Sammelband Vollzugriff
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights
- Herausgeber:innen:
- | |
- Reihe:
- Leipziger Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Europarecht und ausländischen öffentlichen Recht, Band 24
- Verlag:
- 2022
Zusammenfassung
Der Sammelband bietet einen Einblick in aktuelle Debatten zu Theorie und Praxis der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention. Das Buch gliedert sich in drei Teile: Verfahrensrechtliche Aspekte, Grundsätze Herausforderungen durch die aktuelle Rechtsprechung sowie Interaktion mit nationalen Rechtssystemen. Der Sammelband versammelt die Vorträge, die im Jahre 2019 im Rahmen der „1. International Summerschool“ der Universitäten Leipzig und Dresden gehalten wurden. Ziel des Buches ist es, die weitere Forschung und den Diskurs über die Arbeitsweise des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte zu fördern, ein Ziel, das in der zweiten Sommerschule im Jahr 2021 fortgesetzt wird. Mit Beiträgen vonVeronika Bilkova, Katharina Braun, Robert Frau, Hanaa Hakiki, Beti Hohler, Stefanie Lemke, Helga Molbaek-Steensig, Jacopo Roberti di Sarsina, Christiane Schmaltz, Barbara Sonczyk, Dominik Steiger, Edith Wagner und Alain Zysset.
Schlagworte
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Auflage
- 1/2022
- Copyrightjahr
- 2022
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-7966-6
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-2350-3
- Verlag
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Reihe
- Leipziger Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Europarecht und ausländischen öffentlichen Recht
- Band
- 24
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Seiten
- 310
- Produkttyp
- Sammelband
Inhaltsverzeichnis
KapitelSeiten
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 10 Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen: |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- I. Positive Obligations and Criminal LawAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- 1. The Standard for an Effective InvestigationAutor:innen: |
- 2. Criticism of the Court’s Approach to Criminal Law MeasuresAutor:innen: |
- 3. Unintentional Infliction of Death or Life-Threatening InjuriesAutor:innen: |
- C. The Rationales behind the Obligations to Criminalise, Investigate, and ProsecuteAutor:innen: |
- D. ConclusionAutor:innen: |
- BibliographyAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. Introduction – An Alarming TendencyAutor:innen:
- B. Article 18 ECHR – Autonomous Application Linked with Substantive Convention GuaranteesAutor:innen:
- C. Development of the Case Law – From Uncertainty to ClarificationAutor:innen:
- D. Application of Article 18 in Conjunction with Article 6 – Inconsistency, but Positive SignalsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. Burden of Proof – Open Questions and Lack of Guidance for ApplicantsAutor:innen:
- II. Standard of Proof – The Usual ApproachAutor:innen:
- III. Application of these Principles – A Safeguard against Undemocratic TendenciesAutor:innen:
- F. Non-Examination of Article 18 – Missed Chances to ‘Raise the Red Flag’Autor:innen:
- G. Conclusion – A Developing Tool in Need of SharpeningAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- B. The Interlaken Reform: The Latest Chapter in a History of ReformsAutor:innen:
- C. Progress in the Interlaken Process up until CopenhagenAutor:innen:
- D. The Copenhagen DeclarationAutor:innen:
- E. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. The Increase in StrikeoutsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. The Widespread Disregard for the Obligations under the ConventionAutor:innen:
- II. Ukraine and the Chernobyl VictimsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. 2001 to 2009: The First Friendly Settlement and Case-by-Case AdjudicationAutor:innen:
- II. 2009: The Pilot Judgment ProcedureAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. The Procedure for Well-Established Case LawAutor:innen:
- 2. Unilateral DeclarationsAutor:innen:
- IV. 2017: The Mass Strikeout in BurmychAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. The Flawed Prioritisation of Non-repetitive over Repetitive CasesAutor:innen:
- II. The Lack of Weighing and BalancingAutor:innen:
- III. The Substantive Evolution of the ConventionAutor:innen:
- IV. The Lack of a Public Hearing: Perceived Procedural Fairness and LegitimacyAutor:innen:
- E. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- II. The further Development of the Convention and Compliance with Existing ObligationsAutor:innen:
- III. Efficiency at the Expense of the Court’s Legitimacy?Autor:innen:
- ANNEXAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen:
- I. Who are Human Rights Defenders?Autor:innen:
- II. Who are Whistleblowers?Autor:innen:
- III. What are the Shared Features and the Differences between the two Groups?Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. Private Life and SafetyAutor:innen:
- II. Activities in the Public SpaceAutor:innen:
- III. Economic and Social StatusAutor:innen:
- IV. Increased Vulnerability of Human Rights Defenders and WhistleblowersAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. Legal Standards Applicable to Human Rights DefendersAutor:innen:
- II. Legal Standards Applicable to WhistleblowersAutor:innen:
- D. ConclusionsAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. ExpulsionAutor:innen:
- II. CollectiveAutor:innen:
- III. AlienAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. Conditions of ApplicabilityAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1.‘Genuine and Effective’ in the Court’s Jurisprudence on Access to RightsAutor:innen:
- 2. ‘Effective’ in the Court’s Jurisprudence on Access to Rights before Domestic CourtsAutor:innen:
- III. Impact of the ‘Own Culpable Conduct’ Exception on the Applicability of Article 4 Protocol 4 ECHR at BordersAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Article 3 ECHR and the Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading TreatmentAutor:innen:
- 2. Article 13 ECHR and the Right to an Effective RemedyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. The American Convention on Human RightsAutor:innen:
- 2. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ RightsAutor:innen:
- E. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen:
- I. A Very Short History of Influencing ElectionsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. “Fake News” and the Difference between Mis-, Dis- and Mal-InformationAutor:innen:
- 2. Hate Speech: Spreading Hatred based on IntoleranceAutor:innen:
- 3. The Recent Rise of “Fake News” and Hate Speech in the Context of ElectionsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a) Loi Avia Against Hate Speech: Not Enough Time and Too Much DiscretionAutor:innen:
- b) Loi No. 2018–1202 Against the Manipulation of Information: A much more Differentiated and Precise ApproachAutor:innen:
- 2. The German Approach: Generally Combatting Hate Speech and – less so – “Fake News”Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a) Personal and Material Scope of ApplicationAutor:innen:
- b) (Excluding) Liability of Online PlatformsAutor:innen:
- c) Notice and Takedown Procedure and Legal RemediesAutor:innen:
- d) “Fake News” and Advertisement RegulationAutor:innen:
- e) Further Duties of Very Large Online PlatformsAutor:innen:
- f) Fines and PenaltiesAutor:innen:
- g) Summary – Regulating “Fake News” and Hate Speech, Not Only in Election TimesAutor:innen:
- 4. Conclusion: Regulating Online Intermediaries in Different WaysAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Individuals – Protected by the ECHRAutor:innen:
- 2. Companies and Bots – Protected and Indirectly Bound by the ECHRAutor:innen:
- 3. States and the EU – Bound but not Protected by the ECHRAutor:innen:
- 4. Summary – Personal Application as a Mainly Procedural Question, not a Material QuestionAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- 1. Freedom of Expression on the Internet – Offline Rules also Apply OnlineAutor:innen:
- 2. The Material Scope of Freedom of ExpressionAutor:innen:
- 3. Right to Receive InformationAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a) Protection of Elections as a Legitimate AimAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa) Foreseeability: What is Manifestly Illegal Content?Autor:innen:
- bb) Effective Judicial Review: Some Work to be DoneAutor:innen:
- cc) Summary: DSA-Draft as a Model for National LegislationAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- a) Different Rights and Interests to be taken into AccountAutor:innen:
- b) Dis- and Mal-Information and Hate SpeechAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- aa) Delfi v. Estonia (2015) – Demanding a Notice and Takedown Procedure ….Autor:innen:
- bb) MTE and Index.hu ZRT v. Hungary (2016) – …. But not in all CasesAutor:innen:
- cc) Pihl v. Sweden (2017) – Limited Liability for Small BlogsAutor:innen:
- dd) Høiness v. Norway (2019) – Reiteration of the Court’s Cautious ApproachAutor:innen:
- d) Application of the Court’s Case Law: Has the Right Balance Been Found?Autor:innen:
- IV. Conclusion: Regulating Online Intermediaries while Ensuring Freedom of ExpressionAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- B. The turn to procedural review (‘TPR’)Autor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. Authority and JustificationAutor:innen:
- II. From proportionality to justification…Autor:innen:
- III. And back...Autor:innen:
- D. ConclusionAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAutor:innen:
- B. The Role and Responsibilities of Judges and ProsecutorsAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. AzerbaijanAutor:innen:
- II. RussiaAutor:innen:
- III. UkraineAutor:innen:
- D. OutlookAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen: |Download Kapitel (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- I. Short Political History of Kosovo: from an Autonomous Province to Declaration of IndependenceAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- I. Kosovo's Relationship with the ECHR: How it all BeganAutor:innen: |
- II. UNMIK and EULEX Human Rights Review Mechanisms and Their Reliance on the ECHRAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- I. Incorporation of the ECHR in the Constitution of the Republic of KosovoAutor:innen: |
- II. The Status of ECtHR’s Jurisprudence within Kosovo’s Constitutional FrameworkAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- 1. The Constitutional CourtAutor:innen: |
- 2. Individual ReferralsAutor:innen: |
- 3. Strengthening the Domestic Capacity to Implement Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in accordance with the Principle of SubsidiarityAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen: |
- I. Legal Framework of the KSCAutor:innen: |
- II. Implications of the Legal Framework of the KSCAutor:innen: |
- III. The ECHR and War Crimes Cases in Former Yugoslavia: A Valuable Source?Autor:innen: |
- F. ConclusionAutor:innen: |
- BibliographyAutor:innen: |
- Autor:innen:Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Autor:innen:
- I. Constitutional FrameworkAutor:innen:
- II. The ECHR’s position in the German Legal OrderAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. General Relationship between the two RegimesAutor:innen:
- II. Derogations from Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict and other Public EmergenciesAutor:innen:
- C. Extraterritorial Applicability of Human Rights LawAutor:innen:
- Autor:innen:
- I. European Court of Human Rights: Al-SkeiniAutor:innen:
- II. European Court of Human Rights: HananAutor:innen:
- III. The new German ApproachAutor:innen:
- IV. The Federal Constitutional Court’s Approach and the Hanan-CaseAutor:innen:
- E. SummaryAutor:innen:
- BibliographyAutor:innen:
- List of AuthorsSeiten 307 - 310 Download Kapitel (PDF)
