
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights
- Editors:
- | |
- Series:
- Leipziger Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Europarecht und ausländischen öffentlichen Recht, Volume 24
- Publisher:
- 2022
Summary
Der Sammelband bietet einen Einblick in aktuelle Debatten zu Theorie und Praxis der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention. Das Buch gliedert sich in drei Teile: Verfahrensrechtliche Aspekte, Grundsätze Herausforderungen durch die aktuelle Rechtsprechung sowie Interaktion mit nationalen Rechtssystemen. Der Sammelband versammelt die Vorträge, die im Jahre 2019 im Rahmen der „1. International Summerschool“ der Universitäten Leipzig und Dresden gehalten wurden. Ziel des Buches ist es, die weitere Forschung und den Diskurs über die Arbeitsweise des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte zu fördern, ein Ziel, das in der zweiten Sommerschule im Jahr 2021 fortgesetzt wird. Mit Beiträgen vonVeronika Bilkova, Katharina Braun, Robert Frau, Hanaa Hakiki, Beti Hohler, Stefanie Lemke, Helga Molbaek-Steensig, Jacopo Roberti di Sarsina, Christiane Schmaltz, Barbara Sonczyk, Dominik Steiger, Edith Wagner und Alain Zysset.
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Edition
- 1/2022
- Copyright year
- 2022
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-7966-6
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-2350-3
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Leipziger Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Europarecht und ausländischen öffentlichen Recht
- Volume
- 24
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 310
- Product type
- Edited Book
Table of contents
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisPages 1 - 10 Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- I. Positive Obligations and Criminal LawAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 1. The Standard for an Effective InvestigationAuthors: |
- 2. Criticism of the Court’s Approach to Criminal Law MeasuresAuthors: |
- 3. Unintentional Infliction of Death or Life-Threatening InjuriesAuthors: |
- C. The Rationales behind the Obligations to Criminalise, Investigate, and ProsecuteAuthors: |
- D. ConclusionAuthors: |
- BibliographyAuthors: |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- A. Introduction – An Alarming TendencyAuthors:
- B. Article 18 ECHR – Autonomous Application Linked with Substantive Convention GuaranteesAuthors:
- C. Development of the Case Law – From Uncertainty to ClarificationAuthors:
- D. Application of Article 18 in Conjunction with Article 6 – Inconsistency, but Positive SignalsAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. Burden of Proof – Open Questions and Lack of Guidance for ApplicantsAuthors:
- II. Standard of Proof – The Usual ApproachAuthors:
- III. Application of these Principles – A Safeguard against Undemocratic TendenciesAuthors:
- F. Non-Examination of Article 18 – Missed Chances to ‘Raise the Red Flag’Authors:
- G. Conclusion – A Developing Tool in Need of SharpeningAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAuthors:
- B. The Interlaken Reform: The Latest Chapter in a History of ReformsAuthors:
- C. Progress in the Interlaken Process up until CopenhagenAuthors:
- D. The Copenhagen DeclarationAuthors:
- E. ConclusionAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- A. The Increase in StrikeoutsAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. The Widespread Disregard for the Obligations under the ConventionAuthors:
- II. Ukraine and the Chernobyl VictimsAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. 2001 to 2009: The First Friendly Settlement and Case-by-Case AdjudicationAuthors:
- II. 2009: The Pilot Judgment ProcedureAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. The Procedure for Well-Established Case LawAuthors:
- 2. Unilateral DeclarationsAuthors:
- IV. 2017: The Mass Strikeout in BurmychAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. The Flawed Prioritisation of Non-repetitive over Repetitive CasesAuthors:
- II. The Lack of Weighing and BalancingAuthors:
- III. The Substantive Evolution of the ConventionAuthors:
- IV. The Lack of a Public Hearing: Perceived Procedural Fairness and LegitimacyAuthors:
- E. ConclusionAuthors:
- Authors:
- II. The further Development of the Convention and Compliance with Existing ObligationsAuthors:
- III. Efficiency at the Expense of the Court’s Legitimacy?Authors:
- ANNEXAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:
- I. Who are Human Rights Defenders?Authors:
- II. Who are Whistleblowers?Authors:
- III. What are the Shared Features and the Differences between the two Groups?Authors:
- Authors:
- I. Private Life and SafetyAuthors:
- II. Activities in the Public SpaceAuthors:
- III. Economic and Social StatusAuthors:
- IV. Increased Vulnerability of Human Rights Defenders and WhistleblowersAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. Legal Standards Applicable to Human Rights DefendersAuthors:
- II. Legal Standards Applicable to WhistleblowersAuthors:
- D. ConclusionsAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. ExpulsionAuthors:
- II. CollectiveAuthors:
- III. AlienAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. Conditions of ApplicabilityAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1.‘Genuine and Effective’ in the Court’s Jurisprudence on Access to RightsAuthors:
- 2. ‘Effective’ in the Court’s Jurisprudence on Access to Rights before Domestic CourtsAuthors:
- III. Impact of the ‘Own Culpable Conduct’ Exception on the Applicability of Article 4 Protocol 4 ECHR at BordersAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Article 3 ECHR and the Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading TreatmentAuthors:
- 2. Article 13 ECHR and the Right to an Effective RemedyAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. The American Convention on Human RightsAuthors:
- 2. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ RightsAuthors:
- E. ConclusionAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:
- I. A Very Short History of Influencing ElectionsAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. “Fake News” and the Difference between Mis-, Dis- and Mal-InformationAuthors:
- 2. Hate Speech: Spreading Hatred based on IntoleranceAuthors:
- 3. The Recent Rise of “Fake News” and Hate Speech in the Context of ElectionsAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- a) Loi Avia Against Hate Speech: Not Enough Time and Too Much DiscretionAuthors:
- b) Loi No. 2018–1202 Against the Manipulation of Information: A much more Differentiated and Precise ApproachAuthors:
- 2. The German Approach: Generally Combatting Hate Speech and – less so – “Fake News”Authors:
- Authors:
- a) Personal and Material Scope of ApplicationAuthors:
- b) (Excluding) Liability of Online PlatformsAuthors:
- c) Notice and Takedown Procedure and Legal RemediesAuthors:
- d) “Fake News” and Advertisement RegulationAuthors:
- e) Further Duties of Very Large Online PlatformsAuthors:
- f) Fines and PenaltiesAuthors:
- g) Summary – Regulating “Fake News” and Hate Speech, Not Only in Election TimesAuthors:
- 4. Conclusion: Regulating Online Intermediaries in Different WaysAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- 1. Individuals – Protected by the ECHRAuthors:
- 2. Companies and Bots – Protected and Indirectly Bound by the ECHRAuthors:
- 3. States and the EU – Bound but not Protected by the ECHRAuthors:
- 4. Summary – Personal Application as a Mainly Procedural Question, not a Material QuestionAuthors:
- Authors:
- 1. Freedom of Expression on the Internet – Offline Rules also Apply OnlineAuthors:
- 2. The Material Scope of Freedom of ExpressionAuthors:
- 3. Right to Receive InformationAuthors:
- Authors:
- Authors:
- a) Protection of Elections as a Legitimate AimAuthors:
- Authors:
- aa) Foreseeability: What is Manifestly Illegal Content?Authors:
- bb) Effective Judicial Review: Some Work to be DoneAuthors:
- cc) Summary: DSA-Draft as a Model for National LegislationAuthors:
- Authors:
- a) Different Rights and Interests to be taken into AccountAuthors:
- b) Dis- and Mal-Information and Hate SpeechAuthors:
- Authors:
- aa) Delfi v. Estonia (2015) – Demanding a Notice and Takedown Procedure ….Authors:
- bb) MTE and Index.hu ZRT v. Hungary (2016) – …. But not in all CasesAuthors:
- cc) Pihl v. Sweden (2017) – Limited Liability for Small BlogsAuthors:
- dd) Høiness v. Norway (2019) – Reiteration of the Court’s Cautious ApproachAuthors:
- d) Application of the Court’s Case Law: Has the Right Balance Been Found?Authors:
- IV. Conclusion: Regulating Online Intermediaries while Ensuring Freedom of ExpressionAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAuthors:
- B. The turn to procedural review (‘TPR’)Authors:
- Authors:
- I. Authority and JustificationAuthors:
- II. From proportionality to justification…Authors:
- III. And back...Authors:
- D. ConclusionAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAuthors:
- B. The Role and Responsibilities of Judges and ProsecutorsAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. AzerbaijanAuthors:
- II. RussiaAuthors:
- III. UkraineAuthors:
- D. OutlookAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- Authors: |Download chapter (PDF)
- A. IntroductionAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- I. Short Political History of Kosovo: from an Autonomous Province to Declaration of IndependenceAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- I. Kosovo's Relationship with the ECHR: How it all BeganAuthors: |
- II. UNMIK and EULEX Human Rights Review Mechanisms and Their Reliance on the ECHRAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- I. Incorporation of the ECHR in the Constitution of the Republic of KosovoAuthors: |
- II. The Status of ECtHR’s Jurisprudence within Kosovo’s Constitutional FrameworkAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- 1. The Constitutional CourtAuthors: |
- 2. Individual ReferralsAuthors: |
- 3. Strengthening the Domestic Capacity to Implement Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in accordance with the Principle of SubsidiarityAuthors: |
- Authors: |
- I. Legal Framework of the KSCAuthors: |
- II. Implications of the Legal Framework of the KSCAuthors: |
- III. The ECHR and War Crimes Cases in Former Yugoslavia: A Valuable Source?Authors: |
- F. ConclusionAuthors: |
- BibliographyAuthors: |
- Authors:Download chapter (PDF)
- Authors:
- I. Constitutional FrameworkAuthors:
- II. The ECHR’s position in the German Legal OrderAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. General Relationship between the two RegimesAuthors:
- II. Derogations from Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict and other Public EmergenciesAuthors:
- C. Extraterritorial Applicability of Human Rights LawAuthors:
- Authors:
- I. European Court of Human Rights: Al-SkeiniAuthors:
- II. European Court of Human Rights: HananAuthors:
- III. The new German ApproachAuthors:
- IV. The Federal Constitutional Court’s Approach and the Hanan-CaseAuthors:
- E. SummaryAuthors:
- BibliographyAuthors:
- List of AuthorsPages 307 - 310 Download chapter (PDF)



