Cover of book: Voice(s) in the European Parliament
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Voice(s) in the European Parliament

Deliberation and Negotiation in EP Committees
Authors:
Publisher:
 2016

Summary

Die Studie analysiert die Deliberations- und Verhandlungsprozesse im Europäischen Parlament. Der Band nimmt die Akteure der Entscheidung in den Blick: Wie gelangen Abgeordnete unterschiedlicher Nationen und Parteien zu einer gemeinsamen Entscheidung? Anhand ausgewählter Gesetzestexte untersucht der Band parlamentarische Verhandlungsprozesse vergleichend in Ausschussdebatten und in informellen Arenen. In einem Parlament ohne Mehrheit zählen überzeugende Argumente; am Ende der Verhandlungen steht ein Kompromiss.

Die Stärke des EPs im Institutionensetting liegt in der Einigkeit seiner Akteure begründet – diese zu erzielen gelingt den Akteuren in deliberativen Verhandlungen. Die Studie konzeptualisiert Entscheidungsprozesse, indem sie deliberative Ansätze und Rollenkonzepte kombiniert. Die theoretischen Annahmen überprüft sie empirisch in einer vergleichenden Diskursanalyse der Ausschussdebatten und in Interviews mit den Entscheidungsträgern.

Die Autorin forscht zu Parlamenten, Parteien und Öffentlichkeit in der Europäischen Union.

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2016
Copyright Year
2016
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-1496-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-5538-5
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zum Parlamentarismus
Volume
28
Language
English
Pages
323
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 16
  2. Why study deliberation in European Parliament committees? No access 17 - 30
      1. Parliamentary committees No access
      2. Plenary session No access
      3. Political group meetings & Informal forums of deliberation No access
    2. Compromising within the European Parliament No access
      1. The foundations of deliberative democracy No access
      2. The pluralistic challenge: criticism toward deliberation No access
      1. Extended deliberation: integratin No access
      2. Avoiding concept-stretching: a typology of discourses No access
      3. Adopting a sequentialized approach No access
      1. Impact on decision-making No access
      2. Time constraints No access
      3. Pressures for agreement No access
      4. Ordinary legislative procedure: the impact of institutionalvariables No access
    2. Stages of the deliberative process: the temporal variable No access
      1. Topic-related variables No access
      2. Veto-Players No access
      3. Publicity No access
      4. External pressures No access
      1. Representational role orientations No access
      2. Purposive role orientations No access
      3. Role-choice of representatives No access
    2. Role sets in the European Parliament No access
    1. Assessing the situation of decision-making No access
    2. Analyzing MEPs role orientations No access
      1. Analyzing deliberation – adopting a multidimensional approach No access
    4. Case selection No access
      1. The Rapporteurs at the heart of the negotiations No access
      1. Political groups and national delegations in the decision-makingprocess No access
      2. Achieving an agreement: compromising in European Parliamentcommittees No access
    3. The situational dimension: the impact of situational variables onthe debates No access
    4. Role orientations of the representatives No access
      1. Topic of debate No access
      2. Publicity No access
      3. Veto-players No access
      4. Influence of external actors on the decision-making process No access
    2. Role orientations of the MEPs: party orientations No access
      1. Steps of decision-making No access
      2. Temporal dimension of the ECON debates No access
      3. Situational dimension of the ECON debates No access
      1. Topic of debate No access
      2. Publicity No access
      3. Veto-players No access
      4. Influence of external actors on the decision-making process No access
    2. Role orientations of the MEPs: European orientation No access
      1. Steps of decision-making No access
      2. Temporal dimension of the FEMM/LIBE debates No access
      3. Situational dimension of the LIBE/FEMM debates No access
      1. Topic of debate No access
      2. Publicity No access
      3. Veto-players No access
      4. Influence of external actors on the decision-making process No access
    2. Role orientations of the MEPs: regional orie No access
      1. Steps of decision-making No access
      2. Temporal dimension of the REGI debates No access
      3. Situational dimension of the REGI debates No access
    1. The situation of decision-making and the role orientations of MEPs No access
    2. Role performances of MEPs and discourse styles No access
  13. Arguments do matter: how the European Parliament comes toits position No access 267 - 280
    1. Discourse Quality Index No access
      1. Qualitative questionnaire No access
      2. List of qualitative interviews No access
  15. References No access 311 - 323

Bibliography (218)

  1. 14 References Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  2. Alpert, E. J. (1979), »A Reconceptualization of Representational Role Theory«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4/4: 587–603. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  3. Andeweg, R. B., and Thomassen, J. J. (2005), »Modes of Political Representation. Toward a New Typology«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30/4: 507–528. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  4. Aristotle (1994), Politics. Politics 1253a. Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 21, translated by H. Rackham (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  5. Aubenque, P. (2009), La prudence chez Aristote, 5e édition (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  6. Bächtiger, A., and Hangartner, D. (2007), Institutions, Culture, and Deliberative Ideals: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry, Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2 (Chicago). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  7. —— (2010), »When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science. Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Political Deliberation.«, Political Studies, 58: 609–629. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  8. Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M. et al. (2010a), »Toward More Realistic Models of Deliberative Democracy. Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18/1: 32–63. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  9. Bächtiger, A., Pedrini, S., and Ryser, M. (2010b), »Prozessanalyse politischer Entscheidungen. Deliberative Standards, Diskurstypen und Sequenzialisierung«, in J. Benke, T. Bräuninger, and S. Shikano (eds.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie, Band 6: Schwerpunkt Neuere Entwicklungen des Konzepts der Rationalität und ihrer Anwendung (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag), 193–223. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  10. Bächtiger, A., Shikano, S., Pedrini, S. et al. (2010c), Measuring Deliberation 2.0: Standards, Discourse Types, and Sequentialization (Manuscript). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  11. Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., Steenbergen, M. R. et al. (2005), »The Deliberative Dimensions of Legislatures«, Acta politica, 40: 225–238. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  12. Bailer, S. (2011), Parliamentary Party Group Discipline in Comparison. Paper prepared for the 1st Annual General Conference on the European Political Science Association, June 16-18 (Dublin). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  13. Bailer, S., Schulz, T., and Selb, P. (2009), »What Role for the Party Group Leader? A Latent Variable Approach to Leadership Effects on Party Group Cohesion in the European Parliament«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15/4: 355–378. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  14. Barabas, J. (2004), »How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions«, The American Political Science Review, 98/4: 687–701. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  15. Bendjaballah, S. (2011), »La formation des consensus au Parlement européen et à la Chambre des représentants américaine (1999-2009)«, Dissertation (Paris, SciencesPo). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  16. Bendor, J., Glazer, A., and Hammond, T. (2001), »Theories of Delegation«, Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 235–269. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  17. Benedetto, G. (2005), »Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: the dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe's Parliament«, Journal of European Public Policy, 12/1: 67–88. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  18. Berg, H.-J. (1982), Der Verteidigungsausschuss des Deutsches Bundestages: Kontrollorgan zwischen Macht und Ohnmacht (München: Bernhard & Graefe). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  19. Bessette, J. M. (1994), The Mild Voice of Reasons. Deliberative Democracy and American National Government (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  20. Biddle, B. J., and Edwin, T. J. (1966), Role Theory: Concepts and Research (New York, London, Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  21. Blomgren, M., and Rozenberg, O. (2012a), »Legislative roles and legislative studies: the neo-institutionalist turning point?«, in M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge), 8–36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  22. —— (2012b) »Introduction«, in M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge), 1–7. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  23. —— (2012) (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  24. Bogaards, M., and Crepaz, M. M. (2002), »Forum section Consociational interpretations of the European Union«, European Union Politics, 3/3: 357–381. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  25. Bohman, J. (1996), Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass., London: The MIT Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  26. —— (1998), »Survey Artivle. The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6/4: 400–425. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  27. Bohman, J., and Rehg, W. (1997) (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  28. Bowler, S., and Farrell, D. M. (1995), »The Organizing of the European Parliament. Committees, Specialization and Co-ordination«, British Journal of Political Science, 25/219-243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  29. Button, M., and Kevin, M. (1999), »Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Challenges and Prospects for Civic Deliberation«, Polity, XXXI/4: 609–637. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  30. Carruba, C., Gabel, M., Murrah, L. et al. (2006), »Off the Record. Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias and Roll-Call Vote Analysis«, British Journal of Political Science, 36/4: 691–704. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  31. Chambers, S. (2004), »Behind Closed Doors. Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12/4: 389–410. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  32. Chryssochoou, D. N. (1994), »Democracy and symbiosis in the European Union. Toward a confederal consociation?«, West European Politics, 17/4: 1–14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  33. Cohen, J. (1989), »Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy«, in A. Hamlin and P. Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity. Normative Analysis of the State (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), 17–34. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  34. —— (1997), »Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy«, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics (London: MIT Press), 67–91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  35. Converse, P. E., and Pierce, R. (1986), Political Representation in France (Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  36. Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., and Shackleton, M. (2011), The European Parliament (8th edition, London: John Harper Publishing). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  37. Costa, O. (2001), Le Parlement européen, assemblée délibérante (Bruxelles: les éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  38. —— (2009), »Le Parlement européen dans le système décisionnel de l'Union européenne: la puissance au prix de l'illisibilité«, politique européenne, 28/printemps: 137–163. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  39. —— (2013), »La parlementarisation de l'Union: pour une approche dynamique du régime politique européen«, Mémoire pour l'Habilitation à Diriger les Recherches en Science politique (Bordeaux, Sciences Po Bordeaux). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  40. Costa, O., Brack, N., and Dri, C. (2011a), How is working the EP?: Procedural evolution in Europe and in the US. Paper prepared for the AFSP 11th Conference, August 31-September 2 (Strasbourg). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  41. Costa, O., Dehousse, R., and Trakalová, A. (2011b), »Codecision and »early agreements« «, Studies & Research, No. 84. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  42. Costa, O., and Kerrouche, E. (2007), Qui sont les députés français?: Enquête sur des élites inconnues (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  43. Costa, O., and Magnette, P. (2003), »The European Union as a consociation? A methodological assessment«, West European Politics, 26/3: 1–18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  44. Costello, R., and Thomson, R. (2010), »The policy impact of leadership in committees. Rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament's opinions«, European Union Politics, 11/2: 219–240. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  45. —— (2011), »The nexus of bicameralism. Rapporteurs’ impact on decision outcomes in the European Union«, European Union Politics, 12/3: 337–357. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  46. Curato, N. (2012), »A sequential analysis of democratic deliberation«, Acta politica, 47/4: 423–442. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  47. Dahl, R. A. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven: Yale University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  48. Dahrendorf, R. (2006), Homo Sociologicus. Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  49. Damgaard, E. (1997), »The political roles of Danish MPs«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 79–90. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  50. Deitelhoff, N., and Müller, H. (2005), »Theoretical paradise - empricially lost? Arguing with Habermas«, Review of International Studies, 31: 167–179. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  51. Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., and Jacobs, L. R. (2004), »Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement. A Review of the Empirical Literature«, Annual Review of Political Science, 7/1: 315–344. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  52. Dryzek, J. S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  53. —— (2006), Deliberative Global Politics. Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World (reprinted 2008, Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  54. —— (2010), »Rhetoric in Democracy. A systemic Appreciation«, Political Theory, 38/3: 319–339. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  55. Dryzek, J. S., and Braithwaite, V. (2000), »On the Prospects for Democratic Deliberation. Values Analysis Applied to Australian Politics«, Political Psychology, 21/2: 241–266. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  56. Dryzek, J. S., and Niemeyer, S. (2006), »Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals«, American Journal of Political Science, 50/3: 634–649. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  57. Elster, J. (1994), »Argumenter et négocier dans deux Assemblées constituantes.«, Revue francaise de science politique, 44/2: 187–256. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  58. —— (1998a), »Introduction«, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press), 1–18. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  59. —— (1998b), »Deliberation and Constitution Making«, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press), 97–122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  60. —— (1998) (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  61. —— (2000), »Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies«, Journal of Constitutional Law, 2/2: 345–421. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  62. Esaiasson, P., and Holmberg, S. (1996), Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate Dartmouth). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  63. Estlund, D. (1997), »Beyond fairness and Deliberation. The epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority«, in J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press), 173–204. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  64. Eulau, H., Wahlke, J. C., Buchanan, W. et al. (1959), »The Role of Representative. Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke«, The American Political Science Review, 53/3: 742–756. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  65. Farrell, D. M., Hix, S., and Scully, R. (2011), EPRG MEP Survey Dataset: 2011 Release (http://www2.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/EPRG/MEPsurvey Data.aspx). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  66. Farrell, H., and Héritier, A. (2004), »Interorganizational Negotiation and Intraorganizational Power in Shared Decision Making. Early Agreements Under Codecision and Their Impact on the European Parliament and Council«, Comparative Political Studies, 37/10: 1184–1212. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  67. Fearon, J. D. (1998), »Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation«, International Organization, 52/2: 269–305. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  68. Fenno, Richard F. (J.R.) (1973), Congressmen in Committees (Reprinted 1995, Berkeley: University of California). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  69. —— (2003 (1978)), Home Style. House Members in Their Districts (New York, San Francisco, Boston: Longman). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  70. Fishkin, J. S. (2009), When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  71. Fishkin, J. S., and Luskin, R. C. (2005), »Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion«, Acta politica, 40: 284–298. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  72. Fung, A. (2007), »Minipublics. Deliberative Designs and their Consequences«, in S. W. Rosenberg (ed.), Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Can the People Govern? (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan), 159–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  73. Gabel, M. T. (1998), »The Endurance of Supranational Governance: A Consociational Interpretation of the European Union«, Comparative Politics, 30/4: 463–475. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  74. Goodin, R. E. (2000), »Democratic Deliberation Within«, Philosphy & Public Affairs, 29/1: 81–109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  75. —— (2005), »Sequencing Deliberative Moments«, Acta politica, 40/2: 182–196. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  76. —— (2008), Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. (New York: Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  77. Grünefelder, R., and Bächtiger, A. (2007), Gendered Deliberation? How Men and Women Deliberate in Legislatures. Paper to be presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, May 7-12 (Helsinki). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  78. Gutmann, A., and Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, Mass., London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  79. Habermas, J. (1994), »Three normative models of democracy«, Constellations, 1/1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  80. —— (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (second printing, Cambridge, Mass., London: MIT Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  81. —— (1999), Die Einbeziehung des Anderen - Studien zur politischen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  82. —— (2005), »Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics.«, Acta politica, 2005: 348–392. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  83. Hangartner, D., Bächtiger, A., Grünefelder, R. et al. (2007), »Mixing Habermas with Bayes. Methodological and Theoretical Advances in the Study of Deliberation«, Swiss Political Science Review, 13/4: 607–644. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  84. Hix, S. (2002a), »Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion Rule Interpretation. Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam«, British Journal of Political Science, 32: 259–280. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  85. —— (2002b), »Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals. Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament«, American Journal of Political Science, 46/3: 688–698. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  86. Hix, S., Kreppel, A., and Noury, R. (2003), »The Party System in the European Parliament. Collusive or Competitive?«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41/2: 309–331. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  87. Hix, S., and Noury, A. (2009), »After Enlargement. Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXXIV/2: 159–174. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  88. Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2006), »Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament«, American Journal of Political Science, 50/2: 494–511. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  89. Hix, S., Noury, A. G., and Roland, G. (2007), Democratic Politics in the European Parliament (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  90. Holzinger, K. (2001), »Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf Basis der Sprechakttheorie«, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 42/3: 414–446. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  91. —— (2004), »Bargaining Through Arguing: An Empirical Analysis Based on Speech Act Theory«, Political Communication, 21/2: 195–222. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  92. Høyland, B. (2006a), »Allocation of Codecision Reports in the Fifth European Parliament«, European Union Politics, 7/1: 30–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  93. —— (2006b), Left-right and institutional preferences? EP roll-call votes in the codecision procedure. Paper prepared for the Pan-European Conference on EU politics, September 20-23 (Istanbul). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  94. Jensen, T., and Winzen, T. (2012), »Legislative negotiations in the European Parliament«, European Union Politics, 13/1: 118–149. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  95. Judge, D., and Earnshaw, D. (2008), The European Parliament (2nd edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Mcmillan). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  96. Kaeding, M. (2004), »Rapporteurship Allocation in the European Parliament. Information or Distribution?«, European Union Politics, 5/3: 353–371. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  97. Kanra, B. (2009), Binary Deliberation - Enhancing the role of social learning in deliberative democracy (Canberra: The Australian National University). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  98. —— (2012), »Binary Deliberation: The Role of Social Learning in Divided Societies«, Journal of Public Deliberation, 8/1: Article 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  99. Katz, R. S. (1997), »Representational roles«, European Journal of Political Research, 32: 211–226. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  100. Kelle, U. (2008), Die Integration qualitativer und quanitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte, 2nd edition (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  101. Kielhorn, A. (2001), »Rollenorientierungen von Abgeordneten in Europa. Eine empirische Analyse von Bestimmungsgründen und Konsequenzen der Repräsentationsrolle von Parlamentariern in elf EU-Ländern«, Dissertation (Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  102. Kies, R., and Nanz, P. (2013) (eds.), Is Europe Listening To Us?: Sucesses and Failures of EU Citizen Consultations (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  103. Kreppel, A. (2002a), »Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament. Past, Present and Future«, European Union Politics, 1/3: 340–362. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  104. —— (2002b), »Moving Beyond Procedure. An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence«, Comparative Political Studies, 35: 784–813. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  105. Kreppel, A., and Hix, S. (2003), »From »Grand Coalition« To Left-Right Confrontation. Explaining the Shifting Structure of Party Competition in the European Parliament«, Comparative Political Studies, 36 (1/2): 75-96. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  106. Kreppel, A., and Tsebelis, G. (1999), »Coalition Formation in the European Parliament«, Comparative Political Studies, 32/8: 933–966. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  107. Landwehr, C. (2010), »Discourse and Coordination. Modes of Interaction and their Roles in Political Decision-Making«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18/1: 101–122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  108. Lascher, E. L. (1996), »Assessing Legislative Deliberation: A Preface to Empirical Analysis«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21/4: 501–519. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  109. Leibholz, G. (1929), »Das Wesen der Repräsentation«, in L. Gerhard (ed.), Das Wesen der Repräsentation und der Gestaltwandel der Demokratie im 20. Jahrhundert (Berlin: de Gruyter), 13–210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  110. Leite Viegas, J. M., and Carvalho, S. I. (2013), »Democratic Deliberation: The attitudes of deputies and citizens«, in A. Freire and J. M. Leite Viegas (eds.), Election, Leadership and Political Representation in Portugal: Essays on Parliament, Media, Voluntary Associations, Parties, Politics, and Voting (Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  111. Lindberg, B., Rasmussen, A., and Warntjen, A. (2008), »Party politics as usual? The role of political parties in EU legislative decision-making«, Journal of European Public Policy, 15/8: 1107–1126. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  112. Linton, R. (1936), The Study of Man (New York: D. Appleton Century). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  113. —— (1945), The Cultural Background of Personality (New York: D. Appleton Century). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  114. Lord, C. (2008), »Still in Democratic Deficit«, Intereconomics, 43/6: 316–320. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  115. Lord, C., and Tamvaki, D. (2011), »The Politics of Justification? Applying the »Discourse Quality Index« to the Study of the European Parliament«, RECON Online Working Paper, 2011/03. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  116. Lupia, A., and McCubbins, M. D. (2000), »Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation suceed«, European Journal of Political Research, 37: 291–307. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  117. Macedo, S. (1999) (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  118. Magnette, P., and Papadopoulos, Y. (2008), »On the politicization of the European consociation: A middle way between Hix and Bartolini«, European Governance Papers EUROGOV N. C-08-01. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  119. Mair, P. (2007), »Political Opposition and the European Union«, Government and Opposition, 42/1: 1–17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  120. Majone, G. (1994), »Décisions publiques et délibération«, Revue francaise de science politique, 44/4: 579–598. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  121. —— (1998), »Europe‘s »Democratic Deficit«. The Questions of Standards«, European Law Journal, 4/1: 5–28. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  122. Mamadouh, V., and Raunio, T. (2003), »The Committee System. Powers, Appointments and Report Allocation«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41/2: 333-351. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  123. Manin, B. (1987), »On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation«, Political Theory, 15/3: 338–368. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  124. —— (1995), Principes du gouvernement représentatif (Paris: Calmann-Lévy). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  125. Mansbridge, J. (1999), »Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent »Yes« «, The Journal of Politics, 61/3: 626–657. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  126. Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S. et al. (2010), »The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy«, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18/1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  127. Martì, J. L. (2006), »The Epistemic Conception of Deliberative Democracy Defended«, in S. Besson and J. L. Martí (eds.), Deliberative Democracy and its Discontens (Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited), 27–56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  128. Mayring, P. (2008), Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (Weinheim: Beltz). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  129. McElroy, G. (2001), »Committees and Party Cohesion in the European Parliament«, EPRG Working Paper No.8, Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30 (San Francisco). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  130. —— (2006), »Committee Representation in the European Parliament«, European Union Politics, 7/1: 5–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  131. —— (2008), »Committees and Party Cohesion in the European Parliament«, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (ÖZP), 37/3: 357–373. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  132. McElroy, G., and Benoit, K. (2010), »Party Policy and Group Affiliation in the European Parliament«, British Journal of Political Science, 40/2: 377–398. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  133. Mead, G. H. (1934), Mind, Self an Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  134. Mendelberg, T. (2002), »The Deliberative Citizen. Theory and Evidence.«, in M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, and R. Y. Shapiro (eds.), Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), 151–93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  135. Miller, G. J. (2005), »The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models«, Annual Review of Political Science, 8: 203–225. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  136. Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1963), »Constituency Influence in Congress«, The American Political Science Review, 57/1: 45–56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  137. Moravcsik, A. (2008), »The Myth of Europe‘s »Democratic Deficit« «, Intereconomics, 43/6: 331–340. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  138. Mouffe, C. (1999), »Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism«, Social Research, 66/3: 745–758. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  139. Müller, W. C. (2000), »Political parties in parliamentary democracies. Making delegation and accountability work«, European Journal of Political Research, 37: 309–333. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  140. Nastasi, B. K., Hitchcok, J. H., and Brown, L. M. (2010), »An Inclusive Framework for Conceptualizing Mixed Methods Design Typlogogies«, in A. C. Tashakkori (ed.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods & Behavioral Research, 2nd edition (Los Angeles: SAGE), 305–338. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  141. Naurin, D. (2009), »Most Common When Least Important. Deliberation in the European Union Council of Ministers«, British Journal of Political Science, 40: 31–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  142. Navarro, J. (2007), »Les députés européens et leur rôle: analyse sociologique de la représentation«, Dissertation (Bordeaux, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Bordeaux). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  143. —— (2009), »Les rôles au Parlement européen. Une typologie des pratiques de représentation«, Revue française de science politique, 59/3: 479–506. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  144. Neuhold, C. (2001), »The »Legislative Backbone« keeping the Institution upright?«, European Integration online Paper (EIoP), 5/10 <http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-010a.htm>. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  145. Noury, A., and Roland, G. (2000), »Comment vote-t-on au Parlement européen? Premiers résultats«, in P. Magnette and E. Remacle (eds.), Le nouveau modèle européen. Volume 1, Institutions et gouvernance (Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles), 67–77. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  146. Noury, A. G. (2002), »Ideology, Nationality and Euro-Parliamentarians«, European Union Politics, 3/1: 33–58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  147. Parkinson, J., and Mansbridge, J. (2013), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  148. Parsons, T. (1951), The Social System (Clencoe, III: The Free Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  149. Patzelt, W. J. (1991), »Neuere Repräsentationstheorie und das Repräsentationsverständnis von Abgeordneten«, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 38/2: 166–199. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  150. —— (1997), »German MPs and their roles«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 55–78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  151. Pedrini, S., and Bächtiger, A. (2010), Deliberative Inclusion of Minorities: Equality and Reciprocity among Linguistic Groups in Switzerland: Paper to be presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2-5 (Washington). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  152. Petty, R., and Krosnick, J. (1995), The Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  153. Pitkin, H. F. (1967 (1972)), The Concept of Representation, 2nd edition (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press), first pub. 1967. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  154. Proksch, S.-O., and Slapin, J. B. (2010), »Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches«, British Journal of Political Science, 40/3: 587–611. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  155. Rasmussen, A. (2008), »Party soldiers in a non-partisan community? Party linkage in the European Parliament«, Journal of European Public Policy, 15/8: 1164–1183. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  156. Reif, K., and Schmitt, H. (1980), »Nine second-order national elections - a conceptual framework for the anlaysis of European election results«, European Journal of Political Research, 8: 3–44. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  157. Ringe, N. (2010), Who Decides, and How?: Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  158. Risse, T. (1999), »International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area«, Politics & Governance, 27/4: 529–559. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  159. —— (2004), »Global Governance and Communicative Action«, Government and Opposition, 39/2: 288–313. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  160. Roger, L. (2010), Assessing deliberation in European Parliament - Building up an extended measurement instrument. Paper to be presented at the International Conference Making Parliament Speaks, October 13-14 (Paris). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  161. —— (2012a), Analyzing parliamentary communication: The impact of role orientations on MEPs' discursive behavior in committee debates. Paper to be presented at the Inaugural Conference of the ECPR Standing Group on Parliaments, June 24-27 (Dublin). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  162. —— (2012b), Trustee versus Delegate - investigating the role performance of Members of the European Parliament. Paper to be presented at the ECPR Joint Session, April 10-15 (Antwerp). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  163. —— (2013a), MEPs and their voters: Analyzing the impact of interests on MEPs discursive behavior in committee debates. Paper to be presented at the 7th ECPR General Conference, September 4-7 (Bordeaux). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  164. —— (2013b), »The Deliberative Quality of the Agora«, in R. Kies and P. Nanz (eds.), Is Europe Listening To Us? Sucesses and Failures of EU Citizen Consultations (Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate), 173–97. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  165. —— (2014), »Deliberation im Europäischen Parlament. Der Einfluss von Rollenorientierungen auf das Kommunikationsverhalten von Abgeordneten«, in A. Bächtiger, B. Kittel, and E. Linhart (eds.), Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie, Band 9, Räumliche Modelle der Politik (Im Erscheinen). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  166. Roger, L., and Schaal, G. S. (2013), »The Quality of Deliberation in Two Committees of the European Parliament. The Neglected Influence of the Situational Context and the Policymaking Stage«, Politics & Governance, 1/2: 151–169. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  167. Roger, L., and Winzen, T. (2015), »Party groups and committee negotiations in the European Parliament: outside attention and the anticipation of plenary conflict«, Journal of European Public Policy, 22/3: 391–408. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  168. Ryfe, D. M. (2005), »Does Deliberative Democracy Work?«, American Political Science Review, 2005: 49–71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  169. Saalfeld, T. (1997), »Professionalisation of Parliamentary Roles in Germany: An Aggregate-level Analysis, 1949-94«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 32–54. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  170. Saalfeld, T., and Müller, W. C. (1997), »Roles in legislative studies: A theoretical introduction«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 1–16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  171. Saldaña, J. (2013), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  172. Sanders, L. M. (1997), »Against Deliberation«, Political Theory, 25/3: 347–376. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  173. Sartori, G. (1970), »Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics«, The American Political Science Review, 64/4: 1033–1053. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  174. Scarrow, S. E. (1997), »Political Career Paths and the European Parliament«, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22/2: 253–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  175. Schimank, U. (2000), Handeln und Strukturen: Einführung in die akteurtheoretische Soziologie (Weinheim, München: Juventa). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  176. Schwarzmeier, M. (2001), Parlamentarische Mitsteuerung: Strukturen und Prozesse informalen Einflusses im deutschen Bundestag. (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  177. Scully, R., and Farrell, D. M. (2003), »MEPs as Representatives. Individual and Institutional Roles«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41/2: 269–288. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  178. —— (2007), Representing Europe's Citizens?: Electoral Institutions and the Failure of Parliamentary Representation (New York: Oxford University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  179. Searing, D. W. (1994), Westminster´s World. Understanding Political Roles (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  180. Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  181. Settembri, P., and Neuhold, C. (2009), »Achieving Consensus Through Committees. Does the European Parliament Manage?«, Journal of Common Market Studies, 47/1: 127–151. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  182. Sieberer, U. (2006), »Party unity in parliamentary democracies. A comparative analysis«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 12/2: 150–178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  183. Slapin, J. B., and Proksch, S.-O. (2010), »Look who's talking. Parliamentary debate in the European Union«, European Union Politics, 11/3: 333–357. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  184. Squires, J. (2006), »Deliberation and decision making: discontinuity in the two-track model«, in M. Passerin d'Entrèves (ed.), Democracy as Public Deliberation (New Jersey: Manchester University Press), 133–56. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  185. Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. et al. (2003), »Measuring Political Deliberation. A Discourse Quality Index«, Comparative European Politics, 1: 21–48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  186. Steenbergen, M.R., Bächtiger, A., Steiner, J. (2004), Toward a Political Psychology of Deliberation. Paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics, European University Institute, May 21-22 (Florence). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  187. Steiner, J. (2008), »Concept Stretching: The Case of Deliberation«, European Political Science Review, 7: 186–190. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  188. —— (2010), The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy: Empirical Research and Normative Implications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  189. Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M. et al. (2004), Deliberative Politics in Action. Analysing Parliamentary Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  190. Stie, A. E. (2010), »Decision-making Void of Democratic Qualities? An Evaluation of the EU’s Second Pillar Decision-making Procedure«, in S. Vanhoonacker, H. Dijkstra, and H. Maurer (eds.), Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy. European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 14 (1), Article 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  191. Strecker, D., and Schaal, G. S. (2006), »Die politische Theorie der Deliberation: Jürgen Habermas«, in A. Brodocz and G. S. Schaal (eds.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart. Eine Einführung, 2., erweiterte und aktualisierte Auflage (Opladen, Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich), 99–148. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  192. Strøm, K. (1997), »Rules, Reasons, and Routines: Legislative Roles in Parliamentary Democracies«, Journal of Legislative Studies, 3/1: 155–174. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  193. —— (2000), »Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies’, in R. Bellamy and A. Palumbo (eds.), Political Accountability (Farnham: Ashgate). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  194. —— (2012), »Roles as strategies: toward a logic of legislative behavior«, in M. Blomgren and O. Rozenberg (eds.), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Abingdon: Routledge), 85–100. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  195. Stromer-Galley, J. (2007), »Measuring Deliberation's Content. A Coding Scheme«, Journal of Public Deliberation, 3/1: Article 12. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  196. Sunstein, C. (2003), »The Law of Group Polarization«, in J. S. Fishkin and P. Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy (Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing Ltd), 80–101. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  197. Tetlock, P., and Kim, J. I. (1987), »Accountability and Judgment Processes in a Personality Prediction Task«, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52/4: 700–709. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  198. Tetlock, P. E. (1985), »A Social Check on the Fundamental Attribution Error«, Social Psychology Quarterly, 48/3: 227–236. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  199. Thiem, J. (2009), Nationale Parteien im Europäischen Parlament. Delegation, Kontrolle und politischer Einfluss. (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  200. Thompson, D. F. (2008), »Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science«, Annual Review of Political Science, 11/June: 497–520. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  201. Tsebelis, G. (1994), »The Power of the European Parliament as the Conditional Agenda Setter«, The American Political Science Review, 88/1: 128–142. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  202. —— (1995), »Decision Making in Political Systems. Veto Player in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism«, British Journal of Politcal Science, 25/3: 289–325. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  203. Tsebelis, G., and Garrett, G. (2000), »Legislative Politics in the European Union«, European Union Politics, 1/1: 9–36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  204. Turner, R. H. (1962), »Role Taking: Process versus Conformity«, in A. Rose (ed.), Human Behavior and Social Processes (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin), 20–40. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  205. Ulbert, C., and Risse, T. (2005), »Deliberately Changing the Discourse. What Does Make Arguing Effectively?«, Acta politica, 40/3: 351–367. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  206. Urfalino, P. (2005), »La délibération n'est pas une conversation - délibération, décision collective et négociation«, Négociations, 2/4: 99–114. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  207. von Beyme, K. (1997), Der Gesetzgeber. Der Bundestag als Entscheidungszentrum. (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  208. Wahlke, J. C., Eulau, H., Buchanan, W. et al. (1962), The Legislative System. Explorations in Legislative Behavior. (New York, London: John Wiley and Sons). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  209. Warren, M. E. (2012), When, Where and Why Do We Need Deliberation, Voting and Other Means of Organizing Democracy? A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Systems. Paper for delivery at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2 (New Orleans). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  210. Warren, M. E., and Pearse, H. (2008), Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  211. Whitaker, R. (2001), »Party Control in a Committee-Based Legislature? The Case of the European Parliament«, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 7/4: 63–88. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  212. —— (2011), The European Parliament's Committees. National party influence and legislative empowerment (Abingdon: Routledge). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  213. Williams, M. S. (2000), »The Uneasy Alliance of Group Representation and Deliberative Democracy«, in W. Kymlicka and W. Norman (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 124–52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  214. Yack, B. (2006), »Rhetoric and Public Reasoning. An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation«, Political Theory, 34/4: 417–438. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  215. Yordanova, N. (2009), Legislative Power of the European Parliament Committees: Plenary Adoption of Committee Reports. Paper prepared for the 11th Biannual Conference of the European Union Studies Association, April 23-25 (Los Angeles, California). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  216. —— (2010), Plenary »Amendments« to Committee Reports: Legislative Powers of the European Parliament Committees, Unpublished Manuscript. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  217. —— (2011), »Inter-institutional Rules and Division of Power in the European Parliament. Allocation of Consultatin and Co-decision Reports«, West European Politics, 34/1: 97–121. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385
  218. Young, I. M. (2001), »Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy«, Political Theory, 29/5: 670–690. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845255385

Similar publications

from the series "Studien zum Parlamentarismus"
Cover of book: Die Aufstellung der Kandidaten für den Deutschen Bundestag
Monograph No access
Suzanne S. Schüttemeyer, Pia Berkhoff, Malte Cordes, Oscar W. Gabriel, Daniel Hellmann, Benjamin Höhne, Oliver Kannenberg, Sophie Kopsch, Oskar Niedermayer, Anastasia Pyschny, Danny Schindler
Die Aufstellung der Kandidaten für den Deutschen Bundestag
Cover of book: Öffentliche Anhörungen im Deutschen Bundestag
Monograph No access
Sebastian Hünermund
Öffentliche Anhörungen im Deutschen Bundestag
Cover of book: Opposition Party Behavior and Minority Government Support
Monograph No access
Melanie Müller
Opposition Party Behavior and Minority Government Support
Cover of book: Bundesverfassungsgericht und Parlamentarismus
Monograph No access
Astrid Kuhn
Bundesverfassungsgericht und Parlamentarismus
Cover of book: Nationale Parlamentarier im Europarat
Monograph No access
Veronika Ohliger
Nationale Parlamentarier im Europarat

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex