A Philosophical Exploration of the Risks to Privacy Posed by the Highway Technology of the Future, Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 11 (1995), S. 27–44. Google Scholar öffnen
  306. Reinhardt, Stephen: Liberal Judges, Federal Lawyer 44-Feb (1997), S. 46–49. Google Scholar öffnen
  307. Ringhand, Lori A.: In Defense of Ideology: A Principled Approach to the Supreme Court Confirmation Process, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 18 (2009), S. 131–171. Google Scholar öffnen
  308. Rogers, James P.: Third Amendment Protections in Domestic Disasters, Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy 17 (2008), S. 747–780. Google Scholar öffnen
  309. Rosenthal, Lawrence: Seven Theses in Grudging Defense of the Exclusionary Rule, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 10 (2013), S. 525–596. Google Scholar öffnen
  310. Ross, Jacqueline E.: The Place of Covert Surveillance in Democratic Societies: A Comparative Study of the United States and Germany, American Journal of Comparative Law 55 (2007), S. 493–579. Google Scholar öffnen
  311. Ross, William G.: The Role of Judicial Issues in Presidential Campaigns, Santa Clara Law Review 42 (2002), S. 391–482. Google Scholar öffnen
  312. Ross, William G.: The Supreme Court as an Issue in Presidential Campaigns, Journal of Supreme Court History 37 (2012), S. 322–334. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5818.2012.01299.x
  313. Rostron, Allen: The Law and Order Theme in Political and Popular Culture, Oklahoma City University Law Review 37 (2012), S. 323–395. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298888
  314. Rowley, Christian J.: Florida v. Bostick: The Fourth Amendment - Another Casualty of the War on Drugs, Utah Law Review 1992 (1992), S. 601–645. Google Scholar öffnen
  315. Rubenfeld, Jed: The Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review 102 (1989), S. 737–807. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1341305
  316. Rubenfeld, Jed: The End of Privacy, Stanford Law Review 61 (2008), S. 101–161. Google Scholar öffnen
  317. Ruger, Theodore: Justice Harry Blackmun and the Phenomenon of Judicial Preference Change, Missouri Law Review (70) (2005), S. 1209–1231. Google Scholar öffnen
  318. Rushin, Stephen: The Judicial Response to Mass Police Surveillance, University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology and Policy 2011, S. 281–328. Google Scholar öffnen
  319. Saltzburg, Stephen A.: Another Victim of Illegal Narcotics: The Fourth Amendment (as Illustrated by the Open Fields Doctrine), University of Pittsburgh Law Review 48 (1986), S. 1–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1599615
  320. Saltzburg, Stephen A.: The Supreme Court, Criminal Procedure and Judicial Integrity, American Criminal Law Review 40 (2003), S. 133–158. Google Scholar öffnen
  321. Sandeen, Sharon K.: Relative Privacy: What Privacy Advocates Can Learn from Trade Secret Law, Michigan State Law Review 2006 (2006), S. 667–707. Google Scholar öffnen
  322. Savage, Charlie: Takeover: Return of the Imperial Presidency, Washburn Law Journal 48 (2009), S. 299–324. Google Scholar öffnen
  323. Scanlon, Thomas: Thomson on Privacy, Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 (1975), S. 315– 322. Google Scholar öffnen
  324. Schneider, Harvey A.: Katz v. United States: The Untold Story, McGeorge Law Review 40 (2009), S. 13–23. Google Scholar öffnen
  325. Schroeder, Willam A.: Deterring Fourth Amendment Violations: Alternatives to the Exclusionary Rule, Georgetown Law Journal 69 (1981), S. 1361–1426. Google Scholar öffnen
  326. Schulhofer, Stephen: On the Fourth Amendment Rights of the Law-abiding Public, Supreme Court Review 1989 (1989), S. 87–163. Google Scholar öffnen
  327. Schwartz, Adam: Chicago’s Video Surveillance Cameras: A Pervasive and Poorly Regulated Threat to Our Privacy, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 11 (2013), S. 47–60. Google Scholar öffnen
  328. Schwartz, Paul M.: Privacy and Democracy in Cyberspace, Vanderbilt Law Review 52 (1999), S. 1609–1701. Google Scholar öffnen
  329. Schwartz, Paul M.: German and U.S. Telecommunications Privacy Law: Legal Regulation of Domestic Law Enforcement Surveillance, Hastings Law Journal 54 (2003), S. 751–800. Google Scholar öffnen
  330. Schwartz, Paul M. / Peifer, Karl-Nikolaus: Prosser' Privacy and the German Right of Personality: Are Four Privacy Torts Better Than One Unitary Concept?, California Law Review 98 (2010), S. 1925–1987. Google Scholar öffnen
  331. Schwarz, Herman: Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. - A Pragmatic Independent, American Bar Association Journal 72-June (1986), S. 42-. Google Scholar öffnen
  332. Scott, Robert E. / Stuntz, William J.: Plea Bargaining as Contract, Yale Law Journal 101 (1992), S. 1909–1968. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/796952
  333. Searle, Lynn S.: The ‘Administrative’ Search from Dewey to Burger: Dismantling the Fourth Amendment, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 16 (1989), S. 261– 294. Google Scholar öffnen
  334. Segal, Jeffrey A. / Cover, Albert D.: Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices, American Political Science Review 83 (1989), S. 557–565. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1962405
  335. Serr, Brian: Great Expectations of Privacy: A New Model for Fourth Amendment Protection, Minnesota Law Review 73 (1989), S. 583–641. Google Scholar öffnen
  336. Shaman, Jeffrey M.: Justice Harry A. Blackmun - The Evolution of a Realist, American Bar Association Journal 72-June (1986), S. 39–41. Google Scholar öffnen
  337. Shapiro, David L.: Mr. Justice Rehnquist: A Preliminary View, Harvard Law Review 90 (1976), S. 293–357. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1340157
  338. Shapiro, David L.: Justice Ginsburg's First Decade: Some Thoughts about her Contributions in the Fields of Procedure and Jurisdiction, Columbia Law Review 104 (2004), S. 21–31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4099344
  339. Shapiro, Fred R.: The Most?Cited Legal Scholars, Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000), S. 409–426. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1086/468080
  340. Shils, Edward: Privacy: Its Constitution and Vicissitudes, Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1966), S. 281–306. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1190672
  341. Sim, Disa: The Right to Solitude in the United States and Singapore: A Call for a Fundamental Reordering, Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review 22 (2002), S. 443–478. Google Scholar öffnen
  342. Simmons, Ric: From Katz to Kyllo: A Blueprint for Adapting the Fourth Amendment to Twenty-First Century Technologies, Hastings Law Journal 53 (2002), S. 1303–1358. Google Scholar öffnen
  343. Singh, Jai / Singh, Ajay: The War on Terror - Over?, Small Wars Journal 8 (2012), S. No. 08/28, http://smallwarsjournal.com/printpdf/13142. Google Scholar öffnen
  344. Slansky, David A.: Traffic Stops, Minority Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment, Supreme Court Review 1997 (1997), S. 271–329. Google Scholar öffnen
  345. Slansky, David A.: The Fourth Amendment and Common Law, Columbia Law Review 100 (2000), S. 1739–1814. Google Scholar öffnen
  346. Slansky, David A.: Is the Exclusionary Rule Obsolete?, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 5 (2008), S. 567–584. Google Scholar öffnen
  347. Slansky, David A.: 'One Train May Hide Another': Katz, Stonewall, and the Secret Subtext of Criminal Procedure, U.C. Davis Law Review 41 (2008), S. 875– 934. Google Scholar öffnen
  348. Slansky, David A.: A Postscript on Katz and Stonewall: Evidence From Justice Stewart's First Draft, U.C. Davis Law Review 45 (2012), S. 1487–1492. Google Scholar öffnen
  349. Slobogin, Christopher: Die Zukunft des Datenschutzes in den USA, Die Verwaltung 2011, S. 465–497. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3790/verw.44.4.465
  350. Slobogin, Christopher: The World Without a Fourth Amendment, UCLA Law Review 39 (1991), S. 1–107. Google Scholar öffnen
  351. Slobogin, Christopher: Technologically-Assisted Physical Surveillance: The American Bar Association's Tentative Draft Standards, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 10 (1997), S. 383–454. Google Scholar öffnen
  352. Slobogin, Christopher: Let's Not Bury Terry: A Call for Rejuvenation of the Proportionality Principle, Saint John's Law Review 72 (1998), S. 1053–1095. Google Scholar öffnen
  353. Slobogin, Christopher: Peeping Techno-Toms and the Fourth Amendment: Seeing Through Kyllo's Rules Governing Technological Surveillance, Minnesota Law Review 86 (2002), S. 1393–1437. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.300455
  354. Slobogin, Christopher: Public Privacy: Camera Surveillance of Public Places and the Right to Anonymity, Mississippi Law Journal 72 (2002), S. 213–315. Google Scholar öffnen
  355. Slobogin, Christopher: Transaction Surveillance by the Government, Mississippi Law Journal 75 (2005), S. 139–191. Google Scholar öffnen
  356. Slobogin, Christopher: Subpoenas and Privacy, DePaul Law Review 54 (2005), S. 805–845. Google Scholar öffnen
  357. Slobogin, Christopher: The Liberal Assault on the Fourth Amendment, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 4 (2007), S. 603–618. Google Scholar öffnen
  358. Slobogin, Christopher: Government Data Mining and the Fourth Amendment, University of Chicago Law Review 75 (2008), S. 317–341. Google Scholar öffnen
  359. Slobogin, Christopher: Justice Ginsburg's Gradualism in Criminal Procedure, Ohio State Law Journal 70 (2009), S. 867–887. Google Scholar öffnen
  360. Slobogin, Christopher: Surveillance and the Constitution, Wayne Law Review 55 (2009), S. 1105–1130. Google Scholar öffnen
  361. Slobogin, Christopher: Government Dragnets, Law and Contemporary Problems 73 (2010), S. 101–149. Google Scholar öffnen
  362. Slobogin, Christopher: Rehnquist and Panvasive Searches, Mississippi Law Journal 82 (2012), S. 1–22. Google Scholar öffnen
  363. Slobogin, Christopher / Schumacher, Joseph E.: Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and Autonomy in Fourth Amendment Cases: An Empirical Look at 'Understandings Recognized And Permitted By Society', Duke Law Journal 42 (1993), S. 727–775. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1372714
  364. Slonim, Scott: Picking Federal Judges, American Bar Association Journal 66 (1980), S. 1185–1187. Google Scholar öffnen
  365. Smith, Christopher E. / Hensley, Thomas R.: Unfulfilled Aspirations: The Court Packing Efforts of Presidents Reagan and Bush, Albany Law Review 57 (1994), S. 1111–1131. Google Scholar öffnen
  366. Smith, Robert E.: Sometimes, What Is Public Is Private, Rhode Island Bar Journal 59Feb (2011), S. 33–38. Google Scholar öffnen
  367. Solove, Daniel J.: Conceptionalizing Privacy, California Law Review 90 (2002), S. 1087–1155. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3481326
  368. Solove, Daniel J.: Fourth Amendment Codification and Professor Kerr's Misguided Call for Judicial Deference, Fordham Law Review 74 (2005), S. 747–777. Google Scholar öffnen
  369. Solove, Daniel J.: A Taxonomy of Privacy, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154 (2006), S. 477–563. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/40041279
  370. Solove, Daniel J.: Fourth Amendment Pragmatism, Boston University Law Review 51 (2010), S. 1511–1538. Google Scholar öffnen
  371. Sopkin, Gregory E.: The Police Have Become Our Nosy Neighbors: Florida v. Riley and Other Supreme Court Deviations from Katz, University of Colorado Law Review 62 (1991), S. 407–432. Google Scholar öffnen
  372. Sorenson, Quin M.: Losing a Plain View of Katz: The Loss of a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy under the Readily Available Standard, Dickinson Law Review 107 (2002), S. 179–207. Google Scholar öffnen
  373. Stanek, Thomas M.: Photo Radar in Arizona: Is It Constitutional?, Arizona State Law Journal 30 (1998), S. 1209–1243. Google Scholar öffnen
  374. Steiker, Carol S.: Second Thoughts About First Principles, Harvard Law Review 107 (1994), S. 820–857. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1341995
  375. Steiker, Carol S.: Brandeis in Olmstead: 'Our Government is the Potent, the Omnipresent Teacher", Mississippi Law Journal 79 (2009), S. 149–178. Google Scholar öffnen
  376. Steinberg, David E.: Restoring the Fourth Amendment: The Original Understanding Revisited, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 33 (2005), S. 47–82. Google Scholar öffnen
  377. Steinberg, David E.: Zealous Officers and Neutral Magistrates: The Rhetoric of the Fourth Amendment, Creighton Law Review 43 (2010), S. 1019–1047. Google Scholar öffnen
  378. Stern, Stephanie M.: The Inviolate Home: Housing Exceptionalism in the Fourth Amendment, Cornell Law Review 95 (2010), S. 905–955. Google Scholar öffnen
  379. Stewart, Potter: The Road to Mapp v. Ohio and Beyond: The Origins, Development and Future of the Exclusionary Rule in Search-and-Seizure-Cases, Columbia Law Review 83 (1983), S. 1365–1404. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1122492
  380. Stone, Geoffrey R.: O.T. 1983 and the Era of Aggressive Majoritarianism: A Court in Transition, Georgia Law Review 19 (1984), S. 15–30. Google Scholar öffnen
  381. Strahilevitz, Lior J.: A Social Networks Theory of Privacy, University of Chicago Law Review 72 (2005), S. 919–988. Google Scholar öffnen
  382. Strang, Lee J.: The Most Faithful Originalist? Justice Thomas, Justice Scalia, and the Future of Originalism, University of Detroit Mercy Law Review 88 (2012), S. 873–882. Google Scholar öffnen
  383. Strossen, Nadine: Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz: A Roadblock to Meaningful Judicial Enforcement of Constitutional Rights, Hastings Law Journal 42 (1991), S. 285–390. Google Scholar öffnen
  384. Stuntz, William J.: Implicit Bargains, Government Power, and the Fourth Amendment, Stanford Law Review 44 (1992), S. 553–591. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1228975
  385. Stuntz, William J.: Privacy's Problem and the Law of Criminal Procedure, Michigan Law Review 93 (1995), S. 1016–1078. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1289989
  386. Stuntz, William J.: The Substantive Origins of Criminal Procedure, Yale Law Journal 105 (1995), S. 393–447. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/797125
  387. Stuntz, William J.: The Virtues and Vices of the Exclusionary Rule, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 20 (1997), S. 443–455. Google Scholar öffnen
  388. Stuntz, William J.: The Distribution of Fourth Amendment Privacy, George Washington Law Review 67 (1999), S. 1265–1289. Google Scholar öffnen
  389. Stuntz, William J.: O.J. Simpson, Bill Clinton, and the Transsubstantive Fourth Amendment, Harvard Law Review 114 (2001), S. 842–875. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1342698
  390. Sundby, Scott E.: A Return to Fourth Amendment Basics: Undoing the Mischief of Camara and Terry, Minnesota Law Review 72 (1988), S. 383–448. Google Scholar öffnen
  391. Sundby, Scott E.: "Everyman" 's Fourth Amendment: Privacy or Mutual Trust Between Government and Citizen?, Columbia Law Review 94 (1994), S. 1751–1812. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1123178
  392. Sunstein, Cass R.: Justice Breyer's Democratic Pragmatism, Yale Law Journal 115 (2006), S. 1719–1742. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/20455667
  393. Swire, Peter P.: Financial Privacy and the Theory of High-Tech Government Surveillance, Washington University Law Quarterly 77 (1999), S. 461–512. Google Scholar öffnen
  394. Swire, Peter P.: Katz is Dead. Long Live Katz, Michigan Law Review 102 (2004), S. 904–932. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4141984
  395. Taslitz, Andrew E.: The Fourth Amendment in the Twenty-First Century: Technology, Privacy and Human Emotions, Law and Contemporary Problems 65 (2002), S. 125–187. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1192242
  396. Taticchi, Mark: Redefining Possessory Interests: Perfect Copies of Information as Fourth Amendment Seizures, George Washington Law Review 78 (2010), S. 476–511. Google Scholar öffnen
  397. Taylor, Madison M.: Bending Broken Rules: The Fourth Amendment Implications of Full-Body Scanners in Preflight Screening, Richmond Journal of Law & Technology 17 (2010), S. 4–59. Google Scholar öffnen
  398. Taylor, Nick: Closed Circuit Television: The British Experience, Stanford Technology Law Review 1999, 11. Google Scholar öffnen
  399. Tokson, Matthew: Automation and the Fourth Amendment, Iowa Law Review 96 (2011), S. 581–647. Google Scholar öffnen
  400. Tomkovicz, James J.: Beyond Secrecy for Secrecy's Sake: Toward an Expanded Vision of the Fourth Amendment Privacy Province, Hastings Law Journal 36 (1985), S. 645–737. Google Scholar öffnen
  401. Tomkovicz, James J.: Technology and the Threshold of the Fourth Amendment: A Tale of Two Futures, Mississippi Law Journal 72 (2002), S. 317–446. Google Scholar öffnen
  402. Tomkovicz, James J.: Hudson v. Michigan and the Future of Fourth Amendment Exclusion, Iowa Law Review 93 (2008), S. 1819–1887. Google Scholar öffnen
  403. Tomkovicz, James J.: Davis v. United States: The Exclusion Revolution Continues, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 9 (2011), S. 381–403. Google Scholar öffnen
  404. Totenberg, Nina: Harry A. Blackmun: The Conscientous Conscience, American University Law Review 43 (1994), S. 745–748. Google Scholar öffnen
  405. Traynor, Roger J.: Mapp v. Ohio at Large in the Fifty States, Duke Law Journal 3 (1962), S. 319–343. Google Scholar öffnen
  406. Trüg, Gerson: Erkenntnisse aus der Untersuchung des US-amerikanischen plea bargaining-Systems für den deutschen Absprachendiskurs, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 120 (2008), S. 331–374. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/ZSTW.2008.331
  407. Turkington, Richard C.: Legacy of the Warren and Brandeis Article: The Emerging Unencumbered Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy, Northern Illinois University Law Review 10 (1990), S. 479–520. Google Scholar öffnen
  408. Urbonya, Kathryn U.: Rhetorically Reasonable Police Practices: Viewing the Supreme Court's Multiple Discourse Paths, American Criminal Law Review 40 (2003), S. 1387–1442. Google Scholar öffnen
  409. Uviller, H. R.: The Acquisition of Evidence for Criminal Prosecution: Some Constitutional Premises and Practices in Transition, Vanderbilt Law Review 35 (1982), S. 501–526. Google Scholar öffnen
  410. Vargas, Sylvia R. L.: Only Skin Deep?: The Cost of Partisan Politics on Minority Diversity of the Federal Bench, Indiana Law Journal 83 (2008), S. 1423–1475. Google Scholar öffnen
  411. Vernick, Jon S. / Pierce, Matthew W. / Webster, Daniel W. / Johnson, Sara B. / Frattaroli, Shannon: Technologies to Detect Concealed Weapons: Fourth Amendment Limits on a New Public Health and Law Enforcement Tool, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31 (2003), S. 567–576. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2003.tb00124.x
  412. Vitiello, Michael: Herring v. United States: Mapp's 'Artless' Overruling, Nevada Law Journal 10 (2009), S. 164–180. Google Scholar öffnen
  413. Vitiello, Michael / Burger, Jane C.: Mapp's Exclusionary Rule: Is the Court Crying Wolf?, Dickinson Law Review 86 (1981), S. 15–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  414. Volokh, Eugene: Freedom of Speech and Information Privacy: The Troubling Implications of a Right to Stop People From Speaking About You., Stanford Law Review 52 (2000), S. 1049–1124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1229510
  415. Walinski, Richard S. / Tucker, Thomas J.: Expectations of Privacy: Fourth Amendment Legitimacy Through State Law, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 16 (1981), S. 1–39. Google Scholar öffnen
  416. Walther, Susanne / Silverman, Emily: Lauschangriffe durch Informanten, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 1999, S. 100–106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/zstw.1999.111.1.123
  417. Warren, Samuel D. / Brandeis, Louis D.: The Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review 4 (1890), S. 193–219. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1321160
  418. Wasby, Stephen L.: Justice Harry A. Blackmun in the Burger Court, Hamline Law Review 11 (1988), S. 183–245. Google Scholar öffnen
  419. Wasby, Stephen L. / Grossman, Joel B.: Judge Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr.: New Perspective On His Nomination to the Supreme Court, Duke Law Journal 39 (1990), S. 74–80. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1372653
  420. Wasserstrom, Silas J.: The Incredible Shrinking Fourth Amendment, American Criminal Law Review 21 (1984), S. 257–401. Google Scholar öffnen
  421. Wasserstrom, Silas J. / Mertens, William J.: The Exclusionary Rule On the Scaffold: But Was It a Fair Trial?, American Criminal Law Review 22 (1984), S. 85–179. Google Scholar öffnen
  422. Wasserstrom, Silas J. / Seidman, Louis M.: The Fourth Amendment as Constitutional Theory, Georgetown Law Journal 77 (1988), S. 19–112. Google Scholar öffnen
  423. Watts, Kathryn A.: Constraining Certiorari Using Administrative Law Principles, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160 (2011), S. 1–68. Google Scholar öffnen
  424. Weaver, Russell L.: The Fourth Amendment, Privacy and Advancing Technology, Mississippi Law Journal 80 (2011), S. 1131–1227. Google Scholar öffnen
  425. Weichert, Thilo: Anmerkungen zu Warren/Brandeis – Das Recht auf Privatheit, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 2012, S. 753–754. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11623-012-0244-x
  426. Weinreb, Lloyd: Generalities of the Fourth Amendment, University of Chicago Law Review 42 (1974), S. 47–85. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1599127
  427. Weitzman, Jessica M.: They Won't Come Knocking No More: Hudson v. Michigan and the Demise of the Knock-and-Announce Rule, Brooklyn Law Review 73 (2008), S. 1209–1251. Google Scholar öffnen
  428. Westin, Alan F.: Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy, Journal of Social Issues 59 (2003), S. 431–453. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00072
  429. Whitebread, Charles: The Conservative Kennedy Court - What a Difference a Single Justice Can Make: The 2006-2007 Term of the United States Supreme Court, Whittier Law Review 29 (2007), S. 1–145. Google Scholar öffnen
  430. Whitman, James Q.: The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty, Yale Law Journal 113 (2004), S. 1151–1221. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/4135723
  431. Wilkins, Richard G.: Defining the 'Reasonable Expectation of Privacy': An Emerging Tripartite Analysis, Vanderbilt Law Review 40 (1987), S. 1077–1129. Google Scholar öffnen
  432. Winkler, Adam: Fatal in Theory and Strict in Fact: An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in the Federal Courts, Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (2006), S. 793–871. Google Scholar öffnen
  433. Winn, Peter: Katz and the Origins of the 'Reasonable Expectation of Privacy' Test, McGeorge Law Review 40 (2009), S. 1–12. Google Scholar öffnen
  434. Witmer-Rich, Jonathan: Interrogation and the Roberts Court, Florida Law Review 63 (2011), S. 1189–1243. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1767341
  435. Wittmann, Philipp: Nobody Watches the Watchmen - Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen und zunehmende Ausweitung der öffentlichen Videoüberwachung in den USA, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 73 (2013), S. 373–426. Google Scholar öffnen
  436. Wittmann, Philipp: „Miranda v. Arizona“ (1966) und die effektive Garantie der Selbstbelastungsfreiheit - Zwei Mythen des amerikanischen Verfassungsrechts?, Juristenzeitung 2014, S. 105–111. Google Scholar öffnen
  437. Wood, Reeve: The Prolonged Arm of the Law: Fourth Amendment Principles, the Maynard Decision, and the Need for a New Warrant for Electronic Tracking, Maine Law Review 64 (2011), S. 285–323. Google Scholar öffnen
  438. Xenaxis, Aileen B.: Washington and CCTV: It's 2010, Not Nineteen Eighty-Four, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 42 (2010), S. 573–592. Google Scholar öffnen
  439. Yackley, Jennifer: Hudson v. Michigan: Has the Court Turned the Exclusionary Rule into the Exclusionary Exception?, Hamline Law Review 30 (2007), S. 409– 447. Google Scholar öffnen
  440. Yarbrough, Tinsley E.: Mr. Justice Black and Legal Positivism, Virginia Law Review 57 (1971), S. 375–407. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1072096
  441. Yoo, Christopher S. / Calabresi, Steven G. / Colangelo, Anthony J.: The Unitary Executive in the Modern Era, 1945-2004, Iowa Law Review 90 (2005), S. 601–731. Google Scholar öffnen
  442. Zimmer, Michael T.: Surveillance, Privacy and the Ethics of Vehicle Safety Communication Technologies, Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2005), S. 201–210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-0016-0
  443. Arzt, Clemens: Präventionsstaat zwischen Rechtsgüterschutz und Abbau von Freiheitsrechten in den USA, in: Graulich, Kurt / Simon, Dieter (Hrsg.), 840 Google Scholar öffnen
  444. Terrorismus und Rechtsstaatlichkeit, Analysen, Handlungsoptionen, Perspektiven, Berlin, 2007, S. 241–271. Google Scholar öffnen
  445. Arzt, Clemens: Policing Under the Rule of Law, Constitutional Rights as a Legal Constraint on Policing in Germany and in the United States of America, in: Treubrodt, Detlef / Kirstein, Denis (Hrsg.), Auf dem Weg zur Hochschule für öffentliche Aufgaben, Aufsätze aus der Rechts-, Polizei-, Wirtschafts-, Verwaltungs- und Sozialwissenschaft; Festschrift für Hans Paul Prümm zum 60. Geburtstag, Berlin, 2008, S. 19–35. Google Scholar öffnen
  446. Benn, Stanley I.: Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Persons, in: Pennock, J. R. / Chapman, John W. (Hrsg.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, New York, 1971, S. 1–26. Google Scholar öffnen
  447. Bradley, Craig M.: The Fourth Amendment: Be Reasonable, in: Bradley, Craig M. Google Scholar öffnen
  448. (Hrsg.), The Rehnquist Legacy, Cambridge, New York, 2006, S. 81–105. Google Scholar öffnen
  449. Bradley, Craig M.: Taking Privacy Seriously under the Fourth Amendment, in: Dörr, Dieter / Weaver, Russell L. (Hrsg.), The Right to Privacy in the Light of Media Convergence, Perspectives from Three Continents, Berlin, Boston, 2012, S. 37–50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110276152.37
  450. Curry, Michael R.: Discursive Displacement and the Seminal Ambiguity of Space and Place, in: Lievrouw, Leah A. / Livingstone, Sonia M. (Hrsg.), Handbook of New Media, Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs, London, Thousand Oaks (Cal.), 2002, S. 502–517. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781848608245.n36
  451. Davies, Simon G.: Re-engineering the Right to Privacy: How Privacy Has Been Transformed from a Right to a Commodity, in: Agre, Philip E. / Rotenberg, Marc (Hrsg.), Technology and Privacy, The New Landscape, Cambridge (Mass.), 1997, S. 143–165. Google Scholar öffnen
  452. Davies, Thomas Y.: Fourth Amendment, in: Hall, Kermit L. (Hrsg.), The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, 2. Aufl., Oxford, 2005, S. 360–364. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/law/9780195176612.001.0001
  453. Dickerson, Oliver M.: Writs of Assistance as a Cause of the Revolution, in: Morris, Richard B. (Hrsg.), The Era of the American Revolution, New York, 1939, S. 40–75. Google Scholar öffnen
  454. Ditton, Jason: Public Support for Town Centre CCTV Schemes: Myth or Reality?, in: Norris, Clive / Moran, Jade / Armstrong, Gary (Hrsg.), Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television, and Social Control, Aldershot, Brookfield (Vt.), 1998, S. 221–228. Google Scholar öffnen
  455. Evers, Hans-Ulrich: Schutz des "Privatlebens" durch Art. 8 MRK und durch das Grundrecht auf Datenschutz, in: Adamovich, Ludwig / Pernthaler, Peter (Hrsg.), Auf dem Weg zur Menschenwürde und Gerechtigkeit, Festschrift für Hans R. Klecatsky, dargeboten zum 60. Lebensjahr, Wien, 1980, S. 177–203. Google Scholar öffnen
  456. Friedrich, Carl J.: Secrecy versus Privacy: The Democratic Dilemma, in: Pennock, J. R. / Chapman, John W. (Hrsg.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, New York, 1971, S. 105–120. Google Scholar öffnen
  457. Gellman, Robert: A General Survey of Video Surveillance Law in the United States, in: Nouwt, Sjaak / de Vries, Berend R. / Prins, Corien (Hrsg.), Reasonable Expectations of Privacy?, Eleven Country Reports on Camera Surveillance and Workplace Privacy, Den Haag, 2005, S. 7–37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-589-6_2
  458. Gerstein, Robert S.: Privacy and Intimacy, in: Schoeman, Ferdinand D. (Hrsg.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge, New York, 1984, S. 265–271. Google Scholar öffnen
  459. Hoff, Joan: Richard Milhous Nixon, in: Urofsky, Melvin I. (Hrsg.), The American Presidents, Critical Essays, New York, London, 2000, S. 505–523. Google Scholar öffnen
  460. Horn, Hans-Detlef: Schutz der Privatsphäre, in: Isensee, Josef / Kirchhof, Paul (Hrsg.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bd. VII, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg, 2009, § 149. Google Scholar öffnen
  461. Kamisar, Yale: Confessions, Search and Seizure, and the Rehnquist Court, in: Belsky, Martin H. (Hrsg.), The Rehnquist Court, A Retrospective, New York, 2002, S. 80–115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1540-5818.00032
  462. Kerr, Orin S.: Fourth Amendment Remedies and Development of the Law: A Comment on Camreta v. Greene and Davis v. United States, in: Shapiro, Ilya (Hrsg.), Cato Supreme Court Review: 2010-2011, Washington (D.C.), S. 237– 261. Google Scholar öffnen
  463. Kerr, Orin S.: Use Restrictions and the Future of Surveillance Law, in: Rosen, Jeffrey / Wittes, Benjamin (Hrsg.), Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change, Harrisonburg (Va.), 2011, S. 37–46. Google Scholar öffnen
  464. Landynski, Jacob W.: Search and Seizure, in: Nagel, Stuart S. (Hrsg.), The Rights of the Accused: In Law and Action, Beverly Hills (Ca.), 1972, S. 27–58. Google Scholar öffnen
  465. O'Brien, David M.: The Reagan Judges: His Most Enduring Legacy?, in: Jones, Charles O. (Hrsg.), The Reagan Legacy, Promise and Performance, Chatham (N.J.), 1988, S. 60–101. Google Scholar öffnen
  466. Rachels, James: Why Privacy is Important, in: Schoeman, Ferdinand D. (Hrsg.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge, New York, 1984, S. 290–299. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625138.013
  467. Reiman, Jeffrey H.: Privacy, Intimacy and Personhood, in: Schoeman, Ferdinand D. (Hrsg.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge, New York, 1984, S. 300–316. Google Scholar öffnen
  468. Scalia, Antonin G.: Common Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws, in: 842 Google Scholar öffnen
  469. Scalia, Antonin G. / Gutmann, Amy (Hrsg.), A Matter of Interpretation, Federal Courts and the Law : An Essay, Princeton (N.J.), 1997, S. 3–47. Google Scholar öffnen
  470. Schoeman, Ferdinand D.: Privacy and Intimate Information, in: Schoeman, Ferdinand D. (Hrsg.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge, New York, 1984, S. 403–418. Google Scholar öffnen
  471. Schoeman, Ferdinand D.: Privacy: Philosophical Dimensions of the Literature, in: Schoeman, Ferdinand D. (Hrsg.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge, New York, 1984, S. 1–33. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625138
  472. Schwenk, Edmund H.: Das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht in amerikanischer Sicht, in: Wahl, Eduard / Serick, Rolf / Niederländer, Hubert (Hrsg.), Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsvereinheitlichung, Festschrift zum fünfzigjährigen Bestehen des Instituts für ausländisches und internationales Privat- und Wirtschaftsrecht der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 1967, S. 232–258. Google Scholar öffnen
  473. Simmel, Arnold: Privacy is Not an Isolated Freedom, in: Pennock, J. R. / Chapman, John W. (Hrsg.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, New York, 1971, S. 71–87. Google Scholar öffnen
  474. Slobogin, Christopher: Is the Fourth Amendment Relevant in a Technological Age?, in: Rosen, Jeffrey / Wittes, Benjamin (Hrsg.), Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change, Harrisonburg (Va.), 2011, S. 11–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1734755
  475. Stern, Klaus: Der allgemeine Privatsphärenschutz durch das Grundgesetz und seine Parallelen im internationalen und europäischen Recht, in: Bröhmer, Jürgen / Bieber, Roland / Callies, Christian u. a. (Hrsg.), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte, Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. Januar 2005, Köln, 2005, S. 1259–1276. Google Scholar öffnen
  476. Thomson, Judith J.: The Right to Privacy, in: Schoeman, Ferdinand D. (Hrsg.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge, New York, 1984, S. 272–289. Google Scholar öffnen
  477. van den Haag, Ernest: On Privacy, in: Pennock, J. R. / Chapman, John W. (Hrsg.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, New York, 1971, S. 149–168. Google Scholar öffnen
  478. Wasserstrom, Richard: Privacy: Some Arguments and Assumptions, in: Schoeman, Ferdinand D. (Hrsg.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge, New York, 1984, S. 317–332. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625138.015
  479. Weaver, Russell L.: Protecting Privacy in a Digital Age, in: Dörr, Dieter / Weaver, Russell L. (Hrsg.), The Right to Privacy in the Light of Media Convergence, Perspectives from Three Continents, Berlin, Boston, 2012, S. 1–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1515/9783110276152.1
  480. Weinstein, W. L.: The Private and the Free: A Conceptual Inquiry, in: Pennock, J. R. / Chapman, John W. (Hrsg.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, New York, 1971, S. 27–55. Google Scholar öffnen
  481. Wiederin, Ewald: Schutz der Privatsphäre, in: Merten, Detlef / Papier, Hans-Jürgen (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Grundrechte in Deutschland und Europa, Bd. VII / 1, Heidelberg, 2009, § 190. Google Scholar öffnen
  482. Jacobson, Arthur J. / Rosenfeld, Michel (Hrsg.), The Longest Night, Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000, Berkeley, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  483. Sunstein, Cass R. / Epstein, Richard Allen (Hrsg.), The Vote, Bush, Gore, and the Supreme Court, Chicago, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  484. Urofsky, Melvin I. / Urofsky, Philip E. (Hrsg.), The Douglas Letters: Selections from the Private Papers of Justice William O. Douglas, Bethesda (Md.), 1987. Google Scholar öffnen
  485. Adams, Charles F.: The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Bd. 2, Boston, 1850 - 1865. Google Scholar öffnen
  486. Allen, Anita L.: Uneasy Access, Privacy for Women in a Free Society, Totowa (N.J.), 1988. Google Scholar öffnen
  487. Amelung, Ulrich: Der Schutz der Privatheit im Zivilrecht, Schadensersatz und Gewinnabschöpfung bei Verletzung des Rechts auf Selbstbestimmung über personenbezogene Informationen im deutschen, englischen und USamerikanischen Recht, Tübingen, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  488. American Bar Association: ABA Standards for Criminal Justice: Electronic Surveillance: Section B: Technologically-Assisted Physical Surveillance, Washington (D.C.), 3. Aufl. 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  489. American Civil Liberties Union: You Are Being Tracked: How License Plate Readers Are Being Used To Record Americans’ Movements, New York, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  490. American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois: Chicago's Video Surveillance Cameras: A Pervasive and Unregulated Threat to Our Privacy, Chicago, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  491. Arzt, Clemens: Polizeiliche Überwachungsmaßnahmen in den USA, Grundrechtsbeschränkungen durch moderne Überwachungstechniken und im War on Terrorism, Frankfurt am Main, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  492. Avery, Michael / Rudovsky, David / Blum, Karen M.: Police Misconduct, Law and Litigation, St. Paul (Minn.), 3. Aufl. [Loseblatt, Stand 2005]. Google Scholar öffnen
  493. Avery, Michael / Rudovsky, David / Blum, Karen M.: Police Misconduct, Law and Litigation, St. Paul (Minn.), 3. Aufl. [Loseblatt, Stand 2012]. Google Scholar öffnen
  494. Baker, Liva: Miranda: Crime, Law, and Politics, New York, 1983. Google Scholar öffnen
  495. Balko, Radley: Rise of the Warrior Cop, The Militarization of America's Police Forces, New York, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  496. Bartsch, Verena: Rechtsvergleichende Betrachtung präventiv-polizeilicher Videoüberwachungen öffentlich zugänglicher Orte in Deutschland und in den USA, Berlin, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-51391-8
  497. Baum, Lawrence: The Supreme Court, Washington (D.C.), 10. Aufl. 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  498. Beckett, Katherine: Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics, New York, 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  499. Bennett, Colin J.: Regulating Privacy, Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States, Ithaca (N.Y.), 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  500. Bentham, Jeremy: The Works of Jeremy Bentham (1838 - 1843), New York, 1962 [1838-1943], Nachdruck der Bowring Edition. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00089259
  501. Berger, Raoul: Government by Judiciary, The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Cambridge (Mass.) [u.a.], 1977. Google Scholar öffnen
  502. Blackstone, William: Commentaries on the Laws of England, Bd. 1, Oxford, 17651769. Google Scholar öffnen
  503. Blackstone, William: Commentaries on the Laws of England, Bd. 2, Oxford, 17651769. Google Scholar öffnen
  504. Blackstone, William: Commentaries on the Laws of England, Bd. 4, Oxford, 17651769. Google Scholar öffnen
  505. Bloom, Robert M.: Searches, Seizures, and Warrants, A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution, Westport (Conn.), 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  506. Bloustein, Edward J.: Individual and Group Privacy, New Brunswick (N.J.), 1978. Google Scholar öffnen
  507. Bok, Sissela: Secrets, On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation, New York, 1983. Google Scholar öffnen
  508. Bolt, Robert: A Man for All Seasons: A Play of Sir Thomas More, London, 1960 [1973], Nachdruck der Originalausgabe. Google Scholar öffnen
  509. Breyer, Stephen G.: Active Liberty, Interpreting our Democratic Constitution, New York, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  510. Brugger, Winfried: Einführung in das öffentliche Recht der USA, München, 2. Aufl. 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  511. Brugger, Winfried: Demokratie, Freiheit, Gleichheit, Studien zum Verfassungsrecht der USA, Berlin, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  512. Chemerinsky, Erwin: The Conservative Assault on the Constitution, New York, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  513. Coburn, Tom: Safety At Any Price: Assessing the Impact of Homeland Security Spending in U.S. Cities, Washington (D.C.), 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  514. Cuddihy, William J.: The Fourth Amendment, Origins and Original Meaning, 6021791, New York, 2009 [1990], [Dissertation, aktualisierte Veröffentlichung der Urfassung aus dem Jahr 1990]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367195.003.0024
  515. Damaška, Mirjan R.: Evidence Law Adrift, New Haven, 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  516. Dash, Samuel: The Intruders: Unreasonable Searches and Seizures from King John to John Ashcroft, Piscataway (N.J.), 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  517. Davidson, Kenneth M. / Ginsburg, Ruth B. / Kay, Herma H.: Sex-based Discrimination: Texts, Cases, and Materials, St. Paul (Minn.), 1974. Google Scholar öffnen
  518. Dean, John W.: The Rehnquist Choice, The Untold Story of the Nixon Appointment that Redefined the Supreme Court, New York, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  519. DeCew, Judith W.: In Pursuit of Privacy, Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology, Ithaca (N.Y.), 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  520. Diesterhöft, Martin: Das Recht auf medialen Neubeginn, Berlin, 2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-54292-5
  521. Douglas, William O.: The Court Years, 1939-1975: The Autobiography of William O. Douglas, New York, 1980. Google Scholar öffnen
  522. Electronic Privacy Information Center: Privacy & Human Rights, An International Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments, Washington (D.C.), 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  523. Elixmann, Robert: Datenschutz und Suchmaschinen, Neue Impulse für einen Datenschutz im Internet, Berlin, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  524. Epstein, Lee / Segal, Jeffrey A.: Advice and Consent, The Politics of Judicial Appointments, Oxford [u.a.], 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  525. Epstein, Lee / Segal, Jeffrey A. / Spaeth, Harold J. / Walker, Thomas G.: The Supreme Court Compendium, Data, Decisions & Developments, Thousand Oaks (Cal.), 5. Aufl. 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781608717620
  526. Etzioni, Amitai: The Limits of Privacy, New York, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3528345
  527. Foucault, Michel: Discipline and Punish, The Birth of the Prison, New York, 2. Aufl. 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  528. Franceschini, Remo: A Matter of Honor, One Cop's Lifelong Pursuit of John Gotti and the Mob, New York, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  529. Fried, Charles: An Anatomy of Values, Problems of Personal and Social Choice, Cambridge (Mass.), 1970. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674332485
  530. Garrow, David J.: The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., From Solo to Memphis, New York, 1981. Google Scholar öffnen
  531. Gilliom, John: Overseers of the Poor, Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy, Chicago, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  532. Goffmann, Erving: Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings, New York, 1963. Google Scholar öffnen
  533. Goldford, Dennis J.: The American Constitution and the Debate over Originalism, New York, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756214.003
  534. Gorgass, Tim: Staatliche Abhörmaßnahmen bei Voice over IP, Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung zwischen Deutschland und den USA ; unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ausleitung des Sprachkanals (RTP-Streams), Berlin [u.a.], 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  535. Greenburg, Jan C.: Supreme Conflict, The Inside Story of the Struggle for the Control of the United States Supreme Court, New York, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  536. Greenhouse, Linda: Becoming Justice Blackmun, Harry Blackmun's Supreme Court Journey, New York, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  537. Hall, John W.: Search and Seizure, Rochester (N.Y.), 1982. Google Scholar öffnen
  538. Harris, Shane: The Watchers, The Rise of America's Surveillance State, New York, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  539. Hensley, Thomas R. / Hale, Kathleen / Snook, Carl: The Rehnquist Court, Justices, Rulings, and Legacy, Santa Barbara, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  540. Hessel, Tobias J.: Ein Vergleich der Eingriffsschwellen im deutschen und USamerikanischen Recht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des U.S. Supreme Court bei Eingriffen in die Privatsphäre, Berlin, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  541. Hill, Anita: Speaking Truth to Power, New York, 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  542. Hillygus, D. S. / Shields, Todd G.: The Persuadable Voter, Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns, Princeton (N.J.), 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02658.x
  543. Hofmann, Hasso: Einführung in die Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie, Darmstadt, 5. Aufl. 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.12946/rg19/130-141
  544. Hofstadter, Samuel H.: The Development of the Right of Privacy in New York, New York, 1954. Google Scholar öffnen
  545. Hutchinson, Thomas: The History of the Province of Massachusetts Bay, From 1749 to 1774, London, 1828. Google Scholar öffnen
  546. Inness, Julie C.: Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation, New York, 1992. Google Scholar öffnen
  547. Jenkins, John A.: The Partisan, The Life of William Rehnquist, New York, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  548. Johnson, Phillip E.: Cases and Materials on Criminal Procedure, St. Paul (Minn.), 3. Aufl. 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  549. Kamlah, Ruprecht: Right of Privacy: Das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht in amerikanischer Sicht unter Berücksichtigung neuer technologischer Entwicklungen, Köln, 1969. Google Scholar öffnen
  550. Kau, Marcel: United States Supreme Court und Bundesverfassungsgericht, Die Bedeutung des United States Supreme Court für die Errichtung und Fortentwicklung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Berlin [u.a.], 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  551. Kelm, Werner: Rechtsfälle aus dem Bereich des Rechts auf Individualität im deutschen Recht in vergleichender Betrachtung mit 'Right of Privacy Cases' im amerikanischen Recht, Frankfurt am Main, 1956. Google Scholar öffnen
  552. LaFave, Wayne R.: Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, Bd. 1, St. Paul (Minn.), 1978. Google Scholar öffnen
  553. LaFave, Wayne R.: Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, Bd. 1, St. Paul (Minn.), 2. Aufl. 1987. Google Scholar öffnen
  554. LaFave, Wayne R.: Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, Bd. 1, St. Paul (Minn.), 3. Aufl. 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  555. LaFave, Wayne R.: Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, Bd. 1, Eagan (Minn.), 5. Aufl. 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  556. LaFave, Wayne R.: Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, Bd. 2, Eagan (Minn.), 5. Aufl. 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  557. LaFave, Wayne R.: Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, Bd. 5, Eagan (Minn.), 5. Aufl. 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  558. LaFave, Wayne R.: Search and Seizure, A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment, Bd. 6, Eagan (Minn.), 5. Aufl. 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  559. LaFave, Wayne R. / Israel, Jerold H. / King, Nancy J. / Kerr, Orin S.: Criminal Procedure, St. Paul (Minn.), 3. Aufl. 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  560. Landynski, Jacob W.: Search and Seizure and the Supreme Court: A Study in Constitutional Interpretation, Baltimore (Md.), 1966. Google Scholar öffnen
  561. Lasson, Nelson B.: The History and Development of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, New York, 1937. Google Scholar öffnen
  562. Lepsius, Oliver: Verwaltungsrecht unter dem Common Law, Amerikanische Entwicklungen bis zum New Deal, Tübingen, 1997. Google Scholar öffnen
  563. Lessig, Lawrence: Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  564. Lessig, Lawrence: Code, Version 2.0, New York, 2. Aufl. 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  565. Lichtenberg, Illya D.: Voluntary Consent Or Obedience to Authority: An Inquiry into the "Consensual" Police-citizen Encounter, Rutgers University [Dissertation], 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  566. Locke, John: Second Treatise of Government, New York, 1952 [1764, 1690], [auf Basis der 6. Aufl. 1764; erstmals erschienen 1690]. Google Scholar öffnen
  567. Lützner, Axel: Strafprozessuale Zwangs- und Überwachungsmaßnahmen im Recht der USA und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Leipzig, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  568. Lyon, David: The Electronic Eye, The Rise of Surveillance Society, Cambridge, 1994. Google Scholar öffnen
  569. Maclin, Tracey: The Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment's Exclusionary Rule, New York, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795475.003.0050
  570. Maltz, Earl M.: Chief Justiceship of Warren Burger, 1969-1986, Columbia (S.C.), 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  571. Mayer, Jane / Abramson, Jill: Strange Justice, The Selling of Clarence Thomas, Boston, 1994. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2962477
  572. McInnis, Thomas N.: The Evolution of the Fourth Amendment, Lanham (Md.), 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  573. McMahon, Kevin J.: Nixon's Court, His Challenge to Judicial Liberalism and its Political Consequences, Chicago, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226561219.001.0001
  574. Meyer-Ladewig, Jens: Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Handkommentar, Baden-Baden, 3. Aufl. 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19507-5_8
  575. Mielke, Falko: Freiheitsschutz und informationelle Vorfeldbefugnisse in der modernen deutschen und amerikanischen Antiterrorgesetzgebung, Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung am Beispiel der rechtsstaatlichen Bewältigung nachrichtendienstlicher Auskunftsrechte im Bankrecht, Hamburg, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  576. Miller, Arthur: The Assault on Privacy, Ann Arbor, 1971. Google Scholar öffnen
  577. Mills, Jon L.: Privacy, The Lost Right, Oxford, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367355.003.0004
  578. Nagel, Thomas: Concealment and Exposure: And Other Essays, New York, 2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  579. Nestel, Thomas J. III.: Using Surveillance Camera Systems to Monitor Public Domains: Can Abuse Be Prevented?, Monterey (Cal.) [Master's Thesis], 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  580. Nimmer, Raymond T.: Information Law, New York, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  581. Nissenbaum, Helen: Privacy in Context, Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social life, Stanford (Cal.), 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  582. O'Brien, David M.: Privacy, Law, and Public Policy, New York, 1979. Google Scholar öffnen
  583. Orwell, George: Nineteen Eighty-four, A Novel, New York, 1949. Google Scholar öffnen
  584. Ossenberg, Sarah: Die Fernwirkung im deutsch-U.S.-amerikanischen Vergleich, Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Funktionen der Beweisverwertungsverbote, Hamburg, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  585. Perron, Walter: Das Beweisantragsrecht des Beschuldigten im deutschen Strafprozess, Eine Untersuchung der verfassungsrechtlichen und verfahrensstrukturellen 849 Google Scholar öffnen
  586. Grundlagen, gesetzlichen Regelungen und rechtstatsächlichen Auswirkungen sowie eine Erörterung der Reformperspektiven unter rechtsvergleichender Berücksichtigung des adversatorischen Prozessmodells, Berlin, 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  587. Porter, Kirk H. / Johnson, Donald B.: National Party Platforms, 1840-1972, Urbana, 1970. Google Scholar öffnen
  588. Posner, Richard A.: The Economics of Justice, Cambridge (Mass.), 1981. Google Scholar öffnen
  589. Posner, Richard A.: Economic Analysis of Law, New York, 5. Aufl. 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  590. Posner, Richard A.: The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory, Cambridge (Mass.), 1999. Google Scholar öffnen
  591. Post, Robert C.: Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management, Cambridge (Mass.), 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  592. Qin, Jing: DNA-Datenbankgesetzgebung, Eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse unter Berücksichtigung des Spannungsverhältnisses zwischen der Effizienz der Strafverfolgung und den Anforderungen an den Schutz der Privatsphäre, Freiburg, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  593. Quincy, Josiah JR.: Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in The Superior Court of Judicature of The Province of Massachusetts Bay Between 1761 And 1772, Boston, 1865. Google Scholar öffnen
  594. Regan, Priscilla M.: Legislating Privacy, Technology, Social values, and Public Policy, Chapel Hill, 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  595. Rohe, Peter M.: Verdeckte Informationsgewinnung mit technischen Hilfsmitteln zur Bekämpfung der organisierten Kriminalität, Zugleich eine rechtsvergleichende Analyse der polizeilichen Abhörbefugnisse in den USA, Frankfurt am Main, 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  596. Rohloff, Annegret: Grundrechtsschranken in Deutschland und den USA, Berlin [u.a.], 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  597. Rosen, Jeffrey: The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America, New York, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  598. Rotunda, Ronald D. / Nowak, John E.: Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure, Bd. 1, Eagan (Minn.), 5. Aufl. 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  599. Rotunda, Ronald D. / Nowak, John E.: Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure, Bd. 2, Eagan (Minn.), 5. Aufl. 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  600. Rudman, Warren B.: In Combat, 12 Years in the U.S. Senate, New York, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  601. Rule, James B.: Private Lives and Public Surveillance, Social Control in the Computer Age, New York, 1974. Google Scholar öffnen
  602. Sandel, Michael J.: Democracy's Discontent, America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge (Mass.), 1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  603. Schiedermair, Stephanie: Der Schutz des Privaten als internationales Grundrecht, Tübingen, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-152164-5
  604. Schlosberg, Mark / Ozer, Nicole A.: Under the Watchful Eye: The Proliferation of Video Surveillance Systems in California, San Francisco (Cal.), 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  605. Schneider, Franziska: Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für die Vornahme von OnlineDurchsuchungen, Online-Durchsuchungen als Mittel zur Terrorismusbekämpfung in Deutschland und den USA, Frankfurt am Main, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  606. Schröder, Christian: Die Haftung für Verstöße gegen Privacy Policies und Codes of Conduct nach US-amerikanischem und deutschem Recht, Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Rechtsnatur von Datenschutzerklärungen, Verhaltensregeln gem. § 38a BDSG und Unternehmensregelungen gem. § 4c Abs. 2 BDSG, Baden-Baden, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845205069
  607. Seebauer, Florian: Die Zulässigkeit des Spähangriffes zu Strafverfolgungszwecken, Hamburg, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  608. Siegel, Loren / Perry, Robert A. / Gram, Margaret H.: Who’s Watching? Video Camera Surveillance in New York City and the Need for Public Oversight, New York, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  609. Skolnick, Jerome H.: Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society, New York, 3. Aufl. 1994. Google Scholar öffnen
  610. Sloane, Martin: Supermarket Shopper's 1980 Guide to Coupons and Refunds, New York, 1980. Google Scholar öffnen
  611. Slobogin, Christopher: Privacy at Risk, The New Government Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment, Chicago, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226762944.001.0001
  612. Slocum-Schaffer, Stephanie A.: America in the Seventies, Syracuse (N.Y.), 2003. Google Scholar öffnen
  613. Small, Marc A.: The Role of Perceptions of Privacy Invasions in a Psychology of Jurisprudence, 1990. Google Scholar öffnen
  614. Smith, Christopher E.: Justice Antonin Scalia and the Supreme Court's Conservative Moment, Westport (Conn.), 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  615. Smith, Maurice H.: The Writs of Assistance Case, Berkeley, 1978. Google Scholar öffnen
  616. Smith, Robert E.: Ben Franklin's Web Site, Privacy and Curiosity from Plymouth Rock to the Internet, Providence (R.I.), 2000. Google Scholar öffnen
  617. Solove, Daniel J.: The Digital Person, Technology and Privacy in the Information Age, New York, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  618. Solove, Daniel J.: Understanding Privacy, Cambridge (Mass.), 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0908-100
  619. Solove, Daniel J.: Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security, New Haven, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  620. Stüwe, Patricia: Strafprozessuale und präventive Eingriffe im Lichte der Verfassung - ein Rechtsvergleich zwischen der BRD und den USA, Frankfurt am Main, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  621. Taylor, Telford: Two Studies in Constitutional Interpretation, Columbus, 1969. Google Scholar öffnen
  622. The Constitution Project: Guidelines for Public Videosurveillance, Washington (D.C.), 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  623. Thomas, Clarence: My Grandfather's Son, A Memoir, New York, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  624. Thoreau, Henry D.: Excursions, Boston, 1893. Google Scholar öffnen
  625. Toobin, Jeffrey: The Nine, Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court, New York, 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/e446242008-001
  626. Toobin, Jeffrey: The Oath, The Obama White House v. the Supreme Court, 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  627. Walker, Samuel: Taming the System, The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice, 1950-1990, New York, 1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  628. Walker, Samuel: The New World of Police Accountability, Thousand Oaks (Cal.), 2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781452204352
  629. Westin, Alan F.: Privacy and Freedom, New York, 1967. Google Scholar öffnen
  630. White, G. E.: Earl Warren - A Public Life, New York, 1982. Google Scholar öffnen
  631. Whitford, Andrew B. / Yates, Jeff: Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda, Constructing the War on Drugs, Baltimore (Md.), 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  632. Wittern, Felix: Das Verhältnis von Right of Privacy und Persönlichkeitsrecht zur Freiheit der Massenmedien, Hamburg, 2004. Google Scholar öffnen
  633. Woodward, Bob / Armstrong, Scott: The Brethren, Inside the Supreme Court, New York, 2005 [1979], Erstveröffentlichung 1979 mit abweichender Paginierung. Google Scholar öffnen
  634. Yarbrough, Tinsley E.: Harry A. Blackmun, The Outsider Justice, Oxford [u.a.], 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195141238.001.0001
  635. Zill, Nicholas / Nord, Christine W. / Loomis, Laura S.: Adolescent Time Use, Risky Behavior, and Outcomes: An Analysis of National Data., Rockville (Md.), 1995. Google Scholar öffnen
  636. Zimmer, Michael T.: The Quest for the Perfect Search Engine: Values, Technical Design, and the Flow of Personal Information in Spheres of Mobility, Ann Arbor, 2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450440219
  637. Zuboff, Shoshana: In the Age of the Smart Machine, The Future of Work and Power, Oxford, 1988. Google Scholar öffnen
  638. V. Nachschlagewerke Langenscheidt Collins: Großwörterbuch Englisch, Englisch-Deutsch; DeutschEnglisch, Berlin [u.a.], 5. Aufl. 2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  639. Langenscheidt Alpmann: Fachwörterbuch kompakt Recht Englisch, Englisch-Deutsch, Deutsch-Englisch, Berlin [u.a.], 2. Aufl. 2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  640. Byers, Paula K. / Bourgoin, Suzanne M.: Encyclopedia of World Biography, Detroit, 2. Aufl. 1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  641. dict.cc: Deutsch-Englisch-Wörterbuch, http://www.dict.cc/. Google Scholar öffnen
  642. Webster, Noah: Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Springfield (Mass.), 1961. Google Scholar öffnen
  643. Webster, Noah: An American Dictionary of the English Language, San Francisco (Cal.), 6. Aufl. 1989, [Nachdruck der ersten Auflage 1828]. Google Scholar öffnen
  644. VI. Protokolle und Materialien The Human Life Bill: Hearings Before the Subcommitee on Separation of Powers of the Committee on the Judiciary, 97th Cong., 1st Session on S. 158, 1981. Google Scholar öffnen
  645. Katz v. United States, Brief for Petitioner v. 07.09.1967, 1967 WL 113605. Google Scholar öffnen
  646. Katz v. United States, Reply Brief for Petitioner v. 14.10.1967, 1967 WL 113607. Google Scholar öffnen
  647. Katz v. United States, Protokoll der mündlichen Verhandlung v. 17.10.1967, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_35. Google Scholar öffnen
  648. United States v. Chadwick, Brief for the United States v. 27.01.1977, 1977 WL 189820. Google Scholar öffnen
  649. Smith v. Maryland, Entscheidungsentwurf v. 01.12.1978, Library of Congress, Harry A. Blackmun Papers (1918 - 2001), Box 297 (78-5374). Google Scholar öffnen
  650. Smith v. Maryland, Brief for Petitioner v. 18.01.1979, 1979 WL 199743. Google Scholar öffnen
  651. Briefwechsel der Richter Stevens und Blackmun zu „Smith v. Maryland“ v. 24.05.1979, Library of Congress, Harry A. Blackmun Papers (1918 - 2001), Box 297 (78-5374). Google Scholar öffnen
  652. United States v. Knotts, Protokoll der mündlichen Verhandlung v. 06.12.1982, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1982/1982_81_1802. Google Scholar öffnen
  653. Dow Chemical Company v. United States, Petitioner's Brief on the Merits v. 25.07.1985, 1985 WL 670125. Google Scholar öffnen
  654. Arizona v. Hicks, Brief for Petitioner v. 01.10.1985, 1985 WL 669492. Google Scholar öffnen
  655. Supreme Court Nomination Hearings, Statement of Sen. Kennedy v. 29.07.1986, S. Hrg. 99-1067. Google Scholar öffnen
  656. Arizona v. Hicks, Brief for Respondent v. 01.10.1986, 1986 WL 728142. Google Scholar öffnen
  657. Floor Speech, Statement of Sen. Kennedy v. 23.06.1987, 133 Cong. Rec. S9188. Google Scholar öffnen
  658. Erste Fernsehdebatte zwischen Albert Gore Jr. und George W. Bush im Präsidentschaftswahlkampf 2000 [Transkript] v. 03.10.2000, 2000 WL 1466168. Google Scholar öffnen
  659. Hudson v. Michigan, Protokoll der mündlichen Verhandlung v. 09.01.2006, http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/041360.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  660. Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Samuel A. Alito, Jr. v. 09.01.2006 - 13.01.2006, S. HRG. 109-277. Google Scholar öffnen
  661. Solicitor General Hearings (Perrelli / Kagan) v. 10.02.2009, S. Hrg. 111-361. Google Scholar öffnen
  662. United States v. Jones, Protokoll der mündlichen Verhandlung v. 08.11.2011, http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/101259.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  663. Abkommen zwischen den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und der Europäischen Union über die Verwendung von Fluggastdatensätzen und deren Übermittlung an das United States Department of Homeland Security v. 11.08.2012, ABl. Nr. L 215. Google Scholar öffnen
  664. Maryland v. King, Protokoll der mündlichen Verhandlung v. 26.02.2013, http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/12-207lp23.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  665. EuGH, Rs. C-131/12, Schlussanträge GA Jääskinen v. 25.06.2013, [Google Spain v. AEPD]. Google Scholar öffnen
  666. Riley v. California, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari v. 30.06.2013, Alito, Samuel A.: Memorandum to the Solicitor General v. 18.05.1984, http://www.archives.gov/news/samuel-alito/accession-060-89216/MemphisPol-v-Garner-1984-box19-memoAlitotoSolicitorGeneral.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  667. Alito, Samuel A.: Personal Qualifications Statement v. 15.11.1985, http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/alito/111585stmnt2.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  668. Bush, George W.: Address to a joint session of Congress [Transkript] v. 20.09.2001, http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/20/gen.bush.transcript/. Google Scholar öffnen
  669. BVerfG: Pressemitteilung Nr. 2/2009 zur mündlichen Verhandlung "LissabonVertrag" v. 16.01.2009, http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/pressemitteilungen/bvg09-002.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  670. BVerfG: Pressemitteilung Nr. 29/2013 zur mündlichen Verhandlung ESM/EZB v. 19.04.2013, http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/pressemitteilungen/bvg13-029. Google Scholar öffnen
  671. Freund, Paul A.: Dinner Adress to the American Law Institute on May 23, 1975, 1975 ALI Proceedings. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1340299
  672. Nixon, Richard: Adress Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Miami Beach, Florida v. 08.08.1968, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/medialist.php?presid=37. Google Scholar öffnen
  673. Nixon, Richard M.: Toward Freedom From Fear v. 1968, http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/xfe16b00/pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  674. Republican National Convention: Republican Party Platform of 1980 v. 15.07.1980, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25844. Google Scholar öffnen
  675. Scalia, Antonin G.: A Theory of Constitution Interpretation: Vortrag an der Catholic University of America, Washington D.C. v. 18.10.1996, http://web.archive.org/web/19980119172058/www.courttv.com/library/rights/s calia.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  676. Schmidt, Gerhard: Bericht über die Existenz eines globalen Abhörsystems für private und wirtschaftliche Kommunikation (Abhörsystem ECHELON) (2001/2098 (INI)) v. 11.07.2001, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A5-2001-0264+0+DOC+PDF+V0//DE. Google Scholar öffnen
  677. The President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice: The Challenge of Crime In A Free Society, 1967, https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/42.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  678. The White House Information Infrastructure Task Force Working Group on Privacy: Privacy and the National Information Infrastructure: Principles for Providing and Using Personal Information v. 06.06.1995, http://aspe.hhs.gov/datacncl/niiprivp.htm. Google Scholar öffnen
  679. United States General Accounting Office: Report No. 03-748: Video Surveillance v. 27.06.2003, http://www.gao.gov/atext/d03748.txt. Google Scholar öffnen
  680. Avlon, John P.: Is Elena Kagan a Liberal - or a Centrist?, CNN Online v. 30.06.2010, http://edition.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/06/29/avlon.kagan.centrist/index.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  681. Ball, James: Edward Snowden NSA Files: Secret Surveillance and our Revelations So Far, The Guardian v. 21.08.2013, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/ aug/21/edward-snowden-nsa-files-revelations. Google Scholar öffnen
  682. Baynes, Terry: Factobox: Supreme Court's Lengthiest Oral Arguments, Reuters v. 16.11.2011, http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/16/us-usa-healthcare-argu ments-idUSTRE7AF2WH20111116. Google Scholar öffnen
  683. Buchanan, Pat: Bush Recoils from Greatness, Townhall Magazine v. 02.10.2005, http://townhall.com/columnists/patbuchanan/2005/10/03/bush_recoils_from_gr eatness. Google Scholar öffnen
  684. Carlson, Tucker: Bork Calls Miers Nomination a 'Disaster' [Interview mit Robert H. Bork], NBC News v. 14.10.2005, http:// www.nbcnews.com/id/9623345. Google Scholar öffnen
  685. Carson, E. A. / Golinelli, Daniela: Prisoners in 2012 - Advance Counts, U.S. Department of Justice (Bureau of Justice Statistics) v. 25.07.2013, http://www. bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p12ac.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  686. Cline, Jay: Survey: The Best Privacy Advisers of 2010, www.computerworld.com v. 03.02.2011, http:// www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9208018/Survey _The_best_privacy_advisers_of_2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  687. Cohen, ANdrew: This Is Kennedy's Court - the Rest of the Justices Just Sit on It, The Atlantic v. 29.05.2013, http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/05/ this-is-kennedys-court-the-rest-of-the-justices-just-sit-on-it/276309/. Google Scholar öffnen
  688. Friess, Steve / Meyers, Jessica: Boston Frames Surveillance Debate, Politico v. 21.04.2013, http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/cameras-frame-debatesecurity-versus-privacy-90356.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  689. Gellman, Barton / Poitras, Laura: U.S., British Intelligence Mining Data from Nine U.S. Internet Companies in Broad Secret Program, The Washington Post v. 07.06.2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com/ investigations/us-intelligencemining-data-from-nine-us-internet-companies-in-broad-secret-program/2013/ 06/06/3a0c0da8-cebf-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  690. Greenburg, Jan C.: EXCLUSIVE: Supreme Court Justice Stevens Remembers President Ford, ABC News v. 02.01.2007, http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/ story?id=2765753&page=1. Google Scholar öffnen
  691. Greenhouse, Linda: The Roberts Court, Version 4.0, The New York Times Opinionator v. 02.10.2010, http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/02/ the-roberts-court-version-4-0/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26949
  692. Greenhouse, Linda: Robert Bork's Tragedy, The New York Times Opinionator v. 09.01.2013, http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/09/robert-borkstragedy. Google Scholar öffnen
  693. Greenwald, Glenn: The Case Against Elena Kagan, Salon.com v. 13.04.2010, http://www.salon.com/2010/04/13/kagan_3. Google Scholar öffnen
  694. Hoch, Maureen: Justice Anthony Kennedy, PBS News v. 09.03.2007, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/law/jan-june07/ kennedy.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  695. Kerr, Orin S.: Metadata, the NSA, and the Fourth Amendment: A Constitutional Analysis of Collecting and Querying Call Records Databases, Volokh.com v. 17.06.2013, http://www.volokh.com/ 2013/07/17/metadata-the-nsa-and-thefourth-amendment-a-constitutional-analysis-of-collecting-and-querying-callrecords-databases/. Google Scholar öffnen
  696. Kravets, David: NSA Phone Snooping Cannot Be Challenged in Court, Feds Say, Wired.com v. 19.07.2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-secret ive-surveillance-court-rare-scrutiny-in-wake-of-nsa-leaks/2013/06/22/df9eaae6 -d9fa-11e2-a016-92547bf094cc_story.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  697. Kristol, William: Disappointed, Depressed and Demoralized, A Reaction to the Harriet Miers Nomination, The Weekly Standard v. 03.10.2005, http://www.weekly standard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/166quhvd.asp. Google Scholar öffnen
  698. ohne Verfasserangabe: Entire world - Prison Population Rates Per 100,000 of the National Population, International Centre for Prison Studies, http://www. prisonstudies.org/info/worldbrief/wpb_stats.php?area=all&category=wb_popra te. Google Scholar öffnen
  699. ohne Verfasserangabe: GOP Senator Concerned About Mier's Abortion Views, ABC News v. 05.10.2005, http:// abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1184984. Google Scholar öffnen
  700. ohne Verfasserangabe: Elena Kagan Confirmation: See Why 37 Voted 'No', The Huffington Post v. 05.08.2010, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/05/ elena-kagan-confirmation_n_672315.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  701. ohne Verfasserangabe: CTA Ahead of Schedule in Installing Security Cameras, CBS Chicago v. 21.11.2011, http://chicago .cbslocal.com/2011/11/21/ctaahead-of-schedule-in-installing-security-cameras. Google Scholar öffnen
  702. Posner, Richard A.: Why Didn't Robert Bork Reach the Supreme Court?, Slate v. 19.12.2012, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/ 2012/12/robert_bork_dead_why_didn_t_he_reach_the_supreme_court.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  703. Rosen, Jeffrey: Interview Transcript: Justice John Paul Stevens, The New York Times Online v. 22.06.2007, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/magazine/12stevensinterview.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  704. Sanchez, Julian: Contracts and ‘Reasonable Expectations of Privacy’, Cato Institute v. 31.03.2011, http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/contracts-and-reasonable-expectationsof-privacy. Google Scholar öffnen
  705. Schneier, Bruce: It's Time to Drop the "Expectation of Privacy" Test, Wired.com v. 26.03.2009, http://www.wired.com/print/politics/security/commentary/ securitymatters/2009/03/securitymatters_0326. Google Scholar öffnen
  706. Sherman, Mark: Bork: Nixon Offered Next High Court Vacancy in '73, The Associated Press v. 25.02.2013, http:// www.apnewsarchive.com/2013/Bork %3A_Nixon_offered_next_high_court_vacancy_in_'73/id-d402250301744029 826a4a99c41e35a4. Google Scholar öffnen
  707. Shiffman, John / Cooke, Kristina: Exclusive: U.S. Directs Agents to Cover Up Program Used to Investigate Americans, Reuters v. 05.08.2013, http:// www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/05/us-dea-sod-idUSBRE97409R20130805. Google Scholar öffnen
  708. Silverglate, Harvey / Smeallie, Kyle: Elena Kagan's Shaky Record, The Phoenix v. 16.04.2010, http://thephoenix.com/Boston/news/100861-elena-kagans-shakyrecord. Google Scholar öffnen
  709. Simon, Steven: Times Square, Bombs and Big Crowds: Put More Cameras on the Streets, The New York Times: The Opinion Pages v. 03.05.2010, http:// roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/03/times-square-bombs-and-bigcrowds/#steven. Google Scholar öffnen
  710. Stanley, Jay: The Crisis in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, American Constitution Society v. 20.05.2010, http://www.acslaw.org/publications/issue-briefs/the-crisisin-fourth-amendment-jurisprudence-0. Google Scholar öffnen
  711. Stone, Geoffrey R.: John Roberts: Bush's Blink, The Huffington Post v. 27.07.2005, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/john-roberts-bushs-blink_b_ 4755.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  712. Stone, Geoffrey R.: Savaging Roberts: Conservatives Run Amok, The Huffington Post: Blog v. 07.03.2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/ savaging-roberts-conserva_b_1647980.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  713. University of Chicago News Office: Statement Regarding Barack Obama, http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media. Google Scholar öffnen
  714. Whelan, Ed: Will the Left Oppose Elena Kagan?, National Review Online v. 10.03.2010, http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/ 49237/will-leftoppose-elena-kagan/ed-whelan. Google Scholar öffnen
  715. Zetter, Kim: Driving Big Brother, Wired.com v. 21.06.2005, http://www.wired .com/politics/security/news/2005/06/67952. Google Scholar öffnen
  716. Ackerman, Spencer: US Government Declassifies Court Order on NSA Surveillance as Pressure Builds, The Guardian v. 31.07.2013, http://www.theguardian.com/ world/2013/jul/31/us-government-declassifies-court-order-nsa-surveillance. Google Scholar öffnen
  717. Anderson, Nick / Marimow, Ann E.: Former D.C. Nightclub Owner Antoine Jones Sentenced on Drug Charge, The Washington Post v. 01.05.2013, http:// articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-05-01/local/38946696_1_antoine-jonesconspiracy-trial. Google Scholar öffnen
  718. Angwin, Julia / Valentino-Devries, Jennifer: New Tracking Frontier: Your License Plates, The Wall Street Journal v. 29.09.2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  719. Apple, R. W. JR.: For Reagan, an Old Trap; Rhetoric vs. Reality in the Ginsburg Case, The New York Times v. 07.11.1987. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08690
  720. Becker, Jo / Russakoff, Dale: Proving His Mettle in the Reagan Justice Dept., The Washington Post v. 09.01.2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  721. Berke, Richard L.: House Approves Civil Rights Bill; Veto Is Weighed, The New York Times v. 04.08.1990. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09214
  722. Biskupic, Joan: Ex-Supreme Court Justice Byron White Dies, USA Today v. 15.04.2002. Google Scholar öffnen
  723. Blumenthal, Max: In Contempt of Courts, The Nation v. 25.04.2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044559-5/50229-5
  724. Bork, Robert H.: Civil Rights - A Challenge, The New Republic v. 31.08.1963, S. 21– 24. Google Scholar öffnen
  725. Bravin, Jess / Koppel, Nathan: Nominee's Criminal Rulings Tilt to Right of Souter, The Wall Street Journal v. 05.06.2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  726. Broder, John M.: Collapse of the Ginsburg Nomination: At the End, Ginsburg Stood Alone - and Still a Puzzle, Los Angeles Times v. 08.11.1987. Google Scholar öffnen
  727. Bulkeley, William M.: Chicago's Camera Network is Everywhere, The Wall Street Journal v. 17.11.2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  728. Calmes, Jackie: Activism of Thomas's Wife Could Raise Judicial Issues, The New York Times v. 08.10.2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  729. Caplan, Lincoln: Clarence Thomas's Brand of Judicial Logic, The New York Times v. 22.10.2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  730. Chapman, Steve: Surveillance Cameras Aren't All That, There's More to the Story Than Boston, Chicago Tribune v. 05.05.2013. Google Scholar öffnen
  731. Cole, David: Scalia's Kind of Privacy, The Nation v. 12.06.2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  732. Detroit Free Press [Interview]: Obama: Aim for Fundamental Change, Detroit Free Press v. 02.10.2008, S. A13. Google Scholar öffnen
  733. Dowd, Maureen: Souter, New Hampshire Judge, Named by Bush for High Court; No 'Litmus Test,' President Says, The New York Times v. 24.07.1990. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09214
  734. Dworkin, Ronald: The Supreme Court Phalanx, The New York Review of Books v. 27.09.2007. Google Scholar öffnen
  735. Eagan, Margery: Familiar Anger Takes Flight with Airline Tussles, Boston Herald v. 15.08.1999, S. 8. Google Scholar öffnen
  736. Egan, Timothy: Police Surveillance of Streets Turns to Video Cameras and Listening Devices, The New York Times v. 07.02.1996. Google Scholar öffnen
  737. Egelko, Bob: Roberts, Rehnquist: Mirror Images, San Francisco Chronicle v. 06.09.2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/09575140500127956
  738. Elsasser, Glen: Rehnquist, Scalia Get Senate Confirmation, Chicago Tribune v. 18.09.1986. Google Scholar öffnen
  739. Flinn, John: Confessions of a Once-only Carry-on Guy, San Francisco Examiner v. 06.09.1998. Google Scholar öffnen
  740. Goldberg, J.J: Antonin Scalia's Uncivil Religion, The Forward v. 23.10.2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  741. Goldstein, Amy / Cohen, Sarah: Alito, In and Out of Mainstream, Nominee's Record Defies Stereotyping, The Washington Post v. 01.01.2006, S. A01. Google Scholar öffnen
  742. Graham, Fred P.: Supreme Court, in Recent Term, Began Swing to the Right That Was Sought by Nixon, The New York Times v. 02.07.1972, S. 18. Google Scholar öffnen
  743. Greenemeier, Larry: The Apple of Its Eye: Security and Surveillance Pervades Post9/11 New York City, Scientific American v. 09.11.2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  744. Greenhouse, Linda: Thurgood Marshall, Civil Rights Hero, Dies at 84, The New York Times v. 25.01.1993. Google Scholar öffnen
  745. Kamen, Al: Justice Powell Resigns, Was Supreme Court's Pivotal Vote, The Washington Post 27.06.1987, S. A01. Google Scholar öffnen
  746. Kaye, Ken: High-tech Security Gets Tests At Airports, Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel v. 20.02.2002, S. A1. Google Scholar öffnen
  747. Klein, Allison: Police Go Live Monitoring D.C. Crime Cameras, The Washington Post v. 11.02.2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  748. Krauthammer, Charles: Withdraw This Nominee, The Washington Post v. 07.10.2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509896.017
  749. Lacayo, Richard: The Unheard Witnesses, Time Magazine v. 24.06.2001. Google Scholar öffnen
  750. Lichtblau, Eric: Common Cause Asks Court about Thomas Speech, The New York Times v. 14.02.2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  751. Lichtblau, Eric: In Secret, Court Vastly Broadens Powers of N.S.A., The New York Times v. 06.06.2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/07/us/in-secret-courtvastly-broadens-powers-of-nsa.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  752. Liptak, Adam: Justices Step Closer to Repeal of Evidence Ruling, The New York Times v. 30.01.2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26164
  753. Liptak, Adam: Court Under Roberts Is Most Conservative in Decades, The New York Times v. 24.07.2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR26949
  754. Liptak, Adam: Civil Liberties Today, The New York Times v. 07.09.2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  755. Liptak, Adam: In Supreme Court Term, Striking Unity on Major Cases, The New York Times v. 30.06.2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  756. Liptak, Adam: A Secret Surveillance Program Proves Challengeable in Theory Only, The New York Times v. 15.07.2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/16/us/ double-secret-surveillance.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=1&. Google Scholar öffnen
  757. Lochhead, Carolyn: A Prequel for the Next Showdown, San Francisco Chronicle v. 27.09.2005, S. A3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/09575140500127956
  758. Maitland, Leslie: Reagan Offers Bill to Tighten Rules on Criminal Defendants, The New York Times v. 14.09.1982. Google Scholar öffnen
  759. Marcus, Ruth: Booting the Bench, The Washington Post v. 11.04.2005, S. A19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03560
  760. Marcus, Ruth: A Supreme Court Shift to the Right?, The Washington Post v. 10.04.2010. Google Scholar öffnen
  761. Milbank, Dana: And the Verdict on Justice Kennedy Is: Guilty, Washington Post v. 09.04.2005, S. A03. Google Scholar öffnen
  762. Nixon, Ron: U.S. Postal Service Logging All Mail for Law Enforcement, The New York Times v. 03.07.2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/us/moni toring-of-snail-mail.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  763. Nocera, Joe: The Ugliness Started with Bork, The New York Times v. 21.10.2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  764. O'Brien, David M.: Meese's Agenda for Ensuring the Reagan Legacy, Los Angeles Times v. 28.09.1986. Google Scholar öffnen
  765. ohne Verfasserangabe: Powell Fits Law, Order Nixon Mold, St. Petersburg Times v. 22.10.1971, S. 19A. Google Scholar öffnen
  766. ohne Verfasserangabe: Nixon's Hard Line, Time Magazine v. 26.03.1973, S. 68. Google Scholar öffnen
  767. ohne Verfasserangabe: The Law: The Court's Uncompromising Libertarian, Time Magazine v. 24.11.1975. Google Scholar öffnen
  768. ohne Verfasserangabe: Justice Kennedy Speaks Out, The New York Times v. 12.08.2003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03827
  769. ohne Verfasserangabe: Editorial - Scalia's Constitution, The Boston Globe v. 18.06.2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  770. ohne Verfasserangabe: Robert Bork [Obituary], The Telegraph v. 20.12.2012. Google Scholar öffnen
  771. Oliphant, James: Scalia and Thomas Dine with Healthcare Law Challengers as Court Takes Case, Los Angeles Times v. 14.11.2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  772. Posner, Richard A.: In Defense of Looseness, The New Republic v. 27.08.2008. Google Scholar öffnen
  773. Rosen, Jeffrey: The Dissenter, Justice John Paul Stevens, The New York Times v. 23.09.2007. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04331
  774. Savage, Charlie / Miller, Claire C. / Perlroth, Nicole: N.S.A. Said to Tap Google and Yahoo Abroad, The New York Times v. 30.10.2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/technology/nsa-is-mining-google-andyahoo-abroad.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  775. Spielman, Fran: Chicago Mayor Wants Cameras on Every Corner, Chicago SunTimes v. 14.03.2009. Google Scholar öffnen
  776. Stone, Geoffrey R.: The Miers Nomination: Cronyism and the Court, Chicago Tribune v. 04.10.2005, http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2005-10-04/news/051004001 3_1_harvard-law-school-appeals-harriet-miers. Google Scholar öffnen
  777. Stuart, Reginald: Bush Copies Nixon On 'Law And Order' Hits Dukakis As Soft On Crime, Philadelphia Daily News v. 01.07.1988, S. 13. Google Scholar öffnen
  778. Taylor, Stewart JR.: At Top of List, Judge Fitting Centrist Mold, The New York Times v. 10.11.1987. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08690
  779. Tizon, Tomas A.: 80 Eyes on 2,400 People, Los Angeles Times v. 28.03.2006. Google Scholar öffnen
  780. Tregalia, Stephen: The Bumpy Legal History of GPS Devices, New York Law Journal v. 30.08.2011. Google Scholar öffnen
  781. Walker, Samuel: Thanks for Nothing, Nino, Los Angeles Times v. 25.06.2006, S. 5. Google Scholar öffnen
  782. Weisman, Steven R.: Reagan Nominating Woman, an Arizona Appeals Judge, to Serve on Supreme Court, The New York Times v. 07.07.1981. Google Scholar öffnen
  783. West, Paul: Loyalty is Key in Choice of Miers, The Baltimore Sun v. 04.10.2005. Google Scholar öffnen
  784. Zion, Sidney E.: Detectives Get a Course in Law, The New York Times v. 28.04.1965, S. A50. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Staatsrecht & Verfassungsrecht"
Cover des Buchs: Der Volkseinwand
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover des Buchs: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover des Buchs: Ansehen und Absetzen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jonathan Schramm
Ansehen und Absetzen
Cover des Buchs: Der Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit auf Online-Plattformen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Lennard Lehmann
Der Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit auf Online-Plattformen
Cover des Buchs: Bürokratiefilter für den Gesetzgeber
Monographie Vollzugriff
Winfried Kluth
Bürokratiefilter für den Gesetzgeber

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex