Cover des Buchs: Private Governance as an Institutional Response to Wicked Problems
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Private Governance as an Institutional Response to Wicked Problems

A Study of the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Zusammenfassung

Aufgrund von Kindersklaverei auf Kakaoplantagen, Todesfällen in Textilfabriken oder geschlechterspezifischer Gewalt in Goldminen werden international agierende Unternehmen zunehmend mit unmoralischen Wirtschaftspraktiken in Verbindung gebracht. Während unternehmensinterne und staatliche Lösungsversuche weitestgehend ineffektiv bleiben, rücken branchenweite Zusammenschlüsse vermehrt in den Vordergrund. Hierbei geht es um die kollektive und freiwillige Initiative von Unternehmen, sich selbst zu regulieren, damit die Einhaltung von sozialen und ökologischen Mindeststandards gewährleistet werden kann.

Diese Arbeit diskutiert das Phänomen der freiwilligen Regulierung im Rahmen von Multi-Stakeholder-Initiativen anhand einer umfassenden empirischen Studie des deutschen Bündnisses für nachhaltige Textilien. Die Analyse zeigt auf, dass die Entstehung von kollektiver Selbstregulierung davon abhängt, was als „möglich“ erachtet wird, und dass sich diese Wahrnehmung durch externe Faktoren sowie Adjustierungsmechanismen verändern kann.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5949-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0079-5
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Nachhaltige Entwicklung
Band
9
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
186
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 24
    1. 1.1 Background and relevance: Human rights violations in global supply chains Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Problem statement and research object: Second-order free-riding in the context of private governance institutions Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 Purpose statement and research questions: A study to better understand private governance institutions Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 The importance of cooperation Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 Motives for cooperation Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 The importance of institutions Kein Zugriff
    4. 2.4 Implementation of institutions Kein Zugriff
    5. 2.5 The problems that institutions may entail Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 Conditions inherent in the environment of the firm Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.1.2 Conditions inherent in the environment of the institution Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.1.3 Intermediate conclusion: What economics-based literature reveals so far Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.2.1 Conditions inherent in the environment of the firm Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2.2 Conditions describing how firms relate to their environment Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.2.3 Intermediate conclusion: What sociology-based literature reveals so far Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.3.1 Additional insights: Reviewing literature on the effectiveness of institutions Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.3.2 Open questions Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 Research design: An in-depth, longitudinal and single case study Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.2.1 Case selection criteria Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2.2 Industry context: The ready-made garment industry in Bangladesh Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.2.3 Institutional context: Responses to the Rana Plaza building collapse Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.2.4 Case description: The German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.3.1 Data collection process Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.3.2 Primary data sources Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3.3 Secondary data sources Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.3.4 Challenges and ethical considerations Kein Zugriff
    4. 4.4 Data analysis Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.1.1 Phase I (t0): From mid-2001 to early-2014 Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.1.2 Phase II (t1): From early-2014 to late-2014 Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.1.3 Phase III (t2): From late-2014 to mid-2015 Kein Zugriff
      4. 5.1.4 Phase IV (t3): From mid-2015 to mid-2016 Kein Zugriff
      5. 5.1.5 Phase V (t4): From mid-2016 to mid-2018 Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.2.1 Initial field frame: Cooperation as an impossible endeavour Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.2.2 The social construction of a ‘possibility’ frame Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.2.3 Current field frame: Cooperation as a possible endeavour Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.3.1 Conditions connected to the pragmatic pillar of legitimacy Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.3.2 Conditions connected to the moral and cognitive pillars of legitimacy, the role of adjustment mechanisms and time Kein Zugriff
    4. 5.4 Fragility of frames and stabilising criteria Kein Zugriff
    5. 5.5 An extended process model Kein Zugriff
    1. 6.1 Summary and contributions: How the impossible became possible Kein Zugriff
    2. 6.2 Limitations and outlook: Avenues for future research Kein Zugriff
    3. 6.3 Practical implications: Lessons learned Kein Zugriff
  8. References Kein Zugriff 167 - 184
  9. Index Kein Zugriff 185 - 186

Literaturverzeichnis (287)

  1. Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629-649. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Ählström, J., & Egels‐Zandén, N. (2008). The processes of defining corporate responsibility: A study of Swedish garment retailers' responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(4), 230-244. Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Alberini, A., & Segerson, K. (2002). Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality. Environmental & Resource Economics, 22(1-2), 157-184. Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265-1281. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Ansari, S., Wijen, F., & Gray, B. (2013). Constructing a Climate Change Logic: An Institutional Perspective on the “Tragedy of the Commons”. Organization Science, 24(4), 1014–1040. Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Arya, B., & Salk, J. E. (2006). Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 211-234. Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Ashby, S., Chuah, S. H., & Hoffmann, R. (2004). Industry Self-Regulation: A Game-Theoretic Typology of Strategic Voluntary Compliance. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness. European Environment, 16, 290–306. Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Barnett, M. L. (2012). One Voice, But Whose Voice? Exploring What Drives Trade Association Activity. Business & Society, 52(2), 213-244. Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Barnett, M. L., & Hoffman, A. J. (2008). Beyond Corporate Reputation: Managing Reputational Interdependence. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 1-9. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Barnett, M. L., & King, A. A. (2008). Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: A Longitudinal Analysis of an Industry Self-Regulatory Institution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1150-1170. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Barrett, P. M., Baumann-Pauly, D., & Gu, A. (2018). Five Years After Rana Plaza: The Way Forward. NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights. Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bartley, T. (2005). Corporate Accountability and the Privatization of Labor Standards: Struggles over Codes of Conduct in the Apparel Industry. Politics and the Corporation, 14, 211-244. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2), 297-351. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Bartley, T. (2018). Rules without Rights: Land, Labor, and Private Authority in the Global Economy: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Bartley, T., & Child, C. (2007). Shaming the corporation: Reputation, globalization, and the dynamics of anti-corporate movements. American Sociological Review. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Bartley, T., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2015). Responsibility and neglect in global production networks: the uneven significance of codes of conduct in Indonesian factories. Global Networks-a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 15, 21-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Bartley, T., & Smith, S. N. (2010). Communities of practice as cause and consequence of transnational governance: the evolution of social and environmental certification. In M. L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds.), Transnational communities: Shaping global economic governance (pp. 347-374): Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Bates, R. H. (1988). Contra Contractarianism – Some Reflections on the New Institutionalism. Politics & Society, 16(2-3), 387-401. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Battacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 37-44. Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Baumann-Pauly, D., Nolan, J., van Heerden, A., & Samway, M. (2017). Industry-Specific Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives That Govern Corporate Human Rights Standards: Legitimacy assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(4), 771-787. Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Beck, U. (2000). What is Globalization? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Beckmann, M., Hielscher, S., & Pies, I. (2014). Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade-Offs Into Win-Win Outcomes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 18-37. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611-639. Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2015). “Bluewashing” the Firm? Voluntary Regulations, Program Design, and Member Compliance with the United Nations Global Compact. The Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 115-138. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. BGMEA. (2018). Comparative Statement on Export of RMG and Total Export of Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://www.bgmea.com.bd/home/pages/tradeinformation –.VXHbvM9Viko. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of public policy, 18(1), 53-74. Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Bitzer, V., Francken, M., & Glasbergen, P. (2008). Intersectoral partnerships for a sustainable coffee chain: Really addressing sustainability or just picking (coffee) cherries? Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 18(2), 271-284. Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Bitzer, V., Glasbergen, P., & Leroy, P. (2012). Partnerships of a feather flock together? An analysis of the emergence of networks of partnerships in the global cocoa sector. Global Networks, 12(3), 355-374. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. BMZ. (2015). Beitrittswelle zum Textilbündnis – führende Unternehmen erklären Mitgliedschaft. Müller: "Deutschland Vorreiter für faire Standards". Retrieved from http://www.bmz.de/de/presse/aktuelleMeldungen/2015/juni/20150602_Beitrittswelle-zum-Textilbuendnis-fuehrende-Unternehmen-erklaeren-Mitgliedschaft/index.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. BMZ. (2018). Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung in Unternehmen: Freiwillige Verhaltenskodizes. Retrieved from https://www.bmz.de/de/themen/Unternehmerische_Verantwortung/sozialstandards/verhaltenskodizes/index.html. Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Bomsel, O., Börkey, P., Glachant, M., & Lévêque, F. (1996). Is there room for environmental self-regulation in the mining sector? Resources Policy, 22(1-2), 79-86. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three-Country Comparative Study. Business & Society Review, 109(4), 449–477. Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Boström, M. (2006). Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness: Standardization organizations in cases of eco-labelling. Organization, 13(3), 345-367. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Bowler, K., Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. (2015). Understanding Firms’ Approaches to Voluntary Certification: Evidence from Multiple Case Studies in FSC Certification. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3-28. Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The Reason of Rules—Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Bromley, D. W. (1989). Economic interests and institutions. New York: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483-530. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An Economic-Theory of Clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1-14. Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1965). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Cairncross, F. (1993). Costing the Earth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967. Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why Ethical Consumers Don't Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139-158. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Chandler, A. D., & Mazlish, B. (2005). Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (Vol. 2nd edition). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Chowdhury, R. (2017). Rana Plaza Fieldwork and Academic Anxiety: Some Reflections. Journal of Management Studies, 54(7), 1111-1117. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Christiansen, L. H., & Kroezen, J. J. (2016). Institutional maintenance through business collective action: The alcohol industry’s engagement with the issue of alcohol-related harm. How Institutions Matter! Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 101-143. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439-458. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Coase, R. H. (1974). The lighthouse in economics. Journal of Law and Economics, 17, 357-376. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Vol. 4th edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10-27. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Creed, W. D., Scully, M. A., & Austin, J. R. (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13(5), 475-496. Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95-108. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45-56. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Dacin, M. T., Munir, K., & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal Dining at Cambridge Colleges: Linking Ritual Performance and Institutional Maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393-1418. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Dashwood, H. S. (2014). Sustainable Development and Industry Self-Regulation: Developments in the Global Mining Sector. Business & Society, 53(4), 551-582. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. De Mandeville, B. (2017, [1729]). Free thoughts on religion, the church, and national happiness: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: SAGE Publications Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a Theory of Property Rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359. Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Diller, J. (1999). A Social Conscience in the Global Marketplace? Labour Dimensions of Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Investor Initiatives. International Labour Review, 138(2), 99-129. Google Scholar öffnen
  70. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920–1940. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  72. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited – Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2009). World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance. European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), 707-743. Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (2008). Institutions and transnationalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 299-324). London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Transnational Governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Donaghey, J., & Reinecke, J. (2018). When Industrial Democracy Meets Corporate Social Responsibility A Comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as Responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(1), 14-42. Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Donaghey, J., Reinecke, J., Niforou, C., & Lawson, B. (2014). From Employment Relations to Consumption Relations: Balancing Labor Governance in Global Supply Chains. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 229-252. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy – Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Pacific sociological review, 18(1), 122-136. Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Doyle, C. (1997). Self Regulation and Statutory Regulation. Business Strategy Review, 8(3), 35-43. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Eckhardt, G. M., Belk, R., & Devinney, T. M. (2010). Why Don’t Consumers Consume Ethically? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 426-436. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Egels-Zandén, N. (2009). TNC motives for signing international framework agreements: A continuous bargaining model of stakeholder pressure. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 529-547. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Egels-Zandén, N. (2007). Suppliers' Compliance with MNCs' Codes of Conduct: Behind the Scenes at Chinese Toy Suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 45–62. Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Egels-Zandén, N., & Hyllman, P. (2006). Exploring the Effects of Union–NGO Relationships on Corporate Responsibility: The Case of the Swedish Clean Clothes Campaign. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 303–316. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Egels-Zandén, N., & Kallifatides, M. (2006). The corporate social performance dilemma: Organizing for goal duality in low-income African markets. In W. Vissner, M. McIntosh, & C. Middleton (Eds.), Corporate Citizenship in Africa: Lessons from the Past. Paths to the Future. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Egels-Zandén, N., Lindberg, K., & Hyllman, P. (2015). Multiple institutional logics in union–NGO relations: private labor regulation in the Swedish Clean Clothes Campaign. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(4), 347-360. Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Egels-Zandén, N., & Wahlqvist, E. (2007). Post-Partnership Strategies for Defining Corporate Responsibility: The Business Social Compliance Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 175-189. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Royal Society. Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case-Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy through Illegitimate Actions – a Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699-738. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Elster, J. (1989). Social Norms and Economic-Theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 99-117. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Fasterling, B. (2017). Human Rights Due Diligence as Risk Management: Social Risk Versus Human Rights Risk. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2(2), 225-247. Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Fauchart, E., & Cowan, R. (2014). Weak links and the management of reputational interdependencies. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 532-549. Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363-390. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Fligstein, N. (1991). The Structural Transformation of American Industry: An Institutional Account of the Causes of Diversification in the Largest Firms, 1919–1979. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 311–336). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Fligstein, N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656-673. Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397-405. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105-125. Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Fontana, E., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2018). Non Sibi, Sed Omnibus: Influence of Supplier Collective Behaviour on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Bangladeshi Apparel Supply Chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-18. Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Fransen, L. (2012). Multi-stakeholder governance and voluntary programme interactions: legitimation politics in the institutional design of Corporate Social Responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 163-192. Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Fransen, L., & Burgoon, B. (2012). A market for worker rights: Explaining business support for international private labour regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 19(2), 236-266. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Frenkel, S. J., Rahman, K. M., Rahman, S., & Fourie, J. (2017). Between Lead Firms and Institutional Ensembles: Labour and Safety Practices in Bangladeshi Garment Export Factories. Garment Supply Chain Governance Discussion Paper Series, 03. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. Friedman, M. (2009). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Gabbioneta, C., Greenwood, R., Mazzola, P., & Minoja, M. (2013). The influence of the institutional context on corporate illegality. Accounting Organizations and Society, 38(6-7), 484-504. Google Scholar öffnen
  106. Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957-969. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196-214. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Garvin, D. A. (1983). Can Industry Self-Regulation Work? California Management Review, 25(4), 37-52. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Gauthier, D. (1985). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2001). Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development. Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies, 32(3), 1-8. Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104. Google Scholar öffnen
  112. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31. Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Goodrick, E., & Salancik, G. R. (1996). Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and cesarean births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 1-28. Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Graafland, J. J. (2004). Collusion, Reputation Damage and Interest in Codes of Conduct: The Case of a Dutch Construction Company. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(2/3), 127–142. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Graham, D., & Woods, N. (2006). Making corporate self-regulation effective in developing countries. World Development, 34(5), 868-883. Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Grayson, D., & Nelson, J. (2013). Corporate Responsibility Coalitions: The Past, Present and Future of Alliances for Sustainable Capitalism. Redwood City: Greenleaf Pubishing, Austin and Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2005). Reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research (Vol. 3): SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054. Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80. Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Grief, A. (1997). Microtheory and Recent Developments in the Study of Economic Institutions through Economic History. In D. Kreps & K. Wallis (Eds.), Advances in Economic Theory and Econometrics (pp. 79-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Gunningham, N., & Rees, J. (1997). Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective. Law and Policy, 19(4), 363-414. Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Gupta, A. K., & Lad, L. J. (1983). Industry Self-Regulation – an Economic, Organizational, and Political-Analysis. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 416-425. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Habermas, J. (1990). Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In J. Habermas (Ed.), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (pp. 43-115). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Hardin, G. J. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Hardin, R. (1982). Collective Action. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Haufler, V. (1999). Self-regulation and business norms: Political risk, political activism. In A. C. Cutler, V. Haufler, & T. Porter (Eds.), Private authority and international affairs (pp. 199-222). Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Heckathorn, D. D. (1996). The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action. American Sociological Review, 61(2), 250-277. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Hemphill, T. A. (1992). Self-Regulating Industry Behavior – Antitrust Limitations and Trade Association Codes of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(12), 915-920. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Héritier, A., & Eckert, S. (2008). New modes of governance in the shadow of hierarchy: self-regulation by industry in Europe. Journal of public policy, 28(1), 113-138. Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Hobbes, T. (1970, [1651]). Leviathan. Erster und zweiter Teil übersetzt von Jacob Peter Mayer. Stuttgart: Reclam. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. Hollander, S. (2005). Jean-Baptiste Say and the classical canon in economics: The British connection in French classicism: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  137. Homann, K. (2014). Sollen und Können: Grenzen und Bedingungen der Individualmoral: Ibera Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Homann, K., & Blome-Drees, F. (1992). Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Homann, K., & Luetge, C. (2013). Einführung in die Wirtschaftsethik (Vol. 3). Berlin: LIT Verlag Dr. W. Hopf. Google Scholar öffnen
  140. Homann, K., & Suchanek, A. (2000). Ökonomik. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Jastram, S. M., & Schneider, A.-M. (2015). Sustainable fashion governance at the example of the partnership for sustainable textiles. uwf, 23, 205-212. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically Sustainable Organizations – an Institutional Approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015-1052. Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Kaul, I., Conceicao, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (2003). Providing global public goods: managing globalization: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Keohane, R. O. (2003). Global governance and democratic accountability. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Khan, F. R., Munir, K. A., & Willmott, H. (2007). A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1055-1077. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698-716. Google Scholar öffnen
  147. King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Barnett, M. L. (2002). Strategic Responses to the Reputation Commons Problem. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment. Institutional and Strategic Perspectives (pp. 393-406). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. King, B. G. (2008). A Political Mediation Model of Corporate Response to Social Movement Activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395-421. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Klein, N. (2001). No logo: Taking aim at the brand bullies. New York: Picador. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Knudsen, J. S., & Moon, J. (2017). Visible hands: Government regulation and international business responsibility: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Kobrin, S. J. (2001). Territoriality and the governance of cyberspace. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 687-704. Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Kobrin, S. J. (2008). Globalization, transnational corporations and the future of global governance. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism: SAGE Publications Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Lamin, A., & Zaheer, S. (2012). Wall Street vs. Main Street: Firm Strategies for Defending Legitimacy and Their Impact on Different Stakeholders. Organization Science, 23(1), 47-66. Google Scholar öffnen
  156. Lane, C., & Probert, J. (2009). National capitalisms, global production networks: Fashioning the value chain in the UK, US, and Germany: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710. Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1-13. Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Lawrence, T. B. (2017). High-Stakes Institutional Translation: Establishing North America's First Government-Sanctioned Supervised Injection Site. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1771-1800. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). lnstitutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (Vol. 2nd Edition, pp. 215-254). London: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  161. Leach, M., Mearns, R., & Scoones, I. (1999). Environment Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Community Based Natural Resource Management. World Development, 27(2), 225-247. Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Leitheiser, E. (2017). A sheep in wolf’s clothing?: How the illusion of hard law makes business more responsible. Academy of Management Proceedings. Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Lenox, M. J. (2006). The role of private decentralized institutions in sustaining industry self-regulation. Organization Science, 17(6), 677-690. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Lenox, M. J., & Nash, J. (2003). Industry self‐regulation and adverse selection: A comparison across four trade association programs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(6), 343-356. Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Lieberman, M., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31, 366-385. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Lohmeyer, N., & Schuessler, E. (2017). Rana Plaza as a threat to the fast fashion model? An analysis of institutional responses to the disaster in Germany. In C. H. Becker-Leifhold, M. (Ed.), Eco Friendly and Fair: Fast Fashion and Consumer Behavior. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Lorange, P. M., Scott Morton, S., & Goshal, S. (1986). Strategic Control. St. Paul, MN: West. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 29-56. Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012. Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679. Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Mair, J., Wolf, M., & Seelos, C. (2016). Scaffolding: A Process of Transforming Patterns of Inequality in Small-Scale Societies. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2021-2044. Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Maitland, A. (2005). Industries seek safety in numbers. FT Responsible Business, Special Report. Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Maitland, I. (1985). The Limits of Business Self-Regulation. California Management Review, 27(3), 132-147. Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Marques, J. C. (2016). Industry Business Associations: Self-Interested or Socially Conscious? Journal of Business Ethics. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Marx, A. (2008). Limits to non‐state market regulation: A qualitative comparative analysis of the international sport footwear industry and the Fair Labor Association. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 253-273. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Maxwell, J. W., Lyon, T. P., & Hackett, S. C. (2000). Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of corporate environmentalism. Journal of Law & Economics, 43(2), 583-617. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social Movements and Organization Theory (pp. 4-40). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. McDonnell, M. H., King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2015). A Dynamic Process Model of Private Politics: Activist Targeting and Corporate Receptivity to Social Challenges. American Sociological Review, 80(3), 654-678. Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527-556. Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations – Formal-Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Meyer, M., Narjoud, S., & Granata, J. (2017). When collective action drives corporate social responsibility implementation in small and medium-sized enterprises: the case of a network of French winemaking cooperatives. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 32(1-2), 7-27. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Milgrom, P. R., North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1990). The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Medieval Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs. Economics and Politics, 2, 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Molinas, J. R. (1998). The impact of inequality, gender, external assistance and social capital on local-level cooperation. World Development, 26(3), 413-431. Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qual Health Res, 25(9), 1212-1222. Google Scholar öffnen
  190. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1970). An economic theory of the growth of the Western world. Economic History Review, 23, 1-17. Google Scholar öffnen
  193. O’Hare, M. (1982). Information strategies as regulatory surrogates. In E. Bardach & R. Kagan (Eds.), Social regulation: Strategies for reform. San Francisco: Transaction Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  194. O’Rourke, D. (2003). Outsourcing Regulation: Analyzing Nongovernmental Systems of Labor Standards and Monitoring. The Policy Study Journal, 31(1), 1-29. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. O’Rourke, D. (2005). Market movements: Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9, 115-128. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. O’Rourke, D. (2006). Multi-stakeholder Regulation: Privatizing or Socializing Global Labor Standards? World Development, 34(5), 899–918. Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179. Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. (Vol. 5). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? Quality & Quantity, 41, 233–249. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137-158. Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (1997). Neither Markets Nor States: Linking Transformation Processes in Collective Action Arenas. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook (pp. 35-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a Sword – Self-Governance Is Possible. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404-417. Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The Coevolution of Institutional Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Theories. Journal of Management, 36(4), 974-1010. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387-401. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71-88. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Papadakis, K. (2011). Shaping global industrial relations: The impact of international framework agreements. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Partnership, f. S. T. (2014). Plan of Action for the Partnership for Sustainable Textiles. Retrieved from https://www.textilbuendnis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Aktionsplan_Buendnis_fuernachhaltige_Textilien_mit-Annex_Stand_09-10-2014.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Partnership, f. S. T. (2018). Socially and environmentally – we’re on the right track. Retrieved from https://www.textilbuendnis.com. Google Scholar öffnen
  211. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a processual analysis. Scandinavian journal of management, 13(4). Google Scholar öffnen
  212. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Pradhan, D., & Ranjan, R. (2016). Achieving Sustainability and Development through Collective Action? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of the Bore Pool Sharing Program on Farm Incomes and Crop Choices. World Development, 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen
  214. Purdy, J., Ansari, S., & Gray, B. (2017). Are Logics Enough? Framing as an Alternative Tool for Understanding Institutional Meaning Making. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen
  215. Rao, H. (1998). Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 912-961. Google Scholar öffnen
  216. Rees, J. V. (1997). Development of Communitarian Regulation in the Chemical Industry. Law and Policy, 19, 477-528. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). Taming Wicked Problems: The Role of Framing in the Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2015). After Rana Plaza: Building coalitional power for labour rights between unions and (consumption-based) social movement organisations. Organization, 22(5), 720-740. Google Scholar öffnen
  219. Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2017). Collective Action and Social Partnership in Global Supply Chains: Lessons from the Bangladesh Accord. Annual Review of Social Partnerships 2017. Google Scholar öffnen
  220. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & von Hagen, O. (2012). The Emergence of a Standards Market: Multiplicity of Sustainability Standards in the Global Coffee Industry. Organization Studies, 33(5-6), 791-814. Google Scholar öffnen
  221. Reisman, D. A. (1998). Adam Smith on market and State. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 154(2), 357-383. Google Scholar öffnen
  222. Riisgaard, L. (2005). International Framework Agreements: A New Model for Securing Workers Rights? Industrial Relations, 44(4), 707–737. Google Scholar öffnen
  223. Riisgaard, L. (2009). Global Value Chains, Labor Organization and Private Social Standards: Lessons from East African Cut Flower Industries. World Development, 37(2), 326-340. Google Scholar öffnen
  224. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. Google Scholar öffnen
  225. Royle, T. (2005). Realism or Idealism? Corporate Social Responsibility and the Employee Stakeholder in the Global Fast-Food Industry. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 42–55. Google Scholar öffnen
  226. Ruggie, J. G. (2002). The Theory and Practice of Learning Networks: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Global Compact. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 5, 27-36. Google Scholar öffnen
  227. Ruttan, V. W. (2006). Social science knowledge and economic development: An institutional design perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2, 249-272. Google Scholar öffnen
  228. Saldana, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers: SAGE. Google Scholar öffnen
  229. Salvadori, N., & Signorino, R. (2014). Adam Smith on Monopoly Theory. Making good a lacuna. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 61(2), 178-195. Google Scholar öffnen
  230. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899-931. Google Scholar öffnen
  231. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505-532. Google Scholar öffnen
  232. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing Legitimacy in Complex and Heterogeneous Environments: Sustainable Development in a Globalized World. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 259-284. Google Scholar öffnen
  233. Schneiberg, M., & Bartley, T. (2001). Regulating American industries: Markets, politics, and the institutional determinants of fire insurance regulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 101-146. Google Scholar öffnen
  234. Scholtz, J. T. (1984). Cooperation, deterrence, and the ecology of regulation enforcement. Law and Society Review, 18(2), 179-224. Google Scholar öffnen
  235. Schrage, E. J., & Ewing, A. P. (2005). The Cocoa Industry and Child Labour. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 18, 99-112. Google Scholar öffnen
  236. Schreck, P., van Aaken, D., & Donaldson, T. (2013). Positive Economics and the Normativistic Fallacy: Bridging the Two Sides of CSR. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 297-329. Google Scholar öffnen
  237. Schuessler, E. (2009). Strategische Prozesse und Persistenzen: Pfadabhängige Organisation der Wertschöpfung in der Bekleidungsindustrie: Kohlhammer. Google Scholar öffnen
  238. Schuessler, E., Ashwin, S., Oka, C., Lohmeyer, N., & Alexander, R. (2018). Why do Firms Support Transnational Industrial Relations Arrangements? A Processual Lens. Academy of Management Proceedings. Google Scholar öffnen
  239. Schuessler, E., Rueling, C. C., & Wittneben, B. B. F. (2014). On Melting Summits: The Limitations of Field-Configuring Events as Catalysts of Change in Transnational Climate Policy. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 140-171. Google Scholar öffnen
  240. Scott, C., Cafaggi, F., & Senden, L. (2011). The Conceptual and Constitutional Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 38(1), 1-19. Google Scholar öffnen
  241. Scott, W. R. (1983). The organization of environments: Network, cultural and historical elements. In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
  242. Scott, W. R. (1995a). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  243. Scott, W. R. (1995b). Introduction: institutional theory and organizations. In W. R. Scott & S. Christensen (Eds.), The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies. California: Sage Publications. Google Scholar öffnen
  244. Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  245. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  246. Sethi, S. P. (2005). The effectiveness of industry-based codes in serving public interest: the case of the International Council on Mining and Metals. Transnational Corporations, 14(3), 55-100. Google Scholar öffnen
  247. Shrivastava, P. (1994). Castrated Environment – Greening Organizational Studies. Organization Studies, 15(5), 705-726. Google Scholar öffnen
  248. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20-24. Google Scholar öffnen
  249. Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Driven Institutional Change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877-904. Google Scholar öffnen
  250. Smith, A. (1974, [1789]). Der Wohlstand der Nationen. Eine Untersuchung seiner Natur und seiner Ursachen. München: Beck. Google Scholar öffnen
  251. Smith, A. (2010, [1759]). The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Penguin. Google Scholar öffnen
  252. Snow, D. A. (2013). Social movements. The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Google Scholar öffnen
  253. Snow, D. A., Worden, S. K., Rochford, E. B., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464-481. Google Scholar öffnen
  254. Soundararajan, V., & Brown, J. A. (2016). Voluntary Governance Mechniasms in Global Supply Chains: Beyond CSR to a Stakeholder Utility Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 83-102. Google Scholar öffnen
  255. Spar, D. L. (1998). The Spotlight and the Bottom Line: How Multinationals Export Human Rights. Foreign Affairs, 77, 7-12. Google Scholar öffnen
  256. Stahl, B., & Wötzel, U. (2013). Runder Tisch Verhaltenskodizes–ein Dialogforum ohne Biss. Corporate Social Responsibility-Mythen und Maßnahmen, 93-95. Google Scholar öffnen
  257. Stigler, G. J. (1974). Free Riders and Collective Action: An Appendix to Theories of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(2), 359-365. Google Scholar öffnen
  258. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  259. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy – Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. Google Scholar öffnen
  260. Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  261. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843. Google Scholar öffnen
  262. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: SAGE Publications Inc. Google Scholar öffnen
  263. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  264. Tokatli, N. (2014). ‘Made in Italy? Who cares!’ Prada’s new economic geography. Geoforum, 54, 1-9. Google Scholar öffnen
  265. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal-Structure of Organizations – the Diffusion of Civil-Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 22-39. Google Scholar öffnen
  266. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1994). Institutional Analyses of Organizations: Legitimate but not Institutionalized. UCLA, 6(5). Google Scholar öffnen
  267. Turcotte, M. F., Reinecke, J., & den Hond, F. (2014). Explaining variation in the multiplicity of private social and environmental regulation: a multi-case integration across the coffee, forestry and textile sectors. Business and Politics, 16(1), 151-189. Google Scholar öffnen
  268. UN. (1998). Unite Power of Markets with Authority of Universal Values [Press release] Google Scholar öffnen
  269. Utting, P. (2001). UN-business partnerships: Whose agenda counts? Transnational Associations-Associations Transnationales, 3, 118-129. Google Scholar öffnen
  270. Van Tulder, R., & Kolk, A. (2001). Multinationality and corporate ethics: Codes of conduct in the sporting goods industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 267-283. Google Scholar öffnen
  271. Vogel, D. (2007). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  272. Vogel, D. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(13), 261-282. Google Scholar öffnen
  273. Vogel, D. (2010). The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct Achievements and Limitations. Business & Society, 49(1), 68-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  274. von Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  275. Walgenbach, P., & Meyer, R. (2008). Neoinstitutionalistische Organisationstheorie: W. Kohlhammer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  276. Weber, M. (1904). Die "Objektivität" sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 19(1), 22-87. Google Scholar öffnen
  277. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar öffnen
  278. Wijen, F. (2014). Means Versus Ends in Opaque Institutional Fields: Trading Off Compliance and Achievement in Sustainability Standard Adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 302-323. Google Scholar öffnen
  279. Williamson, Q. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613. Google Scholar öffnen
  280. Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research: Sage. Google Scholar öffnen
  281. York, J. G., Vedula, S., & Lenox, M. J. (2017). It’s Not Easy Building Green: The Impact of Public Policy, Private Actors, and Regional Logics on Voluntary Standards Adoption. Academy of Management Journal. Google Scholar öffnen
  282. Yue, L. Q., Luo, J., & Ingram, P. (2013). The Failure of Private Regulation: Elite Control and Market Crises in the Manhattan Banking Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 37-68. Google Scholar öffnen
  283. Zafarullah, H., & Siddiquee, N. A. (2001). Dissecting public sector corruption in Bangladesh: issues and problems of control. Public Organization Review, 1(4), 465-486. Google Scholar öffnen
  284. Zajak, S., Egels-Zandén, N., & Piper, N. (2017). Networks of Labour Activism: Collective Action across Asia and Beyond. An Introduction to the Debate. Development and Change, 48(5), 899-921. Google Scholar öffnen
  285. Zalan, T., & Lewis, G. (2004). Writing about methods in qualitative research: Towards a more transparent approach. Google Scholar öffnen
  286. Zelger, J., Raich, M., Abfalter, D., & Mueller, J. (2011). Gabek®: Theory and application in management studies. 10th Annual European Academy of Management (EURAM) Conference, 1-4. Google Scholar öffnen
  287. Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 726-743. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Umweltökonomie & Umweltmanagement & Energiewirtschaft", "Soziologie allgemein"
Cover des Buchs: Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Michael Rodi, Johannes Saurer
Comparative Perspectives on the Law of Energy Transition in Europe
Cover des Buchs: Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Ralf Kellermann
Systemtheorie und Erzählen
Cover des Buchs: Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Monographie Vollzugriff
Isabelle Hinsche-McLardy
Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Finance
Cover des Buchs: Finance, Accounting, Controlling im Kontext von Digitaler Transformation und Nachhaltigkeit
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Manuela Ender, Tim Alexander Herberger, Michael Kuttner
Finance, Accounting, Controlling im Kontext von Digitaler Transformation und Nachhaltigkeit
Cover des Buchs: Secular Humanism in Sweden
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Susanne Kind
Secular Humanism in Sweden

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex