Cover des Buchs: The Legitimacy of the Afghan Amnesty Law under International Law
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

The Legitimacy of the Afghan Amnesty Law under International Law

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2020

Zusammenfassung

Die anhaltende Bedeutung von Amnestien, einer Form der Straffreiheit, wird am Beispiel Afghanistans deutlich, wo 2010 ein bedingungsloses Amnestiegesetz in Kraft trat. Erklärte Ziele des Gesetzes waren Frieden und Aussöhnung. Ob dies durch eine so umfassende Generalamnestie für schwere internationale Verbrechen erreicht werden kann, ist eine schwierige Frage. Im ersten Hauptteil dieses Buches wird untersucht, ob die Bestimmungen des afghanischen Amnestiegesetzes mit den völkerrechtlichen (Strafverfolgungs-)Verpflichtungen Afghanistans vereinbar sind. Im zweiten Teil werden Vorschläge für einen ganzheitlichen Friedensprozess in Afghanistan unterbreitet, um den Weg für dauerhaften Frieden und Versöhnung, für Gerechtigkeit und Achtung der Rechtsstaatlichkeit zu ebnen. Die Studie analysiert internationale Statuten, Konventionen und Dokumente sowie ausgewählte Rechtsprechung, Staatenpraxis, die Praxis der Vereinten Nationen und die akademische Debatte in Bezug auf Amnestien.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2020
Copyrightjahr
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7910-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2237-7
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Leipziger Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Europarecht und ausländischen öffentlichen Recht
Band
23
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
335
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 10
    1. 1.1 Purpose of the Study Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Methodology and Interdisciplinarity Kein Zugriff
    3. 1.3 Outline of the Chapters Kein Zugriff
    1. 2.1 Amnesties in General Kein Zugriff
    2. 2.2 The Case of Afghanistan – History of Conflicts Kein Zugriff
    3. 2.3 The Afghan Amnesty Law of 2010 Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 Does the Afghan Amnesty Law Violate Explicit Statutory Provisions on Amnesties? Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.1.2 Does the Afghan Amnesty Law Violate Other Statutory Provisions? Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.1.3 The Afghan Amnesty Law and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.1.4 Conclusion Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.1.1 Latin American States Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.1.2 African States Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.2.1.3 Asian States Kein Zugriff
        4. 3.2.1.4 European States and the US Kein Zugriff
        5. 3.2.1.5 States on Foreign Amnesties Kein Zugriff
        6. 3.2.1.6 Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.2.2 The United Nations on Amnesties Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.2.3 The Afghan Amnesty Law and Customary International Law Kein Zugriff
    3. 3.3 Do the General Principles of Law Preclude the Afghan Amnesty Law? Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.4.1 The Inter-American Human Rights System Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.4.2 The Special Court for Sierra Leone Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.4.3 The European Court of Human Rights Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.4.4 The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Kein Zugriff
      5. 3.4.5 The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia Kein Zugriff
      6. 3.4.6 Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.5.1 Amnesty Guidelines Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.5.2 Is the Afghan Amnesty Law Consistent with these Amnesty Guidelines? Kein Zugriff
    6. 3.6 Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 Democratic Legitimacy of the Amnesty Law Kein Zugriff
    2. 4.2 The Scope of the Amnesty Law Kein Zugriff
      1. 4.3.1 National Courts Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.3.2 Ad hoc International Tribunal Kein Zugriff
      3. 4.3.3 Hybrid Court Kein Zugriff
      4. 4.3.4 The International Criminal Court Kein Zugriff
      5. 4.3.5 Universal Jurisdiction Kein Zugriff
      6. 4.3.6 Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    4. 4.4 The Role of Traditional Justice Processes Kein Zugriff
    5. 4.5 Encouraging Participation in Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration Programmes Kein Zugriff
    6. 4.6 Testifying before a Truth Commission Kein Zugriff
    7. 4.7 Reparations for Victims Kein Zugriff
    8. 4.8 Institutional Reforms Kein Zugriff
    9. 4.9 Conclusion Kein Zugriff
  6. 5 Final Remarks and Future Prospects Kein Zugriff 290 - 300
  7. 6 References Kein Zugriff 301 - 335

Literaturverzeichnis (563)

  1. Winterbotham E., The State of Transitional Justice in Afghanistan. http://www.areu.org.af/Uploads/EditionPdfs/1014E-The%20State%20of%20Transitional%20Justice%20in%20Afghanistan%20PN%20April%202010.pdf (12 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  2. van Hoecke, M., ‘Methodology of Comparative Legal Research’, Law and Method (2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  3. van Schaack, B. and Slye, R. C., International Criminal Law and Its Enforcement (New York: Foundation Press, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  4. Vendrell, F., ‘The International Community's Failures in Afghanistan’ in W. Mason (ed.), The Rule of Law in Afghanistan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 53–60. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  5. Villiger, M. E., Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources, Developments in international law, 2nd edn. (The Hague [u.a.]: Kluwer Law International, 1997), vol. 28. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  6. Vogenauer, S. and Weatherill, S., General Principles of Law, Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law (Oxford UK, Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  7. Walker, S. and Bowcott, O., ‘Russia Withdraws Signature from International Criminal Court Statute’, The Guardian, 16 November 2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  8. Wardak, A., ‘State and Non-State Justice Systems in Afghanistan: the Need for Synergy’, U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 32 (2011), 1305–24. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  9. Wardak A., Saba D. and Kazem H., Afghanistan Human Development Report 2007: Bridging Modernity and Tradition: Rule of Law and the Search for Justice. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/nhdr2007.pdf (22 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  10. Werle, G., ‘Transitional Justice – Der juristische Rahmen’ in H. E. Müller, G. M. Sander and H. Válková (eds.), Festschrift für Ulrich Eisenberg zum 70. Geburtstag (München: Beck, 2009), pp. 791–806. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  11. Werle, G., Völkerstrafrecht, 3rd edn. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  12. Werle, G. and Jessberger, F., Principles of International Criminal Law, 3rd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  13. Westerwelle Recommends Assad the Passage Into Exile. http://www.zitecode.com/Articles/detail/westerwelle-recommends-assad-the-passage-into-exile.html (21 August 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  14. Wilkinson B., Court to Soon Rule in Military Executions Trial in Suriname. http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2018/nov/08/court-soon-rule-military-executions-trial-suriname/ (04 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  15. Williams, S., ‘Amnesties in International Law: The Experience of the Special Court for Sierra Leone’, Human Rights Law Review 5 (2005), 271–309. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  16. van Eijl, R., Dealing with Crimes of the Past: No More Amnesty? An Inquiry into the Lawfulness of Amnesty for Human Rights Atrocities Under International Law (Utrecht: Kennispunt Recht, Economie, Bestuur en Organisatie, Universiteit Utrecht, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  17. Winterbotham E., The State of Transitional Justice in Afghanistan: Actors, Approaches and Challenges. http://www.areu.org.af/Uploads/EditionPdfs/1009E-The%20State%20of%20Transitional%20Justice%20in%20Afghanistan%20-%20Actors,%20Approaches%20and%20Challenges%20DP%202010%20Final%20Web.pdf (18 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  18. Winterbotham E., Legacies of Conflict: Healing Complexes and Moving Forwards in Ghazni Province. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4e92ba3a2.html (10 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  19. Winterbotham E., Wartime Suffering: Patterns of Violations in Afghanistan. http://www.areu.org.af/Uploads/EditionPdfs/1123E%20-%20Legacies%20of%20Conflict%20-%20Wartime%20Suffering%202011.pdf (19 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  20. Winterbotham E., Healing the Legacies of Conflict in Afghanistan: Community Voices on Justice, Peace and Reconciliation. http://www.areu.org.af/Uploads/EditionPdfs/1201E-Healing%20the%20Legacies%20of%20Conflict%20in%20Afghanistan%20SP%202011.pdf (19 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  21. Wisner, D., ‘Is Time Ripe for Transitional Justice in Afghanistan?’, The Fletcher School Online Journal for Southwest Asia and Islamic Civilization (2008), 1–12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  22. Wolkowa, I., ‘Generalpardon für "heilige Krieger": Afghanisches Parlament beschloss Amnestie/Kämpfer der letzten 25 Jahre bleiben straffrei’, Neues Deutschland, 03 February 2007. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  23. Worden S. and Steele R., Telling the Story: Documentation Lessons for Afghanistan from the Cambodian Experience. http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/25297/1/Telling%20the%20Story%20-%20Documentation%20Lessons%20for%20Afghanistan%20from%20the%20Cambodian%20Experience.pdf?1 (10 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  24. Yemen Times, Yemen's Immunity Law: Breach of International Obligations. http://www.yementimes.com/en/1720/report/3013/Yemen%E2%80%99s-immunity-law-Breach-of-international-obligations.html (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  25. Ynetnews, 113 Countries Sign Pledge Against Sexual Violence. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4433351,00.html (24 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  26. Zegveld, L., ‘Dutch Cases on Torture Committed in Afghanistan: The Relevance of the Distinction between Internal and International Armed Conflict’, Journal of International Criminal Justice (2006), 878–80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  27. Zulfiqar S. and Calderon H., Chad and Five Other Central African Countries Pledge to End Use of Children in Armed Conflict: 'N’Djaména Declaration' Adopted. http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/chad_53966.html (23 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  28. Zumach, A., ‘Signal gegen Straflosigkeit’, taz, 23 December 2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  29. Zupan, N. and Servaes, S., Transitional Justice & Dealing with the Past, Guidance Paper Transitional Justice (Bonn, Germany, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  30. United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone, S/2000/915. http://www.rscsl.org/Documents/Establishment/S-2000-915.pdf (16 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  31. United Nations General Assembly, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, A/RES/60/147. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  32. United Nations General Assembly, International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism to Assist in the Investigation and Prosecution of Those Responsible for the Most Serious Crimes under International Law Committed in the Syrian Arab Republic since March 2011, A/71/L.48. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/71/L.48 (24 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  33. United Nations General Assembly – Security Council, The Situation in Afghanistan and Its Implications for International Peace and Security: Report of the Secretary-General, A/56/681–S/2001/1157. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2001/1157 (20 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  34. United Nations General Assembly – Security Council, The Situation in Afghanistan and Its Implications for International Peace and Security: Report of the Secretary-General, A/59/581 – S/2004/925. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Afgh%20S2004%20925.pdf (20 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  35. United Nations General Assembly – Security Council, The Situation in Afghanistan and Its Implications for International Peace and Security: Report of the Secretary-General, A/64/705–S/2010/127. http://afghanistan-un.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/S20101271.pdf (13 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  36. United Nations Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations of the UN Human Rights Committee: Uruguay: CCPR/C/79/Add.19. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2F79%2FAdd.19&Lang=en (07 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  37. United Nations Human Rights Committee, Rodríguez v. Uruguay, Communication No. 322/1988: U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/322/1988 (1994). http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/html/vws322.htm (07 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  38. United Nations Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31: The Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13. https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html (29.02.16). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  39. United Nations Human Rights Council, Analytical Study on Human Rights and Transitional Justice, A/HRC/12/18. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/12session/A-HRC-12-18_E.pdf (24 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  40. United Nations Human Rights Council, Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Libya: A/HRC/19/68. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session19/A.HRC.19.68.pdf (20 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  41. United Nations Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence, A/HRC/27/56. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session27/Pages/ListReports.aspx (12 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  42. United Nations Security Council, Sierra Leone, S/PV.4035. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/PV.4035 (28 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  43. United Nations Security Council, Report of the Secretary-General on the Role of United Nations Peacekeeping in Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, S/2000/101. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2000/101 (31 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  44. United Nations Development Programme Afghanistan, Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Programme (APRP) – UNDP Support: Third Quarter Report 2011. http://www.undp.org.af/Projects/Report2011/APRP/3rdQ/APRP_00076674_QPR_Q3_2011.pdf (17 April 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  45. United Nations Security Council, Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-Establishment of Permanent Government Institutions: "Bonn Agreement", S/2001/1154. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3f48f4754.html (20 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  46. United Nations Security Council, The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, Report of the Secretary-General, S/2004/616. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N04/395/29/PDF/N0439529.pdf?OpenElement (08 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  47. United Nations Security Council, United Nations Security Council – 5052nd meeting, S/PV.5052 (Resumption 1). http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/IJ%20SPV5052%20Res1.pdf (16 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  48. United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1674 (2006), S/Res/1674 (2006). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/331/99/PDF/N0633199.pdf?OpenElement (16 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  49. United Nations Security Council, Resolution 1757 (2007), S/RES/1757 (2007). http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N07/363/57/PDF/N0736357.pdf?OpenElement (12 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  50. United Nations Security Council, The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: Report of the Secretary-General, S/2011/634. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/ROL%20S2011%20634.pdf (17 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  51. United Nations Security Council, Resolution 2014 (2011), S/RES/2014 (2011). http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/YEMEN%20S%20RES%202014.pdf (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  52. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Afghanistan Rule of Law Project: Field Study of Informal and Customary Justice in Afghanistan and Recommendations on Improving Access to Justice and Relations Between Formal Courts and Informal Bodies. http://www.usip.org/files/file/usaid_afghanistan.pdf (15 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  53. University of Minnesota – Human Rights Library, Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties – Afghanistan. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/research/ratification-afghanistan1.html (11 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  54. Unofficial Translation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement concluded between the Government of Nepal and the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/file/resources/collections/peace_agreements/nepal_cpa_20061121_en.pdf (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  55. ‘Uruguay: Justice or Democracy?’, The Economist, 23 March 2013. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  56. Valinas, M., ‘Interpreting Complementarity and Interest of Justice in the Presence of Restorative-Based Alternative Forms of Justice’ in C. Stahn and L. van den Herik (eds.), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2010), pp. 267–88. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  57. van der Vyver, J. D., ‘The United Nations and International Criminal Law’, The University of Queensland Law Journal 24 (2005), 317–36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  58. A Declaration of Commitment to End Sexual Violence in Conflict. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/244849/A_DECLARATION_OF_COMMITMENT_TO_END_SEXUAL_VIOLENCE_IN_CONFLICT__TO_PRINT…pdf (24 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  59. Abrão, P. and Torelly, M. D., ‘Resistance to Change: Brazil's Persistent Amnesty and its Alternatives for Truth and Justice’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 152–81. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  60. Adams, M., Husa, J. and Oderkerk, M. (eds.), Comparative Law Methodology, The international library of comparative law (Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017), vol. 3. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  61. Adhikari G., Nepal Inches Towards Truth About War. http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/south-asia/nepal-inches-towards-truth-about-war/article4526543.ece (18 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  62. adveniat – Blickpunkt Lateinamerika, Chile: Schleppende Aufarbeitung von Militärdiktatur. http://www.blickpunkt-lateinamerika.de/news-details/article/schleppende-aufarbeitung-von-militaerdiktatur.html?no_cache=1&cHash=de4bd055606f8b214b963d9df7809aff (08 January 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  63. Afghan Civil Society Forum-organization (ACSFo), A First Step on a Long Journey: How People Define Violence and Justice in Afghanistan (1958-2008). https://af.boell.org/sites/default/files/pdvj_final_20.4.2011.pdf (08 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  64. Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission. http://www.aihrc.org.af/ (22.01.16). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  65. Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC), A Call for Justice: A National Consultation on past Human Rights Violations in Afghanistan. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/47fdfad50.pdf (11 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  66. Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC), Discussion Paper on the Legality of Amnesties. http://www.aihrc.org.af/media/files/Reports/Thematic%20reports/Amnesties_paper_23_Feb_2010.pdf (25 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  67. Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC), Afghan People's Dialogue on Peace: Laying the Foundations for an Inclusive Peace Process. http://www.aihrc.org.af/media/files/People%27s%20Dialogue%20FINAL%20report.pdf (08 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  68. Afghanistan National Development Strategy Secretariat/Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Afghanistan National Development Strategy (ANDS). http://www.undp.org.af/publications/KeyDocuments/ANDS_Full_Eng.pdf (16 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  69. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), Afghanistan Research Newsletter Number 24, January/February 2010. http://www.areu.org.af/Uploads/EditionPdfs/1006E-Afghanistan%20Research%20Newsletter%2024%20Jan-Feb%202010.pdf (26 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  70. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), When Will Transitional Justice in Afghanistan Become a Part of the Transitional Decade?: A Roundtable Discussion. http://www.areu.org.af/Uploads/EditionPdfs/1612E%20When%20Will%20Transitional%20Justice%20in%20Afghanistan1.pdf (28 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  71. Afghanistan: Immunity to Perpetrators of Mass Atrocities Greenlights Impunity (IRIN, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  72. Afghanistan: Justice Action Plan Heading for Oblivion (IRIN Asia, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  73. Aguilar, P., ‘The Spanish Amnesty Law of 1977 in Comparative Perspective: From a Law for Democracy to a Law for Impunity’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 315–35. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  74. Ahmed, F., ‘Judicial Reform in Afghanistan: A Case Study in the New Criminal Procedure Code’, Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 29 (2005-2006), 93–134. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  75. Ahmed, F., ‘Shari’a, Custom, and Statutory Law: Comparing State Approaches to Islamic Jurisprudence, Tribal Autonomy, and Legal Development in Afghanistan and Pakistan’, Global Jurist 7 (2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  76. Al Jazeera, Afghan Official: No Plans to Revive Taliban Peace Talks. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/07/afghan-official-plans-revive-taliban-peace-talks-160714083916947.html (11 October 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  77. Al Jazeera America, Nepal Parliament Passes Amnesty Bill. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2014/04/nepal-parliament-passes-amnesty-bill-20144271502645838.html (18 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  78. Al Jazeera America, UN Rights Chief: War Crimes Not to Be Part of Any Syria Amnesty Deal. http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2016/2/1/un-rights-chief-war-crimes-not-to-be-part-of-any-syria-amnesty-deal.html (08 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  79. al Sharjabi A. M., Yemen’s Revolutionary Ideals Stumble. http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/security/2015/01/yemen-revolution-saleh-hadi-garden-public-space-mohsen.html (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  80. Alford-Jones K., Guatemala's New 'Right-wing' Attorney General Raises Questions and Fears. http://upsidedownworld.org/main/guatemala-archives-33/4851-guatemalas-new-right-wing-attorney-general-raises-questions-and-fears- (15 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  81. Al-Samei M., Derailment of Transitional Justice Law Provokes Exchange of Wild Accusations. http://www.yementimes.com/en/1592/report/1189/Derailment-of-Transitional-Justice-Law-provokes-exchange-of-wild-accusations.html (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  82. Ambos, K., ‘The Legal Framework of Transitional Justice: A Systematic Study with a Special Focus on the Role of the ICC’ in K. Ambos, J. Large and M. Wierda (eds.), Building a Future on Peace and Justice: Studies on Transitional Justice, Conflict Resolution and Development. The Nuremberg Declaration on Peace and Justice (Berlin: Springer, 2009), pp. 19–103. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  83. Ambos, K., Internationales Strafrecht: Strafanwendungsrecht, Völkerstrafrecht, Europäisches Strafrecht, Rechtshilfe, 4th edn. (München: C.H. Beck, 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  84. American Non-Governmental Organizations Coalition for the International Criminal Court (AMICC), Countries Concluding Bilateral Immunity Agreements. http://www.amicc.org/usicc/bialist (26 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  85. Amin, A. S., ‘Transitional Justice and the Culture of Impunity in Afghanistan’, Dissertation, University of Erfurt (2013). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  86. Amnesty International, Annul Report: Algeria 2015/2016. https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east-and-north-africa/algeria/report-algeria/ (23 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  87. Amnesty International, Chile – Transition at the Crossroads: Human Rights Violations under Pinochet Rule Remain the Crux. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/172000/amr220011996en.pdf (04 January 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  88. Amnesty International, International Criminal Court: US Efforts to Obtain Impunity for Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crime, IOR 40/025/2002. http://www.amicc.org/docs/aiusimpunity.pdf (27 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  89. Amnesty International, Afghanistan: “First Execution since Fall of Taliban”. http://reliefweb.int/report/afghanistan/afghanistan-first-execution-fall-taliban (27 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  90. Amnesty International, Afghanistan: Addressing the Past to Secure the Future. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa11/003/2005/en/ (28 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  91. Amnesty International, Getting away with Murder?: The Impunity of International Forces in Afghanistan. https://doc.es.amnesty.org/cgi-bin/ai/BRSCGI/GETTING%20AWAY%20WITH%20MURDER?CMD=VEROBJ&MLKOB=29040884646 (07 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  92. Amnesty International, Afghanistan: 10-Point Human Rights Agenda for President Karzai. https://www.amnesty.nl/sites/default/files/public/afghanistan_10point_human_rights_agenda_for_president_karzai.pdf (12 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  93. Amnesty International, Taleban Should Be Prosecuted for War Crimes in Afghanistan. https://www.amnestyusa.org/press-releases/afghanistan-taliban-should-be-prosecuted-for-war-crimes-2/ (13 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  94. Amnesty International, The Time for Justice Is Now: New Strategy Needed in The Democratic Republic of the Congo, AFR 62/006/2011. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/AFR62/006/2011/en/ (09 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  95. Amnesty International, Yemen’s Immunity Law: Breach of International Obligations. https://doc.es.amnesty.org/cgi-bin/ai/BRSCGI/mde310072012en?CMD=VEROBJ&MLKOB=30564653838 (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  96. Amnesty International, Democratic Republic Of The Congo: Annual Report 2013. http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-democratic-republic-of-congo-2013?page=show (09 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  97. Amnesty International, Annual Report: Suriname 2013. http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-suriname-2013 (20 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  98. Amnesty International, Ukraine: Abuses and War Crimes by the Aidar Volunteer Battalion in the North Luhansk Region, AI Index: EUR 50/040/2014. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/EUR50/040/2014/en/ (24 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  99. Amnesty International, Annual Report – Democratic Republic of the Congo 2015/2016. https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/africa/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/report-democratic-republic-of-the-congo/ (11 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  100. Amnesty International, Amnesty International Report 2017/18 – Yemen. https://www.refworld.org/publisher,AMNESTY,ANNUALREPORT,YEM,5a99382fa,0.html (05 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  101. Anderson P., Calls Grow to Tackle Afghan War Crimes (2005). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/4258343.stm (10 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  102. Apple J. G., What are General Principles of International Law? http://www.judicialmonitor.org/archive_0707/generalprinciples.html (06 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  103. Asian Centre for Human Rights, Afghan Charter of Impunity: President Karzai as the Lame Duck. http://www.achrweb.org/Review/2007/155-07.htm (25 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  104. Auswärtiges Amt, Afghanistan nach der Bonner Konferenz. http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/DE/Aussenpolitik/RegionaleSchwerpunkte/AfghanistanZentralasien/Bonn_Konferenz_2011/111227-AFG-nach-Bonnkonferenz-node.html (14 May 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  105. Azanian Peoples Organisation (AZAPO) and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and others: Case CCT 17/96, Explanatory Note. http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/1996/16media.pdf (05 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  106. Bai L., Truth and Reconciliation Commission on Afghanistan. http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/SRR/Volume13/laxmibai.html (16 July 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  107. Baker, R. B., ‘Customary International Law in the 21st Century: Old Challenges and New Debates’, European Journal of International Law 21 (2010), 173–204. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  108. Barbour E. C. and Weed M. C., The International Criminal Court (ICC): Jurisdiction, Extradition, and U.S. Policy. http://www.amicc.org/docs/R41116_20100316.pdf (01 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  109. Barfield T., Nojumi N. and Thier A. J., The Clash of Two Goods: State and Non-State Dispute Resolution in Afghanistan. http://www.usip.org/files/file/clash_two_goods.pdf (04 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  110. Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Accountability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law and Other Serious Violations of Human Rights’ in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.), Post-Conflict Justice (Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002), pp. 3–54. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  111. Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Proposed Guiding Principles for Combating Impunity for International Crimes’ in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.), Post-Conflict Justice (Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002), pp. 255–82. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  112. Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Reflections on Contemporary Developments in International Criminal Justice’ in B. S. Brown (ed.), Research Handbook on International Criminal Law, Research handbooks in international law (Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 409–17. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  113. Bassiouni, M. C., Introduction to International Criminal Law, Second revised edition (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  114. BBC, Ex-Paramilitaries Jailed for Guatemala Massacre. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17454434 (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  115. BBC, David Cameron: Safe Passage for Syria's Assad Acceptable. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20223759 (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  116. BBC, Nepal to Investigate Civil War Crimes. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-37118106 (19 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  117. Beaudoin S., Appeals Court’s Decision Suspends Genocide Trial. http://www.ijmonitor.org/2015/10/appeals-courts-decision-suspends-genocide-trial/ (17 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  118. Beaudoin S., Guatemala Opens a New Court to Hear Cases Related to Grave Crimes. http://www.ijmonitor.org/2015/11/guatemala-opens-a-new-court-to-hear-cases-related-to-grave-crimes/ (17 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  119. Bell, C., The ‘New Law’ of Transitional Justice, Building a Future on Peace and Justice, “Workshop 1 – From Mediation to Sustainable Peace” (Nuremberg, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  120. Bellal, A., Giacca, G. and Casey-Maslen, S., ‘International Law and Armed Non-State Actors in Afghanistan’, International Review of the Red Cross 93 (2011), 47–79. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  121. Bengali, S. and Faizy, S., ‘Afghanistan Takes a Step Toward Peace With Notorious Ex-Warlord’, Los Angeles Times, 22 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  122. Benish A. J., Between Impunity And Accountability: A Comparative Overview of Transitional Justice Processes in Two Post-Conflict South Asian Countries: Nepal and Afghanistan. http://www.watchafghanistan.org/files/Between_Impunity_and_Accountability_english.pdf (06 March 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  123. Binder, C., ‘The Prohibition of Amnesties by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, German Law Journal 12 (2011), 1203–30. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  124. Blum C. P., Magarrell L. and Wierda M., Prosecuting Abuses of Detainees in U.S. Counter- terrorism Operations: Criminal Justice for Criminal Policy. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-USA-Criminal-Justice-2009-English.pdf (25 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  125. Boone J., Afghanistan Quietly Brings into Force Taliban Amnesty Law. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/11/taliban-amnesty-law-enacted (27 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  126. Boraine, A., ‘Transitional Justice’ in S. Chesterman, M. Ignatieff and R. C. Thakur (eds.), Making States Work: State Failure and the Crisis of Governance (Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 2005), pp. 318–38. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  127. Borger J., Smuggled Syrian Documents Enough to Indict Bashar al-Assad, Say Investigators. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/12/smuggled-syrian-documents-indict-assad-investigators (01 June 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  128. Bos, A., ‘From the International Law Commission to the Rome Conference (1994-1998)’ in A. Cassese, P. Gaeta and J. R. W. D. Jones (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 3 vols. (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), vol. 1, pp. 35–66. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  129. Boyle, A. E., ‘Soft Law in International Law-Making’ in M. D. Evans (ed.), International Law, 3rd edn. (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 122–40. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  130. Boyle, A. E. and Chinkin, C. M., The Making of International Law, Foundations of public international law (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  131. Braid, E. and Roht-Arriaza, N., ‘De Facto and De Jure Amnesty Laws: The Central American Case’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 182–209. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  132. ‘Brazil to Focus on Past Abuses’, The New York Times, 01 April 2014. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  133. Brodzinsky S. and Watts J., Former Guatemalan Dictator Convicted of Genocide and Jailed for 80 Years. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/11/guatemalan-dictator-rios-montt-jailed-genocide (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  134. Brussels Conference on Afghanistan, Partnership for Prosperity and Peace: Communiqué of the Participants. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/10/05-afghanistan-conference-joint-communique/ (11 October 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  135. Buckley-Zistel, S., ‘Einleitung: Nach Krieg, Gewalt und Repression’ in S. Buckley-Zistel and T. Kater (eds.), Nach Krieg, Gewalt und Repression: Vom schwierigen Umgang mit der Vergangenheit, 1st edn. (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011), pp. 7–20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  136. Burke-White, W. W., ‘Reframing Impunity: Applying Liberal International Law Theory to an Analysis of Amnesty Legislation’, Harvard International Law.Journal 42 (2001), 467–533. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  137. Burnet, J. E., ‘(In)Justice: Truth, Reconciliation, and Revenge in Rwanda's Gacaca’ in A. L. Hinton (ed.), Transitional Justice: Global Mechanisms and Local Realities after Genocide and Mass Violence (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2011), pp. 95–118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  138. Buyse A., Amnesty and Torture. http://echrblog.blogspot.de/2009/03/amnesty-and-torture.html (17 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  139. Carasik L., Rios Montt Edges Closer to Escaping Accountability for Genocide. http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2013/11/rios-montt-guatemalagenocidetrial.html (17 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  140. Casey, N., ‘Colombia’s Congress Approves Peace Accord With FARC’, The New York Times, 30 November 2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  141. Cassel, D., ‘Lessons from the Americas: Guidelines for International Response to Amnesties for Atrocities’, Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (1996), 197–230. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  142. Cassese, A., The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  143. Cassese, A. and Gaeta, P., Cassese's International Criminal Law, 3rd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  144. Castillo M. and Vasquez P., Guatemala Genocide Trial Hits Hurdles: Rios Montt Accused in Massacres of 1,700 Ixil Mayans in '80s. http://www.wptz.com/guatemala-genocide-trial-hits-hurdles/30559846 (07 January 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  145. Center for Constitutional Rights, Military Commissions Act of 2006: A Summary of the Law. http://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/assets/files/report_MCA.pdf (26 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  146. Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS), Estadísticas. http://www.cels.org.ar/blogs/estadisticas/ (02 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  147. Cespedes T. and Wade T., Peru's Fujimori Gets 25 Years Prison for Massacres. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-peru-fujimori-idUSTRE5363RH20090407 (09 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  148. Charbonneau, L., ICC Prosecutor Eyes Possible Afghanistan War Crimes (Reuters, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  149. Charbonneau L., Hague Prosecutor Urges Libya Not to Grant Amnesty for War Crimes. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/07/us-libya-icc-idUSBRE8A629N20121107 (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  150. Choudhury, N., ‘Reconceptualising Legal Pluralism in Afghanistan’, Selected Proceedings of the Annual Canadian Law Student Conference, Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues Inaugural Volume (2010), 21–52. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  151. Clark, P., ‘Reconciliation, Peace, Justice: A Conceptual Framework for Transitional Justice and Rebuilding Society’, IP Journal (2010), 19–25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  152. Claude A.-C., Afghanistan – Justice and Reconciliation: The Informal Justice System in Afghanistan. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/6AC2F49A58EF764B492577EF00071C46-Full_Report.pdf (19 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  153. Close J., Amnesty Provisions in the Constitutions of the World: A Comparative Analysis. https://aninternationallawblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/05/amnesty-provisions-in-the-constitutions-of-the-world-a-comparative-analysis/ (08 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  154. Coburn N. and Dempsey J., Informal Dispute Resolution in Afghanistan. http://www.usip.org/files/resources/sr247_0.pdf (25 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  155. Cockburn K., How to Prove a Role of Customary International Criminal Law: Re-imaging a Definition of CIL. http://www.publiclaw.uct.ac.za/usr/public_law/LLMPapers/cockburn.pdf (03 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  156. Cryer, R., Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime, Cambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  157. Cryer, R., ‘International Criminal Law’ in M. D. Evans (ed.), International Law, 3rd edn. (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 752–83. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  158. Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D. and Wilmshurst, E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  159. CTV News, No Peace without Justice, Says Envoy to Afghanistan. http://www.ctvnews.ca/no-peace-without-justice-says-envoy-to-afghanistan-1.503738 (27 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  160. DailyMail – MailOnline, Court: Murder Trial Against Suriname President Must Continue. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-3634186/Court-Murder-trial-against-Suriname-leader-continue.html (20 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  161. Danchin, P. G., ‘Transitional Justice in Afghanistan: Confronting Violations of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 4 (2001), 3–51. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  162. Dayal A., The Institutional Returns of Amnesty?: Evaluating Security Sector Reform in Post-Conflict Cases. http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p413445_index.html (07 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  163. Decree of the Presidency of the Interim Administration of Afghanistan on the Establishment of an Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (2002). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  164. Del Vecchio, G., General Principles of Law (Littleton, Colo.: F.B. Rothman, 1986, 1956). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  165. Democratic Republic of Congo: Peace Agreement Between the Government and the Congrès National pour la Défense du Peuple (CNDP), Goma, March 23, 2009. http://friendsofthecongo.org/images/pdf/cndp_accord.pdf (09 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  166. Demonstrators in Kabul Call for Bringing War Criminals to Justice (Xinhua | English.news.cn, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  167. Dempsey J. and Coburn N., Traditional Dispute Resolution and Stability in Afghanistan. http://www.usip.org/files/resources/PB%2010%20Traditional%20Dispute%20Resolution%20and%20Stability%20in%20Afghanistan.pdf (27 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  168. Derksen D., Impact or Illusion? Reintegration under the Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Program. http://www.usip.org/files/resources/PB%20106.pdf (18 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  169. Derksen D., The Politics of Disarmament and Rearmament in Afghanistan. http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/PW110-The-Politics-of-Disarmament-and-Rearmament-in-Afghanistan.pdf (16 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  170. Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, Public Law 109-148 of December 30, 2007, Title X; 119 STAT. 2739. https://www.dni.gov/index.php/about/organization/ic-legal-reference-book/ref-book-detainee-treatment-act-of-2005 (24 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  171. Deutsche Welle (DW), UN to Set Up War Crimes Panel for Syria Investigations. http://www.dw.com/en/un-to-set-up-war-crimes-panel-for-syria-investigations/a-36869596?maca=en-Twitter-sharing (04 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  172. Deutschlandfunk, Bundesregierung Lobt Friedensabkommen Zwischen Kabul und Hisb-e Islami (2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  173. Dickinson, L. A., ‘Transitional Justice in Afghanistan: The Promise of Mixed Tribunals’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 31 (2002-2003), 23–42. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  174. Dinstein, Y., The Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties, Recueil des cours (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007), vol. 322. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  175. Drumble, M. A., ‘Rights, Culture, and Crime: The Role of Rule of Law for the Women of Afghanistan’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42 (2004), 349–90. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  176. Duthie, R., ‘Afterword: The Consequences of Transitional Justice in Particular Context’ in A. L. Hinton (ed.), Transitional Justice: Global Mechanisms and Local Realities after Genocide and Mass Violence (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2011), pp. 249–56. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  177. Easterday J., No Justice Cascade in Spain. http://www.intlawgrrls.com/2012/03/no-justice-cascade-in-spain.html (14 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  178. Echavez, Chona R., Pilongo, Leah Wilfreda RE, Jayakody A., Noorzai, Ahmad Saboor Hamza, Markova M. and Narasimhaiah S., Transitional Justice: Views from the Ground on How Afghanistan Fares. https://areu.org.af/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1622E-Transitional-Justice-Views-from-the-Ground-on-How-Afghanistan-Fares.pdf (30 November 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  179. Eichhofer, A., ‘Die Rechtsquellen des Völkerstrafrechts’ in H.-H. Kühne, R. Esser and M. Gerding (eds.), Völkerstrafrecht, 1st edn. (Osnabrück: Julius Jonscher Verlag, 2007), pp. 1–22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  180. Eisikovits N., Transitional Justice. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-transitional/ (05 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  181. Ending Recruitment and Use of Children by Armed Forces and Groups: Contributing to Peace, Justice and Development, N’DJAMENA DECLARATION – N’Djamena, 7–9 June 2010. https://www.unicef.org/protection/files/DDR_Conference_Declarations_de_NDjamena.pdf (23 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  182. Engstrom, P. and Pereira, G., ‘From Amnesty to Accountability: The Ebbs and Flows in the Search for Justice in Argentina’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 97–122. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  183. Escudero, R., ‘Road to Impunity: The Absence of Transitional Justice Programs in Spain’, Human Rights Quarterly 36 (2014), 123–46. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  184. FARC-EP International, Agreement Victims. http://farc-epeace.org/peace-process/agreements/agreements/item/939-agreement-victims (22 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  185. Federal Political Department, Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts: Volume IX. http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/RC-records_Vol-9.pdf (23 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  186. Ferdinandusse, W. N., Direct Application of International Criminal Law in National Courts (The Hague, West Nyack, NY: TMC Asser Press; Cambridge University Press, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  187. Ferreira-Hidaka L. J., Accountability for Gross Human Rights Violations in Brazil: The Araguaia Case and Its Repercussions. http://lostintranslationbrazil.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/accountability-for-gross-human-rights-violations-in-brazil-the-araguaia-case-and-its-repercussions/ (19 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  188. Ferrié, J.-N., ‘The Uncertainties of Democratic Promotion in Afghanistan’ in Z. Laidi (ed.), EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World: Normative Power and Social Preferences, 1st edn. (Oxon: Routledge, 2008), pp. 134–42. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  189. Figgins S., After Libya’s Elections, Transitional Justice in the Balance. http://www.egyptindependent.com/news/after-libya-s-elections-transitional-justice-balance (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  190. France 24, Assad Exit not Necessary for Syria Transition, Says Fabius. http://www.france24.com/en/20151205-assad-exit-not-necessary-syria-transition-france-fabius-islamic-state-group (17 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  191. Freeman, M., Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice (Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  192. Freeman, M. and Pensky, M., ‘The Amnesty Controversy in International Law’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 42–65. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  193. Friedman D., Pactat L. and Weisell A., Accountability and Impunity: Afghanistan, Kosovo and Argentina. http://www.gpia.info/files/practicum/28/2008%20Spring%20-%20Human%20Rights%20Watch%20-%20Accountability%20and%20Impunity.pdf (12 June 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  194. Gall, C., ‘With Killer's Execution, Karzai Signals Move on Warlords’, The New York Times, 03 May 2004. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  195. Gall, C., ‘Afghanistan Offers Amnesty to Wanted Taliban Rebels’, The New York Times, 09 May 2005. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  196. Gang R., Community-Based Dispute Resolution Processes in Kabul City. https://areu.org.af/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/1107E-CBDR-Processes-in-Kabul-City-CS-2011-web.pdf (19 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  197. Gaudin A., IACHR Rules Against Uruguay in Operacion Condor Case. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/IACHR+rules+against+Uruguay+in+Operacion+Condor+case.-a0254827283 (12 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  198. Gavron, J., ‘Amnesties in the Light of Developments in International Law and the Establishment of the International Criminal Court’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2002), 91–117. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  199. Georg, H., ‘Kolonialisten kommen zurück – NATO-Staaten inclusive Deutschland setzen auf afghanische Warlords’, Neue Rheinische Zeitung, 31 March 2010. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  200. Gerding, M., ‘Völkerstrafrecht vor Internationalen Strafgerichten’ in H.-H. Kühne, R. Esser and M. Gerding (eds.), Völkerstrafrecht, 1st edn. (Osnabrück: Julius Jonscher Verlag, 2007), pp. 251–91. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  201. German Federal Foreign Office, Nuremberg Declaration on Peace and Justice, press release. http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Infoservice/Presse/Meldungen/2008/080620-Nuernberger-Erklaerung.html (07 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  202. Gilbert, J., ‘Ex-Military Officers Convicted of Human Rights Crimes During Argentina Dictatorship’, The New York Times, 25 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  203. Girke P. and Kamp M., Norduganda: Frieden versus Gerechtigkeit? http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_18362-1522-1-30.pdf?091209114909 (05 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  204. Gossman, P., The Past as Present: War Crimes, Impunity and the Rule of Law, State Reconstruction and International Engagement in Afghanistan (2003). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  205. Gossman P., Transitional Justice and DDR: The Case of Afghanistan. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-DDR-Afghanistan-ResearchBrief-2009-English.pdf (12 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  206. Gossman, P., ‘Kabul's Stealth Attack on Human Rights’, The New York Times, 26 December 2011. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  207. Gossman P., Afghanistan: The Past as a Prologue: Leveraging the Coming Transition to Break the Cycle of Abuse in Afghanistan. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Afghanistan-Briefing-English-%202012.pdf?utm_source=International+Center+for+Transitional+Justice+Newsletter&utm_campaign=98396109c7-PR_Afghanistan_Briefing_24-July-2012&utm_medium=email (19 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  208. Gossman P., Afghanistan War Crimes Suspect Comes Home: Hekmatyar Deal an Affront to Victims of Grave Abuses. https://www.hrw.org/print/294431 (12 October 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  209. Gossman P. and Kouvo S., Tell Us How This Ends: Transitional Justice and Prospects for Peace in Afghanistan. http://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2013-06_AAN_TransitionalJustice2.pdf (26 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  210. Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Action Plan on Peace, Reconciliation and Justice in Afghanistan. http://www.aihrc.org.af/media/files/Reports/Thematic%20reports/Action_Pln_Gov_Af.pdf (22 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  211. ‘Govt’s Disregard for Court Order Upsets Victims of Conflict’, 16 November 2015. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  212. Graham-Harrison E. and Roth A., Taliban and Afghan Groups Find Common Ground in Landmark Talks: Insurgents attend Moscow peace summit, but Afghan president is excluded. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/06/taliban-say-they-have-no-plans-to-seize-afghanistan-by-force (07 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  213. Greiff P. de, Transitional Justice, Security, and Development: Security and Justice Thematic Paper, World Development Report 2011 Background Paper. http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website01306/web/pdf/wdr%20background%20paper_de%20greiff_0.pdf (08 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  214. Häberle, P., Der Sonntag als Verfassungsprinzip, Schriften zum Öffentlichen Recht, 2. Aufl. (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006), vol. 551. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  215. Hakimi, A. and Suhrke, A., ‘A Poisonous Chalice: The Struggle for Human Rights and Accountability in Afghanistan’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights 31 (2013), 201–23. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  216. Harris Rimmer S., Building Democracy and Justice After Conflict: The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission. http://regnet.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/BD-WorkingPaper5.pdf (11 June 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  217. Hartmann, M. E., ‘Casualties of Myopia’ in W. Mason (ed.), The Rule of Law in Afghanistan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 172–204. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  218. Hartmann M. E. and Klonowiecka-Milart A., Impunity Prevails in Afghanistan. http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2010/12/01/impunity-prevails-in-afghanistan.html (22 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  219. Hayner, P. B., Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenge of Truth Commissions (New York: Routledge Chapman & Hall, 2002). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  220. Hazdra, P., ‘Verurteilen – Vergessen – Versöhnen. Die wichtigsten Ansätze zur Konfliktaufarbeitung im Überblick’, Humanitäres Völkerrecht – Informationsschriften / Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict (2006), 156–67. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  221. Heintze, H.-J., ‘On the Relationship Between Human Rights Law Protection and International Humanitarian Law’, International Review of the Red Cross 86 (2004), 789–814. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  222. Henckaerts, J.-M. and Doswald-Beck, L. (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume II: Practice – Part 1 and 2 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  223. Henckaerts, J.-M. and Doswald-Beck, L. (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume I: Rules, 3rd edn. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  224. Henrard, K., ‘The Viability of National Amnesties in View of the Increasing Recognition of Individual Criminal Responsibility at International Law’, Michigan State University-DCL Journal of International Law 8 (1999), 595–649. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  225. Hesse, K., Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C.F. Müller GmbH, 1999). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  226. Higgins, A. and Mashal, M., ‘Taliban Peace Talks in Moscow End With Hope the U.S. Exits, if Not Too Quickly’, The New York Times, 06 February 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  227. Nkadimeng and Others v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others (High Court of South Africa, 12 December 2008). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  228. Hinton, A. L., ‘Introduction: Toward an Anthropology of Transitional Justice’ in A. L. Hinton (ed.), Transitional Justice: Global Mechanisms and Local Realities after Genocide and Mass Violence (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2011), pp. 1–22. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  229. Hoffman, M. B. and Berring, R. C., International Legal Research in a Nutshell, West nutshell series (St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  230. Hollinder, B. D., How to Build a Better Truth Commission: Applying Lessons from Past Truth Commissions to the Selection of Commissioners for an Afghanistan Truth Commission (2006). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  231. Hovell, D., ‘The Authority of Universal Jurisdiction’, European Journal of International Law 29 (2018), 427–56. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  232. Hudson, M. O., ‘Working Paper’, A/CN.4/16 in United Nations (ed.), Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1950 Volume II (1957), pp. 24–33. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  233. Human Rights Watch, Blood-Stained Hands: Past Atrocities in Kabul and Afghanistan’s Legacy of Impunity. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/afghanistan0605.pdf (21 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  234. Human Rights Watch, Afghanistan: Bring War Criminals to Justice: Special Court Needed for Past Atrocities. http://www.hrw.org/news/2005/07/07/afghanistan-bring-war-criminals-justice (26 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  235. Human Rights Watch, Afghanistan: Justice for War Criminals Essential to Peace. https://www.hrw.org/news/2006/12/12/afghanistan-justice-war-criminals-essential-peace (22 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  236. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2008: Algeria. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2009/country-chapters/algeria (23 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  237. Human Rights Watch, Selling Justice Short: Why Accountability Matters for Peace. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/ij0709webwcover_3.pdf (29 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  238. Human Rights Watch, Afghanistan: Repeal Amnesty Law. http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2010/03/10/afghanistan-repeal-amnesty-law (26 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  239. Human Rights Watch, Seductions of “Sequencing”: The Risks of Putting Justice Aside for Peace. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/Sequencing%20Paper%2012.7.10.pdf (28 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  240. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2011: Afghanistan. http://www.hrw.org/world-report-2011/afghanistan (26 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  241. Human Rights Watch, Afghanistan: Little Progress on Rights. http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/01/23/afghanistan-little-progress-rights (18 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  242. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2012: Afghanistan. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/afghanistan_2012.pdf.pdf (08 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  243. Human Rights Watch, Suriname: Revoke Amnesty Legislation. http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/04/18/suriname-revoke-amnesty-legislation (20 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  244. Human Rights Watch, Death of a Dictator: Bloody Vengeance in Sirte. https://www.hrw.org/report/2012/10/16/death-dictator/bloody-vengeance-sirte (20 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  245. Human Rights Watch, Afghanistan: ICC Prosecutor Finds Grave Crimes. http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/12/01/afghanistan-icc-prosecutor-finds-grave-crimes (02 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  246. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2015: Afghanistan. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/afghanistan (04 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  247. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2016: Afghanistan. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2016/country-chapters/afghanistan (28 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  248. Human Rights Watch, Burundi: ICC Withdrawal Major Loss to Victims. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/10/27/burundi-icc-withdrawal-major-loss-victims (30 October 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  249. Human Rights Watch, World Report 2017: Ukraine. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2017/country-chapters/ukraine (24 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  250. Human Security Network, Annual Ministerial Meeting: Statement by Ms. Patricia O’Brien, Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, The Legal Counsel. http://legal.un.org/ola/media/info_from_lc/POB-keynote.pdf (08 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  251. Iliopoulos K., Afghan Amnesty Law a Setback for Peace. http://www.crimesofwar.org/commentary/afghan-amnesty-law-a-setback-for-peace/ (26 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  252. Inazumi, M., Universal Jurisdiction in Modern International Law: Expansion of National Jurisdiction for Prosecuting Serious Crimes under International Law, Teilw. zugl.: Utrecht, Univ., Diss., 2004, School of Human Rights research series (Antwerpen: Intersentia, 2005), vol. 19. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  253. Ingelaere, B., ‘The Gacaca Courts in Rwanda’ in L. Huyse and M. Salter (eds.), Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm, Sweden, 2008), pp. 25–59. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  254. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report Nº 29/92: Cases 10.029, 10.036, 10.145, 10.305, 10.372, 10.373, 10.374 and 10.375 Uruguay. https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/92eng/Uruguay10.029.htm (04 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  255. International Afghanistan Conference in Bonn, 5 December 2011 – Conference Conclusions. http://afghanistan-un.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Konferenzschlussfolgerung_engl.pdf (14 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  256. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Afghanistan: Addressing the Past. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Afghanistan-Addressing-Past-2005-English.pdf (19 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  257. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Amnesty Must Not Equal Impunity. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-DRC-Amnesty-Facts-2009-English.pdf (09 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  258. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Challenges to Peace and Justice in Afghanistan. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Afghanistan-Peace-Justice-2009-English.pdf (12 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  259. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Stabilizing Afghanistan: Legitimacy and Accountability in Governance. http://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Afghanistan-Stabilizing-Accountability-2010-English.pdf (19 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  260. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), ICTJ Statement on Afghanistan: Amnesty Law. http://www.saajs.org/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47:-ictj-statement-on-afghanistan-amnesty-law&catid=42&Itemid=2 (16 October 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  261. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), A Year of Change – A Decade of Hope: Annual Report 2011. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Global-Annual-Report-2011-English_0.pdf (24 June 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  262. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Facing a Troubled Past, Yemen Debates Transitional Justice Measures. https://ictj.org/news/facing-troubled-past-yemen-debates-transitional-justice-measures (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  263. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Afghanistan Mapping Report Opportunity to Break Cycles of Abuse. http://www.ictj.org/news/afghanistan-mapping-report-opportunity-break-cycles-abuse (28 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  264. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Briefing Note on the Recent Political Developments in Nepal Leading to a Lack of Access to Justice for Victims of Gross Human Rights Violations and International Humanitarian Law. http://ictj.org/sites/default/files/Briefing%20Note%20to%20the%20SR%20on%20TJ%2023%2008%202012.pdf (20 January 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  265. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), No One Above the Law: Vetting the Security Sector in Nepal. https://ictj.org/news/no-one-above-law-vetting-security-sector-nepal (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  266. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), What is Transitional Justice? http://ictj.org/about/transitional-justice (07 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  267. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Conviction of Ríos Montt on Genocide a Victory for Justice in Guatemala, and Everywhere. http://www.ictj.org/news/ictj-conviction-rios-montt-genocide-victory-justice-guatemala-and-everywhere (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  268. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Twenty Years Later, A Chance for Accountability in El Salvador. http://ictj.org/news/twenty-years-later-chance-accountability-el-salvador (13 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  269. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Lawyers for Guatemala’s Ixil Community Take Justice Demands to Inter-American Commission. http://ictj.org/news/lawyers-ixil-justice-demands (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  270. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), ICTJ Urges Nepal to Amend Flawed Bill on Truth Seeking. http://ictj.org/news/ictj-urges-nepal-amend-flawed-bill-truth-seeking (18 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  271. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), DRC: Refusal to Pardon Serious Crimes Signals Justice Could Be on the Way. http://ictj.org/news/drc-refusal-pardon-serious-crimes-signals-justice-could-be-way (11 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  272. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Anniversary of Guatemala’s Genocide Verdict Marked by Denial and Polarization. http://ictj.org/multimedia/audio/anniversary-guatemala-genocide-verdict-marked-denial-and-polarization?utm_source=International+Center+for+Transitional+Justice+Newsletter&utm_campaign=5c2da04a39-World_Report_Issue_35_May_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_2d90950d4d-5c2da04a39-237811229 (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  273. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), ICTJ Program Report: Nepal. http://ictj.org/news/ictj-program-report-nepal (18 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  274. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Experts Gather in Kinshasa to Discuss the National Judicial Response to Serious Crimes in the DRC. http://www.ictj.org/news/experts-gather-kinshasa-discuss-national-judicial-response-serious-crimes-drc (11 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  275. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), ICTJ Welcomes the Historic Final Report from Brazil’s National Truth Commission. http://www.ictj.org/news/ictj-welcomes-historic-final-report-brazil%E2%80%99s-national-truth-commission (18 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  276. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), South Africa. https://www.ictj.org/our-work/regions-and-countries/south-africa (04 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  277. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), South Africa: Impunity, Political Interference Emerge Below Veneer of a Celebrated Reconciliation Process. https://www.ictj.org/multimedia/audio/south-africa-impunity-nokuthula-simelane-justice (05 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  278. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), With Amnesty Law Overturned in El Salvador, Prosecutors Must Work with Victims to Investigate Civil War Atrocities. https://www.ictj.org/news/amnesty-el-salvador-civil-war (29 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  279. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), ICTJ Denounces South African Government’s Attempt to Exit the International Criminal Court. https://www.ictj.org/news/ictj-denounces-south-africa-icc-withdrawl (29 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  280. International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Sustainable Peace After Mass Atrocities: The Case for Transitional Justice: Recommendations of the Working Group on Transitional Justice and SDG16+. https://www.ictj.org/news/recommendations-working-group-transitional-justice-and-sdg16 (08 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  281. International Commission of Jurists, Independent Observation Mission to the Trial of President Desiré Delano Bouterse and Others in Relation to Extrajudicial Executions That Took Place in December 1982 at Fort Zeelandia, Paramaribo, Suriname: Statement on the Importance of Resuming the Trial Without Undue Delay. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Suriname-Justice-delayed-Bouterse-case-Advocacy-2017-ENG.pdf (04 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  282. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Practice Relating to Rule 159. Amnesty. http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule159 (05 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  283. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Afghanistan Accedes to Additional Protocols I and II in Historic Step to Limit Wartime Suffering. https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/news-release/2009-and-earlier/afganistan-news-240609.htm (11.02.16). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  284. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), IHL and human rights law. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/war-and-law/ihl-other-legal-regmies/ihl-human-rights/overview-ihl-and-human-rights.htm (20 December 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  285. International Criminal Court (ICC), Preliminary Examination: Afghanistan. https://www.icc-cpi.int/afghanistan (31 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  286. International Criminal Court (ICC), ICC Judges Reject Opening of an Investigation Regarding Afghanistan Situation, ICC-CPI-20190412-PR1448. https://www.icc-cpi.int//Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1448 (23 April 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  287. International Criminal Court (ICC) – The Office of the Prosecutor, Policy Paper on the Interests of Justice. http://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/772c95c9-f54d-4321-bf09-73422bb23528/143640/iccotpinterestsofjustice.pdf (03 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  288. International Criminal Court (ICC) – The Office of the Prosecutor, International Seminar on the Imperatives of the Observance of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Norms in International Security Operations: Speech of Mrs Fatou Bensouda – Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/otp/SpeechProsecutor-AbujaNigeriaFra.pdf (07 September 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  289. International Criminal Court (ICC) – The Office of the Prosecutor, Report on Preliminary Examination Activities 2014. https://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/structure%20of%20the%20court/office%20of%20the%20prosecutor/comm%20and%20ref/reports/Pages/default.aspx (02 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  290. International Criminal Court (ICC) – The Office of the Prosecutor, Report on Preliminary Examination Activities 2015. https://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/structure%20of%20the%20court/office%20of%20the%20prosecutor/comm%20and%20ref/reports/Pages/default.aspx (02 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  291. International Criminal Court (ICC) – The Office of the Prosecutor, Report on Preliminary Examination Activities 2016. https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/otp/161114-otp-rep-PE_ENG.pdf (16 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  292. International Criminal Court (ICC) – The Office of the Prosecutor, Situation in Afghanistan: Summary of the Prosecutor’s Request for Authorisation of an Investigation Pursuant to Article 15. https://www.icc-cpi.int/itemsDocuments/Afghanistan/171120-afgh-art_15-app-summ_ENG.pdf (05 February 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  293. International Criminal Court (ICC) – The Office of the Prosecutor, Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, No. ICC – 02/17. https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2017_06891.PDF (05 February 2018). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  294. International Criminal Court: Preliminary Examinations, Afghanistan. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/preliminary-examinations.aspx?ln=en (02 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  295. International Crisis Group, Afghanistan: Judicial Reform and Transitional Justice. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/afghanistan/afghanistan-judicial-reform-and-transitional-justice (11 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  296. International Crisis Group, Talking About Talks: Toward a Political Settlement in Afghanistan. http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/asia/south-asia/afghanistan/221-talking-about-talks-toward-a-political-settlement-in-afghanistan (19 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  297. International Crisis Group, Yemen: Enduring Conflicts, Threatened Transition, Middle East Report N°125. https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/gulf-and-arabian-peninsula/yemen/yemen-enduring-conflicts-threatened-transition (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  298. International Crisis Group, Trial by Error: Justice in Post-Qadhafi Libya, Middle East/North Africa Report N°140. https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/libya/trial-error-justice-post-qadhafi-libya (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  299. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Afghanistan: Victims’ Voice Must Be Heard. http://www.fidh.org/Afghanistan-Victims-voice-must-be (13 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  300. ‘International Guidelines on Post-Conflict Justice: The Chicago Principles’ in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.), The Pursuit of International Criminal Justice: A World Study on Conflicts, Victimization, and Post-Conflict Justice (Antwerp, Oxford, Portland: Intersentia, 2010), pp. 41–65. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  301. International Justice Resource Center, DR Congo Parliament Approves New Amnesty Law for Insurgency and Other Crimes, as Part of Agreement with M23 Rebel Group. http://www.ijrcenter.org/2014/02/10/dr-congo-parliament-approves-new-amnesty-law-for-insurgency-and-other-crimes-as-part-of-agreement-with-m23-rebel-group/ (09 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  302. International Law Commission. http://legal.un.org/ilc/ (02 December 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  303. International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries – 2001, UN Doc. A/56/10 (2001). http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf (05 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  304. International Legal Foundation, The Customary Laws of Afghanistan. http://www.usip.org/files/file/ilf_customary_law_afghanistan.pdf (06 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  305. International Partnership for Human Rights, Making Amnesty Work: Prospects of Granting Amnesty to the Parties of the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine. http://iphronline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ENG-Making-amnesty-work-January-2016.pdf (23 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  306. International Peace Academy (IPA), A Framework for Lasting Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration of Former Combatants in Crisis Situations. https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/framework_for_ddr.pdf (02 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  307. Ipsen, K., Völkerrecht: Ein Studienbuch, 6th edn. (München: C.H. Beck, 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  308. IRIN – Humanitarian News and Analysis, ICC Could Suspend Northern Investigations – Spokesman. http://www.irinnews.org/report/53945/uganda-icc-could-suspend-northern-investigations-spokesman (15 September 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  309. IRIN – Humanitarian News and Analysis, Uganda: No More Amnesty Certificates for Rebels. http://www.irinnews.org/report/95569/uganda-no-more-amnesty-certificates-for-rebels (06 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  310. Irving S., Talking With Taliban: A Political Solution to a Political Problem. http://atlismta.org/online-journals/0809-journal-intervention/talking-with-taliban/ (21 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  311. ISAF – International Security Assistance Force, Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Program. http://www.isaf.nato.int/article/focus/afghanistan-peace-and-reconciliation-program.html (18 April 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  312. Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Realizing Self-Reliance: Commitments to Reforms and Renewed Partnership, London Conference on Afghanistan. http://www.afghanistan-un.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/REALIZING-FINAL-SELF-RELIANCE-25-November-2014.pdf (12 January 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  313. Jackson A., The Cost of War: Afghan Experiences of Conflict, 1978 – 2009. http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/afghanistan-the-cost-of-war.pdf (18 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  314. Jacobs, D., ‘Puzzling over Amnesties: Defragmenting the Debate for International Criminal Tribunals’ in L. van den Herik and C. Stahn (eds.), The Diversification and Fragmentation of International Criminal Law, Leiden studies on the frontiers of international law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012), pp. 305–45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  315. Joint report by the Advisory Council on International Affairs (AIV) and the Advisory Committee on Issues of Public International Law (CAVV), Transitional Justice: Justice and Peace in Situations of Transition. http://aiv-advies.nl/6cf/publications/advisory-reports/transitional-justice-justice-and-peace-in-situations-of-transition (07 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  316. Jones-Pauly, C. and Nojumi, N., ‘Balancing Relations between Society and State: Legal Steps Toward National Reconciliation and Reconstruction of Afghanistan’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 52 (2004), 825–55. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  317. Josi, C., ‘Nach fast 20 Jahren: Gerechtigkeit für die Opfer von Barrios Altos und La Cantuta in Peru’, TRIAL Zeitschrift (2010), 9–12. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  318. JURIST Legal News & Research, Suriname Lawmakers Pass Amnesty Bill Ending President's Trial. http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/04/suriname-lawmakers-pass-amnesty-bill-ending-presidents-trial.php (20 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  319. Kaczorowska, A., Public International Law, 4th edn. (Abingdon, Oxon [UK], New York: Routledge, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  320. Kaleck, W., Mit zweierlei Maß: Der Westen und das Völkerstrafrecht (Berlin: Klaus Wagenbach, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  321. Kasande S., Kwoyelo and Ongwen Trials Show Progress in Fight Against Impunity. http://www.monitor.co.ug/OpEd/Commentary/Kwoyelo-and-Ongwen-trials-show-progress-in-fight-against/689364-3308688-pl7jgr/index.html (06 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  322. Kazim, H., ‘Kriegsverbrecher-Studie: Massaker-Berichte belasten afghanische Politiker’, SPIEGEL ONLINE, 23 July 2012. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  323. Kersten M., Rethinking Amnesty and Accountability. http://justiceinconflict.org/2014/01/14/rethinking-amnesty-and-accountability/ (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  324. Kersten M., The ICC in Afghanistan: Peace, Justice and Accountability. http://justiceinconflict.org/2014/01/21/the-icc-in-afghanistan-peace-justice-and-accountability/ (02 August 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  325. Khan, A. N., ‘Afghanistan: War Crimes, ICC and NGOs’, IPRI (Islamabad Policy Research Institute) Journal XII (2012), 88–118. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  326. Khan, N., ‘Justice to the Extent Possible: The Prospects for Accountability in Afghanistan’, Temple Int'l & Comp.L.J. 23 (2009), 1–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  327. Khatiwada N., SC Annuls Discretionary Powers of TRC. http://www.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=93003 (19 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  328. Khatiwada N., No Support to TRC, CIEDP on Present Status: UNOHCHR. http://admin.myrepublica.com/feature-article/story/38075/no-support-to-trc-ciedp-on-present-status-unohchr.html (19 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  329. Kihika K. S. and Regué Meritxell, Pursuing Accountability for Serious Crimes in Uganda’s Courts: Reflections on the Thomas Kwoyelo Case. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Briefing-Uganda-Kwoyelo-2015.pdf (06 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  330. Kippen, G., ‘The Long Democratic Transition’ in A. J. Thier (ed.), The Future of Aghanistan (Washington D.C., 2009), pp. 35–44. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  331. Knust Rassekh Afshar M., Max Planck Manual on Afghan Constitutional Law, Volume Two: Constitutional Practice and Human Rights. http://www.mpil.de/shared/data/pdf/mpil_hr_engl_1st.pdf (04 October 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  332. Kotzur, M., ‘Intertemporal Law’ in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  333. Kotzur, M., ‘(Internationales) Strafrecht im Dienste des effektiven Menschenrechtsschutzes’ in K. Gaede, H. Goerlich, M. Kahlo and B. Zabel (eds.), Im Zweifel für die Freiheit: Gedächtnisschrift für Manfred Seebode (Berlin: BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2015), pp. 287–99. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  334. Kouvo S., After Two Years in Legal Limbo: A first Glance at the Approved 'Amnesty law'. http://aan-afghanistan.com/index.asp?id=665 (13 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  335. Kress, C., ‘Frieden statt Recht?’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 27 August 2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  336. Kreß, C. and Grover, L., ‘International Criminal Law Restraints in Peace Talks to End Armed Conflicts of a Non-International Character’ in M. Bergsmo and P. Kalmanovitz (eds.), Law in Peace Negotiations, 2nd edn. (Oslo: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010), pp. 41–84. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  337. Kritz, N. J., ‘Promoting a Formal System of Justice in Post-Taliban Afghanistan’, Conn. J. Int'l L. 17 (2001-2002), 451–9. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  338. Kritz, N. J., ‘Progress and Humility: The Ongoing Search for Post-Conflict Justice’ in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.), Post-Conflict Justice (Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002), pp. 55–87. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  339. Küntzel M., Westliches Wunschdenken: Keine Anti-Terror-Allianz mit Assad (2015). http://www.deutschlandradiokultur.de/westliches-wunschdenken-keine-anti-terror-allianz-mit-assad.1005.de.html?dram:article_id=338520 (17 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  340. Laplante, L. J., ‘Outlawing Amnesty: The Return of Criminal Justice in Transitional Justice Schemes’, Virginia Journal of International Law 49 (2009), 915–84. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  341. Laville S., UK Court Convicts Afghan Warlord: Zardad Found Guilty of Torture after Landmark Old Bailey Retrial. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/19/afghanistan.world (02 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  342. Leicht, L. and Baldwin, C., ‘In Syrien müssen Kriegsverbrechen geahndet werden’, Zeit Online, 03 August 2012. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  343. Leopold J., Afghanistan Enacts Law That Gives War Criminals Blanket Immunity. http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18216 (25 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  344. Lessa, F., ‘Barriers to Justice: The Ley de Caducidad and Impunity in Uruguay’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 123–51. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  345. Lessa, F. and Payne, L. A., ‘Introduction’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  346. Ludwin King, E. B., ‘Amnesties in a Time of Transition’, George Washington International Law Review 41 (2010), 571–618. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  347. Lutz, E. and Sikkink, K., ‘The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, Chicago Journal of International Law 2 (2001). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  348. Maass, C. D., ‘National Reconciliation in Afghanistan.: Conflict History and the Search for an Afghan Approach’, Internationales Asienforum 37 (2006), 5–36. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  349. Macedo, S. (ed.), Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes under International Law, Pennsylvania studies in human rights (Philadelphia, Pa.: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  350. MacLean E., Guatemala Justice Update, January 2014: Rios Montt Trial Faces Continued Challenges as Guatemala Selects New Slate of Judges and Attorney General. https://www.ijmonitor.org/2014/01/guatemala-justice-update-january-2014/ (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  351. Madabish A., Yemen Legal Affairs Minister: Former President Saleh Could Be Prosecuted. http://www.aawsat.net/2014/01/article55326833 (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  352. Mallinder L., The Amnesty Database. http://www.incore.ulst.ac.uk/Amnesty/index.html (23 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  353. Mallinder, L., Amnesty, Human Rights and Political Transitions: Bridging the Peace and Justice Divide (Oxford, Portland, Or: Hart Pub., 2008). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  354. Mallinder, L., ‘Amnesties’ in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.), The Pursuit of International Criminal Justice: A World Study on Conflicts, Victimization, and Post-Conflict Justice (Antwerp, Oxford, Portland: Intersentia, 2010), pp. 793–922. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  355. Mallinder, L., ‘Amnesties’ in W. A. Schabas and N. Bernaz (eds.), Routledge Handbook of International Criminal Law (London and New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 419–34. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  356. Mallinder, L., ‘Amnesties' Challenge to the Global Accountability Norm? Interpreting Regional and International Trends in Amnesty Enactment’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 69–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  357. Mallinder, L., ‘Power, Pragmatism, and Prisoner Abuse: Amnesty and Accountability in the United States’, Oregon Review of International Law 14 (2012), 307–76. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  358. Mallinder, L., ‘Amnesties in the Pursuit of Reconciliation, Peacebuilding, and Restorative Justice’ in J. J. Llewellyn and D. Philpott (eds.), Restorative Justice, Reconciliation, and Peacebuilding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 138–73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  359. Mallinder, L., ‘The End of Amnesty or Regional Overreach?: Interpreting the Erosion of South America's Amnesty Laws’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ) 65 (2016), 645–80. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  360. Mani R., Ending Impunity and Building Justice in Afghanistan. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan016655.pdf (19 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  361. Manley L., Physicians for Human Rights – Afghan Panel on Human Rights and Transitional Justice. http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/blog/guftegu-afghan-panel-on-human-rights-and-transitional-justice.html (08 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  362. Marquis, C., ‘U.S. Is Seeking Pledges to Shield Its Peacekeepers From Tribunal’, The New York Times, 07 August 2002. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  363. Mashal, M., ‘Afghanistan’s Electoral Reform Plan Is Met With Skepticism’, The New York Times, 31 August 2015. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  364. McGregor, L., ‘International Law as a 'Tiered Process': Transitional Justice at the Local, National and International Level’ in K. McEvoy and L. McGregor (eds.), Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Pub., 2008), pp. 47–73. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  365. Meisenberg, S. M., ‘Legality of Amnesties in International Humanitarian Law: The Lomé Amnesty Decision of the Special Court for Sierra Leone’, International Review of the Red Cross 86 (2004), 837–51. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  366. Mendelson, M. H., The Formation of Customary International Law, Recueil des cours (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998), vol. 272. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  367. Miazad, O., ‘Transitional Justice in Post-War Afghanistan’, Human Rights Brief 9 (2002), 1–5. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  368. Minder, R., ‘Argentine Judge Seeks to Put Franco Officials on Trial’, The New York Times, 30 September 2013. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  369. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Government of Afghanistan), Security and Defense Cooperation Agreement Between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Pre-decisional Document as of November 2013. http://mfa.gov.af/Content/files/2013-11-18%20BSA%20TEXT.pdf (01 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  370. Mobekk, E., ‘Transitional Justice in Post-Conflict Societies – Approaches to Reconciliation’ in A. Ebnother and P. Fluri (eds.), After Intervention: Public Security Management in Post-Conflict Societies – From Intervention to Sustainable Local Ownership (Geneva, 2005), pp. 261–92. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  371. Moen H. and Mohammadi A. Z., International Criminal Court (ICC) in Afghanistan: A Report on the Consultative Meeting on Obligations of Afghanistan under ICC. http://www.operationspaix.net/DATA/DOCUMENT/5012~v~International_Criminal_Court__ICC__in_Afghanistan__A_Report_on_the_Consultative_Meeting_on_Obligations_of_Afghanistan_under_ICC.pdf (31 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  372. Mohr, J.*, ‘Negotiation, Reconciliation and Outreach: What Are the Options on the Table?’ in W. Danspeckgruber (ed.), Petersberg Papers on Afghanistan and the Region, Liechtenstein Colloquium Report (2009), pp. 103–15. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  373. Mojumdar A., Afghanistan: Amnesty Law Fuels Debate on Reconciliation Process. http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav031510.shtml (26 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  374. Moreno-Ocampo L., "Das Recht darf nicht wegverhandelt werden" (2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  375. Morris, M., ‘International Guidelines Against Impunity: Facilitating Accountability’, Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (1996), 29–40. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  376. Mühlmann, S., ‘Afghanistan erteilt Massenmördern einen Freibrief’, WELT ONLINE, 18 March 2010. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  377. My Republica, Nepal: Govt Proposes Amnesty to Serious HR Violators. http://www.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php/thweek/www.cpnm.org/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=40343 (17 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  378. Nadery, A. N., ‘Afghans Struggle to Restore Justice in their Country: How Can Afghans Redress Past Abuses Without Creating New Injustices?’ in Bonn International Center for Conversion – Confronting Afghanistan's Security Dilemma brief 28, pp. 49–53. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  379. Nadery A. N., Peace or Justice?: Transitional Justice in Afghanistan. https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/assets/boell.de/images/download_de/worldwide/Peace_or_Justice_Nadery_Oct2007.pdf (28 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  380. Nadery, A. N., ‘A Human Rights Awakening?’ in A. J. Thier (ed.), The Future of Aghanistan (Washington D.C., 2009), pp. 55–62. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  381. Nakandha S., Supreme Court of Uganda Rules on the Application of the Amnesty Act. http://www.ijmonitor.org/2015/04/supreme-court-of-uganda-rules-on-the-application-of-the-amnesty-act/ (06 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  382. Naqvi, Y., ‘Amnesty for War Crimes: Defining the Limits of International Recognition’, International Review of the Red Cross 85 (2003), 583–626. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  383. Naqvi, Y., Impediments to Exercising Jurisdiction over International Crimes (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  384. National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa, Prosecution Policy and Directives Relating to the Prosecution of Criminal Matters Arising from Conflicts of the Past. http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/docs/2005/060117nel.html (05 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  385. NDR, Auswärtiges Amt zeichnet in vertraulichem Bericht düsteres Afghanistan-Lagebild. https://www.ndr.de/der_ndr/presse/mitteilungen/Auswaertiges-Amt-zeichnet-in-vertraulichem-Bericht-duesteres-Afghanistan-Lagebild-,pressemeldungndr16542.html (15 December 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  386. NDTV, UN Removes Former Afghan Warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar From Blacklist. http://www.ndtv.com/world-news/un-removes-former-afghan-warlord-gulbuddin-hekmatyar-from-blacklist-1655968 (04 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  387. Niland, N., ‘Impunity and Insurgency: a Deadly Combination in Afghanistan’, International Review of the Red Cross 92 (2010), 931–50. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  388. Nordland, R., ‘Top Afghans Tied to ’90s Carnage, Researchers Say’, The New York Times, 22 July 2012. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  389. Nordland, R., ‘Old Atrocities, Now Official, Galvanize Afghanistan’, The New York Times, 30 September 2013. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  390. Ntoubandi, F. Z., Amnesty for Crimes against Humanity under International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  391. Nuremberg Declaration on Peace and Justice. http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/491058/publicationFile/3491/080620-NuernbergerErklaerung-EN.pdf (07 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  392. Oellers-Frahm, K., ‘The Evolving Role of Treaties in International Law’ in R. A. Miller and R. M. Bratspies (eds.), Progress in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 173–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  393. O'Keefe, R., International Criminal law, 1st edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  394. Okiror S., Forgive and Forget? Amnesty Dilemma Haunts Uganda. http://www.irinnews.org/report/101625/forgive-and-forget-amnesty-dilemma-haunts-uganda (09 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  395. Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A. and Reiter, A. G., Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy (Washington, D.C: U.S. Institute of Peace Press, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  396. Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A. and Reiter, A. G., ‘The Justice Balance: When Transitional Justice Improves Human Rights and Democracy’, Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2010), 980–1007. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  397. Open Society Foundations, Gomes Lund v. Brazil. http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/litigation/gomes-lund-v-brazil (12 February 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  398. Orakhelashvili, A., ‘The Acts of the Security Council: Meaning and Standards of Review’ in A. v. Bogdandy, R. Wolfrum and C. E. Philipp (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Leiden, Biggleswade: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/Brill Academic, 2007), pp. 143–95. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  399. Ordinance on Investigation of Disappeared Persons, Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Nepal 2013. http://www.simonrobins.com/missing/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Nepal-TRC-Ordinance.pdf (17 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  400. Orentlicher, D. F., ‘Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime’, The Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 2537–615. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  401. Osberg C., Inter-American Court Invalidates Amnesty Law Enacted during Brazil’s Military Dictatorship. http://hrbrief.org/2011/04/inter-american-court-invalidates-amnesty-law-enacted-during-brazil-military-dictatorship/ (12 February 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  402. O'Shea, A., Amnesty for Crime in International Law and Practice (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  403. Osiel, M. J., Making Sense of Mass Atrocity (Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  404. Osman B., Peace With Hekmatyar: What Does It Mean for Battlefield and Politics? https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/peace-with-hekmatyar-what-does-it-mean-for-battlefield-and-politics/ (10 October 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  405. Otim M. and Kihika K. S., On the Path to Vindicate Victims’ Rights in Uganda: Reflections on the Transitional Justice Process Since Juba. https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Briefing-Uganda-TJProcess-2015_0.pdf (06.01.17). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  406. Otto A.-K., Afghanistan: Developmets in Justice & Reconciliation. http://www.operationspaix.net/DATA/DOCUMENT/6347~v~Afghanistan__Developments_in_Justice___Reconciliation__Analysis_of_Reconciliation_and_Amnesty_Law_Detainee_Issues_March_2010.pdf (01 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  407. Oxford Dictionaries: Obiter Dictum. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/obiter_dictum (21 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  408. Peace Agreement between the Governement of Sierra Leone and the RUF (Lomé Peace Agreement). http://peacemaker.un.org/sierraleone-lome-agreement99 (13 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  409. Pejic, J., ‘The Protective Scope of Common Article 3: More than Meets the Eye’, International Review of the Red Cross 93 (2011), 189–225. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  410. Perez S., Guatemalan Court Upholds Top Prosecutor's Ouster. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/guatemalan-court-upholds-top-prosecutors-ouster (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  411. Permanent Mission of Afghanistan to the United Nations, Statement by Dr. Zalmai Rassoul, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan at the High-Level Meeting on The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels. http://afghanistan-un.org/2012/09/statement-of-h-e-dr-zalmai-rassoul-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-the-islamic-republic-of-afghanistan-at-the-high-level-meeting-on-the-rule-of-law/ (31 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  412. Petersen, N., ‘Customary Law Without Custom? Rules, Principles, and the Role of State Practice in International Norm Creation’, American University International Law Review 23 (2007), 275–310. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  413. Petersen N., The Role of Consent and Uncertainty in the Formation of Customary International Law. http://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2011_04online.pdf (03 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  414. Postema, G. J., ‘Custom in International Law: A Normative Practice Account’ in A. Perreau-Saussine and J. B. Murphy (eds.), The Nature of Customary Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 279–306. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  415. Program in Law and Public Affairs P. U., The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction. http://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/unive_jur.pdf (23 March 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  416. Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act: Act 34 of 1995 (1995). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  417. Quinones N., 6,060 Years in Prison for Former Guatemalan Soldier. http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/13/world/americas/guatemala-human-rights-trial/index.html (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  418. Radio Netherlands Worldwide, Amnesty Not Applicable for KRouge Defendant. http://www.rnw.nl/international-justice/article/amnesty-not-applicable-krouge-defendant (17 February 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  419. Rafael, P. and Yardley, J., ‘No Extradition for Franco-Era Police Inspector’, The New York Times, 30 April 2014. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  420. Rai D., Panel Set to Start TRC Formation. http://www.ekantipur.com/2014/09/12/top-story/panel-set-to-start-trc-formation/394922.html (07 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  421. Rai D., Transitional Justice Process Hangs in Balance: Victims Worried About Being Left out in Cold. http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2017-01-19/victims-worried-about-being-left-out-in-cold.html (09 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  422. Raimondo, F. O., General Principles of Law in the Decisions of International Criminal Courts and Tribunals, Zugl.: Amsterdam, Univ., Diss., 2007 (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  423. Raymond-Jetté M., Small Gains on Large Crimes in DR Congo. http://www.insightonconflict.org/2015/07/small-gains-large-crimes-dr-congo/ (11 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  424. Razesberger, F., The International Criminal Court: The Principle of Complementarity, Völkerrecht, Europarecht und internationales Wirtschaftsrecht (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2006), vol. 1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  425. Recknagel C., Explainer: Key Points in U.S.-Afghan Bilateral Security Agreement. http://www.rferl.org/content/explainer-bsa-afghan-us-security-agreement-bsa/26613884.html (09 January 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  426. Renteria N., El Salvador Top Court Orders Probe of Civil War Massacre. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/06/us-elsalvador-justice-idUSBREA1506K20140206 (13 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  427. Reuters, UN Rights Office Against Proposed Saleh Immunity. http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/10/18/idINIndia-59968420111018 (15 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  428. Reuters, Genocide Trial for Guatemala Ex-Dictator Rios Montt Suspended. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-guatemala-trial-idUSKCN0UP21F20160111 (29 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  429. Reuters, Gambia Withdraws From ICC, Accuses World Body of Bias Against Africans. http://thewire.in/76049/gambia-withdraws-from-the-icc-accuses-it-of-ignoring-the-war-crimes-of-the-west/ (02 November 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  430. Reydams, L., Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives, Oxford monographs in international law (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  431. Richter A., Aguiar V. and Queiroz A., Supreme Court Halts Proceedings Against Military Accused of Dictatorship Crimes. http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/politica/noticia/2014-09/supreme-court-halts-proceedings-against-military-accused-dictatorship (19 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  432. Robinson, D., ‘Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court’, European Journal of International Law 14 (2003), 481–505. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  433. Röder, T. J., ‘Kollisionen zwischen shari'a, Gesetz und Stammestradition in Afghanistan’ in M. Kötter and G. F. Schuppert (eds.), Normative Pluralität ordnen: Rechtsbegriffe, Normenkollisionen und Rule of Law in Kontexten dies- und jenseits des Staates, 1st edn. (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009), pp. 257–301. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  434. Röhl, K. F. (ed.), Procedural Justice, Oñati international series in law and society (Aldershot, Hants: Dartmouth, 1997). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  435. Roht-Arriaza, N., ‘State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law’, California Law Review 78 (1990), 449–513. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  436. Roht-Arriaza, N., Transitional Justice and Peace Agreements, Peace Agreements: The Role of Human Rights in Negotiations (Belfast, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  437. Roht-Arriaza, N., ‘Amnesty Laws in Latin America: Devalued Currency?’, The Canadian Consortium on Human Security 6 (2008), 13–6. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  438. Roht-Arriaza N., Uruguay Supreme Court Annuls Amnesty Law, as Accountability Continues in Latin America. http://www.intlawgrrls.com/2010/11/uruguayan-supreme-court-annuls-amnesty.html (04 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  439. Roht-Arriaza, N., ‘The Spanish Civil War, Amnesty, and the Trials of Judge Garzón’, The American Society of International Law 16 (2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  440. Roht-Arriaza, N. and Gibson, L., ‘The Developing Jurisprudence on Amnesty’, Human Rights Quarterly 20 (1998), 843–85. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  441. Roht-Arriaza, N. and Mariezcurrena, J. (eds.), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice (Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  442. Rondeaux, C. and Grono, N., ‘Prosecuting Taliban War Criminals’, The New York Times, 23 March 2010. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  443. Rubin, B. R., ‘Transitional Justice and Human Rights in Afghanistan’, International Affairs 79 (2003), 567–81. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  444. Rubin, B. R., ‘The Transformation of the Afghan State’ in A. J. Thier (ed.), The Future of Aghanistan (Washington D.C., 2009), pp. 13–21. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  445. Ryngaert C., Another Afghan Case in the Hague District Court: Universal Jurisdiction over Violations of Common Article 3. http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/Miscellaneous/Portal%20Ryngaert%20Commentary%20Abdullah%20F%2012-9-2007.pdf (03 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  446. Sadat, L. N., ‘The Effect of Amnesties Before Domestic and International Tribunals: Morality, Law and Politics’ in E. Hughes, W. A. Schabas and R. C. Thakur (eds.), Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice (New York: United Nations University Press, 2007), pp. 225–45. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  447. Sadat, L. N., ‘Individuel Progress in International Law: Considering Amnesty’ in R. A. Miller and R. M. Bratspies (eds.), Progress in International Law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), pp. 335–56. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  448. Saeed A., Armed Men Besiege House of Legal Affairs Minister. http://www.yementimes.com/en/1796/news/4069/Armed-men-besiege-house-of-legal-affairs-minister.htm (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  449. Sain A. C., Latin American Amnesty Laws Annulled; the Struggle Against Impunity Continues. http://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/2011/01/latin-american-amnesty-laws-annulled-the-struggle-against-impunity-continues/ (09 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  450. Sajjad T., Peace at all Costs: Reintegration and Reconciliation in Afghanistan. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4cb411692.html (12 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  451. Sala de lo Constitucional de la Corte Suprema de Justicia: Incostitucionalidad 44-2013/145-2013, San Salvador, (unofficial translation, footnotes omitted). http://www.jurisprudencia.gob.sv/VisorMLX/PDF/44-2013AC.PDF (04 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  452. Salahuddin, S., Afghanistan Must Not Repeal Amnesty Law (Kabul: Reuters, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  453. Sandoval, C., ‘The Challenge of Impunity in Peru: The Significance of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, Essex Human Rights Review 5 (2008), 1–20. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  454. Sandoz, Y., Swinarski, C. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Geneva, Norwell, MA, USA: International Committee of the Red Cross; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; Distributors for the United States and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  455. Schabas, W., Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals, 1st edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  456. Schabas, W. A., ‘National Amnesties, Truth Commissions and International Criminal Tribunals’ in B. S. Brown (ed.), Research Handbook on International Criminal Law, Research handbooks in international law (Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 373–90. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  457. Scharf, M., ‘The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes’, Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (1996), 41–62. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  458. Scharf, M. P., ‘The Amnesty Exception to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’, Cornell International Law Journal 32 (1999), 507–27. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  459. Scharf, M. P., ‘Justice versus Peace’ in S. B. Sewall and C. Kaysen (eds.), The United States and the International Criminal Court: National Security and International Law (Lanham, Md, Oxford, England: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2000), pp. 179–95. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  460. Scharf, M. P., ‘Trading Justice for Peace: The Contemporary Law and Policy Debate’ in E. Hughes, W. A. Schabas and R. C. Thakur (eds.), Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice (New York: United Nations University Press, 2007), pp. 246–74. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  461. Scharf, M. P. and Rodley, N., ‘International Law Principles on Accountability’ in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.), Post-Conflict Justice (Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002), pp. 89–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  462. Scheffer, D., ‘The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’ in M. C. Bassiouni (ed.), International Criminal Law, Volume III: International Enforcement, 3rd edn. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/Brill Academic, 2008), pp. 219–55. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  463. Schlütter, B., Developments in Customary International Law: Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International Ad Hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia, Developments in international law (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010), vol. 62. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  464. Schmeidl, S., ‘Engaging Traditional Justice Mechanisms in Afghanistan: State-Building Opportunity or Dangerous Liaison?’ in W. Mason (ed.), The Rule of Law in Afghanistan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 149–71. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  465. Schmolze B., Ein wichtiger Sieg für die Gerechtigkeit: Amnestiepolitik der südafrikanischen Anklagebehörde für verfassungswidrig erklärt. http://www.gerechtigkeit-heilt.de/texte/suedafrika-amnestiepolitik.html (04 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  466. Schoiswohl, M., ‘"Transitional Justice" in Afghanistan: Vergangenheitsbewältigung der nächsten Generation’, juridikum – zeitschrift im rechtsstaat (2005), 94–8. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  467. Seibert-Fohr, A., ‘The Relevance of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court for Amnesties and Truth Commissions’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 7 (2003), 553–90. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  468. Seibert-Fohr, A., ‘Human Rights as Guiding Principles in the Context of Post Conflict Justice’, Michigan State Journal of International Law 13 (2005), 179–96. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  469. Seibert-Fohr, A., Prosecuting Serious Human Rights Violations (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  470. Seils, P., ‘Political Pardons Would Damage the Legacy of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, The Huffington Post, 06 March 2015. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  471. Seils P., In Syria, Little Chance of Justice or Change Without Return of Displaced. https://www.ictj.org/news/syria-refugees-justice-return-displaced (04 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  472. Senier, A., ‘Rebuilding the Judicial Sector in Afghanistan: The Role of Customary Law’, The Fletcher School Online Journal for issues related to Southwest Asia and Islamic Civilization (2006), 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  473. Sharifzada M. J., Eide Concerned at Amnesty Law. http://www.pajhwok.com/ps/node/90839 (20 February 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  474. Shaw, M. N., International Law, 5. ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  475. Shaw, R. and Waldorf, L., ‘Introduction: Localizing Transitional Justice’ in R. Shaw, L. Waldorf and P. Hazan (eds.), Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence (Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2010), pp. 3–26. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  476. Shelton, D., ‘International Law and 'Relative Normativity'’ in M. D. Evans (ed.), International Law, 3rd edn. (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 141–71. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  477. Showaia, K. M., ‘Transitional Justice in Libya: Between Current Challenges and Future Prospects’, Macquarie Law Journal 13 (2014), 61–78. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  478. Shuja A., Key Afghan Opposition Leader Calls for a Truth Commission, Says Negotiation with Insurgents Possible. http://www.undispatch.com/key-afghan-opposition-leader-calls-for-truth-commissions-says-negotiation-with-insurgents-possible (16 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  479. Sibaja, M., ‘Brazil Prosecutors: Judge Takes First Junta Case’, The Huffington Post, 31 August 2012. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  480. Sigdel K. R., War-Era Crimes: UN Report to Sound Alarm Bell against Nepal’s Blanket Amnesty. http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/printedition/news/2012-03-18/war-era-crimes-un-report-to-sound-alarm-bell-against-nepals-blanket-amnesty.html (17 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  481. Sikkink, K., ‘The Age of Accountability: The Global Rise of Individual Criminal Accountability’ in F. Lessa and L. A. Payne (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 19–41. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  482. Simons, M., ‘Investigators in Syria Seek Paper Trails that Could Prove War Crimes’, The New York Times, 07 October 2014. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  483. Simons, M., Gladstone, R. and Rosenberg, C., ‘Hague Court Abandons Afghanistan War Crimes Inquiry’, 12 April 2019. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  484. Skaar, E., Judicial Independence and Human Rights in Latin America: Violations, Politics, and Prosecution, 1st edn. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  485. Slater M., Uruguay High Court Declares Dictatorship Trials Unconstitutional. http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/02/uruguay-high-court-declares-dictatorship-trials-unconstitutional.php (08 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  486. Slattery G., Chile Doubles Down on Prosecutions for Pinochet-era Crimes. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-chile-dictatorship-trials-idUSKCN0SQ2D120151101 (17.12.15). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  487. Slye, R. C., ‘The Legitimacy of Amnesties Under International Law and General Principles of Anglo-American Law: Is a Legitimate Amnesty Possible?’, Virginia Journal of International Law 43 (2002), 173–247. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  488. Slye, R. C. and van Schaack, B., International Criminal Law: Essentials, Essentials (Austin, New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; Aspen Publishers, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  489. Snow, S., ‘Ghani's Deal With the Devil: Hekmatyar and Transitional Justice’, The Diplomat, 22 September 2016. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  490. Snyder, J. and Vinjamuri, L., ‘Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice’, International Security 28 (Winter 2003), 5–44. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  491. Sooka, Y., ‘Dealing With the Past and Transitional Justice: Building Peace Through Accountability’, International Review of the Red Cross 88 (2006), 311–25. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  492. Sooka, Y., ‘The Politics of Transitional Justice’ in C. L. Sriram and S. Pillay (eds.), Peace versus Justice? The Dilemma of Transitional Justice in Africa (Oxford: James Currey, 2010), pp. 21–43. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  493. Spiegel Online, Bürgerkrieg in Syrien: Cameron befürwortet Exil für Assad. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/buergerkrieg-in-syrien-cameron-schlaegt-exil-fuer-assad-vor-a-865704.html (16 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  494. Stahl, S., Schutzpflichten im Völkerrecht – Ansatz einer Dogmatik: Ein Beitrag zu Grund, Inhalt und Grenzen der völkerrechtlichen Schutzpflichtendogmatik im Bereich konventionell geschützter Menschenrechte, Zugl.: Hamburg, Univ., Diss., 2010, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer, 2012), vol. 232. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  495. Stahn, C., ‘United Nations Peace-Building, Amnesties and Alternative Forms of Justice: A Change in Practice?’, International Review of the Red Cross 84 (2002), 191–206. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  496. Stahn, C., ‘Complementarity, Amnesties and Alternative Forms of Justice: Some Interpretative Guidelines for the International Criminal Court’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 3 (2005), 695–720. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  497. State Library of New South Wales, Non-International Armed Conflict. http://www.legalanswers.sl.nsw.gov.au/guides/hot_topics/intnl_humanitarian_law/non_intl_armed_conflict.html (12 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  498. Synovitz R., Afghanistan: Karzai Confirms Amnesty Offer Is for All Willing Afghans. http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1058802.html (21 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  499. Synovitz R., Afghanistan: Amnesty Law Draws Criticism. http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1075272.html (18 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  500. The Afghanistan Justice Project, Casting Shadows: War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity:, 1978-2001. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/B7C09154CD3E144EC12570430049F76A-ajp-afg-18jul.pdf (19 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  501. The Afghanistan Justice Project, Amnesty Would Jeopardize National Reconciliation and Security. http://www.afghanistanjusticeproject.org/ (10 July 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  502. The Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC), Afghanistan Signs Up for the International Criminal Court: War Crimes in Afghanistan May Now Be Tried Before the ICC. http://www.iccnow.org/documents/2.10.2003-Afghanistan.pdf (11 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  503. The Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC), Updates on Afghanistan (31 Dec 2005). http://www.iccnow.org/?mod=newsdetail&news=1 (31 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  504. The Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC), U.S. Bilateral Immunity Agreements or So-Called "Article 98" Agreements. http://www.iccnow.org/documents/FS-BIAs_Q&A_current.pdf (27 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  505. The Country of Origin Information Centre (Landinfo), Afghanistan: Blood Feuds, Traditional Law (Pashtunwali) and Traditional Conflict Resolution. http://www.landinfo.no/asset/1940/1/1940_1.pdf (17 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  506. The European Sting, Amending Guatemala ‘Reconciliation Law’ Would Lead to Unjust Amnesty, Warns Bachelet. https://europeansting.com/2019/01/23/amending-guatemala-reconciliation-law-would-lead-to-unjust-amnesty-warns-bachelet/ (08 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  507. the guardian, Guatemala Overturns Former Dictator's Genocide Conviction. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/21/guatemala-efrain-rios-montt-genocide-conviction (14 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  508. The Himalayan Times Online, ICJ Finds Faults in TRC Act‚ Says Amend It. http://www.thehimalayantimes.com/fullNews.php?headline=ICJ+finds+faults+in+TRC+Act%26sbquo%3B++says+amend+it+&NewsID=416400&a=3 (01 June 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  509. The Liaison Office, Linkages between State and Non-State Justice Systems in Eastern Afghanistan: Evidence from Jalalabad, Nangarhar and Ahmad Aba, Paktia. http://www.tlo-afghanistan.org/sites/default/files/Working-Paper-Series/TLO-Linkages-between-state-and-non-state-justice-systems-in-eastern-Afghanistan.pdf (30 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  510. The Liaison Office, Building Dispute Resolution Institutions in Southern Afghanistan: Lessons from The Liaison Office Justice Shuras in Helmand, Uruzgan, and Nimruz. http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/ROL/TLO%20-%20Building%20Dispute%20Resolution%20Institutions%20in%20Southern%20Afghanistan%20%282%29.pdf (16 March 2014). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  511. The London Conference on Afghanistan: Afghanistan and International Community: Commitments to Reforms and Renewed Partnership, Communique. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/383205/The-London-Conference-on-Afghanistan-Communique.pdf (10 January 2015). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  512. Rabindra Prasad Dhakal v Nepal Government, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others (The Supreme Court of Nepal, 01 June 2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  513. The Telegraph, Minsk Agreement on Ukraine Crisis: Text in Full. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/11408266/Minsk-agreement-on-Ukraine-crisis-text-in-full.html (23 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  514. The World Bank, Uganda – Emergency Demobilization and Reintegration Project. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/366461468318292528/pdf/dh0Project0Inf1raisal0Stage1updated.pdf (27 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  515. Thielbörger P. and Özdemir Ö., "Afg­ha­nistan" als Risi­ko­fall: Machtspiele am IStGH in Den Haag. https://www.lto.de/recht/justiz/j/istgh-icc021733-afghanistan-usa-kriegsverbrechen-keine-untersuchung/ (23 April 2019). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  516. Thier, A. J., ‘Introduction: Building Bridges’ in A. J. Thier (ed.), The Future of Aghanistan (Washington D.C., 2009), pp. 1–11. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  517. Thirlway, H., ‘The Sources of International Law’ in M. D. Evans (ed.), International Law, 3rd edn. (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 95–121. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  518. Tico Times, Human Rights Court Condemns El Salvador for El Mozote Massacre. http://www.ticotimes.net/More-news/News-Briefs/Human-rights-court-condemns-El-Salvador-for-El-Mozote-massacre_Tuesday-December-11-2012 (12 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  519. Tittemore, B. D., ‘Ending Impunity in the Americas: The Role of the Inter-American Human Rights System in Advancing Accountability for Serious Crimes under International Law’, Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas 12 (2005-2006), 429–75. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  520. Tolbert D., Address by David Tolbert to the National Forum on Launching the Dialogue on Transitional Justice in Tunisia. http://ictj.org/news/address-david-tolbert-national-forum-launching-dialogue-transitional-justice-tunisia (07 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  521. Tolbert D., A Wrong Turn for Human Rights. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/david-tolbert-warns-that-the-gains-made-since-the-end-of-the-cold-war-are-at-risk (13 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  522. Tolbert D., Much Work Ahead for Spain in Facing the Ghosts of the Past. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-tolbert/much-work-ahead-for-spain_b_5965638.html (07 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  523. Tolbert, D. and van Genugten, W. J.M., International Justice in a Time of Transition, International Peace Institute (IPI) Policy Forum (The Hague, 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  524. Tondini, M., Statebuilding and Justice Reform: Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Afghanistan (London and New York: Routledge, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  525. Transitional Justice Coordination Group – Afghanistan, TJCG Statement on the Amnesty Law: Accountability, Not Impunity: Only Victims Have the Right to Forgive. http://tjcgafghanistan.wordpress.com/2010/03/01/tjcg-statement-on-the-amnesty-law/ (20 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  526. Transitional Justice Institute U. o. U., The Belfast Guidelines on Amnesty and Accountability. http://www.ulster.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/57839/TheBelfastGuidelinesFINAL_000.pdf (24 March 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  527. TRIAL, TRIAL WATCH: Assadullah Sarwari. http://www.trial-ch.org/en/resources/trial-watch/trial-watch/profiles/profile/452/action/show/controller/Profile.html (01 June 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  528. TRIAL, TRIAL WATCH: Faryadi Sarwar Zardad. https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/faryadi-sarwar-zardad/ (01 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  529. TRIAL, TRIAL WATCH: Habibullah Jalalzoy. https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/habibullah-jalalzoy/ (01 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  530. TRIAL, TRIAL WATCH: Heshamuddin Hesam. https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/heshamuddin-hesam/ (30 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  531. Tribunal Supremo. ‘Manos Limpias’ and Association Liberty and Identity against Judge Baltasar Garzón for ‘Prevaricación’ (Criminal Offence of Breach of Judicial Duty): Summary of the Judgment 101/2012, of 27 February. http://www.poderjudicial.es/portal/site/cgpj/menuitem.0cb0942ae6fbda1c1ef62232dc432ea0/?vgnextoid=3dc82a011feb5310VgnVCM1000006f48ac0aRCRD&vgnextlocale=en&perfil=2&vgnextfmt=default&lang_choosen=en&vgnextchannel=6d70f20408619210VgnVCM100000cb34e20aRCRD (20 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  532. Trumbull, C. P., ‘Giving Amnesties a Second Chance’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 25 (2007), 283–345. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  533. Tyler, T. R. (ed.), Procedural Justice, The international library of essays in law and society (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  534. UN Committee Against Torture (CAT), Concluding Observations of the Committee Against Torture: El Salvador: CAT/C/SLV/CO/2. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT/C/SLV/CO/2&Lang=En (12 December 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  535. UN News Centre, Nepal: Pillay Welcomes Supreme Court Ruling Against Amnesty for Serious Crimes. http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=46872#.WH9RpH3zz90 (18 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  536. UN News Centre, DR Congo: UN Officials Urge Justice for Grave Crimes Committed by M23. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2014/10/mil-141009-unnews02.htm (11 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  537. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Prosecution Initiatives, HR/PUB/06/4. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/RuleoflawProsecutionsen.pdf (12 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  538. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Truth Commissions, HR/PUB/06/1. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/RuleoflawTruthCommissionsen.pdf (30 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  539. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Vetting: an Operational Framework, HR/PUB/06/5. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/RuleoflawVettingen.pdf (31 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  540. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Reparations Programmes, HR/PUB/08/1. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/ReparationsProgrammes.pdf (31 January 2013). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  541. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties, HR/PUB/09/1. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/Amnesties_en.pdf (07 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  542. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: National Consultations on Transitional Justice, HR/PUB/09/2. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/NationalConsultationsTJ_EN.pdf (23 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  543. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, OHCHR Comments on the Nepal “Commission on Investigation of Disappeared Persons, Truth and Reconciliation Ordinance – 2069 (2013)”. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/NP/OHCHRComments_TRC_Ordinance.docx (18 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  544. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, The Nepal Act on the Commission on Investigation of Disappeared Persons, Truth and Reconciliation, 2071 (2014) – as Gazetted 21 May 2014. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/NP/OHCHRTechnical_Note_Nepal_CIDP_TRC_Act2014.pdf (18 January 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  545. UNDP in Afghanistan, Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Programme (APRP). http://www.af.undp.org/content/afghanistan/en/home/operations/projects/crisis_prevention_and_recovery/aprp.html (27 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  546. UNDP in Afghanistan, Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Programme: 2015 Third Quarter Project Progress Report. http://www.af.undp.org/content/dam/afghanistan/docs/crisisprev/APRP/APRP-3QPR-2015.pdf (02 June 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  547. United Nations, UN Mapping Report Afghanistan – unpublished. http://www.flagrancy.net/salvage/UNMappingReportAfghanistan.pdf (20 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  548. United Nations, United Nations Treaty Collection: Glossary of Terms Relating to Treaty Actions. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/Overview.aspx?path=overview/glossary/page1_en.xml (10 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  549. United Nations, The Work of the International Law Commission, 6th edn. (New York: United Nations, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  550. United Nations, Yearbook of the International Law Commission 2001: Volume II, Part Two, A/CN.4/SER.A/2001/Add.1 (Part 2). http://legal.un.org/ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_2001_v2_p2.pdf (09 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  551. United Nations, High Commissioner Expresses Concern Over National Stability Plan Passed by Afghanistan's Lower House, Press Release (2007). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  552. United Nations, What is Transitional Justice? A Backgrounder. https://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding/pdf/doc_wgll/justice_times_transition/26_02_2008_background_note.pdf (07 January 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  553. United Nations, Guidance Note of the Secretary-General: United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/TJ_Guidance_Note_March_2010FINAL.pdf (17 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  554. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), Transcript of Press Conference in Kabul by Norah Niland, Representative of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Afghanistan. https://unama.unmissions.org/norah-niland-representative-un-high-commissioner-human-rights-afghanistan-0 (16 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  555. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), Afghanistan Mid Year Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict 2010. https://unama.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/August102010_MID-YEAR%20REPORT%202010_Protection%20of%20Civilians%20in%20Armed%20Conflict.pdf (17 February 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  556. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), Afghanistan Midyear Report 2011: Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. https://unama.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/2011_midyear_poc.pdf (11 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  557. United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), Draft Peace Agreement Between Government and Hezb-i-Islami Gulbuddin. http://unama.unmissions.org/print/draft-peace-agreement-between-government-and-hezb-i-islami-gulbuddin (11 October 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  558. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Independent Study on Best Practices, Including Recommendations, to Assist States in Strengthening Their Domestic Capacity to Combat all Aspects of Impunity, by Professor Diane Orentlicher, E/CN.4/2004/88. http://www.unhchr.ch/Huridocda/Huridoca.nsf/0/94b45b7493a558cac1256e6e005a6d1d/$FILE/G0411355.pdf (20 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  559. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Leandro Despouy, E/CN.4/2005/60. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G05/104/13/PDF/G0510413.pdf?OpenElement (23 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  560. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Report of the Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity, Diane Orentlicher, Addendum: Updated Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights Through Action to Combat Impunity, E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1. Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  561. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, Report of the Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity, Diane Orentlicher, E/CN.4/2005/102. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G05/111/03/PDF/G0511103.pdf?OpenElement (13 March 2017). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  562. United Nations Development Programme Afghanistan, Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG): Annual Project Report 2010. http://www.undp.org.af/Projects/Report2011/diag/2011-03-21-%20Annual%20Progress%20Report%20of%20DIAG.pdf (07 May 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377
  563. United Nations Development Programme Afghanistan, Afghanistan’s New Beginnings Programme (ANBP). http://www.undp.org.af/whoweare/undpinafghanistan/Projects/psl/prj_anbp.htm (07 May 2012). Google Scholar öffnen DOI: 10.5771/9783748922377

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Leipziger Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Europarecht und ausländischen öffentlichen Recht"
Cover des Buchs: The Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Félicité Akonkwa Mugombozi
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
Cover des Buchs: Die Aufrechterhaltung des freien Journalismus in Europa
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Carl Moritz Weber
Die Aufrechterhaltung des freien Journalismus in Europa
Cover des Buchs: Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Stephanie Schiedermair, Alexander Schwarz, Dominik Steiger
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights
Cover des Buchs: Menschenrechte in Afrika
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Christine Meyer
Menschenrechte in Afrika
Cover des Buchs: Europäische Demokratie und nationalstaatlicher Partikularismus
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Benedikt Franz Assenbrunner
Europäische Demokratie und nationalstaatlicher Partikularismus

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex