Cover of book: Vertrauen in das Controlling als Informationsquelle und Framing von Informationen in Situationen eskalierender Commitments
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Vertrauen in das Controlling als Informationsquelle und Framing von Informationen in Situationen eskalierender Commitments

Eine experimentelle Untersuchung von Einflussfaktoren und Wirkungen
Authors:
Series:
Controlling und Management, Volume 20
Publisher:
 2020

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2020
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7790-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2195-0
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Controlling und Management
Volume
20
Language
German
Pages
270
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 30
    1. 1.1 Problemstellung No access
      1. Einflussfaktoren des Vertrauens in das Controlling No access
      2. Einfluss der Informationsquelle auf die Bewertung und Nutzung von Informationen No access
      3. Framing in Situationen eskalierender Commitments und mögliche Interaktion des Framings mit dem Vertrauen in die Informationsquelle No access
    3. 1.3 Zielsetzung, Forschungsfragen und Relevanz No access
    4. 1.4 Untersuchungsdesign und Aufbau der Arbeit No access
      1. 2.1.1 Definition und Kennzeichnung des Escalation of Commitment No access
      2. 2.1.2 Erklärungsansätze und der Entscheidungszyklus eskalierender Commitments No access
      1. 2.2.1 Definition und Kennzeichnung interpersonellen Vertrauens No access
      2. 2.2.2 Determinanten des Vertrauens und das Modell interpersonellen Vertrauens von Mayer, Davis und Schoorman No access
      1. 2.3.1 Definition und Kennzeichnung des Framings No access
      2. 2.3.2 Framing im Escalation of Commitment No access
    4. 2.4 Herleitung des konzeptionellen Bezugsrahmens No access
      1. 2.5.1 Einflussfaktoren des Vertrauens in Situationen eskalierender Commitments No access
      2. 2.5.2 Einflüsse des Vertrauens und des Framings auf die Eskalationstendenz No access
      3. 2.5.3 Zusammenfassung der Forschungshypothesen und Forschungsmodell No access
      1. 2.6.1 Diskussion möglicher Forschungsmethoden No access
      2. 2.6.2 Gütekriterien experimenteller Untersuchungen No access
    1. 3.1 Vorgehen bei den Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalysen No access
        1. 3.2.1.1 Operationalisierung No access
        2. 3.2.1.2 Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalysen No access
      2. 3.2.2 Framing der Information No access
        1. 3.3.1.1 Operationalisierung No access
        2. 3.3.1.2 Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalysen No access
        1. 3.3.2.1 Operationalisierung No access
        2. 3.3.2.2 Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalysen No access
        1. 3.3.3.1 Operationalisierung No access
        2. 3.3.3.2 Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalyse No access
        1. 3.3.4.1 Operationalisierung No access
        2. 3.3.4.2 Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalyse No access
        1. 3.3.5.1 Operationalisierung No access
        2. 3.3.5.2 Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalyse No access
      6. 3.3.6 Eskalationstendenz No access
      7. 3.3.7 Risikoneigung No access
        1. 4.1.1.1 Grundlagen der Varianzanalyse (ohne und mit Messwiederholung) No access
        2. 4.1.1.2 Prämissen der Varianzanalyse (ohne und mit Messwiederholung) No access
        1. 4.1.2.1 Grundlagen der regressionsbasierten Moderations- und Mediationsanalyse No access
        2. 4.1.2.2 Prämissen der regressionsbasierten Moderations- und Mediationsanalyse No access
        1. 4.2.1.1 Zielsetzung und grundlegende Informationen zu Aufbau und Durchführung No access
        2. 4.2.1.2 Ablauf des Experimentes No access
        1. 4.2.2.1 Teilnehmer des ersten Experimentes No access
        2. 4.2.2.2 Prüfung der Manipulation von Fähigkeit, Wohlwollen und Integrität No access
        3. 4.2.2.3 Einflüsse der wahrgenommenen Vertrauenswürdigkeit und derer Determinanten auf das Vertrauen No access
          1. Einfluss der Vertrauensneigung auf die wahrgenommene Vertrauenswürdigkeit No access
          2. Einfluss der Vertrauensneigung auf das Vertrauen No access
      3. 4.2.3 Zusammenfassende Prüfung der Forschungshypothesen und Diskussion der Ergebnisse des ersten Experimentes No access
        1. 4.3.1.1 Zielsetzung und grundlegende Informationen zu Aufbau und Durchführung No access
        2. 4.3.1.2 Ablauf des Experimentes No access
        1. 4.3.2.1 Teilnehmer des zweiten Experimentes No access
        2. 4.3.2.2 Einflussfaktoren des Vertrauens No access
        3. 4.3.2.3 Einflüsse von Vertrauen und Framing auf die Eskalationstendenz No access
      3. 4.3.3 Zusammenfassende Prüfung der Forschungshypothesen und Diskussion der Ergebnisse des zweiten Experimentes No access
    1. 5.1 Zusammenfassung der Erkenntnisse anhand der Forschungsfragen No access
      1. 5.2.1 Implikationen für die Entwicklung von Vertrauen in Controller No access
      2. 5.2.2 Implikationen für die Informationsbereitstellung zur Entscheidungsunterstützung No access
    3. 5.3 Limitationen und Ansatzpunkte für weitere Forschung No access
    4. 5.4 Fazit No access
    1. Bitte stellen Sie sich folgende Situation vor: No access
    2. Im Jahr 2016: No access
    3. Im Jahr 2017: No access
  8. Literaturverzeichnis No access 257 - 270

Bibliography (193)

  1. Aguinis, Herman/Bradley, Kyle J. (2014), Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies, in: Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 17, 2014 (4), S. 351–371. Open Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, Icek (1991), The theory of planned behavior, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, 1991 (2), S. 179–211. Open Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, Icek (2002), Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 32, 2002 (4), S. 665–683. Open Google Scholar
  4. Alarcon, Gene M./Lyons, Joseph B./Christensen, James C. (2016), The effect of propensity to trust and familiarity on perceptions of trustworthiness over time, in: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 94, 2016, S. 309–315. Open Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, Svatopluk/Fahn, Sven/Schäfer, Marisa/Vink, Daniel/Pedell, Burkhard/Sautter, Joachim (2017), SAP® S/4HANA Finance – ein Akzelerator für die digitale Transformation im Finanzbereich?, in: Controlling, 29. Jg., 2017K, S. 91–94. Open Google Scholar
  6. Appelman, Alyssa/Sundar, S. Shyam (2016), Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale, in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 93, 2016 (1), S. 59–79. Open Google Scholar
  7. Arkes, Hal R./Blumer, Catherine (1985), The psychology of sunk cost, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 35, 1985 (1), S. 124–140. Open Google Scholar
  8. Armitage, Christopher J./Conner, Mark (1999), Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: Predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the Theory of Planned Behavior, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 29, 1999 (1), S. 72–90. Open Google Scholar
  9. Atzmüller, Christiane/Steiner, Peter M. (2010), Experimental vignette studies in survey research, in: Methodology, Vol. 6, 2010 (3), S. 128–138. Open Google Scholar
  10. Aubert, Benoit A./Kelsey, Barbara L. (2003), Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams, in: Small Group Research, Vol. 34, 2003 (5), S. 575–618. Open Google Scholar
  11. Auspurg, Katrin/Hinz, Thomas/Liebig, Stefan (2009), Komplexität von Vignetten, Lerneffekte und Plausibilität im Faktoriellen Survey, in: Methoden, Daten, Analysen, 3. Jg., 2009 (1), S. 59–96. Open Google Scholar
  12. Backhaus, Klaus/Erichson, Bernd/Plinke, Wulff/Weiber, Rolf (2018), Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 15. Aufl., Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  13. Backhaus, Klaus/Erichson, Bernd/Weiber, Rolf (2015), Fortgeschrittene Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 3. Aufl., Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  14. Baird, Inga Skromme/Thomas, Howard (1985), Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, 1985 (2), S. 230–243. Open Google Scholar
  15. Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun/Hagberg, Andreas/Johansson, Inga‐Lill/Jonäll, Kristina/Marton, Jan (2011), Accounting research and trust: A literature review, in: Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 8, 2011 (4), S. 382–424. Open Google Scholar
  16. Baron, Reuben M./Kenny, David A. (1986), The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 1986 (6), S. 1173–1182. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bateman, Thomas S./Zeithaml, Carl P. (1989), The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, 1989 (1), S. 59–74. Open Google Scholar
  18. Bazerman, Max H./Giuliano, Toni/Appelman, Alan (1984), Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 33, 1984 (2), S. 141–152. Open Google Scholar
  19. Becerra, Manuel/Gupta, Anil K. (2003), Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects, in: Organization Science, Vol. 14, 2003 (1), S. 32–44. Open Google Scholar
  20. Becerra, Manuel/Lunnan, Randi/Huemer, Lars (2008), Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45, 2008 (4), S. 691–713. Open Google Scholar
  21. Berkovits, Ilona/Hancock, Gregory R./Nevitt, Jonathan (2000), Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated measure designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations, in: Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60, 2000 (6), S. 877–892. Open Google Scholar
  22. Bigley, Gregory A./Pearce, Jone L. (1998), Straining for shared meaning in organization science: Problems of trust and distrust, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 1998 (3), S. 405–421. Open Google Scholar
  23. Boettcher, William A./Cobb, Michael D. (2009), “Don’t let them die in vain”: Casualty frames and public tolerance for escalating commitment in Iraq, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 53, 2009 (5), S. 677–697. Open Google Scholar
  24. Bonner, Sarah E. (2008), Judgment and decision making in accounting, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Open Google Scholar
  25. Boon, Susan D./Holmes, John G. (1991), The dynamics of interpersonal trust: resolving uncertainty in the face of risk, in: Hinde, Robert A./Groebel, Jo (Hrsg.), Cooperation and prosocial behaviour, 1991, Cambridge. Open Google Scholar
  26. Brockner, Joel (1992), The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17, 1992 (1), S. 39–61. Open Google Scholar
  27. Burt, Jan/Hampton, Clark (2018), Moderation and mediation in behavioural accounting research, in: Libby, Theresa/Thorne, Linda (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to behavioral accounting research, 2018, London, S. 373–387. Open Google Scholar
  28. Butler, John K. (1991), Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 1991 (3), S. 643–663. Open Google Scholar
  29. Camerer, Colin F./Weber, Roberto A. (1999), The econometrics and behavioral economics of escalation of commitment: A re-examination of Staw and Hoang’s NBA data, in: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 39, 1999 (1), S. 59–82. Open Google Scholar
  30. Campbell, Donald Thomas/Stanley, Julian Cecil (1963), Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, Boston. Open Google Scholar
  31. Castaldo, Sandro/Premazzi, Katia/Zerbini, Fabrizio (2010), The meaning(s) of trust. A content analysis on the diverse conceptualizations of trust in scholarly research on business relationships, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 96, 2010 (4), S. 657–668. Open Google Scholar
  32. Chong, Vincent K./Ferdiansah, Irdam (2011), The effect of trust-in-superior and truthfulness on budgetary slack: An experimental investigation, in: Advances in Management Accounting, Vol. 19, 2011, S. 55–73. Open Google Scholar
  33. Chow, Chee W./Harrison, Paul/Lindquist, Timothy/Wu, Anne (1997), Escalating commitment to unprofitable projects: Replication and cross-cultural extension, in: Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, 1997 (3), S. 347–361. Open Google Scholar
  34. Chung, Chung Joo/Kim, Hyunjung/Kim, Jang Hyun (2010), An anatomy of the credibility of online newspapers, in: Online Information Review, Vol. 34, 2010 (5), S. 669–685. Open Google Scholar
  35. Church, Bryan K./Ackert, Lucy F. (2018), Experimental economics: A primer for accounting researchers, in: Libby, Theresa/Thorne, Linda (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to behavioral accounting research, 2018, London, S. 193–212. Open Google Scholar
  36. Coletti, Angela L./Sedatole, Karen L./Towry, Kristy L. (2005), The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 80, 2005 (2), S. 477–500. Open Google Scholar
  37. Colquitt, Jason A./Rodell, Jessica B. (2011), Justice, trust, and trustworthiness: A longitudinal analysis integrating three theoretical perspectives, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, 2011 (6), S. 1183–1206. Open Google Scholar
  38. Colquitt, Jason A./Scott, Brent A./LePine, Jeffrey A. (2007), Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, 2007 (4), S. 909–927. Open Google Scholar
  39. Costa, Ana Cristina (2003), Work team trust and effectiveness, in: Personnel Review, Vol. 32, 2003 (5), S. 605–622. Open Google Scholar
  40. Cuellar, Michael J./Keil, Mark/Johnson, Roy D. (2006), The deaf effect response to bad news reporting in information systems projects, in: e-Service Journal, Vol. 5, 2006 (1), S. 75–97. Open Google Scholar
  41. Curseu, Petru Lucian/Schruijer, Sandra G. L./Fodor, Oana C. (2016), Decision rules, escalation of commitment and sensitivity to framing in group decision-making, in: Management Decision, Vol. 54, 2016 (7), S. 1649–1668. Open Google Scholar
  42. Davis, James H./Schoorman, F. David/Mayer, Roger C./Tan, Hwee Hoon (2000), The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000 (5), S. 563–576. Open Google Scholar
  43. Davis, Mark A./Bobko, Philip (1986), Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 37, 1986 (1), S. 121–138. Open Google Scholar
  44. Dennis, Alan R. (1996), Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think, in: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, 1996 (4), S. 433–457. Open Google Scholar
  45. Dennis, Alan R./Robert, Lionel P./Curtis, Aaron M./Kowalczyk, Stacy T./Hasty, Bryan K. (2012), Trust is in the eye of the beholder: A vignette study of postevent behavioral controls' effects on individual trust in virtual teams, in: Information Systems Research, Vol. 23, 2012 (2), S. 546–558. Open Google Scholar
  46. Dietz, Graham/Den Hartog, Deanne N. (2006), Measuring trust inside organisations, in: Personnel Review, Vol. 35, 2006 (5), S. 557–588. Open Google Scholar
  47. Döring, Nicola/Bortz, Jürgen (2016), Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften, 5. Aufl., Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  48. Dusenbury, Richard (1994), The effect of prepayment position on individual taxpayers' preferences for risky tax-filing options, in: Journal of the American Taxation Association, Vol. 16, 1994 (1), S. 1–16. Open Google Scholar
  49. Eisinga, Rob/Grotenhuis, Manfred te/Pelzer, Ben (2013), The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?, in: International journal of public health, Vol. 58, 2013 (4), S. 637–642. Open Google Scholar
  50. Erceg-Hurn, David M./Mirosevich, Vikki M. (2008), Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research, in: The American psychologist, Vol. 63, 2008 (7), S. 591–601. Open Google Scholar
  51. Eschweiler, Maurice/Evanschitzky, Heiner/Woisetschläger, David (2007), Ein Leitfaden zur Anwendung varianzanalytisch ausgerichteter Laborexperimente, in: WiSt - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 36. Jg., 2007 (12), S. 546–554. Open Google Scholar
  52. Fabrigar, Leandre R./Wegener, Duane T./MacCallum, Robert C./Strahan, Erin J. (1999), Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research, in: Psychological Methods, Vol. 4, 1999 (3), S. 272–299. Open Google Scholar
  53. Fehrenbacher, Dennis D. (2013), Design of incentive systems: Experimental approach to incentive and sorting effects, Heidelberg u.a. Open Google Scholar
  54. Fehrenbacher, Dennis D./Kaplan, Steven E./Pedell, Burkhard (2017), The relation between individual characteristics and compensation contract selection, in: Management Accounting Research, Vol. 34, 2017, S. 1–18. Open Google Scholar
  55. Feldman, Gilad/Wong, Kin F. E. (2018), When action-inaction framing leads to higher escalation of commitment: A new inaction-effect perspective on the sunk-cost fallacy, in: Psychological science, Vol. 29, 2018 (4), S. 537–548. Open Google Scholar
  56. Field, Andy (2018), Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 5. Aufl., London. Open Google Scholar
  57. Fischer, Daniel (2017), Eskalation und Deeskalation von Commitments: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Rolle erlebter und antizipierter Emotionen, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  58. Frazier, M. Lance/Johnson, Paul D./Fainshmidt, Stav (2013), Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale, in: Journal of Trust Research, Vol. 3, 2013 (2), S. 76–97. Open Google Scholar
  59. Fulmer, C. Ashley/Gelfand, Michele J. (2012), At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 38, 2012 (4), S. 1167–1230. Open Google Scholar
  60. Garland, Howard/Newport, Stephanie (1991), Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 48, 1991 (1), S. 55–69. Open Google Scholar
  61. Gill, Harjinder/Boies, Kathleen/Finegan, Joan E./McNally, Jeffrey (2005), Antecedents of trust: Establishing a boundary condition for the relation between propensity to trust and intention to trust, in: Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 19, 2005 (3), S. 287–302. Open Google Scholar
  62. Gillespie, Nicole (2003), Measuring trust in working relationships: The behavioural trust inventory, paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Seattle. Open Google Scholar
  63. Gillespie, Nicole (2015), Survey measures of trust in organizational contexts: an overview, in: Lyon, Fergus/Möllering, Guido/Saunders, Mark N. K. (Hrsg.), Handbook of research methods on trust, 2. Aufl., 2015, Cheltenham, S. 225–239. Open Google Scholar
  64. Glaser, Wilhelm Robert (1978), Varianzanalyse, Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar
  65. Gomez, Carolina/Sanchez, Juan I. (2013), Cultural boundaries of self-justification and prospect theories in escalation of commitment: A US-Mexico comparison, in: The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 24, 2013 (13), S. 2646–2656. Open Google Scholar
  66. Govier, Trudy (1994), Is it a jungle out there? Trust, distrust and the construction of social reality, in: Dialogue, Vol. 33, 1994 (2), S. 237–252. Open Google Scholar
  67. Haupenthal, Markus (2017), Die Zusammensetzung von Produktpreisen und der Einfluss von Produktbewertungen, Kapazitäts- und Produktportfolioveränderungen und Akquisitionen auf die Preisentwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse am Beispiel von schottischem Single Malt Whisky. Open Google Scholar
  68. Hayes, Andrew F. (2018), Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, 2. Aufl. Open Google Scholar
  69. He, Xin/Mittal, Vikas (2007), The effect of decision risk and project stage on escalation of commitment, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 103, 2007 (2), S. 225–237. Open Google Scholar
  70. Hendrickx, Laurie/Vlek, Charles/Oppewal, Harmen (1989), Relative importance of scenario information and frequency information in the judgment of risk, in: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 72, 1989 (1), S. 41–63. Open Google Scholar
  71. Hertweck, Dieter (2003), Escalating Commitment als Ursache gescheiterter DV-Projekte: Methoden und Werkzeuge zur Deeskalation, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  72. Heyns, Marita/Rothmann, Sebastiaan (2015), Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust, in: SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol. 41, 2015 (1), S. 1–12. Open Google Scholar
  73. Himme, Alexander (2009), Gütekriterien der Messung: Reliabilität, Validität und Generalisierbarkeit, in: Albers, Sönke/Klapper, Daniel/Konradt, Udo/Walter, Achim/Wolf, Joachim (Hrsg.), Methodik der empirischen Forschung, 2009, Wiesbaden, S. 485–500. Open Google Scholar
  74. Holt, Charles A./Laury, Susan (2002), Risk aversion and incentive effects, in: The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, 2002 (5), S. 1644–1655. Open Google Scholar
  75. Homburg, Christian (2017), Marketingmanagement: Strategie – Instrumente – Umsetzung – Unternehmensführung, 6. Aufl., Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  76. Horváth, Péter/Gleich, Ronald/Seiter, Mischa (2015), Controlling, 13. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar
  77. Hoyer, Wayne D./MacInnis, Deborah J./Pieters, Rik (2013), Consumer behavior, 6. Aufl., Mason, Ohio. Open Google Scholar
  78. Huber, Frank/Meyer, Frederik/Lenzen, Michael (2014), Grundlagen der Varianzanalyse: Konzeption – Durchführung – Auswertung, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  79. Jani, Arpan (2011), Escalation of commitment in troubled IT projects: Influence of project risk factors and self-efficacy on the perception of risk and the commitment to a failing project, in: International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29, 2011 (7), S. 934–945. Open Google Scholar
  80. Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L./Knoll, Kathleen/Leidner, Dorothy E. (1998), Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams, in: Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, 1998 (4), S. 29–64. Open Google Scholar
  81. Järvenpää, Marko (2007), Making business partners: A case study on how management accounting culture was changed, in: European Accounting Review, Vol. 16, 2007 (1), S. 99–142. Open Google Scholar
  82. Johansson, Tobias/Wennblom, Gabriella (2017), In female supervisors male subordinates trust!? An experiment on supervisor and subordinate gender and the perceptions of tight control, in: Journal of Management Control, Vol. 28, 2017 (3), S. 321–345. Open Google Scholar
  83. Kahneman, Daniel/Tversky, Amos (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, in: Econometrica, Vol. 47, 1979 (2), S. 263–291. Open Google Scholar
  84. Kaiser, Henry F. (1960), The application of electronic computers to factor analysis, in: Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 20, 1960 (1), S. 141–151. Open Google Scholar
  85. Kaiser, Henry F./Rice, John (1974), Little Jiffy, Mark IV, in: Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 34, 1974 (1), S. 111–117. Open Google Scholar
  86. Keil, Mark/Mann, Joan/Rai, Arun (2000), Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models, in: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, 2000 (4), S. 631–664. Open Google Scholar
  87. Keil, Mark/Tan, Bernard C. Y./Wei, Kwok-Kee/Saarinen, Timo/Tuunainen, Virpi/Wassenaar, Arjen (2000a), A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects, in: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, 2000 (2), S. 299–325. Open Google Scholar
  88. Keil, Mark/Wallace, Linda/Turk, Dan/Dixon-Randall, Gayle/Nulden, Urban (2000b), An investigation of risk perception and risk propensity on the decision to continue a software development project, in: Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 53, 2000 (2), S. 145–157. Open Google Scholar
  89. Koch, Rembert (1994), Betriebliches Berichtswesen als Informations- und Steuerungsinstrument, Frankfurt am Main. Open Google Scholar
  90. Koschate, Nicole (2008), Experimentelle Marktforschung, in: Herrmann, Andreas/Homburg, Christian/Klarmann, Martin (Hrsg.), Handbuch Marktforschung: Methoden – Anwendungen – Praxisbeispiele, 3. Aufl., 2008, Wiesbaden, S. 107–121. Open Google Scholar
  91. Krause, Diana E. (2010), Macht und Vertrauen in Innovationsprozessen, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  92. Kunz, Jennifer/Linder, Stefan (2011), ZP-Stichwort: Vignetten-Experiment, in: Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung, 21. Jg., 2011 (2), S. 211–222. Open Google Scholar
  93. Küpper, Hans-Ulrich/Friedl, Gunther/Hofmann, Christian/Hofmann, Yvette/Pedell, Burkhard (2013), Controlling: Konzeption, Aufgaben, Instrumente, 6. Aufl., Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar
  94. Kwong, Jessica Y. Y./Wong, Kin Fai Ellick (2014), Reducing and exaggerating escalation of commitment by option partitioning, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 99, 2014 (4), S. 697–712. Open Google Scholar
  95. LaMothe, Ethan G./Bobek, Donna (2018), A modern guide to preliminary data analysis and data cleansing in behavioural accounting research, in: Libby, Theresa/Thorne, Linda (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to behavioral accounting research, 2018, London, S. 327–348. Open Google Scholar
  96. Lapierre, Laurent M. (2007), Supervisor trustworthiness and subordinates' willingness to provide extra-role efforts, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 37, 2007 (2), S. 272–297. Open Google Scholar
  97. Laux, Helmut/Gillenkirch, Robert M./Schenk-Mathes, Heike Y. (2014), Entscheidungstheorie, 9. Aufl., Berlin. Open Google Scholar
  98. Lee, Jong Seok/Cuellar, Michael J./Keil, Mark/Johnson, Roy D. (2014), The role of a bad news reporter in information technology project escalation: A deaf effect perspective, in: ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 45, 2014 (3), S. 8–29. Open Google Scholar
  99. Levin, Irwin P./Gaeth, Gary J. (1988), How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, 1988 (3), S. 374–378. Open Google Scholar
  100. Levin, Irwin P./Schneider, Sandra L./Gaeth, Gary J. (1998), All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 76, 1998 (2), S. 149–188. Open Google Scholar
  101. Lewis, J. David/Weigert, Andrew (1985), Trust as a social reality, in: Social Forces, Vol. 63, 1985 (4), S. 967–985. Open Google Scholar
  102. Libby, Robert (1981), Accounting and human information processing: Theory and applications, Englewood Cliffs. Open Google Scholar
  103. Luckett, Peter F./Eggleton, Ian R. C. (1991), Feedback and management accounting: A review of research into behavioural consequences, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16, 1991 (4), S. 371–394. Open Google Scholar
  104. Lyu, Serena C./Ferrin, Donald L. (2018), Determinants, consequences and functions of interpersonal trust within organizations, in: Searle, Rosalind H./Nienaber, Ann-Marie I./Sitkin, Sim B. (Hrsg.), The Routledge companion to trust, 2018, Abingdon, New York, S. 65–104. Open Google Scholar
  105. MacCallum, Robert C./Zhang, Shaobo/Preacher, Kristopher J./Rucker, Derek D. (2002), On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables, in: Psychological Methods, Vol. 7, 2002 (1), S. 19–40. Open Google Scholar
  106. Maccrimmon, Kenneth R./Wehrung, Donald A. (1985), A portfolio of risk measures, in: Theory and Decision, Vol. 19, 1985 (1), S. 1–29. Open Google Scholar
  107. Mackinnon, David P./Lockwood, Chondra M./Williams, Jason (2004), Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods, in: Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 39, 2004 (1), S. 99–128. Open Google Scholar
  108. Mahlendorf, Matthias D. (2008), Eskalation des Commitments bei scheiternden Projekten: Eine empirische Untersuchung kognitiver Eskalationsfaktoren und verhaltenswissenschaftlich basierter Controllingmaßnahmen, 2. Aufl., Vallendar. Open Google Scholar
  109. Mayer, Roger C./Davis, James H. (1999), The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, 1999 (1), S. 123–136. Open Google Scholar
  110. Mayer, Roger C./Davis, James H./Schoorman, F. David (1995), An integrative model of organizational trust, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, 1995 (3), S. 709–734. Open Google Scholar
  111. Mayer, Roger C./Gavin, Mark B. (2005), Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, 2005 (5), S. 874–888. Open Google Scholar
  112. McAllister, D. J. (1995), Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, 1995 (1), S. 24–59. Open Google Scholar
  113. McCall, Morgan W./Kaplan, Robert E. (1985), Whatever it takes: Decision makers at work, Englewood Cliffs. Open Google Scholar
  114. McEvily, Bill/Perrone, Vincenzo/Zaheer, Akbar (2003), Trust as an organizing principle, in: Organization Science, Vol. 14, 2003 (1), S. 91–103. Open Google Scholar
  115. McEvily, Bill/Tortoriello, Marco (2011), Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations, in: Journal of Trust Research, Vol. 1, 2011 (1), S. 23–63. Open Google Scholar
  116. McMillan, Jeffrey J./White, Richard A. (1993), Auditors' belief revisions and evidence search: The effect of hypothesis frame, confirmation bias, and professional skepticism, in: The Accounting Review, Vol. 68, 1993 (3), S. 443–465. Open Google Scholar
  117. McNamara, Gerry/Moon, Henry/Bromiley, Philip (2002), Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization's attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, 2002 (2), S. 443–452. Open Google Scholar
  118. McNamara, Kelly/Dennis, Alan R./Carte, Traci A. (2008), It's the thought that counts: The mediating effects of information processing in virtual team decision making, in: Information Systems Management, Vol. 25, 2008 (1), S. 20–32. Open Google Scholar
  119. Meyerowitz, Beth E./Chaiken, Shelly (1987), The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, 1987 (3), S. 500–510. Open Google Scholar
  120. Mittal, Vikas/Ross, William T. (1998), The impact of positive and negative affect and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 76, 1998 (3), S. 298–324. Open Google Scholar
  121. Moorman, Christine/Zaltman, Gerald/Deshpande, Rohit (1992), Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, 1992 (3), S. 314–328. Open Google Scholar
  122. Nakayachi, Kazuya/Watabe, Motoki (2005), Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: The signaling effects of voluntary “Hostage Posting” on trust, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 97, 2005 (1), S. 1–17. Open Google Scholar
  123. Nitzl, Christian (2012), Vertrauen zwischen Manager und Controller: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Einflussfaktoren mithilfe der Partial Least Square (PLS)-Methode, Hamburg. Open Google Scholar
  124. Nitzl, Christian/Hirsch, Bernhard (2013), Die Entstehung von interpersonellem Vertrauen am Beispiel der Manager-Controller-Interaktion, in: Vollmar, Jens/Becker, Roman/Hoffend, Isabella (Hrsg.), Macht des Vertrauens: Perspektiven und aktuelle Herausforderungen im unternehmerischen Kontext, 2013, Wiesbaden, S. 37–51. Open Google Scholar
  125. Nitzl, Christian/Hirsch, Bernhard (2016), The drivers of a superior’s trust formation in his subordinate: The manager–management accountant example, in: Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 12, 2016 (4), S. 472–503. Open Google Scholar
  126. Northcraft, Gregory B./Wolf, Gerrit (1984), Dollars, sense, and sunk costs: A life cycle model of resource allocation decisions, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, 1984 (2), S. 225–234. Open Google Scholar
  127. Nunnally, Jum C. (1978), Psychometric theory, 2. Aufl., New York, u. a. Open Google Scholar
  128. Parayitam, Satyanarayana/Dooley, Robert S. (2009), The interplay between cognitive- and affective conflict and cognition- and affect-based trust in influencing decision outcomes, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, 2009 (8), S. 789–796. Open Google Scholar
  129. Patzelt, Holger/Shepherd, Dean A. (2008), The decision to persist with underperforming alliances: The role of trust and control, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45, 2008 (7), S. 1217–1243. Open Google Scholar
  130. Pavlou, Paul A./Fygenson, Mendel (2006), Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior, in: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, 2006 (1), S. 115–143. Open Google Scholar
  131. Pfeiffer, Felix (2006), Eskalierendes Commitment und präferenzkonsistente Informationsbewertung: Der Umgang mit Expertenmeinungen bei zweifelhaftem Entscheidungserfolg, Göttingen. Open Google Scholar
  132. Pornpitakpan, Chanthika (2004), The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 34, 2004 (2), S. 243–281. Open Google Scholar
  133. Preacher, Kristopher J./Hayes, Andrew F. (2004), SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models, in: Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, Vol. 36, 2004 (4), S. 717–731. Open Google Scholar
  134. Preacher, Kristopher J./Hayes, Andrew F. (2008), Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, in: Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 40, 2008 (3), S. 879–891. Open Google Scholar
  135. Priem, Richard L./Weibel, Antoinette A. (2015), Measuring the decision to trust using metric conjoint analysis, in: Lyon, Fergus/Möllering, Guido/Saunders, Mark N. K. (Hrsg.), Handbook of research methods on trust, 2. Aufl., 2015, Cheltenham, S. 265–278. Open Google Scholar
  136. Rack, Oliver/Christophersen, Timo (2009), Experimente, in: Albers, Sönke/Klapper, Daniel/Konradt, Udo/Walter, Achim/Wolf, Joachim (Hrsg.), Methodik der empirischen Forschung, 2009, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  137. Rasch, Björn/Friese, Malte/Hofmann, Wilhelm/Naumann, Ewald (2014), Quantitative Methoden 2: Einführung in die Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4. Aufl., Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  138. Remus, William (1996), Will behavioral research on managerial decision making generalize to managers?, in: Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 17, 1996 (1), S. 93–101. Open Google Scholar
  139. Rhodes, Ryan E./Courneya, Kerry S. (2003), Self-efficacy, controllability and intention in the theory of planned behavior: Measurement redundancy or causal independence?, in: Psychology & Health, Vol. 18, 2003 (1), S. 79–91. Open Google Scholar
  140. Riesenhuber, Maximilian (2006), Die Fehlentscheidung: Ursache und Eskalation, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  141. Röber, Björn (2018), Escalation of commitment in internationalization processes: The role of bounded rationality in the Uppsala Model, Cham. Open Google Scholar
  142. Robert, Lionel P./Dennis, Alan R./Hung, Yu-Ting Caisy (2009), Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members, in: Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 26, 2009 (2), S. 241–279. Open Google Scholar
  143. Rose, Jacob M./Roberts, F. Douglas/Rose, Anna M. (2004), Affective responses to financial data and multimedia: The effects of information load and cognitive load, in: International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Vol. 5, 2004 (1), S. 5–24. Open Google Scholar
  144. Ross, Jerry/Staw, Barry M. (1993), Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the shoreham nuclear power plant, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, 1993 (4), S. 701–732. Open Google Scholar
  145. Rousseau, Denise M./Sitkin, Sim B./Burt, Ronald S./Camerer, Colin (1998), Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 1998 (3), S. 393–404. Open Google Scholar
  146. Rutledge, Robert W. (1994), Escalation of commitment in groups and the moderating effects of information framing, in: Management Research News, Vol. 17, 19941/2, S. 12–24. Open Google Scholar
  147. Rutledge, Robert W./Harrell, Adrian (1993), Escalating commitment to an ongoing project: The effects of responsibility and framing of accounting information, in: International Journal of Management, Vol. 10, 1993 (3), S. 300–313. Open Google Scholar
  148. Salter, Stephen B./Lewis, Philip A./Juarez Valdes, Luis Felipe (2004), Aqui No Se Habla Agencia. An examination of the impact of adverse selection and framing in decision-making: A US/Mexico comparison, in: Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, Vol. 15, 2004 (2), S. 93–117. Open Google Scholar
  149. Salter, Stephen B./Sharp, David J. (2001), Agency effects and escalation of commitment: Do small national culture differences matter?, in: The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 36, 2001 (1), S. 33–45. Open Google Scholar
  150. Salter, Stephen B./Sharp, David J./Chen, Yasheng (2013), The moderating effects of national culture on escalation of commitment, in: Advances in Accounting, Vol. 29, 2013 (1), S. 161–169. Open Google Scholar
  151. Sautter, Joachim (2016), Budgetary Slack, in: Controlling, 28. Jg., 20164/5, S. 281–282. Open Google Scholar
  152. Schäffer, Utz/Steiners, Daniel (2004), Zur Nutzung von Controllinginformationen, in: Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung, 15. Jg., 2004 (4), S. 377–404. Open Google Scholar
  153. Schäffer, Utz/Weber, Jürgen (2012), Zukunftsthemen des Controllings, in: Controlling, 24. Jg., 2012 (2), S. 78–84. Open Google Scholar
  154. Schepanski, A./Shearer, T. (1995), A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 63, 1995 (2), S. 174–186. Open Google Scholar
  155. Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah (2018), Are risk preferences stable?, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 32, 2018 (2), S. 135–154. Open Google Scholar
  156. Schildmeyer, Gerrit/Horváth, Péter (2018), Weiterentwicklung des Planungssystems bei Bayer, in: Controlling, 30. Jg., 2018 (6), S. 72–76. Open Google Scholar
  157. Schmidt, Jeffrey B./Calantone, Roger J. (2002), Escalation of commitment during new product development, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, 2002 (2), S. 103–118. Open Google Scholar
  158. Schoorman, F. David/Mayer, Roger C./Davis, James H. (2007), An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, 2007 (2), S. 344–354. Open Google Scholar
  159. Schoorman, F. David/Mayer, Roger C./Davis, James H. (2016), Empowerment in veterinary clinics: The role of trust in delegation, in: Journal of Trust Research, Vol. 6, 2016 (1), S. 76–90. Open Google Scholar
  160. Schoorman, F. David/Mayer, Roger C./Douglas, Christina A./Hetrick, Christopher T. (1994), Escalation of commitment and the framing effect: An empirical investigation, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 24, 1994 (6), S. 509–528. Open Google Scholar
  161. Schultze, Thomas/Pfeiffer, Felix/Schulz-Hardt, Stefan (2012), Biased information processing in the escalation paradigm: Information search and information evaluation as potential mediators of escalating commitment, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 97, 2012 (1), S. 16–32. Open Google Scholar
  162. Schultze, Thomas/Schulz-Hardt, Stefan (2015), The impact of biased information and corresponding meta-information on escalating commitment, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 49, 2015, S. 108–119. Open Google Scholar
  163. Sharp, David J./Salter, Stephen B. (1997), Project escalation and sunk costs: A test of the international generalizability of agency and prospect theories, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, 1997 (1), S. 101–121. Open Google Scholar
  164. Shooter, Wynn/Paisley, Karen/Sibthorp, Jim (2012), Fostering trust in outdoor leaders: The role of personal attributes, in: Journal of Experiential Education, Vol. 35, 2012 (1), S. 222–237. Open Google Scholar
  165. Sitkin, Sim B./Weingart, Laurie R. (1995), Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, 1995 (6), S. 1573–1592. Open Google Scholar
  166. Skarlicki, Daniel P./Turner, R. Anthony (2014), Unfairness begets unfairness: Victim derogation bias in employee ratings, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 124, 2014 (1), S. 34–46. Open Google Scholar
  167. Sleesman, Dustin J./Conlon, Donald E./McNamara, Gerry/Miles, Jonathan E. (2012), Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55, 2012 (3), S. 541–562. Open Google Scholar
  168. Slovic, Paul (1986), Informing and educating the public about risk, in: Risk Analysis, Vol. 6, 1986 (4), S. 403–415. Open Google Scholar
  169. Slovic, Paul (1987), Perception of risk, in: Science, Vol. 236, 1987 (4799), S. 280–285. Open Google Scholar
  170. Späth, Julia F. (2008), Interpersonelles Vertrauen in Organisationen: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Einflussfaktoren und Verhaltenswirkungen, Frankfurt am Main. Open Google Scholar
  171. Staw, Barry M. (1976), Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 16, 1976 (1), S. 27–44. Open Google Scholar
  172. Staw, Barry M. (1981), The escalation of commitment to a course of action, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, 1981 (4), S. 577–587. Open Google Scholar
  173. Staw, Barry M./Ross, Jerry (1987), Behavior in escalation situations: antecedents, prototypes, and solutions, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, 1987, S. 39–78. Open Google Scholar
  174. Staw, Barry M./Ross, Jerry (1989), Understanding behavior in escalation situations, in: Science, Vol. 246, 1989 (4927), S. 216–220. Open Google Scholar
  175. Steinkühler, Dominik/Mahlendorf, Matthias D./Brettel, Malte (2014), How self-justification indirectly drives escalation of commitment, in: Schmalenbach Business Review, Vol. 66, 2014 (2), S. 191–222. Open Google Scholar
  176. Tank, Ann Katarina (2017), Einflussfaktoren und Wirkungen neuronaler Prozesse der Informationsgewichtung, Informationsaufnahme und Informationsverarbeitung in ökonomischen Entscheidungssituationen: Eine Untersuchung mittels funktioneller Magnetresonanztomographie (fMRT), Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar
  177. Taschner, Andreas (2015), Management Reporting und Behavioral Accounting: Verhaltenswirkungen des Berichtswesens im Unternehmen, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  178. Taylor, Shirley/Todd, Peter A. (1995), Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models, in: Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, 1995 (2), S. 144–176. Open Google Scholar
  179. Trumbo, Craig W./McComas, Katherine A. (2003), The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception, in: Risk Analysis, Vol. 23, 2003 (2), S. 343–353. Open Google Scholar
  180. Tversky, Amos/Kahneman, Daniel (1981), The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, in: Science, Vol. 211, 1981 (4481), S. 453–458. Open Google Scholar
  181. Vlek, Charles/Stallen, Pieter-Jan (1980), Rational and personal aspects of risk, in: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 45, 19801-3, S. 273–300. Open Google Scholar
  182. Walsh, James P. (1995), Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane, in: Organization Science, Vol. 6, 1995 (3), S. 280–321. Open Google Scholar
  183. Wason, Kelly D./Polonsky, Michael J./Hyman, Michael R. (2002), Designing vignette studies in marketing, in: Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), Vol. 10, 2002 (3), S. 41–58. Open Google Scholar
  184. Weber, Jürgen/Schäffer, Utz (2016), Einführung in das Controlling, 15. Aufl., Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar
  185. Weiber, Rolf/Mühlhaus, Daniel (2014), Strukturgleichungsmodellierung: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die Kausalanalyse mit Hilfe von AMOS, SmartPLS und SPSS, 2. Aufl., Berlin, Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar
  186. Williams, Damien J./Noyes, Jan M. (2007), How does our perception of risk influence decision-making? Implications for the design of risk information, in: Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol. 8, 2007 (1), S. 1–35. Open Google Scholar
  187. Williams, Steve/Zainuba, Mohamed/Jackson, Robert (2008), Determinants of managerial risk perceptions and intentions, in: Journal of Management Research, Vol. 8, 2008 (2), S. 59–75. Open Google Scholar
  188. Wong, Kin Fai Ellick (2005), The role of risk in making decisions under escalation situations, in: Applied Psychology, Vol. 54, 2005 (4), S. 584–607. Open Google Scholar
  189. Yakovleva, Maria/Reilly, Richard R./Werko, Robert (2010), Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 95, 2010 (1), S. 79–91. Open Google Scholar
  190. Zayer, Eric (2007), Verspätete Projektabbrüche in F&E: Eine verhaltensorientierte Analyse, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar
  191. Zhang, Hongchun/van de Walle, Steven/Zhuo, Yue (2016), Does trust in the performance measurement organization influence how public managers use performance information?, in: Public Performance & Management Review, Vol. 40, 2016 (2), S. 409–430. Open Google Scholar
  192. Zhao, Xinshu/Lynch, John G./Chen, Qimei (2010), Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 37, 2010 (2), S. 197–206. Open Google Scholar
  193. Zikmund, William G./Babin, Barry J./Carr, Jon C./Griffin, Mitch (2013), Business research methods, 9. Aufl., Mason, Ohio. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Health Economics", "Investment & Finance", "Cost Accounting & Controlling", "Human Resources Management & HR"
Cover of book: Zusammenarbeit im Gesundheitsbereich
Edited Book No access
Sabine H. Krauss, Sarah Peuten
Zusammenarbeit im Gesundheitsbereich
Cover of book: Finance, Accounting, Controlling im Kontext von Digitaler Transformation und Nachhaltigkeit
Edited Book No access
Manuela Ender, Tim Alexander Herberger, Michael Kuttner
Finance, Accounting, Controlling im Kontext von Digitaler Transformation und Nachhaltigkeit
Cover of book: Editorial Convergence and Working Conditions in German News Journalism
Book Titles No access
Michael Sengl
Editorial Convergence and Working Conditions in German News Journalism
Cover of book: Siedlungsbausteine für bestehende Wohnquartiere
Edited Book No access
Anette von Ahsen, Jens Schneider, Stephan Rinderknecht, Dirk Schiereck
Siedlungsbausteine für bestehende Wohnquartiere
Cover of book: Auswirkungen von Ermessensspielräumen in Vergütungssystemen auf das Verhalten von Mitarbeitern
Book Titles No access
Fabian Müller
Auswirkungen von Ermessensspielräumen in Vergütungssystemen auf das Verhalten von Mitarbeitern

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex