Cover des Buchs: The Implementation of Circumstancial Evidence pursuant to the European Union Competition Law, the German Cartel Law and the Indonesian Competition Law
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

The Implementation of Circumstancial Evidence pursuant to the European Union Competition Law, the German Cartel Law and the Indonesian Competition Law

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2019
Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4127-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7337-7
Verlag
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
320
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff I - XVI
    1. 1.1 Research Background Kein Zugriff
    2. 1.2 Discourse of Analysis Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1.1 Conceptual Framework Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.2 Cartels and The Oligopolistic Interdependence Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.2.1 Background and Objective Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.2.2.1 The Undertaking and Association of Undertakings Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.2.2.1 ‘Agreements’ Kein Zugriff
          2. 2.2.2.2.2 Decisions by Association of Undertakings Kein Zugriff
            1. 2.2.2.2.3.1 ‘Conscious Concertation’ Kein Zugriff
            2. 2.2.2.2.3.2 ‘Subsequent Market Conduct’ Kein Zugriff
            3. 2.2.2.2.3.3 ‘Causality’ Kein Zugriff
            4. 2.2.2.2.3.4 The Concerted Practices’ Main Instruments Kein Zugriff
              1. 2.2.2.2.3.5.1 Information Exchanges Kein Zugriff
              2. 2.2.2.2.3.5.2 Price Leadership Kein Zugriff
              3. 2.2.2.2.3.5.3 Basing Point Pricing Kein Zugriff
              4. 2.2.2.2.3.5.4 Most-Favoured Customer (MFC) Clauses in Buyer Seller Contracts Kein Zugriff
              5. 2.2.2.2.3.5.5 Governmental Action Encouraging the Facilitating Practices Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.2.2.3.1 Inter-States Clause Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.3.1 Objective, Systematic and Juridical Source Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.2.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
          1. 2.3.2.2.1 Undertakings Kein Zugriff
            1. 2.3.2.2.2.1 Agreements Kein Zugriff
            2. 2.3.2.2.2.2 General Meaning Kein Zugriff
            3. 2.3.2.2.2.3 Model contract Kein Zugriff
            4. 2.3.2.2.2.4 General Terms and Conditions Kein Zugriff
            5. 2.3.2.2.2.5 Circular Letter Kein Zugriff
            6. 2.3.2.2.2.6 Hub and Spoke Cartels (“Sternvertrag”) Kein Zugriff
            7. 2.3.2.2.2.7 Decision of Association of Undertakings Kein Zugriff
            8. 2.3.2.2.2.8 Concerted Practices Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.3.2.2 Restriction of Competition Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.3.2.3 Appreciability (Substantial Effect) Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.3.3.1 Immanence Theory (Immanenztheorie) Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.3.3.2 Exempted Sectors of the Application of Sec. 1 GWB Kein Zugriff
      4. 2.3.4 Legal Exemptions Provisions pursuant to the provision of Sec. 1 GWB Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.4.1 Historical Background Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.4.2 Key Provisions of the Law Number 5/1999 Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.4.3 Objective of the Law Number 5/1999 Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.4.4.1 Per-se Illegal and Rule of Reason Approach Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.4.4.2 Product and Geographical Relevant Market Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.4.4.3 Oligopoly Kein Zugriff
      5. 2.4.5 Legislative Exemptions in the Law Number 5/1999 Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.4.6.1 The existence of an agreement between undertakings Kein Zugriff
        2. 2.4.6.2 Having intention to influence prices on the market Kein Zugriff
        3. 2.4.6.3 Arranging production and/or marketing of goods and/or services Kein Zugriff
        4. 2.4.6.4 Could resulting in the occurrence of monopolistic practice and/or unfair business competition Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.1.2.1 Principle of Legality Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.1.2.2 Officiality Principle Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.1.2.3 Protection of the Fundamental Rights Principle Kein Zugriff
        4. 3.1.2.4 In dubio pro reoPrinciple Kein Zugriff
      3. 3.1.3 The Administrative Proceeding’s Phase and Principle Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.1.4 Judiciary Review by the Court of Justice of the EU Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.1.5.1 Burden and Standard of Proof Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.1.5.2 Evidentiary Evaluation and Category of Evidence Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.1.5.3 The Application of Evidentiary Rules and Principle Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.2.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.2.1 General Principles Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.2.2 Evidentiary and Inquisitorial Principles Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.2.3.1 General Principles Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.2.3.2.1 Principle of the Unfettered Consideration of the Evidence (Grundsatz der freien Beweiwürdigung) Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.2.3.2.2 Principle of Presumption of Innocence (In Dubio Pro Reo) Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.2.3.2 The Appeal (Objection) Proceedings before the Oberlandesgericht (Kartell-OLG) Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.2.4.1.1 Principle of Free Party-Dispositions (Dispositionsgrundsatz) Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.2.4.1.2 Principle of Party Representation (Verhandlungsgrundsatz) Kein Zugriff
          3. 3.2.4.1.3 Principle of the Party’s Right to Due Process (ordnungsgemäßes Verfahren) Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.2.4.2 Evidentiary for Finding Material Truth Principles Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.3.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.3.2 Administrative Proceedings before KPPU Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.3.3 Judiciary Review (Judicial Supervision) Kein Zugriff
      4. 3.3.3 Judiciary Review (Judicial Supervision) Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.3.4.1 General Evidentiary Rule Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.3.4.2 Evidentiary Principle According to the Judge's Conviction (Conviction Intime) Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.3.4.3 Evidentiary Principle According to the Positive Law (Positife Wettelijke Bewijstheorie) Kein Zugriff
        4. 3.3.4.4 Evidentiary Principle According to the Restricted Judges Conviction (La conviction raisonee) Kein Zugriff
        5. 3.3.4.5 Evidentiary Principle According to the Laws Negatively (Negatief Wettelijke) Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.3.4.2.1 Free evidentiary theory Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.3.4.2.2 Negative evidentiary theory Kein Zugriff
          3. 3.3.4.2.3 Positive-limited evidentiary theory Kein Zugriff
        7. 3.3.4.3 Specific Evidentiary Requirement Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.4.1 Application of the Indirect (Circumstantial) Evidences in the Cartel Enforcement Proceedings Kein Zugriff
      2. 3.4.2 Application of the “Plus Factors” (Parallelism Plus) for Consolidating the Evidences of Cartels Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.4.3.1 In the European Competition Law Kein Zugriff
        2. 3.4.3.2 In the German Cartel Law Kein Zugriff
        3. 3.4.3.3 In the Indonesian Competition Law Number 5/1999 Kein Zugriff
        1. 3.4.4.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.4.4.2.1 Motive to Conspire Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.4.4.2.2 Behaviour against Self-Interest Kein Zugriff
          3. 3.4.4.2.3 Factual Plus-Factors Kein Zugriff
          4. 3.4.4.2.4 Economic Plus-Factors Kein Zugriff
            1. 3.4.4.2.5.1 Facilitating Practices in an Oligopolistic Market as the Plus-Factors Kein Zugriff
            2. 3.4.4.2.5.2 Price leadership Kein Zugriff
            3. 3.4.4.2.5.3 Exchanges of Information Kein Zugriff
            4. 3.4.4.2.5.4 Product standardisation Kein Zugriff
            5. 3.4.4.2.5.5 Regional Price Systems Kein Zugriff
            6. 3.4.4.2.5.6 Contingency Contract Provisions Kein Zugriff
    5. 3.5 Chapter Interim Result Kein Zugriff
    1. 4.1 Introduction Kein Zugriff
        1. 4.2.1.1 Bayer AG v Commission of the European Communities-Bayer Adalat Case (ECJ Joined Cases C-2/01 P and C-3/01 P) Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.1.2 Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v Commission (Woodpulp Case) (Joined Cases C-89/85, C-104/85, C-114/85, C-116/85, C-117/85 and C-125/85 to C-129/85, 31 March 1993) Kein Zugriff
        3. 4.2.1.3 Toshiba Corp. v European Union Commission (Gas Insulated Switchgear-GIS Cartel (ECJ Case C-180/16 P) Kein Zugriff
          1. Circumstance of the Case Kein Zugriff
          2. Adjudication of the Court Kein Zugriff
        5. 4.2.1.5 Total/OMV Tankstelle The German Supreme Court Decision (Bundesgerichtshof Beschluss vom 6. Dezember 2011 – KVR 95/10) Kein Zugriff
          1. Case summary Kein Zugriff
          2. The Decision Kein Zugriff
        2. 4.2.2.2 Amlodipine Anti-Hypertension Pharmaceutical Cartel [Case NO. 17/KPPU-I/2010] Kein Zugriff
        3. 4.2.2.3 Cement Loco Cartel [Decision Number 01/KPPU-I/2010] Kein Zugriff
        4. 4.2.2.4 Flight Airline Fuel Surcharges [Decision Number 25/KPPU-I/2009] Kein Zugriff
        5. 4.2.2.5 Short Message Service (SMS) Telecommunication [Decision Number 26/KPPU-I/2007] Kein Zugriff
    3. 4.3 Chapter Interim Result Kein Zugriff
    1. 5.1 The Judicial Praxis in the European Competition and the German Cartel Laws Kein Zugriff
      1. 5.2.1 The Implementation of Circumstantial (Indirect) Evidence versus the Real Economic and Business Circumstances in Indonesia Kein Zugriff
      2. 5.2.2 The Additional KPPU Regulation Related to Circumstantial or Indirect evidences to Complement Article 42 of the Law Number 5/1999 Kein Zugriff
      3. 5.2.3 The Contentious Implementation of Indirect or Circumstantial Evidences in the Indonesian Legislation and Court Practice Kein Zugriff
      4. 5.2.4 The Premature and Anomaly Decisions of the Circumstantial or Indirect Evidences in KPPU and the Court Praxis Kein Zugriff
      5. 5.2.5 The Leniency Programme’s Implementation in the Indonesia Competition Law and the Institutional Strengthening of KPPU for Eradicating Cartels Kein Zugriff
    1. Books and Monographs Kein Zugriff
    2. Commentaries Kein Zugriff
    3. Journal Articles Kein Zugriff
    4. National Competition Commission Document Kein Zugriff
    5. ASEAN Secretariat Document Kein Zugriff
    6. Theses and Dissertation Kein Zugriff
    7. Conference Papers and Presentations Kein Zugriff
      1. European Union (EU) Kein Zugriff
      2. Federal Republic of Germany Kein Zugriff
      3. Republic Indonesia Kein Zugriff
      4. United States of America Kein Zugriff
      1. European Union (EU) Kein Zugriff
      2. Federal Republic of Germany Kein Zugriff
      3. Republic Indonesia Kein Zugriff
      4. United States of America Kein Zugriff

Literaturverzeichnis (272)

  1. Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  2. Books and Monographs Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  3. Agnew John H, Competition Law (1st Publ. Allen & Uwin 1985) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  4. Akman Pinar, The Concept of Abuse in EU Competition Law: Law and Economic Approaches (Hart Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  5. Alese Femi, Federal Antitrust and EC Competition Law Analysis (1st Ed. Routledge Publishing 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  6. Alexander Christian, Fälle zum Kartellrecht (Juristische Fall-Lösungen) Taschenbuch (CH Beck, 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  7. Beaton-Wells Caron and Tan Christopher, Anti-Cartel Enforcement in a Contemporary Age: Leniency Religion (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  8. Bechtold Rainer, Kartellgesetz: Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (§§ 1–96, 130, 131), Kommentar (7 Aufl., CH Beck 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  9. Bidinger Ralph Müller, Wettbewerbsrecht (Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  10. Buccirossi Paolo, Deterrence in Competition Law (Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung 2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  11. Boesche Katharina Vera, Wettbewerbsrecht (5 Aufl., C F Müller 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  12. Blanckenburg K von ‘Detecting illegal activities: The case of cartels European journal of law and economics’ (Vol.32(1) 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  13. Campbell Alan, EC Competition Law: A Practitioner's Textbook (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1980) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  14. Damian Chalmers, Anthony Arnull, Alison Jones, Competition Law Enforcement (1, Oxford University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  15. Dhall Vinod (ed.), Competition Law Today: Concepts, Issues, and the Law in Practice (2nd Ed. Oxford University Press 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  16. Dietze Philipp von and Janssen Helmut, Kartellrecht in der Anwaltlichen Praxis (CH Beck, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  17. Drexl Josef, Idot Lauerence, Moneger Joel (eds.), Economic Theory and Competition Law (ASCOLA Competition Law Series, Edward Elgar 2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  18. Dunne Niamh, Competition Law and Economic Regulation: Making and Managing Markets (Cambridge University Press 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  19. Emmerich Völker and Lange Kurt Werner, Kartellrecht Juristische Kurz-Lehrbücher, (CH Beck 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  20. Ezrachi Ariel, EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases (4th Edition. Heart 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  21. Elhauge Einer and Geradin Damien, Global Competition Law and Economics (Hart 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  22. Ensthaler Jürgen, Kartellrecht (Springer 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  23. Faull Jonathan and Nikpay Ali, The EU Law of Competition (Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  24. Frenz Walter, Handbook of EU Competition Law (Springer 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  25. Foster Nigel and Sule Sutish, German Legal System & Laws (4th Ed. Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  26. Furse Mark, Competition Law of the EC and UK (6th Ed. Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  27. Geradin Damien, Farrar Anne Layne, Petit Nicolas, EU Competition Law and Economics. (Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  28. Gerber David Global Competition: Law, Markets, and Globalization (Oxford University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  29. Gifford Daniel J and Kurdle Robert T., The Atlantic Divide in Antitrust: An Examination of US and EU Competition Policy (Chicago University Press, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  30. Glader Marcus, EU Competition Law and US Antitrust Law: New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics Series (Edward Elgar 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  31. Götting Horst-Peter, Hetmank Sven, Marx Martin and Wündisch Sebastian, Wettbewerbsrecht und Wettbewerbsprozessrecht (C.H. Beck 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  32. Goyder DG, EC Competition Law (Oxford University Press 2003) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  33. Gugerbaue Norbert, Wettbewerbs- und Kartellrecht: [EU-Kartellrecht mit dem Kartell- und Wettbewerbsrecht in Deutschland Und Österreich] (Linde 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  34. Harahap Muhammad Yahya, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHA (Edisi 2. Sinar Grafika 2000) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  35. –,Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi 2 Sinar Grafika 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  36. Haucap Justus and Schmidt Ingo, Wettbewerbspolitik und Kartellrecht: Eine interdisziplinäre Einführung (10 Aufl., Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  37. Heidenhain Martin, German Antitrust Law: An Introduction to the German Antitrust Law with German Text and Synoptic English Translation of the Act against Restraints of Competition (4th Ed Fritz Knapp Verlag 1991) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  38. Heße Manfred, Wettbewerbsrecht: Schnell Erfasst (Springer 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  39. Hönn Günther, Klausurenkurs im Wettbewerbs- und Kartellrecht: Ein Fallbuch zur Wiederholung und Vertiefung (Schwerpunkte Klausurenkurs) Taschenbuch – 9. (CF Müller 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  40. Hofmann Herwig C, Rowe Gerard C and Türk Alexander H, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  41. Hüschelrath Kai and Schweitzer Heike (Eds.), Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Europe (ZEW Economic Studies Springer 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  42. Hofmann Herwig C, Rowe Gerard C and Türk Alexander H, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  43. Horst Albach, Collusion Through Information Sharing? New Trends in Competition Policy (Sigma Publishing 1996) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  44. HolterhusTill Patrik, Beweisführung in der Europäischen Fusionskontrolle: Regelungserfordernis und Regelungsbestand im Spannungsfeld von Wahrheit und Wahrscheinlichkeit (Veröffentlichungen zum Verfahrensrecht 104, Mohr Siebeck Verlag 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  45. Jephcott Mark, The Law of Cartels (2th. Ed. Jordans Publishing 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  46. Jones Alison and Sufrin Brenda, EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th Ed. Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  47. –, EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (5th Ed. Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  48. Karenfort Jörg and Weitbrecht Andreas, Entscheidungen zum Europäischen Kartellrecht: Die Entscheidungen des Europäischen Gerichtshofes, des Europäischen Gerichts und der Europäischen Kommission (Mohr Siebeck 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  49. Kerse C.S. and Khan Nicholas, EU Antitrust Procedure (6th Ed., Sweet and Maxwell 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  50. Kingston Suzanne, Greening EU Competition Law and Policy (Cambridge University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  51. Klees Andreas, Europäisches Kartellverfahrensrecht: mit Fusionskontrollverfahren (1 Aufl. Carl Heymanns Verlag 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  52. Kokkoris Ionannis, Competition Cases from The European Union: The Ultimate Guide to Leading Cases from the EU, Member States and EFTA (2nd Ed. Sweet and Maxwell 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  53. Krebs Peter and Becker Maximillian, Lexikon des Wettbewerbsrechts: Kartellrecht und Lauterkeitsrecht-Taschenbuch (CH Beck 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  54. Kling Michael and Thomas Stefan, Kartellrecht (Franz Vahlen Verlag 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  55. Korah Valentine, An Introductory Guide to EC Competition Law and Practice (9th Ed. Hart Publishing 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  56. Lianos Ioannis and Geradin Damien (eds.), Handbook on European Competition Law Substantive Aspects (Edward Elgar Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  57. –, Handbook on European Competition Law: Enforcement and Procedure (Edward Elgar Publishing 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  58. Monti Giorgio, EC Competition Law: Law in Context (Cambridge University Press, 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  59. Magen Albrecht, Lizenzverträge und Kartellrecht Bücher des Betriebs-Beraters (Verlag Gesellschaftsrecht und Wirtschaft 1963) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  60. Nagy Csongor István, EU and US Competition Law: Divided in Unity? The Rule on Restrictive Agreements and Vertical Intra-brand Restraints (1st Ed. Routledge 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  61. Niels Gunner, Jenkins Helen and Kavanagh James, Economics for Competition Lawyers (2nd Ed, Oxford University Press 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  62. Noonan Chris, The Emerging Principles of International Competition Law (Oxford University Press 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  63. Kettler Stefan Hans Wörterbuch gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht: Englisch – Deutsch, Deutsch – Englisch = Dictionary of Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition Law (CH Beck 20119) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  64. Khemani R S A Framework for the Design and Implementation of Competition Law and Policy (World Bank 1999) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  65. Law Jonathan, Antitrust Law (9th Ed. Oxford University Press 2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  66. Lenaerts Koen, Maselis Ignace, Gutman Kathleen (eds.), EU Procedural Law (Oxford University Press 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  67. Lianos Ioannis and Sokol Daniel D, The Global Limits of Competition Law (Stanford University Press, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  68. Lovdahl Gormsen Liza, A Principled Approach to Abuse of Dominance in European Competition Law (Cambridge University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  69. Papadopoulos Anestis S., The International Dimension of EU Competition Law and Policy (Cambridge University Press 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  70. Posner Richard A., Antitrust Law (2nd Ed. University of Chicago Press 2001) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  71. Reiner Schulze and Hoeren Thomas, Dokumente zum Europäischen Recht (Band 3: Kartellrecht bis 1957 Springerlink, 2000) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  72. Ritter Lennart Kurt, Braun W. David, European Competition Law: A Practitioner’s Guide (3rd Ed. Kluwer Law International 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  73. Rosengarten Joachim, Burmeister Frank and Klein Martin, Mergers &Acquisitions in Germany (CH Beck 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  74. Ruffner Markus, Neue Wettbewerbstheorie und Schweizerisches Kartellrecht: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen Einer Markt- und Institutionentheoretischen Fundierung der Wettbewerbspolitik (Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag 1990) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  75. Schmidt Ingo Wettbewerbspolitik und Kartellrecht: Eine Interdisziplinäre Einführung (Oldenbourg 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  76. Schmidtchen Dieter, Albert Max, Voigt Stefan (eds) The More Economic Approach to European Competition Law (Mohr Siebeck 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  77. Schwalbe Ulrich and Zimmer Daniel, Law and Economics in European Merger Control (Oxford University Press 2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  78. Schwintowski Hans Peter, Wettbewerbs- und Kartellrecht (C.H. Beck 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  79. Sibony Anne Lise, Le Juge Et Le Raisonnement Économique En Droit De La Concurrence Judges and Economic Reasoning in Competition Law (L.G.D.J. 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  80. Siragusa Mario, EU Competition Law: III Book (2 Ed. Claeys & Casteels Publishing 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  81. Stroux Sigrid US and EC Oligopoly Control (International Competition Law Series, volume 14, Kluwer Law International 2004) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  82. van Bael and Bellis, Competition Law of the European Community (4 Ed., Kluwer Law International 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  83. van den Bergh Roger and Camesasca Peter D., European Competition Law and Economics: A Comparative Perspective (2 Ed. Sweet & Maxwell 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  84. Whish Richard and Bailey David, Competition Law (8th Ed, Oxford University Press 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  85. –, Competition Law (7th Ed. Oxford University Press 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  86. Commentaries Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  87. Säcker, Franz Jürgen, Bornkamm Joachim and Montag Frank, Münchener Kommentar europäisches und deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht (Kartellrecht): Kartellrecht, Missbrauchs- und Fusionskontrolle Band 1: Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht (CH Beck, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  88. –,Münchener Kommentar europäisches und deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht (Kartellrecht): Kartellrecht, Missbrauchs- und Fusionskontrolle Band 2: Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht (CH Beck, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  89. Sa¨cker Franz Jürgen, The Concept of the Relevant Product Market: Between Demand-side Substitutability and Supply-side Substitutability in Competition Law (Peter Lang Verlag, 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  90. Säcker Franz Jürgen (ed), Handbuch zum Deutsch-Russischen Energierecht (1 Aufl. CH Beck 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  91. Säcker Franz Jürgen, Rixecker Roland, Oetker Hartmut, Limperg Bettina, Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch: BGB, Band 7: Sachenrecht §§ 854–1296, WEG (CH Beck 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  92. Säcker Franz Jürgen, Rixecker Roland, Oetker Hartmut, Limperg Bettina, Internationales Wettbewerbs- und Kartellrecht (IntWettbR/IntKartellR). Münchener Kommentar zum BGB (7. Aufl. CH Beck 2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  93. Berg Werner and Mäsch Gerard (eds), Deutsches und Europäisches Kartellrecht: Kommentar (3 Aufl. Luchterhand 2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  94. Berg Werner, Deutsches und Europäisches Kartellrecht: Kommentar (2 Aufl. Luchterhand, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  95. Bechtold Rainer and Bosch Wolfgang (eds), Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen: GWB §§ 1–96, 185, 186: Kommentar (8 Aufl. CH Beck 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  96. Busche Jan and Röhling Andreas (eds), Kölner Kommentar zum Kartellrecht Bände 1–4, Band 1: Deutsches Kartellrecht §§ 1–34a GWB (Carl Heymanns Verlag 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  97. Calliess Christian and Ruffert Martin, EUV/AEUV: Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtcharta: Kommentar (5 Aufl. CH Beck 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  98. Doehner Gerhard, Hoffmann Jochen, Münchener Handbuch des Gesellschaftsrechts Bd. 2: 16 Wettbewerbsverbot (5. Aufl. CH Beck 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  99. Godin Hans von and Hoth Jürgen, Wettbewerbsrecht: Kommentar zum Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb nebst Warenzeichenverletzungen, Zugabeverordnung und Rabattgesetz (Sammlung Guttentag) Gebundenes Buch – 1. September 1974 (De Gruyter & Co Verlag, 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  100. Grabitz Eberhard, Hilf Meinhard and Nettesheim Martin, Das Recht der Europäischen Union, Band I EUV/AEUV (Werkstand: 66. EL CH Beck 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  101. Hoeren Thomas, Sieber Ulrich and Holznagel Bern, Handbuch Multimedia Recht (48 Ergänzunglieferung CH Beck 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  102. Henssler Martin and Strohn Lutz, Gesellschaftsrecht: Kommentar: BGB-HGB-PartGG-GmbhG-AktG-GenG-UmwG-InsO-AnfgG-InGesR (4Aufl. CH Beck 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  103. Mestmäcker Ernst Joachim and Immenga Ulrich (eds.), Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 1: EU. Kommentar zum Europäischen Kartellrecht (6 Aufl. CH Beck 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  104. –,Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 2 GWB/Teil 1: Kommentar zum Deutschen Kartellrecht (6 Aufl. CH Beck 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  105. –,Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 1/Teil 1 (5 Aufl. CH. Beck 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  106. –,Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 2/Teil 1 und 2 (5 Aufl, CH Beck 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  107. Mestmäcker Ernst Joachim and Schweitzer Heike, Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht (3Aufl CH Beck 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  108. Kapp Umnuß, Corporate Compliance Checklisten Kapitel 9. Kartellrecht (3 Aufl, CH Beck 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  109. Kamann Hans Georg, Ohlhoff Stefan and Völcker Sven B, Kartellverfahren Und Kartellprozess: Handbuch (CH Beck 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  110. Langen Eugen, Bunte Hermann Josef, Bahr Christian, Kartellrecht: Kommentar (12 Aufl. Luchterhand 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  111. Loewenheim Ulrich, Meessen Karl M., Lindemann Hans Jürgen Meyer, Riesenkampff Alexander, Kartellrecht: Kommentar (3 Aufl. CH Beck 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  112. Löwisch Manfred and Rieble Volker, Tarifvertragsgesetz (4. Aufl. CH Beck 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  113. Schulte Josef and Just Christoph (eds.) Kartellrecht: GWB, Kartellvergaberecht, EU-Kartellrecht: Kommentar (Carl Heymanns Verlag 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  114. Wiedemann Gerhard, Handbuch des Kartellrechts (3 Aufl. CH Beck 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  115. Journal Articles Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  116. Andreoli-Patrick Versbach and Franck J U, ‘Econometric Evidence to Target Tacit Collusion in Oligopolistic Markets’ ‘(Journal of Competition Law & Economics OUP 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  117. Muhammad Ali ‘Penerapan Alat Bukti Petunjuk dalam Perkara Pidana’ (Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  118. Anggraini Anna Maria Tri, ‘Penggunaan Analisis Ekonomi Dalam Mendeteksi Kartel Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, Vol.3/Nr. 3 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  119. Caffarra C and Walker M, ‘An Exploration into the Use of Economics before Courts in Europe’ ‘(Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  120. Christiansen Arndt and Kerber Wolfgang ‘Competition Policy with Optimally Differentiated Rules Instead of ‘Per Se Rules Vs Rule of Reason’(Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  121. Chowdhury A and Jenkins H, ‘Inference or Evidence? The Uncertain Fate of Patent Settlement Agreements’ (Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  122. Damgaard MT, Ramada P, Conlon G and Godel M, ‘The Economics of Cartels: Incentives, Sanctions, Stability, and Effects’ ‘(Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  123. Deng Ai, ‘Cartel Detection and Monitoring: A Look Forward’ ‘(Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  124. Capobianco Antonio. ‘Information Exchange under EC Competition Law’ (Common Market Law Review, Vol.41(5), 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  125. Chin W. ‘Do Price Increases While Demand Is Falling Indicate Collusion?’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  126. Damgaard MT, Ramada P, Conlon G and Godel M, ‘The Economics of Cartels: Incentives, Sanctions, Stability, and Effects’ (Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  127. Deng Ai, ‘Cartel Detection and Monitoring: A Look Forward’ ‘(Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  128. Engel Christopher How Much Collusion? A Meta-Analysis of Oligopoly Experiments (Journal of Competition Law & Economics, Vol.3/4 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  129. Frank N and Lademann R P, ‘Economic Evidence in Private Damage Claims: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the German Cement Cartel Case?’ (Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  130. Fung SS, Yu Y and Ridyard D, ‘The Use of Economics in the Anti-Monopoly Law of China’ (Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  131. Gavil AI, ‘The Challenges of Economic Proof in a Decentralized and Privatized European Competition Policy System: Lessons from the American Experience’ ‘(Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  132. Greg, Shaffer ‘Market-Share Contracts as Facilitating Practices’ (RAND Journal of Economics Vol. 41 (4) 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  133. Ghezzi Federico and Maggiolino Mariateresa, ‘Bridging EU Concerted Practices with U.S. Concerted Actions’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics Vol. 10/3 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  134. Ginsburg Douglas H, ‘Comparing Antitrust Enforcement in the United States and Europe’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  135. Harrington Joseph E, ‘Posted Pricing as a Plus Factor’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  136. Houwen Fred, European Court of Justice Clarifies Circumstances in Which Financial Institutions May Exchange Credit Information without Breaching Competition Law (Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance Vol16 (1) 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  137. Hüschelrath Kai and Laitenberger Ulrich, ‘The Settlement Procedure in the European Commission’s Cartel Cases: An Early Evaluation’ (Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  138. Junaidi Ahmad, ‘Pembuktian Kartel dalam UU No.5/1999” (Jurnal Kompetisi, edisi 11 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  139. –,‘Bukti Petunjuk dan Pembuktian Keadaan dalam Perkara Persaingan‘ (Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  140. Johnson JH and Leonard GK, ‘Economics and the Rigorous Analysis of Class Certification in Antitrust Cases’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  141. Kim N and Kim Y, ‘Who Confesses for Leniency? Evidence from Korea’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  142. Kaplow Louis ‘On the Meaning of Horizontal Agreements in Competition Law’ (Calif. L. Rev., Vol.99 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  143. Koki Arai ‘Indirect Evidence in Japanese Cartel Control’ (International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Vol.46 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  144. Koenig Carsten, ‘An Economic Analysis of the Single Economic Entity Doctrine in EU Competition Law’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  145. Kovacic William E, Marshall Robert C, Marx Leslie M, White Halbert L. ‚Plus Factors and agreement in Antitrust Law (Michigan Law Review Vol.110 (3) 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  146. Lubis Andi Fahmi, Analisis Ekonomi dalam Pembuktian Kartel (Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 32/5 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  147. Marx Leslie M., Mezzetti Claudio ‘Effects of Antitrust Leniency on Concealment Effort by Colluding Firms’ (Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  148. Petersen Niels ‘Antitrust Law and the Promotion of Democracy and Economic Growth’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  149. Ramos Alvaro, ‘Exchange of Information as Restriction by Object? The STANPA Cases in Spain’ (Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  150. Ritter Cyril, ‘Presumptions in Eu Competition Law’ (Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  151. Rusu CS, ‘Eturas: Of Concerted Practices, Tacit Approval, and the Presumption of Innocence’ (Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  152. Schinkel Maarten Pieter, ‘Forensic Economics in Competition Law Enforcement’ ‘(Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  153. Sidak J Gregory, ‘Court-Appointed Neutral Economic Experts’ (Journal of Competition Law & Economics 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  154. Silalahi M. Udin. ‘Indirect Evidence dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha’ (Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  155. Silalahi M. Udin and Parluhutan Dian. ‘The Necessity of ASEAN Competition Law: Rethinking’ (Hasanuddin Law Review 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  156. –, ‘Circumstantial Evidence in the Substantiation Mechanism Against Cartel Infringements in Indonesia’ (Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  157. Silalahi and I C Edgina, ‘Pembuktian Perkara Kartel Di Indonesia Dengan Menggunakan Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence) Kajian Putusan KPPU Nomor 17/KPPU-I/2010 dan Nomor 08/KPPU-I/2014 serta Putusan Nomor 294 K/PDT.SUS/2012 dan Nomor 221 K/PDT.SUS-KPPU/2016’ (Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 10 No. 3 Desember 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  158. Simbolon, A.P. ‘Bukti Tidak Langsung dalam Menentukan Pelanggaran UU No.5 Tahun 1999: Studi Kasus Industri Minyak Goreng Sawit’(Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  159. Svirinas Daivis ‘The Assessment of Information Exchange Agreements Between Competitors from the Perspective of Competition Law of the EU and of the Republic of Lithuania’(Jurisprudencija Vol. 19 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  160. Temple Lang J, ‘The Strengths and Weaknesses of the DG Competition Manual of Procedure’ (Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  161. Toha Kurnia,’Extraterritorial Applicability of Indonesia Business Competition Law as an Efforts Dealing ASEAN Single Market (Journal of Dinamika Hukum Vol.15 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  162. Veri Antoni. ‘The Position of Indirect Evidence as Verification Tools in the Cartel Case.’ (Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  163. Vilaca Jose Luis da Cruz, ‘The Intensity of Judicial Review in Complex Economic Matters -Recent Competition Law Judgments of the Court of Justice of the EU’ ‘(Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  164. Whelan Peter, ‘CISAC: How Difficult It Is to Prove a Concerted Practice’ (Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  165. Wils WPJ, ‘Antitrust Compliance Programmes and Optimal Antitrust Enforcement’ (Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  166. National Competition Commission Document Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  167. The German Federal Cartel Office-Bundeskartellamt, ‘Bekanntmachung Nr. 18/2007 des Bundeskartellamtes über die Nichtverfolgung von Kooperationsabreden mit geringer wettbewerbsbeschränkender Bedeutung („Bagatellbekanntmachung“)‘ 13. März 2007 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  168. The German Federal Cartel Office -Bundeskartellamt,‘Sektoruntersuchung Kraftstoffe (B8–200/09) Abschlussbericht‘ Mai 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  169. The German Federal Cartel Office- Bundeskartellamt,‘Jahresbericht 2017‘ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  170. ASEAN Secretariat Document Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  171. ASEAN Secretariat, ‘ASEAN Economic Community’ (2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  172. ASEAN Secretariat, ‘ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint’ (2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  173. ASEAN Secretariat ‘ASEAN Regional Guidelines on Competition Policy’ (2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  174. ASEAN Secretariat ‘An ASEAN Competition Action Plan 2016–2025’ (2016) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  175. Theses and Dissertation Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  176. Sadhya Madhubanti, ‘Concerted action in an oligopoly and the role of plus factors’ (LL.M Thesis, West Bengal University of Juridical Science, India, 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  177. Arvidsson Klas, ‘Re-Use of PSI and the Undertaking Concept in the EU Competition Law’ (LL.M Thesis Law Faculty Stockholm University, 2014) 21–24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  178. Vereecken Bram ‘Hub and Spoke Cartels in EU Competition Law’ (LLM Thesis Faculty of Law Academic Year 2014–15 Universiteit Gent) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  179. Zega Inggrid G, ‚Tinjauan Mengenai Indirect Evidence (Bukti Tidak Langsung) sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Kasus Dugaan Kartel Fuel Surcharge Maskapai Penerbangan di Indonesia.(Tesis Magister Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  180. S Johri ‘Attribution of Price Parallelism as Cartels under the Competition Act, 2002’ (Dissertation submitted to Competition Commission of India, Nirma University 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  181. Conference Papers and Presentations Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  182. Bailey David, ‘Gas Insulated Switchgear’ (Presentation Paper for the Workshop Milestone Judgement in Competition Law, States Network for Economic Development in Collaboration with the Barbados Fair Trading, 30–31 July 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  183. Gleave S, ‚Benzinpreis – Marktmacht, Preissetzung und Konsequenzen‘ (Bundeskartellamt Sitzung des Arbeitskreises Kartellrecht 6. Oktober 201) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  184. Iwantono Sutrisno, ‘Kartel Dalam Perspektif Pelaku Usaha di Indonesia’ (UPH Law Faculty National Seminar “Eradicating Cartel Practices in Indonesia: The Challenges of Indirect Evidence”, Lippo Karawaci, 20th January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  185. Kekevi, H G ‘Can Economics Help Us with Cartel Detection?’ (Presentation to the International Competition Network Cartel Workshop Lisbon, Portugal October 28, 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  186. Kirchhoff Wolfgang, ‘Requirements of proof in court – the economic approach: Introductory Statement’ (Judge, Federal Court of Justice, Germany IKK Berlin April 15, 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  187. Parluhutan Dian, ‘Analysis of Judicial Procedural Cooperation in Antitrust Matters in the ASEAN Countries for Accelerating ASEAN Economic Community (AEC): Quo Vadis? (Presentation 16th Asian Law Institute Conference Singapore June 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  188. Rizkiyana Rikrik and Iswanto Vovo, ‘Eradicating Cartel: The Use of Indirect Evidence’ (UPH Law Faculty National Seminar “Eradicating Cartel Practices in Indonesia: The Challenges of Indirect Evidence", Lippo Karawaci, 20th January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  189. Ruky Inne Minara, ‘Economic Evidence Dalam Pembuktian Kartel’ (UPH Law Faculty National Seminar Eradicating Cartel Practices in Indonesia: The Challenges of Indirect Evidence, Lippo Karawaci, 20th January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  190. Silalahi M Udin ‘Circumstantial Evidence Dalam Memberantas Kartel Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha’ (UPH Law Faculty National Seminar Eradicating Cartel Practices in Indonesia: The Challenges of Indirect Evidence, Lippo Karawaci, 20th January 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  191. Slobodenjuk Dimitri ‘Parallel Behaviour under EU Antitrust Law’ (Presentation Paper, IBA Conference 1st CIS Competition Law, Clifford Chance, London 8–9 December 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  192. Sirait Ningrum Natasya, ‘Overview of the Indonesia Competition Law Number 5/1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition’ (Presentation Paper, Law School University Sumatra Utara, 2015) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  193. Competition Authority and Court Decisions Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  194. European Union (EU) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  195. European Court of Justice (ECJ) Joined Cases C-2/01 P and C-3/01 P “Bayer AG v Commission of the European Communities” Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  196. European Court of Justice Joined Cases C-89/85, C-104/85, C-114/85, C-116/85, C-117/85 and C-125/85 to C-129/85 “Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v Commission (Woodpulp Case)” Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  197. European Court of Justice Case C-180/16 P, ‘Toshiba Corp. v European Union Commission’ (“Gas Insulated Switchgear-GIS Cartel Case”) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  198. Federal Republic of Germany Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  199. The German Supreme Court-Bundesgerichtshof Kartellsenat, KVR 3/82, 04.10.1983, Gemeinschaftsunternehmen für Mineralölprodukte (Texaco-Zerssen) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  200. The German Supreme Court-Bundesgerichtshof Beschluss vom 6. Dezember 2011 – KVR 95/10, Total/OMV Tankstelle Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  201. Republic Indonesia Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  202. Judgement of the Indonesian Supreme Court (MARI) Number 221 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2016 Tahun 2016, PT. Bridgestone Tire Indonesia and Parties v. Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) (“Automotive Tire Cartel”) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  203. Judgement of the Indonesian Higher Court (Pengadilan Tinggi) 70/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2015/PN.Jkt.Pst, PT. Bridgestone Tire Indonesia and Parties v. Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) (Appeal Decision “Automotive Tire Cartel”) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  204. Decision of the Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Number 08/KPPU- I/2014 on Automotive Tire Cartel (“Automotive Tire Cartel”) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  205. Decision of the Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Number 17/KPPU-I/2010 on Amlodipine Anti- hypertension Pharmaceutical. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  206. Decision of the Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Number 01/KPPU-I/2010 on the Cement Loco Cartel. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  207. Decision of the Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Number 25/KPPU-I/2009 on the Domestic Flight Airline Fuel Surcharges. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  208. Decision of the Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Number 26/KPPU-I/2007 on the SMS Cellular Telecommunication. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  209. Decision of the Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Number 24/KPPU-I/2009 on Cooking Oil Cartels. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  210. United States of America Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  211. US Court Judgement, 346 U.S. 537, Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v Paramount Film Distributing 541 (1954) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  212. US Court Judgement, 384 U.S. 127, 142–143, United States v General Motor Corp (1966) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  213. US Court Judgement, 465 U.S. 752, 768, Monsanto Co. v Spray-Rite Servs. Corp. (1984). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  214. US Court Judgement, 475 U.S. 574, 588, Matsushita Electronics Industries Co. v Zenith Radi (1986). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  215. US Court Judgement, 550 U.S. 544,Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  216. US Court Judgement, In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation No. 10–8037, 2010 U.S. App. (2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  217. Legislations Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  218. European Union (EU) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  219. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (2012 O.J. C 326/13) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  220. Consolidated Version on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) (2012 O.J. C 326/47) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  221. Council Regulation No 2821/71 on application of Article 85 (3) [now 81 (3)] of the Treaty to categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices (Official Journal L 285, 29.12.1971) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  222. Council Regulation (EC) No 1215/1999 of 10 June 1999 amending Regulation No 19/65/EEC on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices (Oficial Journal L 148) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  223. Council Regulation EC No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition Laid Down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  224. Commission Regulation 773/2004/EC of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 123/18, 27.4.2004) amended by Commission Regulation 1792/2006/EC of 23 October 2006 (OJ L 362/1, 20.12.2006) and by Commission Regulation 622/2008/EC of 30 June 2008 (OJ L 171/3, 1.7.2008)eng Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  225. Commission Regulation 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (Official Journal L 102, 23.4.2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  226. Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 275/29, 20.10.2011) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  227. Commission Notice on the co-operation between the Commission and the courts of the EU Member States in the application of Articles 81 and 82 EC (OJ C 101/54, 27.4.2004) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  228. Commission Notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law (OJ C 372, 9.12.1997) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  229. Commission Notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 81(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (de minimis) (OJ C 368/13, 22.12.2001) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  230. Commission Notice: Guidelines on the effect on trade concept contained in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ C 101/81, 27.4.2004) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  231. Commission Notice: Guidelines on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty (OJ C 101/97, 27.4.2004) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  232. Guidance on the Commission's enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings (OJ C 45/7, 24.2.2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  233. Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation 1/2003/EC (OJ C 210/2, 1.9.2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  234. Commission Notice on the handling of complaints by the Commission under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ C 101/65, 27.4.2004) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  235. Commission Notice on informal guidance relating to novel questions concerning Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty that arise in individual cases (guidance letters) (OJ C 101/78, 27.4.2004) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  236. Commission Notice on the rules for access to the Commission file in cases pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, Articles 53, 54 and 57 of the EEA Agreement and Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004, (OJ C 325/7, 22.12.2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  237. Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation 1/2003/EC in cartel cases (OJ C 167/1, 2.7.2008) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  238. Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases (OJ C 298/17, 8.12.2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  239. Council Regulation EC No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition Laid Down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  240. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (O.J. C 326/391 2012) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  241. Federal Republic of Germany Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  242. Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 26. Juni 2013 (BGBl. I S. 1750, 3245), das zuletzt durch Artikel 10 des Gesetzes vom 12. Juli 2018 (BGBl. I S. 1151) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  243. Strafprozeßordnung in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 7. April 1987 (BGBl. I S. 1074, 1319), die zuletzt durch Artikel 12 des Gesetzes vom 18. Dezember 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2639) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  244. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 2. Januar 2002 (BGBl. I S. 42, 2909; 2003 I S. 738), das zuletzt durch Artikel 4d des Gesetzes vom 18. Dezember 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2651) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  245. Zivilprozessordnung in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 5. Dezember 2005 (BGBl. I S. 3202; 2006 I S. 431; 2007 I S. 1781), die zuletzt durch Artikel 11 des Gesetzes vom 18. Dezember 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2639) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  246. Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 23. Januar 2003 (BGBl. I S. 102), das zuletzt durch Artikel 7 des Gesetzes vom 18. Dezember 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2639) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  247. Gesetz über Ordnungswidrigkeiten in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 19. Februar 1987 (BGBl. I S. 602), das zuletzt durch Artikel 3 des Gesetzes vom 17. Dezember 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2571) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  248. Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 23. Januar 2003 (BGBl. I S. 102), das zuletzt durch Artikel 7 des Gesetzes vom 18. Dezember 2018 (BGBl. I S. 2639) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  249. Vergabeverordnung vom 12. April 2016 (BGBl. I S. 624), die zuletzt durch Artikel 4 des Gesetzes vom 10. Juli 2018 (BGBl. I S. 1117) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  250. Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 3. März 2010 (BGBl. I S. 254), das zuletzt durch Artikel 4 des Gesetzes vom 17. Februar 2016 (BGBl. I S. 233) geändert worden ist Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  251. Bundeskartellamt, Notice no. 9/2006 on the immunity from and reduction of fines in cartel cases (Leniency Programme 7 March 2006) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  252. Bundeskartellamt, Guidelines for the Setting of Fines in Cartel Administrative Offence Proceedings (25 June 2013) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  253. Bundeskartellamt, Notice no. 18/2007 on the Non-Prosecution of Cooperation Agreements of Minor Importance1 (“de minimis Notice”) of 13 March 2007 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  254. Republic Indonesia Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  255. The Law Number 5 year of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  256. The Indonesian Law Number 8 year of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure (KUHAP) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  257. The Indonesian Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek 1847) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  258. The Indonesian Law Number 19/2003 concerning the State-Owned Company (Badan Usaha Milik Negara) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  259. The Indonesian Law Number 25/1992 concerning the Cooperative (Kooperasi) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  260. The Indonesian Law Number 40/2007 concerning the Limited Liability Company (Perseroan Terbatas-PT) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  261. The Indonesian Law Number 25/2000 concerning the Foundation (Yayasan) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  262. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Dagang (Wetboek van Koophandel voor Indonesie S. 1847–23) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  263. The Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah-PP) Number 75 year of 1999 concerning the Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  264. The Indonesian Supreme Court (MARI) Regulation Number 03 year of 2005 on Procedures for Appeal of Law against the Decision of KPPU Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  265. The Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Regulation Number 04/2010 concerning the Guideline for Implementing Article 11 on Cartels. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  266. The Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Regulation Number 01/2010 concerning the Procedure for Handling Competition Violation Cases. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  267. The Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Regulation Number 04/2009 concerning the Guideline for Administrative Sanction according to Article 47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  268. The Indonesian Supervisory Commission for Business Competition (KPPU) Regulation Number 01/2019 concerning the Guideline for Handling Antimonopoly and Unfair Business Practices Cases Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  269. United States of America Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  270. The Sherman Act 1890. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  271. The Federal Trade Commission Act 1914. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377
  272. The Clayton Act 1914. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828873377

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover des Buchs: Privatrechtliche Informationspflichten im Recht der Investmentfonds
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Phillip Cannell
Privatrechtliche Informationspflichten im Recht der Investmentfonds
Cover des Buchs: Die Vereinbarkeit der Unionsmethode mit dem Europäischen Demokratieprinzip
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Linda Karl
Die Vereinbarkeit der Unionsmethode mit dem Europäischen Demokratieprinzip
Cover des Buchs: Wegzug einer deutschen Kapitalgesellschaft ins Ausland
Monographie Vollzugriff
Judith Lehmann
Wegzug einer deutschen Kapitalgesellschaft ins Ausland
Cover des Buchs: Russisches Zentralbankvermögen in der Europäischen Union
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Tim Vogler
Russisches Zentralbankvermögen in der Europäischen Union
Cover des Buchs: Kulturpluralismus und die Grenzen der Universalität der Menschenrechte am Beispiel der künstlerischen Äußerungsfreiheit unter der EMRK
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Martyna Kryžiūtė-Gineitienė
Kulturpluralismus und die Grenzen der Universalität der Menschenrechte am Beispiel der künstlerischen Äußerungsfreiheit unter der EMRK

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex