From common rules to best practices in European Civil Procedure

Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Burkhard Hess; Prof. Dr. Xandra E. Kramer

doi:10.5771/9783845285214

Summary

Mehr als 20 Experten aus Praxis und Wissenschaft diskutieren in diesem Band die Zukunft des EU-Zivilprozessverfahrens – von grenzüberschreitenden Problemen über das Prinzip des gegenseitigen Vertrauens bis zu „E-CODEX“ und Online-Streitschlichtung. Dabei werden grundlegende Modelle justizieller Zusammenarbeit diskutiert und entwickelt.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2017
Copyright Year: 2017
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-4219-6
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-8521-4
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Studies of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
Volume: 8
Language: English
Pages: 486
Product Type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 8
Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. (1) Policy and Legislative Perspectives No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) An Academic Endeavour: the ELI-Unidroit European Rules of Civil Procedure No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) From Common Rules to Best Practices No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. (1) Common Standards of EU Civil Procedure: Harmonization and Cooperation No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Procedural Innovation and e-Justice No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Alternative Dispute Resolution and Judicial Cooperation No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) Promoting Best Practices in Judicial Cooperation No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) Justice for Growth and Justice as an End in Itself No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Horizontal and/or Vertical Harmonization: Towards More Coherence No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Towards “Minimum Common Standards”? No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) Best Practices: Uniform and Effective Application No access
    Authors:
  5. (5) Changing Dynamics in the EU No access
    Authors:
4. (D) Concluding Remarks No access
  Authors:
Common Rules and Best Practices From the Perspective of the European Commission No access Pages 31 - 34
Authors:
Common Rules and Best Practices From the Perspective of the European Parliament No access Pages 35 - 42
Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Preliminary Remark No access
  Authors:
2. (B) The Notion of a “Standard” No access
  Authors:
3. (C) Procedural rules, financial resources, mindsets No access
  Authors:
4. (D) Harmonization of Civil Procedure: Criticism No access
  Authors:
5. (E) Praesumptio Similitudinis? No access
  Authors:
6. (F) Procedural Law and Culture No access
  Authors:
7. (G) Drivers of Harmonization of Civil Procedure No access
  Authors:
8. (H) The “Quiet [?] Power of Indicators” No access
  Authors:
9. (I) The ELI/UNIDROIT Joint Project on European Rules of Civil Procedure No access
  Authors:
10. (J) Goals of Civil Justice No access
  Authors:
11. (K) Concluding Remarks No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Is Harmonization Necessary? No access
  Authors:
3. (C) How should Approximation be Achieved? No access
  Authors:
4. (D) Best Practices? No access
  Authors:
5. (E) How to Achieve Civil Procedural Alignment in Europe? No access
  Authors:
6. (F) Beyond Common Rules and Towards Best Practices; EU Justice Scoreboard No access
  Authors:
7. (G) Conclusion No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. (A) Introduction No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. (1) Background and First Steps towards Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters No access
      Authors:
    2. (2) Procedural Safeguards: From 2000 to 2009 and Beyond No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. (1) Mutual Recognition versus/and Approximation No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. (a) Mutual Recognition, Approximation and Fundamental Rights No access
        Authors:
      2. (b) The CJEU. Mutual Trust beyond Approximation No access
        Authors:
    3. (3) Allocation of Roles between the Issuing and the Requested Member States No access
      Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. (1) Procedures for Mutual Recognition No access
      Authors:
    2. (2) Approximation of Procedural Rights and Safeguards No access
      Authors:
    3. (3) Assessment No access
      Authors:
  5. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. (a) A Divergent Wording No access
        Authors:
      2. (b) Relevant Divergences No access
        Authors:
    2. (2) Conceptual Bases. The Role of the Individual No access
      Authors:
    3. (3) Nuances No access
      Authors:
    4. (4) How, How Much No access
      Authors:
  6. (F) Conclusion No access
    Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Has Harmonisation in Criminal Justice Led to Harmonious Cooperation? No access
  Authors:
3. (C) The Civil Justice Paradigm and the Role of Party Autonomy No access
  Authors:
4. (D) Minimum Standards as Maximum Standards No access
  Authors:
5. (E) Enforcement of Standards No access
  Authors:
6. (F) Conclusion No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) From the English Tradition to a United States Model No access
  Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) Procedural Diversity Across US States No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Procedural Diversity within the Federal System No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Procedural Diversity Between State Systems and the Federal System No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) Implications for the European Union No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. (1) Full Faith and Credit No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Fundamental Principles of Procedure No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Implications for the EU No access
    Authors:
5. (E) The Politics of Procedural Reform No access
  Authors:
6. (G) Conclusion No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Reasons for legal transplants from the federal or European level to the member states No access
  Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. (a) Recognition and enforcement of third-state judgments No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) Public policy No access
      Authors:
    3. (c) Service of documents No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. (a) In general No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) Place of performance in contractual litigation No access
      Authors:
    3. (c) Choice-of-court agreements with consumers No access
      Authors:
    4. (d) Violations of personality rights via the internet No access
      Authors:
    5. (e) Negative declaratory action and lis alibi pendens No access
      Authors:
  3. (3) Conclusion No access
    Authors:
4. (D) Top-down harmonization No access
  Authors:
5. (E) "Full faith and credit" and mutual trust No access
  Authors:
6. (F) The political dimension No access
  Authors:
7. (G) Conclusion No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Research Methodology No access
  Authors:
3. (C) European Civil Procedures No access
  Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. (1) An introduction to the project No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. (a) Key legal requirements No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) Key technological requirements No access
      Authors:
    3. (c) Additional requirements No access
      Authors:
  3. (3) The e-codex solution No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) From developing to piloting No access
    Authors:
5. Authors:
  1. (1) Knowledge creation on cross-border procedures No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Policy making and Political dimensions No access
    Authors:
6. (F) Concluding remarks No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Background to the Reforms No access
  Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) The first route – The HMCTS Reform Programme No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) The second route – JUSTICE, the CJC and the CCSR No access
    Authors:
4. (D) Inspiration for European Convergence No access
  Authors:
5. (E) Conclusion No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Where It All Began: At the Origins of the Cross-border Access to Justice Topic No access
  Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) e-Law No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. The deployment of e-CODEX in the Civil Law domain experience No access
      Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. (1) An Example of User Story Derived From the API for Justice Project: DIY Application for the European Order for Payment No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Getting away from frustration No access
    Authors:
5. (E) Where to Go From Here No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction: A Triad of Issues No access
  Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. (1) Background No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. (a) Aims, Scope and Functions No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) Achievements and Future Projects No access
      Authors:
    3. (c) e-CODEX No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. (a) Challenge of Decentralisation and Interoperability No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) Challenge of Functionality No access
      Authors:
    3. (c) Additional Challenges No access
      Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) Domestic Models in the EU No access
    Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. (a) EU Civil Justice Acts No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) Other Structures and Models No access
      Authors:
  3. (3) Issues for the Legislator No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. (1) General Perspective: What is the Crux? No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) EU Perspective: An Easy Fix or a True Change? No access
    Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introductory Remarks No access
  Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. Authors:
    1. (a) For the Users of Judicial Services No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) For Third Individuals No access
      Authors:
    3. (c) For the Providers of Judicial Services No access
      Authors:
  2. Authors:
    1. (a) Court Fees No access
      Authors:
    2. (b) Costs Arising from Taking of Evidence No access
      Authors:
    3. (c) Attorney Fees No access
      Authors:
  3. Authors:
    1. Authors:
      1. (i) Inter partes No access
        Authors:
      2. (ii) Inter users No access
        Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. (i) The allocation of costs on taxpayers No access
        Authors:
      2. (ii) The limits of the allocation of costs to taxpayers in time of crisis No access
        Authors:
    3. Authors:
      1. (i) Legal aid No access
        Authors:
      2. (ii) Mutualising litigation risks among potential litigants No access
        Authors:
      3. (iii) Litigation investors No access
        Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) Pre-litigation Costs No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Cost of Service No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Cost of Translation No access
    Authors:
  4. Authors:
    1. (a) Ex officio Application of Foreign Law No access
      Authors:
    2. Authors:
      1. (i) National practices No access
        Authors:
      2. (ii) International and EU instruments No access
        Authors:
  5. (5) Cost of Enforcement No access
    Authors:
4. (D) Conclusions No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Rise and Autonomy of CDR No access
  Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) A(C)DR No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) New Approaches of Enforcement No access
    Authors:
4. Authors:
  1. (1) ADR Directive No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Guide for Regulating Dispute Resolution No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) EU Collective Redress Policy No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) Human Rights No access
    Authors:
  5. (5) Administrative Justice No access
    Authors:
5. (E) Conclusion No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) The Limited Success of the European Small Claims Procedure And The Reasons Behind Its Limited Use No access
  Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) Increasing the Economic Ceiling for Small Claims and Requiring Proportionate Fees No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Greater Use of Electronic Communications No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Extension of the Information Obligations No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) The Enforcement Stage No access
    Authors:
4. (D) Obstacles in the Enforcement Process No access
  Authors:
5. Authors:
  1. (1) The Need for Greater Synergy No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Pre-Action ODR No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Court-Annexed ADR Processes No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) The EU ODR Platform No access
    Authors:
6. (F) Conclusions No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. Authors:
  1. (1) Synergies between ADR and Court Proceedings No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Transplants or Cross-fertilization between ADR and Court Proceedings to Overcome the Obstacles of Cross-border Litigation No access
    Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. (1) The Adjudicator Issue No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) The Place for the Development of Proceedings No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) The Issue of Language No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) Case Management No access
    Authors:
  5. (5) Costs No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) Finding the Appropriate Body to Resolve a C2B Dispute No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) Costs No access
    Authors:
  3. (3) Duration No access
    Authors:
  4. (4) Language No access
    Authors:
  5. (5) The Issue of Enforcement No access
    Authors:
4. (D) Final Remarks No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) The European Consumer Centres Network (ECC-Net) No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Judicial co-operation No access
  Authors:
3. (C) ADR entities and ODR-platform No access
  Authors:
4. (D) Enforcement and Consumer Protection Cooperation network No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Scope No access
  Authors:
2. Authors:
  1. (1) The Field is Occupied by European Legislation No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) The Field is Occupied by National Legislation No access
    Authors:
3. Authors:
  1. (1) When is there a need to further Mutual Trust? No access
    Authors:
  2. (2) The Example of Judicial Expertise No access
    Authors:
4. (D) Identifying Best Practices No access
  Authors:
5. (E) Promoting Best Practices No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Context No access
  Authors:
2. (B) European Order for Payment Procedure: Practical Feedback from the Companies No access
  Authors:
3. (C) Best Practices in Companies Support No access
  Authors:
How can the best practices of legal professionals with judicial cooperation be operationalised to improve mutual trust? No access Pages 455 - 458
Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Introduction No access
  Authors:
2. (B) Methodology No access
  Authors:
3. (C) European Uniform Procedures No access
  Authors:
4. (D) Implementation Within National System and Practice No access
  Authors:
5. (E) Use of the European Uniform Procedures No access
  Authors:
6. (F) Best Practices: a Way to Address National Differences No access
  Authors:
7. (G) Final Remarks No access
  Authors:
Authors:
1. (A) Lecture in Milano No access
  Authors:
2. (B) The third World Congress of the IAPL No access
  Authors:
Index No access Pages 485 - 486