Cover des Buchs: Voice(s) in the European Parliament
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Voice(s) in the European Parliament

Deliberation and Negotiation in EP Committees
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2016

Zusammenfassung

Die Studie analysiert die Deliberations- und Verhandlungsprozesse im Europäischen Parlament. Der Band nimmt die Akteure der Entscheidung in den Blick: Wie gelangen Abgeordnete unterschiedlicher Nationen und Parteien zu einer gemeinsamen Entscheidung? Anhand ausgewählter Gesetzestexte untersucht der Band parlamentarische Verhandlungsprozesse vergleichend in Ausschussdebatten und in informellen Arenen. In einem Parlament ohne Mehrheit zählen überzeugende Argumente; am Ende der Verhandlungen steht ein Kompromiss.

Die Stärke des EPs im Institutionensetting liegt in der Einigkeit seiner Akteure begründet – diese zu erzielen gelingt den Akteuren in deliberativen Verhandlungen. Die Studie konzeptualisiert Entscheidungsprozesse, indem sie deliberative Ansätze und Rollenkonzepte kombiniert. Die theoretischen Annahmen überprüft sie empirisch in einer vergleichenden Diskursanalyse der Ausschussdebatten und in Interviews mit den Entscheidungsträgern.

Die Autorin forscht zu Parlamenten, Parteien und Öffentlichkeit in der Europäischen Union.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1496-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5538-5
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Studien zum Parlamentarismus
Band
28
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
323
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 16
  2. Why study deliberation in European Parliament committees? Kein Zugriff 17 - 30
      1. Parliamentary committees Kein Zugriff
      2. Plenary session Kein Zugriff
      3. Political group meetings & Informal forums of deliberation Kein Zugriff
    2. Compromising within the European Parliament Kein Zugriff
      1. The foundations of deliberative democracy Kein Zugriff
      2. The pluralistic challenge: criticism toward deliberation Kein Zugriff
      1. Extended deliberation: integratin Kein Zugriff
      2. Avoiding concept-stretching: a typology of discourses Kein Zugriff
      3. Adopting a sequentialized approach Kein Zugriff
      1. Impact on decision-making Kein Zugriff
      2. Time constraints Kein Zugriff
      3. Pressures for agreement Kein Zugriff
      4. Ordinary legislative procedure: the impact of institutionalvariables Kein Zugriff
    2. Stages of the deliberative process: the temporal variable Kein Zugriff
      1. Topic-related variables Kein Zugriff
      2. Veto-Players Kein Zugriff
      3. Publicity Kein Zugriff
      4. External pressures Kein Zugriff
      1. Representational role orientations Kein Zugriff
      2. Purposive role orientations Kein Zugriff
      3. Role-choice of representatives Kein Zugriff
    2. Role sets in the European Parliament Kein Zugriff
    1. Assessing the situation of decision-making Kein Zugriff
    2. Analyzing MEPs role orientations Kein Zugriff
      1. Analyzing deliberation – adopting a multidimensional approach Kein Zugriff
    4. Case selection Kein Zugriff
      1. The Rapporteurs at the heart of the negotiations Kein Zugriff
      1. Political groups and national delegations in the decision-makingprocess Kein Zugriff
      2. Achieving an agreement: compromising in European Parliamentcommittees Kein Zugriff
    3. The situational dimension: the impact of situational variables onthe debates Kein Zugriff
    4. Role orientations of the representatives Kein Zugriff
      1. Topic of debate Kein Zugriff
      2. Publicity Kein Zugriff
      3. Veto-players Kein Zugriff
      4. Influence of external actors on the decision-making process Kein Zugriff
    2. Role orientations of the MEPs: party orientations Kein Zugriff
      1. Steps of decision-making Kein Zugriff
      2. Temporal dimension of the ECON debates Kein Zugriff
      3. Situational dimension of the ECON debates Kein Zugriff
      1. Topic of debate Kein Zugriff
      2. Publicity Kein Zugriff
      3. Veto-players Kein Zugriff
      4. Influence of external actors on the decision-making process Kein Zugriff
    2. Role orientations of the MEPs: European orientation Kein Zugriff
      1. Steps of decision-making Kein Zugriff
      2. Temporal dimension of the FEMM/LIBE debates Kein Zugriff
      3. Situational dimension of the LIBE/FEMM debates Kein Zugriff
      1. Topic of debate Kein Zugriff
      2. Publicity Kein Zugriff
      3. Veto-players Kein Zugriff
      4. Influence of external actors on the decision-making process Kein Zugriff
    2. Role orientations of the MEPs: regional orie Kein Zugriff
      1. Steps of decision-making Kein Zugriff
      2. Temporal dimension of the REGI debates Kein Zugriff
      3. Situational dimension of the REGI debates Kein Zugriff
    1. The situation of decision-making and the role orientations of MEPs Kein Zugriff
    2. Role performances of MEPs and discourse styles Kein Zugriff
  13. Arguments do matter: how the European Parliament comes toits position Kein Zugriff 267 - 280
    1. Discourse Quality Index Kein Zugriff
      1. Qualitative questionnaire Kein Zugriff
      2. List of qualitative interviews Kein Zugriff
  15. References Kein Zugriff 311 - 323

Literaturverzeichnis (218)

  1. 14 References Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Alpert, E. J. (1979), »A Reconceptualization of Representational Role Theory«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4/4: 587–603. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/439406
  3. Andeweg, R. B., and Thomassen, J. J. (2005), »Modes of Political Representation. Toward a New Typology«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30/4: 507–528. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201653
  4. Aristotle (1994), Politics. Politics 1253a. Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 21, translated by H. Rackham (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd). Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Aubenque, P. (2009), La prudence chez Aristote, 5e édition (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France). Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Bächtiger, A., and Hangartner, D. (2007), Institutions, Culture, and Deliberative Ideals: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry, Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2 (Chicago). Google Scholar öffnen
  7. —— (2010), »When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science. Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Political Deliberation.«, Political Studies, 58: 609–629. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00835.x
  8. Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M. et al. (2010a), »Toward More Realistic Models of Deliberative Democracy. Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18/1: 32–63. Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Bächtiger, A., Pedrini, S., and Ryser, M. (2010b), »Prozessanalyse politischer Entscheidungen. Deliberative Standards, Diskurstypen und Sequenzialisierung«, in J. Benke, T. Bräuninger, and S. Shikano (eds.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie, Band 6: Schwerpunkt Neuere Entwicklungen des Konzepts der Rationalität und ihrer Anwendung (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag), 193–223. Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Bächtiger, A., Shikano, S., Pedrini, S. et al. (2010c), Measuring Deliberation 2.0: Standards, Discourse Types, and Sequentialization (Manuscript). Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., Steenbergen, M. R. et al. (2005), »The Deliberative Dimensions of Legislatures«, Acta politica, 40: 225–238. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500103
  12. Bailer, S. (2011), Parliamentary Party Group Discipline in Comparison. Paper prepared for the 1st Annual General Conference on the European Political Science Association, June 16-18 (Dublin). Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Bailer, S., Schulz, T., and Selb, P. (2009), »What Role for the Party Group Leader? A Latent Variable Approach to Leadership Effects on Party Group Cohesion in the European Parliament«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15/4: 355–378. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13572330903302455
  14. Barabas, J. (2004), »How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions«, The American Political Science Review, 98/4: 687–701. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041425
  15. Bendjaballah, S. (2011), »La formation des consensus au Parlement européen et à la Chambre des représentants américaine (1999-2009)«, Dissertation (Paris, SciencesPo). Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bendor, J., Glazer, A., and Hammond, T. (2001), »Theories of Delegation«, Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 235–269. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.235
  17. Benedetto, G. (2005), »Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: the dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe's Parliament«, Journal of European Public Policy, 12/1: 67–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000311916
  18. Berg, H.-J. (1982), Der Verteidigungsausschuss des Deutsches Bundestages: Kontrollorgan zwischen Macht und Ohnmacht (München: Bernhard & Graefe). Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Bessette, J. M. (1994), The Mild Voice of Reasons. Deliberative Democracy and American National Government (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Biddle, B. J., and Edwin, T. J. (1966), Role Theory: Concepts and Research (New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Blomgren, M., and Rozenberg, O. (2012a), »Legislative roles and legislative studies: the neo-institutionalist turning point?«, in M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge), 8–36. Google Scholar öffnen
  22. —— (2012b) »Introduction«, in M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge), 1–7. Google Scholar öffnen
  23. —— (2012) (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.7202/1013198ar
  24. Bogaards, M., and Crepaz, M. M. (2002), »Forum section Consociational interpretations of the European Union«, European Union Politics, 3/3: 357–381. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003003004
  25. Bohman, J. (1996), Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass., London: The MIT Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  26. —— (1998), »Survey Artivle. The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6/4: 400–425. Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Bohman, J., and Rehg, W. (1997) (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Bowler, S., and Farrell, D. M. (1995), »The Organizing of the European Parliament. Committees, Specialization and Co-ordination«, British Journal of Political Science, 25/219-243. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007158
  29. Button, M., and Kevin, M. (1999), »Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation«, Polity, XXXI/4: 609–637. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3235238
  30. Carruba, C., Gabel, M., Murrah, L. et al. (2006), »Off the Record. Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias and Roll-Call Vote Analysis«, British Journal of Political Science, 36/4: 691–704. Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Chambers, S. (2004), »Behind Closed Doors. Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12/4: 389–410. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x
  32. Chryssochoou, D. N. (1994), »Democracy and symbiosis in the European Union. Toward a confederal consociation?«, West European Politics, 17/4: 1–14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425040
  33. Cohen, J. (1989), »Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy«, in A. Hamlin and P. Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity. Normative Analysis of the State (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), 17–34. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. —— (1997), »Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy«, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (London: MIT Press), 67–91. Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Converse, P. E., and Pierce, R. (1986), Political Representation in France (Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., and Shackleton, M. (2011), The European Parliament (8th edition, London: John Harper Publishing). Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Costa, O. (2001), Le Parlement européen, assemblée délibérante (Bruxelles: les éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles). Google Scholar öffnen
  38. —— (2009), »Le Parlement européen dans le système décisionnel de l'Union européenne: la puissance au prix de l'illisibilité«, politique européenne, 28/printemps: 137–163. Google Scholar öffnen
  39. —— (2013), »La parlementarisation de l'Union: pour une approche dynamique du régime politique européen«, Mémoire pour l'Habilitation à Diriger les Recherches en Science politique (Bordeaux, Sciences Po Bordeaux). Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Costa, O., Brack, N., and Dri, C. (2011a), How is working the EP?: Procedural evolution in Europe and in the US. Paper prepared for the AFSP 11th Conference, August 31-September 2 (Strasbourg). Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Costa, O., Dehousse, R., and Trakalová, A. (2011b), »Codecision and »early agreements« «, Studies & Research, No. 84. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Costa, O., and Kerrouche, E. (2007), Qui sont les députés français?: Enquête sur des élites inconnues (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po). Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Costa, O., and Magnette, P. (2003), »The European Union as a consociation? A methodological assessment«, West European Politics, 26/3: 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280568
  44. Costello, R., and Thomson, R. (2010), »The policy impact of leadership in committees. Rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament's opinions«, European Union Politics, 11/2: 219–240. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116510353459
  45. —— (2011), »The nexus of bicameralism. Rapporteurs’ impact on decision outcomes in the European Union«, European Union Politics, 12/3: 337–357. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Curato, N. (2012), »A sequential analysis of democratic deliberation«, Acta politica, 47/4: 423–442. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/ap.2012.15
  47. Dahl, R. A. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Dahrendorf, R. (2006), Homo Sociologicus. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90216-6_1
  49. Damgaard, E. (1997), »The political roles of Danish MPs«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 79–90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420500
  50. Deitelhoff, N., and Müller, H. (2005), »Theoretical paradise - empricially lost? Arguing with Habermas«, Review of International Studies, 31: 167–179. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006364
  51. Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., and Jacobs, L. R. (2004), »Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement. A Review of the Empirical Literature«, Annual Review of Political Science, 7/1: 315–344. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
  52. Dryzek, J. S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  53. —— (2006), Deliberative Global Politics. Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World (reprinted 2008, Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  54. —— (2010), »Rhetoric in Democracy. A systemic Appreciation«, Political Theory, 38/3: 319–339. Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Dryzek, J. S., and Braithwaite, V. (2000), »On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation. Values Analysis Applied to Australian Politics«, Political Psychology, 21/2: 241–266. Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Dryzek, J. S., and Niemeyer, S. (2006), »Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals«, American Journal of Political Science, 50/3: 634–649. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
  57. Elster, J. (1994), »Argumenter et négocier dans deux Assemblées constituantes.«, Revue francaise de science politique, 44/2: 187–256. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.1994.394826
  58. —— (1998a), »Introduction«, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press), 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen
  59. —— (1998b), »Deliberation and Constitution Making«, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press), 97–122. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. —— (1998) (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  61. —— (2000), »Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies«, Journal of Constitutional Law, 2/2: 345–421. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Esaiasson, P., and Holmberg, S. (1996), Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate Dartmouth). Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Estlund, D. (1997), »Beyond fairness and Deliberation. The epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority«, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press), 173–204. Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Eulau, H., Wahlke, J. C., Buchanan, W. et al. (1959), »The Role of Representative. Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke«, The American Political Science Review, 53/3: 742–756. Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Farrell, D. M., Hix, S., and Scully, R. (2011), EPRG MEP Survey Dataset: 2011 Release (http://www2.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/EPRG/MEPsurvey Data.aspx). Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Farrell, H., and Héritier, A. (2004), »Interorganizational Negotiation and Intraorganizational Power in Shared Decision Making. Early Agreements Under Codecision and Their Impact on the European Parliament and Council«, Comparative Political Studies, 37/10: 1184–1212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0010414004269833
  67. Fearon, J. D. (1998), »Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation«, International Organization, 52/2: 269–305. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1162/002081898753162820
  68. Fenno, Richard F. (J.R.) (1973), Congressmen in Committees (Reprinted 1995, Berkeley: University of California). Google Scholar öffnen
  69. —— (2003 (1978)), Home Style. House Members in Their Districts (New York, San Francisco, Boston: Longman). Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Fishkin, J. S. (2009), When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Fishkin, J. S., and Luskin, R. C. (2005), »Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion«, Acta politica, 40: 284–298. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
  72. Fung, A. (2007), »Minipublics. Deliberative Designs and their Consequences«, in S. W. Rosenberg (ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Can the People Govern? (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan), 159–83. Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Gabel, M. T. (1998), »The Endurance of Supranational Governance: A Consociational Interpretation of the European Union«, Comparative Politics, 30/4: 463–475. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/422334
  74. Goodin, R. E. (2000), »Democratic Deliberation Within«, Philosphy & Public Affairs, 29/1: 81–109. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00081.x
  75. —— (2005), »Sequencing Deliberative Moments«, Acta politica, 40/2: 182–196. Google Scholar öffnen
  76. —— (2008), Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. (New York: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Grünefelder, R., and Bächtiger, A. (2007), Gendered Deliberation? How Men and Women Deliberate in Legislatures. Paper to be presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, May 7-12 (Helsinki). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/9780230591080_5
  78. Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, Mass., London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Habermas, J. (1994), »Three normative models of democracy«, Constellations, 1/1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00001.x
  80. —— (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (second printing, Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  81. —— (1999), Die Einbeziehung des Anderen - Studien zur politischen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main). Google Scholar öffnen
  82. —— (2005), »Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics.«, Acta politica, 2005: 348–392. Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Hangartner, D., Bächtiger, A., Grünefelder, R. et al. (2007), »Mixing Habermas with Bayes. Methodological and Theoretical Advances in the Study of Deliberation«, Swiss Political Science Review, 13/4: 607–644. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2007.tb00091.x
  84. Hix, S. (2002a), »Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion Rule Interpretation. Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam«, British Journal of Political Science, 32: 259–280. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. —— (2002b), »Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals. Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament«, American Journal of Political Science, 46/3: 688–698. Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Hix, S., Kreppel, A., and Noury, R. (2003), »The Party System in the European Parliament. Collusive or Competitive?«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41/2: 309–331. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00424
  87. Hix, S., and Noury, A. (2009), »After Enlargement. Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXXIV/2: 159–174. Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2006), »Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament«, American Journal of Political Science, 50/2: 494–511. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00198.x
  89. Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2007), Democratic Politics in the European Parliament (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491955
  90. Holzinger, K. (2001), »Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf Basis der Sprechakttheorie«, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 42/3: 414–446. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s11615-001-0073-2
  91. —— (2004), »Bargaining Through Arguing: An Empirical Analysis Based on Speech Act Theory«, Political Communication, 21/2: 195–222. Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Høyland, B. (2006a), »Allocation of Codecision Reports in the Fifth European Parliament«, European Union Politics, 7/1: 30–50. Google Scholar öffnen
  93. —— (2006b), Left-right and institutional preferences? EP roll-call votes in the codecision procedure. Paper prepared for the Pan-European Conference on EU politics, September 20-23 (Istanbul). Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Jensen, T., and Winzen, T. (2012), »Legislative negotiations in the European Parliament«, European Union Politics, 13/1: 118–149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116511419982
  95. Judge, D., and Earnshaw, D. (2008), The European Parliament (2nd edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535026.003.0014
  96. Kaeding, M. (2004), »Rapporteurship Allocation in the European Parliament. Information or Distribution?«, European Union Politics, 5/3: 353–371. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116504045157
  97. Kanra, B. (2009), Binary Deliberation - Enhancing the role of social learning in deliberative democracy (Canberra: The Australian National University). Google Scholar öffnen
  98. —— (2012), »Binary Deliberation: The Role of Social Learning in Divided Societies«, Journal of Public Deliberation, 8/1: Article 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Katz, R. S. (1997), »Representational roles«, European Journal of Political Research, 32: 211–226. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00339
  100. Kelle, U. (2008), Die Integration qualitativer und quanitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte, 2nd edition (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91174-8
  101. Kielhorn, A. (2001), »Rollenorientierungen von Abgeordneten in Europa. Eine empirische Analyse von Bestimmungsgründen und Konsequenzen der Repräsentationsrolle von Parlamentariern in elf EU-Ländern«, Dissertation (Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin). Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Kies, R., and Nanz, P. (2013) (eds.), Is Europe Listening To Us?: Sucesses and Failures of EU Citizen Consultations (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate). Google Scholar öffnen
  103. Kreppel, A. (2002a), »Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament. Past, Present and Future«, European Union Politics, 1/3: 340–362. Google Scholar öffnen
  104. —— (2002b), »Moving Beyond Procedure. An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence«, Comparative Political Studies, 35: 784–813. Google Scholar öffnen
  105. Kreppel, A., and Hix, S. (2003), »From »Grand Coalition« To Left-Right Confrontation. Explaining the Shifting Structure of Party Competition in the European Parliament«, Comparative Political Studies, 36 (1/2): 75-96. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0010414002239372
  106. Kreppel, A., and Tsebelis, G. (1999), »Coalition Formation in the European Parliament«, Comparative Political Studies, 32/8: 933–966. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032008002
  107. Landwehr, C. (2010), »Discourse and Coordination. Modes of Interaction and their Roles in Political Decision-Making«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18/1: 101–122. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Lascher, E. L. (1996), »Assessing Legislative Deliberation: A Preface to Empirical Analysis«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21/4: 501–519. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/440459
  109. Leibholz, G. (1929), »Das Wesen der Repräsentation«, in L. Gerhard (ed.), Das Wesen der Repräsentation und der Gestaltwandel der Demokratie im 20. Jahrhundert (Berlin: de Gruyter), 13–210. Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Leite Viegas, J. M., and Carvalho, S. I. (2013), »Democratic Deliberation: The attitudes of deputies and citizens«, in A. Freire and J. M. Leite Viegas (eds.), Election, Leadership and Political Representation in Portugal: Essays on Parliament, Media, Voluntary Associations, Parties, Politics, and Voting (Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Lindberg, B., Rasmussen, A., and Warntjen, A. (2008), »Party politics as usual? The role of political parties in EU legislative decision-making«, Journal of European Public Policy, 15/8: 1107–1126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13501760802407623
  112. Linton, R. (1936), The Study of Man (New York: D. Appleton Century). Google Scholar öffnen
  113. —— (1945), The Cultural Background of Personality (New York: D. Appleton Century). Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Lord, C. (2008), »Still in Democratic Deficit«, Intereconomics, 43/6: 316–320. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/s10272-008-0266-7
  115. Lord, C., and Tamvaki, D. (2011), »The Politics of Justification? Applying the »Discourse Quality Index« to the Study of the European Parliament«, RECON Online Working Paper, 2011/03. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Lupia, A., and McCubbins, M. D. (2000), »Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation suceed«, European Journal of Political Research, 37: 291–307. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00514
  117. Macedo, S. (1999) (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Magnette, P., and Papadopoulos, Y. (2008), »On the politicization of the European consociation: A middle way between Hix and Bartolini«, European Governance Papers EUROGOV N. C-08-01. Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Mair, P. (2007), »Political Opposition and the European Union«, Government and Opposition, 42/1: 1–17. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00209.x
  120. Majone, G. (1994), »Décisions publiques et délibération«, Revue francaise de science politique, 44/4: 579–598. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.1994.396230
  121. —— (1998), »Europe‘s »Democratic Deficit«. The Questions of Standards«, European Law Journal, 4/1: 5–28. Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Mamadouh, V., and Raunio, T. (2003), »The Committee System. Powers, Appointments and Report Allocation«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41/2: 333-351. Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Manin, B. (1987), »On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation«, Political Theory, 15/3: 338–368. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0090591787015003005
  124. —— (1995), Principes du gouvernement représentatif (Paris: Calmann-Lévy). Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Mansbridge, J. (1999), »Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent »Yes« «, The Journal of Politics, 61/3: 626–657. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2647821
  126. Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S. et al. (2010), »The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18/1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00344.x
  127. Martì, J. L. (2006), »The Epistemic Conception of Deliberative Democracy Defended«, in S. Besson and J. L. Martí (eds.), Deliberative Democracy and its Discontens (Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited), 27–56. Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Mayring, P. (2008), Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (Weinheim: Beltz). Google Scholar öffnen
  129. McElroy, G. (2001), »Committees and Party Cohesion in the European Parliament«, EPRG Working Paper No.8, Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30 (San Francisco). Google Scholar öffnen
  130. —— (2006), »Committee Representation in the European Parliament«, European Union Politics, 7/1: 5–29. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. —— (2008), »Committees and Party Cohesion in the European Parliament«, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (ÖZP), 37/3: 357–373. Google Scholar öffnen
  132. McElroy, G., and Benoit, K. (2010), »Party Policy and Group Affiliation in the European Parliament«, British Journal of Political Science, 40/2: 377–398. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990469
  133. Mead, G. H. (1934), Mind, Self an Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Mendelberg, T. (2002), »The Deliberative Citizen. Theory and Evidence.«, in M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, and R. Y. Shapiro (eds.), Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), 151–93. Google Scholar öffnen
  135. Miller, G. J. (2005), »The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models«, Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 203–225. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104840
  136. Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1963), »Constituency Influence in Congress«, The American Political Science Review, 57/1: 45–56. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1952717
  137. Moravcsik, A. (2008), »The Myth of Europe‘s »Democratic Deficit« «, Intereconomics, 43/6: 331–340. Google Scholar öffnen
  138. Mouffe, C. (1999), »Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism«, Social Research, 66/3: 745–758. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. Müller, W. C. (2000), »Political parties in parliamentary democracies. Making delegation and accountability work«, European Journal of Political Research, 37: 309–333. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00515
  140. Nastasi, B. K., Hitchcok, J. H., and Brown, L. M. (2010), »An Inclusive Framework for Conceptualizing Mixed Methods Design Typlogogies«, in A. C. Tashakkori (ed.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods & Behavioral Research, 2nd edition (Los Angeles: SAGE), 305–338. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n13
  141. Naurin, D. (2009), »Most Common When Least Important. Deliberation in the European Union Council of Ministers«, British Journal of Political Science, 40: 31–50. Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Navarro, J. (2007), »Les députés européens et leur rôle: analyse sociologique de la représentation«, Dissertation (Bordeaux, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Bordeaux). Google Scholar öffnen
  143. —— (2009), »Les rôles au Parlement européen. Une typologie des pratiques de représentation«, Revue française de science politique, 59/3: 479–506. Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Neuhold, C. (2001), »The »Legislative Backbone« keeping the Institution upright?«, European Integration online Paper (EIoP), 5/10 <http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-010a.htm>. Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Noury, A., and Roland, G. (2000), »Comment vote-t-on au Parlement européen? Premiers résultats«, in P. Magnette and E. Remacle (eds.), Le nouveau modèle européen. Volume 1, Institutions et gouvernance (Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles), 67–77. Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Noury, A. G. (2002), »Ideology, Nationality and Euro-Parliamentarians«, European Union Politics, 3/1: 33–58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003001003
  147. Parkinson, J., and Mansbridge, J. (2013), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Parsons, T. (1951), The Social System (Clencoe, III: The Free Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Patzelt, W. J. (1991), »Neuere Repräsentationstheorie und das Repräsentationsverständnis von Abgeordneten«, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 38/2: 166–199. Google Scholar öffnen
  150. —— (1997), »German MPs and their roles«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 55–78. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Pedrini, S., and Bächtiger, A. (2010), Deliberative Inclusion of Minorities: Equality and Reciprocity among Linguistic Groups in Switzerland: Paper to be presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2-5 (Washington). Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Petty, R., and Krosnick, J. (1995), The Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Pitkin, H. F. (1967 (1972)), The Concept of Representation, 2nd edition (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press), first pub. 1967. Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Proksch, S.-O., and Slapin, J. B. (2010), »Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches«, British Journal of Political Science, 40/3: 587–611. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990299
  155. Rasmussen, A. (2008), »Party soldiers in a non-partisan community? Party linkage in the European Parliament«, Journal of European Public Policy, 15/8: 1164–1183. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13501760802407672
  156. Reif, K., and Schmitt, H. (1980), »Nine second-order national elections - a conceptual framework for the anlaysis of European election results«, European Journal of Political Research, 8: 3–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
  157. Ringe, N. (2010), Who Decides, and How?: Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  158. Risse, T. (1999), »International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area«, Politics & Governance, 27/4: 529–559. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027004004
  159. —— (2004), »Global Governance and Communicative Action«, Government and Opposition, 39/2: 288–313. Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Roger, L. (2010), Assessing deliberation in European Parliament - Building up an extended measurement instrument. Paper to be presented at the International Conference Making Parliament Speaks, October 13-14 (Paris). Google Scholar öffnen
  161. —— (2012a), Analyzing parliamentary communication: The impact of role orientations on MEPs' discursive behavior in committee debates. Paper to be presented at the Inaugural Conference of the ECPR Standing Group on Parliaments, June 24-27 (Dublin). Google Scholar öffnen
  162. —— (2012b), Trustee versus Delegate - investigating the role performance of Members of the European Parliament. Paper to be presented at the ECPR Joint Session, April 10-15 (Antwerp). Google Scholar öffnen
  163. —— (2013a), MEPs and their voters: Analyzing the impact of interests on MEPs discursive behavior in committee debates. Paper to be presented at the 7th ECPR General Conference, September 4-7 (Bordeaux). Google Scholar öffnen
  164. —— (2013b), »The Deliberative Quality of the Agora«, in R. Kies and P. Nanz (eds.), Is Europe Listening To Us? Sucesses and Failures of EU Citizen Consultations (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate), 173–97. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. —— (2014), »Deliberation im Europäischen Parlament. Der Einfluss von Rollenorientierungen auf das Kommunikationsverhalten von Abgeordneten«, in A. Bächtiger, B. Kittel, and E. Linhart (eds.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie, Band 9, Räumliche Modelle der Politik (Im Erscheinen). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05008-5_1
  166. Roger, L., and Schaal, G. S. (2013), »The Quality of Deliberation in Two Committees of the European Parliament. The Neglected Influence of the Situational Context and the Policymaking Stage«, Politics & Governance, 1/2: 151–169. Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Roger, L., and Winzen, T. (2015), »Party groups and committee negotiations in the European Parliament: outside attention and the anticipation of plenary conflict«, Journal of European Public Policy, 22/3: 391–408. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.941379
  168. Ryfe, D. M. (2005), »Does Deliberative Democracy Work?«, American Political Science Review, 2005: 49–71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633
  169. Saalfeld, T. (1997), »Professionalisation of Parliamentary Roles in Germany: An Aggregate-level Analysis, 1949-94«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 32–54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420498
  170. Saalfeld, T., and Müller, W. C. (1997), »Roles in legislative studies: A theoretical introduction«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420496
  171. Saldaña, J. (2013), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications). Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Sanders, L. M. (1997), »Against Deliberation«, Political Theory, 25/3: 347–376. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002
  173. Sartori, G. (1970), »Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics«, The American Political Science Review, 64/4: 1033–1053. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/1958356
  174. Scarrow, S. E. (1997), »Political Career Paths and the European Parliament«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22/2: 253–263. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/440385
  175. Schimank, U. (2000), Handeln und Strukturen: Einführung in die akteurtheoretische Soziologie (Weinheim, München: Juventa). Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Schwarzmeier, M. (2001), Parlamentarische Mitsteuerung: Strukturen und Prozesse informalen Einflusses im deutschen Bundestag. (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80388-7_3
  177. Scully, R., and Farrell, D. M. (2003), »MEPs as Representatives. Individual and Institutional Roles«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41/2: 269–288. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00422
  178. —— (2007), Representing Europe's Citizens?: Electoral Institutions and the Failure of Parliamentary Representation (New York: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Searing, D. W. (1994), Westminster´s World. Understanding Political Roles (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  181. Settembri, P., and Neuhold, C. (2009), »Achieving Consensus Through Committees. Does the European Parliament Manage?«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47/1: 127–151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.01835.x
  182. Sieberer, U. (2006), »Party unity in parliamentary democracies. A comparative analysis«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 12/2: 150–178. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13572330600739413
  183. Slapin, J. B., and Proksch, S.-O. (2010), »Look who's talking. Parliamentary debate in the European Union«, European Union Politics, 11/3: 333–357. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116510369266
  184. Squires, J. (2006), »Deliberation and decision making: discontinuity in the two-track model«, in M. Passerin d'Entrèves (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (New Jersey: Manchester University Press), 133–56. Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. et al. (2003), »Measuring Political Deliberation. A Discourse Quality Index«, Comparative European Politics, 1: 21–48. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002
  186. Steenbergen, M.R., Bächtiger, A., Steiner, J. (2004), Toward a Political Psychology of Deliberation. Paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, May 21-22 (Florence). Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Steiner, J. (2008), »Concept Stretching: The Case of Deliberation«, European Political Science Review, 7: 186–190. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210186
  188. —— (2010), The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. et al. (2004), Deliberative Politics in Action. Analysing Parliamentary Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Stie, A. E. (2010), »Decision-making Void of Democratic Qualities? An Evaluation of the EU’s Second Pillar Decision-making Procedure«, in S. Vanhoonacker, H. Dijkstra, and H. Maurer (eds.), Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy. European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 14 (1), Article 1. Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Strecker, D., and Schaal, G. S. (2006), »Die politische Theorie der Deliberation: Jürgen Habermas«, in A. Brodocz and G. S. Schaal (eds.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart. Eine Einführung, 2., erweiterte und aktualisierte Auflage (Opladen, Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich), 99–148. Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Strøm, K. (1997), »Rules, Reasons, and Routines: Legislative Roles in Parliamentary Democracies«, Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 155–174. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/13572339708420504
  193. —— (2000), »Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies’, in R. Bellamy and A. Palumbo (eds.), Political Accountability (Farnham: Ashgate). Google Scholar öffnen
  194. —— (2012), »Roles as strategies: toward a logic of legislative behavior«, in M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge), 85–100. Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Stromer-Galley, J. (2007), »Measuring Deliberation's Content. A Coding Scheme«, Journal of Public Deliberation, 3/1: Article 12. Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Sunstein, C. (2003), »The Law of Group Polarization«, in J. S. Fishkin and P. Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd), 80–101. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1002/9780470690734.ch4
  197. Tetlock, P., and Kim, J. I. (1987), »Accountability and Judgment Processes in a Personality Prediction Task«, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52/4: 700–709. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.700
  198. Tetlock, P. E. (1985), »A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution Error«, Social Psychology Quarterly, 48/3: 227–236. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/3033683
  199. Thiem, J. (2009), Nationale Parteien im Europäischen Parlament. Delegation, Kontrolle und politischer Einfluss. (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91357-5
  200. Thompson, D. F. (2008), »Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science«, Annual Review of Political Science, 11/June: 497–520. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555
  201. Tsebelis, G. (1994), »The Power of the European Parliament as the Conditional Agenda Setter«, The American Political Science Review, 88/1: 128–142. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2944886
  202. —— (1995), »Decision Making in Political Systems. Veto Player in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism«, British Journal of Politcal Science, 25/3: 289–325. Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Tsebelis, G., and Garrett, G. (2000), »Legislative Politics in the European Union«, European Union Politics, 1/1: 9–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001001002
  204. Turner, R. H. (1962), »Role Taking: Process versus Conformity«, in A. Rose (ed.), Human Behavior and Social Processes (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin), 20–40. Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Ulbert, C., and Risse, T. (2005), »Deliberately Changing the Discourse. What Does Make Arguing Effectively?«, Acta politica, 40/3: 351–367. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Urfalino, P. (2005), »La délibération n'est pas une conversation - délibération, décision collective et négociation«, Négociations, 2/4: 99–114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.3917/neg.004.0099
  207. von Beyme, K. (1997), Der Gesetzgeber. Der Bundestag als Entscheidungszentrum. (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90189-7_15
  208. Wahlke, J. C., Eulau, H., Buchanan, W. et al. (1962), The Legislative System. Explorations in Legislative Behavior. (New York, London: John Wiley and Sons). Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Warren, M. E. (2012), When, Where and Why Do We Need Deliberation, Voting and Other Means of Organizing Democracy? A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Systems. Paper for delivery at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2 (New Orleans). Google Scholar öffnen
  210. Warren, M. E., and Pearse, H. (2008), Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491177
  211. Whitaker, R. (2001), »Party Control in a Committee-Based Legislature? The Case of the European Parliament«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 7/4: 63–88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1080/714003891
  212. —— (2011), The European Parliament's Committees. National party influence and legislative empowerment (Abingdon: Routledge). Google Scholar öffnen
  213. Williams, M. S. (2000), »The Uneasy Alliance of Group Representation and Deliberative Democracy«, in W. Kymlicka and W. Norman (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 124–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1093/019829770X.003.0005
  214. Yack, B. (2006), »Rhetoric and Public Reasoning. An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation«, Political Theory, 34/4: 417–438. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0090591706288232
  215. Yordanova, N. (2009), Legislative Power of the European Parliament Committees: Plenary Adoption of Committee Reports. Paper prepared for the 11th Biannual Conference of the European Union Studies Association, April 23-25 (Los Angeles, California). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/1465116509103377
  216. —— (2010), Plenary »Amendments« to Committee Reports: Legislative Powers of the European Parliament Committees, Unpublished Manuscript. Google Scholar öffnen
  217. —— (2011), »Inter-institutional Rules and Division of Power in the European Parliament. Allocation of Consultatin and Co-decision Reports«, West European Politics, 34/1: 97–121. Google Scholar öffnen
  218. Young, I. M. (2001), »Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy«, Political Theory, 29/5: 670–690. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005004

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europapolitik & Europäische Union"
Cover des Buchs: Europa
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hans Jörg Schrötter
Europa
Cover des Buchs: Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Antonino Alì
Le sanzioni dell’UE nei confronti della Russia tra sicurezza internazionale e diritti umani
Cover des Buchs: The Multipolar Turn
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Carla Fetcas, Martin Kreutner
The Multipolar Turn
Cover des Buchs: European Union, How Comes?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hartmut Marhold
European Union, How Comes?
Cover des Buchs: Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Sara Arezes
Understanding the Emergence of Joint Debt Issuance on the EU Agenda

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex