, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

The Weapons Provisions in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and in the German Code of Crimes Against International Law

Authors:
Publisher:
 2010

Summary

Ist der Einsatz von Massenvernichtungswaffen strafbar? Die Verbreitung von Atomwaffen wie auch die mögliche Verwendung von biologischen und chemischen Waffen oder Unruhebekämpfungsmitteln in bewaffneten Konflikten verlangen nach einer rechtlichen Regelung, die die Verwendung solcher Waffen unter Strafe stellt. Das Römische Statut des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs enthält Vorschriften zur Strafbarkeit bestimmter Mittel der Kriegsführung – Gift, Giftgas und Dum-Dum-Geschosse. Deutschland hat diese Regelungen mittels des Völkerstrafgesetzbuchs übernommen.

In seinem Werk gibt David Krivanek eine detaillierte Übersicht der Waffenvorschriften in beiden Texten. Nach Ansicht des Autors sind bestimmte Massenvernichtungswaffen hiervon erfasst. Gleichzeitig macht er Vorschläge für die Überarbeitung des Statuts.

Diese Untersuchung wird sowohl für Praktiker als auch für Studenten des Völkerstrafrechts und des Humanitären Völkerrechts von großem Nutzen sein, weil es an einer gefestigten internationalen Rechtsprechung zu diesem Thema bislang fehlt.

David Krivanek hat am Internationalen Strafgerichtshof und am Ruanda-Tribunal gearbeitet. 2009 trat er in das Auswärtige Amt ein.



Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2010
Copyright year
2010
ISBN-Print
978-3-8329-5618-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-2755-9
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
English
Pages
232
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 2 - 18
    Authors:
  2. List of Abbreviations No access Pages 19 - 20
    Authors:
      1. Overview of the Rome Statute's weapons provisions No access Pages 21 - 23
        Authors:
      2. Article 8 (2) (b) (xx) of the Rome Statute No access Pages 23 - 23
        Authors:
      3. Comparison with the weapons provisions of the Code of Crimes against International Law No access Pages 23 - 24
        Authors:
    1. History of restricting the use of certain means of warfare No access Pages 24 - 25
      Authors:
    2. Overview of new provisions in the Rome Statute No access Pages 25 - 27
      Authors:
    3. Drafting history of the weapons provisions in the Rome Statute No access Pages 27 - 31
      Authors:
      1. Introduction No access Pages 31 - 33
        Authors:
      2. Content of the Code of Crimes against International Law No access Pages 33 - 34
        Authors:
      3. Interpretation of the Code of Crimes against International Law No access Pages 34 - 35
        Authors:
      4. Recourse by the ICC to the Code of Crimes against International Law No access Pages 35 - 37
        Authors:
    1. General Comment No access Pages 38 - 39
      Authors:
      1. Employment No access
        Authors:
      2. Substance No access Pages 40 - 40
        Authors:
      3. Weapon that releases a substance as a result of its employment No access Pages 40 - 40
        Authors:
      1. Toxic properties No access Pages 40 - 42
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        1. Death or serious damage to health No access
          Authors:
        2. In the ordinary course of events No access
          Authors:
      3. Relationship to Article 8 (2) (b) (xviii) of the Rome Statute No access Pages 44 - 46
        Authors:
      4. Authors:
        1. Authors:
          1. Mode of employment of riot control agents No access
            Authors:
          2. Case study No access
            Authors:
          3. Conclusion regarding the applicability to riot control agents No access
            Authors:
        2. Authors:
          1. Mode of employment of nuclear weapons No access
            Authors:
          2. Authors:
            1. Literal interpretation No access
              Authors:
            2. Contextual interpretation No access
              Authors:
            3. Teleological interpretation No access
              Authors:
            4. Historical interpretation No access
              Authors:
            5. Preliminary conclusion No access
              Authors:
          3. Authors:
            1. Character of the declarations No access
              Authors:
            2. Content of the declarations No access
              Authors:
            3. Conclusion regarding the declarations No access
              Authors:
          4. Conclusion regarding the applicability to nuclear weapons No access
            Authors:
        3. Applicability to depleted uranium munitions No access
          Authors:
    2. Mental Element No access Pages 67 - 70
      Authors:
    3. Conclusion regarding the scope of application of Article 8 (2) (b) (xvii) of the Rome Statute No access Pages 70 - 70
      Authors:
      1. Introduction No access Pages 70 - 70
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        1. International basis of the definition No access
          Authors:
        2. Definition of poison in German law No access
          Authors:
        3. Relationship to Sec. 12 (1) No. 2 of the CCAIL No access
          Authors:
      3. Authors:
        1. Applicability to riot control agents No access
          Authors:
        2. Authors:
          1. Contextual interpretation No access
            Authors:
          2. Teleological interpretation No access
            Authors:
          3. Literal interpretation No access
            Authors:
          4. Historical interpretation No access
            Authors:
          5. Conclusion regarding the applicability to nuclear weapons No access
            Authors:
        3. Authors:
          1. Toxicological effects of depleted uranium No access
            Authors:
          2. Radiological effects of depleted uranium No access
            Authors:
          3. Conclusion regarding the applicability to depleted uranium munitions No access
            Authors:
        4. Preliminary conclusion No access
          Authors:
      4. Mental element No access Pages 81 - 83
        Authors:
      5. Aggravating circumstances No access Pages 83 - 85
        Authors:
      6. Conclusion regarding the scope of application of Sec. 12 (1) No. 1 of the CCAIL No access Pages 85 - 85
        Authors:
    4. Comparing Article 8 (2) (b) (xvii) of the Rome Statute and Sec. 12 (1) No. 1 of the CCAIL No access Pages 85 - 86
      Authors:
    1. General Comment No access Pages 87 - 89
      Authors:
      1. Employment No access Pages 89 - 89
        Authors:
      2. Gas or other analogous substance or device No access
        Authors:
      1. Asphyxiating or toxic properties No access Pages 90 - 91
        Authors:
      2. Effects of the gas, substance or device No access Pages 91 - 92
        Authors:
      3. Scope of application No access Pages 92 - 93
        Authors:
      4. Authors:
        1. Authors:
          1. Inclusion in the Geneva Protocol No access
            Authors:
          2. Inclusion in Article 8 (2) (b) (xviii) of the Rome Statute No access
            Authors:
          3. Conclusion regarding the applicability to riot control agents No access
            Authors:
        2. Authors:
          1. Chemical weapons as gas, other analogous substance or device No access
            Authors:
          2. Authors:
            1. Literal interpretation No access
              Authors:
            2. Contextual interpretation No access
              Authors:
            3. Teleological interpretation No access
              Authors:
            4. Historical interpretation No access
              Authors:
          3. Conclusion regarding the applicability to chemical weapons No access
            Authors:
        3. Authors:
          1. Biological weapons as gas or other analogous substance or device No access
            Authors:
          2. Authors:
            1. Literal interpretation No access
              Authors:
            2. Contextual interpretation No access
              Authors:
            3. Teleological interpretation No access
              Authors:
            4. Historical interpretation No access
              Authors:
          3. Conclusion regarding the applicability to biological weapons No access
            Authors:
        4. Authors:
          1. Nuclear weapons as gas or other analogous substance or device No access
            Authors:
          2. Authors:
            1. Literal interpretation No access
              Authors:
            2. Contextual interpretation No access
              Authors:
            3. Teleological interpretation No access
              Authors:
            4. Historical interpretation No access
              Authors:
          3. Declarations made upon ratifying the Rome Statute No access
            Authors:
          4. Conclusion regarding the applicability to nuclear weapons No access
            Authors:
    2. Mental Element No access Pages 117 - 118
      Authors:
    3. Conclusion regarding the scope of application of Article 8 (2) (b) (xviii) of the Rome Statute No access Pages 118 - 118
      Authors:
      1. Introduction No access Pages 118 - 118
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        1. Authors:
          1. Applicability to biological weapons No access
            Authors:
          2. Applicability to chemical weapons No access
            Authors:
        2. Preliminary conclusion regarding the scope of application No access
          Authors:
      3. Authors:
        1. Applicability to riot control agents No access
          Authors:
        2. Applicability to nuclear weapons No access
          Authors:
      4. Mental element No access Pages 125 - 126
        Authors:
      5. Aggravating circumstances No access Pages 126 - 126
        Authors:
      6. Conclusion regarding the scope of application of Sec. 12 (1) No. 2 of the CCAIL No access Pages 126 - 126
        Authors:
    4. Comparing Article 8 (2) (b) (xviii) of the Rome Statute and Sec. 12 (1) No. 2 of the CCAIL No access Pages 126 - 126
      Authors:
    1. General Comment No access Pages 127 - 128
      Authors:
    2. Element of Crime 1: The perpetrator employed certain bullets. No access Pages 128 - 128
      Authors:
      1. Authors:
        1. Original scope of application: Dum-dum bullets No access
          Authors:
        2. Authors:
          1. Applicability to shotgun ammunition No access
            Authors:
          2. Applicability to high-velocity weapons No access
            Authors:
          3. Applicability to similar bullets as defined by their effects No access
            Authors:
      2. In violation of the international law of armed conflict No access Pages 135 - 136
        Authors:
      3. Possible applicability to other weapons No access Pages 136 - 138
        Authors:
    3. Mental Element: The perpetrator was aware that the nature of the bullets was such that their employment would uselessly aggravate suffering or the wounding effect. No access Pages 138 - 140
      Authors:
    4. Conclusion regarding the scope of application of Article 8 (2) (b) (xix) of the Rome Statute No access Pages 140 - 141
      Authors:
      1. Introduction No access Pages 141 - 142
        Authors:
      2. Scope of application No access Pages 142 - 142
        Authors:
      3. Authors:
        1. Applicability to shotgun ammunition No access
          Authors:
        2. Applicability to high-velocity weapons No access
          Authors:
        3. Applicability to other weapons No access
          Authors:
      4. Mental element No access Pages 145 - 145
        Authors:
      5. Aggravating circumstances No access Pages 145 - 146
        Authors:
      6. Conclusion regarding the scope of application of Sec. 12 (1) No. 3 of the CCAIL No access Pages 146 - 146
        Authors:
    5. Comparing Article 8 (2) (b) (xix) of the Rome Statute and Sec. 12 (1) No. 3 of the CCAIL No access Pages 146 - 146
      Authors:
    1. General Comment No access Pages 147 - 148
      Authors:
      1. Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare No access Pages 148 - 149
        Authors:
      2. Authors:
        1. Authors:
          1. The meaning of 'superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering' No access
            Authors:
          2. The SIrUS Project of the ICRC No access
            Authors:
          3. Balancing military necessity and humanitarian considerations No access
            Authors:
        2. Inherently indiscriminate No access
          Authors:
        3. Authors:
          1. Nuclear weapons No access
            Authors:
          2. Chemical weapons No access
            Authors:
          3. Biological weapons No access
            Authors:
          4. Riot control agents No access
            Authors:
          5. Preliminary conclusion No access
            Authors:
      3. In violation of the international law of armed conflict No access Pages 165 - 165
        Authors:
      4. Authors:
        1. Nuclear weapons No access
          Authors:
        2. Chemical weapons No access
          Authors:
        3. Biological weapons No access
          Authors:
        4. Riot control agents No access
          Authors:
        5. Preliminary conclusion No access
          Authors:
      5. Included in an annex to the Statute No access Pages 172 - 173
        Authors:
      6. Mental element No access Pages 173 - 173
        Authors:
    2. Conclusion regarding the scope of application of Article 8 (2) (b) (xx) of the Rome Statute No access Pages 173 - 174
      Authors:
    3. Implementation of Article 8 (2) (b) (xx) of the Rome Statute into the German Code of Crimes against International Law No access Pages 174 - 174
      Authors:
    4. Conclusion No access Pages 174 - 175
      Authors:
    1. Introduction No access Pages 176 - 176
      Authors:
      1. Authors:
        1. International armed conflict No access
          Authors:
        2. Nexus between the acts and the armed conflict No access
          Authors:
      2. Contextual element 2 No access Pages 179 - 179
        Authors:
    2. Contextual elements of Article 8 (2) (b) (xx) of the Rome Statute No access Pages 179 - 179
      Authors:
      1. Armed conflict No access
        Authors:
      2. Nexus between the acts and the armed conflict No access Pages 181 - 181
        Authors:
      3. Mental element No access Pages 181 - 181
        Authors:
    3. Comparing the contextual elements of the Rome Statute and of the CCAIL No access Pages 181 - 185
      Authors:
    4. Conclusion regarding the contextual elements No access Pages 185 - 186
      Authors:
    1. Findings No access Pages 187 - 188
      Authors:
      1. A decision by the International Criminal Court No access Pages 188 - 190
        Authors:
      2. Future Review Conferences No access Pages 190 - 193
        Authors:
    1. Introduction No access Pages 194 - 195
      Authors:
    2. Decision taken at the Review Conference No access Pages 195 - 196
      Authors:
    3. Elements of Crimes of the new provisions No access Pages 196 - 198
      Authors:
    4. Conclusion No access Pages 198 - 200
      Authors:
  3. Bibliography No access Pages 201 - 232
    Authors:

Similar publications

from the topics "Europarecht & Internationales Recht & Rechtsvergleichung"
Cover of book: AI-Contracting
Edited Book No access
Sebastian Lohsse, Reiner Schulze, Dirk Staudenmayer
AI-Contracting
Cover of book: 75 Jahre Europarat
Edited Book Full access
Peter Bußjäger, Walter Obwexer, Aloisia Wörgetter
75 Jahre Europarat
Cover of book: Doing Justice
Edited Book No access
Henning Glaser
Doing Justice